Methods and apparatus for storing and retrieving information relating to edible objects

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9511601
  • Patent Number
    9,511,601
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, August 14, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 6, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A method of marking an egg is disclosed and comprises applying radiant energy to the shell of an egg so as to cause discoloration of the eggshell, thereby forming a marking comprising at least a traceability code and a freshness date. Apparatus is also disclosed for applying markings on eggs being processed by an egg-handling machine that is designed and configured to transport a plurality of eggs therethrough, wherein the apparatus comprises a radiant energy source located in proximity to the egg-handling machine, the radiant energy source being configured to apply radiant energy to the eggs as the eggs are transported past the radiant energy source to selectively discolor the shell of the eggs and form markings on the shell, including a freshness date and a traceability code.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an egg marked with advertisements, a freshness date and a traceability code, and the method and apparatus used to create those eggs. Advertising on eggs provides a unique medium for advertisers to reach consumers. Attempts have been made to take advantage of this medium of advertising as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,843,958, to Egosi and titled “Method and Apparatus for Applying Advertisements to Eggs.” However, there is still a need for an easy application of advertising on eggs. There is also a need to put a date on eggs, to ensure customers that the egg is fresh.


The present invention addresses this need. The present invention provides an egg that has a freshness date, a traceability code and one or more advertising messages applied on it. The traceability code enables the consumer to access one or more websites and input the code and obtain information relating to the history of the egg. The freshness date tends to cause the consumer to scrutinize the egg, to confirm that it is fresh. As the consumer looks at the egg, he or she will tend to view the advertisement as well. Thus, providing both the freshness date and the advertisement enhances the efficacy of the advertisement. Moreover, the cost of the marking operation is at least partially offset by the economic value of the advertisement. Further aspects of this invention provide methods and apparatus for applying markings to eggs.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One aspect of embodiments of the present invention includes a method of marking an egg by applying radiant energy to the shell of an egg so as to cause discoloration of the eggshell to form a permanent marking. The markings include text and graphics, and can include an advertisement, a freshness date, and a traceability code or most preferably includes all of this information. A laser is preferably employed as the radiant energy source. Desirably, the radiant energy is applied so as to leave much of the area of the eggshell unaffected so as to form contrast between the unaffected areas and the marking. The method preferably forms the markings while the egg rapidly moves through a predetermined region of an egg handling machine.


In the preferred method according to the present invention, the markings are made by laser etching without applying a foreign material to the eggshell.


A preferred embodiment comprises an apparatus for applying markings on eggs that is operable in association with an egg-handling machine that performs washing, candling, grading and packing of eggs. The apparatus comprises a radiant energy source located in proximity to the egg-handling machine, so that the radiant energy source can apply radiant energy to the egg to discolor the eggshell and form the markings. There is provided an egg bearing an information marking on it, wherein the marking is formed at least in part by discolored material on the eggshell. The egg may include the marking being formed entirely by discolored material of the eggshell. The egg may also be raw or pasteurized.


In some embodiments, a method of marking an egg is provided, comprising applying radiant energy to the shell of an egg so as to cause discoloration of the eggshell, thereby forming a marking comprising at least a traceability code and a freshness date. The marking may further comprise an advertisement. The radiant energy may be applied by a laser. The markings may be formed by a generally stationary radiant energy source as the egg is transported by said source.


In some further embodiments, an apparatus is provided for applying markings on eggs being processed by an egg-handling machine that is designed and configured to transport a plurality of eggs therethrough, said apparatus comprising a radiant energy source located in proximity to the egg-handling machine, said radiant energy source being configured to apply radiant energy to the eggs as the eggs are transported past said radiant energy source to selectively discolor the shell of the eggs and form markings on the shell, including a freshness date and a traceability code. The egg-handling machine may be an egg-grading machine.


In some further embodiments, a method of marking at least one egg is provided, comprising: conveying the egg to a marking station having at least one laser marking device configured to apply laser energy of sufficient intensity to etch indicia in the outer surface of the shell of the egg; and activating the laser device to apply laser energy to the egg and thereby etch the indicia in the outer surface of the egg shell, said indicia comprising at least a freshness date and a traceability identification. The indicia may further comprise advertising text and/or graphics. The applied laser energy may ablate and melt surface egg shell material to an approximate depth within the range of about 25 to about 200 micrometers, where the depth may be within the range of about 50 to about 90 micrometers. The applied laser energy may ablate and melt surface egg shell material to an approximate depth that is within the range of about 5 to about 8 percent of the thickness of the egg shell. The traceability identification may comprise one or more items of information selected from the group consisting of: a traceability code; an identification of the producer of the egg; an address of the producer; a process date of the egg; a time of processing the egg; an identification of the grader of the egg; an identification of the packer lane in which the egg was processed; an identification of the customer who purchased the egg; an indication of the type of packaging of the egg; an indication of the color of the egg; an indication of the temperature at which the egg was washed; an indication of the temperature of the cooler in which the egg was placed; and an identification of any advertising indicia that was placed on the egg.


In some further embodiments, an egg is provided having indicia on an outer portion of its shell, said indicia comprising a freshness date and a traceability code that specifies unique identification and history information regarding the egg. The indicia may be laser etched on the outer portion of its shell. The unique identification and history information may comprise one or more items of information selected from the group consisting of: a traceability code; an identification of the producer of the egg; an address of the producer; a process date of the egg; a time of processing the egg; an identification of the grader of the egg; an identification of the packer lane in which the egg was processed; an identification of the customer who purchased the egg; an indication of the type of packaging of the egg; an indication of the color of the egg; an indication of the temperature at which the egg was washed; an indication of the temperature of the cooler in which the egg was placed; and an identification of any advertising indicia that was placed on the egg. The traceability code may be capable of being inserted into a field of at least one predetermined Internet website, which website is configured to display said identification and history information of the egg.


In some further embodiments, an egg is provided having the outer surface of its shell laser etched with a freshness date and a traceability code that specifies unique identification and history information regarding the egg.


In some further embodiments, a system is provided for processing eggs and providing information relating to eggs that are processed through the system, the system comprising egg grading, candling, marking and packing stations, said system including a central processing unit having associated memory that is configured to receive and store data relating to eggs that are processed through the system, said system comprising: conveying the eggs through said egg grading station where said eggs are graded and data relating to the grade of each egg is transmitted to said central processing unit; conveying the eggs through said egg candling station where said eggs are candled and data relating to the candling of each egg is transmitted to said central processing unit; conveying the eggs through said egg marking station where said eggs are marked with at least a freshness date and a traceability code that specifies unique identification and history information regarding the egg; storing data relating to the marking of each egg in memory associated with said central processing unit; and conveying the eggs through said egg packing station where data relating to the packaging of each egg is transmitted to said central processing unit, said central processing unit being operatively connected to a predetermined website that is accessible through the Internet, wherein said identification and history information regarding an individual egg is accessible by inserting its traceability code in a predetermined field of said website. The markings may further comprise advertising indicia. The marking station may further comprise at least one laser.


For a better understanding of the present invention, reference is made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a diagram depicting an egg bearing markings using method and apparatus embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a diagram of another view of an egg bearing markings using method and apparatus embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a diagram of another view of an egg bearing markings using method and apparatus embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a diagram of a top view of an egg bearing markings using method and apparatus embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic view depicting apparatus for performing an embodiment of the method of the present invention.



FIG. 6 is a diagrammatic view depicting apparatus embodying a portion of the present invention shown together with a portion of an egg-handling machine, for performing an embodiment of the method of the present invention.



FIG. 7 is a diagrammatic view depicting apparatus useful in performing another embodiment of the method of the present invention.



FIG. 8 is a block diagram depicting portions of an egg-handling machine and particularly illustrating inline and offline operations.



FIG. 9 is a diagrammatic view depicting apparatus for performing another embodiment of a method of the present invention.



FIG. 10 is another diagram depicting an egg bearing markings using method and apparatus embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 11 is a table indicating history information that may be supplied on at least one website when a traceability code of an egg is inserted in a predetermined window located on a website.



FIG. 12 is another table indicating history and aging information that may be supplied on at least one website when a traceability code of an egg is entered in a predetermined window located on a website.



FIG. 13 is a diagram depicting a display that included the predetermined window for entering a traceability code of an egg, wherein the display may be provided at one or more websites.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1, an egg 120 is provided with markings (i.e., indicia). The markings include text 123 and graphics 124. The markings are formed by discoloring material of the shell to form text 123 and graphics 124, by discoloring some material of the shell, such as that which forms the number 0 as indicated at 125 and leaving other areas of the shell unaffected, such as the area inside the number 0, as indicated at 129. The discoloration may also be done variably so as to form a gradient of discoloration to form the graphics 124, or to create a variety of text 123 such as bold text, italic text, or any type of text font. That is, some areas may be more discolored than others as, for example, by exposing them to radiant energy for a higher intensity or longer duration than other areas. The egg itself preferably is a raw chicken egg, although other edible raw eggs such as, duck, goose or ostrich eggs can be used. Also, the markings on can be applied to precooked eggs, as for example, boiled or microwaved eggs.


The text and graphics may be applied horizontally (FIG. 2), vertically (FIG. 3), or on top (FIG. 4) of the egg 120. The text and graphic discolorations can be controlled to form a freshness date 126 and an advertisement 127, 128. The freshness date 126 may also include a traceability code 135 (see FIG. 10) to identify the origin of the egg. The advertisement includes a tag line or other information 127 and/or a logo 128. Most preferably, the egg 120 includes a freshness date 126, a tag line 127, a logo 128 and a traceability code 135. The advertisement, comprised of at least the tag line 127 and logo 128, may include a trademark, slogan, or any other promotional text or graphics affiliated with conveying information for advertising.


The freshness date 126 is provided to reassure consumers about the expiration date of the particular egg 120. The traceability code 135 enables a consumer, for example, to obtain detailed historical information regarding the location of where the egg was produced in order to assist in consumer alerts. This detailed historical information accessible to the consumer by virtue of the historical information being located in a database that is generated during the processing of eggs during the egg-handling and marking of the egg. The eggs that are sold with the above described markings will initially be sold by safety conscious grocery stores and chains that recognize the need to provide their customers with information about the freshness of the eggs they sell. Since most large grocery stores and chains have websites they maintain for their and their customer's benefit, they will have a display, such as display 136 shown in FIG. 13, located prominently on their website that has a window 137 in which a consumer can enter the alpha-numeric identification of the egg they wish to inquire about. When they do so, detailed historical data such as that shown in FIG. 11 will be shown which provides a wealth of information about the history of the egg. For example, it can include all of the items shown in the table of FIG. 11, as well as other information that can include an indication of whether the eggs are laid by chickens that are caged, free range, or caged in a certain sized cage, the diet, supplements and medication the chickens are given, among other items.


With regard to the expiration date, there is not consistency with regard to what such a date indicates. The information that can be provided by the table of FIG. 12 cuts through the ambiguity of terms that are commonly used at the present time by providing information relating to each of them. Importantly, the date that they were processed and packed is indicated and this is nearly always the date that they were laid by chickens. “Sell by” and “use by” dates are indicated and an expiration date is also indicated. While the FDA or other governmental agency may dictate expiration dates in the future, it is presently believed that it is safe to consume refrigerated eggs within 30 days of their packing date.


While each egg is preferably provided with a unique traceability code, it should be understood that having several eggs with the exact same traceability code is within the spirit and scope of the present invention. For example, if all eggs run through a particular line, within a few minutes of one another, and all or nearly all of the items of information shown in the table of FIG. 11 are the same, the fact that they had the same traceability code should not avoid infringement. In other words, the word ‘unique’ in this context, means that the traceability code will enable a customer to obtain all relevant historical information relating to any egg by accessing the database through the website or otherwise. In this regard, a consumer not having a computer should be able to obtain such information from the seller of the egg by telephone or direct inquiry at the seller's store, for example.


Radiant energy as, for example, electromagnetic radiation such as visible, infrared or ultraviolet light, can be used to discolor the eggshell. The radiant energy can be controlled to only discolor a targeted print area 125 of the eggshell. Some areas of the egg can be left unaffected 129 (see FIG. 1). The discoloration on the eggshell is easily viewable because of the contrast of the eggshell color 129 to the discoloration 125 from the radiant energy. A significant benefit of the use of laser marking is that brown eggs have etched indicia that is a contrasting white color, while white eggs have etched indicia that is a contrasting dark brown color. The discoloration 125 can be used to form indicia or marking information on the eggs. The discoloration to form text and graphics can be applied generally simultaneously by one or more radiant energy source.


No foreign material must be added to the eggshell in order for the radiant energy to discolor the eggshell. Thus, no foreign material such as any ink or radiant energy sensitive material that could react with the radiant energy needs to be added to form a marking. The radiant energy is applied to the natural eggshell. Thus, the marking most desirably is formed solely by the effect of the radiant energy on the normally occurring materials of the eggshell itself. This provides several significant benefits. The egg can be properly represented to the consumer as a product with no additives or contaminants. Moreover, because it is not necessary to apply additional materials for purposes of the marking process, it is unnecessary to add the equipment needed contact the egg with a foreign substance. This greatly simplifies the task of performing the process inline in the production environment of an existing high-speed egg handling apparatus.


In a method according to an embodiment of the present invention, a radiant energy source 110 (FIG. 5) in proximity of an egg 120 directs radiant energy 112 towards the egg 120. Radiant energy source 110 desirably includes a laser such as a C02 gas laser adapted to provide light at about 10.6 nm wavelength, at a minimum of 25 watts, and a projected maximum of 200 watts radiated power, in a beam projected from approximately 100 mm at the surface of the egg. When operated in this power range, the beam ablates and melts the outer surface material from the egg shell. The structural integrity of the egg shell is not affected because the etching by the beam only affects the outer approximately 50 to approximately 90 micrometers of the egg shell, which is approximately 5% to approximately 8% of the thickness of the egg shell. The beam is directed onto those areas of the egg, which are to be discolored and turned on and off so as to provide a series of pulses, the beam being “on” for about 60 milliseconds during each pulse. During this pulsed actuation, the beam is swept across those areas of the egg surface, which are to be discolored The sweeping motion may be performed in any manner which will provide the desired relative motion of the beam and the egg. Since the preferred embodiments will operate in association with an egg-handling machine which moves eggs at an extremely rapid speed, the beam must be rapidly moved to produce the desired indicia and also compensate for the speed of movement of the eggs past the laser apparatus, which is preferably stationary. For example, the radiant energy source 110 may include a beam-sweeping unit incorporating conventional optical elements such as movable or variable lenses, mirrors or prisms adapted to deflect the beam and to vary the deflection with time. One suitable radiant energy source is a laser of the type sold under the designation DSL-1 Series (in all available wattages) by the Domino Amjet and Domino Printing Company of Gurnee, Ill., U.S.A.


Using such equipment, and referring to FIG. 5, radiant energy 112 is directed towards a target print area 122 of egg 120. Radiant energy 112 discolors egg 120 to form text 123 and graphics 124.


In a method according to an embodiment of the present invention, an egg moves through a portion of an egg-grading machine as shown in FIG. 6. An egg-grading machine grades the quality of the eggs, and may also transport the eggs towards a packaging machine. Egg-grading machines will move the egg along a path. Somewhere along the path, and preferably immediately before the eggs are packed, a predetermined region can be selected where the egg will pass through and radiant energy can form markings on the egg. Typically, as shown in FIG. 6, egg-grading machines have calipers 139 that hold the eggs at some point in the path of the egg-grading machine. The radiant energy source 110 may be placed in proximity to this point when the eggs are held so that the radiant energy 112 forms the markings on an egg 120 as it passes through this predetermined region. This eliminates any need for a special apparatus to position the egg. In this way the method is performed inline with the egg-grading machine. A beam-sweeping unit 111 may control the direction of the radiant energy 112.


In another embodiment of the present invention, a radiant energy source may be placed in proximity of an existing egg-handling machine. Egg-handling machines includes any device or apparatus that will control the movement of an egg along a path, including egg-grading machines. The radiant energy source can be placed in proximity to the egg-handling machine so that the markings may be applied to the egg inline. In FIG. 7, the egg-handling machine moves an egg 120 along a conveyor apparatus 132. Conveyor apparatus 132 may include rollers 135, or some other form of conveyance such as the calipers discussion above, that moves egg 120 in a particular direction 133. Egg 120 will move along apparatus 132 in the direction 133 apparatus 132 is moving, and egg 120 may move in a rotational direction 134 on apparatus 132. Radiant energy source 110 is placed in proximity to conveyor belt 132 such that radiant energy 112 is directed towards egg 120. Beam-sweeping unit 111 can be used to compensate for the movement 133 of conveyor belt 132 and the rotation 134 of egg 120, so that the text and graphics can be applied to the egg 120.


There are many variations of egg-handling machines. Most perform some common minimal basic functions. FIG. 8 is a block diagram outlining the basic functions of those machines. The eggs move through these machines while these basic functions are performed, and a radiant energy source can be placed inline 130 or offline 131 in between many of these functions to perform a method of the present invention. The eggs are loaded into the machine. An offline procedure may be performed after this function. The eggs are then washed, after which an inline method may be performed. The eggs are candled, after which an inline method may be performed. The eggs move to the grading portion of the machine where they are weighted and graded, after which an inline method may be performed. The eggs are then transferred to a sorter, before which an inline method may be performed. The eggs are then sorted by grades, after which an inline method may be performed. The eggs are placed into a package, after which an inline method may be performed. An offline process 131 can be performed prior to the load processor after the unload process and, typically involves human intervention or some other form of mechanical intervention alien to the egg-handling machine. In preferred embodiments of the present invention, the radiant energy source can be associated with an existing egg-handling machine without appreciably modifying the machine.


The radiant energy source may be connected to an input that can control the text and graphics. In one embodiment of the invention, the input is a computer. The computer can be used to enter the design of the advertisement, consisting of a tag line, a logo, and the freshness date, to be applied to the egg. The design of the tag line, logo, and freshness date can be entered into the computer in many ways, including scanning an image into the computer, or using software to make the design. The computer may be connected to the computer control system of the egg-handling machine and can import much of the data that is contained in the table of FIG. 11, and can calculate the key egg dates from the process date imported from the egg-handling machine. This data is then stored in the database together with the traceability code that can be generated by conventional indexing software located on the computer or elsewhere. The computer then controls the radiant energy source or the beam-sweeping unit to apply the marking to the egg.


In FIG. 9, a method is shown where the markings are formed by a raster pattern. A radiant energy source 110 can apply radiant energy 112 such that one ray of the radiant energy is responsible for marking along one horizontal of the egg to form text 123, and another radiant energy source 115 provides radiant energy 116 that is responsible for the marking of graphics 124. This also can be done with one radiant energy source that emits multiple rays of radiant energy, or with any plurality of radiant energy sources that emit radiant energy. Because of the high speed of many egg-handling machines, and therefore the small window of time during which the marking must occur, several sources may be required to provide all of the markings without decreasing the operating speed of the egg-handling machines.


While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it should be understood that other modifications, substitutions and alternatives are apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. Such modifications, substitutions and alternatives can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which should be determined from the appended claims.


Various features of the invention are set forth in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for providing historical information regarding an egg, the method comprising: receiving a request to access information relating to an egg, the request including a traceability code associated with the egg, wherein the traceability code is a marking that has been generated and applied to an eggshell of the egg with a radiant energy source that is located along a path of an egg-handling machine,wherein the traceability code is generated by a computer control system of the egg-handling machine;retrieving, from at least one database, via the traceability code, the historical information regarding the egg, the historical information including information indicative of one or more operating conditions of at least one processing station of the egg-handling machine during processing of the egg, a date at which the egg was processed, and information regarding a packing lane in which the egg was processed; andtransmitting the historical information regarding the egg to be displayed to a user.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further including providing a web site configured to receive requests to access information relating to eggs, wherein the act of receiving the request includes receiving the request via the web site.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein applying a marking to the eggshell includes using one or more laser beams to form the making on the eggshell.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further including monitoring the one or more operating conditions of the at least one processing station during the processing of the egg, andrecording the information indicative of the one or more operating conditions in the at least one database.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the historical information regarding the egg includes a temperature under which the egg was washed at the at least one processing station.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, further including monitoring the temperature under which the egg was washed at the at least one processing station, andrecording the temperature under which the egg was washed in the at least one database.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the historical information regarding the egg further includes an identification of a customer who purchased the egg.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the historical information regarding the egg further includes an identification of a customer who purchased the egg.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the historical information regarding the egg further includes an identification of at least one advertising indicia formed on the egg.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the historical information further includes information regarding a producer that produced the egg.
  • 11. A system for providing historical information regarding an egg, the system comprising: at least one interface configured to receive a request to access information relating to at least one edible object, the request including a traceability code associated with the at least one edible object, the at least one edible object being an egg, wherein the traceability code is a marking that has been generated and applied to an eggshell of the egg with a radiant energy source that is located along a path of an egg-handling machine,wherein the traceability code is generated by a computer control system of the egg-handling machine; andat least one processor configured to retrieve, from at least one database, via the traceability code, historical information regarding the at least one edible object, the historical information including information indicative of one or more operating conditions of at least one processing station, of the egg-handling machine, during the processing of the egg, a date at which the egg was processed, and information regarding a packing lane in which the egg was processed, wherein the at least one interface is further configured to transmit the historical information regarding the at least on edible object to be displayed to a user.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the at least one interface is configured to receive web requests, and wherein the request to access information relating to the at least one edible object includes a web request.
  • 13. The system of claim 11, wherein the historical information further includes information indicative of one or more operating conditions of at least one processing station during processing of the at least one edible object.
  • 14. The system of claim 11, wherein the historical information further includes an identification of a customer who purchased the at least one edible object.
  • 15. The system of claim 11, wherein the historical information further includes an identification of a retailer who sells the at least one edible object.
  • 16. The system of claim 11, wherein the historical information further includes an identification of at least one advertising indicia formed on the at least one edible object.
  • 17. The system of claim 11, wherein the historical information further includes information regarding producer that produced the edible object.
Parent Case Info

This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/090,614, filed on Apr. 20, 2011, which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/333,580, filed on Jan. 17, 2006, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/542,324, filed on Apr. 4, 2007, which is a National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US2004/000633, filed on Jan. 12, 2004, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/440,273, filed on Jan. 15, 2003, all of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (179)
Number Name Date Kind
1906094 Powell Apr 1933 A
3094920 Priesmeyer Jun 1963 A
3665148 Yasenchak et al. May 1972 A
3779159 Rose et al. Dec 1973 A
3916143 Farrell Oct 1975 A
4043105 Cochran Aug 1977 A
4316720 Ackerman Feb 1982 A
4578329 Holsappel Mar 1986 A
4636043 Bellar Jan 1987 A
4652722 Stone et al. Mar 1987 A
4659902 Swensrud et al. Apr 1987 A
4734858 Schlafly Mar 1988 A
4839181 MacMurray et al. Jun 1989 A
4843958 Egosi Jul 1989 A
4900617 Smith Feb 1990 A
5021631 Ravellat Jun 1991 A
5120631 Kanbayashi et al. Jun 1992 A
5120928 Piliero Jun 1992 A
5142976 Roulleau Sep 1992 A
5164009 Chandler Nov 1992 A
5198843 Ito et al. Mar 1993 A
5230628 Kaneko et al. Jul 1993 A
5262470 Shimotsuma et al. Nov 1993 A
5305244 Newman et al. Apr 1994 A
5316397 Robertson et al. May 1994 A
5318449 Schoell et al. Jun 1994 A
5335003 Sugden Aug 1994 A
5477179 Takada et al. Dec 1995 A
5478990 Montanari et al. Dec 1995 A
5526119 Blit et al. Jun 1996 A
5546502 Hart et al. Aug 1996 A
5608429 Hayashihara et al. Mar 1997 A
5644693 Fitzgerald et al. Jul 1997 A
5646765 Laakmann et al. Jul 1997 A
5653900 Clement Aug 1997 A
5660747 Drouillard et al. Aug 1997 A
5691757 Hayashihara et al. Nov 1997 A
5724261 Denny et al. Mar 1998 A
5734412 Hasebe et al. Mar 1998 A
5767477 Sutter, Jr. Jun 1998 A
5792807 Hayashihara et al. Aug 1998 A
5798843 Yamamoto et al. Aug 1998 A
5817243 Shaffer Oct 1998 A
5860810 Faul Jan 1999 A
5897797 Drouillard et al. Apr 1999 A
5924069 Kowalkowski et al. Jul 1999 A
5928842 Shinmoto et al. Jul 1999 A
5939974 Heagle et al. Aug 1999 A
6018135 Weick Jan 2000 A
6029424 McEvoy et al. Feb 2000 A
6033226 Bullen Mar 2000 A
6104966 Haagensen Aug 2000 A
6148249 Newman Nov 2000 A
6154738 Call Nov 2000 A
6180914 Jones et al. Jan 2001 B1
6188990 Brook et al. Feb 2001 B1
6270222 Herpst Aug 2001 B1
6409082 Davis et al. Jun 2002 B1
6421159 Sutter et al. Jul 2002 B1
6429889 Murokh Aug 2002 B1
6546304 Thorvaldsson et al. Apr 2003 B2
6584982 Clay et al. Jul 2003 B1
6671698 Pickett et al. Dec 2003 B2
6678094 Sator et al. Jan 2004 B2
6691135 Pickett et al. Feb 2004 B2
6732928 Lawlor May 2004 B1
6791592 Assa et al. Sep 2004 B2
6796241 Catalan et al. Sep 2004 B2
6810796 Catalan et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829000 Assa et al. Dec 2004 B2
6874000 Sholl et al. Mar 2005 B2
6878517 Benson Apr 2005 B1
6911969 Nelson et al. Jun 2005 B1
6995675 Curkendall et al. Feb 2006 B2
7062513 Beck et al. Jun 2006 B2
7085777 Beck et al. Aug 2006 B2
7096221 Nakano Aug 2006 B2
7194395 Genovese Mar 2007 B2
7249006 Lombardo et al. Jul 2007 B2
7349808 Kreiswirth et al. Mar 2008 B1
7412461 Sholl et al. Aug 2008 B2
7440901 Dlott et al. Oct 2008 B1
7575770 Garwood Aug 2009 B2
7657740 Numao et al. Feb 2010 B2
7668754 Bridgelall Feb 2010 B1
7951409 Parker May 2011 B2
8082191 Omatsu Dec 2011 B2
8084712 Griffiths et al. Dec 2011 B2
8455026 Chait et al. Jun 2013 B2
8455030 Chait et al. Jun 2013 B2
8499718 Chait et al. Aug 2013 B2
8544739 Parker Oct 2013 B2
8657098 Chait et al. Feb 2014 B2
20010030179 Knieb et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010056359 Abreu Dec 2001 A1
20020011311 Carignan et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020035439 Takeda et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020082924 Koether Jun 2002 A1
20020179580 Costin Dec 2002 A1
20030004750 Teraoka et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030006281 Thomas et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030009239 Lombardo et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030015507 Miller et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018513 Hoffman et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030036044 Pastrick et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030069774 Hoffman et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030074250 Burk Apr 2003 A1
20030080191 Lubow et al. May 2003 A1
20030083947 Hoffman et al. May 2003 A1
20030177025 Curkendall et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177048 Jacobson Sep 2003 A1
20030206227 Assa et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030226835 Bell Dec 2003 A1
20040015318 Heller et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040054506 Singh et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040078227 Morris Apr 2004 A1
20040083201 Sholl et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040100380 Lindsay et al. May 2004 A1
20040130612 Assa et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040158447 Leger et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172587 Lawlor Sep 2004 A1
20040177011 Ramsay et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040203377 Eaton et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040220855 Carignan et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050067106 Melges Mar 2005 A1
20050091113 Mitchell et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050091124 White Apr 2005 A1
20050118704 Malobabic Jun 2005 A1
20050131723 Sholl et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050131763 Junger Jun 2005 A1
20050226975 Drouillard Oct 2005 A1
20050251449 Pape et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261864 Edwards et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261991 Kennamer Nov 2005 A1
20050267790 Skalsky Dec 2005 A1
20050273369 Ota et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004702 St. John et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060012821 Franklin et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060059137 Walker Mar 2006 A1
20060138105 Parker Jun 2006 A1
20060161392 Sholl et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060187048 Curkendall et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060259471 Droubie et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060265584 Bourret et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271555 Beck et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070067177 Martin et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070086822 Sato Apr 2007 A1
20070088634 Matsumoto et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070095905 Kadaba May 2007 A1
20070170242 Fobbe et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070221727 Reznik Sep 2007 A1
20070229649 Parker Oct 2007 A1
20070292559 Garwood Dec 2007 A1
20080086321 Walton Apr 2008 A1
20080245859 Saito et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080305827 Barnes et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090222285 Silverbrook et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090234756 Omatsu Sep 2009 A1
20090271243 Sholl et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100145730 Abreu Jun 2010 A1
20110004485 Sholl et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110035326 Sholl et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040660 Allison et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110140380 Ulrich Jun 2011 A1
20110174223 Chait et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110175974 Chait et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110176901 Chait et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110177206 Chait et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110177207 Chait et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110177208 Chait et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110177217 Chait et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110258171 Parker Oct 2011 A1
20120114820 Griffiths et al. May 2012 A1
20120180436 Chait et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120253883 Sholl et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130017296 Chait et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130110580 Sholl et al. May 2013 A1
20130212981 Chait et al. Aug 2013 A1
20140057028 Chait et al. Feb 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (49)
Number Date Country
2722417 Oct 2009 CA
3601913 Jul 1987 DE
3722176 Jan 1989 DE
3836821 May 1990 DE
247831 Apr 1991 DE
0291471 Apr 1991 DE
4125007 Jan 1993 DE
4322252 Jan 1995 DE
1019109 Oct 2001 DE
0421837 Apr 1991 EP
0684144 Nov 1995 EP
1489538 Dec 2004 EP
2033185 Mar 1993 ES
2654662 May 1991 FR
2621529 Apr 1999 FR
2776790 Oct 1999 FR
2131767 Jun 1984 GB
2365165 Feb 2002 GB
55034966 Mar 1980 JP
58090985 May 1983 JP
61206692 Sep 1986 JP
1108940 Apr 1989 JP
1196259 Aug 1989 JP
260552 Mar 1990 JP
3138092 Jun 1991 JP
3211068 Sep 1991 JP
3221290 Sep 1991 JP
5146887 Jun 1993 JP
7011183 Jan 1995 JP
1128588 Feb 1999 JP
2000168157 Jun 2000 JP
2001136859 May 2001 JP
2004342097 Dec 2004 JP
2004344040 Dec 2004 JP
2005138169 Jun 2005 JP
2006018420 Jan 2006 JP
WO 0135376 May 2001 WO
WO 0156789 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0193036 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0197555 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0197556 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0237375 May 2002 WO
WO 03048725 Jun 2003 WO
WO 03069508 Aug 2003 WO
WO 03098388 Nov 2003 WO
WO 2006044689 Apr 2006 WO
WO 2007016937 Feb 2007 WO
WO 2009132237 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2009132237 Oct 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (83)
Entry
[No Author Listed], American Association for the Advancement of Science. Planning Effective Bioterror Responses. Press release, Feb. 14, 2004.
[No Author Listed], Center for Disease Control (CDC) “What is FoodNet?”, available at http://www.cdc.gov/foodnet, Aug. 2004. 5 Pages.
[No Author Listed], Food Safety and Inspection Service. Salmonella Enteritidis Risk Assessment: Shell Eggs and Egg Products. Final Report, available at www.fsis.usda.gov/OPHS/risk/, Aug. 10, 1998.
[No Author Listed], National Academy of Sciences. Countering Agricultural Bioterrorism. Available at http://books.nap.edu/catalog/10505.html, executive summary only, 2004.
[No Author Listed], National Research Council “Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism”, Committee on Science and Technology for Countering Terrorism, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2002. ISBN 0-309-08481-4 HV6431.M354. 62 Pages.
[No Author Listed], Qtek 9090-Full phone specification, http://www.gsmarena.com/qtek—9090-1171.php, 3 pages, 2005.
[No Author Listed], Quantitative Assessment of the Relative Risk to Public Health from Foodborne Listeria monocytogenes Among Selected Categories of Ready-to-Eat Foods, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Sep. 2003, pp. 1-272.
[No Author Listed], U.S. Department of Agriculture National Inter-Agency Incident Management System (NIIMS): Operational System Description 2004.
[No Author Listed], Zebra Technologies “Bar Coding and RFID: The Key to Traceability and Safety in the Foodservice Supply Chain”, white paper, 2004.
Aginfolink, AgInfoLink Products and Services. Downloaded from www.aginfolink.com, Apr. 17, 2003. 8 Pages.
Auernhammer, The Role of Mechatronics in Crop Product Traceability. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Journal of Scientific Research and Development, Invited Overview Paper, vol. IV, Oct. 2002. Presented at the Club of Bologna meeting Jul. 27, 2002. Chicago, IL. USA. 21 Pages.
Axtell et al., Improving Recalls at the Food Safety Inspection Service. Report of the Recall Policy Working Group, Food Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Aug. 1998.
Bailar III, Ensuring Safe Food: An Organizational Perspective. In Layne, S.P. et al., eds. FirePower in the Lab: Automation in the Fight Against Infectious Diseases and Bioterrorism. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press, NAS, pp. 133-142, 2000.
Bantham et al., Creating Value Through Traceability Solutions: A Case Study. Submitted by FoodOrigins, to the International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, Texas A&M University, May 19, 2003. 12 Pages.
Barrett et al., If Smallpox Strikes Portland . . . Scientific American, Feb. 21, 2005. 8 Pages.
Beamon, Supply Chain Design and Analysis: Models and Methods. International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 55, No. 3, Aug. 15, 1998, pp. 281-294.
Benson, Simulation Modeling and Optimization Using ProModel. Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, Dec. 7-10, 1997, pp. 587-593.
Bidawid et al., Contamination of Foods by Food Handlers: Experiments on Hepatitis A Virus Transfer to Food and Its Interruption. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66, No. 7, Jul. 2000, pp. 2759-2763.
Boyle, A Recipe for Disaster. Fortune Magazine, Nov. 14, 2005. 3 Pages.
Bruemmer, Food Biosecurity. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 103, No. 6, Jun. 2003. pp. 687-691.
Cellarosi et al., Detecting Outbreaks by Time Series Analysis. Dept. of Electronics, Computer Science and Systems, Proceedings of the 15th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2002, pp. 1-6.
Chalk, The U.S. Agricultural Sector: A New Target for Terrorism? Jane's International Security News, Feb. 9, 2001. 8 Pages.
Chowhound, “Why are they stamping eggs with a use by date?”, http://chowhound.chow.com/topics/338070, dated Oct. 29, 2006.
Cipra, “Hot Topics” Workshop Takes a Logistical Look at Biodefense. SIAM News. vol. 35, No. 10, Dec. 2002. 3 Pages.
Clause, Supply Chains, Quality Assurance and Traceability Using ISO 9000-2000 in Agriculture. presented at the symposium “Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation in Grains and Oilseeds: Implications in Transition.” Economic Research Service, USDA, and The Farm Foundation, Jan. 27-28, 2003. 8 Pages.
Crawford, A Conversation on Food Safety and Global Security. Remarks to the Open Forum, U.S. Department of State, downloaded from www.state.gov/s/p/of/proc/tr/13454.htm, Sep. 6, 2002. 3 Pages.
Durand-Wayland Labeling Systems, http://www.durand-wayland.com/label/8/7/2006, downloaded Aug. 7, 2006.
Eubank, Scalable, Efficient Epidemiological Simulation. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Mar. 11-14, 2002, pp. 139-145.
European Search Report from related application, PCT/US08/03160, filed Mar. 11, 2008, mailed Aug. 12, 2008.
Food Net Annual Report 2000, Published 2001. pp. 1-36.
Gan et al., Distributed Supply Chain Simulation Across Enterprise Boundaries. Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, Dec. 10-13, 2000, pp. 1245-1251.
Gast et al., Minimizing Microbial Food Safety Hazards for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: Sanitation and Traceback. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Servic, Document MF-2482. Dec. 2000. 6 Pages.
Glemot, Issues and Tools of Traceability at Growing and Shipping Stages. Infos-Ctifl, vol. 166, pp. 24-28, Nov. 2000. With English translation of French article.
Golan et al., Traceability for Food Marketing & Food Safety: What's the Next Step? Agricultural Outlook, Economic Research Service/USDA, pp. 21-25, Jan./Feb. 2002.
Golan et al.,Traceability in the U.S. Food Supply: Economic Theory and Industry Studies. U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report No. 830, Mar. 2004.
Gorris et al., The Food Micromodel for Prediction of Growth of Foodborne Pathogens. Voedingsmiddelentechnologie, vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 36-39, 1993.
Gorris et al., The Impact of Risk Analysis on Food Safety. Address presented during the inauguration as the new holder of the European Chair in Food Safety Microbiology at Wageningen University, Oct. 3, 2002.
Greg Stiles, “Laser Labeling,” Mail Tribune, Sep. 19, 2004.
Guzewich et al., FDA's Role in Traceback Investigation for Produce. Food Safety Magazine, Dec. 2000/Jan. 2001.
Hadfield, Computerweekly.com, McDonald's cuts inspection report times as PDA-based system goes on global menu, http://www.computerweekly.com/feature/McDonalds-cuts-inspection-report-times-as-PDAbased-system-goes-on-global-menu, 2005. 1 Page.
Harlander et al., Software Systems for Food Safety and Defense. AIB Update, May/Jun. 2007, pp. 9-10.
Heflin et al., Simulation Modeling and Optimization Using ProModel. Proceedings in the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, Dec. 13-16, 1998, pp. 191-197.
Herrmann, Traceability in the U.S. Grain and Plant Protein Feed Ingredient Industries. White Paper, The American Feed Industry Association, Jul. 2, 2002. 19 Pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2007/000005 mailed on Jul. 31, 2008.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2007/000005 mailed on Jun. 13, 2008.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2003/031887 mailed Aug. 24, 2004.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2005/037062 mailed Oct. 11, 2006.
Jaine, A Predictive Modeling and Decision-Making Tool to Facilitate Government and Industry Response to an International Contamination of the Food Supply. Proceedings of the Institute of Food Technologists' First Annual Food Protection and Defense Research Conference, Nov. 3-4, 2005. 16 Pages.
Joppen, Food Terror. Food Engineering and Ingredients, vol. 28, No. 4, Aug. 2003. 2 Pages.
Jouglard, Device and Procedure that Enables Tracing the History of a Food Product through a Productoin, Transformation and Marketing Chain. translation of French Patent Document FR-2776790-Al, Oct. 1, 1999.
Kleer et al., Importance of Predictive Microbiology for Risk Minimization in Food Production Processes. Fleischwirtschaft, vol. 81, No. 6, pp. 99-103, 2001.
Koopman, Responding to an Infection Transmission Emergency. PowerPoint™. presentation, IMA Special “Hot Topics” Workshop: Operational Modeling and BioDefense: Problems, Techniques and Opportunities, Sep. 28, 2002. 16 Pages.
Labuza, Food Bio-Security: Case Studies in the Food Distribution Chain. PowerPoint™. presentation, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, 2004. 42 Pages.
Lambert, Agroterrorism: The Threat to America's Breadbasket. Statement before the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, available from http://govt-aff.senate.gov, Nov. 19, 2003. 14 Pages.
Lammerding et al., Quantitative Risk Assessment: An Emerging Tool for Emerging Foodborne Pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 3 Oct./Dec. 1997, pp. 483-487.
Layne, Firepower in the lab: Automation in the fight against infectious diseases and bioterrorism. Washington DC, Joseph Henry Press, pp. 133-163, 2001 (Synopsis Only).
Machine translation of Japan Patent document JP-2000-168,157, May 2010.
Machine translation of Japan Patent document JP-2000-263,276, May 2010.
Machine translation of Japan Patent document JP2003-290,939, May 2010.
Madison et al., U.S. egg production on the sunny side in the 1990's. Agricultural Outlook. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. May 1997:12-4.
Maslanka et al., Foodborne Pathogen and Toxin Diagnostics. In Layne, S.P. et al., eds. FirePower in the Lab: Automation in the Fight Against Infectious Diseases and Bioterrorism. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press, NAS, pp. 143-163 2000.
Material Flow, Jan. 2005, vol. 46, pp. 88-93.
Michael, FDA Plans Food-Tracking System. FCW.com, Apr. 28, 2003. 2 Pages.
Michael, Software to Predict Food Dangers. FCW.com, Aug. 11, 2003.
Murano, Perspectives on Food Security. Speech presented by the Under Secretary for Food Safety at the Amarillo Farm and Ranch Show, Amarillo, Texas, U.S. Department of Agriculture, available from http://www.fsis.usda.gov, Dec. 2, 2003. 5 Pages.
Nganje et al., Terrorism and the Grain Handling System in Canada and the United States. Principal Session 2, paper 3, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society Annual Meeting, Jul. 26-30, 2003, Montreal Canada. J. Can. Agric. Econom. Society, 38 Pages.
Opara et al., Food Traceability from Field to Plate. Outlook on Agricultural, vol. 30, No. 4, 2001, pp. 239-247.
Opara, Engineering and Technological Outlook on Traceability of Agricultural Production and Products. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Journal of Scientific Research and Development, vol. IV, Dec. 2002, pp. 1-13.
Opara, Traceability in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain: a Review of Basic Concepts, Technological Implications, and Future Prospects. Food, Agriculture & Environment, vol. 1, No. 1, Jan. 2003, pp. 101-106.
Padmos et al., How i2 Integrates Simulation in Supply Chain Optimization. Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, Dec. 5-8, 1999, pp. 1350-1355.
Prewitt, Chains turn to technology to battle food-borne illness, 2005 http://findarticles.co/p/articles/mi—m3190/is—16—39/ai—n13652054/ , 4 Pages.
Scott et al., The Food Industry's Response to Ensuring Food Security and Safety. PowerPoint™ presentation, Bioterrorism and Food Security: Issues and Challenges, Oct. 28-19, 2002.
Sholl, Security of the Food Supply: Detection, Identification and Response. PowerPoint™ presentation, Apr. 22, 2004.
Silliker et al., International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF) “Microorganisms in Foods, vol. 4”, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 1-43 and 207-263, 1988. ISBN 0-632-02181-0. QR115.I46 1988.
Verbeke, The Emerging Role of Traceability and Information in Demand-Oriented Livestock Production. Outlook on Agricultural, vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 249-255, 2001.
Wein et al., Analyzing a Bioterror Attack on the Food Supply: The Case of Botulinum Toxin in Milk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 102, No. 28, Jul. 12, 2005, pp. 9984-9989.
Weisman, R., “Born free eggs etches data on its fragile wares”, http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2005/09/19/born—free—eggs—etches—data—on—its—fragile—wares/?rss—id=Boston+Globe+--+Business+News, dated Sep. 19, 2005.
Wijtzes et al., A Decision Support System for the Prediction of Microbial Food Safety and Food Quality. International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 42, Issue 1-2, Jun. 30, 1998, pp. 79-90.
Wilson et al., Food Safety and Traceability in the Agriculture Supply Chain: Using the Internet to Deliver Traceability. Supply Chain Management, vol. 3, No. 3, No. 3, p. 127, 1998.
Woo, The Evolution of Terrorism Risk Modeling. Journal of Reinsurance, London, England, Apr. 22, 2003. 9 Pages.
Yakov Horenstein, “How Lasers Could Print Ads on Food,” Daily Mail, Mar. 4, 1999.
Zwietering et al., A Decision Support System for Prediction of the Microbial Spoilage of Foods. Journal of Food Protection, vol. 55, No. 12, pp. 973-979, Dec. 1992.
Zwietering., et al. Modeling of Bacterial Growth as a Function of Temperature. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, pp. 1094-1101, Apr. 1991.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140085397 A1 Mar 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60440273 Jan 2003 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13090614 Apr 2011 US
Child 13967118 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11333580 Jan 2006 US
Child 13090614 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10542324 US
Child 11333580 US