In a wireless communication system, a mobile station first needs to perform a random access for establishing communication with a base station. The random access typically includes two steps: (1) Ranging and (2) Resource Request and Allocation. During Ranging, the mobile station sends a signal to the base station, so that the base station can identify the mobile station and measure the power and time delay of the mobile station, and inform the mobile station for power adjustment and time advance. During Resource Request and Allocation, the uplink and downlink resources for communication are requested and allocated. Ranging is a critical part of multi-carrier wireless communication system, and there are several important issues related to ranging:
The ranging process typically involves an exchange of messages between the base station and the mobile station by which the mobile station aligns itself with the start of each time slot after compensating for propagation delay and other factors. One problem in a shared medium communication network involves the ranging of many mobile stations. When many mobile stations attempt to perform the ranging simultaneously, they are forced to contend for access to the shared channel and it becomes difficult for any of the mobile stations to complete the ranging process due to the large number of collisions. As a result, the time needed for all of the mobile stations to complete the ranging process is excessive, and much bandwidth on the shared channel is wasted.
In the following description, the invention is explained with respect to some of its various embodiments, and provides specific details for a thorough understanding. However, one skilled in the art will understand that the invention may be practiced without such details. In other instances, well-known structures and functions have not been shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the embodiments.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to.” Words using the singular or plural number also include the plural or singular number respectively. Additionally, the words “herein,” “above,” “below” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. When the claims use the word “or” in reference to a list of two or more items, that word covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list and any combination of the items in the list.
The embodiments of this invention disclose methods and apparatus for random access in a multi-carrier system. In particular, ranging signals are designed to improve receiving reliability and to reduce interference with other uplink signals. Furthermore, methods and apparatus are described that improve the detection performance at the base station receiver.
In a multi-carrier communication system such as multi-carrier code division multiple access (MC-CDMA) and orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) systems, information data are multiplexed on subcarriers that are mutually orthogonal in the frequency domain. In effect, a frequency selective channel is partitioned in frequency into a number of parallel, but small, segments that can be treated as flat fading channels and can employ simple one-tap equalizers. The modulation/demodulation can be performed using the fast Fourier transform (FFT).
In a multi-carrier communication system the physical media resource (e.g., radio or cable) can be divided in both the frequency and time domains. This canonical division provides a high flexibility and fine granularity for resource sharing. A basic structure of a multi-carrier signal in the frequency domain is made up of subcarriers, and within a particular spectral band or channel there are a fixed number of subcarriers. There are three types of subcarriers:
The data subcarriers can be arranged into groups called subchannels to support scalability and multiple-access. The carriers forming one subchannel are not necessarily adjacent to each other. Each user may use part or all of the subchannels. The concept is illustrated in
In accordance with aspects of some embodiments, the ranging signal is carried over a ranging subchannel that contains multiple subcarriers. Either binary or non-binary signals can be modulated on the subcarriers of a ranging subchannel.
The sequence of modulating signals in a ranging subchannel is called a ranging sequence. Multiple ranging sequences are permitted in a cell. A mobile station chooses a ranging sequence for random access and uses the sequence to identify itself in the initial communication with a base station. The period of a ranging signal is called a ranging slot. A ranging slot may last over one or multiple OFDM symbols. Multiple ranging slots can be provided to increase the random access opportunity and reduce the collision probability.
In one embodiment, different cells may have different subcarrier configurations for their ranging subchannels. Different cells may also have different ranging sequence sets. These differences may be used to identify the association of a mobile station with a cell.
In one embodiment, the ranging subchannel is composed of multiple blocks of subcarriers. The subcarriers in each block are contiguous in frequency. The signal power of the subcarriers towards the boundary (the lower ends and the higher ends in frequency) of a block is lower than that of the subcarriers towards the center of the block. In a special case, the power levels of the two subcarriers at both ends of a block are set to zero.
In yet another embodiment, each segment of a ranging sequence is a Hadamard sequence and a full ranging sequence is composed of multiple Hadamard sequences. Each segment corresponds to a block of contiguous subcarriers. In Table 1, a typical example is shown for two ranging sequences. Each segment is a 4-bit Hadamard sequence and each ranging sequence is composed of 4 segments. The two ranging sequences are segment-wise orthogonal to each other.
In addition, other properties in signal processing can be exploited in sequence design. In one embodiment of the implementation, the ranging sequence is designed such that its corresponding time-domain signal exhibits relatively low peak-to-average power ratio. This improves the power efficiency of the mobile station transmission power amplifier. Furthermore, the ranging signal is designed such that the time signal can be approximated with a binary sequence (e.g.,
In another embodiment, the blocks of a ranging subchannel can be distributed or allocated in such a way that the autocorrelation of a ranging sequence corresponding to the ranging subchannel, in time-domain, exhibits a set of desired properties such as a narrow main peak and low sidelobes. For example, the blocks can be distributed in the frequency band of interest such that there is minimum redundancy in a co-sampling function. In other words, spacing between the blocks of a ranging subchannel in the frequency domain has no or minimum repetition, as illustrated in
With regard to controlling the power settings of a ranging signal, before a random access, a mobile station estimates the path loss from a base station, using the received downlink signal. It uses open-loop power control to set the power level of the ranging signal. In one embodiment, the mobile station adds a negative offset to the open-loop power setting and gradually ramps up the transmission power of the ranging signal as the number of random access failures and retrials increase.
In one embodiment, the base station receiver detects the presence of each ranging signal, its time delay, and its power level through the use of a matched filter, a correlator, or other means in the time domain, the frequency domain, or both.
In another embodiment, when the ranging subchannel is composed of blocks of contiguous subcarriers, the base station performs hierarchical detection: first in frequency domain, then in time domain. The detection process is as follows:
where the dot-product is computed by:
and where N denotes the number of subcarriers in a block, x(k,n) denotes the received version of the nth subcarrier of the kth block in the given ranging subchannel, and cm(k,n) represents the value of the nth subcarrier of the kth block in the given ranging subchannel for the mth sequence. It is noted that that both {right arrow over (r)}(k) and {right arrow over (b)}m(k) are vectors of the dimension same as the segment length. If Pm is greater than a given threshold, this indicates that a ranging signal corresponding to the mth sequence has been detected.
where T denotes the length of the time-domain ranging sequence, D corresponds to the maximum time delay allowed by the system, and z*(t) represents the time-domain signal of the detected ranging sequence. The maximum value of C(τ) for τ=0,1, . . . , D is the estimate of the power of the ranging signal and the corresponding value of τ indicates the time delay associated with the ranging signal.
In the case of ranging sequences composed of Hadamard sequences, the dot-products of the received signal and the ranging sequence in a particular segment in Step 2 can be evaluated simultaneously using a single Fast Hadamard Transform (FHT), thereby simultaneously detecting multiple ranging sequences.
The above detailed description of the embodiments of the invention is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed above or to the particular field of usage mentioned in this disclosure. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the invention are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the invention, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. Also, the teachings of the invention provided herein can be applied to other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.
All of the above patents and applications and other references, including any that may be listed in accompanying filing papers, are incorporated herein by reference. Aspects of the invention can be modified, if necessary, to employ the systems, functions, and concepts of the various references described above to provide yet further embodiments of the invention.
Changes can be made to the invention in light of the above “Detailed Description.” While the above description details certain embodiments of the invention and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the invention can be practiced in many ways. Therefore, implementation details may vary considerably while still being encompassed by the invention disclosed herein. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing certain features or aspects of the invention should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics, features, or aspects of the invention with which that terminology is associated.
In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above Detailed Description section explicitly defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the invention encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the invention under the claims.
While certain aspects of the invention are presented below in certain claim forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the invention in any number of claim forms. Accordingly, the inventors reserve the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects of the invention.
This application is a continuation of, and incorporates by reference in its entirety, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/425,735, entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR RANDOM ACCESS IN MULTI-CARRIER COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS”, filed Feb. 6, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/899,226, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,565,700, entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR RANDOM ACCESS IN MULTI-CARRIER COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS”, filed May 21, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/205,579, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,467,366, entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR RANDOM ACCESS IN MULTI-CARRIER COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS”, filed Aug. 8, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/583,158, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,995,967, entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR RANDOM ACCESS IN MULTI-CARRIER COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS”, filed Aug. 27, 2008, which is a U.S. National Stage application of PCT/US05/08169, entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR RANDOM ACCESS IN MULTI-CARRIER COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS”, filed Mar. 9, 2005, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/551,589, entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR RANDOM ACCESS IN MULTI-CARRIER COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS”, filed Mar. 9, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4977593 | Ballance | Dec 1990 | A |
5598154 | Wilson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5726978 | Frodigh et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5898338 | Proctor et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5929704 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5970092 | Currivan | Oct 1999 | A |
5991308 | Fuhrmann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6078216 | Proctor, Jr. | Jun 2000 | A |
6101179 | Soliman | Aug 2000 | A |
6144711 | Raleigh | Nov 2000 | A |
6519449 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535547 | Lyckegård | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539320 | Szajnowski et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6600772 | Zeira et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6768714 | Heinonen | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6839876 | Tong et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
7263058 | Joo | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7301985 | Hall et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7817707 | Sohn et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7995967 | Li et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8169944 | Walton | May 2012 | B2 |
8199632 | Geile et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
10638468 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
20020027957 | Paulraj | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020154705 | Walton | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159537 | Crilly, Jr. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030026324 | Li | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030086371 | Walton | May 2003 | A1 |
20030134656 | Chang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040001429 | Ma et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040063450 | Uhlik | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040114504 | Jung et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114566 | Lim et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040141548 | Shattil | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040166886 | Laroia et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040174845 | Koo et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050030931 | Sung et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050068886 | Wang | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080576 | Dickerson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050185796 | Lablans | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20100111017 | Um et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110292881 | Li et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20050015119 | Feb 2005 | KR |
100585233 | May 2006 | KR |
20060055636 | May 2006 | KR |
2000035121 | Jun 2000 | WO |
2001061880 | Aug 2001 | WO |
03075500 | Sep 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Patent Application No. PCT/US05/08169; Filed Mar. 9, 2005; Applicant: WalticaiSolutions, Inc.; dated Jun. 9, 2005; 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/205,579, dated Mar. 6, 2013, Examiner A. Akinyemi, 14 pages. |
Neo Wireless LLC v. Dell Technologies Inc. et al., Defendants' Reply Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-0024 (Dec. 2, 2021). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. Dell Technologies Inc. et al., Supplemental Declaration of James Proctor in Support of Defendants' Reply Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-0024 (Dec. 2, 2021). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. Dell Technologies Inc. et al., Plaintiff Neo Wireless LLC's Claim Construction Sur Reply Brief, Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-0024 (Dec. 16, 2021). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. Dell Technologies Inc. et al., Joint Claim Construction Statement, Civil Action No. 3:21-cv-0024 (Dec. 21, 2021). |
Definition of “guard band,” McGraw Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, 6th edition (2003). |
ETSI Special Mobile Group (SMG) Report of UMTS 30.06 V3.0.0; Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); UMTS Terrestrial Radio Acces (UTRA); Concept evaluation (UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0), TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (Dec. 1997). |
Sklar, Digital Communications, Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall PTR, pp. 7-9 (2001). |
Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); UMTS Terrestrial Radio Acces (UTRA); Concept evaluation (UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0), TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (Dec. 1997). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. Dell Technologies, Inc. et al., Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, Civil Action No. 3:21-cv-0024 (Apr. 28, 2021). |
Dell Inc. et al., v. Neo Wireless LLC, Declaration of Craig Bishop, Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,467,366 and U.S. Pat. No. 10,833,908 (Sep. 2, 2021). |
Dell Inc. et al., v. Neo Wireless LLC, Declaration of Dr. Matthew Valenti, Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,467,366 (Sep. 15, 2021). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al., Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, Civil Action No. 6:21 -ov-0025 (Apr. 28, 2021). |
Dell Inc. et al., v. Neo Wireless LLC, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,467,366 pursuant to 35 U.S C. §§ 311-319, 37 C.F.R. § 42 ((Sep. 16, 2021). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. Dell Technologies Inc. et al., Defendant's Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-0024 (Jun. 18, 2021). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. Dell Technologies Inc. et al., Neo Wireless's Answer to Dell's Counterclaims, Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-0024 (Jul. 9, 2021). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. Dell Technologies Inc. et al., Defendants' Opening Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-0024 (Oct. 28, 2021). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. Dell Technologies Inc. et al., Declaration of Roger Fulgham in Support of Defendants' Opening Claim Construction, Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-0024 (Oct. 28, 2021). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. Dell Technologies Inc. et al., Declaration of James Proctor in Support of Defendants' Opening Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-0024 (Oct. 27, 2021). |
Van Nee et al., OFDM for Wireless Multimedia Communications, Artech House (2000). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. Dell Technologies Inc. et al., Stipulated Constructions, Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-0024 (Oct. 27, 2021). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. Dell Technologies Inc. et al., Plaintiff Neo Wireless LLC's Responsive Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-0024 (Nov. 18, 2021). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. Dell Technologies Inc. et al., Declaration of William Alberth in Support of Neo Wireless's Responsive Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-0024 (Nov. 18, 2021). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. Apple Inc., Apple Inc's Answer to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-00026-ADA (Jun. 17, 2021). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. LG Electrincs Inc., Defendant LG's Answer to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-00025-ADA (Jun. 17, 2021). |
You et al., “A Simple Construction of OFDM-CDMA Signals with Low Peak-to-Average Power Ratio,” IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. 49, No. 4 (Dec. 2003).Baxley et al., “Power Savings Analysis of Peak-to-Average Power Ratio Reduction in OFDM,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 50, No. 3 (Aug. 2004). |
Baxley et al., “Power Savings Analysis of Peak-to-Average Power Ratio Reduction in OFDM,” IEEE Transactions an Consumer Electronics, vol. 50, No. 3 (Aug. 2004). |
Prasad, “Chapter 6—The Peak Power Problem,” in OFDM for Wireless Communications Systems, Artech House (2004). |
Panta et al., “Use of Peak-to-Average Power Reduction Technique in HIPERLAN2 and its Performance in a Fading Channel.” Proc. 6th International Symposium on DSP for Communication Systems, pp. 113-117, (2002). |
Guo et al., “Reducing Peak-to-Average Power Ratio in OFDM Systems by Adaptive Dynamic Range Companding,” 2002 World Wireless Congress, San Francisco, CA (2002). |
Koffman et al., “Broadband Wireless Access Solutions Based on OFDM Access in IEEE 802.16,” IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 96-103 (Apr. 2002). |
Third Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical layer procedures (FDD) (Release 5),” 3GPP TS 25.214 V5.7.0 (Dec. 2003). |
Neo Wireless LLC v. Apple Inc., Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-0026 (Apr. 28, 2021). |
Neo Wireless LLC, Claim Chart—Claim 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,467,366, submitted with Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, Neo Wireless LLC v Dell, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-0024 (Apr. 28, 2021). |
Third Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical layer procedures (FDD) (Release 5),” 3GPP TS 25.214 V5.10.0 (Dec. 2004). |
Third Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical layer procedures (FDD) (Release 6),” 3GPP TS 25.214 V6.0.0 (Dec. 2003). |
Third Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical layer procedures (FDD) (Release 6),” 3GPP TS 25.214 V6.4.0 (Dec. 2004). |
Dell Inc. et al., v. Neo Wireless LLC, Decision Denying institution of Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,467,366, IPR 2021-01480 (Mar. 16, 2022). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200187257 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60551589 | Mar 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15425735 | Feb 2017 | US |
Child | 16544201 | US | |
Parent | 13899226 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 15425735 | US | |
Parent | 13205579 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 13899226 | US | |
Parent | 10583158 | US | |
Child | 13205579 | US |