This invention relates to the manufacture of sheet glass and, in particular, to methods and apparatus for reducing the level of platinum-group defects in sheet glass. Although the invention can be used in the manufacture of various types of sheet glass, it is especially advantageous in the production of large glass sheets for use as substrates in the production of displays, such as liquid crystal displays (LCDs), where the requirement for low defect levels is particularly stringent.
Sheet glass is produced by various techniques known in the art, including float processes and downdraw processes, such as the overflow downdraw process also known as the fusion process. In all of these processes, flowing molten glass is formed into a continuous glass ribbon which is separated into individual glass sheets.
For glasses having high melting temperatures, such as those used to produce LCD substrates, at least some of the melting, fining, stirring, conditioning, delivery, and forming equipment is made of materials comprising platinum-group metals, with platinum and platinum alloys, e.g., platinum-rhodium alloys, being the most commonly used materials. (As used herein, the platinum-group metals are platinum, rhodium, palladium, iridium, rhenium, ruthenium, and osmium.)
The presence of platinum-containing defects has been a long standing problem in the production of LCD glass substrates. Commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 7,127,919 discusses one source of such defects, namely, erosion of platinum-containing components (e.g., stirrers and stir chamber walls) used in homogenizing molten glass. The '919 patent provides methods and apparatus for substantially reducing the level of defects arising from this source without compromising the homogeneity of the finished glass substrates.
The present invention addresses another source of platinum-group defects, namely, the formation of condensates of platinum-group metals, e.g., platinum, at locations in the manufacturing process at which there is a free (open) surface of flowing molten glass. Commonly-assigned U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2006/0042318 discloses one approach for addressing the condensate problem. In the '318 publication, a flow of gas, e.g., air, along the shaft of a stirrer used in homogenizing a glass melt is employed to reduce the formation of platinum-containing condensates on the shaft.
The present invention involves an alternate approach to the condensate problem which has surprisingly been found to markedly reduce the number of condensate-based, platinum-group defects found in glass sheets.
In accordance with a first aspect, the invention provides a method for reducing the level of platinum-group condensate defects in glass sheets produced by a process in which flowing molten glass has a free surface (open surface) that is located at or below a structure that comprises a platinum-group metal that can serve as a source of said defects, said method comprising:
(a) providing a limited-volume, gas-filled space which is in contact with said free surface and said structure; and
(b) substantially controlling the environment within the space and substantially isolating the space from the surrounding environment so that the average level of platinum-group condensate defects in the glass sheets produced by the process is less than or equal to 0.02 defects/kilogram.
In accordance with a second aspect, the invention provides a method for reducing the level of platinum-group condensate defects in glass sheets produced by a process in which flowing molten glass has a free surface (open surface) that is located at or below a structure that comprises a platinum-group metal that can serve as a source of said defects, said method comprising:
(a) providing a limited-volume, gas-filled space which is in contact with said free surface and said structure; and
(b) substantially controlling the environment within the space and substantially isolating the space from the surrounding environment so as to produce an average level of platinum-group condensate defects in the glass sheets produced by the process that is at least 50% less than the average level of platinum-group condensate defects in glass sheets produced by the same process but without the substantial control and isolation.
In certain embodiments of the first and second aspects of the invention, the space is filled with a gas whose average oxygen content is less than or equal to 10 volume percent.
In accordance with a third aspect, the invention provides apparatus comprising:
(a) an enclosure over a free surface (open surface) of flowing molten glass, said enclosure having a limited internal volume, said volume being in contact with a material which comprises a platinum-group metal;
(b) at least one heat source which provides heat to the enclosure; and
(c) at least one inlet through which gas of a defined composition is introduced into the enclosure at a selected rate;
wherein:
(i) the maximum temperature difference between any two points within the enclosure is less than or equal to 250° C.; and
(ii) the selected rate results in a gas exchange time for the enclosure which is greater than 3 minutes.
In accordance with a fourth aspect, the invention provides a population of 100 sequential glass sheets produced by a glass sheet manufacturing process wherein: (i) each sheet has a volume of at least 1,800 cubic centimeters (e.g., the sheets are large enough to produce Gen 6 LCD substrates), preferably, a volume of at least 3,500 cubic centimeters (e.g., the sheets are large enough to produce Gen 8 LCD substrates), and (ii) the level of platinum-group condensate defects for the population is less than or equal to 0.02 defects/kilogram.
Additional features and advantages of the invention are set forth in the detailed description which follows, and in part will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from that description or recognized by practicing the invention as described herein. It is to be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely exemplary of the invention and are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the invention without limiting its scope.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. It is to be understood that the various features of the invention disclosed in this specification and in the drawings can be used in any and all combinations.
As discussed above, the present invention relates to the problem of platinum-group defects in sheet glass. More particularly, it relates to the formation of condensates of platinum-group metals at locations in the manufacturing process at which flowing molten glass has a free surface and one or more exposed surfaces comprising a platinum-group metal, e.g., platinum or a platinum alloy, are located at or above the free surface. (As used herein, the phrase “at or above” when applied to the spatial relationship between a structure or surface which comprises a platinum-group metal and a free surface of flowing molten glass includes a structure or surface which is both at and above the free surface. Similarly the phrase “at or below” used for the same purpose includes the case where a free surface of flowing molten glass is both at and below a structure or surface which comprises a platinum-group metal.)
Because of the high temperatures involved, at certain locations at or above the free surface, platinum-group metals can undergo oxidization to form a vapor of the metal (e.g., a PtO2 vapor) which can revert to the metal and condense into metal particles at other locations at or above the free surface. These platinum-group metal particles can then “rain” back onto the free surface or be entrained in the glass flow and thereby form defects (typically, inclusions) in the finished glass sheets.
Defects comprising a platinum-group metal formed by this mechanism (referred to herein as “platinum-group condensate defects” or simply “condensate defects”) have characteristics that distinguish them from defects comprising a platinum-group metal formed by other mechanisms. Thus, condensate defects are crystalline shaped and their largest dimensions are equal to or greater than 50 microns.
Platinum-group condensate defects originate from the following chemical and thermodynamic effects. The primary source of the problem is a range of 2-way reactions which platinum-group metals can enter into with oxygen. For example, for platinum and rhodium, one of the 2-way reactions can be written:
Pt(s)+O2(g)PtO2 (1)
4Rh(s)+3O2(g)2Rh2O3 (2)
Other reactions involving platinum can generate PtO and other oxides, and other reactions involving rhodium can generate RhO, RhO2, and other oxides.
The forward direction of these reactions can be considered as the “originating source” (starting point) for platinum-group condensate defects. As illustrated in
In particular,
As can be seen in
Considering
Oxidation/vaporization of platinum-group metals in and of itself does not lead to condensate defects. Rather, there needs to be a condensation of solids from the vapor/gaseous atmosphere over a free surface of flowing molten glass to produce particles which can “rain” down on the free surface or otherwise become entrained in the flowing glass and thus become condensate defects in the glass sheets. The backward reactions of the governing equations (1) and (2) above promote condensation of the platinum-group metals and thus can be thought of as the “sink” for solid particle formation.
Factors responsible for accelerating the rate of the backward reactions include drops in temperature and/or pO2.
As can be seen in this figure, as platinum and/or rhodium vapors created in a high temperature area move into a colder region, they become unstable, resulting in condensation of solid particles of the parent metal. The three circled points at the top of the figure show this effect for platinum in an atmosphere having a pO2 value of 0.2 atmospheres. As can be seen from these points, as the temperature drops from 1450° C. to 1350° C., the total pressure of platinum-containing species in the atmosphere must drop from about 0.5×10−6 atm to about 0.8×10−7 atm. The mechanism for this drop in gaseous pressure of platinum-containing species is condensation, i.e., transformation from the gaseous state to the solid state.
As with the “source” portion of the defect generation process, gas flow also plays a role in the “sink” (condensation) portion. Although again not wishing to be bound by any particular theory of operation, it is believed that substantial flows inhibit the establishment of an equilibrium vapor pressure of oxide at those locations where solid particles are likely to form.
In accordance with the invention, the problem of platinum-group condensate defects is addressed by attacking both the source and sink sides of the problem. This is accomplished by providing a substantially-isolated/controlled, limited volume, gas-filled space which contacts (e.g., is bounded by and/or contains): (1) the free surface of the flowing molten glass, (2) the material or materials which comprise platinum-group metal(s) and serve as the originating source for the defects, and (3) the structure(s) at or above the free surface upon which condensates can be expected to form and thereafter “rain” down onto the free surface and/or be entrained into the flowing glass.
The space is filled with a gas, as opposed to being evacuated. The gas has a defined composition. In particular, the gas preferably has a low oxygen content. This not only reduces the source side of the defect generation process, but also the sink side through a reduction in the magnitudes of oxygen gradients with the space. As discussed below, the gas-filled space preferably has an oxygen content which is less than or equal to 10 vol. %, more preferably, less than or equal to 2 vol. %, and most preferably, less than or equal to 1 vol. %. The remainder of the gas can be composed of inert components, e.g., nitrogen or argon.
The gas-filled space has a limited volume in the sense that it is dedicated to isolating/controlling the space at and above a specific free surface of molten glass, as opposed to a larger portion of a glass manufacturing line (see, for example, space 142 of
The limited-volume, gas-filled space is “substantially-isolated/controlled” in the sense that its internal environment and its interaction with its surrounding environment are substantially determined by the user both in terms of material flows and heat flows. With regard to material flows, the substantial isolation/control allows the chemical composition of the limited-volume, gas-filled space to be determined by the user. In particular, it allows the average oxygen content in the space to be specified and controlled so as to address the role oxygen plays in both the source (see, for example,
Because in a manufacturing setting it is difficult to prevent all flow into or out of a gas-filled space, e.g., it can be difficult to reduce all leaks to zero especially at the elevated temperatures associated with molten glass, the substantial-isolation/control with regard to material flows will often involve providing the limited-volume, gas-filled space with a pressure somewhat above that of its surrounding environment so that net flow is outward from the space, e.g., a positive differential pressure that is above zero and is at most 0.01 atmospheres, preferably, at most 0.001 atmospheres, and most preferably, at most 0.0001 atmospheres. This facilitates control of the chemical composition within the space since it avoids entry of gases from the surrounding environment whose composition may be uncontrolled and/or variable over time.
The pressure within the space and thus the net outward flow from the space is achieved by providing the space with one or more gas inlets for introducing gas having the desired chemical composition into the space. The location(s) of the inlet(s) is chosen to minimize flow at the typical source/sink trouble spots for condensate defect generation within the space. For example, as illustrated by the computer simulations of
In terms of heat flows, the limited-volume, gas-filled space is substantially isolated/controlled relative to its environment so that temperature gradients within the space can be reduced. In this way, the space can address the role that temperature differences plays in both the source (see, for example,
Heat flow isolation/control will generally involve the use of thermal insulating materials around the limited-volume, gas-filled space, the placement of heat sources at selected locations, and the use of free or forced convection at the boundaries with the external environment. Typically, the heat sources will be located along or in the vicinity of the space's perimeter wall, but heat sources within the space can also be used if desired. The heat sources can be adjustable to allow the temperatures within the space to be controlled irrespective of temporal and/or spatial changes in the temperature distribution in the environment outside of the space. In addition to using insulation around the outside of the space, insulation can also be used inside the space to reduce internal temperature gradients. For example, in the case of a stir chamber, an intermediate cover can be used to divide the space into two regions having restricted gas communication. By insulating the cover, the temperature gradient in the region closest to the molten glass can be reduced.
The words “substantial” and “substantially” are used in connection with the isolation/control of the limited-volume, gas-filled space to denote that complete isolation/control is not needed but merely a practical and sufficient amount of isolation/control to achieve a level of platinum-group condensate defects which is acceptable for particular applications of the invention. For example, in the case of LCD substrates, the size requirements for substrates has increased over the years and the surface discontinuity requirements have been tightened. Since platinum-group condensate defects are a significant source of rejected substrates, in practice, a level of isolation/control of the limited-volume, gas-filled space will be used which provides an acceptably low level of rejects. Of course, from an economic point of view, the lower the level of rejects, the better, and thus in the end, the level of isolation/control used will depend on a cost/benefit analysis between the overall costs in achieving greater levels of isolation/control and the resulting benefits in terms of lower defect levels.
In view of the foregoing, the level of isolation/control can conveniently be expressed in terms of the level of platinum-group condensate defects in glass sheets produced using the invention. Preferably, the limited-volume, gas-filled space is isolated/controlled at a level such that use of the space reduces the average number of platinum-group condensate defects per unit weight of glass sheets by at least 50%, preferably, by at least 75%, and most preferably, by at least 90%. In terms of absolute levels of defects, the use of the substantially-isolated/controlled, limited-volume, gas-filled space (or spaces when more than one free surface of glass is equipped with such a space) preferably results in an average level of platinum-group condensate defects that is less than or equal to 0.01 defects/pound (0.02 defects/kilogram), more preferably, less than or equal to 0.005 defects/pound (0.01 defects/kilogram), and most preferably, less than or equal to 0.001 defects/pound (0.002 defects/kilogram).
The level of defects can also be expressed in terms of the defects per pound for a sequential series of glass sheets having a specified size produced by a glass sheet manufacturing process, e.g., a fusion process. This is a direct measure of the reject level of the manufacturing process and, as will be evident, is of great commercial significance. Through the use of the substantially-isolated/controlled, limited-volume, gas-filled space(s) of the invention, reject levels not previously known in the art have become achievable. In particular, a population of 100 sequential glass sheets, each having a volume of at least 1,800 cubic centimeters, can be manufactured with a level of platinum-group condensate defects for the population that is less than or equal to 0.01 defects/pound (0.02 defects/kilogram).
Depending on the application, the level of isolation/control of the limited-volume, gas-filled space can also be characterized in terms of: (i) the oxygen concentration within the gas-filled space, (ii) temperature differences within the gas-filled space, (iii) net flows of gases out of the space, and/or (iv) convective gas flows within the space.
The oxygen concentration in the space is particularly useful in characterizing the level of isolation/control of the limited-volume, gas-filled space for cases where local oxygen concentrations are close to the average oxygen concentration. As discussed below in connection with
Quantitatively, the average oxygen content in the space is preferably less than or equal to 10 volume percent (i.e., less than the volume percentage of oxygen in air), more preferably, less than or equal to 2 volume percent, and most preferably, less than or equal to 1 volume percent. In addition to reducing condensate defects, lower oxygen levels may help in reducing gaseous inclusions by reducing the oxygen content in the glass which is known to cause shrinkage of oxygen-containing gaseous inclusions in molten glass.
The maximum temperature difference between any two points in the limited-volume, gas-filled space is another useful parameter for characterizing the level of isolation/control of the space. As discussed below in connection with
The temperature distribution of a limited-volume, gas-filled space can be measured by, for example, placing thermocouples at various locations along the wall of the space. However, in practice, it has been found more practical and efficient to use computer modeling to estimate the temperature distribution and to confirm the computer modeling using a limited number of actual measurements, e.g., thermocouple measurements. This was the approach used for
Whether determined by actual measurements or by modeling, the maximum temperature difference between any two points of the substantially-isolated/controlled, limited-volume, gas-filled space is preferably less than 250° C., more preferably, less than or equal to 125° C., and most preferably, less than or equal to 25° C.
The net flow of gas out of the limited-volume, gas-filled space is also a useful measure of the degree of isolation/control of the space. Quantitatively, the net flow can be characterized in terms of the gas exchange time for the space, i.e., the time required to achieve a full exchange of the volume of gas within the space. Preferably, the gas exchange time is greater than or equal to 3 minutes, more preferably, greater than or equal to 10 minutes, and most preferably, greater than or equal to 30 minutes.
In terms of convective flows, although it is possible to make gas flow measurements at different locations within the space, in practice, it is more economical and efficient to use computer modeling to calculate convective flows based on inputted data, e.g., molten glass temperatures, temperatures at selected locations of the modeled space, and net outflow of gas from the space, in combination with the known geometry of the space and the thermal properties of the materials bounding the space.
The modeling is preferably performed using techniques of the type employed in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations. In overview, in accordance with CFD, the geometry to be studied is specified and divided into, for example, a mesh of finite elements, boundary conditions and material properties are also specified, and then a numerical solution to the fluid dynamics equations is obtained for the specified geometry and the specified boundary conditions and material properties.
Each of these modeling steps can be performed using customized software or, preferably, with commercially available software packages, such as, for 3-D CAD: AUTOCAD, PRO/ENGINEER, or SOLIDWORKS; for meshing: GAMBIT OR ICEMCFD; and for calculating flows, temperatures, etc.: FLUENT, FLOW3-D, or ACUSOLVE. For example, the plots of
In the modeling of
The inputted material properties were as follows: for solids—thermal conductivity, density, and specific heat; for fluids (gases)—thermal conductivity, density, specific heat, and viscosity. For solid-gas interfaces, where there is heat transfer through radiation, a value for emissivity (dependent on the solid material) was also given. The molten glass was treated in the model as a solid, and its radiative properties were included in its thermal conductivity property via a Rosseland approximation.
The boundary conditions used were as follows. The temperatures of the glass and of the stirrer shaft at the bottom of the model were set to match the measured value at this location for the physical equipment. Heater powers were also set to those of the physical equipment. External conditions define how heat can leave the model. These conditions are not identical everywhere, but depend on what surrounds the various parts of the physical equipment. The chief differences are whether there is free or forced convection on the boundary, and the ambient temperature near it. Based on the known configuration and environment of the physical equipment, these heat loss conditions were also specified in the model.
The results are shown graphically in
In both cases, the maximum temperature within the space was at the junction between the glass and the vertical wall (1305° C. for
Using the calculated maximum internal temperatures and calculated maximum convective linear velocities for
Using computer modeling of the foregoing type, substantial control of convective flows within a limited-volume, gas-filled space can be quantified in terms of the gas' maximum calculated convective linear velocity within the space. Preferably, that velocity is less than or equal to 15 centimeters/second, more preferably, less than or equal to 10 centimeters/second, and most preferably less than or equal to 5 centimeters/second. The convective flows can also be characterized by their overall calculated flowrate values determined by taking a cross-section through the limited-volume, gas-filled space and calculating the flow across that cross-section per unit time. For this measure, substantial control of the convective flow within the limited volume, gas-filled space corresponds to a flowrate that preferably is less than or equal to 1.0 SCFM (5.28 ft3/min; 2,500 cm3/sec), more preferably, less than or equal to 0.5 SCFM (2.64 ft3/min; 1,250 cm3/min), and most preferably, less than or equal to 0.25 SCFM (1.32 ft3/min; 625 cm3/min).
The convective flow approach for quantifying substantial isolation/control will often be less practical than the other measures. In general, the reduction in the level of platinum-group condensate defects in glass sheets resulting from use of the limited-volume, gas-filled space is the most practical measure of substantial isolation/control of the space, followed in order by the average oxygen content in the space, the maximum temperature difference within the space, the gas exchange time for the space, and then the maximum linear velocity and overall flowrate values due to convective flows in the space. In certain embodiments of the invention, only one of the foregoing measures of substantial isolation/control will be satisfied, although in certain preferred embodiments, multiple measures (including all the measures) are satisfied.
The substantially-isolated/controlled, limited-volume, gas-filled space of the invention can be used at various locations in the glass making process where flowing molten glass has a free surface and one or more structures which comprise platinum-group metals which can serve as a source for condensate defects are located at or above the free surface.
As shown in
Dashed line 116 in
A particularly advantageous application of the invention is at stir chamber 120.
Front section 352 has a latched door 359 to allow access for maintenance of the protected area. The door includes a window 360 made of fire rated glass, which allows viewing of the enclosed space without opening the door and thus destroying the isolation of the gas-filled space. Front and rear sections 351,352 have multiple access ports 370 for pressure control/monitoring, oxygen and dew point sensors, and control/monitoring thermocouples, as well as port 371 for introducing gas of a controlled composition into the gas-filled space. A heat exchanger (not shown) can be included in the apparatus to help regulate the temperature of the gas inside the equipment, as well as to protect temperature sensitive electrical components from overheating.
The vertical bar between times points 50 and 60 represents the point during the experiment at which substantial control was applied to the oxygen and temperature gradients within a limited-volume, gas-filled space at and above the free surface of molten glass passing through a stir chamber of a glass sheet manufacturing line using the fusion process. This change in operating conditions took place about one week into the experiment.
For the time points before the vertical bar, the oxygen content and temperatures within the space were allowed to vary as a result of changes within the capsule environment (see 142 of
As can be seen in
As can be seen in
From the foregoing, it can be seen that the substantially-isolated/controlled, limited-volume, gas-filled space(s) described herein reduces the level of platinum-group condensate defects in glass sheets by at least one and, preferably, all of the following:
Unlike other approaches, this approach addresses and controls both the source(s) and sink(s) of defect generation. It is applicable to all types of display glasses and any glass melted or delivered in a system employing platinum-group metals irrespective of the specifics of the glass' composition. Moreover, as an additional benefit, for glass compositions that contain substantial amounts of volatile oxides, e.g., B and/or Sn oxides, the substantially-isolated/controlled, limited-volume, gas-filled space(s) reduces condensate defects from such oxides as a result of the oxides leaving the molten glass at a free surface, condensing on structures at or above the free surface, and then raining down on the free surface or being entrained in the flowing glass to form additional defects in glass sheets.
Based on the foregoing disclosure, a variety of modifications which do not depart from the scope and spirit of the invention will be evident to persons of ordinary skill in the art. The following claims are intended to cover the specific embodiments set forth herein as well as such modifications, variations, and equivalents.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/067,562, filed on Feb. 29, 2008. The content of this document and the entire disclosure of publications, patents, and patent documents mentioned herein are incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61067562 | Feb 2008 | US |