The present invention relates generally to the field of encrypted streams in a communications system, and more specifically towards methods and apparatus for transmitting dual encrypted streams in a communications system.
The control of the content is important in order to protect the programming from, for example, nonpaying customers. A conventional communications system, such as a cable television system, therefore, typically applies an encryption scheme to television content in order to prevent unrestricted access. Once a system operator chooses an encryption scheme, the operator installs all of the necessary headend equipment (e.g., Scientific-Atlanta's conditional access software and equipment). The devices (set-tops) located at the subscriber's premises must be compatible with the encryption scheme in order to decrypt the content for viewing. Due to the proprietary systems, however, an operator is prevented from installing different set-tops that do not have the proper decryption scheme. If the operator wishes to install different set-tops that decrypt a different conditional access system, the operator would also have to install a second proprietary system to overlay the incumbent system in order to use both boxes.
It would be to the operator's advantage to be able to choose boxes from any manufacturer and easily implement different encryption schemes in the system without duplicating the headend equipment and utilizing extra bandwidth. Some have attempted to address a technique that overlays two encryption schemes in a system. The present application is directed towards improvements to and alternative embodiments of a conditional access system that enables different proprietary set-tops that decrypt content that has been encrypted by different encryption schemes.
The present invention will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like numerals represent like elements throughout the several figures, and in which an exemplary embodiment of the invention is shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as being limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, the embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. The present invention is described more fully hereinbelow.
The present invention is directed towards a partial dual encryption scheme. Methods and apparatus are described that provide a transport stream including a clear stream and dually-encrypted streams. The present invention allows for two different set-tops (i.e., an incumbent set-top and an overlay set-top) to be located in a single system. Each set-top is designed to decrypt a proprietary encryption scheme. Advantageously, the present invention is accomplished without duplicating all of the headend equipment, and without consuming twice the original bandwidth. It will be appreciated that the incumbent set-tops remain unchanged and are simply conventional devices that are most likely already deployed in the system.
A clear multiprogram transport stream (MPTS) is provided to a headend facility. It will be appreciated that the clear MPTS includes several streams of unencrypted programs each including video, audio, and data packets. The packets each have a packet identifier (PID). Typically, an encryption scheme encrypts some or all of the packets (herein referred to as critical packets) of some or all of the programs depending upon the level of desired security. Further information regarding a conditional access system can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/602,986 entitled “Method for Partially Encrypting Program Data” filed Jun. 25, 2003 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,424,717 entitled “Conditional Access System” filed Dec. 16, 1999, which are commonly assigned, the disclosure and teachings of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Referring again to
There are, however, several disadvantages with the teachings of Unger. More specifically, Unger relies on controlling the incumbent headend encryption equipment to the level of specifying exactly which PIDs to encrypt, which would be extremely difficult to accomplish in some existing encryption systems. For example, a Scientific-Atlanta encryption system, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,424,717, does not provide a control interface to encrypt a specific PID. The encryption schemes are performed at the program level and would require extensive recreations of a program mapping table and its associated sessions. In contrast, the present invention does not require any changes to the incumbent headend equipment or require any special control. More specifically, the present invention simply utilizes the output of the existing headend equipment without modifications. Another disadvantage, is that the teachings of Unger require two operations on the clear stream by the overlayed headend equipment; specifically, a first time for the critical packet selection and again for the PID remapping. The present invention, however, only processes the streams once using one piece of equipment. Advantageously, this is an improvement that reduces the cost and the complexity of the system.
A further advantage of the present invention is that modification of the encryption percentage is accomplished as a function of available bandwidth in the system. For example, if there is additional bandwidth available, the present invention can increase the encrypted percentage from, for example, 2% to 6%. Notably, this feature is important to the system operators who need to be sensitive of both the required bandwidth and the security level of the programs.
Referring now to
Referring again to
In the aligned state 928, state 930 waits until buffers A 505, B 510, and C 515 have greater than one packet. Subsequently, the head packets are verified to have the same PID value, in state 935. If not, in state 940, the packet in stream C passes and packets in streams A and B drop, and state 935 continues verifying the packets. At times, packets in a program can be swapped in their position and are essentially out of order. In that case, passing the packets in the clear stream C ensures that the packets are passed rather than stalling in the buffers. If the head packet PID values are the same, the values of the continuity_counter field of the packets are then verified to be the same, in state 945. If not, the assumption is that there is an error in the alignment, and the comparator 520 returns to the initial state 905. It will be appreciated that the continuity counter of the clear stream C is used as the reference number. If the continuity counters are the same for the all the packets in the streams, state 950 releases the packets from the buffers A, B, and C, and returns to the aligned state 930 to continue ensuring alignment of the packets. It will be appreciated that there are other methods for verifying alignment, other than the use of the continuity_count value, such as the presence and length of an adaptation_field, or the presence and value of a program_clock_reference (PCR) value.
It should be noted that MPEG packet processing equipment typically modifies the Program Clock Reference (PCR) of programs being processed, to correct for any PCR jitter that would otherwise be introduced. In this embodiment, the PCRs of clear stream C are regarded as the primary PCRs, and all PCR modifications are performed on the values in stream C. If the PCR-bearing packet is also a critical packet, the corrected PCR value from stream C is placed into the PCR field in the packet from streams A and B.
Referring again to
A selector 530 also receives the released packet of clear stream C, which it uses as a reference stream to control the switches 535, 540, 545. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the selector 530 allows the packets of the clear stream C to pass through to a multiplexer 550 until such time as a critical packet is detected. Again, it will be appreciated that the critical packet can be a video, audio, and/or data packet. When the critical packet is detected, the switch 545 opens and switches 535, 540 are closed, thereby allowing the released packets of encrypted streams A and B, which each have the aligned critical packet, to simultaneously pass through to the multiplexer 550. The multiplexer 550 then combines the packets to provide a partial dual-encrypted transport stream where the dual encryption includes packets encrypted by both scrambler A 410 and scrambler B 415. The multiplexed stream is then provided to multiplexer 440 (
A partial dual-encrypted transport stream is then provided to the multiplexer 640 (
It will be appreciated that modifications can be made to the two embodiments that are still within the scope of the invention. Additionally, the present invention can be implemented using hardware and/or software that are within the scope of one skilled in the art. The embodiments of the description have been presented for clarification purposes; however, the invention is defined by the following claims.
The present application is a continuation of prior application Ser. No. 10/629,839, filed Jul. 30, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,224,798, which is hereby entirely incorporated by reference and which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/602,986, filed Jun. 25, 2003, which was filed simultaneously with application Ser. No. 10/602,988 and application Ser. No. 10/602,987, all three of which were continuations of application Ser. No. 09/930,901 filed Aug. 16, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,937,729, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/487,076, filed Jan. 19, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,292,568, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/126,783, filed Jul. 31, 1998, presently abandoned, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/054,575, filed Aug. 1, 1997, and is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/111,958, filed Jul. 8, 1998, now abandoned, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/054,578, filed Aug. 1, 1997, and is continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/767,535, filed Dec. 16, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,005,938; and is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/580,759 filed Dec. 29, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,870,474, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/007,962, filed Dec. 4, 1995; and is continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/415,617, filed Apr. 3, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,742,677. The present application descends from an application, which was one of seven original applications with identical Detailed Descriptions. All of these applications have the same filing date and the same assignee. The serial numbers and filing dates of the six applications follow: application Ser. No. 09/127,352, filed Jul. 31, 1998, presently abandoned, for which a continuation application Ser. No. 09/488,230 was filed on Jan. 20, 2000, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,252,964, and continuation application Ser. No. 09/811,085 was filed on Mar. 16, 2001, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,516,412, and continuation application Ser. No. 10/287,913 was filed on Nov. 5, 2002, currently pending; application Ser. No. 09/126,921, filed Jul. 31, 1998, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,157,719, for which a continuation application Ser. No. 09/135,615 was filed on Aug. 18, 1998, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,424,714; application Ser. No. 09/127,273, filed Jul. 31, 1998, presently abandoned, for which a continuation application Ser. No. 09/493,409 was filed on Jan. 28, 2000, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,560,340, and for which continuation Ser. No. 10/377,416 was filed on Mar. 3, 2003, which is currently pending; application Ser. No. 09/127,152, filed Jul. 31, 1998, presently abandoned, for which a continuation application Ser. No. 09/488,104 was filed on Jan. 20, 2000, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,246,767; for which continuation application Ser. No. 09/748,313 was filed on Dec. 26, 2000, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,526,508; and for which continuation application Ser. No. 09/881,428 was filed on Jun. 14, 2001, currently pending; application Ser. No. 09/126,888, filed Jul. 31, 1998, presently abandoned, for which a continuation application Ser. No. 09/464,794 was filed on Dec. 16, 1999, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,424,717; and application Ser. No. 09/126,795, filed Jul. 31, 1998, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,105,134.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4150404 | Tercic et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4155042 | Permut et al. | May 1979 | A |
4358672 | Hyatt et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4405829 | Rivest et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4531020 | Wechselberger et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4599647 | George et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4600921 | Thomas et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4613901 | Gilhousen et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4634807 | Chorley et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4649533 | Chorley et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4658093 | Hellman | Apr 1987 | A |
4704725 | Harvey et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4712238 | Gilhousen et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4712239 | Frezza et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4718107 | Hayes | Jan 1988 | A |
4736422 | Mason | Apr 1988 | A |
4823385 | Hegendorfer | Apr 1989 | A |
4837820 | Bellavia, Jr. | Jun 1989 | A |
4862268 | Campbell et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4864615 | Bennett et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4866770 | Seth-Smith et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4885777 | Takaragi et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4887296 | Horne | Dec 1989 | A |
RE33189 | Lee et al. | Mar 1990 | E |
4912762 | Lee et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4937866 | Crowther et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4980912 | Welmer | Dec 1990 | A |
4982430 | Frezza et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4993068 | Piosenka et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5003591 | Kauffman et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5018196 | Takaragi et al. | May 1991 | A |
5029207 | Gammie | Jul 1991 | A |
5036537 | Jeffers et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5073935 | Pastor | Dec 1991 | A |
RE33808 | Wright, Jr. | Jan 1992 | E |
5081678 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5124117 | Tatebayashi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5142578 | Matyas et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5151782 | Ferraro | Sep 1992 | A |
5155591 | Wachob | Oct 1992 | A |
5175765 | Perlman | Dec 1992 | A |
5231664 | Bestler et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5231665 | Auld et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5235643 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5237610 | Gammie et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5243652 | Teare et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249230 | Mihm, Jr. | Sep 1993 | A |
5270822 | Choi | Dec 1993 | A |
5282248 | DeJoy | Jan 1994 | A |
5282249 | Cohen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5285497 | Thatcher, Jr. | Feb 1994 | A |
5341425 | Wasilewski et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343527 | Moore | Aug 1994 | A |
5359601 | Wasilewski et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5381477 | Beyers, II et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5381481 | Gammie et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5400401 | Wasilewski | Mar 1995 | A |
5402490 | Mihm, Jr. | Mar 1995 | A |
5414773 | Handelman | May 1995 | A |
5418782 | Wasilewski | May 1995 | A |
5420866 | Wasilewski | May 1995 | A |
5425101 | Woo et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5432542 | Thibadeau et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440633 | Augustine et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5465299 | Matsumoto et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5473692 | Davis | Dec 1995 | A |
5481542 | Logston et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5481613 | Ford et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488410 | Lieberfarb et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5497422 | Tysen et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5499294 | Friedman | Mar 1996 | A |
5499295 | Cooper | Mar 1996 | A |
5506904 | Sheldrick et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5509073 | Monnin | Apr 1996 | A |
5519780 | Woo et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523781 | Brusaw | Jun 1996 | A |
5524052 | Augustine et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5550984 | Gelb | Aug 1996 | A |
5557678 | Ganesan | Sep 1996 | A |
5557765 | Lipner et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559889 | Easter et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563950 | Easter et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5565909 | Thibadeau et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568552 | Davis | Oct 1996 | A |
5568554 | Eastlake, III | Oct 1996 | A |
5583939 | Chang et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5588058 | Le Berre | Dec 1996 | A |
5590202 | Bestler et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592552 | Fiat | Jan 1997 | A |
5600378 | Wasilewski | Feb 1997 | A |
5621793 | Bednarek et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5671276 | Eyer et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675649 | Brennan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5734589 | Kostreski et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740246 | Saito | Apr 1998 | A |
5742677 | Pinder et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742681 | Giachetti et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5764770 | Schipper et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5787172 | Arnold | Jul 1998 | A |
5793427 | Mills et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799081 | Kim et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802063 | Deiss | Sep 1998 | A |
5828419 | Bruette et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5857020 | Peterson, Jr. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862220 | Perlman | Jan 1999 | A |
5870474 | Wasilewski et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870475 | Allan et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5907619 | Davis | May 1999 | A |
5920626 | Durden et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5969748 | Casement et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991400 | Kamperman | Nov 1999 | A |
6005938 | Banker et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009116 | Bednarek et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6035037 | Chaney | Mar 2000 | A |
6041123 | Colvin | Mar 2000 | A |
6067564 | Urakoshi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6105134 | Pinder et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108365 | Rubin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6157719 | Wasilewski et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6246767 | Akins, III et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252964 | Wasilewski et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6292568 | Akins, III et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6424714 | Wasilewski et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424717 | Pinder et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6510519 | Wasilewski et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6516412 | Wasilewski et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6526508 | Akins, III et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6560340 | Akins, III et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6594361 | Chaney et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6937729 | Akins, III et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6971008 | Wasilewski et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7039614 | Candelore | May 2006 | B1 |
7092616 | Unger | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7124303 | Candelore et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127619 | Unger et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139398 | Candelore et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7151831 | Candelore et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7216358 | Vantalon et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7224798 | Pinder et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7336787 | Unger et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7376233 | Candelore et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7490236 | Wasilewski | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496198 | Pinder et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7515712 | Wasilewski et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
20020188567 | Candelore | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194613 | Unger | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030026423 | Unger et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040003008 | Wasilewski et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040107350 | Wasilewski et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050259813 | Wasilewski et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20090147954 | Pinder et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150673 | DeFreese et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 723 371 | Jul 1996 | EP |
752 786 | Jan 1997 | EP |
1 013 091 | Jun 2000 | EP |
04-200125 | Jul 1992 | JP |
62-6589 | Jul 1992 | JP |
9413107 | Jun 1994 | WO |
9529560 | Nov 1995 | WO |
9621320 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO 9635293 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO 9641477 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9704553 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 9718655 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9724832 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9827732 | Jun 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070286417 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60054575 | Aug 1997 | US | |
60054578 | Aug 1997 | US | |
60007962 | Dec 1995 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10629839 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 11739161 | US | |
Parent | 09930901 | Aug 2001 | US |
Child | 10602986 | US | |
Parent | 09487076 | Jan 2000 | US |
Child | 09930901 | US | |
Parent | 09126783 | Jul 1998 | US |
Child | 09487076 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10602986 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 10629839 | US | |
Parent | 09111958 | Jul 1998 | US |
Child | 09126783 | US | |
Parent | 08767535 | Dec 1996 | US |
Child | 09111958 | US | |
Parent | 08580759 | Dec 1995 | US |
Child | 08767535 | US | |
Parent | 08415617 | Apr 1995 | US |
Child | 08580759 | US |