The present disclosure relates generally to media monitoring and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus to perform audio watermarking and watermark detection and extraction.
Identifying media information and, more specifically, audio streams (e.g., audio information) is useful for assessing audience exposure to television, radio, or any other media. For example, in television audience metering applications, a code may be inserted into the audio or video of media, wherein the code is later detected at monitoring sites when the media is presented (e.g., played at monitored households). The information payload of the code/watermark embedded into original signal can consist of unique source identification, time of broadcast information, transactional information or additional content metadata.
Monitoring sites typically include locations such as, for example, households where the media consumption of audience members or audience member exposure to the media is monitored. For example, at a monitoring site, codes from the audio and/or video are captured and may be associated with audio or video streams of media associated with a selected channel, radio station, media source, etc. The collected codes may then be sent to a central data collection facility for analysis. However, the collection of data pertinent to media exposure or consumption need not be limited to in-home exposure or consumption.
The following description makes reference to audio encoding and decoding that is also commonly known as audio watermarking and watermark detection, respectively. It should be noted that in this context, audio may be any type of signal having a frequency falling within the normal human audibility spectrum. For example, audio may be speech, music, an audio portion of an audio and/or video program or work (e.g., a television program, a movie, an Internet video, a radio program, a commercial spot, etc.), a media program, noise, or any other sound.
In general, as described in detail below, the encoding of the audio inserts one or more codes or information (e.g., watermarks) into the audio and, ideally, leaves the code inaudible to hearers of the audio. However, there may be certain situations in which the code may be audible to certain listeners. The codes that are embedded in audio may be of any suitable length and any suitable technique for assigning the codes to information may be selected.
As described below, the codes or information to be inserted into the audio may be converted into symbols that will be represented by code frequency signals to be embedded in the audio to represent the information. The code frequency signals include one or more code frequencies, wherein different code frequencies or sets of code frequencies are assigned to represent different symbols of information. Techniques for generating one or more tables mapping symbols to representative code frequencies such that symbols are distinguishable from one another at the decoder are also described. Any suitable encoding or error correcting technique may be used to convert codes into symbols.
By controlling the amplitude at which these code frequency signals are input into the native audio, the presence of the code frequency signals can be imperceptible to human hearing. Accordingly, in one example, masking operations based on the energy content of the native audio at different frequencies and/or the tonality or noise-like nature of the native audio are used to provide information upon which the amplitude of the code frequency signals is based.
Additionally, it is possible that an audio signal has passed through a distribution chain, where, for example, the content has passed from a content originator to a network distributor (e.g., NBC national) and further passed to a local content distributor (e.g., NBC in Chicago). As the audio signal passes through the distribution chain, one of the distributors may encode a watermark into the audio signal in accordance with the techniques described herein, thereby including in the audio signal an indication of that distributors identity or the time of distribution. The encoding described herein is very robust and, therefore, codes inserted into the audio signal are not easily removed. Accordingly, any subsequent distributors of the audio content may use techniques described herein to encode the previously encoded audio signal in a manner such that the code of the subsequent distributor will be detectable and any crediting due that subsequent distributor will be acknowledged.
Additionally, due to the repetition or partial repetition of codes within a signal, code detection can be improved by stacking messages and transforming the encoded audio signal into a signal having an accentuated code. As the audio signal is sampled at a monitored location, substantially equal sized blocks of audio samples are summed and averaged. This stacking process takes advantage of the temporal properties of the audio signal to cause the code signal to be accentuated within the audio signal. Accordingly, the stacking process, when used, can provide increased robustness to noise or other interference. For example, the stacking process may be useful when the decoding operation uses a microphone that might pick up ambient noise in addition to the audio signal output by a speaker.
A further technique to add robustness to the decoding operations described herein provides for validation of messages identified by a decoding operation. After messages are identified in an encoded audio signal, the messages are added to a stack. Subsequent repetitions of messages are then compared to identify matches. When a message can be matched to another message identified at the proper repetition interval, the messages are identified as validated. When a message can be partially matched to another message that has already been validated, the message is marked as partially validated and subsequent messages are used to identify parts of the message that may have been corrupted. According to this example validation technique, messages are only output from the decoder if they can be validated. Such a technique prevents errors in messages caused by interference and/or detection errors.
The following examples pertain generally to encoding an audio signal with information, such as a code, and obtaining that information from the audio via a decoding process. The following example encoding and decoding processes may be used in several different technical applications to convey information from one place to another.
The example encoding and decoding processes described herein may be used to perform broadcast identification. In such an example, before a work is broadcast, that work is encoded to include a code indicative of the source of the work, the broadcast time of the work, the distribution channel of the work, or any other information deemed relevant to the operator of the system. When the work is presented (e.g., played through a television, a radio, a computing device, or any other suitable device), persons in the area of the presentation are exposed not only to the work, but, unbeknownst to them, are also exposed to the code embedded in the work. Thus, persons may be provided with decoders that operate on a microphone-based platform so that the work may be obtained by the decoder using free-field detection and processed to extract codes therefrom. The codes may then be logged and reported back to a central facility for further processing. The microphone-based decoders may be dedicated, stand-alone devices, or may be implemented using cellular telephones or any other types of devices having microphones and software to perform the decoding and code logging operations. Alternatively, wire-based systems may be used whenever the work and its attendant code may be picked up via a hard wired connection.
The example encoding and decoding processes described herein may be used, for example, in tracking and/or forensics related to audio and/or video works by, for example, marking copyrighted audio and/or associated video content with a particular code. The example encoding and decoding processes may be used to implement a transactional encoding system in which a unique code is inserted into a work when that work is purchased by a consumer. Thus, allowing a media distribution to identify a source of a work. The purchasing may include a purchaser physically receiving a tangible media (e.g., a compact disk, etc.) on which the work is included, or may include downloading of the work via a network, such as the Internet. In the context of transactional encoding systems, each purchaser of the same work receives the work, but the work received by each purchaser is encoded with a different code. That is, the code inserted in the work may be personal to the purchaser, wherein each work purchased by that purchaser includes that purchaser's code. Alternatively, each work may be may be encoded with a code that is serially assigned.
Furthermore, the example encoding and decoding techniques described herein may be used to carry out control functionality by hiding codes in a steganographic manner, wherein the hidden codes are used to control target devices programmed to respond to the codes. For example, control data may be hidden in a speech signal, or any other audio signal. A decoder in the area of the presented audio signal processes the received audio to obtain the hidden code. After obtaining the code, the target device takes some predetermined action based on the code. This may be useful, for example, in the case of changing advertisements within stores based on audio being presented in the store, etc. For example, scrolling billboard advertisements within a store may be synchronized to an audio commercial being presented in the store through the use of codes embedded in the audio commercial.
An example encoding and decoding system 100 is shown in
The audio signal 104 may be any form of audio including, for example, voice, music, noise, commercial advertisement audio, audio associated with a television program, live performance, etc. In the example of
In one example, the audio signal 104 is a digitized version of an analog audio signal, wherein the analog audio signal has been sampled at 48 kilohertz (KHz). As described below in detail, two seconds of audio, which correspond to 96,000 audio samples at the 48 KHz sampling rate, may be used to carry one message, which may be a synchronization message and 49 bits of information. Using an encoding scheme of 7 bits per symbol, the message requires transmission of eight symbols of information. Alternatively, in the context of overwriting described below, one synchronization symbol is used and one information symbol conveying one of 128 states follows the synchronization symbol. As described below in detail, according to one example, one 7-bit symbol of information is embedded in a long block of audio samples, which corresponds to 9216 samples. In one example, such a long block includes 36 overlapping short blocks of 256 samples, wherein in a 50% overlapping block 256 of the samples are old and 256 samples are new.
Although the transmit side of the example system 100 shown in
The transmitter 106 may include one or more of a radio frequency (RF) transmitter that may distribute the encoded audio signal through free space propagation (e.g., via terrestrial or satellite communication links) or a transmitter used to distribute the encoded audio signal through cable, fiber, etc. In one example, the transmitter 106 may be used to broadcast the encoded audio signal throughout a broad geographical area. In other cases, the transmitter 106 may distribute the encoded audio signal through a limited geographical area. The transmission may include up-conversion of the encoded audio signal to radio frequencies to enable propagation of the same. Alternatively, the transmission may include distributing the encoded audio signal in the form of digital bits or packets of digital bits that may be transmitted over one or more networks, such as the Internet, wide area networks, or local area networks. Thus, the encoded audio signal may be carried by a carrier signal, by information packets or by any suitable technique to distribute the audio signals.
When the encoded audio signal is received by a receiver 110, which, in the media monitoring context, may be located at a statistically selected metering site 112, the audio signal portion of the received program signal is processed to recover the code, even though the presence of that code is imperceptible (or substantially imperceptible) to a listener when the encoded audio signal is presented by speakers 114 of the receiver 110. To this end, a decoder 116 is connected either directly to an audio output 118 available at the receiver 110 or to a microphone 120 placed in the vicinity of the speakers 114 through which the audio is reproduced. The received audio signal can be either in a monaural or stereo format. Further details regarding decoding and example decoders are provided below.
Audio Encoding
As explained above, the encoder 102 inserts one or more inaudible (or substantially inaudible) codes into the audio 104 to create encoded audio. One example encoder 102 is shown in
In general, during operation, the encoder 102 receives the audio 104 and the prior code detector 204 determines if the audio 104 has been previously encoded with information, which will make it difficult for the encoder 102 to encode additional information into the previously encoded audio. For example, a prior encoding may have been performed at a prior location in the audio distribution chain (e.g., at a national network level). The prior code detector 204 informs the encoding lineup 202 as to whether the audio has been previously encoded. The prior code detector 204 may be implemented by a decoder as described herein.
The encoding lineup 202 receives the information 103 and produces code frequency signals based thereon and combines the code frequency signal with the audio 104. The operation of the encoding lineup 202 is influenced by the output of the prior code detector 204. For example, if the audio 104 has been previously encoded and the prior code detector 204 informs the encoding lineup 202 of this fact, the encoding lineup 202 may select an alternate message that is to be encoded in the audio 104 and may also alter the details by which the alternate message is encoded (e.g., different temporal location within the message, different frequencies used to represent symbols, etc.).
The encoding lineup 202 is also influenced by the masking lineup 206. In general, the masking lineup 206 processes the audio 104 corresponding to the point in time at which the encoding lineup 202 wants to encode information and determines the amplitude at which the encoding should be performed. As described below, the masking lineup 206 may output a signal to control code frequency signal amplitudes to keep the code frequency signal below the threshold of human perception.
As shown in the example of
In one example, the message format 222 representative of messages output from the message generator 210 includes a synchronization symbol 224. The synchronization symbol 224 is used by decoders, examples of which are described below, to obtain timing information indicative of the start of a message. Thus, when a decoder receives the synchronization symbol 224, that decoder expects to see additional information following the synchronization symbol 224.
In the example message format 222 of
The message format 222 also includes pre-existing code flag information 230. However, the pre-existing code flag information 230 is only selectively used to convey information. When the prior code detector 204 informs the message generator 210 that the audio 104 has not been previously encoded, the pre-existing code flag information 230 is not used. Accordingly, the message output by the message generator only includes the synchronization symbol 224, the 42 bits of message information 226, and the seven bits of message information 228; the pre-existing code flag information 230 is blank or filled by unused symbol indications. In contrast, when the prior code detector 204 provides to the message generator 210 an indication that the audio 104 into which the message information is to be encoded has previously been encoded, the message generator 210 will not output the synchronization symbol 224, the 42 bits of message information 226, or the seven bits of message information 228. Rather, the message generator 210 will utilize only the pre-existing code flag information 230. In one example, the pre-existing code flag information will include a pre-existing code flag synchronization symbol to signal that pre-existing code flag information is present. The pre-existing code flag synchronization symbol is different from the synchronization symbol 224 and, therefore, can be used to signal the start of pre-existing code flag information. Upon receipt of the pre-existing code flag synchronization symbol, a decoder can ignore any prior-received information that aligned in time with a synchronization symbol 224, 42 bits of message information 226, or seven bits of message information 228. To convey information, such as a channel indication, a distribution identification, or any other suitable information, a single pre-existing code flag information symbol follows the pre-existing code flag synchronization symbol. This pre-existing code flag information may be used to provide for proper crediting in an audience monitoring system.
The output from the message generator 210 is passed to the symbol selector 212, which selects representative symbols. When the synchronization symbol 224 is output, the symbol selector may not need to perform any mapping because the synchronization symbol 224 is already in symbol format. Alternatively, if bits of information are output from the message generator 210, the symbol selector may use straight mapping, wherein, for example seven bits output from the message generator 210 are mapped to a symbol having the decimal value of the seven bits. For example, if a value of 1010101 is output from the message generator 210, the symbol selector may map those bits to the symbol 85. Of course other conversions between bits and symbols may be used. In certain examples, redundancy or error encoding may be used in the selection of symbols to represent bits. Additionally, any other suitable number of bits than seven may be selected to be converted into symbols. The number of bits used to select the symbol may be determined based on the maximum symbol space available in the communication system. For example, if the communication system can only transmit one of four symbols at a time, then only two bits from the message generator 210 would be converted into symbols at a time.
The symbols from the symbol selector 212 are passed to the code frequency selector 214 that selects code frequencies that are used to represent the symbol. The symbol selector 212 may include one or more look up tables (LUTs) 232 that may be used to map the symbols into code frequencies that represent the symbols. That is, a symbol is represented by a plurality of code frequencies that the encoder 102 emphasizes in the audio to form encoded audio that is transmitted. Upon receipt of the encoded audio, a decoder detects the presence of the emphasized code frequencies and decodes the pattern of emphasized code frequencies into the transmitted symbol. Thus, the same LUT selected at the encoder 210 for selecting the code frequencies needs to be used in the decoder. One example LUT is described in conjunction with
The code frequency selector 214 may select any number of different LUTs depending of various criteria. For example, a particular LUT or set of LUTs may be used by the code frequency selector 214 in response to the prior receipt of a particular synchronization symbol. Additionally, if the prior code detector 204 indicates that a message was previously encoded into the audio 104, the code frequency selector 214 may select a lookup table that is unique to pre-existing code situations to avoid confusion between frequencies used to previously encode the audio 104 and the frequencies used to include the pre-existing code flag information.
An indication of the code frequencies that are selected to represent a particular symbol is provided to the synthesizer 216. The synthesizer 216 may store, for each short block constituting a long block, three complex Fourier coefficients representative of each of the possible code frequencies that the code frequency selector 214 will indicate. These coefficients represent the transform of a windowed sinusoidal code frequency signal whose phase angle corresponds to the starting phase angle of code sinusoid in that short block.
While the foregoing describes an example code synthesizer 208 that generates sine waves or data representing sine waves, other example implementations of code synthesizers are possible. For example, rather than generating sine waves, another example code synthesizer 208 may output Fourier coefficients in the frequency domain that are used to adjust amplitudes of certain frequencies of audio provided to the combiner 220. In this manner, the spectrum of the audio may be adjusted to include the requisite sine waves.
The three complex amplitude-adjusted Fourier coefficients corresponding to the symbol to be transmitted are provided from the synthesizer 216 to the inverse Fourier transform 218, which converts the coefficients into time-domain signals having the prescribed frequencies and amplitudes to allow their insertion into the audio to convey the desired symbols are coupled to the combiner 220. The combiner 220 also receives the audio. In particular, the combiner 220 inserts the signals from the inverse Fourier transform 218 into one long block of audio samples. As described above, for a given sampling rate of 48 KHz, a long block is 9216 audio samples. In the provided example, the synchronization symbol and 49 bits of information require a total of eight long blocks. Because each long block is 9216 audio samples, only 73,728 samples of audio 104 are needed to encode a given message. However, because messages begin every two seconds, which is every 96,000 audio samples, there will be many samples at the end of the 96,000 audio samples that are not encoded. The combining can be done in the digital domain, or in the analog domain.
However, in the case of a pre-existing code flag, the pre-existing code flag is inserted into the audio 104 after the last symbol representing the previously inserted seven bits of message information. Accordingly, insertion of the pre-existing code flag information begins at sample 73,729 and runs for two long blocks, or 18,432 samples. Accordingly, when pre-existing code flag information is used, fewer of the 96,000 audio samples 104 will be unencoded.
The masking lineup 206 includes an overlapping short block maker that makes short blocks of 512 audio samples, wherein 256 of the samples are old and 256 samples are new. That is, the overlapping short block maker 240 makes blocks of 512 samples, wherein 256 samples are shifted into or out of the buffer at one time. For example, when a first set of 256 samples enters the buffer, the oldest 256 samples are shifted out of the buffer. On a subsequent iteration, the first set of 256 samples are shifted to a latter position of the buffer and 256 samples are shifted into the buffer. Each time a new short block is made by shifting in 256 new samples and removing the 256 oldest samples, the new short block is provided to a masking evaluator 242. The 512 sample block output from the overlapping short block maker 240 is multiplied by a suitable window function such that an “overlap-and-add” operation will restore the audio samples to their correct value at the output. A synthesized code signal to be added to an audio signal is also similarly windowed to prevent abrupt transitions at block edges when there is a change in code amplitude from one 512-sample block to the next overlapped 512-sample block. These transitions if present create audible artifacts.
The masking evaluator 242 receives samples of the overlapping short block (e.g., 512 samples) and determines an ability of the same to hide code frequencies to human hearing. That is, the masking evaluator determines if code frequencies can be hidden within the audio represented by the short block by evaluating each critical band of the audio as a whole to determine its energy and determining the noise-like or tonal-like attributes of each critical band and determining the sum total ability of the critical bands to mask the code frequencies. According to the illustrated example, the bandwidth of the critical bands increases with frequency. If the masking evaluator 242 determines that code frequencies can be hidden in the audio 104, the masking evaluator 204 indicates the amplitude levels at which the code frequencies can be inserted within the audio 104, while still remaining hidden and provides the amplitude information to the synthesizer 216.
In one example, the masking evaluator 242 conducts the masking evaluation by determining a maximum change in energy Eb or a masking energy level that can occur at any critical frequency band without making the change perceptible to a listener. The masking evaluation carried out by the masking evaluator 242 may be carried out as outlined in the Moving Pictures Experts Group-Advanced Audio Encoding (MPEG-AAC) audio compression standard ISO/IEC 13818-7:1997, for example. The acoustic energy in each critical band influences the masking energy of its neighbors and algorithms for computing the masking effect are described in the standards document such as ISO/IEC 13818-7:1997. These analyses may be used to determine for each short block the masking contribution due to tonality (e.g., how much the audio being evaluated is like a tone) as well as noise like (i.e., how much the audio being evaluated is like noise) features. Further analysis can evaluate temporal masking that extends masking ability of the audio over short time, typically, for 50-100 milliseconds (ms). The resulting analysis by the masking evaluator 242 provides a determination, on a per critical band basis, the amplitude of a code frequency that can be added to the audio 104 without producing any noticeable audio degradation (e.g., without being audible).
Because a 256 sample block will appear in both the beginning of one short block and the end of the next short block and, thus, will be evaluated two times by the masking evaluator 242, the masking evaluator makes two masking evaluations including the 256 sample block. The amplitude indication provided to the synthesizer 216 is a composite of those two evaluations including that 256 sample block and the amplitude indication is timed such that the amplitude of the code inserted into the 256 samples is timed with those samples arriving at the combiner 220.
Referring now to
In one example operation of the code frequency selector 214, a symbol of 25 (e.g., a binary value of 0011001) is received from the symbol selector 212. The code frequency selector 214 accesses the LUT 232 and reads row 25 of the symbol column 302. From this row, the code frequency selector reads that code frequency indices 217, 288, 325, 403, 512, 548, and 655 are to be emphasized in the audio 104 to communicate the symbol 25 to the decoder. The code frequency selector 214 then provides an indication of these indices to the synthesizer 216, which synthesizes the code signals by outputting Fourier coefficients corresponding to these indices.
The combiner 220 receives both the output of the code synthesizer 208 and the audio 104 and combines them to form encoded audio. The combiner 220 may combine the output of the code synthesizer 208 and the audio 104 in an analog or digital form. If the combiner 220 performs a digital combination, the output of the code synthesizer 208 may be combined with the output of the sampler 202, rather than the audio 104 that is input to the sampler 202. For example, the audio block in digital form may be combined with the sine waves in digital form. Alternatively, the combination may be carried out in the frequency domain, wherein frequency coefficients of the audio are adjusted in accordance with frequency coefficients representing the sine waves. As a further alternative, the sine waves and the audio may be combined in analog form. The encoded audio may be output from the combiner 220 in analog or digital form. If the output of the combiner 220 is digital, it may be subsequently converted to analog form before being coupled to the transmitter 106.
An example encoding process 600 is shown in
If the received samples have not been previously encoded (block 604), the process 600 generates a communication message (block 606), such as a communication message having the format shown in
The communication message is then mapped into symbols (block 608). For example, the synchronization information need not be mapped into a symbol if the synchronization information is already a symbol. In another example, if a portion of the communication message is a series of bits, such bits or groups of bits may be represented by one symbol. As described above in conjunction with the symbol selector 212, which is one manner in which the mapping (block 608) may be carried out, one or more tables or encoding schemes may be used to convert bits into symbols. For example, some techniques may include the use of error correction coding, or the like, to increase message robustness through the use of coding gain. In one particular example implementation having a symbol space sized to accommodate 128 data symbols, seven bits may be converted into one symbol. Of course, other numbers of bits may be processed depending on many factors including available symbol space, error correction encoding, etc.
After the communication symbols have been selected (block 608), the process 600 selects a LUT that will be used to determine the code frequencies that will be used to represent each symbol (block 610). In one example, the selected LUT may be the example LUT 232 of
After the symbols have been generated (block 608) and the LUT is selected (block 610), the symbols are mapped into code frequencies using the selected LUT (block 612). In one example in which the LUT 232 of
Code signals including the code frequencies are then synthesized (block 614) at amplitudes according to a masking evaluation, which is described in conjunction with blocks 240 and 242 or
After the code signals including the code frequencies have been synthesized, they are combined with the audio samples (block 616). As described in conjunction with
The insertion of the code signal into the audio may be carried out by adding samples of the code signal to samples of the host audio signal, wherein such addition is done in the analog domain or in the digital domain. Alternatively, with proper frequency alignment and registration, frequency components of the audio signal may be adjusted in the frequency domain and the adjusted spectrum converted back into the time domain.
The foregoing described the operation of the process 600 when the process determined that the received audio samples have not been previously encoded (block 604). However, in situations in which a portion of media has been through a distribution chain and encoded as it was processed, the received samples of audio processed at block 604 already include codes. For example, a local television station using a courtesy news clip from CNN in a local news broadcast might not get viewing credit based on the prior encoding of the CNN clip. As such, additional information is added to the local news broadcast in the form of pre-existing code flag information. If the received samples of audio have been previously encoded (block 604), the process generates pre-existing code flag information (block 618). The pre-existing code flag information may include the generation of an pre-existing code flag synchronization symbol and, for example, the generation of seven bits of data, which will be represented by a single data symbol. The data symbol may represent a station identification, a time, or any other suitable information. For example, a media monitoring site (MMS) may be programmed to detect the pre-existing code flag information to credit the station identified therein.
After the pre-existing code flag information has been generated (block 618), the process 600 selects the pre-existing code flag LUT that will be used to identify code frequencies representative of the pre-existing code flag information (block 620). In one example, the pre-existing code flag LUT may be different than other LUTs used in non-pre-existing code conditions. In one particular example, the pre-existing code flag synchronization symbol may be represented by the code frequencies 220, 292, 364, 436, 508, 580, and 652.
After the pre-existing code flag information is generated (block 618) and the pre-existing code flag LUT is selected (block 620), the pre-existing code flag symbols are mapped to code frequencies (block 612), and the remainder of the processing follows as previously described.
Sometime before the code signal is synthesized (block 614), the process 600 conducts a masking evaluation to determine the amplitude at which the code signal should be generated so that it still remains inaudible or substantially inaudible to human hearers. Accordingly, the process 600 generates overlapping short blocks of audio samples, each containing 512 audio samples (block 622). As described above, the overlapping short blocks include 50% old samples and 50% newly received samples. This operation may be carried out by, for example, the overlapping short block maker 240 of
After the overlapping short blocks are generated (block 622), masking evaluations are performed on the short blocks (block 624). For example, this may be carried out as described in conjunction with block 242 of
Lookup Table Generation
A system 700 for populating one or more LUTs with code frequencies corresponding to symbols may be implemented using hardware, software, combinations of hardware and software, firmware, or the like. The system 700 of
A critical band pair definer 702 defines a number (P) of critical band pairs. For example, referring to
A frequency definer 704 defines a number of frequencies (N) that are selected for use in each critical band pair. In one example, the value of N is sixteen, meaning that there are sixteen data positions in the combination of the critical bands that form each critical band pair. Reference numeral 1004 in
A number generator 706 defines a number of frequency positions in the critical band pairs defined by the critical band pair definer 702. In one example the number generator 706 generates all NP, P-digit numbers. For example, if N is 16 and P is 7, the process generates the numbers 0 through 268435456, but may do so in base 16-hexadecimal, which would result in the values 0 through 10000000.
A redundancy reducer 708 then eliminates all number from the generated list of numbers sharing more than one common digit between them in the same position. This ensures compliance with criteria (1) above because, as described below, the digits will be representative of the frequencies selected to represent symbols. An excess reducer 710 may then further reduce the remaining numbers from the generated list of numbers to the number of needed symbols. For example, if the symbol space is 129 symbols, the remaining numbers are reduced to a count of 129. The reduction may be carried out at random, or by selecting remaining numbers with the greatest Euclidean distance, or my any other suitable data reduction technique. In another example, the reduction may be carried out in a pseudorandom manner.
After the foregoing reductions, the count of the list of numbers is equal to the number of symbols in the symbol space. Accordingly, a code frequency definer 712 defines the remaining numbers in base P format to represent frequency indices representative of symbols in the critical band pairs. For example, referring to
Using the first hexadecimal number as an example of mapping to a particular frequency index, the decimal value of Fh is 15. Because position four of each critical band pair is reserved for non-data information, the value of any hexadecimal digit greater than four is incremented by the value of one decimal. Thus, the 15 becomes a 16. The 16 is thus designated (as shown with the asterisk in
A LUT filler 714 receives the symbol indications and corresponding code frequency component indications from the code frequency definer 712 and fills this information into a LUT.
An example code frequency index table generation process 800 is shown in
The process 800 begins by defining a number (P) of critical band pairs. For example, referring to
After the band pairs have been defined (block 802), a number of frequencies (N) is selected for use in each critical band pair (block 804). In one example, the value of N is sixteen, meaning that there are sixteen data positions in the combination of the critical bands that form each critical band pair. As shown in
After the number of critical band pairs and the number of frequency positions in the pairs is defined, the process 800 generates all NP, P-digit numbers with no more than one hexadecimal digit in common (block 806). For example, if N is 16 and P is 7, the process generates the numbers 0 through 268435456, but may do so in base 16-hexadecimal, which would results in 0 through FFFFFFF, but does not include the numbers that share more than one common hexadecimal digit. This ensures compliance with criteria (1) above because, as described below, the digits will be representative of the frequencies selected to represent symbols.
According to an example process for determining a set of numbers that comply with criteria (1) above (and any other desired criteria), the numbers in the range from 0 to NP−1 are tested. First, the value corresponding to zero is stored as the first member of the result set R. Then, the numbers from 1 to NP−1 are selected for analysis to determine if they meet criteria (1) when compared to the members of R. Each number that meets criteria (1) when compared against all the current entries in R is added to the result set. In particular, according to the example process, in order to test a number K, each hexadecimal digit of interest in K is compared to the corresponding hexadecimal digit of interest in an entry M from the current result set. In the 7 comparisons not more than one hexadecimal digit of K should equal the corresponding hexadecimal digit of M. If, after comparing K against all numbers currently in the result set, no member of the latter has more than one common hexadecimal digit, then K is added to the result set R. The algorithm iterates through the set of possible numbers until all values meeting criteria (1) have been identified.
While the foregoing describes an example process for determining a set of numbers that meets criteria (1), any process or algorithm may be used and this disclosure is not limited to the process described above. For example, a process may use heuristics, rules, etc. to eliminate numbers from the set of numbers before iterating throughout the set. For example, all of the numbers where the relevant bits start with two 0's, two 1's, two 2's, etc. and end with two 0's, two 1's, two 2's, etc. could immediately be removed because they will definitely have a hamming distance less than 6. Additionally or alternatively, an example process may not iterate through the entire set of possible numbers. For example, a process could iterate until enough numbers are found (e.g., 128 numbers when 128 symbols are desired). In another implementation, the process may randomly select a first value for inclusion in the set of possible values and then may search iteratively or randomly through the remaining set of numbers until a value that meets the desired criteria (e.g., criteria (1)) is found.
The process 800 then selects the desired numbers from the generated values (block 810). For example, if the symbol space is 129 symbols, the remaining numbers are reduced to a count of 129. The reduction may be carried out at random, or by selecting remaining numbers with the greatest Euclidean distance, or my any other suitable data reduction technique.
After the foregoing reductions, the count of the list of numbers is equal to the number of symbols in the symbol space. Accordingly, the remaining numbers in base P format are defined to represent frequency indices representative of symbols in the critical band pairs (block 812). For example, referring to
Using the first hexadecimal number as an example of mapping to a particular frequency index, the decimal value of Fh is 15. Because position four of each critical band pair is reserved for non-data information, the value of any hexadecimal digit greater than four is incremented by the value of one decimal. Thus, the 15 becomes a 16. The 16 is thus designated (as shown with the asterisk in
After assigning the representative code frequencies (block 812), the numbers are filled into a LUT (block 814).
Of course, the systems and processes described in conjunction with
Audio Decoding
In general, the decoder 116 detects a code signal that was inserted into received audio to form encoded audio at the encoder 102. That is, the decoder 116 looks for a pattern of emphasis in code frequencies it processes. Once the decoder 116 has determined which of the code frequencies have been emphasized, the decoder 116 determines, based on the emphasized code frequencies, the symbol present within the encoded audio. The decoder 116 may record the symbols, or may decode those symbols into the codes that were provided to the encoder 102 for insertion into the audio.
In one implementation, the example decoder 116 of
As shown in
The samples from the sampler 1102 are provided to a stacker 1104. In general, the stacker 1104 accentuates the code signal in the audio signal information by taking advantage of the fact that messages are repeated or substantially repeated (e.g., only the least significant bits are changed) for a period of time. For example, 42 bits (226 of
By way of example, a watermarked signal y(t) can be represented by the sum of the host signal x(t) and watermark w(t):
y(t)=x(t)+w(t)
In the time domain, watermarks may repeat after a known period T:
w(t)=w(t−T)
According to an example stacking method, the input signal y(t) is replaced by a stacked signal S(t):
In the stacked signal S(t), the contribution of the host signal decreases because the values of samples x(t), x(t−T), . . . , x(t−nT) are independent if the period T is sufficiently large. At the same time, the contribution of the watermarks being made of, for example, in-phase sinusoids, is enhanced.
Assuming x(t), x(t−T), . . . , x(t−nT) are independent random variables drawn from the same distribution X with zero mean E[X]=0 we obtain:
Accordingly, the underlying host signal contributions x(t), . . . , x(t−nT) will effectively be canceling each other while the watermark is unchanged allowing the watermark to be more easily detected.
In the illustrated example, the power of the resulting signal decreases linearly with the number of stacked signals n. Therefore, averaging over independent portions of the host signal can reduce the effects of interference. The watermark is not affected because it will always be added in-phase.
An example process for implementing the stacker 1104 is described in conjunction with
The decoder 116 may additionally include a stacker controller 1106 to control the operation of the stacker 1104. The example stacker controller 1106 receives a signal indicating whether the stacker 1104 should be enabled or disabled. For example, the stacker controller 1106 may receive the received audio signal and may determine if the signal includes significant noise that will distort the signal and, in response to the determination, cause the stacker to be enabled. In another implementation, the stacker controller 1106 may receive a signal from a switch that can be manually controlled to enable or disable the stacker 1104 based on the placement of the decoder 116. For example, when the decoder 116 is wired to the receiver 110 or the microphone 120 is placed in close proximity to the speaker 114, the stacker controller 1106 may disable the stacker 1104 because stacking will not be needed and will cause corruption of rapidly changing data in each message (e.g., the least significant bits of a timestamp). Alternatively, when the decoder 116 is located at a distance from the speaker 114 or in another environment where significant interference may be expected, the stacker 1104 may be enabled by the stacker controller 1106. Of course, any type of desired control may be applied by the stacker controller 1106.
The output of the stacker 1104 is provided to a time to frequency domain converter 1108. The time to frequency domain converter 1108 may be implemented using a discrete Fourier transformation (DFT), or any other suitable technique to convert time-based information into frequency-based information. In one example, the time to frequency domain converter 1108 may be implemented using a sliding long block fast Fourier transform (FFT) in which a spectrum of the code frequencies of interest is calculated each time eight new samples are provided to the example time to time to frequency domain converter 1108. In one example, the time to frequency domain converter 1108 uses 1,536 samples of the encoded audio and determines a spectrum therefrom using 192 slides of eight samples each. The resolution of the spectrum produced by the time to frequency domain converter 1108 increases as the number of samples used to generate the spectrum is increased. Thus, the number of samples processed by the time to frequency domain converter 1108 should match the resolution used to select the indices in the tables of
The spectrum produced by the time to frequency domain converter 1108 passes to a critical band normalizer 1110, which normalizes the spectrum in each of the critical bands. In other words, the frequency with the greatest amplitude in each critical band is set to one and all other frequencies within each of the critical bands are normalized accordingly. For example, if critical band one includes frequencies having amplitudes of 112, 56, 56, 56, 56, 56, and 56, the critical band normalizer would adjust the frequencies to be 1, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, and 0.5. Of course, any desired maximum value may be used in place of one for the normalization. The critical band normalizer 1110 outputs the normalized score for each of the frequencies of the interest.
The spectrum of scores produced by the critical band normalizer 1110 is passed to the symbol scorer 1112, which calculates a total score for each of the possible symbols in the active symbol table. In an example implementation, the symbol scorer 1112 iterates through each symbol in the symbol table and sums the normalized score from the critical band normalizer 1110 for each of the frequencies of interest for the particular symbol to generate a score for the particular symbol. The symbol scorer 1112 outputs a score for each of the symbols to the max score selector 1114, which selects the symbol with the greatest score and outputs the symbol and the score.
The identified symbol and score from the max score selector 1114 are passed to the comparator 1116, which compares the score to a threshold. When the score exceeds the threshold, the comparator 1116 outputs the received symbol. When the score does not exceed the threshold, the comparator 1116 outputs an error indication. For example, the comparator 1116 may output a symbol indicating an error (e.g., a symbol not included in the active symbol table) when the score does not exceed the threshold. Accordingly, when a message has been corrupted such that a great enough score (i.e., a score that does not exceed the threshold) is not calculated for a symbol, an error indication is provided. In an example implementation, error indications may be provided to the stacker controller 1106 to cause the stacker 1104 to be enabled when a threshold number of errors are identified (e.g., number of errors over a period of time, number of consecutive errors, etc.).
The identified symbol or error from the comparator 1116 is passed to the circular buffers 1118 and the pre-existing code flag circular buffers 1120. An example implementation of the standard buffers 1118 is described in conjunction with
The example pre-existing code flag circular buffers 1120 are implemented in the same manner as the circular buffers 1118, except the pre-existing code flag circular buffers 1120 include one location for the pre-existing code flag synchronize symbol and one location for each symbols in the pre-existing code flag message (e.g., an pre-existing code flag synchronize that includes one message symbol would be stored in two location circular buffers). The pre-existing code flag circular buffers 1120 are populated at the same time and in the same manner as the circular buffers 1118.
The example message identifier 1122 analyzes the circular buffers 1118 and the pre-existing code flag circular buffers 1120 for a synchronize symbol. For example, the message identifier 1122 searches for a synchronize symbol in the circular buffers 1118 and an pre-existing code flag synchronize symbol in the pre-existing code flag circular buffers 1120. When a synchronize symbol is identified, the symbols following the synchronize symbol (e.g., seven symbols after a synchronize symbol in the circular buffers 1118 or one symbol after an pre-existing code flag synchronize symbol in the pre-existing code flag circular buffers 1120) are output by the message identifier 1122. In addition, the sample index identifying the last audio signal sample processed is output.
The message symbols and the sample index output by the message identifier 1122 are passed to the validator 1124, which validates each message. The validator 1124 includes a filter stack that stores several consecutively received messages. Because messages are repeated (e.g., every 2 seconds or 16,000 samples at 8 KHz), each message is compared with other messages in the filter stack that are separated by approximately the number of audio samples in a single message to determine if a match exists. If a match or substantial match exists, both messages are validated. If a message cannot be identified, it is determined that the message is an error and is not emitted from the validator 1124. In cases where messages might be affected by noise interference, messages might be considered a match when a subset of symbols in a message match the same subset in another already validated message. For example, if four of seven symbols in a message match the same four symbols in another message that has already been validated, the message can be identified as partially validated. Then, a sequence of the repeated messages can be observed to identify the non-matching symbols in the partially validated message.
The validated messages from the validator 1124 are passed to the symbol to bit converter 1126, which translates each symbol to the corresponding data bits of the message using the active symbol table.
An example decoding process 1200 is shown in
As each sample is obtained, the sample is aggregated by a stacker such as the example stacker 1104 of
The new stacked audio samples from the stacker process 1204 are inserted into a buffer and the oldest audio samples are removed (block 1206). As each sample is obtained, a sliding time to frequency conversion is performed on a collection of samples including numerous older samples and the newly added sample obtained at blocks 1202 and 1204 (block 1208). In one example, a sliding FFT may be used to process streaming input samples including 9215 old samples and the one newly added sample. In one example, the FFT using 9216 samples results in a spectrum having a resolution of 5.2 Hz.
After the spectrum is obtained through the time to frequency conversion (block 1208), the transmitted symbol is determined (block 1210). An example process for determining the transmitted symbol is described in conjunction with
After the transmitted message is identified (block 1210), buffer post processing is performed to identify a synchronize symbol and corresponding message symbols (block 1212). An example process for performing post-processing is described in conjunction with
After post processing is performed to identify a transmitted message (block 1212), message validation is performed to verify the validity of the message (block 1214). An example process for performing the message validation is described in conjunction with
After a message has been validated (block 1214), the message is converted from symbols to bits using the active symbol table (block 1216). Control then returns to block 1106 to process the next set of samples.
When the stacker control is enabled, newly received audio signal samples are pushed into a buffer and the oldest samples are pushed out (block 1304). The buffer stores a plurality of samples. For example, when a particular message is repeatedly encoded in an audio signal every two seconds and the encoded audio is sampled at 8 KHz, each message will repeat every 16,000 samples so that buffer will store some multiple of 16,000 samples (e.g., the buffer may store six messages with a 96,000 sample buffer). Then, the stacker 1108 selects substantially equal blocks of samples in the buffer (block 1306). The substantially equal blocks of samples are then summed (block 1308). For example, sample one is added to samples 16,001, 32,001, 48,001, 64,001, and 80,001, sample two is added to samples 16,002, 32,002, 48,002, 64,002, 80,002, sample 16,000 is added to samples 32,000, 48,000, 64,000, 80,000, and 96,000.
After the audio signal samples in the buffer are added, the resulting sequence is divided by the number of blocks selected (e.g., six blocks) to calculate an average sequence of samples (e.g., 16,000 averaged samples) (block 1310). The resulting average sequence of samples is output by the stacker (block 1312). The process of
After the frequencies of interest have been normalized (block 1402). The example symbol scorer 1112 selects the appropriate symbol table based on the previously determined synchronization table (block 1404). For example, a system may include two symbol tables: one table for a normal synchronization and one table for an pre-existing code flag synchronization. Alternatively, the system may include a single symbol table or may include multiple synchronization tables that may be identified by synchronization symbols (e.g., cross-table synchronization symbols). The symbol scorer 1112 then computes a symbol score for each symbol in the selected symbol table (block 1406). For example, the symbol scorer 1112 may iterate across each symbol in the symbol table and add the normalized scores for each of the frequencies of interest for the symbol to compute a symbol score.
After each symbol is scored (block 1406), the example max score selector 1114 selects the symbol with the greatest score (block 1408). The example comparator 1116 then determines if the score for the selected symbol exceeds a maximum score threshold (block 1410). When the score does not exceed the maximum score threshold, an error indication is stored in the circular buffers (e.g., the circular buffers 1118 and the pre-existing code flag circular buffers 1120) (block 1412). The process of
When the score exceeds the maximum score threshold (block 1410), the identified symbol is stored in the circular buffers (e.g., the circular buffers 1118 and the pre-existing code flag circular buffers 1120) (block 1414). The process of
For example,
The pre-existing code flag circular buffers 1120 of
Returning to
For example,
Returning to
When the message has not been previously validated (block 1804), the validator 1124 determines if there is another suitably matching message in the filter stack (block 1806). A message may be suitably matching when it is identical to another message, when a threshold number of message symbols match another message (e.g., four of the seven symbols), or when any other error determination indicates that two messages are similar enough to speculate that they are the same. According to the illustrated example, messages can only be partially validated with another message that has already been validated. When a suitable match is not identified, control proceeds to block 1814.
When a suitable match is identified, the validator 1124 determines if a time duration (e.g., in samples) between identical messages is proper (block 1808). For example, when messages are repeated every 16,000 samples, it is determined if the separation between two suitably matching messages is approximately a multiple of 16,000 samples. When the time duration is not proper, control proceeds to block 1814.
When the time duration is proper (block 1808), the validator 1124 validates both messages by setting the validation flag for each of the messages (block 1810). When the message has been validated completely (e.g., an exact match) the flag may indicate that the message is fully validated (e.g., the message validated in
When it is determined that there is not a suitable match for the top message (block 1806) or that the time duration between a suitable match(es) is not proper (block 1808), the top message is not validated (block 1814). Messages that are not validated are not output from the validator 1124.
After determining not to validate a message (blocks 1806, 1808, and 1814) or outputting the top message (block 1812), the validator 1816 pops the filter stack to remove the top message from the filter stack. Control then returns to block 1802 to process the next message at the top of the filter stack.
While example manners of implementing any or all of the example encoder 102 and the example decoder 116 have been illustrated and described above one or more of the data structures, elements, processes and/or devices illustrated in the drawings and described above may be combined, divided, re-arranged, omitted, eliminated and/or implemented in any other way. Further, the example encoder 102 and example decoder 116 may be implemented by hardware, software, firmware and/or any combination of hardware, software and/or firmware. Thus, for example, the example encoder 102 and the example decoder 116 could be implemented by one or more circuit(s), programmable processor(s), application specific integrated circuit(s) (ASIC(s)), programmable logic device(s) (PLD(s)) and/or field programmable logic device(s) (FPLD(s)), etc. For example, the decoder 116 may be implemented using software on a platform device, such as a mobile telephone. If any of the appended claims is read to cover a purely software implementation, at least one of the prior code detector 204, the example message generator 210, the symbol selector 212, the code frequency selector 214, the synthesizer 216, the inverse FFT 218, the mixer 220, the overlapping short block maker 240, the masking evaluator 242, the critical band pair definer 702, the frequency definer 704, the number generator 706, the redundancy reducer 708, the excess reducer 710, the code frequency definer 712, the LUT filler 714, the sampler 1102, the stacker 1104, the stacker control 1106, the time domain to frequency domain converter 1108, the critical band normalize 1110, the symbol scorer 1112, the max score selector 1114, the comparator 1116, the circular buffers 1118, the pre-existing code flag circular buffers 1120, the message identifier 1122, the validator 1124, and the symbol to bit converter 1126 are hereby expressly defined to include a tangible medium such as a memory, DVD, CD, etc. Further still, the example encoder 102 and the example decoder 116 may include data structures, elements, processes and/or devices instead of, or in addition to, those illustrated in the drawings and described above, and/or may include more than one of any or all of the illustrated data structures, elements, processes and/or devices.
The processor platform 2000 of the example of
The processor platform 2000 also includes an interface circuit 2030. The interface circuit 2030 may be implemented by any type of interface standard, such as a USB interface, a Bluetooth interface, an external memory interface, serial port, general purpose input/output, etc. One or more input devices 2035 and one or more output devices 2040 are connected to the interface circuit 2030.
Although certain example apparatus, methods, and articles of manufacture are described herein, other implementations are possible. The scope of coverage of this patent is not limited to the specific examples described herein. On the contrary, this patent covers all apparatus, methods, and articles of manufacture falling within the scope of the invention.
This patent arises from a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/182,321, filed Nov. 6, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,386,908, titled “METHODS AND APPARATUS TO PERFORM AUDIO WATERMARKING AND WATERMARK DETECTION AND EXTRACTION,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/331,168, filed Oct. 21, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,134,408, titled “METHODS AND APPARATUS TO PERFORM AUDIO WATERMARKING AND WATERMARK DETECTION AND EXTRACTION,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/464,811, filed May 12, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,667,365, titled “METHODS AND APPARATUS TO PERFORM AUDIO WATERMARKING AND WATERMARK DETECTION AND EXTRACTION,” which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/174,708 filed May 1, 2009, titled “METHODS AND APPARATUS TO PERFORM AUDIO WATERMARKING AND WATERMARK DETECTION AND EXTRACTION” and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/108,380, filed Oct. 24, 2008, titled “STACKING METHOD FOR ADVANCED WATERMARK DETECTION.” Priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/182,321, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/331,168, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/464,811, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/174,708, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/108,380 is hereby claimed. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/182,321, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/331,168, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/464,811, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/174,708, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/108,380 are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1742397 | Kauffmann | Jan 1930 | A |
4230990 | Lert, Jr. | Oct 1980 | A |
4647974 | Butler et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4677466 | Lert, Jr. | Jun 1987 | A |
4697209 | Kiewit et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4745468 | Von Kohorn | May 1988 | A |
4876592 | Von Kohorn | Oct 1989 | A |
4876736 | Kiewit | Oct 1989 | A |
4926255 | Von Kohorn | May 1990 | A |
4973952 | Malec et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5019899 | Boles et al. | May 1991 | A |
5023929 | Call | Jun 1991 | A |
5034807 | Von Kohorn | Jul 1991 | A |
5057915 | Von Kohorn | Oct 1991 | A |
5081680 | Bennett | Jan 1992 | A |
5117228 | Fuchigami et al. | May 1992 | A |
5128752 | Von Kohorn | Jul 1992 | A |
5157489 | Lowe | Oct 1992 | A |
5227874 | Von Kohorn | Jul 1993 | A |
5234345 | Weinblatt | Aug 1993 | A |
5245665 | Lewis et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249044 | Von Kohorn | Sep 1993 | A |
5283734 | Von Kohorn | Feb 1994 | A |
5287266 | Malec et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5331544 | Lu et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5373315 | Dufresne et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5382970 | Kiefl | Jan 1995 | A |
5401946 | Weinblatt | Mar 1995 | A |
5425100 | Thomas et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5444769 | Koen et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450490 | Jensen et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5453790 | Vermeulen et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5481294 | Thomas et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483276 | Brooks et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485199 | Elkind et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5512933 | Wheatley et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5524195 | Clanton, III | Jun 1996 | A |
5526427 | Thomas et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5543856 | Rosser et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5574962 | Fardeau et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579124 | Aijala et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581800 | Fardeau et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594934 | Lu et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5629739 | Dougherty | May 1997 | A |
5659366 | Kerman | Aug 1997 | A |
5666293 | Metz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675510 | Coffey et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682196 | Freeman | Oct 1997 | A |
5719634 | Keery et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719880 | Leung | Feb 1998 | A |
5734413 | Lappington et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740035 | Cohen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5764763 | Jensen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768680 | Thomas | Jun 1998 | A |
5787334 | Fardeau et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5801747 | Bedard | Sep 1998 | A |
5815671 | Morrison | Sep 1998 | A |
5841978 | Rhoads | Nov 1998 | A |
5848155 | Cox | Dec 1998 | A |
5850249 | Massetti et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5872588 | Aras et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878384 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880789 | Inaba | Mar 1999 | A |
5889548 | Chan | Mar 1999 | A |
5893067 | Bender et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5907366 | Farmer et al. | May 1999 | A |
5918223 | Blum et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930369 | Cox et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933789 | Byun et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956674 | Smyth et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956716 | Kenner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956743 | Bruce et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966120 | Arazi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974380 | Smyth et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974396 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978855 | Metz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987855 | Dey et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005490 | Higashihara | Dec 1999 | A |
6029045 | Picco et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034722 | Viney et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6035177 | Moses et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049830 | Saib | Apr 2000 | A |
6055573 | Gardenswartz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6097441 | Allport | Aug 2000 | A |
6108637 | Blumenau | Aug 2000 | A |
6115680 | Coffee et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119092 | Patwardhan | Sep 2000 | A |
6125368 | Bridge | Sep 2000 | A |
6128597 | Kolluru et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6154209 | Naughton et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154571 | Cox | Nov 2000 | A |
6157413 | Hanafee et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6208735 | Cox | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216129 | Eldering | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221881 | Garvey | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6263505 | Walker | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266815 | Shen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286036 | Rhoads | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286140 | Ivanyi | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291559 | Krinski | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298348 | Eldering | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300888 | Chen | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308327 | Liu | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311876 | Liu | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331876 | Koster | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335736 | Wagner | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353929 | Houston | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363159 | Rhoads | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6389055 | August | May 2002 | B1 |
6400827 | Rhoads | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411725 | Rhoads | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421445 | Jensen | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6457010 | Eldering | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466913 | Yasuda | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467089 | Aust | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487564 | Asai | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6505160 | Levy | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507299 | Nuijten | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512836 | Xie | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6513014 | Walker | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6516079 | Rhoads | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522771 | Rhoads | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6526385 | Kobayashi | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6539095 | Rhoads | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546556 | Kataoka | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553127 | Kurowski | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553178 | Abecassis | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6606605 | Kolls | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607136 | Atsmon | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614914 | Rhoads | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621881 | Srinivasan | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6642966 | Limaye | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645873 | Shimizu | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6647269 | Hendrey | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6647548 | Lu | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651253 | Dudkiewicz | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654480 | Rhoads | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6665873 | Van Gestel | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6675383 | Wheeler | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681209 | Schmidt | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683966 | Tian | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687663 | McGrath | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6710815 | Billmaier | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714683 | Tian | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6735775 | Massetti | May 2004 | B1 |
6741684 | Kaars | May 2004 | B2 |
6745011 | Hendrickson | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748362 | Meyer | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6750985 | Rhoads | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6754470 | Hendrickson | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6766523 | Herley | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6795972 | Rovira | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6804379 | Rhoads | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6804566 | Colomes | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6823310 | Ishito | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829368 | Meyer | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6845360 | Jensen | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853634 | Davies | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6871180 | Neuhauser | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6871323 | Wagner | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873688 | Aarnio | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6941275 | Swierczek | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6956575 | Nakazawa | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958710 | Zhang | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965601 | Nakano | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968315 | Nakisa | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968371 | Srinivasan | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968564 | Srinivasan | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970131 | Percy | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970886 | Conwell | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6996213 | De Jong | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003731 | Rhoads | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7006555 | Srinivasan | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7020285 | Kirovski | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7038619 | Percy | May 2006 | B2 |
7039932 | Eldering | May 2006 | B2 |
7050603 | Rhoads | May 2006 | B2 |
7051086 | Rhoads | May 2006 | B2 |
7058697 | Rhoads | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7082434 | Gosselin | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7092964 | Dougherty | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7095871 | Jones | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7127261 | Van Erlach | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131007 | Johnston | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7131077 | Roxby et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7143949 | Hannigan | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7155159 | Weinblatt | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7155210 | Benson | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7158943 | Van Der Riet | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171018 | Rhoads | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174293 | Kenyon | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185201 | Rhoads | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194752 | Kenyon | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7197156 | Levy | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7203338 | Ramaswamy | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215280 | Percy | May 2007 | B1 |
7221405 | Basson | May 2007 | B2 |
7227972 | Brundage | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7239981 | Kolessar | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248715 | Levy | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254249 | Rhoads | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260221 | Atsmon | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7269564 | Milsted | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7269734 | Johnson | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7273978 | Uhle | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7280970 | Tamir | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7317716 | Boni | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7328153 | Wells | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7328160 | Nishio | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7334735 | Antebi | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7346512 | Li-Chun Wang | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7356700 | Noridomi | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363278 | Schmelzer | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369678 | Rhoads | May 2008 | B2 |
7383297 | Atsmon | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7421723 | Harkness | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7440674 | Plotnick | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7443292 | Jensen | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7463143 | Forr | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7519658 | Anglin | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7526430 | Kato | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7540012 | Herzberg | May 2009 | B1 |
7577195 | Hickey | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7586439 | Percy | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7587732 | Wright | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7592908 | Zhang | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7623823 | Zito | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627477 | Wang | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640141 | Kolessar | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7761602 | Knight | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7941480 | Atsmon | May 2011 | B2 |
7949722 | Ullman | May 2011 | B1 |
7961881 | Jensen | Jun 2011 | B2 |
RE42627 | Neuhauser | Aug 2011 | E |
8019609 | Tamir | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8065260 | Herre | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069037 | Singhal | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8121830 | Topchy | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8127137 | Levy | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8132224 | Bae | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8185351 | Crystal | May 2012 | B2 |
8200476 | Butterfield | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8229159 | Tourapis | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8255763 | Yang | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8285814 | Rehiman et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8350971 | Malone | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8359205 | Topchy | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8365236 | Krikorian | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8369972 | Topchy | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8554545 | Topchy | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559412 | Nicholls et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8666528 | Harkness | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8700407 | Wang | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8768713 | Chaoui et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8924995 | Ramaswamy | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8965786 | Frumkin | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9015563 | Lynch | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9021516 | Nielsen | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9124769 | Srinivasan | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9336784 | Lynch | May 2016 | B2 |
9667365 | Srinivasan | May 2017 | B2 |
9711152 | Neuhauser | Jul 2017 | B2 |
10003846 | Harkness | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10134408 | Srinivasan et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10467286 | Srinivasan | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10555048 | Harkness | Feb 2020 | B2 |
11004456 | Harkness | May 2021 | B2 |
11386908 | Srinivasan | Jul 2022 | B2 |
20010037232 | Miller | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044899 | Levy | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010056573 | Kovac | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020032734 | Rhoads | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020033842 | Zetts | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020053078 | Holtz | May 2002 | A1 |
20020056094 | Dureau | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059218 | August | May 2002 | A1 |
20020062382 | Rhoads | May 2002 | A1 |
20020088011 | Lamkin | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091991 | Castro | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020102993 | Hendrey | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108125 | Joao | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111934 | Narayan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112002 | Abato | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020114490 | Taniguchi | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124246 | Kaminsky | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133562 | Newnam | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138851 | Lord | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020144262 | Plotnick | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020144273 | Reto | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162118 | Levy | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174425 | Markel | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020194592 | Tsuchida | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196275 | Willner | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199187 | Gissin | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004589 | Bruekers | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005056 | Yamamoto | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021441 | Levy | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030039465 | Bjorgan | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030054757 | Kolessar | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088452 | Kelly | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088674 | Ullman | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103645 | Levy | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105870 | Baum | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108200 | Sako | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115586 | Lejouan | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115598 | Pantoja | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030122708 | Percy | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131350 | Peiffer | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144899 | Kokubo | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030171833 | Crystal | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172274 | Hsia et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172375 | Shaw | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177488 | Smith | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185232 | Moore | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191653 | Birnbaum | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030192060 | Levy | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195851 | Ong | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208763 | McElhatten | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030210803 | Kaneda | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229900 | Reisman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040004630 | Kalva | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006696 | Shin | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008615 | Oh | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015399 | Maggio | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024588 | Watson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031058 | Reisman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040037271 | Liscano | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038692 | Muzaffar | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040058675 | Lu | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059918 | Xu | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059933 | Levy | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064319 | Neuhauser | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073916 | Petrovic | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073951 | Bae | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040102961 | Jensen | May 2004 | A1 |
20040120417 | Lynch | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125125 | Levy | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128514 | Rhoads | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040137929 | Jones | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143349 | Roberts | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143844 | Brant | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040146161 | De Jong | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162720 | Jang | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162773 | Del Rey | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163020 | Sidman | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040184369 | Herre | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193489 | Boyd | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199387 | Wang | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236819 | Anati | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237114 | Drazin | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267533 | Hannigan | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050028189 | Heine | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033758 | Baxter | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035857 | Khang | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036653 | Brundage | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050058319 | Rhoads | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086488 | Kori | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086682 | Burges | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102696 | Westberg | May 2005 | A1 |
20050144004 | Bennett | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144632 | Mears | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050169497 | Gustafson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177738 | Van Der Veen | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192933 | Rhoads | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216346 | Kusumoto | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216509 | Kolessar | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234728 | Tachibana | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234731 | Sirivara | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234774 | Dupree | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050254453 | Barneah | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262351 | Levy | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264430 | Zhang | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050271246 | Sharma | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060041615 | Blank | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060059277 | Zito | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060083403 | Zhang | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089912 | Spagna | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095401 | Krikorian | May 2006 | A1 |
20060107195 | Ramaswamy | May 2006 | A1 |
20060107302 | Zdepski | May 2006 | A1 |
20060110005 | Tapson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111962 | Holsinger | May 2006 | A1 |
20060136549 | Carro | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136564 | Ambrose | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060153041 | Miyashita | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060156002 | Bruekers | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167747 | Goodman | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168613 | Wood | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060212290 | Ide | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212710 | Baum | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221173 | Duncan | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060224798 | Klein | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239502 | Petrovic | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060277410 | Jajodia et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060280246 | Alattar | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070006250 | Croy | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011040 | Wright | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016918 | Alcorn | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070036357 | Van Der Veen | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038516 | Apple | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070052560 | Van Der Veen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055987 | Lu | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061577 | Van De Kerkhof | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064937 | Van Leest | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070429 | Hein | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088801 | Levkovitz | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070104335 | Shi | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106760 | Houh | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110089 | Essafi | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118375 | Kenyon | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124756 | Covell | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124771 | Shvadron | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127717 | Herre | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070129952 | Kenyon | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070133223 | Fredley | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143778 | Covell | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149114 | Danilenko | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162927 | Ramaswamy | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198738 | Angiolillo | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201835 | Rhoads | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070220263 | Ziener | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226760 | Neuhauser | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070240234 | Watson | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242826 | Rassool | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250310 | Sato | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250716 | Brunk | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256141 | Nakano | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274523 | Rhoads | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276925 | La Joie | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276926 | Lajoie | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288277 | Neuhauser | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288476 | Flanagan | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294057 | Crystal | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294132 | Zhang | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294705 | Gopalakrishnan | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294706 | Neuhauser | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005656 | Pang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019560 | Rhoads | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022114 | Moskowitz | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027734 | Zhao | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028223 | Rhoads | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028474 | Horne | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040354 | Ray | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059160 | Saunders | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065507 | Morrison | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071530 | Ehara | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080075128 | Fourcand | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077956 | Morrison | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082510 | Wang | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082922 | Biniak | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080083003 | Biniak | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080085031 | Estevez | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086304 | Neuhauser | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086553 | Theobald | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091087 | Neuhauser | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091762 | Neuhauser | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101454 | Luff | May 2008 | A1 |
20080117975 | Sasai | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126420 | Wright | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133223 | Son | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080137749 | Tian | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080139182 | Levy | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140573 | Levy | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080168503 | Sparrell | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172261 | Albertson | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080204273 | Crystal | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209219 | Rhein | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209491 | Hasek | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215333 | Tewfik | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215889 | Celik | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219496 | Tewfik | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228744 | Desbiens | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235077 | Harkness | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240490 | Finkelstein | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243590 | Rich | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263359 | Radzishevsky | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263620 | Berkvens | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080292134 | Sharma | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080319739 | Mehrotra | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090007159 | Rangarajan | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031134 | Levy | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090063250 | Burgess | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070408 | White | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070587 | Srinivasan | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090074185 | Srinivasan | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090119723 | Tinsman | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125310 | Lee | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150553 | Collart | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171767 | Kolessar | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193052 | Fitzgerald | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090240505 | Villemoes | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252370 | Picard | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259325 | Topchy | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265214 | Jobs | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281815 | Zopf | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090306920 | Zwinger | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307061 | Monighetti | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307084 | Monighetti | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326960 | Breebaat | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327734 | Aprea | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100008500 | Lisanke | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100027837 | Levy | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030838 | Atsmon | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100106510 | Topchy et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106718 | Topchy | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121210 | Lindner | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131970 | Falcon | May 2010 | A1 |
20100134278 | Srinivasan | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100135638 | Mio | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100166120 | Baum | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100206949 | Mattlin | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223062 | Srinivasan | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226526 | Modro | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100240455 | Gagner | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268540 | Arshi | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268573 | Jain | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280641 | Harkness et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100324708 | Ojanpera | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110035462 | Akella | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110106587 | Lynch et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126222 | Wright | May 2011 | A1 |
20110224992 | Chaoui et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110314486 | Lu | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120078396 | Case, Jr. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120101827 | Topchy et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120130802 | Shimizu | May 2012 | A1 |
20120159541 | Carton et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120203363 | McKenna | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203559 | McKenna | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120233646 | Coniglio et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239407 | Lynch | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245978 | Jain | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120266187 | Deng | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120275621 | Elko | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120278651 | Muralimanohar | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130013737 | Rehiman et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130014141 | Bhatia et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130096706 | Srinivasan | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130144631 | Miyasaka et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130144709 | Narasimhan et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140026159 | Cuttner | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140189724 | Harkness | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140226814 | Fernando | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140259039 | Nielsen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270195 | Nielsen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282640 | Nielsen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150039320 | Neuhauser | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150039321 | Neuhauser | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150039322 | Lynch | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150039972 | Lynch | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150221312 | Lynch | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20170061975 | Srinivasan | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20190074021 | Srinivasan | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190281349 | Harkness et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200142927 | Srinivasan | May 2020 | A1 |
20220351739 | Srinivasan | Nov 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
8976601 | Feb 2002 | AU |
9298201 | Apr 2002 | AU |
2003230993 | Nov 2003 | AU |
2006203639 | Sep 2006 | AU |
2006203639 | Jan 2009 | AU |
2009308256 | Apr 2010 | AU |
2009308304 | Apr 2010 | AU |
2009308256 | Mar 2014 | AU |
2009308304 | Apr 2014 | AU |
112901 | Jun 2003 | BR |
0112901 | Jun 2003 | BR |
309598 | Feb 2005 | BR |
0309598 | Feb 2005 | BR |
2293957 | Jul 2000 | CA |
2483104 | Nov 2003 | CA |
2741342 | Apr 2010 | CA |
2741391 | Apr 2010 | CA |
3015423 | Apr 2010 | CA |
3124234 | Apr 2010 | CA |
2741391 | Oct 2017 | CA |
2741342 | Oct 2018 | CA |
3015423 | Sep 2021 | CA |
1149366 | May 1997 | CN |
1282152 | Jan 2001 | CN |
1303547 | Jul 2001 | CN |
1372682 | Oct 2002 | CN |
1497876 | May 2004 | CN |
1592906 | Mar 2005 | CN |
1647160 | Jul 2005 | CN |
1672172 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1795494 | Jun 2006 | CN |
1282152 | Oct 2006 | CN |
101115124 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101124624 | Feb 2008 | CN |
101243688 | Aug 2008 | CN |
101361301 | Feb 2009 | CN |
102239521 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102265344 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102265536 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102625982 | Aug 2012 | CN |
1497876 | Jul 2014 | CN |
102239521 | Dec 2014 | CN |
102265344 | Jan 2015 | CN |
104376845 | Feb 2015 | CN |
102625982 | Mar 2015 | CN |
102265536 | Jun 2015 | CN |
104683827 | Jun 2015 | CN |
104376845 | Jan 2018 | CN |
0713335 | May 1996 | EP |
0769749 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0883939 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0967803 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1026847 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1267572 | Dec 2002 | EP |
0883939 | May 2003 | EP |
1307833 | May 2003 | EP |
1349370 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1406403 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1463220 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1504445 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1307833 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1703460 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1704695 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1742397 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1745464 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1745464 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1704695 | Feb 2008 | EP |
1504445 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2351028 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2351271 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2351271 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2487858 | Aug 2012 | EP |
2351028 | Jun 2016 | EP |
2351271 | Dec 2016 | EP |
1163918 | Sep 2012 | HK |
1164565 | Sep 2012 | HK |
1207200 | Jan 2016 | HK |
H10294896 | Nov 1998 | JP |
2000172282 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000307530 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001005471 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001040322 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2002521702 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002237610 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002247610 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2003208187 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003536113 | Dec 2003 | JP |
2006154851 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2007318745 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008511844 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2012507044 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2012507047 | Mar 2012 | JP |
9417609 | Aug 1994 | WO |
9527349 | Oct 1995 | WO |
9702672 | Jan 1997 | WO |
0004662 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0019699 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0072309 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0119088 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0124027 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0131497 | May 2001 | WO |
0140963 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0153922 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0175743 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0191109 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0199109 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0205517 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0211123 | Feb 2002 | WO |
0215081 | Feb 2002 | WO |
0215086 | Feb 2002 | WO |
0217591 | Feb 2002 | WO |
0219625 | Mar 2002 | WO |
0227600 | Apr 2002 | WO |
0237381 | May 2002 | WO |
0245034 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02061652 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02065305 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02065318 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02069121 | Sep 2002 | WO |
03009277 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03091990 | Nov 2003 | WO |
03094499 | Nov 2003 | WO |
03096337 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004010352 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004010376 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004040416 | May 2004 | WO |
2004040475 | May 2004 | WO |
2005011198 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005025217 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005064885 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005101243 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005111998 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006012241 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006025797 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2007056531 | May 2007 | WO |
2007056532 | May 2007 | WO |
2007073484 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2008042953 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008044664 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008045950 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008072145 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008110002 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008110790 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2009011206 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009061651 | May 2009 | WO |
2009064561 | May 2009 | WO |
2010045458 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010048458 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010048459 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010048498 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010127268 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2020019625 | Jan 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,578, dated Jun. 7, 2017, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with United States U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,547, dated Jun. 28, 2017, (14 pages). |
Intellectual Property Office of India, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 8465/DELNP/2011, dated Jun. 28, 2017, 2 Pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Second Notification of Office Action,” mailed in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201410725835.3, dated Aug. 1, 2017 (9 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,578, dated Aug. 23, 2017 (7 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/331,168, dated Oct. 6, 2017, (9 pages). |
The State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Notice of Completion of Formalities for Patent Registration,” issued in connection with application No. 201410725324.1, dated Oct. 10, 2017, 5 pages, translation attached. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Second Office Action,” issued in connection with application No. 201510070787.3, dated Dec. 4, 2017, 8 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance”, issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,760,677, dated Dec. 18, 2017, 1 page. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Third Office Action” mailed in connection with application No. 201410725835.3, dated Jan. 4, 2018, (8 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,547, dated Feb. 7, 2018, 14 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance”, issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,741,342, dated Feb. 27, 2018, 1 page. |
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European patent Application No. 09748893.6-1208, dated Feb. 28, 2018, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,547, dated Mar. 13, 2018, (11 pages). |
The State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Notice of Completion of Formalities,” issued in connection with application No. 201410725835.3, dated May 31, 2018, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/331,168 , dated Jul. 3, 2018, (8 pages). |
European Patent Office, “ Decision to grant a European patent,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 09748893.6, dated Jul. 26, 2018, 2 pages. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” issued in connection with European patent appl. No. 18183643, filed Aug. 24, 2018, 2 pages. |
The State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Decision of Rejection,” mailed in connection with Application No. 201510070787.3, dated Oct. 8, 2018, (12 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with United States U.S. Appl. No. 15/698,373, dated Nov. 29, 2018, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” dated Apr. 10, 2019 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/698,373, 7 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action”, issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 3,008,502, dated Apr. 26, 2019, 4 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/004,111, dated Apr. 29, 2019, (25 pages). |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Reexamination,” issued in connection with application No. 201510070787.3, on May 14, 2019, with English translation, 14 pages. |
Canadian Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with CA Patent Application No. 3,015,423, dated Jun. 18, 2019, (3 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance” in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/698,373, dated Jun. 26, 2019, 8 pages. |
The State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Reexamination,” mailed in connection with Application No. 201510070787.3, on Jul. 22, 2019, (17 pages). |
European Patent Office, “Examination Report,” dated Jul. 30, 2019, issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 18183643.8, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowability,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/698,373, dated Aug. 23, 2019, 2 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance” in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/698,373, dated Sep. 12, 2019, 2 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/004,111, dated Sep. 18, 2019, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowability,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/004,111, dated Nov. 26, 2019, 4 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/672,128, dated Apr. 21, 2021, 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Office Action” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/182,321, dated Jan. 10, 2020, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/426,803, dated Jan. 21, 2020, 6 pages. |
Intellectual Property of Office of India, “Hearing adjournment notice,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 8465/DELNP/2011, dated Feb. 24, 2020, 2 Pages. |
Intellectual Property of Office of India, “Hearing adjournment notice,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 8465/DELNP/2011, dated Mar. 13, 2020, 2 Pages. |
Canadian Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with CA Patent Application No. 3,015,423, dated Jun. 5, 2020, (3 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/426,803, dated Jun. 17, 2020, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/182,321, dated Jul. 24, 2020, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/426,803, dated Sep. 1, 2020, 4 pages. |
Canadian Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with CA Patent Application No. 3,015,423, dated Oct. 5, 2020, (20 pages). |
Intellectual Property of Office of India, “Hearing adjournment notice,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 8465/DELNP/2011, dated Nov. 3, 2020, 2 Pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/672,128, dated Dec. 10, 2020, 8 pages. |
Intellectual Property of Office of India, “Intimation of Grant,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 8465/DELNP/2011, dated Dec. 21, 2020, 1 Page. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/426,803, dated Jan. 12, 2021, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” mailed in connection with European Patent Application No. 18183643.8, dated Feb. 11, 2021, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/779,212, dated Feb. 22, 2021, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/182,321, dated Apr. 15, 2021, 12 pages. |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2010242814, dated May 10, 2013, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark , “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,092, dated May 10, 2013, 16 Pages. |
IP Australia,“Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Application No. 2013203888, dated May 15, 2013, 4 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Search Report,” issued in connection with application No. CN 200980152527.3, dated Jun. 8, 2013 (2 pages). |
Intellectual Property Office of China, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with application No. CN 200981052527.3, dated Jun. 24, 2013 (6 pages). |
Japanese Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-508780, dated Jul. 2, 2013, 9 pages. [English Translation Included]. |
The State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “First Notification of Office Action,” mailed in connection with Application No. CN 200980148637.2, dated Jul. 2, 2013 (7 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action”, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,245, dated Jul. 3, 2013, 24 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,226, dated Jul. 31, 2014, 6 pages. |
Intellectual Property Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian patent application No. 2010242814, dated Jul. 22, 2014, 3 pages. |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 2,” issued in connection with AU Application No. 2009308305, dated Jul. 23, 2013, 2 pages. |
Canadian Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with CA Patent Application No. 2,741,342, dated Jul. 29, 2013, (3 pages). |
The State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Search Report,” mailed in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200980152518.4, dated Jul. 31, 2013 (2 pages). |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “First Office Action,” mailed in connection with application No. CN 200980152518.4, dated Aug. 9, 2013 (10 pages). |
IP Australia,“Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with AU Application No. 2009308305, dated Aug. 19, 2013, 2 pages. |
IP Australia, “Notice of Grant”, issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2009308256, dated Jul. 10, 2014, 1 page. |
Australian Government, IP Australia,“Patent Examination Report No. 2,” issued in connection with AU Application No. 2009308304, dated Aug. 21, 2013, 4 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Second Notification of Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200980148637.2, dated Mar. 5, 2014, 9 pages. |
Australian Government, IP Australia,“Patent Examination Report No. 3,” issued in connection with AU Application No. 2009308304, dated Sep. 5, 2013, 3 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark , “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,092, dated Sep. 9, 2013, 6 Pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/771,640, dated Sep. 16, 2013, 8 Pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Application No. 2,760,677 dated Sep. 30, 2013, 3 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/771,640, dated Oct. 22, 2013, 10 Pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Decision of Refusal”, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-533356, dated Oct. 16, 2013 (2 Pages). English Translation Included. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Rejection,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/530,233, dated Nov. 7, 2013, 14 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “2nd Office Action,” mailed in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200980152518.4, dated Apr. 14, 2014 (7 pages). |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2009308304, dated Apr. 3, 2014 (2 pages). |
Rowand LLP, “Response to Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Application No. 2,760,677 dated Mar. 28, 2014, 16 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Decision of Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-508780, dated Dec. 3, 2013, 2 pages. [English Translation Included]. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/464,811, dated Dec. 17, 2013, 16 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,245, dated Dec. 31, 2013, 27 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “2nd Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200980152527.3, dated Jan. 24, 2014, 9 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Canadian Application No. 2,741,536, dated Mar. 4, 2014, 1 page. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/771,640, dated Feb. 3, 2014, 4 Pages. |
IP Australia,“Patent Examination Report No. 4,” issued in connection with AU Application No. 2009308304, dated Mar. 21, 2014, 4 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/530,233, dated Feb. 20, 2014, 5 pages. |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance”, issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2009308256, dated Mar. 12, 2014, 2 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Search Report,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201080029773.2, dated Feb. 25, 2014, 2 pages. |
The State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “1st Office Action,” mailed in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201080029773.2, dated Mar. 4, 2014 (5 pages). |
IP Australia, “Certificate of Grant,” mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2009308304, dated Jul. 31, 2014, 1 page only. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,221, dated Dec. 3, 2015, 11 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Third Notification of Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200980152527.3, dated Aug. 6, 2014 (13 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,578, dated Nov. 17, 2015 (12 pages). |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Notice of Decision of Granting Patent Right for Invention,” issued in connection with Chinese patent application No. 200980148637.2, dated Sep. 9, 2014, with English translation, 5 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Application No. 2,760,677, dated Sep. 29, 2014, 3 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,760,677, dated Nov. 9, 2015 (4 pages). |
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 09748892.8, dated Oct. 6, 2014 (4 Pages.). |
IP Australia,“Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2015202561, dated Sep. 22, 2015, 3 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Notice of Decision of Granting Patent Right for Invention,” issued in connection with Chinese patent application No. 200980152518.4, dated Oct. 13, 2014, with English translation, 5 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 09747953.9-2223, dated Oct. 15, 2014, 5 pages. |
International Bureau, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/049202, dated Nov. 12, 2014 (9 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/530,233, dated Sep. 18, 2015, 27 pages. |
IP Australia, “Notice of Grant,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2010242814, dated Nov. 13, 2014, 1 page. |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with AU Application No. 2013203838, dated Nov. 24, 2014, 6 pages. |
The State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notice to Grant,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201080029773.2, dated Nov. 26, 2014, 3 Pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report No. 1”, issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013203820, dated Nov. 28, 2014, 3 pages. |
IP Australia,“Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with AU Application No. 2013203674, dated Dec. 2, 2014, 4 pages. |
Hong Kong Patents Registry, “Certificate of Grant of a Standard Patent,” mailed in connection with Hong Kong Patent Application No. 13101413.2, dated Aug. 21, 2015 (2 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,578, dated Dec. 3, 2014, 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,226, dated Dec. 23, 2014 (5 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection to U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,245, dated Aug. 20, 2015, 15 pages. |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian patent application No. 2013203888, dated Feb. 2, 2015, 2 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, Notice of Decision of Granting Patent Right for Invention, issued in connection with Chinese patent application No. 200980152527.3, dated Feb. 26, 2015, with English translation, 5 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance”, issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,741,391, dated Mar. 13, 2015, 4 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Corrected Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,438, dated Jun. 2, 2015 (14 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,578, dated Apr. 21, 2015, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,438, dated May 22, 2015 (15 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/685,984, dated Jul. 31, 2015 (5 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/464,811, dated Jul. 6, 2015, 16 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/530,233, dated May 26, 2015, 11 pages. |
IP Australia, “Notice of Grant” mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013203888, dated May 28, 2015 (2 pages). |
Canadian Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with CA Patent Application No. 2,741,342, dated Jun. 10, 2015, (4 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,221, dated Jun. 29, 2015 (10 pages). |
United State Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,438, dated Jun. 6, 2015, 14 pages. |
Wagner, “Lexington Area Travel Data Collection Test, Global Positioning Systems for Personal Travel Surveys, Final Report,” Federal Highway Administration, Sep. 15, 1997 (92 pages). |
Hopper, “EBU Project Group P/META Metadata Exchange Standards,” EBU Technical Review, Sep. 2000, pp. 1-24. [http://www.ebu.ch/en/technical/trev/trev—284-contents.html, retrieved on Jul. 20, 2006] (24 pages). |
Mulder, “The Integration of Metadata From Production to Consumer,” EBU Technical Review, Sep. 2000, pp. 1-5. [http://www.ebu.ch/en/technical/trev/trev_284-contents.html, retrieved on Jul. 20, 2006], 5 pages. |
“EBU Technical Review (Editorial),” No. 284 Sep. 2000, pp. 1-3. [http://www.ebu.ch/en/technical/trev/trev—284-contents.html, retrieved on Jul. 20, 2006] (3 pages). |
Heuer et al.,“Adaptive Multimedia Messaging based on MPEG-7—The M3-Box,” Nov. 9-10, 2000, Proc. Second Int'l Symposium on Mobile Multimedia Systems Applications, pp. 6-13 (8 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,578 dated Jun. 7, 2017, 17 pages. |
Wactlar et al., “Digital Video Archives: Managing Through Metadata” Building a National Strategy for Digital Preservation: Issues in Digital Media Archiving, Apr. 2002, pp. 84-88.[http: www.infomedia.cs.cmu.edu/doc11mcnis/Wact1ar-CL1R-final.pdf, retrieved on Jul. 20, 2006) (14 pages). (Document already of record in parent U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,578. Copy can be provided upon request.). |
Wang, “An Industrial-Strength Audio Search Algorithm,” Shazam Entertainment, Ltd., in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, Baltimore, Oct. 26-30, 2003 (7 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US03/31180, dated Jun. 8, 2004 (5 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Examination Report,” issued in connection with PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US03/31180, dated Aug. 17, 2004 (4 pages). |
Fink et al., “Social- and Interactive-Television Applications Based on Real-Time Ambient-Audio Identification,” EurolTV, 2006, 10 pages. |
Claburn, “Google Researchers Propose TV Monitoring,” Information Week, Jun. 7, 2006, 3 pages. |
Anderson, “Google to compete with Nielsen for TV-ratings info?,” Ars Technica, Jun. 19, 2006 (2 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/779,212, dated Sep. 3, 2021, 12 pages. |
Evain, “TV-Anytime Metadata—A Preliminary Specification on Schedule!,” EBU Technical Review, Sep. 2000, pp. 1-14. [http://www.ebu.ch/en/technical/trev/trev_284-contents.html, retrieved on Jul. 20, 2006] (14 pages). |
Wactlar et al., “Digital Video Archives: Managing Through Metadata” Building a National Strategy for Digital Preservation: Issues in Digital Media Archiving, Apr. 2002, pp. 84-88. [http://www.informedia.cs.cmu.edu/documents/Wactlar-CLIR-final.pdf, retrieved on Jul. 20, 2006] (14 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” issued in connection with PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US05/26426, dated Aug. 18, 2006 (9 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with PCT No. PCT/US2005/026426, dated Feb. 1, 2007, 9 pages. |
Shazam, “Shazam turns up the volume on mobile music,” http://www.shazam.com/music/web/newsdetail.html?nid=NEWS 137, Nov. 28, 2007, 1 page. |
Arbitron, “Critical Band Encoding Technology Audio Encoding System From Arbitron,” Feb. 2008, 27 pages. |
Shazam, “Shazam and video zone digital media announce UK's first fixed price mobile download service for music videos,” http://www.shazam.com/music/web/newsdetail.html?nid=NEWS136, Feb. 11, 2008, 1 page. |
Shazam, “Shazam launches new music application for Facebook fans,” https://mobilemarketingmagazine.com/shazam-launches-facebook-app, Feb. 18, 2008 (1 page). |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with CA Application Serial No. 2,574,998, dated Aug. 26, 2008 (4 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/672,128, dated Oct. 13, 2021, 10 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,245, dated Feb. 5, 2009 (35 pages). |
Sullivan, “Google cozies up to SMBs for Digital Content,” Mediapost News, Mar. 18, 2009, 2 pages. |
Stultz, “Hand-held captioning at Disney World Theme Parks,” Article retrieved on Mar. 19, 2009, http://goflorida.about.com/od/disneyworld/a/wdw_captioning.htm, 2 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application Serial No. 2,574,998, dated Mar. 23, 2009, 5 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action”, issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 3,094,520, dated Oct. 25, 2021, 5 pages. |
Kane, “Entrepreneur Plans On-Demand Videogame Service,” The Wall Street Journal, Mar. 24, 2009, 2 pages. |
Boehret, “Yahoo Widgets Lend brains to boob tube,” The Wall Street Journal, Mar. 25, 2009, 3 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,245, dated Jul. 21, 2009 (26 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” dated Nov. 26, 2021, in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/182,321, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/779,212, dated Jan. 24, 2022, 12 Pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/530,233, dated Sep. 16, 2009 (20 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/182,321, dated Mar. 16, 2022, 10 pages. |
Canadian Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with CA Patent Application No. 3,124,234, dated Aug. 15, 2022, (4 pages). |
Canadian Patent Office, “Examiner's Report,” mailed in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 3,094,520, dated Sep. 2, 2022, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,245, dated Sep. 30, 2009, 3 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/779,212, dated Oct. 5, 2022, 13 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with CA Application Serial No. 2,574,998, dated Nov. 13, 2009, 10 pages. |
Canadian Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with CA Patent Application No. 3,124,234, dated Dec. 14, 2022, (23 pages). |
Stross, “Apple wouldn't risk its cool over a Gimmick, Would it?”, The New York Times, Nov. 14, 2009, 3 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/779,212, dated Jan. 9, 2023, 3 pages. |
Jacked, “What is Jacked?,” [http://www.jacked.com/], retrieved on Dec. 3, 2009, 1 page. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/676,461, dated Feb. 15, 2023, 6 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report”, issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/061750, dated Mar. 9, 2010, 3 Pages. |
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/061750, dated Mar. 9, 2010, 6 Pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,438 dated Dec. 4, 2015 (12 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/685,984, dated Dec. 18, 2015 (5 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,547 dated Dec. 18, 2015 (14 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection to U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,245, dated May 17, 2017, 9 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Examination Report”, issued in connection with application No. 09748892.8 dated Dec. 21, 2015, 7 pages. |
IP Australia,“Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with AU Application No. 2013203674, dated Jan. 5, 2016, 2 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 09747953.9-2223, dated Jan. 7, 2016, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/049202, dated Feb. 2, 2016, 4 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication regarding the expiry of opposition period”, issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 09747953.9-2223, dated May 4, 2017, 1 page. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection to U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,245, dated Feb. 26, 2016, 10 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner Report”, issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,741,391, dated Feb. 29, 2016, 4 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/464,811, dated Mar. 10, 2016, 14 pages. |
Hong Kong Patents Registry, “Certificate of Grant of Standard Patent,” mailed in connection with Hong Kong Patent Application No. 12105179.8, dated Mar. 18, 2016 (3 pages). |
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European patent Application No. 09748893.6-1908, dated Apr. 5, 2016, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,547, dated Apr. 27, 2016, 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,578, dated Apr. 29, 2016, 14 pages. |
Canadian Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with CA Patent Application No. 2,741,342, dated May 16, 2016, (3 pages). |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance” mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2015202561, dated May 16, 2016 (2 pages). |
European Patent Office, “Decision to grant a European patent pursuant to Article 97(1) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 09747953.9-2223, dated Jun. 2, 2016, 2 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 09 748 892.8 , dated Jun. 9, 2016 ( 7 Pages. ). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,245, dated Jun. 24, 2016 (12 pages). |
European Patent Office, “Transmission of the certificate for a European patent pursuant to Rule 74 EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 09747953.9-2223, dated Jun. 29, 2016, 1 page. |
IP Australia,“Patent Examination Report No. 2,” issued in connection with AU Application No. 2013203838, dated Jul. 29, 2016, 4 pages. |
IP Australia,“Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with AU Application No. 2013203838, dated Aug. 25, 2016, 2 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,221, dated Aug. 31, 2016 (13 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,438, dated May 2, 2017, 15 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,547, dated Sep. 1, 2016, 14 pages. |
IP Australia,“Notice of Grant,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2015202561, dated Sep. 8, 2016, 1 page. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,438, dated Sep. 9, 2016 (13 pages). |
European Patent Office, “Summons to attend oral proceedings,” issued in connection with European patent Application No. 09748893.6-1908, Sep. 21, 2016, 25 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/464,811, dated Sep. 23, 2016, 8 pages. |
The State Intellectual Property Office of China, “First Notification of Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese patent application No. 201510070787.3, dated Apr. 28, 2017, with English translation, 18 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Decision to grant a European patent pursuant to Article 97/(1) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 09748892.8 , dated Nov. 10, 2016 ( 2 Pages. ). |
IP Australia, “Notice of Grant”, issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013203820, dated Nov. 17, 2016, 1 page. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Application No. 2,760,677, dated Nov. 21, 2016, 3 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection to U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,245, dated Nov. 22, 2016, 14 pages. |
IP Australia, “Notice of Grant”, issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013203820, dated Nov. 24, 2016, 1 page. |
European Patent Office, “Transmission of the certificate for a European patent pursuant to Rule 74 EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application 09748892.8, dated Dec. 7, 2016, 1 Page. |
The State Intellectual Property Office of China, “First Office Action,” issued in connection with application No. 201410725835.3, dated Dec. 12, 2016, 16 pages. |
IP Australia, “Certificate of Grant”, mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013203838, dated Dec. 22, 2016 (1 page). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due”, issue in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/464,811, dated Jan. 20, 2017, 30 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,578, dated Jan. 23, 2017, 12 pages. |
The State Intellectual Property Office of China, “First Notification of Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese patent application No. 201410725324.1, dated Feb. 4, 2017, with English translation, 16 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office action”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,221, dated Mar. 9, 2017, 14 pages. |
Canadian Patent Office, “Notice of Allowance”, issued in connection with Canadian Patent application No. 2,741,391, dated Mar. 10, 2017, 1 page. |
Canadian Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with CA Patent Application No. 2,741,342, dated Apr. 3, 2017, (4 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2009/061827, dated Mar. 15, 2010, 3 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/530,233, dated Mar. 18, 2010 (9 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/779,212, dated Mar. 13, 2023, 13 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner Requisition”, issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 3,094,520, dated Jun. 5, 2023, 5 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion,” issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/061827, dated May 15, 2010 (8 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2009/061749, dated May 26, 2010, 5 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/061749, dated May 26, 2010, 8 Pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal”, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-533356, dated May 7, 2013 (5 Pages). English Translation Included. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Application No. 2,574,998, dated Aug. 10, 2010, 1 page. |
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with Application No. 10725310.6, dated Apr. 17, 2013, 7 Pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” issued in connection with PCT No. PCT/US2010/033201, dated Oct. 1, 2010, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/771,640, dated Apr. 4, 2013, 20 Pages. |
European Patent Office, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with corresponding European Patent Application No. 10725310.6, dated Apr. 17, 2011, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2009/061750, dated Apr. 26, 2011, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2009/061749, dated Apr. 26, 2011, 9 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2009/061827, dated Apr. 26, 2011, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,245, dated Apr. 28, 2011, 48 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/464,811, dated Apr. 1, 2013, 14 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/530,233, dated Mar. 25, 2013 (28 pages). |
Japanese Patent Office, “Decision of Refusal”, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-533363, dated Mar. 19, 2013 (4 pages). English Translation Included. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/604,176, dated Oct. 24, 2011 (25 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,245, dated Oct. 26, 2011, 36 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Written Opinion”, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-533363, dated Feb. 25, 2013 (4 pages). English Translation Included. |
Canadian Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with CA Patent Application No. 2,741,536, dated Feb. 22, 2013, (2 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion,” mailed in connection with PCT/US2010/033201, dated Nov. 1, 2011 (9 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Supplemental Notice of Allowability,” issued in connection with parent U.S. Appl. No. 12/604,176, dated Nov. 8, 2011 (6 pages). |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 107253 10.6 dated Jan. 20, 2012 (2 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/551,220, dated Apr. 26, 2012, 10 Pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report No. 1”, issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2009308256, dated Jun. 25, 2012, 6 pages. |
IP Australia,“Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with AU Application No. 2009308305, dated Jun. 25, 2012, 5 pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Application No. 2009308304, dated Jun. 29, 2012, 11 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal”, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-533356, dated Jul. 31, 2012 (8 Pages). English Translation Included. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal”, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-533357, dated Aug. 7, 2012 (6 Pages). English Translation Included. |
United States Patent and Trademark , “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,092, dated Aug. 30, 2012, 10 Pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/464,811, dated Aug. 31, 2012, 15 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal”, issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-533363, dated Oct. 2, 2012 (6 pages). English Translation Included. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/551,220, dated Dec. 5, 2012, 5 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220351739 A1 | Nov 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61174708 | May 2009 | US | |
61108380 | Oct 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16182321 | Nov 2018 | US |
Child | 17860920 | US | |
Parent | 15331168 | Oct 2016 | US |
Child | 16182321 | US | |
Parent | 12464811 | May 2009 | US |
Child | 15331168 | US |