1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to drug delivery. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and apparatus for delivering agents that cause vasoconstriction to mucosal and other tissue surfaces in the presence of capnic gases, particularly for the treatment of migraine headaches.
Drug delivery to mucosal surfaces, such as the mucosa of the nose, is well known. While in some cases drugs delivered to the nose and other mucosal surfaces are intended to have local effect, more often such transmucosal drug delivery is intended for systemic administration. In either case, penetration of the drug into or through the mucosa is limited by the ability of the particular drug to pass into or through the mucosal cell structure. Such resistance from the mucosal cell structure can result in slowing of the delivery, the need to use higher dosages of the drug, or in the case of larger molecules, the inability to deliver via a nasal or other mucosal route.
Migraine headaches are a form of severe headache that tends to recur in susceptible patients. Migraine headaches may be accompanied by associated symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, hypersensitivity to light, sound and odor. Patients suffering from migraines often must remain immobile since even small movements can exacerbate the pain. In “classic” migraine etiology, the patient often experiences an aura some ten to thirty minutes before the onset of the migraine. The aura may include a perception of flashing lights, zigzag lines, or in some instances may even cause temporary vision impairment. So-called “common” migraines are not preceded by such an aura. Both types of migraines may occur as often as several times a week or as rarely as once every few years.
Migraines are most often treated using drugs that cause vasoconstriction. For years, ergotamines was the primary drug available for treating severe migraine pain. More recently, triptan drugs have become available for treating all forms of migraine.
While drug therapy using triptans and ergotamines are often effective, the drugs can require one to two hours to reach effective plasma concentrations. Even so-called quick acting forms, such as quick-melt tablets, intra-nasal sprays, injectable forms of the drugs, and topical forms of the drug, still have significant lag times before they become effective. Moreover, not all individuals benefit from triptans, ergotamines, or other drug therapies for migraines.
Very recently, the use of carbon dioxide and other capnic gases alone and in combination with other gases has been proposed for the treatment of migraine headaches and other conditions. The carbon dioxide is preferably delivered to nasal or other mucosa without inhalation. It is believed that the carbon dioxide may cause an acidosis which inhibits the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) which in turn reduces the pain and associated symptoms resulting from the migraine. It has also been found that the onset of relief is usually much more rapid than that achieved with triptans, ergotamines, and other systemic drug therapies.
Despite the promise of conventional drug therapies and the newer delivery of capnic gases, neither therapy is effective in all individuals and neither therapy is entirely effective in relieving all migraine pain and associated symptoms in all circumstances. It would thus be desirable to provide improved methods and systems for treating migraine headaches. In particular, it would be desirable to provide treatments which are more effective, more rapid, more long-lasting, and/or which have other benefits when compared to the administration of either known systemic drugs or capnic gases alone.
2. Description of Background Art
Inhalation devices, systems and methods for delivering carbon dioxide and other gases and aerosols to patients, with and without co-delivery of a drug are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,776,227; 3,513,843; 3,974,830; 4,137,914; 4,554,916; 5,262,180; 5,485,827; 5,570,683, 6,581,539; and 6,652,479. While some methods and devices provide for co-delivery of a drug and carbon dioxide or other gases, the purpose is usually not potentiation. For example, carbon dioxide may be used as a safe propellant, as shown in Wetterlin, U.S. Pat. No. 4,137,914. See also copending application Ser. Nos. 09/614,389; 10/666,947; and 10/666,562, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Additional background art may be found in the following references: Guyton A C, Hall J E. Textbook of Medical Physiology. Ninth Ed., W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1996; Tang A, Rayner M, Nadel J. “Effect of CO2 on serotonin-induced contraction of isolated smooth muscle,” Clin Research 20:243, 1972; Qi S, Yang Z, He B. “An experimental study of reversed pulmonary hypertension with inhaled nitric oxide on smoke inhalation injury,” Chung Hua Wai Ko Tsa Chih 35(1):56-8, January 1997; Loh E, Lankford E B, Polidori D J, Doering-Lubit E B, Hanson C W, Acker M A. “Cardiovascular effects of inhaled nitric oxide in a canine model of cardiomyopathy,” Ann Thorac Surg 67(5): 13 80-5, May 1999; Pagano D, Townend J N, Horton R, Smith C, Clutton-Brock T, Bonser R S. “A comparison of inhaled nitric oxide with intravenous vasodilators in the assessment of pulmonary haemodynamics prior to cardiac transplantation,” Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 10(12):1120-6, 1996; and Sterling G, et al. “Effect of CO2 and pH on bronchoconstriction caused by serotonin vs. acetylcholine,” J of Appl Physiology, vol. 22, 1972.
The present invention provides methods and apparatus for treating patients, particularly patients suffering or at risk of suffering from migraine headaches, by administering a vasoconstrictive agent to the patient and simultaneously delivering a capnic gas to a nasal, oral, auricular, or ocular membrane of the patient. By “simultaneously,” it is meant that the vasoconstrictive agent will be administered and the capnic delivered at the same time or within a very short time of each other, typically within 60 minutes, preferably within 30 minutes, and more preferably within 10 minutes. In some instances, it may be desirable to deliver the vasoconstrictive agent together with the capnic gas, e.g., where the capnic gas can act as a carrier for the vasoconstrictive agent. It will be more common to deliver the vasoconstrictive agent separately in a separate dosage form, such as any of the dosage forms which are commonly available for the particular vasoconstrictive agents described below.
In preferred protocols, at the onset of a migraine headache, the patient would take a dose of the vasoconstrictive agent and substantially simultaneously initiate delivery of the capnic gas to the target membrane. The capnic gas would provide a rapid onset of action, possibly by inhibiting the release of CGRP as described above, in order to interrupt or delay progression of the migraine episode. At the same time, the circulating plasma levels of the vasoconstrictive agent would increase, resulting in constriction of the cranial blood vessels. The patient would experience a more effective treatment in one of several ways. As the capnic gas would at least slow the progression of the migraine, the migraine would be less intense at the time effective plasma levels of the vasoconstrictive agent have been achieved. The magnitude of pain and associated symptoms experienced by the patient should be lessened at all points during the treatment. In other cases, the patient might benefit by reducing the dosage of the vasoconstrictive agent and thereby reducing side effects.
Exemplary vasoconstrictive agents useful in the methods of the present invention include both triptans and ergotamines. The use of triptans is preferred, and common triptans include sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, rizatriptan, almotriptan, naratriptan, eletriptan, and frovatriptan. Common ergotamines include ergotamine tartrate (Cafergot®, Wigraine®, Ergostat®), and dihydroergotamine DHE-45 (Migranal®).
In addition to vasoconstrictive agents, in some instances, the methods of the present invention could combine the delivery of capnic gases with other known treatments for migraines, including certain anticonvulsants, such as carbamazepine and topiramate.
The vasoconstrictive agents will be delivered systemically, and may be delivered in any conventional systemic form, including oral dosage forms (tablets, gels, capsules, and the like), intranasal forms (in which case they could optionally be combined with delivery of the capnic gases), forms intended for pulmonary delivery, injectable forms, and topical forms (for transcutaneous delivery). In particular for the delivery of triptans, presently available dosage forms include tablets, orally dissolving tablets (also known as quick-melts or rapi-melts), intranasal sprays, and subcutaneous injection.
Preferred capnic treatment gases include carbon dioxide, nitric oxide, nitrous oxide, and dilute acid gases, such as dilute hydrochloric acid and the like. Particularly preferred are carbon dioxide gases having a relatively high concentration, typically greater than 10% by volume, usually greater than 20% by volume, and preferably greater than 25% by volume and often being as great as 80% by volume, 90% by volume, and in many instances being substantially pure. The capnic gases may be used in combinations of one or more adjuvant gases and/or may be combined with physiologically inert gases such as nitrogen, to control concentration of the capnic gases.
The capnic gas is delivered to a nasal, oral, auricular, or ocular membrane of the patient, typically using a hand-held or other dispenser. Preferably, the capnic gas will be delivered to a nasal or oral mucosa, while the patient refrains from inhaling the capnic gas. In the exemplary embodiments, the capnic gas is infused through a nostril and exits through a nostril and/or the mouth. The patient will refrain from inhaling, typically by holding the velum in the throat closed, while the capnic gas is infused. In other instances, the capnic gas will be infused through the mouth and be allowed to exit through at least one nostril, usually both nostrils. In those instances, the patient will also refrain from inhaling the gas.
The capnic gases will usually be delivered using a dispenser. Typically, the dispenser includes a pressurized source of the capnic gas and a valve assembly for releasing the gas at a controlled flow rate, typically in the range from 0.5 cc/sec to 30 cc/sec in the case of high concentration of carbon dioxide. Optionally, the vasoconstrictive agent may be dissolved or suspended in the pressurized capnic gas for simultaneous delivery. Alternatively, the vasoconstrictive agent may be delivered simultaneously from a separate receptacle, either through the same or a different delivery path. Often, the capnic gas and the vasoconstrictive agent, even when stored in separate receptacles, will be delivered through a common conduit and nozzle to allow for both simultaneous and sequential delivery.
An exemplary carbon dioxide dispenser 100 comprising a carbon dioxide cartridge 101 is illustrated in
The dispenser 100 of
Referring now to
Infusion can be continued to the limit of tolerance or until the desired potentiation effect is realized. Since most individuals develop a temporary increased tolerance after extended applications or repeated applications, it may be possible and desirable to increase the duration of additional infusions after a few applications when all applications occur within a short time of each other, i.e., approximately 1 to 20 minutes between each application.
While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/340,410, filed Jan. 25, 2006, now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/192,852, filed Jul. 29, 2005, now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/708,186, filed Nov. 7, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,959,708, issued Nov. 1, 2005; which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 60/164,125, filed Nov. 8, 1999 and 60/185,495, filed Feb. 28, 2000. The contents of the above-identified applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1288850 | Easly | Dec 1918 | A |
1449047 | Johnson | Mar 1923 | A |
1742605 | Lemoine | Jan 1930 | A |
2574028 | Fields et al. | Nov 1951 | A |
2585254 | Kochner | Feb 1952 | A |
2651303 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1953 | A |
2860634 | Duncan et al. | Nov 1958 | A |
2920623 | Holt | Jan 1960 | A |
3127058 | Johnston | Mar 1964 | A |
3425414 | Roche | Feb 1969 | A |
3513843 | Exler | May 1970 | A |
3776227 | Pitesky et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3870072 | Lindemann | Mar 1975 | A |
3934585 | Maurice | Jan 1976 | A |
3974830 | LaVerne | Aug 1976 | A |
4067499 | Cohen | Jan 1978 | A |
4137914 | Wetterlin | Feb 1979 | A |
4175704 | Cohen | Nov 1979 | A |
4188946 | Watson et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4273124 | Zimmerman | Jun 1981 | A |
4375812 | Vaseen et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4447449 | Marshall | May 1984 | A |
4465067 | Koch et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4554916 | Watt | Nov 1985 | A |
4694850 | Fumino | Sep 1987 | A |
4934359 | Blaine | Jun 1990 | A |
5099834 | Fishman | Mar 1992 | A |
5123442 | Geuy et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5262180 | Orlando et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5288462 | Carter et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5318015 | Månsson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5370862 | Klokker-Bethke et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5431155 | Marelli | Jul 1995 | A |
5485827 | Zapol et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5490498 | Faithfull et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5525130 | Beaudry | Jun 1996 | A |
5558083 | Bathe et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562644 | McLeod | Oct 1996 | A |
5570683 | Zapol | Nov 1996 | A |
5807357 | Kang | Sep 1998 | A |
5839433 | Higenbottam | Nov 1998 | A |
5848998 | Marasco, Jr. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851544 | Penska et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855907 | Peyman | Jan 1999 | A |
5875776 | Vaghefi | Mar 1999 | A |
5891885 | Caruso | Apr 1999 | A |
5908870 | McLeod | Jun 1999 | A |
5918596 | Heinonen | Jul 1999 | A |
5938590 | Elliott | Aug 1999 | A |
5941241 | Weinstein et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951538 | Joshi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5983891 | Fukunaga | Nov 1999 | A |
5993428 | Hardge | Nov 1999 | A |
6001332 | Garrett | Dec 1999 | A |
6113922 | Swenson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125844 | Samiotes | Oct 2000 | A |
6258032 | Hammesfahr | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6581539 | Rasor | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6638236 | Thrash et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6652479 | Rasor et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6780400 | Rabinowitz et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6959708 | Rasor et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7017573 | Rasor et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7748379 | Rasor et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7827986 | Rasor et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7836883 | Rasor et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845347 | Rasor et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7845348 | Rasor et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20040260253 | Rosati | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050228337 | Rasor et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060076011 | Rasor et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060172017 | Rasor et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060251542 | Sims | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070039615 | Rasor et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080132825 | Rasor et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080169047 | Connolly et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20100104665 | Rasor et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100210565 | Rasor et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110040240 | Rasor et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046546 | Rasor et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
247 873 | Mar 1947 | CH |
837 158 | Apr 1952 | DE |
14 91 660 | Aug 1969 | DE |
89 06 590 | Oct 1989 | DE |
43 19 612 | Dec 1994 | DE |
195 48 652 | Oct 1997 | DE |
0 198 708 | Oct 1986 | EP |
0 768 094 | Apr 1997 | EP |
2 656 218 | Jun 1991 | FR |
408856 | Apr 1934 | GB |
08-224321 | Sep 1996 | JP |
09-084876 | Mar 1997 | JP |
WO-9108793 | Jun 1991 | WO |
WO-9300951 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO-9523596 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 9742992 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9929249 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO-0051672 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO-0057851 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-0057851 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-0103645 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-0103645 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-0164280 | Sep 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100152120 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60164125 | Nov 1999 | US | |
60185495 | Feb 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11340410 | Jan 2006 | US |
Child | 12708407 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11192852 | Jul 2005 | US |
Child | 11340410 | US | |
Parent | 09708186 | Nov 2000 | US |
Child | 11192852 | US |