The present invention relates generally to medical devices and particularly to methods and devices for deploying expandable heart valve prostheses especially for use in minimally-invasive surgeries.
Prosthetic heart valves are used to replace damaged or diseased heart valves. In vertebrate animals, the heart is a hollow muscular organ having four pumping chambers: the left and right atria and the left and right ventricles, each provided with its own one-way valve. The natural heart valves are identified as the aortic, mitral (or bicuspid), tricuspid and pulmonary valves. Prosthetic heart valves can be used to replace any of these naturally occurring valves.
Where replacement of a heart valve is indicated, the dysfunctional valve is typically cut out and replaced with either a mechanical valve or a tissue valve. Tissue valves are often preferred over mechanical valves because they typically do not require long-term treatment with anticoagulants. The most common tissue valves are constructed with whole porcine (pig) valves, or with separate leaflets cut from bovine (cow) pericardium. Although so-called stentless valves, comprising a section of porcine aorta along with the valve, are available, the most widely used valves include some form of stent or synthetic leaflet support. Typically, a wireform having alternating arcuate cusps and upstanding commissures supports the leaflets within the valve, in combination with an annular stent and a sewing ring. The alternating cusps and commissures mimic the natural contour of leaflet attachment.
A conventional heart valve replacement surgery involves accessing the heart in the patient's thoracic cavity through a longitudinal incision in the chest. For example, a median sternotomy requires cutting through the sternum and forcing the two opposing halves of the rib cage to be spread apart, allowing access to the thoracic cavity and heart within. The patient is then placed on cardiopulmonary bypass which involves stopping the heart to permit access to the internal chambers. Such open heart surgery is particularly invasive and involves a lengthy and difficult recovery period.
Recently, a great amount of research has been done to reduce the trauma and risk associated with conventional open heart valve replacement surgery. In particular, the field of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has exploded since the early to mid-1990s, with devices now being available to enable valve replacements without opening the chest cavity. MIS heart valve replacement surgery still typically requires bypass, but the excision of the native valve and implantation of the prosthetic valve are accomplished via elongated tubes (catheters or cannulas), with the help of endoscopes and other such visualization techniques. Some examples of recent MIS heart valves are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,411,552 to Anderson, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,980,570 to Simpson, U.S. Pat. No. 5,984,959 to Robertson, et al., PCT Publication No. 00/047139 to Garrison, et al., and PCT Publication No. WO 99/334142 to Vesely.
The typical MIS valve of the prior art includes a directly radially expanding stent that is initially compressed for delivery through a cannula, and is then expanded at the site of implantation after removing the constraint of the cannula. The expansion is accomplished using an internal balloon catheter around which the stent is compressed.
Despite various delivery systems for conventional MIS valves, there remains a need for a delivery system that more reliably controls the expansion of new MIS valves.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment, the present invention provides a system for delivering and deploying an expandable prosthetic heart valve, comprising a catheter shaft having a proximal end and a distal end and a lumen therethrough extending along an axis. The heart valve deployment mechanism extends axially from the distal end of the catheter shaft, and includes spaced apart proximal and distal deployment members. An actuating shaft extends through the lumen of the catheter shaft and operates to actuate at least one of the proximal and distal deployment members. The deployment members may be radially movable and comprise fingers each pivoted at one end thereof to the deployment mechanism. There are desirably at least two proximal deployment fingers and at least two distal deployment fingers, wherein the deployment fingers are axially movable. The deployment members may be radially movable and there are two of the actuating shafts. A first actuating shaft operates to radially displace the proximal deployment members and a second actuating shaft operates to radially displace the distal deployment members, wherein the first and second actuating shafts are concentrically disposed to slide with respect one another.
In one embodiment the deployment mechanism comprises a proximal collet with respect to which the proximal deployment members pivot, and a distal collet with respect to which the distal deployment members pivot, wherein the proximal collet and distal collet are relatively axially movable. A first actuating shaft extends within a cavity in the proximal collet and a first driver attaches thereto that acts upon the proximal deployment members to pivot them with respect to the proximal collet. A second actuating shaft extends through the first actuating shaft and into a cavity in the distal collet and a second driver attaches thereto that acts upon the distal deployment members to pivot them with respect to the distal collet.
There are various ways to actuate the deployment members. First, each deployment member may pivot about a point that is fixed with respect to the associate collet and includes structure that engages cooperating structure on the associated driver, wherein axial movement of the driver rotates the structure about the pivot point, thus rotating the deployment member. Alternatively, each deployment member has a pin fixed with respect thereto that is received within a corresponding slot in the associated driver, and each collet includes a plurality of pins fixed with respect thereto that are received within corresponding slots in the associated deployment members. In the alternative configuration, axial movement of the driver displaces the pins fixed with respect to the deployment members and causes the deployment members to pivot outward due to a camming action of the deployment member slots over the collet pins.
In a still further embodiment, each deployment member may comprise a pad that is coupled to a respective proximal and distal end cap disposed along the catheter shaft, the pads being radially displaceable with respect to the associated end cap, wherein the proximal and distal end caps are axially movable with respect to each other. There may be two of the actuating shafts, each shaft controlling a plurality of flexible tongs having column strength that extend between one of the end caps and attach to the associated pads, wherein axial movement of each shaft shortens or lengthens the radial extent of the flexible tongs controlled thereby so as to radially displace the attached pads.
Still further, each deployment member may comprise a gear that engages a gear track on the heart valve.
The system preferably includes a stabilization balloon on the catheter shaft proximal to the deployment mechanism and sized to expand and contact a surrounding vessel adjacent the site of implantation. The stabilization balloon may be shaped so as to permit blood flow past it in its expanded configuration, such as with multiple outwardly extending lobes.
The heart valve deployment mechanism may be a modular unit coupled to the distal ends of the catheter shaft and actuating shaft.
In another aspect of the invention, a system for delivering and deploying a self-expandable prosthetic heart valve to a site of implantation is provided. The system comprises a catheter for advancing the heart valve in a contracted configuration to the site of implantation; means on the catheter for permitting the heart valve to self-expand from its contracted configuration to an initial expanded configuration in contact with the surrounding site of implantation; and means for regulating the rate of self-expansion of the heart valve. The system may also include means for expanding the heart valve from its initial expanded configuration to a final expanded configuration, such as a balloon. Alternatively, the means for expanding the heart valve from its initial expanded configuration to a final expanded configuration may be the same as the means for regulating the rate of self-expansion of the heart valve.
The means for expanding the heart valve from its initial expanded configuration to its final expanded configuration and the means for regulating the rate of self-expansion of the heart valve may comprise a gear mechanism that engages both the distal and proximal ends of the heart valve. If the heart valve is of the rolled type having multiple wound layers, the gear mechanism may have a gear shaft that engages an inner layer of the spirally wound heart valve and a retaining bar that engages an outer layer of the spirally wound heart valve, wherein the distance between the gear shaft and retaining bar is adjustable.
Another aspect of the invention is a system for delivering and deploying an expandable prosthetic heart valve to a site of implantation, comprising a catheter for advancing the heart valve in a contracted configuration to the site of implantation, and a stabilization device provided on the catheter sized to expand and contact a surrounding vessel adjacent the site of implantation. The system also has means on the catheter distal to the stabilization device for expanding the heart valve from its contracted configuration to an initial expanded configuration in contact with the surrounding site of implantation. The stabilization device may be a balloon shaped so as to permit blood flow past it in its expanded configuration, such as for example with multiple outwardly extending lobes.
A method for delivering and deploying a self-expandable prosthetic heart valve to a site of implantation is also provided by the present invention. The method comprises:
advancing the heart valve in a contracted configuration to the site of implantation;
permitting the heart valve to self-expand from its contracted configuration to an initial expanded configuration in contact with the surrounding site of implantation; and
regulating the rate of self-expansion of the heart valve.
In the preferred method, the step of advancing the heart valve in a contracted configuration to the site of implantation comprises providing a heart valve deployment mechanism that in one operating mode maintains the heart valve in the contracted configuration, and in another operating mode regulates the rate of self-expansion of the heart valve. The heart valve deployment mechanism may have a plurality of proximal deployment members that engage a proximal end of the valve, and a plurality of distal deployment members that engage a distal end of the valve, and wherein coordinated radial movement of the proximal and distal deployment members regulates the rate of self-expansion of the heart valve. Alternatively, the heart valve deployment mechanism includes a gear shaft having a plurality of gear teeth that engage a gear track provided on the heart valve, wherein the rate of self-expansion of the heart valve is regulated by regulating the rotational speed of the gear shaft.
The preferred method further includes expanding the heart valve from its initial expanded configuration to a final expanded configuration. Also, a catheter-based valve deployment mechanism may be provided having deployment members that both regulate the rate of self-expansion of the heart valve and expand the heart valve from its initial expanded configuration to its final expanded configuration. Alternatively, a catheter-based valve deployment mechanism may be provided having deployment members that regulate the rate of self-expansion of the heart valve, and an inflation balloon expands the heart valve from its initial expanded configuration to its final expanded configuration. In the latter case, the valve inflation balloon is separate from the deployment mechanism and is introduced into the valve after at least a partial expansion thereof. The method further desirably includes stabilizing the heart valve in its contracted configuration adjacent the site of implantation prior to permitting the heart valve to self-expand. The step of stabilizing the heart valve may involve inflating a stabilization balloon, and also permitting blood flow past the inflated stabilization balloon.
A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the invention will become apparent by reference to the remaining portions of the specification and drawings.
The present invention discloses a number of expandable heart valves for implantation in a host annulus, or host tissue adjacent the annulus. The valves may be implanted in any of the four valve positions within the heart, but are more likely to be used in replacing the aortic or mitral valves because of the more frequent need for such surgery in these positions. The patient may be placed on cardiopulmonary bypass or not, depending on the needs of the patient.
A number of expandable prosthetic heart valves are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,733,525 that are initially rolled into a tight spiral to be passed through a catheter or other tube and then unfurled or unrolled at the implantation site, typically a valve annulus. These will be denoted “rolled heart valves” and comprise one- or two-piece sheet-like stent bodies with a plurality of leaflet-forming membranes incorporated therein. Various materials are suitable for the stent body, although certain nickel-titanium alloys are preferred for their super-elasticity and biocompatibility. Likewise, various materials may be used as the membranes, including biological tissue such as bovine pericardium or synthetic materials. It should also be noted that specific stent body configurations disclosed herein or in U.S. Pat. No. 6,733,525 are not to be considered limiting, and various construction details may be modified within the scope of the invention. For example, the number and configuration of lockout tabs (to be described below) may be varied.
As a general introduction, the heart valves in a first, spirally-wound or contracted configuration are delivered through a tube such as a percutaneously-placed catheter or shorter chest cannula and expelled from the end of the tube in the approximate implantation location. The heart valve is then expanded into a second, unwound or expanded configuration that engages the native host tissue, such as the target valve annulus. Depending on the native valve being replaced, the prosthetic heart valve may have varying axial lengths. For example, in the aortic position, an outflow portion of the valve may extend upward into and even flare out and contact the aorta to better stabilize the commissure regions of the valve. In other words, the particular design of the valve may depend on the target valve location.
The present invention is particularly adapted for delivering and deploying self-expandable rolled heart valves, although those of skill in the art will recognize that certain embodiments may be adapted for deploying plastically deformable rolled heart valves. Self-expandable stents in general are known, typically constructed of a tubular metal lattice that has a normal, relaxed diameter and is compressed for insertion into a vein or artery. Upon expulsion from the end of a catheter, the tubular metal lattice expands to its original larger diameter in contact with the vessel wall. It is important to note that there is no regulation of the self-expansion of the stent, as the tube reliably assumes its larger shape.
A number of embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the attached drawings. It should be understood that the various elements of any one particular embodiment may be utilized in one or more of the other embodiments, and thus combinations thereof are within the scope of the appended claims.
Prior to describing the exemplary deployment mechanism 26, and alternative mechanisms, in greater detail, an overview of the techniques for using the system 20 is appropriate. For this discussion, it will be assumed that the heart valve 30 will be implanted in the aortic position.
Prior to introduction of the distal end of the system 20 into the patient, the expandable heart valve 30 is selected based on a measurement of the aortic annulus. Various sizing methodology are available, a discussion of which is outside the scope of the present invention. The selected heart valve 30 may be initially wound into a tight spiral in its storage container, or it may be stored expanded and then wound into its contracted configuration just prior to use. For this purpose, U.S. Pat. No. 6,723,122, entitled Container and Method for Storing and Delivering Minimally-Invasive Heart Valves, filed Aug. 30, 2001, which is expressly incorporated herein, may be used. That application discloses a system for storing and then automatically converting an expandable valve into its contracted shape while still in the storage container. Additionally, the valve 30 may be stored along with the deployment mechanism 26 as a modular unit. In that case, the deployment mechanism 26 and valve 30 may be snapped onto or otherwise coupled with the distal end of the catheter shaft 24. This enables one operating handle 22 and catheter shaft 24 to be used with a number of different valve/deployment mechanism units. After those of skill in the art have an understanding of the various control or actuation shafts/cables described herein, the coupling structure should be relatively straightforward, and thus a detailed explanation will not be provided.
The '122 patent in
The guidewire 28 is first inserted into a peripheral artery, such as the femoral or carotid, using known techniques, and advanced through the ascending aorta into the left ventricle. The catheter shaft 24 with the deployment mechanism 26 on its leading or distal end is then passed over the guidewire 28, possibly with the assistance of an intermediate sized obturator, and into the peripheral vessel via the well-known Seldinger method. The operator then advances and positions the deployment mechanism 26 in proximity to the implantation site, in this case the aortic annulus, using visualization devices such as radiopaque markers on the deployment mechanism 26 or heart valve 30, or an endoscope. Advancement of the deployment mechanism 26 involves simply pushing the entire catheter shaft 24 along the guidewire 28 using the handle 22. Once the valve 30 is properly positioned, the operator expands the stabilization balloon 36 into contact with the surrounding aorta. In this manner, the heart valve 30 is both axially and radially anchored with respect to the surrounding annulus to facilitate proper engagement therewith. The stabilization balloon 36 may be shaped to permit blood flow in its expanded configuration for beating heart surgeries.
Expansion of the heart valve 30 may be accomplished in various ways, as will be described in greater detail below. Operation of the deployment mechanism 26 involves manipulation of cables, shaft, or other elongated devices passing from the operating handle 22 through the catheter shaft 24. These elongated devices may be utilized to transfer axial (push/pull) forces or rotational torque initiated in the handle 22 to various elements of the deployment mechanism 26. The present application will not focus on specific mechanisms in the handle 22 for initiating the forces on the cables or shafts passing through the catheter shaft 24, as numerous such apparatuses are known in the art.
Now with reference to
The inflated stabilization balloon 36 is shown having generally a disk-shape, although other shapes are contemplated, such as a lobed-shape to permit blood flow, as will be described below. A cross-section of the catheter shaft 24 illustrates a plurality of outer lumens 50 surrounding a central lumen 52. The lumens 50 may be used for inflating the balloon 36, 40, or for passing fluid or the devices therethrough. The central lumen 52 is typically used for passage of the cables or shafts for operating the deployment mechanism 26.
As seen in
A distal driver shaft 90 extends over the guidewire 28 to be fixed within a bore of the distal driver 80. Likewise, the distal collet shaft 92 is concentrically disposed about the distal driver shaft 90 and is fixed within a bore of the distal collet body 32. All these elements are thus coaxial about the guide wire 28. Axial movement of the shafts 90, 92 causes axial movement of the driver 80 and collet body 32, respectively. Collet movement is indicated by the double-headed arrow 94. In the initial delivery configuration of
In operation of the deployment mechanism 26 of
Therefore, the valve body 42 converts from its spirally wound configuration with multiple spirally-wound layers 60a, 60e as seen in
It is important to note that during transition of the valve body 42 from its contracted to its expanded configuration, the distal collet body 32 moves in a proximal direction with respect to the valve body 42 as indicated by the movement arrow 96. The reader will note the different relative positions of the proximal end of the collet body 32 with respect to the distal end 44a of the valve body 42 in
The valve body 42 expands outward under regulation of the fingers 46, 48 until it contacts the surrounding host tissue. The valve body 42 has an annealed shape such that its relaxed configuration is open, with its inner and outer side edges being spaced apart. As such, the valve body 42 will continue to expand until it contacts the surrounding tissue, as long as the final tubular size of the valve is larger than the site of implantation. Therefore, proper sizing of the valve is extremely important.
Once the valve body 42 contacts the surrounding tissue, it has reached its initial expanded state. At this stage, the deployment fingers 46, 48 remain outwardly pivoted but are moved apart by relative axial movement of the collet bodies 32, 34 away from each other so as to disengage the claws 64 from the distal and proximal ends 44a, 44b of the valve body 42. Once disengaged from the valve, the fingers 46, 48 may be retracted into their respective channels 70. Subsequently, inflation of the lockout balloon 40 (
The lockout balloon 40 resides initially in the catheter shaft 24 or even outside of the body during the first phase of expansion of the valve body 42. Because the valve body 42 advances through the vasculature in a relatively tight spiral so as to minimize its radial profile for minimally invasive surgeries, the lockout balloon 40 is preferably not positioned in the middle thereof. Of course, this constraint is necessary only when the insertion space is limited, and if the surgery is open heart or otherwise not so space-limited then the balloon 40 may indeed be initially positioned inside and delivered along with the valve. In the preferred minimally invasive deployment, however, the balloon must be introduced within the valve body 42 after at least a partial expansion or unwinding thereof. Typically, the valve body 42 expands into its initial expanded configuration in contact with the surrounding tissue before the lockout balloon 40 advances into its position as seen in
The lockout balloon 40 preferably has a shape with enlarged ends and a connecting middle portion, much like a dumbbell. In this manner, the balloon acts on the proximal and distal ends of the valve body 42, without contacting a middle portion where the leaflets of the valve are located. Of course, other arrangements of balloon are possible, as are multiple lockout balloons.
After the valve body 42 is fully implanted, the lockout balloon 40 is deflated and the catheter shaft 24 withdrawn from the body along the guide wire 28. The proximal collet body 34 also has a bullet-shaped proximal end to facilitate this removal through the vasculature.
With specific reference to
The proximal collet 108 carries a plurality of collet pins 116 that are fixed across an approximate midpoint of each of the collet channels 144 and are received within curved finger cam slots 162. As mentioned previously, two, and preferably three fingers 110 are required for reliable regulation of the self expansion of the valve 112, and there are an equivalent number of collet channels 144 and pins 160. The finger cam slots 162 are disposed in the middle of each finger 110, and the finger also carries a pin 166 fixed to its proximal end. As seen best in
Movement of the various components of the proximal end of the deployment mechanism 102 is depicted in
The shapes of the finger cam slot 162 and collet cam slot 168 are designed such that the claw 116 at the distal end of the finger 110 moves radially outward but remains in the same axial position. Furthermore, this movement of the finger 110 is accomplished by maintaining the proximal collet 108 in a fixed relationship with respect to the valve body 112, while only displacing the proximal driver 132 in a distal direction, indicated by arrow 180. As such, only the proximal driver cable 152 need be displaced. In the same manner, only the distal driver shaft 140 need be displaced with respect to the distal collet shaft 128 to actuate the distal deployment fingers 106 (
A sequence of steps in the delivery and deployment of a heart valve utilizing the deployment mechanism 102 of
Now with reference to
With specific reference to
For the purpose of describing radial movement of the distal pads 206 with reference to
The final outward position of the distal and proximal pads 206, 208 is seen in
After permitting the heart valve 202 to self-expand to its initial expanded configuration as seen in
As seen in
With reference to
The gear shaft 318 includes gear teeth 350 positioned to engage the distal gear track 324. In a similar manner, a second set of gear teeth (not shown) is provided on the proximal end of the gear shaft 318 to engage the proximal gear track 326. As mentioned, the gear shaft 318 rotates about the connecting rod 316, which is held by a shaft retainer 352 in a winding variance slot 354 in the distal end keeper 308. The end of the connecting rod 316 includes a flat or other such feature that registers with a cooperating feature in the winding variance slot 354 to prevent rotation of the rod, and provide a counter-torque to rotation of the gear shaft 318. The slot 354 is elongated in the radial direction to permit radial movement of the connecting rod 316 and accompanying gear shaft 318. Provision of a pusher 356 spring loaded against the connecting rod 316 by a spring 358 and set screw 360 maintains the gear teeth 350 in engagement with the gear track 324.
With reference to
One advantage of such a deployment system 300 that utilizes a gearing mechanism is that both unwinding and winding of the valve 302 may be easily controlled. Therefore, the surgeon may initially expand the valve 302 but then contract it somewhat to modify its position prior to locking it into its final expanded shape. In the worst case, the valve 302 may be completely contracted into its thin profile and removed from the patient if desired, such as if the sizing is not optimal or from other complications.
In contrast to the valve 302 shown
While the foregoing describes the preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used. Moreover, it will be obvious that certain other modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 14/203,258, filed Mar. 10, 2014, which is a continuation of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 13/350,730, filed Jan. 13, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/488,480, filed Jun. 19, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,740,975, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/951,701, filed Sep. 13, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,556,646, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3409013 | Berry | Nov 1968 | A |
3472230 | Fogarty | Oct 1969 | A |
3548417 | Kisher | Dec 1970 | A |
3587115 | Shiley | Jun 1971 | A |
3657744 | Ersek | Apr 1972 | A |
3671979 | Moulopoulos | Jun 1972 | A |
3714671 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3739402 | Cooley et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3755823 | Hancock | Sep 1973 | A |
4035849 | Angell et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4056854 | Boretos et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4106129 | Carpentier et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4204283 | Bellhouse et al. | May 1980 | A |
4222126 | Boretos et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4265694 | Boretos et al. | May 1981 | A |
4297749 | Davis et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4339831 | Johnson | Jul 1982 | A |
4340977 | Brownlee et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4343048 | Ross et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4345340 | Rosen | Aug 1982 | A |
4373216 | Klawitter | Feb 1983 | A |
4406022 | Roy | Sep 1983 | A |
4470157 | Love | Sep 1984 | A |
4490859 | Black et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4535483 | Klawitter et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4574803 | Storz | Mar 1986 | A |
4592340 | Boyles | Jun 1986 | A |
4605407 | Black et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4612011 | Kautzky | Sep 1986 | A |
4643732 | Pietsch et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4655771 | Wallsten | Apr 1987 | A |
4692164 | Dzemeshkevich et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4759758 | Gabbay | Jul 1988 | A |
4762128 | Rosenbluth | Aug 1988 | A |
4777951 | Cribier et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4787899 | Lazarus | Nov 1988 | A |
4787901 | Baykut | Nov 1988 | A |
4796629 | Grayzel | Jan 1989 | A |
4829990 | Thuroff et al. | May 1989 | A |
4851001 | Taheri | Jul 1989 | A |
4856516 | Hillstead | Aug 1989 | A |
4878495 | Grayzel | Nov 1989 | A |
4878906 | Lindemann et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4883458 | Shiber | Nov 1989 | A |
4922905 | Strecker | May 1990 | A |
4966604 | Reiss | Oct 1990 | A |
4979939 | Shiber | Dec 1990 | A |
4986830 | Owens et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4994077 | Dobben | Feb 1991 | A |
5007896 | Shiber | Apr 1991 | A |
5026366 | Leckrone | Jun 1991 | A |
5032128 | Alonso | Jul 1991 | A |
5037434 | Lane | Aug 1991 | A |
5047041 | Sammuels | Sep 1991 | A |
5059177 | Towne et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5080668 | Bolz et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5085635 | Cragg | Feb 1992 | A |
5089015 | Ross | Feb 1992 | A |
5147370 | McNamara et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152771 | Sabbaghian et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163953 | Vince | Nov 1992 | A |
5167628 | Boyles | Dec 1992 | A |
5192297 | Hull | Mar 1993 | A |
5266073 | Wall | Nov 1993 | A |
5282847 | Trescony et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5295958 | Shturman | Mar 1994 | A |
5332402 | Teitelbaum | Jul 1994 | A |
5344425 | Sawyer | Sep 1994 | A |
5360444 | Kusuhara | Nov 1994 | A |
5370685 | Stevens | Dec 1994 | A |
5397351 | Pavcnik et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5411055 | Kane | May 1995 | A |
5411552 | Andersen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421334 | Jabba | Jun 1995 | A |
5443446 | Shturman | Aug 1995 | A |
5480424 | Cox | Jan 1996 | A |
5500014 | Quijano et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5545209 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545214 | Stevens | Aug 1996 | A |
5549665 | Vesely et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554185 | Block et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556413 | Lam | Sep 1996 | A |
5571175 | Vanney et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591185 | Kilmer et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5607464 | Trescony et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5609626 | Quijano et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5618299 | Khosravi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5639274 | Fischell et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5665115 | Cragg | Sep 1997 | A |
5716417 | Girard et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5728068 | Leone et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5749890 | Shaknovich | May 1998 | A |
5756476 | Epstein et al. | May 1998 | A |
5769812 | Stevens et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5800508 | Goicoechea et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5840081 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5855597 | Jayaraman | Jan 1999 | A |
5855601 | Bessler | Jan 1999 | A |
5855602 | Angell | Jan 1999 | A |
5925063 | Khosravi | Jul 1999 | A |
5957929 | Brenneman | Sep 1999 | A |
5957949 | Leonhardt | Sep 1999 | A |
5968068 | Dehdashtian et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980570 | Simpson | Nov 1999 | A |
5984959 | Robertson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6027525 | Suh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6042607 | Williamson, IV et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6132473 | Williams et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6168614 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6168616 | Brown, III | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171335 | Wheatley et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174327 | Mertens et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6210408 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217585 | Houser et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221091 | Khosravi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231602 | Carpentier et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245102 | Jayaraman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6299637 | Shaolian | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302906 | Goecoechea et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312465 | Griffin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6350277 | Kocur | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358277 | Duran | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379372 | Dehdashtian et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425916 | Garrison et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440164 | DiMatteo et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454799 | Schreck | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458153 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461382 | Cao | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468660 | Ogle | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6482228 | Norred | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488704 | Connelly et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6569196 | Vesely et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6582462 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6605112 | Moll | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629534 | St. Goar et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6723122 | Yang | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730118 | Spenser et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6733525 | Yang et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6790229 | Berreklouw | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6830584 | Seguin | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6893460 | Spenser et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908481 | Cribier | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7018406 | Seguin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7276078 | Spenser et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7276084 | Yang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7318278 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7374571 | Pease et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7381210 | Zarbatany et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7393360 | Spenser et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7462191 | Spenser et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7510575 | Spenser et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7579381 | Dove | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7585321 | Cribier | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618446 | Andersen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621948 | Herrmann et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7993394 | Hariton et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8007992 | Tian et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8029556 | Rowe | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8167932 | Bourang | May 2012 | B2 |
9168136 | Yang et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
20010021872 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020032481 | Gabbay | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049370 | Laufer et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020173842 | Buchanan | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030050694 | Yang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030100939 | Yodfat et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120333 | Ouriel et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030212454 | Scott et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040039436 | Spenser et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040133263 | Dusbabek et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040186565 | Schreck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040260389 | Case et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033398 | Seguin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050203614 | Forster et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203617 | Forster et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234546 | Nugent et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050288766 | Plain et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025857 | Bergheim et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060149350 | Patel et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060229719 | Marquez et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259137 | Artof et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070005131 | Taylor | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005231 | Seguchi | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010877 | Salahieh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070112422 | Dehdashtian | May 2007 | A1 |
20070203575 | Forster et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070270943 | Solem | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080065011 | Marchand et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080114442 | Mitchell et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080154355 | Benichou et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20081061911 | Revuelta et al. | Jul 2008 | |
20090157175 | Benichou | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164005 | Dove et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171456 | Kveen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090281619 | Le et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090319037 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100049313 | Alon et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100204781 | Alkhatib | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110015729 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120123529 | Levi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2246526 | Mar 1973 | DE |
19532846 | Mar 1997 | DE |
19546692 | Jun 1997 | DE |
19857887 | Jul 2000 | DE |
19907646 | Aug 2000 | DE |
10049812 | Apr 2002 | DE |
10049813 | Apr 2002 | DE |
10049814 | Apr 2002 | DE |
10049815 | Apr 2002 | DE |
0103546 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0144167 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0592410 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0597967 | May 1994 | EP |
0850607 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1057460 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1088529 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1255510 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1259194 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1281375 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1570809 | Sep 2005 | EP |
2788217 | Jul 2000 | FR |
1315844 | May 1973 | GB |
2056023 | Mar 1981 | GB |
1271508 | Nov 1986 | SU |
9117720 | Nov 1991 | WO |
9217118 | Oct 1992 | WO |
9301768 | Feb 1993 | WO |
9724080 | Jul 1997 | WO |
9749355 | Dec 1997 | WO |
9829057 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9933414 | Jul 1999 | WO |
9940964 | Aug 1999 | WO |
9947075 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0018333 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0041652 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0047139 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0135878 | May 2001 | WO |
0149213 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0162189 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0154624 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0154625 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0164137 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0176510 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0222054 | Mar 2002 | WO |
0236048 | May 2002 | WO |
0241789 | May 2002 | WO |
0243620 | Jun 2002 | WO |
0247575 | Jun 2002 | WO |
0249540 | Jun 2002 | WO |
03047468 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2005087140 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006014233 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006034008 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2008005405 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008035337 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008147964 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2008150529 | Dec 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Andersen, et al., “Transluminal implantation of artificial heart valves. Description of a new expandable aortic valve and initial results with implantationby catheter technique in closed chest pigs.” European Heart Journal (1992), 13, 704-708. |
Andersen, Henning Rud, “History of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Prosthesis,” Herz 34 2009 Nr. 5, Urban & Vogel, pp. 343-346, Skejby University Hospital Department of Cardiology, Aarhus, Denmark. |
Almagor, M.D., Yaron, et al., “Balloon Expandable Stent Implantation in Stenotic Right Heart Valved Conduits,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 1310-1314, Nov. 1, 1990; ISSN 0735-1097. |
Sabbah, Ph.D., Hani N., et al., “Mechanical Factors in the Degeneration of Porcine Bioprosthetic Valves: An Overview,” Journal of Cardiac Surgery, vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 302-309, Dec. 1989; ISSN 0886-0440. |
Serruys, P.W., et al., “Stenting of Coronary Arteries. Are we the Sorcerer's Apprentice?,” European Heart Journal (1989) 10, 774-782, pp. 37-45, Jun. 13, 1989. |
Kolata, Gina, “Device That Opens Clogged Arteries Gets a Failing Grade in a New Study,” nytimes.com, http://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/03/health/device-that-opens-clogged-arteri- es-gets-a-faili . . . , Jul. 29, 2009, 2 pages. |
Urban, M.D., Philip, “Coronary Artery Stenting,” Editions Medecine et Hygiene, Geneve, 1991, pp. 5-47. |
Al-Khaja, N., et al., “Eleven Years' Experience with Carpentier-Edwards Biological Valves in Relation to Survival and Complications,” European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 3:305-311, Jun. 30, 2009. |
Wheatley, M.D., David J., “Valve Prostheses,” Rob & Smith's Operative Surgery, Fourth Edition, pp. 415-424, Butterworths 1986. |
Benchimol, Alberto, et al., “Simultaneous Left Ventricular Echocardiography and Aortic Blood Velocity During Rapid Right Ventricular Pacing in Man,” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, Jan.-Feb. 1977 vol. 273, No. 1, pp. 55-62. cited byapplicant. |
Watt, A.H., et al. “Intravenous Adenosine in the Treatment of Supraventricular Tachycardia; a Dose-Ranging Study and Interaction with Dipyridamole,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (1986), 21, 227-230. |
Uchida, Barry T., et al., “Modifications of Gianturco Expandable Wire Stents,” AJR:150, May 1988, Dec. 3, 1987, pp. 1185-1187. |
Selby, M.D., J. Bayne, “Experience with New Retrieval Forceps for Foreign Body Removal in the Vascular, Urinary, and Biliary Systems,” Radiology 1990; 176:535-538. |
Inoune, M.D., Kanji, et al., “Clinical Application of Transvenous Mitral Commissurotomy by a New Balloon Catheter,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 87:394-402, 1984. |
Al Zaibag, Muayed, et al., “Percutaneous Balloon Valvotomy in Tricuspid Stenosis,” British Heart Journal, Jan. 1987, vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 51-53. |
Lawrence, Jr., M.D., David D., “Percutaneous Endovascular Graft: Experimental Evaluation,” Radiology (1987); 163: 357-360. |
Dotter, M.D., Charles T., “Transluminal Treatment of Arteriosclerotic Obstruction,” University of Oregon's Minthorn Memorial Laboratory for Cardiovascular Research through Radiology, Circulation, vol. XXX, Nov. 1964, pp. 654-670. |
Sigwart, Ulrich, “An Overview of Intravascular Stents: Old and New,” Chapter 48, Textbook of Interventional Cardiology, 2.sup.nd Edition, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, .COPYRGT. 1994, 1990, pp. 803-815. |
Rashkind, M.D., William J., “Historical Aspects of Interventional Cardiology: Past, Present, Future,” Texas Heart Institute Journal, Interventional Cardiology, pp. 363-367, (1986). |
Rosch, M.D., Josef, “The Birth, Early Years and Future of Interventional Radiology,” J Vasc Intery Radiol 2003; 14:841-853. |
Pavcnik, M.D., Ph.D., Dusan, et al. “Development and Initial Experimental Evaluation of a Prosthetic Aortic Valve for Transcatheter Placement,” Cardiovascular Radiology 1992; 183:151-154. |
Ross, F.R.C.S., D.N., “Aortic Valve Surgery,” Guy's Hospital, London, pp. 192-197, approximately 1968. |
Rashkind, M.D., William J., “Creationof an Atrial Septal Defect Withoput Thoracotomy,” the Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 196, No. 11, Jun. 13, 1966, pp. 173-174. |
Porstmann, W., et al., “Der Verschlu.beta. des Ductus Arteriosus Persistens ohne Thorakotomie,” Thoraxchirurgie Vaskulare Chirurgie, Band 15, Heft 2, Stuttgart, im Apr. 1967, pp. 199-203. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160074157 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14203258 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 14949687 | US | |
Parent | 13350730 | Jan 2012 | US |
Child | 14203258 | US | |
Parent | 12488480 | Jun 2009 | US |
Child | 13350730 | US | |
Parent | 09951701 | Sep 2001 | US |
Child | 12488480 | US |