The invention relates to securely displaying digital images of documents containing selected or confidential information. More particularly, the invention relates to methods and apparatus for altering or redacting digital images of documents for viewing such as personal checks in order to secure sensitive information.
Converting a paper hardcopy document into a digital image may be desirable due to the ease with which it can be transmitted and processed by a computer system. For example, images of documents can be scanned and transmitted via e-mail or shared on the Internet using a variety of known protocols such as HTTP or FTP. Obtaining a digital image of a document may also be advantageous so that it can be manipulated or edited on a computer system. Electronic transmissions of digital images are frequently preferred over traditional postal methods due to speed of delivery and the ever increasing number of computer systems and our reliance thereon.
The U.S. Congress recognized the advantages of using digital versions of checks over paper versions thereof by passing the Check 21 Act enacted in 2003. The Check 21 Act allows a financial institution to create a digital version of a processed check and make it accessible online to the payer of the check, thereby eliminating the need for further handling or return of the paper check. This computerized process greatly reduces the time and costs associated with the processing of paper checks, and hence enhances the efficiency of our banking system. It also provides an easy and convenient alternative for bank customers to monitor and manage banking related documents and activities. Online checking offered by many financial institutions such as Bank of America and Wells Fargo allows customers to conveniently view digital images of their cashed checks.
However digital images of documents may often contain personal or sensitive information that a customer or a user may wish to conceal. The term “sensitive information” may include anything designated by a party that should be secured for viewing online such as a customer's name, address or telephone number in conjunction with the customer's social security number, driver's license, or account number (FDIC FIL-27 2005).
At the same time, images must also reveal or contain sufficient information that is legible or usable to the user. For example, banks and other kinds of financial institutions allow a user to access an online bank account and view a digital image of a processed check or financial document. But sensitive information such as the customer's name, bank account number, routing number, address, telephone number, signature and other personal information, may appear on a computer screen while viewing a digital version of the check. The security of such personalized or sensitive information is compromised when it is displayed. The customer or user may therefore wish to hide or secure such personalized information from computer hackers, identity thieves, or even from viewers with no ill intentions.
A variety of graphics editing programs are available today such as Adobe Photoshop that allows a digital image to be edited or altered manually. Original versions of an image may be created and saved as a new image. When using such software programs, a user often manually edits the personalized or sensitive content of the individual digital image with an editing tool such as a blur tool included with the software. Meanwhile, banks and other financial institutions usually process large quantities of checks and/or documents containing personalized or sensitive information. A financial institution may have numerous customers, each with an online bank account on which they can view digital versions of a processed or cashed check. The digital image may be conveniently displayed to a customer while at the same time the financial institution can avoid having to mail or return the processed check to the customer. The ability to efficiently process a large number of checks while protecting personal information contained therein presents significant challenges in online security and the prevention of fraud or theft.
A need therefore exists to secure and protect personalized or sensitive information within digital images of documents. It would be further advantageous to protect available information online without having to manually and singularly edit or alter the contents of the digital images.
The invention provides methods and apparatus for securing selected information contained within digital images of documents. Various aspects of the invention described herein may be applied to any of the particular applications set forth below or for any other types of information that is displayed for viewing. The invention may be applied as a standalone tool or as part of an integrated software solution against online fraud and identify theft. The invention can be optionally integrated into existing business processes seamlessly. It shall be understood that different aspects of the invention can be appreciated individually, collectively or in combination with each other.
A preferable embodiment of the invention provides image masking systems and methods for providing online banking customers with necessary or shared information online without exposing sensitive data to potential fraud. Such image masking can be performed real-time or on-the-fly to a presented image only without necessarily altering an originally scanned document. An originally scanned image can be remain intact and unaltered, in a preferable embodiment, while a new revised or redacted digital image can be created. All of the image information for redacted digital images provided herein may be transmitted for viewing, or alternatively, sanitized versions of a scanned document with just some of the image information may be sent instead to display non-sensitive portions of an original document. The modified or redacted digital images provided in accordance with the invention offer customers access to pictorial or graphical images of corresponding paper documents without compromising account or personal identity information that should be kept secured. Such information can be blurred by various digital editing techniques such as blurring or pixelating or shading, or alternatively, sections of the digital image containing sensitive information may not be transmitted at all.
Accordingly, the invention can provide numerous advantages over other available and complicated document security solutions by protecting sensitive customer data from fraud and identify theft without involving customer education, adoption or enrollment. No enrollment process or change of behavior is required on the part of customers. The security processes provided in accordance with the invention can be performed on the back end, invisible to users which can thereby enhance their sense of security without adding inconvenience or latency to the online experience (automated backend security). While the masked images of secured documents herein may be helpful for daily use, customers can still request to view and access an unredacted version of a document when appropriate security measures are in place for additional authentication. Further password information may be requested, challenge questions may be presented calling for valid responses, one-time tokens or other strong authentication protocols may be employed.
Other goals and advantages of the invention will be further appreciated and understood when considered in conjunction with the following description and accompanying drawings. While the following description may contain specific details describing particular embodiments of the invention, this should not be construed as limitations to the scope of the invention but rather as an exemplification of preferable embodiments. For each aspect of the invention, many variations are possible as suggested herein that are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. A variety of changes and modifications can be made within the scope of the invention without departing from the spirit thereof.
All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized:
The invention is directed to methods and apparatus for modifying or altering digital images of documents in order to secure selected information contained therein. The selected information may include personalized or sensitive information or any content which can be redacted or hidden from view in accordance with the invention. The selected information may be hidden in an altered digital image so it can be secured from view. Another aspect of the invention provides high throughput automated processes and apparatus for securing or altering of digital images of hardcopies of documents. The invention further provides computer systems and software programs that include instructions to carry out or perform various steps of such methods.
A preferable embodiment of the invention provides a method of securely displaying digital images of banking related documents. The method comprises selecting a first digital image of a banking related document containing personalized content, dividing the first digital image into a plurality of image cells, and then redacting at least one of the image cells to provide a second digital image wherein the personalized content in the banking related document is illegible (see
A digital image of a check or a selected document can be chosen for secure display in accordance with the invention as shown in
As shown in
Alternatively, the number and/or kind of image cells can be user defined. A user may select various image cell inputs designating the size, shape, and number of rows and columns for a desired grid. For example, a digital image can be divided into a plurality of image cells located within a rectangular grid based on user input values with a predefined number of rows and columns, e.g., 4 columns×3 rows. The grid may be characterized as a conceptual overlay upon the image so that the image can be broken-up or segmented into image cells that pertain to both redacted and un-redacted portions of the digital image. It shall be understood that image cells are not necessarily laid out in a grid like pattern with both rows and columns and can be alternatively arranged in any manner including a layout with cells that are aligned in only horizontal rows or only vertical columns.
By selectively altering redacted portions of the digital image as shown in
There are a variety of ways in which digital images can be redacted in accordance with the invention. For example, the step of redacting selected portions of a digital image can be achieved by a combination of one or more different means including graying or blacking out these areas. For purposes of this invention, the term “redacted” can mean a blurred, obscured, removed, blocked out, or crossed out so that underlying information cannot be seen and is not apparent on its face to an ordinary observer. Preferably, personalized information protected in accordance with the invention includes confidential subject matter such as personal data, financial or other types of information that can or should be shielded from general public viewing. Other ways to redact digital images in accordance with the invention may include various combinations of one or more techniques such as masking in solid colors (e.g., black, grey, white), pixelating or pixelizing, encrypting and/or otherwise rendering selected regions of a digital image illegible or indecipherable. In preferable embodiments of the invention, some legible portions of the digital image remain unredacted or plainly visible to reveal image fragments or contents of the document residing within these portions. It is often useful to provide at least some context and to relay some minimal amount of information to an observer but not to the extent such that sensitive information is revealed beyond an intended purpose.
As shown in
In a preferable embodiment of the invention, as shown in
In some embodiments of the invention, a group of image cells formed within a grid can be identified by a marker to distinguish the image cell relative to others within the entire electronic image. The marker may be a reference number according to a numbering convention. In an exemplary numbering system, the image cells may be designated with sequential numbers starting with zero (0) or one (1) in the upper left corner of the grid. The image cells may be assigned numbers from left to right (each column) and continue from top to bottom (each row). While any unique identifier or number may be assigned in any order, methods are provided herein whereby each image cell is assigned a unique number until all image cells are identified. Other numbering or marking systems may be used to designate the position of the image cells within the grid including but not limited to an alphabetical system (A-Z), an alphanumeric system (A1, A2 . . . Z10) or a color coded system may be used to uniquely label the plurality of image cells. In some embodiments of the invention, a simple binary-type cell identifier system can be also adopted. Each image cell would not have to be uniquely identified from every other image cell. For example, each image cell corresponding to a portion of a digital image may be designated either as a redacted cell or not (un-redacted cell). Any or all image cells designated as redacted cells can be altered while un-redacted cells remain visible in accordance with this embodiment the invention.
As shown in
The selected image cells to be redacted can be identified according to markers or cell identifiers that direct the editing tool or program as to which portions of the digital image should be redacted. It shall be understood that information to be secured within checks or any other selected document in accordance with the invention may reside in slightly or entirely different locations therein. An appropriate number of image cells may be chosen in order to offer at least some minimal level of security to at least partially redact information positioned within a digital image since checks or any other selected document may vary in size and shape. Accordingly, a financial institution such as a bank may therefore decide beforehand how much or which portions of customer checks should be generally available for online display.
While masked or redacted images provided herein may be advantageous for securing personalized content, a user or customer may wish to view the original unredacted image or document. An alternative embodiment of the invention may offer this by presenting a complete digital image to an authorized person following an authentication procedure. A user may view an original unredacted image online after providing for example a user identification and password. It shall be understood that the invention may be also applied to digital image encryption/decryption schemes such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,954,532 (Handley et al), which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. But preferable embodiments of the invention herein can provide document security without encryption/decryption schemes or segmenting digital images into conceptual layers. For example, redacted portions of documents (e.g., pixelated) provided in accordance with the invention may be permanently altered and considered unredactable (e.g., unpixelated) by anyone including even the creator of the document. Other alternative embodiments of the invention however provide temporarily redacted documents that can be unredacted, preferably without public/private key encryption and decryption techniques wherein redacted images shared online include embedded public key information. Such keyless redaction and unredaction techniques such as pixelating/unpixelating according to graphical editing software programs (e.g., Adobe PhotoShop) that are known only by authorized users or viewers can be also be applied to embodiments of the invention herein. Alternatively, the unredacted image may be presented following some predetermined level of second level authentication online (or ordered through paper mail or made available and a local branch of a financial institution).
In accordance with yet another aspect of the invention, as shown in
Various aspects of the invention herein may scan paper documents, or convert digital images of documents, into any digital image format. The following is a description of some of the most commonly used graphics file formats for putting graphics on the World Wide Web that may be applied to the invention:
JPEG/JPG. Short for Joint Photographic Experts Group, the original name of the committee that wrote the standard. JPG is an image file format supported on the Web that is a lossy compression technique designed to compress color and grayscale continuous-tone images. The information that is discarded in the compression is information that the human eye cannot detect. JPG images can support 16 million colors and are suitable for photographs and complex graphics. A user may have to compromise on either the quality of the image or the size of the file. JPG may not work well on line drawings, lettering or simple graphics.
GIF. Short for Graphics Interchange Format, another of the graphics formats supported by the Web. Unlike JPG, the GIF format is a lossless compression technique and it can support 256 colors. GIF may be viewed as a preferred format over JPG for images with only a few distinct colors, such as line drawings, black and white images and small text that is only a few pixels high. With an animation editor, GIF images can be put together for animated images. GIF also supports transparency, where the background color can be set to transparent in order to let the color on the underlying Web page to show through.
PNG. Short for Portable Network Graphics, it is another graphics standard found on the Web but is not supported by all browsers. An image in a lossless PNG file can be 5%-25% more compressed than a GIF file of the same image. PNG builds on the idea of transparency in GIF images and allows the control of the degree of transparency, known as opacity. PNG does not support animation like GIF does.
It shall be understood that the invention herein can redact and convert or produce document images from many other different types of image formats such as TIF, TIFF, BMP, PSD, WMF, EMF, PCX, PIC and PDF formats.
Another aspect of the invention provides automated high throughput processes wherein a large number of digital images can be generated and/or secured on-the-fly (real time). For example, many checks from various financial institutions often adopt a relatively standard or substantially similar format. Because checks usually include the same kinds of information, their corresponding images can be similarly redacted (batch redacted) without individual manual editing or redacting with software programs such as Adobe PhotoShop. A variety of automated processes and systems are provided herein to redact sensitive information from digital images of documents for display online or through other communication channels as part of a high throughput process. With respect to checks, the image masking systems and processes herein can leverage the fact that personal or sensitive information often appears in common locations as described elsewhere herein. The front side of a check, for example, may include the payor address in an upper left side area while the routing number and account number may appear along the bottom near the signature of the payor. Digital images of a plurality of checks, for example, can be secured or altered in an automated batch process, thus requiring less time than would be required if the images were scanned and/or secured individually. A grid constructed with a plurality of image cells can be designed for the checks as described herein so that commonly selected (or the same) image cells can be redacted on-the-fly for each corresponding check. The selection of a sufficient number and/or location of image cells for redaction may be considered in view of modest variations existing as between different checks (different sizes, fonts and layouts). Some information on checks may be more edited or redacted compared to others but enough cells should be appropriately selected for redaction in order to sufficiently mask the check images to afford at least some level of protection, e.g., at least 5 digits from a 9 digit routing transit number should be redacted while 6, 7 or more digits may be redacted in some checks. The digital images of the checks or any other document containing information to be protected herein can be therefore dynamically divided and masked in accordance with the invention on-the-fly, and preferably as part of a batch processing of checks or other documents by a financial institution, merchants and other parties desiring secure digital images.
For example, referring to
Other embodiments relating to this aspect of the invention can provide batch processing of digital images for other kinds of documents containing confidential or sensitive information described elsewhere herein to protect against identity theft, fraud and other kinds of illegal activity.
In an online application of the invention that securely displays digital images, the following data flow can be implemented: a user requests a page with a dynamic image content (such as a check); a server returns a HTML page with a reference to a back end service that can provide the image; a browser intercepts the <IMG> tag and follows the SRC link to retrieve the image; the service behind the <IMG> link interprets the request and locates the image in a repository (e.g., scanned documents created as shown in
A preferable embodiment of the invention performs a wrapper function around an existing image content call, for example, when a customer desires to view a cashed check. This Java API function call can take the image and mask relevant parts in accordance with the invention herein before resolving an updated redacted image to an end user. The typical delivery process and image can retain intact, processing time can be negligible and no duplicate images are generated.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a database or repository of digital images can be created as shown in
For example, the electronic image data for a document such as a cashed personal check may be stored in the repository 110. When the document exists in its unredacted form, its image may be divided into a plurality of image cells so that certain selected cells containing sensitive information can be identified in accordance with other aspects of the invention (e.g.,
Alternatively, a document may exist in the repository in its redacted form 116 following image data processing in accordance with other aspects of the invention. In this embodiment of the invention, the document may have been already redacted by the image security module so that sensitive portions of the document are not legible when rendered on a computer browser or device screen 119. Here the image security system may transmit directly or indirectly a complete set of image data for a document 117 including both redacted and uredacted portions. The transmitted image data may include information corresponding to redacted image cells (solid masked and/or pixelated image portions) and unredacted image cells. But in alternative embodiments of the invention, the data for some image cells (cross-hatch/shaded section), preferably the ones corresponding to confidential or sensitive information in a document, are not transmitted at all and omitted from the relayed image data to render a sanitized document 118 for viewing on a display. This may reduce the amount of data sent over the networks to a remote user device, and also provides added security in that the data corresponding to sensitive information does not even leave a secure computer network such as those operated by financial institutions. Selected image data or data streams corresponding to repository documents can be buffered and streamed back to a client browser or display for secure viewing. Accordingly, this aspect of the invention provides systems and processes for sanitizing a digital representation of a document for viewing.
The embodiments of the invention which perform sanitization of documents and data herein may be characterized as systems and processes for removing sensitive information from a document or other medium so that it may be securely distributed. When dealing with sensitive or classified information, sanitization may convert an otherwise classified document into an unclassified document. For example, a page of a classified document may be sanitized for public release in accordance with the invention. Classified information may be removed so that only the unclassified information is available or visible. A printed document which contains classified or sensitive information will frequently contain significant information which is less sensitive. And, there may be a need to release the less sensitive portions to uncleared personnel or members of the general public such as requests under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The printed document may thus be sanitized to remove the sensitive information, or as with any of the embodiments of the invention herein, the document may be redacted to obscure the information instead. The terms sanitization and redaction as used herein may be applied to printed or paper documents as well as computer media, information and data as well.
It should be understood from the foregoing that, while particular implementations have been illustrated and described, various modifications can be made thereto and are contemplated herein. It is also not intended that the invention be limited by the specific examples provided within the specification. While the invention has been described with reference to the aforementioned specification, the descriptions and illustrations of the preferable embodiments herein are not meant to be construed in a limiting sense. Furthermore, it shall be understood that all aspects of the invention are not limited to the specific depictions, configurations or relative proportions set forth herein which depend upon a variety of conditions and variables. Various modifications in form and detail of the embodiments of the invention will be apparent to a person skilled in the art. It is therefore contemplated that the invention shall also cover any such modifications, variations and equivalents.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/769,674, filed on Jun. 27, 2007, which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/612,425 filed on Dec. 18, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,612,854, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/751,188 filed on Dec. 16, 2005, wherein each are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4805222 | Young et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4912761 | Tan et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4924387 | Jeppesen | May 1990 | A |
5184849 | Taylor | Feb 1993 | A |
5491735 | Hsieh | Feb 1996 | A |
5519827 | Mizushima | May 1996 | A |
5521907 | Ennis, Jr. | May 1996 | A |
5557686 | Brown et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5721765 | Smith | Feb 1998 | A |
5748740 | Curry et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748780 | Stolfo | May 1998 | A |
5764275 | Lappington et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5886334 | D'Entremont et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6009523 | Owaki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6062474 | Kroll | May 2000 | A |
6078907 | Lamm | Jun 2000 | A |
6092053 | Boesch et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6105012 | Chang et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112240 | Pogue et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6148407 | Aucsmith | Nov 2000 | A |
6151593 | Cho et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6163604 | Baulier et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163771 | Walker et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6205436 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209104 | Jalili | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6295605 | Dockter et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327384 | Hirao | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6405922 | Kroll | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6442692 | Zilberman | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6457021 | Berkowitz et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6509847 | Anderson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6523019 | Borthwick | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6567099 | Dawson | May 2003 | B1 |
6646765 | Barker | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6678666 | Boulware | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687390 | Avni et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689055 | Mullen et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6718363 | Ponte | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6803920 | Gossett et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6804624 | Silverman | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6892307 | Wood et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6895507 | Tepler | May 2005 | B1 |
6895514 | Kermani | May 2005 | B1 |
6898709 | Teppler | May 2005 | B1 |
6908030 | Rajasekaran et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6937569 | Sarkar et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6947978 | Huffman | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954532 | Handley et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6957339 | Shinzaki | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7002712 | Barker et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003670 | Heaven et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7039505 | Southard et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7039699 | Narin et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7043640 | Pritchard et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7089310 | Ellerman et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7089585 | Dharmarajan | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7100049 | Gasparini et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7130858 | Ciaramitaro et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7143095 | Barrett et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7165051 | Ronning et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7191467 | Dujari et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7197646 | Fritz et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7260837 | Abraham et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7272610 | Torres | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272728 | Pierson et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7292723 | Tedesco et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7296088 | Padmanabhan et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7330871 | Barber | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7349955 | Korb et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7363170 | Seul et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7373669 | Eisen | May 2008 | B2 |
7401082 | Keene et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7428587 | Rowland et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7436780 | Stephens | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7438226 | Helsper et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7447494 | Law et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457823 | Shraim et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7475242 | Baird et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7478182 | Schweig | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7543740 | Greene et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7577620 | Donner | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7657626 | Zwicky | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7665658 | Fields | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7673793 | Greene et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685629 | White et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7708200 | Helsper et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7711846 | Padmanabhan et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7739402 | Roese et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7739512 | Hawkes | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7853533 | Eisen | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7908645 | Varghese et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7933984 | Smith et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7945494 | Williams | May 2011 | B2 |
7958029 | Bobich et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7983691 | Wong et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8020763 | Kowalchyk et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8037097 | Guo et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8042164 | Sheynblat et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8150968 | Barber | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8151327 | Eisen | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8201099 | Osbourn et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8209744 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8271891 | Osbourn et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8280833 | Miltonberger | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296229 | Yellin et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8321269 | Linden et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8567669 | Griegel et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8612854 | Eisen et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8779981 | Eisen et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8826393 | Eisen | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8838967 | Mills et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8862514 | Eisen | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8938671 | Eisen et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9060012 | Eisen | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9098617 | Pauley, Jr. et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9112850 | Eisen | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9118646 | Pierson et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9196004 | Eisen | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9361597 | Britton et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9390384 | Eisen | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9396331 | Eisen et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9412123 | Eisen | Aug 2016 | B2 |
20010011243 | Dembo et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010011304 | Wesigner et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010016840 | Hijikata et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010016876 | Kurth et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010034712 | Colvin | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010046096 | Worden | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020035622 | Barber | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020041328 | LeCompte et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020056042 | van der Kaay et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073046 | David | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073327 | Vellandi | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083079 | Meier et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020112171 | Ginter et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020153424 | Li | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156836 | Janosik, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166063 | Lachman et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020167965 | Beasley et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030002732 | Gossett et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030002740 | Melikian | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033161 | Walker | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033356 | Tran et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030070080 | Rosen | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076242 | Burns et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030105707 | Audebert et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105854 | Thorsteinsson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115334 | Bhat et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115481 | Baird et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120543 | Carey | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120586 | Litty | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030140258 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154214 | Tu et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163413 | Wiczkowski | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172036 | Feigenbaum | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182551 | Frantz et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208684 | Camacho et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212618 | Keyes et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233553 | Parks et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001044 | Luciani et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040004733 | Barker | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006553 | de Vries et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010682 | Foster et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027385 | Rekimoto et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030912 | Merkle, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034794 | Mayer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040073809 | Wing Keong | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088313 | Torres | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105431 | Monjas-Llorente et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111621 | Himberger et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117321 | Sancho | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040159699 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166857 | Shim et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040171381 | Inselberg | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181598 | Paya et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203750 | Cowdrey et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230820 | Hui Hsu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236696 | Aoki et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236702 | Fink et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254890 | Sancho et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260876 | Singh | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008148 | Jacobson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015601 | Tabi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022020 | Fremberg et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033653 | Eisenberg et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033703 | Holdsworth | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039034 | Doyle et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039219 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050076230 | Redenbaugh et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097320 | Golan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108177 | Sancho | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111054 | Umeda | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113092 | Coppinger et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131826 | Cook | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050185225 | Brawn et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188423 | Motsinger et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050246551 | Dondl et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278542 | Pierson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008779 | Shand et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010072 | Eisen | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026669 | Zakas | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060048211 | Pierson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080263 | Willis et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060126829 | Lai | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060130132 | Dharmarajan | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136294 | Linden et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155985 | Canard et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161501 | Waserstein et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060200855 | Willis | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200856 | Salowey et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224898 | Ahmed | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060237531 | Heffez et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264202 | Hagmeier et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060281541 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282660 | Varghese et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060284838 | Tsatalos et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287902 | Helsper et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011078 | Jain et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038568 | Greene et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043837 | Kruse et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061211 | Ramer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073630 | Greene et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094594 | Matichuk | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070097076 | Gross | May 2007 | A1 |
20070097976 | Wood et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070101405 | Engle et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070107059 | Chasin et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124246 | Lawyer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070162763 | Bender et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183000 | Eisen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198410 | Labgold et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070199054 | Florencio et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204044 | Rice et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070220594 | Tulsyan | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233599 | Ganesan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070234070 | Horning et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239604 | O'Connell et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255821 | Ge et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266257 | Camaisa et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271466 | Mak | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070294401 | Shkedi | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002911 | Eisen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005394 | Crooks | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010367 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010678 | Burdette et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015988 | Brown et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021801 | Song et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040653 | Levine | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040802 | Pierson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046562 | Butler | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052629 | Phillips et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080098222 | Zilberman | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101277 | Taylor | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104672 | Lunde | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104684 | Lunde | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120214 | Steele et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133420 | Barber | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162200 | O'Sullivan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162202 | Khanna et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162475 | Meggs | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080163128 | Callanan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184372 | Hoshina | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189790 | Park | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201214 | Aaron | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204788 | Kelly | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222706 | Renaud et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235623 | Li | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080281606 | Kitts | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301281 | Wang et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319774 | O'Sullivan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090024971 | Willner et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090044282 | Govindaraju | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090089869 | Varghese | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106413 | Salo | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090157417 | Bradley et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164269 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177692 | Chagoly et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090222308 | Zoldi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228585 | Kosbab et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241174 | Rajan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090280777 | Doherty | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292568 | Khosravani et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090307119 | Ahles et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005013 | Uriarte | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100070606 | Shenfield et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100145960 | Casteel et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153540 | Li et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169192 | Zoldi et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100293094 | Kolkowitz et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100321296 | Gross | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100333170 | Cox et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110082768 | Eisen | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110161228 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184778 | Graepel et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110288932 | Marks et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120233665 | Ranganathan et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239574 | Smith et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239774 | Tola et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120323788 | Keresman et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323836 | Wright et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130024300 | Choudhuri et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036304 | Lin et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130097673 | Meehan et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130144539 | Allen et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130185764 | Krstić et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130197998 | Buhrmann et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226717 | Ahluwalia et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130273879 | Eisen et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140032902 | Agrawal et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140120864 | Manolarakis et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140122343 | Einav et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140289867 | Bukai | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140361926 | Eisen et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150026027 | Priess et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150106270 | Burrell et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150242861 | Baldassano | Aug 2015 | A9 |
20150294316 | Eisen | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160019546 | Eisen | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160021084 | Eisen | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160203487 | Eisen | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160328710 | Britton et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 418 144 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0 923 039 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1 209 935 | May 2002 | EP |
1 256 911 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1 703 382 | Sep 2006 | EP |
2 154 891 | Feb 2010 | EP |
05-257602 | Oct 1993 | JP |
2000-276281 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2005-063216 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2008-535124 | Aug 2008 | JP |
10-1999-0015738 | Mar 1999 | KR |
10-0645983 | Nov 2006 | KR |
10-2008-0044558 | May 2008 | KR |
10-2009-0051977 | Sep 2009 | KR |
10-2010-0085888 | Jul 2010 | KR |
WO 0111450 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0195550 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 02091226 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03025868 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03075197 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03075197 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004038997 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2005099166 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2006135367 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007001394 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007045818 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007072238 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007075573 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2008054849 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2009132148 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2012054646 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2013142722 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 2014022813 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2014078569 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Banking Services Newsletter: Keeping You Up-to-Date on Banking Developments Throughout the UC System. UCOP-Banking Services Group. Dec. 2005. (8 pages). |
Bharosa Press Release. Bharosa announces online authentication solution to counter check 21-based fraud. Nov. 7, 2005. Available at http://www.bharosa.com/news/PR-110705.html. Accessed Jan. 18, 2007. (2 pages). |
Bharosa Products: Bharosa Virtual Authentication Devices—CheckPad: Secure check viewing online. Available at http://bharosa.com/authenticator.html. Accessed Jan. 18, 2007. (3 pages). |
Darlin, Damon. Opening the door on credit reports and pitching the lock. The New York Times. Mar. 18, 2006. (2 pages). |
European search report dated Oct. 27, 2008 for Application No. 08159110.9. |
European search report dated Mar. 13, 2009 for Application No. 06845722.5. |
International search report dated Feb. 26, 2008 for PCT/US2006/48251. |
Notice of allowance dated Aug. 13, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,425. |
Notice of allowance dated Sep. 11, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/769,674. |
Office action dated Feb. 15, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/769,674. |
Office action dated Feb. 28, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,425. |
Office action dated May 8, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/769,674. |
Office action dated Jun. 20, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,425. |
Office action dated Jun. 21, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,425. |
Office action dated Jun. 23, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,425. |
Office action dated Jul. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/769,674. |
Office action dated Oct. 6, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,425. |
Office action dated Oct. 11, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/769,674. |
Office action dated Oct. 24, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,425. |
Office action dated Nov. 8, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/769,674. |
Office action dated Dec. 29, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,425. |
Techweb News: Wells Fargo Intros Anti-Theft Alerts. Available at http://techweb.com/wire/166404177. Accessed Mar. 20, 2006. (1 page). |
UPIC Marketing Guide—The Clearing House. Available at http://www.upic.com/infofiles/UPIC—Marketing—Guide.pdf. Accessed Dec. 19, 2006. (17 pages). |
Gueye et al., “Constraint-Based Geolocation of Internet Hosts”, ACM Internet Measurement Conference 2004, Oct. 25-27, 2004, Taormina, Sicily, Italy, vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 288-293. |
“ISO 8583”, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO—8583, dated Apr. 13, 2015 in 14 pages. |
Kohno et al., “Remote Physical Device Fingerprinting”, Proceedings of 2005 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, May 8-11, 2005, Oakland, CA, pp. 211-225. |
Manavoglu et al., “Probabilistic User Behavior Models”, ICDM, Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Nov. 19-22, 2003, pp. 203-210. |
Official Communication in European Patent Application No. 05818903.6, dated Dec. 23, 2011. |
Official Communication in European Patent Application No. 05818903.6, dated Mar. 18, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2005/035532, dated Oct. 29, 2007. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2005/035532, dated Jan. 9, 2008. |
Official Communication in European Patent Application No. 8159110.9, dated Mar. 22, 2010. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2006/048251, dated Jun. 18, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2007/065776, dated Jul. 3, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2007/065776, dated Sep. 30, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/020750, dated Jun. 13, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion received in PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/020750, dated Jul. 1, 2008. |
Official Communication in European Patent Application No. 08165224.0, dated Nov. 15, 2010. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP09735653, dated Dec. 16, 2011. |
Official Communication for Application No. EP09735653, dated Jan. 4, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/041462, dated Dec. 1, 2009. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/041462, dated Nov. 4, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/056948, dated Apr. 18, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2011/056948, dated May 2, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/033357, dated Jul. 10, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2013/033357, dated Sep. 23, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/053495, dated Nov. 22, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2013/053495, dated Feb. 3, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/070146, dated Mar. 3, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2013/070146, dated May 19, 2015. |
Provisional Application as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 61/324,312, dated Apr. 15, 2010 in 15 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150205978 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60751188 | Dec 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11769674 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 14580085 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11612425 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 11769674 | US |