Methods and apparatus to determine a state of a media presentation device

Description

FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

This disclosure relates generally to market research, and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus to determine a state of a media presentation device.

BACKGROUND

Audience measurement systems may be used to identify content output by a media presentation device. For example, a metering device can be equipped with microphone(s) to identify program content emanating from a media presentation device, such as a television (TV). An audio signal captured by the microphone(s) is processed either to extract an embedded watermark from the audio signal or convert the audio signal to a signature for matching against signatures stored in a reference database. Audio watermarks are embedded in media program content prior to distribution of the media program content for consumption. Reference audio signature databases are created from broadcast or distributed media program content.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts an example system including a meter to determine a state of a media presentation device.

FIG. 2 shows an example implementation of a metering device such as the meter of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 illustrates an example implementation of a source detector such as the source detector of FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 depicts an example filter weight distribution corresponding to filter weights that indicate a monitored media presentation device is turned on.

FIG. 5 depicts another example filter weight distribution corresponding to filter weights that indicate a monitored media presentation device is turned off.

FIG. 6 depicts an example filter apparatus implementing an adaptive least mean square algorithm using a finite impulse response (FIR) filter, such as in the example source detector of FIG. 3.

FIG. 7 depicts an example implementation of a state determiner such as the state determiner of FIG. 3.

FIG. 8 is a flow diagram representative of example machine readable instructions that may be executed to implement a monitoring and audience measurement process including an example metering device and its source detector of FIGS. 1-3 and 6-7.

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram providing additional detail representative of example machine readable instructions that may be executed to implement a portion of the flow diagram of FIG. 8.

FIG. 10 is a flow diagram providing additional detail representative of example machine readable instructions that may be executed to implement a portion of the flow diagram of FIG. 8.

FIG. 11 is a block diagram of an example processor system structured to execute the example machine readable instructions represented by FIGS. 8-10 to implement the example metering device and its source detector of FIGS. 1-3 and 6-7.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific examples that may be practiced. These examples are described in sufficient detail to enable one skilled in the art to practice the subject matter, and it is to be understood that other examples may be utilized and that logical, mechanical, electrical and other changes may be made without departing from the scope of the subject matter of this disclosure. The following detailed description is, therefore, provided to describe example implementations and not to be taken as limiting on the scope of the subject matter described in this disclosure. Certain features from different aspects of the following description may be combined to form yet new aspects of the subject matter discussed below.

When introducing elements of various embodiments of the present disclosure, the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.

In many microphone-based audience measurement environments, it is necessary to determine a source of audio signals being captured by a metering, monitoring, or measurement device (referred to herein as a “metering device or a meter” for illustrative brevity). If a source of captured audio signal is not properly identified, error is introduced into the audience measurement data that is generated based on the captured audio.

However, in some environments, a monitoring or metering device captures audio not only emanating from a media presentation device of interest, but also from other sources including ambient noise, speech signals from viewers talking to each other, etc. As disclosed herein, a source of the captured audio is identified to avoid erroneous audience measurement stemming from audio that is not emanating from the media presentation device of interest.

Examples disclosed herein facilitate audience measurement to determine whether audio being captured is emanating from the media presentation device of interest. When watermarks embedded in media are not successfully extracted, signatures computed from the microphone-captured audio may or may not represent the audio emanating from the media presentation device of interest. For example, the media presentation device of interest may be turned down or off, and the source of audio captured by the microphone can be any one of a plurality of other possible sources (e.g., people talking, other equipment in the room, ambient noise, etc.). In some such cases, it is possible to obtain false matches for program signature information when monitoring signatures generated by a metering or monitoring device are compared against a large number of reference signatures in a reference database. Certain examples confirm the media presentation device as source by analyzing the audio signals captured by the metering device.

Examples disclosed herein facilitate reducing instances of false matching by distinguishing audio emanating from the media presentation device of interest from audio generated by other potential sources. For example, disclosed examples facilitate identifying the media presentation device of interest as the source of the detected audio by analyzing the audio captured by the metering device to determine whether the media presentation device of interest is 1) turned on or 2) turned down or off.

Certain examples determine whether the media presentation device of interest is 1) turned on or 2) turned down or off by determining whether or not the detected audio matches a characteristic of audio previously detected from the media presentation device. If the detected audio matches a characteristic of audio previously detected from the media presentation device, then the media presentation device is inferred to be turned on. However, if the detected audio does not match a characteristic of audio previously detected from the media presentation device, then the media presentation device is inferred to be turned down or turned off.

When metering devices incorrectly credit exposure minutes, one or more household tuning estimates and/or projections may be over-reported and/or otherwise inflated. Additionally, attempted detection of watermarks and/or other codes by metering devices can return false positives and/or erroneous data if ambient noise interferes with proper capture and analysis of audio information from a media presentation device of interest. Example methods, apparatus, systems and/or articles of manufacture disclosed herein distinguish instances of ambient sound to be ignored from instances of audio from a media presentation device of interest that are to be monitored.

Examples disclosed herein provide methods of determining a state of a media presentation device. Disclosed example methods include generating a first set of weighted coefficients based on first audio received by first and second microphones at a first time. Disclosed example methods include generating a second set of weighted coefficients based on second audio received by the first and second microphones at a second time after the first time. Disclosed example methods include comparing the first set of coefficients and the second set of coefficients to generate a similarity value. Disclosed example methods include, when the similarity value satisfies a first threshold, determining that the media presentation device is in a first state. Disclosed example methods include, when the similarity value does not satisfy the first threshold, determining that the media presentation device is in a second state. Disclosed example methods include controlling a metering device based on the state of the media presentation device.

Examples disclosed herein provide tangible computer readable storage media having instruction that, when executed, cause a machine to generate a first set of weighted coefficients based on first audio received by first and second microphones at a first time. Disclosed example computer readable storage media have instructions that, when executed, further cause the machine to generate a second set of weighted coefficients based on second audio received by the first and second microphones at a second time after the first time. Disclosed example computer readable storage media have instructions that, when executed, further cause the machine to compare the first set of coefficients and the second set of coefficients to generate a similarity value. Disclosed example computer readable storage media have instructions that, when executed, further cause the machine to, when the similarity value satisfies a first threshold, determine that the media presentation device is in a first state. Disclosed example computer readable storage media have instructions that, when executed, further cause the machine to, when the similarity value does not satisfy the first threshold, determine that the media presentation device is in a second state. Disclosed example computer readable storage media have instructions that, when executed, further cause the machine to control a metering device based on the state of the media presentation device.

Examples disclosed herein provide apparatus including a metering device including a programmed processor. Disclosed example apparatus include the processor programmed to generate a first set of weighted coefficients based on first audio received by first and second microphones at a first time. Disclosed example apparatus include the processor programmed to generate a second set of weighted coefficients based on second audio received by the first and second microphones at a second time after the first time. Disclosed example apparatus include the processor programmed to compare the first set of coefficients and the second set of coefficients to generate a similarity value. Disclosed example apparatus include the processor programmed to, when the similarity value satisfies a first threshold, determine that the media presentation device is in a first state. Disclosed example apparatus include the processor programmed to, when the similarity value does not satisfy the first threshold, determine that the media presentation device is in a second state. Disclosed example apparatus include the processor programmed to control a metering device based on the state of the media presentation device.

Examples disclosed herein provide methods of determining a state of a media presentation device. Disclosed example methods include generating a first set of weighted coefficients based on first audio received by first and second microphones at a first time. Disclosed example methods include generating a second set of weighted coefficients based on second audio received by the first and second microphones at a second time after the first time. Disclosed example methods include calculating a dot product between the first set of coefficients and the second set of coefficients. Disclosed example methods include, when the calculated dot product satisfies a threshold, determining that the media presentation device is in a first state (e.g., turned on or activated, etc.). Disclosed example methods include, when the calculated dot product does not satisfy the threshold, determining that the media presentation device is in a second state (e.g., turned off or powered down, etc.).

Examples disclosed herein provide tangible computer readable storage media having instruction that, when executed, cause a machine to generate a first set of weighted coefficients based on first audio received by first and second microphones at a first time. Disclosed example computer readable storage media have instructions that, when executed, further cause the machine to generate a second set of weighted coefficients based on second audio received by the first and second microphones at a second time after the first time. Disclosed example computer readable storage media have instructions that, when executed, further cause the machine to calculate a dot product between the first set of coefficients and the second set of coefficients. Disclosed example computer readable storage media have instructions that, when executed, further cause the machine to, when the calculated dot product satisfies a threshold, determine that the media presentation device is in a first state. Disclosed example computer readable storage media have instructions that, when executed, further cause the machine to, when the calculated dot product does not satisfy the threshold, determine that the media presentation device is in a second state.

Examples disclosed herein provide apparatus including a metering device. Disclosed example metering devices are to generate a first set of weighted coefficients based on first audio received by first and second microphones at a first time. Disclosed example metering devices are to generate a second set of weighted coefficients based on second audio received by the first and second microphones at a second time after the first time. Disclosed example metering devices are to calculate a dot product between the first set of coefficients and the second set of coefficients. Disclosed example metering devices are to, when the calculated dot product satisfies a threshold, determine that the media presentation device is in a first state. Disclosed example metering devices are to, when the calculated dot product does not satisfy the threshold, determine that the media presentation device is in a second state.

Examples disclosed herein provide methods of determining a source location for an audio signal. Disclosed example methods include processing a captured audio signal to generate a first set of weighted coefficients characterizing the captured audio signal. Disclosed example methods include comparing the first set of weighted coefficients to a second set of weighted coefficients representing a reference audio signal originating from a first location to generate a similarity value. Disclosed example methods include, when the similarity value satisfies a comparison threshold, identifying a source location of the captured audio signal as the first location. Disclosed example methods include, when the similarity value does not satisfy the comparison threshold, identifying the source location of the captured audio signal as a second location.

Examples disclosed herein provide a metering device including a processor particularly programmed to at least determine a source location for an audio signal by processing a captured audio signal to generate a first set of weighted coefficients characterizing the captured audio signal. The processor of the disclosed example metering device is programmed to at least determine a source location for an audio signal by comparing the first set of weighted coefficients to a second set of weighted coefficients representing a reference audio signal originating from a first location to generate a similarity value. The processor of the disclosed example metering device is programmed to at least determine a source location for an audio signal by, when the similarity value satisfies a comparison threshold, identifying a source location of the captured audio signal as the first location. The processor of the disclosed example metering device is programmed to at least determine a source location for an audio signal by, when the similarity value does not satisfy the comparison threshold, identifying the source location of the captured audio signal as a second location.

Examples disclosed herein include example systems and methods for determining whether or not the audio captured by a monitoring device is from a media presentation device of interest when measuring audience member exposure to media. In the examples disclosed herein, two microphones are separated by a fixed distance to monitor the audio present in a room. Audio emanating from different locations within the room create audio signals detected by the microphones that are time delayed with respect to each other and have different multi-path interference effects that are controlled by room acoustics as well as audio source location. In the examples disclosed herein, the differences between the audio signals are analyzed by an adaptive equalization algorithm using a finite impulse response (FIR) filter. The example filter taps or coefficients generated by applying the FIR filter constitute a feature vector (e.g., a set of coefficients) that characterizes the audio source (e.g., an identity and/or location of the audio source, etc.). In the examples disclosed herein, the set of coefficients obtained while the media presentation device is ON is used as a vector to uniquely identify future audio signals from the media presentation device as well as to reject audio signals from other sources. An example baseline (e.g., reference) vector is generated during an interval in which the audio from the media presentation device is confirmed by the successful extraction of watermarks embedded in the media presented by the media presentation device, for example.

Example Monitoring and Determination Systems

FIG. 1 depicts an example system 100, depicted in an example room 110 having a media presentation device 120 (e.g., a television, other display or monitor, etc.) including speakers 122, 124 providing audio 126 in the room 110. While the example of FIG. 1 depicts a typical room 110 in a household, the room 110 can be any space, public or private, including a home, restaurant, bar, vehicle, bus, boat, etc. The example system 100 includes an example metering device 130 including a pair of microphones 132 and 134, a source detector 136, a decoder 138, and a creditor 139.

The example source detector 136 of the metering device 130 determines a state of the example media presentation device 120. The metering device 130 of the illustrated example is disposed on or near the media presentation device 120 and may be adapted to perform one or more of a plurality of metering methods (e.g., channel detection, watermark detection, collecting signatures and/or codes, etc.) to collect data concerning the media exposure of the metering device 130, and thus, the media exposure of one or more audience member(s) 140, 142 with respect to the media presentation device 120.

Depending on the type(s) of metering that the metering device 130 is adapted to perform, the metering device 130 may be physically coupled to the media presentation device 120 or may instead be configured to capture signals emitted externally by the media presentation device 120 such that direct physical coupling to the media presentation device 120 is not required. For instance, in this example, the metering device 130 is not physically or electronically coupled to the monitored media presentation device 120. Instead, the metering device 130 is provided with at least one audio sensor, such as, for example, a microphone, to capture audio data regarding in-home media exposure for the audience member(s) 140, 142. Similarly, the example metering device 130 is configured to perform one or more of a plurality of metering methods (e.g., collecting watermarks, signatures and/or codes, etc.) on the collected audio to enable identification of the media to which the audience members 140, 142.

As shown in more detail in the example of FIG. 2, the metering device 130 is provided with two example microphones 132 and 134, separated by a distance D_m, to record an audio signal 126 from the media presentation device 120. The example media presentation device 120 (e.g., a television set) has two speakers 122 and 124. Both speakers 122 and 124 reproduce or emit the audio signal 126 that is sensed by the microphones 132 and 134. In a typical room 110, multiple reflections may occur and the resulting audio signal 126 sensed by microphones 132 and 134 represents the combined effect of a direct wave and these reflections. Similarly, audience members 140, 142 talking to each in the room 110 other can create audio signals 144, 146 that are sensed by the microphones 132 and 134, as direct waves and/or as reflections.

In order to identify a single audio signal for metering, the example source detector 136 uses an algorithm, such as an adaptive least mean square algorithm, to construct a finite impulse response (FIR) filter that attempts to convert the audio (e.g., the audio signal 126, 144, and/or 146) captured by the first microphone 132 to a new synthetic signal (also referred to herein as a filtered audio signal) that is as close as possible, in a least mean squared sense, to the audio captured by the second microphone 134. Coefficients or “filter taps” of the corresponding adaptive filter depend on, for example, a location of the audio/media source (e.g., the media presentation device 120, the audience members 140, 142, etc.) of audio (e.g., the audio signal 126, 144, and/or 146, etc.) within the room 110 (e.g., assuming there is a single source). For example, a media presentation device 120 (e.g., a television set, etc.) equipped with two or more speakers (e.g., the speakers 122, 124, etc.) is considered to be a single source such that substantially the same audio waveform emanates from the speakers 122, 124 connected to the media presentation device 120). Coefficients or “filter taps” of the corresponding adaptive filter also depend on, for example, a separation between the microphones (D_m). Coefficients or “filter taps” of the corresponding adaptive filter also depend on, for example, acoustic characteristics of the room 110 determined by walls and/or other objects in the room 110 (e.g., devices, furniture, etc.). The source detector 136 assumes microphone separation and acoustic characteristics are constant for the coefficients that characterize the audio source.

As described further below, an adaptive algorithm subtracts the filtered version of the audio signal 126 received by the microphone 132 from the audio signal 126 received by the microphone 134. An adaptive filter generates the filter taps or coefficients used in the adaptive algorithm to yield information about similarity (or lack thereof) between the audio signals received by the microphones 132, 134, wherein the signal from the microphone 132 is delayed and filtered and the signal from the microphone 134 is not. Once the audio has been processed, the audio (e.g., audio signal 126, 144, 146, etc.) can be analyzed to determine a likely source of that audio and its associated status.

The example metering device 130 includes a decoder 138 and a creditor 139 in addition to the source detector 136 and microphones 132, 134. The decoder 138 receives and decodes audio received by the microphones 132 and 134 to extract a watermark and/or other code from the received audio. The decoder 138 works with the source detector 136 to determine whether or not the received audio is associated with the media presentation device 120 or from other ambient sound sources, such as audience members 140, 142, audio from another device, etc. If the decoder 138 identifies a valid watermark, for example, then the creditor 139 captures an identification of the media exposure and/or other audience measurement data based on the decoded watermark, code, etc. In some examples, the watermark is associated with a score (e.g., a reliability score) indicating a strength of or confidence in the decoded watermark. In some examples, a volume analysis is done in conjunction with the watermark identification to confirm that the watermark has been generated by a nearby monitored source instead of from a source that is farther away (e.g., spillover). In some examples, a signature and/or other code can be computed from the audio instead of or in addition to the watermark (e.g., when a watermark is not identified in the audio, etc.). The creditor 139 may also assign a location identifier, timestamp, etc., to the decoded data.

In certain examples, a home processing system (not shown) may be in communication with the meter 130 to collect media/audience exposure data (e.g., watermark, signature, location, timestamp, etc.) from the metering device 130 for further analysis, relay, storage, etc. As shown in the example of FIG. 1, data gathered by the meter 130 (e.g., watermark, signature, location, timestamp, etc.) can be relayed (e.g., directly or via the home processing system, etc.) via a network 150 to an audience measurement entity (AME) 160, such as a data collection facility of a metering entity (e.g., The Nielsen Company (US), LLC) for further tracking, analysis, storage, reporting, etc. Data can be relayed to the AME 160 via the network 150 (e.g., the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network, a cellular network, etc.) via wired and/or wireless connections (e.g., a cable/DSL/satellite modem, a cell tower, etc.).

In the illustrated example of FIG. 1, the AME 160 includes a monitoring database 162 in which to store the information from the monitored room 110 and a server 164 to analyze data aggregated in the monitoring database 162. The example AME 160 may process and/or store data received from other metering device(s) (not shown) in addition to the metering device 130 such that a plurality of audience members can be monitored and evaluated. In another example, multiple servers and/or databases may be employed as desired.

For example, the example server 164 collects the media exposure data from the meter 130 and stores the collected media exposure data in the example monitoring database 162. The example server 164 processes the collected media exposure data by comparing the codes, metadata, and/or signatures in the collected media exposure data to reference codes and/or signatures in a reference database to identify the media and/or station(s) that transmit the media. Examples to process the codes and/or signatures in the collected media exposure data are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/473,670, filed on Aug. 29, 2014, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The example server 164 awards media exposure credits to media identified in the collected media exposure data, for example. In some examples, the media exposure credits are associated with demographic information corresponding to the audience member 140, 142 and/or type of audience member 140, 142 associated with the meter 130 that collected the media exposure data.

FIG. 3 illustrates an example implementation of the example source detector 136 of FIG. 2. In the illustrated example of FIG. 3, the example source detector 136 includes an adaptive audio filter 302, a weight adjuster 304, an audio comparator 306, and a state determiner 308. The example adaptive audio filter 302 samples audio received by the first microphone 132 at a specified sampling rate. In some examples, the adaptive audio filter 302 uses a 48 kHz sampling rate and uses 512 filter taps or weights (e.g., with values starting at zero and increasing based on signal delay). In such examples, the 512 filter taps or weights correspond to a maximum time delay of 10.66 milliseconds ( 1/48000 second per sample×512 samples). Because the microphones 132, 134 are close to one another (e.g., distance D_m) relative to a distance between the meter 130 and the potential audio sources 120, 140, 142, a delay of the audio signal 126 is below a maximum time delay value (e.g., 10.66 milliseconds). In some examples, other sampling rates, such as 24 kHz, may be used. In such examples, the filter weights used by the adaptive audio filter 302 become relatively constant values in, for example, less than a second from the start of the detected audio processing.

The set of weights (e.g., {W_m, m=0, 1, . . . M−1}, also referred to as a feature vector) generated by the weight adjuster 304 characterizes a particular source of audio. In some examples, filter weights are modified and/or generated by the weight adjuster 304 based on feedback from the audio comparator 306 and/or other external input regarding the audio signal 126.

The audio comparator 306 analyzes the filtered audio signal provided by the adaptive audio filter 302 from the microphone 132 and compares it to the unfiltered audio signal input from the microphone 134. An error signal, used to impact the set of filter coefficients, can be also generated by the audio comparator 306 based on the comparison. If the audio comparator 306 matches the filtered and unfiltered signals and determines that the filtered audio detected by the first microphone 132 is substantially the same as the unfiltered audio detected by the second microphone 134, the error signal decreases to a low value. If, however, the filtered audio from the first microphone 132 is distinct from the unfiltered audio from the second microphone 134, the error signal increases in value. An increase in the error signal can trigger a re-calculation of the filter weight coefficients by the adaptive audio filter 302 to help ensure that the filtered audio from the microphone 132 matches the unfiltered audio from the microphone 134 and properly characterizes the audio source. The coefficients characterizing that audio source can then be compared to a reference to determine whether the audio source is the media presentation device 120 or is some other source of audio (e.g., people 140, 142 talking, ambient noise, another device emitting sound in the same room and/or another room, etc.).

In the illustrated example of FIG. 3, the adaptive audio filter 302 and/or the audio comparator 306 examines the filter coefficient distribution to help ensure that the filter taps or weights generated by the weight adjuster 304 have a decay characteristic (e.g., in which coefficient weights “decay” or reduce to zero over time). In the illustrated example, audio received by the second microphone 134 is delayed relative to the audio received by the first microphone 132 when the media presentation device 120 is the source of audio (e.g., the audio 126 of FIG. 1) because the first microphone 132 is relatively closer (in the example of FIG. 1) to the media presentation device 120 than the second microphone 134. Phrased differently, a relative delay between audio detected by the first and second microphones 132, 134 is dependent on the location of the meter 130 relative to the media presentation device 120. In some examples, the relative delay is based is also based on multiple sound wave paths in a room (e.g., the room 110 of FIG. 1) due to walls and other objects that contribute to acoustic reflections.

The example weight adjuster 304 generates and/or updates a set of filter coefficients having a magnitude that exponentially decreases as the index increases (e.g., a decay characteristic). An example filter weight distribution corresponding to filter weights that indicate that measured audio matches characteristics of audio emitted by the monitored presentation device 120, and, therefore, indicate that the monitored media presentation device 120 is turned on is shown in FIG. 4.

As shown in the example of FIG. 4, an example filter weight distribution 402 includes a plot of a plurality of filter weight coefficients 404 along an index 406, such as time (e.g., milliseconds), sample, etc. Individual weights 408-413 along the distribution form the set of filter coefficients used as a feature vector to represent the audio and calculate similarity between the audio signal and a reference vector.

The example audio comparator 306 of FIG. 3 calculates a signal error between the audio signal received by the first microphone 132 and then filtered and the audio signal received by the second microphone 134. As described above, if the audio comparator 306 matches the filtered and unfiltered signals and determines that the filtered audio detected by the first microphone 132 is substantially the same as to the unfiltered audio detected by the second microphone 134, the error signal has a low value (e.g., close to zero), and the associated weight coefficients can be used for analysis. If, however, the filtered audio from the first microphone 132 is distinct from the unfiltered audio from the second microphone 134, the error signal has a high value (e.g., one), and associated weight coefficients may be unsuitable for analysis. The example weight adjuster 304 adjusts and/or recalculates the weighted coefficients generated by the adaptive audio filter 302 based on the error signal till the filtered and unfiltered signals match and can then be compared to a reference to determine whether the monitored presentation device 120 is the source of the detected audio (and is therefore inferred to be “on” or “off”, for example).

For example, filter weight coefficients are determined by an echo cancellation algorithm, described further below with respect to FIG. 6, so that, if the microphone 132 output is filtered using these coefficients and added to the microphone 134 signal, the net result is a very low energy audio output. Under ideal conditions, signals from 132 (filtered) and 134 (unfiltered) should perfectly cancel one another. In reality, however, the difference between filtered and unfiltered microphone inputs should be close to zero if the signals from 132 and 134 are both indicative of audio from the media presentation device 120.

In an example, suppose a difference in signals between microphone 132 and microphone 134 is a constant delay equivalent to ten samples. In this example, an FIR filter includes a single high value at a tenth coefficient and remaining filter coefficients are zero. However, room acoustics may complicate the filter coefficient analysis (e.g., remaining filter coefficients may be low but not exactly zero). Thus, in such an example, results include a primary audio “beam” with a delay of ten samples when measured at microphone 132 relative to microphone 134. The primary beam provides a high value coefficient at index 10 (e.g., corresponding to the delay of ten samples) followed by several smaller coefficients at indexes 11, 12, etc.

After the inputs from microphones 132 and 134 have been compared to reconcile the audio and generate the set of filter coefficients, the example audio comparator 306 provides the set of filter coefficients to the example state determiner 308. The state determiner 308 compares the set of filtered coefficients associated with the received audio signal 126 to a stored representation (e.g., a reference set of filter coefficients) of a reference signal indicating that the media presentation device 120 is turned on. If the received audio signal 126 matches or closely approximates characteristics of the reference signal (e.g., based on a comparison of the coefficient sets resulting in generation of a similarity value), then the state determiner 308 infers that the media presentation device 120 is turned on and outputting the audio 126. That is, characteristics of the audio signal 126, as identified by its set of filter coefficients, indicate a location of source for the audio signal 126 that matches a predetermined or “known” location of the media presentation device 120 as indicated by the reference set of filter coefficients.

Otherwise, the state determiner 308 infers that the media presentation device 120 is turned off or is otherwise not outputting detectable audio (e.g., is muted, the volume is turned down past a detectable threshold, etc.). Thus, a source of the audio detected by the microphones 132, 134 is other than the media presentation device 120. In some examples, as described further below, a mathematical operation such as a dot product determines a similarity of characteristics between the weight coefficients of the detected audio and reference coefficients. In some examples, reference coefficients can be recalculated by the weight adjuster 304 to accommodate a re-positioning of the media presentation device 120, an introduction of a new audio source in the room 110, etc. Recalculation or recalibration of reference coefficients can be based on one or more factors such as a time period without detecting audio having similar coefficients to the reference, identification of a valid watermark having a high reliability score, passage of a defined period of time (e.g., based on statistical analysis of prior media exposure data, household characteristic, etc.), etc.

When the meter 130 is extracting audio watermarks embedded in the detected audio, the state determiner 308 infers that the media presentation device 120 is likely the source (or a significant contributor) of the detected audio. As mentioned above, periodically and/or at certain defined times (e.g., as preset in the source detector 136, based on accuracy of watermark detection, based on quality of feedback, etc.), the example state determiner 308 stores filter coefficients generated by the example adaptive audio filter 302 and weight adjuster 304 during respective intervals as baseline (e.g., reference) filter coefficients {W_m1, m=0, 1, . . . M−1}.

In some examples, if the state determiner 308 determines that the baseline filter coefficients generated by the weight adjuster 304 do not exhibit a decay characteristic (e.g., decreasing as the index increases), the example adapter audio filter 302 and the example audio comparator 306 interchange the audio signals received by the first and second microphones 132 and 134 (e.g., so that now the signal received at the second microphone 134 is filtered and the signal received at the first microphone 132 remains unfiltered) and rerun the adaptation algorithm to obtain a more suitable set of baseline coefficients that exhibit a decay characteristic. The signals are interchanged to correct an assumption in relative position and delay between the media presentation device 120 and the microphones 132 and 134. For example, the filter coefficients generated by the weight adjuster 304 may not exhibit a decay characteristic when the signal from microphone 132 is processed relative to the signal from microphone 134 because the relative positions of the microphones 132, 134 with respect to the media presentation device 120 are such that audio received by the first microphone 132 is delayed relative to audio received by the second microphone 134 (rather than the initial assumption that audio received from microphone 134 is delayed with respect to audio received by microphone 132).

In some examples, when the media presentation device 120 is turned off, there may be other sources of audio in the room 110, such as audience members 140, 142 talking to each other. In such examples, the weight adjuster 304 generates a new or updated set of coefficients {W_m2, m=0, 1, . . . M−1} for the audio 144, 146. FIG. 5 shows filter coefficients generated by the weight adjuster 304 corresponding to filter weights that indicate that measured audio does not match characteristics of audio emitted by the monitored presentation device, and, therefore, the monitored media presentation device is turned down or off in such an example.

As shown in the example of FIG. 5, an example filter weight distribution 502 includes a plot of a plurality of filter weight coefficients 504 along an index 506, such as time (e.g., milliseconds), sample, etc. Individual weights 508-513 along the distribution form the set of filter coefficients used as a feature vector to represent the audio and calculate similarity between the audio signal and a reference vector.

Based on the filter weight coefficients from the weight adjuster 304 and signal comparison by the audio comparator 306, the state determiner 308 determines whether or not the monitored media presentation device 120 is 1) turned on or 2) turned off, down, or muted such that no audio signal 126 can be detected by the microphones 132, 134.

FIG. 6 shows an example filter apparatus 600 which can be included, for example, in the source detector 136 of the metering device 130 (e.g., illustrated in FIGS. 1-3) to help identify a source of audio detected by the microphones 132, 134 of the metering device 130. As shown in the example of FIG. 6, the example filter apparatus 600 can be used to implement all or part of the adaptive audio filter 302, weight adjuster 304, and audio comparator 306. The example filter apparatus 600 shown in FIG. 6 implements an adaptive echo cancellation algorithm and is configured to subtract a filtered version of detected audio recorded by the first microphone 132 from the detected audio recorded by the second microphone 134. In some examples, the microphones 132, 134 may also have picked up other ambient audio, including the human speech 144, 146.

As disclosed in more detail below, the adaptive filter 600 (e.g., an adaptive Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filter, etc.) generates filter coefficients or taps which, upon analysis, yield information about a similarity between the audio signals detected by the microphones 132, 134. Depending on a location of the source, the audio received by the microphone 134 may be delayed relative to the audio received by the microphone 132, or vice versa. In some examples, multiple sound wave paths exist due to reflections from walls and other objects in the room. Therefore, in order to subtract the effect of the audio detected by the first microphone 132 from the audio detected by second microphone 134, a FIR filter is used to delay and/or attenuate the audio detected by the first microphone 132, for example.

In the example illustrated in FIG. 6, audio samples 602 received by the microphone 132 are passed through a delay line 604, which includes a set of M shift registers D. In the illustrated example, X_M−1, is a most recent sample, and X₀is an oldest sample. An output Y₀of the filter is shown in Equation 1 below:

$\begin{matrix} Y_{o} = \sum_{m = 0}^{m = M - 1} W_{m} X_{m} . & Equation 1 \end{matrix}$

In Equation 1 above, {W_m, m=0, 1, . . . M−1} are weights whose initial values are set to 0. The set of weights may define a feature or reference vector. A current unfiltered input sample of audio 606 from the second microphone 134 is X_d. In the illustrated example of FIG. 6, by summing 608 the weighted audio samples X_M−1to X₀as shifted using shift registers D, the filter apparatus 600 operates to make the output Y₀of the filter from the audio sample 602 of microphone 132 approximate the current input sample X_dfrom microphone 134 (e.g., Y₀≈X_d).

To verify the approximation, a difference 610 is obtained in comparing the filter output Y₀to X_dto generate a difference signal X_eindicative of an error in the approximation. For example, if Y₀≈X_d, then X_eshould be at or near 0. However, if Y₀≈X_d, then X_ewill be greater than 0. To help ensure that the approximation of Y₀to X_dholds true, the weights W_M−1, W_M−2, W_M, . . . , W₀are adjusted 612 to new values based on an error signal X_egenerated, for example, as shown in Equations 2 and 3 below:

X_e(n)=X_d(n)−Y₀(n) Equation 2;
W_m(n+1)=W_m(n)+μX_eX_m(n) Equation 3.

In Equations 2 and 3 above, an index n is an iteration index denoting a time, indicated in sample counts, at which the modification in weights is made, and μ is a learning factor that is usually set to a low value (e.g., 0.05, etc.) in the illustrated example. This learning factor gradually minimizes a least mean squared (LMS) error in the output comparison as the filter output converges over the n iterations.

In certain examples, to determine a state (e.g., turned on or turned off) of the media presentation device 120, the example state determiner 308 calculates a dot product between a reference vector of filter coefficients and a comparison vector of filter coefficients {W_m1, W_m2} and compares the result (e.g., referred to as a similarity value, comparison value, etc.) to a threshold (e.g., 0.5, etc.):

$\begin{matrix} A \cdot B = \sum_{m = 0}^{m = M - 1} A_{m} B_{m} = A_{0} B_{0} + A_{1} B_{1} + \dots A_{M - 1} B_{M - 1} . & Equation 4 \end{matrix}$

The dot product (e.g., shown in Equation 4 between corresponding M coefficients of vectors A and B) or other similar mathematical comparison between a) a known reference set of coefficients indicative of audio characteristics from an audio source (e.g., the media presentation device 120) at a particular location in the room 110 and b) a second set of coefficients indicative of audio characteristics from a captured audio signal determines whether or not the captured audio originated from the same source as the reference audio (e.g., whether the audio signal 126 came from the media presentation device 120 or was instead generated by another source such as people 140, 142 in the room 110, etc.). If the analysis determines that the audio signal 126 originated from the media presentation device 120, then it can be inferred that the media presentation device 120 is turned on. Otherwise, it can be inferred that the media presentation device 120 is turned off or muted or turned down such that audio is not detectable from the media presentation device 120 by the microphones 132, 134. Audio that does not emanate from the media presentation device 120 is not metered, for example.

In the illustrated example, the threshold for dot product comparison may be specified (e.g., by a user, by a programmer, based on feedback from another application, etc.) to achieve a desired level of accuracy in identifying whether the media presentation device 120 is “ON” or “OFF”. If the result of the dot product satisfies (e.g., is greater than) the threshold, the example state determiner 308 determines that the media presentation device 120 is ON. For example, if the media presentation device 120 is ON, the result of the dot product may be close to 1.0 (e.g., assuming that the meter 130 has not been moved since the baseline coefficients were last calculated). If the result of the dot product does not satisfy (e.g., is less than) the threshold, the example state determiner 308 determines that the media presentation device 120 is OFF.

In certain examples, the dot product is calculated by converting each set of filter coefficients to a unit vector. Thus, the set of filter coefficients can be normalized for comparison between a comparison vector of measured filter coefficients and a reference vector of known filter coefficients. The unit vector or “normalized vector” represents a spatial direction in n-dimensional space. Then, the dot product is calculated using the unit vectors to determine an output in a range between negative one and positive one (−1.0 to +1.0). This output can be used to identify or otherwise characterize a source of the audio signal 126 and, extension, determine whether the monitored media presentation device 120 is outputting detectable audio (e.g., is turned on) or is not outputting detectable audio (e.g., is turned off or has its volume turned down or muted such that the media presentation device 120 is not outputting audio detectable by the meter 130).

The dot product or “scalar product” of two unit vectors in n-dimensional space is a scalar value calculated from a sum of the products of the corresponding n elements in each of the two unit vectors. If the two unit vectors are distinct unit vectors (e.g., orthogonal in n-dimensional space), then their dot product is zero. However, if the two unit vectors are identical, then their dot product is one. Therefore, two unit vectors that are different will have almost no dot product (e.g., close to 0), while two unit vectors that are the same or similar will have a dot product close to +1.0.

For example, suppose a reference vector obtained when the media presentation device 120 is confirmed “on”, such as the example set of filter coefficients from the example of FIG. 4, is represented as reference vector R={900, 100, −300, 0, 0, 0}. A first comparison filter coefficient vector C1={910, 120, −310, 0, 0, 0}. A second comparison filter coefficient vector, modeled after the example filter coefficients in the example of FIG. 5, C2={100, 0, 0, −200, 100, 200}.

In certain examples, coefficient vectors are normalized or converted to unit vectors as follows: u=v/|v|, where u represents the unit vector, v represents the original vector, and |v| represents a magnitude of the vector v. For the first comparison vector C1, its unit vector can be determined as follows (values truncated for purposes of the illustrative example):

|C1|=√{square root over ((910)²+(120)²+(−310)²+0+0+0)}=968.81, and

- Unit vector CU1={910/968.81, 120/968.81, −310/968.81, 0, 0, 0}.
  
  For the second comparison vector C2, its unit vector can be determined as follows:
  
  |C2|=√{square root over ((100)²+0+0+(−200)²+(100)²+(200)²)}=316.23,
  and
  Unit vector CU2={100/316.23,0,0,−200/316.23,100/316.23,200/316.23}.
  
  For the reference vector R, its unit vector can be determined as follows:
  
  |R|=√{square root over ((900)²+(100)²+(−300)²+0+0+0)}=953.94, and
  Unit vector RU={900/953.94,100/953.94,−300/953.94,0,0,0}.

Using the above example values and Equation 4, a dot product of RU and CU1 can be computed as follows:

RU·CU1=(910/968.81*900/953.94)+(120/968.81*100/953.94)+(−310/968.81*−300/953.94)+0+0+0=0.999798.

Comparing the dot product result to the example threshold of 0.5 shows that the dot product of RU and CU1 is greater than the threshold of 0.5 and close to 1.0. As described above, such a result indicates that the audio signal 126 is emanating from the media presentation device 120, and, therefore, the media presentation device 120 is inferred to be turned on.

Similarly, a dot product of coefficient unit vector CU2 and reference unit vector RU can be determined as follows:

$RU \cdot CU 2 = (100 / 316.23 * 900 / 9 5 3.9 4) + (0 * 100 / 9 5 3.9 4) + (0 * - 300 / 95 3.9 4) + (- 2 0 0 / 3 16.23 * 0) + (1 0 0 / 3 16.23 * 0) + (2 0 0 / 3 16.23 * 0) = 0.30 .$

Comparing the dot product result to the example threshold of 0.5 shows that the dot product of RU and CU2 is less than the threshold of 0.5 and close to 0. As described above, such a result indicates that the audio signal 126 is not emanating from the media presentation device 120, and, therefore, the media presentation device 120 is inferred to be turned off, turned down, or muted so as to not be detectable by the microphones 132, 134.

In the illustrated example, the weight adjuster 304 generates a new set of baseline filter coefficients W_m1periodically and/or occasionally (e.g., every thirty seconds, every thirty minutes, upon receiving feedback from the decoder 138, creditor 139, and/or AME 160 for bad or otherwise inaccurate result, etc.). For example, the weight adjuster 304 can generate a new reference vector of filter coefficients periodically, in response to a certain number or time period of “off” determinations, in response to a confirmed watermark extraction, etc. For example, the weight adjuster 304 can periodically recalibrate by calculating the reference vector of filter coefficients when a watermark analysis confirms that the media presentation device 120 is turned “on” and emitting valid audio data. The baseline or reference coefficients W_m1may be stored for use by the adaptive audio filter 302, the audio comparator 306, and the state determiner 308 in subsequent audio signal analysis and dot product computation, for example.

FIG. 7 shows an example implementation of the state determiner 308 shown and described above with respect to the example of FIG. 3. As shown in the example of FIG. 7, the example state determiner 308 includes a comparison vector 702, a reference vector 704, a coefficient comparator 706, and a state machine 708 to receive filter weight coefficients from the audio comparator 306, determine a status or operating state of the monitored media presentation device 120, and output the determined device state to the decoder 138 and/or creditor 139, as described above with respect to FIGS. 1-3.

As described above, after the inputs from microphones 132 and 134 have been compared to reconcile the audio and generate the set of filter coefficients, the example audio comparator 306 provides a comparison set of filter coefficients to the example state determiner 308. The set of coefficients forms the comparison vector 702 (e.g., converted to a unit vector as described above). The state determiner 308 receives a baseline or reference set of vector coefficients (e.g., from a known or confirmed “on” state of the media presentation device) from the weight adjuster 304 and/or otherwise stores reference coefficients as the reference vector 704 (e.g., converted to a unit vector as described above). The coefficient comparator 706 compares the comparison vector 702 to the reference vector 704 to determine if the filter weight characteristics of the currently captured audio are similar to the reference characteristics of the “known” media presentation device 120 audio. For example, a dot product of the comparison vector 702 and the reference vector 704 yields a value indicative of the similarity or dissimilarity between the comparison vector 702 and the reference vector 704 (and, thereby, the current audio signal 126 and the previously evaluated reference audio signal).

Based on the similarity value determined by the coefficient comparator 706, the state machine 708 infers and/or otherwise determines a state or status of the monitored media presentation device 120. For example, if the similarity value indicates that the comparison vector 702 and the reference vector 704 are identical or similar (e.g., a dot product of the vectors 702, 704 is greater than a threshold (0.5, for example), such as near 1.0), then the state machine 708 indicates or infers that the monitored media presentation device 120 is turned on and is the source of the detected audio signal 126. However, if the similarity value indicates that the comparison vector 702 and the reference vector 704 are not similar (e.g., a dot product of the vectors 702, 704 is less than the threshold, such as near 0), then the state machine 708 indicates or infers that the monitored media presentation device 120 is turned off or is otherwise not outputting detectable audio (e.g., is muted, the volume is turned down past a detectable threshold, etc.). Thus, a source of the audio detected by the microphones 132, 134 is other than the media presentation device 120. The state of the media presentation device 120 provided by the state machine 708 (e.g., on, off, etc.) is sent to the decoder 138 and/or creditor 139 to further process or not process the detected audio (e.g., to process the audio signal 126 from the media presentation device 120 to extract a watermark, calculate a signature, and/or otherwise determine media exposure data, for example).

While an example manner of implementing the source detector 136 and filter apparatus 600 are illustrated in FIGS. 1-3 and 6-7, one or more of the elements, processes and/or devices illustrated in FIGS. 1-3 and 6-7 may be combined, divided, re-arranged, omitted, eliminated and/or implemented in any other way. Further, the example adaptive audio filter 302, the example weight adjuster 304, the example audio comparator 306, the example state determiner 308, and/or, more generally, the example source detector 136 and/or example filter apparatus 600 of FIGS. 1, 2, 3, and 6-7 may be implemented by hardware, software, firmware and/or any combination of hardware, software and/or firmware. Thus, for example, any of the example adaptive audio filter 302, the example weight adjuster 304, the example audio comparator 306, the example state determiner 308, and/or, more generally, the example source detector 136 and/or the filter apparatus 600 can be implemented by one or more analog or digital circuit(s), logic circuits, programmable processor(s), application specific integrated circuit(s) (ASIC(s)), programmable logic device(s) (PLD(s)) and/or field programmable logic device(s) (FPLD(s)). When reading any of the apparatus or system claims of this patent to cover a purely software and/or firmware implementation, at least one of the example adaptive audio filter 302, the example weight adjuster 304, the example audio comparator 306, the example state determiner 308, and the example filer apparatus 600 is/are hereby expressly defined to include a tangible computer readable storage device or storage disk such as a memory, a digital versatile disk (DVD), a compact disk (CD), a Blu-ray disk, etc. storing the software and/or firmware. Further still, the example source detector 136 and filter apparatus 600 of FIGS. 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 may include one or more elements, processes and/or devices in addition to, or instead of, those illustrated in FIGS. 1-3 and 6-7, and/or may include more than one of any or all of the illustrated elements, processes and devices.

Example Monitoring and Determination Methods

Flowcharts representative of example machine readable instructions for implementing the example source detector 136 and filter apparatus 600 of FIGS. 1-3 and 6-7 are shown in FIGS. 8-10. In this example, the machine readable instructions comprise a program for execution by a processor such as the processor 1112 shown in the example processor platform 1100 discussed below in connection with FIG. 11. The program may be embodied in software stored on a tangible computer readable storage medium such as a CD-ROM, a floppy disk, a hard drive, a digital versatile disk (DVD), a Blu-ray disk, or a memory associated with the processor 1112, but the entire program and/or parts thereof could alternatively be executed by a device other than the processor 1112 and/or embodied in firmware or dedicated hardware. Further, although the example program is described with reference to the flowcharts illustrated in FIGS. 8-10, many other methods of implementing the example source detector 136 and filter apparatus 600 of FIGS. 1-3 and 6-7 may alternatively be used. For example, the order of execution of the blocks may be changed, and/or some of the blocks described may be changed, eliminated, or combined.

As mentioned above, the example processes of FIGS. 8-10 may be implemented using coded instructions (e.g., computer and/or machine readable instructions) stored on a tangible computer readable storage medium such as a hard disk drive, a flash memory, a read-only memory (ROM), a compact disk (CD), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a cache, a random-access memory (RAM) and/or any other storage device or storage disk in which information is stored for any duration (e.g., for extended time periods, permanently, for brief instances, for temporarily buffering, and/or for caching of the information). As used herein, the term tangible computer readable storage medium is expressly defined to include any type of computer readable storage device and/or storage disk and to exclude propagating signals and to exclude transmission media. As used herein, “tangible computer readable storage medium” and “tangible machine readable storage medium” are used interchangeably. Additionally or alternatively, the example processes of FIGS. 8-10 may be implemented using coded instructions (e.g., computer and/or machine readable instructions) stored on a non-transitory computer and/or machine readable medium such as a hard disk drive, a flash memory, a read-only memory, a compact disk, a digital versatile disk, a cache, a random-access memory and/or any other storage device or storage disk in which information is stored for any duration (e.g., for extended time periods, permanently, for brief instances, for temporarily buffering, and/or for caching of the information). As used herein, the term non-transitory computer readable medium is expressly defined to include any type of computer readable storage device and/or storage disk and to exclude propagating signals and to exclude transmission media. As used herein, when the phrase “at least” is used as the transition term in a preamble of a claim, it is open-ended in the same manner as the term “comprising” is open ended.

FIG. 8 is a flow diagram representative of example machine readable instructions 800 that may be executed to implement a monitoring and audience measurement process including the example metering device 130 of FIG. 1 and its components (see, e.g., FIGS. 1, 2, 3, and 6-7). At block 802, a reference vector of filter coefficients is determined as part of a calibration of the source detector 136 for audio monitoring in the room 110. For example, the echo cancellation algorithm of Equations 1-3 and the adaptive filter apparatus 600 are applied by the example adaptive audio filter 302 (FIG. 3) to known audio captured from each of the plurality of microphones 132, 134. As disclosed above with respect to FIGS. 1-7, a baseline or reference vector (e.g., such as the reference vector 704 of the example of FIG. 7) of filter coefficients is generated by the source detector 136 (e.g., the example weight adjuster 304 of the example of FIG. 3) for use in determining an identity and/or location of an audio source (e.g., the media presentation device 120, audience member 140, and/or audience member 142).

At block 804, the example metering device 130 (FIG. 1) monitors the room 110 to detect and capture audio via multiple microphones 132 and 134. For example, microphones 132, 134 in the example meter 130 operate to capture audio 126, 144, and/or 146 audible within range of the microphones 132, 134 in the room 110.

In some examples, before advancing to block 806, captured audio is analyzed to identify a watermark in the captured audio signal. If a watermark is found, then, the watermark information can be used to identify media content associated with the audio (e.g., at block 814 below). In some examples, a reliability score associated with the watermark can also be evaluated to determine whether the watermark is reliable enough for use in media identification. For example, if a watermark is detected from audio emanating from another device in an adjacent room (e.g., a device other than the monitored media presentation device 120), then the distance (and its associated noise affect) from the metering device 130 and its microphones 132, 134 can result in an inadvertently detected watermark with a low reliability score.

Alternatively or in addition to the reliability score, a volume level of the captured audio signal can be analyzed to determine whether the watermark has been detected in an audio signal near the metering device 130 or far from the metering device 130 (e.g., is originating from the monitored media presentation device 120 near the metering device 130 or is originating from another device away from the metering device 130).

In such examples, upon determination of a low score, low volume, etc., associated with a detected watermark, further analysis of the audio signal can then proceed to block 806 as described below. Additionally, if no watermark is identified in the captured audio, then analysis moves to block 806 below.

At block 806, the example source detector 136 (FIG. 1) (and its adaptive audio filter 302, weight adjuster 304, and audio comparator 306 (FIG. 3)) processes the captured audio signal to generate a comparison vector (e.g., such as the comparison vector 702 of the example of FIG. 7). For example, the echo cancellation algorithm of Equations 1-3 and the adaptive filter apparatus 600 are applied to the audio captured from each of the plurality of microphones 132, 134. As disclosed above with respect to FIGS. 1-7, a vector of filter coefficients is generated by the source detector 136 for comparison against the reference vector to determine whether or not the captured audio is generated by the media presentation device 120 and/or by another ambient source such as the audience members 140, 142.

At block 808, the example source detector 136 (FIG. 1) (and its audio comparator 306 (FIG. 3)) compares the comparison vector for the captured audio signal to the reference vector to generate a similarity value. For example, a dot product is computed between the comparison vector coefficients and the reference vector coefficients to determine a similarity or difference between the vectors. Such a similarity or difference in the audio filter coefficients is indicative of a location of origin for the audio signal, allowing the example source detector 136 to determine whether a likely source for the audio signal 126 is or is not the media presentation device 120, for example.

If the captured audio is determined to be emanating from the “known” location of the media presentation device 120, then the dot product comparison yields a value of approximately 1.0, indicating a similarity between the vectors. At block 810, such a result processed by the example state determiner 308 indicates that the media presentation device 120 is turned “on” and the audio matches the characteristics of sound coming from the media presentation device 120 (e.g., audio 126 from the television).

If the captured audio is determined to be ambient audio (e.g., emanating from an audience member 140, 142 and/or other unidentified source such as a device in an adjacent room, etc.), then the dot product comparison yields a value of well below 0.5, indicating that the vectors are dissimilar. At block 812, such a result processed by the example state determiner 308 indicates that the media presentation device 120 is turned “off” (or has been muted or has the volume set too low to be detectable by the microphones, etc.). In some examples, if the media presentation device 120 is determined to be “off”, then the creditor 139 of the example metering device 130 discards, ignores, and/or marks as invalid the captured audio signal and associated information (e.g., timestamp, erroneous code, etc.).

At block 814, if the media presentation device 120 is determined to be on, then the example metering device 130 analyzes the captured audio. For example, the metering device 130 extracts a watermark from the captured audio signal. Alternatively or in addition, the example metering device 130 can process the audio signal to determine a signature for further analysis, for example. For example, the example decoder 138 decodes the captured audio signal to identify a watermark embedded in the audio signal and/or process the captured audio signal to compute a signature associated with the signal in the absence of a watermark. Identification of the watermark and processing of a signature from the captured audio signal may occur in conjunction with the AME 160 as well as with the decoder 138 and creditor 139 of the example meter 130, for example.

At block 816, media exposure information is logged based on the signal analysis (e.g., based on the identified watermark and/or computed signature information). For example, based on the identification of the extracted watermark, the example creditor 139 captures an identification of the media exposure based on the decoded watermark. The creditor 139 may also assign a location identifier, timestamp, etc., to the decoded data. The creditor 139 may transmit and/or otherwise work in conjunction with the AME 160 via the network 150, for example.

At block 818, results of the comparison of vectors at block 708 are evaluated to determine whether reference vector coefficients should be recalibrated. For example, changed conditions in the room 110 (e.g., additional audience members 140, 142, moved furniture, repositioning of the media presentation device 120, etc.) can affect the coefficients indicating the location of the media presentation device 120 and the distinction between the media presentation device 120 and other ambient audio sources (e.g., audience member 140, 142, etc.). In some examples, the example state determiner 308 may determine whether or not to trigger a recalibration of the reference vector based on the available information.

Alternatively or in addition to evaluating the vector comparison, recalibration of the reference coefficients can be triggered based on confirmation of a valid watermark in the captured audio signal. For example, as described above, identification of a watermark in a captured audio signal and computation of a score associated with the watermark to determine its reliability can validate that the media presentation device 120 is turned on and is outputting an audio signal 126 indicative of media content exposed to the room 110. Thus, the operating state of the monitored media presentation device 120 and the validity of its audio output can be automatically determined and used to periodically verify or recalculate the reference vector of filter weight coefficients. Such automated recalibration can be conducted continuously, after passage of a certain period of time, triggered based on a consecutive number of dissimilar results, etc.

At block 820, if recalibration is triggered (e.g., based on the results of the comparison, based on an accurate extraction and identification of watermark data, triggered upon request, etc.), then weighted filter coefficients for the reference vector are re-calculated using an adaptive echo cancellation algorithm such as the filter algorithm of Equations 1-3 and the adaptive filter apparatus 600 of FIG. 6, which is applied to an updated known audio sample (e.g., program audio generated when the media presentation device 120 is known to be turned on) captured from each of the plurality of microphones 132, 134.

At block 822, state information is evaluated by the state determiner 308 to determine whether monitoring is to continue. For example, state information for the metering device 130 and/or instructions from the AME 160 are evaluated by the example state determiner 308 to determine whether to continue monitoring for audio from the media presentation device 120 in the room 110. If the example state determiner 308 determines that monitoring is to continue, then control returns to block 804 to monitor for a new audio signal. Otherwise, if the example state determiner 308 determines that monitoring is not to continue, then the example process 800 ends.

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram representative of example machine readable instructions that may be executed to implement the example filter apparatus 600 of FIG. 6 and block 802 of the example process 800 of FIG. 8 to process incoming audio to calculate filter taps or coefficients for comparison to determine a state of the media presentation device 120 (FIG. 1). While the example process of FIG. 9 as shown provides additional detail regarding execution of block 802 of the example process 800 of FIG. 8 to provide a reference vector, the example process of FIG. 9 can also be applied to generate a comparison vector (block 806) of comparison filter weight coefficients and/or to recalibrate reference vector coefficients (block 820) for audio signal analysis, for example.

At block 902, audio samples are received. For example, audio samples 602 are received by the example microphone 132. At block 904, the received audio samples are processed. For example, audio samples 602 received by the microphone 132 are passed through a delay line 604 such that M samples are shifted by a delay D. In the illustrated example, X_M−1is a most recent sample, and X₀is an oldest sample. An output Y₀is summed from samples as weighted by a reference set of coefficients {W_m, m=0,1, . . . M−1} using Equation 1 applied to the filter apparatus 600.

At block 906, the processed audio samples from the first microphone are compared to audio samples acquired from a second microphone. For example, the output Y₀is subtracted from audio sample(s) X_d606 received by the example microphone 134. Thus, if the summed total of the weighted audio samples X_M−1to X₀(as shifted using shift registers D) approximately matches the audio sample Xd, a difference between X_dand Y₀is approximately zero.

At block 908, the difference between X_dand Y₀is evaluated to determine whether the difference is approximately zero or is significantly greater than zero. At block 910, if the difference is approximately zero, then weights in the reference vector may remain unchanged. If, however, the difference is greater than a threshold above zero, then, at block 912, weights in the reference vector (e.g., W_M−1, W_M−2, W_M, . . . , W₀) are adjusted to new values based on Equations 2 and 3 disclosed above. For example, movement of the media presentation device 120, presence of audience members 140, 142, presence of furniture, etc., in the room 110 may result in a change in sound characteristics that affects the weights in the reference vector and trigger adjustment of reference vector weights.

At block 914, the reference vector is made available for use. For example, if weights were adjusted at block 912, the updated reference vector is made available for use in determining the state (e.g., identity, on/off status, location, etc.) of the media presentation device 120 in the monitored room 110.

FIG. 10 is a flow diagram representative of example machine readable instructions that may be executed to implement the example source detector 136 of FIGS. 1-3 and its components (e.g., the adaptive audio filter of FIG. 6 and the state determiner of FIG. 7) to determine a state of the media presentation device 120 (FIG. 1). The example process of FIG. 10 provides additional and/or related detail regarding execution of block 808 of the example process 800 of FIG. 8.

Initially, at block 1002, a baseline set of weighted coefficients W_m1is received. For example, a reference vector, such as example reference vector 704, is received from the example weight adjuster 304 (FIG. 3), which generates the vector based on audio received by the first and second microphones 132, 134 (FIGS. 1-3) at a first time (e.g., using Equations 1-3 as disclosed above in connection with FIG. 6). At block 1004, a current set of weighted coefficients W_m2is received. For example, a comparison vector, such as the example comparison vector 702, is received from the weight adjuster 304, which generates the vector based on audio received by the first and second microphones 132, 134, at a second time after the first time.

At block 1006, the example audio comparator 306 calculates a dot product between W_m1and W_m2. For example, as described above with respect to Equation 4 and FIG. 3, vectors W_m1and W_m2are converted to unit vectors and analyzed according to a dot product and/or other mathematical calculation. At block 1008, the example state determiner 308 determines if the result of the dot product satisfies (e.g., is greater than) a threshold.

If the result of the dot product satisfies the threshold (e.g., is close to 1.0), then, at block 1010, the media presentation device 120 is determined to be “ON”. That is, based on the result of the dot product, the example state determiner 308 determines that the media presentation device 120 is ON. Based on the determination that the media presentation device 120 is ON, program control continues to block 810.

Otherwise, if the result of the dot product does not satisfy the threshold (e.g., is close to zero), at block 1012, the media presentation device 120 is determined to be “OFF”. That is, based on the result of the dot product, the example state determiner 308 determines that the media presentation device 120 is OFF. Based on the determination that the media presentation device 120 is OFF (or is otherwise not generating detectable audio), program control continues to block 812.

FIG. 11 is a block diagram of an example processor platform 1100 capable of executing the instructions of FIGS. 8-10 to implement the example source detector 136 (and its components) of FIGS. 1-3 and 6-7. The processor platform 1100 can be, for example, a server, a personal computer, a mobile device (e.g., a cell phone, a smart phone, a tablet such as an iPad™), a personal digital assistant (PDA), an Internet appliance, a DVD player, a CD player, a digital video recorder, a Blu-ray player, a gaming console, a personal video recorder, a set top box, or any other type of computing device.

The processor platform 1100 of the illustrated example includes a processor 1112. The processor 1112 of the illustrated example is hardware. For example, the processor 1112 can be implemented by one or more integrated circuits, logic circuits, microprocessors or controllers from any desired family or manufacturer. In the illustrated example, the processor 1112 is structures to include the example adaptive audio filter 302, the example weight adjuster 304, the example audio comparator 306, and the example state determiner 308 of the example source detector 136.

The processor 1112 of the illustrated example includes a local memory 1113 (e.g., a cache). The processor 1112 of the illustrated example is in communication with a main memory including a volatile memory 1114 and a non-volatile memory 1116 via a bus 1118. The volatile memory 1114 may be implemented by Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (SDRAM), Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), RAMBUS Dynamic Random Access Memory (RDRAM) and/or any other type of random access memory device. The non-volatile memory 1116 may be implemented by flash memory and/or any other desired type of memory device. Access to the main memory 1114, 1116 is controlled by a memory controller.

The processor platform 1100 of the illustrated example also includes an interface circuit 1120. The interface circuit 1120 may be implemented by any type of interface standard, such as an Ethernet interface, a universal serial bus (USB), and/or a PCI express interface.

In the illustrated example, one or more input devices 1122 are connected to the interface circuit 1120. The input device(s) 1122 permit(s) a user to enter data and commands into the processor 1112. The input device(s) can be implemented by, for example, an audio sensor, a microphone, a camera (still or video), a keyboard, a button, a mouse, a touchscreen, a track-pad, a trackball, isopoint and/or a voice recognition system.

One or more output devices 1124 are also connected to the interface circuit 1120 of the illustrated example. The output devices 1124 can be implemented, for example, by display devices (e.g., a light emitting diode (LED), an organic light emitting diode (OLED), a liquid crystal display, a cathode ray tube display (CRT), a touchscreen, a tactile output device, a printer and/or speakers). The interface circuit 1120 of the illustrated example, thus, typically includes a graphics driver card, a graphics driver chip or a graphics driver processor.

The interface circuit 1120 of the illustrated example also includes a communication device such as a transmitter, a receiver, a transceiver, a modem and/or network interface card to facilitate exchange of data with external machines (e.g., computing devices of any kind) via a network 1126 (e.g., an Ethernet connection, a digital subscriber line (DSL), a telephone line, coaxial cable, a cellular telephone system, etc.).

The processor platform 1100 of the illustrated example also includes one or more mass storage devices 1128 for storing software and/or data. Examples of such mass storage devices 1128 include floppy disk drives, hard drive disks, compact disk drives, Blu-ray disk drives, RAID systems, and digital versatile disk (DVD) drives.

Coded instructions 1132 representing the flow diagrams of FIGS. 8-10 may be stored in the mass storage device 1128, in the volatile memory 1114, in the non-volatile memory 1116, and/or on a removable tangible computer readable storage medium such as a CD or DVD.

From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that examples have been disclosed which allow a meter 130 (FIG. 1) to distinguish between measurable content and ambient sound to determine an operating state of a media presentation device and improve accuracy of audience measurement. Because the meter 130 can automatically and autonomously monitor, analyze, and determine operating state and validity of monitored data, additional devices, panelist involve, and external oversight can be avoided, resulting in increased accuracy and robustness as well as convenience.

Although certain example methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture have been disclosed herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the claims of this patent.

Claims

1. An apparatus to determine a source of an audio signal captured by a microphone, the apparatus comprising: memory to store instructions; andat least one processor to execute the instructions to at least: calibrate a reference vector of coefficients for audio monitoring using a known audio sample from a location;compare a comparison vector of coefficients for the audio signal captured at the location to the reference vector of coefficients to generate a similarity value;evaluate the similarity value and the comparing of the comparison vector of coefficients to the reference vector of coefficients to determine reliability of the reference vector of coefficients; andwhen the evaluation determines that the reference vector of coefficients is unreliable, trigger recalibration of the reference vector of coefficients using an updated known audio sample.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the coefficients of the reference vector are filter coefficients generated from the known audio sample captured using a plurality of microphones.
3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the coefficients of the reference vector are weighted.
4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the coefficients of the comparison vector are filter coefficients generated from the captured audio signal captured using a plurality of microphones.
5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the coefficients of the reference vector are weighted.
6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the comparing of the comparison vector of coefficients and the reference vector of coefficients includes computing a dot product between the comparison vector of coefficients and the reference vector of coefficients to generate the similarity value.
7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the comparison vector of coefficients is generated from the captured audio signal using echo cancellation and an adaptive filter.
8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein recalibration of the reference vector of coefficients is to be triggered by identification of a watermark in the captured audio signal.
9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the reference vector of coefficients is determined to be unreliable based on at least one of a period of time or a number of dissimilar results indicated by the similarity value below a threshold.
10. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising instructions that, when executed, cause at least one processor to at least: calibrate a reference vector of coefficients for audio monitoring using a known audio sample from a location;compare a comparison vector of coefficients for an audio signal captured at the location to the reference vector of coefficients to generate a similarity value;evaluate the similarity value and the comparing of the comparison vector of coefficients to the reference vector of coefficients to determine reliability of the reference vector of coefficients; andwhen the evaluation determines that the reference vector of coefficients is unreliable, trigger recalibration of the reference vector of coefficients using an updated known audio sample.
11. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to generate the coefficients of the reference vector as filter coefficients from the known audio sample captured using a plurality of microphones.
12. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to weight the coefficients of the reference vector.
13. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to generate the coefficients of the comparison vector as filter coefficients from the audio signal captured at the location using a plurality of microphones.
14. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to weight the coefficients of the reference vector.
15. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to compare the comparison vector of coefficients and the reference vector of coefficients by computing a dot product between the comparison vector of coefficients and the reference vector of coefficients to generate the similarity value.
16. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to generate the comparison vector of coefficients from the captured audio signal using echo cancellation and an adaptive filter.
17. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to trigger recalibration of the reference vector of coefficients by identification of a watermark in the captured audio signal.
18. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to determine that the reference vector of coefficients is unreliable based on at least one of a period of time or a number of dissimilar results indicated by the similarity value below a threshold.
19. A method to determine a source of an audio signal captured by a microphone, the method comprising: calibrating a reference vector of coefficients for audio monitoring using a known audio sample from a location;comparing a comparison vector of coefficients for an audio signal captured at the location to the reference vector of coefficients to generate a similarity value;evaluating the similarity value and the comparing of the comparison vector of coefficients to the reference vector of coefficients to determine reliability of the reference vector of coefficients; andwhen the evaluation determines that the reference vector of coefficients is unreliable, triggering recalibration of the reference vector of coefficients using an updated known audio sample.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein comparing the comparison vector of coefficients and the reference vector of coefficients includes computing a dot product between the comparison vector of coefficients and the reference vector of coefficients to generate the similarity value.
21. The method of claim 19 wherein triggering recalibration of the reference vector of coefficients includes triggering by identification of a watermark in the captured audio signal.
22. The method of claim 19, further including generating the comparison vector of coefficients from the captured audio signal using echo cancellation and an adaptive filter.

RELATED APPLICATION

This patent claims the benefit of U.S. Non Provisional application Ser. No. 15/925,360, entitled “Methods and Apparatus to Determine a State of a Media Presentation Device,” which was filed on Mar. 19, 2018, which claims priority to U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 14/926,885, entitled “Methods and Apparatus to Determine a State of a Media Presentation Device,” which was filed on Oct. 29, 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/142,771, entitled “Methods and Apparatus to Determine a State of a Media Presentation Device,” which was filed on Apr. 3, 2015. These applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (502)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
1988621	Hansell	Jan 1935	A
2558754	Horn et al.	Jul 1951	A
2855993	Rahmel	Oct 1958	A
2903508	Hathaway	Sep 1959	A
3056135	Currey et al.	Sep 1962	A
3142820	Daniels	Jul 1964	A
3281695	Bass	Oct 1966	A
3315160	Goodman	Apr 1967	A
3351910	Miller	Nov 1967	A
3483327	Schwartz	Dec 1969	A
3633112	Anderson	Jan 1972	A
3651471	Haselwood et al.	Mar 1972	A
3733430	Thompson et al.	May 1973	A
3742359	Behymer	Jun 1973	A
3803349	Watanabe	Apr 1974	A
3906454	Martin	Sep 1975	A
3947624	Miyake	Mar 1976	A
4027332	Wu et al.	May 1977	A
4044376	Porter	Aug 1977	A
4058829	Thompson	Nov 1977	A
4107734	Percy et al.	Aug 1978	A
4245245	Matsumoto et al.	Jan 1981	A
4382291	Nakauchi	May 1983	A
4388644	Ishman et al.	Jun 1983	A
4546382	McKenna et al.	Oct 1985	A
4566030	Nickerson et al.	Jan 1986	A
4574304	Watanabe et al.	Mar 1986	A
4605958	Machnik et al.	Aug 1986	A
4613904	Lurie	Sep 1986	A
4622583	Watanabe et al.	Nov 1986	A
4626904	Lurie	Dec 1986	A
4642685	Roberts et al.	Feb 1987	A
4644393	Smith et al.	Feb 1987	A
4644509	Kiewit et al.	Feb 1987	A
4647964	Weinblatt	Mar 1987	A
4652915	Heller, III	Mar 1987	A
4695879	Weinblatt	Sep 1987	A
4697209	Kiewit et al.	Sep 1987	A
4718106	Weinblatt	Jan 1988	A
4723302	Fulmer et al.	Feb 1988	A
4728930	Grote et al.	Mar 1988	A
4764808	Solar	Aug 1988	A
4769697	Gilley et al.	Sep 1988	A
4779198	Lurie	Oct 1988	A
4800437	Hosoya	Jan 1989	A
4807031	Broughton et al.	Feb 1989	A
4876736	Kiewit	Oct 1989	A
4885632	Mabey et al.	Dec 1989	A
4907079	Turner et al.	Mar 1990	A
4912552	Allison, III et al.	Mar 1990	A
4918516	Freeman	Apr 1990	A
4930011	Kiewit	May 1990	A
4931865	Scarampi	Jun 1990	A
4943963	Waechter et al.	Jul 1990	A
4955000	Nastrom	Sep 1990	A
4955070	Welsh et al.	Sep 1990	A
4965825	Harvey et al.	Oct 1990	A
4972471	Gross et al.	Nov 1990	A
4972503	Zurlinden	Nov 1990	A
4990892	Guest et al.	Feb 1991	A
5023929	Call	Jun 1991	A
5081680	Bennett	Jan 1992	A
5097328	Boyette	Mar 1992	A
5103675	Komninos	Apr 1992	A
5119104	Heller	Jun 1992	A
5136644	Audebert et al.	Aug 1992	A
5146231	Ghaem et al.	Sep 1992	A
5165069	Vitt et al.	Nov 1992	A
5226090	Kimura	Jul 1993	A
5226177	Nickerson	Jul 1993	A
5235414	Cohen	Aug 1993	A
5251324	McMullan, Jr.	Oct 1993	A
5285498	Johnston	Feb 1994	A
5294981	Yazolino et al.	Mar 1994	A
5319453	Copriviza et al.	Jun 1994	A
5335277	Harvey et al.	Aug 1994	A
5355161	Bird et al.	Oct 1994	A
5382970	Kiefl	Jan 1995	A
5387993	Heller et al.	Feb 1995	A
5398055	Nonomura et al.	Mar 1995	A
5404161	Douglass et al.	Apr 1995	A
5404172	Berman et al.	Apr 1995	A
5404377	Moses	Apr 1995	A
5408258	Kolessar	Apr 1995	A
5425100	Thomas et al.	Jun 1995	A
5442343	Cato et al.	Aug 1995	A
5457807	Weinblatt	Oct 1995	A
5473631	Moses	Dec 1995	A
5481294	Thomas et al.	Jan 1996	A
5483276	Brooks et al.	Jan 1996	A
5488408	Maduzia et al.	Jan 1996	A
5505901	Harney et al.	Apr 1996	A
5512933	Wheatley et al.	Apr 1996	A
5550928	Lu et al.	Aug 1996	A
5564088	Saitoh	Oct 1996	A
5574962	Fardeau et al.	Nov 1996	A
5579124	Aijala et al.	Nov 1996	A
5581800	Fardeau et al.	Dec 1996	A
5583776	Levi et al.	Dec 1996	A
5594934	Lu et al.	Jan 1997	A
5629739	Dougherty	May 1997	A
5630203	Weinblatt	May 1997	A
5640144	Russo et al.	Jun 1997	A
5646675	Copriviza et al.	Jul 1997	A
5659367	Yuen	Aug 1997	A
5692215	Kutzik et al.	Nov 1997	A
5760760	Helms	Jun 1998	A
5767922	Zabih et al.	Jun 1998	A
5771307	Lu et al.	Jun 1998	A
5774876	Woolley et al.	Jun 1998	A
5787334	Fardeau et al.	Jul 1998	A
5793409	Tetsumura	Aug 1998	A
5801747	Bedard	Sep 1998	A
5812930	Zavrel	Sep 1998	A
5815114	Speasl et al.	Sep 1998	A
5839050	Baehr et al.	Nov 1998	A
5872588	Aras et al.	Feb 1999	A
5874724	Cato	Feb 1999	A
5884278	Powell	Mar 1999	A
5889548	Chan	Mar 1999	A
5893093	Wills	Apr 1999	A
5894331	Yang	Apr 1999	A
5896554	Itoh et al.	Apr 1999	A
5963844	Dail	Oct 1999	A
5980246	Ramsay et al.	Nov 1999	A
5982808	Otto	Nov 1999	A
6002918	Heiman et al.	Dec 1999	A
6035177	Moses et al.	Mar 2000	A
6049286	Forr	Apr 2000	A
6054950	Fontana	Apr 2000	A
6078672	Saunders et al.	Jun 2000	A
6091956	Hollenberg	Jul 2000	A
6098048	Dashefsky et al.	Aug 2000	A
6124877	Schmidt	Sep 2000	A
6137539	Lownes et al.	Oct 2000	A
6154548	Bizzan	Nov 2000	A
6175634	Graumann	Jan 2001	B1
6177931	Alexander et al.	Jan 2001	B1
6184918	Goldschmidt Iki et al.	Feb 2001	B1
6243739	Schwartz et al.	Jun 2001	B1
6252522	Hampton et al.	Jun 2001	B1
6272176	Srinivasan	Aug 2001	B1
6286140	Ivanyi	Sep 2001	B1
6292943	Shin et al.	Sep 2001	B1
6297859	George	Oct 2001	B1
6308328	Bowcutt et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6311214	Rhoads	Oct 2001	B1
6317854	Watanabe	Nov 2001	B1
6359557	Bilder	Mar 2002	B2
6380988	Sung	Apr 2002	B1
6388662	Narui et al.	May 2002	B2
6396413	Hines et al.	May 2002	B2
6400996	Hoffberg et al.	Jun 2002	B1
6421445	Jensen et al.	Jul 2002	B1
6424264	Giraldin et al.	Jul 2002	B1
6430498	Maruyama et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6433689	Hovind et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6446261	Rosser	Sep 2002	B1
6457010	Eldering et al.	Sep 2002	B1
6463413	Applebaum et al.	Oct 2002	B1
6467089	Aust et al.	Oct 2002	B1
6470264	Bide	Oct 2002	B2
6477508	Lazar et al.	Nov 2002	B1
6484316	Lindberg	Nov 2002	B1
6487719	Itoh et al.	Nov 2002	B1
6493649	Jones et al.	Dec 2002	B1
6497658	Roizen et al.	Dec 2002	B2
6519769	Hopple et al.	Feb 2003	B1
6523175	Chan	Feb 2003	B1
6529212	Miller et al.	Mar 2003	B2
6542878	Heckerman et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6563423	Smith	May 2003	B2
6563430	Kemink et al.	May 2003	B1
6567978	Jarrell	May 2003	B1
6570559	Oshima	May 2003	B1
6577238	Whitesmith et al.	Jun 2003	B1
6614987	Ismail et al.	Sep 2003	B1
6647212	Toriumi et al.	Nov 2003	B1
6647548	Lu et al.	Nov 2003	B1
6654800	Rieger, III	Nov 2003	B1
6675383	Wheeler et al.	Jan 2004	B1
6681396	Bates et al.	Jan 2004	B1
6697628	Green et al.	Feb 2004	B1
6703918	Kita	Mar 2004	B1
6707762	Goodman et al.	Mar 2004	B1
6731942	Nageli	May 2004	B1
6738044	Holzrichter et al.	May 2004	B2
6748317	Maruyama et al.	Jun 2004	B2
6766524	Matheny et al.	Jul 2004	B1
6788704	Lindsay	Sep 2004	B1
6791472	Hoffberg	Sep 2004	B1
6842877	Robarts et al.	Jan 2005	B2
6862541	Mizushima	Mar 2005	B2
6882837	Fernandez et al.	Apr 2005	B2
6888457	Wilkinson et al.	May 2005	B2
6890285	Rahman et al.	May 2005	B2
6898434	Pradhan et al.	May 2005	B2
6917686	Jot et al.	Jul 2005	B2
6919803	Breed	Jul 2005	B2
6928280	Xanthos et al.	Aug 2005	B1
6934508	Ceresoli et al.	Aug 2005	B2
6940403	Kail, IV	Sep 2005	B2
6946803	Moore	Sep 2005	B2
6954745	Rajan	Oct 2005	B2
6958710	Zhang et al.	Oct 2005	B2
6967674	Lausch	Nov 2005	B1
6970131	Percy et al.	Nov 2005	B2
6983225	Sprogis et al.	Jan 2006	B2
7038619	Percy et al.	May 2006	B2
7046162	Dunstan	May 2006	B2
7047548	Bates et al.	May 2006	B2
7051352	Schaffer	May 2006	B1
7076441	Hind et al.	Jul 2006	B2
7076733	Smith	Jul 2006	B2
7080061	Kabala	Jul 2006	B2
7099676	Law et al.	Aug 2006	B2
7100181	Srinivasan et al.	Aug 2006	B2
7102615	Marks	Sep 2006	B2
7126454	Bulmer	Oct 2006	B2
7130797	Beaucoup et al.	Oct 2006	B2
7148803	Bandy et al.	Dec 2006	B2
7150030	Eldering et al.	Dec 2006	B1
7155159	Weinblatt et al.	Dec 2006	B1
7171331	Vock et al.	Jan 2007	B2
7222071	Neuhauser et al.	May 2007	B2
7284255	Apel et al.	Oct 2007	B1
7295108	Corrado et al.	Nov 2007	B2
7295114	Drzaic et al.	Nov 2007	B1
7343615	Nelson et al.	Mar 2008	B2
7363028	de Clerq et al.	Apr 2008	B2
7373820	James	May 2008	B1
7411631	Joshi et al.	Aug 2008	B1
7428310	Park	Sep 2008	B2
7460827	Schuster et al.	Dec 2008	B2
7463143	Forr et al.	Dec 2008	B2
7471987	Crystal et al.	Dec 2008	B2
7483975	Kolessar et al.	Jan 2009	B2
7555766	Kondo et al.	Jun 2009	B2
7587728	Wheeler et al.	Sep 2009	B2
7587732	Wright et al.	Sep 2009	B2
7627139	Marks et al.	Dec 2009	B2
7640141	Kolessar et al.	Dec 2009	B2
7647604	Ramaswamy	Jan 2010	B2
7665104	Maehara et al.	Feb 2010	B2
7668188	Chang et al.	Feb 2010	B2
7680653	Yeldener	Mar 2010	B2
7712114	Ramaswamy	May 2010	B2
7739705	Lee et al.	Jun 2010	B2
7739718	Young et al.	Jun 2010	B1
7760248	Marks et al.	Jul 2010	B2
7769757	Grefenstette et al.	Aug 2010	B2
7786987	Nielsen	Aug 2010	B2
7792660	Iyengar	Sep 2010	B2
7793316	Mears et al.	Sep 2010	B2
7796516	Todd et al.	Sep 2010	B2
7882514	Nielsen et al.	Jan 2011	B2
7880613	Maeng	Feb 2011	B1
7920713	Wells et al.	Apr 2011	B2
7954120	Roberts et al.	May 2011	B2
7958526	Wheeler et al.	Jun 2011	B2
7962929	Oddo et al.	Jun 2011	B1
8046798	Schlack et al.	Oct 2011	B1
8060372	Topchy et al.	Nov 2011	B2
8065703	Wilson et al.	Nov 2011	B2
8108888	Ramaswamy	Jan 2012	B2
8156517	Nielsen	Apr 2012	B2
8180712	Nelson et al.	May 2012	B2
8189748	Susama et al.	May 2012	B2
8239887	Gilboa et al.	Aug 2012	B2
8245249	Lee	Aug 2012	B2
8249992	Harkness et al.	Aug 2012	B2
8260927	Coronado	Sep 2012	B2
8266644	Randolph et al.	Sep 2012	B2
8295217	Kone et al.	Oct 2012	B2
8345620	Chen et al.	Jan 2013	B2
8526626	Nielsen et al.	Sep 2013	B2
8549552	Ramaswamy et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8699723	Fried et al.	Apr 2014	B2
8738763	Crystal et al.	May 2014	B2
8793717	Lee	Jul 2014	B2
8810392	Teller et al.	Aug 2014	B1
8826314	Wang et al.	Sep 2014	B2
8855101	Chen	Oct 2014	B2
8863166	Harsh et al.	Oct 2014	B2
8885842	Chen	Nov 2014	B2
9021516	Nielsen	Apr 2015	B2
9027043	Johnson	May 2015	B2
9094710	Lee et al.	Jul 2015	B2
9118960	Nielsen	Aug 2015	B2
9191704	Nielsen	Nov 2015	B2
9197930	Lee	Nov 2015	B2
9219969	Nielsen	Dec 2015	B2
9264748	Nielsen	Feb 2016	B2
9473795	Stokes et al.	Oct 2016	B2
9924224	Srinivasan et al.	Mar 2018	B2
20020010919	Lu et al.	Jan 2002	A1
20020012353	Gerszberg et al.	Jan 2002	A1
20020015112	Nagakubo et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020026635	Wheeler et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020056087	Berezowski et al.	May 2002	A1
20020057893	Wood et al.	May 2002	A1
20020059218	August et al.	May 2002	A1
20020059577	Lu et al.	May 2002	A1
20020068556	Brown	Jun 2002	A1
20020072952	Hamzy et al.	Jun 2002	A1
20020077880	Gordon et al.	Jun 2002	A1
20020080286	Dagtas et al.	Jun 2002	A1
20020083435	Blasko et al.	Jun 2002	A1
20020097885	Birchfield et al.	Jul 2002	A1
20020141730	Haken	Oct 2002	A1
20020144259	Gutta et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020150387	Kunii et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020166119	Cristofalo	Nov 2002	A1
20020174425	Markel et al.	Nov 2002	A1
20020198762	Donato	Dec 2002	A1
20030033600	Cliff et al.	Feb 2003	A1
20030040272	Lelievre et al.	Feb 2003	A1
20030046685	Srinivasan et al.	Mar 2003	A1
20030054757	Kolessar et al.	Mar 2003	A1
20030056215	Kanungo	Mar 2003	A1
20030067459	Lim	Apr 2003	A1
20030070182	Pierre et al.	Apr 2003	A1
20030093784	Dimitrova et al.	May 2003	A1
20030093790	Logan et al.	May 2003	A1
20030097302	Overhultz et al.	May 2003	A1
20030101449	Bentolila et al.	May 2003	A1
20030110485	Lu et al.	Jun 2003	A1
20030115591	Weissmueller, Jr. et al.	Jun 2003	A1
20030122708	Percy et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030126593	Mault	Jul 2003	A1
20030131350	Peiffer et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030136827	Kaneko et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030146871	Karr et al.	Aug 2003	A1
20030171833	Crystal et al.	Sep 2003	A1
20030177488	Smith et al.	Sep 2003	A1
20030194004	Srinivasan	Oct 2003	A1
20030208754	Sridhar et al.	Nov 2003	A1
20030216120	Ceresoli et al.	Nov 2003	A1
20030222819	Karr et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20030222820	Karr et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20040003073	Krzyzanowski et al.	Jan 2004	A1
20040003394	Ramaswamy	Jan 2004	A1
20040019675	Hebeler, Jr. et al.	Jan 2004	A1
20040025174	Cerrato	Feb 2004	A1
20040027271	Schuster et al.	Feb 2004	A1
20040039855	Bohrer et al.	Feb 2004	A1
20040055020	Delpuch	Mar 2004	A1
20040058675	Lu et al.	Mar 2004	A1
20040072577	Myllymaki et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040073615	Darling	Apr 2004	A1
20040073915	Dureau	Apr 2004	A1
20040073918	Ferman et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040088212	Hill	May 2004	A1
20040088721	Wheeler et al.	May 2004	A1
20040095276	Krumm et al.	May 2004	A1
20040100437	Hunter et al.	May 2004	A1
20040117816	Karaoguz et al.	Jun 2004	A1
20040122679	Neuhauser et al.	Jun 2004	A1
20040181799	Lu et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040198386	Dupray	Oct 2004	A1
20040210922	Peiffer et al.	Oct 2004	A1
20040218701	Singh et al.	Nov 2004	A1
20040233126	Moore	Nov 2004	A1
20040266457	Dupray	Dec 2004	A1
20050006466	Overhultz et al.	Jan 2005	A1
20050035857	Zhang et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050054285	Mears et al.	Mar 2005	A1
20050057550	George	Mar 2005	A1
20050060740	Stecyk	Mar 2005	A1
20050125820	Nelson et al.	Jun 2005	A1
20050141345	Holm et al.	Jun 2005	A1
20050144632	Mears et al.	Jun 2005	A1
20050172311	Hjelt et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050200476	Forr et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050201826	Zhang et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050203798	Jensen et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050204379	Yamamori	Sep 2005	A1
20050207592	Sporer et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050216509	Kolessar et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050221774	Ceresoli et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050234774	Dupree	Oct 2005	A1
20050243784	Fitzgerald et al.	Nov 2005	A1
20050244011	Kim	Nov 2005	A1
20050244012	Asada	Nov 2005	A1
20050264430	Zhang et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20050277401	Watabe	Dec 2005	A1
20050286860	Conklin	Dec 2005	A1
20060053110	McDonald et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060062401	Neervoort et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060075421	Roberts et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060075428	Farmer et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060080314	Hubert et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060093998	Vertegaal	May 2006	A1
20060109384	Miller-Smith et al.	May 2006	A1
20060168613	Wood et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060171474	Ramaswamy et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060184780	Yamada et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060195857	Wheeler et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060204012	Marks et al.	Sep 2006	A1
20060209632	Goodman et al.	Sep 2006	A1
20060212895	Johnson	Sep 2006	A1
20060225106	Bedingfield, Jr.	Oct 2006	A1
20060232575	Nielsen	Oct 2006	A1
20070005301	Iyengar	Jan 2007	A1
20070006275	Wright et al.	Jan 2007	A1
20070011040	Wright et al.	Jan 2007	A1
20070018708	Yoo	Jan 2007	A1
20070050832	Wright et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070055987	Lu et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070061830	Chang	Mar 2007	A1
20070063850	Devaul et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070186228	Ramaswamy et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070192782	Ramaswamy	Aug 2007	A1
20070250901	Mcintire et al.	Oct 2007	A1
20070266395	Lee et al.	Nov 2007	A1
20070288277	Neuhauser et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20070288476	Flanagan, III et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20070288628	Sadovsky et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20070294057	Crystal et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20070294132	Zhang et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20070294705	Gopalakrishnan et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20070294706	Neuhauser et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20080028427	Nesvadba et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080059988	Lee et al.	Mar 2008	A1
20080091087	Neuhauser et al.	Apr 2008	A1
20080101454	Luff et al.	May 2008	A1
20080112574	Brennan et al.	May 2008	A1
20080130906	Goldstein et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080148307	Nielsen et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080148309	Wilcox et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080154858	Manavoglu et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080204273	Crystal et al.	Aug 2008	A1
20080276265	Topchy et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20080300700	Hammer et al.	Dec 2008	A1
20090037575	Crystal et al.	Feb 2009	A1
20090055170	Nagahama	Feb 2009	A1
20090064252	Howarter et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090070797	Ramaswamy et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090133058	Kouritzin et al.	May 2009	A1
20090141908	Jeong et al.	Jun 2009	A1
20090169024	Krug et al.	Jul 2009	A1
20090192805	Topchy et al.	Jul 2009	A1
20090225994	Topchy et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20090259325	Topchy et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090260027	Weinblatt	Oct 2009	A1
20090265729	Weinblatt	Oct 2009	A1
20090285409	Yoshizawa et al.	Nov 2009	A1
20090296526	Amada	Dec 2009	A1
20100083299	Nelson et al.	Apr 2010	A1
20100162285	Cohen et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100169908	Nielsen	Jul 2010	A1
20100199296	Lee et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100211967	Ramaswamy et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100303254	Yoshizawa et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20110016231	Ramaswamy et al.	Jan 2011	A1
20110019835	Schmidt et al.	Jan 2011	A1
20110055577	Candelore et al.	Mar 2011	A1
20110061088	Rieger et al.	Mar 2011	A1
20110091055	LeBlanc	Apr 2011	A1
20110110531	Klefenz et al.	May 2011	A1
20110122258	Masuda	May 2011	A1
20110126222	Wright et al.	May 2011	A1
20110239253	West et al.	Sep 2011	A1
20120020486	Fried et al.	Jan 2012	A1
20120102515	Ramaswamy	Apr 2012	A1
20120102518	Wheeler et al.	Apr 2012	A1
20120120218	Flaks et al.	May 2012	A1
20120124602	Tan et al.	May 2012	A1
20120142378	Kim	Jun 2012	A1
20120148058	Chen	Jun 2012	A1
20120148067	Petersen et al.	Jun 2012	A1
20120159529	Nielsen	Jun 2012	A1
20120169359	Kim et al.	Jul 2012	A1
20120219156	Ramaswamy et al.	Aug 2012	A1
20120304212	Lee	Nov 2012	A1
20120307877	Delbecq	Dec 2012	A1
20130034244	Van Raalte et al.	Feb 2013	A1
20130084056	Harsh et al.	Apr 2013	A1
20130121499	Li et al.	May 2013	A1
20130160042	Stokes et al.	Jun 2013	A1
20130166050	Duwenhorst	Jun 2013	A1
20130232517	Reis Dos Santos	Sep 2013	A1
20130238276	Vock et al.	Sep 2013	A1
20130312019	McMillan	Nov 2013	A1
20140007153	Nielsen et al.	Jan 2014	A1
20140059579	Vinson et al.	Feb 2014	A1
20140126746	Shin et al.	May 2014	A1
20140150001	McMillan	May 2014	A1
20140250448	Nielsen	Sep 2014	A1
20140259039	Nielsen	Sep 2014	A1
20140270195	Nielsen	Sep 2014	A1
20140282640	Nielsen	Sep 2014	A1
20140282663	Lee	Sep 2014	A1
20140302773	Jantunen et al.	Oct 2014	A1
20140380349	Shankar et al.	Dec 2014	A1
20150006286	Liu et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150052541	Chen	Feb 2015	A1
20150052542	Reis dos Santos et al.	Feb 2015	A1
20150195592	Nielsen	Jul 2015	A1
20150319491	Nielsen	Nov 2015	A1
20160100265	Maggiore et al.	Apr 2016	A1
20180213281	Srinivasan et al.	Jul 2018	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (88)

Number	Date	Country
2006279518	Feb 2007	AU
2777579	Nov 2012	CA
1244982	Feb 2000	CN
1882961	Dec 2006	CN
101419437	Apr 2009	CN
201331687	Oct 2009	CN
102981418	Mar 2013	CN
3401762	Aug 1985	DE
283570	Sep 1988	EP
593202	Apr 1994	EP
946012	Sep 1999	EP
1133090	Sep 2001	EP
1160772	Dec 2001	EP
1213860	Jun 2002	EP
1318679	Jun 2003	EP
1411326	Apr 2004	EP
1574964	Sep 1980	GB
2260246	Apr 1993	GB
2292506	Feb 1996	GB
63084396	Apr 1988	JP
8331482	Dec 1996	JP
2000224617	Aug 2000	JP
2000307520	Nov 2000	JP
2000307530	Nov 2000	JP
2003061027	Feb 2003	JP
2003125102	Apr 2003	JP
2003279400	Oct 2003	JP
2005020233	Jan 2005	JP
2005322262	Nov 2005	JP
2006194700	Jul 2006	JP
2006215774	Aug 2006	JP
2006254297	Sep 2006	JP
4219749	Feb 2009	JP
2010171606	May 2010	JP
2010257278	Nov 2010	JP
2012507904	Mar 2012	JP
2012095014	May 2012	JP
2012242214	Dec 2012	JP
200020000288	Jan 2002	KR
100911679	Aug 2009	KR
1020040004648	Aug 2009	KR
20100048338	May 2010	KR
20120131826	Jun 2012	KR
20120131826	Dec 2012	KR
8810540	Dec 1988	WO
9111062	Jul 1991	WO
9115062	Oct 1991	WO
9411989	May 1994	WO
9512278	May 1995	WO
9526106	Sep 1995	WO
9731440	Aug 1997	WO
9810539	Mar 1998	WO
9832251	Jul 1998	WO
9933206	Jul 1999	WO
9955057	Oct 1999	WO
9959275	Nov 1999	WO
38360	Jun 2000	WO
72484	Nov 2000	WO
111506	Feb 2001	WO
131816	May 2001	WO
145103	Jun 2001	WO
161892	Aug 2001	WO
219581	Mar 2002	WO
2052759	Jul 2002	WO
2097791	Dec 2002	WO
3049339	Jun 2003	WO
3052552	Jun 2003	WO
3060630	Jul 2003	WO
2003077455	Sep 2003	WO
3087871	Oct 2003	WO
2004051303	Jun 2004	WO
2004051304	Jun 2004	WO
2005032145	Apr 2005	WO
2005038625	Apr 2005	WO
2005041166	May 2005	WO
2005055601	Jun 2005	WO
2005065159	Jul 2005	WO
2005079457	Sep 2005	WO
2006012629	Feb 2006	WO
2006020560	Feb 2006	WO
2006037014	Apr 2006	WO
2006096177	Sep 2006	WO
2006121681	Nov 2006	WO
2007022250	Feb 2007	WO
2007120518	Oct 2007	WO
2008033136	Mar 2008	WO
2010049809	May 2010	WO
2011115945	Sep 2011	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (262)

Entry
Schuman, Evan. “Smarter Smart Cart?” [online]. Storefront Backtalk, Feb. 16, 2005 [retrieved on Nov. 20, 2006], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.storefrontbacktalk.com>. (5 pages).
“American Technology Corporation—Retailer Ads—AM & FM Sounds”, [online]. Woody Norris, May 4, 2004 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.woodynorris.com>. (3 pages).
“Arbitron & Scarborough Unveil New Mall Shopper Audience Measurement”, [online], Streamline Media Inc., Jun. 22, 2007 [retrieved in 2007], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.radioink.com>. (2 pages).
“Arkon Sound Feeder II FM Transmitter”, [online], Yahoo Shopping, 2002 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://store.yahoo.com/semsons-inc/arsoundfeedii.html>. (2 pages).
“Cricket Project”, “Cricket v2 User Manual,” MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Cambridge, U.S.A., Jan. 2005 (57 pages).
“Discovery Spy Motion Tracking System”, [online]. Discovery Communications Inc., 2004 [retrieved on Sep. 14, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://shopping.discovery.com/stores/servlel/Produc!Display?catalogId=10000&storeId=10000&lanlan=-1 &productId=53867&partnumber=689638>. (3 pages).
“Dust Networks—SmartMesh”, [online]. Dust Networks Inc., 2002 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.dustnetworks.com>. (2 pages).
“Eltek GenII Radio Data Logging System”, [online], Eltek Lid., 2004 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.elteckdataloggers.co.uk>. (4 pages).
“FM Wireless Microphone Module Kits”, [online]. Horizon Industries, 2004 [retrieved on Sep. 30, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.horizonindustries.com/fm.htm>. (1 page).
“New Sonitor Patent Combines Ultrasound and RFID”, [online], Sonitor Technologies, Feb. 17, 2005 [retrieved on Jun. 13, 2005], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://sonitor.com/news/article.asp?id=73>. (1 page).
“NIST Location System”, [online]. Wireless Communication Technologies Group, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Mar. 12, 2004 [retrieved in Nov. 1, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.antd.nisl.gov>. (2 pages).
“The Nibble Location System”, [online], UCLA, May 21, 2001 [retrieved on Nov. 2, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://mmsl.cs.ucla.edu/nibble/>. (13 pages).
“UHF Radio Data Logging System—Genii Data Logger”, [online]. Amplicon, 2004 [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.amplicon.co.uk/dr-prod3.cfm/subsecid/10037/secid/1/groupid/11809.htm>. (3 pages).
“University Library Navigation Enabled by Ekahau”, [online]. Directions Magazine, Jun. 12, 2003 [Aug. 3, 2007], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www/directionsmag.com/press.releases/index.php? duty=Show&id=7276&trv=1>. (3 pages).
“World's Smallest Hands Free Radio,” [online], Yahoo Shopping, 2004 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://store.yahoo.com/latesttrends/worsmalhanfr.html>. (1 page).
“XI Button Radio—The World's Smallest Radio”, [online]. Exxun, 2004 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.exxun.com>. (2 pages).
Azondekon et al., “Service Selection in Networks Based on Proximity Confirmation Using Infrared”, http://www.scs.carleton.ca/-barbeau/Publications/2002/azondekon.pdf, International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT) Beijing, 2002 (5 Pages).
Bahl et al., “A Software System for Locating Mobile Users: Design, Evaluation, and Lessons,” Technical Report MSR-TR-2000-12 Microsoft Research, [retrieved from internet, http://research.microsofl.com/-bahl/Papers/Pdf/radar.pdf] Feb. 2000 (13 pages).
Battelle, Report: “Lexington Area Travel Data Collection Test; GPS for Personal Travel Surveys”, Final Report for Office of Highway Information Management, Office of Technology Application and Federal Highway Administration, Sep. 1997 (92 pages).
Battiti et al. “Location-Aware Computing: a Neural Network Model for Determining Location in Wireless LANS” University of Trento: Department of Information and Communication Technology, Technical Report #DIT-02-0083, Feb. 2002 (pp. 1-16).
Bernstein et al., “An Introduction to Map Matching for Personal Navigation Assistants,” New Jersey TIDE Center, New Jersey Institute ofTechnology, Aug. 1996 (17 pages).
Fang et al., “Design of a Wireless Assisted Pedestrian Dead Reckoning System—The NavMote Experience,” vol. 54, Issue 6, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Dec. 2005 (16 pages).
Ferguson, Michael, “XTensionTech Notes,” [online]. Sand Hill Engineering Inc., Dec. 10, 1998 [retrieved in Jan. 12, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.shed.com/articles/TN.proximity.html >. (9 pages).
Gentile et al., “Robust Location using System Dynamics and Motion Constraints,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Wireless Communication Technologies Group, Jun. 24, 2004 (5 pages).
Handy et al., “Lessons Learned from Developing a Bluetooth Multiplayer-Game,” 2nd International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Workshop on Gaming, [retrieved from internet, http://www.ipsi.fraunhofer.de/ambiente/pervasivegaming/papers/Handy_Pervasive2004.pdf] (pp. 7).
Holm, Sverre, “Technology Presentation,” [online], Sonitor Technologies, May 26, 2004 [retrieved on Oct. 13, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.sonitor.com/news/article.asp?id=62> (16 pages).
Kanellos, Michael. “Dust Makes Mesh of Wireless Sensors,” [online], CNET News.com, Sep. 20, 2004 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.news.com/Dust-makes-mesh-of-wireless-sensors/2100-1008_3-5374971.html?tag=item>. (2 pages).
Kerschbaumer, Ken, “Who's Really Watching?” PricewaterhouseCoopers Global Entertainment and Medai Outlook 2004-2008, May 16, 2005 (4 pages).
McCarthy et al., “RF Free Ultrasonic Positioning (Presentation),” 7th International Symposiom on Wearable Computers, Oct. 2003 (12 pages).
McCarthy et al., “RF Free Ultrasonic Positioning,” Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol, U.K., 2003 (7 pages).
Yeung, K.L., & Yum, T.-S.P. “A Comparative Study on Location Tracking Strategies in Cellular Mobile Radio Systems,” Global Telecommunications Conference, 1995. Globecom '95, IEEE, Nov. 14-26, 1995 (pp. 22-28 vol. 1).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,755 dated Sep. 20, 2010 (10 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/692,087 dated Oct. 30, 2009 (15 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/692,087 dated Jan. 12, 2010 (8 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,755 dated Mar. 23, 2015 (9 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Decision on Appeal,” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,755, filed Dec. 17, 2014 (3 pages).
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-121053, dated Feb. 14, 2013 (2 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/313,414, dated Mar. 13, 2015 (13 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office. “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/791,432, dated Apr. 10, 2015 (9 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/313,414 dated Jul. 17, 2015 (25 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/791,432, dated Jul. 9, 2014 (37 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/791,432 dated Mar. 18, 2014 (7 pages).
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/020337, dated Jun. 27, 2014 (4 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/500,443, dated May 28, 2015, 15 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/500,443, dated Sep. 30, 2015, 20 pages.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Application No. 2,581,982, dated Jan. 14, 2013, 1 page.
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with Application No. 05798935.2, dated May 3, 2012, 7 pages.
Mexican Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Application No. MX/a/2007/003680, dated Sep. 14, 2009, 6 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/692,087, dated May 13, 2009, 11 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,415, dated Apr. 18, 2013, 8 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,415, dated Dec. 19, 2013, 9 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,415, dated Jan. 3, 2013, 10 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,415, dated Sep. 6, 2013, 8 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,415, dated Jun. 30, 2014, 7 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowability,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,415, dated Sep. 11, 2014, 4 pages.
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 2,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013204919 dated Aug. 30, 2015, (2 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,875,592, dated Mar. 30, 2015 (5 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2014/022704, dated Jun. 25, 2014 (3 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “Written Opinion” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2014/022704, dated Jun. 25, 2014 (5 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “Search Report,” dated Oct. 31, 2006 in corresponding PCT application No. PCT/US05/34743 (4 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “Written Opinion” dated Oct. 31, 2006 in corresponding PCT application No. PCT/US05/34743 (7 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/692,087, dated Dec. 11, 2009 (3 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,702, dated Jan. 5, 2015, 12 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,702, dated Jul. 23, 2014, 10 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,702, dated Jun. 11, 2015, 9 pages.
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013204919, dated Aug. 27, 2014, 4 pages.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Application No. 2,875,592, dated Dec. 14, 2015, 1 page.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2014/022704, dated Sep. 15, 2015, 6 pages.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,873,115, dated Dec. 18, 2014 (4 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “Search Report,” issued in connection with PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/018921, dated Jun. 27, 2014 (5 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with PCT Application No. PCT/ US2014/018921, dated Jun. 27, 2014 (6 pages).
Australian Government, IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Application No. 2013204263, dated Oct. 28, 2014 (3 pages).
Australian Government, IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Application No. 2013204263, dated Mar. 17, 2015 (3 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/782,895, dated Sep. 18, 2013, (22 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/782,895, dated Dec. 19, 2014 (5 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office. “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/782,895 dated May 22, 2014 (18 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/662,792, dated Jun. 30, 2015, 8 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/662,792, dated Dec. 10, 2015, 9 pages.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,873,115, dated Jun. 8, 2015 (3 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/018921, dated Sep. 1, 2015 (7 pages).
Australian Government. IP Australia. “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2015200081 dated Aug. 20, 2015 (2 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/796,584, dated Oct. 26, 2015, 6 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/796,584, dated Dec. 22, 2015, 7 pages.
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Application No. 2013204911, dated Oct. 20, 2014, 4 pages.
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Application No. 2013204911, dated Jan. 15, 2015, 2 pages.
International Searching Authority, “Written Opnion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/020337, dated Jun. 27, 2014 (4 pages).
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Reporton Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/020337, dated Sep. 8, 2015 (5 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Sep. 15, 2015, in connection with PCT/US2014/028131, (7 pages).
IP Australia, “Examination Report”, issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013204937, dated Feb. 24, 2015 (5 pages).
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, issued in connection with corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2014/028131, dated Jul. 11, 2014 (14 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Ex parte Quayle Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,441, filed May 5, 2015, 7 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,441, dated Jul. 23, 2015, 5 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Corrected Notice of Allowability,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,441, dated Oct. 29, 2015, 2 pages.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2014/021986, dated Jun. 27, 2014 (4 Pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2014/021986, dated Jun. 27, 2014 (3 Pages).
Australian Government, IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013205025 dated Aug. 11, 2014 (5 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,176, dated Apr. 9, 2015, 7 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,176, dated Aug. 12, 2015, 7 pages.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2014/021986, dated Sep. 15, 2015 (6 Pages).
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Reporton Patentability”, issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/34743, dated Apr. 27, 2007 (8 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Corrected Notice of Allowability,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/313,414, dated Nov. 16, 2015, 4 pages.
Finding Your Way Around the TI-83+/84+ Graphing Calculator: Statistics 2, “Correlation Coefficient,” [retrieved from http://mathbits.com/mathbits/tisection/statistics2/correlation.htm on Nov. 30, 2010], 3 pages.
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 09/076,517, filed May 12, 1998, 77 pages.
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Application No. 2015200081, dated Jan. 12, 2016, 2 pages.
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013204919, dated Jan. 11, 2016, (2 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Application No. 2,875,356, dated Jan. 25, 2016, 5 pages.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Application No. 2,875,374, dated Jan. 18, 2016, 5 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/879,544, dated Mar. 3, 2016, 9 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Restrictions Requirement”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/718,878, dated Mar. 13, 2014, 6 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office action”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/718,878, dated Jul. 14, 2014, 30 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office action”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/718,878, dated Jan. 6, 2015, 32 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/718,878, dated Sep. 25, 2015, 49 pages.
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2015255256, dated Apr. 13, 2017, 3 pages.
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2015255256, dated Nov. 11, 2016, 2 pages.
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201280070000.8, dated Oct. 21, 2016, 8 pages.
Japanese Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Reasons for Rejection,” issued in connection with Application No. 2014-547558, dated Nov. 24, 2015, 2 pages.
IP Australia, “Notice of Grant,” issued in connection with Application No. 2012327192, dated Nov. 26, 2015, 1 page.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Application No. 2,859,560, dated Nov. 3, 2015, 5 pages.
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Application No. 2012327192, dated Jul. 29, 2015, 2 pages.
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with Application No. 12859707.7, dated Jul. 6, 2015, 7 pages.
Doe, “Bringing Set Top Box Data to Life,” ARF Audience Measurement Symposium 2.0, NYC, Jun. 26, 2007, 9 pages.
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Application No. 2012327192, dated Aug. 6, 2014, 3 pages.
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Rules 161(2) and 162 EPC,” issued in connection with Application No. 12859707.7, dated Aug. 1, 2014, 3 pages.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Preliminary Reporton Patentability,” issued in connection with Application No. PCT/US2012/070362, dated Jun. 24, 2014, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with International application No. PCT/US2012/070362, dated Apr. 30, 2013, 8 pages.
The State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Third Office Action”, issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201210175375.2, dated Aug. 18, 2015 (15 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with Application No. PCT/ US2015/043465, dated Nov. 13, 2015, 5 pages.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with Application No. PCT/ US2015/043465, dated Nov. 13, 2015, 4 pages.
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/043465, dated Feb. 17, 2017, 6 pages.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with Application No. PCT/ US02/12333, dated Jul. 4, 2003, 2 pages.
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201110288875.2, dated Oct. 30, 2013, and corresponding English translation, 8 pages.
Tsekeridou et al., “Content-Based Video Parsing and Indexing Based on Audio-Visual Interaction,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 11 No.4, Apr. 2001, 14 pages.
Extended European Search Report, issued by the European Patent Office in connection with European Patent Application No. 11009958.7, dated Jul. 18, 2012, 10 pages.
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued by the European Patent Office in connection with European Patent Application No. 11009958.7, dated Mar. 20, 2013, 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the Korean Intellectual Property Office in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2007-7005373, dated Dec. 24, 2012, 3 pages.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2576865 dated Oct. 2, 2012, 1 page.
Notice of Allowance, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of China P.R. in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200580030202, dated Jun. 21, 2013, 5 pages.
Fourth Office Action, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of China P.R. in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200580030202, dated Mar. 18, 2013, 6 pages.
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2010201753, dated Apr. 17, 2012 (3 pages).
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2010219320, dated Jun. 20, 2012 (4 pages).
EPO, “Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 05798239.9, mailed Dec. 22, 2011 (3 pages).
EPO, “Communication Pursuant to Rule 62a(1) EPC and Rule 63(1) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 11009958.7, dated Mar. 27, 2012 (3 pages).
KIPO, “Notice of Preliminary Rejection,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10- 2007-7005373, dated May 30, 2012 (5 pages).
PCT, “Search Report,” issued in connection with PCT Application No. PCT/US2003/030355, dated May 5, 2004 (6 pages).
PCT, “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/028106, dated Mar. 12, 2007 (5 pages).
PCT, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/028106, dated Mar. 27, 2007 (4 pages).
PCT, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/031960, dated Feb. 20, 2008 (5 pages).
Lu et al., “Content Analysis for Audio Classification and Segmentation,” IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 10, No. 7, Oct. 2002, (14 pages).
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Rejection Decision,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200580030202, dated Mar. 24, 2011 (9 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Application No. 05 798 239.9-220 dated Dec. 27, 2010 (4 pages).
Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Preliminary Rejection,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2007-7005373, dated Oct. 31, 2011 (5 pages).
IP Australia, “Examiner's Response,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2010201753, dated Mar. 23, 2011, (2 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,576,865, dated Jun. 17, 2011 (3 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 05798239.9 dated Dec. 8, 2009 (5 pages).
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with New Zealand Patent Application No. 553385, dated Nov. 18, 2009 (2 pages).
Mexican Patent Office, “Official Action,” issued in connection with Mexican Patent Application Serial No. Mx/a/2007/001734, dated Jul. 24, 2009, and an English Language Translation (5 pages).
State Intellectual Property Office of China, English Language Translation of the First Office Action in connection with the Chinese Patent Application Serial No. 200580030202, dated Jun. 5, 2009, (11 pages).
IP Australia, “Examiner's First Report,” issued in connection with the Australian Patent Application Serial No. 2005273948, dated May 22, 2009 (2 pages).
Austrian Patent Office Service and Information Center, (TRF), “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with Singaporean Patent Application Serial No. 200700990-5, dated Jun. 23, 2009 (4 pages).
Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with New Zealand Patent Application Serial No. 553385, dated Oct. 17, 2008 (2 pages)
Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). “Office Action” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application Serial No. 2,576,865, dated Mar. 29, 2010 (5 pages).
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand, “Examination Report and Notice of Acceptance of Complete Specification,” issued in connection with New Zealand Patent Application No. 553385, dated May 27, 2010 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” in connection with Patent Application No. 2006279518, dated May 28, 2010 (4 pages).
IP Australia, “Standard Patent Granted,” issued in connection with Australian Patent No. 2006279518, on Sep. 23, 2010 (1 page).
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Second Office Action (with translation),” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200680036510.8, dated Mar. 24, 2010 (5 pages).
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Notification of Publication of Application,” in connection with Chinese Application No. 200680036510.8, issued on Oct. 17, 2008 (1 page).
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “First Office Action, (with translation),” in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200680036510.8, dated Jul. 10, 2009 (10 pages)
Patents Registry, Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, “Grant of Request for Registration and Grant,” in connection with Application No. 09101551.0, issued on March 22, 2011 (4 pages).
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200680036510.8, dated August 9, 2010 (4 pages).
Mexican Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2008/002317, dated Aug. 19, 2010 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2005273948, dated Jan. 20, 2010 (3 pages).
Andrieu et al., “Bayesian Blind Marginal Separation ofConvolutively Mixed Discrete Sources,” Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop, Department of Engineering, Cambridge, UK, 1998 IEEE, (10 pages).
Rajon et al., “Bayesian approach to parameter estimation and interpolation of time-varying autoregressive process using the Gibbs sampler,” IEE Proceedings: Vision, Image, and Signal Processing, Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1997, (8 pages).
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued by the European Patent Office dated Dec. 1, 2009, in connection with European application No. 09013713.4-2221, (8 pages).
Thomas, William L., “Television Audience Research Technology, Today's Systems and Tomorrow's Challenges,” Nielsen Media Research, Jun. 5, 1992 (4 pages).
Vincent et al., “A Tentative Typology of Audio Source Separation Tasks,” 41th International Symposium on Independent Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation (ICA 2003), held in Nara, Japan, Apr. 2003 (6 pages).
Smith, Leslie S., “Using IIDs to Estimate Sound Source Direction,” Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior on from Animals to Animats, pp. 60-61, 2002 (2 pages).
The Peltarion Blog, Jul. 10, 2006 [Retrieved from the Internet on Mar. 11, 2009] Retrieved from the Internet: http//blog.peltarion.com/2006/07110/classifier-showdown (14 pages).
Logical Connective: Philosophy 103: Introduction to Logic Conjunction, Negation, and Disjunction, [Retrieved from the Internet on Mar. 11, 2009] Retrieved from the Internet: http://philosophy.lander.edu!logic/conjunct.html (5 pages).
Naive Bayes Classifier, Wikipedia entry as of Mar. 11, 2009 [Retrieved from the Internet on Mar. 11, 2009] (7 pages).
Naive Bayes Classifier, Wikipedia entry as of Jan. 11, 2008 [Retrieved from the Internet from Wikipedia history pages on Mar. 11, 2009] (7 pages).
Zimmerman, H., Fuzzy set applications in pattern recognition and data-analysis, 11th IAPR International conference on Pattern Recognition, Aug. 29, 1992 (81 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with PCT application No. PCT/US2003/030355, dated Mar. 21, 2008 (5 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with PCT application No. PCT/US2003/030355, dated May 5, 2004 (8 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Preliminary Examination Report,” issued by the International Preliminary Examining Authority in connection with PCT application No. PCT/US2003/030370, dated Mar. 10, 2005 (3 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with PCT application No. PCT/US2003/030370, dated Mar. 11, 2004 (1 page).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with PCT application No. PCT/US2003/030370, dated Nov. 15, 2004 (5 pages).
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 05798239.9, dated Sep. 9, 2008 (4 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with PCT application No. PCT/US2006/031960, dated Feb. 21, 2007 (1 page).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with PCT application No. PCT/US2006/031960, dated Feb. 21, 2007 (3 pages).
Zhang, Harry “The Optimality of Naive Bayes,” 2004, American Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 2004 (6 Pages).
Domingos et al., “On the Optimality of the Simple Bayesian Classifier under Zero-One Loss,”, Department ofInformation and Computer Science, University of California, California, Jul. 30, 1997, [retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/pedrod.mli97.ps.gz, (28 Pages).
Perez et al., “A Probalistic Framework for Recognizing Similar Actions using Spatio-Temporal Features,” University of Oxford, (England), [retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.dcs.warwick.ac.uklbmvc2007/proceedings/CD-ROM/papers/paper-161.pdf, (10 Pages).
Elkan, Charles“Naive Bayesian Learning,” Department of Computer Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Sep. 1997 (4 Pages).
Mitchell, Tom M. “Generative and Discriminative Classifiers: Naive Bayes and Logistic Regression,” Sep. 21, 2006, [retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.cs.cmu.eduHom/mlbook/NBayesLogReg.pdf, (17 Pages).
Lang, Markus “Implementation of Naive Bayesian Classifiers in Java,” Department of Zweibrucken, Kaiserslautern University of Applied Sciences, (Germany), [retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.iit.eduHpro356fD3/ipro/documents/naive-bayes.doc, (4 Pages).
Liang et al., “Learning Naive Bayes Tree for Conditional Probability Estimation,” University of New Brunswick, (Canada), [retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.flydragontech.com/publications/2006/CAI06.pdf, (13 Pages).
Mozina et al., “Nomograms for Visualization ofNaive Bayesian Classifier,” [retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.ailab.si/blaz/papers/2004-PKDD.pdf, (12 Pages).
Naive Bayes Classification, Lecture 3 [retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/-zemei/Courses?CS411/Lect?03bayes.pdf, (9 Pages).
Klein, “CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall2007: Lecture 23 Naive Bayes,” University of Berkeley, California, Nov. 15, 2007, [retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/cs188/fa07/sliders/FA07%20cs188%201ecture%2023%20--%20bayes%20(6PP).pdf, (6 Pages).
Learning Bayesian Networks: Naive and non-Naive Bayes, Oregon States University, Oregon, [retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://web.engr.oregonstate.edu/- tgd/classes/534/slides/part6.pdf, (18 Pages).
The Naive Bayes Classifier, Oregon States University, Oregon, [retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://web.engr.oregonstate.edu/-afern/classes/cs534/notes/Naivebayes-1O.pdf, (19 Pages).
Bayesian Networks: Machine Learning A: 708.064 07W 1sst KU, [retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.igi.tugraz.at/lehre/MLA!WS07/slides3.pdf, (21 Pages).
The Peltarion Blog, Aug. 3, 2006 [retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http:/I blog.peltarion.com/img/cs/cs1.png, (9 Pages).
Logical Connective: Philosophy 103 Introduction to Logic; Cojunction, Negation, and Disjunction, [retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://philosophy. lander.edu!logic/images/graphics/conjunct.jpg, (7 Pages).
Wikipedia, “Naive Bayes Classifier,” Wikipedia, [retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 29, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive bayes, (11 Pages).
Dai et al., “Transferring Naive Bayes Classifiers for Text Classification,” 2007, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 6 pages.
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Application No. 201110288875.2, dated Jul. 18, 2014, and corresponding English translation, (6 pages).
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 28, 2013 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,575 (9 pages).
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office action dated Jul. 10, 2013 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,575 (11 pages).
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 24, 2013 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/831,870 (8 pages).
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office action dated Nov. 29, 2012 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/831,870 (8 pages).
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Advisory Action dated Jan. 7, 2010 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,262 (3 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/725,018 dated Jun. 27, 2011 (7 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/576,328, dated Apr. 7, 2010 (8 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action Before the Filing an Appeal Brief,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,555, dated Mar. 22, 2010 (3 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,555, dated May 20, 2010 (4 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,262 dated Apr. 28, 2010 (11 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,262 dated Sep. 28, 2010 (3 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,262 dated Oct. 12, 2010 (11 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,262, filed Feb. 28, 2011 (2 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,262, filed Aug. 4, 2011 (20 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/672,706, dated Dec. 31, 2009 (16 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office. “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,555, dated Dec. 8, 2009 (15 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,555, dated Mar. 31, 2009 (10 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,262, dated Sep. 2, 2009 (13 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/672,706, dated Jul. 23, 2009 (8 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/576,328, dated Aug. 7, 2009 (11 pages).
Non-Final Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office dated Feb. 5, 2009, in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/576,328 (20 pages).
Non-Final Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office dated Mar. 5, 2009, in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,262 (22 pages).
Non-Final Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office dated Dec. 27, 2007, in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,555 (12 pages).
Final Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office dated Oct. 6, 2008, in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,555 (18 pages).
Advisory Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office dated Jan. 13, 2009, in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/388,555 (4 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/263,150, dated Jul. 18, 2011, 51 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/263,150, dated Nov. 18, 2011, 28 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/263,150, dated Mar. 6, 2013, 37 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/263,150, dated Jul. 25, 2013, 25 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/263,150, dated Dec. 10, 2013, 19 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/263,150, dated Mar. 31, 2014, 15 pages.
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance”, issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2012203037, dated Jul. 30, 2014 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Examination Report”, issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013203338, dated Sep. 30, 2014 (3 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of China, “First Office Action”, issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201210175375.2, dated May 12, 2014 (4 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action”, issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,777,579, dated Mar. 10, 2014 (2 pages).
Notice of Reasons for Rejection, issued by the Japanese Intellectual Property Office in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. P2012-118947, dated Aug. 26, 2013, 4 pages.
Patent Examination Report No. 1, issued by Australian Intellectual Property Office in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2012203037, dated May 23, 2013, 4 pages.
Extended European Search Report, issued by European Intellectual Property Office in connection with European Patent Application No. 12004179.3, dated Oct. 18, 2013, 7 pages.
European Patent Office, “Examination Report”, issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 12004179.3, dated May 27, 2016 (6 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,500, dated Oct. 25, 2012 (13 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,500, dated May 21,2013 (14 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,500, dated Apr. 9, 2014 (11 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,500, dated Jul. 30, 2014 (18 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Propety Office, “Office Action”, issued in connection with Canadian Application No. 2,777,579, dated Apr. 23, 2015 (3 pages).
Chinese Intellectual Property Office, “2nd Office Action”, issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201210175375.2, dated Jan. 6, 2015 (16 pages).
Puikkonen, “Development of an Adaptive Equalization Algorithm Using Acousitc Engery Density,” Bringham Young University, Apr. 21, 2009, 208 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/926,885, dated Dec. 19, 2016, 15 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/926,885, dated Jun. 5, 2017, 24 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/926,885, dated Nov. 2, 2017, 12 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/925,360, dated Oct. 28, 2019, 29 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/925,360, dated May 16, 2019, 21 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/925,360, dated Jun. 29, 2018, 20 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Patent Applciation No. 15/925,360, dated Mar. 25, 2020, 10 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/925,360, dated Nov. 16, 2018, 23 pages.

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20210021897 A1	Jan 2021	US

Provisional Applications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	62142771	Apr 2015	US

Continuations (2)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	15925360	Mar 2018	US
Child	16983639		US
Parent	14926885	Oct 2015	US
Child	15925360		US

Methods and apparatus to determine a state of a media presentation device

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Disclaimer

Abstract