Methods and apparatus for uniform distribution of liquid desiccant in membrane modules in liquid desiccant air-conditioning systems

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10921001
  • Patent Number
    10,921,001
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 1, 2018
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 16, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
A liquid desiccant air-conditioning system provides a uniform liquid desiccant flow distribution and wetting out of membranes used in the membrane-modules of the system.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present application relates generally to liquid desiccant air-conditioning systems and, more particularly, to membrane modules used in conditioners and regenerators of such air-conditioning systems.


Liquid desiccant air-conditioning systems are known in the art as disclosed, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 9,273,877 incorporated by reference herein. These systems have been demonstrated to provide significant savings in energy usage and costs.


SUMMARY

Various embodiments disclosed herein relate to liquid desiccant air-conditioning systems providing a uniform liquid desiccant flow distribution and wetting out of membranes used in membrane-modules. The system combines liquid desiccant pressure control in the panels with a well-defined very narrow uniform liquid desiccant channel formed by a pattern of spaced-apart features. These features, which can e.g., be spaced apart 1-3 inches, can be thermoformed or embossed on the panel with the membrane heat-sealed against them. Alternatively, the features can be a heat-seal pattern on an otherwise flat panel sheet. The pressure control device can be, e.g., an overflow tube or a spring activated pressure control. The combination of pressure and flow control with a narrow uniform desiccant channel between the membrane and the sheet can ensure 90% plus coverage of the membrane by the liquid desiccant through a geometry of the liquid desiccant channel that allows for constant pressure liquid desiccant flow, rather than by using wicking materials, or by surface treatments to reduce the hydrophobicity of the plate materials or by using more costly materials.


In one or more embodiments, the thin film achieves flows of about 1 to 15 mm/min at 20-35% concentration liquid desiccant and for temperatures between 0 and 60 C in a 0.1 to 0.2 mm liquid desiccant film. Lower temperatures and higher concentrations require wider channels. Higher temperatures and lower concentrations would require either higher flows or narrower channels. Exemplary solutions for creating a 0.1 to 0.2 mm channel include 7000 Dots at 0.14 mm height for a short panel, or 1-200 dots at 0 mm height. A flow model using membrane stretch, hydrophobicity, concentration, and temperature of the liquid desiccant can be used to optimize the panel for certain applications.


For different temperatures and concentrations of liquid desiccant, the flow rate will differ depending on the pressure driving the flow through the channel. At a constant pressure drop, the flow rate would fall from about 0.05 l/m per channel at high temperatures and low concentrations to 0.01 l/min at high concentrations and low temperatures. Very low flow rates increase the change in concentration of the liquid desiccant and thus reduces the rate of humidification or dehumidification. Thus, the latent effectiveness of the panel is reduced. High flows of liquid desiccant in the conditioner creates a heat loss, e.g., when hot liquid desiccant is moved from the regenerator to the conditioner, the load on the evaporator side of the compressor is increased. This represents an efficiency loss. For concentrations around 25% and temperatures around 20 C, it is desirable to maintain a desiccant flow rate of about 0.03 liter/panel. At that rate, the panels can provide good coverage.


A heat exchanger for use in a desiccant air conditioning system in accordance with one or more embodiments comprises a plurality of membrane-covered structures facing each other in a generally parallel arrangement and being spaced apart to define air channels therebetween through which an air flow to be treated by the desiccant air conditioning system can flow. Each of the membrane-covered structures comprise a structure having a hollow interior portion defining a heat transfer fluid channel through which a heat transfer fluid can flow. The structure also has one or more outer hydrophobic polymer surfaces. Each membrane-covered structure also has one or more hydrophobic polymer membranes covering the one or more outer surfaces of the structure to define a liquid desiccant gap therebetween through which a liquid desiccant can flow. Each membrane is heat sealed to the outer surface of the structure at discrete locations spaced apart by less than 50 mm on the outer surface to define liquid desiccant flow channels, wherein the liquid desiccant flow channels have a channel height measured from the outer surface to the membrane not exceeding 0.5 mm. The heat exchanger also includes a liquid desiccant pressure regulator connected to a liquid desiccant inlet of the heat exchanger. The pressure regulator is configured to maintain a positive pressure at the liquid desiccant flow channels not exceeding a given preset value at a flow rate sufficient to fill each of the liquid desiccant flow channels across a given range of liquid desiccant temperature and concentration conditions. The liquid desiccant pressure regulator is configured to divert a portion of the liquid desiccant flowing to the heat exchanger to a liquid desiccant tank in order to maintain a constant liquid desiccant pressure at the liquid desiccant flow channels.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary prior art 3-way liquid desiccant air conditioning system using a chiller or external heating or cooling sources.



FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary single membrane plate in the liquid desiccant system of FIG. 1.



FIGS. 3A-3D illustrate various prior art membrane panel constructions.



FIG. 4 illustrates horizontal and vertical fluid flows through liquid desiccant air conditioning systems.



FIG. 5 illustrates use of siphoning liquid desiccant to inhibit membrane bulging in a panel assembly.



FIG. 6 shows generally horizontal fluid flow in a prior art membrane panel assembly.



FIG. 7 illustrates construction of an exemplary prior art panel assembly.



FIG. 8 illustrates a prior art panel assembly with raised features.



FIG. 9 shows a panel assembly with a liquid desiccant channel.



FIG. 10 is a graph showing the relationship between viscosity, temperature, and concentration for a typical liquid desiccant LiCl.



FIG. 11A illustrates a liquid desiccant air conditioning unit in accordance with one or more embodiments showing the flow of liquid desiccant through the unit.



FIG. 11B shows the same flow path for a single tank system schematically, including pumps in the unit.



FIG. 11C shows a liquid desiccant pressure control device in a liquid desiccant air conditioning unit in accordance with one or more embodiments.



FIG. 12 shows the relationship between the liquid desiccant flow rate in 1/min and the pressure in inches H20.



FIG. 13 shows typical pressure/flow rate patterns for the panels in FIG. 11.



FIGS. 14A-14K illustrate various exemplary membrane structures for a liquid desiccant air conditioning unit in accordance with one or more embodiments.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

U.S. Pat. No. 9,243,810, which is incorporated by reference herein, discloses a new kind of liquid desiccant system. The system includes a conditioner 101 and the regenerator 102, both of which comprise a set of plate structures that are internally hollow. Heat transfer fluid is generated in the cold and hot sources 107 and 108 and entered into the plates 101, 102. Liquid desiccant solution at 114, 115 is brought onto the outer surface of the plates. The liquid desiccant runs behind a thin membrane that is located between the airflows 103, 105 and the surface of the plates. The liquid desiccant from the plates is collected at 111 and 112. Heat exchanger 113 is used to minimize heat losses as the liquid desiccant is transferred from the cold plates where it is diluted as the desiccant absorbs humidity to hot plates 102 where the desiccant is reconcentrated before returning to the conditioner panels 101. External sources of hot and cold 107 and 108 can also be a chiller system 116, where the evaporator and regenerator can be used to directly cool and heat the liquid desiccant or in other configurations to heat and cool the heat transfer fluid. The conditioner processes air 103 and supplies 104, while the regenerator will process a mix of exhaust and outside air 105 and exhaust 106. The compressor 116 is shown to heat the desiccant 114 and 115, but can also operate as a heat source using refrigerant to water heat exchanger as shown in prior art.


The heat exchanger 113 takes the cold liquid desiccant 111 from the conditioner and warms it up prior to it entering the regenerator at 115. The hot liquid desiccant 112 is cooled before it enters the conditioner at 114. 109 and 110 show the flows of heat transfer fluid to the conditioner and regenerator from the cold and the hot source. The role of heat exchanger 113 is critical. Exchanging the liquid desiccant between the cold conditioner and hot regenerator can lead to a significant heat losses as the cold and hot source need to do more work. Minimizing the flows of liquid desiccant reduces that heat loss for a given size heat exchanger or allow a smaller heat exchanger to be used. Modelling of similar systems have shown that over a wide range of flows and conditions lower flows of liquid desiccant reduce the latent effectiveness of the conditioner or regenerator, but that loss in effectiveness at lower rates is smaller than the gain from reduced heat losses.



FIG. 2 shows a cross section of a single membrane-plate assembly with the cooling fluid (heat transfer fluid) 204 flowing through the center of the plate in counter flow with the airflow 201. The liquid desiccant 203 flows over the outer surface of the panels 205 and behind the membranes 202. In the conditioner, heat is absorbed directly by the heat transfer fluid 208 from the air in 207 or indirectly as the humidity in the air is absorbed by the liquid desiccant 206. The heat generated by the absorption is then transferred to the heat transfer fluid 208.



FIG. 3D shows the same structure of a three fluid heat exchanger with the heat transfer fluid 304 flowing between panels 303 and the liquid desiccant flowing between the panels 303 and membranes 301. Alternatives are shown in FIGS. 3A, 3B, 3C where a similar thin layer of liquid desiccant is shown in a two fluid heat exchanger with liquid desiccant and air, where a thin film of liquid desiccant flows either between a plate 303 and a membrane 301 or between two membranes 301.



FIG. 4 shows various sets of panels 404 in horizontal and vertical orientations. Counter flow of air 401 and water (or other heat transfer fluid) 402/405 maximizes performance of the heat exchanger. Desiccant flow 403 to 410 can be parallel, cross or counter flow. FIG. 4 shows embodiments requiring a vertical orientation of the liquid desiccant in a partially gravity driven flow. The air and water flows can both be horizontal and vertical. Optimization of the form factor for small units in among others selected residential and transportation applications make it desirable to enable all three flows to be horizontal. The current application describes how this can be done.


U.S. Pat. No. 9,101,874 describes how syphoning can be used to stop bulging of membranes. Bulging disrupts airflow. The negative pressure behind the membrane keeps it flat. This allows wider spacing of the dots that seal the membrane to the double plates surrounding the heat transfer fluid. The patent also discloses vertical and horizontal flow, cross and counter flow. The patent also further discloses how wicking materials can be used as one of the surfaces or as a separate sheet to optimize wetting out.



FIGS. 5 and 6 of the present application (as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,101,874) illustrate how the liquid desiccant enters the desiccant channel at 511 and flows between membrane 503 and panels 509. To limit bulging of the membrane, it is connected at points 507 leaving the panel at 502 back to tank 508. Without syphon 514, the membrane will bulge at 501 and partially or completely block the air channel Mixing of the liquid desiccant flow 506 is disclosed to maximize absorption and desorption and minimize heat transfer resistance. The membrane is sealed at 507 to sheet 509. Heat transfer fluid flows on the inside of sheet 509. The pressure at 503 is positive. Tank 508 is used to store the desiccant.


While the flow in FIG. 5 is described as driven by gravity and syphoning, a near horizontal panel in FIG. 6 is shown with a pressure 611 provided at the beginning of the panel and a large syphon 614 at the end, which again seeks to minimize bulging at 601 by sucking the membrane flat against the desiccant. One advantage described is that syphoning reduces the need for dots between membrane 503 and plate 509. To drain most of the liquid desiccant during maintenance a slight angle is required. The syphoning feature or negative pump suction can be used to minimize the need to connect support plates 509.


A challenge is that significant syphoning of the liquid desiccant tends to draw in air into the desiccant, which when captured in the liquid heat exchanger will reduce its effectiveness. Being able to operate the liquid desiccant channel under mostly positive pressure with no or little syphon removes that problem and makes the design more robust.



FIG. 7 discloses a prior art membrane panel assembly for structuring the heat transfer and desiccant channels. It shows three layers. The water (or other heat transfer fluid) channel 701 can be formed with glue lines. Since the water channel operates under negative pressure, netting 702 is added and kept in place with glue dots 705, which connect the netting to plates 703 on both sides of the water channel Plate 703 can be flat or thermoformed to create a 0.1 to 0.5 mm channel for the liquid desiccant with the dots 705 determining the height of the channel Membrane 704 is sealed to the thermoformed panel at dots 705. The desiccant flows through channel 706 to manifold 710. A challenge is how to maintain optimal distribution and coverage of the liquid desiccant in the channel, while the desiccant changes in temperature and concentration and thus in viscosity.



FIG. 8 shows features 801 raised above the surface of the plate to provide for mixing of the desiccant, for bonding the membrane to the plate and to set a uniform firm distance between the membrane and the plate for uniform heat and water vapor transport to occur. Desiccant enters the panels at 802 and is distributed over the width of the plates through channel 804 and moves from the center to the front of the panel 803 down the panel, and exits at 805 and via 806 to be collected at manifold 807. Border 808 can be used to connect two thermoformed panels together to form a central water channel with exit and entry 810. The height of the features into the desiccant channel are disclosed as typically 0.5 mm. While the water channel height is typically 1.5 and 2 mm.



FIG. 9 shows a further prior art panel design with thermoformed features. The airflow 901 flows over thermoformed sheet 900 covered by a membrane (not shown). The desiccant enters through 902 and exits via 906. The water enters through 903 and exits through 905. The membrane is attached to the raised features 908 and 904 that also determine the height of the desiccant channel.


All these designs have a similar challenge: how to maintain coverage and distribution of a very thin liquid desiccant film behind a membrane, while the temperature and concentration of the liquid desiccant changes. Various embodiments disclosed herein address these challenges.


The performance of liquid desiccant air-conditioning systems depends crucially on the ability of the liquid desiccant to dehumidify air while it is being cooled or heated simultaneously by a heat transfer fluid. U.S. Pat. No. 9,101,874 discloses a variety of membrane module structures, including hollow plates and tubes. The corrosion resistant heat exchangers use polymers to contain the liquid desiccants. Most metals will corrode quickly by highly concentrated liquid desiccants. The patents describe how the desiccant is contained by a highly porous membrane that allows humidity to pass through, but contains the liquid desiccant. Both the polymer and the membrane are highly hydrophobic, the efficiency of such a system is driven by a combination of low flows of liquid desiccant and high coverage of the panel with liquid desiccant.


The liquid desiccant flow is about 1/10th to 1/20th of the flows or air and water in terms of weight.


It has been found that high coverage of the panel by liquid desiccant requires the film of liquid desiccant to be very thin (e.g., 0.1 to 0.3 mm) and uniform. The wetting out of the membrane by the liquid desiccant is an important factor improving panel efficiency. However, between a hydrophobic membrane and a hydrophobic panel liquid desiccants will tend to concentrate on parts of the panel in “rivulets” of desiccant behind the membrane. With contact angles between desiccant and various plastics exceeding 100 degrees, the desiccant will not spread out. Reducing hydrophobicity by adding wicking materials has been disclosed. While that improves spreading out of the desiccant, it tends to cause most of the desiccant to flow only along particular paths, leading to great differences in the distribution of flowrates.


Extensive experimentation and modelling has shown that geometry is the critical factor driving the wetting out of the membrane. By pushing desiccant under pressure through the channel, the desiccant spreads out to fill the complete channel. The viscosity of the liquid desiccant will determine the flow rate and pressures at which full wetting out can be maintained. At high dynamic viscosities, flow rates will decrease at constant pressure. When the viscosity of the liquid desiccant is lowered flow rates will increase at constant pressure or pressure needs to drop to keep the flow rate constant. Dynamic viscosity if the liquid desiccant is reduced by increasing temperature and by lowering the concentration of the desiccant. To maintain full wet out, the pressure in the panel will need to remain positive.


In a thin film of liquid desiccant, channel the height of the channel is the key determinant of flow rates. If the channel is too high, wetting out will drop. The critical factors that determine channel height are the height of the connection points between the membrane and the panel and the bulging or flexing of the membrane between the connection points. Optimizing the number of connection points is thus a critical design variable. More connection points reduces bulging. Also connection points do not expose the air to desiccant and thus reduce the dehumidification capacity of the panel. With 3000-5000 dots for a 300 by 500 mm panel, the dots can use more than 10% of the total area. This is acceptable and has led to good experimental results with latent effectiveness of panels as much as 90%+ of the theoretical optimum.


The connection points of a given pattern and height can be created through thermoforming as described in the existing art. Injection molding and embossing are two other options. Flat panels can also be used, but require a bigger distance between connection points. Creep occurs where the membrane and the panel first touch. The open structure of the membrane combined with the heat-sealing makes this a potentially vulnerability for the membrane. Longer distances between the connection points increase the stress at the connection points and thus the risk of damage to the membrane. The shape and size of the connection point also is important with larger dots or longer lines reducing stress.


Significant factors in driving the choice of manufacturing methods include the flatness of the panel, material choices, and cost per panel. Flat panels can also be used where the channel height is only driven by the bulging of the material. Modelling and experimentation indicate a reduction in the number of dots to 50-500 depending on the expected flow rates, the modulus for the membrane, and the viscosity and pressure of the liquid desiccant.


Improving distribution of the membrane on the panel and between panels at very low flow rates require a positive pressure drop across the flow direction of the panel as well as adjusting this pressure depending on the viscosity of the liquid desiccant. Dynamic Viscosity in mPa·s results from the concentration and temperature of the liquid desiccant. Colder, higher concentrated desiccant is more viscous.


Flow in the panels has typically been pressure driven using overflow tubes on the top of the panel and air references at or below the bottom of the panel. For most of the relevant concentrations and temperatures the system will maintain a constant high pressure in the panel. Only at high temperatures or low concentrations will the pressure needed to maintain the flow drop. When the pressure across the panel becomes negative coverage will be reduced and latent effectiveness of the panel will drop.


Flow and pressure controls need to maintain low flows, positive pressure and high coverage over a wide range of temperatures and concentrations of liquid desiccant. They also need to allow for separate operation of conditioner and regenerator in both heating and cooling modes. The design should ensure that desiccant film flow rates do not exceed ⅕th of the airflow in lb./min. An overflow tube pressure regulator allows pressure at the beginning of a block of panels to be determined by the flow rate and viscosity, until the pressure drop is higher than the height of the tube. Then part of the liquid desiccant flow will be diverted back into the tank and the flow through the panel will drop while maintaining positive pressure in the complete channel. As a result at high viscosity and constant pressure, flows through the panel will be low, while still maintaining coverage while most of the desiccant pumped will overflow and return to the tank via the overflow tube.


Low flow rates reduce the effectiveness of the panel, since the delta concentration in the liquid desiccant increases. But system efficiency can still improve since the heat losses through the liquid desiccant heat exchanger go down as flows increase.


As the concentration of the liquid desiccant is lowered or temperatures increase, the flow will increase until the flow through the panel becomes equal to the flow presented.


Modelling has shown over what range of temperatures and concentrations of the liquid desiccant an effective channel height of 0.1 to 0.5 mm can maintain the necessary flow rate of 1.5 to 15 mm/sec. with an entry pressure between 0 and 10 inches of water pressure and with siphoning with a reference point between 0 and 4 inches below the panel in both horizontal and vertical flows. Concentration ranges depend on the type of application and are typically between 20-35%. An application with a lower target range of 15-25% at high temperatures would benefit from a narrower channel Applications that have a need for higher concentrations of 40-45% could benefit from a wider channel, especially if these concentrations are needed in a heating mode with lower temperatures then during a cooling cycle.


In liquid desiccant systems, the difference in concentration between the conditioner and regenerator is typically less than 2%. Depending on outside conditions and controls, liquid desiccant concentrations can vary from 10-45% without risks of crystallization or condensation in the panels. More typically concentrations between 20 and 35% are maintained to minimize tank size and volume of liquid desiccant required to fill the system. A narrower range reduces the size of the system and the cost of the liquid desiccant.


Temperatures between a conditioner and regenerator typically differ 30-60 F. As a result the viscosity of the liquid desiccant at the warmer unit will be lower than at the colder unit. To maintain the same flow at the warmer unit as at the colder unit will require a 50-75% lower pressure drop at the warmer unit, driven by the difference in temperature over a broad range of concentrations. When an overflow tube pressure regulator is used this results in a 50-75% lower riser tube. In cooling mode the regenerator is the warmer unit. In heating mode the conditioner is the warmer unit. Therefore the pressure control device of the regenerator will need to be adjusted when the system changes from cooling to heating or back. In heating mode the height of the riser tube can be 4 to 8* higher than the setting in cooling mode. This can be achieved for example by designing the regenerator riser for the high pressure and allowing for a low level escape valve to be opened in cooling mode.


A variety of plate and other structure designs are possible for membrane structures in accordance with one or more embodiments.


In one example, plates can have dimensions of about 500 by 500 mm. A variety of materials can be used for these plates, including plastics like Polypropylene, polycarbonates, polyethylene among others. Other metals can also be used, including titanium because of its anti-corrosive qualities but also metal piping covered with anti-corrosive material, e.g., tubes or plates covered with plastic. The latter allows the use of refrigerant as cooling fluid, thereby eliminating the need for a refrigerant-to-heat transfer fluid heat exchanger.


Smaller panels of 200-300 mm can reduce the size and weight of the heat exchangers as well as the pressure drop through the panel for a given airflow and enthalpy load. Air gaps below 2.5 mm have been demonstrated, eliminating the need for features inside the channel to stir the air. A narrow empty air gap reduces wear of the membrane and improves reliability but imposes additional requirements for panel flatness and a well-controlled height of the desiccant channel Bulging of the channel becomes more problematic as panels get narrower without standoffs in the channel.


Taller and shorter panels from 200 mm to 1000 mm are also possible providing different form factors which are particularly important in industrial applications.


A significant factor in creating a thin film is the depth of the liquid desiccant channel, which should be less than 0.5 mm. Channel heights of 0.1-0.25 mm have been found suitable Thinner channels reduce the flow rate of the desiccant which has been shown to increase overall system efficiency as long as uniform desiccant flow and membrane wetting out can be achieved.


The channel height is determined by the height of the raised features to which the membrane is attached (if any) and the bulging of the membrane between the features or attachment points.



FIG. 10 shows the experimental relationship between viscosity, concentration, and temperature of liquid desiccant as well as some theoretical approximations 1001 shows a typical set of conditioner concentrations. Extremely high concentrations, e.g., in hot and dry conditions are shown in 1002, and the full range of potential viscosities in a system in heat pump mode is shown in 1003.



FIG. 11A illustrates an exemplary liquid desiccant flow system in accordance with one or more embodiments. Desiccant is pumped from tank 1101 to conditioner blocks 1102 and regenerator blocks 1103. Here the regenerator blocks are shown in embodiment above the conditioner. Other embodiments with the units in parallel or with the conditioner above the regenerator are also used. They depend mostly on the required form factor for the unit. The panels in this embodiment are shown here in a vertical orientation with horizontal airflow 1102a for the air supply and 1103a for the regenerator airflow, counter flow for the heat transfer fluid (1102b/1103b) and vertical cross flow for the liquid desiccant (1102c/1103c). Vertical air- and heat transfer fluids as well as horizontal liquid desiccant flows have also been disclosed and provide flexibility in form factors and airflow design.



FIG. 11B shows the flow of the liquid desiccant through the conditioner block 1102 and the regenerator block 1103 from the desiccant tank 1101. Desiccant is pumped with 1104 to pressure/flow regulator 1111 through the block. Pump 1105 sends the Liquid desiccant to liquid desiccant heat exchanger 1106. The diluted liquid desiccant is then send through block 1103 via pressure/flow regulator 1112 the height of the riser 1111 and 1112 is linked to the operating conditions especially of the liquid desiccant. Higher risers are needed for colder and more concentrated liquid desiccant.


The liquid desiccant that passes through the block 1115 can be diverted via 1116 to the tank. This allows the conditioner to be operated independently from the regenerator. Similarly, 1117 is a one way valve that allows extra desiccant to be added to the regenerator if the flow from the conditioner is low or the regenerator is operated independently. Valves 1131 are isolation valves for maintenance of the pumps and have no role in the direct regulation of the flows. The overflow from 1111 is directed via 1114 to the tank. The overflow from the regenerator pressure/flow controller 1112 is directed via 1118 back to the flow 1119 from the regenerator and returns via the heat exchanger to the tank.


The choice to place the heat exchanger between the tank and the regenerator is appropriate for systems that supply temperatures well below ambient and regenerate at low temperatures. Deep dehumidification at high concentrations and high regeneration temperatures may make a heat exchanger between the tank and the conditioner more attractive.



FIG. 11C shows how the desiccant is supplied to the blocks at the top as shown in 1112 for the regenerator. The pressure flow regulator 1111 allows desiccant to enter the blocks at 1115. The height of the desiccant in 1110 reflects the pressure required to maintain a constant desiccant flow. If the required pressure to maintain the constant flow exceeds the height of the riser tube at 1110b the excess liquid desiccant is returned to the tank in 1114.


The resulting pressure flow characteristic for the liquid desiccant is shown in FIG. 12. At low liquid desiccant viscosities, i.e., at low concentrations and/or high temperatures, the flow is constant as the pressure 1201 at the beginning of the panel increases. As concentrations rise and/or temperatures are reduced the viscosity of the liquid desiccant increases. When the pressure required to maintain a constant flow 1202a exceeds the height of the riser tube 1201b, the flow through the panel will start to be reduced 1202b.


At very low viscosities it may be necessary to increase flows 1203 to maintain a positive pressure drop 1204 across the panel.



FIG. 13 shows the resulting flow rates and pressure drop in the panels based on a simulation of an actual panel design. The pressure at the beginning of the panel is shown at 1301 in cm or inches of water. The pressure at the top of the panel is shown at 1302, which reflects the resistance in the manifold. 1303 shows the resulting pressure at the top of the desiccant film behind the membrane. At the bottom of the membrane the pressure drop is negative when syphoning 1305 is used or zero with an air reference at the same height as the bottom of the panel. Good coverage and distribution is achieved with a gradual drop in pressure through the panel. If the panel does not have a positive pressure through the desiccant channel, then it is not fully filled and coverage and distribution will suffer 1306. FIG. 13 shows that a minimum flow rate of 60 ml/min is required for good coverage at 20% LiCl and 25 C with a 10 inch pressure drop, while at 1313 with a liquid desiccant concentration of 38% a flow of only 20 ml/min will maintain the same pressure drop and thus good coverage.


Again the challenge is how to maintain uniform distribution and coverage of the membrane over a full range of temperatures and concentrations.



FIG. 14A is a simplified cross-section view showing formation of an exemplary uniform liquid desiccant channel in accordance with one or more embodiments using a combination of embossed or thermoformed raised features 1401 on a plate structure and the flexibility/billowing of the membrane 1402. Typically, a thermoformed height 1403 of about 0.1 to 0.3 mm is used to maintain a total height 1404 between 0.2 and 0.5 mm. The width of the channel is modelled at 300 mm in this exemplary embodiment. Distances 1405 between heat-sealed dots 1406 vary between 1 and 3 cm for high dots and 2 and 6 cm for flat panels. This allows for desiccant flow rates of between 4 and 12 mm/sec with a pressure drop of 3 to 6 inches over the panel for liquid desiccant with concentrations between 20 and 35%.



FIG. 14B shows how the same effective height dimension can be achieved without raised thermoformed features, but with a pattern of heat sealing features, where the heat seals can be dots, ovals or lines shaped to minimize sheer of the membrane 1402.



FIGS. 14C and 14D shows how the channel height restriction in flat structures has outside air 1413 on the outside and heat transfer fluid 1412 inside the panel 1411. Liquid desiccant flows between the panel and the membrane. The sheet 1401 can be made up out of multiple layers, e.g. a very thin polymer layer 1401 to prevent corrosion and high strength metal layer 1410. In the latter case, the heat transfer fluid can be refrigerant assuming the channel formed by the sheets 1410 are designed to withstand the high pressure of refrigerants.



FIG. 14E shows a tubular channel in cross section where a sheet 1401 is bent to form a tube with heat transfer fluid and the membrane 1402 is sealed at intervals 1406 to the sheet surrounding the heat transfer fluid 1412. The air 1413 flows over the membrane 1402 and is dehumidified by the liquid desiccant 1411. The ratio of the tubes dimensions 1420 and 1421 can vary from 1:1 to 1:10 depending on the needs of the heat exchanger.


The shape of the panel is driven by cost, strength, form factors and system requirements. However, the combination of a thin channel geometry created through a pattern of features that heat seals the membrane to the sheet surrounding the heat transfer channel with the pressure control mechanisms described below can ensure uniform distribution of the desiccant and wet out of the membrane.


Examples of various alternative panel structures in accordance with one or more embodiments are shown in FIGS. 14F through 14K. FIG. 14F is a cross section of extruded polymer tubes with the membrane heat sealed to it. One or more of the extruded channels can be used as a manifold for the liquid desiccant. The channels can be horizontal or vertical to ensure counterflow of the heat transfer fluid with the airflow 1403.


A different alternative design is shown in FIG. 14G where very thin polymer sheet 1401 is sealed to a similar flexible sheet 1409 that has been vacuum formed into channels for the heat transfer fluid 1412 and to the membrane 1402 that creates the channel for the liquid desiccant 1411. Such a flexible structure may involve an external frame to create consistent air channels between the membranes, but could be a cost effective and efficient solution if the polymer sheet 1401 is sufficiently thin.



FIG. 14H shows a membrane covered sheet 1401 that is heat-sealed to membrane 1402 through again a pattern of heat-seals 1406 optimized for channel height and membrane shear. The sheets can be shaped to form a channel for the heat transfer fluid 1412.



FIG. 14I shows how the tubular channels of FIG. 14E can be used to create a heat exchanger where the ratio of the tubes width and height can vary. 1430 shows in a cross section how the sheet material can again be either a polymer or a polymer covered metal.



FIGS. 14J and 14K show panels in a horizontal position where the panel can be bent into a wavy structure for additional strength. The use of composite metal/polymer sheets can add strength and improve heat transfer. If the composite channel is used with a refrigerant, it can eliminate the need for a refrigerant-to-heat transfer fluid heat exchanger, thus improving system efficiency.


In one or more embodiments, a constant speed liquid desiccant pump is used with a flow regulator to send liquid desiccant through the membrane modules. Alternatively, a variable speed pump is used to move liquid desiccant through the membrane modules.


Non-Limiting Examples:


Various exemplary liquid desiccant air conditioning system embodiments may include the following operational features:






    • 1. Flow rate of desiccant in 1 between 0.01 and 0.11/min per panel for a 20-50 cm and 50 cm wide panel with an design airflow between 10 and 20 cfm

    • 2. Flow rates increase with total airflow and total work

    • 3. Total airflow is proportional to panel height

    • 4. At these flow rates, the height of the channel of 1 is determined by height of the connection point, modulus of the membrane, and the distance between the membrane connection points

    • 5. For 20 micron membranes without backing the distance between features is 2 to 5 cm for a flat panel and 0.5 to 1 cm for connections points of 0.1 to 0.15 mm. The relevant distance (largest distance) between the connection points increases as the height of the connection points gets lower.

    • 6. Total surface area of the connection points do not exceed 15% of the panel.

    • 7. The height of the connection features can be created by thermoforming or embossing extruded sheets or by injection molding

    • 8. The features can be dots or lines.

    • 9. Cooling of the desiccant can be heat transfer fluid or refrigerant.

    • 10. When cooling is by refrigerant through welded metal structures, usually made copper, that can withstand high pressure transfer heat to/from the corrosion resistant sheet connected to the membrane. The height of and distance between the connection points can be set by the metal structure before coating with a corrosion resistant sheet to which the membrane is bonded, e.g. a thin PE layer.

    • 11. A flat coated metal sheet has 2 to 5 cm distance between the connection points

    • 12. The connection points can be dots or lines.

    • 13. The channel height can be increased by using hydrophilic materials, wicking layers or coatings on the sheet or in the channel for a higher cost panel with greater control over desiccant flows

    • 14. Air references above and below the panel can be used to set the pressure on the desiccant entering and exiting the panel, which will be equal to the distance between the highest and lowest reference point. The pressure gradient in the panel should be positive, i.e. higher pressure higher in the panel.

    • 15. Height of channels in flat panels is up to 100% higher than in vertical panels.

    • 16. Flow in the panel is pressure driven allowing flow rates to vary with temperature and concentration. Fixed flow rates lead to excessive pressures on the connection points at high concentrations and low temperatures and to gravity driven flow with low coverage at low concentrations and high temperatures.

    • 17. Pressures over regenerator panels side is 2-4 times pressure over the conditioner in cooling mode and the reverse in heating mode.

    • 18. Height of the pressure reference points is changed as the system switches from cooling to heating mode.





Having thus described several illustrative embodiments, it is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to form a part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. While some examples presented herein involve specific combinations of functions or structural elements, it should be understood that those functions and elements may be combined in other ways according to the present disclosure to accomplish the same or different objectives. In particular, acts, elements, and features discussed in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from similar or other roles in other embodiments. Additionally, elements and components described herein may be further divided into additional components or joined together to form fewer components for performing the same functions. Accordingly, the foregoing description and attached drawings are by way of example only, and are not intended to be limiting.

Claims
  • 1. A heat exchanger for use in a desiccant air conditioning system, comprising: a plurality of membrane-covered structures facing each other in a generally parallel arrangement and being spaced apart to define air channels therebetween through which an air flow to be treated by the desiccant air conditioning system can flow, each of said membrane-covered structures comprising:a structure having a hollow interior portion defining a heat transfer fluid channel through which a heat transfer fluid can flow, said structure also having one or more outer hydrophobic polymer surfaces; andone or more hydrophobic polymer membranes covering the one or more outer surfaces of the structure to define a liquid desiccant gap therebetween through which a liquid desiccant can flow, each membrane being heat sealed to the outer surface of the structure at discrete locations spaced apart by less than 50 mm on the outer surface to define liquid desiccant flow channels, wherein the liquid desiccant flow channels have a channel height measured from the outer surface to the membrane not exceeding 0.5 mm; anda liquid desiccant pressure regulator connected to a liquid desiccant inlet of the heat exchanger, said pressure regulator configured to maintain a positive pressure at the liquid desiccant flow channels not exceeding a given preset value at a flow rate sufficient to fill each of the liquid desiccant flow channels across a given range of liquid desiccant temperature and concentration conditions, said liquid desiccant pressure regulator configured to divert a portion of the liquid desiccant flowing to the heat exchanger to a liquid desiccant tank in order to maintain a constant liquid desiccant pressure at the liquid desiccant flow channels.
  • 2. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein each membrane is heat sealed to the outer surface of the structure at discrete locations spaced apart by less than 30 mm on the outer surface to define liquid desiccant flow channels.
  • 3. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein the liquid desiccant flow channels have a channel height measured from the outer surface to the membrane not exceeding 0.3 mm.
  • 4. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein the flow rate in the liquid desiccant flow channels can be further maintained by a constant flow device between a pump and the liquid desiccant pressure regulator.
  • 5. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein the pressure regulator comprises an overflow tube or a spring-activated back pressure regulator.
  • 6. The heat exchanger of claim of 1, wherein the pressure regulator is configured to limit the flow rate of the liquid desiccant flowing into the liquid desiccant flow channels to 2-10 mm/sec while maintaining a positive pressure at the inlet of each liquid desiccant flow channel across a range of temperatures and liquid desiccant concentration levels to improve uniformity of the wetting out of the membranes and the uniformity of the liquid desiccant flowing through the liquid desiccant flow channels.
  • 7. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein the pressure regulator is configured to maintain the flow rate of the liquid desiccant at ⅕- 1/20th of the flow rate of the air in lbs./min. over a temperature range 50-140° F. during cooling operations and 0-100° F. during heating operations for desiccant concentrations ranging from about 15-40% when the liquid desiccant comprises LiCl.
  • 8. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein the pressure regulator is configured to maintain the flow rate of the liquid desiccant at less than ⅕th of the flow rate of the air flow in lbs./min. over a range of liquid desiccant temperature and concentration levels needed to condition the air by humidification, dehumidification, cooling, or heating.
  • 9. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein the discrete locations at which the membrane is heat sealed to the outer surface of each structure comprise a pattern of lines or dots.
  • 10. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein the outer surface of each structure includes a plurality of raised features at the discrete locations at which the membrane is heat sealed.
  • 11. The heat exchanger of claim 10, wherein the raised features comprises less than 15% of the surface area of the outer surface of each structure.
  • 12. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein the heat transfer fluid gap in each structure has a thickness of 0.5 mm to 2 mm.
  • 13. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein each structure comprises a panel, and wherein the panels have a vertical orientation.
  • 14. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein each structure comprises a panel, and wherein the panels have a horizontal orientation.
  • 15. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein the hollow interior portion of each structure is defined by a metal layer, and wherein the heat transfer fluid comprises a refrigerant.
  • 16. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein each structure has a tubular shape.
  • 17. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein each structure has a planar construction.
  • 18. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein each structure comprises two polymer plates that are sealed together around their periphery.
  • 19. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein each structure has a curved plate shape.
  • 20. The heat exchanger of claim 1, wherein each structure is vacuum formed to form the heat transfer fluid gap.
  • 21. The heat exchanger of claim of 1, wherein the pressure regulator is configured to limit the flow rate of the liquid desiccant flowing into the liquid desiccant flow channels to 5-10 mm/sec.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/580,222 filed on Nov. 1, 2017 entitled METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DISTRIBUTION OF LIQUID DESICCANT IN MEMBRANE MODULES IN LIQUID DESICCANT AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEMS, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (338)
Number Name Date Kind
1791086 Sperr Feb 1931 A
2221787 Downs et al. Nov 1940 A
2235322 Martin Mar 1941 A
2433741 Crawford Dec 1947 A
2634958 Simpelaar Apr 1953 A
2660159 Hughes Nov 1953 A
2708915 Mandelburg May 1955 A
2939686 Wildermuth Jun 1960 A
2988171 Arnold et al. Jun 1961 A
3119446 Weiss Jan 1964 A
3193001 Meckler Jul 1965 A
3276634 Arnot Oct 1966 A
3409969 Simons Nov 1968 A
3410581 Christensen Nov 1968 A
3455338 Pollit Jul 1969 A
3718181 Reilly et al. Feb 1973 A
4100331 Fletcher et al. Jul 1978 A
4164125 Griffiths Aug 1979 A
4176523 Rousseau Dec 1979 A
4205529 Ko Jun 1980 A
4209368 Coker et al. Jun 1980 A
4222244 Meckler Sep 1980 A
4235221 Murphy Nov 1980 A
4239507 Benoit et al. Dec 1980 A
4259849 Griffiths Apr 1981 A
4305456 Mueller Dec 1981 A
4324947 Dumbeck Apr 1982 A
4341263 Arbabian Jul 1982 A
4399862 Hile Aug 1983 A
4429545 Steinberg Feb 1984 A
4435339 Kragh Mar 1984 A
4444992 Cox, III Apr 1984 A
4583996 Sakata et al. Apr 1986 A
4607132 Jarnagin Aug 1986 A
4612019 Langhorst Sep 1986 A
4649899 Moore Mar 1987 A
4660390 Worthington Apr 1987 A
4686938 Rhodes Aug 1987 A
4691530 Meckler Sep 1987 A
4703629 Moore Nov 1987 A
4730600 Harrigill Mar 1988 A
4744414 Schon May 1988 A
4766952 Onodera Aug 1988 A
4786301 Rhodes Nov 1988 A
4832115 Albers et al. May 1989 A
4872578 Fuerschbach et al. Oct 1989 A
4882907 Brown, II Nov 1989 A
4887438 Meckler Dec 1989 A
4900448 Bonne et al. Feb 1990 A
4910971 McNab Mar 1990 A
4939906 Spatz et al. Jul 1990 A
4941324 Peterson et al. Jul 1990 A
4955205 Wilkinson Sep 1990 A
4971142 Mergler Nov 1990 A
4976313 Dahlgren et al. Dec 1990 A
4979965 Sannholm Dec 1990 A
4984434 Peterson et al. Jan 1991 A
4987750 Meckler Jan 1991 A
5005371 Yonezawa et al. Apr 1991 A
5181387 Meckler Jan 1993 A
5182921 Yan Feb 1993 A
5186903 Cornwell Feb 1993 A
5191771 Meckler Mar 1993 A
5221520 Cornwell Jun 1993 A
5351497 Lowenstein Oct 1994 A
5361828 Lee et al. Nov 1994 A
5375429 Tokizaki et al. Dec 1994 A
5448895 Coellner et al. Sep 1995 A
5462113 Wand Oct 1995 A
5471852 Meckler Dec 1995 A
5528905 Scarlatti Jun 1996 A
5534186 Walker et al. Jul 1996 A
5582026 Barto, Sr. Dec 1996 A
5595690 Filburn et al. Jan 1997 A
5605628 Davidson et al. Feb 1997 A
5606865 Caron Mar 1997 A
5638900 Lowenstein et al. Jun 1997 A
5641337 Arrowsmith et al. Jun 1997 A
5661983 Groten et al. Sep 1997 A
5685152 Sterling Nov 1997 A
5685485 Mock et al. Nov 1997 A
5797272 James Aug 1998 A
5816065 Maeda Oct 1998 A
5832993 Ohata et al. Nov 1998 A
5860284 Goland et al. Jan 1999 A
5860285 Tulpule Jan 1999 A
5928808 Eshraghi Jul 1999 A
5933702 Goswami Aug 1999 A
5950442 Maeda et al. Sep 1999 A
6012296 Shah Jan 2000 A
6018954 Assaf Feb 2000 A
6035657 Dobak, III et al. Mar 2000 A
6083387 LeBlanc et al. Jul 2000 A
6103969 Bussey Aug 2000 A
6131649 Pearl et al. Oct 2000 A
6134903 Potnis et al. Oct 2000 A
6138470 Potnis et al. Oct 2000 A
6156102 Conrad et al. Dec 2000 A
6171374 Barton et al. Jan 2001 B1
6216483 Potnis et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216489 Potnis et al. Apr 2001 B1
6244062 Prado Jun 2001 B1
6247604 Taskis et al. Jun 2001 B1
6266975 Assaf Jul 2001 B1
6417423 Koper et al. Jul 2002 B1
6442951 Maeda et al. Sep 2002 B1
6463750 Assaf Oct 2002 B2
6487872 Forkosh et al. Dec 2002 B1
6488900 Call et al. Dec 2002 B1
6497107 Maisotsenko et al. Dec 2002 B2
6497749 Kesten et al. Dec 2002 B2
6502807 Assaf et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514321 Lehto et al. Feb 2003 B1
6539731 Kesten et al. Apr 2003 B2
6546746 Forkosh et al. Apr 2003 B2
6557365 Dinnage et al. May 2003 B2
6660069 Sato et al. Dec 2003 B2
6684649 Thompson Feb 2004 B1
6739142 Korin May 2004 B2
6745826 Lowenstein et al. Jun 2004 B2
6766817 da Silva et al. Jul 2004 B2
6848265 Lowenstein et al. Feb 2005 B2
6854278 Maisotsenko et al. Feb 2005 B2
6854279 Digiovanni et al. Feb 2005 B1
6918404 Dias da Silva et al. Jul 2005 B2
6938434 Fair Sep 2005 B1
6945065 Lee et al. Sep 2005 B2
6976365 Forkosh et al. Dec 2005 B2
6986428 Hester et al. Jan 2006 B2
7066586 da Silva et al. Jun 2006 B2
RE39288 Assaf Sep 2006 E
7143597 Hyland et al. Dec 2006 B2
7191821 Gronwall et al. Mar 2007 B2
7197887 Maisotsenko et al. Apr 2007 B2
7228891 Shin et al. Jun 2007 B2
7258923 van den Bogerd et al. Aug 2007 B2
7269966 Lowenstein et al. Sep 2007 B2
7279215 Hester et al. Oct 2007 B2
7306650 Slayzak et al. Dec 2007 B2
7337615 Reidy Mar 2008 B2
7430878 Assaf Oct 2008 B2
7758671 Kesten et al. Jul 2010 B2
7841201 Sedlak Nov 2010 B2
7930896 Matsui et al. Apr 2011 B2
7938888 Assaf May 2011 B2
8141379 Al-Hadhrami et al. Mar 2012 B2
8337590 Herencia et al. Dec 2012 B2
8353175 Wohlert Jan 2013 B2
8496732 Culp et al. Jul 2013 B2
8499576 Meijer Aug 2013 B2
8500960 Ehrenberg et al. Aug 2013 B2
8623210 Manabe et al. Jan 2014 B2
8641806 Claridge et al. Feb 2014 B2
8648209 Lastella Feb 2014 B1
8695363 Tang et al. Apr 2014 B2
8696805 Chang et al. Apr 2014 B2
8769971 Kozubal et al. Jul 2014 B2
8790454 Lee et al. Jul 2014 B2
8800308 Vandermeulen et al. Aug 2014 B2
8876943 Gottlieb et al. Nov 2014 B2
8881806 Xie et al. Nov 2014 B2
8943844 Forkosh Feb 2015 B2
8943850 Vandermeulen et al. Feb 2015 B2
8968945 Fasold et al. Mar 2015 B2
9000289 Vandermeulen et al. Apr 2015 B2
9086223 Vandermeulen et al. Jul 2015 B2
9101874 Vandermeulen Aug 2015 B2
9101875 Vandermeulen et al. Aug 2015 B2
9243810 Vandermeulen et al. Jan 2016 B2
9273877 Vandermeulen Mar 2016 B2
9308490 Vandermeulen et al. Apr 2016 B2
9377207 Vandermeulen et al. Jun 2016 B2
9429332 Vandermeulen et al. Aug 2016 B2
9470426 Vandermeulen Oct 2016 B2
9506697 Vandermeulen Nov 2016 B2
9631823 Vandermeulen et al. Apr 2017 B2
9631824 Maisey et al. Apr 2017 B1
9631848 Vandermeulen et al. Apr 2017 B2
9709285 Vandermeulen Jul 2017 B2
9709286 Vandermeulen et al. Jul 2017 B2
9835340 Vandermeulen et al. Dec 2017 B2
10006648 Vandermeulen et al. Jun 2018 B2
10024558 Vandermeulen Jul 2018 B2
10024601 Vandermeulen Jul 2018 B2
10168056 Vandermeulen Jan 2019 B2
10323867 Vandermeulen Jun 2019 B2
10443868 Vandermeulen et al. Oct 2019 B2
10591191 Christians Mar 2020 B2
10619867 Vandermeulen Apr 2020 B2
10619868 Vandermeulen Apr 2020 B2
10619895 Vandermeulen Apr 2020 B1
10731876 Vandermeulen Aug 2020 B2
10753624 Vandermeulen et al. Aug 2020 B2
10760830 Vandermeulen et al. Sep 2020 B2
20010008148 Ito et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010013226 Potnis et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010015500 Shimanuki et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020023740 Lowenstein et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026797 Sundhar Mar 2002 A1
20020038552 Maisotsenko et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020098395 Shimanuki et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020104439 Komkova et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020139245 Kesten et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020139320 Shimanuki et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020148602 Nakamura Oct 2002 A1
20020185266 Dobbs et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030000230 Kopko Jan 2003 A1
20030029185 Kopko Feb 2003 A1
20030033821 Maisotsenko et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030051367 Griffin Mar 2003 A1
20030051498 Sanford Mar 2003 A1
20030106680 Serpico et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030121271 Dinnage et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030230092 Lowenstein et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040040697 Pierre et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040061245 Maisotsenko et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040101698 Yamanaka et al. May 2004 A1
20040109798 Chopard et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040112077 Forkosh et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040118125 Potnis et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040134212 Lee et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040168462 Assaf Sep 2004 A1
20040194944 Hendricks et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040211207 Forkosh et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040230092 Thierfelder et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040231512 Slayzak et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040261440 Forkosh et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050095433 Bogerd et al. May 2005 A1
20050106021 Bunker et al. May 2005 A1
20050109052 Albers et al. May 2005 A1
20050133082 Konold et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050210907 Gillan et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050217485 Olapinski et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050218535 Maisotsenko et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050257551 Landry Nov 2005 A1
20060042295 Assaf Mar 2006 A1
20060070728 Shin et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060124287 Reinders Jun 2006 A1
20060156750 Lowenstein et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060156761 Mola et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060278089 Theilow Dec 2006 A1
20070169916 Wand et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070175234 Pruitt Aug 2007 A1
20070234743 Assaf Oct 2007 A1
20080127965 Burton Jun 2008 A1
20080156471 Han et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080196758 McGuire Aug 2008 A1
20080203866 Chamberlain Aug 2008 A1
20080302357 DeNault Dec 2008 A1
20080314567 Noren Dec 2008 A1
20090000732 Jacobine et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090056919 Hoffman et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090095162 Hargis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090126913 Lee et al. May 2009 A1
20090173096 Wohlert Jul 2009 A1
20090183857 Pierce et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090200022 Bravo et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090238685 Santa Ana Sep 2009 A1
20100000247 Bhatti et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012309 Uges Jan 2010 A1
20100018322 Neitzke et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100051083 Boyk Mar 2010 A1
20100077783 Bhatti et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100084120 Yin et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100170776 Ehrenberg et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100319370 Kozubal et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110073290 Chang et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110100618 Carlson May 2011 A1
20110101117 Miyauchi May 2011 A1
20110126885 Kokotov et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110132027 Gommed Jun 2011 A1
20110209858 Konno Sep 2011 A1
20120052785 Nagamatsu et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120114527 Hoglund et al. May 2012 A1
20120118148 Culp et al. May 2012 A1
20120118155 Claridge et al. May 2012 A1
20120125020 Vandermeulen et al. May 2012 A1
20120125021 Vandermeulen et al. May 2012 A1
20120125031 Vandermeulen et al. May 2012 A1
20120125581 Allen et al. May 2012 A1
20120131937 Vandermeulen et al. May 2012 A1
20120131938 Vandermeulen et al. May 2012 A1
20120131939 Vandermeulen et al. May 2012 A1
20120132513 Vandermeulen et al. May 2012 A1
20120152318 Kee Jun 2012 A1
20120186281 Vandermeulen et al. Jul 2012 A1
20130056177 Coutu et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130101909 Fasold et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130186121 Erb et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130199220 Ma et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130227982 Forkosh Sep 2013 A1
20130255287 Forkosh Oct 2013 A1
20130340449 Kozubal et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140054004 LePoudre et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140054013 LePoudre et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140150481 Vandermeulen Jun 2014 A1
20140150656 Vandermeulen Jun 2014 A1
20140150657 Vandermeulen et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140150662 Vandermeulen et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140223947 Ranjan et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140245769 Vandermeulen et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140250935 Prochaska et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140260367 Coutu et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140260369 LePoudre Sep 2014 A1
20140260371 Vandermeulen Sep 2014 A1
20140260398 Kozubal et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140260399 Vandermeulen Sep 2014 A1
20140262125 Erb et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140262144 Erb et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140264968 Erb et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140360373 Peacos et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140366567 Vandermeulen Dec 2014 A1
20150107287 Forkosh Apr 2015 A1
20150153210 Bartlett Jun 2015 A1
20150184876 Vandermeulen et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150228993 Mori et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150300754 Vandermeulen et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150308711 Gillan et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150316288 Erickson Nov 2015 A1
20150323216 Wallin Nov 2015 A1
20150338140 Vandermeulen Nov 2015 A1
20160187011 Vandermeulen Jun 2016 A1
20160290665 Vandermeulen et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160290666 Coutu et al. Oct 2016 A1
20170045257 Moffitt Feb 2017 A1
20170074530 Kozubal Mar 2017 A1
20170102155 Vandermeulen Apr 2017 A1
20170106639 Vandermeulen et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170167794 Vandermeulen Jun 2017 A1
20170184319 Vandermeulen et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170241655 LePoudre Aug 2017 A1
20170292722 Vandermeulen Oct 2017 A1
20180051897 Vandermeulen et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180163977 Vandermeulen Jun 2018 A1
20200096241 Vandermeulen Mar 2020 A1
20200141593 Vandermeulen et al. May 2020 A1
20200173671 Rowe et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200182493 Luttik Jun 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (72)
Number Date Country
100366981 Feb 2008 CN
101336358 Dec 2008 CN
100476308 Apr 2009 CN
101636630 Jan 2010 CN
102282426 Dec 2011 CN
202229469 May 2012 CN
202734094 Feb 2013 CN
0781972 Jul 1997 EP
1120609 Aug 2001 EP
1563229 Aug 2005 EP
1781995 May 2007 EP
2256434 Dec 2010 EP
2306100 Apr 2011 EP
2787293 Oct 2014 EP
1172247 Nov 1969 GB
S54-77443 Jun 1979 JP
S62-297647 Dec 1987 JP
02306067 Dec 1990 JP
H03-125830 May 1991 JP
H03-213921 Sep 1991 JP
H08-105669 Apr 1996 JP
H09-184692 Jul 1997 JP
H10-220914 Aug 1998 JP
H11-137948 May 1999 JP
H11-197439 Jul 1999 JP
H11-351700 Dec 1999 JP
2000-230730 Aug 2000 JP
2001-517773 Oct 2001 JP
2002-206834 Jul 2002 JP
2004-524504 Aug 2004 JP
2005-134060 May 2005 JP
2006-263508 Oct 2006 JP
2006-529022 Dec 2006 JP
2008-020138 Jan 2008 JP
2009-517622 Apr 2009 JP
2009-04273555 Jun 2009 JP
2009-180433 Aug 2009 JP
2009-192101 Aug 2009 JP
2009-281668 Dec 2009 JP
2009-293831 Dec 2009 JP
2010002162 Jan 2010 JP
201054136 Mar 2010 JP
2010-247022 Nov 2010 JP
2011-064359 Mar 2011 JP
2011-511244 Apr 2011 JP
201192815 May 2011 JP
2011-163682 Aug 2011 JP
2012-073013 Apr 2012 JP
2013-064549 Apr 2013 JP
10-2001-0017939 Mar 2001 KR
2004-0026242 Mar 2004 KR
10-0510774 Aug 2005 KR
2014-0022785 Feb 2014 KR
201009269 Mar 2010 TW
WO-1997021061 Jun 1997 WO
WO-1999022180 May 1999 WO
WO-2000011426 Mar 2000 WO
WO-2000055546 Sep 2000 WO
WO-2002066901 Aug 2002 WO
WO-2002086391 Oct 2002 WO
WO-2003004937 Jan 2003 WO
WO-2004046618 Jun 2004 WO
WO-2006006177 Jan 2006 WO
WO-2008037079 Apr 2008 WO
WO-2009094032 Jul 2009 WO
WO-2009144880 Dec 2009 WO
WO-2009157277 Dec 2009 WO
WO-2011062808 May 2011 WO
WO-2011161547 Dec 2011 WO
WO-2012071036 May 2012 WO
WO-2012082093 Jun 2012 WO
WO-2013172789 Nov 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (21)
Entry
Open Absorption System for Cooling and Air Conditioning using Membrane Contactors—Annual Report 2005, Publication Number: Publication 260097, Project: 101310—Open Absorption System for Cooling and Air Conditioning using Membrane Contactors, Date of publication: Jan. 31, 2006, Author: Manuel Conde-Petit, Robert Weber, Contractor: M. Conde Engineering.
Open Absorption System for Cooling and Air Conditioning using Membrane Contactors Annual, Report 2006, Publication Number: Publication 260098, Project: 101310—Open Absorption System for Cooling and Air Conditioning using Membrane Contactors, Date of publication: Nov. 14, 2006, Author: Manuel Conde-Petit, Robert Weber, Contractor: M. Conde Engineering.
Open Absorption System for Cooling and Air Conditioning Using Membrane Contactors—Final Report, Publication Number: Publication 280139, Project: 101310—Open Absorption System for Cooling and Air Conditioning using Membrane Contactors, Date of publication: Aug. 7, 2008, Author: Viktor Dorer, Manuel Conde-Petit, Robert Weber, Contractor: M. Conde Engineering.
Conde-Petit, M. 2007. Liquid Desiccant-Based Air-Conditioning Systems—LDACS, Proc. of the 1st European Conference on Polygeneration—Technologies and Applications, 217-234, A. Coronas, ed., Tarragona—Spain, Oct. 16-17, Published by CREVER—Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
Conde-Petit, M. 2008. Open Absorption Systems for Air-Conditioning using Membrane Contactors,Proceedings ‘15. Schweizerisches Status-Seminar «Energie- und Umweltforschung im Bauwesen»’, Sep. 11-12—ETH Zurich, Switzerland. Published by BRENET—Eggwilstr. 16a, CH-9552 Bronschhofen—Switzerland (brenet@vogel-tech.ch).
Third Party Observations for PCT/US2011/037936, dated Sep. 24, 2012.
Ashrae, et al., “Desiccant Dehumidification and Pressue Drying Equipment,” 2012 ASHRAE Handbook—HVAC Systems and Equipment, Chapter 24, pp. 24.1-24.12.
Beccali, et al., “Energy and Economic Assessment of Desiccant Cooling,” Solar Energy, Issue 83, pp. 1828-1846, Aug. 2009.
Fimbres-Weihs, et al., “Review of 3D CFD modeling of flow and mass transfer in narrow spacer-filled channels in membrane modules,” Chemical Engineering and Processing 49 (2010) pp. 759-781.
Lachner, “An Investigation into the Feasibility of the Use of Water as a Refrigerant,” International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference, 723:1-9 (2004).
Li, F., et al., “Novel spacers for mass transfer enhancement in membrane separations,” Journal of Membrane Science, 253 (2005), pp. 1-12.
Li, Y., et al., “CFD simulation of fluid flow through spacer-filled membrane module: selecting suitable cell types for periodic boundary conditions,” Desalination 233 (2008) pp. 351-358.
Liu, et al., “Research Progress in Liquid Desiccant Air Conditioning Devices and Systems,” Frontiers of Energy and Power Engineering in China, vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 55-65, Feb. 2010.
Lowenstein, “A Solar Liquid-Desiccant Air Conditioner,” Solar 2003, Proceedings of the 32nd ASES Annual Conference, Austin, TX, Jul. 2003.
Mathioulakis, “Desalination by Using Alternative Energy,” Desalination, Issue 203, pp. 346-365, 2007.
Perry “Perry's Chemical Engineers handbook” 1999 McGraw Hill p. 11-52,11-53.
Refrigerant—Random House Kernerman Webster's College Dictionary, “Refrigerant,” Random House, <https://thefreedictionary.com/refrigerant> (2010).
Russell, et al., “Optimization of Photovolatic Thermal Collector Heat Pump Systems,” ISES International Solar Energy Conference, Atlanta, GA, vol. 3, pp. 1870-1874, May 1979.
Siphon—Encyclopedia Americana. “Siphon.” Grolier Online, 2015. Web. Apr. 3, 2015. 1 page.
Welty, “Liquid Desiccant Dehumidification,” Engineered Systems, May 2010, vol. 27 Issue 5, p. 34.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/058750 dated Mar. 4, 2019.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190145639 A1 May 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62580222 Nov 2017 US