The present invention relates to implants, tools, and methods for adjusting sagittal imbalance of a spine.
A human spine has three main regions—the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions. In a normal spine, the cervical and lumbar regions have a lordotic (backward) curvature, while the thoracic region has a kyphotic (forward) curvature. Such a disposition of the curvatures gives a normal spine an S-shape. Sagittal imbalance is a condition in which the normal alignment of the spine is disrupted in the sagittal plane causing a deformation of the spinal curvature. One example of such a deformity is “flat-back” syndrome, wherein the lumbar region of the spine is generally linear rather than curved. A more extreme example has the lumbar region of the spine exhibiting a kyphotic curvature such that the spine has an overall C-shape, rather than an S-shape. Sagittal imbalance is disadvantageous from a biomechanical standpoint and generally results in discomfort, pain, and an awkward appearance in that the patient tends to be bent forward excessively.
Various treatments for sagittal imbalance are known in the art. These treatments generally involve removing at least some bone from a vertebra (osteotomy) and sometimes removal of the entire vertebra (vertebrectomy) in order to reduce the posterior height of the spine in the affected region and recreate the lordotic curve. Such procedures are traditionally performed via an open, posterior approach involving a large incision (often to expose multiple spinal levels at the same time) and require stripping of the muscle tissue away from the bone. These procedures can have the disadvantages of a large amount of blood loss, high risk, long operating times, and a long and painful recovery for the patient.
In some other treatments, achieving sagittal balance is accomplished by via an open, anterior approach to position an intervertebral implant between two affected vertebrae in order to increase the anterior height of the spine in the affected region and thereby recreate the lordotic curve. Effectuating an anterior spinal fusion typically involves retracting the great vessels (aorta and vena cava) and tissue adjacent to the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL), then severing the ALL 16 to increase flexibility and permit insertion of the implant between the adjacent vertebrae. The anterior approach is advantageous in that the ALL 16 is generally exposed, allowing the physician to simply dissect across the exposed portion of the ALL 16 to access the spine. The anterior approach to the spine can also have the disadvantages of a large amount of blood loss, build-up of scar tissue near vital organs, and sexual dysfunction in males. Furthermore, depending upon the patient, multiple procedures, involving both anterior and posterior approaches to the spine, may be required.
In contrast, a lateral approach could be used to access a target spinal site, remove the intervertebral disc between two affected vertebrae, and insert an intervertebral implant. A lateral approach to the spine provides a number of advantages over the posterior and anterior approaches to the spine. Because a lateral approach may be performed without creating a large incision or stripping muscle from bone, this approach does not present the problems associated with a posterior approach, namely there is no large incision, muscle stripping, high blood loss, long operating time, or long and painful recovery for the patient. Furthermore, because a lateral approach to the spine does not involve exposing the anterior aspect of the ALL 16, retracting the great vessels and nearby tissues is unnecessary such that the risks of blood loss, scar tissue, and sexual dysfunction are much less likely to be encountered.
However, in patients with sagittal imbalance, release of the ALL 16 may be necessary to achieve the flexibility between the two affected vertebrae to facilitate insertion of an implant and achieve the amount of correction desired. A need exists for implants, tools, and methods for safe and reproducible means of releasing the ALL 16 via lateral approach as well as restoring the lordotic curvature of the lumbar spine. The present invention is directed at overcoming, or at least improving upon, the disadvantages of the prior art.
Many advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art with a reading of this specification in conjunction with the attached drawings, wherein like reference numerals are applied to like elements and wherein:
Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure. The methods and devices described herein include a variety of inventive features and components that warrant patent protection, both individually and in combination.
With reference to
According to a preferred method, the implant 10 is implanted through a lateral access corridor formed through the side of the patient. Accessing the targeted spinal site through the lateral access corridor avoids a number of disadvantages associated with posterior access (e.g. cutting through back musculature and possible need to reduce or cut away part of the posterior bony structures like lamina, facets, and spinous process) and anterior access (e.g. use of an access surgeon to move various organs and blood vessels out of the way in order to reach the target site). Accordingly, by accessing the target site via a lateral access approach and correcting the sagittal imbalance without reducing the posterior height (i.e. no bone removal) the high blood loss and painful recovery associated previous methods may be avoided (or at least mitigated).
According to one example, the lateral access approach to the targeted spinal space may be performed according to the instruments and methods described in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,207,949 entitled “Surgical Access System and Related Methods,” and/or U.S. Pat. No. 7,905,840 entitled “Surgical Access System and Related Methods,” the entire contents of which are each incorporated herein by reference as if set forth herein in their entireties. With reference to
With the sequential dilation system 30 positioned adjacent the target site (and optionally docked in place via a k-wire), the retractor assembly 36 is advanced to the target site over the sequential dilation system 30. According to the embodiment shown, the retractor assembly 36 includes retractor blades 38, 40, 42 and a body 44. With the sequential dilation system 30 removed, the retractor blades 38, 40, and 42 are separated (
With the lateral access corridor formed (as pictured in
A cutting blade 68 is exposed between the first and second fingers 58, 60 in the opening 62. A slot 70 formed along a side of the distal head 56 allows a cutting blade 68 to be inserted and removed from the distal head 56 as needed (such as, for example, if a blade were to become dull or bent). Thus, the cutting blade 68 may be disposable and the remainder of the ALL resector 50 may be reusable. Alternatively, both cutting blade 68 and remainder of the ALL resector 50 may be reusable or both may be disposable. In use, the ALL resector 50 is preferably positioned such that the second finger 60 is aligned along the anterior side of the ALL and the first finger 58 is aligned along the posterior side of the ALL 16, thus, at least partially bounding the ALL 16 on either side which allows the cutting blade 68 to maintain a generally perpendicular alignment relative to the length of the ALL 16. The ALL resector 50 is advanced forward so that the cutting blade 70 cuts through the ALL 16 from one lateral edge to the other. As discussed above, the second finger 60 is preferably aligned along the anterior side of the ALL 16 as the distal head 56 is advanced, thereby shielding the tissue lying anterior to the finger 60 (e.g. great vessels, etc. . . . ) from the cutting blade 68. Furthermore, as the user advances the ALL resector 50, the fingers 58, 60 may also act as a stabilizing guide.
Additionally, it has been contemplated that the first and second fingers 74, 76 be sized and shaped to have a greater width than the first and second fingers 58, 60 of ALL resector 50. Added width of the fingers may provide for increased protection and shielding of the cutting area while adding greater stability during insertion.
The sliding blade 82 includes a blade 96 that is secured to the distal end of an extender 98 by way of an attachment feature 100. The attachment feature 100 as shown is similar to known attachment features used for attaching a blade at the end of a scalpel. It will be appreciated that any number of mechanisms may be used to attach blade 96 to extender 98. Blade 96 may be disposable and extender 98 may be reusable. Alternatively, both blade 96 and extender 100 may be reusable or both may be disposable. The blade 96 includes a cutting edge 102 that, when advanced beyond the lumen 94 of shaft 86, cuts through tissue or material situated adjacent the cutting edge 102.
The proximal end of the extender 98 includes a grip 104 that a surgeon or other user may use to manipulate the position of the sliding blade 82 relative to the shaft 86 and head 88. At least one stop feature 106 extends from the outer surface of the extender 98 which engages with a track 108 that extends along a portion of the elongated shaft 86. The track 108 limits the longitudinal travel of the sliding blade 82 relative to the shaft 86 so that the sliding blade 82 remains slidably mated to the tissue retractor 80 without becoming unassembled and such that the blade 96 cannot extend beyond the protective head 88. Additionally, the stop feature 106 restricts rotation of the sliding blade 82 relative to the tissue retractor 80.
The ALL resector 110 is preferably compatible with a hand-held retraction tool, for example the hand-held retraction tool 130 of
To use the ALL resector 110, the surgeon may preferably first insert the retraction tool 130 between the ALL 16 and the great vessels, aligning the paddle 136 in a manner that protects the vessels without over-retracting them. The surgeon determines the ideal angle to approach the ALL 16 and whether to use a hooked, straight, or custom-bent tip. Once the ALL resector 110 is prepared with the preferred tip 118, the electrical connector can be connected to an electrosurgical unit that delivers electrical current to the anode tip 118 in an amount that will cauterize (thus cut) the tissue of the ALL. The non-conductive paddle 136 of the retraction tool 130 protects the great vessels from the cauterizing effect of the electrical current.
The cutter 146 includes a blade 160 that is secured to the distal end of an extender 162 by way of an attachment feature 164. The attachment feature 164 as shown is similar to known attachment features used for attaching a cutting blade at the end of a scalpel. In the embodiment shown, the blade 160 includes only a single cutting edge 166, however it is contemplated that more than one cutting edge 166 may be utilized. It will be appreciated that any number of mechanisms may be used to attach blade 160 to extender 162. Blade 160 may be disposable and extender 162 may be reusable. Alternatively, both blade 160 and extender 162 may be reusable or both may be disposable. The blade 160 includes a cutting edge 166 that, when advanced along the elongate shaft 150 of the retractor component 144, cuts through tissue or material situated adjacent the cutting edge 166.
The proximal end of the extender 162 includes a connector 168 to which a handle may be connected that a surgeon may use to manipulate the position of the cutter 146 relative to the shaft 150 and head 152. At least one anti-rotation bar 170 extends from the outer surface of the extender 162 which can be slidably inserted between guide posts 158 and travel along a portion of the elongated shaft 150. When the cutter 146 is positioned with the anti-rotation bar 170 between the guide posts 158, the guide posts 158 keeps the cutter 146 slidably mated to the tissue retractor 144 and restricts rotation of the cutter 146 relative to the tissue retractor 144. Further, the cutter 146 is restricted from movement in the cephalad/caudal direction by the vertebral bodies V1 and V2. Additionally, the extender 162 includes a pair of distal wings 172 protruding generally perpendicularly from the outer surface of the extender 162. Distal wings 172 are sized and dimensioned to contact the proximal surfaces of V1 and V2 when the blade 160 is fully advanced across the ALL in order to act as a depth stop andy restrict excessive advancement of the cutting blade 160. The cutting blade 160 may also be provided with an elongated finger 174 as shown in
While the ALL resectors 50, 72, 78, 110, 142 are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope and spirit of the invention as defined herein. Furthermore, the ALL resectors 50, 72, 78, 110, 142 may be incorporated into a surgical kit or used with any number of various tooling and/or implants. The following are examples of tooling and implants that may be used in conjunction with the ALL resectors discussed herein, as well as any variation of an ALL resector not disclosed herein.
As discussed above, a patient may undergo a lateral procedure and have an intervertebral disc space prepared for the permanent implantation of, for example, a hyperlordotic implant. The intervertebral space may be prepared via any number of well-known surgical preparation tools, including but not limited to, kerrisons, rongeurs, pituitaries, and rasps. Preparation of the disc space may also include the removal of any implants already occupying the disc space. By way of example only, during a revision surgery, it may be necessary to remove a spinal fusion implant or TDR device previously implanted.
Once the disc space is prepared, the surgeon may designate the appropriate implant size. This may be accomplished through the use of a trial sizer (not shown). The trial sizer may include grooves along at least a portion of the upper and/or lower surfaces to help insert the sizer along the desired path through the intervertebral space. The sizer may also be connected to a guide clip attachment that can be guided along the retractor blade 38 of the retractor assembly (as will be described below in connection with the implant insertion). When the appropriate size is determined, an insertion instrument, for example, insertion instrument 310 may then be secured to an implant such that the implant is advanceable into the prepared intervertebral disc space.
Turning now to
The implant 200 may be provided with any number of additional features for promoting fusion, such as fusion apertures 214 extending between the top and bottom surfaces 202, 204 which allow a boney bridge to form through the implant 200. Various osteoinductive materials may be deposited within the apertures 214 and/or adjacent to the implant 200 to further facilitate fusion. Such osteoinductive materials may be introduced before, during, or after the insertion of the exemplary spinal fusion implant 200, and may include (but are not necessarily limited to) autologous bone harvested from the patient receiving the spinal fusion implant, bone allograft, bone xenograft, any number of non-bone implants (e.g. ceramic, metallic, polymer), bone morphogenic protein, and bio-resorbable compositions, including but not limited to any of a variety of poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) based polymers. Visualization apertures 216 situated along the sidewalls, may aid in visualization at the time of implantation and at subsequent clinical evaluations. More specifically, based on the generally radiolucent nature of the preferred embodiment of implant 200, the visualization apertures 216 provide the ability to visualize the interior of the implant 200 during X-ray and/or other imaging techniques. Further, the visualization apertures 216 will provide an avenue for cellular migration to the exterior of the implant 200. Thus the implant 200 will serve as additional scaffolding for bone fusion on the exterior of the implant 200.
The spinal fusion implant 200 may be provided in any number of sizes by varying one or more of the implant height, width, and length. The length of the implant 200 is such that it may span from one lateral aspect of the disc space to the other, engaging the apophyseal ring on each side. By way of example, the implant 200 may be provided with a length between 40 mm and 60 mm. The size ranges described are generally appropriate for implantation into the lordotic lumbar portion of the spine. The dimensions of the implant 200 may be altered according to proportions of the particular patient. Further, variation of the implant dimensions may be implemented to produce implants generally appropriate for implantation into any portion of the spine. By way of example only, the posterior sidewall 208 may be dimensioned at a height greater than that of anterior sidewall 206 such that top surface 202 and bottom surface 204 converge toward one another at the anterior sidewall 206 (e.g. to create a hyper-kyphotic implant) in order to promote the proper kyphotic angle in the thoracic spine.
As shown in
Tapered surfaces 224 may be provide along the leading end 210 to help facilitate insertion of the implant 200. Additional instrumentation may also be used to help deploy the implant 200 into the disc space. By way of example, the implant installation device shown and described in detail in the commonly owned and copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/378,685, entitled “Implant Installation Assembly and Related Methods,” filed on Feb. 17, 2009, the entire contents of which is incorporated by reference herein, may be used to help distract the disc space and deposit the implant therein.
The spinal fusion implant 200 may be provided with any number of suitable features for engaging the insertion instrument 310 (illustrated in
In the example shown, the tab 232 is arcuate at the corners and generally trapezoidal, however, it should be appreciated that the tab 232 may take any number of suitable shapes, such as, by way of example only, square, rectangular, triangular, partially circular, or partially ovular, among others, the tab may be of different lengths. It should also be appreciated that tab 232 surfaces may be one or more of generally concave, generally convex, or generally planar. The tab 232 is comprised of a perimeter surface 234, an anterior side 236, a posterior side 238, and a tab side 240. Anterior side 236 and posterior side 238 may be interchangeable (i.e. the implant may be flipped horizontally or vertically) such that the same implant may be implanted from either the right side or the left side of the patient. Anterior side 236 and posterior side 238 are preferably, though not necessarily, configured coplanar with anterior sidewall 206 and posterior sidewall 208, respectively (i.e. the width of tab 232 is preferably equal to the width of the implant proximal end, however, the width of the tab may be greater than, or less than, the width of the implant at proximal end). Tab side 240 of tab 232 is configured to engage the exterior surface of an adjacent vertebrae.
The tab 232 is provided with a fixation aperture 242 for enabling the engagement of a fixation anchor 302 within the vertebral bone to secure the placement of the implant 230. The fixation aperture 242 may have any number of shapes and/or features for enabling an anchor (for example the fixation anchor 302 of
The intermediate region 268 includes a plurality of vertically-oriented chocks 264 distributed in a radial gear-shaped pattern about the anchor 262. The chocks 264 are configured to engage with the contoured periphery 263 of a fixation aperture 252 to provide a solid connection between the anchor 262 and implant 260. The intermediate region 268 further has a sloped distal-facing surface 278 configured to contact the relevant vertebral bodies. The sloped distal-facing surface 278 may have any cross-sectional shape desired by the user, including but not limited to concave, convex, and generally planar.
The elongated shaft 270 extends distally from the intermediate region 268. The shaft 270 includes a threadform 280 configured to provide purchase into the bone. By way of example only, the threadform 280 is provided as a single-lead threadform, however, multiple threads may be used without departing from the scope of the present invention. The shaft 270 further includes a notch 282 to provide the anchor 262 with a self-tapping feature. Further, the anchor 262 may be provided with a lumen 284 extending therethrough such that the anchor 262 is cannulated. The anchor 262 has a major diameter defined by the outer diameter of the threadform 272.
The hyper-lordotic implants 200, 230, 248, 250, 260, and 300 have been shown, by way of example, according to a number of embodiments. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the scope to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope and spirit of the invention as defined herein. By way of example, one will appreciate that the various quantities, sizes, shapes and locking elements/anchors of the tabs described for fixing the implants to the spine, as well as additional possible quantities, sizes, shapes and locking mechanisms/anchors not described, may be combined in any number of different configurations that can provide for a hyper-lordotic implant that can be fixed in position relative to the spine.
With reference to
The handle 312 is generally disposed at the proximal end of the insertion instrument 310. The handle 312 may be further equipped with a universal connector to allow the attachment of accessories for ease of handling of the insertion instrument 310 (e.g. a straight handle or a T-handle, not shown). The handle 312 is fixed to the thumbwheel housing 314 allowing easy handling by the user. By way of example, the thumbwheel housing 314 holds at least one thumbwheel 320, and at least one spacer (not shown). Because the handle 312 is fixed, the user has easy access to the thumbwheel 320 and can stably turn the thumbwheel 320 relative to the thumbwheel housing 314. Additionally, the relative orientation of the thumbwheel 320 to the handle 312 orients the user with respect to the distal insertion head 318. The inserter shaft (not shown) is attached to the thumbwheel 320 and is freely rotatable with low friction due to the spacer. The user may then employ the thumbwheel to rotate the inserter shaft thereby advancing it towards the distal inserter head 318.
The elongate tubular element 316 is generally cylindrical and of a length sufficient to allow the device to span from the surgical target site to a location sufficiently outside the patient's body so the handle 312 and thumbwheel housing 314 can be easily accessed by a surgeon or a complimentary controlling device. The elongate tubular element 316 is dimensioned to receive a spring (not shown) and the proximal end of the inserter shaft into the inner bore 322 of the elongate tubular element 316. The elongate tubular element 316 is further configured to be snugly received within the inner recess 336 of the snap-fit channel 330 of the guided clip attachment 338 which will be explained in further detail below. The distal inserter head 318 is comprised of a threaded connector 324 and a plate 326. The threaded connector 324 is sized and dimensioned to be threadably received by the receiving aperture 104. Further, the plate 326 is sized and dimensioned to be snugly received within the grooved purchase region 106.
According to one example the insertion instrument 310 may be used in combination with a guided clip attachment 328 that engages a retractor blade 38 of the retractor assembly 36 to facilitating proper orientation and positioning of a hyper-lordotic implant, for example hyper-lordotic implant 200 as shown, or any of the various hyper-lordotic implant embodiments described herein. As illustrated in
In addition to the locking mechanism 332, one or more ball plungers 348 may also be provided within the snap-fit channel 330 to provide greater stability and control of the guided clip attachment 328 relative to the insertion instrument 310. The ball plunger 348 may be further provided with a threaded screw 350 surrounding it, thereby creating a spring-loaded ball detent mechanism. The ball-plunger components 348, 350 are disposed within, and protrude from, at least one aperture 352 located on the inner recess 336 of the guided clip attachment 328. When the guided clip attachment 328 is attached to the elongate tubular element 316 of the inserter instrument 310, the spring-loaded ball components 348, 350 retract into the aperture 352 to allow the elongate tubular element 316 to be fully captured while still providing friction between the guided clip attachment 328 and the elongate tubular element 316 portion of the insertion instrument 310.
The guided clip attachment 328 further includes an attachment base 334 for coupling with a retractor blade (e.g. retractor blades, 38, 40, or 42) as will be explained below. This attachment provides stability for the implant 200 to be inserted and to prevent the implant 200 from migrating anteriorly during insertion. The attachment base 334 is comprised of a shim 354 and a stabilizing arm 356. The shim 354 is capable of rotating in two axes via an internal polyaxial joint 358 that allows for cephalad-caudal and anterior-posterior positioning of the implant 328. Further, the stabilizing arm 356 contains cut-out regions 362 to limit the amount of rotation in the cephalad-caudal directions. The cut-out regions 362 may be sized and figured to allow for any pre-determined amount of rotation between 1 and 359 degrees. According to one example, the cut-outs are configured to allow for rotation within the range of 10 to 30 degrees. Steps 360 engage the ends of the cutout region to prevent further rotation and also rest against the stabilizing arm 356 to prevent lateral rocking of the shim. Alternatively, cutout regions 362 may be removed and the shim may be allowed to rotate 360 degrees. The shim 354 has at least one notch 364 that is sized and dimensioned to snugly mate with the track 46 (specifically the dove tail grooves 48 formed on the interior of retractor blade 42) and may travel up and down the length of the retractor blade 38.
According to another example embodiment depicted in
As depicted in the flowchart of
According to the embodiment shown in
It is contemplated that the implants 500, 600, 700 may be made of any biocompatible material suitable for intervertebral implants. Specifically, the implants 500, 600, 700 according to these exemplary embodiments may be made of PEEK or titanium. Similarly, the detachable tabs 504, 604, 704 may be made of any biocompatible material suitable for bone plates, and according to these exemplary embodiments may be made of PEEK, carbon fiber reinforced PEEK (CFRP) or titanium. The inserts 745 may be made of any suitable biocompatible material and according to the exemplary embodiment shown in
The implant 500, 600, 700 according to the embodiments shown in
While this invention has been described in terms of a best mode for achieving this invention's objectives, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that variations may be accomplished in view of these teachings without deviating from the spirit or scope of the invention. For example, particularly at L5-S1 where the pelvic bone makes a lateral access approach difficult, an antero-lateral approach similar to the approach utilized during appendectomies may be utilized.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/015,182 filed Jun. 21, 2018, which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/000,033 filed Jan. 19, 2016, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/077,977, filed Mar. 31, 2011, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/799,021, filed on Apr. 16, 2010 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/212,921, filed Apr. 16, 2009 and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/319,823, filed Mar. 31, 2010, the entire contents of which are all hereby expressly incorporated by reference into this disclosure as if set forth in its entirety herein. The U.S. application Ser. No. 15/000,033 filed Jan. 19, 2016 also claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/104,758, filed Jan. 18, 2015. The entire contents of the above-mentioned applications are hereby expressly incorporated by reference into this disclosure as if set forth in its entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3867728 | Stubstad et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
4743256 | Brantigan | May 1988 | A |
4759769 | Hedman et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
5458642 | Beer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5785707 | Boyd et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5888223 | Bray, Jr. | Mar 1999 | A |
6146421 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146422 | Lawson | Nov 2000 | A |
6156037 | LeHuec et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159211 | Boriani et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6200347 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6231571 | Ellman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235059 | Benezech et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6296640 | Wampler et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306170 | Ray | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6391028 | Fanton et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405733 | Fogarty et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6432106 | Fraser | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461359 | Tribus et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6540753 | Cohen | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558423 | Michelson | May 2003 | B1 |
6576017 | Foley et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6641580 | Edwards et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648895 | Burkus et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6726684 | Woloszko et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6730127 | Michelson | May 2004 | B2 |
6772012 | Ricart et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6821276 | Lambrecht et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821298 | Jackson | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6923811 | Carl et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6923814 | Hildebrand et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6942698 | Jackson | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6984245 | McGahan et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7033394 | Michelson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7112222 | Fraser et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118580 | Beyersdorff et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7163561 | Michelson | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172627 | Fiere et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7207949 | Miles et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7226482 | Messerli et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7232464 | Mathieu et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7255698 | Michelson | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7326248 | Michelson | Feb 2008 | B2 |
RE40156 | Sharps et al. | Mar 2008 | E |
7338525 | Ferree | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7419505 | Fleischmann et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7491237 | Randall et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7563286 | Gerber et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7582058 | Iwiles et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7594931 | Louis et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7621938 | Molz, IV | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7628816 | Magerl et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7691057 | Miles et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7811325 | Cannon et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819801 | Miles et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7833245 | Kaes et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846207 | Lechmann et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7850731 | Brittan et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7905840 | Pimenta et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914554 | Michelson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918891 | Curran et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8100975 | Waugh et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8157865 | Hochschuler et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8187329 | Theofilos | May 2012 | B2 |
8216312 | Gray | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231628 | Zubok et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8252059 | Overes et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8257370 | Moskowitz et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8257439 | Zeegers | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8268000 | Waugh et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8273127 | Jones et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8287597 | Pimenta et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8292815 | Burdette et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8496708 | Blain | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8920500 | Pimenta et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
9192482 | Pimenta et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9220547 | Blain et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9259144 | Smith et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9339390 | Fortin et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9351845 | Pimenta et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9757246 | Pimenta et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
20020029082 | Muhanna | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045922 | Nield et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020077632 | Tsou | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020089176 | Iwasaki | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030130737 | McGahan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030171813 | Kiester | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040024400 | Michelson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040078078 | Shepard | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040127893 | Hovda | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050101960 | Fiere et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050149011 | Ashley et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177245 | Leatherbury et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197702 | Coppes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050273093 | Patel et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060089633 | L. Bleich et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089640 | Bleich et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060129244 | Ensign | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060235426 | Lim et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235533 | Blain | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070072475 | Justin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088441 | Duggal et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070123989 | Gfeller et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070233253 | Bray et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270972 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080015582 | DiPoto et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033436 | Song et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080103504 | Schmitz et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080262583 | Sharkey et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281424 | Parry et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080287947 | Ellman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080287957 | Hester et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294262 | Levieux | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300634 | Gray | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080312742 | Abernathie | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090054987 | Chin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076616 | Duggal et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090105831 | Jones et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090182430 | Tyber et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090210062 | Thalgott et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090304717 | Kercher et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306779 | Ahn | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100023006 | Ellman | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100057206 | Duffield et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100145460 | McDonough et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100204693 | Sanders et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100249937 | Blain et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100305704 | Messerli et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312345 | Duffield et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312346 | Kueenzi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324553 | Sharps et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004253 | Fraser et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110015745 | Bucci | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110040382 | Muhanna | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110082550 | Yeh | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110098747 | Donner et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110146692 | Callaghan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160866 | Laurence et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166658 | Garber et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110245819 | Nardini et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110301713 | Theofilos | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110301714 | Theofilos | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120078310 | Bernstein | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120116397 | Rencher et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136392 | Keegan et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120197401 | Duncan et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203348 | Michelson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120232552 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130218276 | Fiechter et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130345813 | Frank et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140052263 | Curran et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20150025635 | Laubert | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20160267379 | Refai | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160367379 | Refai | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180303621 | Brotman | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20220110761 | Brotman | Apr 2022 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Brau, “Chapter 22: Anterior Retroperitoneal Muscle-Sparing approach to L2-S1 of the Lumbar Spine,” Surgical Approaches to the Spine, (2003), 165-181. |
Calancie, “Stimulus-Evoked EMG Monitoring During Transpedicular Lumbosacral Spine Instrumentation,” Spine, 19 (24), (1994), 2780-2786. |
Clements, “Evoked and Spontaneous Electromyography to Evaluate Lumbosacral Pedicle Screw Placement,” Spine, 21(5), (1996), 600-604. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210038406 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62104758 | Jan 2015 | US | |
61212921 | Apr 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16015182 | Jun 2018 | US |
Child | 17078632 | US | |
Parent | 15000033 | Jan 2016 | US |
Child | 16015182 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13077977 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 15000033 | US | |
Parent | 12799021 | Apr 2010 | US |
Child | 13077977 | US |