Cells within a tissue of a subject have differences in cell morphology and/or function due to varied analyte levels (e.g., gene and/or protein expression) within the different cells. The specific position of a cell within a tissue (e.g., the cell's position relative to neighboring cells or the cell's position relative to the tissue microenvironment) can affect, e.g., the cell's morphology, differentiation, fate, viability, proliferation, behavior, and signaling and cross-talk with other cells in the tissue.
Spatial heterogeneity has been previously studied using techniques that only provide data for a small handful of analytes in the context of an intact tissue or a portion of a tissue, or provide a lot of analyte data for single cells, but fail to provide information regarding the position of the single cell in a parent biological sample (e.g., tissue sample).
Tissue sections have previously been studied by placing them on a slide during early steps of sample processing, where subsequent steps have to be performed on the slide, thus limiting potential future manipulations for tissue processing.
Disclosed herein are methods and compositions for manipulating a biological sample and determining the presence of an analyte in the biological sample. In some instances, provided herein is a method of determining abundance and location of an analyte in a biological sample, the method comprising: (a) embedding a plurality of sections of the biological sample into a polymer solution; (b) generating a plurality of partitions, wherein a partition of the plurality of partitions comprises a section of the plurality of sections of the biological sample; (c) manipulating each section in order to detect the analyte; and (d) determining the abundance and location of the analyte in a biological sample.
In some embodiments, provided herein are methods of processing a biological sample, the method including: (a) depositing a plurality of tissue sections obtained from the biological sample into a polymer solution; (b) generating a plurality of partitions wherein a partition of the plurality of partitions includes a tissue section of the plurality of tissue sections; and (c) imaging the tissue section of the plurality of tissue sections. In some embodiments, the tissue section is obtained from a fresh tissue sample or a frozen tissue sample. In some embodiments, the tissue section is obtained from a tissue sample that has been fixed. In some embodiments, the tissue sample is fixed in one or more of: paraffin, a wax, a resin, an epoxy, an agar, a glycol, a hydrogel, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the plurality of tissue sections are serial sections from a tissue sample. In some embodiments, the average thickness of the plurality of tissue sections is about 0.1 to about 100 micrometers. In some embodiments, methods of processing a biological sample provided herein further include fixing the tissue section prior to step (a). In some embodiments, the tissue section is obtained from a tissue sample that has been permeabilized. In some embodiments, methods of processing a biological sample provided herein further include permeabilizing the tissue section prior to step (a). In some embodiments, methods of processing a biological sample provided herein further include fixing the tissue section prior to permeabilizing. In some embodiments, methods of processing a biological sample provided herein further include permeabilizing the tissue section prior to or after step (b). In some embodiments, the tissue section is permeabilized via electroporation. In some embodiments, the tissue section is permeabilized via by contacting the tissue section with a permeabilization agent.
In some embodiments, the polymer solution is a hydrogel solution. In some embodiments, methods of processing a biological sample provided herein includes forming a hydrogel matrix from the hydrogel solution, and wherein generating a plurality of partitions includes generating a plurality of hydrogel macrobeads, wherein a hydrogel macrobead of the plurality of hydrogel macrobeads includes the tissue section. In some embodiments, the hydrogel macrobeads are generated by dissociating the hydrogel matrix. In some embodiments, methods of processing a biological sample provided herein further include removing the hydrogel matrix prior to imaging.
In some embodiments of methods of processing a biological sample provided herein, generating a plurality of partitions includes generating a plurality of droplets including the polymer solution, wherein a droplet of the plurality of droplets includes the tissue section. In some instances, the generating a plurality of partitions comprises surrounding the section with a non-aqueous droplet. In some embodiments, the plurality of droplets are formed in an emulsion including a non-aqueous droplet solution. In some embodiments, the non-aqueous droplet solution includes oil. In some embodiments, the plurality of droplets are generated in a microfluidic device. In some embodiments, the average volume of the plurality of droplets is less than 10,000 picoliters. In some embodiments, the average volume of the plurality of droplets is less than 1,000 picoliters. In some embodiments, the partition of the plurality of partitions further includes a bead including a capture probe.
In some embodiments, the analyte is an mRNA molecule. In some embodiments, the manipulating step comprises: (a) contacting the biological sample with a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality comprises (i) a spatial barcode and (ii) a capture domain that binds to a sequence present in the analyte; (b) hybridizing the analyte to the capture domain; (c) extending a 3′ end of the capture probe using the analyte that is bound to the capture domain as a template to generate an extended capture probe; and (d) amplifying the extended capture probe. In some embodiments, the determining comprises determining (i) all or a portion of the sequence of the spatial barcode or the complement thereof, and (ii) all or a portion of the sequence of the analyte; and using the determined sequences of (i) and (ii) to identify the location of the analyte in the biological sample, thereby determining the abundance and the location of the analyte.
In some embodiments, the analyte is a protein. In some embodiments, the manipulating step comprises attaching the biological sample with a plurality of analyte capture agents, wherein an analyte capture agent of the plurality of analyte capture agents comprises: (i) an analyte binding moiety that binds to the analyte; (ii) an analyte binding moiety barcode that uniquely identifies an interaction between the analyte and the analyte binding moiety; and (iii) an analyte capture sequence, wherein the analyte capture sequence binds to a capture domain. In some embodiments, the determining step comprises determining the abundance and location of the analyte, the method comprising: (a) contacting the biological sample with a substrate, wherein the substrate comprises a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality of capture probes comprises (i) the capture domain and (ii) a spatial barcode; (b) hybridizing the analyte to the capture probe; and (c) determining (i) all or a part of a sequence corresponding to the analyte binding moiety barcode, and (ii) all or a part of a sequence corresponding to the spatial barcode, or a complement thereof, and using the determined sequence of (i) and (ii) to identify the abundance and spatial location of the analyte in the biological sample.
In some embodiments, the manipulating comprises immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry.
In some embodiments of methods of processing a biological sample provided herein, the capture probe binds to a biological analyte in the tissue section. In some embodiments, the partition of the plurality of partitions further includes an analyte capture agent. In some embodiments, the analyte capture agent binds to a biological analyte in the tissue section. In some embodiments, methods of processing a biological sample provided herein further include staining the tissue section in the partition. In some embodiments, the staining includes labeling two or more biological analytes in the tissue section with an optical label. In some embodiments, the two or more biological analytes are, individually, RNA, DNA, or protein. In some embodiments, the optical label is a fluorescent, radioactive, chemiluminescent, calorimetric, or colorimetric detectable label. In some embodiments, the staining includes immunohistochemical staining or chemical staining. In some embodiments, the partition is placed in a staining solution. In some embodiments, methods of processing a biological sample provided herein further include depositing the partition on a substrate. In some embodiments, the substrate is a multi-well plate. In some embodiments, the substrate is positively charged. In some embodiments, the partition is attached to the substrate via a chemical linker. In some embodiments, methods of processing a biological sample provided herein further include applying heat to the substrate. In some embodiments, the heat is applied to a portion of the substrate corresponding to the location of the partition. In some embodiments, the tissue section is imaged using bright field microscopy, fluorescence microscopy, or capillary microscopy.
In some embodiments, the methods further include dispensing the section onto a surface and imaging the biological sample. In some embodiments, the imaging comprises capillary microscopy, brightfield microscopy, or fluorescent microscopy.
In some embodiments, the polymer solution comprises a hydrogel.
In some embodiments, the biological sample is a tissue section sample. In some embodiments, the biological sample is from a fresh tissue sample, a frozen tissue sample, or a formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) sample. In some embodiments, the plurality of sections are serial sections from the biological sample. In some embodiments, the average thickness of the plurality of sections is about 0.1 to about 100 micrometers.
In some embodiments, the methods further include fixing the biological sample. In some embodiments, the methods further include permeabilizing the biological sample.
Also disclosed herein are kits. In some instances, the kit includes (a) a polymer solution comprising a hydrogel; (b) a container for the polymer solution; (c) one or more non-aqueous droplets to partition a biological sample comprising an analyte; (d) one or more compositions to manipulate the biological sample, wherein the one or more compositions are selected from the group consisting of: (1) a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality comprises (i) a spatial barcode and (ii) a capture domain that binds to a sequence present in the analyte; (2) a plurality of analyte capture agents, wherein an analyte capture agent of the plurality of analyte capture agents comprises: an analyte binding moiety that binds to the analyte; an analyte binding moiety barcode that uniquely identifies an interaction between the analyte and the analyte binding moiety; and an analyte capture sequence, wherein the analyte capture sequence binds to a capture domain; and (3) a protein-binding molecule for immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry; and (e) instructions for performing any of the methods disclosed herein. In some instances, the analyte is an mRNA molecule or a protein.
Also disclosed herein are compositions. In some instances, the compositions include (a) a biological sample embedded in a polymer solution; (b) a non-aqueous droplet, wherein the non-aqueous droplet surrounds the biological sample; (c) one or more reagents to manipulate the biological sample, wherein the one or more reagents are selected from the group consisting of: (1) a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality comprises (i) a spatial barcode and (ii) a capture domain that binds to a sequence present in the analyte; (2) a plurality of analyte capture agents, wherein an analyte capture agent of the plurality of analyte capture agents comprises: an analyte binding moiety that binds to the analyte; an analyte binding moiety barcode that uniquely identifies an interaction between the analyte and the analyte binding moiety; and an analyte capture sequence, wherein the analyte capture sequence binds to a capture domain; and (3) a protein-binding molecule for immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry; and (d) a substrate comprising a plurality of probes that is capable of detecting the analyte, the capture probe, or the analyte capture agent.
All publications, patents, patent applications, and information available on the internet and mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, patent application, or item of information was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference. To the extent publications, patents, patent applications, and items of information incorporated by reference contradict the disclosure contained in the specification, the specification is intended to supersede and/or take precedence over any such contradictory material.
Where values are described in terms of ranges, it should be understood that the description includes the disclosure of all possible sub-ranges within such ranges, as well as specific numerical values that fall within such ranges irrespective of whether a specific numerical value or specific sub-range is expressly stated.
The term “each,” when used in reference to a collection of items, is intended to identify an individual item in the collection but does not necessarily refer to every item in the collection, unless expressly stated otherwise, or unless the context of the usage clearly indicates otherwise.
The singular form “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. For example, the term “a cell” includes one or more cells, including mixtures thereof. “A and/or B” is used herein to include all of the following alternatives: “A”, “B”, “A or B”, and “A and B”.
Various embodiments of the features of this disclosure are described herein. However, it should be understood that such embodiments are provided merely by way of example, and numerous variations, changes, and substitutions can occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of this disclosure. It should also be understood that various alternatives to the specific embodiments described herein are also within the scope of this disclosure.
The following drawings illustrate certain embodiments of the features and advantages of this disclosure. These embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the appended claims in any manner. Like reference symbols in the drawings indicate like elements.
Spatial analysis methods using capture probes and/or analyte capture agents provide information regarding the abundance and location of an analyte (e.g., a nucleic acid or protein). The efficiency of spatial analysis using arrays with capture probes depends, at least in part, on the density of the probes on the array or the density of the analytes captured on the array. That is, on how many capture probes can be printed on the surface of a slide or how many RNA molecules can be captured. Disclosed herein are methods and compositions for increasing the efficiency of spatial analysis by increasing the number of interactions between the capture probe and the analyte. In this way, analyte detection signal is increased, thus increasing the capturing efficiency, sensitivity, and the resolution of detection on the spatial array.
Traditionally, these methods identify a singular molecule at a location. Extending these methods to study interactions between two or more analytes would provide information on the interactions between two or more analytes at a location in a biological sample. Analyte capture agents as provided herein comprise an analyte binding moiety affixed to an oligonucleotide. The oligonucleotide comprises a sequence that uniquely identifies the analyte and moiety. Further, nearby oligonucleotides affixed to a different moiety in a nearby location can be ligated to the first oligonucleotide and then can be detected using the spatial methods described herein. The methods disclosed herein thus provide the ability to study the interaction between two or more analytes in a biological sample.
Spatial analysis methodologies and compositions described herein can provide a vast amount of analyte and/or expression data for a variety of analytes within a biological sample at high spatial resolution, while retaining native spatial context. Spatial analysis methods and compositions can include, e.g., the use of a capture probe including a spatial barcode (e.g., a nucleic acid sequence that provides information as to the location or position of an analyte within a cell or a tissue sample (e.g., mammalian cell or a mammalian tissue sample) and a capture domain that is capable of binding to an analyte (e.g., a protein and/or a nucleic acid) produced by and/or present in a cell. Spatial analysis methods and compositions can also include the use of a capture probe having a capture domain that captures an intermediate agent for indirect detection of an analyte. For example, the intermediate agent can include a nucleic acid sequence (e.g., a barcode) associated with the intermediate agent. Detection of the intermediate agent is therefore indicative of the analyte in the cell or tissue sample.
In some instance, the capture domain is designed to detect one or more specific analytes of interest. For example, a capture domain can be designed so that it comprises a sequence that is complementary or substantially complementary to one analyte of interest. Thus, the presence of a single analyte can be detected. Alternatively, the capture domain can be designed so that it comprises a sequence that is complementary or substantially complementary to a conserved region of multiple related analytes. In some instances, the multiple related analytes are analytes that function in the same or similar cellular pathways or that have conserved homology and/or function. The design of the capture probe can be determined based on the intent of the user and can be any sequence that can be used to detect an analyte of interest. In some embodiments, the capture domain sequence can therefore be random, semi-random, defined or combinations thereof, depending on the target analyte(s) of interest.
Non-limiting aspects of spatial analysis methodologies and compositions are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 10,774,374, 10,724,078, 10,480,022, 10,059,990, 10,041,949, 10,002,316, 9,879,313, 9,783,841, 9,727,810, 9,593,365, 8,951,726, 8,604,182, 7,709,198, U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2020/239946, 2020/080136, 2020/0277663, 2020/024641, 2019/330617, 2019/264268, 2020/256867, 2020/224244, 2019/194709, 2019/161796, 2019/085383, 2019/055594, 2018/216161, 2018/051322, 2018/0245142, 2017/241911, 2017/089811, 2017/067096, 2017/029875, 2017/0016053, 2016/108458, 2015/000854, 2013/171621, WO 2018/091676, WO 2020/176788, Rodrigues et al., Science 363(6434):1463-1467, 2019; Lee et al., Nat. Protoc. 10(3):442-458, 2015; Trejo et al., PLoS ONE 14(2):e0212031, 2019; Chen et al., Science 348(6233):aaa6090, 2015; Gao et al., BMC Biol. 15:50, 2017; and Gupta et al., Nature Biotechnol. 36:1197-1202, 2018; the Visium Spatial Gene Expression Reagent Kits User Guide (e.g., Rev C, dated June 2020), and/or the Visium Spatial Tissue Optimization Reagent Kits User Guide (e.g., Rev C, dated July 2020), both of which are available at the 10× Genomics Support Documentation website, and can be used herein in any combination. Further non-limiting aspects of spatial analysis methodologies and compositions are described herein.
Some general terminology that may be used in this disclosure can be found in Section (I)(b) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. Typically, a “barcode” is a label, or identifier, that conveys or is capable of conveying information (e.g., information about an analyte in a sample, a bead, and/or a capture probe). A barcode can be part of an analyte, or independent of an analyte. A barcode can be attached to an analyte. A particular barcode can be unique relative to other barcodes. For the purpose of this disclosure, an “analyte” can include any biological substance, structure, moiety, or component to be analyzed. The term “target” can similarly refer to an analyte of interest.
Analytes can be broadly classified into one of two groups: nucleic acid analytes, and non-nucleic acid analytes. Examples of non-nucleic acid analytes include, but are not limited to, lipids, carbohydrates, peptides, proteins, glycoproteins (N-linked or O-linked), lipoproteins, phosphoproteins, specific phosphorylated or acetylated variants of proteins, amidation variants of proteins, hydroxylation variants of proteins, methylation variants of proteins, ubiquitylation variants of proteins, sulfation variants of proteins, viral proteins (e.g., viral capsid, viral envelope, viral coat, viral accessory, viral glycoproteins, viral spike, etc.), extracellular and intracellular proteins, antibodies, and antigen binding fragments. In some embodiments, the analyte(s) can be localized to subcellular location(s), including, for example, organelles, e.g., mitochondria, Golgi apparatus, endoplasmic reticulum, chloroplasts, endocytic vesicles, exocytic vesicles, vacuoles, lysosomes, etc. In some embodiments, analyte(s) can be peptides or proteins, including without limitation antibodies and enzymes. Additional examples of analytes can be found in Section (I)(c) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. In some embodiments, an analyte can be detected indirectly, such as through detection of an intermediate agent, for example, a connected probe (e.g., a ligation product) or an analyte capture agent (e.g., an oligonucleotide-conjugated antibody), such as those described herein.
A “biological sample” is typically obtained from the subject for analysis using any of a variety of techniques including, but not limited to, biopsy, surgery, and laser capture microscopy (LCM), and generally includes cells and/or other biological material from the subject. In some embodiments, a biological sample can be a tissue section. In some embodiments, a biological sample can be a fixed and/or stained biological sample (e.g., a fixed and/or stained tissue section). Non-limiting examples of stains include histological stains (e.g., hematoxylin and/or eosin) and immunological stains (e.g., fluorescent stains). In some embodiments, a biological sample (e.g., a fixed and/or stained biological sample) can be imaged. Biological samples are also described in Section (I)(d) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
In some embodiments, a biological sample is permeabilized with one or more permeabilization reagents. For example, permeabilization of a biological sample can facilitate analyte capture. Exemplary permeabilization agents and conditions are described in Section (I)(d)(ii)(13) or the Exemplary Embodiments Section of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
Array-based spatial analysis methods involve the transfer of one or more analytes from a biological sample to an array of features on a substrate, where each feature is associated with a unique spatial location on the array. Subsequent analysis of the transferred analytes includes determining the identity of the analytes and the spatial location of the analytes within the biological sample. The spatial location of an analyte within the biological sample is determined based on the feature to which the analyte is bound (e.g., directly or indirectly) on the array, and the feature's relative spatial location within the array.
A “capture probe” refers to any molecule capable of capturing (directly or indirectly) and/or labelling an analyte (e.g., an analyte of interest) in a biological sample. In some embodiments, the capture probe is a nucleic acid or a polypeptide. In some embodiments, the capture probe includes a barcode (e.g., a spatial barcode and/or a unique molecular identifier (UMI)) and a capture domain). In some embodiments, a capture probe can include a cleavage domain and/or a functional domain (e.g., a primer-binding site, such as for next-generation sequencing (NGS)).
The functional sequences can generally be selected for compatibility with any of a variety of different sequencing systems, e.g., Ion Torrent Proton or PGM, Illumina sequencing instruments, PacBio, Oxford Nanopore, etc., and the requirements thereof. In some embodiments, functional sequences can be selected for compatibility with non-commercialized sequencing systems. Examples of such sequencing systems and techniques, for which suitable functional sequences can be used, include (but are not limited to) Ion Torrent Proton or PGM sequencing, Illumina sequencing, PacBio SMRT sequencing, and Oxford Nanopore sequencing. Further, in some embodiments, functional sequences can be selected for compatibility with other sequencing systems, including non-commercialized sequencing systems.
In some embodiments, the spatial barcode 105 and functional sequences 104 is common to all of the probes attached to a given feature. In some embodiments, the UMI sequence 106 of a capture probe attached to a given feature is different from the UMI sequence of a different capture probe attached to the given feature.
In some embodiments, more than one analyte type (e.g., nucleic acids and proteins) from a biological sample can be detected (e.g., simultaneously or sequentially) using any appropriate multiplexing technique, such as those described in Section (IV) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
In some embodiments, detection of one or more analytes (e.g., protein analytes) can be performed using one or more analyte capture agents. As used herein, an “analyte capture agent” refers to an agent that interacts with an analyte (e.g., an analyte in a biological sample) and with a capture probe (e.g., a capture probe attached to a substrate or a feature) to identify the analyte. In some embodiments, the analyte capture agent includes: (i) an analyte binding moiety (e.g., that binds to an analyte), for example, an antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof; (ii) analyte binding moiety barcode; and (iii) a capture handle sequence. As used herein, the term “analyte binding moiety barcode” refers to a barcode that is associated with or otherwise identifies the analyte binding moiety. As used herein, the term “analyte capture sequence” or “capture handle sequence” refers to a region or moiety configured to hybridize to, bind to, couple to, or otherwise interact with a capture domain of a capture probe. In some embodiments, a capture handle sequence is complementary to a capture domain of a capture probe. In some cases, an analyte binding moiety barcode (or portion thereof) may be able to be removed (e.g., cleaved) from the analyte capture agent.
Additional description of analyte capture agents can be found in Section (II)(b)(ix) of WO 2020/176788 and/or Section (II)(b)(viii) U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
There are at least two methods to associate a spatial barcode with one or more neighboring cells, such that the spatial barcode identifies the one or more cells, and/or contents of the one or more cells, as associated with a particular spatial location. One method is to promote analytes or analyte proxies (e.g., intermediate agents) out of a cell and towards a spatially-barcoded array (e.g., including spatially-barcoded capture probes). Another method is to cleave spatially-barcoded capture probes from an array and promote the spatially-barcoded capture probes towards and/or into or onto the biological sample.
In some cases, capture probes may be configured to prime, replicate, and consequently yield optionally barcoded extension products from a template (e.g., a DNA or RNA template, such as an analyte or an intermediate agent (e.g., a connected probe (e.g., a ligation product) or an analyte capture agent), or a portion thereof), or derivatives thereof (see, e.g., Section (II)(b)(vii) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663 regarding extended capture probes). In some cases, capture probes may be configured to form a connected probe (e.g., a ligation product) with a template (e.g., a DNA or RNA template, such as an analyte or an intermediate agent, or portion thereof), thereby creating ligation products that serve as proxies for a template.
As used herein, an “extended capture probe” refers to a capture probe having additional nucleotides added to the terminus (e.g., 3′ or 5′ end) of the capture probe thereby extending the overall length of the capture probe. For example, an “extended 3′ end” indicates additional nucleotides were added to the most 3′ nucleotide of the capture probe to extend the length of the capture probe, for example, by polymerization reactions used to extend nucleic acid molecules including templated polymerization catalyzed by a polymerase (e.g., a DNA polymerase or a reverse transcriptase). In some embodiments, extending the capture probe includes adding to a 3′ end of a capture probe a nucleic acid sequence that is complementary to a nucleic acid sequence of an analyte or intermediate agent bound to the capture domain of the capture probe. In some embodiments, the capture probe is extended using reverse transcription. In some embodiments, the capture probe is extended using one or more DNA polymerases. The extended capture probes include the sequence of the capture probe and the sequence of the spatial barcode of the capture probe.
In some embodiments, extended capture probes are amplified (e.g., in bulk solution or on the array) to yield quantities that are sufficient for downstream analysis, e.g., via DNA sequencing. In some embodiments, extended capture probes (e.g., DNA molecules) act as templates for an amplification reaction (e.g., a polymerase chain reaction).
Additional variants of spatial analysis methods, including in some embodiments, an imaging step, are described in Section (II)(a) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. Analysis of captured analytes (and/or intermediate agents or portions thereof), for example, including sample removal, extension of capture probes, sequencing (e.g., of a cleaved extended capture probe and/or a cDNA molecule complementary to an extended capture probe), sequencing on the array (e.g., using, for example, in situ hybridization or in situ ligation approaches), temporal analysis, and/or proximity capture, is described in Section (II)(g) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. Some quality control measures are described in Section (II)(h) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
Spatial information can provide information of biological and/or medical importance. For example, the methods and compositions described herein can allow for: identification of one or more biomarkers (e.g., diagnostic, prognostic, and/or for determination of efficacy of a treatment) of a disease or disorder; identification of a candidate drug target for treatment of a disease or disorder; identification (e.g., diagnosis) of a subject as having a disease or disorder; identification of stage and/or prognosis of a disease or disorder in a subject; identification of a subject as having an increased likelihood of developing a disease or disorder; monitoring of progression of a disease or disorder in a subject; determination of efficacy of a treatment of a disease or disorder in a subject; identification of a patient subpopulation for which a treatment is effective for a disease or disorder; modification of a treatment of a subject with a disease or disorder; selection of a subject for participation in a clinical trial; and/or selection of a treatment for a subject with a disease or disorder.
Spatial information can provide information of biological importance. For example, the methods and compositions described herein can allow for: identification of transcriptome and/or proteome expression profiles (e.g., in healthy and/or diseased tissue); identification of multiple analyte types in close proximity (e.g., nearest neighbor analysis); determination of up- and/or down-regulated genes and/or proteins in diseased tissue; characterization of tumor microenvironments; characterization of tumor immune responses; characterization of cells types and their co-localization in tissue; and identification of genetic variants within tissues (e.g., based on gene and/or protein expression profiles associated with specific disease or disorder biomarkers).
Typically, for spatial array-based methods, a substrate functions as a support for direct or indirect attachment of capture probes to features of the array. A “feature” is an entity that acts as a support or repository for various molecular entities used in spatial analysis. In some embodiments, some or all of the features in an array are functionalized for analyte capture. Exemplary substrates are described in Section (II)(c) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. Exemplary features and geometric attributes of an array can be found in Sections (II)(d)(i), (II)(d)(iii), and (II)(d)(iv) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
Generally, analytes and/or intermediate agents (or portions thereof) can be captured when contacting a biological sample with a substrate including capture probes (e.g., a substrate with capture probes embedded, spotted, printed, fabricated on the substrate, or a substrate with features (e.g., beads, wells) comprising capture probes). As used herein, “contact,” “contacted,” and/or “contacting,” a biological sample with a substrate refers to any contact (e.g., direct or indirect) such that capture probes can interact (e.g., bind covalently or non-covalently (e.g., hybridize)) with analytes from the biological sample. Capture can be achieved actively (e.g., using electrophoresis) or passively (e.g., using diffusion). Analyte capture is further described in Section (II)(e) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
In some cases, spatial analysis can be performed by attaching and/or introducing a molecule (e.g., a peptide, a lipid, or a nucleic acid molecule) having a barcode (e.g., a spatial barcode) to a biological sample (e.g., to a cell in a biological sample). In some embodiments, a plurality of molecules (e.g., a plurality of nucleic acid molecules) having a plurality of barcodes (e.g., a plurality of spatial barcodes) are introduced to a biological sample (e.g., to a plurality of cells in a biological sample) for use in spatial analysis. In some embodiments, after attaching and/or introducing a molecule having a barcode to a biological sample, the biological sample can be physically separated (e.g., dissociated) into single cells or cell groups for analysis. Some such methods of spatial analysis are described in Section (III) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
In some cases, spatial analysis can be performed by detecting multiple oligonucleotides that hybridize to an analyte. In some instances, for example, spatial analysis can be performed using RNA-templated ligation (RTL). Methods of RTL have been described previously. See, e.g., Credle et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Aug. 21; 45(14):e128. Typically, RTL includes hybridization of two oligonucleotides to adjacent sequences on an analyte (e.g., an RNA molecule, such as an mRNA molecule). In some instances, the oligonucleotides are DNA molecules. In some instances, one of the oligonucleotides includes at least two ribonucleic acid bases at the 3′ end and/or the other oligonucleotide includes a phosphorylated nucleotide at the 5′ end. In some instances, one of the two oligonucleotides includes a capture domain (e.g., a poly(A) sequence, a non-homopolymeric sequence). After hybridization to the analyte, a ligase (e.g., SplintR ligase) ligates the two oligonucleotides together, creating a connected probe (e.g., a ligation product). In some instances, the two oligonucleotides hybridize to sequences that are not adjacent to one another. For example, hybridization of the two oligonucleotides creates a gap between the hybridized oligonucleotides. In some instances, a polymerase (e.g., a DNA polymerase) can extend one of the oligonucleotides prior to ligation. After ligation, the connected probe (e.g., a ligation product) is released from the analyte. In some instances, the connected probe (e.g., a ligation product) is released using an endonuclease (e.g., RNAse H). The released connected probe (e.g., a ligation product) can then be captured by capture probes (e.g., instead of direct capture of an analyte) on an array, optionally amplified, and sequenced, thus determining the location and optionally the abundance of the analyte in the biological sample.
During analysis of spatial information, sequence information for a spatial barcode associated with an analyte is obtained, and the sequence information can be used to provide information about the spatial distribution of the analyte in the biological sample. Various methods can be used to obtain the spatial information. In some embodiments, specific capture probes and the analytes they capture are associated with specific locations in an array of features on a substrate. For example, specific spatial barcodes can be associated with specific array locations prior to array fabrication, and the sequences of the spatial barcodes can be stored (e.g., in a database) along with specific array location information, so that each spatial barcode uniquely maps to a particular array location.
Alternatively, specific spatial barcodes can be deposited at predetermined locations in an array of features during fabrication such that at each location, only one type of spatial barcode is present so that spatial barcodes are uniquely associated with a single feature of the array. Where necessary, the arrays can be decoded using any of the methods described herein so that spatial barcodes are uniquely associated with array feature locations, and this mapping can be stored as described above.
When sequence information is obtained for capture probes and/or analytes during analysis of spatial information, the locations of the capture probes and/or analytes can be determined by referring to the stored information that uniquely associates each spatial barcode with an array feature location. In this manner, specific capture probes and captured analytes are associated with specific locations in the array of features. Each array feature location represents a position relative to a coordinate reference point (e.g., an array location, a fiducial marker) for the array. Accordingly, each feature location has an “address” or location in the coordinate space of the array.
Some exemplary spatial analysis workflows are described in the Exemplary Embodiments section of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. See, for example, the Exemplary embodiment starting with “In some non-limiting examples of the workflows described herein, the sample can be immersed . . . ” of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. See also, e.g., the Visium Spatial Gene Expression Reagent Kits User Guide (e.g., Rev C, dated June 2020), and/or the Visium Spatial Tissue Optimization Reagent Kits User Guide (e.g., Rev C, dated July 2020).
In some embodiments, spatial analysis can be performed using dedicated hardware and/or software, such as any of the systems described in Sections (II)(e)(ii) and/or (V) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663, or any of one or more of the devices or methods described in Sections Control Slide for Imaging, Methods of Using Control Slides and Substrates for, Systems of Using Control Slides and Substrates for Imaging, and/or Sample and Array Alignment Devices and Methods, Informational labels of WO 2020/123320.
Suitable systems for performing spatial analysis can include components such as a chamber (e.g., a flow cell or sealable, fluid-tight chamber) for containing a biological sample. The biological sample can be mounted for example, in a biological sample holder. One or more fluid chambers can be connected to the chamber and/or the sample holder via fluid conduits, and fluids can be delivered into the chamber and/or sample holder via fluidic pumps, vacuum sources, or other devices coupled to the fluid conduits that create a pressure gradient to drive fluid flow. One or more valves can also be connected to fluid conduits to regulate the flow of reagents from reservoirs to the chamber and/or sample holder.
The systems can optionally include a control unit that includes one or more electronic processors, an input interface, an output interface (such as a display), and a storage unit (e.g., a solid state storage medium such as, but not limited to, a magnetic, optical, or other solid state, persistent, writeable and/or re-writeable storage medium). The control unit can optionally be connected to one or more remote devices via a network. The control unit (and components thereof) can generally perform any of the steps and functions described herein. Where the system is connected to a remote device, the remote device (or devices) can perform any of the steps or features described herein. The systems can optionally include one or more detectors (e.g., CCD, CMOS) used to capture images. The systems can also optionally include one or more light sources (e.g., LED-based, diode-based, lasers) for illuminating a sample, a substrate with features, analytes from a biological sample captured on a substrate, and various control and calibration media.
The systems can optionally include software instructions encoded and/or implemented in one or more of tangible storage media and hardware components such as application specific integrated circuits. The software instructions, when executed by a control unit (and in particular, an electronic processor) or an integrated circuit, can cause the control unit, integrated circuit, or other component executing the software instructions to perform any of the method steps or functions described herein.
In some cases, the systems described herein can detect (e.g., register an image) the biological sample on the array. Exemplary methods to detect the biological sample on an array are described in PCT Application No. 2020/061064 and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/951,854.
Prior to transferring analytes from the biological sample to the array of features on the substrate, the biological sample can be aligned with the array. Alignment of a biological sample and an array of features including capture probes can facilitate spatial analysis, which can be used to detect differences in analyte presence and/or level within different positions in the biological sample, for example, to generate a three-dimensional map of the analyte presence and/or level. Exemplary methods to generate a two- and/or three-dimensional map of the analyte presence and/or level are described in PCT Application No. 2020/053655 and spatial analysis methods are generally described in WO 2020/061108 and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/951,864.
In some cases, a map of analyte presence and/or level can be aligned to an image of a biological sample using one or more fiducial markers, e.g., objects placed in the field of view of an imaging system which appear in the image produced, as described in the Substrate Attributes Section, Control Slide for Imaging Section of WO 2020/123320, PCT Application No. 2020/061066, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/951,843. Fiducial markers can be used as a point of reference or measurement scale for alignment (e.g., to align a sample and an array, to align two substrates, to determine a location of a sample or array on a substrate relative to a fiducial marker) and/or for quantitative measurements of sizes and/or distances.
The sandwich process is described in PCT Patent Application Publication No. WO 2020/123320, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Disclosed herein are methods and compositions for performing spatial analysis and analyte detection in a biological sample. In particular, the methods and compositions disclosed herein relate to manipulation of biological samples that can be performed while the biological sample is not on a surface, such as a glass slide. Generally, spatial analysis of analytes in biological samples (e.g., tissues) is coupled to microscopy readouts; because microscopy readouts require biological samples to be placed onto a surface (e.g., a slide), the biological sample usually is placed on the surface. Further, because scientists usually apply a biological sample on a surface (e.g., a glass slide) in the early steps of sample processing, so that all follow-up steps are also performed on the surface. For example, follow-up steps include analyte detection and sample manipulation, such as fluorescent tagging of proteins. The methods and compositions disclosed herein provide a way to detect analytes and manipulate the biological sample without the need to perform such steps on a surface. Further, the methods and compositions provided herein allow for high-throughput analysis of multiple sections of the same sample (e.g., using multiple tissue slices).
Accordingly, provided herein are methods of analyzing a biological sample, including examining the abundance and location of one or more analytes in the biological sample. In some instances, provided herein are various methods of processing a biological sample, the methods including: (a) depositing a plurality of tissue sections obtained from the biological sample into a polymer solution; (b) generating a plurality of partitions wherein a partition of the plurality of partitions comprises a tissue section of the plurality of tissue sections; and (c) imaging the tissue section of the plurality of tissue sections.
In some instances, the methods disclosed herein include methods of determining the abundance and the location of an analyte in a biological sample. In some instances, the methods include (a) embedding a plurality of sections of the biological sample into a polymer solution; (b) generating a plurality of partitions, wherein a partition of the plurality of partitions comprises a section of the plurality of sections of the biological sample; (c) manipulating each section in order to detect the analyte; and (d) determining the abundance and location of an analyte in a biological sample. Also disclosed herein are kits and compositions relating to the same.
Additional embodiments of the disclosure are provided herein.
A. Biological Sample, Analytes, and Preparation of the Same
(i) Biological Samples and Analytes
As used herein, a “biological sample” (also called “sample,” and where appropriate, “tissue sample,” “cell culture sample,” and the like) is obtained from the subject for analysis using any of a variety of techniques including, but not limited to, biopsy, surgery, and laser capture microscopy (LCM), and generally includes cells and/or other biological material from the subject. In some instances, a biological sample can be obtained from a eukaryote. In some instances, the biological sample is obtained from a mammal. In some instances, the biological sample is obtained from a human.
The biological samples described herein can be obtained from a tissue sample processed using any of the methods provided herein. The biological sample can be, e.g., a fresh tissue sample or a tissue sample that has been fixed. Fixed biological samples can be embedded in any suitable medium described herein or known in the art, including but not limited to, paraffin, waxes, resins, epoxies, agar, glycols, hydrogel or combinations thereof. After sectioning the biological sample into one or more tissue sections, the medium can optionally be removed from the tissue sections (e.g. deparaffinized) prior to depositing them into the polymer solution. The tissue sections can also be obtained from a frozen biological sample (e.g. snap frozen in liquid nitrogen), by methods provided herein or known in the art (e.g. sectioned on a microtome or cryostat). Frozen tissue sections can be thawed (completely or partially) prior to depositing into the polymer solution. The biological sample may be (or can have been) permeabilized prior to obtaining tissue sections, using methods provided herein or known in the art (e.g. using any of the variety of permeabilization agents and/or conditions, e.g., electroporation, described herein or known in the art).
Biological sections can also be fixed and/or permeabilized prior to being deposited into the polymer solution, using methods provided herein or known in the art. In some instances, the tissue sections are fixed prior to or after permeabilization. In some instances, tissue sections are permeabilized after being deposited into the polymer solution, and before or after the generation of partitions in step (b) of the methods provided herein.
In some embodiments, a biological sample can be permeabilized to facilitate transfer of analytes out of the sample, and/or to facilitate transfer of species (such as capture probes) into the sample. If a sample is not permeabilized sufficiently, the amount of analyte captured from the sample may be too low to enable adequate analysis. Conversely, if the tissue sample is too permeable, the relative spatial relationship of the analytes within the tissue sample can be lost. Hence, a balance between permeabilizing the tissue sample enough to obtain good signal intensity while still maintaining the spatial resolution of the analyte distribution in the sample is desirable.
In general, a biological sample can be permeabilized by exposing the sample to one or more permeabilizing agents. Suitable agents for this purpose include, but are not limited to, organic solvents (e.g., acetone, ethanol, and methanol), cross-linking agents (e.g., paraformaldehyde), detergents (e.g., saponin, Triton X100™, Tween-20™, or sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)), and enzymes (e.g., trypsin, proteases (e.g., proteinase K). In some embodiments, the detergent is an anionic detergent (e.g., SDS or N-lauroylsarcosine sodium salt solution). In some embodiments, the biological sample can be permeabilized using any of the methods described herein (e.g., using any of the detergents described herein, e.g., SDS and/or N-lauroylsarcosine sodium salt solution) before or after enzymatic treatment (e.g., treatment with any of the enzymes described herein, e.g., trypin, proteases (e.g., pepsin and/or proteinase K)).
In some instances, a biological sample can be obtained from non-mammalian organisms (e.g., a plants, an insect, an arachnid, a nematode (e.g., Caenorhabditis elegans), a fungi, an amphibian, or a fish (e.g., zebrafish)). In some instances, a biological sample can be obtained from a prokaryote such as a bacterium, e.g., Escherichia coli, Staphylococci or Mycoplasma pneumoniae; an archaea; a virus such as Hepatitis C virus or human immunodeficiency virus; or a viroid. In some instances, biological samples can be derived from a homogeneous culture or population of the subjects or organisms mentioned herein or alternatively from a collection of several different organisms, for example, in a community or ecosystem.
In some instances, biological samples can include one or more diseased cells. A diseased cell can have altered metabolic properties, gene expression, protein expression, and/or morphologic features. Examples of diseases include inflammatory disorders, metabolic disorders, nervous system disorders, and cancer. Cancer cells can be derived from solid tumors, hematological malignancies, cell lines, or obtained as circulating tumor cells.
In some instances, the biological sample is a cell culture sample. In some embodiments, the biological sample can be derived from a cell culture grown in vitro. Samples derived from a cell culture can include one or more suspension cells which are anchorage-independent within the cell culture.
As discussed above, a biological sample can include a single analyte of interest, or more than one analyte of interest. Methods for performing multiplexed assays to analyze two or more different analytes in a single biological sample is discussed in a subsequent section of this disclosure. For the purpose of this disclosure, an “analyte” can include any biological substance, structure, moiety, or component to be analyzed. The term “target” can similarly refer to an analyte of interest.
Analytes can be broadly classified into one of two groups: nucleic acid analytes, and non-nucleic acid analytes. Examples of non-nucleic acid analytes include, but are not limited to, lipids, carbohydrates, peptides, proteins, glycoproteins (N-linked or O-linked), lipoproteins, phosphoproteins, specific phosphorylated or acetylated variants of proteins, amidation variants of proteins, hydroxylation variants of proteins, methylation variants of proteins, ubiquitylation variants of proteins, sulfation variants of proteins, viral coat proteins, extracellular and intracellular proteins, antibodies, and antigen binding fragments. In some embodiments, the analyte can be an organelle (e.g., nuclei or mitochondria).
Examples of nucleic acid analytes include DNA analytes such as genomic DNA, methylated DNA, specific methylated DNA sequences, fragmented DNA, mitochondrial DNA, in situ synthesized PCR products, and RNA/DNA hybrids. Additional examples of nucleic acid analytes also include RNA analytes such as various types of coding and non-coding RNA. Examples of the different types of RNA analytes include messenger RNA (mRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), microRNA (miRNA), and viral RNA. The RNA can be a transcript (e.g., present in a tissue section). The RNA can be small (e.g., less than 200 nucleic acid bases in length) or large (e.g., RNA greater than 200 nucleic acid bases in length). Small RNAs mainly include 5.8S ribosomal RNA (rRNA), 5S rRNA, transfer RNA (tRNA), microRNA (miRNA), small interfering RNA (siRNA), small nucleolar RNA (snoRNAs), Piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA), tRNA-derived small RNA (tsRNA), and small rDNA-derived RNA (srRNA). The RNA can be double-stranded RNA or single-stranded RNA. The RNA can be circular RNA. The RNA can be a bacterial rRNA (e.g., 16s rRNA or 23s rRNA).
In general, the methods and compositions disclosed herein can be used to analyze any number of analytes. For example, the number of analytes that are analyzed can be at least about 2, at least about 3, at least about 4, at least about 5, at least about 6, at least about 7, at least about 8, at least about 9, at least about 10, at least about 11, at least about 12, at least about 13, at least about 14, at least about 15, at least about 20, at least about 25, at least about 30, at least about 40, at least about 50, at least about 100, at least about 1,000, at least about 10,000, at least about 100,000 or more different analytes present in a region of the sample or within an individual feature of the substrate. Methods for performing multiplexed assays to analyze two or more different analytes will be discussed in a subsequent section of this disclosure.
(ii) Preparation of Biological Samples
A variety of steps can be performed to prepare a biological sample for analysis. Except where indicated otherwise, the preparative steps described below can generally be combined in any manner to appropriately prepare a particular sample for analysis.
In some instances, a biological sample can be harvested from a subject (e.g., via surgical biopsy, whole subject sectioning), grown in vitro on a growth substrate or culture dish as a population of cells, or prepared as a tissue slice or tissue section. Grown samples may be sufficiently thin for analysis without further processing steps. Alternatively, grown samples, and samples obtained via biopsy or sectioning, can be prepared as thin tissue sections using a mechanical cutting apparatus such as a vibrating blade microtome. As another alternative, in some embodiments, a thin tissue section can be prepared by applying a touch imprint of a biological sample to a suitable substrate material.
The thickness of the tissue section can be a fraction of (e.g., less than 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, 0.6, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, or 0.1) the maximum cross-sectional dimension of a cell. However, tissue sections having a thickness that is larger than the maximum cross-section cell dimension can also be used. For example, cryostat sections can be used, which can be, e.g., 10-20 micrometers thick. More generally, the thickness of a tissue section typically depends on the method used to prepare the section and the physical characteristics of the tissue, and therefore sections having a wide variety of different thicknesses can be prepared and used. For example, the thickness of the tissue section can be at least 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20, 30, 40, or 50 micrometers. Thicker sections can also be used if desired or convenient, e.g., at least 70, 80, 90, or 100 micrometers or more. Typically, the thickness of a tissue section is between 1-100 micrometers, 1-50 micrometers, 1-30 micrometers, 1-25 micrometers, 1-20 micrometers, 1-15 micrometers, 1-10 micrometers, 2-8 micrometers, 3-7 micrometers, or 4-6 micrometers, but as mentioned above, sections with thicknesses larger or smaller than these ranges can also be analysed.
Multiple sections can also be obtained from a single biological sample. For example, multiple tissue sections can be obtained from a surgical biopsy sample by performing serial sectioning of the biopsy sample using a sectioning blade. Spatial information among the serial sections can be preserved in this manner, and the sections can be analysed successively to obtain three-dimensional information about the biological sample.
Additional methods can be performed on biological sample. For instances, in some embodiments, the biological sample (e.g., a tissue section as described above) can be prepared by deep freezing at a temperature suitable to maintain or preserve the integrity (e.g., the physical characteristics) of the tissue structure. Such a temperature can be, e.g., less than −20° C., or less than −25° C., −30° C., −40° C., −50° C., −60° C., −70° C., 80° C. −90° C., −100° C., −110° C., −120° C., −130° C., −140° C., −150° C., −160° C., −170° C., −180° C., −190° C., or −200° C.
In some embodiments, the biological sample can be prepared using formalin-fixation and paraffin-embedding (FFPE), which are established methods. In some embodiments, cell suspensions and other non-tissue samples can be prepared using formalin-fixation and paraffin-embedding. Following fixation of the sample and embedding in a paraffin or resin block, the sample can be sectioned as described above. Prior to analysis, the paraffin-embedding material can be removed from the tissue section (e.g., deparaffinization) by incubating the tissue section in an appropriate solvent (e.g., xylene) followed by a rinse (e.g., 99.5% ethanol for 2 minutes, 96% ethanol for 2 minutes, and 70% ethanol for 2 minutes). It is appreciated that other fixatives (e.g., ethanol, methanol, acetone, formaldehyde (e.g., 2% formaldehyde), paraformaldehyde-Triton, glutaraldehyde, or combinations thereof) can be used to fix the biological sample.
B. Embedding and Partitioning of a Biological Sample
In some embodiments, methods provided herein include generating a plurality of partitions where a partition of the plurality of partitions includes a tissue section of the plurality of tissue sections. In general, each partition maintains separation of its own contents from the contents of other partitions. The partitions can be flowable within fluid streams. The partitions can be droplets of multiple phases. In some instances, the multiple phases include a first phase within a second phase, wherein the first and second phases are immiscible.
(i) Biological Sample Embedding
In some embodiments, the polymer solution in methods provided herein is a hydrogel solution. The hydrogel solution can include a plurality of hydrogel subunits (e.g., hydrophilic monomers, molecular precursors, or polymers) that can be polymerized (e.g., cross-linked) to form a hydrogel matrix. In some embodiments, a biological sample (e.g., tissue section) is embedded in a hydrogel. In some embodiments, hydrogel subunits are infused into the biological sample, and polymerization of the hydrogel is initiated by an external or internal stimulus. A “hydrogel” as described herein can include a cross-linked 3D network of hydrophilic polymer chains. A “hydrogel subunit” can be a hydrophilic monomer, a molecular precursor, or a polymer that can be polymerized (e.g., cross-linked) to form a three-dimensional (3D) hydrogel network.
A hydrogel can swell in the presence of water. In some embodiments, a hydrogel comprises a natural material. In some embodiments, a hydrogel includes a synthetic material. In some embodiments, a hydrogel includes a hybrid material, e.g., the hydrogel material comprises elements of both synthetic and natural polymers. Any of the materials used in hydrogels or hydrogels comprising a polypeptide-based material described herein can be used. Embedding the sample in this manner typically involves contacting the biological sample with a hydrogel such that the biological sample becomes surrounded by the hydrogel. For example, the sample can be embedded by contacting the sample with a suitable polymer material, and activating the polymer material to form a hydrogel. In some embodiments, the hydrogel is formed such that the hydrogel is internalized within the biological sample.
In some embodiments, the biological sample is immobilized in the hydrogel via cross-linking of the polymer material that forms the hydrogel. Cross-linking can be performed chemically and/or photochemically, or alternatively by any other hydrogel-formation method known in the art. For example, the biological sample can be immobilized in the hydrogel by polyacrylamide crosslinking. Further, analytes of a biological sample can be immobilized in a hydrogel by crosslinking (e.g., polyacrylamide crosslinking).
The composition and application of the hydrogel to a biological sample typically depends on the nature and preparation of the biological sample (e.g., sectioned, non-sectioned, fresh-frozen tissue, type of fixation). A hydrogel can be any appropriate hydrogel where upon formation of the hydrogel on the biological sample the biological sample becomes anchored to or embedded in the hydrogel. Non-limiting examples of hydrogels are described herein or are known in the art. As one example, where the biological sample is a tissue section, the hydrogel can include a monomer solution and an ammonium persulfate (APS) initiator/tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) accelerator solution. As another example, where the biological sample consists of cells (e.g., cultured cells or cells disassociated from a tissue sample), the cells can be incubated with the monomer solution and APS/TEMED solutions. For cells, hydrogel are formed in compartments, including but not limited to devices used to culture, maintain, or transport the cells. For example, hydrogels can be formed with monomer solution plus APS/TEMED added to the compartment to a depth ranging from about 0.1 μm to about 5 mm.
In some embodiments, a hydrogel includes a linker that allows anchoring of the biological sample to the hydrogel. In some embodiments, a hydrogel includes linkers that allow anchoring of biological analytes to the hydrogel. In such cases, the linker can be added to the hydrogel before, contemporaneously with, or after hydrogel formation. Non-limiting examples of linkers that anchor nucleic acids to the hydrogel can include 6-((Acryloyl)amino) hexanoic acid (Acryloyl-X SE) (available from ThermoFisher, Waltham, Mass.), Label-IT Amine (available from MirusBio, Madison, Wis.) and Label X (Chen et al., Nat. Methods 13:679-684, (2016)).
In some embodiments, functionalization chemistry can be used. In some embodiments, functionalization chemistry includes hydrogel-tissue chemistry (HTC). Any hydrogel-tissue backbone (e.g., synthetic or native) suitable for HTC can be used for anchoring biological macromolecules and modulating functionalization. Non-limiting examples of methods using HTC backbone variants include CLARITY, PACT, ExM, SWITCH and ePACT. In some embodiments, hydrogel formation within a biological sample is permanent. For example, biological macromolecules can permanently adhere to the hydrogel allowing multiple rounds of interrogation. In some embodiments, hydrogel formation within a biological sample is reversible.
In some embodiments, additional reagents are added to the hydrogel subunits before, contemporaneously with, and/or after polymerization. For example, additional reagents can include but are not limited to oligonucleotides (e.g., capture probes), endonucleases to fragment DNA, fragmentation buffer for DNA, DNA polymerase enzymes, dNTPs used to amplify the nucleic acid and to attach the barcode to the amplified fragments. Other enzymes can be used, including without limitation, RNA polymerase, transposase, ligase, proteinase K, and DNAse. Additional reagents can also include reverse transcriptase enzymes, including enzymes with terminal transferase activity, primers, and switch oligonucleotides. In some embodiments, optical labels are added to the hydrogel subunits before, contemporaneously with, and/or after polymerization.
In some embodiments, HTC reagents are added to the hydrogel before, contemporaneously with, and/or after polymerization. In some embodiments, a cell tagging agent is added to the hydrogel before, contemporaneously with, and/or after polymerization. In some embodiments, a cell-penetrating agent is added to the hydrogel before, contemporaneously with, and/or after polymerization.
In some embodiments, a biological sample is embedded in a hydrogel to facilitate sample transfer to another location (e.g., to an array). For example, archived biological samples (e.g., FFPE tissue sections) can be transferred from storage to a spatial array to perform spatial analysis. In some embodiments, a biological sample on a substrate can be covered with any of the prepolymer solutions described herein. In some embodiments, the prepolymer solution can be polymerized such that a hydrogel is formed on top of and/or around the biological sample. Hydrogel formation can occur in a manner sufficient to anchor (e.g., embed) the biological sample to the hydrogel. After hydrogel formation, the biological sample is anchored to (e.g., embedded in) the hydrogel wherein separating the hydrogel from the substrate (e.g., glass slide) results in the biological sample separating from the substrate along with the hydrogel. The biological sample contained in the hydrogel can then be contacted with a spatial array, and spatial analysis can be performed on the biological sample.
Any variety of characteristics can determine the transfer conditions required for a given biological sample. Non-limiting examples of characteristics likely to impact transfer conditions include the sample (e.g., thickness, fixation, and cross-linking) and/or the analyte of interest (different conditions to preserve and/or transfer different analytes (e.g., DNA, RNA, and protein)).
In some embodiments, the hydrogel is removed after contacting the biological sample with the spatial array. For example, methods described herein can include an event-dependent (e.g., light or chemical) depolymerizing hydrogel, wherein upon application of the event (e.g., external stimuli) the hydrogel depolymerizes. In one example, a biological sample can be anchored to a DTT-sensitive hydrogel, where addition of DTT can cause the hydrogel to depolymerize and release the anchored biological sample.
Hydrogels embedded within biological samples can be cleared using any suitable method. For example, electrophoretic tissue clearing methods can be used to remove biological macromolecules from the hydrogel-embedded sample. In some embodiments, a hydrogel-embedded sample is stored in a medium before or after clearing of hydrogel (e.g., a mounting medium, methylcellulose, or other semi-solid mediums).
In some embodiments, the hydrogel chemistry can be tuned to specifically bind (e.g., retain) particular species of analytes (e.g., RNA, DNA, protein, etc.). In some embodiments, a hydrogel includes a linker that allows anchoring of the biological sample to the hydrogel. In some embodiments, a hydrogel includes linkers that allow anchoring of biological analytes to the hydrogel. In such cases, the linker can be added to the hydrogel before, contemporaneously with, or after hydrogel formation. Non-limiting examples of linkers that anchor nucleic acids to the hydrogel can include 6-((Acryloyl)amino) hexanoic acid (Acryloyl-X SE), Label-IT Amine and Label X (Chen et al., Nat. Methods 13:679-684, (2016)). Non-limiting examples of characteristics likely to impact transfer conditions include the sample (e.g., thickness, fixation, and cross-linking) and/or the analyte of interest (different conditions to preserve and/or transfer different analytes (e.g., DNA, RNA, and protein)).
Additional methods and aspects of hydrogel embedding of biological samples are described for example in Chen et al., Science 347(6221):543-548, 2015, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In some instances, methods involving use of a hydrogel can include forming a hydrogel matrix from the hydrogel solution, and generating a plurality of hydrogel beads (e.g., called “macrobeads” in some instances), where a hydrogel macrobead of the plurality of hydrogel macrobeads includes a biological (e.g., tissue) section of the plurality of tissue sections.
In some instances, forming a hydrogel matrix from the hydrogel solution immobilizes or anchors the plurality of tissue sections within the hydrogel matrix. The hydrogel matrix can then be dissociated into a plurality of chunks, where a chunk of the plurality of chunks includes a tissue section of the plurality of tissue sections. The chunks can be formed into various shapes and/or dimensions depending on the context of the intended use. In some instances, the chunks are shaped into beads (e.g., macrobeads). The volume, fluidity, porosity, and/or rigidity of the beads can be dependent on the type of materials used to form the hydrogel matrix. The hydrogel matrix can be dissociated into chunks by various mechanical means (e.g., cutting, stamping, microdissecting), acoustic means (e.g., sonication), or any other suitable method provided herein.
A hydrogel macrobead can contain one or more tissue sections. In some instances, a hydrogel macrobead contains a single tissue section. In instances where a hydrogel macrobead contains more than one tissue sections, each tissue section can be physically separated from other tissue sections in the same macrobead. The size of a hydrogel macrobead can be dependent on the size and/or thickness of the tissue sections, and can be adapted to fully encapsulate one or more tissue sections. The macrobeads can be of uniform size or heterogeneous size.
(ii) Biological Sample Partitioning
In some embodiments, generating a plurality of partitions includes generating a plurality of droplets containing the polymer solution, where a droplet of the plurality of droplets includes a tissue section of the plurality of tissue sections. The partitions can be droplets of aqueous fluid within a non-aqueous continuous phase (e.g., oil phase). In another example, the partitions can be droplets of a non-aqueous fluid within an aqueous phase. The plurality of droplets can be generated using any of the droplet generating methods provided herein. For instance, droplets can be formed in an emulsion that contains a second solution. For droplets in an emulsion, allocating individual tissue sections to discrete partitions can be accomplished, for example, by introducing a flowing stream of tissue sections in an aqueous fluid into a flowing stream of a non-aqueous fluid, such that droplets are generated at the junction of the two streams. In some instances, the partitions are provided in a water-in-oil emulsion or oil-in-water emulsion. In some instances, the droplets are generated in a microfluidic device.
A droplet can contain one or more tissue sections. In some instances, a droplet contains a single tissue section. The size of a droplet can be dependent on the size and/or thickness of the tissue sections, and can be adapted to fully encapsulate one or more tissue sections. The average volume of droplets in the plurality of droplets can be less than 10,000 picoliters (e.g., less than 8000, 7000, 6000, 5000, 4000, 3000, 2000, 1000, or 800 picoliters).
In some instances, the biological sample is partitioned into serial sections of the same sample (e.g., tissue). In some embodiments, the biological sample can optionally be separated into single cells, cell groups, or other fragments/pieces that are smaller than the original, unfragmented sample. Each of these smaller portions of the sample can be analyzed to obtain spatially-resolved analyte information for the sample.
For samples that have been separated into smaller fragments—and particularly, for samples that have been disaggregated, dissociated, or otherwise separated into individual cells—one method for analyzing the fragments involves separating the fragments into individual partitions (e.g., fluid droplets), and then analyzing the contents of the partitions. In general, each partition maintains separation of its own contents from the contents of other partitions. The partition can be a droplet in an emulsion, for example.
The partitions can be flowable within fluid streams. The partitions can include, for example, micro-vesicles that have an outer barrier surrounding an inner fluid center or core. In some cases, the partitions can include a porous matrix that is capable of entraining and/or retaining materials within its matrix. The partitions can be droplets of a first phase within a second phase, wherein the first and second phases are immiscible. For example, the partitions can be droplets of aqueous fluid within a non-aqueous continuous phase (e.g., oil phase). In another example, the partitions can be droplets of a non-aqueous fluid within an aqueous phase. In some examples, the partitions can be provided in a water-in-oil emulsion or oil-in-water emulsion. A variety of different vessels are described in, for example, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0155295, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Emulsion systems for creating stable droplets in non-aqueous or oil continuous phases are described, for example, in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0105112, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
For droplets in an emulsion, allocating individual particles to discrete partitions can be accomplished, for example, by introducing a flowing stream of particles in an aqueous fluid into a flowing stream of a non-aqueous fluid, such that droplets are generated at the junction of the two streams. Fluid properties (e.g., fluid flow rates, fluid viscosities, etc.), particle properties (e.g., volume fraction, particle volume, particle concentration, etc.), microfluidic architectures (e.g., channel geometry, etc.), and other parameters can be adjusted to control the occupancy of the resulting partitions (e.g., number of analytes per partition, number of beads per partition, etc.). For example, partition occupancy can be controlled by providing the aqueous stream at a certain concentration and/or flow rate of analytes.
C. Manipulation of the Biological Sample
Manipulation of Biological Sample in Solution
In addition to cells and/or analytes, a partition can include additional components, and in particular, one or more beads. A partition can include a single gel bead, a single cell bead, or both a single cell bead and single gel bead. A variety of different beads can be incorporated into partitions. In some embodiments, for example, non-barcoded beads can be incorporated into the partitions. For example, where the biological particle (e.g., a cell) that is incorporated into the partitions carries one or more barcodes (e.g., spatial barcode(s), UMI(s), and combinations thereof), the bead can be a non-barcoded bead.
In some embodiments, a barcode carrying bead can be incorporated into partitions. In general, an individual bead can be coupled to any number of individual nucleic acid molecules, for example, from one to tens to hundreds of thousands or even millions of individual nucleic acid molecules. The respective barcodes for the individual nucleic acid molecules can include both common sequence segments or relatively common sequence segments and variable or unique sequence segments between different individual nucleic acid molecules coupled to the same bead. For example, a nucleic acid molecule (e.g., an oligonucleotide), can be coupled to a bead by a releasable linkage (e.g., a disulfide linker), wherein the nucleic acid molecule can be or include a barcode. For example, barcodes can be injected into droplets previous to, subsequent to, or concurrently with droplet generation. The delivery of the barcodes to a particular partition allows for the later attribution of the characteristics of the individual biological particle to the particular partition. Barcodes can be delivered, for example on a nucleic acid molecule (e.g., an oligonucleotide), to a partition via any suitable mechanism. Barcoded nucleic acid molecules can be delivered to a partition via a microcapsule. A microcapsule, in some instances, can include a bead. The same bead can be coupled (e.g., via releasable linkage) to one or more other nucleic acid molecules.
In some embodiments, a microcapillary array with spatially barcoded beads can be generated. A plurality of spatially barcoded beads can be flowed into channels on a microcapillary array such that each microcapillary channel can be loaded with one spatially barcoded bead. In some embodiments, the spatially barcoded bead microcapillary array can be contacted to a biological sample for subsequent spatial analysis of biological analytes within the biological sample. In some embodiments, a microcapillary array channel can mechanically compress the biological sample and form fluidically isolated reaction chambers. In some embodiments, reagents (e.g., enzymes, nucleic acids) are introduced into the reaction chambers. The reagents can be sealed (e.g., by silicone oil, mineral oil) within the reaction chambers and incubated, allowing for a cellular and/or nuclear permeabilization reaction to occur. In some embodiments, biological analytes (e.g., DNA, RNA, proteins, metabolites, small molecules, and lipids) are released and captured onto the spatially barcoded microcapillary array, preserving their spatial information. In some embodiments, spatial analysis using a spatially barcoded feature microcapillary array can be used to obtain spatial information of the biological sample analytes at single-cell resolution.
The nucleic acid molecule can include a functional domain that can be used in subsequent processing. For example, the functional domain can include one or more of a sequencer specific flow cell attachment sequence (e.g., a P5 sequence for Illumina® sequencing systems) and a sequencing primer sequence (e.g., a R1 primer for Illumina® sequencing systems). The nucleic acid molecule can include a barcode sequence for use in barcoding the sample (e.g., DNA, RNA, protein, etc.). In some cases, the barcode sequence can be bead-specific such that the barcode sequence is common to all nucleic acid molecules coupled to the same bead. Alternatively or in addition, the barcode sequence can be partition-specific such that the barcode sequence is common to all nucleic acid molecules coupled to one or more beads that are partitioned into the same partition. The nucleic acid molecule can include a specific priming sequence, such as an mRNA specific priming sequence (e.g., poly(T) sequence), a targeted priming sequence, and/or a random priming sequence. The nucleic acid molecule can include an anchoring sequence to ensure that the specific priming sequence hybridizes at the sequence end (e.g., of the mRNA). For example, the anchoring sequence can include a random short sequence of nucleotides, such as a 1-mer, 2-mer, 3-mer or longer sequence, which can ensure that a poly(T) segment is more likely to hybridize at the sequence end of the poly(A) tail of the mRNA.
The nucleic acid molecule can include a unique molecular identifying sequence (e.g., unique molecular identifier (UMI)). In some embodiments, the unique molecular identifying sequence can include from about 5 to about 8 nucleotides. Alternatively, the unique molecular identifying sequence can include less than about 5 or more than about 8 nucleotides. The unique molecular identifying sequence can be a unique sequence that varies across individual nucleic acid molecules coupled to a single bead. In some embodiments, the unique molecular identifying sequence can be a random sequence (e.g., such as a random N-mer sequence). For example, the UMI can provide a unique identifier of the starting mRNA molecule that was captured, in order to allow quantitation of the number of original expressed RNA.
A partition can also include one or more reagents. Unique identifiers, such as barcodes, can be injected into the droplets previous to, subsequent to, or concurrently with droplet generation, such as via a microcapsule (e.g., bead). Microfluidic channel networks (e.g., on a chip) can be utilized to generate partitions. Alternative mechanisms can also be employed in the partitioning of individual biological particles, including porous membranes through which aqueous mixtures of cells are extruded into non-aqueous fluids.
In some embodiments, barcoded nucleic acid molecules can be initially associated with a microcapsule and then released from the microcapsule. Release of the barcoded nucleic acid molecules can be passive (e.g., by diffusion out of the microcapsule). In addition or alternatively, release from the microcapsule can be upon application of a stimulus which allows the barcoded nucleic acid nucleic acid molecules to dissociate or to be released from the microcapsule. Such stimulus can disrupt the microcapsule, an interaction that couples the barcoded nucleic acid molecules to or within the microcapsule, or both. Such stimulus can include, for example, a thermal stimulus, photo-stimulus, chemical stimulus (e.g., change in pH or use of a reducing agent(s)), a mechanical stimulus, a radiation stimulus; a biological stimulus (e.g., enzyme), or any combination thereof.
In some embodiments, one more barcodes (e.g., spatial barcodes, UMIs, or a combination thereof) can be introduced into a partition as part of the analyte. As described previously, barcodes can be bound to the analyte directly, or can form part of a capture probe or analyte capture agent that is hybridized to, conjugated to, or otherwise associated with an analyte, such that when the analyte is introduced into the partition, the barcode(s) are introduced as well. As described above,
A second fluid 810 that is immiscible with the aqueous fluid 807 (e.g., oil) can be delivered to the junction 806 from each of channel segments 803 and 804. Upon meeting of the aqueous fluid 807 from each of channel segments 801 and 802 and the second fluid 810 from each of channel segments 803 and 804 at the channel junction 806, the aqueous fluid 807 can be partitioned as discrete droplets 811 in the second fluid 810 and flow away from the junction 806 along channel segment 805. The channel segment 805 can deliver the discrete droplets to an outlet reservoir fluidly coupled to the channel segment 805, where they can be harvested.
As an alternative, the channel segments 801 and 802 can meet at another junction upstream of the junction 806. At such junction, beads and biological particles can form a mixture that is directed along another channel to the junction 806 to yield droplets 811. The mixture can provide the beads and biological particles in an alternating fashion, such that, for example, a droplet includes a single bead and a single biological particle, such as a tissue fragment.
The second fluid 810 can include an oil, such as a fluorinated oil, that includes a fluorosurfactant for stabilizing the resulting droplets, for example, inhibiting subsequent coalescence of the resulting droplets 811.
The partitions described herein can include small volumes, for example, less than about 10 microliters (μL), 5 μL, 1 μL, 900 picoliters (μL), 800 μL, 700 μL, 600 μL, 500 μL, 400 μL, 300 μL, 200 μL, 100 μL, 50 μL, 20 μL, 10 μL, 1 μL, 500 nanoliters (nL), 100 nL, 50 nL, or less. In the foregoing discussion, droplets with beads were formed at the junction of different fluid streams. In some embodiments, droplets can be formed by gravity-based partitioning methods.
An aqueous fluid 860 comprising a plurality of particles 856 may be transported along the channel segment 852 into the junction 858 to meet a second fluid 862 (e.g., oil, etc.) that is immiscible with the aqueous fluid 860 in the reservoir 854 to create droplets 864 of the aqueous fluid 860 flowing into the reservoir 854. At the junction 858 where the aqueous fluid 860 and the second fluid 862 meet, droplets can form based on factors such as the hydrodynamic forces at the junction 858, relative flow rates of the two fluids 860, 862, fluid properties, and certain geometric parameters (e.g., Δh, etc.) of the channel structure 850. A plurality of droplets can be collected in the reservoir 854 by continuously injecting the aqueous fluid 860 from the channel segment 852 at the junction 858.
A discrete droplet generated may comprise one or more particles of the plurality of particles 856. As described elsewhere herein, a particle may be any particle, such as a bead, cell bead, gel bead, biological particle, macromolecular constituents of biological particle, or other particles. Alternatively, a discrete droplet generated may not include any particles.
In some instances, the aqueous fluid 860 can have a substantially uniform concentration or frequency of particles 856. As described elsewhere herein, the particles 856 (e.g., beads) can be introduced into the channel segment 852 from a separate channel (not shown in
In some instances, the second fluid 862 may not be subjected to and/or directed to any flow in or out of the reservoir 854. For example, the second fluid 862 may be substantially stationary in the reservoir 854. In some instances, the second fluid 862 may be subjected to flow within the reservoir 854, but not in or out of the reservoir 854, such as via application of pressure to the reservoir 854 and/or as affected by the incoming flow of the aqueous fluid 860 at the junction 858. Alternatively, the second fluid 862 may be subjected and/or directed to flow in or out of the reservoir 854. For example, the reservoir 854 can be a channel directing the second fluid 862 from upstream to downstream, transporting the generated droplets.
The channel structure 850 at or near the junction 858 may have certain geometric features that at least partly determine the volumes and/or shapes of the droplets formed by the channel structure 850. The channel segment 852 can have a first cross-section height, h1, and the reservoir 854 can have a second cross-section height, h2. The first cross-section height, h1, and the second cross-section height, h2, may be different, such that at the junction 858, there is a height difference of Δh. The second cross-section height, h2, may be greater than the first cross-section height, h1. In some instances, the reservoir may thereafter gradually increase in cross-section height, for example, the more distant it is from the junction 858. In some instances, the cross-section height of the reservoir may increase in accordance with expansion angle, (3, at or near the junction 858. The height difference, Δh, and/or expansion angle, (3, can allow the tongue (portion of the aqueous fluid 860 leaving channel segment 852 at junction 858 and entering the reservoir 854 before droplet formation) to increase in depth and facilitate decrease in curvature of the intermediately formed droplet. For example, droplet volume may decrease with increasing height difference and/or increasing expansion angle.
The height difference, Δh, can be at least about 1 μm. Alternatively, the height difference can be at least about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 μm or more. Alternatively, the height difference can be at most about 500, 400, 300, 200, 100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 μm or less. In some instances, the expansion angle, (3, may be between a range of from about 0.5° to about 4°, from about 0.1° to about 10°, or from about 0° to about 90°. For example, the expansion angle can be at least about 0.01°, 0.1°, 0.2°, 0.3°, 0.4°, 0.5°, 0.6°, 0.7°, 0.8°, 0.9°, 1°, 2°, 3°, 4°, 5°, 6°, 7°, 8°, 9°, 10°, 15°, 20°, 25°, 30°, 35°, 40°, 45°, 50°, 55°, 60°, 65°, 70°, 75°, 80°, 85°, or higher. In some instances, the expansion angle can be at most about 89°, 88°, 87°, 86°, 85°, 84°, 83°, 82°, 81°, 80°, 75°, 70°, 65°, 60°, 55°, 50°, 45°, 40°, 35°, 30°, 25°, 20°, 15°, 10°, 9°, 8°, 7°, 6°, 5°, 4°, 3°, 2°, 1°, 0.1°, 0.01°, or less.
In some instances, the flow rate of the aqueous fluid 860 entering the junction 858 can be between about 0.04 microliters (μL)/minute (min) and about 40 μL/min. In some instances, the flow rate of the aqueous fluid 860 entering the junction 858 can be between about 0.01 microliters (μL)/minute (min) and about 100 μL/min. Alternatively, the flow rate of the aqueous fluid 860 entering the junction 858 can be less than about 0.01 μL/min. alternatively, the flow rate of the aqueous fluid 860 entering the junction 858 can be greater than about 40 μL/min, such as 45 μL/min, 50 μL/min, 55 μL/min, 60 μL/min, 65 μL/min, 70 μL/min, 75 μL/min, 80 μL/min, 85 μL/min, 90 μL/min, 95 μL/min, 100 μL/min, 110 μL/min, 120 μL/min, 130 μL/min, 140 μL/min, 150 μL/min, or greater. At lower flow rates, such as flow rates of about less than or equal to 10 microliters/minute, the droplet radius may not be dependent on the flow rate of the aqueous fluid 860 entering the junction 858. The second fluid 862 may be stationary, or substantially stationary, in the reservoir 854. Alternatively, the second fluid 862 may be flowing, such as at the above flow rates described for the aqueous fluid 860.
While
It should be noted that while the example workflow in
By way of example, in the context of analyzing sample RNA as shown in
Within any given partition, all of the cDNA transcripts of the individual mRNA molecules can include a common barcode sequence segment. However, the transcripts made from the different mRNA molecules within a given partition can vary at the unique molecular identifying sequence segment (e.g., UMI segment). Beneficially, even following any subsequent amplification of the contents of a given partition, the number of different UMIs can be indicative of the quantity of mRNA originating from a given partition. As noted above, the transcripts can be amplified, cleaned up and sequenced to identify the sequence of the cDNA transcript of the mRNA, as well as to sequence the barcode segment and the UMI segment. While a poly(T) primer sequence is described, other targeted or random priming sequences can also be used in priming the reverse transcription reaction. Likewise, although described as releasing the barcoded oligonucleotides into the partition, in some cases, the nucleic acid molecules bound to the bead can be used to hybridize and capture the mRNA on the solid phase of the bead, for example, in order to facilitate the separation of the RNA from other cell contents.
In some embodiments, partitions include precursors that include a functional group that is reactive or capable of being activated such that it becomes reactive can be polymerized with other precursors to generate gel beads that include the activated or activatable functional group. The functional group can then be used to attach additional species (e.g., disulfide linkers, primers, other oligonucleotides, etc.) to the gel beads. For example, some precursors featuring a carboxylic acid (COOH) group can co-polymerize with other precursors to form a bead that also includes a COOH functional group. In some cases, acrylic acid (a species comprising free COOH groups), acrylamide, and bis(acryloyl)cystamine can be co-polymerized together to generate a bead with free COOH groups. The COOH groups of the bead can be activated (e.g., via 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) and N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) or 4-(4,6-Dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-methylmorpholinium chloride (DMTMM)) such that they are reactive (e.g., reactive to amine functional groups where EDC/NHS or DMTMM are used for activation). The activated COOH groups can then react with an appropriate species (e.g., a species comprising an amine functional group where the carboxylic acid groups are activated to be reactive with an amine functional group) comprising a moiety to be linked to the bead.
In some embodiments, a bead can be formed from materials that include degradable chemical cross-linkers, such as BAC or cystamine. Degradation of such degradable cross-linkers can be accomplished through a number of mechanisms. In some examples, a bead can be contacted with a chemical degrading agent that can induce oxidation, reduction or other chemical changes. For example, a chemical degrading agent can be a reducing agent, such as dithiothreitol (DTT). Additional examples of reducing agents can include β-mercaptoethanol, (2S)-2-amino-1,4-dimercaptobutane (dithiobutylamine or DTBA), tris(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP), or combinations thereof. A reducing agent can degrade the disulfide bonds formed between gel precursors forming the bead, and thus, degrade the bead.
In some embodiments, beads that are partitioned with the analyte can include different types of oligonucleotides bound to the bead, where the different types of oligonucleotides bind to different types of analytes. For example, a bead can include one or more first oligonucleotides (which can be capture probes, for example) that can bind or hybridize to a first type of analyte, such as mRNA for example, and one or more second oligonucleotides (which can be capture probes, for example) that can bind or hybridize to a second type of analyte, such as gDNA for example. Partitions can also include lysis agents that aid in releasing nucleic acids from the co-partitioned cell, and can also include an agent (e.g., a reducing agent) that can degrade the bead and/or break covalent linkages between the oligonucleotides and the bead, releasing the oligonucleotides into the partition. The released barcoded oligonucleotides (which can also be barcoded) can hybridize with mRNA released from the cell and also with gDNA released from the cell.
Barcoded constructs thus formed from hybridization can include a first type of construct that includes a sequence corresponding to an original barcode sequence from the bead and a sequence corresponding to a transcript from the cell, and a second type of construct that includes a sequence corresponding to the original barcode sequence from the bead and a sequence corresponding to genomic DNA from the cell. The barcoded constructs can then be released/removed from the partition and, in some embodiments, further processed to add any additional sequences. The resulting constructs can then be sequenced, the sequencing data processed, and the results used to spatially characterize the mRNA and the gDNA from the cell.
In another example, a partition includes a bead that includes a first type of oligonucleotide (e.g., a first capture probe) with a first barcode sequence, a poly(T) capture sequence that can hybridize with the poly(A) tail of an mRNA transcript, and a UMI barcode sequence that can uniquely identify a given transcript. The bead also includes a second type of oligonucleotide (e.g., a second capture probe) with a second barcode sequence, a targeted priming sequence that is capable of specifically hybridizing with a third barcoded oligonucleotide (e.g., an analyte capture agent) coupled to an antibody that is bound to the surface of the partitioned cell. The third barcoded oligonucleotide includes a UMI barcode sequence that uniquely identifies the antibody (and thus, the particular cell surface feature to which it is bound).
In some instances, a partition described herein further includes one or more beads (e.g. any of the beads described herein) that can be delivered into the partition via any of the methods provided herein. The beads can be barcoded or non-barcoded. In some instances, the beads include a capture probe (e.g., any of the capture probes described herein), which can bind to a biological analyte (e.g., any of the biological analytes described herein) in the tissue section within the partition. In some instances, a partition of the plurality of partitions described herein further includes an analyte capture agent capable of binding to a biological analyte in the tissue section within the partition. Analysis of the captured analytes can be carried out according to any of the methods provided herein. Multiple analytes in a tissue section within a partition can be analyzed in parallel. For example, a bead with capture probes capable of binding to different biological analytes can be included in the partition. In some embodiments, the analytes are of the same type (e.g., the analytes can be RNA, e.g., mRNAs). In some embodiments, the analytes are of two or more types (e.g., RNA, DNA, and/or proteins can be analyzed in parallel).
The partitions can also include additional agents, such as but not limited to, lysis agents that aid in releasing biological analytes from the tissue section, DNase and RNase inactivating agents or inhibitors, such as proteinase K, chelating agents, such as EDTA, and/or other reagents employed in removing or otherwise reducing negative activity or impact of different cell lysate components on subsequent processing of nucleic acids. Additionally or alternatively, reagents that can also be co-partitioned include, without limitation, endonucleases to fragment DNA, DNA polymerase enzymes and/or dNTPs used to amplify nucleic acid fragments and to attach the barcode molecular tags to the amplified fragments. Additionally or alternatively, reagents that can also be co-partitioned include, without limitation, reverse transcriptase enzymes, including enzymes with terminal transferase activity, primers and oligonucleotides, and/or switch oligonucleotides (also referred to herein as “switch oligos” or “template switching oligonucleotides”) which can be used for template switching.
In some instances, methods provided herein include staining the tissue section using any of the suitable staining techniques described herein or known in the art (e.g., IHC, IF, or chemical staining). For instance, a partition containing a tissue section can be deposited into one or more staining solutions, where the tissue section is exposed to staining reagents. The partition can be incubated in the staining solutions for a period of time sufficient to allow the staining agent to contact and stain the tissue section. A plurality of partitions can be processed together. For instance, multiple partitions can be deposited into the same staining solution at one time. In some instances, at least 10 (e.g., at least 20, 50, 80, 120, 160, 200, 300, or 500) partitions can be processed in parallel.
Staining the tissue section in a partition can include labeling biological analytes in the tissue section with a detectable label (e.g., an optical label). Any suitable optical labels can be used in methods provided herein, including but not limited to, fluorescent, radioactive, chemiluminescent, calorimetric, and/or colorimetric detectable labels. In some instances, methods provided herein include staining the tissue section and labeling two or more (e.g., 3 or more, 5 or more, 8 or more, or 12 or more) biological analytes in the tissue section with an optical label. The biological analytes can be any suitable biological analytes described herein, e.g., RNA, DNA, or protein. The material encapsulating the tissue section within a partition can be substantially transparent to allow detection of the optical labels attached to the biological analytes in the tissue section.
(ii) Microscopy and Analysis
In some instances, methods provided herein further include imaging the tissue section within a partition. The tissue section can be removed from the partition prior to imaging, or can be retained in the partition for imaging. Any suitable imaging techniques described herein are contemplated, including brightfield and fluorescence modalities, using a variety of different techniques, e.g., expansion microscopy, bright field microscopy, dark field microscopy, phase contrast microscopy, electron microscopy, fluorescence microscopy, reflection microscopy, interference microscopy, confocal microscopy, and visual identification (e.g., by eye), and combinations thereof. In some instances, the partitions are subjected to capillary microscopy. In some instances, the partitions are subjected to FACS sorting.
Methods provided herein can further include, prior to imaging the tissue section, depositing the partition containing the tissue section on a substrate (e.g., any of the variety of substrates described herein). For instance, the substrate can be a multi-well plate where one well is configured to accommodate one partition. The substrate can be a glass slide, where one partition is deposited on one slide. The substrate can be positively charged to aid in attachment of the partition. In some instances, the partition is attached to the substrate via a chemical linker. The partition can be attached to the substrate reversibly or irreversibly, depending upon the nature of the partition and subsequent steps in the analytical method. In some instances, upon placement on the substrate having a flat surface, the tissue section within the partition unfolds to be substantially flat.
The material encapsulating the tissue section can be removed after the partition is deposited on the substrate. In some embodiments, removing the material encapsulating the tissue section facilitates unfolding of the tissue section onto the substrate and/or in imaging analysis. As an example, for hydrogel macrobeads containing tissue sections, the hydrogel can be removed after the macrobeads are deposited onto the substrate. The hydrogel macrobeads described herein can include an event-dependent (e.g., light-dependent or chemical-dependent) depolymerizing hydrogel, wherein upon application of the event (e.g., external stimuli) the hydrogel depolymerizes. In some examples, the hydrogel macrobeads can include a DTT-sensitive hydrogel, where addition of DTT can cause the hydrogel to depolymerize and release the tissue section.
Upon depositing the partition on a substrate, the methods may further include applying heat to the substrate, e.g., facilitating the tissue section to unfold onto the substrate for imaging analysis. Heat can be applied to the entire substrate or portions of the substrate. For instance, heat can be applied to a portion of the substrate corresponding to the location of the partition, e.g., directly underneath the partition.
D. Compositions and Kits
In some embodiments, also provided herein are kits that include one or more reagents to prepare a spatial array as described herein. In some instances, the kit includes a polymer solution comprising a hydrogel; a container for the polymer solution; one or more non-aqueous droplets; one or more compositions to manipulate the biological sample; and instructions to perform the methods disclosed herein. In some embodiments, the kits can include one or more enzymes for performing any of the methods described herein, including but not limited to, a DNA polymerase, a reverse transcriptase, a ligase, an endonuclease, a protease, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, a non-limiting example of a kit used to perform any of the methods described herein includes: (a) a polymer solution comprising a hydrogel; (b) a container for the polymer solution; (c) one or more non-aqueous droplets to partition a biological sample comprising an analyte; (d) one or more compositions to manipulate the biological sample, wherein the one or more compositions are selected from the group consisting of: (i) a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality comprises (i) a spatial barcode and (ii) a capture domain that binds to a sequence present in the analyte; (ii) a plurality of analyte capture agents, wherein an analyte capture agent of the plurality of analyte capture agents comprises: (1) an analyte binding moiety that binds to the analyte; (2) an analyte binding moiety barcode that uniquely identifies an interaction between the analyte and the analyte binding moiety; and (3) an analyte capture sequence, wherein the analyte capture sequence binds to a capture domain; and (iii) a protein-binding molecule for immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry; and (e) instructions for performing any of the methods disclosed herein.
In another aspect, this disclosure includes compositions that includes (a) a biological sample embedded in a polymer solution; (b) a non-aqueous droplet, wherein the non-aqueous droplet surrounds the biological sample; (c) one or more compositions to manipulate the biological sample, wherein the one or more compositions are selected from the group consisting of: (i) a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality comprises (i) a spatial barcode and (ii) a capture domain that binds to a sequence present in the analyte; (ii) a plurality of analyte capture agents, wherein an analyte capture agent of the plurality of analyte capture agents comprises: (1) an analyte binding moiety that binds to the analyte; (2) an analyte binding moiety barcode that uniquely identifies an interaction between the analyte and the analyte binding moiety; and (3) an analyte capture sequence, wherein the analyte capture sequence binds to a capture domain; and (iii) a protein-binding molecule for immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry; and (d) a substrate comprising a plurality of probes that is capable of detecting the analyte, the capture probe, or the analyte capture agent.
In some embodiments, the compositions also include an analyte bound to the first and/or second capture probes. In some embodiments, the composition also includes an analyte bound to the first and/or second capture probes, where the capture probe has been extended using the captured analyte as a template (e.g., as a template in a nucleic acid extension reaction).
This example provides an exemplary method for partitioning a biological sample for manipulation and analysis. Referring to
A tissue section is then contacted with one or more compositions that can associate with an analyte in the biological sample. For instance, the tissue section is contacted with (1) a plurality of capture probes that hybridize to one or more mRNA molecules in the tissue section; (2) a plurality of analyte capture agents that associate with one or more proteins in a tissue section; or (3) a protein binding agent that can be identified using immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence.
After manipulation of the tissue sections, the sections 907 are transferred to a substrate like a glass slide, a slide with wells, etc. 906, where the tissues if they are folded can unfold and be imaged using microscopy techniques 910. Alternatively, the tissues sections are placed in a capillary system 908 and imaged individually 909. After removing the tissue sections from the vial and imaging the tissue sections, the location and abundance of an analyte can be determined using analysis described herein 911.
It is to be understood that while the invention has been described in conjunction with the detailed description thereof, the foregoing description is intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications are within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/975,168, filed Feb. 11, 2020. This application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4683195 | Mullis | Jul 1987 | A |
4683202 | Mullis | Jul 1987 | A |
4800159 | Mullis | Jan 1989 | A |
4883867 | Lee | Nov 1989 | A |
4965188 | Mullis | Oct 1990 | A |
5002882 | Lunnen | Mar 1991 | A |
5130238 | Malek | Jul 1992 | A |
5308751 | Ohkawa | May 1994 | A |
5321130 | Yue | Jun 1994 | A |
5410030 | Yue | Apr 1995 | A |
5436134 | Haugland | Jul 1995 | A |
5455166 | Walker | Oct 1995 | A |
5494810 | Barany et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5503980 | Cantor | Apr 1996 | A |
5512439 | Hornes | Apr 1996 | A |
5512462 | Cheng | Apr 1996 | A |
5582977 | Yue | Dec 1996 | A |
5599675 | Brenner | Feb 1997 | A |
5641658 | Adams | Jun 1997 | A |
5648245 | Fire et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658751 | Yue | Aug 1997 | A |
5750341 | Macevicz | May 1998 | A |
5763175 | Brenner | Jun 1998 | A |
5830711 | Barany et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837832 | Chee et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5854033 | Lizardi | Dec 1998 | A |
5863753 | Haugland | Jan 1999 | A |
5871921 | Landegren et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5912148 | Eggerding | Jun 1999 | A |
6013440 | Lipshutz | Jan 2000 | A |
6027889 | Barany et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6060240 | Kamb et al. | May 2000 | A |
6130073 | Eggerding | Oct 2000 | A |
6143496 | Brown | Nov 2000 | A |
6153389 | Haarer | Nov 2000 | A |
6165714 | Lane et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6210891 | Nyren | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6210894 | Brennan | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214587 | Dattagupta | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6258568 | Nyren | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266459 | Walt | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274320 | Rothberg | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6300063 | Lipshutz et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309824 | Drmanac | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6344316 | Lockhart | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355431 | Chee | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368801 | Faruqi | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6401267 | Drmanac | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404907 | Gilchrist | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6432360 | Church et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6503713 | Rana | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506561 | Cheval et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6544732 | Chee | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6620584 | Chee | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632641 | Brennan | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6737236 | Pieken et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6770441 | Dickinson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6773886 | Kaufman | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787308 | Balasubramanian | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800453 | Labaer | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812005 | Fan et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6828100 | Ronaghi | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6833246 | Balasubramanian | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6859570 | Walt | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6864052 | Drmanac | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6897023 | Fu | May 2005 | B2 |
6942968 | Dickinson et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7057026 | Barnes | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7115400 | Adessi | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7118883 | Inoue | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7166431 | Chee et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7211414 | Hardin | May 2007 | B2 |
7255994 | Lao | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258976 | Mitsuhashi | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7297518 | Quake | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7329492 | Hardin | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7361488 | Fan et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7378242 | Hurt | May 2008 | B2 |
7393665 | Brenner | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7405281 | Xu | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7407757 | Brenner | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7537897 | Brenner | May 2009 | B2 |
7563576 | Chee | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7582420 | Oliphant et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601498 | Mao | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7635566 | Brenner | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7674752 | He | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7709198 | Luo et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7776547 | Roth | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776567 | Mao | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7803943 | Mao | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7910304 | Drmanac | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7955794 | Shen et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7960119 | Chee | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8003354 | Shen et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8148068 | Brenner | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8206917 | Chee | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8288103 | Oliphant | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8343500 | Wraith | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8460865 | Chee | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8481257 | Van Eijk | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8603743 | Liu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8604182 | Luo et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8815512 | Van Eijk | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8835358 | Fodor | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8911945 | Van Eijk | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8951726 | Luo et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9062348 | Van Eijk | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9194001 | Brenner | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9290808 | Fodor | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9290809 | Fodor | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9328383 | Van Eijk | May 2016 | B2 |
9334536 | Van Eijk | May 2016 | B2 |
9371598 | Chee | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9404156 | Hicks | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9506061 | Brown et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9593365 | Frisen et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9644204 | Hindson et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9694361 | Bharadwaj | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9702004 | Van Eijk | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9727810 | Fodor et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9777324 | Van Eijk | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9783841 | Nolan et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9834814 | Peter et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9850536 | Oliphant et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9868979 | Chee et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9879313 | Chee et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9902950 | Church et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10002316 | Fodor et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10011872 | Belgrader et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10023907 | Van Eijk | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10030261 | Frisen et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10041949 | Bendall et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10059990 | Boyden et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10208982 | Bannish et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10266876 | Cai et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10267808 | Cai | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10273541 | Hindson et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10357771 | Bharadwaj | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10472669 | Chee | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10480022 | Chee | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10480029 | Bent et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10494667 | Chee | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10550429 | Harada et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10590244 | Delaney et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10724078 | Van Driel et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10725027 | Bell | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10774372 | Chee et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10774374 | Frisen et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10787701 | Chee | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10858702 | Lucero et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10872679 | Cai et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10913975 | So et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10914730 | Chee et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10927403 | Chee et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10961566 | Chee | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11008607 | Chee | May 2021 | B2 |
11008608 | Samusik et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11046996 | Chee et al. | Jun 2021 | B1 |
11067567 | Chee | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11156603 | Chee | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11162132 | Frisen et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11208684 | Chee | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11286515 | Chee et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11293917 | Chee | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11299774 | Frisen et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11313856 | Chee | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11332790 | Chell et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11352659 | Frisen et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11352667 | Hauling et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11359228 | Chee et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11365442 | Chee | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11371086 | Chee | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11384386 | Chee | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11390912 | Frisen et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11401545 | Chee | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11407992 | Dadhwal | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11408029 | Katiraee et al. | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11434524 | Ramachandran Iyer et al. | Sep 2022 | B2 |
11479809 | Frisen et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
11479810 | Chee | Oct 2022 | B1 |
11492612 | Dadhwal | Nov 2022 | B1 |
11505828 | Chell et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11512308 | Gallant et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11519022 | Chee | Dec 2022 | B2 |
11519033 | Schnall-Levin et al. | Dec 2022 | B2 |
11519138 | Meier et al. | Dec 2022 | B2 |
11530438 | Persson et al. | Dec 2022 | B2 |
11535887 | Gallant et al. | Dec 2022 | B2 |
11542543 | Chee | Jan 2023 | B2 |
11549138 | Chee | Jan 2023 | B2 |
11560587 | Chee | Jan 2023 | B2 |
11560592 | Chew et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
11560593 | Chell et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
11592447 | Uytingco et al. | Feb 2023 | B2 |
11608498 | Gallant et al. | Mar 2023 | B2 |
11608520 | Galonska et al. | Mar 2023 | B2 |
11613773 | Frisen et al. | Mar 2023 | B2 |
11618897 | Kim et al. | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11618918 | Chee et al. | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11624063 | Dadhwal | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11624086 | Uytingco et al. | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11634756 | Chee | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11649485 | Yin et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
11661626 | Katiraee et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
11680260 | Kim et al. | Jun 2023 | B2 |
11692218 | Engblom et al. | Jul 2023 | B2 |
11702693 | Bharadwaj | Jul 2023 | B2 |
11702698 | Stoeckius | Jul 2023 | B2 |
20020040275 | Cravatt | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020164611 | Bamdad | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030017451 | Wang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022207 | Balasubramanian | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030087232 | Christians | May 2003 | A1 |
20030148335 | Shen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030162216 | Gold | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030224419 | Corcoran | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232348 | Jones et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232382 | Brennan | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040033499 | Ilsley et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040067492 | Peng et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096853 | Mayer | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106110 | Balasubramanian | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050037393 | Gunderson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050048580 | Labaer | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050100900 | Kawashima et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050130173 | Leamon et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136414 | Gunderson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050191656 | Drmanac et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050191698 | Chee et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202433 | Van Beuningen | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227271 | Kwon | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050260653 | LaBaer | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060046313 | Roth | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060211001 | Yu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216775 | Burkart et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060263789 | Kincaid | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070020640 | McCloskey et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070054288 | Su et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070099208 | Drmanac et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070128624 | Gormley et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070128656 | Agrawal | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070172873 | Brenner et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070207482 | Church et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070254305 | Paik et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070269805 | Hogers | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080009420 | Schroth et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080108804 | Hayashizaki et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080160580 | Adessi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080220434 | Thomas | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080261204 | Lexow | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080286795 | Kawashima et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090005252 | Drmanac et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006002 | Honisch et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018024 | Church et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090026082 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090082212 | Williams | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099041 | Church et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105959 | Braverman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090117573 | Fu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090127589 | Rothberg et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090155781 | Drmanac et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090233802 | Bignell et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090253581 | Van Eijk et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090289184 | Deininger | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090291854 | Weisinger-Mayr et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090312193 | Kim et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100035249 | Hayashizaki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100105112 | Heltze et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100120097 | Matz et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100120098 | Grunenwald et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100145037 | Brive et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110028685 | Purkayastha et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110059436 | Hardin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110223613 | Gut | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245111 | Chee | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120135871 | Van Eijk et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120202698 | Van Eijk et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130171621 | Luo et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140065609 | Hicks et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140066318 | Frisen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140155295 | Hindson et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140270435 | Dunn | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274731 | Raymond et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140323330 | Glezer et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140378350 | Hindson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150000854 | Gann-Fetter et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150292988 | Bharadwaj et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150344942 | Frisen et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160108458 | Frei et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160138091 | Chee et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160145677 | Chee et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160253584 | Fodor et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160289669 | Fan et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160289740 | Fu et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160298180 | Chee | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170016053 | Beechem et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170029875 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170067096 | Wassie et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170089811 | Tillberg et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170220733 | Zhuang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170241911 | Rockel et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170242020 | Yamauchi et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170343545 | Hadrup et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180051322 | Church et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180057873 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180105808 | Mikkelsen et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180112261 | Van Driel et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180114316 | Lele et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180201980 | Chee et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180216161 | Chen et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180216162 | Belhocine et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180245142 | So et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180251825 | Stoeckius et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180282803 | Belgrader et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180291439 | Van Eijk et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180305681 | Jovanovich et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180346970 | Chang | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190055594 | Samusik et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190064173 | Bharadwaj et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190085324 | Regev et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190085383 | Church et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190161796 | Hauling et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190177777 | Chee | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190177778 | Chee | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190177789 | Hindson et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190177800 | Boutet et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190194709 | Church et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190203275 | Frisen et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190233878 | Delaney et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190249226 | Bent et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190262831 | West et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190264268 | Frisen et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190271030 | Chee | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190271031 | Chee | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190300943 | Chee et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190300944 | Chee et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190300945 | Chee et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190309353 | Chee | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190309354 | Chee | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190309355 | Chee | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190323071 | Chee | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190323088 | Boutet et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190330617 | Church et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190338353 | Belgrader et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190352708 | Gaige et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190367969 | Belhocine et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190367982 | Belhocine et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190367997 | Bent et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200002763 | Belgrader et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200002764 | Belgrader et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200024641 | Nolan et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200047010 | Lee et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200048690 | Chee | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200063191 | Bent et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200063195 | Chee | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200063196 | Chee | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200071751 | Daugharthy et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200080136 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200109443 | Chee | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200224244 | Nilsson et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200239946 | Dewal | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200256867 | Hennek et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200277663 | Iyer | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200277664 | Frenz | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200299757 | Chee et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200325531 | Chee | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200370095 | Farmer et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200399687 | Frisen et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200407781 | Schnall-Levin | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210010068 | Chee et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210010070 | Schnall-Levin et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210095331 | Fan et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210123040 | Macosko et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210140982 | Uytingco et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210150707 | Weisenfeld et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210155982 | Yin et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210158522 | Weisenfeld et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210172007 | Chee et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210189475 | Tentori et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210190770 | Delaney et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210198741 | Williams | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210199660 | Williams et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210207202 | Chee | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210214785 | Stoeckius | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210222235 | Chee | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210222241 | Bharadwaj | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210222242 | Ramachandran Iyer | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210222253 | Uytingco | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210223227 | Stoeckius | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210230584 | Mikkelsen et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210230681 | Patterson et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210230692 | Daugharthy et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210238664 | Bava et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210237022 | Bava | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210238581 | Mikkelsen et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210238675 | Bava et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210238680 | Bava | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210255175 | Chee et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210262018 | Bava et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210262019 | Alvarado Martinez et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210269864 | Chee | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210270822 | Chee | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210285036 | Yin et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210285046 | Chell et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210292748 | Frisen et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210292822 | Frisen et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210317510 | Chee et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210317524 | Lucero et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210324457 | Ramachandran Iyer et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210332424 | Schnall-Levin | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210332425 | Pfeiffer et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210348221 | Chell et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20220002791 | Frisen et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220003755 | Chee | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220010367 | Ramachandran Iyer et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220017951 | Ramachandran Iyer et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220025446 | Shah | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220025447 | Tentori et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220033888 | Schnall-Levin et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220049293 | Frenz et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220064630 | Bent et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220081728 | Williams | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220090058 | Frisen et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220090175 | Uytingco et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220090181 | Gallant et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220098576 | Dadhwal | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220098661 | Chew et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220106632 | Galonska et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220106633 | Engblom et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220112486 | Ramachandran Iyer et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220112545 | Chee | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220119869 | Ramachandran Iyer et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220127659 | Frisen et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220127666 | Katiraee et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220127672 | Stoeckius | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220145361 | Frenz et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220154255 | Chee et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220170083 | Khaled et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220195422 | Gallant et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220195505 | Frisen et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220196644 | Chee | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220213526 | Frisen et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20220241780 | Tentori et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220267844 | Ramachandran Iyer et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220282329 | Chell et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220290217 | Frenz et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220290219 | Chee | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220298560 | Frisen et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220315984 | Edelman et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220325325 | Chee et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220326251 | Uytingco et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220333171 | Chee | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220333191 | Mikkelsen et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220333192 | Uytingco | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220333195 | Schnall-Levin et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220334031 | Delaney et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220348905 | Dadhwal | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220348992 | Stoeckius et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220356464 | Kim et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220364163 | Stahl et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220389491 | Chee | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20220389503 | Mikkelsen et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20220389504 | Chew et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20220403374 | Soumillon | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20220403455 | Ramachandran Iyer et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20220404245 | Chell et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20230002812 | Stoeckius et al. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230014008 | Shastry | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230033960 | Gallant et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230034039 | Shahjamali | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230034216 | Bava | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230040363 | Chee | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230042088 | Chee | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230042817 | Mignardi | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230047782 | Tentori et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230056549 | Dadhwal | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230064372 | Chell et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230069046 | Chew et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230077364 | Patterson et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230080543 | Katiraee et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230081381 | Chew et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230100497 | Frisen et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230107023 | Chee | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230111225 | Chew et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230113230 | Kim et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230126825 | Nagendran et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230129552 | Ramachandran Iyer | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230135010 | Tentori et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230143569 | Iyer et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230145575 | Gallant et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230147726 | Hadrup et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230151412 | Chee | May 2023 | A1 |
20230159994 | Chee | May 2023 | A1 |
20230159995 | Iyer et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230160008 | Chell et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230175045 | Katsori et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230183785 | Frisen et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230194469 | Tentori et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230194470 | Kim et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230203478 | Kim et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230183684 | Gallant et al. | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230212650 | Chew et al. | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230212655 | Chee | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230220368 | Kim | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230220454 | Bent | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230220455 | Galonska | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230227811 | Dadhwal | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230228762 | Uytingco et al. | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230242973 | Frisen et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230242976 | Tentori et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1680604 | Oct 2005 | CN |
1923471 | May 2008 | EP |
2002017 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2831465 | Jun 2015 | EP |
3013984 | May 2016 | EP |
3511423 | Jul 2019 | EP |
3541956 | Sep 2019 | EP |
2270254 | Feb 2006 | RU |
WO 1989010977 | Nov 1989 | WO |
WO 1991006678 | May 1991 | WO |
WO 1995025116 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 1995035505 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 200017390 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 2000024940 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 2002024952 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 2002059355 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 2002077283 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2003002979 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2003010176 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 2005007814 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2006117541 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007073171 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007076726 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007145612 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2009032167 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009152928 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2010126614 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 2011008502 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011068088 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2011094669 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2012048341 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012083225 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO 2012159089 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 2013123442 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO 2013131962 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 2013138510 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 2013150082 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2013150083 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2014060483 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO 2014210223 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO 2014210225 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO 2014210353 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO 2015031691 | Mar 2015 | WO |
WO 2016040476 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO 2016057552 | Apr 2016 | WO |
WO 2016126871 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2016138496 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO 2016138500 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO 2016166128 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO 2016168825 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO 2017019456 | Feb 2017 | WO |
WO 2017075265 | May 2017 | WO |
WO 2017075293 | May 2017 | WO |
WO 2017096158 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO 2017147483 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO 2018064640 | Apr 2018 | WO |
WO 2018075693 | Apr 2018 | WO |
WO 2018091676 | May 2018 | WO |
WO 2019104337 | May 2019 | WO |
WO 2019113457 | Jun 2019 | WO |
WO 2019113533 | Jun 2019 | WO |
WO 2019213254 | Nov 2019 | WO |
WO 2019213294 | Nov 2019 | WO |
WO 2020028194 | Feb 2020 | WO |
WO 2020047002 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO 2020047005 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO 2020047010 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO 2020053655 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO 2020061064 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO 2020061066 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO 2020061108 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO 2020076979 | Apr 2020 | WO |
WO 2020077236 | Apr 2020 | WO |
WO 2020099640 | May 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123301 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123305 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123309 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123311 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123316 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123317 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123318 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123319 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123320 | Jul 2020 | WO |
WO 2020160044 | Aug 2020 | WO |
WO 2020167862 | Aug 2020 | WO |
WO 2020176788 | Sep 2020 | WO |
WO 2020176882 | Sep 2020 | WO |
WO 2020190509 | Sep 2020 | WO |
WO 2020198071 | Oct 2020 | WO |
WO 2020206285 | Oct 2020 | WO |
WO 2020219901 | Oct 2020 | WO |
WO 2020243579 | Dec 2020 | WO |
WO 2021041974 | Mar 2021 | WO |
WO 2021067246 | Apr 2021 | WO |
WO 2021067514 | Apr 2021 | WO |
WO 2021091611 | May 2021 | WO |
WO 2021092433 | May 2021 | WO |
WO 2021097255 | May 2021 | WO |
WO 2021102003 | May 2021 | WO |
WO 2021102005 | May 2021 | WO |
WO 2021102039 | May 2021 | WO |
WO 2021116715 | Jun 2021 | WO |
WO 2021133842 | Jul 2021 | WO |
WO 2021133845 | Jul 2021 | WO |
WO 2021133849 | Jul 2021 | WO |
WO 2021142233 | Jul 2021 | WO |
WO 2021168261 | Aug 2021 | WO |
WO 2021168278 | Aug 2021 | WO |
WO 2021207610 | Oct 2021 | WO |
WO 2021216708 | Oct 2021 | WO |
WO 2021225900 | Nov 2021 | WO |
WO 2021236625 | Nov 2021 | WO |
WO 2021236929 | Nov 2021 | WO |
WO 2021237056 | Nov 2021 | WO |
WO 2021237087 | Nov 2021 | WO |
WO 2021242834 | Dec 2021 | WO |
WO 2021247543 | Dec 2021 | WO |
WO 2021247568 | Dec 2021 | WO |
WO 2021252499 | Dec 2021 | WO |
WO 2021252576 | Dec 2021 | WO |
WO 2021252591 | Dec 2021 | WO |
WO 2021252747 | Dec 2021 | WO |
WO 2021263111 | Dec 2021 | WO |
WO 2022025965 | Feb 2022 | WO |
WO 2022060798 | Mar 2022 | WO |
WO 2022060953 | Mar 2022 | WO |
WO 2022061152 | Mar 2022 | WO |
WO 2022087273 | Apr 2022 | WO |
WO 2022099037 | May 2022 | WO |
WO 2022103712 | May 2022 | WO |
WO 2022109181 | May 2022 | WO |
WO 2022140028 | Jun 2022 | WO |
WO 2022147005 | Jul 2022 | WO |
WO 2022147296 | Jul 2022 | WO |
WO 2022164615 | Aug 2022 | WO |
WO 2022178267 | Aug 2022 | WO |
WO 2022198068 | Sep 2022 | WO |
WO 2022221425 | Oct 2022 | WO |
WO 2022226057 | Oct 2022 | WO |
WO 2022236054 | Nov 2022 | WO |
WO 2022256503 | Dec 2022 | WO |
WO 2022271820 | Dec 2022 | WO |
WO 2023287765 | Jan 2023 | WO |
WO 2023018799 | Feb 2023 | WO |
WO 2023034489 | Mar 2023 | WO |
WO 2023076345 | May 2023 | WO |
WO 2023086880 | May 2023 | WO |
WO 2023102118 | Jun 2023 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Burgess, “Spatial transcriptomics coming of age,” Nat Rev Genet., Jun. 2019, 20(6):317, 1 page. |
Hughes et al., “Highly Efficient, Massively-Parallel Single-Cell RNA-Seq Reveals Cellular States and Molecular Features of Human Skin Pathology,” bioRxiv, Jul. 2019, 51 pages. |
10xGenomics.com, [online], “Visium Spatial Gene Expression Reagents Kits—Tissue Optimization,” Nov. 2019, retrieved from URL<https://assets.ctfassets.net/an68im79xiti/4q03w6959AJFxffSw5lee9/6a2ac61cf6388a72564eeb96bc294967/CG000238_VisiumSpatialTissueOptimizationUserGuide_Rev_A.pdf>, 46 pages. |
Hamaguchi et al., “Direct reverse transcription—PCR on oligo(dT)-immobilized polypropylene microplates after capturing total mRNA from crude cell lysates,” Clin Chem., Nov. 1998, 44(11):2256-63. |
Hayes et al., “Electrophoresis of proteins and nucleic acids: I-Theory,” BMJ, Sep. 1989, 299(6703):843-6. |
[No Author Listed], “Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3′ Reagent Kits V3.1,” User Guide, Document No. CG000204, 10X Genomics, Nov. 2019, 58 pages. |
[No Author Listed], “HuSNP Mapping Assay User's Manual,” Affymetrix Part No. 90094 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, Calif.), GeneChip, 2000, 104 pages. |
[No Author Listed], “Microarray technologies have excellent possibilities in genomics-related researches,” Science Tools From Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, 1998, 3(4): 8 pages (with English Translation). |
10xGenonmics.com, [online], “Visium Spatial Gene Expression Reagent Kits—User Guide,” Jun. 2020, retrieved on May 25, 2021, retrieved from URL<https://assets.ctfassets.net/an68im79xiti/3GGIfH3RWpd1bFVha1pexR/8baa08d9007157592b65b2cdc7130990/CG000239_VisiumSpatialGeneExpression_UserGuide_RevD.pdf>, 70 pages. |
10xGenonmics.com, [online], “Visium Spatial Gene Expression Reagent Kits—Tissue Optimization—User Guide,” Jul. 2020, retrieved on May 25, 2021, retrieved from URL<https://assets.ctfassets.net/an68im79xiti/5UJrN0cH17rEk0UXwdl9It/e54d99fb08a8f1500aba503005a04a56/CG000238_VisiumSpatialTissueOptimizationUserGuide_RevD.pdf>, 43 pages. |
Adessi et al., “Solid phase DNA amplification: characterisation of primer attachment and amplification mechanisms,” Nucl. Acids Res, 2000, 28(20):E87, 8 pages. |
Affymetrix, “GeneChip Human Genome U133 Set,” retrieved from the Internet: on the World Wide Web at affymetrix.com/support/technical/datasheets/hgu133_datasheet.pdf, retrieved on Feb. 26, 2003, 2 pages. |
Affymetrix, “Human Genome U95Av2,” Internet Citation, retrieved from the internet: on the World Wide Web affymetrix.com, retrieved on Oct. 2, 2002, 1 page. |
Albretsen et al., “Applications of magnetic beads with covalently attached oligonucleotides in hybridization: Isolation and detection of specific measles virus mRNA from a crude cell lysate,” Anal. Biochem., 1990, 189(1):40-50. |
Allawi et al., “Thermodynamics and NMR of Internal GaT Mismatches in DNA,” Biochemistry, 1996, 36(34): 10581-10594. |
Anderson et al., “Microarrayed Compound Screening to Identify Activators and Inhibitors of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase,” J. of Biomolecular Screening, 2004, 9:112. |
Andersson et al., “Analysis of protein expression in cell microarrays: a tool for antibody-based proteomics.,” J Histochem Cytochem., 4(12): 1413-1423, 2006. |
Armani et al, “2D-PCR: a method of mapping DNA in tissue sections,” Lab Chip, 2009, 9(24):3526-34. |
Atkinson et al., “An Updated Protocol for High Throughput Plant Tissue Sectioning,” Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8:1721, 8 pages. |
Atkinson, “Overview of Translation: Lecture Manuscript,” U of Texas, 2000, DD, pp. 6.1-6.8. |
Bains et al., “A novel method for nucleic acid sequence determination,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1988, 135(3), 303-7. |
Barnes, “PCR amplification of up to 35-kb DNA with high fidelity and high yield from lambda bacteriophage templates,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 1994, 91(6): 2216-2220. |
Bartosovic et al., “Single-cell CUT&Tag profiles histone modifications and transcription factors in complex tissues,” Nat Biotechnol., Jul. 2021, 39(7):825-835, Abstract. |
Beattie et al., “Advances in genosensor research,” Clin Chem., May 1995, 41(5):700-6. |
Beechem et al., “High-Plex Spatially Resolved RNA and Protein Detection Using Digital Spatial Profiling: A Technology Designed for Immuno-oncology Biomarker Discovery and Translational Research,” Methods Mol Biol, 2020, Chapter 25, 2055:563-583. |
Bielas et al., “Quantification of random genomic mutations,” Nat. Methods, 2005, 2(4):285-290. |
Birney et al., “Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project,” Nature, 2007, 447(7146): 799-816. |
Blanchard et al., “High-density oligonucleotide arrays,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 1996, 11(6- 7):687-690. |
Blokzijl et al., “Profiling protein expression and interactions: proximity ligation as a tool for personalized medicine,” J Intern. Med., 2010, 268(3):232-245. |
Blow, “Tissue Issues,” Nature, 2007, 448(7156):959-962. |
Brandon et al., “Mitochondrial mutations in cancer,” Oncogene, 2006, 25(34):4647-4662. |
Brenner et al., “Gene expression analysis by massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) on microbead arrays,” Nat. Biotech., 2000, 18(6):630-634. |
Brenner et al., “In vitro cloning of complex mixtures of DNA on microbeads: physical separation of differentially expressed cDNAs,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2000, 97(4): 1665-1670. |
Brow, “35—The Cleavase I enzyme for mutation and polymorphism scanning,” PCR Applications Protocols for Functional Genomics, 1999, pp. 537-550. |
Brown et al., “Retroviral integration: structure of the initial covalent product and its precursor, and a role for the viral IN protein,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, Apr. 1989, 86(8):2525-9. |
Buenrostro et al., “Transposition of native chromatin for multimodal regulatory analysis and personal epigenomics,” Nat Methods, Dec. 2013, 10(12):1213-1218. |
Bullard et al., “Direct comparison of nick-joining activity of the nucleic acid ligases from bacteriophage T4,” Biochem. J. 2006, 398(1):135-144. |
Burgess, “A space for transcriptomics,” Nature Reviews Genetics, 2016, 17(8):436-7. |
Burgess, “Finding structure in gene expression,” Nature Reviews Genetics, 2018, 19(5):249, 1 page. |
Burton et al., “Coverslip Mounted-Immersion Cycled in Situ RT-PCR for the Localization of mRNA in Tissue Sections,” Biotechniques, 1998, 24(1): 92-100. |
Butler et al., “Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species,” Nat Biotechnol., Jun. 2018, 36(5):411-420. |
Cha et al., “Specificity, efficiency, and fidelity of PCR,” Genome Res., 1993, 3(3):S18-29. |
Chandra et al., “Cell-free synthesis-based protein microarrays and their applications,” Proteomics, 2009, 5(6):717-30. |
Chatterjee et al., “Mitochondrial DNA mutations in human cancer. Oncogene,” 2006, 25(34):4663-4674. |
Chen et al., “Expansion microscopy,” Science, 2015, 347(6221):543-548. |
Chen et al., “Nanoscale imaging of RNA with expansion microscopy,” Nat Methods, Aug. 2016, 13(8):679-84. |
Chen et al., “RNA imaging. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells,” Science, Apr. 2015, 348(6233):aaa6090, 21 pages. |
Chen et al., “Spatial Transcriptomics and In Situ Sequencing to Study Alzheimer's Disease,” Cell, Aug. 2020, 182(4):976-991. |
Chen et al., “Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells,” Science, 2015, 348(6233):aaa6090, 21 pages. |
Chen et al., “μCB-seq: microfluidic cell barcoding and sequencing for high-resolution imaging and sequencing of single cells,” Lab Chip, Nov. 2020, 20(21): 3899-3913. |
Chen et al., “ATAC-see reveals the accessible genome by transposase-mediated imaging and sequencing.” Nature Methods, Dec. 2016, 13(12): 1013-1020. |
Cheng et al., “Sensitive Detection of Small Molecules by Competitive Immunomagnetic-Proximity Ligation Assay,” Anal Chem, 2012, 84:2129-2132. |
Chung et al., “Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems,” Nature, May 2013, 497:332-337. |
Constantine et al., “Use of genechip high-density oligonucleotide arrays for gene expression monitoring,” Life Sceience News, Amersham Life Science, 1998, pp. 11-14. |
Corces et al., “Lineage-specific and single-cell chromatin accessibility charts human hematopoiesis and leukemia evolution,” Nature Genetics, Oct. 2016, 48(10):1193-1203. |
Credle et al., “Multiplexed analysis of fixed tissue RNA using Ligation in situ Hybridization,” Nucleic Acids Research, 2017, 45(14):e128, 9 pages. |
Crosetto et al., “Spatially resolved transcriptomics and beyond,” Nature Review Genetics, 2015, 16(1):57-66. |
Dahl et al., “Circle-to-circle amplification for precise and sensitive DNA analysis,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2004, 101(13):4548-4553. |
Daubendiek et al., “Rolling-Circle RNA Synthesis: Circular Oligonucleotides as Efficient Substrates for T7 Rna Polymerase,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117(29):7818-7819. |
Davies et al., “How best to identify chromosomal interactions: a comparison of approaches,” Nat. Methods, 2017, 14(2):125-134. |
Dean et al., “Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification,” Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2002, 99(8):5261-66. |
Duncan et al., “Affinity chromatography of a sequence-specific DNA binding protein using Teflon-linked oligonucleotides,” Anal. Biochem., 1988, 169(1):104-108. |
Eberwine et al., “Analysis of gene expression in single live neurons,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 89, 3010-3014, 1992. |
Eguiluz et al., “Multitissue array review: a chronological description of tissue array techniques, applications and procedures,” Pathology Research and Practice, 2006, 202(8):561-568. |
Eldridge et al., “An in vitro selection strategy for conferring protease resistance to ligand binding peptides,” Protein Eng Des Sel., 2009, 22(11):691-698. |
Ellington et al., “Antibody-based protein multiplex platforms: technical and operational challenges,” Clin Chem, 2010, 56(2):186-193. |
Fire et al., “Rolling replication of short DNA circles,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1995, 92(10):4641-4645. |
Fodor et al., “Light-directed, spatially addressable parallel chemical synthesis,” Science, 1995, 251(4995):767-773. |
Forster et al., “A human gut bacterial genome and culture collection for improved metagenomic analyses,” Nature Biotechnology, 2019, 37(2):186-192. |
Frese et al., “Formylglycine aldehyde Tag—protein engineering through a novel post-translational modification,” ChemBioChem., 2009, 10(3):425-27. |
Fu et al., “Counting individual DNA molecules by the stochastic attachment of diverse labels,” PNAS, 2011, 108(22):9026-9031. |
Fu et al., “Continuous Polony Gels for Tissue Mapping with High Resolution and RNA Capture Efficiency,” bioRxiv, 2021, 20 pages. |
Fullwood et al., “Next-generation DNA sequencing of paired-end tags (PET) for transcriptome and genome analyses,” Genome Res., 2009, 19(4):521-532. |
Gao et al., “Q&A: Expansion microscopy”, BMC Biology, 15:50, 9 pages, 2017. |
Gene@arrays[online], BeadArray Technology, available on or before Feb. 14, 2015, via Internet Archive: Wayback Machine URL <https://web.archive.org/web/20150214084616/http://genearrays.com/services/microarrays/illumina/b eadarray-technology/>, [retrieved on Jan. 30, 2020], 3 pages. |
Gierahn et al., “Seq-Well: portable, low-cost RNA sequencing of single cells at high throughput,” ResearchSquare, 2017, 53 pages. |
Gnanapragasam, “Unlocking the molecular archive: the emerging use of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for biomarker research in urological cancer,” BJU International, 2009, 105(2):274-278. |
Goldkorn et al., “A simple and efficient enzymatic method for covalent attachment of DNA to cellulose. Application for hybridization-restriction analysis and for in vitro synthesis of DNA probes,” Nucleic Acids Res., 1986, 14(22):9171-9191. |
Gracia Villacampa et al., “Genome-wide Spatial Expression Profiling in FFPE Tissues,” bioRxiv, 2020, pp. 38 pages. |
Gunderson et al., “Decoding randomly ordered DNA arrays,” Genome Research, 2004, 14(5):870-877. |
Guo et al., “Direct fluorescence analysis of genetic polymorphisms by hybridization with oligonucleotide arrays on glass supports,” Nucleic Acids Res., Dec. 1994, 22(24):5456-65. |
Gupta et al., “Single-cell isoform RNA sequencing characterizes isoforms in thousands of cerebellar cells,” Nature Biotechnol., Oct. 2018, 36:1197-1202. |
Habib et al., “Div-Seq: Single-nucleus RNA-Seq reveals dynamics of rare adult newborn neurons,” Science, Aug. 2016, 353(6302):925-8. |
Habib et al., “Massively parallel single-nucleus RNA-seq with DroNc-seq,” Nat Methods, Oct. 2017, 14(10):955-958. |
Hammond et al., “Profiling cellular protein complexes by proximity ligation with dual tag microarray readout,” PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(7):e40405, 9 pages. |
He et al., “In situ synthesis of protein arrays,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2008, 19(1):4-9. |
He, “Cell-free protein synthesis: applications in proteomics and biotechnology,” New Biotechnology, 2008, 25(2-3):126-132. |
Heaton et al., “souporcell: Robust clustering of single cell RNAseq by genotype and ambient RNA inference without reference genotypes,” bioRxiv, Sep. 2019, 22 pages. |
Hedskog et al., “Dynamics of HIV-1 Quasispecies during Antiviral Treatment Dissected using Ultra-Deep Pyrosequencing,” PLoS One, 5(7): e11345, 2010. |
Hejatko et al., “In situ hybridization technique for mRNA detection in whole mount Arabidopsis samples,” Nature Protocols, 2006, 1(4):1939-1946. |
Hiatt et al., “Parallel, tag-directed assembly of locally derived short sequence reads,” Nature Methods, 2010, 7(2):119-25. |
Hu et al., “Dissecting Cell-Type Composition and Activity-Dependent Transcriptional State in Mammalian Brains by Massively Parallel Single-Nucleus RNA-Seq,” Mol Cell., Dec. 2017, 68(5):1006-1015. |
Jabara et al., Accurate sampling and deep sequencing of the HIV-1 protease gene using a Primer ID. PNAS 108(50); 20166-20171, 2011. |
Jamur et al., “Permeabilization of cell membranes.,” Method Mol. Biol., 2010, 588:63-66. |
Jemt et al., “An automated approach to prepare tissue-derived spatially barcoded RNA-sequencing libraries,” Scientific Reports, 2016, 6:37137, 10 pages. |
Jones et al., Comparative lesion sequencing provides insights into tumor evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105(11): 4283-4288, 2008. |
Kapteyn et al., “Incorporation of non-natural nucleotides into template-switching oligonucleotides reduces background and improves cDNA synthesis from very small RNA samples,” BMC Genomics, Jul. 2010, 11:413, 9 pages. |
Kaya-Okur et al., “CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells,” Apr. 2019, 10(1):1930, 10 pages. |
Korbel et al., “Paired-end mapping reveals extensive structural variation in the human genome,” Science, 2007, 318(5849):420-426. |
Korsunsky et al., “Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony,” Nat. Methods, Dec. 2019, 16(12):1289-1296. |
Kozlov et al., “A highly scalable peptide-based assay system for proteomics,” PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(6):e37441, 10 pages. |
Kristensen et al., “High-Throughput Methods for Detection of Genetic Variation,” BioTechniques, Feb. 2001, 30(2):318-332. |
Kurz et al., “cDNA—protein fusions: covalent protein-gene conjugates for the in vitro selection of peptides and proteins,” ChemBioChem., 2001, 2(9):666-72. |
Kwok, “High-throughput genotyping assay approaches,” Pharmocogenomics, Feb. 2000, 1(1):95-100. |
Lacar et al., “Nuclear RNA-seq of single neurons reveals molecular signatures of activation,” Nat Commun., Apr. 2016, 7:11022, 12 pages. |
Lage et al., “Whole genome analysis of genetic alterations in small DNA samples using hyperbranched strand displacement amplification and array-CGH,” Genome Research, 2003, 13(2):294-307. |
Lake et al., “Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain,” Science, Jun. 2016, 352(6293):1586-90. |
Landegren et al., “Reading bits of genetic information: methods for single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis,” Genome Res., Aug. 1998, 8(8):769-76. |
Langdale et al., “A rapid method of gene detection using DNA bound to Sephacryl,” Gene, 1985, 36(3):201-210. |
Lee et al., “Fluorescent in situ sequencing (FISSEQ) of RNA for gene expression profiling in intact cells and tissues,” Nature Protocols, 2015, 10(3):442-458. |
Lee et al., “XYZeq: Spatially resolved single-cell RNA sequencing reveals expression heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment,” Science Advances, 2021, 7:eabg4755, 1-14. |
Leriche et al., “Cleavable linkers in chemical biology,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 2012, 20:571-582. |
Linnarsson, “Recent advances in DNA sequencing methods—general principles of sample preparation,” Experimental Cell Research, 2010, 316(8):1339-1343. |
Liu et al., “High-Spatial-Resolution Multi-Omics Atlas Sequencing of Mouse Embryos via Deterministic Barcoding in Tissue,” BioRxiv, 2019, 55 pages. |
Lizardi et al., “Mutation detection and single-molecule counting using isothermal rolling-circle amplification,” Nat. Genet., 1998, 19(3):225-232. |
Lundberg et al., “Multiplexed homogeneous proximity ligation assays for high-throughput protein biomarker research in serological material,” Mol Cell Proteomics, 2011, 10(4):M110.004978, 11 pages. |
Macosko et al., “Highly Parallel Genome-wide Expression Profiling of Individual Cells Using Nanoliter Droplets,” Cell 161, 1202-1214, 2015. |
Marx, “Method of the Year: spatially resolved transcriptomics,” Nature Methods, 2021, 18(1):9-14. |
Meers et al., “Improved CUT&RUN chromatin profiling tools,” Elife, Jun. 2019, 8:e46314, 16 pages. |
Merritt et al., “Multiplex digital spatial profiling of proteins and RNA in fixed tissue,” Nat Biotechnol, May 2020, 38(5):586-599. |
Metzker, “Sequencing technologies—the next generation,” Nature Reviews Genetics, 2010, 11(1):31-46. |
Miller et al., “Basic concepts of microarrays and potential applications in clinical microbiology,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 2009, 22(4):611-633. |
Mishra et al., “Three-dimensional genome architecture and emerging technologies: looping in disease,” Genome Medicine, 2017, 9(1):87, 14 pages. |
Mitra et al., “Digital genotyping and haplotyping with polymerase colonies,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, May 2003, 100(10):5926-5931. |
Mizusawa et al., “A bacteriophage lambda vector for cloning with BamHI and Sau3A,” Gene, 1982, 20(3):317-322. |
Mortazavi et al., “Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq,” Nature Methods, 5(7): 621-8, 2008. |
Nikiforov et al., “The use of 96-well polystyrene plates for DNA hybridization-based assays: an evaluation of different approaches to oligonucleotide immobilization,” Anal Biochem, May 1995, 227(1):201-9. |
Nowak et al., “Entering the Postgenome Era,” Science, 1995, 270(5235):368-71. |
Pemov et al., “DNA analysis with multiplex microarray-enhanced PCR,” Nucl. Acids Res., Jan. 2005, 33(2):e11, 9 pages. |
Perler et al., “Intervening sequences in an Archaea DNA polymerase gen,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, Jun. 1992, 89(12):5577-5581. |
Petterson et al., “Generations of sequencing technologies,” Genomics, 2009, 93(2):105-111. |
Polsky-Cynkin et al., “Use of DNA immobilized on plastic and agarose supports to detect DNA by sandwich hybridization,” Clin. Chem., 1985, 31(9):1438-1443. |
Ranki et al., “Sandwich hybridization as a convenient method for the detection of nucleic acids in crude samples,” Gene, 1983, 21(1-2):77-85. |
Reinartz et al., “Massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) as a tool for in-depth quantitative gene expression profiling in all organisms,” Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, Feb. 2002, 1(1):95-104. |
Rodriques et al., “Slide-seq: A scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution,” Science, 2019, 363(6434):1463-1467. |
Ronaghi et al., “A sequencing method based on real-time pyrophosphate,” Science, Jul. 1998, 281(5375):363-365. |
Ronaghi et al., “Real-time DNA sequencing using detection of pyrophosphate release,” Analytical Biochemistry, Nov. 1996, 242(1):84-89. |
Ronaghi, “Pyrosequencing sheds light on DNA sequencing,” Genome Res, Jan. 2001, 11(1):3-11. |
Satpathy et al., “Massively parallel single-cell chromatin landscapes of human immune cell development and intratumoral T cell exhaustion,” Nat Biotechnol., Aug. 2019, 37(8):925-936. |
Saxonov et al., “10x Genomics, Mastering Biology to Advance Human Health,” PowerPoint, 10x, 2020, 41 pages. |
Schena et al., “Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray,” Science, Oct. 1995, 270(5235):467-470. |
Setliff et al., High-Throughput Mapping of B Cell Receptor Sequences to Antigen Specificity, Cell, 2019, 179:1636-1646. |
Shalon et al., “A DNA microarray system for analyzing complex DNA samples using two-color fluorescent probe hybridization,” Genome Res., Jul. 1996, 6(7):639-45. |
Shirai et al., “Novel Tools for Analyzing Gene Expressions in Single Cells,” The 5th International Workshop on Approaches to Single-Cell Analysis, The University of Tokyo, Mar. 3-4, 2011, 1 page. |
Skene et al., “An efficient targeted nuclease strategy for high-resolution mapping of DNA binding sites,” Elife, Jan. 2017, 6:e21856, 35 pages. |
Stahl et al., “Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics,” Science, Jun. 2016, 353(6294):78-82. |
Stahl et al., “Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics,” Supplementary Materials, Science, Jul. 2016, 353(6294):78-82, 41 pages. |
Stimpson et al., “Real-time detection of DNA hybridization and melting on oligonucleotide arrays by using optical wave guides,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, Jul. 1995, 92(14):6379-83. |
Strell et al., “Placing RNA in context and space—methods for spatially resolved transcriptomics,” The FEBS Journal, 2019, 286(8):1468-1481. |
Stuart et al., “Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data,” Cell, Jun. 2019, 177(7):1888-1902. |
Tang et al., “RNA-Seq analysis to capture the transcriptome landscape of a single cell.,” Nat Protoc., 5:516-35, 2010. |
Taniguchi et al., “Quantitative analysis of gene expression in a single cell by qPCR,” Nature Methods, 6, pp. 503-506, 2009. |
Tentori et al., “Detection of Isoforms Differing by a Single Charge Unit in Individual Cells,” Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55(40):12431-5. |
Tijssen et al., “Overview of principles of hybridization and the strategy of nucleic acid assays” in Techniques in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology—Hybridization with Nucleic Acid Probes, 1993, 24(Chapter 2), 65 pages. |
Trejo et al., “Extraction-free whole transcriptome gene expression analysis of FFPE sections and histology-directed subareas of tissue,” PLOS ONE, February 2019, 14(2):e0212031, 22 pages. |
Twyman et al., “Techniques Patents for SNP Genotyping,” Pharmacogenomics, January 2003, 4(1):67- 79. |
Van Gelder et al., “Amplified RNA synthesized from limited quantities of heterogeneous cDNA,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1990, 87(5): 1663-1667. |
Vandernoot et al., “cDNA normalization by hydroxyapatite chromatography to enrich transcriptome diversity in RNA-seq applications,” Biotechniques, December 2012, 53(6):373-80. |
Vasiliskov et al., “Fabrication of microarray of gel-immobilized compounds on a chip by copolymerization,” Biotechniques, September 1999, 27(3):592-606. |
Vickovic et al., “High-definition spatial transcriptomics for in situ tissue profiling,” Nature Methods, 2019, 9 pages. |
Vickovic et al., “Massive and parallel expression profiling using microarrayed single-cell sequencing,” Nature Communications, 2016, 7(13182): 1-9. |
Vogelstein et al., “Digital PCR,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, August 1999, 96(16):9236-9241. |
Walker et al., “Strand displacement amplification—an isothermal, in vitro DNA amplification technique,” Nucleic Acids Research, 1992, 20(7): 1691-1696 |
Wang et al., “Single cell analysis: the new frontier in ‘omics,’” Trends Biotechnol., 28: 281-90, 2010. |
Wang et al., “High-fidelity mRNA amplification for gene profiling,” Nature Biotechnology, April 2000, 18(4):457-459. |
Worthington et al., “Cloning of random oligonucleotides to create single-insert plasmid libraries,” Anal Biochem, 2001, 294(2):169-175 |
Yamauchi et al., “Subcellular western blotting of single cells,” Microsyst Nanoeng., 2017, 3:16079, 9 pages. |
Yershov et al., “DNA analysis and diagnostics on oligonucleotide microchips,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, May 1996, 93(10):4913-4918. |
Zhu et al., “Reverse transcriptase template switching: a SMART approach for full-length cDNA library construction,” Biotechniques, April 2001, 30(4): 892-897. |
U.S. Appl. No. 63/033,348, filed Jun. 2, 2020, Bent. |
Borm et al., “High throughput Human embryo spatial transcriptome mapping by surface transfer of tissue RNA,” Abstracts Selected Talks, Single Cell Genomics mtg, (SCG2019), 2019, 1 pages (Abstract Only). |
Chen et al., “Large field of view-spatially resolved transcriptomics at nanoscale resolution,” bioRxiv, Jan. 19, 2021, retrieved from URL <https://www.biorxiv.org/node/1751045.abstract>, 37 pages. |
Cho et al., “Seq-Scope: Submicrometer-resolution spatial transcriptomics for single cell and subcellular studies,” bioRxiv, Jan. 27, 2021, retrieved from URL <https://www.biorxiv.org/node/1754517.abstract>, 50 pages. |
Codeluppi et al., “Spatial organization of the somatosensory cortex revealed by osmFISH,” Nature Methods, Nov. 2018, 15:932-935. |
DePasquale et al., “DoubletDecon: Deconvoluting Doublets from Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Data,” Cell Rep., Nov. 5, 2019, 29(6):1718-1727.e8, 19 pages. |
Eng et al., “Transcriptome-scale super-resolved imaging in tissues by RNA seqFISH+,” Nature, Apr. 2019, 568(7751):235-239, 37 pages. |
Goh et al., “Highly Specific Multiplexed RNA Imaging in Tissues With Split-FISH,” Nat Methods, Jun. 15, 2020, 17(7):689-693, 21 pages. |
Liu et al., “High-Spatial-Resolution Multi-Omnics Sequencing via Deterministic Barcoding in Tissue,” Cell, Nov. 13, 2020, 183(6):1665-1681, 36 pages. |
Liu et al., “Spatial transcriptome sequencing of FFPE tissues at cellular level,” bioRxiv 788992, Oct. 14, 2020, 39 pages. |
Lubeck et al., “Single cell systems biology by super-resolution imaging and combinatorial labeling,” Nature Methods, Jan. 2013, 9(7):743-748, 18 pages. |
Lubeck et al., “Single-cell in situ RNA profiling by sequential hybridization,” Nature Methods, Apr. 2014, 11(4):360-361, 2 pages (Supplemental Materials). |
McGinnis et al., “MULTI-seq: sample multiplexing for single-cell RNA sequencing using lipid-tagged indices,” Nat Methods, Jul. 2019, 16(7): 619-626, 14 pages. |
Stoeckius et al., “Cell Hashing with barcoded antibodies enables multiplexing and doublet detection for single cell genomics,” Genome Biology, Dec. 19, 2018, 19: 224, 12 pages. |
Takei et al., “Integrated Spatial Genomics Reveals Global Architecture Of Single Nuclei,” Nature, Jan. 27, 2021, 590(7845):344-350, 53 pages. |
Xia et al., “Spatial transcriptome profiling by MERFISH reveals subcellular RNA compartmentalization and cell cycle-dependent gene expression”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Sep. 2019, 116(39):19490-19499. |
Zheng et al., “Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells,” Nat Commun., Jan. 16, 2017, 8:14049, 12 pages. |
Adamson et al., “A Multiplexed Single-Cell CRISPR Screening Platform Enables Systematic Dissection of the Unfolded Protein Response,” Cell, Dec. 2016, 167(7):1867-1882.e21. |
Azioune et al., “Simple and rapid process for single cell micro-patterning,” Lab Chip, Jun. 2009, 9(11):1640-1642. |
Chen et al., “Geometric control of cell life and death, ” Science, May 1997, 276(5317):1425-1428. |
Chung et al., “Imaging single-cell signaling dynamics with a deterministic high-density single-cell trap array,” Anal Chem, Sep. 2011, 83(18):7044-7052. |
Collins et al., “Two-dimensional single-cell patterning with one cell per well driven by surface acoustic waves,” Nature Communications, Nov. 2015, 6:8686, 11 pages. |
Datlinger et al., “Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome readout,” Nat Methods, Mar. 2017, 14(3):297-301. |
Ding et al., “On-chip manipulation of single microparticles, cells, and organisms using surface acoustic waves,” PNAS, Jul. 2012, 109(28):11105-11109. |
Dixit et al., “Perturb-Seq: Dissecting Molecular Circuits with Scalable Single-Cell RNA Profiling of Pooled Genetic Screens,” Cell, Dec. 2016, 167(7):1853-1866.e17. |
Falconnet et al., “Surface engineering approaches to micropattern surfaces for cell-based assays,” Biomaterials, Jun. 2006, 27(16):3044-3063. |
Folch et al., “Microfabricated elastomeric stencils for micropatterning cell cultures,” J Biomed Mater Res, Nov. 2000, 52(2):346-353. |
Giam et al., “Scanning probe-enabled nanocombinatorics define the relationship between fibronectin feature size and stem cell fate,” PNAS, Mar. 2012, 109(12):4377-4382. |
Gross et al., “Technologies for Single-Cell Isolation,” Int. J Mol. Sci., Jul. 2015, 16(8):16897-16919. |
Jaitin et al., “Dissecting Immune Circuits by Linking CRISPR-Pooled Screens with Single-Cell RNA-Seq,” Cell, Dec. 2016, 167(7):1883-1896.e15. |
Laurell et al., “Chip integrated strategies for acoustic separation and manipulation of cells and particles,” Chem. Soc. Rev., Mar. 2007, 36(3):492-506. |
Liberali et al., “Single-cell and multivariate approaches in genetic perturbation screens,” Nat Rev Genet., Jan. 2015, 16(1):18-32. |
Lin et al., “Microfluidic cell trap array for controlled positioning of single cells on adhesive micropatterns,” Lab Chip, Feb. 2013, 13(4):714-721. |
Nakamura et al., “Biocompatible inkjet printing technique for designed seeding of individual living cells.” Tissue Eng, Nov. 2005, 11(11-12):1658-1666. |
Ostuni et al., “Patterning Mammalian Cells Using Elastomeric Membranes,” Langmuir, Aug. 2000, 16(20):7811-7819. |
Rettig et al., “Large-scale single-cell trapping and imaging using microwell arrays,” Anal Chem, Sep. 2005, 77(17):5628-5634. |
Rosenthal et al., “Cell patterning chip for controlling the stem cell microenvironment,” Biomaterials, Jul. 2007, 28(21):3208-3216. |
Suh et al., “A simple soft lithographic route to fabrication of poly(ethylene glycol) microstructures for protein and cell patterning,” Biomaterials, Feb. 2004, 25(3):557-563. |
Tan et al., “Parylene peel-off arrays to probe the role of cell-cell interactions in tumour angiogenesis,” Integr Biol (Camb), Oct. 2009, 1(10):587-594. |
Tseng et al., “Magnetic nanoparticle-mediated massively parallel mechanical modulation of single-cell behavior,” Nat Methods, Nov. 2012, 9(11):1113-1119. |
Vermesh et al., “High-density, multiplexed patterning of cells at single-cell resolution for tissue engineering and other applications,” Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, Aug. 2011, 50(32):7378-7380. |
Wang et al., “Imaging-based pooled CRISPR screening reveals regulators of lncRNA localization,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, May 2019, 116(22):10842-10851. |
Wood et al., “Single cell trapping and DNA damage analysis using microwell arrays,” PNAS, Jun. 2010, 107(22):10008-10013. |
Wright et al., “Reusable, reversibly scalable parylene membranes for cell and protein patterning,” J Biomed Mater Res A., May 2008, 85(2):530-538. |
Yusof et al., “Inkjet-like printing of single-cells,” Lab Chip, Jul. 2011, 11(14):2447-2454. |
Zhang et al., “Block-Cell-Printing for live single-cell printing,” PNAS, Feb. 2014, 111(8):2948-2953. |
Ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, [online], “Molecular Inversion Probe Assay,” available on or before Oct. 14, 2014, via Internet Archive: Wayback Machine URL<https://web.archive.org/web/20141014124037/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/probe/docs/techmip/>, retrieved on Jun. 16, 2021, retrieved from URL<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/probe/docs/techmip/>, 2 pages. |
Vickovic et al., “Massive and parallel expression profiling using microarrayed single-cell sequencing,” Nat. Commun. Oct. 14, 2016, 7:13182, 9 pages. |
[No Author Listed], “Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3′ Reagent Kits v3.1 (Dual Index)—User Guide,” 10x Genomics, Mar. 2021, Document No. CG000315, 61 pages. |
10xGenomics.com, [online], “Visium Spatial Gene Expression Reagent Kits—Tissue Optimization,” Oct. 2020, retrieved on Dec. 28, 2021, retrieved from URL<https://assets.ctfassets.net/an68im79xiti/5UJrN0cH17rEk0UXwdI9It/e54d99fb08a8f1500aba503005a04a56/CG000238_VisiumSpatialTissueOptimizationUserGuide_RevD.pdf>, 43 pages. |
10xGenomics.com, [online], “Visium Spatial Gene Expression Reagent Kits—User Guide,” Oct. 2020, retrieved on Dec. 28, 2021, retrieved from URL<https://assets.ctfassets.net/an68im79xiti/3GGIfH3RWpd1bFVhalpexR/8baa08d9007157592b65b2cdc7130990/CG000239_VisiumSpatialGeneExpression_UserGuide_RevD.pdf>, 70 pages. |
Czarnik, “Encoding methods for combinatorial chemistry,” Curr Opin Chem Biol., Jun. 1997, 1(1):60-6. |
MacBeath et al., “Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination,” Science, Sep. 2000, 289(5485):1760-1763. |
Asp et al., “Spatially Resolved Transcriptomes-Next Generation Tools for Tissue Exploration,” Bioessays, Oct. 2020, 42(10):e1900221, 16 pages. |
Bergenstråhle et al., “Seamless integration of image and molecular analysis for spatial transcriptomics workflows,” BMC Genomics, Jul. 2020, 21(1):482, 7 pages. |
Bolotin et al., “MiXCR: software for comprehensive adaptive immunity profiling,” Nat Methods., May 2015, 12(5):380-1. |
Nam et al., “Somatic mutations and cell identity linked by Genotyping of Transcriptomes,” Nature, Jul. 2019, 571(7765):355-360. |
Picelli et al., “Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2,” Nat Protoc., Jan. 2014, 9(1):171-81. |
Singh et al., “High-throughput targeted long-read single cell sequencing reveals the clonal and transcriptional landscape of lymphocytes,” Nat Commun., Jul. 2019, 10(1):3120, 13 pages. |
Sountoulidis et al., “SCRINSHOT, a spatial method for single-cell resolution mapping of cell states in tissue sections, ” PLoS Biol., Nov. 2020, 18(11):e3000675, 32 pages. |
Tu et al., “TCR sequencing paired with massively parallel 3' RNA-seq reveals clonotypic T cell signatures,” Nature Immunology, Dec. 2019, 20(12):1692-1699. |
Biosyntagma.com, [online], “Resolving Heterogeneity One Cell at a Time,” available on or before Apr. 21, 2017, via Internet Archive: Wayback Machine URL<https://web.archive.org/web/20170421212315/http:/www.biosyntagma.com/>, retrieved on Sep. 29, 2021, URL<http://www.biosyntagma.com/>, 3 pages. |
Ganguli et al., “Pixelated spatial gene expression analysis from tissue,” Nat Commun., Jan. 2018, 9(1):202, 9 pages. |
Wheeler et al., “Microfluidic device for single-cell analysis,” Analytical Chemistry, Jul. 2003, 75(14):3581-3586. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/353,937, Frisen et al., filed Mar. 14, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/707,189, Chell et al., filed Mar. 29, 2022. |
Dalma-Weiszhausz et al., “The affymetrix GeneChip platform: an overview,” Methods Enzymol., 2006, 410:3-28. |
Madissoon et al., “scRNA-seq assessment of the human lung, spleen, and esophagus tissue stability after cold preservation,” Genome Biol., Dec. 2019, 21(1):1, 16 pages. |
Miller et al., “Chapter 11—Solid and Suspension Microarrays for Microbial Diagnostics,” Methods in Microbiology, 2015, 42:395-431. |
Vickovic et al., “SM-Omics: An automated Platform for High-Throughput Spatial Multi-Omics,” bioRxiv, Oct. 2020, 40 pages. |
Salmón et al., “Barcoded solid-phase RNA capture for Spatial Transcriptomics profiling in mammalian tissue sections,” Nature Protocols, Oct. 2018, 13(11):2501-2534. |
O'Huallachain et al., “Ultra-high throughput single-cell analysis of proteins and RNAs by split-pool synthesis,” Communications Biology, 2020, 3:213, 19 pages. |
Satija et al., “Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data,” Nature, Apr. 13, 2015, 33(5):495-402, 14 pages. |
Stoeckius et al., “Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells,” Nature Methods, Jul. 31, 2017, 14(9):865-868. |
Adam et al., “Psychrophilic proteases dramatically reduce single-cell RNA-seq artifacts: a molecular atlas of kidney development,” Development, Oct. 1, 2017, 144(19):3625-3632. |
Eastburn et al., “Identification of Genetic Analysis of Cancer Cells with PCT-activated Cell Sorting,” Nucleic Acids Research, Jul. 16, 2014, 42(16):e128, 10 pages. |
Eastburn et al., “Ultrahigh-throughput Mammalian Single Cell Reverse-transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction in Microfluiding Drops,” Analytical Chemistry, American Chemical Society, Aug. 20, 2013, 85(16):8016-8021. |
Edsgard et al., “Identification of spatial expression trends in single-cell gene expression data,” Nature Methods, Mar. 19, 2018, 15: 339-342, 16 pages. |
Ha et al, “Self-assembly hollow nanosphere for enzyme encapsulation,” Soft Matter, Feb. 11, 2010, 6, 1405-1408, 10 pages. |
Hu et al., “A thermo-degradable hydrogel with light-tunable degradation and drug release,” Biomaterials, Jan. 2017, 112:133-140. |
Ju et al, “Supramolecular dendrimer capsules by cooperative binding,” Chem. Commun., Jan. 7, 2011, 47(1):268-270, 8 pages. |
Kuiper et al, “Enzymes containing porous polymersomes as nano reaction vessels for cascade reactions,” Org. Biomol, Chem, Oct. 15, 2008, 6(23):4315-4318. |
Liu et al., “Preparation and Characterization of Temperature-Sensitive Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-b-poly(d,l-lactide) Microspheres for Protein Deliveg,” Biomacromolecules, 2003, 4(6):1784-1793. |
Luo et al., “Probing infectious disease by single-cell RNA sequencing: Progresses and perspectives,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, Oct. 21, 2020, 18:2962-2971. |
Lyu et al., “One-Pot Synthesis of Protein-Embedded Metal-Organic Frameworks with Enhanced Biological Activities,” Nano Lett., Sep. 11, 2014, 14:5761-5765. |
Massoni-Badosa et al, “Sampling artifacts in single-cell genomics cohort studies,” bioRXiV, Jan. 15, 2020, 32 pages. |
Miller et al., “Rapid and Efficient Enzyme Encapsulation in a Dendrimer Silica Nanocomposite,” Macromolecular Bioscience, Oct. 25, 2006, 6(10):839-845. |
O'Flanagan et al, “Dissociation of solid tumor tissues with cold active protease for single-cell RNA-seq minimizes conserved collagenase-associated stress responses,” Genome Biology, Oct. 17, 2019, 20:210, 13 pages. |
Pellegrino et al, “High-throughput Single-cell DNA Sequencing of Acut Myeloid Leukemia Tumors with Droplet Microfluidics,” Genome Research, Aug. 7, 2018, 28(9):1345-1352. |
Rahimi et al, “Synthesis and Characterization of Thermo-Sensitive Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery Applications,” J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. Dec. 2008, 4(4):482-490, 19 pages. |
Shieh, et al., “Imparting Functionality to Biocatalysts via Embedding Enzymes into Nanoporous Materials by a de Novo Approach: Size-Selective Sheltering of Catalase in Metal-Organic Framework Microcrystals,” J Am Chem Soc., Apr. 8, 2015, 137(13):4276-4279, 4 pages. |
Soderberg, “Droplet Microfluidics Reverse Transcription and PCR Towards Single Cell and Exosome Analysis,” Doctoral Thesis, KTH School of Biotechnology Science for Life Laboratory, 2017, 69 pages. |
Sun et al., “Statistical Analysis of Spatial Expression Pattern for Spatially Resolved Transcriptomic Studies,” Nature Methods, Jan. 27, 2020, 17(2): 193-200. |
Svensson et al., “SpatialDE: identification of spatially variable genes,” Nature Methods, May 2018, 15:343-346, 15 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210247316 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62975168 | Feb 2020 | US |