This disclosure relates generally to changing the mobility of formation fluids and, more specifically, to changing the mobility of formation fluids using both thermal and non-thermal stimulation.
As global reserves of light crude oil diminish, the exploration for and production of heavy oil and bitumen becomes of increased importance to maintain a stable global supply of hydrocarbon. When evaluating heavy oil or bitumen formations, it is advantageous to obtain representative samples of the formation to determine appropriate drilling and production methods. However, due to the mobility of heavy oil and bitumen, sampling these formations can be difficult or impossible using many known light crude oil sampling techniques.
Attempting to sample a heavy oil or bitumen, for example, without first increasing the mobility of these fluids can result in excessive drawdown pressures, which can cause failure of a pump or pumpout unit being used to extract the fluid, failure (e.g., cracking, fracturing and/or collapse) of the formation, and/or phase changes and, thus, compositional changes to the fluid being sampled. Further, such excessive drawdown pressures can lead to the production of sand, which may cause failure of sampling tool seals. While increasing the areas of the sampling ports or probes can reduce the drawdown pressures, larger port or probe areas can be difficult to achieve without adversely impacting the size of the sampling tool and the ability to achieve an effective seal around the sampling ports or probes.
One factor contributing to the low mobility of heavy oil and bitumen formation is the high viscosity of these fluids. As illustrated by Equation 1 below, a flow-rate of fluid from a subsurface formation may be changed by increasing a pressure difference, changing the permeability of the formation or by decreasing the viscosity of the formation fluid. The pressure difference applied by the sampling tool to withdraw the fluid is represented by Δp, the fluid viscosity is represented by η and the permeability of the formation is represented by k.
Q∝Δp·k/η Equation 1
Substantially reducing the viscosity of the heavy oil and bitumen in a formation can increase mobility sufficiently to obtain a sample. However, to be helpful in determining a production strategy, the fluid sample has to be representative of the formation fluid and/or any changes to the characteristics of the fluid sample have to be reversible.
Some known methods to increase the mobility of formation fluids involve heating the formation through a variety of means (e.g., thermal stimulation), or injecting a diluent into the formation (e.g., non-thermal stimulation). The diluent or solvent is usually miscible with the formation fluid, and in these cases, the diluent may be referred to as a solvent. However, steam or water may not be readily miscible diluents. Production methods that rely on injecting a suitable solvent into a formation include vapor assisted extraction (VAPEX). Another primary production method is cold heavy oil production with sand (CHOPS) that relies on reducing the pressure and evolving the gas from the formation to produce a foam. Some example methods of heating a formation include cyclic steam circulation, steam floods, and steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD). While the use of some diluents may be appropriate for certain applications such as, for example, production in which the chemical composition and/or the physical properties of the formation fluid need not be maintained, these diluents may not be appropriate to obtain samples of formation fluid because they irreversibly change the formation fluid.
While the above-mentioned methods may be used to change the mobility of a formation fluid, in some circumstances, the mobility of the formation fluid is not sufficiently increased by either heating the formation fluid or injecting a diluent into the formation fluid.
In accordance with a disclosed example, an example apparatus to simultaneously provide thermal and non-thermal stimulation to change a mobility of a fluid in a subsurface formation. The apparatus includes one or more containers to hold one or more reactants. Additionally, the apparatus includes a reactor to initiate a chemical reaction with at least one of the reactants. Further, the apparatus includes an injector to inject a product of the chemical reaction into a formation. The product of the chemical reaction comprises heat and a gaseous diluent to change a mobility of a formation fluid. Still further, the apparatus includes a controller to control at least one of the reactor, or the injector.
In accordance with another disclosed example, an example method to simultaneously provide thermal and non-thermal stimulation to change a mobility of a fluid in a subsurface formation. The method includes initiating a chemical reaction with one or more chemicals. A product of the chemical reaction comprises heat and a gaseous diluent. Additionally, the method includes exposing the product of the chemical reaction to the formation to change the mobility of the formation fluid.
Certain examples are shown in the above-identified figures and described in detail below. In describing these examples, like or identical reference numbers are used to identify the same or similar elements. The figures are not necessarily to scale and certain features and certain views of the figures may be shown exaggerated in scale or in schematic for clarity and/or conciseness. Additionally, several examples have been described throughout this specification. Any features from any example may be included with, a replacement for, or otherwise combined with other features from other examples.
As described in Quail et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1988, 27, 519-523, the solubility, viscosity and density of 59 heavy crude oil samples taken from Saskatchewan, Canada were expressed as a function of the concentration of carbon dioxide at temperatures between 293K and 413K at pressures ranging between 0.1 MPa and 14 MPa. The results of these measurements indicated that the viscosity of the formation fluid decreased at a substantially constant temperature with increasing carbon dioxide concentration within the formation fluid.
A mobility of formation fluid may be changed by non-thermal stimulation or thermal stimulation. To change the mobility of a formation fluid using non-thermal stimulation involves injecting into a formation fluid a diluent or solvent that may or may not be miscible with the formation fluid and which increases the mobility of the formation fluid by decreasing its viscosity. Examples of non-thermal stimulation have been described in Kokal et al., S. G. Phase Behavior Correlation of CO2/Heavy Oil Mixtures For Enhanced Oil Recovery. Fluid Phase Equilib. 1989, 52, 283-290 and Mehrotra, et al., Data and correlation for CO2-Peace River Bitumen Phase Behaviour at 22-200 C. AOSTRA J. Res. 1989, 5, 351-358. These materials describe decreasing the viscosity of the formation fluid by a factor of approximately 60 by injecting carbon dioxide into a formation fluid up to its solubility limit. For example, the viscosity of a formation fluid having a viscosity of approximately 2000 cP at reservoir conditions (e.g., down-hole conditions) can be decreased to about 30 cP. To decrease the viscosity of 1 liter (L) of formation fluid in this manner requires about 2 liters of carbon dioxide at a pressure of approximately 20 kpsi to be injected into the formation. Alternatively, natural gas and/or mixtures of nitrogen and carbon dioxide may be injected into a formation to reduce the viscosity of a formation fluid. However, the decrease in viscosity may be less compared to the example above involving the injection of carbon dioxide.
Another example of non-thermal stimulation involves injecting hydrogen into a formation. Such a process has been recognized by the Shell Oil Company, which has sponsored measurements of phase equilibira of hydrogen with heavy oil components at the Delft University of Technology. Hydrogen is relatively soluble in hydrocarbons (e.g., formation fluid) and, if injected into a formation fluid, may be later removed using a process called vacuum sublimation. However, if hydrogen is injected into a formation fluid at an elevated temperature, a reaction (e.g., hydrothermolysis) may occur that causes an irreversible alteration of the chemical composition of the fluid sample, which is not desirable when obtaining a formation fluid sample. To substantially prevent this type of reaction from occurring between the hydrogen and the formation fluid, the temperature at which the hydrogen is exposed to the formation fluid may be controlled.
Turning to
The example wireline tool 200 also includes a formation tester 214 having a selectively extendable probe assembly 216 and a selectively extendable tool anchoring member 218 that are arranged on opposite sides of the elongated body 208. The extendable probe assembly 216 is configured to selectively seal off or isolate selected portions of the wall of the wellbore 202 to fluidly couple to the adjacent formation F, to inject reactant(s) and/or the product of a chemical reaction into the formation F and/or to draw fluid samples from the formation F. The example wireline tool 200 may be provided with one or more reactant chambers 220 and 222 to retain the reactant(s) prior to being mixed, injected and/or exposed to the formation F. The extendable probe assembly 216 may be provided with a sampling probe 304 (
In some examples, the example wireline tool 200 may analyze the quantity of asphaltenes within the formation fluid. In practice, the viscosity of a formation fluid is associated with the quantity and type of asphaltenes within the formation fluid. High asphaltene content within the formation fluid may be associated with an increased viscosity of the formation fluid and, therefore, understanding the chemical structure of asphaltenes and the mole fraction can facilitate the development of different production and/or sampling strategies.
To inject chemical reactants and/or the product of a chemical reaction into the formation F (
The first reactant store 310 and/or the second reactant store 311 may be provided with a plurality of chambers (not shown), which are to hold reactant(s) that are to be used in a chemical reaction such as, an exothermic reaction (i.e., a chemical reaction that releases heat). In other examples, the plurality of chambers are to hold reactants that are mixed (e.g., to form a mixture) prior to the wireline tool 200 (
Each of the chambers of the first reactant store 310 and/or the second reactant store 311 are to be filled with their respective reactant prior to the wireline tool 200 (
The reactor 312 receives from the first reactant store 310 and/or the second reactant store 311 the one or more reactants used in the chemical reaction. The reactor 312 may combine (e.g., mix) two or more reactants to initiate the chemical reaction. Alternatively, the reactor 312 may initiate a chemical reaction in which a single reactant decomposes. The reactor 312 may be provided with any suitable catalyst such as, for example, a platinum metal dispersed on a substrate of aluminum oxide, manganese dioxide, titanium oxide or silica, that changes the rate at which the chemical reaction occurs. The catalyst may be in any suitable arrangement such as, for example, a grill arrangement, a lattice arrangement, a packed bed arrangement or a filter pack arrangement to promote the exposure of the reactant(s) to the catalyst and/or accelerate the rate at which the chemical reaction occurs. In some examples, the product of the exothermic chemical reaction is only heat and a gaseous diluent (e.g. gaseous solvent). In other examples, the product of the exothermic chemical reaction includes at least heat and a gaseous diluent (e.g., gaseous solvent). The gaseous diluent may be dissolvable and/or miscible in a formation fluid and the gaseous diluent may be soluble within the formation fluid to cause a change in a viscosity of the formation fluid. Specifically, the gaseous diluent may be a solvent that at least partially dilutes the formation fluid by admixture. Additionally, the gaseous diluent may be able to migrate and/or diffuse within the formation fluid relatively quickly. Further, in some examples, exposing the formation fluid to the product of the chemical reaction does not substantially alter the formation fluid and/or change a chemical composition of the formation fluid.
Exposing a formation fluid to the product of the chemical reaction may decrease the viscosity of the formation fluid. For example, exposing the formation fluid to heat decreases the viscosity of the formation fluid, as shown, for example, in
As illustrated in Equations 3 through 12 below, another product of the reaction also includes steam or water. While gaseous solvents are dissolvable within a formation fluid, water (H2O) or steam and/or hot acid typically are not readily dissolvable within formation fluid. Water or steam may form foam and/or an emulsion in the formation fluid, which, depending on the water concentration within the formation fluid, may also reduce the viscosity of the formation fluid. However, steam may alter some characteristics of the formation fluid and, thus, steam may not be appropriate to obtain samples of formation fluid because it may prevent the analysis of the chemical composition and/or the physical properties of the formation fluid.
In some example subterranean formations such as heavy oil or bitumen formations, carbon dioxide and hydrogen are not typically present in formation fluids (e.g., not a pristine component of formation fluid) and, therefore, if either hydrogen and/or carbon dioxide are present in a formation fluid sample after hydrogen and/or carbon dioxide have been injected into the formation via the injector 309, the fluid analyzer 325 and/or any other testing device(s) will recognize that these components or elements were not previously present in the formation fluid. The testing device(s) may be positioned within the wireline tool 200 (
Furthermore, though the examples described below describe chemical reactions using certain elements and/or components, any chemical reaction using any suitable element and/or components may be used to produce at least a gaseous diluent and heat.
The chemical reactions represented in Equations 3 and 4 produce gaseous products and relatively large standard molar enthalpies of reaction (e.g., heat content) which are represented by Δl÷gHm⊙. The chemical reaction illustrated in Equation 3, provides a total energy of about 48 MJ (i.e., mega joules) with a volume of about 1.5 dm3 (i.e., cubic decimeter) comprising 50% water (i.e., H2O) and 50% hydrogen peroxide (i.e., H2O2) and 0.8 dm3 methanol (i.e., CH3OH). In some examples, the components and/or elements represented in Equations 2 and 3 are exposed to a catalyst such as, for example, a platinum material supported on aluminum oxide (i.e., Al2O3) or any other suitable catalyst that may initiate or increase the rate at which the chemical reaction occurs. The reactor 312 may be provided with the catalyst. In other examples, the catalyst is positioned in any other suitable position such as, for example, within the sampling probe 304.
Any other suitable chemical compound or element may be substituted for any or all of the components or elements illustrated in Equations 3 and 4 such as, for example, methanol (i.e., CH3OH) may be substituted at least in part by ethanol (e.g., CH3CH2OH), and/or a carbohydrate such as sugar, etc.
The standard molar enthalpies of Equations 3 and 4 were obtained from the enthalpy of liquid to gas transition, which is represented by Δl÷gHm⊙ for water and illustrated in Equation 5 below.
H2O(l)=H2O(g),Δl÷gHm⊙=40.65 kJ·mol−1 Equation 5
The standard molar enthalpies and the enthalpy of liquid to gas transition were combined with the standard molar enthalpy of formation, which is represented by ΔfHm⊙ and illustrated in Equations 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 below.
An alternative chemical reaction that may have a lower enthalpy of reaction is illustrated below in Equation 11. Equation 11 illustrates an example chemical reaction in which hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is decomposed to create water (e.g., steam) and oxygen (O2). In some examples, the hydrogen peroxide is exposed to a catalyst such as, for example, a silver (i.e., Ag) screen and/or a platinum (i.e., Pt) screen) to initiate the decomposition (e.g., the chemical reaction).
The product(s) of the chemical reaction proceed through the scrubber 314 from the reactor 312. The scrubber 314 removes unwanted components from the product of the chemical reaction. As illustrated above, the chemical reactions represented by Equations 3 and 4 produce carbon dioxide (CO2). Carbon dioxide may be dissolvable within a formation fluid without causing precipitation of asphaltenes. However, precipitation of asphaltenes may occur after a certain amount of carbon dioxide is dissolved within the formation fluid. Precipitation of asphaltenes is associated with solid particles forming within the formation fluid that may clog the formation, slow the rate at which a fluid sample is obtained, decrease the rate at which the mobility of the formation fluid increases, and/or alters (e.g., chemically alters) the formation fluid sampled following an exposure to the products of the chemical reaction. Having the product of chemical reaction pass through the scrubber 314 may substantially eliminate the presence of carbon dioxide and/or any other unwanted elements or components from the product of the chemical reaction to prevent its introduction into the formation fluid and, thus, substantially prevent precipitation of asphaltenes. In other examples, the example apparatus 300 may not be provided with the scrubber 314.
The injector 309 injects (e.g., moves) the product of the chemical reaction from the scrubber 314 into the formation F (
In another example implementation (not shown), the example apparatus 300 may be provided with a plurality of sampling probes (not shown) as described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0066536 and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0066904, both of which are assigned to the assignee of the present patent and incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. In this example, at least one of the sampling probes may inject and/or expose the product of a chemical reaction to the formation F (
To measure properties and/or characteristics of the formation fluid, the example apparatus 300 is provided with a formation evaluation sensor 337. The formation evaluation sensor 337 may monitor a viscosity of the fluid in the subsurface formation before, during and/or after the injector 309 has injected the product of the chemical reaction into the formation F. The formation evaluation sensor 337 may identify a change in the viscosity of the formation fluid such as, for example, the formation evaluation sensor 337 may identify when the formation fluid has become sufficiently mobile to enable sampling of the formation fluid. For example, the formation evaluation sensor 337 may be provided with a NMR tool (not shown) to make NMR measurements and to at least partially determine characteristics of the formation fluid associated with the viscosity of the formation fluid within the formation before, during and/or after the product of the chemical reaction is exposed to the formation F.
Once the mobility of the formation fluid has increased by decreasing the viscosity of the formation fluid, a sufficient amount of the product has been exposed to the formation F, and/or a specified time as lapsed, the injector 309 stops injecting the product of the chemical reaction into the formation F and the third pump 320 draws a sample of the formation fluid (e.g., from the formation F) through the sample flowlines 306 and 318, to the fluid analyzer 325. The formation fluid may be any type of formation fluid such as, for example, a wellbore fluid, a fluid extracted from subsurface formation, a heavy oil, a bitumen, a gas condensate, a hydrocarbon fluid, a typical crude oil, methane hydrate or a drilling fluid. In some examples, the formation fluid may be an oil-based drilling fluid or a filtrate of an oil-based drilling fluid mixed with a formation hydrocarbon. The example apparatus 300 of
To control the hydraulic system 302, the reactor 312, the scrubber 314, the injector 309, the third pump 320, the valves 322 and 332, the formation evaluation sensor 337 and the fluid analyzer 325, the example apparatus 300 is provided with a downhole control and processing system 338. Although not shown, the downhole control and processing system 338 may include a processor, one or more memories, and a communication interface (e.g., a modem). The communication interface of the downhole control and processing system 338 may be communicatively coupled to a surface system (e.g., the electronics and processing system 206 of
In operation, the downhole control and processing system 338 may be used to control the hydraulic system 302 to cause the sampling probe 304 to engage the formation F (
Now turning to
The first and second pressure sources 406 and 408 may be used to provide a sufficient pressure level to inject the reactants or a product of a chemical reaction between the reactants into a formation. The first pressure source 406 and/or the second pressure source 408 pumps or moves at least a part of the different reactants through the flowlines 414 and 416 to the reactor 412. In some examples, the quantity and/or rate at which the first reactant is moved from the first reactant store or chamber 402 to the reactor 412 is substantially the same as the quantity and/or rate at which the second reactant is moved from the second reactant store or chamber 404 to the reactor 412. In other examples, the amount and/or rate (e.g., speed) at which the first reactant is moved from the first reactant store or chamber 402 to the reactor 412 is different from the quantity and/or rate at which the second reactant is moved from the second reactant store or chamber 404 to the reactor 412. Specifically, the quantity and/or rate at which the first and second reactants move from the first and second reactant stores or chambers 402 and 404 through the flowlines 414 and 416 to the reactor 412 is associated with a stoichiometric ratio. For example, 2 liters (L) of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) may be moved from the first reactant store or chamber 40 to the reactor 412 and 1 liter (L) of methanol (CH3OH) may be moved from the second reactant store or chamber 404 to the reactor 412. In other examples, only one reactant is used in a chemical reaction such as, for example, the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. In some examples, some or all of the reactants may be in a substantially liquid state. In other examples, some or all of the reactants may be in a substantially gaseous state or any other suitable state.
As described above, the reactor 412 receives the reactant(s) from the first reactant store or chamber 402 and/or the second reactant store or chamber 404 and may be used to mix the reactants together and expose the reactants to a catalyst that may be positioned within the reactor 412. In other examples, the first reactant and the second reactant are mixed in the reactor 412 and then exposed to a catalyst that is in or relatively close to the sampling probe 304 (
The positioning of the flowlines 414 and 416 relative to the reactor 412 may be at least in part to substantially delay the first reactant from the first reactant store or chamber 402 from reacting with the second reactant from the second reactant store or chamber 404 and, thus, may substantially delay the initiation of the chemical reaction until the first and second reactants are adjacent to or within the formation F (
Now turning to
Once the first and second reactants enter the second flow channel 504, the second reactant at least partially mixes with the first reactant and initiates the chemical reaction. The chemical reaction produces at least heat and a gaseous diluent. As the first and second reactants flow through the second flow channel 504, a heat transfer fluid flows through the first flow channel 502 and at least part of the heat from chemical reaction radiates and/or conducts through the second flow channel 504 to the heat transfer fluid and, thus, the temperature of the heat transfer fluid increases. Along with the first and second reactants, the heat transfer fluid exits the opening 512 into the formation F (
The first flow channel 502 is substantially concentric with the second flow channel 504. The position of the first flow channel 502 relative to the second flow channel 504 may substantially control when the first reactant contacts the second reactant and, thus, as discussed above, the initiation of the chemical reaction may be delayed until the first reactant and the second reactant are substantially adjacent to or within the formation F (
The first flow channel 502 may be provided with the heat pipe 514 that may be partially inserted into a perforation 515 of the formation and may be used to implement the sampling probe 304 of
The second flow channel 504 is provided with a catalyst 518 that at least partially contacts the first and second reactants as they flow through the second flow channel 504. The catalyst 518 may be in any suitable arrangement such as, for example, a grill arrangement, a lattice arrangement, a packed bed arrangement or a filter pack arrangement. The catalyst 518 may be in any other suitable position such as, for example, a position within the first flow channel 502 and the position of the catalyst 518 relative to the first and/or second reactants may be associated with delaying and/or changing when the chemical reaction occurs. In other examples, the first flow channel 502 may be in any other suitable position relative to the second flow channel 504, such as, for example, the first flow channel 502 may be substantially parallel to the second flow channel 504. A sensor 520 is at least partially positioned within the second flow channel 504 and may monitor a characteristic of the product of the chemical reaction such as the temperature. If the temperature of the product of the chemical reaction is too low or too high as compared to a desired temperature, the flow rate of the reactant(s) from the first and second reactant stores 310 and 311 may change to substantially achieve the desired temperature.
While an example manner of implementing the example formation tester 214 of
Initially, one or more reactants that are stored in the first and/or second reactant stores 310 and 311 (
To initiate a chemical reaction, the first reactant is exposed to the second reactant and/or the catalyst (block 606). The injector 309 (
As discussed above, heating the formation F (
The example method then determines if the formation mobility has sufficiently changed (e.g., the viscosity has decreased sufficiently) to enable sampling of the formation fluid (block 612). As described above, the example apparatus 300 (
Once a sample is obtained, the fluid analyzer 325 (
The downhole control and processing system 338 then determines whether it should initiate another chemical reaction (block 618). For example, if the example apparatus 300 determines that another fluid sample is necessary and the downhole control and processing system 338 has not received an instruction or command to stop initiating another chemical reaction, the downhole control and processing system 338 may determine that it should initiate another chemical reaction. Otherwise, the example process of
Although certain example methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture have been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the appended claims either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/077219 | 9/22/2008 | WO | 00 | 8/13/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/051936 | 4/23/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2580766 | Hall | Jan 1952 | A |
2680486 | Carpenter | Jun 1954 | A |
4004636 | Brown et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4546829 | Martin et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
5692565 | MacDougall et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
7347262 | Tarvin et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7464755 | Edwards | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7614294 | Hegeman et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7717172 | Sonne et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7748265 | Goodwin et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7878243 | Goodwin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20060137873 | Caudwell et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070137858 | Considine et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080066535 | Vasques et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066536 | Goodwin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066904 | Van Hal et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080078581 | Goodwin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090008079 | Zazovsky et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100186948 | Sonne et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100223989 | Reid et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2430218 | Mar 2007 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Vogel, H. “The Law of the Relation Between the Viscosity of Liquids and the Temperature”, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 1921, vol. 22; pp. 645-646. |
Bell, T. N., Cussler, Jr., E. L., Harris, K. R., Pepela, C. N., and Dunlop, P. J., “An Apparatus for Degassing Liquids by Vacuum Sublimation”, Journal of Physical Chemistry, Dec. 1968, ol. 72(13): pp. 4693. |
Quail, B., Hill, G. A., and Jha, K. N., “Correlations of Viscosity, Gas Solubility, and Density for Saskatchewan Heavy Oils”, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Mar. 1988, vol. 27(3); pp. 519-523. |
Kokal, S. L. and Sayegh, S. G., “Phase Behaviour Correlation of CO2/Heavy Oil Mxues for Enhanced Oil Recovery”, Fluid Phase Equilibria, Dec. 1989, pp. 283-290. |
Mehrotra, A. K., Nighswander, J. A., and Kalogerakis, N., “Data and Correlation for CO2-Peace River Bitumen Phase Behaviour at 22-200°”, AOSTRA Journal of Research, 1989, vol. 5(4); pp. 351-358. |
Chase, M., “NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables, Fourth Edition,” Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data Monographs & Supplements, 1989, American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY USA. |
Barin, I., Sauert, F., Schultz-Rhonhof, E., and Sheng, W. S., Thermochemical Data of Pure Substances, Parts I and II, 1989, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany. |
Lillico, D. A., Babchin, A. J., Jossy, W. E., Sawatzky, R. P., Yuan J.-Y., “Gas Bubble Nucleation Kinetics in a Live Heavy Oil”, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, Nov. 2001, vol. 192(1); pp. 25-38. |
Coniglio, L., Rauzy, E., Péneloux, A., and Neau, E., “Use of Heat Capacities for the Estimation of Cubic Equation-of-State Parameters—Application to the Prediction of Very Low Vapor Pressures of Heavy Hydrocarbons”, Fluid Phase Equilibria, Aug. 2002, vol. 200(2); pp. 275-398. |
George, D. S., Hayat, O., and Kovscek, A. R. “A Microvisual Study of Solution-Gas-Drive Mechanisms in Viscous Oils”, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Feb. 2005, vol. 46(1-2); pp. 101-119. |
Kaye and Laby, “Standard Thermodynamic Functions for Pure Inorganic Substances, for Aqueous Ions, and for Pure Organic Substances”, National Physical Laboratory, 2005, URL: <http://www.kayelaby.npl.co.uk/chemistry/3—10/3—10—5. html>. |
Chen, Z., “Heavy Oils, Part I”, SIAM News, Apr. 2006, vol. 39(3): pp. 1-3. |
Chen, Z., “Heavy Oils, Part II”, SIAM News, May 2006, vol. 39(4): pp. 1-4. |
Shigemoto, N., Al-Maamari, R. S., Jibril, B. Y. and Hirayama, A., “A Study of the Effect of Gas Condensate on the Viscosity and Storage Stability of Omani Heavy Crude Oils”, Energy & Fuels, Nov. 2006, vol. 20(6); pp. 2504-2508. |
Goodvvin, A. R. H., Hegeman, P., Reid, Jr., L., Nold, R., “SLB White Paper: Sampling Heavy Oil and Bitumen”, 2007. |
Goodwin, A. R. H., Marsh, K. N., Peters, C. J., “Solubility and the Oil Industry”, in Developments and Applications of Solubility for the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Elsevier Science, Editor T. J. Letcher (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2007), IUPAC Project No. 2005-016-1-100. |
CIPO Office Action of Canadian Application No. 2,702,495 dated Oct. 24, 2011; pp. 1-2. |
Shigemoto, N.; Al-Maamari, R. S.; Jibril, B. Y.; Hirayama, A. Energy Fuel 2006, 20, 2504-2508. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100294493 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60979694 | Oct 2007 | US |