Patent Grant
11388461
This application is related to commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/440,490 filed May 24, 2006 and entitled “Personal Content Server Apparatus And Methods”, commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/441,476 filed May 24, 2006 and entitled “Secondary Content Insertion Apparatus And Methods”, commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/080,693 filed Mar. 14, 2005 and entitled “Method And Apparatus For Network Content Download and Recording”, commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/182,307 filed Jul. 26, 2002 and entitled “System And Method For Providing Broadcast Programming, A Virtual VCR, And A Video Scrapbook To Programming Subscribers”, and commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/626,051 filed Jul. 24, 2003 and entitled “Technique for Providing a Virtual Digital Video Recorder Service Through a Communications Network”, each of the foregoing incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates generally to the field of providing content over a network and other distribution channels, and specifically in one embodiment to the configuration, storage, and delivery of such content over a cable television network.
Cable system and other content network operators have historically been at somewhat of a competitive disadvantage to retail and rental outlets for the delivery of certain content (such as new release movie titles) due to the latency inherent in the distribution of such content over cable as compared to these other distribution channels. New release DVDs will typically be available in the rental or retail stores such as Blockbuster® or NetFlix® well in advance of the availability of the same title on a VOD or similar service. This difference in distribution timing and availability is caused in part by the lack of any effective means for distributing the desired content to cable users in a hard (e.g., disc or other tangible media) form. Rather, under the prior art, such users must make use of third party rental or retail outlets if they desire to obtain a physical copy of the content (such as for unlimited personal use).
When content is newly created value related to its release is carefully controlled through various distribution channels in an effort to maximize revenue return for the content owner. For example, a new major motion picture is released through various distribution channels according to availability windows. A typical sequence of such availability windows might be: (1) three months in commercial theater release; (2) subsequent one month release for commercial airline viewing; (3) subsequent two month release for DVD/VCR retail and rental; (4) subsequent 2 month release in cable Video-On-Demand (VOD) or cable and satellite Pay-Per-View (PPV); (5) subsequent two month release for premium cable or satellite channel distribution (e.g., HBO, Showtime, etc.); and (6) subsequent release for non-premium channel broadcast (e.g., NBC, TBS, etc.). Distribution networks such as cable operators have sought to increase the value of distribution of such content through their networks by obtaining rights to earlier windows of availability, thereby increasing potential interest by cable subscribers and buy rates of content through VOD or PPV purchases. In particular, cable and satellite operators have sought availability of major motion picture releases through VOD and PPV on the same “day and date” terms as rental or purchase through retail outlets. However, conventional business models dictate that only after the rental and retail markets have at least partly saturated can the “new” release be distributed via cable or satellite.
One possible approach for cable or satellite system operators to overcome this competitive disadvantage is to offer to sell and ship a DVD or similar medium with the purchase of a viewing opportunity (e.g., on-demand movie purchase). Hence, if a subscriber wanted to purchase the content, they could be provided with this opportunity concurrent with viewing, or via a similar mechanism. Such an approach creates a certain billing and fulfillment requirements where the service provider may be required to use one or more third party providers (e.g., an on-line entity such as Amazon.com) to process the transaction, fill the order, and/or deliver the requested medium. Furthermore, if the DVD is to be shipped ground or some other reasonably inexpensive shipping option (which would be mandated in order to keep the costs competitive with other modalities), a protracted and potentially unpredictable delivery period may occur, thereby significantly reducing customer satisfaction. Such protracted or unpredictable period may also increase the user's propensity to return the merchandise, since they now have more time to consider the merits of the purchase. Stated simply, the more “impulsive” the opportunity for commerce (especially at a comparatively low price point), the smaller the likelihood of a return or cancellation of that purchase. Under the foregoing approach, the cable service provider would also have to pay the third party for providing the required billing and/or shipping services.
Recent advances in cable network and consumer premises equipment (CPE) technology have enabled a greater capability in terms of providing cable system and other network subscribers with both high-quality video and high-speed content/data download that is responsive to their personal needs.
Specifically, the advent of video-on-demand (VOD) technology has greatly increased the ability of a subscriber to utilize certain content (e.g., watch a movie) delivered over their cable system on their schedule. In a typical configuration, the VOD service makes available to its users a selection of multiple video programs that they can choose from and watch over a network connection with minimum setup delay. At a high level, a VOD system consists of one or more VOD servers that pass and/or store the relevant content; one or more network connections that are used for program selection and program delivery; and CPE to receive, decode and present the video on a display unit. The content is typically distributed to the CPE over a Hybrid Fiber Coaxial (HFC) network.
Depending on the type of content made available and rate structure for viewing, a particular VOD service could be called “subscription video-on-demand (SVOD)” that gives customers on-demand access to the content for a flat monthly fee, “free video-on-demand (FVOD)” that gives customers free on-demand access to some content, “movies on-demand” where VOD content consists of movies only, and so forth. Many of these services, although referred to by names different than VOD, still share many of the same basic attributes including storage, network and decoder technologies. Exemplary methods and apparatus are described in, e.g., co-owned U.S. application Ser. No. 09/876,677 filed Jun. 7, 2001 entitled “Hybrid Central/Distributed VOD Network With Tiered Content Structure”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,690,020 on Mar. 30, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Just as different varieties of VOD service offerings have evolved over time, several different network architectures have also evolved for deploying these services. These architectures range from fully centralized (e.g., VOD servers at a central location) to fully distributed (e.g., multiple copies of content distributed on VOD servers very close to customer premises), as well as various other network architectures there between. Since most cable television networks today consist of optical fiber towards the “core” of the network which are connected to coaxial cable networks towards the “edge”, VOD transmission network architectures also consist of a mixture of optical fiber and coaxial cable portions.
The CPE for VOD often consists of a digital cable set-top box (DSTB) that provides the functions of receiving cable signals by tuning to the appropriate RF channel, processing the received signal and outputting VOD signals for viewing on a display unit. Such a digital set-top box also typically hosts a VOD application that enables user interaction for navigation and selection of VOD menu.
While the architectural details of how video is transported in the core HFC network can be different for each VOD deployment, each generally will have a transition point where the video signals are modulated, upconverted to the appropriate RF channel and sent over the coaxial segment(s) of the network. Depending on the topology of the individual cable plant, this could be performed at a node, hub or a headend. The coaxial cable portion of the network is variously referred to as the “access network” or “edge network” or “last mile network.”
Similar to VOD technology, personal video recorder (PVR) functions allow the user a great degree of control over the playback and viewing of their selected content. The user can pause, fast-forward, rewind, and perform similar functions all via a unitary remote control or similar device.
Broadcast delivery models, while lacking the features and capability of VOD systems, are also none-the-less quite prevalent, and provide a more simplified and streamlined means of delivering content that is not personalized to any given user (e.g., live television programs, etc.). However, these broadcast models also have very significant latency of “new” content availability as compared to retail or rental distribution channels.
Hence in sum, a very salient downside to the use of “hard” media for delivering new content to consumers is the time and effort associated with obtaining it (whether by rental or purchase), and returning it (rental only), while a salient deficiency with VOD, broadcast, or similar cable distribution paradigms is the latency of the availability of new content as compared to the retail or rental (hard media) distribution channels.
Conversely, “hard” media has several desirable attributes, including (i) portability (i.e., the ability to physically transport the media and use it at any number of different locations); (ii) unlimited replay and control (i.e., the owner can replay, rewind, FF, etc. the media any way they want and as many times as they want); (iii) archival capability (i.e., the owner can back the content up onto another media, so that if one copy is lost or corrupted, it can be recovered without further purchase); and (iv) the ability to impose limitations on reproduction, and provide for copyright protection/enforcement, via physical limitations or configurations of the media.
Accordingly, it would be ideal to be able to merge all of the benefits of the hard media and network delivery paradigms, yet without the associated investments in time and effort in order to obtain (and return if necessary) the hard media, and also without the aforementioned content availability latency.
It would also be desirable for the subscriber or user to be able to preview the content before having to make a purchase decision, thereby allowing them to purchase only content they truly want to own. Ideally, such previewing would be temporally/spatially proximate to the purchase mechanism; i.e., done liked the preview, they could buy it immediately. Under the rental paradigm, the user must first rent the DVD (whether by going to a rental store or via mail), view it, and then make some additional arrangement to return the rented copy and then purchase a separate (new) copy retail, or keep the copy they have. Under the retail paradigm, the user must have some foreknowledge of the content and hence form their purchase decision based on another source (such as a good review from a friend or a critic).
A number of commercial products provide ostensibly “new” content to the user, yet do not provide all of the benefits of a hard media. For example. The ABC/Disney MovieBeam system receiver comes with a predetermined number (i.e., 100) movies already stored inside. Each week, up to 10 movies are replaced with new movies, thereby making this approach somewhat similar to the Netflix approach of a “rolling” population of available content. This approach has no ability to allow for remote viewing, and restricts the subscriber in terms of their content choices.
Alternatively, SeaChange provides a consumer product that gives a DVD-like experience run from the network head-end. The SeaChange “VODlink” product comprises a software application that provides set-top boxes with DVD player capability. VODlink is a software suite that is interoperable on Motorola and Scientific-Atlanta set-tops, as well as on VOD server platforms from SeaChange and others. VODlink, however, is a basically an extended VOD system, and hence limited to networks with VOD delivery capability. It also is ostensibly affected by the same content latency issues described above with respect to traditional VOD services.
Furthermore, none of the foregoing solutions provide for delivery of media to other locations in a flexible manner; e.g., delivery to a user's premises, as well as to that user remotely such as when they are traveling. It is also highly impractical to bring one's DVD collection along with them while traveling, due to space and weight considerations.
Hence, there is a salient need for improved distribution apparatus and methods which allow a cable subscriber or other network user to obtain a “virtual” copy of their desired content in a prompt and effortless manner, using extant network infrastructure (e.g., VOID infrastructure and interfaces), and with the option of delivery to other locations. Such apparatus and methods would also optionally tie the purchase of the “virtual” content to the viewing of thereof, thereby providing content creators and distributors with a viable business model which would not usurp rental and retail profits.
Such improved apparatus and methods would also provide all of the benefits associated with a tangible medium to the subscriber, including inter alia ability to replay as many times as they like, optional “trick mode” functions (i.e., the ability to fast-forward, pause, rewind, etc.), physical redundancy, the ability to transfer or trade the content with others, and low latency from selection to viewing, yet without the attendant cost and effort of purchase, storage, carrying from location to location, and possible loss or damage due to use, environmental factors, and so forth.
Such improved apparatus and methods would further enhance the user's ownership experience by extending the feature set beyond that available with a DVD purchase or rental, including inter alia the ability to optionally customize or personalize their content, provide for automated updates thereto, and even dynamically encode or optimize the content for use on different platforms or equipment.
The present invention satisfies the foregoing needs by providing, inter alia, improved apparatus and methods for the selection, purchase and storage, of content over a network.
In a first aspect of the invention, a method of providing virtual ownership of content delivery over a network is disclosed. In one embodiment, the method comprises: receiving content from a content source; storing the content at a storage location; associating the content with at least one owner; and selectively causing the content to be transmitted from a server entity associated with the server location to consumer premises equipment (CPE) operatively coupled to the network, the CPE being associated with the at least one owner.
In one variant, the act of associating comprises: receiving a selection by the at least one owner of the content for purchase; processing a purchase transaction for the content; and generating a record of an association between the content and the at least one owner. The server entity comprises an on-demand server, and the act of transmitting comprises creation of a session between the server entity and the CPE, the session being used to transmit the content.
In another variant, the method further comprises inserting copyright protection data into at least portions of the content, whether before the content is stored, or after storage, but before transmission. The inserted data can also be uniquely related to at least one of the at least one owners.
In another variant, the content is encoded according to one of a plurality of possible coding formats before transmitting, the encoding determined based at least in part on data received from a client device on which the content will be played.
In yet another variant, the content comprises new release content, and the creation of the session is restricted to a temporal coordinate corresponding generally to the release of the content via another distribution channel.
In a second aspect of the invention, a method of providing virtual ownership of new release content via a network is disclosed. In one embodiment, the method comprises: receiving the content; storing at least a portion of the content so that the purchaser may receive the content a plurality of times; and selectively transmitting the content over the network to the purchaser, the transmitting being based at least in part on a request by the purchaser to receive the content. Transmitting of the content is restricted to occur only after a certain temporal coordinate.
In one variant, the stored content is associated with a purchaser, and the act of transmitting comprises transmitting the content using a VOD infrastructure of the network. In another variant, a broadcast delivery mode is used. In still another variant, the act of transmitting over the network comprises transmitting the content to the purchaser at a first location over a cable network based on a first request; and transmitting the content to the purchaser at a second location over a packet-switched network based on a second request.
In yet another variant, the act of storing the content comprises storing the content at a distribution node or hub of the network; and the transmitting comprises transmitting the content stored at the node or hub to the purchaser from the node or hub.
In a third aspect of the invention, network apparatus adapted to obtain and store content is disclosed. In one embodiment, the apparatus comprises: a processor; a storage device in data communication with the processor; a network interface in data communication with the processor, the network interface being adapted to at least receive the content from the network; and at least one computer program operative to run on the apparatus, the at least one computer program being adapted to: provide a user with a user interface configured to enable user selection of at least one of a plurality of content for purchase; forward the selection to a node of the network; cause payment information to be provided to complete the purchase of the selected content; and customize at least one aspect of the content before delivery.
In one variant, the network apparatus comprises consumer premises equipment (CPE), and the at least one customized aspect comprises selecting one of a plurality of encoding formats. The program is further adapted to forward information to the node relating to the decoding capabilities of the CPE.
In another variant, the program is further adapted to establish a trusted or authorized service domain within at least the apparatus for protection of the content.
In still another variant, the at least one customized aspect comprises adding annotations to one or more portions of the content, the annotations being viewable on subsequent playback of the content.
In a fourth aspect of the invention, network server apparatus is disclosed. In one embodiment, the apparatus comprises: a processor; a storage device in data communication with the processor; a network interface in data communication with the processor, the network interface being adapted to at least transmit the content via the network; and at least one computer program operative to run on the apparatus, the at least one computer program being adapted to: receive at least one purchase selection for content from a user; store the user selected content at a storage location accessibly by the apparatus; associate at least the user with the stored content; and selectively deliver the content to the user over the network.
In one variant, the at least one computer program is further adapted to: receive at least one user-specified customization; and customize at least one aspect of the content before the delivery based at least in part on the at least one user-specified customization. In another variant, the content comprises audio or music content relating to a plurality of artists, and at least one computer program is further adapted to deliver at least selected portions of the content to the user based on one or more configurations specified by the user. These one or more configurations may comprise for example: (i) substantially randomized play; (ii) genre play; and (iii) artist play.
In a fifth aspect of the invention, a network architecture for use in delivering content to a user is disclosed. In one embodiment, the architecture comprises: a server operatively coupled to the network; and a plurality of nodes operatively coupled to the network, the nodes each comprising at least a portion of the content. The server is operative to: receive a purchase transaction for the content from the user; cause retrieval of the at least portions of the content from respective ones of the nodes; and deliver the content to the user.
In one variant, the delivery of the content to the user comprises assembling the at least portions of the content before transmitting the content to the user over the network. In another variant, the delivery of the content to the user comprises assembling the at least portions of the content at a client premises device of the user.
In a sixth aspect of the invention, a method of doing business is disclosed. In one embodiment, the method comprises: receiving content from a source; storing at least a portion of the content so that a purchaser thereof may receive the content a plurality of times; and selectively providing the content to the purchaser, the act of providing being based at least in part on a request by the purchaser to receive the content.
In one variant, the act of storing comprises storing the at least portion of the content within a virtual content database according to an algorithm, the algorithm dynamically varying the contents of the virtual content database based on at least one parameter. The at least one parameter comprises, e.g., a metric related to the estimated subscriber demand for the content.
In a seventh aspect of the invention, a method of providing a virtual hard drive for a computerized device disposed at a first location and in communication with a cable network is disclosed. In one embodiment, the method comprises: receiving a plurality of files from the computerized device via the cable network; storing at least a portion of the files at a second location within the network and substantially remote from the first location; and selectively providing the files to the device via the network, the act of providing being based at least in part on a request by the device to receive or access the files.
In an eighth aspect of the invention, a method of providing updates to virtual content of an owner over a network is disclosed. In one embodiment, the method comprises: receiving first content from a content source; storing the first content at a storage location; associating the first content with at least one owner; receiving an update to the first content; storing the update at a storage location; and selectively causing either of the first content or update to be transmitted to consumer premises equipment (CPE) operatively coupled to the network, the CPE being associated with the at least one owner. The act of selectively causing is based at least in part on a preference received from the at least one owner.
In a ninth aspect of the invention, a method of providing virtual ownership of content via a network is disclosed. In one embodiment, the method comprises: storing first content so that it is associated with a first subscriber, the first subscriber having purchased the first content; storing second content so that it is associated with a second subscriber, the second subscriber having purchased the second content; and allowing the first and second subscribers to trade ownership of the first and second content using the network.
Reference is now made to the drawings wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout.
As used herein, the term “application” refers generally to a unit of executable software that implements a certain functionality or theme. The themes of applications vary broadly across any number of disciplines and functions (such as on-demand content management, e-commerce transactions, brokerage transactions, home entertainment, calculator etc.), and one application may have more than one theme. The unit of executable software generally runs in a predetermined environment; for example, the unit could comprise a downloadable Java Xlet™ that runs within the JavaTV™ environment.
As used herein the term “browser” refers to any computer program, application or module which provides network access capability including, without limitation, Internet browsers adapted for accessing one or more websites or URLs over the Internet, as well as any “user agent” including those adapted for visual, aural, or tactile communications.
As used herein, the terms “client device” and “end user device” include, but are not limited to, set-top boxes (e.g., DSTBs), personal computers (PCs), and minicomputers, whether desktop, laptop, or otherwise, and mobile devices such as handheld computers, PDAs, personal media devices (PMDs), such as for example an iPod™ or Motorola ROKR, and smartphones.
As used herein, the term “codec” refers to an video, audio, or other data coding and/or decoding algorithm, process or apparatus including, without limitation, those of the MPEG (e.g., MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4, etc.), Real (RealVideo, etc.), AC-3 (audio), DiVX, XViD/ViDX, Windows Media Video (e.g., WMV 7, 8, or 9), ATI Video codec, or VC-1 (SMPTE standard 421M) families.
As used herein, the term “computer program” or “software” is meant to include any sequence or human or machine cognizable steps which perform a function. Such program may be rendered in virtually any programming language or environment including, for example, C/C++, Fortran, COBOL, PASCAL, assembly language, markup languages (e.g., HTML, SGML, XML, VoXML), and the like, as well as object-oriented environments such as the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA), Java™ (including J2ME, Java Beans, etc.) and the like.
As used herein, the term “conditional access” refers to any access control scheme, whether implemented in hardware, software, or firmware (or combinations thereof), including without limitation members of the “Powerkey” family (Powerkey Book 2, Powerkey Book 3, etc.), NDS (including VideoGuard, mVideoGuard, etc.), ANSI/SCTE Standard 52 2003 (DVS-042), incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, and Motorola/General Instrument DigiCipher® family (DigiCipher II, etc.). These can be implemented using, for example, the so-called “CableCard” plug-in security module access technology, a downloadable CA system (DCAS), or otherwise.
The terms “Customer Premises Equipment (CPE)” and “host device” refer to any type of electronic equipment located within a customer's or user's premises and connected to a network. The term “host device” refers generally to a terminal device that has access to digital television content via a satellite, cable, or terrestrial network. The host device functionality may be integrated into a digital television (DTV) set. The term “customer premises equipment” (CPE) includes such electronic equipment such as set-top boxes (e.g., DSTBs), televisions, cable modems (CMs), embedded multimedia terminal adapters (eMTAs), whether stand-alone or integrated with other devices, Digital Video Recorders (DVR), gateway storage devices (Furnace), and ITV Personal Computers.
As used herein, the term “database” refers generally to one or more tangible or virtual data storage locations, which may or may not be physically co-located with each other or other system components.
As used herein, the term “display” means any type of device adapted to display information, including without limitation CRTs, LCDs, TFTs, plasma displays, LEDs, incandescent and fluorescent devices. Display devices may also include less dynamic devices such as, for example, printers, e-ink devices, and the like.
As used herein, the term “DVI” (digital video interface) refers generally to any type of interface (e.g., hardware and/or software) adapted to provide interface and/or conversion between different formats or domains, including without limitation interfaces compliant with the Digital Display Working Group (DDWG) DVI specification (e.g., DVI-A, DVI-D, and DVI-I). For example, using a DVI connector and port, a digital signal sent to an analog monitor is converted into an analog signal; if the monitor is digital, such as a flat panel display, no conversion is necessary. A DVI output is an option in OpenCable compliant hardware that provides a high-definition TV (HDTV) output which includes copy protection.
As used herein, the term “DVR” (digital video recorder) refers generally to any type or recording mechanism and/or software environment whereby content sent over a network can be recorded and selectively recalled. Such DVR may be dedicated in nature, or part of a non-dedicated or multi-function system.
As used herein, the term “DOCSIS” refers to any of the existing or planned variants of the Data Over Cable Services Interface Specification, including for example DOCSIS versions 1.0, 1.1, 2.0 and 3.0. DOCSIS (version 1.0) is a standard and protocol for internet access using a “digital” cable network. DOCSIS 1.1 is interoperable with DOCSIS 1.0, and has data rate and latency guarantees (VoIP), as well as improved security compared to DOCSIS 1.0. DOCSIS 2.0 is interoperable with 1.0 and 1.1, yet provides a wider upstream band (6.4 MHz), as well as new modulation formats including TDMA and CDMA. It also provides symmetric services (30 Mbps upstream).
As used herein, the term “head-end” refers generally to a networked system controlled by an operator (e.g., an MSO) that distributes programming to MSO clientele using client devices. Such programming may include literally any information source/receiver including, inter alia, free-to-air TV channels, pay TV channels, interactive TV, and the Internet. DSTBs may literally take on any configuration, and can be retail devices meaning that consumers may or may not obtain their DSTBs from the MSO exclusively. Accordingly, it is anticipated that MSO networks may have client devices from multiple vendors, and these client devices will have widely varying hardware capabilities. Multiple regional head-ends may be in the same or different cities.
As used herein, the term “integrated circuit (IC)” refers to any type of device having any level of integration (including without limitation ULSI, VLSI, and LSI) and irrespective of process or base materials (including, without limitation Si, SiGe, CMOS and GaAs). ICs may include, for example, memory devices (e.g., DRAM, SRAM, DDRAM, EEPROM/Flash, ROM), digital processors, SoC devices, FPGAs, ASICs, ADCs, DACs, transceivers, memory controllers, and other devices, as well as any combinations thereof.
As used herein, the terms “Internet” and “internet” are used interchangeably to refer to inter-networks including, without limitation, the Internet.
As used herein, the terms “local” and “remote” refer generally to devices, entities, or users that are serviced by substantially different communications channels. These terms are intended to be relative, and bear no physical or absolute reference or connotation as to the placement of the communication channels or the served device, entities or users. For example, a “local” network may comprise the MSO cable or satellite network, whereas a “remote” network may comprise the Internet or a LAN/WAN/MAN, the latter which may literally serve the very same premises.
As used herein, the term “memory” includes any type of integrated circuit or other storage device adapted for storing digital data including, without limitation, ROM. PROM, EEPROM, DRAM, SDRAM, DDR/2 SDRAM, EDO/FPMS, RLDRAM, SRAM, “flash” memory (e.g., NAND/NOR), and PSRAM.
As used herein, the terms “microprocessor” and “digital processor” are meant generally to include all types of digital processing devices including, without limitation, digital signal processors (DSPs), reduced instruction set computers (RISC), general-purpose (CISC) processors, microprocessors, gate arrays (e.g., FPGAs), PLDs, reconfigurable compute fabrics (RCFs), array processors, and application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Such digital processors may be contained on a single unitary IC die, or distributed across multiple components.
As used herein, the term “modem” refers to any kind of modulation or demodulation process or apparatus including without limitation cable (e.g., DOCSIS compliant) modems, DSL modems, analog modems, and so forth.
As used herein, the terms “MSO” or “multiple systems operator” refer to a cable, satellite, or terrestrial network provider having infrastructure required to deliver services including programming and data over those mediums.
As used herein, the terms “network” and “bearer network” refer generally to any type of telecommunications or data network including, without limitation, hybrid fiber coax (HFC) networks, satellite networks, telco networks, and data networks (including MANs, WANs, LANs, WLANs, internets, and intranets). Such networks or portions thereof may utilize any one or more different topologies (e.g., ring, bus, star, loop, etc.), transmission media (e.g., wired/RF cable, RF wireless, millimeter wave, optical, etc.) and/or communications or networking protocols (e.g., SONET, DOCSIS, IEEE Std. 802.3, ATM, X.25, Frame Relay, 3GPP, 3GPP2, WAP, SIP, UDP, FTP, RTP/RTCP, TCP/IP, H.323, etc.).
As used herein, the term “network agent” refers to any network entity (whether software, firmware, and/or hardware based) adapted to perform one or more specific purposes. For example, a network agent may comprise a computer program running in server belonging to a network operator, which is in communication with one or more processes on a CPE or other device.
As used herein, the term “QAM” refers to modulation schemes used for sending signals over cable networks. Such modulation scheme might use any constellation level (e.g. QPSK, QAM-16, QAM-64, QAM-256 etc.) depending on details of a cable network. A QAM may also refer to a physical channel modulated according to said schemes.
As used herein, the term “network interface” refers to any signal or data interface with a component or network including, without limitation, those of the Firewire (e.g., FW400, FW800, etc.), USB (e.g., USB2), Ethernet (e.g., 10/100, 10/100/1000 (Gigabit Ethernet), 10-Gig-E, etc.), MoCA, Serial ATA (e.g., SATA, e-SATA, SATAII), Ultra-ATA/DMA, Coaxsys (e.g., TVnet™), radio frequency tuner (e.g., in-band or OOB, cable modem, etc.), modem, WiFi (802.11a,b,g,n), WiMAX (802.16), PAN (802.15), or IrDA families.
As used herein, the term “provisioning” refers generally to a process whereby a package, content title or other information is provided to a service (such as on-demand download service) so that the information is integrated with other functions and software modules within the service.
As used herein, the term “purchase” shall mean without limitation any sale, agreement for sale, transfer of funds, promise to transfer funds, barter arrangement, promotional or incentive agreement or arrangement, virtual ownership, subscription, or other relationship wherein consideration of any kind is exchanged between two or more parties (or their proxies).
As used herein, the term “recording medium” refers to any material, component, collection of components or device adapted to store information in a substantially permanent or semi-permanent state. Exemplars of recording media include, without limitation, magnetic media, integrated circuits (e.g., RAM or ROM), optical media, chemical media, and atomic- and subatomic-level storage structures (e.g., crystalline structures, quantum or spin states, etc.).
As used herein, the term “server” refers to any computerized component, system or entity regardless of form which is adapted to provide data, files, applications, content, or other services to one or more other devices or entities on a computer network.
As used herein, the term “Service Group” refers to either a group of service users (e.g. subscribers) or the resources shared by them in the form of entire cable RF signal, only the RF channels used to receive the service or otherwise treated as a single logical unit by the network for resource assignment.
As used herein, the term “speech recognition” refers to any methodology or technique by which human or other speech can be interpreted and converted to an electronic or data format or signals related thereto. It will be recognized that any number of different forms of spectral analysis such as, without limitation, MFCC (Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients) or cochlea modeling, may be used. Phoneme/word recognition, if used, may be based on HMM (hidden Markov modeling), although other processes such as, without limitation, DTW (Dynamic Time Warping) or NNs (Neural Networks) may be used. Myriad speech recognition systems and algorithms are available, all considered within the scope of the invention disclosed herein.
As used herein, the term “user interface” refers to, without limitation, any visual, graphical, tactile, audible, sensory, or other means of providing information to and/or receiving information from a user or other entity.
As used herein, the term “Wi-Fi” refers to, without limitation, any of the variants of IEEE-Std. 802.11 or related standards including 802.1 a/b/g/n.
As used herein, the term “wireless” means any wireless signal, data, communication, or other interface including without limitation Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 3G, HSDPA/HSUPA, TDMA, CDMA (e.g., IS-95A, WCDMA, etc.), FHSS, DSSS, GSM, PAN/802.15, WiMAX (802.16), 802.20, narrowband/FDMA, OFDM, PCS/DCS, analog cellular, CDPD, satellite systems, millimeter wave or microwave systems, acoustic, and infrared (i.e., IrDA).
The present invention comprises improved methods and apparatus for the selection, storage, and provision of content or other data via a network (such as a cable television network).
In one exemplary embodiment, the present invention utilizes extant network streaming and broadcast technologies to provide a here-to-fore unavailable capability to the network subscriber or other user; i.e., timely and rapid download of new content such as a new-release movie or game. Furthermore, “virtual” ownership of the content is provided, such that it can be utilized by the purchaser or subscriber as if they had possession of the tangible medium, yet without the attendant disabilities of purchasing and owning a physical medium (e.g., DVD) including storage, requirement for a DVD player, and so forth. The provision of the new content for viewing can also be tied to a purchase of the content (or other commerce-based event), such as where the content is only delivered after the user agrees to purchase it. This capability provides a number of distinct advantages, including, inter alia: the ability to sell the subscriber a movie or other title in an earlier window than would otherwise be available under prior art network content distribution paradigms, while providing the subscriber enhanced flexibility and choices for content ownership no added effort or cost.
Furthermore, by using the aforementioned “tying” of the content purchase and viewing of the content, content providers such as studios or networks can be assured of no diminution of their rental and retail channels. This approach provides a strong differentiation over other physical distribution channels (e.g., rental and retail), since viewers can now select, purchase, and view/use their selected content without the attendant cost and effort of renting/return or retail purchase. Also, delivery and controlled distribution (i.e., recording) over a cable or similar network can provide certain security benefits as compared to other electronic network distribution channels (such as the Internet), which are inherently untrusted and hence provide a significant risk of theft or unauthorized “ripping” or peer-sharing of content to the content provider without additional security measures. Copyright or other intellectual property rights management mechanisms can also be readily implemented and enforced using the approach of the present invention.
The present invention also advantageously provides the ability to deliver content to hardware domains or locations where delivery of full-featured content might otherwise be impractical or impossible. For example, in the context of a prior art DVD, a DVD player of some sort (whether as a stand-alone device, integrated into a PC or laptop, etc.) would be required in order to view the content. Under the present invention, however, delivery of content can occur repeatedly and in effect instantaneously to devices not having a DVD player or significant storage volume (e.g., DVR); rather, the only salient requirement is access to the virtual content server and sufficiently high bandwidth capability between the client device and the server.
The “virtual” or dynamic storage capability of the invention can also readily be disposed at any number of different locations or nodes within the network (depending on its topology and delivery paradigm) including, e.g., at the head-end, BSA hub site, or other distribution or management node.
Various other aspects of the present invention include: (i) the ability for virtual content owners to annotate or otherwise personalize their content; (ii) parental or other controls for masking or blocking selected portions of content; (iii) a distributed premises gaming architecture based on virtually owned gaming applications/content; (iv) a peer-to-peer (P2P) distributed delivery architecture; (v) content preview capability; (vi) the ability to virtually store subscriber-generated content; (vii) virtual audio storage and services; (viii) the ability to trade or transfer virtually owned content over the network; (ix) dynamic virtual content database shaping; (x) privacy mechanisms (i.e., to prevent association of a particular subscriber with particular content by a third party); (xi) automated or semi-automated updating of content, such as when new or remixed versions are released; (xii) dynamic or adaptive encoding, so that content can be encoded on-the-fly for particular subscriber platforms as opposed to storing multiple different variants; and (xiii) “virtual hard drive” capability for subscriber PCs to provide all of the benefits of content storage, yet for data and/or software applications that would normally be resident on a computerized device.
Exemplary embodiments of network server and subscriber premises devices are also described, as well as an operational/business “rules” engine to enforce various network rules within the virtual content management (VCM) architecture,
Various business methodologies and paradigms relating to the foregoing features are also described.
Exemplary embodiments of the apparatus and methods of the present invention are now described in detail. While these exemplary embodiments are described in the context of the aforementioned hybrid fiber coax (HFC) cable architecture having an multi-system operator (MSO), digital networking capability, and plurality of client devices/CPE, the general principles and advantages of the invention may be extended to other types of networks and architectures where bandwidth allocation is required or desirable, whether broadband, narrowband, wired or wireless, content or data, or otherwise. Hence, the following description is merely exemplary in nature. For example, the invention may be practiced over a fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) or fiber-to-the-curb (FTTC) system, or over a satellite or millimeter wave-based network.
It will also be appreciated that while described generally in the context of a network providing service to a consumer (i.e., home) end user domain, the present invention may be readily adapted to other types of environments including, e.g., commercial/enterprise, and government/military applications. Myriad other applications are possible.
It is further noted that while described primarily in the context of 6 MHz RF channels, the present invention is applicable to literally any frequency/bandwidth, such as for example 8 MHz channels.
Furthermore, as referenced above, the invention is in no way limited to traditional cable system frequencies (i.e., below 1 GHz), and in fact may be used with systems that operate above 1 GHz band in center frequency or bandwidth, to include without limitation so-called ultra-wideband (UWB) systems. For example, in one variant of the invention, high-bandwidth UWB signals imposed atop the traditional QAMs of the cable network are used to provide a high-speed data download capability for the content to be utilized at the subscriber's premises (e.g., applications or archived data).
Also, while certain aspects are described primarily in the context of the well-known Internet Protocol (described in, inter alia, RFC 791 and 2460), it will be appreciated that the present invention may utilize other types of protocols (and in fact bearer networks to include other internets and intranets) to implement the described functionality.
The data/application origination point 102 comprises any medium that allows data and/or applications (such as a VOD-based application, gaming application, or “Watch TV” application) to be transferred to a distribution server 104. This can include for example a third party data source, application vendor website, CD-ROM, external network interface, mass storage device (e.g., RAID system), etc. Such transference may be automatic, initiated upon the occurrence of one or more specified events (such as the receipt of a request packet or ACK), performed manually, or accomplished in any number of other modes readily recognized by those of ordinary skill.
The application distribution server 104 comprises a computer system where such applications can enter the network system. Distribution servers are well known in the networking arts, and accordingly not described further herein.
The VOD server 105 comprises a computer system where on-demand content can be received from one or more of the aforementioned data sources 102 and enter the network system. These servers may generate the content locally, or alternatively act as a gateway or intermediary from a distant source.
The CPE 106 includes any equipment in the “customers' premises” (or other locations, whether local or remote to the distribution server 104) that can be accessed by a distribution server 104. Exemplary embodiments of a “converged” CPE (i.e., CD) of the invention are also described subsequently herein.
Referring now to
The architecture 150 of
Content (e.g., audio, video, etc.) is provided in each downstream (in-band) channel associated with the relevant service group. To communicate with the head-end or intermediary node (e.g., hub server), the CPE 106 may use the out-of-band (OOB) or DOCSIS channels and associated protocols. The OCAP 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 (and subsequent) specification provides for exemplary networking protocols both downstream and upstream, although the invention is in no way limited to these approaches.
It will also be recognized that the multiple servers (broadcast, VOD, or otherwise) can be used, and disposed at two or more different locations if desired, such as being part of different server “farms”. These multiple servers can be used to feed one service group, or alternatively different service groups. In a simple architecture, a single server is used to feed one or more service groups. In another variant, multiple servers located at the same location are used to feed one or more service groups. In yet another variant, multiple servers disposed at different location are used to feed one or more service groups.
As shown in
“Switched” Networks—
Switching architectures allow improved efficiency of bandwidth use for ordinary digital broadcast programs. Ideally, the subscriber will be unaware of any difference between programs delivered using a switched network and ordinary streaming broadcast delivery.
Co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/956,688 filed Sep. 20, 2001, entitled “Technique For Effectively Providing Program Material In A Cable Television System”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,713,623 on Apr. 29, 2014, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, describes one exemplary broadcast switched digital architecture useful with the present invention, although it will be recognized by those of ordinary skill that other approaches and architectures may be substituted.
In addition to “broadcast” content (e.g., video programming), the systems of
Referring again to
The edge switch 194 forwards the packets receive from the CMTS 199 to the QAM modulator 189, which transmits the packets on one or more physical (QAM-modulated RF) channels to the CPEs. The IP packets are typically transmitted on RF channels that are different that the RF channels used for the broadcast video and audio programming, although this is not a requirement. The CPE 106 are each configured to monitor the particular assigned RF channel (such as via a port or socket ID/address, or other such mechanism) for IP packets intended for the subscriber premises/address that they serve.
It will be appreciated that while the exemplary embodiments presented herein are described in the context of Internet services that include multicast and unicast data, the present invention is applicable to other types of services that include multicast transmission of data delivered over a network having multiple physical channels or even virtual or logical channels. For example, switching between various physical channels that comprise a virtual channel, can itself be conducted according to the “switched” approach of the present invention. As a simple illustration, if a first virtual channel is comprised of physical channels (e.g., QAMs) A, B and D, and a second virtual channel is comprised of QAMs C, E and F, a CM or other CPE can be configured to switch between the A/B/D and C/E/F virtual channels as if they were a single QAM.
Virtual Content Management Architecture (VCMA)—
Referring now to
In one aspect, the VCM architecture provides a functionality generally comparable to rental (i.e., the ability to user-select titles for viewing on more than one occasion); however, the procurement and return of physical media are advantageously obviated. Even with an approach such as the well known Netflix™ service, the source (Netflix) must generate the physical media and mail it to the user, who must then also physically package and return it via mail. The present invention has no such issues, in that only ephemeral transmission of the content occurs, much like a PPV or VOD selection process. However, the present invention also allows the owner to view the content as many times as they like, and whenever (and even from wherever) they like, without incurring additional charges. Hence, their ownership is tangible in the sense that they exert control over the disposition and use of their content; yet, their ownership is also virtual in that they are not saddled with the disabilities of owning such tangible media including inter alia additional costs of producing and transmitting the media, wearing (e.g., scratches on the DVD) or other degradation of the media with time or use, storage space, potential for theft, access control (e.g., undesired access to DVDs of mature content by children), and so forth. Hence, the exemplary VCM architecture of the present invention in effect fuses the best attributes of renting with those of physical ownership to provide a highly flexible, cost efficient and user-customizable “virtual” ownership experience. This is all accomplished using primarily extant capabilities within the MSO's or satellite provider's network, thereby mitigating significant impediments to deployment.
As shown in
In one embodiment, the storage devices 204 each comprise a redundant array (e.g., RAID) device, and when coupled with the fault tolerance, self monitoring, self-healing, and automatic communication channel fail-over (in the event of a hardware or software failure or loss of channel) of the illustrated architecture 200, provide a highly redundant and reliable configuration.
Furthermore, while illustrated generally as a plurality of substantially local components, the architecture of
In one embodiment, a physically secure storage facility is disposed at the network head-end 150, in order to prevent the theft or surreptitious access to the copyrighted and valuable content owned by the users/purchasers.
In another embodiment, the “purchased’ content is stored at a content source provider facility (e.g., a studio's RAID or similar storage site), and the content streamed or bursted to the MSO facility (e.g., head-end or BSA hub) over virtually secure channels so as to maintain data (content) confidentiality and integrity, as well as provide for authentication and anti-replay protection. For example, one variant of this architecture uses well-known virtual private network (VPN) capability, wherein AES or similar encryption is used to encapsulate content packets for transmission over an untrusted or physically non-secure network (e.g., the Internet). Alternatively, a more secure or trusted network infrastructure between the content storage location and the MSO facility could be utilized. This infrastructure may be wired or wireless in nature, so long as it provides the desired data bandwidth and security capabilities.
In one such approach, requests to access content are processed by the MSO but serviced by content from one or more third party databases (e.g., the databases of studios or other content source can collectively act as the MSO's “virtual library”). Such servicing of content requests can be effectively real-time, with any encoding, annotation, inclusion of metadata, etc. performed essentially on-the-fly (“just in time” processing) if desired.
The ingestion process 206 shown in
Communication channels outside the MSO network can also be used, such as an ISP DSL, dial-up, T1, ISDN, or other such data or telecommunications channel. The server portion 214 may also be adapted to include a protocol stack (e.g., TCP/IP) for communication via an Internet website, such as where the user can interface with the website via a mobile or remote device (e.g., WAP 2.0 enabled mobile handset) 220 to purchase the content, configure the various delivery parameters and options associated with the purchase, etc.
It will be appreciated that the “client portion” 216 may also advantageously comprise a portion of a VOD or PVR application, such as those capable of utilizing LSCP or the like to control the streaming of the content. Hence, when using the VOD delivery mechanism, the session initiation, control, and tear-down may be substantially similar to those of existing VOD systems. The client portion may also, however, be integrated with other types of applications (e.g., EPG, WatchTV, etc.) as well if desired.
Once the content source has completed the purchase transaction from the user, it then utilizes the MSO-relevant information, and the illustrated network interface 232 to communicate 234 the content to the MSO, e.g., the storage facility 236 shown in
This approach is desirable from the standpoint that the content source can set its own business rules or policies, and simply communicate instructions to the MSO on how to implement these policies. These content source policies may or may not be consistent with those of the MSO. For example, the MSO might offer certain content for sale (via, e.g., the topology of
As used in this context, the term “best” may refer to the terms of one third party source, and average or other compilation of multiple sources' terms, the aggregation of the most favorable terms taken from a group of sources, and so forth.
Alternatively, the MSO can maintain a local copy or “library” of content from the source 218, and the content source process 218 merely communicates the relevant subscriber and purchase information to the MSO server portion 214, causing the server 214 to enable download or broadcast of the purchased content to the subscriber. Again, this may be on the same or different terms than a comparable offering by the MSO, or another content source.
When the user is ready to view their content, they issue a request 238 to the MSO server portion, such as via any indigenous protocol (e.g., LSCP in an exemplary VOD system), to which the server portion 214 responds by initiating streaming (or broadcast) 240 of the content, after all necessary authentications and other requirements have been satisfied.
Referring now to
After the content source receives the communications from the client device, it then communicates 250 with the MSO server portion 214 as previously described with respect to
It will also be recognized that the use of a cable (e.g., HFC) network as the basis of the illustrated embodiment can provide several salient benefits and advantages over other modes of delivery, e.g., PC-based streaming or download over an IP network such as the Internet. Specifically, the cable system carried enhanced security as compared to the Internet, the latter being a notoriously untrusted network having no indigenous security measures. In untrusted networks such as the Internet, users must “tunnel” packets across the network using a VPN or similar approach (e.g., secure sockets, TLS, or comparable transport layer security), or provide application layer encryption or the like. In contrast, the typical cable environment can be considered a trusted domain and hence more difficult to “hack”, since it utilizes a variety of physical security measures for at least portions of its physical run (e.g., the various links within the system utilize physical measures to exclude access, and/or protocol to preserve the security of the link). Cable systems also provide their downstream content in an encoded and multiplexed stream, and can be configured to utilize application or other layer encryption protocols (sealers) such as AES or DES to ensure both a) data and source integrity (i.e., assurance that the data has not been tampered with) and b) confidentiality (prevention of access by unauthorized parties).
Cable systems can also be configured to authenticate their users and/or their CPE 106 if desired, thereby assuring user integrity (i.e., prevention of a false user standing in place of an authorized one, or “spoofing”). Such authentication may be via a SIM (subscriber identity module) or comparable approach, user PIN, link or other key (e.g., public/private encryption key), RAND and SRES challenge/response approach, etc.
Additionally, the cable network in-band paradigm previously described offers the potential for significantly higher download speeds (i.e., greater than 6 Mbps cable modem speeds), thereby reducing the time needed to download a given content to the user and accordingly increasing their satisfaction in using this service. It will further be recognized that even higher rate systems may be used consistent with the invention, including those exceeding 1 Gbps, thereby providing a very high speed download, and hence very low latency associated with the viewing or access processes described herein. With such low latency, this very-high speed download capability can support an alternate delivery model to normal in-band streaming; e.g., download and playback versus streaming.
Local Content Insertion—
It will be appreciated that while the embodiments of
For example, in this alternate embodiment, once content has been selected by the subscriber for delivery, the locally stored copy of this selected content can be inserted directly into the hub delivery system such as by, e.g., switching the BSA hub switch to include this content stream issued by a local delivery device coupled to the local storage. Note, however, that even a VOD or other session-based architecture can use this paradigm; e.g., by instantiating a VOD session using a local VOD server that is coupled to the local storage repository (e.g., at a network hub), as opposed to one disposed at the head-end 150.
These smaller local nodes can also be equipped to “fetch” purchased content from a larger repository (e.g., the head-end 150, a third party storage facility, content source, etc.) in the even that a particular content is requested that is not locally stored when requested. In one variant, the high-speed download capabilities described in co-owned U.S. application Ser. No. 11/013,665 filed Dec. 15, 2004, entitled “Method and Apparatus for High Bandwidth Data Transmission in Content-Based Networks”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,522,293 on Aug. 27, 2013, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, are utilized for this purpose, in order to reduce the latency of this process. However, rather than a head-end server-to-CPE link, the present embodiment utilizes a head-end server-to-hub site server link. In-band downstream QAMs already instantiated for other purposes may also be used for this link.
Hence, this exemplary feature of the invention operates somewhat like a BSA network, in that it selectively “switches in” purchased content to the local repository based on user activity/presence, yet makes content that is not switched-in at a given point in time readily available via the aforementioned dynamic fetch/insertion process.
The techniques for minimizing the size of the stored content database described elsewhere herein are especially useful for configurations where the storage is decentralized or pushed out to the edge of the network, such as for example those at the BSA hub site.
Broadcast Delivery Modes—
In addition to session-based modes, the virtual content delivery of the present invention may include broadcast modes including, inter alia, those over a broadcast switched architecture (BSA) such as that previously described with respect to
In one variant of this approach, the purchaser of content is given a special channel allocation to which their tuner is tuned (either automatically or manually), somewhat akin to normal BSA operation where a single user on a hub is viewing a program channel (thereby keeping it “switched in” for delivery at the hub switch), with the exception that no other users on that hub are capable of tuning to that channel. This gives the purchaser exclusivity for their particular purchased content. The head-end or hub site (depending on whether a centralized or local content architecture is used as described previously herein), upon receiving the user's request for viewing, spawns a broadcast of the content over the designated QAM channel(s), and instructs that particular user's CPE to tune to that QAM (or collection of QAMs in a wideband tuner approach such as that described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/013,671 filed Dec. 15, 2004, entitled “Method And Apparatus For Wideband Distribution Of Content”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,723,267 on Aug. 1, 2017, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). These tuning instructions can be delivered via, e.g., an in-band or OOB downstream message already indigenous to such networks.
However, unlike the exemplary VOD delivery paradigm previously described, delivery of the virtual content over the BSA network is broadcast only, and hence does not provide the user with the PVR-like “trick mode” features normally associated VOD (e.g., pause, rewind, etc.). Accordingly, users viewing their purchased content over the BSA network model will only be provided a PPV-like experience (except with unlimited viewings, and which can be instigated at any time of day). However, this “broadcast” deliver approach may be desirable for certain users, including those which do not have VOD functionality as part of their delivery network or subscription package. Also, certain PMDs or other client devices (and their supporting infrastructure) simply may not be able to effectively generate and relay upstream VOD commands (e.g., LSCP or the like), and hence can only view a broadcast delivery of the content.
Moreover, the lack of the PVR-like features can be compensated for via other mechanisms such as cost or other the provision of other complementary features or incentives. For example, the cost of purchase of a content title (e.g., movie) for broadcast delivery may be set significantly lower than the fully-enabled VOD/session-based counterpart. Or, a purchaser of a VOD-enabled version of the content may be given the opportunity to specify a “buddy list” which includes a limited number of family members, friends, etc. (whether for an additional fee or otherwise) who can view the content, yet again only on a broadcast basis.
Accordingly, one variant of the invention allows the user/purchaser to obtain two or more versions of the content (although these may actually comprise one stored version, as discussed elsewhere herein), so that they, or their designated buddies if that approach is implemented, can select the proper delivery paradigm for their current viewing context. This selection may also be made entirely automated, such as where the user's PMD transmits configuration information upstream to the virtual manager, which determines that the PMD is not VOD or session capable, and hence can only view a broadcast variant.
It will be recognized that while a BSA variant is described with respect to the foregoing embodiment, other types of broadcast paradigms can be used to fulfill the function of broadcast delivery of the virtual content.
It is further recognized that while the aforementioned embodiment of the broadcast mode makes such broadcast user-specific, one or more other subscribers or designated parties may be given access to the broadcast content if desired. For example, a user's family member who is remote from the user (e.g., on the road) can also receive the broadcast content via, e.g., a Slingbox type approach, or alternatively that described in commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/440,490 filed May 24, 2006 and entitled “Personal Content Server Apparatus And Methods” previously incorporated herein, such as via an IP network and personal content server. This remote delivery can also be conducted from the local (e.g., BSA) hub site if desired.
In another embodiment, the aforementioned broadcast delivery mode can be utilized in conjunction with a “start over” or similar feature, such as e.g., the exemplary “Start Over™” capability offered by the Assignee hereof in select markets in the United States. Specifically, such start-over functionality allows the re-initiation of delivery of a program (e.g., restart of a broadcast or other program) so that subscribers who miss the start or a feature of interest can restart the delivery.
In the present context, this functionality may be implemented by providing the subscriber with an application or client function (e.g., client portion of the DA) that transmits a restart or similar command upstream the relevant component of the VCM architecture 200 (e.g., server portion 214 or its proxy) so as to re-initiate playing or streaming of the broadcast content from the virtual storage location previously described. In the local embodiments, this storage and retransmission may occur at the hub site or the like as opposed to the head-end 150.
Alternate Delivery Paradigms—
It will be appreciated that the present invention may be used with, inter alia, “streaming” (e.g., an ongoing or running transmission of content) and/or “download” (a complete or partial transmission of content followed by a subsequent playback or use) modes of delivery. For example, one variant of the invention streams content such as video according to a VOD or similar session-based protocol and with QoS requirements. Alternatively, a download paradigm is used, such as for downloading gaming applications, wherein a high-speed download capability such as that described in commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/013,665 filed Dec. 15, 2004, entitled “Method And Apparatus For High Bandwidth Data Transmission In Content-Based Networks”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,522,293 on Aug. 27, 2013, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This high-speed download might be useful, for example, where the user has purchased a large “virtual” application or database to which they desire access. So as to avoid having to store the application/data locally, the virtual storage approach of the invention stores the application/data at the head-end, hub, etc., and then uses high-speed in-band download to provide it to the subscriber upon request with very little latency.
As yet another option, the CPE 106 and/or local premises DVR or similar device with sufficient storage or buffering capability can download all (or portions at a time) of the selected virtual content into temporary or ephemeral storage, and then play it back for the subscriber. In effect, a virtual image of the virtual content is being made within memory or ephemeral storage on the premises device, somewhat akin to loading RAM of a PC with code stored on the HDD of the PC. Here, the equipment (CPE or DVR) is configured to dump the content after playing it or after a prescribed period of time, such as using a FIFO approach. In this fashion, only a temporary or ephemeral copy of the protected content is made, thereby mitigating risk that it would be stored on a more permanent basis and reproduced without authorization. To this end, the downloaded content can also be encrypted, threaded with self-disabling data (e.g., if an unauthorized service domain attempts to record or play back the content), or utilize other such mechanisms for frustrating reproduction.
The foregoing temporary or buffered approach can also be made substantially opportunistic in terms of network downstream bandwidth usage, since the buffering or storage at the subscriber's premises allows for a range of delivery rates and schemes, including: (i) bursty streaming, wherein blocks of content are downloaded at high speed in a non-contiguous fashion; or (ii) block high-speed download and replay.
Hence, under scenario (i), non-contiguous blocks of relatively high bandwidth are required. Under scenario (ii), a single continuous block of very high bandwidth is required. The head-end server delivering the content (e.g., VOD server 105, application server 104, or otherwise), in conjunction with the VCM 214 (or autonomously once the content download decision has been handed off to the relevant server) therefore has the option to opportunistically use available bandwidth, even switching back and forth between these schemes in the same download, in order to avoid contention or achieve other operational goals (or accommodate operational conditions such as equipment failures or bottlenecking). For example, if sufficient bandwidth for the “high speed block” approach (scenario (ii)) is not available at the time download is to commence, then the lower-bandwidth non-contiguous block or (real time) continuous streaming approaches can be used. However, where a sufficiently large window of available bandwidth opens, the download to the temporary storage on the subscriber premises equipment can be invoked. This latter approach has the advantage of freeing up bandwidth more quickly, since there is less stranded bandwidth (i.e., unusable due to its timing or placement on a given QAM) as the algorithm in effect uses up stranded bandwidth blocks to complete the content download as rapidly as possible.
The aforementioned accelerated bursty approach also allows for a “rolling start” to a video; i.e., starting playback off the local (temporary) storage medium before all of the content has been received. This approach can reduce latency to the subscriber, since the playback need not wait for the download to complete, generally comparable to a streaming approach, yet with playback independent of the CPE tuner.
Other types of bearer mediums can also be used consistent with the cable system. For example, in one alternate embodiment, the requested data or content is streamed out-of-band (OOB) using the cable system's extant OOB infrastructure. While this path has typically much less data bandwidth, it is also far less loaded than in-band channels (QAMs). Alternatively, a hybridized approach can be used as previously referenced, such as where the data/content is sent in-band, yet where all or a portion of the communications necessary between the head-end and the CPE necessary to perform the purchase are carried OOB.
It will also be appreciated that different carrier and/or multiplexing schemes can be used for the delivery of content or data consistent with the present invention, the latter being largely agnostic to its bearer medium. While some of the exemplary embodiments herein are described primarily in terms of an OD infrastructure adapted to transmit data over a single physical channel (e.g., 256-QAM modulated carrier) at any given time, it will be recognized that this “physical channel” may actually comprise one or more carriers. For example, in one multi-carrier variant of the invention, the content/data is streamed over multiple physical carriers according to a multiplexing algorithm such as that described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/013,671 filed Dec. 15, 2004, entitled “Method And Apparatus For Wideband Distribution Of Content”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,723,267 on Aug. 1, 2017, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Under this approach, the data of a given TS can be multiplexed across a plurality of physical carriers, with the multiplexed signal being reassembled at the CPE 106 using a wideband tuner (or a plurality of related tuners). Information from the head-end as to the multiplexing scheme and channels used is provided to the CPE in order to enable it to de-multiplex (and decode) the multiplexed transport stream. Hence, for the purposes of the present invention, the aggregation of multiplexed channels acts like a single QAM.
As yet another option, two or more QAMs within the network can be established simultaneously (as part of a single session, or alternatively two distinct but related sessions) to achieve one or more desired objectives, such as an increased download speed or statistical multiplex pool size.
Virtual Data Storage—
It is also envisioned that, e.g., “virtual hard drives” can be maintained for subscribers of the aforementioned networks (or other designated users), thereby giving their CPE 106 or CD (and any connected devices) literally terabytes of storage that they could not otherwise have using their home PC, etc. This can be used for any number of different reasons, such as: (i) purely for archival or back-up purposes, (ii) to permit access to a data volume by multiple MSO subscribers, (iii) to maintain the security of the data (i.e., when no local copy is present at the subscriber's premises, theft of their computer from the premises is much less troubling), or (iv) merely to provide the subscriber with storage volume that they could otherwise not obtain. Depending on the bandwidth allocated to the download (e.g., a “burst” mode with ultra-high downstream bandwidth), the access latency can be kept quite low.
This capability becomes increasingly significant with respect to PCs and mobile computerized devices, some of which are now migrating toward operating systems and applications that are stored entirely on removable media (versus the hard drive of the PC, etc.). Hence, using the aforementioned “virtual” hard drive and content storage capabilities, the content and operating system of the subscriber's PC or mobile device can reside entirely off-device, including at the MSO head-end or other such location if desired. Moreover, the data volumes for each subscriber may be encrypted, authenticated, and made physically secure, thereby providing a level of protection that exceeds that of the normal home PC, PMD, or the like.
These data volumes or “virtual hard drives” can also be made part of a business paradigm; e.g., wherein the user pays a fee (such as on a per-Tb used) or subscribes for X terabytes of storage space for a given period of time.
Methods—
Referring now to
In a first step 302 of the method 300, the desired content is made available for purchase, and purchased by a user (e.g., MSO subscriber). As described in greater detail subsequently herein, this purchase may be pursuant to a user request for the content (or a listing of the available content) instigated from the CPE 106 or a client device, or may be as a result of interaction with a third party (e.g., content source) web server, operator or other such network agent.
Next, per step 304, the purchased content is delivered to the storage facility (if not already there), and the content stored.
Lastly, per step 306, the purchased and stored content is delivered to the target device (e.g., customer CPE 106 or client device) via a communication channel. Upon receipt, the target device either conducts playback of the content, such as the playing of an MPEG-2 stream, or alternatively the playback of a compressed video file downloaded at high speed, or even the installation and execution of an application.
It will be appreciated that the delivery of the purchased content may occur immediately, e.g., immediately after or even contemporaneous with storage, and/or may occur at a subsequent time or date, depending on the purchaser's preferences.
Moreover, the downloaded content may be optionally disposed onto a recording medium at the user's premises; see, e.g., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/080,693 filed Mar. 14, 2005, entitled “Method And Apparatus For Network Content Downloading and Recording”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,028,322 on Sep. 27, 2011, previously incorporated herein, which discloses exemplary download and recording mechanisms for use in, e.g., a consumer premises or enterprise.
Referring now to
It will be appreciated that such user interface is not limited to the MSO network domain either. For example, as described in greater detail subsequently herein, the user interface may comprise part of a PMD or mobile device (e.g., PDA or smartphone), which can access the MSO virtual database manager from a remote location or network.
Next, per step 312, the user designates one or more content items for purchase, such as by selecting one or more interactive elements on the EPG, GUI menu, etc. Exemplary user interfaces, on-screen menus and related functions generally useful with the present invention are shown and described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/080,693 filed Mar. 14, 2005 previously incorporated herein (see, e.g.,
Once the user makes their selection(s), this information is transferred to the virtual content manager (e.g., server portion 214) via an upstream communication channel, DOCSIS modem, ISP connection, or other modality appropriate to the user's situation. The user's selection (e.g., availability) and payment information are then validated (step 314, such as by the VCM 214 accessing a subscriber database associated with that user (as determined by, e.g., TUNER ID, MAC, or other information uniquely identifying the requesting CPE/subscriber.
Menus or other user interfaces may also be generated for receiving user preferences (e.g., format, particular versions of the same content, codec selection, and so forth). This information can be transmitted to the VCM 214 at time of selection, or alternatively at another time (such as being pre-stored in a configuration file disposed in the head-end or other location directly accessible to the virtual manager).
Advantageously, the present invention may be used consistent with any number of different payment options, including for example: (i) payment via billing to the user's existing cable subscription (whether based on a monthly fee, a “per-purchase” paradigm similar to PPV, trial basis, or other), (ii) direct payment via a credit/debit card (e.g., wherein the user enters their credit/debit card directly, or has it stored in a secured location for easy recall), or (iii) via an electronic payment service such as “PayPal” or the like. The selection may also be made as part of a promotion or in exchange for services by the user, such as where the user agrees to submit a review of the film (or the service itself) in exchange for “virtual” access. Models based on user discount or promotional codes are also envisaged.
It will be recognized that a preview or other sampling of the target content may also be employed as part of the method of
Referring now to
If/when the user has entered their desired annotations or personalizations, this information is transmitted upstream (e.g., via OOB message, DOCSIS modem, etc.) to the VCM, and stored in a file within the content database, that is associated with the selected content (step 326).
Per step 328, the selected content is optionally encoded or recoded as required (e.g., such as where the content requires encoding into the format requested by the user), and then stored within the virtual database (step 330) for subsequent access. The content can alternatively be coded “on the fly”, such as immediately preceding streaming over a VOD session.
Note that the storage of step 328 need not necessarily occur at this stage of the method 300 (or at all); rather, another variant of the method allows the VCM to merely identify the subscriber as a valid purchaser, hence permitting them access to content that has already been stored. Contemporaneous storage may be used, however, where the content is new to the virtual database, or otherwise must be modified, such as for a specific purchaser's preferences. Along these lines, the present invention optionally utilizes a storage optimization algorithm which is part of the VCM architecture 200; i.e., rendered as a computer program running within the architecture, such as on a virtual content server, VOD server, SRM, etc. This optimization algorithm is structured to store content in a more space-efficient and operationally efficient manner. For example, in one variant of the invention, common titles virtually owned by a plurality of subscribers are stored as a lesser number of files or data structure within the database in order to avoid undue replication of identical content. Should the owning users require different encodings, apply different personalizations or annotations, and so forth, these differences are applied when the content is called up for access by the particular users. The algorithm can also be constructed to dynamically manage and vary the number of copies of content accessible by users as a function of one or more other parameters including, e.g., time of day, historical demand for that title as a function of date/time, number of virtual owners of that content whose CPE are presently on the network (as determined by their TUNER ID, MAC, upstream messaging, etc.), and so forth.
As part of step 304, the user can optionally be notified that his/her selected content or data will be available for viewing or access once the transaction is authorized. As part of this notification, the user may also optionally be provided any cryptographic data (e.g., key seeds, public/private key pairs, challenges/responses, etc.) required to complete the viewing and decrypt the content if encrypted. This cryptographic data may also be sent via a separate data channel (e.g., OOB or IP) in order to minimize the chance of interception of both the content and the crypto by a single entity.
Referring now to
Next, per step 336, the user's selections/preferences are used as the basis for selecting the proper variant of the content (e.g., where multiple different variants are present). For example, the virtual database may contain different variants encoded into MPEG-2, MPEG-4, and Real formats. Or, the database may contain the original release of a film, and a subsequent enhanced re-release. If any modification or conditioning of the stored content is required (such as recoding, encryption, compression, etc.), this is also performed per step 336.
Per step 338, any annotations, personalizations, or other additions to the content are inserted. In one variant, this process comprises accessing an associated data or metadata file for that content and specific to the requesting purchaser, and “inserting” this secondary content into the primary or requested content. It will be appreciated that any number of different techniques can be utilized for such insertion, including for example: (i) merely transmitting the data/metadata file to the requesting CPE/CD/client as a separate data structure, and allowing the indigenous processing and software of the CPE/CD/client to unpack the file and insert the data/metadata as appropriate; or (ii) performing the insertion of the data/metadata directly into the media stream during streaming, such as based on SI references or other coordinates referenced to the media. For example, as discussed elsewhere herein, one aspect of the invention comprises receiving user annotations or personalizations via an editing/authoring software environment, with this data referenced to particular portions or scenes of the content. Hence, the VCM can access the file containing this data at time of streaming, and insert the necessary data at the prescribed locations, thereby. providing the user with a seamless (and personalized) viewing experience, with the annotations actually present in the content as viewed. Alternatively, a software application running on the CPE/CD/client is utilized in another exemplary embodiment to take the required actions specified by “markers” associated with the streamed data; e.g., generate a pop-up window on the user's display that contains the annotations. Myriad different schemes for generating user-customized content will be recognized by those of ordinary skill, and accordingly are not described further herein.
Various other types of functionalities may be included within the data/content delivered to the purchaser. For example, in one embodiment, digital copyright data is included within the recorded data/content, such as well-known digital watermarking data of the type authorized under the United States Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA). For example, Digimarc®, SysCoP™, EIKONAmark™, and other similar commercially available watermarking approaches can be used. Media rights management systems such as the Microsoft Windows® Media Digital Rights Manager, may be used as well. Various types of steganographic approaches may also be employed consistent with the invention in order to enforce copyright and provide the copyright owner with accountability and/or trace-ability of reproduced versions of their copyrighted material.
In one embodiment, the digital rights management (DRM) insertion occurs at the content source, before delivery to the MSO network. In another embodiment, the DRM is inserted by the MSO after receipt of the content; e.g., (i) before storage; or (ii) after storage but before transmission to the requesting user(s).
In yet another embodiment, the DRM insertion occurs at the user's CPE or CD, such as by way of the methods and apparatus described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/080,693 previously incorporated herein.
In another aspect of the invention, a user-specific DRM insertion process is utilized, such that the DRM content (e.g., watermark, steganographic data, etc.) inserted into the purchased content in a user-specific fashion that can be used to trace the origin of the content. For example, a cryptographic public key portion and data, or other such mechanism, can be embedded into the content without notice of the user; this data will be reproduced as part of the surreptitious content copying, thereby also being present in the media on which the content is copied. This approach provides significant copyright protection and law enforcement capabilities, since it basically acts as a pointer to the individual or account from which the content was obtained.
Lastly, per step 340, the content is transmitted to the requesting purchaser's CPE/CD/client, such as via a session between the content server and the CPE (e.g. VOID) that transmits the content over one or more in-band downstream QAMs. Alternatively, delivery may occur via a broadcast (e.g., BSA) mode, an IPTV (e.g., MPEG over IP) mode, via satellite link, or any other mode having suitable bandwidth and quality of service (QoS).
Delivery may also occur to remote or visited networks; e.g., to client devices that are outside the MSO or “local” delivery network. Co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/440,490 filed May 24, 2006 entitled “Personal Content Server Apparatus and Methods”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,280,982 on Oct. 2, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, discloses exemplary apparatus and methods for delivery of content to remote client devices and networks, although it will be recognized that other apparatus and techniques may be used for this purpose.
In other variants, a user session based on the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) is used for delivery, whether with the same or another bearer medium such as a non-VOD approach, or a WAP Wireless Session Protocol (WSP) session disposed on a handheld device, and so forth. It is noted that in such SIP or WAP variants, the initiating device need not necessarily be the target device (e.g., DSTB) to which the content is streamed. Rather, the SIP or WAP-enabled device can act as a session proxy for the DSTB or other target CPE, such as where the user utilizes their SIP-enabled FDA to communicate with a head-end or other content-providing network entity to establish the download session. The VOD session is selected in the illustrated embodiment, however, since it advantageously comprises an already-installed service base thereby requiring little modification or infrastructure upgrade to implement the capabilities of the present invention.
Accordingly, it will be appreciated that the methodology of
The aforementioned VOD or other session (or user-specific broadcast in the BSA variant) per step 340 may be initiated promptly, e.g., automatically upon authorization of the transaction, or alternatively at another time selected by either the MSO or the user (such as, e.g., at a pre-determined day or date when the content is to be released). Similarly, if the target CPE (e.g., DSTB) has multiple RF tuners and one is available, data/content streaming or download can be initiated immediately, or as soon as a tuner becomes available when all are initially in use. Likewise, if the CPE has a single tuner, the data/content streaming or download is initiated when that single tuner is free.
The foregoing transmission or delivery logic can also be masked with other requirements if desired, such as where both a free tuner and the permitted viewing start time falling within a prescribed temporal window are required (i.e., viewing or access is valid only for a certain “aging” period), or where the user acknowledges a splash screen or comparable mechanism acknowledging the copyright of the content to be viewed (akin to a physical DVD, where the user's DVD player controls are ineffective during the copyright notice portions), and the restrictions on its use. Masking may also be based on network status or bandwidth availability, such as where the session will not be instantiated until sufficient bandwidth is available to provide a sufficiently high assurance of completing the streaming or download. Myriad other functional masks of the type well known in the networking arts may be used as well consistent with the invention.
It will also be recognized that the transmission of the data may also employ such error detection/correction functions, such as where a cable or satellite network uses turbo codes or Viterbi code/decode for FEC of the data streamed over the bearer medium.
P2P—
In another exemplary embodiment, the MSO (or a content provider such as a studio) can distribute content including e.g., films and TV shows over the Internet using peer-to-peer (P2P) technology. In one such variant, a “file swarming” technology of the type known in the art, such as for example that marketed by BitTorrent, Inc., which uses assembles files from separate data downloaded from other computer users or sources accessible via the Internet.
In one business model, purchase or rental of such “swarmed” content can be made available on the same day as the content becomes available on retails DVD, similar to other approaches described elsewhere herein. This purchased content may also be reduced to a tangible medium, such as using the premised recording techniques described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/080,693 previously incorporated herein.
In one exemplary implementation of the aforementioned peer-to-peer approach, the speed of downloading content to a particular subscriber is substantially dependent on how many other individual computers in the network have that content. The more computers, the faster the process. Hence, as more computers on the network (e.g., Internet) are seeded with this content, the faster the process becomes. To this end, the MSO or content source can also intentionally seed certain computers with content, for the sole purpose of accelerating download. These distributed “content nodes” can be physically and/or logically secured if desired, and maintained by the MSO or source, so as to avoid the content being provided from unknown users on the Internet. Specifically, the use of known-good-nodes (KGNs) not only reduces threat of unauthorized content copying and manipulation, but also gives a level of surety to the MSO and source that the content that a subscriber receives that is assembled from components stored at the nodes is not degraded in quality, infected with viruses or other malware, etc.
In another variant, the head-end or hub virtual storage system previously described with respect to
Dynamic Coding and Configuration—
As previously described, one variant of the invention utilizes a reduced number of “generic” copies of the content retained for each user/owner (or shared among multiple users/owners); these generic copies are stored e.g., at the head-end 150, BSA hub, etc., and distributed as requested. The generic content can be stored coded (e.g., MPEG-2 encoded), or alternatively can be dynamically coded (or recoiled) for the codec context which the user request has been issued from. See, e.g., co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/363,577 filed Feb. 27, 2006, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Selecting Digital Coding/Decoding Technology for Programming and Data Delivery”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,916,755 on Mar. 29, 2011, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, for exemplary apparatus and methods by which such dynamic coding may be conducted.
The foregoing dynamic coding approach advantageously allows the subscriber to view the content in two or more formats depending on which device they are using for download/playback. For example, if the user's first request is issued from their DSTB context, an upstream message or other communication can be used to signal the head-end server process that an MPEG-2 decoder is in use on the DSTB, and hence the content should be coded into MPEG-2 (if not already done) before transmission. Alternatively, if the user is requesting download to their laptop computer or PMD e.g., via a WiFi or PAN interface, or via personal video encoder (PVE) such as a Slingbox or personal Content Server, then the server may need to encode the content according to another context (e.g., AVC or Real format) appropriate for those other devices.
The aforementioned signaling may also be manual; e.g., wherein the user checks a box or otherwise states their preference for the content format whether at the time of request or otherwise (e.g., via a “preferences” or setup menu).
This approach provides the user with a capability not present in prior art “tangible” rental or purchase paradigms; i.e., the ability to obtain multiple formats particularly encoded to their current context, the latter which changes as a function of time. Hence, the user need not buy or rent a physical medium having one encoding for one device, and another encoding for a different device; the stored “blank” of the current invention can be dynamically receded any number of times based simply on the user's request (see discussion of
This dynamic configuration approach can also be extended to the conditional access (CA) and network interfaces associated with delivery of the content, such as via the exemplary methods and apparatus of co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/363,578 filed Feb. 27, 2006, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Selecting Digital Access Technology for Programming and Data Delivery”, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,170,065 on May 1, 2012, and Ser. No. 11/364,147 filed Feb. 27, 2006, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Selecting Digital Interface Technology for Programming and Data Delivery”, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,718,100 on May 6, 2014, respectively, each of the foregoing being incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. For example, one user/owner device may have a Powerkey or similar CA capability, while another is enabled for downloadable conditional access (DCAS) within its trusted domain. Accordingly, the head-end server process can configure the CA aspects of the content as appropriate for the relevant CA context, and also trigger other processes (such as DCAS download, key negotiation, etc.) necessary to facilitate the playback of the requested content. In this regard, the server process can be made “self healing”; i.e., where the requesting client domain or device is not properly configured to play back the content, the necessary configuration changes can be instituted automatically to provide a seamless appearance to the user.
Similarly, where the user's network interface requires selection and/or reconfiguration, this can be accomplished as well. For example, if the user requests a content download via an in-band QAM, but all QAMs capable of servicing that user are at or near capacity, the server process may dynamically choose to route the content through a DOCSIS QAM for delivery to the user's cable modem (which can then be routed to the user's output or display device via the converged premises device (CD) described subsequently herein with respect to
Updates and Changes to Content—
In another aspect of the invention, the stored content can be subject to an “auto-update” or other update feature, wherein when such content is re-released (e.g., with director's commentary, as an anniversary edition, colorized, etc.) or remixed, the user can optionally be given the new version automatically (or at least presented with the option of obtaining the newer version). This feature can be offered under any number of different business models including for example being complementary (e.g., included within the purchase price), made as part of a subscription package, included as part of a short-term incentive plan, provided only after payment of an additional fee, and so forth. The user may also be offered the opportunity to keep multiple versions in virtual storage if desired.
To the degree that the differences in the various versions of the content can be cleanly identified and separated, the present invention contemplates saving one copy of the generic content, and then also saving these differences as a separate file or data structure, thereby obviating storing two complete yet slightly different versions of the same content. In one variant, the VCM process evaluates the content upon delivery from the content source (including, e.g., any metadata or other information provided therewith for such purposes) to identify differences between the new version and the existing version. These differences are extracted and saved as a “difference” file, which can then be integrated with the generic content when delivered to a client requesting the newer version. For example, a newer version of a movie that has director commentary or “how it was made” trailers or the like could simply have these additional components added onto the front or back end of the prior version before delivery, thereby presenting a seamless transition to the user.
Privacy Mechanisms and Content Authorities—
So as to maintain anonymity of user purchases (i.e., prevent tying a particular user to particular content purchases and possibly raising privacy issues), another embodiment of the invention uses one or more network variables for associating of the content and the purchaser. See, e.g., co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/186,452 filed Jul. 20, 2005 entitled “Method And Apparatus For Boundary-Based Network Operation”, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, wherein variables such as TUNER ID, TUNER USE, MAC, and so forth are used to anonymously yet specifically correlate activities to a particular CPE or client device. Hence, under such an approach, the purchasing or requesting user's CPE or client device would issue a parameter (e.g., TUNER ID or MAC) that would be maintained at the head-end, hub site, etc. and ultimately coded into the transmitted content in the form of steganographic data. With the proper private key portion, for example, law enforcement could decrypt the embedded data to retrieve the TUNER ID, MAC, etc. of the originating subscriber. This could then be presented to the MSO, who could then, under proper legal controls, identify the identity of the subscriber as warranted. See, e.g., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/440,490 filed May 24, 2006 previously referenced, which describes various approaches for maintaining anonymity of subscribers, as well as for the content association such as for example using an “end-to-end” anonymous association between the subscriber and the content they have purchased, that can be used consistent with the virtual content purchase or selection approach of the present invention.
In another aspect of the invention, a third party content source database or other such data repository is used to determine whether a given subscriber or entity (which may be anonymous by virtue, e.g., identification or association of the subscriber's CPE/CD/PMD with the purchased content instead of their actual physical identity) has purchased particular content. For example, in one variant, the user registers with the content source such as during an on-line Internet purchase via the content source website. This information is maintained by the content source and, through agreement or cooperation between the MSO and the content source, provided to the MSO when the latter receives a “remote” request for content from one of its subscribers. Hence, the content server at the head-end or BSA hub can authenticate the user, and also access the content source database to determine if the content has been previously purchased by that user. A correlation table or similar data structure can be maintained by the content source, MSO, or combination thereof, which correlates the various devices under a subscriber's MSO account or otherwise associated with the subscriber.
In another variant, two or more content sources (e.g., copyright holders) may create an accessible database (“Content Authority” or CA) for content purchases, somewhat akin to the centralized trusted authority (TA) architecture used for authentication and security purchases. The CA can then act as a local- or even national-level clearinghouse for remote content requests from MSO subscribers. This approach provides a substantially centralized point (or points) of access for network operators of varying types and configurations, so that they may process requests for content from “remote” locations or entities in a timely fashion, thereby also potentially relieving the MSO of having to store data and information relating to content purchases or downloads. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/440,490 filed May 24, 2006 referenced above describes exemplary embodiments of such content authorities for use in, inter alia, cable or satellite networks.
Dynamic Database Shaping—
It will be appreciated that the composition of the virtual content database previously described can be varied dynamically or programmatically. For example, the content of the database may be based on user CPE 106 or PMD activity; e.g., such as where for a plurality of subscribers, the VCM/head-end server, BSA server or other management entity can gather information relating to currently active users within that population, and adjust the contents of the virtual storage based on the previous purchases of content by that population.
In one embodiment, “purchase statistics” are maintained for those users using the network (which may also be collected and parsed for users on a given hub or other subset of the network, e.g., service group), and the virtual content database adjusted to best service that population. For example, in one approach, the techniques described in co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/186,452 previously incorporated herein, are used to uniquely but anonymously correlate users and their content based on e.g., TUNERID, MAC, or other such CPE-specific parameter. This approach advantageously maintains user privacy (no specific user is correlated to a specific content title), yet allows for correlation of CPE or client devices with content. When a user's CPE or client device is activated, information uniquely identifying that CPE/device is transmitted to the virtual database manager, which correlates that unique information to one or more items of purchased content.
For example, a subscriber's virtual database record might contain the information shown in Table 1, including the TUNER ID variable for that subscriber's CPE, any corresponding MAC address (for that CPE or client devices associated with that CPE, such as on a home coaxial network), and any content “purchases” to date (here, indicated by an arbitrary 7-digit catalog number or identifier variable named PUR_CONT):
As these TUNER IDs or MAC's are registered on the network, indicating that the associated CPE is in use, the virtual database manager can access the PUR_CONT variable and queue these entries for loading into the virtual database if not already there, based on the expectation that the user may wish to view one or more of their purchased content items (as compared to viewers whose CPE are not presently active on the network).
This feature can also be used in a content-specific manner; e.g., such as where the specific correlation to the content is used as the basis for a statistical or other such analysis. For example, where exemplary content “A” (e.g., Movie A) has been purchased by the greatest number or fraction of the current active population (such activity as determined by TUNER ID, MAC, or some other parameter), and Movie “B” by the next greatest number/fraction, and Movie “C” the next greatest, and so forth, the virtual manager process selectively loads the virtual storage with (or otherwise selectively makes available, such as by selectively encoding, etc.) these movies A, B, C, etc., since those are most likely to be viewed based purely on statistics. This technique is particularly useful when storage space is limited, such as where a plurality of “local” virtual storage nodes (e.g., at each BSA hub site) are used.
Alternatively, the latency or priority in serving requests for A, B, C, etc. can be adjusted in that order; i.e., A being most likely to requested is given highest queuing or “front of the line” privileges. This can be useful where one generic copy of content owned by a plurality of subscribers is requested for delivery; since many owners (statistically speaking) are likely to request the content, it can be pushed higher in the queue for less latency in responding to subscriber delivery requests. The requesting subscriber's status or privileges can also be used as a basis for priority; e.g., those with “premium” feature subscriptions can have their content lists queued ahead of other subscribers, thereby providing premium subscribers with the least latency for their virtual content requests.
The foregoing statistical process can also be modified or qualified using other information available to the MSO, including e.g., anecdotal viewing patterns or history for a particular content selection or subscriber, prevailing geographical, temporal, political, etc. conditions, and so forth. For example, in the context of Movies A, B, C, . . . described above, while Movie A may correlate to the highest number/fraction of purchases by the present on-line subscriber population, Movie B might have only been viewed an aggregate number of times that is much less than that of Movie A. Stated differently, while more people who bought Movie A are currently on-line, those purchasers of Movie B that are now on-line have viewed it very few times to date, and hence are ostensibly more likely to view it in the near term as compared to the owners of Movie A. Or, Movie C may be of particular topical relation to the current date or time of year (e.g., holiday; see discussion of metadata provided elsewhere herein), and hence more likely selected for viewing by its purchaser population than that for Movies A or B. Myriad other schemes for evaluating or estimating purchaser demand for particular content titles, genre, etc. will be recognized by those of ordinary skill given the present disclosure.
Gaming Variants—
As previously noted, gaming content and applications can be “purchased” by the user and owned in a virtual capacity similar to that described for movies, audio, etc. However, in certain cases, it may be desirable to adapt the network architecture to optimize such gaming uses; e.g., to reduce latency and therefore increase user satisfaction.
In one exemplary embodiment of the invention, a distributed application (DA) architecture is used that maintains a portion (“serve”) of the application used to run the gaming content at a distant or remote location; e.g., at the head end 150, and downloads a smaller “client” portion of the application to the user's CPE or client device. The owner can also designate one or more other parties (e.g., within the MSO's network, such as other subscribers) that can access the server portion of the gaming application and also be provided a client portion that is in communication with the server portion (and hence in indirect communication with the other client portion(s)). This way, the garners can conduct multi-user gaming over the net from remote locations, or simply multiple locations within the same premises. With the high bandwidth availability in the upstream (premises-to-network) and downstream (network-to-premises) directions via, e.g., in-band channel or DOCSIS QAM, the communications with the server portion of the gaming application are effectively real time, and allow for substantially latency-free operation. Use of the client portions at the various premises also permits substantially distributed processing; i.e., some tasks that would otherwise have to be communicated upstream and performed at the head-end can be performed locally on a given user's client device (e.g., PMD), thereby eliminating much latency.
In another variant, a substantially “peer-to-peer” model is utilized wherein the client portions of the distributed application (DA) are adapted to communicate at least primarily on a peer-to-peer basis, such as over a local premises or WAN Ethernet (e.g., twisted shielded pair CAT-5), WiFi, PAN (802.15), HomePlug, or premises coaxial cable network, with little or no involvement of the server portion of the DA. This approach has the benefit of, inter alba, increasing possible speed of play and reducing latency, since effectively all processing and communications are conducted locally on the premises (or over a network that is less distant than the cable head-end). This approach can also be extended to multiple participants on a common cable network node (e.g., distribution hub), which also significantly reduces latency as compared to models which are required to communicate with the head-end 150.
In one embodiment, the gaming applications are downloaded to the clients upon each request or authorization by the registered owner, and then used by the clients over the premises network. When the gaming session making use of the application is terminated (or the client device switched off, or goes out-of-network), the client portion of the application can be programmed to uninstall, thereby not monopolizing precious storage space on the “thin” client device(s). However, files relating to e.g., past scores, progression of play, player identities, etc. can be left on the client device(s) so that users can effectively pick up where they left off at the end of the last session, if desired. These “configuration/information” files take up very little space on the client device, yet allow for largely seamless restart of the gaming session once the client portion is again downloaded.
In yet another variant, a local premises device (e.g., DSTB, or converged device (CD) such as that described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/378,129 entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Centralized Content and Data Delivery” filed Mar. 16, 2006, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,347,341 on Jan. 1, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, may be used as a proxy server for the sake of the local client devices.
The foregoing paradigms for gaming, etc. content delivery may also make use of the “trusted domain” concept described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/006,404 filed Dec. 7, 2004, entitled “Technique For Securely Communicating And Storing Programming Material In A Trusted Domain”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,347,341 on Jan. 1, 2013, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, as well as the authorized service domain (ASD) described elsewhere herein.
It will be appreciated that while described in the context of an exemplary gaming application, these aspects of the invention may be extended to literally any functionality or theme that requires some sort of interaction between: (i) the client and a server; or (ii) two or more clients, including without limitation collaborative applications (electronic whiteboards), multi-user financial applications (e.g., family financial tracking programs such as an aggregated tax tracking and return preparation application), intra-family music sharing, etc. Hence, a family's library of DVDs and CD-ROMs for content, games, applications, music, and so forth, might conceivably be replaced with a virtual library, with the aforementioned CD acting as a converged gateway to these services delivered over the MSO network. The MSO might therefore provide significant opportunities for access concentration and aggregation of services; such as where it provides: (i) VOD services (traditional); (ii) broadcast television services (e.g., broadcast-switched); (iii) PPV; (iv) high speed broadband/internet (e.g., DOCSIS); (v) IPTV; (vi) VoIP or other telephony; (vii) home networking (e.g., via local WiFi, Homeplug, CAT-5, coax, or other indigenous network environment), and (viii) “virtual library” for purchased movies, games, music CDs, shared user-generated content, virtual hard drives, etc.
In effect, this model would provide a premises with all of its required data, telecommunication, and content requirements, thereby obviating the need for multiple service providers, bills, and the presence of incompatible equipment, as well as rentals or purchases of DVDs. This advantage is further leveraged through the use of highly standardized and universally compatible technologies such as UpnP and the like, which make for a substantially unified user environment and cross-over between domains (e.g., PMD can talk to CD and PC and DSTB and WiFi and so forth).
Content Trading and Transfer—
In another aspect of the invention, two or more users/purchasers can transfer or “trade” ownership, much as two friends might swap physical DVD's they had each purchased. In one embodiment, the VCM is configured to permit owners of content (i) purchased through the MSO, or (ii) otherwise stored on the database, such as resulting from a sale of the content to the MSO subscriber via a content source (e.g., studio) website or the like, to swap viewing privileges according to one or more criteria such as for a fixed period of time, for a number of viewings, permanently, on certain prescribed dates/times, and so forth. This swapping of viewing privileges can also be made to require two-party authorization (and authentication) such as via a software U/I screen acknowledgement or other affirmative action, so that in fact both parties to the transaction agree.
Accordingly, users/owners of content under the present invention are also optionally afforded another capability not present in rentals or DVD purchase (without significant added effort at least); i.e., the ability to dynamically swap viewing rights to acquired content. It will also be appreciated that an additional fee can be exacted from one or both parties to the swap transaction so as to, inter alia, generate additional revenue for the MSO (there is some threshold or price point for the convenience of being able to electronically share media without physically having to do so), as well as to avoid subrogation of the copyright royalty on the content (i.e., the MSO could pay a portion of the additional fee back to the content source or copyright holder, thereby creating an additional revenue stream for the latter entities, as well as the MSO).
In another embodiment, the users/purchasers of the content can do so for assignment to a third party; e.g., to give as gifts, etc. For example, an MSO subscriber might purchase certain content for unlimited future viewing by another MSO subscriber, with notification and delivery of the “gift” being performed electronically (such as via an on-screen pop-up window, ticker, audible cue, e-mail, Vol? call over the MSO network, or other such user interface mechanism).
Personalization of Content—
In another exemplary embodiment, the present invention provides the user/owner with the capability to personalize their stored version of the content. This can be accomplished in a number of different ways, including without limitation: (i) storing whole or complete customized versions of content for each different user/owner; (ii) storing only the differences from user to user (e.g., in the form of a customizations metadata or similar file) that relate to a “generic” version of the content; or (iii) storing a generic version of the content at the head-end, BSA hub, etc., and then adding the user personalization at their CPE.
Such personalization might include, for example and without limitation, (i) annotating or flagging particular portions of their content for other family members (e.g., “Dad's favorite scene”; “Hey John, check out this car chase . . . ”, “slow part . . . go get the popcorn now” and the like), enterprise users (e.g., “Note the low-pressure sales technique employed by Mr. Smith . . . ”), etc.; (ii) “scene” partitions or breakpoints, such as to permit rapid navigation to portions of the content which are frequently watched or re-watched; (iii) creation of user-customized sequences of “vignettes” (in effect, hitting all those portions of the content which the user feels are important or desirable, thereby summarizing the content within a compressed period of time); or (iv) the addition of subtitled lyrics or tablature so that the user or other family members can sing/play along with musical portions of the content if any. Myriad other types and purposes of personalization will be envisaged by those of ordinary skill when provided the present disclosure.
Accordingly, one embodiment of the invention provides the user with a downloadable software environment for user content editing and annotation which permits the user to make such annotations/personalizations to their content, which are stored in a file that is transmitted up to the head-end, BSA hub site, etc. as appropriate. This file can be thought of as a layer atop the encoded content which functions much like metadata; it instructs the head-end, BSA, etc. server to perform certain additional functions such as skipping to different frame or SI references within the content, inserting overlays or other graphical and/or audible mechanisms (e.g., pop-up windows), etc. when that particular user plays back their purchased content. This user editing environment is particularly well adapted to VOD or “PVR” delivery models, wherein the user can for example pause the content playback; call up the editing environment to add an annotation and “tag” it to that reference point in the content (wherein the editing environment transmits this annotation and reference to the head-end server process via, e.g., OOB message, to be used on subsequent playbacks), and then un-pause the playback and continue watching. Any number of user interface mechanisms well known to those of ordinary skill can be used for enabling the user's entry of annotations, personalizations, etc. including without limitation on-screen displays (OSDs), browsers, interactive remote controls, keyboards, mice, joysticks, touch-screens, speech recognition algorithms, and so forth.
However, even broadcast modes can be annotated or personalized, such as by marking locations within the content during viewing (e.g., using a remote control function that initiates a marking reference function that can store the mark points, such as for example by an SI reference or artifact within the content), and utilize these points later within the aforementioned software environment to add the user's personalizations. A screen capture or “snapshot” function can also be employed, such as where the screen display or contents of VRAM, frame buffer, etc. can be captured at each marking point, and saved along with the markings, so as to refresh the user's recollection when conducting annotation at a later time. These references and capture data can be saved locally (e.g., on the user's CPE or PC), or at the head-end 150 or hub-site server.
Alternatively, the software environment can associate one or more predetermined annotations with certain portions of the content, such as shown in the exemplary scheme of Table 2:
These annotations can be user-designated, set by the MSO, or otherwise as desired. Such annotations can be useful, for example, to warn viewers of impending themes, situations, action, eta. which may be of particular interest, not suitable for children, etc.
These annotations may also be inserted by the content provider, in effect extending the utility of the well known “rating system” used for alerting viewers as to the maturity, sexual content, etc. of the content. Many viewers either tend to ignore these ratings, or at least forget them after the movie has started, in effect forcing them to make an “all or nothing” decision as to whether they or another should watch the movie. Under the present invention, however, the viewers can be pre-alerted during the content playback or streaming itself as to impending points of possible concern. In one embodiment, these annotations or warnings are displayed graphically on the display of the viewer, akin to the network logo markings commonly used in the lower corners of the viewed content display. For example, a small but noticeable flashing “A” might indicate impending adult content, whereas a “V” indicates violence, etc. Myriad other approaches will be recognized by those of ordinary skill given the present disclosure.
Similarly, the present invention contemplates the ability to save or store two or more versions of the purchased content for use by authorized users; e.g., wherein a clean or un-annotated version is stored, as well as other versions, such as for example those annotated or modified by or for different family members, etc.
In this fashion, the present invention advantageously provides a feature which is not available to either renters or purchasers of physical media; i.e., customization of the ancillary features of the content which may make the viewing experience more enjoyable or productive for that particular user or their friends, family, co-workers, etc.
Virtual Audio/Music—
It will also be appreciated that the present invention can be extended to musical content as well as movies, applications, gaming, etc. In somewhat analogous fashion to the well known “iTunes™” service provided by Apple Computer Corporation, the MSO can provide downloads of music files (e.g., MP3s, Windows media, etc.) to its subscribers. However, the exemplary embodiment of the present invention differs in that the storage of the musical content is virtual, whereas the iTunes paradigm generally uses a download-and-store-locally approach. One exemplary application for the present invention therefore is the virtual ownership of CD-ROMs (“music CDs”); similar to the “Music Choice” or “XM Radio” services provided by satellite providers such as DIRECTV™, music can be streamed to the subscriber (or downloaded for an ephemeral playback from local equipment); however, unlike these prior art services, the user can make selections and replay their content, since the programming is not picked for them. Hence, in one variant, the subscriber purchases and maintains a virtual library of musical content on the MSO infrastructure (e.g., virtual content database at the head-end), from which they can selectively choose and tailor according to their desires. For example, one delivery mode might be “random play”, wherein the MSO streams individual songs in a randomized fashion. These randomized selections may be from the subscriber's entire virtual collection, or from subsets thereof (e.g., “random play—Jazz”; “random play—Jazz by David Sanborn”; “random play—Jazz—1950 to 1970”, and so forth).
As can be appreciated, metadata or other such classification mechanisms can be used to assist the virtual database manager at the head end in making such subset selections; e.g., the content source (recording studio) can add the metadata to the content files that identifies the artist, genre, date, etc.). Alternatively, this information can be added by the MSO at ingestion (e.g., via a human or automated process, such as when the content is ingested and groomed for storage within the virtual database). As yet another alternative, the user/purchaser can be given the ability to add metadata annotations or the like via, e.g., the content editing and personalization software environment described previously herein. For example, the user can be presented with an on-screen browser, menu or interface, or use their home PC, PMD, etc., to configure the metadata according to their own personal system. One user might, for instance, designate “favorites” with metadata, and such classification can be used as the basis for inclusion in a subset (i.e., irrespective of genre, date, artist, etc., or alternatively with one or more of these as additional filters or population criteria). These metadata classifications or annotations can be made at the album level, song level, or even intra-song (e.g., such as where the best portions of songs are selected for playback, similar to a medley).
Users of the present invention can also establish “themes” or contexts for their music, such as for example “dinner music”, “Christmas music”, etc., which may also make use of the foregoing subset approach (e.g., “Christmas music—classical—1930 to 1970”).
The virtual music delivery model described herein is also amenable to the various other forms of “ownership” described herein, including without limitation ownership for a prescribed period or during prescribed windows, site licensing, “buddy” sharing, and so forth. For example, many types of music (including so-called “pop”) tends to have a finite lifetime in the minds of its listeners; songs go in and out of style sometimes very rapidly. Hence, one model of music delivery according to the invention allows purchasers to purchase the content for a given length of time (e.g., one year), after which they can no longer access the content without additional payments.
Alternatively, certain types of music may only be useful to a listener at certain periods of the day/week/month/year. For example, a user may purchase rights to listen to Christmas music only during the Christmas holiday season. Myriad other applications of such “partial” or finite ownership will also be recognized by those of ordinary skill.
The foregoing approach of virtual storage of music obviates many disabilities associated with the prior art purchase of physical media, including inter alia, (i) no manufacture, packaging, or shipping costs; (ii) no physical storage space required in the user's premises; (iii) the ability to assign and search metadata associated with a subscriber's library instantaneously (e.g., using a search engine within the user's CPE/CD, PMD, or the head-end); (iv) no possible damage to the physical media (e.g., scratching, melting due to leaving out in the sun, etc.); (iv) no possibility of theft; and (vi) no shuffling or loading of physical media into a CD player or the like.
It will also be recognized that the methodology and apparatus described herein lends itself to certain competitive advantages over the purchase of a DVD or other such tangible media. As is evidenced in the commercial success of on-line download music services (e.g., Apple iTunes™), the rapid “electronic/virtual” procurement model has the potential of substantially displacing the traditional physical medium approach to content purchase. Accordingly, since no physical medium is involved (including the costs associated with the medium itself, delivery, packaging, etc.), cost and delivery time can be reduced, thereby making for a more desirable user experience.
Subscriber Generated Content—
The storage apparatus and methods of the present invention can also be utilized for subscriber-generated content, as well as third party content. For example, a user may upload content (e.g., home movies, personal musical performances, photos, etc.) to the MSO storage facility via any number of different communication channels including for example: (i) via an upstream OOB or DOCSIS communication via the MSO infrastructure and the user's CPE or CD; (ii) via an internet (e.g., the Internet) that is coupled directly to the MSO head-end or hub site (thereby avoiding the “last mile” of the MSO distribution network), such as e.g., via an Internet connection of a third party ISP, or an enterprise WAN; (iii) Telco PSTN or DSL link or other circuit-switched channel to a telecommunications switch that is coupled to an IP/ATM gateway or backbone; or (iv) via an internet connection to a cellular service provider (CSP) or wireless service provider (WSP) or satellite provider (e.g., satellite Internet). See, e.g., co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/258,229 filed Oct. 24, 2005 and entitled “Method and Apparatus For On-Demand Content Transmission and Control Over Networks”, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, that describes exemplary apparatus and methods for the creation, storage, and sharing of such user-generated content. When coupled with the storage and authentication mechanisms described in the present invention, powerful and highly flexible capabilities are provided; e.g., the ability to store and archive user generated content in real time, even using a PMD such as a cellular telephone, that can be selectively and immediately shared by the user with family, friends, etc. The “VOD-like” functions of certain embodiments of the foregoing incorporated application further allow mobile users to have a PVR/VOD-like experience when accessing the content via the mobile device, including the ability to pause, stop, rewind, etc. Hence, there is the ability for such users to instantaneously access archived personal content regardless of their location, and play it back as if on their home equipment (e.g., DVR or DSTB).
Preview Capability—
It will also be appreciated that the streaming or download of content to the user may occur before the content is purchased. For example, in one variant of the invention, the user is provided a “preview” function, wherein the user can view selected portions of the content before purchase. This may provide the basis for, inter alia, a “return” policy of sorts, wherein the user at that stage can cancel the transaction and any billing associated therewith by selecting not to obtain (virtual) ownership of the content. To this end, the MSO or third party source can deliver only a limited portion (e.g., first five minutes) of the selected content, or alternatively a “trailer” or preview short, or even a limited function executable relating to an application, which can be viewed or used an unlimited number of times.
In effect, the downloaded preview content is either kept in a physically and/or electrically secure holding area within the user's trusted domain, or simply restricted in its scope or capabilities, while the user decides whether or not to irrevocably purchase the content.
This functionality can also be achieved by, e.g., encoding or encrypting the downloaded content, such as via a public/private key system, where in the user's CPE is only provided the necessary private key for decryption upon affirmatively selecting “yes” on the purchase decision, such selection also causing the billing module within the head-end or other location to charge the user's account. Another approach may comprise lacing the downloaded content with disruptive noise or similar data such that the picture rendered by playing the content is garbled or effectively unusable, with such data only being removed upon (i) payment by the user, and/or (ii) use of the appropriate cryptographic or authentication data (or even a SIM card or similar device) to “unlock” the decoding algorithm so that removal of the disruptive data is enabled. Myriad other approaches to securing data compatible with the present invention are well known to those of ordinary skill, and hence not described further herein.
Parental or Other Supervisory Controls—
In addition to other aspects described herein, the selection (including preview), purchase and delivery of virtual content can be masked or controlled according to one or more supervisory processes or functions resident on either the network side (e.g., head-end within VCM 214, or at the hub site), or alternatively on the CPE/CD side. For example, one such masking function comprises a parental control, wherein content rated with a certain viewer rating (e.g., “M” for mature only) can be selectively filtered from the purchase option list, and/or filtered before purchase or delivery. These controls may also comprise allowing the purchase and delivery of such content to the premises, yet only within certain domains of the receiving premises (e.g., the parents bedroom), as can be determined through any number of well known mechanisms such as Device ID, MAC address or LAN address on the local premises coax or CAT-5 LAN, etc. As another option, the delivered and controlled content can be encrypted and/or password protected, such that only those with the proper password or encryption key component can unlock or decode the content for viewing.
The foregoing parental or operational controls can also be linked to user personalizations or annotations of the type described previously herein (See, e.g., Table 2). For example, a parent may annotate content such as a movie that is generally acceptable for viewing by their children, yet has some limited undesirable portions. These annotations can be used as cues for masking algorithms (e.g., software running on the VCM or the CPE/CD) to take particular actions with respect to the content, such as without limitation scrambling the signal, shunting delivery of the packets to the CPE/CD for a prescribed period of time, deleting the audio portion, inserting visual screen masks or patterns, disabling the video monitor, Firewire, etc. interfaces to interrupt signal reaching the monitor, etc. For example, in the context of Table 2 above, the “08” (Violence) annotation reference may instigate the aforementioned software process in the VCM 214 or CPE/CD to simply blank out the delivered content for a prescribed period of time. Note that the annotation/personalization scheme previously described can readily be adapted by those of ordinary skill to include specification of one or more related parameters that will allow user control of these actions (e.g., specifying the duration of blanking, percentage or portions of the display image to be masked, etc.). In this fashion, the parent can avoid depriving their child of what would otherwise be a meaningful or useful viewing experience for the sake of a limited amount of undesired content.
The present aspect of the invention can therefore can be thought of as providing “enhanced V-chip” capability; rather than blanking an entire program (e.g., by encoding rated programs' signals on line 21 of the broadcast signal's vertical blanking interval (VBI) using the XDS protocol as in the V-chip), only selective portions of the content are blocked or otherwise obscured from user perception. Furthermore, while the V-chip has been mandated for certain classes of consumer device (e.g., televisions), no such mandate or accommodations within the subscriber's hardware need exist; rather, the exemplary “parental/operational controls” functionality described herein can be effected entirely using indigenous CPE/CD or VCM hardware, and only a software download (e.g., head-end to CPE/CD download and installation of an application).
Virtual Possession—
In another aspect of the invention, the user or subscriber is provided the opportunity to: (1) lease or even own equipment within the network operator's infrastructure or facilities; and/or (ii) extend a virtual control boundary around one or more components or portions of the network operator's equipment or infrastructure. Specifically, it may be desirable under certain circumstances (e.g., for certain business models, in order to address security or legal/copyright issues, etc.) to provide the user with some degree of “ownership” or control of the MSO network facilities, whether on a short-term or long-term basis.
In one variant, the user or subscriber leases or even purchases storage space and/or actual storage and playback devices from the MSO. Such lease or purchase may be for a period of time (or number of uses, etc.), or even permanent if desired. To this end, the MSO or other network operator may utilize a highly modular architecture, such that the operations of the leased space/equipment for respective subscribers are largely or completely separated from one another. The MSO maintains the leased/owned equipment (including physical security thereof), and operates the equipment at the behest of the owner. For example, the MSO would determine the configuration of the device, perform software upgrades, periodic maintenance, control encryption/decryption of the stored content, regulate access thereto, etc.
In another variant, a virtual control boundary is further constructed around the subscriber's leased or purchased equipment, thereby allowing them to be in direct control of all aspects of the operation and access of their equipment. For example, one embodiment employs a software application disposed at the client premises (e.g., on their CPE 106) which communicates with a corresponding application or portion at the MSO node (e.g., head-end 150) that controls the operation of the leased/purchased equipment. In this sense, the MSO's equipment is in a very real sense in the possession and under the control of the subscriber, albeit being physically located at a place remote from the subscriber's premises (e.g., the head-end of the cable network). This can somewhat be analogized to putting one's furniture or personal possessions in storage; the user/subscriber still maintains ownership of the equipment (and any content disposed thereon) at all times, yet the MSO provides a physical location, and physical security, for the owned property.
In another variant, these storage and recording/playback apparatus are disposed at a local hub site or other node even more physically proximate to the user's premises.
It will be appreciated that various business models may also be constructed around such “virtual possession” schemes, including for example where the user or subscriber can themselves specify or configure the equipment that they lease or own, much like one currently configures a PC or laptop from a manufacturer at time of purchase. A user can also be provided with the capability of changing or upgrading their equipment, such as for more storage space, different codecs, network interfaces, conditional access, encryption/authentication schemes, indigenous processing or signal conditioning capability, etc.
Network Server—
Referring now to
The server device 401 of
It can also be appreciated that the methods of the present invention may be practiced using any configuration or combination of hardware, firmware, or software, and may be disposed within one or any number of different physical or logical entities. For example, any required conditioning of the content before delivery (such as the inclusion of annotations or personalization, watermarking or other data, encryption, generation of encryption key pairs and/or challenges, and so forth) may take the form of one or more computer programs running on a single device disposed within the network (e.g., the VOD server module 105), such as at a head-end, node, or hub. Alternatively, such computer programs may have one or more components distributed across various hardware environments at the same or different locations, wherein various of the functions are distributed across the VOD servers 105, content servers 103, application servers 104 and other system components.
As yet another example, portions of the virtual content selection and delivery functionality may be rendered as a dedicated or application specific IC (ASIC) or DSP having code running thereon. For example, a security processor of the type well known in the art can be used to implement encryption algorithms on the downloaded content or upstream communications, and/or to perform key pair generation and the like. Myriad different configurations for practicing the invention will be recognized by those of ordinary skill in the network arts provided the present disclosure.
In one exemplary embodiment, the server device 401 is coupled to a billing or other payment management module and configured so as to only permit initiation of a VOD session or other content delivery mode to start after the target content is purchased by the user; e.g., upon receipt of a “payment accepted” or comparable signal from the billing module. This approach implements the aforementioned coupling between the availability of the “new” content over the network and the purchase decision (i.e., the user can't watch the new content without first purchasing it). The server operation can also be masked or controlled by a “business rules” engine” or other logical wrapper as described subsequently herein.
CPE Architecture and Operation—
The device 106 may also optionally include a recording device (e.g., DVD burner) 512 useful for recording the user's media, as well as (optionally playing it back after recording); see, e.g., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/080,693 filed Mar. 14, 2005, entitled “Method And Apparatus For Network Content Downloading and Recording”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,028,322 on Sep. 27, 2011, previously incorporated herein, which describes exemplary apparatus and methods for downloading and control of content within the user's premises (including recording). However, it will be recognized that the present invention effectively obviates the need for such local recording and storage.
Other components which may be utilized within the device (deleted from
The device 106 of
The processor 504 and internal bus and memory architecture of the CPE 106 of
As part of the application layer of the CPE 106 protocol stack (not shown), various different types of client applications may be running (or operable to run) consistent with the present invention. In one embodiment, a separate (dedicated) client application adapted for content selection, browsing, and download may be used to interface with the lower layers of the stack. This may include, e.g., a separate GUI or other type of UI, and may operate substantially independent of other applications on the CPE 106. Alternatively, the selection and download functionality described herein may be integrated into one or more existing or downloadable applications (such as the aforementioned annotation and personalization software environment, a VOD application, “Watch TV” application, navigator, TV-commerce application, or even EPG). The application (and even session) layer protocols necessary to control the content selection and download functionality may even be disposed on another device (e.g., PDA or cellular smartphone) as previously described in order to instigate the browsing, selection, purchase and download/streaming of content. For example, the user may be able to use a client application (with SIP session layer) on their smartphone to negotiate, via e.g., a dial-in number or Internet URL, the purchase and download/streaming of a movie at a later time via their CPE.
As yet another option, the streaming/download functionality may be completely transparent to the end user, such as where a VOD application running on the CPE 106 (or an associated device) makes data download “calls” as necessary to the other components of the stack in order to (i) initiate a session if not already established, (ii) download the data, including any necessary error correction and/or retransmission, and (iii) manage termination of the session.
As previously noted, the server 401 can be used to restrict session instantiation until one or more preconditions (e.g., payment) are met, but the CPE 106 may also be used to provide all or part of this functionality. For example, the billing module or other entity can send an authorization signal to the CPE 106 directly, and the middleware (or other functionality) of the CPE controls the user's ability to instantiate the download or viewing session, or receive broadcasts. In one variant, the server 401 controls the download (i.e., no download or streaming until payment authorization cycle is complete), yet the ability to view the downloaded or streamed content is delegated to the CPE. In another variant, the server 401 controls and provides the download session to a temporary storage location (e.g., on the CPE or on a device associated therewith, but the viewing of the content remains “locked” (such as based on SI or similar clock reference data) until a prescribed time/date coordinate when the user can view the content. Other schemes for allocating and restricting session instantiation, data streaming or download, and viewing may be used consistent with the invention, as will be recognized by those of ordinary skill given the present disclosure. The CPE middleware and any other relevant components may also be modified in order to provide a “universal” software interface for the content browsing, selection, payment and download/streaming functions, such that application developers can write their applications to make use of this capability. Similarly, the “universal” CPE described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/782,680 filed Feb. 18, 2004, entitled “Media Extension Apparatus And Methods For Use In An Information Network”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,078,669 on Dec. 13, 2011, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, may be used consistent with the present invention in order to allow specific features (including content selection and download) to be configured by a particular MSO or other entity when the CPE is used in their network.
In another embodiment, the client application can function in response to signals or communications provided by a device in communication with the CPE 106. For example, the CPE 106 may comprise a wireless interface (e.g., 802.11 a/b/g/n, Bluetooth, 802.15 PAN, 802.16 WiMAX, 802.20, etc.) such that it can service content selection, payment, and download/streaming requests from client devices of the CPE 106 itself. In one such variant, the client device comprises a PDA, gaming console, or similar handheld device that has a distributed portion of the client application running thereon. This application may be stand-alone or integrated with another application. Hence, users operating the distributed client application on the PDA will utilize their wireless interface to the CPE 106 in order to remotely instigate a content purchase and download from the network via the CPE. The wireless forward channel(s) of the interface (e.g., CPE to PDA) can be used to transmit the content after processing (e.g., decoding) by the CPE, or even stream the “raw” unprocessed content (or even the received and demultiplexed MPEG encoded packets) to the PDA(s) for use thereby.
Myriad other schemes for integrating the content selection, purchase and download/streaming functions within the existing CPE software environment will be recognized by those of ordinary skill in the software arts when provided the present disclosure.
The network or virtual content server can also instantiate a trusted domain within the CPE 106 if one does not already exist. For example, using a downloadable CA (DCAS) approach, the necessary software and firmware if any can be downloaded to the CPE, thereby enabling designation of the CPE as a trusted domain for handling content. Exemplary trusted domain apparatus and methods are described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/006,404 previously incorporated herein by reference, although it will be recognized that other approaches may be used.
In one embodiment, an authorized service domain (ASD) approach is utilized for protecting content delivered to the CPE 106. The exemplary configuration of the ASD comprises a UPnP digital rights management technology that is used by the network operator to protect content using security credentials of a multi-stream cable card or secure microprocessor (e.g., trusted processor) disposed on the CPE 214. An exemplary ASD service (ASDService) defines a service that runs on the virtual content server 202 and is invoked by the CPE (or the manager 214). The ASDService process in defined for exchanging and authenticating security credentials to the CPE (and any connected devices within the CPE domain).
The exemplary ASDService described herein abides by the UPnP AV Architecture for browsing content, setting up connections, transporting content and finally controlling the flow of the content between devices, although this is by no means a requirement for practicing the invention. The ASDService is a precursor to the UPnP general playback process, and is executed before the remote device can browse as ASD content directory (e.g., maintained by the VCM architecture 200) or allow playing.
The exemplary ASD Service also allows an ASD capable rendering device (e.g., CPE or connected devices) to scan the remote or local domain networks for ASD capable “servers”. Once identified, the CPE 106 can request authentication from the ASD capable servers to view the ASD content directory. The CPE 106 or its proxy selects content from the directory and submits its ASD credentials along with the content ID or other data identifying the content of interest in order to gain access from the server. The submission of the security package is required each time a CPE accesses content in order for the server to maintain counters to comply with “copy once” and “copy never” classified content.
The converged premises device can also provide a trusted domain for content or data, as well as allowing a subscriber total mobility in the home or other premises by not limiting content or data to any one viewing/access location. For example, content or data may be accessed on any monitor in the premises, as well as on a PC or personal media device (PMD).
A wired home network utilizing existing coaxial cable in the premises is also created, using e.g., an Ethernet-to-coaxial bridge technology based on the MoCA specification. This allows existing devices and DVRs to connect and share content with the CD, and also allows the network operator (e.g., MSO) to control and manage the premises coaxial network.
The CD is also advantageously accessible via any remote device with internetworking (e.g., Internet) capability, thereby allowing personal content (or virtual content, with the CD acting as a proxy for the virtual content manager/server) to be accessed by the user (or other entities such as the virtual content manager 214) from outside the premises.
Business Methods and Considerations—
Various exemplary business-related aspects of the content purchase and delivery technology previously discussed herein are now described in further detail.
One salient benefit of the present invention is its ability to provide users (e.g., cable system subscribers) with the ability to virtually own and repeatedly receive data, applications and/or media content, as if they actually possessed a tangible medium. This capability also provides the basis for a highly useful business model; i.e., the provision of new content or data at least contemporaneous with that provided by other distribution channels (e.g., DVD rentals or retail sales), with ostensibly a reduced level of effort required by the user.
As previously discussed, cable system and other content network operators have heretofore been at somewhat of a competitive disadvantage due to the latency inherent in the provision of certain data or content (e.g., certain new release movie titles) as compared to these other channels. New release DVDs will typically be available in the rental or retail stores such as Blockbuster® or NetFlix® well in advance of the availability of the same title on a VOD, broadcast, or similar service.
Advantageously, the virtual ownership approach of the present invention removes this latency, and precludes the user from having to go to a specified retail or rental outlet to receive and view the content, since they can now merely purchase it “on line” (e.g., via MSO network, Internet, etc.) and have it delivered at their convenience and as many times as they like, as well as optionally deliver it or record it, such as in a remote trusted domain.
Similarly, the time and effort expended under prior art mail-based approaches (such as Netflix), not to mention the delay associated with receiving the desired content by mail, is obviated under the present invention, since the user is presented with an easily accessed interface (via their television, PC, PDA or the like) by which to order the desired media in one simple transaction, along with the capability to almost instantly view it whenever and as many times as they like.
From the MSO and content source perspective, the foregoing approach also obviates at least some of the physical distribution channels necessitated under the prior art, and also allows for a coupling between the viewing and purchase events, such that retail and rental sales are not diminished by also contemporaneously providing the content for purchase over the cable (or satellite) network. Under one rental/retail approach, the physical media (e.g., DVDs) are recorded, and then physically shipped to the various retail or rental locations, thereby incurring additional cost and delay. In contrast, the purchase and distribution scheme of the present invention effectively eliminates such cost and delay. The capability uses existing delivery infrastructure almost exclusively (with the exception of, e.g., the client portion of the DA which can be downloaded directly to the CPE). Hence, there is very little additional overhead for the service or content provider associated with providing the virtual content purchase capability of the invention.
Another salient benefit of one embodiment of the business model of the invention relates to the user/subscriber never having to return the physical medium to the provider, or store it at their premises. For example, under prior art approaches, a rented DVD must always be returned to the provider, whether by drop-off (Blockbuster®) or mail (Netflix®). In contrast, the exemplary methods of the present invention allow the user to retain ownership of the media content/data/application, thereby making it akin to a purchase.
Furthermore, the session and “user-specific broadcast” based approaches of the exemplary embodiments described above advantageously allow for control of the streaming or broadcast of the content. In this fashion, the content provider for example can (in conjunction with the MSO) determine when the new content should be made available for purchase, and then permit users to access (see exemplary business method flow of
Third party content or data providers such as studios are also afforded yet another distribution channel for their content, thereby achieving further market penetration (especially for that segment which would otherwise buy and watch the content but for having to go through the machinations of either renting or buying it via extant prior art approaches). For example, one variant of the business model comprises providing the studio or other third party provider with a royalty or other compensation based on sale of each virtual copy of the selected content, while the MSO or service provider also obtains a portion of the profit for use of its distribution infrastructure and services. The prices afforded to the user or subscriber may be set above, below, or in parity with those via retail outlets for example.
The on-line purchase and distribution paradigm of the present invention also provides a benefit in terms of its synergy with new subscriptions/users; i.e., by providing subscribers with the ability to purchase and view content that would otherwise have to be procured via one or more additional distribution channels. Hence, not only is the existing subscriber base more completely and effectively served by providing this new capability, but many incipient or possible future subscribers are given an incentive to enter into a subscription, since such subscription obviates their need to go to the rental/retail outlets (and all of the associated effort), wait for their content selections to arrive by mail, or wait for the title to be later released via VOD or similar network channel. Furthermore, the restrictions placed on users of such other channels may be removed if desired, such as where the user can order any number of movies at any given time (instead of the “X-per-month” approach of Netfiix and similar prior art services).
Hence, the present invention also gives content providers access to an otherwise untapped pool of profits and sales, since there is currently a significant number of people who would not rent or purchase any given content unless the cost/effort threshold is reduced. Stated differently, by making purchase and ownership (including obviating storage space, having to purchase/maintain a DVD player, and having to manually insert the DVD into the player) nearly effortless and low enough in cost, more people will view movies or other content more often, thereby increasing the content provider's effective penetration into a given demographic.
Furthermore, as previously discussed, many portions of the HFC network advantageously are physically protected, and additional encryption and security measures are provided all the way to the CPE so as to prevent signal theft and access to sensitive customer data. This added physical and higher layer security provides content developers and providers with additional assurances that their valuable content will be protected, as compared to a completely entrusted network such as the Internet. It will be recognized, however, that with sufficient protection (including for example encryption and the use of trusted domains), even remote distribution over such internets or less inherently secure networks can be used; see, e.g., the remote delivery methods and apparatus described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/440,490 filed May 24, 2006 and entitled “Personal Content Server Apparatus And Methods”, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Also, copying and distribution rules can be enforced via the CPE hardware and software; e.g., precluding copying of a given stream or broadcast, or marking content with digital rights notice or protective measures (such as digital watermarking, encryption key generation, authentication of the viewing device, etc.), as contrasted with Internet-based “ripping” of content via peer-to-peer or similar uncontrollable network models.
It will be appreciated that a “site license” approach can also be used for content (including applications) that are virtually owned by a subscriber or user. For example, one member of a family might purchase the content, and also pay an additional fee to allow unlimited use by that purchaser's family members or friends (who can be designated e.g., at time of purchase, or later). Alternatively, such a site license might comprise the ability to make unlimited use of the content within a given physical premises or network. Myriad different approaches to licensing will be recognized by those of ordinary skill provided the present disclosure.
In another aspect of the invention, arrangements with content producers (e.g., movie studios) may be used in conjunction with the apparatus and methods described herein to allow subscribers or users (whether those of the MSO network, or those of the content source) to “purchase” content via an Internet web portal, telephone service, WAP-enabled mobile device, etc., with the virtual content being provided by the MSO in a fashion similar to that described elsewhere herein. This cooperative arrangement between the MSO and content source ostensibly benefits both parties (and the consumer), since: (1) the MSO will have a wider range of content (and earlier release dates) available to its subscribers, thereby increasing viewer satisfaction; (ii) more MSO subscribers will spend more time on the MSO network; (iii) the content source is provided with an additional delivery channel for its “physical” media (and hence additional revenue opportunities); (iv) consumers will be provided with more channels by which they can obtain the content (instead of merely via the MSO network, users can purchase it via the web, mobile device, etc.); and (v) the cost of the content is reduced as compared to purchase of an actual tangible medium, since there is no packaging, shipping, inventory control, etc. associated with the “virtual” delivery mode.
It will also be appreciated that a common account can be maintained for the MSO subscriber by the MSO and the content source if desired. For example, Warner Bros. Studios might maintain an “online” user account for Subscriber A, which is also correlated or coupled to an MSO (e.g., Time Warner Cable) account for that subscriber (or vice versa), thereby allowing for unified tracking and billing. In this fashion, the MSO subscriber can log onto the Warner Bros. website, purchase content (e.g., in advance of the release date), and have it both available for viewing via the Time Warner Cable infrastructure on that release date, and billed to the subscriber's Time Warner Cable statement directly.
This approach need not be limited to related or affiliated companies such as Warner Bros. and Time Warner Cable (TWC); for example, Fox and Time Warner Cable might just as easily agree to form such a cooperative arrangement so that content purchases made via the Fox website (e.g., the entire first season of “24” on virtual DVD) are linked to the subscribers TWC account, and show up on their TWC monthly statement.
Conversely, all of the foregoing functions can be provided within one entity. For example, the TWC “Roadrunner” high speed Internet website or similar site associated with the MSO could be used as a content portal as well, under agreement from the relevant content source(s).
The ability to purchase the virtual content via the Internet according to the present invention also provides significant additional opportunities for “impulse” purchase by the user. Specifically, if given a modality by which they can rapidly purchase content from any location for later viewing at their premises (or even at that point in time via their mobile device), users might be more likely to purchase more content in any given period of time. For example, a number of co-workers discussing last night's episode of “24” might decide to purchase the DVD during their discussion, but the likelihood of that intent translating into an actual purchase diminishes unless they are presented with an easy way to make the purchase in a timely fashion. Stated simply, the easier it is to make the purchase, the more likely they will be to do so. Hence, where a user can use their mobile device (e.g., WAP-enabled mobile phone or PDA) to make the purchase via an Internet website, they might be much more likely to actually do so as compared to having to go home and make the purchase via their premises cable TV system, since they may forget, change their mind, be persuaded not to make the purchase by another family member, etc. Hence, the present embodiment of the invention provides significant “point of sale” type capability to the MSO and content source.
In another embodiment of the invention, a tiered or graded price structure is used, depending on the features provided to the user/owner. For example, one variant lets the user specify one or terms that can be applied to their ownership, which may be advantageous to them, the MSO, content source (e.g., studio), etc.
For example, one such ownership term comprises one or more specific periods or windows of ownership; the user is therefore limited to access to the content only during certain periods. This approach might be useful, for example, where the user only watches movies on weekends, and hence has no use for the content during weekdays. Similarly, the user may only watch content during the evening period, and hence the daytime ownership could be masked out. Or, the purchased content may only have a limited duration of applicability for the user; e.g., a children's movie that once the children are grown past a certain age, no further viewing would be made. Or the user may only wish to “own” the content for a given duration of time corresponding to an event in their life such as vacation period, etc. (e.g., an instructional title teaching the French language for an impending trip to Paris), after which no further viewing would likely occur.
By mapping these “windows” against the storage device used to store the content, the network operator (e.g., MSO) can vacate storage capacity dynamically; i.e., remove content from a server or switch knowing that there are no users who “own” that content during that period, and hence would request delivery thereof. If a user does request delivery (e.g., new purchase), the content can be rapidly de-archived and loaded for delivery to that user. This information can also be useful for dynamic or advanced bandwidth management purposes; e.g., forecasting network loading, or at least loading of particular assets (e.g., VOD servers) within the network.
In one respect, the foregoing approach of windows or periods of ownership is somewhat analogous to prior art techniques used by electric utilities to manage KW loading during peak demand periods (e.g., hot summer days) by pre-negotiating with customers to forego a portion of their capability, such as air conditioning.
Ownership windows can be non-contiguous, and can be coupled to events (e.g., viewing window “opens” on weekends, holidays, or even when topic or feature of content correlates to some event (e.g., the demand for the movie “War of the Worlds” would very likely spike if/when aliens from outer space visit Earth for the first time). For this last capability, metadata (e.g., XML metadata or the like) can be stored with the content to allow a search and correlation algorithm (described below; part of the exemplary head-end or hub site content storage and delivery manager) to perform analysis of the content loading to anticipate variations in demand. As a simple example, consider the increase in demand among virtual owners of the title “It's a Wonderful Life” during the Christmas Holiday and season; metadata for this title might include the word “Christmas”, by which the aforementioned algorithm would flag this title as having a high likelihood of use during the Christmas season. It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill that the grading or ranking of likelihood of use or other such metrics can be implemented according to a discrete system (e.g., 0 to 10 scale, with “10” being highest likelihood), a generalized information theory (Gil) variable system including e.g., (i) fuzzy logic, (ii) Dempster-Shafer theory; (iii) Bayesian theory; (iv) probability theory; and (v) possibility theory, (e.g., “high”, “medium”, or “low” likelihood; or “possible” or “impossible”), or yet other approach, based on the particular attributes of the application. As another example of anticipatory correlation and loading, metadata for each title stored by the MSO might include a list of the primary actors/actresses, which could then be correlated to current events involving them (e.g., upon his death, numerous stations broadcast “John Wayne film festivals”). Hence, upon such an event, the algorithm could search the metadata of each title for the presence of that individual, and preferentially load the database with titles starring that individual. Multiple layers of this process may also be utilized, such as where after the aforementioned titles starring that individual were located, this population is then evaluated for secondary and even tertiary criteria relating to the event; e.g., if Jimmy Stewart hypothetically had died during the Christmas season, the “It's a Wonderful Lift” title might be in especially high demand as compared to other non-Christmas/holiday Jimmy Stewart films, and hence would be ranked or rated quite highly over the others (starring Jimmy Stewart or otherwise).
In one variant of the invention, users/owners can also be provided ownership on a number-of-uses basis; e.g., the user purchases “credits” for say five (5) viewings that can be used at any time. This information may be statistically useful for the MSO, since while they do not know the precise timing of when a given user's “n” viewings will occur, they can apply statistical or historical (anecdotal) data to help manage content database loading and bandwidth allocation within the network. For example, it may be known that about ninety percent (90%) of all such exemplary “number-of-uses” purchasers use all “n” of their viewings within one year of their purchase date. Hence, the MSO can track such purchases as a function of time, and develop projections on the demand for certain titles as a function of time, which can then be used to manage the database contents.
Another consideration with the foregoing electronic/virtual delivery paradigm of the invention relates to the possibility of losing the purchased content due to, e.g., electronic failure, electromagnetic pulse or exposure to a strong magnetic field, loss of or damage to the device on which the content is stored, etc. Feasibly, and depending on the type of storage device used, the content which the user has purchased may be partially or completely lost through such occurrences. Possession of a physical copy (e.g., DVD), on the other hand, makes a user feel more secure that they will always have a “back up copy”. Accordingly, while not providing a physical medium, the methods and apparatus of the present invention effectively provide back-up or archive functions for content that user's have purchased. In this fashion, a user who downloads the content onto their DSTB or PMD has no worries about losing the ephemeral rendering of the content (e.g., the download), since they can always obtain a replacement copy from the MSO or other such source, upon showing proof of prior purchase. This feature can be used as the basis of a business model or “premium feature” as well; i.e., guaranteed never to be lost or degraded.
Operational/Business Rules Engine—
In another aspect of the invention, the aforementioned selection, purchase, virtual storage and delivery functions are rendered as one or more computer programs running at, e.g., the content server 202, VOD server 105, Session Resource Manager (SRM) or BSA manager, and further include a so-called “business rules” engine. This engine comprises, in an exemplary embodiment, a series of software routines adapted to control the operation of the purchase, storage and delivery algorithms previously described. In effect, the business rules engine comprises a wrapper or controller entity which monitors the VCM operations (e.g., OD session or BSA switching requests received by the server 105 or manager 198) and dynamically (or manually) controls the operation of the server and, where required, the CPE 106, CD or other data recipient in order to implement a prescribed set of business rules. In the exemplary embodiment, this rules engine is integrated within the VCM architecture 200, such as within the VCM server portion 214, although this is by no means a requirement.
For example, one business rule may state that no VOD or other content streaming session may be instantiated until a payment authorization/confirmation is received. Another business rule may comprise the policy that data download bandwidth are weighted or skewed based on profitability or similar considerations, allocating available bandwidth preferentially to higher-profit delivery channels or subscribers, or even service level (e.g., HO versus SD).
As another exemplary business rule, delivery requests from those subscribers having a content “purchase” and storage subscription (as compared to a standard service subscription) are serviced first. Hence, all users submitting delivery requests are processed in real time, yet the purchase-subscribed users are given priority for delivery, and hence shorter perceived latency from request to commencement of streaming/broadcast.
Other types of business or operational rules can be applied as well. For example, it may be desirable to alter the availability window for delivery into certain time slots, such that traditional VOD, BSA or other network functions are not adversely impacted (e.g., the user's PVR commands are not slowed during prime time viewing due to too many virtual content deliveries being requested within a given service area). As previously discussed, the availability of the delivery can also be restricted so as to be contemporaneous with, or bear some other temporal relationship to, the release of the same content via other distribution channels.
Alternatively, business rules may be applied across other demographics and parameters such as geography and service group.
Literally any of the selection, purchase, or delivery constraints previously described herein can also be implemented via the rules engine, such as for example enforcing virtual “ownership” only during prescribed windows.
It will be recognized that while certain aspects of the invention are described in terms of a specific sequence of steps of a method, these descriptions are only illustrative of the broader methods of the invention, and may be modified as required by the particular application. Certain steps may be rendered unnecessary or optional under certain circumstances. Additionally, certain steps or functionality may be added to the disclosed embodiments, or the order of performance of two or more steps permuted. All such variations are considered to be encompassed within the invention disclosed and claimed herein.
While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointed out novel features of the invention as applied to various embodiments, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the device or process illustrated may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. The foregoing description is of the best mode presently contemplated of carrying out the invention. This description is in no way meant to be limiting, but rather should be taken as illustrative of the general principles of the invention. The scope of the invention should be determined with reference to the claims.
This application is a divisional of and claims priority to co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/773,477 filed Feb. 21, 2013 of the same title, issuing on Nov. 13, 2018 as U.S. Pat. No. 10,129,576, which is a continuation of and claims priority to co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/400,524 filed Feb. 20, 2012 of the same title, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,021,535 on Apr. 28, 2015, which is a continuation of and claims priority to co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/764,761 filed Apr. 21, 2010 of the same title, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,122,479 on Feb. 21, 2012, which is a continuation of and claims priority to co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/811,953 filed Jun. 11, 2007 of the same title, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,024,762 on Sep. 20, 2011, which claims priority to co-owned U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/813,479 filed Jun. 13, 2006 also of the same title, each of the foregoing incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3388376 | Magee | Jun 1968 | A |
| 4355415 | George et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4384610 | Cook et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4534056 | Feilchenfeld et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4546382 | McKenna et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4577177 | Marubashi | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4602279 | Freeman | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4694490 | Harvey et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4696578 | Mansuria et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4708224 | Schrooder | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4749062 | Tsuji et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4902732 | Itoh et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4905080 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4908707 | Kinghorn | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4930120 | Baxter et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4930158 | Vogel | May 1990 | A |
| 4959720 | Duffield et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4975909 | Masson et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4977455 | Young | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4979593 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4995479 | Fujiwara et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5042620 | Yoneda et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5047867 | Strubbe et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5056629 | Tsuji et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5086450 | Kitagawa et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5155591 | Wachob | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5159163 | Bahjat et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5172413 | Bradley et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5200583 | Kupersmith et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5200822 | Bronfin et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5253066 | Vogel et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5255341 | Nakajima | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5285272 | Bradley et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5287266 | Malec et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5290710 | Haj-Ali-Ahmadi et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5295064 | Malec et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5335277 | Harvey et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5357276 | Banker et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5371532 | Gelman et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5371551 | Logan et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5373315 | Dufresne et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5394182 | Klappert et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5412720 | Hoarty | May 1995 | A |
| 5414455 | Hooper et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5442389 | Blahut et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5461415 | Wolf et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5463209 | Figh et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5479266 | Young et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5479268 | Young et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5481294 | Thomas et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5485897 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5497185 | Dufresne et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5512934 | Kochanski | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5515510 | Kikinis | May 1996 | A |
| 5517257 | Dunn et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5524195 | Clanton, III et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5528282 | Voeten et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5528284 | Iwami et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5534911 | Levitan | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5535206 | Bestler et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541738 | Mankovitz | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5551532 | Kupersmith | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5583561 | Baker et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5583563 | Wanderscheid et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5585838 | Lawler et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5589892 | Knee et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5592551 | Lett et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5600364 | Hendricks et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5606154 | Doigan et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5610653 | Abecassis | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5619247 | Russo | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5619249 | Billock et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625405 | Dulac et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5652615 | Bryant et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5657072 | Aristides et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5659350 | Hendricks et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5671225 | Hooper et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5675647 | Garneau et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5682597 | Ganek et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5684714 | Yogeshwar et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5684963 | Clement | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5689094 | Friedli et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5701383 | Russo et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5708961 | Hylton et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5710970 | Walters et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5721878 | Ottesen et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5724646 | Ganek et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5729280 | Inoue et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5729648 | Boyce et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5748254 | Harrison et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5749443 | Romao | May 1998 | A |
| 5751282 | Girard et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5758257 | Herz et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5761607 | Gudesen | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5771354 | Crawford | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5771435 | Brown | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774170 | Hite et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5778181 | Hidary et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5778187 | Monteiro et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5781228 | Sposato | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5793409 | Tetsumura | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5793971 | Fujita et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5794217 | Allen | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5805154 | Brown | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5805155 | Allibhoy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5805763 | Lawler et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5805804 | Laursen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5808608 | Young et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5809204 | Young et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5812642 | Leroy | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5815146 | Youden et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5815148 | Tanaka | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5818438 | Howe et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5818440 | Allibhoy et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5818510 | Cobbley et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5819034 | Joseph et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5822530 | Brown | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5826168 | Inoue et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5832231 | Raman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5835125 | Bhagavath | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5841468 | Wright | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5844181 | Amo et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5844897 | Asamizuya | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5847703 | Teicher et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850218 | LaJoie et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5861881 | Freeman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5864176 | Babock et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5887139 | Madison, Jr. et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5887243 | Harvey et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5892535 | Allen et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5892900 | Ginter | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5892915 | Duso et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5896454 | Cookson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5897635 | Torres et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5909638 | Allen | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5914945 | Abu-Amara et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917538 | Asamizuya | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5918222 | Fukui et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5918665 | Babcock et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930473 | Teng et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930893 | Eaton | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5932853 | Friedli et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940370 | Curtis et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5955710 | DiFranza | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956716 | Kenner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960411 | Hartman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5970206 | Yuen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974299 | Massetti | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5979757 | Tracy et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5984051 | Morgan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991308 | Fuhrmann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995708 | Corey | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6002393 | Hite et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005603 | Flavin | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005643 | Morimoto et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6006265 | Rangan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009098 | Asamizuya | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6011839 | Friedli et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016509 | Dedrick | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6018509 | Itoh et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6029045 | Picco et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6047327 | Tso et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6052145 | Macrae et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6057832 | Lev et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6058380 | Anderson et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6069023 | Bernier et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6073160 | Grantham et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6073727 | DiFranza et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078928 | Schnase et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6081830 | Schindler | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6082500 | Amo et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6088722 | Herz et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6091883 | Artigalas et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6092197 | Coueignoux | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6097431 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112192 | Capek | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6122647 | Horowitz et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6134532 | Lazarus et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6137793 | Gorman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6144401 | Casement et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6160989 | Hendricks et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6161142 | Wolfe et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167188 | Young et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167432 | Jiang | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6169570 | Suzuki | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6177931 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6181697 | Nurenberg et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6182050 | Ballard | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6202008 | Beckert et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6202210 | Ludtke | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6202799 | Drop | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6206142 | Meacham | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6208335 | Gordon et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6216129 | Eldering | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6219710 | Gray et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6223160 | Kostka et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6233389 | Barton et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236968 | Kanevsky et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6240401 | Oren et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6259701 | Shur et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6286041 | Collins, III et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6292624 | Saib et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6321257 | Kotola et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324338 | Wood et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327418 | Barton | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6341668 | Fayette et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6343313 | Salesky et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6343647 | Kim et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
| 6349797 | Newville et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6369840 | Barnett et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6378035 | Parry et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6378129 | Zetts | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6397976 | Hale et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6421305 | Gioscia et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6434562 | Pennywitt et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6446261 | Rosser | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| RE37881 | Haines | Oct 2002 | E |
| 6460036 | Herz | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6463585 | Hendricks et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6466232 | Newell et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6467089 | Aust et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6470378 | Tracton et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6504571 | Narayanaswami et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6519062 | Yoo | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6523696 | Saito et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6549718 | Grooters et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553178 | Abecassis | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6560203 | Beser et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6560578 | Eldering | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6567980 | Jain | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6571279 | Herz et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6574617 | Immerman et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6578054 | Hopmann | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6587835 | Treyz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6588015 | Eyer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6591420 | McPherson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6598228 | Hejna et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6604138 | Virine et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6611654 | Shteyn | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6615039 | Eldering | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6615175 | Gazdzinski | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6615251 | Klug et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6622305 | Willard | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6640145 | Hoffberg et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6647548 | Lu et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6651045 | Macaulay | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6671736 | Virine et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6671879 | Schlarb et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6681393 | Bauminger et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6687735 | Logston et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6694145 | Riikonen et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6704930 | Eldering et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6718551 | Swix et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6738978 | Hendricks et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6741980 | Langseth et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6757796 | Hofmann | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6760918 | Rodriguez et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6769127 | Bonomi et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6771290 | Hoyle | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6772434 | Godwin | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6774926 | Ellis | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6775778 | Laczko, Sr. et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6782550 | Cao | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6785704 | McCanne | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6788676 | Partanen et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6792577 | Kimoto | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6801792 | Schuster et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6802077 | Schlarb | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6810528 | Chatani | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6813776 | Chernock et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6817028 | Jerding et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6826267 | Daum et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6832259 | Hymel et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6851063 | Boyle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6853731 | Boyle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6857132 | Rakib et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6859845 | Mate | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6898762 | Ellis et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6909726 | Sheeran | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6909837 | Unger | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6910064 | Astarabadi et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6914446 | Tustaniwskyj et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6915528 | McKenna, Jr. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6925257 | Yoo | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6934880 | Hofner | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6944150 | McConnell et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6959288 | Medina et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6975850 | Hurtta et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6978370 | Kocher | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6990312 | Gioscia et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6990680 | Wugofski | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 7004243 | Babcock et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7006881 | Hoffberg et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7009972 | Maher et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7016376 | Goldenberg et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7017179 | Asamoto et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7020892 | Levesque et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7024466 | Russell et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7024678 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7025209 | Hawkins | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7027460 | Iyer et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7028009 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7028329 | Mizutani | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7039048 | Monta et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7039928 | Kamada et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7054843 | Charas | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7054902 | Toporek et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7058685 | Van et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7058810 | Kumazawa et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7068639 | Varma et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7069577 | Geile et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7073189 | McElhatten et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7073193 | Marsh | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7075945 | Arsenault et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7080397 | Cochran et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7080400 | Navar | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7099308 | Merrill et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7100183 | Kunkel et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7103905 | Novak | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7103906 | Katz et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7106382 | Shiotsu | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7109848 | Schybergson | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7124195 | Roach et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7136573 | Kikuchi et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7136853 | Kohda et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7137728 | Witham et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7143431 | Eager et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7146627 | Ismail et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7146630 | Dravida et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7149772 | Kalavade | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7152237 | Flickinger et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7155226 | Oh et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7155508 | Sankuratripati et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7159235 | Son et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171485 | Roach et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7174126 | McElhatten et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7174127 | Otten et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7174385 | Li | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7184526 | Cook | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7191244 | Jennings et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7194001 | Leatherbury et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7194009 | Eng | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197472 | Conkwright et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7203185 | Dhara et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7203311 | Kahn et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7209458 | Ahvonen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7209892 | Galuten et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7212543 | Arwald et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7213742 | Birch et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7216170 | Ludvig et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7222078 | Abelow | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7222163 | Girouard et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7228359 | Monteiro | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7228555 | Schlack | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7231669 | Leung et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7233948 | Shamoon et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7237017 | Pecus et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7237250 | Kanojia et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7240196 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7242960 | Van Rooyen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7246150 | Donoho et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7246172 | Yoshiba et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7254608 | Yeager et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7257308 | Plourde et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7260564 | Lynn et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7263187 | Pedlow et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7263188 | Kohno | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7266198 | Medvinsky | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7266832 | Miller | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7266836 | Anttila et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7269854 | Simmons et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7280737 | Smith | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7281261 | Jaff et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7301944 | Redmond | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7305357 | Hamilton | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7305691 | Cristofalo | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7315886 | Meenan et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7317728 | Acharya et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7320134 | Tomsen et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7321923 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7325073 | Shao et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7327692 | Ain et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7330483 | Peters, Jr. et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7330875 | Parasnis et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7337147 | Chen et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7337459 | Tsutsui et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7340510 | Liskov et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7340760 | Wachtfogel et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7346558 | Rosenberg | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7346630 | Eichstaedt et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7352775 | Powell | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7355980 | Bauer et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7356751 | Levitan | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7360233 | Russ et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7363371 | Kirby et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7363643 | Drake et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7367043 | Dudkiewicz et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7369750 | Cheng et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7373594 | Lopez et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7376386 | Phillips et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7383228 | Lisanke et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7386621 | Hlasny | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7406099 | Schlagintweit | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7438233 | Leiper | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7441037 | Saxena | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7486869 | Alexander et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7496647 | Karaoguz et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7512638 | Jhaveri | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7533376 | Anwar et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7558837 | Denny | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7565672 | Yun | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7567262 | Clemens et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7567988 | Wolf et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7577118 | Haumonte et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7602820 | Helms et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7603321 | Gurvey | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7603529 | Machardy et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
| 7627492 | Nishizawa et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7634546 | Strickholm et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7636792 | Ho | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7640581 | Brenton et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7647618 | Hunter et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
| 7653689 | Champagne et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
| 7673004 | Sherstinsky et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7693171 | Gould | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7707644 | Choi et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7711605 | Santeufemia et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
| 7712125 | Herigstad et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7720432 | Colby et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
| 7721314 | Sincaglia et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7730509 | Boulet et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7742074 | Minatogawa | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7769629 | Kriza et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7787416 | Gidwani | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7793334 | Lewis | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7805515 | Riley | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7809942 | Baran et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7814119 | Sato | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7843876 | Holt et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7849491 | Perlman | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7878908 | Sloate et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7900229 | Dureau | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7908626 | Williamson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7984473 | Casile et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7986686 | Nadeau et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8006262 | Rodriguez et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8006273 | Rodriguez | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8015583 | Bates et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8024762 | Britt | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8028322 | Riedl et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8042131 | Flickinger | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8055585 | Wu | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8065703 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8127331 | Heilbron et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8150757 | Sieffert et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8181206 | Hasek | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8205226 | Ko et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8250034 | Manousos | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8272020 | Watson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8280982 | La et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8291101 | Yan | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8396055 | Patel et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8424048 | Lyren et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8438243 | Lajoie et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8527602 | Rasmussen et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
| 8561113 | Cansler et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8583758 | Casey et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8584182 | Berberet et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8848969 | Ramsdell et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 9215423 | Kimble et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9317241 | Tranchina | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9325710 | Lajoie et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9578288 | Chen et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9832246 | Lajoie et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 20010001160 | Shoff et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
| 20010003194 | Shimura et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20010004768 | Hodge et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20010013123 | Freeman et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010013173 | Mertens et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010030975 | Limb et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010037223 | Beery et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049705 | Murase et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010054181 | Corvin | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020003789 | Kim et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020004870 | Kobayashi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020013940 | Tsukamoto et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020019984 | Rakib | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020026496 | Boyer et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020027883 | Belaiche | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032754 | Logston et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020038296 | Margolus et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042921 | Ellis | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046286 | Caldwell et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046406 | Chelehmal et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046407 | Franco | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049800 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049902 | Rhodes | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020054754 | Kikuchi et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020056118 | Hunter et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020056125 | Hodge et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020056175 | Magarino et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059619 | Lebar | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059621 | Thomas et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059635 | Hoang | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020066033 | Dobbins et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069404 | Copeman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020073327 | Vellandi | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020073419 | Yen et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077984 | Ireton | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020078176 | Nomura et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020078444 | Krewin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082858 | Heddaya et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020083456 | Bates et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020085516 | Bridgelall | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087661 | Matichuk et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087976 | Kaplan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099642 | Schwankl et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020100055 | Zeidman | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020104019 | Chatani et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020104083 | Hendricks et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020104099 | Novak | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020112186 | Ford et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020112240 | Bacso et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120498 | Gordon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020123928 | Eldering et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020124182 | Bacso et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138854 | Desai et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143565 | Headings et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020144262 | Plotnick et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020144263 | Eldering et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147771 | Traversat et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147984 | Tomsen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151271 | Tatsuji et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152299 | Traversat et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152318 | Menon | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152458 | Eyer et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161835 | Ball et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020166121 | Rovira | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169961 | Giles et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174430 | Ellis et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020178445 | Eldering et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020178447 | Plotnick et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184629 | Sie et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184634 | Cooper | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184635 | Istvan | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188689 | Michael | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188744 | Mani | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188869 | Patrick | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020191950 | Wang | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194498 | Blight et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020196940 | Isaacson et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030004810 | Eldering | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030005447 | Rodriguez | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030005453 | Rodriguez et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030018977 | McKenna | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030022990 | Hirota et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023690 | Lohtia | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028893 | H. Addington et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030030751 | Lupulescu et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030033199 | Coleman | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030037330 | Makofka | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030037335 | Gatto et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030037338 | Suzuki | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046689 | Gaos | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030049021 | Kamieniecki | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030053476 | Sorenson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030056217 | Brooks | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030058887 | Dworkin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030070052 | Lai | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030074661 | Krapf et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093311 | Knowlson | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093515 | Kauffman | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093784 | Dimitrova et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093790 | Logan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093792 | Labeeb et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093806 | Dureau et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097574 | Upton | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030101449 | Bentolila et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030101451 | Bentolila et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030101454 | Ozer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110499 | Knudson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110503 | Perkes | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115267 | Hinton et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115601 | Palazzo et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030130008 | Rajaniemi et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135513 | Quinn et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030143984 | Umeda | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030145323 | Hendricks et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149581 | Chaudhri et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149884 | Hernandez et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149975 | Eldering et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149988 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149993 | Son et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030151621 | McEvilly et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030163832 | Tsuria et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030165241 | Fransdonk | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030166401 | Combes et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030177490 | Hoshino et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182551 | Frantz et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030188023 | Grecco et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208768 | Urdang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030217137 | Roese et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030217365 | Caputo | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030223450 | Bender et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030225777 | Marsh | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030226150 | Berberet et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229898 | Babu et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229900 | Reisman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030231661 | Depietro et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236839 | Demsky et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030237090 | Boston et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040006694 | Heelan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040015608 | Ellis et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040015989 | Kaizu et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040025181 | Addington et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040025190 | McCalla et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040034873 | Zenoni | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040034877 | Nogues | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039911 | Oka et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040045032 | Cummings et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040045035 | Cummings et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040045037 | Cummings et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040047599 | Grzeczkowski | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049694 | Candelore | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040060076 | Song | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040078371 | Worrall et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040078809 | Drazin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093394 | Weber et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103120 | Fickle et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103429 | Carlucci et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103479 | Mossbeck et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040104842 | Drury et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040113936 | Dempski | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040114539 | Beshai et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117817 | Kwon et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117846 | Karaoguz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040123125 | Zuili | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133467 | Siler | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133923 | Watson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137918 | Varonen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040148625 | Eldering et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153525 | Borella | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162900 | Bucher et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040163111 | Palazzo et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040163129 | Chapman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172531 | Little et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040177383 | Martinolich et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181811 | Rakib | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040184432 | Gateva et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040185856 | McKenna et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193712 | Benenati et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040198386 | Dupray | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040221305 | Broussard et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040246933 | Valko et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040250273 | Swix et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040255139 | Giobbi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040255335 | Fickle et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040261099 | Durden et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040264511 | Futch et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040264551 | Eidson | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040266336 | Patsiokas et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040268386 | Logan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050021940 | Ma | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050022237 | Nomura | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050022242 | Rosetti et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050022247 | Bitran et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027696 | Swaminathan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050028208 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050034171 | Benya | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050034173 | Hatanaka | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038904 | Dougall | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050039205 | Riedl | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049886 | Grannan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055220 | Lee et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060742 | Riedl et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060745 | Riedl et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050071882 | Rodriguez et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080330 | Masuzawa et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086683 | Meyerson | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086691 | Dudkiewicz et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050091539 | Wang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050091681 | Borden et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097006 | Nyako | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102529 | Buddhikot et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108529 | Juneau | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108763 | Baran et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050111467 | Ng et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114900 | Ladd et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050132191 | Joshi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050138357 | Swenson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144333 | Kotzin | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144635 | Boortz et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050153778 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050166224 | Ficco | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177855 | Maynard et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050179938 | Kayashima et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050183120 | Jain et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050204019 | Flynn et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050210502 | Flickinger et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216942 | Barton | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050223032 | Shan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050223409 | Rautila et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050229209 | Hildebolt et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050229213 | Ellis et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050233776 | Allen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050235318 | Grauch et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239402 | Gioscia et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251454 | Wood | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050261970 | Vucina et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262418 | Gehrmann | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262542 | Deweese et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267787 | Rose et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273819 | Knudson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273828 | Barton | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278741 | Robarts et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278760 | Dewar et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289588 | Kinnear | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289618 | Hardin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060010226 | Hurtta et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060013557 | Poslinski | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015502 | Szucs | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015580 | Gabriel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015637 | Chung | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015925 | Logan | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060019702 | Anttila et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060020786 | Helms et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060021004 | Moran et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060021019 | Hinton et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060031558 | Ortega et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060031883 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060031892 | Cohen | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036750 | Ladd et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041910 | Hatanaka et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047603 | Fontijn | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047745 | Knowles et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047801 | Haag et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047957 | Helms et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053473 | Vau et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060075230 | Baird, III | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060080408 | Istvan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060088063 | Hartung et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060089911 | Dandekar et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095940 | Yearwood | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060107302 | Zdepski | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060116966 | Pedersen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060117341 | Park | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060117365 | Ueda et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060117366 | Fries | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060123147 | Yasuhara | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060130099 | Rooyen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060130107 | Gonder et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060130113 | Carlucci et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060130120 | Brandyberry et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136964 | Diez et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060137015 | Fahrny et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149850 | Bowman | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060153017 | Kim | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060159048 | Han et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161635 | Lamkin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060163340 | Leiper | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167808 | Greene et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060168119 | Inoue et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060168219 | Ahluwalia et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060168616 | Candelore | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060171390 | La | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173787 | Weber et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173974 | Tang | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060176884 | Fair et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060185004 | Song et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187900 | Akbar | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190336 | Pisaris-Henderson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195553 | Nakamura | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200559 | Ling et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200761 | Judd et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200865 | Leake et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206565 | Ganesan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206712 | Dillaway et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209799 | Gallagher et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212400 | Kamperman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212435 | Williams et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060218604 | Riedl et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060222321 | Russ | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242267 | Grossman | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248209 | Chiu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248355 | Thayer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248553 | Mikkelson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248555 | Eldering | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060253328 | Kohli et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060253545 | Lakamp | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060253584 | Dixon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060253864 | Easty | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060253894 | Bookman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256814 | Caci | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259924 | Boortz et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259927 | Acharya et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060272032 | Jogand-Coulomb et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277569 | Smith | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277576 | Acharya et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282319 | Maggio | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060291506 | Cain | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060291507 | Sarosi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060293954 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060294259 | Matefi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060294371 | Fanning | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070005795 | Gonzalez | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070011335 | Burns et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070019645 | Menon | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070022032 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070022459 | Gaebel et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070022469 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070027809 | Alve | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070033531 | Marsh | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038931 | Allaire et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070049245 | Lipman | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061331 | Ramer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061336 | Ramer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070067851 | Fernando et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070076728 | Rieger et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070077921 | Hayashi et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078714 | Ott et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083899 | Compton et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070086372 | Lee et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070088801 | Levkovitz et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070088832 | Tsang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070089127 | Flickinger et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094691 | Gazdzinski | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070101359 | Schiller et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070106814 | Son et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070107035 | Howe et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112685 | Yamamichi | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070113243 | Brey | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070115389 | Mccarthy et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070115922 | Schneider et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118857 | Chen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070121612 | Nadeau et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070121678 | Brooks et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070123253 | Simongini et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124416 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124488 | Baum et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124781 | Casey | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070129987 | Hauser et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070136743 | Hasek et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070136777 | Hasek | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150919 | Morishita et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070157249 | Cordray et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070157260 | Walker | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162958 | Kao et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070166687 | Bell et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070168429 | Apfel et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070171274 | Yim | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070186103 | Randle et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070204300 | Markley et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070204310 | Hua et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070204311 | Hasek et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070204314 | Hasek et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209054 | Cassanova | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209059 | Moore et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070217436 | Markley | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070219910 | Martinez | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220158 | Tolgu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220573 | Chiussi et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220605 | Chien | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233857 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070237330 | Srivastava | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070244760 | Bodnar et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070247395 | Barraclough | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250880 | Hainline | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070260604 | Haeuser et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070261116 | Prafullchandra et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265978 | Kahn et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070271388 | Bowra et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276864 | Espelien | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276925 | La et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276926 | LaJoie | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070279625 | Rzasa et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070280110 | Murphy et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070294178 | Pinder et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070294720 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080009268 | Ramer et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080040758 | Beetcher et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080052157 | Kadambi et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059409 | Montpetit | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080072249 | Hovnanian et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080090513 | Collins et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080098212 | Helms et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080098422 | Rodriguez et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103977 | Khosravy et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080115161 | Kurzion | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080115169 | Ellis et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080139193 | Hao et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147497 | Tischer | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080155589 | McKinnon et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080155600 | Klappert et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080155607 | Klappert | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080155616 | Logan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080162623 | Flynn et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080163305 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080171423 | Ieong et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080192820 | Brooks et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080195871 | Peinado et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080196056 | Bassett et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080209464 | Wright-Riley | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080216106 | Maxwell | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080221986 | Soicher et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080229354 | Morris et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080263578 | Bayer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080271068 | Ou et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080273591 | Brooks et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080282299 | Koat et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080289009 | Lee et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080313671 | Batrouny et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080313691 | Cholas et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090019134 | Bellifemine et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090019492 | Grasset | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090030802 | Plotnick et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090034521 | Kato | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090094652 | Al Adham et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090098861 | Kalliola et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090100459 | Riedl et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132346 | Duggal et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090138922 | Thomas et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090187939 | Lajoie | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090198794 | Beals | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090210899 | Lawrence-Apfelbaum et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235319 | Mao et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090248794 | Helms et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090249473 | Cohn | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090282241 | Prafullchandra et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090317065 | Fyock et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319379 | Joao | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090320059 | Bolyukh | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100042478 | Reisman | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100083362 | Francisco et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100107194 | Mckissick et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100146539 | Hicks, III et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100175584 | Kusaka et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100251304 | Donoghue et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100251312 | Albano et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100287584 | Starikov et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306369 | Riley | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110015989 | Tidwell et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110016479 | Tidwell et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110016482 | Tidwell et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110040755 | Hindle et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110041146 | Lewis | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110055347 | Hu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110099593 | Kim et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110103374 | Lajoie et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20120005756 | Hoefelmeyer et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120011567 | Cronk et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120117584 | Gordon | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120158547 | Wood et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284765 | Killick et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120291140 | Robert et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130036011 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130120570 | Stanley et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130219458 | Ramanathan | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130227608 | Evans et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130239135 | Parker et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140283137 | Rebaud et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150348129 | Inoue et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20200329260 | Mathur | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2376550 | Dec 2000 | CA |
| 2438497 | Aug 2002 | CA |
| 1134951 | Sep 2001 | EP |
| 1691523 | Aug 2006 | EP |
| S5218653 | Feb 1977 | JP |
| S5239237 | Mar 1977 | JP |
| H01226681 | Sep 1989 | JP |
| H03272977 | Dec 1991 | JP |
| H0517083 | Jan 1993 | JP |
| H0558564 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| H05201624 | Aug 1993 | JP |
| 2002335507 | Nov 2002 | JP |
| 20060009376 | Jan 2006 | KR |
| WO-9617306 | Jun 1996 | WO |
| WO-9929107 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO-9963759 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO-0018120 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO-0072592 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO-0110125 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO-0160071 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| 3 Point Digital to Showcase Revolutionary Video-On-Demand at Streaming Media West '99, http://www.vsoftcom/press 1999nhtm, Dec. 3, 1999. |
| Almeroth, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, The Use of Multicast Delivery to Provide a Scalable and Interactive Video-On-Demand Service, pp. 1110-1122, vol. 14: No. 6, 1996. |
| Bodzinga et al., “Enhancing the IPTV Service Architecture to Enable Service Innovation”, International Engineering Consortium, May 1, 2006. |
| Butts, Tom, “Israeli Defense Technology Fuel's Vsoft's Software”, pp. 1-2, http://www.vsoft.com/prints/israeli.sub.--defence.htm, Feb. 1, 1999. |
| Cantor, et al., Assertions and Protocols for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0, OASIS Standard, Mar. 15, 2005. Document ID: saml-core-2.0-os (http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/v2.0/saml-core-2.0-os.pdf). |
| Carnoy, David, “Anthony Wood and Mike Ramsey at War,” Success, Mar. 1999, pp. 52-57. |
| David P.A., “The Beginnings and Prospective Ending of‘End-to-End’: An Evolutionary Perspective on the Internet's Architecture,” Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Aug. 2001, 34 pages. |
| Ford B., “Unmanaged Internet Protocol: Scalable Application-Friendly Internet Routing,” Jul. 24, 2003, 6 pages. |
| Ford B., “Unmanaged Internet Protocol: Taming the Edge Network Management Crisis,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communications Review, vol. 34 (1), Jan. 2004, pp. 93-98. |
| Furchgott, Roy, “Don't People Want to Control Their TV's?” The New York Times, Aug. 24, 2000, p. GI. |
| Hamilton, David P., “Driving Force”, The Wall Street Journal, Jun. 26, 2000, p. R12. |
| Jacobs, Karen (Dec. 7, 1999) “Elevator Maker to Add Commercial Touch,” The Wall Street Journal, pp. 1-2. |
| Kahaner, (Mar. 16, 1991) “Hitachi 1991 Technology Exhibition, Tokyo,” Asian Technology Information Program, pp. 1-14. |
| Lewis M,, “Boom Box”, The New York Times Magazine, Aug. 13, 2000, p. 36. |
| Lipschitz Sugarman, Margo “A Picture of the Future” pp. 1-2, http://vvww.vsoft.com/prints/picture.sub.--of.sub.--the.sub.--future.htm, Dec. 20, 1999. |
| Marusic, et al., “Share it!--Content Transfer in Home-to-Home Networks.” IEEE MELECON 2004, May 12-15, 2004, Dubrovnik, Croatia. |
| Maxwell, Kim, Residential Broadband: An Insider's Guide to the Battle for the Last Mile, 1999, pp. 43-46, 308-312, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. |
| Parsons, Patrick R., et al., The Cable and Satellite Televison Industries, 1998, pp. 162-163, 170-172, Allyn and Bacon, Boston. |
| Perdue, Lewis (Jul. 20, 1999) “Forget Elevator Music Here Comes Elevator Internet,” Internet VCWatch, pp. 1-2. |
| Sadok D.H., et al., “Trends in Network and Device Composition,” Topics in Internet Technology, IEEE Communications Magazine, Oct. 2006, pp. 112-118. |
| Stevens Institute of Technology, Spring 1999 Final Report, pp. 1-12. |
| Videodick 2.0 is Now Available on Sun Servers, p. 1, http://www.vsoft.com/press1999d.htm, Apr. 19, 1999. |
| Vsoft Launches Videoclick .COPYRGT. Home at IBC 2000, pp. 1-2, http:/www.vsoft.com/press2000o.htm, Sep. 8, 2000. |
| Vsoft to Implement Its Advanced Videoclick Interactive TV Software on Power TV Based Digital Cable Set-Top Boxes, pp. 1-2, http://www.vsoft.com/press1999m.htm, Dec. 13, 1999. |
| Vsoft to Present First Set-Top Box Implementation of Its Digital Video Software Platform, Targeted to Service Providers of Digital Video Services for Home Video, p. 1, http://www.vsoft.com/press1999j.htm, Sep. 8, 1999. |
| Yoneda, et al. (Dec. 1997) “Multi-Objective Elevator Supervisory-Control System with Individual Floor-Situation Control,” Hitachi Review, p. 1. |
| Congdon P., et al., “IEEE 802.1 X Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) Usage Guidelines,” RFC 3580—IEEE 802.1X Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service, 2003, pp. 1-30. |
| McDevitt., et al., “Switched vs Broadcast Video for Fiber-To-The Home Systems”, 1990, 11 pages. |
| Merriam Webster, “Apparatus”, 2015. |
| Merriam Webster, “subscribe”, 2015. |
| Merriam-Webster, “mapping”, 2020 (Year: 2020). |
| Microsoft Computer Dictionary, “Device”, Fifth edition, 2002, 648 pages. |
| Wikipedia, “Client (computing)”, 2020, 2 pages. |
| Wikipedia, “Content delivery network”, 2015. |
| Wikipedia, “Hybrid fibre-coaxial”, 2015, 1 page. |
| Wikipedia, “Packet switching”, 2015, 1 page. |
| Wikipedia, “switched”, 2015. |
| Dictionary, “Recording”, 2021. |
| Dictionary, “Recorded”, 2021. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190149864 A1 | May 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60813479 | Jun 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13773477 | Feb 2013 | US |
| Child | 16186269 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13400524 | Feb 2012 | US |
| Child | 13773477 | US | |
| Parent | 12764761 | Apr 2010 | US |
| Child | 13400524 | US | |
| Parent | 11811953 | Jun 2007 | US |
| Child | 12764761 | US |
