In recent years, edge computing have been implemented to bring computational capabilities and data storage closer to the data source, reducing latency and enhancing real-time processing. Edge nodes collect data from various sensors, devices, or applications in the local environment. The collected data is processed locally on the edge nodes. This processing can include real-time analytics, filtering, aggregation, and other tasks that provide valuable insights. The processed data can be stored on edge storage device. The edge storage infrastructure can be located at or near the edge node. The edge node may include various storage devices, such as hard drives (HDDs), solid-state drives (SSDs) or other storage solutions.
In general, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawing(s) and accompanying written description to refer to the same or like parts. The figures are not necessarily to scale.
A distributed data lake is used to store, manage, and analyze data in a distributed and scalable manner. An energy proportional infrastructure (EPI) can be used to support the distributed data lake to ensure that the data lake has efficient energy consumption and is capable of scaling resources as needed to handle data processing workloads. Energy proportionality is a measure of the relationship between power consumed in a computer system, and the rate at which work is done (e.g., utilization). Hence, the EPI refers to a design and management approach for edge computing devices that aims to ensure that energy consumption scales with workload demand. The EPI is designed to use less power when the workload is low and use more power when the workload is high. This approach reduces energy waste and operating costs in edge computing devices. EPI may involve using energy-efficient hardware, dynamic resource allocation, and/or power management techniques to control energy consumption based on the computing needs of the system. EPI may also incorporate power management features, such as decreasing power to idle components or powering down unused servers during period of low activity. Efficient management of a distributed data lake reduces operational costs and contributes to environmental sustainability.
In edge computing, an edge node is a computing device located at the edge of a network close to where data is generated or collected. The edge node collects data from various sensors, devices, or internet-of-things (IoT) endpoints at the edge of the network. The edge node processes the received data locally to reduce latency and improve real-time processing. The edge node performs the preliminary data processing, filtering and/or aggregation before transmitting the data to a central location like a data center or cloud for further analysis and storage.
The environmental impact of distributed data lakes, like any data storage and processing infrastructure, can be significant due to the energy consumption associated with edge device operations, cooling requirements, and other supporting systems. One of the environmental impacts from distributed data lakes is the contribution to greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent is a unit of measurement that expresses the impact of various greenhouse gases, such as CO2, methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and other greenhouse gases, in terms of the global warming potential of one unit of CO2 over a specified time period. One aspect of a data center hosting data lakes that contributes to negative environmental impacts is the use of storage to store data at edge devices. The amount of CO2 emissions (or carbon emissions) and other greenhouse gas emissions caused by the creation and/or use of storage components, including electricity generation and/or cooling, can be significant. The carbon footprint (e.g., the carbon emissions and the CO2 equivalent) of edge devices have a direct impact on climate change.
Another environmental impact from distributed data lakes is e-waste generation. The cycle of hardware upgrades and replacements in edge devices can lead to electronic waste, which, if not managed properly can harm the environment. Improper disposal of electronic waste generated by edge devices can lead to environmental contamination and/or harm to communities near waste disposal sites. Additionally, data lakes can lead to resource inefficiency if not properly managed, with redundant data storage and underutilized resources. A server that has low utilization can result in underused resources, leading to inefficient energy consumption.
Another environmental impact caused by data lakes is the inefficient handling of raw or unprocessed data in a data lake. When a data lake has inadequate governance and data ingestion policies, it can result in excessive and redundant data being ingested into the data lake. Storing unnecessary data wastes storage capacity and resources. Without proper coordination, redundant data copies can accumulate within the data lake. This redundancy leads to increased storage requirements. Duplicate records or incomplete data can also lead to data wastage, as the data may need to be cleaned, corrected, or discarded, which require additional processing resources. Further, inefficient data processing can consume unnecessary computing resources and time, leading to inefficiencies and increased operational costs. The absence of clear data retention policies can also lead to accumulation of outdated or irrelevant data within the data lake, which consumes storage capacity and impacts data lake performance. Ineffective data lifecycle management practices contribute to data wastage and negative impact on energy and storage resources.
Human activities associated with the generation and/or operation of edge devices can contribute to social and/or political impact. For example, the unethical practices in managing people in the generation of storage devices included in edge devices can have negative social and environmental impacts. Engaging in exploitative labor practices, such as underpaying workers or disregarding labor laws, can harm employee well-being, and lead to labor disputes.
Promoting environmental sustainability in data lake operations can reduce the environmental footprint and/or the social impact associated with data storage and processing. Monitoring and properly maintaining data in data lakes prevent inefficiencies, reduce data waste, and reduce the environmental impact. Examples disclosed herein describes a system to mitigate an environmental, social, and/or political impact from a data lake by determining where to store data based on the least amount of environmental, social, and/or political impact of the available storage devices. For example, examples disclosed herein describes techniques to dynamically allocate data to an appropriate data storage resource to help improve server utilization, reduce the energy consumption, and/or reduce carbon emissions and CO2 equivalent associated with underutilized hardware. Along with effective data lifecycle management practices, the examples disclosed herein reduce data wastage, and/or the energy and storage resources to store and process data.
Compute, memory, and storage are scarce resources, and generally decrease depending on the edge location (e.g., fewer processing resources being available at consumer endpoint devices, than at a base station, than at a central office). However, the closer that the edge location is to the endpoint (e.g., user equipment (UE)), the more that space and power is often constrained. Thus, edge computing attempts to reduce the amount of resources needed for network services, through the distribution of more resources which are located closer both geographically and in network access time. In this manner, edge computing attempts to bring the compute resources to the workload data where appropriate or bring the workload data to the compute resources.
The following describes aspects of an edge cloud architecture that covers multiple potential deployments and addresses restrictions that some network operators or service providers may have in their own infrastructures. These include, variation of configurations based on the edge location (because edges at a base station level, for instance, may have more constrained performance and capabilities in a multi-tenant scenario); configurations based on the type of compute, memory, storage, fabric, acceleration, or like resources available to edge locations, tiers of locations, or groups of locations; the service, security, and management and orchestration capabilities; and related objectives to achieve usability and performance of end services. These deployments may accomplish processing in network layers that may be considered as “device edge,” “near edge”, “close edge”, “local edge”, “middle edge”, “user device edge,” or “far edge” layers, depending on latency, distance, and timing characteristics.
Edge computing is a developing paradigm where computing is performed at or closer to the “edge” of a network, typically through the use of a compute platform (e.g., x86 or ARM compute hardware architecture) implemented at base stations, gateways, network routers, or other devices which are much closer to endpoint devices producing and consuming the data. For example, edge gateway servers may be equipped with pools of memory and storage resources to perform computation in real-time for low latency use-cases (e.g., autonomous driving or video surveillance) for connected client devices. Or as an example, base stations may be augmented with compute and acceleration resources to directly process service workloads for connected user equipment, without further communicating data via backhaul networks. Or as another example, central office network management hardware may be replaced with standardized compute hardware that performs virtualized network functions and offers compute resources for the execution of services and consumer functions for connected devices. Within edge computing networks, there may be scenarios in services which the compute resource will be “moved” to the data, as well as scenarios in which the data will be “moved” to the compute resource. Or as an example, base station compute, acceleration and network resources can provide services in order to scale to workload demands on an as needed basis by activating dormant capacity (subscription, capacity on demand) in order to manage corner cases, emergencies or to provide longevity for deployed resources over a significantly longer implemented lifecycle.
Examples of latency, resulting from network communication distance and processing time constraints, may range from less than a millisecond (ms) when among the endpoint layer 200, under 5 ms at the edge devices layer 210, to even between 10 to 40 ms when communicating with nodes at the network access layer 220. Beyond the edge cloud 110 are core network 230 and cloud data center 240 layers, each with increasing latency (e.g., between 50-60 ms at the core network layer 230, to 100 or more ms at the cloud data center layer). As a result, operations at a core network data center 235 or a cloud data center 245, with latencies of at least 50 to 100 ms or more, will not be able to accomplish many time-critical functions of the use cases 205. Each of these latency values are provided for purposes of illustration and contrast; it will be understood that the use of other access network mediums and technologies may further reduce the latencies. In some examples, respective portions of the network may be categorized as “device edge”, “close edge”, “local edge”, “near edge”, “middle edge”, or “far edge” layers, relative to a network source and destination. For instance, from the perspective of the core network data center 235 or a cloud data center 245, a central office or content data network may be considered as being located within a “near edge” layer (“near” to the cloud, having high latency values when communicating with the devices and endpoints of the use cases 205), whereas an access point, base station, on-premise server, or network gateway may be considered as located within a “far edge” layer (“far” from the cloud, having low latency values when communicating with the devices and endpoints of the use cases 205). It will be understood that other categorizations of a particular network layer as constituting a “close”, “local”, “near”, “middle”, or “far” edge may be based on latency, distance, number of network hops, or other measurable characteristics, as measured from a source in any of the network layers 200-240.
The various use cases 205 may access resources under usage pressure from incoming streams, due to multiple services utilizing the edge cloud. To achieve results with low latency, the services executed within the edge cloud 110 balance varying requirements in terms of: (a) Priority (throughput or latency) and Quality of Service (QoS) (e.g., traffic for an autonomous car may have higher priority than a temperature sensor in terms of response time requirement; or, a performance sensitivity/bottleneck may exist at a compute/accelerator, memory, storage, or network resource, depending on the application); (b) Reliability and Resiliency (e.g., some input streams need to be acted upon and the traffic routed with mission-critical reliability, where as some other input streams may be tolerate an occasional failure, depending on the application); and (c) Physical constraints (e.g., power, cooling and form-factor).
The end-to-end service view for these use cases involves the concept of a service-flow and is associated with a transaction. The transaction details the overall service requirement for the entity consuming the service, as well as the associated services for the resources, workloads, workflows, and business functional and business level requirements. The services executed with the “terms” described may be managed at each layer in a way to assure real time, and runtime contractual compliance for the transaction during the lifecycle of the service. When a component in the transaction is missing its agreed to service level agreement (SLA) or service level objective (SLO), the system as a whole (components in the transaction) may provide the ability to (1) understand the impact of the SLA/SLO violation, and (2) augment other components in the system to resume overall transaction SLA/SLO, and (3) implement operations to remediate.
Thus, with these variations and service features in mind, edge computing within the edge cloud 110 may provide the ability to serve and respond to multiple applications of the use cases 205 (e.g., object tracking, video surveillance, connected cars, etc.) in real-time or near real-time, and meet ultra-low latency requirements for these multiple applications. These advantages enable a whole new class of applications (Virtual Network Functions (VNFs), Function as a Service (FaaS), Edge as a Service (EaaS), standard processes, etc.), which cannot leverage conventional cloud computing due to latency or other limitations.
However, with the advantages of edge computing comes the following caveats. The devices located at the edge are often resource constrained and therefore there is pressure on usage of edge resources. Typically, this is addressed through the pooling of memory and storage resources for use by multiple users (tenants) and devices. The edge may be power and cooling constrained and therefore the power usage needs to be accounted for by the applications that are consuming the most power. There may be inherent power-performance tradeoffs in these pooled memory resources, as many of them are likely to use emerging memory technologies, where more power requires greater memory bandwidth. Likewise, improved security of hardware and root of trust trusted functions are also required because edge locations may be unmanned and may even need permissioned access (e.g., when housed in a third-party location). Such issues are magnified in the edge cloud 110 in a multi-tenant, multi-owner, or multi-access setting, where services and applications are requested by many users, especially as network usage dynamically fluctuates and the composition of the multiple stakeholders, use cases, and services changes.
At a more generic level, an edge computing system may be described to encompass any number of deployments at the previously discussed layers operating in the edge cloud 110 (network layers 200-240), which provide coordination from client and distributed computing devices. One or more edge gateway nodes, one or more edge aggregation nodes, and one or more core data centers may be distributed across layers of the network to provide an implementation of the edge computing system by or on behalf of a telecommunication service provider (“telco”, or “TSP”), internet-of-things service provider, cloud service provider (CSP), enterprise entity, or any other number of entities. Various implementations and configurations of the edge computing system may be provided dynamically, such as when orchestrated to meet service objectives.
Consistent with the examples provided herein, a client compute node may be embodied as any type of endpoint component, device, appliance, or other thing capable of communicating as a producer or consumer of data. Further, the label “node” or “device” as used in the edge computing system does not necessarily mean that such node or device operates in a client or agent/minion/follower role; rather, any of the nodes or devices in the edge computing system refer to individual entities, nodes, or subsystems which include discrete or connected hardware or software configurations to facilitate or use the edge cloud 110.
As such, the edge cloud 110 is formed from network components and functional features operated by and within edge gateway nodes, edge aggregation nodes, or other edge compute nodes among network layers 210-230. The edge cloud 110 thus may be embodied as any type of network that provides edge computing and/or storage resources which are proximately located to radio access network (RAN) capable endpoint devices (e.g., mobile computing devices, IoT devices, smart devices, etc.), which are discussed herein. Additionally or alternatively, the edge cloud 110 may be a home network that is connected to the edge and/or could via a FIOS link or a cable network. In other words, the edge cloud 110 may be envisioned as an “edge” which connects the endpoint devices and traditional network access points that serve as an ingress point into service provider core networks, including mobile carrier networks (e.g., Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) networks, Long-Term Evolution (LTE) networks, 4G/5G networks, etc.), while also providing storage and/or compute capabilities. Other types and forms of network access (e.g., Wi-Fi, long-range wireless, wired networks including optical networks) may also be utilized in place of or in combination with such 3GPP carrier networks.
The network components of the edge cloud 110 may be servers, multi-tenant servers, appliance computing devices, set up, home gateway, client workstation, client mobile personal computer (PC), smart phone, and/or any other type of computing devices. For example, the edge cloud 110 may be an appliance computing device that is a self-contained processing system including a housing, case, or shell. In some cases, edge devices are devices presented in the network for a specific purpose (e.g., a traffic light), but that have processing or other capacities that may be harnessed for other purposes. Such edge devices may be independent from other networked devices and provided with a housing having a form factor suitable for its primary purpose; yet be available for other compute tasks that do not interfere with its primary task. Edge devices include Internet of Things devices. The appliance computing device may include hardware and software components to manage local issues such as device temperature, vibration, resource utilization, updates, power issues, physical and network security, etc. Example hardware for implementing an appliance computing device is described in conjunction with
In the example of
It should be understood that some of the devices 410 are multi-tenant devices where Tenant 1 may function within a tenant1 ‘slice’ while a Tenant 2 may function within a tenant2 ‘slice’ (and, in further examples, additional or sub-tenants may exist; and each tenant may even be specifically entitled and transactionally tied to a specific set of features all the way day to specific hardware features). A trusted multi-tenant device may further contain a tenant-specific cryptographic key such that the combination of key and slice may be considered a “root of trust” (RoT) or tenant specific RoT. A RoT may further be computed dynamically composed using a DICE (Device Identity Composition Engine) architecture such that a single DICE hardware building block may be used to construct layered trusted computing base contexts for layering of device capabilities (such as a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA)). The RoT may further be used for a trusted computing context to enable a “fan-out” that is useful for supporting multi-tenancy. Within a multi-tenant environment, the respective edge nodes 422, 424 may operate as security feature enforcement points for local resources allocated to multiple tenants per node. Additionally, tenant runtime and application execution (e.g., in instances 432, 434) may serve as an enforcement point for a security feature that creates a virtual edge abstraction of resources spanning potentially multiple physical hosting platforms. Finally, the orchestration functions 460 at an orchestration entity may operate as a security feature enforcement point for marshalling resources along tenant boundaries.
Edge computing nodes may partition resources (memory, central processing unit (CPU), graphics processing unit (GPU), interrupt controller, input/output (I/O) controller, memory controller, bus controller, etc.) where respective partitioning may contain a RoT capability and where fan-out and layering according to a DICE model may further be applied to Edge Nodes. Cloud computing nodes consisting of virtual execution environments, FaaS engines, Servlets, servers, or other computation abstraction may be partitioned according to a DICE layering and fan-out structure to support a RoT context for each. Accordingly, the respective devices 410, 422, and 440 spanning RoTs may coordinate the establishment of a distributed trusted computing base (DTCB) such that a tenant-specific virtual trusted secure channel linking all elements end to end can be established.
Further, it will be understood that a virtual execution environment (e.g., a container, a virtual machine, etc.) may have data or workload specific keys protecting its content from a previous edge node. As part of migration of a virtual execution environment, a pod controller at a source edge node may obtain a migration key from a target edge node pod controller where the migration key is used to wrap the virtual execution environment-specific keys. When the virtual execution environment/pod is migrated to the target edge node, the unwrapping key is exposed to the pod controller that then decrypts the wrapped keys. The keys may now be used to perform operations on virtual execution environment specific data. The migration functions may be gated by properly attested edge nodes and pod managers (as described above).
In further examples, an edge computing system is extended to provide for orchestration of multiple applications through the use of virtual execution environments (deployable execution environment that provides code and needed dependencies to execute instructions (e.g., a program)) in a multi-owner, multi-tenant environment. A multi-tenant orchestrator may be used to perform key management, trust anchor management, and other security functions related to the provisioning and lifecycle of the trusted ‘slice’ concept in
For instance, each of the edge nodes 422, 424 may implement the use of virtual execution environments, such as with the use of a virtual execution environment (VEE) “pod” 426, 428 providing a group of one or more virtual execution environments. In a setting that uses one or more virtual execution environment pods, a pod controller or orchestrator is responsible for local control and orchestration of the virtual execution environments in the pod. Various edge node resources (e.g., storage, compute, services, depicted with hexagons) provided for the respective edge slices 432, 434 are partitioned according to the needs of each virtual execution environment.
With the use of virtual execution environment pods, a pod controller oversees the partitioning and allocation of virtual execution environments and resources. The pod controller receives instructions from an orchestrator (e.g., the orchestrator 460) that instructs the controller on how best to partition physical resources and for what duration, such as by receiving key performance indicator (KPI) targets based on SLA contracts. The pod controller determines which virtual execution environment requires which resources and for how long in order to complete the workload and satisfy the SLA. The pod controller also manages virtual execution environment lifecycle operations such as: creating the virtual execution environment, provisioning it with resources and applications, coordinating intermediate results between multiple virtual execution environments working on a distributed application together, dismantling virtual execution environments when workload completes, and the like. Additionally, a pod controller may serve a security role that prevents assignment of resources until the right tenant authenticates or prevents provisioning of data or a workload to a virtual execution environment until an attestation result is satisfied.
Also, with the use of virtual execution environment pods, tenant boundaries can still exist but in the context of each pod of virtual execution environments. If each tenant specific pod has a tenant specific pod controller, there will be a shared pod controller that consolidates resource allocation requests to avoid typical resource starvation situations. Further controls may be provided to ensure attestation and trustworthiness of the pod and pod controller. For instance, the orchestrator 460 may provision an attestation verification policy to local pod controllers that perform attestation verification. If an attestation satisfies a policy for a first tenant pod controller but not a second tenant pod controller, then the second pod could be migrated to a different edge node that does satisfy it. Alternatively, the first pod may be allowed to execute, and a different shared pod controller is installed and invoked prior to the second pod executing.
The system arrangements of depicted in
In the context of
In further examples, aspects of software-defined or controlled silicon hardware, and other configurable hardware, may integrate with the applications, functions, and services of an edge computing system. Software defined silicon may be used to ensure the ability for some resource or hardware ingredient to fulfill a contract or service level agreement, based on the ingredient's ability to remediate a portion of itself or the workload (e.g., by an upgrade, reconfiguration, or provision of new features within the hardware configuration itself).
It should be appreciated that the edge computing systems and arrangements discussed herein may be applicable in various solutions, services, and/or use cases involving mobility. As an example,
The edge gateway nodes 620 may communicate with one or more edge resource nodes 640, which are illustratively embodied as compute servers, appliances or components located at or in a communication base station 642 (e.g., a based station of a cellular network). As discussed above, the respective edge resource node(s) 640 include an amount of processing and storage capabilities and, as such, some processing and/or storage of data for the client compute nodes 610 may be performed on the edge resource node(s) 640. For example, the processing of data that is less urgent or important may be performed by the edge resource node(s) 640, while the processing of data that is of a higher urgency or importance may be performed by the edge gateway devices 620 (depending on, for example, the capabilities of each component, or information in the request indicating urgency or importance). Based on data access, data location or latency, work may continue on edge resource nodes when the processing priorities change during the processing activity. Likewise, configurable systems or hardware resources themselves can be activated (e.g., through a local orchestrator) to provide additional resources to meet the new demand (e.g., adapt the compute resources to the workload data).
The edge resource node(s) 640 also communicate with the core data center 650, which may include compute servers, appliances, and/or other components located in a central location (e.g., a central office of a cellular communication network). The example core data center 650 may provide a gateway to the global network cloud 660 (e.g., the Internet) for the edge cloud 110 operations formed by the edge resource node(s) 640 and the edge gateway devices 620. Additionally, in some examples, the core data center 650 may include an amount of processing and storage capabilities and, as such, some processing and/or storage of data for the client compute devices may be performed on the core data center 650 (e.g., processing of low urgency or importance, or high complexity).
The edge gateway nodes 620 or the edge resource node(s) 640 may offer the use of stateful applications 632 and a geographic distributed database 634. Although the applications 632 and database 634 are illustrated as being horizontally distributed at a layer of the edge cloud 110, it will be understood that resources, services, or other components of the application may be vertically distributed throughout the edge cloud (including, part of the application executed at the client compute node 610, other parts at the edge gateway nodes 620 or the edge resource node(s) 640, etc.). Additionally, as stated previously, there can be peer relationships at any level to meet service objectives and obligations. Further, the data for a specific client or application can move from edge to edge based on changing conditions (e.g., based on acceleration resource availability, following the car movement, etc.). For instance, based on the “rate of decay” of access, prediction can be made to identify the next owner to continue, or when the data or computational access will no longer be viable. These and other services may be utilized to complete the work that is needed to keep the transaction compliant and lossless.
In further scenarios, a virtual execution environment (VEE) 636 (or pod of virtual execution environments) may be flexibly migrated from one of the edge nodes 620 to other edge nodes (e.g., another one of edge nodes 620, one of the edge resource node(s) 640, etc.) such that the virtual execution environment with an application and workload does not need to be reconstituted, re-compiled, re-interpreted in order for migration to work. However, in such settings, there may be some remedial or “swizzling” translation operations applied. For example, the physical hardware at the edge resource node(s) 640 may differ from the hardware at the edge gateway nodes 620 and therefore, the hardware abstraction layer (HAL) that makes up the bottom edge of the virtual execution environment will be re-mapped to the physical layer of the target edge node. This may involve some form of late-binding technique, such as binary translation of the HAL from the virtual execution environment native format to the physical hardware format, or may involve mapping interfaces and operations. A pod controller may be used to drive the interface mapping as part of the virtual execution environment lifecycle, which includes migration to/from different hardware environments.
The scenarios encompassed by
In further configurations, the edge computing system may implement FaaS computing capabilities through the use of respective executable applications and functions. In an example, a developer writes function code (e.g., “computer code” herein) representing one or more computer functions, and the function code is uploaded to a FaaS platform provided by, for example, an edge node or data center. A trigger such as, for example, a service use case or an edge processing event, initiates the execution of the function code with the FaaS platform.
In an example of FaaS, a virtual execution environment is used to provide an environment in which function code (e.g., an application which may be provided by a third party) is executed. The virtual execution environment may be any isolated-execution entity such as a process, a Docker or Kubernetes virtual execution environment, a virtual machine, etc. Within the edge computing system, various datacenter, edge, and endpoint (including mobile) devices are used to “spin up” functions (e.g., activate and/or allocate function actions) that are scaled on demand. The function code gets executed on the physical infrastructure (e.g., edge computing node) device and underlying virtualized virtual execution environments. Finally, virtual execution environment is “spun down” (e.g., deactivated and/or deallocated) on the infrastructure in response to the execution being completed.
Further aspects of FaaS may enable deployment of edge functions in a service fashion, including a support of respective functions that support edge computing as a service (Edge-as-a-Service or “EaaS”). Additional features of FaaS may include: a granular billing component that enables customers (e.g., computer code developers) to pay only when their code gets executed; common data storage to store data for reuse by one or more functions; orchestration and management among individual functions; function execution management, parallelism, and consolidation; management of virtual execution environment and function memory spaces; coordination of acceleration resources available for functions; and distribution of functions between virtual execution environments (including “warm” virtual execution environments, already deployed or operating, versus “cold” which require initialization, deployment, or configuration).
The edge computing system 600 can include or be in communication with an edge provisioning node 644. The edge provisioning node 644 can distribute software such as the example computer readable instructions 1132 of
In an example, edge provisioning node 644 includes one or more servers and one or more storage devices. The storage devices host computer readable instructions such as the example computer readable instructions 1132 of
In some examples, the processor platform(s) that execute the computer readable instructions 1132 can be physically located in different geographic locations, legal jurisdictions, etc. In some examples, one or more servers of the edge provisioning node 644 periodically offer, transmit, and/or force updates to the software instructions (e.g., the example computer readable instructions 1132 of
In further examples, any of the compute nodes or devices discussed with reference to the present edge computing systems and environment may be fulfilled based on the components depicted in
The example orchestrator 702 of
The example network 704 of
The example edge cloud 110 of
The example edge computing device 708 of
The example federated edge computing device 720 of
The example federated infrastructure data agent 724 of
The example data storage controller 710 of
The example base priority determination circuitry 804 of
In some examples, the data storage controller 710 includes means for generating a metric identifier and base priority value for data. For example, the means for generating may be implemented by the base priority determination circuitry 804. In some examples, the base priority determination circuitry 804 may be instantiated by programmable circuitry such as the example programmable circuitry 1112 of
The example throttling circuitry 806 of
The example data consumption analysis circuitry 808 of
In some examples, the historical data is created by analyzing and clustering all received data to the edge computing device 708 or the peer edge computing device(s) 722, to help inform decisions on where to store the received data 802. The example data consumption analysis circuitry 808 analyzes the received data 802 generated by the system and represents the data as variables V1, . . . VN and decides which of those variables are meaningful information with respect to the other information received and which data are not meaningful. This can be implemented using an algorithm such as a principal component analysis (PCA). A PCA is a dimensionality reduction technique used in data analysis to reduce the dimensionality of large data sets, by transforming a large set of variables into a smaller set of variables that still contains most of the information in the large set. The variables V1, . . . VN that are identified during a particular period of time to be relevant are correlated with contextual variables of the system. Contextual variables Cl, CN include information such as temperature, amount of applications running, state or mode of the edge computing device 708, amount of resources being consumed by the edge computing device 708, type of workloads being executed by the edge computing device 708, etc. The correlations that are analyzed over time are utilized to configure selector circuitry. Selector circuitry is circuitry included in the data consumption analysis circuitry 808 that selects the actual representative variables V1, . . . VN to be stored in a storage system or data lake based on the contextual variable. The peer edge computing device(s) 722 and corresponding EPI may provide similar rules over time that can be used to configure the selectors. This policy can be implemented across different peer edge computing devices that belong to or are deployed in similar circumstances. The example data consumption analysis circuitry 808 also determines whether the data 802 is critical based on a likelihood that the data 802 will be accessed within a threshold period of time.
Additionally, the example data consumption analysis circuitry 808 of
In some examples, the data storage controller 710 includes means for determining that the data corresponds to a stored data. For example, the means for determining may be implemented by the data consumption analysis circuitry 808. In some examples, the data consumption analysis circuitry 808 may be instantiated by programmable circuitry such as the example programmable circuitry 1112 of
In some examples, the means for determining that the data corresponds to a stored data includes means for analyzing and clustering stored data to generate historical information.
In some examples, if it is likely that the data 802 will be accessed later (e.g., corresponding to a likelihood that the data will not be used within the threshold amount of time), the data consumption analysis circuitry 808 of
The example priority adjustment circuitry 810 of
Additionally or alternatively, the example priority adjustment circuitry 810 of
Additionally or alternatively, the priority adjustment circuitry 810 of
Additionally or alternatively, the priority adjustment circuitry 810 may adjust a priority value of the data 802 based on the characteristics and/or operating mode of the edge computing device 708. For example, if the edge computing device 708 is operating in a sleep or low power mode, the likelihood that the edge computing device 708 will access the data 802 within a threshold amount of time may be lower than when the edge computing device 708 is operating in a full power mode. Accordingly, the priority adjustment circuitry 810 can lower the priority value of the data 802 when the edge computing device 708 is operating in a low power mode. In another example, the edge computing device 708 can adjust the priority value based on the workload currently being executed by the edge computing device 708. For example, some types of workloads may result in the use or more resources than other types of workloads. Thus, the edge computing device 708 may access telemetry data more often while executing particular workload types to ensure that the edge computing device 708 is not working past capacity. Thus, the priority adjustment circuitry 810 can increase the priority when the edge computing device 708 is executing a particular workload.
In some examples, the data storage controller 710 includes means for adjusting the base priority value. For example, the means for adjusting may be implemented by the priority adjustment circuitry 810. In some examples, the priority adjustment circuitry 810 may be instantiated by programmable circuitry such as the example programmable circuitry 1112 of
The example network interface 812 of
The example environmental impact determination circuitry 814 of
In some examples, the data storage controller 710 includes means for determining environmental impact associated with storing data in a storage device. For example, the means for determining environmental impact may be implemented by the environmental impact determination circuitry 814. In some examples, the environmental impact determination circuitry 814 may be instantiated by programmable circuitry such as the example programmable circuitry 1112 of
The example storage selection circuitry 816 of
In some examples, the data storage controller 710 includes means for writing data to the first storage device or the second storage device. For example, the means for writing data may be implemented by the storage selection circuitry 816. In some examples, the storage selection circuitry 816 may be instantiated by programmable circuitry such as the example programmable circuitry 1112 of
The example first storage device 818 and the example second storage device 820 of
The example data storage controller 710 including the example base priority determination circuitry 804, the example throttling circuitry 806, the example priority adjustment circuitry 810, the example data consumption analysis circuitry 808, the example environmental impact determination circuitry 814, and the example storage selection circuitry 816 could be implemented by one or more artificial intelligence (AI)-based models. Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and/or other artificial machine-driven logic, enables machines (e.g., computers, logic circuits, etc.) to use a model to process input data to generate an output based on patterns and/or associations previously learned by the model via a training process. For instance, the model may be trained with data to recognize patterns and/or associations and follow such patterns and/or associations when processing input data such that other input(s) result in output(s) consistent with the recognized patterns and/or associations.
In general, implementing a ML/AI system involves two phases, a learning/training phase, and an inference phase. In the learning/training phase, a training algorithm is used to train a model to operate in accordance with patterns and/or associations based on, for example, training data. In general, the model includes internal parameters that guide how input data is transformed into output data, such as through a series of nodes and connections within the model to transform input data into output data. Additionally, hyperparameters are used as part of the training process to control how the learning is performed (e.g., a learning rate, a number of layers to be used in the machine learning model, etc.). Hyperparameters are defined to be training parameters that are determined prior to initiating the training process.
Different types of training may be performed based on the type of ML/AI model and/or the expected output. For example, supervised training uses inputs and corresponding expected (e.g., labeled) outputs to select parameters (e.g., by iterating over combinations of select parameters) for the ML/AI model that reduce model error. As used herein, labelling refers to an expected output of the machine learning model (e.g., a classification, an expected output value, etc.) Alternatively, unsupervised training (e.g., used in deep learning, a subset of machine learning, etc.) involves inferring patterns from inputs to select parameters for the ML/AI model (e.g., without the benefit of expected (e.g., labeled) outputs).
Training is performed using training data. In examples disclosed herein, the training data originates from publicly available data obtained from the federated edge computing 720 with multiple peer edge computing device(s) 722. Unsupervised training is used by inferring patterns from inputs from the multiple peer edge node 722.
After training is complete, the model is deployed for use as an executable construct that processes an input and provides an output based on the network of nodes and connections defined in the model. The model is stored at the edge computing device 708. The model may then be executed by the data storage controller 710.
In the example of
While an example manner of implementing the data storage controller 710 of
Flowcharts representative of example machine readable instructions, which may be executed by programmable circuitry to implement and/or instantiate the data storage controller 710 of
The program may be embodied in instructions (e.g., software and/or firmware) stored on one or more non-transitory computer readable and/or machine readable storage medium such as cache memory, a magnetic-storage device or disk (e.g., a floppy disk, a Hard Disk Drive (HDD), etc.), an optical-storage device or disk (e.g., a Blu-ray disk, a Compact Disk (CD), a Digital Versatile Disk (DVD), etc.), a Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID), a register, ROM, a solid-state drive (SSD), SSD memory, non-volatile memory (e.g., electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory, etc.), volatile memory (e.g., Random Access Memory (RAM) of any type, etc.), and/or any other storage device or storage disk. The instructions of the non-transitory computer readable and/or machine readable medium may program and/or be executed by programmable circuitry located in one or more hardware devices, but the entire program and/or parts thereof could alternatively be executed and/or instantiated by one or more hardware devices other than the programmable circuitry and/or embodied in dedicated hardware. The machine readable instructions may be distributed across multiple hardware devices and/or executed by two or more hardware devices (e.g., a server and a client hardware device). For example, the client hardware device may be implemented by an endpoint client hardware device (e.g., a hardware device associated with a human and/or machine user) or an intermediate client hardware device gateway (e.g., a radio access network (RAN)) that may facilitate communication between a server and an endpoint client hardware device. Similarly, the non-transitory computer readable storage medium may include one or more mediums. Further, although the example program is described with reference to the flowchart(s) illustrated in
The machine readable instructions described herein may be stored in one or more of a compressed format, an encrypted format, a fragmented format, a compiled format, an executable format, a packaged format, etc. Machine readable instructions as described herein may be stored as data (e.g., computer-readable data, machine-readable data, one or more bits (e.g., one or more computer-readable bits, one or more machine-readable bits, etc.), a bitstream (e.g., a computer-readable bitstream, a machine-readable bitstream, etc.), etc.) or a data structure (e.g., as portion(s) of instructions, code, representations of code, etc.) that may be utilized to create, manufacture, and/or produce machine executable instructions. For example, the machine readable instructions may be fragmented and stored on one or more storage devices, disks and/or computing devices (e.g., servers) located at the same or different locations of a network or collection of networks (e.g., in the cloud, in edge devices, etc.). The machine readable instructions may require one or more of installation, modification, adaptation, updating, combining, supplementing, configuring, decryption, decompression, unpacking, distribution, reassignment, compilation, etc., in order to make them directly readable, interpretable, and/or executable by a computing device and/or other machine. For example, the machine readable instructions may be stored in multiple parts, which are individually compressed, encrypted, and/or stored on separate computing devices, wherein the parts when decrypted, decompressed, and/or combined form a set of computer-executable and/or machine executable instructions that implement one or more functions and/or operations that may together form a program such as that described herein.
In another example, the machine readable instructions may be stored in a state in which they may be read by programmable circuitry, but require addition of a library (e.g., a dynamic link library (DLL)), a software development kit (SDK), an application programming interface (API), etc., in order to execute the machine-readable instructions on a particular computing device or other device. In another example, the machine readable instructions may need to be configured (e.g., settings stored, data input, network addresses recorded, etc.) before the machine readable instructions and/or the corresponding program(s) can be executed in whole or in part. Thus, machine readable, computer readable and/or machine readable media, as used herein, may include instructions and/or program(s) regardless of the particular format or state of the machine readable instructions and/or program(s).
The machine readable instructions described herein can be represented by any past, present, or future instruction language, scripting language, programming language, etc. For example, the machine readable instructions may be represented using any of the following languages: C, C++, Java, C#, Perl, Python, JavaScript, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Structured Query Language (SQL), Swift, etc.
As mentioned above, the example operations of
At block 904, the example base priority determination circuitry 804 (
At block 906, the example base priority determination circuitry 804 transmits (e.g., passes, outputs, etc.) the base priority value to the example priority adjustment circuitry 810 (
At block 910, the example priority adjustment circuitry 810 adjusts the base priority value of the data based on the historical data that corresponds to the metric ID. For example, if the historical data corresponding to the metric ID includes information that previously stored data with the same metric ID has been accessed frequently and/or soon after being stored, the priority adjustment circuitry 810 may increase the base priority value based on the frequency (e.g., the higher the frequency, the higher the value increase) and/or the amount of time the data was accessed after being stored (e.g., the sooner the time, the higher the value increase). At block 912, the example environmental impact determination circuitry 814 determines the environmental impact associated with storing the data 802 in different storage types based on the metric ID, information carried in the data, historically processed data, processed data from another nodes, and/or information from the example data consumption analysis circuitry 808. At block 914, the example priority adjustment circuitry 810 adjusts the base priority value based on the environmental impact. For example, the priority adjustment circuitry 810 can increase or decrease the priority value based on the environmental impact associated with storing the data 802 in each storage device. At block 916, the example priority adjustment circuitry 810 adjusts the priority value of the data 802 based on the characteristics and/or operating mode of the edge computing device 708. For example, the priority adjustment circuitry 810 can lower the priority value of the data 802 when the edge computing device 708 is operating in a low power mode and increase the priority value when the edge computing device 708 is operating in a high power mode.
At block 918, the example priority determination circuitry 810 determines whether the data 802 is a duplicate and/or whether the priority value is below a threshold (block 918). For some metric IDs, duplicate data may be discarded because they may provide little to no value to the processing system and therefore will correspond to a low likelihood that they will be accessed after stored. Accordingly, the priority determination circuitry 810 can discard such duplicate data. Additionally, if the priority value is below a particular value or threshold, the likelihood that the data will be accessed may be so low that there may be little to no risk to discarding the data. Thus, if the data 802 is a duplicate or the priority value is below a threshold (block 918: YES), the example priority determination circuitry 810 discards the data 802 (block 920) and the example instructions and/or operations 900 end. If the data 802 is not a duplicate or the priority value is not below a threshold (block 918: NO), control proceeds to block 922.
At block 922, the example storage selection circuitry 816 (
At block 1004, the example data consumption analysis circuitry 808 groups the stored data. For example, the data consumption analysis circuitry 808 groups the stored data based on metric ID. Data corresponding to similar data type and data usage are grouped under the same metric ID so that future received data can be compared to the group of stored data to determine if it was similar to the stored data, and be assigned the same metric ID. At block 1006, the example data consumption analysis circuitry 808 analyzes the use of the stored data to make patterns associated with likelihood the received data 802 will be used sooner. For example, the data consumption analysis circuitry 808 compares the received data 802 with the stored data to identify if the received data 802 is similar to the stored data in terms of circumstances, data type. Additionally, the data consumption analysis circuitry 808 identifies how often the stored data that matches the received data 802 was used, accessed, and/or processed by an edge node based on the circumstances. This creates a pattern that is associated with the likelihood that the currently received data will be used sooner or later. At block 1008, the example data consumption analysis circuitry 808 determines whether the stored data is being accessed. For example, the edge computing device 708 may access the data to detect device failure, make decisions regarding execution of workloads, perform mitigating operations, etc. If the stored data is not being accessed (block 1008: NO), control returns to block 1002.
If the stored data is being accessed (block 1008: YES), control proceeds to block 1010, at which the example data consumption analysis circuitry 808 determines information related to the accessed data. These information may include a metric ID, a priority value, a data storage type, how long the data was stored in the memory, how many times the data has been accessed, etc. At block 1012, the example data consumption analysis circuitry 808 determines system information associated with the data. The system information includes operation mode, information from sensors, central processing unit (CPU) usage, memory usage, etc. At block 1014, the example data consumption analysis circuitry 808 associates accessed data with determined information to generate historical data information.
At block 1016, the example data consumption analysis circuitry 808 determines whether the example priority adjustment circuitry 810 is processing the incoming data similar to stored data (e.g., to determine where to store the incoming data). If the example priority adjustment circuitry 810 is not processing the incoming data similar to stored data (block 1016: NO), control returns to block 1002 at which the example data consumption analysis circuitry 808 continues analyzing, tracking, and/or monitoring the stored data. If the example priority adjustment circuitry 810 is processing the incoming data similar to stored data (block 1016: YES), control proceeds to block 1018. At block 1018, the example data consumption analysis circuitry 808 provides the relevant historical information corresponding to the incoming data (e.g., historical data corresponding to the same metric ID as the incoming data) to the example priority adjustment circuitry 810. In this manner, the priority adjustment circuitry 810 can adjust a priority value and/or select a storage type for the incoming data based on the relevant historical data. After block 1018, control returns to block 1002.
The programmable circuitry platform 1100 of the illustrated example includes programmable circuitry 1112. The programmable circuitry 1112 of the illustrated example is hardware. For example, the programmable circuitry 1112 can be implemented by one or more integrated circuits, logic circuits, FPGAs, microprocessors, CPUs, GPUs, DSPs, and/or microcontrollers from any desired family or manufacturer. The programmable circuitry 1112 may be implemented by one or more semiconductor based (e.g., silicon based) devices. In this example, the programmable circuitry 1112 implements the example base priority determination circuitry 804, the example throttling circuitry 806, the example data consumption analysis circuitry 808, the example priority adjustment circuitry 810, the example environmental impact determination circuitry 814, and the example storage selection circuitry 816.
The programmable circuitry 1112 of the illustrated example includes a local memory 1113 (e.g., a cache, registers, etc.). The programmable circuitry 1112 of the illustrated example is in communication with main memory 1114, 1116, which includes a volatile memory 1114 and a non-volatile memory 1116, by a bus 1118. The volatile memory 1114 may be implemented by Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (SDRAM), Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), RAMBUS® Dynamic Random Access Memory (RDRAM®), and/or any other type of RAM device. The non-volatile memory 1116 may be implemented by flash memory and/or any other desired type of memory device. Access to the main memory 1114, 1116 of the illustrated example is controlled by a memory controller 1117. In some examples, the memory controller 1117 may be implemented by one or more integrated circuits, logic circuits, microcontrollers from any desired family or manufacturer, or any other type of circuitry to manage the flow of data going to and from the main memory 1114, 1116. In example
The programmable circuitry platform 1100 of the illustrated example also includes interface circuitry 1120. In example
In the illustrated example, one or more input devices 1122 are connected to the interface circuitry 1120. The input device(s) 1122 permit(s) a user (e.g., a human user, a machine user, etc.) to enter data and/or commands into the programmable circuitry 1112. The input device(s) 1122 can be implemented by, for example, an audio sensor, a microphone, a camera (still or video), a keyboard, a button, a mouse, a touchscreen, a trackpad, a trackball, an isopoint device, and/or a voice recognition system.
One or more output devices 1124 are also connected to the interface circuitry 1120 of the illustrated example. The output device(s) 1124 can be implemented, for example, by display devices (e.g., a light emitting diode (LED), an organic light emitting diode (OLED), a liquid crystal display (LCD), a cathode ray tube (CRT) display, an in-place switching (IPS) display, a touchscreen, etc.), a tactile output device, a printer, and/or speaker. The interface circuitry 1120 of the illustrated example, thus, typically includes a graphics driver card, a graphics driver chip, and/or graphics processor circuitry such as a GPU.
The interface circuitry 1120 of the illustrated example also includes a communication device such as a transmitter, a receiver, a transceiver, a modem, a residential gateway, a wireless access point, and/or a network interface to facilitate exchange of data with external machines (e.g., computing devices of any kind) by a network 1126. The communication can be by, for example, an Ethernet connection, a digital subscriber line (DSL) connection, a telephone line connection, a coaxial cable system, a satellite system, a beyond-line-of-sight wireless system, a line-of-sight wireless system, a cellular telephone system, an optical connection, etc.
The programmable circuitry platform 1100 of the illustrated example also includes one or more mass storage discs or devices 1128 to store firmware, software, and/or data. Examples of such mass storage discs or devices 1128 include magnetic storage devices (e.g., floppy disk, drives, HDDs, etc.), optical storage devices (e.g., Blu-ray disks, CDs, DVDs, etc.), RAID systems, and/or solid-state storage discs or devices such as flash memory devices and/or SSDs.
The machine readable instructions 1132, which may be implemented by the machine readable instructions of
The cores 1202 may communicate by a first example bus 1204. In some examples, the first bus 1204 may be implemented by a communication bus to effectuate communication associated with one(s) of the cores 1202. For example, the first bus 1204 may be implemented by at least one of an Inter-Integrated Circuit (I2C) bus, a Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI) bus, a PCI bus, or a PCIe bus. Additionally or alternatively, the first bus 1204 may be implemented by any other type of computing or electrical bus. The cores 1202 may obtain data, instructions, and/or signals from one or more external devices by example interface circuitry 1206. The cores 1202 may output data, instructions, and/or signals to the one or more external devices by the interface circuitry 1206. Although the cores 1202 of this example include example local memory 1220 (e.g., Level 1 (L1) cache that may be split into an L1 data cache and an L1 instruction cache), the microprocessor 1200 also includes example shared memory 1210 that may be shared by the cores (e.g., Level 2 (L2 cache)) for high-speed access to data and/or instructions. Data and/or instructions may be transferred (e.g., shared) by writing to and/or reading from the shared memory 1210. The local memory 1220 of each of the cores 1202 and the shared memory 1210 may be part of a hierarchy of storage devices including multiple levels of cache memory and the main memory (e.g., the main memory 1114, 1116 of
Each core 1202 may be referred to as a CPU, DSP, GPU, etc., or any other type of hardware circuitry. Each core 1202 includes control unit circuitry 1214, arithmetic and logic (AL) circuitry (sometimes referred to as an ALU) 1216, a plurality of registers 1218, the local memory 1220, and a second example bus 1222. Other structures may be present. For example, each core 1202 may include vector unit circuitry, single instruction multiple data (SIMD) unit circuitry, load/store unit (LSU) circuitry, branch/jump unit circuitry, floating-point unit (FPU) circuitry, etc. The control unit circuitry 1214 includes semiconductor-based circuits structured to control (e.g., coordinate) data movement within the corresponding core 1202. The AL circuitry 1216 includes semiconductor-based circuits structured to perform one or more mathematic and/or logic operations on the data within the corresponding core 1202. The AL circuitry 1216 of some examples performs integer based operations. In other examples, the AL circuitry 1216 also performs floating-point operations. In yet other examples, the AL circuitry 1216 may include first AL circuitry that performs integer-based operations and second AL circuitry that performs floating-point operations. In some examples, the AL circuitry 1216 may be referred to as an Arithmetic Logic Unit (ALU).
The registers 1218 are semiconductor-based structures to store data and/or instructions such as results of one or more of the operations performed by the AL circuitry 1216 of the corresponding core 1202. For example, the registers 1218 may include vector register(s), SIMD register(s), general-purpose register(s), flag register(s), segment register(s), machine-specific register(s), instruction pointer register(s), control register(s), debug register(s), memory management register(s), machine check register(s), etc. The registers 1218 may be arranged in a bank as shown in
Each core 1202 and/or, more generally, the microprocessor 1200 may include additional and/or alternate structures to those shown and described above. For example, one or more clock circuits, one or more power supplies, one or more power gates, one or more cache home agents (CHAs), one or more converged/common mesh stops (CMSs), one or more shifters (e.g., barrel shifter(s)) and/or other circuitry may be present. The microprocessor 1200 is a semiconductor device fabricated to include many transistors interconnected to implement the structures described above in one or more integrated circuits (ICs) contained in one or more packages.
The microprocessor 1200 may include and/or cooperate with one or more accelerators (e.g., acceleration circuitry, hardware accelerators, etc.). In some examples, accelerators are implemented by logic circuitry to perform certain tasks more quickly and/or efficiently than can be done by a general-purpose processor. Examples of accelerators include ASICs and FPGAs such as those discussed herein. A GPU, DSP and/or other programmable device can also be an accelerator. Accelerators may be on-board the microprocessor 1200, in the same chip package as the microprocessor 1200 and/or in one or more separate packages from the microprocessor 1200.
More specifically, in contrast to the microprocessor 1200 of
In the example of
In some examples, the binary file is compiled, generated, transformed, and/or otherwise output from a uniform software platform utilized to program FPGAs. For example, the uniform software platform may translate first instructions (e.g., code or a program) that correspond to one or more operations/functions in a high-level language (e.g., C, C++, Python, etc.) into second instructions that correspond to the one or more operations/functions in an HDL. In some such examples, the binary file is compiled, generated, and/or otherwise output from the uniform software platform based on the second instructions. In some examples, the FPGA circuitry 1300 of
The FPGA circuitry 1300 of
The FPGA circuitry 1300 also includes an array of example logic gate circuitry 1308, a plurality of example configurable interconnections 1310, and example storage circuitry 1312. The logic gate circuitry 1308 and the configurable interconnections 1310 are configurable to instantiate one or more operations/functions that may correspond to at least some of the machine readable instructions of
The configurable interconnections 1310 of the illustrated example are conductive pathways, traces, vias, or the like that may include electrically controllable switches (e.g., transistors) whose state can be changed by programming (e.g., using an HDL instruction language) to activate or deactivate one or more connections between one or more of the logic gate circuitry 1308 to program desired logic circuits.
The storage circuitry 1312 of the illustrated example is structured to store result(s) of the one or more of the operations performed by corresponding logic gates. The storage circuitry 1312 may be implemented by registers or the like. In the illustrated example, the storage circuitry 1312 is distributed amongst the logic gate circuitry 1308 to facilitate access and increase execution speed.
The example FPGA circuitry 1300 of
Although
It should be understood that some or all of the circuitry of
In some examples, some or all of the circuitry of
In some examples, the programmable circuitry 1112 of
A block diagram illustrating an example software distribution platform 1405 to distribute software such as the example machine readable instructions 1132 of
“Including” and “comprising” (and all forms and tenses thereof) are used herein to be open ended terms. Thus, whenever a claim employs any form of “include” or “comprise” (e.g., comprises, includes, comprising, including, having, etc.) as a preamble or within a claim recitation of any kind, it is to be understood that additional elements, terms, etc., may be present without falling outside the scope of the corresponding claim or recitation. As used herein, when the phrase “at least” is used as the transition term in, for example, a preamble of a claim, it is open-ended in the same manner as the term “comprising” and “including” are open ended. The term “and/or” when used, for example, in a form such as A, B, and/or C refers to any combination or subset of A, B, C such as (1) A alone, (2) B alone, (3) C alone, (4) A with B, (5) A with C, (6) B with C, or (7) A with B and with C. As used herein in the context of describing structures, components, items, objects and/or things, the phrase “at least one of A and B” is intended to refer to implementations including any of (1) at least one A, (2) at least one B, or (3) at least one A and at least one B. Similarly, as used herein in the context of describing structures, components, items, objects and/or things, the phrase “at least one of A or B” is intended to refer to implementations including any of (1) at least one A, (2) at least one B, or (3) at least one A and at least one B. As used herein in the context of describing the performance or execution of processes, instructions, actions, activities, etc., the phrase “at least one of A and B” is intended to refer to implementations including any of (1) at least one A, (2) at least one B, or (3) at least one A and at least one B. Similarly, as used herein in the context of describing the performance or execution of processes, instructions, actions, activities, etc., the phrase “at least one of A or B” is intended to refer to implementations including any of (1) at least one A, (2) at least one B, or (3) at least one A and at least one B.
As used herein, singular references (e.g., “a”, “an”, “first”, “second”, etc.) do not exclude a plurality. The term “a” or “an” object, as used herein, refers to one or more of that object. The terms “a” (or “an”), “one or more”, and “at least one” are used interchangeably herein. Furthermore, although individually listed, a plurality of means, elements, or actions may be implemented by, e.g., the same entity or object. Additionally, although individual features may be included in different examples or claims, these may possibly be combined, and the inclusion in different examples or claims does not imply that a combination of features is not feasible and/or advantageous.
As used herein, unless otherwise stated, the term “above” describes the relationship of two parts relative to Earth. A first part is above a second part, if the second part has at least one part between Earth and the first part. Likewise, as used herein, a first part is “below” a second part when the first part is closer to the Earth than the second part. As noted above, a first part can be above or below a second part with one or more of: other parts therebetween, without other parts therebetween, with the first and second parts touching, or without the first and second parts being in direct contact with one another.
As used in this patent, stating that any part (e.g., a layer, film, area, region, or plate) is in any way on (e.g., positioned on, located on, disposed on, or formed on, etc.) another part, indicates that the referenced part is either in contact with the other part, or that the referenced part is above the other part with one or more intermediate part(s) located therebetween.
As used herein, connection references (e.g., attached, coupled, connected, and joined) may include intermediate members between the elements referenced by the connection reference and/or relative movement between those elements unless otherwise indicated. As such, connection references do not necessarily infer that two elements are directly connected and/or in fixed relation to each other. As used herein, stating that any part is in “contact” with another part is defined to mean that there is no intermediate part between the two parts.
Unless specifically stated otherwise, descriptors such as “first,” “second,” “third,” etc., are used herein without imputing or otherwise indicating any meaning of priority, physical order, arrangement in a list, and/or ordering in any way, but are merely used as labels and/or arbitrary names to distinguish elements for ease of understanding the disclosed examples. In some examples, the descriptor “first” may be used to refer to an element in the detailed description, while the same element may be referred to in a claim with a different descriptor such as “second” or “third.” In such instances, it should be understood that such descriptors are used merely for identifying those elements distinctly within the context of the discussion (e.g., within a claim) in which the elements might, for example, otherwise share a same name.
As used herein, “approximately” and “about” modify their subjects/values to recognize the potential presence of variations that occur in real world applications. For example, “approximately” and “about” may modify dimensions that may not be exact due to manufacturing tolerances and/or other real world imperfections as will be understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art. For example, “approximately” and “about” may indicate such dimensions may be within a tolerance range of +/−10% unless otherwise specified herein.
As used herein “substantially real time” refers to occurrence in a near instantaneous manner recognizing there may be real world delays for computing time, transmission, etc. Thus, unless otherwise specified, “substantially real time” refers to real time+1 second.
As used herein, the phrase “in communication,” including variations thereof, encompasses direct communication and/or indirect communication through one or more intermediary components, and does not require direct physical (e.g., wired) communication and/or constant communication, but rather additionally includes selective communication at periodic intervals, scheduled intervals, aperiodic intervals, and/or one-time events.
As used herein, “programmable circuitry” is defined to include (i) one or more special purpose electrical circuits (e.g., an application specific circuit (ASIC)) structured to perform specific operation(s) and including one or more semiconductor-based logic devices (e.g., electrical hardware implemented by one or more transistors), and/or (ii) one or more general purpose semiconductor-based electrical circuits programmable with instructions to perform specific functions(s) and/or operation(s) and including one or more semiconductor-based logic devices (e.g., electrical hardware implemented by one or more transistors). Examples of programmable circuitry include programmable microprocessors such as Central Processor Units (CPUs) that may execute first instructions to perform one or more operations and/or functions, Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) that may be programmed with second instructions to cause configuration and/or structuring of the FPGAs to instantiate one or more operations and/or functions corresponding to the first instructions, Graphics Processor Units (GPUs) that may execute first instructions to perform one or more operations and/or functions, Digital Signal Processors (DSPs) that may execute first instructions to perform one or more operations and/or functions, XPUs, Network Processing Units (NPUs) one or more microcontrollers that may execute first instructions to perform one or more operations and/or functions and/or integrated circuits such as Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For example, an XPU may be implemented by a heterogeneous computing system including multiple types of programmable circuitry (e.g., one or more FPGAs, one or more CPUs, one or more GPUs, one or more NPUs, one or more DSPs, etc., and/or any combination(s) thereof), and orchestration technology (e.g., application programming interface(s) (API(s)) that may assign computing task(s) to whichever one(s) of the multiple types of programmable circuitry is/are suited and available to perform the computing task(s).
As used herein integrated circuit/circuitry is defined as one or more semiconductor packages containing one or more circuit elements such as transistors, capacitors, inductors, resistors, current paths, diodes, etc. For example an integrated circuit may be implemented as one or more of an ASIC, an FPGA, a chip, a microchip, programmable circuitry, a semiconductor substrate coupling multiple circuit elements, a system on chip (SoC), etc.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that example systems, apparatus, articles of manufacture, and methods have been disclosed that store data based on environmental impact of storage device. Disclosed systems, apparatus, articles of manufacture, and methods improve the efficiency of using a computing device by implementing a data storage controller to determine where to store received and/or generated data based on an environmental impact corresponding to one or more storage devices. By processing the data to determine where to store the data, examples disclosed herein result in more memory efficient edge devices that have a smaller environmental impact on the world. Disclosed systems, apparatus, articles of manufacture, and methods are accordingly directed to one or more improvement(s) in the operation of a machine such as a computer or other electronic and/or mechanical device.
Example methods, apparatus, systems, and articles of manufacture to store data based on environmental impact of storage device are disclosed herein. Further examples and combinations thereof include the following: Example 1 includes an apparatus to store data, the apparatus comprising interface circuitry, machine readable instructions, and programmable circuitry to at least one of instantiate or execute the machine readable instructions to determine a first environmental impact associated with storing the data in a first storage device, determine a second environmental impact associated with storing the data in a second storage device, and cause the data to be stored in one of the first storage device or the second storage device based on the first environmental impact and the second environmental impact.
Example 2 includes the apparatus of example 1, wherein the programmable circuitry is to generate a metric identifier (ID) and base priority value to the data based on a data type of the data.
Example 3 includes the apparatus of example 1 or 2, wherein the programmable circuitry is to adjust the base priority value based on at least one of 1) historical information corresponding to the metric ID, or 2) the first or second environmental impact associated with storing the data in the first storage device or the second storage device.
Example 4 includes the apparatus of example 1, 2, or 3, wherein the programmable circuitry is to determine that the data corresponds to stored data, the stored data stored into at least one of the first storage device or the second storage device prior to the data, and cause the data to be stored in the one of the first storage device or the second storage device based on historical information corresponding to the stored data.
Example 5 includes the apparatus of example 1, 2, 3, or 4, wherein the stored data includes at least one of 1) a metric identifier (ID), 2) a priority value, 3) a storage device type, or 4) information related to a system.
Example 6 includes the apparatus of example 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, wherein the programmable circuitry is to track the stored data to generate historical information.
Example 7 includes the apparatus of example 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6, wherein the stored data is first stored data, the programmable circuitry to cluster the stored data with second stored data using a k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm.
Example 8 includes the apparatus of example 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7, wherein the stored data is stored in a peer edge node.
Example 9 includes the apparatus of example 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and/or 8, wherein the first environmental impact corresponds to at least one of a generation, a use, or a disposal of the first storage device.
Example 10 includes the apparatus of example 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and/or 9, wherein the first environmental impact corresponds to greenhouse gas emissions related to the first storage device.
Example 11 includes the apparatus of example 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and/or 10, further including transport circuitry, wherein the environmental impact corresponds to the transportation of the data via the transport circuitry.
Example 12 includes a non-transitory machine readable storage medium comprising instructions to cause programmable circuitry to at least determine a first environmental impact associated with writing data in a first storage device, determine a second environmental impact associated with writing the data in a second storage device, and cause the data to be written to one of the first storage device or the second storage device based on the first environmental impact and the second environmental impact.
Example 13 includes the non-transitory machine readable storage medium of example 12, wherein the instructions are to cause the programmable circuitry to generate a metric identifier (ID) and base priority value to the data based on a data type of the data.
Example 14 includes the non-transitory machine readable storage medium of example 12 or 13, wherein the instructions are to cause the programmable circuitry to adjust the base priority value based on at least one of 1) historical information corresponding to the metric ID, or 2) the first or second environmental impact associated with writing the data in the first storage device or the second storage device.
Example 15 includes the non-transitory machine readable storage medium of example 12, 13, or 14, wherein the instructions are to cause the programmable circuitry to discard the data based on at least one of 1) the data being a duplicative, or 2) the corresponding to a priority value below a threshold.
Example 16 includes the non-transitory machine readable storage medium of example 12, 13, 14, or 15, wherein the instructions are to cause the programmable circuitry to determine that the data corresponds to stored data the stored data including at least one of 1) a metric identifier (ID), 2) a priority value, 3) a storage device type, or 4) information related to a system, and the stored data written to at least one of the first storage device or the second storage device prior to the data, and cause the data to be written to the one of the first storage device or the second storage device based on historical information corresponding to the stored data.
Example 17 includes the non-transitory machine readable storage medium of example 12, 13, 14, 15, or 16, wherein the instructions are to cause the programmable circuitry to track the stored data to generate historical information.
Example 18 includes the non-transitory machine readable storage medium of example 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, or 17, wherein the stored data is first stored data, and the instructions are to cause the programmable circuitry to cluster the stored data with second stored data using a k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm.
Example 19 includes the non-transitory machine readable storage medium of example 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, or 18, wherein the data is telemetry data.
Example 20 includes a method comprising determining a first environmental impact associated with storing a data in first memory, determining a second environmental impact associated with storing the data in second memory, and causing the data to be stored in one of the first memory or the second memory based on the first environmental impact and the second environmental impact.
The following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description by this reference. Although certain example systems, apparatus, articles of manufacture, and methods have been disclosed herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all systems, apparatus, articles of manufacture, and methods fairly falling within the scope of the claims of this patent.