Patent Application
20100125303
The present application relates in general to joint replacement surgery and more specifically to methods and apparatus for replacing biological joints, but applies also to the fixation of any solid implant for use in dental or orthopaedic applications.
When a surgeon performs a joint replacement (e.g., a hip replacement), he must attach one or more implants to one or more bones. For example, in a total knee replacement, the surgeon typically attaches two or three different implants to two or three different bones. These implants are typically made of metal, plastic, or ceramic in any combination and are attached in one of two ways.
Using one attachment method, each implant is attached to the bone using bone cement. Bone cement is typically an acrylic material dispensed as a powder and a liquid, that is mixed as is any other cement. The powder contains polymethyl methacrylate, (or similar type material) a filler, plasticizer, and polymerization initiator. The liquid monomer may be methyl methacrylate with an inhibitor and an activator.
This method is problematic because the bone cement must be mixed and applied in the operating room. This requires know-how and skill that is not always present in the assistants during the operation. The mixing in the operating room also lengthens the time for the operation as the mixing process takes time to set up and perform. In addition, the time needed for application of the cement and cleaning the excess cement lengths the operation time. After the bone cement is mixed, the surgeon must “race the clock” as the cement starts to dry. For example, bone cement may be applied to one implant, which is then placed in the patient and excess cement is cleaned off. Next, bone cement may be applied to another implant, which is then placed in the patient and excess cement is cleaned off. In some cases, additional round(s) of applying bone cement, placing implant(s) and cleaning of the excess cement are required. If more than one implant is to be placed in the patient, the polymerization phase of the cement (e.g., the hardness of the cement from liquid to solid) is different for each implant. In other words the bone cement is more polymerized and firmer for later placed implants. As a result, each implant is not placed with the bone cement at the ideal consistency. In addition, if there are any powder clumps, in the cement from improper mixing by the technician, complications can occur (e.g. crack propagation from the voids in the cement mantle). Finally, after the bone cement is injected, the excess must be cleaned out. If any cement is missed, that excess cement may cause wearing complications for the artificial joint and the patient by interposing third body wear and causing abrasive wear to the implant.
Using another attachment method, each implant is manufactured with a rough contact surface such as a porous surface. This roughened surface may also be coated with a very thin bone mineral substance layer, e.g. hydroxyapatite or other calcium mineral substances, that is applied and is hardened into a solid layer on the implant substrate. The bone grows into this layer, and no bone cement is needed.
However, this “cementless” type of operation may not be successful if micromotion during healing interferes with this bone ingrowth into the roughened layer of the prosthesis. This lack of ingrowth could lead to a painful joint because of the lack of bony fixation. One potential solution is to apply a layer of bone mineral substance hardened to the prosthesis to increase the healing speed and consistency of bony ingrowth. However this does not address the initial fixation problem, leaving this still susceptible to micromotion and with that a lack of bony ingrowth and with it pain. Another alternative is to apply a paste of bone mineral substance on at the time of implantation. However, this has some of the same problems as applying bone cement. Namely, the surgeon must “race the clock” as the calcium layer hardens.
The present disclosure provides methods and apparatus for replacing biological joints that solve all of these problems. As described in more detail below, an ideal amount of bone mineral substance is applied to the implant prior to going in to the operating room. Next, the setting (e.g., hardening) process is suspended with the bone mineral substance in a semi solid-liquid stage, e.g. doughy state, by a manufacturing process such as a coating and/or a chemical. For example, the setting process may be suspended and then resumed using by freezing and then thawing the bone mineral substance. Once the implant(s) are needed in the operating room, the setting process is resumed. In this manner, the bone mineral substance does not need to be applied in the operating room, and the surgeon does not need to “race the clock.” Each implant is placed with the ideal amount of bone mineral substance in the ideal consistency, in the ideal distribution on the implant. The surgeon is able to open the implant package and implant the prosthesis with confidence that fixation is achieved without the inherent problems of the mixing of the bone mineral substance in the operating room.
Turning to the figures, a flowchart of an example process 100 for replacing biological joints is presented in
In general, during the process 100, an ideal amount of bone mineral substance is applied in the desired location on the implant prior to going in to the operating room. Next, the setting (e.g., drying) process is suspended with a manufacturing process, coating and/or a chemical. Once the implant(s) are needed in the operating room, the setting process is resumed.
The process 100 begins when an ideal amount of bone mineral substance is applied to the implant prior to going in to the operating room (block 102). An example of a portion 200 of an implant 202 including bone mineral substance 204 in such a pre-suspended setting state (e.g., 25% setting) is illustrated in
Next, the setting process is suspended with a manufacturing process, coating and/or a chemical (block 104). An example of a portion 300 of an implant including bone mineral substance in such a suspended setting state (e.g., 50% setting) is illustrated in
Once the implant(s) are transported to the operating room (block 106), the setting process is resumed (block 108). An example of a portion 400 of an implant including a bone mineral substance in such a resumed setting state (e.g., 75% setting) is illustrated in
In this manner, the bone mineral substance does not need to be applied in the operating room, the surgeon does not need to “race the clock,” and each implant is placed with the bone mineral substance in the ideal consistency.
In summary, persons of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that methods and apparatus for replacing a biological joint have been provided. The foregoing description has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the exemplary embodiments disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description of examples, but rather by the claims appended hereto.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/116,528, filed Nov. 20, 2008, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Replacing Biological Joints,” the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61116528 | Nov 2008 | US |
