Methods and compositions comprising cement kiln dust having an altered particle size

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8895486
  • Patent Number
    8,895,486
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 14, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 25, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
Methods and compositions are disclosed that comprise cement kiln dust having a mean particle size that has been altered. An embodiment discloses a method of preparing cement kiln dust comprising: providing cement kiln dust having an original particle size; and altering the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust from the original size by grinding, separating, or a combination thereof. Another embodiment discloses a well treatment fluid comprising: cement kiln dust having a mean particle size that has been altered from its original size by grinding, separating, or a combination thereof; and water.
Description
BACKGROUND

In general, well treatments include a wide variety of methods that may be performed in oil, gas, geothermal and/or water wells, such as drilling, completion and workover methods. The drilling, completion and workover methods may include, but are not limited to, drilling, fracturing, acidizing, logging, cementing, gravel packing, perforating and conformance methods. Many of these well treatments are designed to enhance and/or facilitate the recovery of desirable fluids from a subterranean well.


In cementing methods, such as well construction and remedial cementing, settable compositions are commonly utilized. As used herein, the term “settable composition” refers to a composition(s) that hydraulically sets or otherwise develops compressive strength. Settable compositions may be used in primary cementing operations whereby pipe strings, such as casing and liners, are cemented in well bores. In performing primary cementing, a settable composition may be pumped into an annulus between a subterranean formation and the pipe string disposed in the subterranean formation. The settable composition should set in the annulus, thereby forming an annular sheath of hardened cement (e.g., a cement sheath) that should support and position the pipe string in the well bore and bond the exterior surface of the pipe string to the walls of the well bore. Settable compositions also may be used in remedial cementing methods, such as the placement of cement plugs, and in squeeze cementing for sealing voids in a pipe string, cement sheath, gravel pack, formation, and the like. Settable compositions may also be used in surface applications, for example, construction cementing.


Settable compositions for use in subterranean formations may further include Portland cement. Portland cement generally is a major component of the cost for the cement compositions. Other components may be included in the cement composition in addition to, or in place of, the Portland cement. Such components may include fly ash, slag, shale, zeolite, metakaolin, pumice, perlite, lime, silica, rice-hull ash, micro-fine cement, lime kiln dust, and the like. However, the operating conditions for wells are becoming more challenging and demanding, and the search for new materials continues to meet these challenges.


SUMMARY

An embodiment discloses a subterranean treatment method. The method may comprise introducing a treatment fluid into a subterranean formation, wherein the treatment fluid comprises cement kiln dust having a mean particle size that has been altered from its original size by grinding, separating, or a combination thereof


Another embodiment discloses a subterranean treatment method. The method may comprise introducing a treatment fluid into a subterranean formation, wherein the treatment fluid comprises cement kiln dust having a mean particle size that has been reduced from its original size.


Another embodiment discloses a subterranean treatment method. The method may comprise introducing a treatment fluid into a subterranean formation, wherein the treatment fluid comprises cement kiln dust that has been ground.


Another embodiment discloses a method of preparing cement kiln dust. The method may comprise providing cement kiln dust having an original particle size. The method may further comprise altering the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust from the original particle size by grinding, separating, or a combination thereof


Another embodiment discloses a well treatment fluid. The well treatment fluid may comprise cement kiln dust having a mean particle size that has been altered from its original particle size by grinding, separating, or a combination thereof


Another embodiment discloses an additive for a settable composition. The additive may comprise cement kiln dust having a mean particle size that has been altered from its original particle size by grinding, separating, or a combination thereof


The features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. While numerous changes may be made by those skilled in the art, such changes are within the spirit of the invention.







DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Embodiments of the settable compositions of the present invention comprise cement kiln dust having a mean particle size that has been altered from its original size. The mean particle size of the cement kiln dust may be altered, for example, to selectively increase or decrease the mean particle size as desired for a particular application.


In embodiments of the present invention, altering the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust may improve one or more properties of the cement kiln dust, including the void-filling properties, gelation times, and compressive strengths. In some embodiments, the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust may be selectively altered based on the sizes of voids to be filled, which may be beneficial in remedial cementing methods, for example. For example, the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust may be optimized to more effectively fill voids in a pipe string, cement sheath, gravel pack, formation, or the like. In some embodiment, it is believed that altering the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust may be used to adjust the gelation time of compositions containing the cement kiln dust. In some embodiments, the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust may be reduced to provide an increase in compressive strength. For example, reducing mean particle size of the cement kiln dust to less than about 15 microns has been shown to provide unexpected increases in compressive strength for settable compositions to which the cement kiln dust may be added, especially when compared to use of the cement kiln dust prior to the size reduction.


In some embodiments, the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust may be reduced from its original size to provide an increase in compressive strength of at least about 5%, for example an increase in an amount in a range of at least about 5% to about 100%. In specific embodiments, the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust may be reduced to provide an increase in compressive strength of at least about 20%, at least about 40%, at least about 60%, at least about 80%, or at least about 100%. It should be understood that, as used herein, an increase in compressive strength for the cement kiln dust having a reduced mean particle size refers to a comparison of the compressive strength of a settable composition comprising the reduced particle size cement kiln dust to a settable composition comprising the original cement kiln dust prior to the particle size reduction. The compressive strength may be determined using either a destructive or non-destructive testing method. In some embodiments, the compressive strength tests may be performed in accordance with API RP Practice 10B-2, Recommended Practice for Testing Well Cements, First Edition, July 2005. For example, the 24-hour compressive strength for a settable composition comprising the cement kiln dust may be determined using an Ultrasonic Cement Analyzer from Farm Instruments, Houston, Texas, while maintained at 140° F. and 8,000 pounds per square inch (“psi”). In one particular example, the 24-hour compressive strengths may be determined for a settable composition having a density of about 12 pounds per gallon (“lb/gal”).


Cement kiln dust, as that term is used herein, refers to a partially calcined kiln feed which is removed from the gas stream and collected, for example, in a dust collector during the manufacture of cement. The cement kiln dust generally may exhibit cementitious properties, in that it may set and harden in the presence of water. Usually, large quantities of cement kiln dust are collected in the production of cement that are commonly disposed of as waste. Disposal of the cement kiln dust can add undesirable costs to the manufacture of the cement, as well as the environmental concerns associated with its disposal. The chemical analysis of the cement kiln dust from various cement manufactures varies depending on a number of factors, including the particular kiln feed, the efficiencies of the cement production operation, and the associated dust collection systems. Cement kin dust generally may comprise a variety of oxides, such as SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, SO3, Na2O, and K2O.


In accordance with present embodiments, the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust can be altered using any suitable technique, including, without limitation, grinding or separating to provide a material having an altered particle size. Separating the cement kiln dust may include sieving or any other suitable technique for separating the cement kiln dust to provide a mean particle size that has been altered from its original size. For example, sieving may be used to produce cement kiln dust having an increased or reduced mean particle size as desired for a particular application. By way of further example, grinding may be used to decrease the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust. Combinations of grinding and separating may be used in some embodiments. The term “ground” or “grinding” as used herein means using a grinder (e.g., ball mill, rod mill, etc.) to reduce the particle size of the specified component(s). An example of a suitable grinder is an 8000 Mixer/Mill® ball mill, available from SPEX Sample Prep. In some embodiments, the cement kiln dust may be ground for a time period in a range of from about 30 minutes to about 1 hour.


The mean particle size of the cement kiln dust can be altered to any size suitable for use in cementing operations. In some embodiments, the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust may be altered from its original particle size to have a mean particle size in a range of about 1 micron to about 350 microns. The mean particle size corresponds to d50 values as measured by particle size analyzers such as those manufactured by Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, United Kingdom.


In some embodiments, the mean particle size of the cement kiln of the cement kiln dust may be increased from its original size. For example, the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust may be at least 5% greater than its original size. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the cement kiln dust may be increased to a size that is in a range of from about 5% to about 100% greater than its original size. In some embodiments, the mean particle size may be increased to a size ranging between any of and/or including any of about 5%, about 10%, about 15%, about 20%, about 25%, about 30%, about 35%, about 40%, about 45%, about 50%, about 55%, about 60%, about 65%, about 70%, about 75%, about 80%, about 90%, or about 95% greater than its of the original size.


In some embodiments, the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust may be reduced from its original size. For example, the mean particle size may be reduced in an amount sufficient to increase the compressive strength of the cement kiln dust. In some embodiments, the cement kiln dust may have a mean particle size that is at least 5% less than its original size. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the cement kiln dust may be reduced to have a mean particle size in a range of from about 5% to about 95% of its original size. For example, the mean particle size may be reduced to a size ranging between any of and/or including any of about 5%, about 10%, about 15%, about 20%, about 25%, about 30%, about 35%, about 40%, about 45%, about 50%, about 55%, about 60%, about 6%, about 70%, about 75%, about 80%, about 90%, or about 95% of its original size. By way of example, the reduced particle size cement kiln dust may have a mean particle size of less than about 15 microns. In some embodiments, the reduced particle size cement kiln dust may have a mean particle size of less than about 10 microns, less than about 5 microns, less than about 4 microns, less than about 3 microns, less than about 2 microns, or less than about 1 micron. In specific embodiments, the reduced particle size cement kiln dust may have a mean particle size in a range of from about 0.1 microns to about 15 microns, from about 0.1 microns to about 10 microns, or from about 1 micron to about 10 microns. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, should be able to select a particle size for the cement kiln dust suitable for a particular application.


The cement kiln dust having a particle size that has been altered may be included in the settable compositions in an amount sufficient to provide, for example, the desired compressive strength, gelation time, and the like. In some embodiments, the altered particle size cement kiln dust may be present in the settable compositions of the present invention in an amount in the range of from about 1% to 100% by weight of cementitious components (“% bwoc”). The term “cementitious components” refers to the components, or a combination thereof, of the settable compositions that hydraulically set, or otherwise harden, to develop compressive strength, including, for example, cement kiln dust, Portland cement, fly ash, natural pozzolans (e.g., pumicite), slag, lime, shale, and the like. The altered particle size cement kiln dust may be present in an amount, for example, ranging between any of and/or including any of about 5%, about 10%, about 15%, about 20%, about 25%, about 30%, about 35%, about 40%, about 45%, about 50%, about 55%, about 60%, about 65%, about 70%, about 75%, about 80%, about 90%, about 95%, or 100% bwoc. In specific embodiments, the altered particle size cement kiln dust may be present in the settable compositions in an amount in the range of from about 5% to 100% bwoc, from about 50% to 100% bwoc, or from about 75% to 100% bwoc. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate amount of the cement kiln dust having a mean particle size that has been altered to include for a chosen application.


Embodiments of the settable compositions may further comprise one or more additional additives, including, but not limited to, hydraulic cement, fly ash, slag, shale, zeolite, metakaolin, pumice, perlite, lime, silica, rice-hull ash, micro-fine cement, lime kiln dust, and combinations thereof, and the like. In accordance with present embodiments, the cement kiln dust having a mean particle size that has been altered may be prepared by a process comprising intergrinding the cement kiln dust with one or more of the additional additives to a particular desired size. For example, the cement kiln dust and the one or more additional additives may be interground to a mean particle size of less than about 15 microns. In some embodiments, the cement kiln dust and the one or more additional additives may be interground to a mean particle size of less than about 10 microns, less than about 5 microns, less than about 4 microns, less than about 3 microns, less than about 2 microns, or less than about 1 micron. In specific embodiments, the cement kiln dust and the one or more additional additives may be interground to a mean particle size in a range from about 0.1 microns to about 15 microns, from about 0.1 microns to about 10 microns, or from about 1 micron to about 10 microns. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, should be able to select a particle size of the interground cement kiln dust and the one or more additional additives suitable for a particular application.


Hydraulic cement may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions of the present invention. A variety of hydraulic cements may be utilized in accordance with the present invention, including, but not limited to, those comprising calcium, aluminum, silicon, oxygen, iron, and/or sulfur, which set and harden by reaction with water. Suitable hydraulic cements include, but are not limited to, Portland cements, pozzolana cements, gypsum cements, high alumina content cements, slag cements, silica cements, and combinations thereof. In certain embodiments, the hydraulic cement may comprise a Portland cement, including Portland cements classified as Classes A, C, G and H cements according to American Petroleum Institute, API Specification for Materials and Testing for Well Cements, API Specification 10, Fifth Edition, Jul. 1, 1990. In addition, Portland cements suitable for use in embodiments the present invention may also include those classified as ASTM Type I, II, III, IV, or V. In some embodiments, the cement may be present in the settable compositions in an amount in the range of from about 0.1% to about 99% bwoc. For example, the cement may be present in an amount ranging between any of and/or including any of about 5%, about 10%, about 15%, about 20%, about 25%, about 30%, about 35%, about 40%, about 45%, about 50%, about 55%, about 60%, about 65%, about 70%, about 75%, about 80%, about 85%, about 90%, or about 95% bwoc. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate amount of the cement to include for a chosen application.


Fly ash may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions of the present invention. A variety of fly ashes may be suitable, including fly ash classified as Class C and Class F fly ash according to American Petroleum Institute, API Specification for Materials and Testing for Well Cements, API Specification 10, Fifth Ed., Jul. 1, 1990. Class C fly ash comprises both silica and lime so that, when mixed with water, it sets to form a hardened mass. Class F fly ash generally does not contain sufficient lime, so an additional source of calcium ions may be required for the Class F fly ash to form a settable composition with water. In some embodiments, lime may be mixed with Class F fly ash in an amount in the range of about 0.1% to about 25% by weight of the fly ash. In some instances, the lime may be hydrated lime. Suitable examples of fly ash include, but are not limited to, POZMIX® A cement additive, available from Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Duncan, Okl. Where present, the fly ash generally may be included in the settable compositions in an amount sufficient to provide the desired compressive strength, density, and/or cost. In some embodiments, the fly ash may be present in settable compositions of the present invention in an amount in the range of about 0.1% to about 75% bwoc. In some embodiments, the fly ash may be present in an amount ranging between any of and/or including any of about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, or about 70% bwoc. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate amount of the fly ash to include for a chosen application.


Slag may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions of the present invention. Slag generally does not contain sufficient basic material, so slag may be used with a base to produce a settable composition that may react with water to set to form a hardened mass. Examples of suitable sources of bases include, but are not limited to, sodium hydroxide, sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate, lime, and combinations thereof. Where present, the slag generally may be included in the settable compositions in an amount sufficient to provide the desired compressive strength, density, and/or cost. In some embodiments, the slag may be present in settable compositions of the present invention in an amount in the range of about 0.1% to about 75% bwoc. In some embodiments, the slag may be present in an amount ranging between any of and/or including any of about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, or about 70% bwoc. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate amount of the slag to include for a chosen application.


Shale may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions of the present invention. A variety of shales may be suitable, including those comprising silicon, aluminum, calcium, and/or magnesium. An example of a suitable shale comprises vitrified shale. Suitable examples of vitrified shale include, but are not limited to, PRESSUR-SEAL FINE LCM material and PRESSUR-SEAL COARSE LCM material, which are available from TXI Energy Services, Inc., Houston, Tex. Generally, the shale may have any particle size distribution as desired for a particular application. In certain embodiments, the shale may have a particle size distribution in the range of about 37 microns to about 4,750 microns. Where present, the shale may be included in the settable compositions of the present invention in an amount sufficient to provide the desired compressive strength, density, and/or cost. In some embodiments, the shale may be present in settable compositions of the present invention in an amount in the range of about 0.1% to about 75% bwoc. In some embodiments, the shale may be present in an amount ranging between any of and/or including any of about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, or about 70% bwoc. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate amount of the shale to include for a chosen application.


Zeolite may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions of the present invention. Zeolites suitable for use typically may include porous alumino-silicate minerals that may be either a natural or synthetic material. Synthetic zeolites are based on the same type of structural cell as natural zeolites, and may comprise aluminosilicate hydrates. As used herein, the term “zeolite” refers to all natural and synthetic forms of zeolite. Examples of suitable zeolites are described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 7,445,669. An example of a suitable source of zeolite is available from the C2C Zeolite Corporation of Calgary, Canada. In some embodiments, the zeolite may be present in settable compositions of the present invention in an amount in the range of about 0.1% to about 75% bwoc. In some embodiments, the zeolite may be present in an amount ranging between any of and/or including any of about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, or about 70% bwoc. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate amount of the zeolite to include for a chosen application.


Metakaolin may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions of the present invention. Generally, metakaolin is a white pozzolan that may be prepared by heating kaolin clay, for example, to temperatures in the range of about 600° C. to about 800° C. In some embodiments, the metakaolin may be present in settable compositions of the present invention in an amount in the range of about 0.1% to about 75% bwoc. In some embodiments, the metakaolin may be present in an amount ranging between any of and/or including any of about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, or about 70% bwoc. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate amount of the metakaolin to include for a chosen application.


Pumice may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions of the present invention. Generally, pumice is a volcanic rock that exhibits cementitious properties, in that it may set and harden in the presence of hydrated lime and water. Hydrated lime may be used in combination with the pumice, for example, to provide sufficient calcium ions for the pumicite to set. In some embodiments, the pumice may be present in settable compositions of the present invention in an amount in the range of about 0.1% to about 75% bwoc. In some embodiments, the pumice may be present in an amount ranging between any of and/or including any of about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, or about 70% bwoc. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate amount of the pumice to include for a chosen application.


Perlite may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions of the present invention. Perlite is an ore and generally refers to a naturally occurring volcanic, amorphous siliceous rock comprising mostly silicon dioxide and aluminum oxide. Perlite suitable for use in embodiments of the present invention includes expanded perlite and unexpanded perlite. In some embodiments, the perlite may comprise unexpanded perlite. The perlite may also be ground, for example. In some embodiments, the perlite may be present in settable compositions of the present invention in an amount in the range of about 0.1% to about 75% bwoc. In some embodiments, the perlite may be present in an amount ranging between any of and/or including any of about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, or about 70% bwoc. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate amount of the perlite to include for a chosen application.


Lime may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions of the present invention. In certain embodiments, the lime may be hydrated lime. The lime may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions, for example to, form a hydraulic composition with other components of the settable compositions, such as the pumice, fly ash, slag, and/or shale. Where present, the lime may be included in the settable compositions in an amount in the range of from about 0.1% to about 25% bwoc, for example. In some embodiments, the lime may be present in an amount ranging between any of and/or including any of about 5%, about 10%, about 15%, about 20%, or about 25% bwoc. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate amount of the lime to include for a chosen application.


Silica may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions of the present invention. Silicas suitable for use typically may include amorphous silica, crystalline silica, or combinations thereof. Crystalline silica is a powder that may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions, for example, to prevent cement compressive strength retrogression. Amorphous silica is a powder that may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions as a lightweight filler and/or to increase cement compressive strength. In some embodiments, the silica may be present in settable compositions of the present invention in an amount in the range of about 0.1% to about 75% bwoc. In some embodiments, the silica may be present in an amount ranging between any of and/or including any of about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, or about 70% bwoc. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate amount of the silica to include for a chosen application.


Rice-hull ash may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions of the present invention. In general, rice-hull ash is the ash produced from the burning of rice hulls, which are the hard coverings of grains of rice, and may comprise primarily silica and carbon. In some embodiments, the rice-hull ash may be present in settable compositions of the present invention in an amount in the range of about 0.1% to about 75% bwoc. In some embodiments, the rice-hull ash may be present in an amount ranging between any of and/or including any of about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, or about 70% bwoc. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate amount of the rice-hull ash to include for a chosen application.


Micro-fine cement may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions of the present invention. As used herein, the term “micro-fine cement” refers to a cement having a mean particle size no larger than about 5 microns, for example, in a range of about 1 micron to about 5 microns. In some embodiments, the micro-fine cement may be present in settable compositions of the present invention in an amount in the range of about 0.1% to about 75% bwoc. In some embodiments, the micro-fine cement may be present in an amount ranging between any of and/or including any of about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, or about 70% bwoc. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate amount of the micro-fine cement to include for a chosen application.


Lime kiln dust may be included in embodiments of the settable compositions of the present invention. Lime kiln dust, as that term is used herein, refers to a product generated in the manufacture of lime. The lime kiln dust may be collected, for example, by dust control systems in the calcination of lime stone. In some embodiments, the lime kiln dust may be present in settable compositions of the present invention in an amount in the range of about 0.1% to about 75% bwoc. In some embodiments, the lime kiln dust may be present in an amount ranging between any of and/or including any of about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, or about 70% bwoc. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate amount of the lime kiln dust to include for a chosen application.


Embodiments of the settable compositions further may include water. The water that may be used in embodiments of the settable compositions include, for example, freshwater, saltwater (e.g., water containing one or more salts dissolved therein), brine (e.g., saturated saltwater produced from subterranean formations), seawater, or combinations thereof. Generally, the water may be from any source, provided that the water does not contain an excess of compounds that may undesirably affect other components in the settable composition. In some embodiments, the water may be included in an amount sufficient to form a pumpable slurry. In some embodiments, the water may be included in the settable compositions of the present invention in an amount in the range of about 40% to about 200% bwoc. For example, the water may be present in an amount ranging between any of and/or including any of about 50%, about 75%, about 100%, about 125%, about 150%, or about 175% bwoc. In specific embodiments, the water may be included in an amount in the range of about 40% to about 150% bwoc. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate amount of water to include for a chosen application.


Optionally, other additional additives may be added to the settable compositions of the present invention as deemed appropriate by one skilled in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure. Examples of such additives include, but are not limited to, strength-retrogression additives, set accelerators, weighting agents, lightweight additives, gas-generating additives, mechanical-property-enhancing additives, lost-circulation materials, filtration-control additives, dispersants, fluid-loss-control additives, defoaming agents, foaming agents, oil-swellable particles, water-swellable particles, thixotropic additives, and combinations thereof. Specific examples of these, and other, additives include salts, fibers, hydratable clays, microspheres, elastomers, elastomeric particles, resins, latex, combinations thereof, and the like. A person having ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will readily be able to determine the type and amount of additive useful for a particular application and desired result. Embodiments of the settable compositions may be foamed and/or extended as desired by those of ordinary skill in the art.


The settable compositions of the present invention should have a density suitable for a particular application as desired by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure. In some embodiments, the settable compositions may have a density in the range of from about 8 lb/gal to about 16 lb/gal. In other embodiments, the settable compositions may be foamed to a density in the range of from about 8 lb/gal to about 13 lb/gal.


While the settable compositions may be suitable for a number of different cementing operations, they may be particularly suitable for methods of cementing in a subterranean formation. For example, the settable compositions may be used in primary and remedial cementing operations in which the settable compositions may be introduced into a subterranean formation and allowed to set. As used herein, introducing the settable composition into a subterranean formation includes introduction into any portion of the subterranean formation, including, without limitation, into a well bore drilled into the subterranean formation, into a near well bore region surrounding the well bore, or into both.


In primary cementing embodiments, for example, a settable composition may be introduced into a space between a wall of a well bore and a conduit (e.g., pipe strings, liners) located in the well bore, the well bore penetrating the subterranean formation. The settable composition may be allowed to set to form an annular sheath of hardened cement in the space between the well bore wall and the conduit. Among other things, the set settable composition may form a barrier, preventing the migration of fluids in the well bore. The set settable composition also may, for example, support the conduit in the well bore.


In remedial cementing embodiments, a settable composition may be used, for example, in squeeze-cementing operations or in the placement of cement plugs. By way of example, the settable composition may be placed in a well bore to plug an opening, such as a void or crack, in the formation, in a gravel pack, in the conduit, in the cement sheath, and/or a microannulus between the cement sheath and the conduit.


While the preceding description is directed to the use of the cement kiln dust having a mean particle size that has been altered in subterranean cementing methods, it should be understood that embodiments of the present technique also encompasses the use of the altered particle size cement kiln dust in any of a variety of different subterranean treatments. For example, a subterranean treatment method may include providing a treatment fluid comprising the altered particle size cement kiln dust and introducing the treatment fluid into a subterranean formation. The cement kiln dust having a mean particle size that has been altered may be included in any of a number of well treatment fluids that may be used in subterranean treatments, including drilling fluids, completion fluids, spacer fluids, stimulation fluids, and well clean-up fluids. For example, a drilling fluid may comprise the reduced particle size cement kiln dust, wherein the drilling fluid may be circulated downwardly through a drill pipe and drill bit and then upwardly through the well bore to the surface. The drilling fluid used may be any number of fluids (gaseous or liquid) and mixtures of fluids and solids (such as solid suspensions, mixtures, and emulsions).


In some embodiments, a spacer fluid may comprise the cement kiln dust having a mean particle size that has been altered. Spacer fluids may be used, for example, in the displacement of fluids from well bore. In an embodiment, the fluid displaced by the spacer fluid comprises a drilling fluid. By way of example, the spacer fluid may be used to displace the drilling fluid from the well bore. The drilling fluid may include, for example, any number of fluids, such as solid suspensions, mixtures, and emulsions. Additional steps in embodiments of the method may comprise introducing a pipe string into the well bore, introducing a cement composition into the well bore with the spacer fluid separating the cement composition and the first fluid. In an embodiment, the cement composition may be allowed to set in the well bore. The cement composition may include, for example, cement and water.


Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention disclose methods and compositions that comprise cement kiln dust having a mean particle size that has been altered. There may be several potential advantages to the methods and compositions of the present invention, only some of which may be alluded to herein. One of the many potential advantages of embodiments of the present invention is that reducing the particle size of the cement kiln dust can result in increased compressive strength for the settable compositions after setting. For example, it has been shown that compositions with reduced particle size cement kiln dust have increased compressive strength as compared to use of the cement kiln dust prior to the size reduction. Another potential advantage is that altering the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust may impact the gelation time of compositions containing the cement kiln dust. Yet another potential advantage is that the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust may be selectively altered, for example, based on the size of voids. This could potentially result in more effective remedial cementing methods, as the particle size of the cement kiln dust has been optimized.


To facilitate a better understanding of the present invention, the following examples of certain aspects of some embodiments are given. In no way should the following examples be read to limit, or define, the scope of the invention.


EXAMPLE 1

The following series of tests was performed to evaluate the force resistance properties of settable compositions comprising cement kiln dust having a mean particle size that has been reduced. Two different sample settable compositions, designated Samples 1 and 2, were prepared by adding 250 grams of cement kiln dust to 267.3 grams of tap water while mixing in a Waring blender at 4,000 rpm for 15 seconds followed by mixing at 12,000 rpm for 35 seconds for each sample. Sample 1 contained unground cement kiln dust while the cement kiln dust included in Sample 2 was ground to a reduced particle size. Each of Samples 1 and 2 was then placed in a sealed cylindrical container, 2 inches in diameter by 4 inches in height. Each container was placed in a water bath at 140° F. and allowed to cure for 96 hours. Each container was then removed from the water bath, allowed to cool, and the cylindrical samples were demolded. The cylindrical samples were then placed in a Tinius Olsen tester, and the compressive strengths were determined. The compressive strength testing was performed in accordance with API RP Practice 10B-2, Recommended Practice for Testing Well Cements.


Sample 1 comprised water (106.93% bwoc) and cement kiln dust (100% bwoc). The cement kiln dust was unground and had a mean particle size of about 18.7 microns. Sample 1 had a density of 12 lb/gal.


Sample 2 comprised water (106.93% bwoc) and ground cement kiln dust (100% bwoc). The cement kiln dust in Sample 2 was ground from a mean particle size of 18.7 microns to a mean particle size of 5.9 microns using an 8000 Mixer/Mill® ball mill, available from SPEX Sample Prep. Sample 2 had a mean particle size reduction of 68.45%. The cement kiln dust was ground in the grinder for time period of about 30 minutes to about 1 hour. Sample 2 had a density of 12 lb/gal.


The results of the compressive strength testing are provided in Table 1 below. The data reported in the table below is the average of 3 tests for each of the sample settable compositions.









TABLE 1







Compressive Strength Tests

















CKD

96-Hr






Particle

Comp.


Sample
Density
Water
CKD
Size
Temp.
Strength


No.
(lb/gal)
(% bwoc)
(% bwoc)
(micron)
(° F.)
(psi)
















1
12
106.93
100
18.7
140
64.3


2
12
106.93
100
5.9
140
169.5









Example 1 thus indicates that reducing the particle size of the cement kiln dust may increase the compressive strength of the settable compositions as compared to unground cement kiln dust. At 140° F., for example, Sample 2 with cement kiln dust ground to a mean particle size of 5.9 microns had a 96-hour compressive strength of 169.5 psi as compared to a 96-hour compressive strength of 64.3 psi for Sample 1 with unground cement kiln dust.


EXAMPLE 2

An additional series of tests was performed to further evaluate the force resistance properties of settable compositions comprising cement kiln dust have a mean particle size that has been reduced. Two different sample settable compositions, designated Samples 3 and 4, were prepared by adding 200 grams of cement kiln dust to 213.9 grams of tap water while mixing in a Waring blender at 4,000 rpm for 15 seconds followed by mixing at 12,000 rpm for 35 seconds for each sample. Sample 3 contained unground cement kiln dust while the cement kiln dust in Sample 4 was ground to a reduced particle. Each of the samples was then placed in an Ultrasonic Cement Analyzer (“UCA”) from Fann Instruments, Houston, Tex. In the UCA, the compressive strength of each sample was determined over time at 140° F. and 8,000 psi. The compressive strength testing was performed in accordance with API RP Practice 10B-2, Recommended Practice for Testing Well Cements.


Sample 3 comprised water (106.93% bwoc) and cement kiln dust (100% bwoc). The cement kiln dust was unground and had a mean particle size of about 18.7 microns. Sample 3 had a density of 12 lb/gal.


Sample 4 comprised water (106.93% bwoc) and ground cement kiln dust (100% bwoc). The cement kiln dust in Sample 4 was ground from a mean particle size of 18.7 microns to a mean particle size of 9.7 microns using an 8000 Mixer/Mill® ball mill, available from SPEX Sample Prep. Sample 4 had a mean particle size reduction of 48.13%. The cement kiln dust was ground in the grinder for time period of about 30 minutes to about 1 hour. Sample 4 had a density of 12 lb/gal.


The results of the compressive strength testing are provided in Table 2 below. The data reported in the table below is compressive strengths reported by the UCA at 12 hours and 24 hours.









TABLE 2







UCA Compressive Strength Tests















Den-


CKD

12-Hr
24-Hr


Sam-
sity
Water
CKD
Particle

Comp.
Comp.


ple
(lb/
(%
(%
Size
Temp.
Strength
Strength


No.
gal)
bwoc)
bwoc)
(micron)
(° F.)
(psi)
(psi)

















3
12
106.93
100
18.7
140
153
166


4
12
106.93
100
9.7
140
298
326









Example 2 thus indicates that reducing the particle size of the cement kiln dust may increase the compressive strength of the settable compositions as compared to unground cement kiln dust. At 140° F., for example, Sample 4 with cement kiln dust ground to a mean particle size of 9.7 microns had a 12-hour compressive strength of 298 psi as compared to a 12-hour compressive strength of 153 psi for Sample 3 with unground cement kiln dust.


It should be understood that the compositions and methods are described in terms of “comprising,” “containing,” or “including” various components or steps, the compositions and methods can also “consist essentially of” or “consist of” the various components and steps. Moreover, the indefinite articles “a” or “an,” as used in the claims, are defined herein to mean one or more than one of the element that it introduces.


For the sake of brevity, only certain ranges are explicitly disclosed herein. However, ranges from any lower limit may be combined with any upper limit to recite a range not explicitly recited, as well as, ranges from any lower limit may be combined with any other lower limit to recite a range not explicitly recited, in the same way, ranges from any upper limit may be combined with any other upper limit to recite a range not explicitly recited. Additionally, whenever a numerical range with a lower limit and an upper limit is disclosed, any number and any included range falling within the range is specifically disclosed. In particular, every range of values (of the form, “from about a to about b,” or, equivalently, “from approximately a to b,” or, equivalently, “from approximately a-b”) disclosed herein is to be understood to set forth every number and range encompassed within the broader range of values even if not explicitly recite. Thus, every point or individual value may serve as its own lower or upper limit combined with any other point or individual value or any other lower or upper limit, to recite a range not explicitly recited.


Therefore, the present invention is well adapted to attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those that are inherent therein. The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the present invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Although individual embodiments are discussed, the invention covers all combinations of all those embodiments. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. Also, the terms in the claims have their plain, ordinary meaning unless otherwise explicitly and clearly defined by the patentee. It is therefore evident that the particular illustrative embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the present invention. If there is any conflict in the usages of a word or term in this specification and one or more patent(s) or other documents that may be incorporated herein by reference, the definitions that are consistent with this specification should be adopted.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: individually grinding a cementitious component consisting essentially of a partially calcined kiln feed removed from a gas stream, wherein the partially calcined kiln feed has an original mean particle size, wherein the cementitious component was ground to reduce the original mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed to a size of about 15 microns or less, wherein the original mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed was reduced by about 25% or more by the grinding, and wherein the partially calcined kiln feed comprises SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, SO3, Na2O, and K2O; andmixing the ground partially calcined kiln feed with a hydraulic cement.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the original mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed is reduced by about 50% or more by the grinding.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the original mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed is reduced to a range of from about 1 micron to about 10 microns.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the settable composition further comprises an additive selected from the group consisting of fly ash, slag, shale, zeolite, metakaolin, pumice, perlite, lime, silica, rice-hull ash, micro-fine cement, and any combination thereof.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising using the partially calcined kiln feed in a settable composition comprising an additive selected from the group consisting of a set retarding additive, a strength-retrogression additive, a set accelerator, a weighting agent, a lightweight additive, a gas-generating additive, a mechanical-property-enhancing additive, a lost-circulation material, a filtration-control additive, a dispersant, a fluid-loss-control additive, a defoaming agent, a foaming agent, an oil-swellable particle, a water-swellable particle, a thixotropic additive, and any combination thereof.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising introducing a settable composition comprising the partially calcined kiln feed into a subterranean formation.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the settable composition is used in primary cementing.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the settable composition is used in remedial cementing.
  • 9. The method of claim 6, wherein the partially calcined kiln feed comprises cement kiln dust and is present in the settable composition in an amount in a range of from about 1% to about 100% by weight of the total amount of cementitious components present in the settable composition.
  • 10. The method of claim 6, wherein the partially calcined kiln feed comprises cement kiln dust and is present in the settable composition in an amount in a range of from about 80% to about 100% by weight of the total amount of cementitious components present in the settable composition.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed has been reduced in an amount sufficient to provide an increase in 24-hour compressive strength of at least about 5% for a settable composition comprising the partially calcined kiln feed, the 24-hour compressive strength being measured using an Ultrasonic Cement Analyzer while maintained at 140° F. and 3,000 psi.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed has been reduced in an amount sufficient to provide an increase in 24-hour compressive strength of at least about 20% for a settable composition comprising the partially calcined kiln feed, the 24-hour compressive strength being measured using an Ultrasonic Cement Analyzer while maintained at 140° F. and 3,000 psi.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed has been reduced in an amount sufficient to provide an increase in 24-hour compressive strength of at least about 100% for a settable composition comprising the partially calcined kiln feed, the 24-hour compressive strength being measured using an Ultrasonic Cement Analyzer while maintained at 140° F. and 3,000 psi.
  • 14. A method of preparing a partially calcined kiln feed removed from a gas stream comprising: providing the partially calcined kiln feed removed from a gas stream, wherein the partially calcined kiln feed has an original mean particle size and comprises SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, SO3, Na2O, and K2O; andintergrinding the partially calcined kiln feed with one or more additives to reduce the original mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed to a size of about 15 microns or less, wherein the original mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed was reduced by at least about 25% by the grinding, wherein the partially calcined kiln feed is present in an amount of about 55% or more by weight of a total amount of the partially calcined kiln feed and the one or more additives.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the reduced mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed is in a range of from about 1 micron to about 10 microns.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, wherein the partially calcined kiln feed is from the manufacture of cement.
  • 17. The method of claim 14, further comprising using the partially calcined kiln feed in a settable composition comprising an additive selected from the group consisting of hydraulic cement, fly ash, slag, shale, zeolite, metakaolin, pumice, perlite, lime, silica, rice-hull ash, micro-fine cement, and any combination thereof.
  • 18. The method of claim 14, further comprising using the partially calcined kiln feed in a settable composition comprising an additive selected from the group consisting of a set retarding additive, a strength-retrogression additive, a set accelerator, a weighting agent, a lightweight additive, a gas-generating additive, a mechanical-property-enhancing additive, a lost-circulation material, a filtration-control additive, a dispersant, a fluid-loss-control additive, a defoaming agent, a foaming agent, an oil-swellable particle, a water-swellable particle, a thixotropic additive, and any combination thereof.
  • 19. The method of claim 14, further comprising introducing a settable composition comprising the partially calcined kiln feed into a subterranean formation.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the settable composition is used in primary cementing.
  • 21. The method of claim 19, wherein the settable composition is used in remedial cementing.
  • 22. The method of claim 19, wherein the partially calcined kiln feed comprises cement kiln dust.
  • 23. The method of claim 19 wherein the partially calcined kiln feed comprises cement kiln dust and is present in the settable composition in an amount in a range of from about 80% to about 100% by weight of the total amount of cementitious components present in the settable composition.
  • 24. The method of claim 14, wherein the mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed has been reduced in an amount sufficient to provide an increase in 24-hour compressive strength of at least about5% for a settable composition comprising the partially calcined kiln feed, the 24-hour compressive strength being measured using an Ultrasonic Cement Analyzer while maintained at 140° F. and 3,000 psi.
  • 25. The method of claim 14, wherein the mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed has been reduced in an amount sufficient to provide an increase in 24-hour compressive strength of at least about 20% for a settable composition comprising the partially calcined kiln feed, the 24-hour compressive strength being measured using an Ultrasonic Cement Analyzer while maintained at 140° F. and 3,000 psi.
  • 26. The method of claim 14, wherein the mean particle size of the cement kiln dust has been reduced in an amount sufficient to provide an increase in 24-hour compressive strength of at least about 100% for a settable composition comprising the partially calcined kiln feed, the 24-hour compressive strength being measured using an Ultrasonic Cement Analyzer while maintained at 140° F. and 3,000 psi.
  • 27. A method of preparing a partially calcined kiln feed removed from a gas stream comprising: providing the partially calcined kiln feed removed from a gas stream, wherein the partially calcined kiln feed has an original mean particle size and comprises SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, SO3, Na2O, and K2O; andintergrinding the partially calcined kiln feed with at least one additive selected from the group consisting of pumice, perlite, and a combination thereof to reduce the original mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed to a size of about 15 microns or less, wherein the original mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed was reduced by about 25% or more by the grinding, wherein the partially calcined kiln feed is present in an amount of about 55% or more by weight of a total amount of the partially calcined kiln feed and the one or more additives.
  • 28. The method of claim 27, wherein the original mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed is reduced by about 50% or more by the grinding.
  • 29. The method of claim 27, wherein the original mean particle size of the partially calcined kiln feed is reduced to a range of from about 1 micron to about 10 microns.
  • 30. The method of claim 27, further comprising using the partially calcined kiln feed in a settable composition comprising an additive selected from the group consisting of a set retarding additive, a strength-retrogression additive, a set accelerator, a weighting agent, a lightweight additive, a gas-generating additive, a mechanical-property-enhancing additive, a lost-circulation material, a filtration-control additive, a dispersant, a fluid-loss-control additive, a defoaming agent, a foaming agent, an oil-swellable particle, a water-swellable particle, a thixotropic additive, and any combination thereof.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/477,777, entitled “Methods and Compositions Comprising Cement Kiln Dust Having an Altered Particle Size,” filed on May 22, 2012, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/399,913, entitled “Methods and Compositions Comprising Cement Kiln Dust Having an Altered Particle Size,” filed on Feb. 17, 2012, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/180,238, entitled “Settable Compositions Comprising Interground Perlite and Hydraulic Cement,” filed on Jul. 11, 2011, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/975,196, entitled “Settable Compositions Comprising Unexpanded Perlite and Methods of Cementing in Subterranean Formations,” filed on Dec. 21, 2010, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/399,913, entitled “Methods and Compositions Comprising Cement Kiln Dust Having an Altered Particle Size,” filed on Feb. 17, 2012, is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/895,436, entitled “Spacer Fluids Containing Cement Kiln Dust and Methods of Use, filed on Sep. 30, 2010, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/264,010, entitled “Reduced Carbon Footprint Settable Compositions for Use in Subterranean Formations,” filed on Nov. 3, 2008, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/223,669, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,445,669, entitled “Settable Compositions Comprising Cement Kiln Dust and Additive(s),” filed Sep. 9, 2005, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (433)
Number Name Date Kind
1931921 Breerwood Oct 1933 A
2021956 Gladney et al. Nov 1935 A
2045899 Davis Jun 1936 A
2094316 Cross et al. Sep 1937 A
2133622 Larmour et al. Oct 1938 A
2144254 Breerwood Jan 1939 A
2193775 Stratford Mar 1940 A
2193807 Dieterich Mar 1940 A
2214715 Breerwood Sep 1940 A
2329940 Ponzer Sep 1943 A
2592468 Rex et al. Apr 1952 A
2772739 Arie Dec 1956 A
2842205 Allen et al. Jul 1958 A
2844361 Dilcher et al. Jul 1958 A
2848051 Williams Aug 1958 A
2871133 Palonen et al. Jan 1959 A
2880096 Hurley Mar 1959 A
2945769 Gama et al. Jul 1960 A
3024125 Lee Mar 1962 A
3168139 Kennedy et al. Feb 1965 A
3320077 Prior May 1967 A
3411580 Roberts et al. Nov 1968 A
3421703 Galer Jan 1969 A
3454095 Messenger et al. Jul 1969 A
3467193 Messenger Sep 1969 A
3473939 Mayberry et al. Oct 1969 A
3499491 Wyant et al. Mar 1970 A
3557876 Tragesser Jan 1971 A
3574113 Shannon Apr 1971 A
3574816 Abbdellatif et al. Apr 1971 A
3628973 Greening et al. Dec 1971 A
3748159 George Jul 1973 A
3749173 Hill et al. Jul 1973 A
3863718 Bruist Feb 1975 A
3876005 Fincher et al. Apr 1975 A
3887009 Miller et al. Jun 1975 A
3887385 Quist et al. Jun 1975 A
3921717 Danjushevsky Nov 1975 A
3959007 Pitt May 1976 A
4018617 Nicholson Apr 1977 A
4031184 McCord Jun 1977 A
4036301 Powers et al. Jul 1977 A
4083407 Griffin et al. Apr 1978 A
4101332 Nicholson Jul 1978 A
4105459 Mehta Aug 1978 A
4141843 Watson Feb 1979 A
4160674 Sawyer Jul 1979 A
4176720 Wilson Dec 1979 A
4268316 Wills et al. May 1981 A
4274881 Langton Jun 1981 A
4304300 Watson Dec 1981 A
4333764 Richardson Jun 1982 A
4341562 Ahlbeck Jul 1982 A
RE31190 Detroit et al. Mar 1983 E
4400474 Copperthwaite et al. Aug 1983 A
4407677 Wills et al. Oct 1983 A
4423781 Thomas Jan 1984 A
4432800 Kneller et al. Feb 1984 A
4435216 Diehl et al. Mar 1984 A
4436850 Burdick et al. Mar 1984 A
4440576 Flannery et al. Apr 1984 A
4460292 Durham et al. Jul 1984 A
4462835 Car Jul 1984 A
4470463 Holland Sep 1984 A
4494990 Harris Jan 1985 A
4515635 Rao et al. May 1985 A
4519452 Tsao et al. May 1985 A
4555269 Rao et al. Nov 1985 A
4614599 Walker Sep 1986 A
4624711 Styron Nov 1986 A
4633950 Delhommer et al. Jan 1987 A
4676317 Fry et al. Jun 1987 A
4676832 Childs et al. Jun 1987 A
4741782 Styron May 1988 A
4784223 Worrall et al. Nov 1988 A
4829107 Mehta May 1989 A
4883125 Wilson et al. Nov 1989 A
4941536 Brothers et al. Jul 1990 A
4992102 Barbour Feb 1991 A
5030366 Wilson et al. Jul 1991 A
5049288 Brothers et al. Sep 1991 A
5058679 Hale et al. Oct 1991 A
RE33747 Hartley et al. Nov 1991 E
5086850 Harris et al. Feb 1992 A
5113943 Wilson et al. May 1992 A
5121795 Ewert et al. Jun 1992 A
5123487 Harris et al. Jun 1992 A
5125455 Harris et al. Jun 1992 A
5127473 Harris et al. Jul 1992 A
5183505 Spinney Feb 1993 A
5183506 Zhang Feb 1993 A
5213160 Nahm et al. May 1993 A
5215585 Luthra et al. Jun 1993 A
5238064 Dahl et al. Aug 1993 A
5252128 Gopalkrishnan Oct 1993 A
5266111 Barbour Nov 1993 A
5290355 Jakel et al. Mar 1994 A
5295543 Terry et al. Mar 1994 A
5305831 Nahm Apr 1994 A
5314022 Cowan et al. May 1994 A
5316083 Nahm et al. May 1994 A
5327968 Onan et al. Jul 1994 A
5337824 Cowan Aug 1994 A
5339902 Harris Aug 1994 A
5346548 Mehta Sep 1994 A
5352288 Mallow Oct 1994 A
5358044 Hale et al. Oct 1994 A
5358049 Hale et al. Oct 1994 A
5361841 Hale et al. Nov 1994 A
5361842 Hale et al. Nov 1994 A
5368103 Heathman et al. Nov 1994 A
5370185 Cowan et al. Dec 1994 A
5372641 Carpenter Dec 1994 A
5382290 Nahm et al. Jan 1995 A
5383521 Onan et al. Jan 1995 A
5383967 Chase Jan 1995 A
5398758 Onan et al. Mar 1995 A
5417759 Huddleston May 1995 A
5421409 Mueller et al. Jun 1995 A
5423379 Hale et al. Jun 1995 A
5430235 Hooykaas et al. Jul 1995 A
5439056 Cowan Aug 1995 A
5456751 Zandi et al. Oct 1995 A
5458195 Totten et al. Oct 1995 A
5464060 Hale et al. Nov 1995 A
5472051 Brothers Dec 1995 A
5476144 Nahm et al. Dec 1995 A
5478391 Babaev et al. Dec 1995 A
5484019 Griffith Jan 1996 A
5494513 Fu et al. Feb 1996 A
5499677 Cowan Mar 1996 A
5515921 Cowan et al. May 1996 A
5518996 Maroy et al. May 1996 A
5520730 Barbour May 1996 A
5529123 Carpenter et al. Jun 1996 A
5529624 Riegler Jun 1996 A
5536311 Rodrigues Jul 1996 A
5542782 Carter et al. Aug 1996 A
5554352 Jaques et al. Sep 1996 A
5569324 Totten et al. Oct 1996 A
5580379 Cowan Dec 1996 A
5584926 Borgholm et al. Dec 1996 A
5585333 Dahl et al. Dec 1996 A
5588489 Chatterji et al. Dec 1996 A
5626665 Barger et al. May 1997 A
5641584 Andersen et al. Jun 1997 A
5673753 Hale et al. Oct 1997 A
5681384 Liskowitz Oct 1997 A
5688844 Chatterji et al. Nov 1997 A
5711383 Terry et al. Jan 1998 A
5716910 Totten et al. Feb 1998 A
5728654 Dobson et al. Mar 1998 A
5788762 Barger et al. Aug 1998 A
5795924 Chatterji et al. Aug 1998 A
5820670 Chatterji et al. Oct 1998 A
5851960 Totten et al. Dec 1998 A
5866516 Costin Feb 1999 A
5866517 Carpenter et al. Feb 1999 A
5874387 Carpenter et al. Feb 1999 A
5897699 Chatterji et al. Apr 1999 A
5900053 Brothers et al. May 1999 A
5913364 Sweatman Jun 1999 A
5988279 Udarbe et al. Nov 1999 A
6022408 Stokes et al. Feb 2000 A
6060434 Sweatman et al. May 2000 A
6060535 Villar et al. May 2000 A
6063738 Chatterji et al. May 2000 A
6098711 Chatterji et al. Aug 2000 A
6138759 Chatterji et al. Oct 2000 A
6143069 Brothers et al. Nov 2000 A
6145591 Boncan et al. Nov 2000 A
6153562 Villar et al. Nov 2000 A
6167967 Sweatman Jan 2001 B1
6170575 Reddy et al. Jan 2001 B1
6230804 Muller et al. May 2001 B1
6244343 Brothers et al. Jun 2001 B1
6245142 Reddy et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258757 Sweatman et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264738 Lorke et al. Jul 2001 B1
6277189 Chugh Aug 2001 B1
6312515 Barlet-Gouedard et al. Nov 2001 B1
6315042 Griffith et al. Nov 2001 B1
6328106 Griffith et al. Dec 2001 B1
6332921 Brothers et al. Dec 2001 B1
6367550 Chatterji et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379456 Heathman et al. Apr 2002 B1
6402833 O'Hearn et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409819 Ko Jun 2002 B1
6416574 Steelhammer Jul 2002 B1
6451104 Mehta Sep 2002 B2
6457524 Roddy et al. Oct 2002 B1
6478869 Reddy et al. Nov 2002 B2
6488763 Brothers et al. Dec 2002 B2
6488764 Westerman Dec 2002 B2
6494951 Reddy et al. Dec 2002 B1
6500252 Chatterji et al. Dec 2002 B1
6502634 Evans et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508305 Brannon et al. Jan 2003 B1
6516884 Chatterji et al. Feb 2003 B1
6524384 Griffith et al. Feb 2003 B2
6547871 Chatterji et al. Apr 2003 B2
6547891 Linden et al. Apr 2003 B2
6561273 Brothers et al. May 2003 B2
6562122 Dao et al. May 2003 B2
6565647 Day et al. May 2003 B1
6572697 Gleeson et al. Jun 2003 B2
6610139 Reddy et al. Aug 2003 B2
6626243 Go Boncan Sep 2003 B1
6641658 Dubey Nov 2003 B1
6645289 Sobolev Nov 2003 B2
6645290 Barbour Nov 2003 B1
6656265 Garnier et al. Dec 2003 B1
6660080 Reddy et al. Dec 2003 B2
6666268 Griffith et al. Dec 2003 B2
6668927 Chatterji et al. Dec 2003 B1
6668929 Griffith et al. Dec 2003 B2
6689208 Brothers Feb 2004 B1
6702044 Reddy et al. Mar 2004 B2
6706108 Polston Mar 2004 B2
6708760 Chatterji et al. Mar 2004 B1
6715568 Bailey Apr 2004 B1
6716282 Griffith et al. Apr 2004 B2
6729405 DiLullo et al. May 2004 B2
6749679 Shi Jun 2004 B2
6755905 Oates Jun 2004 B2
6767398 Trato Jul 2004 B2
6776237 Dao et al. Aug 2004 B2
6796378 Reddy et al. Sep 2004 B2
6797054 Chatterji et al. Sep 2004 B2
6823940 Reddy et al. Nov 2004 B2
6832652 Dillenbeck et al. Dec 2004 B1
6835243 Brothers et al. Dec 2004 B2
6837316 Reddy et al. Jan 2005 B2
6840318 Lee Jan 2005 B2
6846357 Reddy et al. Jan 2005 B2
6848519 Reddy et al. Feb 2005 B2
6869474 Perez-Pena et al. Mar 2005 B2
6869475 Krowl Mar 2005 B1
6874578 Garnier Apr 2005 B1
6883609 Drochon Apr 2005 B2
6887833 Brothers et al. May 2005 B2
6889767 Reddy et al. May 2005 B2
6904971 Brothers et al. Jun 2005 B2
6908508 Brothers Jun 2005 B2
6911078 Barlet-Gouedard et al. Jun 2005 B2
7022755 Chatterji et al. Apr 2006 B1
7048053 Santra et al. May 2006 B2
7077203 Roddy et al. Jul 2006 B1
7096944 Vargo et al. Aug 2006 B2
7101829 Guichard Sep 2006 B2
7174962 Roddy et al. Feb 2007 B1
7182137 Fyten et al. Feb 2007 B2
7199086 Roddy et al. Apr 2007 B1
7204307 Roddy et al. Apr 2007 B2
7204310 Roddy et al. Apr 2007 B1
7213646 Roddy et al. May 2007 B2
7284609 Roddy et al. Oct 2007 B2
7285164 Luke et al. Oct 2007 B2
7303015 Fyten Dec 2007 B2
7325611 Santra et al. Feb 2008 B2
7335252 Roddy et al. Feb 2008 B2
7337842 Roddy et al. Mar 2008 B2
7338923 Roddy et al. Mar 2008 B2
7341104 Roddy et al. Mar 2008 B2
7341105 Bingamon Mar 2008 B2
7350573 Reddy Apr 2008 B2
7353870 Roddy et al. Apr 2008 B2
7381263 Roddy et al. Jun 2008 B2
7387675 Roddy et al. Jun 2008 B2
7395860 Roddy et al. Jul 2008 B2
7404855 Chatterji et al. Jul 2008 B2
7409990 Burts et al. Aug 2008 B1
7445669 Roddy et al. Nov 2008 B2
7478675 Roddy et al. Jan 2009 B2
7607482 Roddy et al. Oct 2009 B2
7607484 Roddy et al. Oct 2009 B2
7627870 Michaeli et al. Dec 2009 B1
7631692 Roddy et al. Dec 2009 B2
7655088 Bethani Feb 2010 B2
7674332 Roddy et al. Mar 2010 B2
7741841 Edwards et al. Jun 2010 B2
7743828 Roddy et al. Jun 2010 B2
7784542 Roddy et al. Aug 2010 B2
7789150 Roddy et al. Sep 2010 B2
7815880 Constantz et al. Oct 2010 B2
7867954 Warrender et al. Jan 2011 B2
7922809 Constantz et al. Apr 2011 B1
7927419 Roddy Apr 2011 B2
8006446 Constantz et al. Aug 2011 B2
8029618 Al-Shafei Oct 2011 B2
8030253 Roddy et al. Oct 2011 B2
8039253 Asou Oct 2011 B2
8062999 Reddy et al. Nov 2011 B2
8143198 Lewis et al. Mar 2012 B2
8261827 Roddy Sep 2012 B2
8281859 Roddy Oct 2012 B2
8297357 Brenneis Oct 2012 B2
8307899 Brenneis Nov 2012 B2
8318642 Roddy Nov 2012 B2
8327939 Roddy Dec 2012 B2
8333240 Roddy Dec 2012 B2
8394744 Woytowich et al. Mar 2013 B2
8399387 Roddy Mar 2013 B2
8403045 Brenneis et al. Mar 2013 B2
8434553 Brenneis et al. May 2013 B2
8440596 Brenneis et al. May 2013 B2
8486868 Brenneis et al. Jul 2013 B2
8486869 Brenneis et al. Jul 2013 B2
8522873 Benkley et al. Sep 2013 B2
8544543 Chatterji et al. Oct 2013 B2
8551923 Benkley et al. Oct 2013 B1
8554543 Cherepanov et al. Oct 2013 B2
8555967 Chatterji et al. Oct 2013 B2
8672028 Karcher et al. Mar 2014 B2
8691737 Chatterji et al. Apr 2014 B2
20020033121 Marko Mar 2002 A1
20020073897 Trato Jun 2002 A1
20020117090 Ku Aug 2002 A1
20030116065 Griffith et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030116887 Scott Jun 2003 A1
20030167970 Polston Sep 2003 A1
20040007162 Morioka et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040040475 De La Roij et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040079260 Datta et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040107877 Getzlaf et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040108113 Luke et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040112600 Luke et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040129181 Lalande et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040182577 Chatterji et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040187740 Timmons Sep 2004 A1
20040188091 Luke et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040191439 Bour et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040211562 Brothers et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040211564 Brothers et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040244650 Brothers Dec 2004 A1
20040244977 Luke et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040256102 Trato Dec 2004 A1
20040262000 Morgan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050000734 Getzlaf et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050034867 Griffith et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050056191 Brothers et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050061505 Caveny et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050072599 Luke et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050077045 Chatterji et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050084334 Shi et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050098317 Reddy et al. May 2005 A1
20050133221 Chatterji et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050205255 Gagliano et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060025312 Santra et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060054319 Fyten Mar 2006 A1
20060065399 Luke et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060081372 Dealy et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060086499 Badalamenti et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060166834 Roddy Jul 2006 A1
20060175060 Reddy Aug 2006 A1
20060213397 Bethani Sep 2006 A1
20060260512 Nordmeyer Nov 2006 A1
20070056475 Roddy et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070056479 Gray Mar 2007 A1
20070056732 Roddy et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070089643 Roddy et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070102157 Roddy et al. May 2007 A1
20070137528 LeRoy-Delage et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070186820 O'Hearn Aug 2007 A1
20070289744 Bingamon et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080092780 Bingamon et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080156491 Roddy et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080229979 Lewis Sep 2008 A1
20080236814 Roddy Oct 2008 A1
20080300149 Reddy et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090044726 Brouillette et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090105099 Warrender et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090120644 Roddy et al. May 2009 A1
20090124522 Roddy et al. May 2009 A1
20090145601 Bailey et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090169452 Constantz et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090200029 Roddy et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090202410 Kawatra et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090266543 Roddy et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090308611 Santra et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090312445 Roddy et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090320720 Roddy et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100025039 Roddy et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100041792 Roddy et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100044043 Roddy et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100044057 Dealy et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100051266 Roddy et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100051275 Lewis et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100077922 Constantz et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100081584 Perez Apr 2010 A1
20100196104 Constantz et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100258035 Constantz et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100258312 Brenneis et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100273912 Roddy et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100282466 Brenneis et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100292365 Roddy et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100294496 Woytowich et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100313793 Constantz et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110000400 Roddy Jan 2011 A1
20110017452 Benkley Jan 2011 A1
20110100626 Brenneis May 2011 A1
20110297378 Reddy et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120012315 Woytowich Jan 2012 A1
20120145387 Pyatina et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120145393 Roddy Jun 2012 A1
20120152539 Karcher Jun 2012 A1
20120193097 Roddy Aug 2012 A1
20120227631 Roddy Sep 2012 A1
20120234541 Roddy Sep 2012 A1
20120267107 Benkley et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120285682 Santra et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120291674 Brenneis et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120318506 Benkley et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120325119 Brenneis et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120325476 Brenneis et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120325477 Brenneis et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120328377 Brenneis et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130008352 Roddy et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130048286 Morgan et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130061779 Brenneis Mar 2013 A1
20130112405 Chatterji et al. May 2013 A1
20130118752 Hannegan et al. May 2013 A1
20130126159 Bryan et al. May 2013 A1
20130153214 Roddy et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130157903 Benkley et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130213642 Chatterji et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130213643 Chatterji et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130233538 Chatterji et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130244911 Benkley et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140048266 Morgan et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140060389 Chatterji et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140076204 Brenneis et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140123879 Karcher et al. May 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (34)
Number Date Country
2064682 Apr 1992 CA
2336077 Jan 2000 CA
2153372 Jan 2006 CA
97105827.X Jul 2000 CN
0814067 Dec 1997 EP
1092693 Apr 2001 EP
1236701 Sep 2002 EP
1394137 Jul 2003 EP
1348831 Oct 2003 EP
1900703 Mar 2008 EP
2075303 Jul 2009 EP
1469954 Apr 1997 GB
2455446 Jun 2009 GB
WO 8301443 Sep 1982 WO
9321122 Oct 1993 WO
9721637 Jun 1997 WO
WO 9854108 Dec 1998 WO
WO 0063134 Jan 2000 WO
WO 03031364 Apr 2003 WO
WO 2004101951 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2004101952 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2005047212 May 2005 WO
WO 2005061846 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2006032841 Mar 2006 WO
2006074946 Jul 2006 WO
WO 2007028952 Mar 2007 WO
2007041841 Apr 2007 WO
WO 2007048999 May 2007 WO
WO 2007128945 Nov 2007 WO
2009071962 Nov 2009 WO
WO 2009138747 Nov 2009 WO
2010086592 Aug 2010 WO
2011051664 May 2011 WO
2012001343 Jan 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (210)
Entry
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/477,777 dated Oct. 15, 2012.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/844,612 dated Oct. 18, 2012.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,196 dated Oct. 23, 2012.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/555,624 dated Oct. 19, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/622,821, filed Sep. 19, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/669,149, filed Nov. 5, 2012.
Office Action from USPTO for U.S. Appl. No. 13/431,701 dated Nov. 9, 2012.
Office Action from USPTO for U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,163 dated Nov. 9, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/046117 dated Oct. 26, 2012.
Office Action from USPTO for U.S. Appl. No. 13/669,149 dated Dec. 19, 2012.
Office Action from USPTO for U.S. Appl. No. 13/606,098 dated Dec. 13, 2012.
HES Brochure “Micro Matrix® Cement” dated Nov. 2006.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,145, filed Jun. 27, 2012, Benkley et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/560,406, filed Jul. 27, 2012, Brenneis et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,493, filed Aug. 27, 2012, Benkley.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/605,875, filed Sep. 6, 2012, Brenneis.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/606,098, filed Sep. 7, 2012, Brenneis.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/606,120, filed Sep. 7, 2012, Brenneis.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,013, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Roddy.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,163, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Roddy.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/622,821, filed Sep. 19, 2012, Brenneis.
Bartlet-Gouedard, “A Non-Conventional Way of Developing Cement Slurry for Geothermal Wells”, 2001.
Poon, “A Study of the Hydration of Natural Zeolite Blended Cement Pastes”, 1999.
“Beneficial use of Solid Waste in Maine”, Apr. 14, 2005.
Smith, “Cementing” Society of Petroleum Engineers, p. 38, 1990.
Smith, “Cementing” Society of Petroleum Engineers, pp. 14, 38, 1987.
Chan, Comparative Study of the Initial Surface Absorption and Chloride Diffusion of High Performance Zeolite Silica Fume and PFA concretes, 1999.
Rogers, “Designing a Remedial Acid Treatment for Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Turbidite Sands Containing Zeolite Cement”, 1996.
Janotka, “Effect of Bentonite and Zeolite on Durability of Cement Suspension Under Sulfate Attack”, 1998.
Ding, “Extreme Vertices Design of Concrete With Combined Mineral Admixtures”, 1999.
“Kiln Dusts”, Apr. 14, 2005.
Sersale, “Portland-Zeolite-Cement for Minimizing Alkali-Aggregate Expansion”, 1987.
“Standards for the Management of Cement Kiln Dust Waste”, Apr. 14, 2005.
Naiqian, “Study on the Suppression Effect of Natural Zeolite on Expansion of Concrete Due to Alkali-Aggregate Reaction”, 1998.
Janotka, “The Properties of Mortar Using Blends With Portland Cement Clinker, Zeolite Tuff and Gypsum”, 1995.
Herndon, “Setting Downhole Plugs: A State-of-the-Art”, Petroleum Engineer International, Apr. 1978.
Sugama, “Hot Alkali Carbonation of Sodium Metaphosphate Modified Fly Ash/Calcium Aluminate Blend Hydrothermal Cements”, pp. 1661-1672, Sep. 11, 1996.
“Use of Cement Kiln Dust for the Stabilization of Soils”, R. L. Parsons, et al., Apr. 14, 2005.
Feng, “Zeolite Ceramiste Cellular Concrete”, 2000.
Marfil, “Zeolite Crystallization in Portland Cement Concrete Due to Alkali-Aggregate Reaction”, 1993.
Atkins, “Zeolite P In Cements”, “Its Potential for Immobilizing Toxic and Radioactive Waste Species”, 1995.
HES Brochure “AQF-2 Foaming Agent”, 1999.
HES Brochure “Halad-23 Fluid Loss Additive”, 2000.
HES Brochure “Halad-344 Fluid Loss Additive”, 1998.
HES Brochure “Halad-413 Fluid Loss Additive”, 1999.
HES Brochure “Howco Suds Surfactant”, 1999.
HES Brochure “HR-12 Cement Retarder”, 1999.
HES Brochure “HR-15 Cement Retarder”, 1999.
HES Brochure “HR-25 Cement Retarder”, 1999.
HES Brochure “HR-4 Cement Retarder”, 1999.
HES Brochure “HR-5 Cement Additive”, 1998.
HES Brochure “HR-7 Cement Retarder”, 1999.
HES Brochure “Pozmix a Cement Additive”, 1999.
HES Brochure “SCR-100 Cement Retarder a Valuable Time Saver”, 1994.
HES Brochure “SCR-100 Cement Retarder”, 1999.
HES Brochure “SCR-500L High Temp Retarder”, 2000.
HES Brochure “ThermaLock™ Cement for Corrosive CO2 Environments”, 1999.
“3M Scotchlite, Glass Bubbles Floated Product Series Product Information”, 1999.
“API Specification for Materials and Testing for Well Cements”, API Spec. 10, 5th ed., pp. 7, 19-21, Jul. 1, 1980.
“Appendix A”, API RP 13B-2, 2d ed.; pp. 6-8, Dec. 1, 1991.
LAFARGE brochure “TerraCem™”, Aug. 2006.
LAFARGE MSDS “Cement Kiln Dust”, Mar. 3, 2005.
LAFARGE MSDS “LaFarge Blended Cement (cement)”, Mar. 3, 2005.
TXI Material Safety Data Sheet for Pressur-Seal, Oct. 2003.
“Manufacture of supplementary cementitious materials from cement kiln dust”, Mishulovich et al., World Cement Research and Development, p. 116-120, Mar. 1996.
“Alkali-activated binders by use of industrial by-products”, Buchwald et al., Cement and concrete Research 35, p. 968-973, 2005.
Answer 3 of 24 Chemical Abstracts on STN “Effect of cement kiln dust substitution on chemical and physical properties and compressive strength of Portland and slag cements”, Adb El-aleem et al. (abstract only), 2005.
Adaska and Taubert, “Beneficial Uses of Cement Kiln Dust”, 2008 IEEE/PCA 50th Cement Industry Technical Conference, Miami, FL, May 19-22, 2008, pp. 1-19, 2008.
Nelson, “Well Cementing”, 1990.
“Fly Ash Resource Center-Pozzolan,” available at http://www.rmajko.com/pozzolan.htm, Apr. 20, 2009.
HES Brochure “Enhancer 923™ Cement Agent”, 2010.
HES Brochure “Enhancer 923™ Agent—Successes from the Field”, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,671, Dec. 15, 2005.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/271,431, Mar. 6, 2006.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,671, Mar. 31, 2006.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/271,431, May 17, 2006.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/271,431 (Advisory Action), Jul. 11, 2006.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/416,563, Jul. 21, 2006.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/403,032, Jul. 24, 2006.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/271,431, Aug. 15, 2006.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/440,627, Aug. 21, 2006.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,741, Oct. 19, 2006.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/484,951, Oct. 26, 2006.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/484,951, Dec. 21, 2006.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,703, Jan. 17, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,741, Feb. 2, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,485, Feb. 28, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,669, Feb. 28, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/271,690, Mar. 13, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,741, Mar. 22, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,703, Apr. 25, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,741, May 29, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,669, Jun. 18, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/257,261, Aug. 10, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,741, Sep. 6, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,669, Oct. 9, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,750, Oct. 16, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,741, Oct. 24, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,669, Jan. 29, 2008.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,669, Apr. 8, 2008.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/263,800, May 1, 2009.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/283,398, Jul. 15, 2009.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/263,800, Jul. 28, 2009.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/420,630, Aug. 3, 2009.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/349,676, Nov. 4, 2009.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,381, Mar. 23, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/609,993, Apr. 9, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/609,993, Jun. 15, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/558,097, Jun. 30, 2010.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/609,993, Jul. 26, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/558,097, Sep. 3, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/844,612, Oct. 1, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,915, Aug. 1, 2011.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/844,612, Sep. 6, 2011.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/264,010, Oct. 31, 2011.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/844,612, Dec. 23, 2011.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/264,010, Apr. 10, 2012.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/844,612, Apr. 11, 2012.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/399,913, May 15, 2012.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,560, May 31, 2012.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,412, Jun. 5, 2012.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/825,004, Jun. 14, 2012.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,560, Jun. 21, 2012.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/479,476, Jul. 2, 2012.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,196, Jul. 3, 2012.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/844,612, Jul. 30, 2012.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/399,913, Aug. 23, 12.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,258, Aug. 7, 2012.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/825,004, Aug. 20, 2012.
Foreign Search Report from PCT/GB2005/001415, Sep. 9, 2005.
Foreign Search Report from PCT/GB2006/000406, Jul. 5, 2006.
Foreign Search Report from PCT/GB2006/003163, Oct. 27, 2006.
Foreign Search Report from PCT/GB2006/003160, Nov. 2, 2006.
Foreign Search Report from PCT/GB2006/003735, Dec. 1, 2006.
Foreign Search Report from PCT/GB2006/003694, Dec. 19, 2006.
Foreign Search Report from PCT/GB2006/000401, May 8, 2007.
Foreign Search Report from PCT/GB2009/000295, Feb. 3, 2009.
Foreign Search Report from PCT/GB2009/000295, Jul. 30, 2009.
EPO Application No. 06794648.3 Examination Report, Apr. 17, 2009.
EPO Application No. 06779194.7 Examination Report, May 29, 2009.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2009/000295, Jul. 30, 2009.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2009/002597, Feb. 1, 2010.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2009/002598, Feb. 11, 2010.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2009/000295, Aug. 24, 2010.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2010/001986, Jan. 19, 2011.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2010/002011, Feb. 4, 2011.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2009/002018, Mar. 24, 2011.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2011/000933, Sep. 22, 2011.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2011/001411, Jan. 27, 2012.
English language translation of USSR Patent No. RU 2026959, Jan. 20, 1995.
English language translation of Foreign Office Action for Application No. RU2008113765, Jul. 6, 2009.
English language translation of Chinese Application No. 200680042014.3, Dec. 1, 2010.
Foreign Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2621835, Oct. 2, 2009.
Foreign Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2621832, Oct. 5, 2009.
Foreign Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2650630, Oct. 14, 2010.
Foreign Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2658155, Nov. 16, 2010.
Foreign Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2736148, May 29, 2012.
Foreign Office Action for CN Patent Application No. 200680042004.X, May 12, 2010.
Foreign Office Action for EP Application No. 06 779 199.6, Mar. 1, 2010.
Foreign Office Action for EP Application No. 06 779 191.3, Mar. 31, 2010.
Foreign Office Action for EP Application No. 06 779 194.7, Jul. 2, 2010.
Foreign Office Action for EP Application No. 06 794 646.7, Sep. 24, 2010.
Foreign Office Action for EP Application No. 09 713 469.6, Sep. 28, 2010.
Foreign Office Action for RU Application No. 2008113766, Jul. 14, 2009.
Foreign Office Action for RU Application No. 2008113766, Apr. 8, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/767,710 (Benkley et al.) filed Feb. 14, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/851,391 (Chatterji et al.) filed Mar. 27, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/851,475 (Chatterji et al.) filed Mar. 27, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/851,925 (Chatterji et al.) filed Mar. 27, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,833 (Chatterji et al.) filed Dec. 21, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,833 (Chatterji et al.) mailing date: Apr. 10, 2013.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2011/001749 dated Apr. 5, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/GB2010/000712 dated Jul. 26, 2010.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/560,406 dated Oct. 17, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,063 (Chatterji et al.) filed Apr. 23, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,398 (Benkley et al.) filed May 8, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,063 (Chatterji et al.) filed Apr. 26, 2013.
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/669,149 (Brenneis et al.) mailed May 13, 2013.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/477,777 dated May 29, 2013.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,398 dated Aug. 20, 2013.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/851,391 dated Jul. 31, 2013.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/560,406 dated May 29, 2013.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/895,436 dated May 28, 2013.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,145 dated May 24, 2013.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/851,925 dated Jun. 2, 2013.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/851,391 dated Jul. 3, 2013.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,398 dated Jun. 20, 2013.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,063 dated Jul. 12, 2013.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/767,710 dated Jul. 19, 2013.
Clinker (Cement), Wikipedia, printed from the Internet on Aug. 23, 2013, available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinker—(cement).
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,111 dated Oct. 21, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/180,238 dated Sep. 25, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/851,925 dated Sep. 20, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/767,710 dated Sep. 20, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/477,777 dated Sep. 20, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056719 dated Oct. 25, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,516 dated Dec. 19, 2013.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/180,238 dated Jan. 22, 2014.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/851,925 dated Jan. 24, 2014.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/851,475 dated Jan. 24, 2014.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,013 dated Jan. 30, 2014.
USPTO Office Action for Application U.S. Appl. No. 14/079,421 dated Jan. 30, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/048092 dated Nov. 13, 2013.
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/026162 dated Aug. 26, 2013.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,493 dated Jul. 23, 2014.
Chinese Application No. 200680042004.X dated Apr. 30, 2014 and Translation.
Chinese Reexamination of Application No. 200680042014.3 and Translation.
The Professional standard of the People's Republic of China, Rotary Kiln Dust Added to Cement, ZB Q 12001-84, dated Oct. 25, 1994 and translation.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/2013/057213 dated Nov. 18, 2013.
Toshinori Kojima et al., Reduction of CO2 Emission from Cement Manufacturing Process by Partly Substituting Silicate for Limestone, Geenhouse Gas Control Technologies, pp. 933-938, dated 1999.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130008352 A1 Jan 2013 US
Divisions (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13477777 May 2012 US
Child 13620013 US
Parent 13399913 Feb 2012 US
Child 13477777 US
Continuation in Parts (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 13180238 Jul 2011 US
Child 13399913 US
Parent 12975196 Dec 2010 US
Child 13180238 US
Parent 12895436 Sep 2010 US
Child 13399913 Feb 2012 US
Parent 12264010 Nov 2008 US
Child 12895436 US
Parent 11223669 Sep 2005 US
Child 12264010 US