Patent Grant
8734320
This invention relates generally to suction-assisted tissue-engaging devices, systems and methods that can be employed through minimal surgical incisions to engage, i.e., position, manipulate, stabilize, and/or hold tissue, e.g., tissue of a body organ, during a medical procedure through a suction member or head applied to the tissue, particularly to apply suction to the heart to engage and position, manipulate, stabilize, and/or hold the beating heart during cardiac surgery.
Coronary artery disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Western societies. Coronary artery disease is manifested in a number of ways. For example, disease of the coronary arteries can lead to insufficient blood flow to various areas of the heart. This can lead to the discomfort of angina and the risk of ischemia. In severe cases, acute blockage of coronary blood flow can result in irreversible damage to the myocardial tissue including myocardial infarction and the risk of death.
A number of approaches have been developed for treating coronary artery disease. In less severe cases, it is often sufficient to merely treat the symptoms, with pharmaceuticals, or treat the underlying causes of the disease, with lifestyle modification. In more severe cases, the coronary blockage can be treated endovascularly or percutaneously using techniques such as balloon angioplasty, atherectomy, laser ablation, stents, and the like.
In cases where these approaches have failed or are likely to fail, it is often necessary to perform a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedure. CABG surgery, also known as “heart bypass” surgery, generally entails the use of a graft or conduit to bypass the coronary obstruction and, thereby provide blood flow to the downstream ischemic heart tissues. The major objective of any CABG procedure is to perform a technically perfect anastomosis of the graft with the vessel. Creation of a technically perfect anastomosis is generally complex, tedious, time consuming and its success is highly dependent on a surgeon's skill level.
The CABG procedure is typically conducted on an arrested heart while the patient is on a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit, also known as a “heart-lung machine” that provides continuous systemic blood circulation, while cardioplegic cardiac arrest enables meticulous anastomosis suturing in a bloodless, still-heart, operating field. In a CPB procedure performed as an adjunct to a CABG procedure, the patient's venous blood that normally returns to the right atrium is diverted to a CPB system or circuit that supplies oxygen to the blood and removes carbon dioxide from the blood and returns the blood, at sufficient pressure, into the patient's aorta for further distribution through the arterial system to the body. Creation of the CPB circuit typically entails arterial and venous cannulation, connecting the bloodstream to a heart-lung machine, cooling the body to about 32° Celsius, cross clamping of the aorta, and cardioplegic perfusion of the coronary arteries to arrest and cool the heart to about 4° Celsius. The arrest or stoppage of the heart is generally required because the constant pumping motion of the beating heart would make surgery upon the heart difficult in some locations and extremely difficult if not impossible in other locations. Generally, such a CPB system requires several separate components, including an oxygenator, several pumps, a reservoir, a blood temperature control system, filters, and flow, pressure and temperature sensors.
A blood vessel or vessels for use in the graft procedure are harvested or mobilized from the patient. In the majority of patients, obstructed coronary arteries are bypassed using an in situ internal mammary artery (IMA) or a reversed segment of saphenous vein harvested from a leg although other graft vessels may also be used. For this reason, CABG surgery is typically performed through a median sternotomy, which provides access to the heart and to all major coronary branches. A median sternotomy incision begins just below the sternal notch and extends slightly below the xiphoid process. A sternal retractor is used to spread the left and right rib cage apart for optimal exposure of the heart. Hemostasis of the sternal edges is typically obtained using electrocautery with a ball-tip electrode and a thin layer of bone wax. The pericardial sac is opened thereby achieving direct access to the heart. One or more grafts are attached to the relevant portion of a coronary artery (or arteries) to bridge the obstruction while the heart is in cardiac arrest. Then, the patient is weaned from CPB, the heart is restarted, and cannulation is discontinued. The surgical incisions in the chest are then closed.
The CABG procedure is generally expensive, lengthy, traumatic and subject to patient risk. The arrest of the heart and the use of the CPB circuit add to the time and expense of the CABG procedure and present a number of risk factors to the patient. The initiation of global (hypothermic) cardiac arrest may result in global myocardial ischemia, and cross clamping the ascending aorta may contribute to the patient experiencing a post-operative stroke. In fact, recent studies have shown aortic clamping and manipulation may release atherosclerotic debris into the bloodstream, resulting in neurological injury. Exposure of blood to foreign surfaces results in the activation of virtually all the humoral and cellular components of the inflammatory response, as well as some of the slower reacting specific immune responses. A systemic inflammatory response can result due to the interactions of blood elements with the artificial material surfaces of the components of the CPB circuit. Other complications associated with cardiopulmonary bypass include loss of red blood cells and platelets due to shear stress damage. In addition, cardiopulmonary bypass requires the use of an anticoagulant, such as heparin that increases the risk of hemorrhage. Cardiopulmonary bypass also sometimes necessitates giving additional blood to the patient that may expose the patient to blood-borne diseases, if it is from a source other than the patient.
Therefore, a number of cardiac surgical procedures have been developed or proposed to enable off-pump, beating heart, CABG procedures either through a median sternotomy or employing minimally invasive procedures and even totally endoscopic procedures with access through ports extending through the chest wall into the thoracic cavity. For example, Trapp and Bisarya, in “Placement of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Without Pump Oxygenator”, Annals Thorac. Surq., Vol. 19, No. 1, (January 1975), pp. 1-9, immobilized the area of the bypass graft by encircling sutures deep enough to incorporate enough muscle to suspend an area of the heart and prevent damage to the coronary artery. More recently, Fanning et al. also reported, in “Reoperative Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass”, Annals Thorac. Surg., Vol. 55, (February 1993), pp. 486-489, immobilizing the area of the bypass graft with stabilization sutures.
Other approaches of stabilizing at least a portion of the heart to facilitate CABG or other procedures involve applying pressure against the heart wall as exemplified by the stabilization apparatus disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,875,782, 6,120,436, and 6,331,158, for example. In one embodiment disclosed in the '436 patent, a U-shaped platform is pressed against the heart surface exposed through a thoracotomy and maintained there by suturing the platform to the myocardium or by attaching the platform to the end of an adjustable arm. The adjustable arm is mounted to a rib retractor maintaining the ribs spread apart, and the adjustable arm can be adjusted to direct pressure through the platform against the heart to stabilize it.
In addition, mechanical systems for lifting the heart, particularly to enable access to the heart for performing valve surgery, have been proposed as exemplified in the apparatus disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,558,318.
In one embodiment disclosed therein, a tissue positioning tool is provided comprising a tool support member adapted to be mounted to the patient's body, an elongated shaft supported by the tool support member adapted to be passed through a small incision, and a tissue supporting member having a surface adapted to contact tissue, e.g., the heart, that can be attached and detached from the elongated shaft. In use, the tissue support member is introduced into the thoracic cavity through a first percutaneous penetration, and the elongated shaft is introduced through a second percutaneous penetration. The tissue-supporting member is connected to the shaft within the thoracic cavity to form a tissue-positioning tool. Assembling the tool within the thoracic cavity allows the use of tissue-engaging devices having parts and surfaces too large to be introduced through the typically smaller penetration from which the shaft of the tool extends.
These mechanical systems for applying force against or lifting the heart are less efficacious than systems that apply suction against the heart to engage the heart. Suction-assisted tissue-engaging devices, such as the various models of the Medtronic® Octopus 3™ tissue stabilizer and or Starfish™ heart positioner and accessories available from the assignee of the present invention, use suction for stabilizing or positioning, respectively, tissue of an organ. The Medtronic® Octopus 3™ tissue stabilizer is approved for use in applying suction to a surface of the heart to stabilize the heart tissue at the site of engagement while the heart is beating to facilitate a surgical procedure, e.g., to perform an anastomosis in the course of a CABG procedure. The Starfish™ heart positioner is approved for use in applying suction to a surface of the heart, particularly near the apex of the heart, to move and reposition the heart to achieve better access to areas that would otherwise be difficult to access, such as the posterior or backside of the heart. For example, the surgeon can bring an anastomosis site into better view by supporting and rotating the heart using the Starfish™ heart positioner. The surgeon can also use the Octopus 3™ tissue stabilizer in the same procedure to stabilize the anastomosis site. See, for example, commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,836,311, 5,927,284, 6,015,378, 6,464,629, and 6,471,644 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/678,203, filed Oct. 2, 2000, and European Patent Publication No. EP 0 993 806 describing aspects of the Octopus 3™ heart stabilization system and commonly assigned U.S. Patent Application Publication US 2002/0095067 disclosing aspects of the Starfish™ heart positioner.
The Octopus 3™ tissue stabilizer employs a pair of elongated, malleable suction pads mounted to extend in a U-shape from the distal end of a malleable, articulating arm, and a tissue spreading mechanism that the surgeon can employ to spread the elongated arms apart. As described in the above-referenced '629 patent, after the suction pods are applied to the heart surface, tightening a cable extending through the arm fixes the arm in place. Then, the suction pods may be spread apart from each other to tighten the surface of the cardiac tissue lying between the suction pods. In one embodiment, fixation of the articulating arm as well as the spreading apart of the suction pods may occur concurrently or almost concurrently through the tensioning of a single cable.
The Starfish™ heart positioning system employs a three appendage, silicone head mounted to the distal end of a malleable, articulating arm. The silicone head is shaped so that the flexible appendages or legs diverge apart and can engage the heart surface particularly adjacent to the apex of the heart to lift and position the heart when suction is applied.
Further suction-assisted tissue-engaging devices for use in cardiac surgery through a sternotomy are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,799,661 in PCT Publication WO 01/17437 A2 wherein a conical or helmet shaped suction member is mounted to the distal end of an articulating arm and is adapted to apply suction to the apex of the heart and lift the heart. Other suction-assisted tissue-engaging devices for cardiac surgery having circular or horseshoe-shaped suction members introduced through a sternotomy are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,868,770, 5,782,746, and 6,071,295.
These suction-assisted, tissue-engaging devices are used in open chest sternotomy procedures that involve making a 20 to 25 cm incision in the chest of the patient, severing the sternum, cutting and peeling back various layers of tissue in order to give access to the heart and arterial sources, and fitting a retractor across the incision to maintain the ribs spread apart. The articulating arms of the above-described Medtronic® Octopus 3™ tissue stabilizer and or Starfish™ heart positioner are mounted to the Medtronic® OctoBase™ retractor.
Such median sternotomies are highly traumatic and typically require many sutures or staples to close the incision and 5 to 10 wire hooks to keep the severed sternum together during recovery. Such surgery often carries additional complications such as instability of the sternum, post-operative bleeding, and mediastinal infection. The thoracic muscle and ribs are also severely traumatized, and the healing process results in an unattractive scar. Post-operatively, most patients endure significant pain and must forego work or strenuous activity for a long recovery period.
Many minimally invasive surgical techniques and devices have been proposed or introduced in order to reduce the risk of morbidity, expense, trauma, patient mortality, infection, and other complications associated with open-chest cardiac surgery. Less traumatic limited open chest techniques using an abdominal (sub-xyphoid) approach or, alternatively, a “Chamberlain” incision (an approximately 8 cm incision at the sternocostal junction), have been developed to lessen the operating area and the associated complications. In recent years, a growing number of surgeons have begun performing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures using minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) surgical techniques and devices. Using the MIDCAB method, the heart typically is accessed through a mini-thoracotomy (i.e., a 6 to 8 cm incision in the patient's chest) that avoids the sternal splitting incision of conventional cardiac surgery. A MIDCAB technique for performing a CABG procedure is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,875,782, for example.
Other minimally invasive, percutaneous, coronary surgical procedures have been proposed or introduced that employ multiple small trans-thoracic incisions to and through the pericardium, instruments advanced through the incisions, and a thoracoscope to view the accessed cardiac site while the procedure is performed as shown, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,332,468, 5,464,447, and 5,716,392. As stated in the '468 patent, instruments advanced through the incisions can include electrosurgical tools, graspers, forceps, scalpels, electrocauteries, clip appliers, scissors, etc. Each incision is maintained open by insertion of a cannula or port through the incision so that the instruments can be advanced through the lumen of the cannula or port. If a trocar is used, a trocar rod is inserted into the trocar sleeve, and the sharpened tip of the trocar rod is advanced to puncture the abdomen or chest to create the incision into the thoracic cavity. The trocar rod is then withdrawn leaving the trocar sleeve in place so that a surgical instrument can be inserted into the thoracic cavity through the trocar sleeve lumen.
In such procedures, the surgeon can stop the heart by utilizing a series of internal catheters to stop blood flow through the aorta and to administer cardioplegia solution. The endoscopic approach typically also utilizes groin cannulation to establish CPB and an intra-aortic balloon catheter that functions as an internal aortic clamp by means of an expandable balloon at its distal end used to occlude blood flow in the ascending aorta. A full description of an example of one preferred endoscopic technique is found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,452,733, for example.
The above-described Medtronic® Octopus 3™ tissue stabilizer and or Starfish™ heart positioner are not sized and designed to fit through such a minimally invasive incision or the lumen of a cannula or port or trocar sleeve. The use of the an early version of an Octopus™ tissue stabilizer through a minimally invasive incision without CPB to stabilize a site of the beating heart is disclosed in one embodiment in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,464,630 and 6,394,948, for example. In this embodiment, the tissue stabilizer employs a single elongated suction pod fixed at the distal end of an elongated shaft to extend substantially axially and to the elongated shaft. It is necessary to employ two such elongated shafts and suction pods to place the suction pads on either side of the heart surface to be stabilized. Consequently, it would be difficult to position two such elongated shafts and suction pads through a single minimally invasive incision of parallel incisions. Thus, the suggested approach offers little advantage over employing a single large incision or sternotomy.
A modification of the Octopus™ tissue stabilizer is suggested in the above-referenced commonly assigned pending application Ser. No. 09/678,203, wherein the two suction pods are supported fixed to the distal end of the tissue stabilizer in a manner that enables the suction pods to be collapsed into a small diameter to facilitate insertion through the lumen of a cannula or port or trocar sleeve.
Other methods and apparatus that are introduced through percutaneously placed ports or directly through small trans-thoracic incisions for accessing the pericardial space employ suction devices to grip the pericardium or epicardium as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,991,578, 5,336,252, 5,827,216, 5,868,770, 5,972,013, 6,080,175, and 6,231,518. The suction devices are typically configured like a catheter or tube having a single suction lumen and typically having a further instrument delivery lumen. The suction lumen terminates in a single suction lumen end opening through the device distal end in the '578, '252, '175, '770, and '013 patents and through the device sidewall in the '216 and '518 patents. Certain of these patents recite that the applied suction draws a “bleb,” i.e., a locally expanded region of the pericardium, into the suction lumen or a suction chamber at the device distal end. A needle can then be advanced into the bleb and used to draw off fluids or deliver drugs into the pericardial space, or the like. In addition, it is suggested in these patents that treatment devices including catheters, guidewires, and electrodes, e.g., defibrillation electrodes, can be advanced into the pericardial space through a device introduction lumen for a variety of reasons. Although theoretically plausible, the ability to reliably maintain a vacuum seal against the pericardium when such treatment devices are advanced can be problematic.
Surgeons have found that the Octopus 3™ stabilization system and Starfish™ heart positioner provide significant benefits in the above-described operative procedures involving relatively large sternotomies or thoracotomies. It would be desirable to be able to enjoy the advantages of such suction-assisted tissue-manipulation systems using minimally invasive procedures for performing coronary procedures or to access and perform a procedure on other body tissue.
In accordance with the present invention, suction-assisted tissue-engaging devices, systems, and methods are provided that can be employed through minimal surgical incisions to engage body tissue, e.g., tissue of an organ, during a medical procedure through application of suction to the tissue through a suction member of a suction-assisted tissue-engaging device applied to the body tissue.
The suction-assisted tissue-engaging device of the present invention has a first portion and a second portion that can be attached together and detached from one another. The first portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device is introduced into a body cavity through a first incision. The second portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device is then attached to the first portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device via a second incision. The second portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device is then applied against the body tissue by manipulation of the first portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device, and suction is applied through the second portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device to engage the body tissue. The medical procedure is then performed through the second incision while the body tissue is either positioned or stabilized by the applied suction. When the medical procedure is completed, suction is discontinued, the second portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device is detached from the first portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device and withdrawn from the body cavity through the second incision, and the first portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device is retracted through the first incision.
The suction-assisted tissue-engaging device of the present invention can further comprise a third portion that functions when the second portion is detached from the first portion to minimize damage to tissue as the first portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device is introduced into or moved about the body cavity through the first incision.
In preferred embodiments of the present invention, the first portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device is an elongated shaft having a shaft body extending between a proximal shaft handle and shaft body distal end and a shaft body diameter facilitating introduction through a minimally invasive first incision. The second portion comprises a suction member or head that is configured to engage body tissue and function either as an organ positioner or a tissue stabilizer and that can be attached to or detached from the shaft body distal end.
In preferred embodiments of the invention, a fastener is provided at the shaft body distal end for engagement with the suction head to attach or detach the suction head to or from the shaft body distal end either manually or employing a further tool.
In one preferred embodiment, the fastener can be manipulated through the shaft body from the shaft handle to engage or release the suction head. The shaft fastener extends through the shaft body from a shaft fastener proximal end at the shaft handle to a shaft fastener distal end, and the shaft fastener is adapted to be moved to a disengage position to receive or release the suction head fastener element and to an engage position fixedly attaching the suction head to the shaft body distal end. In this embodiment, the fastener at the shaft body distal end is preferably blunted to function as the third portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device so that the shaft body can be advantageously manipulated within the body cavity without causing undesirable tissue damage.
In a further preferred embodiment, the fastener comprises mating fastener elements of the shaft body distal end and the suction head that are adapted to be manipulated manually or with a tool to attach or detach the suction head to or from the shaft body distal end. A separate blunting element is provided with a fastener element that can be manipulated manually or with a tool to attach or detach the blunting element to or from the shaft body distal end. In this embodiment, the blunting element is attached to the shaft body distal end as a third portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device so that the shaft body can be advantageously manipulated within a patient without causing undesirable tissue damage. The blunting element is then detached from the shaft body distal end to enable attachment of the suction head to the shaft body distal end and may be re-attached to the shaft body distal end after the suction head is detached.
The suction head can be introduced into the body cavity through the second incision and attached to the shaft body distal end. In a preferred method of the present invention, the shaft handle is manipulated to pass the shaft body distal end out of the body cavity through the second incision, the suction head is attached to the shaft body distal end outside the patient's body, and the shaft handle is again manipulated to bring the suction head through the second incision into the body cavity.
In use, the proximal handle of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device is manipulated to orient suction ports of the suction head against the body tissue so that the tissue site is engaged, whereby the elongated shaft body is oriented at a particular operative vector in 3-D space relative to the patient's body. The system of the present invention preferably comprises a support that can be coupled to the elongated shaft to maintain the operative vector while the medical procedure is conducted through the second incision or until it is necessary to change the operative vector.
In a preferred embodiment, the support comprises an elongated, articulating, support arm having an arm distal end that can be attached to and detached from the elongated shaft and an arm proximal end that can be attached to and detached from a fixed reference point. The fixed reference point preferably comprises the frame of the operating table or a rigid rail attached to the operating table frame. The articulating arm body can be manipulated in shape while in a flexible condition or state and maintains the shape in a rigid condition or state.
In use of the system, the arm distal end is coupled to the elongated shaft, and the arm proximal end is coupled to the reference point while the articulating arm is in the flexible state. The elongated shaft is manipulated to the desired operative vector of the elongated shaft, and the articulating arm is rendered rigid to maintain the desired operative vector of the shaft.
At the conclusion of the medical procedure, suction is discontinued, and the elongated shaft is released from the articulating arm. In the preferred method of the present invention, the shaft handle is manipulated to pass the shaft body distal end and attached suction member out of the body cavity through the second incision, and the suction head is detached from the shaft body distal end outside the patient's body. The shaft handle is again manipulated to bring the elongated shaft body back through the second incision into the body cavity and to retract it from the body cavity through the first incision.
The suction-assisted tissue-engaging devices, systems and methods of the present invention are advantageously employed through minimal surgical incisions into the thoracic cavity to obviate the necessity of performing a sternotomy or large thoracotomy to introduce and position the suction head to apply suction to the heart to position and/or stabilize the beating heart to perform a medical procedure.
This summary of the invention has been presented here simply to point out some of the ways that the invention overcomes difficulties presented in the prior art and to distinguish the invention from the prior art and is not intended to operate in any manner as a limitation on the interpretation of claims that are presented initially in the patent application and that are ultimately granted.
These and other advantages and features of the present invention will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments thereof, when considered in conjunction with the drawings, in which like reference numerals indicate identical structures throughout the several views, and wherein:
In the following detailed description, references are made to illustrative embodiments of methods and apparatus for carrying out the invention. It is understood that other embodiments can be utilized without departing from the scope of the invention. Preferred methods and apparatus are described for accessing the heart surface in the thoracic cavity and stabilizing or positioning the heart as an example of accessing an anatomic space or cavity containing body tissue to stabilize or position the tissue to perform a medical procedure.
The term “medical procedure” may mean any one or more medical or surgical procedures such as, for example cardiac surgery, performed with or without CPB, heart valve repair, heart valve replacement, MAZE procedures, transmyocardial revascularization (TMR), CABG procedures, anastomosis procedures, non-surgical procedures, endoscopic procedures, non-invasive procedures, invasive procedures, port-access procedures, fluoroscopic procedures, beating heart surgery, vascular surgery, neurosurgery, electrophysiology procedures, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, ablation procedures, ablation of arrhythmias, endovascular procedures, treatment of one or more organs and/or vessels, treatment of the heart, aneurysm repair, aortic aneurysm repairs, imaging procedures of the heart and great vessels, CAT scan procedures, MRI procedures, cardiograms, pharmacological therapies, drug delivery procedures, delivery of biological agents, gene therapies, cellular therapies, cancer therapies, radiation therapies, genetic, cellular, tissue and/or organ manipulation or transplantation procedures, coronary angioplasty procedures, placement or delivery of coated or uncoated stents, LVAD procedures, lead placement procedures, placement of cardiac reinforcement devices, placement of cardiac assistance devices, atherectomy procedures, atherosclerotic plaque manipulation and/or removal procedures, emergency procedures, cosmetic procedures, reconstructive surgical procedures, biopsy procedures, autopsy procedures, surgical training procedures, birthing procedures, congenital repair procedures, and medical procedures that require positioning one or more organs and/or tissues.
The system 10 of a first embodiment of the present invention is depicted in
The first portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device 20 is an elongated shaft 22 having a shaft body 24 extending between a proximal shaft handle 30 and shaft body distal end 26 and a shaft body diameter facilitating introduction through a minimally invasive first incision. A shaft body fastener element at the shaft body distal end 26 comprises a spiral thread 28. The proximal shaft handle 30 is enlarged to enable the user to grasp it outside the first incision and manipulate the elongated shaft body 24 in the manner described with reference to
The second portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device 20 comprises a suction member or head 40 that is configured to engage body tissue and function in this embodiment as an organ positioner, particularly a heart positioner and that can be attached to or detached from the shaft body distal end 26 either manually or with a tool. The suction head 40 comprises a suction pad 42 and a head shaft 46 supporting the fastener nut 48 at the head shaft proximal end 49 and enclosing a head suction lumen that extends into suction channels of a suction pad 42. The head shaft 46 is formed having a 90° angle distal segment 47, and suction pad 42 is supported at the distal end of the head shaft segment 47. The head shaft 46 can be made bendable in the 90° angle segment 47 so that the user can adjust the angle. Suction is applied to body tissue contacting suction ports (not shown) of the suction pad 42 from a vacuum source coupled to the suction tube 36 through the shaft suction lumen 34 and the head suction lumen extending through head shaft 46 to the suction ports.
The suction pad 42 can take any of the shapes of and incorporate any of the features of the suction pads employed in the above-referenced Starfish™ heart positioner and/or as disclosed in the above-referenced commonly assigned Publication No. 2002/0095067 having a plurality of legs, e.g., two to four legs. The illustrated suction pad 42 has three legs 44, 44′, 44″ that diverge outward in a generally starfish-shaped configuration. The legs 44, 44′, 44″ preferably are generally arcuate, curving downwardly away the head shaft distal end 47 to the free ends of the legs 44, 44′, 44″.
Preferably, the suction pad 42 and the legs 44, 44′, 44″ are formed integrally of substantially transparent or translucent medical grade silicone or thermoplastic elastomeric material (e.g., polyurethane). The material selected most preferably has a low durometer so that the suction pad 42 tends to conform to the surface of the heart and to flex to help seal against the heart to maintain the vacuum in the internal vacuum channels. The suction pad 52 is preferably sufficiently flexible such that the suction pad 52 draws down toward the surface of the heart more than the surface of the heart is pulled into the suction ports and channels.
In this embodiment, a separate blunting element 50 is provided as a third portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device 20. The blunting element 50 is bullet-shaped having a blunt distal tip 52 and a proximal lumen having a female spiral thread 54. The blunting element 50 is attached to the shaft body distal end 26 so that the shaft body 24 can be advantageously manipulated within the body cavity without causing undesirable tissue damage. The blunting element 50 is detached from the shaft body distal end to enable attachment of the suction head 40 to the shaft body distal end 26 but can be reattached after the suction head 40 is detached to facilitate withdrawal of the elongated shaft body 22.
Optionally, the blunting element 50 can incorporate one or more sensors, electrodes, cameras, fiber optics, ports and/or orifices that are used during introduction into the body cavity, e.g., the thoracic cavity. In such a case, the suction tube 36 can be disconnected from the fitting at shaft handle 30, and tubing or electrical cable connected to the blunting element can be routed through the shaft body lumen 34 to external equipment. The shaft 20 may be packaged with the blunting tip installed to the shaft body distal end 26 in this configuration for use during introduction through the first incision and into the body cavity. The tubing or electrical cable can be withdrawn through the shaft body lumen 34 when the blunting element 50 is detached from the shaft body distal end 26.
In this embodiment, the fastener that is provided to selectively attach and detach one of the suction head 40 and the blunting element 50 to or from the shaft body distal end comprises a shaft body fastener element that can be coupled with a blunting element fastener element or to the suction head fastener element. The shaft body fastener element comprises the male spiral thread 28 at the shaft body distal end 26, the suction head fastener element comprises a female spiral thread of a rotatable fastener nut 48 of the suction head 40, and the blunting element fastener element comprises a female spiral thread 54 of a blunting element 50. The fastener can alternatively be formed as a bayonet fastener or a snap lock, a ball lock, or a push-pull luer lock or the like.
In accordance with one method of the present invention, the patient P is prepared for surgery and the first and second incisions FI and SI are made as shown in
The blunting element 50 is fastened to the shaft body distal end 26, and the shaft body 22 is inserted through the first incision FI into the thoracic cavity. The blunting element 50 can be detached from the shaft body distal end 26 by use of a wrench introduced through the second incision SI to unscrew it from the spiral thread 28 and can be removed from the thoracic cavity through the second incision SI. Similarly, the suction head 40 can be passed through the second incision SI and the nut 48 can be screwed onto the spiral thread 26 employing a wrench. The nut 48 can be unscrewed from the spiral thread 26 employing the wrench when the medical procedure is completed so that the suction head 40 can be withdrawn through the second incision SI and the shaft body 22 can be withdrawn through the first incision FI.
In a preferred method of the present invention illustrated in
The suction-assisted tissue-engaging device 20 is preferably attached prior to engaging the heart with suction as shown in
The support shaft, handle or arm 60 shown in
The clamping mechanism 68 of the articulating support arm 60 comprises a turret 67 and a post 69 that is adapted to be coupled to the mounting rail 70 that is adapted to be attached to the operating table or another stable structure to provide a stable platform supporting the articulating support arm 60. The distal clamp 64 is also coupled to the internal cable, and is tightened when the proximal knob 66 is rotated to stiffen the articulating links 62.
The mounting rail 70 comprises a post 72 adapted to be clamped by clamps (not shown) to the frame of the operating table to extend vertically and an extension arm 74 that extends from the upper end of post 72 horizontally over the patient. The post 72 can be adjusted vertically to dispose the extension arm 74 horizontally over the patient at a desired distance from the patient's chest. The extension arm 74 has a slot 76 shaped to receive the post 69 of turret 67 and a knob 78 coupled to a shaft bridging the slot 76 and that can be rotated to compress the slot 76 around post 69.
Thus, the mounting rail 70 can be coupled to the operating table, and the articulating support arm 60 can be coupled to the mounting rail 70 so that the articulating support arm is fixed to a reference position. In use of the system as depicted in
After the suction head 40 is attached to the shaft body distal end 26, the user manipulates the shaft handle 30 and the heart to apply the suction pad 42 and legs 44, 44′, 44″ against the heart at a site that allows the heart to be engaged by the applied suction and held in a desired non-physiologic position. The shape of the legs 44, 44′, 44″ allow the suction pad 42 to be oriented to avoid placement over particular features of the heart anatomy, such as the cardiac arteries, or to avoid conflict with other devices employed in the medical procedure. When accessing various walls of the heart, the suction pad 42 can be preferably applied in one of two positions depending on the anatomy of the patient and the walls of the heart to be accessed. The first position is directly on the apex of the heart, which can be used for positioning for access to the lateral wall, posterior wall, or anterior wall of the heart. The second position is an off-apex position immediately adjacent to the apex. In particular, the suction pad 42 can be attached to the left ventricle immediately lateral to the apex of the heart. This particular off-apex position is especially useful for accessing the lateral wall in “apex under right hemisternum” position since even modest rightward movement of the apex greatly enhances exposure of proximal obtuse marginals. Thus, the suction pad 42 can be effectively attached to the heart not only on the apex but also to near-apex surfaces of the heart when that positioning would be desirable. The references herein to “near-apex”, “near the apex of the heart” or the like includes application of the suction pad 42 onto the apex or onto other surfaces of the heart immediately adjacent to the apex.
Once a position of engagement is selected, a portion of the heart H is moved from its natural physiologic position to a non-physiologic position shown in
In this way, an operative vector defined by the axis of the elongated shaft body 22 extending through the first incision FI is defined. The proximal knob 66 is then rotated to render the articulating support arm 60 rigid to maintain the operative vector of the elongated shaft 20 stable and the heart H in the non-physiologic position. In this physiologic position, the heart H continues to beat and supply blood to the patient without marked deterioration in hemodynamic performance because the shape of the heart is not appreciably changed. In these medical procedures on the heart, it is also typically necessary to surgically open the pericardial sac surrounding the heart to expose the epicardium, and suction is applied through one of the described suction heads directly to the epicardium. The surgical exposure is preferably made through the second incision SI.
At the conclusion of the medical procedure, suction is discontinued, and the proximal knob 66 is rotated to render the articulating support arm 60 flexible and so that the elongated shaft 22 can be released from the articulating support arm 60. In the preferred method of the present invention, the shaft handle 30 is manipulated to pass the shaft body distal end 26 and attached suction member 40 out of the thoracic cavity through the second incision SI, and the suction head 40 is detached from the shaft body distal end 26 outside the patient's body. The shaft handle 30 is again manipulated to bring the elongated shaft body 24 back through the second incision SI into the thoracic cavity and to retract it from the thoracic cavity through the first incision FI.
The method and system as described above can be practiced employing alternative forms of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device 20, e.g., the suction-assisted tissue engaging device 120 depicted in
The first portion of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device 120 is an elongated shaft 122 having a shaft body comprising an outer tube 124 and an inner tube 150 extending between a proximal shaft handle 130 and shaft body distal end 126, the outer tube 124 having a shaft body diameter facilitating introduction through a minimally invasive first incision FI. The proximal shaft handle 130 is enlarged to enable the user to grasp it outside the first incision FI and manipulate the elongated shaft body in the manner described above with reference to
The inner tube 150 disposed within the lumen of the outer tube 124 is attached at its proximal end to proximal fitting 172 and provides a shaft suction lumen 134 that extends from the distal lumen end opening at the shaft body distal end 126 to the proximal fitting 172. The proximal fitting 172 is coupled to a flexible vacuum hose or line 136 adapted to be coupled to a vacuum source provided in an operating room that preferably provides a negative pressure of about 400 mm Hg. A stopcock (not shown) is provided in the suction tube 136 to provide or interrupt suction to the shaft suction lumen 134. The inner tube 150 is also adapted to be moved axially within the lumen of the outer tube 124 by rotation of a remote actuator or knob 170 with respect to the outer tube 124. The knob 170 is coupled to the proximal end of the outer tube 124 through mating spiral threads 174 and 176 and abuts a flange 178 of the proximal fitting 172 as shown in
Turning to the suction head 140, it comprises a tubular housing 146 supporting a rotatable nut 148 having an interior spiral adapted to engage the spiral turn 128 at the shaft body distal end 126 to attach the suction head 140 to the shaft body distal end 126. A plunger 160 and a split ball mechanism 142 are disposed for axial movement in an interior chamber of the tubular housing 146. The split ball mechanism is coupled to support arms 145 and 145′ that support the elongated pods 144 and 144′ respectively. Distal movement of the plunger 160 compresses the split ball mechanism 142 and forces the support arms 145 and 145′ to pivot outward and spread elongated suction pods 144 and 144′, respectively, apart in a manner described for example in the above-referenced '629 patent.
The plunger 160 is formed with an axially extending bore 164 and cross-bore 166 that a vacuum is drawn through when the suction head 144 is attached to the elongated shaft 122 and the stopcock is opened. The cross-bore 166 extends to the lumens of suction tubes 154 and 154′ that extend into the support arms 145 and 145′ and to suction channels of the elongated suction pods 144 and 144′, respectively. The configuration of the elongated suction pods 144 and 144′ can take any of the configurations disclosed in the above-referenced '629 patent, for example.
When the suction head 144 is attached to the elongated shaft 122, a proximal portion of the plunger 160 is received in the suction lumen 134, and the distal end of the inner tube 150 bears against a proximal shoulder of the plunger 160. Therefore, rotation of the knob 170 in a direction moving the inner tube 150 distally, applies a force through the plunger 160 to move it distally against the resistance presented by the split ball mechanism 142 and forces the support arms 145 and 145′ to pivot outward and spread elongated suction pods 144 and 144′, respectively, apart.
In this embodiment, the suction head 140 can be attached and detached from the shaft body distal end 126 in the same manner as the suction head 40 is attached and detached from the shaft body distal end 26 as described above.
The method and system as described above can be practiced employing further alternative forms of the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device 20, e.g., the suction-assisted tissue-engaging device 220 depicted in
In the further preferred embodiments illustrated in
In these embodiments, the shaft fastener element extends through the shaft body from a shaft fastener proximal end at the shaft handle 230 to a shaft fastener distal end, and the shaft fastener is adapted to be moved to a disengage position to receive or release the suction head fastener element and to an engage position fixedly attaching the suction head to the shaft body distal end. The shaft fastener element can be manipulated through the shaft body lumen from the shaft handle 230 to engage or release the suction head 240 shown in detail in
A slot or notch 255 is formed in the distal hook 250 that cooperates with is adapted to engage a suction head fastener element. The suction head fastener element comprises a bridge 246 of the suction head 240 shown in
The distal hook 250 at the shaft body distal end 226 is preferably blunted so that the shaft body can be advantageously advanced through the first incision FI from a skin incision into the body cavity and out of the second incision SI without damaging tissue. As shown in
As shown in
The spring bias presented by spring 280 can be overcome by depressing the toggle button 274 distally as shown in
A further embodiment of a an elongated shaft 222′ is depicted in
The first suction head 240 that can be attached as the second portion to the elongated shaft 222 or 222′ is depicted in detail in
The second suction head 340 that can be attached as the second portion to the elongated shaft 222 or 222′ is depicted in
Sutures may be used to attach or position epicardial tissue relative to the elongated suction pods 344 and 344″ to enhance the stabilization function of the invention and or to position epicardial tissue or the target vessel of an anastomosis. As shown in
In addition, one or more sutures may be passed through the myocardium around a target vessel positioned between the elongated suction pods 344 and 344′ and inserted through a pair of the slots of the suture holding members 360, 362 and 360′ 362′. The surgeon can tighten or loosen the sutures extending around the target vessel to control blood flow through the target vessel, and the tightened or loosened state is maintained by the frictional engagement of the sutures by the suture holding members 360, 362 and 360′ 362′. It will be understood that such suture holding members can also be incorporated in the suction heads 140, 240, and 440
The third suction head 440 that can be attached as the second portion to the elongated shaft 222 or 222′ is depicted in
The elongated suction pods 444 and 444′ are joined together by T-shaped suction tube 450 that is formed with a single suction nozzle 454. The suction nozzle 454 can extend rearward or distally as shown in
It will be appreciated that the elongated shaft 222 depicted in
In the suction heads 540 and 640, the head shaft 548, 648 extends proximally to a suction tube nozzle 554, 654 adapted to be coupled to a suction tube 36, but the head shaft could extend distally in the manner of the suction head 340 to locate the nozzle 554. 654 distal to the suction pad 542, 642. The head shaft 548, 648 is formed having a 90° angle in head shaft segment 547, 647, and suction pad 542, 642 is supported at the distal end of the head shaft distal segment 547, 647. The head shaft 548, 648 can be made bendable in the 90° angle distal segment 547, 647 so that the user can adjust the angle. Suction is applied to body tissue contacting suction ports (not shown) of the suction pad 542, 642 from a vacuum source coupled to the suction tube 36 through the suction nozzle 554, 654 and the head suction lumen extending through head shaft 546, 646 to the suction ports.
The suction pad 542, 642 can take any of the shapes of and incorporate any of the features of the suction pads employed in the above-referenced Starfish™ heart positioner and/or as disclosed in the above-referenced Publication No. 2002/0095067 having a plurality of legs, e.g., two to four legs. The illustrated suction pad 542, 642 has three legs 544, 544′, 544″ or 644, 644′, 644″ that diverge outward in a generally starfish-shaped configuration. The legs 544, 544′, 544″ or 644, 644′, 644″ preferably are generally arcuate, curving downwardly away the head shaft distal end 547, 647 to the free ends of the legs 544, 544′, 544″ or 644, 644′, 644″.
It will also be appreciated that the elongated shaft 222 depicted in
The suction head fastener element of the conical suction head 740 comprises an elongated ring-shaped bridge 746 extending around and laterally away from the head shaft 748 and suction nozzle 754 to provide two loops that can be selectively received in the notch 255 of hook 254. The suction head fastener element of the conical suction head 840 comprises a ring-shaped bridge 846 extending away from the head shaft 848 to provide a single loop that can be selectively received in the notch 255 of hook 254. The suction head 740 or 840 can be attached as the second portion to the elongated shaft 222 or 222′ by insertion of the ring-shaped bridge 746 or 846 into the notch 255 to bear against the slot 228 as described above in reference to
In the suction head 840, the head shaft 848 is formed having a 90° angle in head shaft segment 847, and suction pad 842 is supported at the distal end of the head shaft distal segment 847. The head shaft 848 extends proximally to a suction tube nozzle 854 adapted to be coupled to a suction tube 36, but the head shaft 848 could extend distally in the manner of the suction head 340 to locate the nozzle 854 distal to the conical suction pad 842. The head shaft 848 can be made bendable in the 90° angle distal segment 847, 647 so that the user can adjust the angle. It will be understood that the head shaft 748 can also be formed in the manner of head shaft 848.
Any of the suction pads 240, 340, 440, 540, 640, 740, and 840 can be attached to the distal fastener of the shaft 222 or 222′ in the manner described above when the shaft distal end 226 and hook 250 are passed through the second incision S1 as shown in
The above-described embodiments of the suction heads 240, 340, 440, 540, 640, 740 and 840 and the elongated shaft 222 or 222′ involve use of a separate suction tube 36 that is introduced through the first or second incisions FI and SI or a third incision of
It will be understood that the suction adaptor 290 can comprise only a single suction tube 294 attached to the single nozzle 454 of suction head 440 or the single nozzle 554 of suction head 540 or the single nozzle 654 of suction head 640 or the single nozzle 754 of suction head 740 or the single nozzle 854 of suction head 840 and variations thereof. Moreover, it will be understood that the suction adaptor 290 having one or two suction tubes 294 and 294′ can be miniaturized and attached permanently to the outer tube 224 at or near the shaft body distal end 226.
All patents and publications referenced herein and the above-referenced Provisional No. 60/404,969 filed Aug. 21, 2002 and Provisional No. 60/424,243 filed Nov. 6, 2002 are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
It will be understood that certain of the above-described structures, functions and operations of the above-described preferred embodiments are not necessary to practice the present invention and are included in the description simply for completeness of an exemplary embodiment or embodiments.
In addition, it will be understood that specifically described structures, functions and operations set forth in the above-referenced patents can be practiced in conjunction with the present invention, but they are not essential to its practice. It is therefore to be understood, that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described without actually departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/330,033 filed Dec. 8, 2008, now allowed, which application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/675,815, filed Sep. 30, 2003, which application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/643,299 filed Aug. 19, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,338,434, entitled METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ORGAN POSITIONING AND STABILIZATION in the names of Philip J. Haarstad et al., which Ser. No. 10/643,299 application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional No. 60/404,969 filed Aug. 21, 2002, and Provisional No. 60/424,243 filed Nov. 6, 2002, and which Ser. No. 10/675,815 application also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional No. 60/424,243 filed Nov. 6, 2002.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 452131 | Haughawout | May 1891 | A |
| 2590527 | Fluck | Mar 1952 | A |
| 3577982 | La Par | May 1971 | A |
| 3720433 | Rosfelder | Mar 1973 | A |
| 3783873 | Jacobs | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3786815 | Ericson | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3858926 | Ottenhues | Jan 1975 | A |
| 3916909 | Kletschka et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3951138 | Akopov | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3983863 | Janke et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
| 3999795 | Barker | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4047532 | Phillips et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4049000 | Williams | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4049002 | Kletschka et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4096864 | Kletschka et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4306561 | De Medinaceli | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4314568 | Loving | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4350160 | Kolesov | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4366819 | Kaster | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4368736 | Kaster | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4428368 | Torii | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4447227 | Kotsanis | May 1984 | A |
| 4463980 | Orii | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4627421 | Symbas et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4637377 | Loop | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4646747 | Lundbáck | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4688570 | Kramer et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4711247 | Fishman | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4718418 | L'Esperance, Jr. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4726356 | Santilli et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4736749 | Lundback | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4767142 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4808163 | Laub | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4852552 | Chaux | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4854318 | Solem et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4865019 | Phillips | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4892343 | Hall | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4904012 | Nishiguchi et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4925443 | Heilman et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4955896 | Freeman | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4962758 | Lasner et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4973300 | Wright | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4989587 | Farley | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4991578 | Cohen | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5009660 | Clapham | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5011469 | Buckberg et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5053041 | Ansari et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5053043 | Gottesman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5098369 | Heilman et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5108412 | Krumeich et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5119804 | Anstadt | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5131905 | Grooters | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5133737 | Grismer | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5167223 | Koros et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5171254 | Sher | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5207467 | Smith | May 1993 | A |
| 5256132 | Snyders | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5287861 | Wilk | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5290082 | Palmer et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5300087 | Knoepfler | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5324087 | Shimose et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5336252 | Cohen | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5365921 | Bookwalter et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5372124 | Takayama et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5374277 | Hassler | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5383840 | Heilman et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5417709 | Slater | May 1995 | A |
| 5425705 | Evard et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5437651 | Todd et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5452733 | Sterman et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5472438 | Schmit et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5503617 | Jako | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5509890 | Kazama | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5545123 | Ortiz et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5553198 | Wang | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5556147 | Somekh et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5607421 | Jeevanandam et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613937 | Garrison et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5657429 | Wang | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5667624 | Akimoto et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5702420 | Sterling et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5727569 | Benetti et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5730757 | Benetti et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5735290 | Sterman et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5749892 | Vierra et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5772583 | Wright et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5782746 | Wright | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5799661 | Boyd et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5807243 | Vierra et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5827216 | Igo et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5836311 | Borst et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5865730 | Fox et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5875782 | Ferrari et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5876332 | Looney | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5885271 | Hamilton et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888247 | Benetti | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5891017 | Swindle et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5894843 | Benetti et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5906607 | Taylor et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5927284 | Borst et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5947896 | Sherts et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5957835 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5967972 | Santilli et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5976080 | Farascioni | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5976171 | Taylor | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5984864 | Fox et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6007486 | Hunt et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6015378 | Borst et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6017304 | Vierra et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6019722 | Spence et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030340 | Maffei et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6032672 | Taylor | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6033362 | Cohn | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6036641 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6050266 | Benetti et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6063021 | Hossain et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6071235 | Furnish et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6071295 | Takahashi | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6102854 | Cartier et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110187 | Donlon | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6113534 | Koros et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6139492 | Vierra et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6152874 | Looney et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6159201 | Hamilton et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6174307 | Daniel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6210323 | Gilhuly et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6213941 | Benetti et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6238334 | Easterbrook, III et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6251065 | Kochamba et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6258023 | Rogers et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6328688 | Borst | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6334843 | Borst | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6336898 | Borst | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6350229 | Borst | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6364826 | Borst | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6371906 | Borst | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6371910 | Zwart et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6394948 | Borst | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6394951 | Taylor et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6395015 | Borst | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6459926 | Nowlin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6464629 | Boone et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6464630 | Borst | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6468265 | Evans | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6488618 | Paolitto et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6503245 | Palmer et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6506149 | Peng et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6511416 | Green, II et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6517563 | Paolitto et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6551242 | Furnish et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6558314 | Adelman et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6585643 | Clem et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6589166 | Knight et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6602183 | Levi et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6602189 | Bennetti et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6607479 | Kochamba et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6740028 | Boone et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6755780 | Borst | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6936001 | Snow | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 7048683 | Borst | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7261723 | Smith et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7338434 | Haarstad et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 8083664 | David | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 20010041827 | Spence et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020045888 | Ramans | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082612 | Moll | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099268 | Paul et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020124856 | Borst et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020128552 | Nowlin | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020137989 | Clem et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161277 | Mansvelt-Beck et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165434 | Williamson, IV et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030013949 | Moll | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055410 | Evans | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078470 | Borst | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078471 | Foley et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083554 | Paolitto et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088150 | Green, II et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120268 | Bertolero et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125604 | Kochamba et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158463 | Julian et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158464 | Bertolero | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030216715 | Moll | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040092875 | Kochamba | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040102771 | Bertolero et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167549 | Borst | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181118 | Kochamba | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181119 | Kochamba | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181120 | Kochamba | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050010079 | Bertolero et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033270 | Ramans | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050059853 | Kochamba | Mar 2005 | A9 |
| 20050107808 | Evans | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20060025756 | Francischelli et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036128 | Borst | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178559 | Kumar | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241414 | Nowlin | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 167 345 | Jan 1986 | EP |
| 0 293 760 | May 1988 | EP |
| 0 432 560 | Nov 1990 | EP |
| 0 630 629 | Dec 1994 | EP |
| 0 668 058 | Aug 1995 | EP |
| 0 808 606 | Nov 1997 | EP |
| 0 908 139 | Apr 1999 | EP |
| 0 919 193 | Jun 1999 | EP |
| 0 920 835 | Jun 1999 | EP |
| 0 993 806 | Apr 2000 | EP |
| 0 993 806 | Jun 2000 | EP |
| 2 140 695 | Dec 1984 | GB |
| 2 214 428 | Sep 1989 | GB |
| 2 233 561 | Jan 1991 | GB |
| 2 214 428 | Jun 1991 | GB |
| 2267827 | Dec 1993 | GB |
| 8704081 | Jul 1987 | WO |
| 8800481 | Jan 1988 | WO |
| 9403142 | Feb 1994 | WO |
| 9414383 | Jul 1994 | WO |
| 9414715 | Jul 1994 | WO |
| 9418881 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| 9501757 | Jan 1995 | WO |
| 9515715 | Jun 1995 | WO |
| 9517127 | Jun 1995 | WO |
| 9600033 | Jan 1996 | WO |
| 9710753 | Mar 1997 | WO |
| 9740751 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| 9810705 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| 9817182 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| 9827869 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| 9848703 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| 9849947 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| 9908585 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| 9909892 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| 9916367 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| 0006041 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| 0010466 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| 0015119 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| 03001969 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| 03001998 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Mammary Artery-Coronary Artery Anastomosis as Method of Treatment for Angina Pectoris, V.I Kolessov, MD/Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 54, No. 4, Oct. 1967 pp. 535-544. |
| Direct Myocardial Revascularization by Saphenous Vein Graft, R.G. Favaloro, MD; DG Effler, MD; LK Groves, MD; WG Sheldon, MD; and FM Sones, Jr., MD / The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 10, No. 2, Aug. 1970. |
| A Simple Technique and Device to Provide a Bloodless Operative Field in Coronary Artery Surgery Without Cross-Clamping the Aorta, M. Riahi, RJ Schlosser and LA Tomastis/The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 66, No. 6, Dec. 1973, pp. 974-978. |
| To Use or Not to Use the Pump Oxygenator in Coronary Bypass Operations, Drs. WG Trapp and R. Bisarya/The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 19, No. 1, Jan. 1975, pp. 108-109. |
| A Prospective Evaluation of the Pulsatile Assist Device, GL Zumbro, Jr., MD; G Shearer, CCP; ME Fishback, MD; and RF Galloway, MD / The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 28, No. 2 Aug. 1979, pp. 269-273. |
| Preservation of Interventricular Septal Function in Patients Having Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass, CW Akins, MD; CA Boucher, MD; and GM Pohost, MD / American Heart Journal, vol. 107, No. 2, Feb. 1984, pp. 304-309. |
| Coronary Artery Revascularization Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass, R. Archer, DO; DA Ott, MD; R. Parravicini, MD; DA Cooley, MD; GJ Reul, MD; OH Frazier, MD; JM Duncan, MD; JJ Livesay, MD and WE Walker, MD, Texas Heart Institute Journal, vol. 11, No. 1, Mar. 1984, pp. 52-57. |
| Direct Myocardial Revascularization Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass, E. Buffolo; JCS Andrade, J Succi; LEV Leao; and C Gallucci. Thoac. Cardiovasc. Surgeon, 33 (1985) pp. 26-29. |
| Direct Coronary Surgery with Saphenous Vein Bypass Without Eigher Cardiopulmonary Bypass or Cardiac Arrest, FJ Benetti, The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 26, No. 3, May-Jun. 1985, pp. 217-222. |
| Heart-Mechanical Assist Device Interaction, JY Kresh; PLM Kerkhof; SM Goldman; and SK Brockman, Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs, vol. XXXII, 1986, pp. 437-443. |
| Delayed Recovery of Severaly ‘Stunned’ Myocardium with the Support of a Left Ventricular Assist Device after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery, CM Ballantyne MD; MS verani, MD, FACC; HD Short, MD; C Hyatt, BSN, RN; GP Noon, MD, FACC, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 10, No. 3, Sep. 1987, pp. 710-712. |
| Long-Term Follow-up of Survivors of Postcardiotomy Circulatory Support, SA Ruzevich; KR Kanter; DG Pennington; MT Swartz; LR McBride; and DT Termuhlen, Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs, vol. XXXIV, 1988, pp. 116-124. |
| Extended Clinical Support with an Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Device, MG McGee; SM Parnis; T Nakatani; T Myers; K Dasse; WD Hare; JM Duncan; VL Poirier; and OH Frazier, Trans Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs, vol. XXXV, 1989, pp. 614-616. |
| Current Status of Cardiac Surgery: A 40-Year Review, WE Richenbacher, MD; JL Myers, MD, FACC; JA Walhausen, MD, FACC, Journal of American College of Cardiology, vol. 14, No. 3, Sep. 1989, pp. 535-544. |
| Transfemoral Placement of the Left Ventricular Assist Device “Hemopump” During Mechanical Resuscitation, KH Scholz; U Tebbe; M Chemnitius; H Kreuzer; T Schroder; JP Hering; P Uhlig; G Hellige; HJ Grone; R Autschbach; B Schorn; W Ruschewski; and H Dalichau, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, vol. 38 (1990) pp. 69-72. |
| Direct Mechanical Ventricular Actuation for Cardiac Arrest in Humans, MP Anstadt, MD; RL Bartlett, MD; JP Malone, MD, FCCP; and GL Anstadt, VMD; Chest, vol. 100, No. 1, Jul. 1991. |
| Direct Myocardial Revascularization Without Extracorpoeal Circulation, FJ Benetti, MD; G Naselli, MD; M Wood, MD; and L Geffner, MD, Chest, vol. 100. No. 2, Aug. 1991, pp. 312-316. |
| Coronary Artery Bypass Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Pfister et al, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 54 #Dec. 6, 1992 pp. 1085-1092. |
| Coronary Artery Operation Supported by the Hemopump: An Experimental Study on Pig, U Lonn, MD; B Peterzen, MD; H Granfeldt, MD; and H Casimir-Ahn, MD, Ph.D. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 58, No. 1, Jul. 1994, pp. 516-523. |
| Regional Cardiac Wall Immobilization for Open Chest and Closed Chest Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on the Beating Heart: The ‘Octopus’ Method, Circulation, vol. 92. No. 8 Supplement 1, I-177 (Oct. 15, 1995). |
| A Minimally Invasive Surgical Method for Coronary Revascularization—Preliminary Experience in Five Patients, MC Robinson, DR Gross, and W Zeman, Circulation, (Oct. 15, 1995) vol. 92, No. 8, I-176. |
| Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Without Interruption of Native Coronary Flow Using a Novel Astamosis Site Restraining Device (“Octopus”), C. Borst et al., Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 27, No. 6, 1356-1364 (May 1996). |
| Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: the Use of Coronary Angioplasty and the Integration of the New Support Device into Patient Management, GM Gacioch, MD; Stephen G. Ellism, MD, FACC; L Lee, MD; ER Bates, MD, FACC; M Kirsh, MD, FACC; JA Walton, MD, FACC; EH Topol, MD, FACC, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 19, No. 3, Mar. 1, 1992. |
| Reoperative Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass, WJ Fanning, MD; GS Kakos, MD; and TE Williams, Jr., MD, Ph.D., The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 55, No. 2, Feb. 1993, pp. 486-489. |
| Enhanced Preservation of Acutely Ischemic Myocardium with Transeptal Left Ventricular Assist, JD Fonger, MD; Y Zhou, MD; H Matsuura, MD; GS Aldea, MD; and RJ Shemin, MD, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 57, No. 3, Mar. 1994, pp. 570-575. |
| Transcatheter Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Tissue Using a Suction Catheter, Th Lavergne et al. (PACE, vol. 12, Jan. 1989, Part II, pp. 177-186. |
| Placement of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft without Pump Oxygenator, Trapp et al., Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Assn. vol. 19. No. 7 Jan. 1975. |
| Experimental Videothoracoscopic Cannulation of the Left Atrial Appendix: A Feasible Rapid Approach for Initiating Left Heart Bypass? PF Gründeman; DW Meijer; JJG Bannenberg; R tukkie; and PJ Klopper, Surgical Endoscopy (1993) 7: 511-513. |
| The Last Operation: Techniques and Results Before and After the Stabilization Era, Antonio M. Calafiore, MD; Giuseppe Vitolla, MD; Valerio Massei, MD; Giovanni Teodori, MD; Gabriele Di Giammarco, MD; Teresa Iovino, MD and Angela Iaco, MD; Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66:998-1001. |
| Hybrid-Type Stabilizer for Off-Pump Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, by: Toshio Konishi, M.D.; Kazuhiko Higuchi, M.D.; Mutumu Fukata, M.D.; Shinji Akisima, M.D.; and Shiji Fukuda, M.D.; Ann Thorac Surgery 1998; 66:961-2. |
| A.J. Delrossi, M.D., and G.M. Lemore, M.D., A New Retractor to Aid in Coronary Artery Surgery, The Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 36 Jul. 1983, pp. 101-102. |
| Stephen Westaby, Frcs and Federico J. Benetti, M.D.; Less Invasive Coronary Surgery: Consensus from the Oxford Meeting, Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1996, 62: 924-31. |
| Kolessov V.I. The Surgery of Coronary Arteries of the Heart, Leningrad, Meditsina, 1977, pp. 360. (Russian Article). |
| Kolessov V.I. The Surgery of Coronary Arteries of the Heart, Leningrad, Meditsina, 1977, pp. 360. (English Translation). |
| New Helper Instrument in Cardiac Surgery—D. Roux, M.D.; G. Fournial, M.D.; Y. Glock, M.D.; P. Dalous, M.D.; and P. Puel, M.D., Annal Thorac Surg. 1989;48:595-6. |
| Specifications and drawings in U.S. Appl. No. 10/643,299, filed Aug. 19, 2003 (72 pages). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/643,299, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 10, 2007. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/643,299, Response mailed Jan. 8, 2007. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/643,299, Office Action mailed Sep. 7, 2006. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130217959 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60404969 | Aug 2002 | US | |
| 60424243 | Nov 2002 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10675815 | Sep 2003 | US |
| Child | 12330033 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12330033 | Dec 2008 | US |
| Child | 13852069 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10643299 | Aug 2003 | US |
| Child | 10675815 | US |
