The present disclosure relates generally to audience measurement, and more particularly, to methods and apparatus to detect an operating state of a display.
Determining the size and demographics of a television viewing audience helps television program producers improve their television programming and determine a price to be charged for advertising that is broadcasted during such programming. In addition, accurate television viewing demographics allows advertisers to target audiences of a desired size and/or audiences comprised of members having a set of common, desired characteristics (e.g., income level, lifestyles, interests, etc.).
In order to collect these demographics, an audience measurement company may enlist a number of television viewers to cooperate in an audience measurement study for a predefined length of time. The viewing habits of these enlisted viewers, as well as demographic data about these enlisted viewers, are collected using automated and/or manual collection methods. The collected data is subsequently used to generate a variety of informational statistics related to television viewing audiences including, for example, audience sizes, audience demographics, audience preferences, the total number of hours of television viewing per household and/or per region, etc.
The configurations of automated data collection systems vary depending on the equipment used to receive, process, and display television signals in each home being monitored. For example, homes that receive cable television signals and/or satellite television signals typically include a set top box (STB) to receive television signals from a cable and/or satellite television provider. Television systems configured in this manner are typically monitored using hardware, firmware, and/or software to interface with the STB to extract or to generate signal information therefrom. Such hardware, firmware, and/or software may be adapted to perform a variety of monitoring tasks including, for example, detecting the channel tuning status of a tuning device disposed in the STB, extracting program identification codes embedded in television signals received at the STB, generating signatures characteristic of television signals received at the STB, etc. However, many television systems that include an STB are configured such that the STB may be powered independent of the television set. As a result, the STB may be turned on (i.e., powered up) and continue to supply television signals to the television set even when the television set is turned off. Thus, monitoring of television systems having independently powered devices typically involves an additional device or method to determine the operational status of the television set to ensure that the collected data reflects information about television signals that were merely supplied to the television set, which may or may not be turned on. Although there are a variety of techniques to determine the operational status of the television set, many of these techniques are invasive to the television set and increases unnecessary risk in damaging the television set during installation of the circuitry to determine the operational status. Further some of these techniques involve monitoring the consumption of power by the television set. Unfortunately, the consumption of power by the television set does not necessarily indicate that the television screen is operational. Other techniques to determine the operational status of the television set are complex and tend to be costly to implement.
Although the following discloses example systems including, among other components, software executed on hardware, it should be noted that such systems are merely illustrative and should not be considered as limiting. For example, it is contemplated that any or all of the disclosed hardware and software components could be embodied exclusively in dedicated hardware, exclusively in software, exclusively in firmware or in some combination of hardware, software, and/or firmware.
In addition, while the following disclosure discusses example television systems, it should be understood that the disclosed system is readily applicable to many other media systems. Accordingly, while the following describes example systems and processes, persons of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that the disclosed examples are not the only way to implement such systems.
In the example of
The display monitoring device 140 may also be configured to determine the total number of hours of television watched by the household members 160. As described in detail below, the display monitoring device 140 may generate time stamps corresponding to the times at which the television 120 is turned on (i.e., begins to display content) and/or the times at which the television 120 is turned off (i.e., stops displaying content). Alternatively, the display monitoring device 140 may be configured to provide the television operating state data to the metering device 135, which in turn, generates time stamps associated with the data so that the total number of hours of television watched may be calculated therefrom. Further, the display monitoring device 140 may provide the television operating state data to the central data collection facility 180 either directly or via the metering device 135. If the display monitoring device 140 directly provides the television operating state data to the data collection facility 180 then the display monitoring device 140 may include a communication device (one shown as 270 in
The service provider 110 may be implemented by any television service provider such as, for example, a cable television service provider 112, a radio frequency (RF) television service provider 114, and/or a satellite television service provider 116. The television 120 receives a plurality of television signals transmitted via a plurality of channels by the service provider 110 and may be adapted to process and display television signals provided in any format such as a National Television Standards Committee (NTSC) television signal format, a high definition television (HDTV) signal format, an Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) television signal format, a phase alteration line (PAL) television signal format, a digital video broadcasting (DVB) television signal format, an Association of Radio Industries and Businesses (ARIB) television signal format, etc.
The user-operated remote control device 125 allows a user to cause the television 120 to tune to and receive signals transmitted on a desired channel, and to cause the television 120 to process and present the programming content contained in the signals transmitted on the desired channel. The processing performed by the television 120 may include, for example, extracting a video and/or an audio component delivered via the received signal, causing the video component to be displayed on a screen/display associated with the television 120, and causing the audio component to be emitted by speakers associated with the television 120. The programming content contained in the television signal may include, for example, a television program, a movie, an advertisement, a video game, and/or a preview of other programming content that is currently offered or will be offered in the future by the service provider 110.
While the components shown in
In the example of
The display monitoring device 240 is optically coupled to the light energy source 224 of the display 220 via an optical fiber 230 (e.g., plastic or glass). In particular, the display monitoring device 240 includes an optical-to-electrical converter 242, a signal processing circuit 244, and a logic circuit 246. The optical-to-electrical converter 242 may be a photodetector, a photodiode and/or any suitable light-sensitive semiconductor junction device configured to convert light energy emitted by the light energy source 224 via the optical fiber 230 into an electrical signal. The electrical signal is provided to the signal processing circuit 244 and the logic circuit 246. The signal processing circuit 244 amplifies the electrical signal to a particular voltage level and filters noise and/or other extraneous signals from the electrical signal so that the logic circuit 246 may generate an output signal indicative of an operating state of the display 220 based on the electrical signal as described in detail below.
When the logic circuit 246 receives the electrical signal from the signal processing circuit 244, the logic circuit 246 generates an output signal indicative of an operating state of the display 220. In particular, the output signal indicates either an on state or an off state of the display 220. For example, the logic circuit 246 may generate a HIGH signal (i.e., a logic “1”) to indicate that the display 220 is turned on (i.e., light energy to project images on the screen 222 is detected). In contrast, the logic circuit 246 may generate a LOW signal (i.e., a logic “0”) to indicate that the display 220 is turned off (i.e., no light energy to project images on the screen 222 is detected).
A processor 250 may use the output signal indicative of the operating state of the display 220 to track when and how long the display 220 is turned on or off. For example, the processor 250 may generate a time stamp corresponding to the time when the processor 250 receives a HIGH signal as the output signal. The processor 250 may generate another time stamp when the processor 250 receives a LOW signal as the output signal. The processor 250 is operatively coupled to a memory 260 to store the on/off information. The memory 260 may be implemented by any type of memory such as a volatile memory (e.g., random access memory (RAM)), a nonvolatile memory (e.g., flash memory) or other mass storage device (e.g., a floppy disk, a CD, and a DVD). Based on the time stamps corresponding to the output signals from the logic circuit 246, the processor 250 may automatically provide operating information (e.g., when the display 220 was turned on or off) to the data collection facility 180 via a communication device 270 (e.g., a wired or wireless telephone communication circuit, a cable modem, etc.). As noted above, the data collection facility 180 is configured to produce television viewing data. For example, the data collection facility 180 may use the on/off information to determine a total number of hours that the household members 160 watch television.
While the components shown in
An example method which may be executed to detect an operating state of a display is illustrated in
In the example of
Whenever there is a change in the state of the output signal from the logic circuit 246, the processor 250 may generate a time stamp (block 360). For example, when the processor 250 first detects a HIGH signal from the logic circuit 246, the processor 250 generates a time stamp and stores data indicating that the display 220 entered an on state at the time indicated by the time stamp. When the processor 250 detects a LOW signal from the logic circuit 246, it generates a time stamp and stores data indicating that the display 220 entered an off state at the time indicated by the time stamp. This operating information (e.g., when the display 210 was turned on or off) may be provided to the data collection facility 180 and/or provided to the metering device 135 that subsequently transmits the operating information to the data collection facility 180. The operating information may be used to produce television audience statistics. As noted above, the operating information may be used to determine a number of hours of that the household members 160 watch television. Further, as noted above, the operating information may also be used to reduce and/or to filter out data that is collected by the metering device 135. The data collection facility 180 may also use the operating information to separate the viewing data corresponding to programming content that were actually displayed from the viewing data corresponding to programming content that were merely provided to the television 120 when the television 120 was turned off.
While the methods and apparatus disclosed herein are particularly well suited for use with an LCD, the teachings of the disclosure may be applied to detect an operating state of other types of displays. For example, the methods and apparatus disclosed herein may detect an operating state of a plasma display. In addition to a television, the methods and apparatus disclosed herein may detect an operating state of a computer monitor, a projector screen, and/or other media output device. Thus, the methods and apparatus disclosed herein may collect data associated with Internet usage and/or other display of media via a computer.
Although certain example methods, apparatus, and articles of manufacture have been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus, and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the appended claims either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
This patent arises from a continuation of PCT Application Ser. No. PCT/US2003/030355, filed Sep. 25, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3281695 | Bass | Oct 1966 | A |
3315160 | Goodman | Apr 1967 | A |
3483327 | Schwartz | Dec 1969 | A |
3651471 | Haselwood et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3733430 | Thompson et al. | May 1973 | A |
3803349 | Watanabe | Apr 1974 | A |
3906454 | Martin | Sep 1975 | A |
3947624 | Miyake | Mar 1976 | A |
4027332 | Wu et al. | May 1977 | A |
4044376 | Porter | Aug 1977 | A |
4058829 | Thompson | Nov 1977 | A |
4245245 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4388644 | Ishman et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4546382 | McKenna et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4566030 | Nickerson et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4574304 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4613904 | Lurie | Sep 1986 | A |
4622583 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4642685 | Roberts et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4644393 | Smith et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4647964 | Weinblatt | Mar 1987 | A |
4697209 | Kiewit et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4723302 | Fulmer et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4764808 | Solar | Aug 1988 | A |
4769697 | Gilley et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4779198 | Lurie | Oct 1988 | A |
4800437 | Hosoya | Jan 1989 | A |
4807031 | Broughton et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4876736 | Kiewit | Oct 1989 | A |
4885632 | Mabey et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4907079 | Tumer et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4912552 | Allison, III et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4931865 | Scarampi | Jun 1990 | A |
4943963 | Waechter et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4965825 | Harvey et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4972503 | Zurlinden | Nov 1990 | A |
5097328 | Boyette | Mar 1992 | A |
5136644 | Audebert et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5165069 | Vitt et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5226177 | Nickerson | Jul 1993 | A |
5235414 | Cohen | Aug 1993 | A |
5251324 | McMullan, Jr. | Oct 1993 | A |
5310222 | Chatwin et al. | May 1994 | A |
5319453 | Copriviza et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5335277 | Harvey et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5355161 | Bird et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5398055 | Nonomura et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5404161 | Douglass et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5404172 | Berman et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5408258 | Kolessar | Apr 1995 | A |
5425100 | Thomas et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5481294 | Thomas et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483276 | Brooks et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488408 | Maduzia et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5505901 | Harney et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512933 | Wheatley et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5550928 | Lu et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5659367 | Yuen | Aug 1997 | A |
5760760 | Helms | Jun 1998 | A |
5767922 | Zabih et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771307 | Lu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5801747 | Bedard | Sep 1998 | A |
5874724 | Cato | Feb 1999 | A |
5889548 | Chan | Mar 1999 | A |
5896554 | Itoh | Apr 1999 | A |
5963844 | Dail | Oct 1999 | A |
6035177 | Moses et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049286 | Forr | Apr 2000 | A |
6124877 | Schmidt | Sep 2000 | A |
6137539 | Lownes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6177931 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184918 | Goldschmidt Iki et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6286140 | Ivanyi | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297859 | George | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311214 | Rhoads | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6388662 | Narvi et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6400996 | Hoffberg et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6457010 | Eldering et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463413 | Applebaum et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467089 | Aust et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477508 | Lazar et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487719 | Itoh et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6519769 | Hopple et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523175 | Chan | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529212 | Miller et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6542878 | Heckerman et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6567978 | Jarrel | May 2003 | B1 |
6570559 | Oshima | May 2003 | B1 |
6647212 | Toriumi et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647548 | Lu et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6675383 | Wheeler et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681396 | Bates et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6791472 | Hoffberg | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6934508 | Ceresoli et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6946803 | Moore | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7051352 | Schaffer | May 2006 | B1 |
7100181 | Srinivasan et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7150030 | Eldering et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7786987 | Nielsen | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20020012353 | Gerszberg et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015112 | Nagakubo et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026635 | Wheeler et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020056087 | Berezowski et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057893 | Wood et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059577 | Lu et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072952 | Hamzy et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077880 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080286 | Dagtas et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083435 | Blasko | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020141730 | Haken | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174425 | Markel et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198762 | Donato | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030046685 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030054757 | Kolessar et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056215 | Kanungo | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067459 | Lim | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093790 | Logan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101449 | Bentolila et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110485 | Lu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115591 | Weissmueller et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030131350 | Peiffer et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030216120 | Ceresoli et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040003394 | Ramaswamy | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040055020 | Delpuch | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040058675 | Lu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073918 | Ferman et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088212 | Hill | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088721 | Wheeler et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100437 | Hunter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040210922 | Peiffer et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040233126 | Moore | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050054285 | Mears et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050057550 | George | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050125820 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050221774 | Ceresoli et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050286860 | Conklin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060075421 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060093998 | Vertegaal | May 2006 | A1 |
20060195857 | Wheeler et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212895 | Johnson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060232575 | Nielsen | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070063850 | Devaul et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070186228 | Ramaswamy et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192782 | Ramaswamy | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080028427 | Nesvadba et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080148307 | Nielsen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080276265 | Topchy et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3401762 | Aug 1985 | DE |
0593202 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0946012 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1318679 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1574964 | Sep 1980 | GB |
8331482 | Dec 1996 | JP |
2000307520 | Nov 2000 | JP |
9115062 | Oct 1991 | WO |
9512278 | May 1995 | WO |
9526106 | Sep 1995 | WO |
9526106 | Sep 1995 | WO |
9810539 | Mar 1998 | WO |
9933206 | Jul 1999 | WO |
9933206 | Jul 1999 | WO |
9959275 | Nov 1999 | WO |
0038360 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0038360 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0072484 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0111506 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0161892 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0219581 | Mar 2002 | WO |
02052759 | Jul 2002 | WO |
03049339 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03052552 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03060630 | Jul 2003 | WO |
03060630 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2005032145 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005038625 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005041166 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005041166 | May 2005 | WO |
2005055601 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005055601 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005065159 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005079457 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006012629 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2007120518 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report corresponding to International Application Serial No. PCT/US2003/030355, May 5, 2004, 6 sheets. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability corresponding to International Application Serial No. PCT/US2003/03070, Mar. 7, 2005, 4 pages. |
International Search Report corresponding to International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2003/03070, Mar. 11, 2004, 7 pages. |
Written Opinion corresponding to International Application Serial No. PCT/US2003/03070, Nov. 15, 2004, 5 pages. |
Nielsen, Christen V., “Methods and Apparatus to Detect an Operating State of Display Based on Visible Light,” U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,555, filed Mar. 24, 2006. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, Written Opinion, for counterpart PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2003/30355 mailed on Mar. 21, 2008 (5 pages). |
Thomas, William L., “Television Audience Research Technology, Today's Systems and Tomorrow's Challenges,” Nielsen Media Research, Jun. 5, 1992 (4 pages). |
Vincent et al., “A Tentative Typology of Audio Source Separation Tasks,” 4th International Symposium on Independent Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation (ICA 2003), held in Nara, Japan, Apr. 2003 (6 pages). |
Smith, Leslie S., “Using IIDs to Estimate Sound Source Direction,” Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior on from Animals to Animats, pp. 60-61, 2002 (2 pages). |
Dai et al., “Transferring Naive Bayes Classifiers for Text Classification,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, held in Vancouver, British Columbia on Jul. 22-26, 2007 (6 pages). |
Elkan, Charles, “Naive Bayesian Learning,” Adapted from Technical Report No. CS97-557, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, U.S.A., Sep. 1997 (4 pages). |
Zhang, Harry, “The Optimality of Naive Bayes,” Proceedings of the Seventeenth International FLAIRS Conference, 2004 (6 pages). |
Domingos et al., “On the Optimality of the Simple Bayesian Classifier under Zero-One Loss,” Machine Learning, vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 103-130, Nov. 1, 1997 (28 pages). |
Patron-Perez et al., “A Probabilistic Framework for Recognizing Similar Actions using Spatio-Temporal Features,” BMVC07, 2007 [Retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008] (10 pages). |
Mitchell, Tom M., “Chapter 1; Generative and Discriminative Classifiers: Naive Bayes and Logistic Regression,” Machine Learning, Sep. 21, 2006 (17 pages). |
Lang, Marcus, “Implementation on Naive Bayesian Classifiers in Java,” http://www.iit.edu/˜ipro356f03/ipro/documents/naive-bayes.edu [Retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008] (4 pages). |
Liang et al., “Learning Naive Bayes Tree for Conditional Probability Estimation,” Proceedings of the Canadian Al-2006 Conference, held in Quebec, Canada, pp. 456-466, on Jun. 7-9, 2006 (13 pages). |
Mozina et al., “Nomograms for Visualization of Naive Bayesian Classifier,” Proceedings of the Eight European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, held in Pisa, Italy, pp. 337-348, 2004 [Retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008] (12 pages). |
“Lecture 3; Naive Bayes Classification,” http://www.cs.utoronto.ca/˜strider/CSCD11—f08/NaiveBayes—Zemel.pdf [Retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008] (9 pages). |
Klein, Dan, PowerPoint Presentation of “Lecture 23: Naive Bayes,” CS 188: Artificial Intelligence held on Nov. 15, 2007 (6 pages). |
“Learning Bayesian Networks: Naïve and non-Naïve Bayes” Oregon State University, Oregon [Retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://web.engr.oregonstate.edu/˜tgd/classess/534/slides/part6.pdf (18 pages). |
“The Naïve Bayes Classifier,” CS534-Machine Learning, Oregon State University, Oregon [Retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://web.engr.oregonstate.edu/˜afern/classes/cs534/notes/Naivebayes-10.pdf (19 pages). |
“Bayesian Networks,” Machine Learning A, 708.064 07 1sst KU Oregon State University, Oregon [Retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.igi.tugraz.at.lehre/MLA/WS07/slides3.pdf (21 pages). |
“The Peltarion Blog,” Jul. 10, 2006 [Retrieved from the Internet on Mar. 11, 2009] Retrieved from the Internet: http//blog.peltarion.com/2006/07/10/classifier-showdown (14 pages). |
“Logical Connective: Philosophy 103: Introduction to Logic Conjunction, Negation, and Disjunction,” [Retrieved from the Internet on 200-03-11] Retrieved from the Internet: http://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/conjunct.html (5 pages). |
“Naïve Bayes Classifier,” Wikipedia entry as of Mar. 11, 2009 [Retrieved from the Internet on Mar. 11, 2009] (7 pages). |
“Naive Bayes Classifier,” Wikipedia entry as of Jan. 11, 2008 [Retrieved from the Internet from Wikipedia history pages on Mar. 11, 2009] (7 pages). |
Zimmerman, H., “Fuzzy set applications in pattern recognition and data-analysis,” 11th IAPR International conference on Pattern Recognition, Aug. 29, 1992 (81 pages). |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report, issued in connection with European Patent Application No. EP05798239.9, on Sep. 9, 2008 (4 pages). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued by the International Bureau in connection with PCT application No. PCT/US2005/028106, mailed Apr. 5, 2007 (5 pages). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report, issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with PCT application No. PCT/US2005/028106, mailed Mar. 12, 2007 (2 pages). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with PCT application No. PCT/US2005/028106, mailed Mar. 12, 2007 (4 pages). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report, issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with PCT application No. PCT/US2006/031960, mailed Feb. 21, 2007 (2 pages). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with PCT application No. PCT/US2006/031960, mailed Feb. 21, 2007 (3 pages). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued by the International Bureau in connection with PCT application No. PCT/US2006/031960, mailed Feb. 20, 2008 (4 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Feb. 5, 2009, in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/576,328 (20 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Dec. 27, 2007, in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,555 (12 pages). |
Final Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Oct. 6, 2008, in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,555 (18 pages). |
Advisory Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 13, 2009, in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,555 (4 pages). |
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,555, mailed on Dec. 8, 2009, 16 pages. |
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,555, mailed on May 20, 2010, 15 pages. |
Official Action dated Mar. 31, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,555, 17 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060212895 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US03/30355 | Sep 2003 | US |
Child | 11388262 | US |