Tissue treatments and compositions.
Ischemic heart disease typically results from an imbalance between the myocardial blood flow and the metabolic demand of the myocardium. Progressive atherosclerosis with increasing occlusion of coronary arteries leads to a reduction in coronary blood flow, which creates ischemic heart tissue. “Atherosclerosis” is a type of arteriosclerosis in which cells including smooth muscle cells and macrophages, fatty substances, cholesterol, cellular waste product, calcium and fibrin build up in the inner lining of a body vessel. “Arteriosclerosis” refers to the thickening and hardening of arteries. Blood flow can be further decreased by additional events such as changes in circulation that lead to hypoperfusion, vasospasm or thrombosis.
Myocardial infarction (MI) is one form of heart disease that results from the sudden lack of supply of oxygen and other nutrients. The lack of blood supply is a result of a closure of the coronary artery (or any other artery feeding the heart) which nourishes a particular part of the heart muscle. The cause of this event is generally attributed to arteriosclerosis in coronary vessels.
Formerly, it was believed that an MI was caused from a slow progression of closure from, for example, 95% then to 100%. However, an MI can also be a result of minor blockages where, for example, there is a rupture of the cholesterol plaque resulting in blood clotting within the artery. Thus, the flow of blood is blocked and downstream cellular damage occurs. This damage can cause irregular rhythms that can be fatal, even though the remaining muscle is strong enough to pump a sufficient amount of blood. As a result of this insult to the heart tissue, scar tissue tends to naturally form.
Various procedures, including mechanical and therapeutic agent application procedures, are known for reopening blocked arties. An example of a mechanical procedure includes balloon angioplasty with stenting, while an example of a therapeutic agent application includes administering a thrombolytic agent, such as urokinase. Such procedures do not, however, treat actual tissue damage to the heart. Other systemic drugs, such as ACE-inhibitors and Beta-blockers, may be effective in reducing cardiac load post-MI, although a significant portion of the population that experiences a major MI ultimately develop heart failure.
An important component in the progression to heart failure is remodeling of the heart due to mismatched mechanical forces between the infarcted region and the healthy tissue resulting in uneven stress and strain distribution in the left ventricle. Once an MI occurs, remodeling of the heart begins. The principle components of the remodeling event include myocyte death, edema and inflammation, followed by fibroblast infiltration and collagen deposition, and finally scar formation from extra-cellular matrix (ECM) deposition. The principle component of the scar is collagen which is non-contractile and causes strain on the heart with each beat. Non-contractility causes poor pump performance as seen by low ejection fraction (EF) and akinetic or diskinetic local wall motion. Low EF leads to high residual blood volume in the ventricle, causes additional wall stress and leads to eventual infarct expansion via scar stretching and thinning and border-zone cell apoptosis. In addition, the remote-zone thickens as a result of higher stress which impairs systolic pumping while the infarct region experiences significant thinning because mature myocytes of an adult are not regenerated. Myocyte loss is a major etiologic factor of wall thinning and chamber dilation that may ultimately lead to progression of cardiac myopathy. In other areas, remote regions experience hypertrophy (thickening) resulting in an overall enlargement of the left ventricle. This is the end result of the remodeling cascade. These changes also correlate with physiological changes that result in increase in blood pressure and worsening systolic and diastolic performance.
Compositions for forming a self-reinforcing composite biomatrix, methods of manufacture and use therefore are herein disclosed. Kits including delivery devices suitable for delivering the compositions are also disclosed. In some embodiments, the composition can include at least three components. In one embodiment, a first component can include a first functionalized polymer, a second component can include a second functionalized polymer and a third component can include silk protein or constituents thereof. In some embodiments, the composition can include at least one cell type and/or at least one growth factor. In some embodiments, the composition can include a biologic encapsulated, suspended, disposed within or loaded into a biodegradable carrier. In some embodiments, the composition(s) of the present invention can be delivered by a dual lumen injection device to a treatment area in situ, in vivo, as well as ex vivo applications.
A self-reinforcing composite matrix formed of three components and applied in situ to tissue for treatment or reparation of tissue damage, or to provide a support for sustained-delivery of a biologic, is herein disclosed. The composite matrix can include a two-component gelation system and a silk protein. “Bioscaffolding” and “two-component gelation system” and “gelation system” are hereinafter used interchangeably. Examples of two-component gelation systems include, but are not limited to, alginate construct systems, fibrin glues and fibrin glue-like systems, self-assembled peptides, synthetic polymer systems and combinations thereof. The gelation system can provide a rapidly degrading matrix for a slower degrading constituent, such as, for example, silk protein. Over time, the silk protein can form a self-reinforcing composite matrix. The components of the composite matrix, in various combinations, may be co-injected to an infarct region by a dual-lumen delivery device. Examples of dual-lumen delivery devices include, but are not limited to, dual syringes, dual-needle left-ventricle injection devices, dual-needle transvascular wall injection devices and the like.
In some applications, the two-component gelation system includes fibrin glue. Fibrin glue consists of two main components, fibrinogen and thrombin. Fibrinogen is a plasma glycoprotein of about 340 kiloDaltons (kDa) in its endogenous state. Fibrinogen is a symmetrical dimer comprised of six paired polypeptide chains, alpha, beta and gamma chains. On the alpha and beta chains, there is a small peptide sequence called a fibrinopeptide which prevents fibrinogen from spontaneously forming polymers with itself. In some embodiments, fibrinogen is modified with proteins. Thrombin is a coagulation protein. When combined in equal volumes, thrombin converts the fibrinogen to fibrin by enzymatic action at a rate determined by the concentration of thrombin. The result is a biocompatible gel which gelates when combined at the infarct region. Fibrin glue can undergo gelation between about 5 to about 60 seconds. Examples of fibrin glue-like systems include, but are not limited to, Tisseel™ (Baxter), Beriplast P™ (Aventis Behring), Biocol® (LFB, France), Crosseal™ (Omrix Biopharmaceuticals, Ltd.), Hemaseel HMN® (Haemacure Corp.), Bolheal (Kaketsuken Pharma, Japan) and CoStasis® (Angiotech Pharmaceuticals).
In some applications, a two-component gelation system is a synthetic polymer system. Examples of synthetic polymers include, but are not limited to, polyamino acids, polysaccharides, polyalkylene oxide or polyethylene glycol (PEG). The molecular weight of the compounds can vary depending on the desired application. In most instances, the molecular weight (mw) is about 100 to about 100,000 mw. When the core material is polyethylene glycol, the molecular weight of the compound(s) is/are about 7,500 to about 20,000 mw and more preferably, about 10,000 mw. When combined together, synthetic polymers can form a hydrogel depending on the abundancy of reactive groups, among other parameters. A “hydrogel” is a network of polymer chains that are hydrophilic, sometimes found as a colloidal gel in which water is the dispersion medium. Hydrogels are super-absorbent (they can contain over 99% water) and can be comprised of natural or synthetic polymers.
In some embodiments, the two-component gelation system includes polyethylene glycols. PEG is a synthetic polymer having the repeating structure (OCH2CH2)n. A first component may be a polyethylene glycol (PEG) polymer functionalized with at least two nucleophilic groups. Examples of nucleophilic groups include, but are not limited to, thiol (—SH), thiol anion (—S−), and amine (—NH2). A “nucleophile” is a reagent which is attracted to centers of positive charge. A nucleophile participates in a chemical reaction by donating electrons to an electrophile in order to form a chemical bond. A second component may be a PEG polymer functionalized with at least two electrophilic groups. Examples of electrophilic groups include, but are not limited to, N-hydroxy succinimide ester (—NHS), acrylate, vinyl sulfone, and maleimide. —NHS, or succinimidyl, is a five-member ring structure represented by the chemical formula —N(COCH2)2. An “electrophile” is a reagent attracted to electrons that participates in a chemical reaction by accepting an electron pair in order to bond to a nucleophile. The total number of electrophilic and nucleophilic groups should be greater than four.
Some inherent characteristics of unmodified hydrogels include, but are not limited to, its ability to swell and its ability to rapidly gel. As used herein, the term “unmodified” means hydrogels in which no other constituents are added thereto. These characteristics can contribute to rapid degradation of the hydrogel. In addition, in situ gelling hydrogels generally exhibit weak mechanical properties, resulting in poor implant integrity. In some applications, however, these same characteristics (e.g., swelling) can be harmful. For example, if applied to an organ such as the heart to treat a post-infarct myocardial region, swelling should be minimized to reduce or eliminate excess pressure on the treatment region. Additionally, in some applications, a less rapid degradation may be desirable.
In some embodiments, two functionalized PEGs comprising a PEG functionalized with at least two nucleophilic groups and a PEG functionalized with at least two electrophilic groups can be combined in a 1:1 ratio. The PEGs can be stored in a 0.01M acidic solution at a pH below about 4.0. At room temperature and standard concentration, reaction and cross-linking between the two functionalized PEGs occurs beginning at approximately pH greater than 6.5. Under these conditions, reaction kinetics are slow. When 0.3 M basic buffer solution at pH about 9.0 is added to the PEGs, gelation occurs in less than 1 minute. This system exhibits poor cytocompatibility due to the low pH of the functionalized PEG solution and the high osmolality pH 9.0 buffer. “Cytocompatibility” refers to the ability of media to provide an environment conducive to cell growth. Additionally, this system does not include any cell adhesion ligands.
The reaction of the functionalized PEGs in forming a gel can occur by a number of different chemical reactions depending on the functionality of the groups attached to the PEGs. For example, the gel can be formed by a Michael-type addition reaction or a condensation reaction. In general, a Michael-type addition reaction involves the reaction of an α,β-unsaturated carbonyl with a nucleophile. A Michael-type addition reaction can occur at a pH greater than about 6.8. Michael addition reactions are well known by those skilled in the art. Examples of moieties on functionalized PEGs which can undergo a Michael's addition reaction include, but are not limited to: PEG-SH combined with PEG-maleimide; and PEG-SH combined with PEG-acrylate. In some embodiments, the reaction could be activated with a buffer with a pH greater than about 4, by a catalytic amount of various amines or a combination thereof. A condensation reaction is a chemical reaction in which two molecules or moieties react and become covalently bonded to one another by the concurrent loss of a small molecule, often water, methanol, or a type of hydrogen halide such as hydrogen chloride. In polymer chemistry, a series of condensation reactions can take place whereby monomers or monomer chains add to each other to form longer chains. Examples of moieties on functionalized PEGs which can undergo a condensation reaction include, but are not limited to, PEG-NHS ester and PEG-NH2. It is anticipated that a Michael addition reaction would contribute to the long term stability of the resulting gel since thioether bonds are formed as compared to the more hydrolytically labile thioester bonds formed from the reaction of thiols with activated esters.
Silk fibers from spiders (e.g., Nephila clavipes and Araneus diadematus) and silkworms (e.g., Bombyx mori) represent the strongest natural fibers currently known. Their mechanical properties include high strength and toughness and are derived from a highly controlled self-assembly path through liquid crystalline phases leading to highly stable materials. Silk from B. mori consists primarily of two protein components, fibroin and sericin. Fibroin, or silk protein, is the structural protein in silk fibers and sericin is the water-soluble glue that binds fibroin fibers together. Fibroin protein consists of light and heavy chain polypeptides of approximately 350 kDa and 25 kDa, respectively. The principal constituent of silk fibers, i.e., silk proteins, can undergo self-assembly into insoluble β-sheets. The β-sheets have been shown to exhibit a high level of organization. The β-sheets have also been shown to be numerous and very small and contained within the heavy chain. Compared to synthetic polymers, which are made of one or two repeating monomer units polymerized to a broad range of lengths, biological polymers such as silk fibroin are identical molecules of great complexity made up of almost 20 different amino acid monomers. Natural silk can be made at room temperature from an aqueous solution, which methods are known in the art.
The United States Pharmacopeia defines silk as non-degradable because it retains greater than 50% of its tensile integrity 60 days post-implantation in vivo. Within the period of a year, silk has been shown to proteolytically degrade and resorb when applied in vivo. Recent experiments have shown that silk is a mechanically robust biomaterial with predictable long-term degradation characteristics. See, e.g., R. L. Horan, et al., In vitro degradation of silk fibroin, Biomaterials 26 (2005) 3385-3393. It is anticipated that silk matrices formed from silk proteins have the potential for many different types of medical treatments.
In some embodiments, a silk protein or a block-copolymer of silk protein (hereinafter, collectively referred to as “silk protein”) can be combined with a two-component gelation system to form a self-reinforcing composite matrix. A block co-polymer of silk protein can be, for example, silk-elastin (available from Protein Polymer Technologies, Inc., California), silk-collagen or silk-laminin, or any peptide sequence of elastin, collagen or laminin conjugated with a silk protein. In some embodiments, a glycosoaminoglycan (GAG) such as, for example, hyaluronic acid, heparin sulfate, chondroitin sulfate or keratin sulfate can be conjugated with a block-copolymer of silk protein. The matrix can be used in a variety of medical treatment applications including, but not limited to, cell delivery, a platform for neo tissue formation, cartilage repair, spinal repair, treatment of hernias, organ adhesion prevention, use as a biosurgical adhesive and/or post-myocardial infarction treatment. Combined with unmodified hydrogels such as, but not limited to, fibrin glue and functionalized PEGs, it is anticipated that the silk protein will reduce or eliminate swelling of the hydrogel and increase its mechanical stability. In addition, a silk matrix has a very porous structure. Salt leaching and gas foaming are known to produce silk protein matrices with porosity greater than 100 μm, which is generally considered to be the minimum porosity for cell migration and expansion. Nazarov, R., et al., Porous 3-D Scaffolds from Regenerated Silk Fibroin, Biomacromolecules 2004, 5, 718-719. The structure of a silk matrix can allow for controlled release of a substance, including, but not limited to, biologics such as therapeutic agents, cells and growth factors.
In some embodiments, at least two functionalized PEGs with a total functionality greater than four can be combined with a silk protein in solution to form a self-reinforcing composite matrix. “Functionality” refers to the number of electrophilic or nucleophilic groups on the polymer core which are capable of reacting with other nucleophilic or electrophilic groups, respectively, to form a gel. For example, a first functionalized PEG may be thiol PEG, or amino PEG wherein the first functionalized PEG includes at least two nucleophilic groups. A second functionalized PEG may be N-hydroxy succinimide ester PEG, acrylate PEG, vinyl sulfone PEG or maleimide PEG wherein the second functionalized PEG includes at least two electrophilic groups. In some embodiments, the first functionalized PEG and the second functionalized PEG may be combined in a 1:1 ratio. In other embodiments, the first functionalized PEG and the second functionalized PEG may be combined in a less than 1:1 ratio.
In some embodiments, the combination (i.e., the functionalized PEGs) can be stored in a solid or liquid phase. In one embodiment, the combination is stored in a solid phase. Approximately 2 hours before delivery, an acidic aqueous solution can be added to the functionalized PEGs to form a liquid phase. The solution may be, for example, a dilute hydrochloric acid solution in a pH range of about 3.5 to about 4.5. An acidic environment may be appropriate for PEG-NHS esters. In some embodiments, a neutral pH aqueous solution can be appropriate for PEG-NHS esters. A basic environment may be appropriate for thiol PEG or amino PEG.
At or close to the time of delivery, a silk protein in aqueous solution may be added to the acidic or neutral functionalized PEG solution. For PEGs stored in a basic environment, the silk protein may to co-delivered in situ. The silk protein can be up to 50 mass percent of the combined PEGs. In some embodiments, the silk protein is 10 mass percent of the combined PEGs.
In some embodiments, the functionalized PEGs can be combined with a silk protein in a solid phase. Approximately 2 hours before delivery, an aqueous solution can be added to the combination to form a liquid phase. At or close to the time of delivery, a high pH buffer solution of about 7.5 to about 9.5 may be added to initiate the gelation process. For example, basic buffers can include sodium phosphate and sodium carbonate buffers at a concentration of about 100 mM to about 300 mM. For PEG-NHS esters, a stoichiometric amount of base can be added. For vinyl sulfone or acrylate PEGs, a catalytic amount of base can be added. The silk protein can be up to 50 mass percent of the combined PEGs. In some embodiments, the silk protein is 10 mass percent of the combined PEGs.
In some embodiments, components of fibrin glue can be combined with a silk protein to form a self-reinforcing composite matrix. Fibrin glue may include fibrinogen or a fibrinogen-like compound and thrombin. The silk protein may be combined with fibrin glue in a similar manner as that described with respect to the PEGs.
In some embodiments, a cell type can be added to the self-reinforcing composite matrix. Examples of cell types include, but are not limited to, localized cardiac progenitor cells, mesenchymal stem cells (osteoblasts, chondrocytes and fibroblasts), bone marrow derived mononuclear cells, adipose tissue derived stem cells, embryonic stem cells, umbilical-cord-blood-derived stem cells, smooth muscle cells or skeletal myoblasts. In some embodiments, a growth factor can be added to the self-reinforcing composite matrix. Examples of growth factors include, but are not limited to, isoforms of vasoendothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF, e.g. beta-FGF), Del 1, hypoxia inducing factor (HIF 1-alpha), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1), nicotine, platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), transforming growth factor (TGF alpha), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), estrogens, follistatin, proliferin, prostaglandin E1 and E2, tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha), interleukin 8 (Il-8), hematopoietic growth factors, erythropoietin, granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) and platelet-derived endothelial growth factor (PD-ECGF). In some applications, the functionalized PEGs can react with the growth factors which could stabilize the growth factors, extend their half-life or provide a mode for controlled release of the growth factors. The growth factors can act to help survival of injected hMSC or endogenous progenitor cells of the infarct region. In addition, the growth factors can aid in homing endogenous progenitor cells to the injury site.
In some embodiments, a biologic such as a growth factor or pharmaceutical can be encapsulated, suspended, disposed within or loaded into a biodegradable carrier and combined with at least one component of a two-component gel system and silk protein for sustained-release and/or controlled delivery to a target site. An example of a suitable biologic includes, but is not limited to, IGF-1, HGF, VEGF, bFGF, stem cell factor (SCF), G-CSF, PDGF or other growth factor. In one embodiment, the biologic is IGF-1. IGF-1 is known for its pro-survival and anti-apoptotic effects, among other characteristics. It is known that IGF-1 has beneficial effects on acute MI and chronic heart failure by affecting endogenous cardiac cells. Since IGF-1 has a short in vivo half-life, treatment can be enhanced by providing controlled release of IGF-1 from a biodegradable carrier or self-reinforcing composite matrix.
In one embodiment, the biodegradable carrier is an electrospun absorbable nanofiber or microfiber, hereinafter referred to interchangeably. A nanofiber can be in a range of between about 40 nm and about 2000 nm, while a microfiber can be in a range of between about 1 μm and about 10 μm. In one embodiment, the biologic (or no biologic) infused microfiber can be formulated by electrospinning “Electrospinning” is a process by which microfibers are formed by using an electric field to draw a polymer solution from the tip of a reservoir with a nozzle to a collector. The nozzle can be a single nozzle or a coaxial nozzle. A voltage is applied to the polymer solution which causes a stream of solution to be drawn toward a grounded collector. Electrospinning generates a web of fibers which can be subsequently processed into smaller lengths. For example, the fibers can be cryogenically milled using a high frequency ball or centrifugal mill.
Examples of polymers which may be used to form the electrospun microfibers generally include, but are not limited to, polyglycolide (PGA), poly(L-lactide) (PLLA), poly(D,L-lactide) (PDLLA), poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PDLGA), poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), polydioxanone, PEG-PLGA diblock and PEG-PLGA-PEG triblock copolymers, and poly(ester amides) (PEA).
Additionally, polymers which may be used to form elastomeric electrospun microfibers include, but are not limited to, biodegradable poly(ester urethanes) (PEU), poly(ester urethane) ureas (PEUU), polyhydroxyalkanoates such as poly(4-hydroxybutyrate) or poly(3-hydroxybutyrate), PCL-PLA copolymers, PCL-PGA copolymers, poly(1,3-trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC), PTMC-PLA, and PTMC-PCL copolymers. Elastomeric microfibers have been demonstrated to possess mechanical anisotropy similar to native tissue.
Additionally, the polymers described above can be used to form core-shell electrospun microfibers. Core-shell electrospun microfibers can be formed by using a coaxial nozzle in the electrospinning process. For example, two different polymer solutions can be placed in two separate coaxial reservoirs with one common nozzle. When the electrospinning process is started, the polymer solutions will only come into contact at the nozzle tip, resulting in a fiber within a tube morphology. Core-shell electrospun microfibers can be useful for reduction of burst release and sequential biologics release profiles. “Burst” refers to the amount of agent released in one day or any short duration divided by the total amount of agent (which is released for a much longer duration). A sequential biologics release profile is the case when a first biologic is added to the first polymer solution and a second biologic is added to the second polymer solution. Depending on which polymer solution forms the “core” or “shell”, the biologic in the “shell” (outer tube) will be released prior to the biologic in the “core” (inner fiber). In this manner, the application of two different types of biologics can be controlled.
In another embodiment, the biodegradable carrier is a microparticle, or microsphere, hereinafter referred to interchangeably. Various methods can be employed to formulate and infuse or load the microparticles with the biologic. In some embodiments, the microparticles are prepared by a water/oil/water (W/O/W) double emulsion method. In the first phase, an aqueous phase containing the biologic is dispersed into the oil phase consisting of polymer dissolved in organic solvent (e.g., dichloromethane) using a high-speed homogenizer. Examples of sustained-release polymers which may be used include those polymers described above. The primary water-in-oil (W/O) emulsion is then dispersed to an aqueous solution containing a polymeric surfactant, e.g., poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), and further homogenized to produce a W/O/W emulsion. After stirring for several hours, the microparticles are collected by filtration. In other embodiments, the microparticles can be prepared by an electrospray method. Such methods are known by those skilled in the art. See, e.g., Yeo, L. Y. et al., AC electrospray biomaterials synthesis, Biomaterials. 2005 November; 26(31):6122-8.
A first component is a 10% solution of PEG thiol in carbonate and/or phosphate buffer adjusted to pH between 8 and 9. The buffer can be between 140 mM and 160 mM. The PEG thiol can be PTE-200SH, molecular weight 20,000 kD available from NOF corporation, Japan. A second component is a 10% to 13% solution of PEG NHS in phosphate buffer at physiological pH. The PEG NHS can be PTE-200GS, molecular weight 20,000 kD available from NOF corporation, Japan. The amount of oligomer component in solution can vary from 2% to 20% by weight, however stoichiometry between the first component and the second component should be close to 1:1 to assure reaction between the components. An aqueous solution of silk protein (synthetic or non-synthetic) can be added to the first component for a final concentration of 50 mg/mL. The aqueous silk protein solution should be kept at between 3° C. and 9° C., preferably between 4° C. and 8° C. Prior to addition of the aqueous silk protein to the first component, a biologic including a growth factor and/or pharmaceutical encapsulated, suspended, disposed within or loaded into a biodegradable carrier can be added to the aqueous silk protein solution. The biodegradable carrier can be formulated according to embodiments of the present invention. Just prior to injection to a treatment site, a cell suspension including between about 0.5 million and about 10 million cells can be added to the second component. Each injection can be between 100 μL to 200 μL combined for up to 25 injections.
A first component is a 10% solution of PEG amine in carbonate or phosphate buffer adjusted to pH between 8 and 9. The buffer can be between 140 mM and 160 mM, preferably 150 mM. The PEG amine can be PTE-200PA, molecular weight 20,000 kD available from NOF corporation, Japan. A second component is a 10% to 13% solution of PEG NHS in phosphate buffer at physiological pH. The PEG NHS can be PTE-200GS, molecular weight 20,000 kD available from NOF corporation, Japan. The amount of oligomer component in solution can vary from 2% to 20% by weight, however stoichiometry between the first component and the second component should be close to 1:1 to assure reaction between the components. An aqueous solution of silk protein (synthetic or non-synthetic) can be added to the first component for a final concentration of 50 mg/mL. The aqueous silk protein solution should be kept at between 3° C. and 5° C., preferably 4° C. Prior to addition of the aqueous silk protein to the first component, a biologic including a growth factor and/or pharmaceutical encapsulated, suspended, disposed within or loaded into a biodegradable carrier can be added to the aqueous silk protein solution. The biodegradable carrier can be formulated according to embodiments of the present invention. Just prior to injection to a treatment site, a cell suspension including between about 0.5 million and about 10 million cells can be added to the second component. Each injection can be between 100 μL to 200 μL combined for up to 25 injections.
A first component is a 10% solution of PEG thiol in carbonate or phosphate buffer adjusted to pH between 8 and 9. The buffer can be between 140 mM and 160 mM. The PEG thiol can be PTE-200SH, molecular weight 20,000 kD available from NOF corporation, Japan. A second component is a 4% to 5% solution of PEG diacrylate in phosphate buffer. The PEG diacrylate can be poly(ethylene glycol)diacrylate, molecular weight 4000 kD available from Polysciences, Inc., Pennsylvania, U.S.A. The amount of oligomer component in solution can vary from 2% to 20% by weight, however stoichiometry between the first component and the second component should be close to 1:1 to assure reaction between the components. An aqueous solution of silk protein (synthetic or non-synthetic) can be added to the first component for a final concentration of 50 mg/mL. The aqueous silk protein solution should be kept at between 3° C. and 9° C., preferably between 4° C. and 8° C. Prior to addition of the aqueous silk protein to the first component, a biologic including a growth factor and/or pharmaceutical encapsulated, suspended, disposed within or loaded into a biodegradable carrier can be added to the aqueous silk protein solution. The biodegradable carrier can be formulated according to embodiments of the present invention. Just prior to injection to a treatment site, a cell suspension including between about 0.5 million and about 10 million cells can be added to the second component. Each injection can be between 100 μL to 200 μL combined for up to 25 injections.
In any of the above examples, an additional two-component gel can be combined with the oligomers. For example, sodium hyaluronate, available from Genzyme Advanced Biomaterials, Massachusetts, U.S.A., can be combined with the oligomers. Sodium hyaluronate provides a ligand to the CD 44 receptor on hMSCs. The CD44 receptor is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed on a variety of cells like endothelial, epithelial and smooth muscle cells. This molecule has many important functions, including cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions and signal transduction. In one embodiment, hyaluronic acid is a solution between about 0.01% and 0.5%. Additionally, in some embodiments, an extracellular matrix polymer, such as collagen, can be the first component.
The compositions described herein can be used in medical treatment applications in which hydrogels can contribute beneficially, but swelling is not desired (an inherent characteristic of unmodified hydrogels). For example, the resulting self-reinforcing composite matrix can be used for cell delivery in a necrosed or compromised organ or tissue region, or, as a platform for cells to grow and form neo tissue. It is anticipated that the silk matrix will degrade at a treatment site at a rate substantially slower than an unmodified hydrogel system, thus enabling cells to proliferate longer, or, allowing for a more controlled release of cells within the matrix to the treatment region. Additionally, the slower degrading platform of the silk protein can allow for a more sustained and/or controlled release of a biologic encapsulated in, suspended, disposed within or loaded into a biodegradable carrier, which can be added to the precursor silk protein aqueous solution prior to delivery to a treatment region. Silk protein naturally degrades between about 60 days and 365 days. Thus, as the silk protein matrix degrades over time, it is anticipated that the biodegradable carrier will slowly diffuse out of the matrix and into the treatment site. Since the biologic also must diffuse out from the biodegradable carrier, the compositions described in embodiments of the present invention can allow for a sustained-release of treatment agent to the treatment region without the patient having to undergo multiple invasive procedures. In vivo, in vivo and in situ applications are contemplated in the present invention.
Methods of Use
In some embodiments, the self-reinforced composite matrix is delivered to a post-myocardial infarct region or other treatment region. The viscosity of the precursors, i.e., aqueous solutions of the two-component gelation system, silk protein and buffer, can be in a range from about 5 centipoise to about 70 centipoise. Devices which can be used to deliver each component of the gel include, but are not limited to, minimally invasive injection devices such as dual-needle left-ventricle injection devices and dual-needle transvascular wall injection devices, and dual syringes. Methods of access to use the minimally invasive injection devices (i.e., percutaneous or endoscopic) include access via the femoral artery or the sub-xiphoid. “Xiphoid” or “xiphoid process” is a pointed cartilage attached to the lower end of the breastbone or sternum, the smallest and lowest division of the sternum. Both methods are known by those skilled in the art.
In some applications, first barrel 310 can include a first mixture including precursors of a two-component gelation system in solid phase wherein an aqueous solution of silk is added prior to delivery. The pH of the solution in first barrel 310 can be between 2 and 6.5 (for PEG-nucleophile with PEG-electrophile), or 5 and 7 (fibrinogen). In neutral pH, a cell suspension can be added to first barrel 310 just prior to delivery. Second barrel 320 can include a basic buffer or thrombin according to any of the embodiments described previously. A therapeutic amount of the resulting self-reinforcing composite matrix can be between about 25 μL to about 200 μL, preferably about 50 μL. In some applications, first barrel 310 includes a first basic buffer solution combined with a first functionalized polyethylene glycol with nucleophilic groups forming a 10% weight/volume solution at a pH between 8 and 9 and second barrel 320 includes a second buffer solution combined with a second functionalized polyethylene glycol with electrophilic groups forming a 4% to 13% weight/volume solution at a physiological pH. First barrel 310 can further include a biologic encapsulated, suspended, disposed within or loaded into a biodegradable carrier suspended within an aqueous solution of silk protein. In one embodiment, the biologic is IGF-1. When the contents of barrel 310 and barrel 320 are combined in situ or in vivo, a self-reinforcing composite matrix may form at the treatment region. Dual syringe 300 can be used during, for example, an open chest surgical procedure.
In one embodiment, delivery assembly 400 includes first needle 420 movably disposed within delivery lumen 430. Delivery lumen 430 is, for example, a polymer tubing of a suitable material (e.g., polyamides, polyolefins, polyurethanes, etc.). First needle 420 is, for example, a stainless steel hypotube that extends a length of the delivery assembly. First needle 420 includes a lumen with an inside diameter of, for example, 0.08 inches (0.20 centimeters). In one example for a retractable needle catheter, first needle 420 has a needle length on the order of about 40 inches (about 1.6 meters) from distal portion 405 to proximal portion 415. Lumen 410 also includes auxiliary lumen 440 extending, in this example, co-linearly along the length of the catheter (from a distal portion 405 to proximal portion 415). Auxiliary lumen 440 is, for example, a polymer tubing of a suitable material (e.g., polyamides, polyolefins, polyurethanes, etc.). At distal portion 405, auxiliary lumen 440 is terminated at a delivery end of second needle 450 and co-linearly aligned with a delivery end of needle 420. Auxiliary lumen 440 may be terminated to a delivery end of second needle 450 with a radiation-curable adhesive, such as an ultraviolet curable adhesive. Second needle 450 is, for example, a stainless steel hypotube that is joined co-linearly to the end of main needle 420 by, for example, solder (illustrated as joint 455). Second needle 450 has a length on the order of about 0.08 inches (0.20 centimeters).
Referring to
The proximal end of main needle 420 includes adaptor 470 for accommodating a substance delivery device (e.g., a component of a two-component bioerodable gel system). Adaptor 470 is, for example, a molded female luer housing. Similarly, a proximal end of auxiliary side arm 460 includes adaptor 480 to accommodate a substance delivery device (e.g., a female luer housing).
The design configuration described above with respect to
In one embodiment, catheter assembly 500 is defined by elongated catheter body 550 having proximal portion 520 and distal portion 510. Guidewire cannula 570 is formed within catheter body (from proximal portion 510 to distal portion 520) for allowing catheter assembly 500 to be fed and maneuvered over guidewire 580. Balloon 530 is incorporated at distal portion 510 of catheter assembly 500 and is in fluid communication with inflation cannula 560 of catheter assembly 500.
Balloon 530 can be formed from balloon wall or membrane 535 which is selectively inflatable to dilate from a collapsed configuration to a desired and controlled expanded configuration. Balloon 530 can be selectively dilated (inflated) by supplying a fluid into inflation cannula 560 at a predetermined rate of pressure through inflation port 565 (located at proximal end 520). Balloon wall 535 is selectively deflatable, after inflation, to return to the collapsed configuration or a deflated profile. Balloon 530 may be dilated (inflated) by the introduction of a liquid into inflation cannula 560. Liquids containing treatment and/or diagnostic agents may also be used to inflate balloon 530. In one embodiment, balloon 530 may be made of a material that is permeable to such treatment and/or diagnostic liquids. To inflate balloon 530, the fluid can be supplied into inflation cannula 560 at a predetermined pressure, for example, between about one and 20 atmospheres. The specific pressure depends on various factors, such as the thickness of balloon wall 535, the material from which balloon wall 535 is made, the type of substance employed and the flow-rate that is desired.
Catheter assembly 500 also includes at least two substance delivery assemblies 505a and 505b (not shown; see
From the foregoing detailed description, it will be evident that there are a number of changes, adaptations and modifications of the present invention which come within the province of those skilled in the part. The scope of the invention includes any combination of the elements from the different species and embodiments disclosed herein, as well as subassemblies, assemblies and methods thereof. However, it is intended that all such variations not departing from the spirit of the invention be considered as within the scope thereof.
This application is a divisional application of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/472,324, filed May 15, 2012, which application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/566,643, filed Dec. 4, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,192,760, incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2512569 | Saffir | Jun 1950 | A |
3144868 | Jascalevich | Aug 1964 | A |
3584624 | de Ciutiis | Jun 1971 | A |
3780733 | Martinez-Manzor | Dec 1973 | A |
3804097 | Rudie | Apr 1974 | A |
3890976 | Bazell et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
4141973 | Balazs | Feb 1979 | A |
4617186 | Schafer et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4794931 | Yock | Jan 1989 | A |
4818291 | Iwatsuki et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4842590 | Tanabe et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5000185 | Yock | Mar 1991 | A |
5024234 | Leary et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5026350 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5049130 | Powell | Sep 1991 | A |
5092848 | DeCiutiis | Mar 1992 | A |
5100185 | Menke et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5109859 | Jenkins | May 1992 | A |
5116317 | Carson et al. | May 1992 | A |
5128326 | Balazs et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5171217 | March et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5202745 | Sorin et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5203338 | Jang | Apr 1993 | A |
5242427 | Bilweis | Sep 1993 | A |
5270300 | Hunziker | Dec 1993 | A |
5291267 | Sorin et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5306250 | March et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5321501 | Swanson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5328955 | Rhee et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5336252 | Cohen | Aug 1994 | A |
5354279 | Hofling | Oct 1994 | A |
5365325 | Kumasaka et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5372138 | Crowley et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5380292 | Wilson | Jan 1995 | A |
5419777 | Hofling et al. | May 1995 | A |
5437632 | Engelson | Aug 1995 | A |
5455039 | Edelman et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459570 | Swanson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464395 | Faxon et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5465147 | Swanson | Nov 1995 | A |
5485486 | Gilhousen et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5499630 | Hiki et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5516532 | Atala et al. | May 1996 | A |
5540912 | Roorda et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546948 | Hamm et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554389 | Badylak et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5575815 | Slepian et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5580714 | Polovina | Dec 1996 | A |
5580856 | Prestrelski et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5588432 | Crowley | Dec 1996 | A |
5621610 | Moore et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5631011 | Wadstrom | May 1997 | A |
5642234 | Altman et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5655548 | Nelson et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5667778 | Atala | Sep 1997 | A |
5669883 | Scarfone et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672153 | Lax et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676151 | Yock | Oct 1997 | A |
5693029 | Leonhardt | Dec 1997 | A |
5722403 | McGee et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725551 | Myers et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5730732 | Sardelis et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740808 | Panescu et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749915 | Slepian | May 1998 | A |
5785689 | De Toledo et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5795331 | Cragg et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5810885 | Zinger | Sep 1998 | A |
5811533 | Gold et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5827313 | Ream | Oct 1998 | A |
5843156 | Slepian et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5874500 | Rhee et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879713 | Roth et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900433 | Igo et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906934 | Grande et al. | May 1999 | A |
5919449 | Dinsmore | Jul 1999 | A |
5935160 | Auricchio et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5939323 | Valentini et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941868 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5957941 | Ream | Sep 1999 | A |
5968064 | Selmon et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5979449 | Steer | Nov 1999 | A |
5980887 | Isner et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5981568 | Kunz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984908 | Davis et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997536 | Osswald et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6022540 | Bruder et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6045565 | Ellis et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050949 | White et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051071 | Charvet et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051648 | Rhee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056744 | Edwards | May 2000 | A |
6058329 | Salo et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060053 | Atala | May 2000 | A |
6071305 | Brown et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6086582 | Altman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093177 | Javier, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099563 | Zhong | Aug 2000 | A |
6099864 | Morrison et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102887 | Altman | Aug 2000 | A |
6102904 | Vigil et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102926 | Tartaglia et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120520 | Saadat et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120904 | Hostettler et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127448 | Domb | Oct 2000 | A |
6133231 | Ferrara et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134003 | Tearney et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146373 | Cragg et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151525 | Soykan | Nov 2000 | A |
6152141 | Stevens et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6153428 | Gustafsson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159443 | Hallahan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162202 | Sicurelli et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175669 | Colston et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177407 | Rodgers et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179809 | Khairkhahan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183432 | Milo | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6183444 | Glines et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187330 | Wang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190353 | Makower et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191144 | Isner | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192271 | Hayman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193763 | Mackin | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197324 | Crittenden | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201608 | Mandella et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206893 | Klein et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206914 | Soykan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207180 | Ottoboni et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210392 | Vigil et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217527 | Selmon et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217554 | Green | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221049 | Selmon et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231546 | Milo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235000 | Milo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241710 | Van Tassel et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251104 | Kesten et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6283947 | Mirzaee | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287285 | Michal et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290729 | Slepian et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296602 | Headley | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299604 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309370 | Haim et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312725 | Wallace et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315994 | Usala et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6323278 | Rhee et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
RE37463 | Altman | Dec 2001 | E |
6328229 | Duronio et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331309 | Jennings, Jr. et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333194 | Levy et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334872 | Termin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338717 | Ouchi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6346098 | Yock et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6346099 | Altman | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6346515 | Pitaru et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358247 | Altman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358258 | Arcia et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360129 | Ley et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368285 | Osadchy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371935 | Macoviak et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371992 | Tanagho et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379379 | Wang | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385476 | Osadchy et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391052 | Buirge et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6395023 | Summers | May 2002 | B1 |
6409716 | Sahatjian et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416510 | Altman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425887 | McGuckin et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432119 | Saadat | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436135 | Goldfarb | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440947 | Barron et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443941 | Slepian et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6443949 | Altman | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6447504 | Ben-Haim et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458095 | Wirt et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6458098 | Kanesaka | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464862 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6465001 | Hubbell et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478775 | Galt et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478776 | Rosenman et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482231 | Abatangelo et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485481 | Pfeiffer | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494862 | Ray et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514217 | Selmon et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6544227 | Sahatjian et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6544230 | Flaherty et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6548081 | Sadozai et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554801 | Steward et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6599267 | Ray et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602241 | Makower et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6616869 | Mathiowitz et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624245 | Wallace et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628988 | Kramer et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629947 | Sahatjian et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6632457 | Sawhney | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635267 | Miyoshi et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6660034 | Mandrusov et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6682730 | Mickle et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6689608 | Mikos et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6692466 | Chow et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6702744 | Mandrusov et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706034 | Bhat | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6726677 | Flaherty et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726923 | Iyer et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6737072 | Angele et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6748258 | Mueller et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6749617 | Palasis et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6759431 | Hunter et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6761887 | Kavalkovich et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6777000 | Ni et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6777231 | Katz et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6790455 | Chu et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6824791 | Mathiowitz et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6858229 | Hubbell et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6893431 | Naimark et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6916488 | Meier et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6916648 | Goddard et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6926692 | Katoh et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6992172 | Chang et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7008411 | Mandrusov et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7035092 | Hillman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7112587 | Timmer et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7129210 | Lowinger et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7169127 | Epstein et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169404 | Hossainy et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7270654 | Griego et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7273469 | Chan et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7294334 | Michal et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7361360 | Kitabwalla et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7361368 | Claude et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7374774 | Bowlin et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7378106 | Hossainy et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7393339 | Zawacki et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7438692 | Tsonton et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7615373 | Simpson et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7641643 | Michal et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7732190 | Michal et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7815590 | Cooper | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7854944 | Mandrusov et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8003123 | Hossainy et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8038991 | Stankus et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8187621 | Michal | May 2012 | B2 |
8192760 | Hossainy et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8221744 | Basu et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8293226 | Basu et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8303972 | Michal | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8383158 | Michal et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8388948 | Basu et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8486386 | Michal et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8486387 | Michal et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8500680 | Claude et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8521259 | Mandrusov et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8608661 | Mandrusov et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8609126 | Michal et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20010023349 | Van Tassel et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010055615 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020006429 | Redmond et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013408 | Rhee et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020042473 | Trollsas et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020072706 | Hiblar et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020076441 | Shih et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077657 | Ginn et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090725 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020102272 | Rosenthal et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124855 | Chachques | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020131974 | Segal | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020142458 | Williams et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020146557 | Claude et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151867 | McGuckin et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169420 | Galt et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188170 | Santamore et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023202 | Nielson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040712 | Ray et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050597 | Dodge et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030078671 | Lesniak et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030105493 | Salo | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125766 | Ding | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030175410 | Campbell et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040002650 | Mandrusov et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040181206 | Chiu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040185084 | Rhee et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040208845 | Michal et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213756 | Michal et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040229856 | Chandrasekar et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050015048 | Chiu et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050031874 | Michal et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050042254 | Freyman et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050064038 | Dinh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065281 | Lutolf et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070844 | Chow et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050186240 | Ringeisen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050281883 | Daniloff et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060149392 | Hsieh et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060233850 | Michal | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070270948 | Wuh | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080025943 | Michal et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090022817 | Michal et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090226519 | Claude et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20120225040 | Hossainy et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120225041 | Hossainy et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0331584 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0835667 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0861632 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0938871 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1214077 | Jan 2004 | EP |
2715855 | Aug 1995 | FR |
2194144 | Mar 1988 | GB |
61205446 | Sep 1986 | JP |
H02145600 | Jun 1990 | JP |
06507106 | Aug 1994 | JP |
10236984 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2000502380 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000262525 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001508666 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2003062089 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2007009185 | Jan 2007 | JP |
WO 9210142 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO 9315781 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO-9522316 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO-9733633 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO-9830207 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO-9854301 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-9953943 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO-0016818 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO-0054661 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO-0071196 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0124775 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-0124842 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-0145548 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO-0149357 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO-0200173 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-0204008 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-0228450 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO-0240070 | May 2002 | WO |
WO-02072166 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO-02087623 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-03005961 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO-03022324 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-03022909 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-03026492 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO-03027234 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO-03064637 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO-04000915 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2004050013 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO-2004058305 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2004060346 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2004066829 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO-2004091592 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO-2004098669 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2005061019 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO-2005067890 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO-2006014570 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2006027549 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2006039704 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2006113407 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO-20060113407 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO-2007048831 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2007145909 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/447,340. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/792,960. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,643. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Office Action dated May 12, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/496,824. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 5, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/507,860. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/414,602. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, International search report and written opinion dated Jun. 18, 2009 for PCT/US2008/051505. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non final office action dated Jul. 9, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,328. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non final office action dated Aug. 5, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/031,608. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 30, 2009 for PCT/US2008/051505. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final office action dated Nov. 12, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/013,286. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final office action dated Nov. 25, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,643. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non final office action dated Dec. 9, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/781,984. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Examination Report dated Jan. 13, 2010 for EP Application No. 07795729.8. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non final office action dated Feb. 5, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/447,340. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/792,960. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Examination Report dated Jan. 15, 2010 for EP 08727952.7. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Examination Report dated Feb. 5, 2010 for EP 07810637.4. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final office action dated Mar. 29, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/031,608. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non final office action dated Apr. 29, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/792,960. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 04, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/781,984. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,328. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 15, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/507,860. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non final office action dated Aug. 13, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/447,340. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final office action mailed Sep. 27, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/792,960. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final office action mailed Sep. 27, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/016,180. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 22, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/781,984. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action mailed Nov. 24, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/013,286. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action mailed Dec. 8, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,643. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action mailed Dec. 10, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/938,752. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action mailed Dec. 17, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,922. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, website for Healon (R) OVD, copyright 2010, accessed Dec. 15, 2010, URL: <http://abbottmedicaloptics.com/products/cataract/ovds/healon-viscoelastic>, (2010), 2 pages. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Product Information Sheet for HEALON (R), from Abbott Medical Optics, (2005), 1 page. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/013,286. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non final office action dated Apr. 14, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/016,180. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final office action dated Apr. 22, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/414,602. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 8, 2010 for Japanese Patent App No. 2006-509975, 6 pages. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non final office action mailed Feb. 8, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/792,960. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 15, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/414,602. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non final office action mailed Nov. 8, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/792,960. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 13, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/963,397. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 5, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/361,920. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Office Action mailed Jan. 17, 2012 for European Patent Application 08727952.7. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 30, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/781,984. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 8, 2012 for Japanese application No. 2006-509975, 6 pages. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 15, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/114,717. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 4, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/792,960. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, European Office Action mailed Apr. 11, 2012 for App No. 12155231.9, 9 pages. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, European Office Action mailed Apr. 10, 2012 for App No. 07810637.4, 6 pages. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final Office Action mailed May 9, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/110,223. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, European Search report for application No. 12151788.2 mailed Apr. 18, 2012, 6 pages. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action mailed Jun. 22, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/963,397. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action mailed Jun. 26, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/632,612. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Japanese Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2012 for Appln. No. 2010-162711. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action mailed Aug. 30, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,328. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-Final Office Action Sep. 11, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/792,960. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Japanese office action dated Aug. 20, 2012 for JP 2009-537153. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/756,119. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non final office action mailed Jun. 7, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/447,340. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non final office action mailed Jul. 6, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/781,984. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final office action mailed Jun. 28, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/792,960. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final office action mailed Jul. 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,643. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 31, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/110,223. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final office action mailed Sep. 20, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/938,752. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 21, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/781,984. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Japanese Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2012 for JP 2009-522776. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/114,717. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 7, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/781,984. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Japanese Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2012 for Appln. No. 2009-539265. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Japanese office action mailed Mar. 25, 2013 for JP 2009-539265. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, PCT Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 26, 2008 for PCT/US2007/016433. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, PCT Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 31, 2008 for PCT/US2007/024158. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Dec. 24, 2008 for PCT/US2007/013181, P4437X2PCT. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, “PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Feb. 10, 2009”, PCT/US2007/023419. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, “PCT Search Report dated Feb. 12, 2008”, PCT Appln No. PCT/US2007/013181, 17 pages. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, “PCT Search Report dated Jan. 31, 2007”, PCT Appln No. PCT/US2006/014021, 11 pages. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, “PCT Search Report dated Mar. 27, 2008”, PCT Appln No. PCT/US2007/003614, 18 pages. |
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Extended EP Search Report dated May 20, 2011 for EP Application No. 10186197.9. |
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Extended European search report dated Apr. 21, 2011 for EP Application No. 10186186.2. |
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, et al., “PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 19, 2007”, PCT Appln. No. PCT/US2005/045627. |
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, “PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 3, 2005”, PCT Appln. No. PCT/US2004/011356, 6 pages. |
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, “PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Oct. 13, 2006”, PCT Appln No. PCT/US2005/045627. |
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, “PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 9, 2004”, PCT Appln. No. PCT/US03/30464, 5 pages. |
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, “PCT International Search Report dated Jan. 28, 2004”, PCT Appln. No. PCT/US03/18360, 7 pages. |
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, “PCT Invitation to Pay Additional Fees mailed Nov. 4, 2003”, PCT Appln No. PCT/US03/18360,3 pages. |
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, “PCT Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 24, 2004”, PCT Appln. No. PCT/US2004/011356, 12 pages. |
Agocha, A., et al., “Hypoxia regulates basal and induced DNA synthesis and collagen type I production in human cardiac fibroblasts: effects of transforming growth factor-beta 1, thyroid hormone, angiotensin II and basic fibroblast growth factor”, J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol., 29(8), (Apr. 1997), pp. 2233-2244. |
Allemann, E., et al., “Kinetics of Blood Component Adsorption on poly(D,L-lactic acid) Nanoparticles: Evidence of Complement C3 Component Involvement”, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 37(2), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed, (Nov. 1997), 229-234. |
Anderson, James M., et al., “Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 28, (1997), 5-24. |
Assmus, B., et al., “Transplantation of Progenitor Cells and Regeneration Enhancement in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TOPCARE—AMI)”, Clinical Investigation and Reports, Circulation, 106, (2002), 3009-3017. |
Baxter Healthcare Corporation, “FloSeal Matrix Hemostatic Sealant”, fusionmed.com/docs/surgeon/default.asp, (2002), pp. 1-2. |
Berger, et al., “Poly-L-cysteine”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 78(17), (Sep. 5, 1956), pp. 4483-4488. |
Bernatowicz, M., et al., “Preparation of Boc-[S-(3-nitro-2-pyridinesulfeny1)]-cysteine and its use for Unsymmetrical Disulfide Bond Formation”, Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 28(2), (Aug. 1996), pp. 107-112. |
Boland, E. D., “Electrospinning Collagen and Elastin: Preliminary Vascular Tissue Engineering”, Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 9, (May 1, 2004), pp. 1422-1432. |
Brust, G., “Polyimides”, Department of Polymer Science; The University of Southern Mississippi, pslc.usm.edu/macrog/imide.htm, (2005), pp. 1-4. |
Bull, S., et al., “Self-Assembled Peptide Amphiphile Nanofibers Conjugated to MRI Contrast Agents”, Nano Letters, vol. 5, No. 1, (Jan. 2005), 4 pages. |
Buschmann, I, et al., “Arteriogenesis versus angiogenesis: Two mechanisms of vessel growth”, News Physiol. Sci., vol. 14, (Jun. 1999), 121-125. |
Canderm Pharma, “Technical Dossier: Artecoll”, downloaded from the Internet on Oct. 22, 2002 from: http://www.canderm.com/artecoll/tech.html, pp. 1-3. |
Capan, Y., et al., “Preparation and Characterization of Poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) Microspheres for Controlled Release of Human Growth Hormone”, AAPS PharmSciTech., 4(2) Article 28, (2003), 1-10. |
Caplan, Michael J., et al., “Dependence on pH of polarized sorting of secreted proteins”, Nature, vol. 29, (Oct. 15, 1987), 630. |
Carpino, L., et al., “Tris(2-aminoethyl)amine as a Substitute for 4-(Aminomethyl)piperidine in the FMOC/Polyamine Approach to Rapid Peptide Synthesis”, J. Org. Chem., 55(5), (Mar. 1990), pp. 1673-1675. |
Chandy, et al., “The development of porous alginate/elastin/PEG composite matrix for cardiovascular engineering”, Journal of Biomaterials Applications, vol. 17, (Apr. 2003), 287-301. |
Choi, Young Seon, et al., “Study on gelatin-containing artificial skin: I. Preparation and characteristics of novel gelatin-alginate sponge”, Biomaterials, vol. 20, (1999), 409-417. |
Chung, Y., et al., “Sol-gel transition temperature of PLGA-g-PEG aqueous solutions”, Biomacromolecules, vol. 3, No. 3, (May 2002), 511-516. |
Corbett, S., et al., “Covalent Cross-linking of Fibronectin to Fibrin is Required for Maximal Cell Adhesion to a Fibronectin-Fibrin Matrix”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272(40), (Oct. 3, 1997), pp. 24999-25005. |
Creemers, E., et al., “Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibition After Myocardial Infarction: A New Approach to Prevent Heart Failure?”, Circ. Res., vol. 89, (2001), pp. 201-210. |
Crivello, et al., “Synthesis and Photoinitiated Cationic Polymerization of Monomers with the Silsesquioxane Core”, J Polym Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry 35, (1997), pp. 407-425. |
Csonka, E., et al., “Interspecific Interaction of Aortic Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Cells”, Acta Morphologica Hungarica, vol. 35, No. 1-2, (1987), 31-35. |
Davis, M. E., et al., “Injectable Self-Assembling Peptide Nanofibers Create Intramyocardial Microenvironments for Endothelial Cells”, Circulation, 111, (Feb. 2005), pp. 442-450. |
Davis, M E., et al., “Injectable Self-Assembling Peptide Nanofibers Create Intramyocardial Microenvironments for Endothelial Cells”, Circulation, 111, (2005), 442-450. |
De Rosa, et al., “Biodegradable Microparticles for the Controlled Delivery of Oligonucleotides”, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 242, (Aug. 21, 2002), pp. 225-228. |
Desai, M., et al., “Polymer bound EDC (P-EDC): A convenient reagent for formation of an amide bond”, Tetrahedron Letters, 34(48), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at sciencedirect.com, (Nov. 1993), 7685-7688. |
Dinbergs, et al., “Cellular response to transforming growth factor-β1 and basic fibroblast growth factor depends on release kinetics and extracellular matrix interactions”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, No. 47, (Nov. 1996), 29822-29829. |
Dong, Zhanfeng, et al., “Alginate/gelatin blend films and their properties for drug controlled release”, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 280, (2006), 37-44. |
Edelman, “Controlled and modulated release of basic fibroblast growth factor”, Biomaterials, vol. 12, (Sep. 1999), 619-626. |
Elbert, D. L., et al., “Protein delivery from materials formed by self-selective conjugate addition reactions”, Journal of Controlled Release, 76, (2001), 11-25. |
Etzion, S., et al., “Influence of Embryonic Cardiomyocyte Transplantation on the Progression of Heart Failure in a Rat Model of Extensive Myocardial Infarction”, J. Mol. Cell Cardiol., 33, (May 2001), pp. 1321-1330. |
Ferrara, N., “Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in the Regulation of Angiogenesis”, Kidney International, 56(3), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at nature.com/ki/journal/v56/n3/abs/4490967a.html, (1999), 794-814. |
Friedman, Paul M., et al., “Safety Data of Injectable Nonanimal Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid Gel for Soft Tissue Augmentation”, Dermatologic Surgery, vol. 28, (2002), pp. 491-494. |
Fuchs, S., et al., “Catheter-Based Autologous Bone Marrow Myocardial Injection in No-Option Patients with Advanced Coronary Artery Disease”, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 41(10), (2003), pp. 1721-1724. |
Fukumoto, S., et al., “Protein Kinase C δ Inhibits the Proliferation of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells by Suppressing G1 Cyclin Expression”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272(21), (May 1997), pp. 13816-13822. |
Giordano, F., et al., “Angiogenesis: The Role of the Microenvironment in Flipping the Switch”, Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, 11, (2001), pp. 35-40. |
Gossler, et al., “Transgenesis by means of blastocyst-derived embryonic stem cell lines”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, (Dec. 1986), pp. 9065-9069. |
Grafe, T. H., “Nanofiber Webs from Electrospinning”, Presented at the Nonwovens in Filtration—Fifth International Conference Stuttgart, Germany, (Mar. 2003), pp. 1-5. |
Gref, R., et al., “Biodegradable Long-Circulating Polymeric Nanospheres”, Science, 263(5153), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/263/5153/1600, 1 page, (Mar. 1994). |
Griese, D. P., et al., “Vascular gene delivery of anticoagulants by transplantation of retrovirally-transduced endothelial progenitor cells”, Cardiovascular Research, vol. 58, (2003), 469-477. |
Grund, F., et al., “Microembolization in Pigs: Effects on Coronary Blood Flow and Myocardial Ischemic Tolerance”, Am. J. Physiol., 277 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 46), (1999), pp. H533-H542. |
Gupta, et al., “Changes in Passive Mechanical Stiffness of Myocardial Tissue with Aneurysm Formation”, Circulation, 89(5), (May 1994), pp. 2315-2326. |
Hanawa, T., et al., “New oral dosage form for elderly patients: preparation and characterization of silk fibroin gel”, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, Pharmaceutical Society of Japan, Tokyo, vol. 43, No. 2, (Jan. 1995), 284-288. |
Hao, X, et al., “Angiogenic Effects of Sequential release of VEGF-A 165 and PDGF-BB with Alginate Hydrogels After Myocardial Infarction”, Cardiovascular Research, 75(1), (Apr. 6, 2007), 178-185. |
Hao, X, et al., “Angiogenic effects of sequential release of VEGF-A165 and PDGF-BB with alginate hydrogels after myocardial infarction”, Cardiovascular Research, 75, (2007), 178-185. |
Hartgerink, J. D., et al., “Peptide-amphiphile nanofibers: A versatile scaffold for the preparation of self-assembling materials”, PNAS, vol. 99, No. 8, (Apr. 16, 2002), 5133-5138. |
Hartgerink, J. D., et al., “Self-Assembly and Mineralization of Peptide-Amphiphile Nanofibers”, Science, vol. 294, (Nov. 23, 2001), 1684-1688. |
Hashimoto, T., et al., “Development of Alginate Wound Dressings Linked with Hybrid Peptides Derived from Laminin and Elastin”, Biomaterials, 25, (2004), pp. 1407-1414. |
Haugland, et al., “Dialkylcarbocyanine and Dialkylaminostryryl Probes”, Handbook of Fluorescent Probes and Research Products, Molecular Probes, Inc., (2002), 530-534. |
Haugland, et al., “Membrane-permeant reactive tracers”, Handbook of Fluorescent Probes and Research Products, Molecular Probes, Inc., (2002), 458-553. |
Haynesworth, Stephen E., et al., “Platelet Effects on Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells”, Abstract, presented at Orthopaedic Research Society 48th Annual Meeting, Dallas, TX, Oct. 2-13, 2010), 2 pages. |
Heeschen, C., et al., “Nicotine Stimulates Tumor Angiogenesis”, American College of Cardiology, 37(2) Supplement A,, Abstract downloaded from the Internet at: http://24.132.160.238/ciw-01acc/abstract—search—author.cfm?SearchName=Heeschen, 1 page, (Feb. 2001), pp. 1A-648A. |
Helisch, A, et al., “Angiogenesis and arteriogenesis”, NEUE Diagnostische Und Therap. Verfahren, Z Kardiol 89, (2000), 239-244. |
Hendel, R. C., et al., “Effect of Intracoronary Recombinant Human Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor on Myocardial Perfusion: Evidence for a Dose-Dependent Effect”, Circulation, 101, (2000), pp. 118-121. |
Henry, R. R., et al., “Insulin Action and Glucose Metabolism in Nondiabetic Control and NIDDM Subjects: Comparison Using Human Skeletal Muscle Cell Cultures”, Diabetes, 44(8), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at www.diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/44/8/936, (1995), pp. 936-946. |
Hoffman, “Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 43, (2002), pp. 3-12. |
Holland, N. B., et al., “Biomimetic Engineering of Non-Adhesive glycocalyx-like Surfaces Using Oligosaccharide Surfactant Polymers”, Nature, 392, Abstract downloaded from the Internet at www.nature.com, (Apr. 1998), pp. 799-801. |
Horan, R.L., et al., “In Vitro Degradation of Silk Fibroin”, Biomaterials, vol. 26, (2004), 3385-3393. |
Hovinen, J., et al., “Synthesis of 3′-functionalized oligonucleotides on a single solid support”, Tetrahedron Letters, 34(50), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at www.sciencedirect.com, (Dec. 1993), pp. 8169-8172. |
Huang, K., et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of Self-Assembling Block Copolymers Containing Bioadhesive End Groups”, Biomacromolecules, 3(2), (2002), pp. 397-406. |
Hutcheson, K., et al., “Comparison of Benefits on Myocardial Performance of Cellular Cardiomyoplasty with Skeletal Myoblasts and Fibroblasts”, Cell Transplantation, 9(3), (2000), pp. 359-368. |
Huynh, T. V., et al., “Constructing and Screening cDNA Libraries in λgt10 and λgt11”, Chapter 2 in DNA Cloning, vol. 1: A Practical Approach, ed. By D.M. Glover, (1985), pp. 49-78. |
Indik, Z., et al., “Production of Recombinant Human Tropoelastin: Characterization and Demonstration of Immunologic and Chemotactic Activity”, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 280(1), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed, 1 page, (Jul. 1990), pp. 80-86. |
Iskandrian, A. S., et al., “Nuclear Cardiac Imaging: Principles and Applications”, second edition, F.A. Davis Co., Philadelphia, cover page, title page and TOC, (1996), 5 pages total. |
Isner, J. M., “Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor: Gene Therapy and Therapeutic Angiogenesis”, Am. J. Cardiol., 82(10A), (Nov. 19, 1998), pp. 63S-64S. |
Ito, Wulf D., et al., “Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 increases collateral and peripheral conductance after femoral artery occlusion”, Max-Planck-Institute for Physiological and Clinical Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany, (Feb. 21, 1997), 829-837. |
Johnson, et al., “The stabilization and encapsulation of human growth hormone nto biodegradable microspheres”, Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 14, No. 6, (1997), 730-735. |
Jonasson, P., et al., “Denatured states of human carbonic anhydrase II: an NMR study of hydrogen/deuterium exchange at tryptophan-indole-Hn sites”, FEBS Letters, 445, (1999), pp. 361-365. |
Kalltorp, Mia, et al., “Inflammatory cell recruitment, distribution, and chemiluminescence response at IgG precoated- and thiol functionalized gold surfaces”, Swedish Biomaterials Consortium, Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, (Apr. 9, 1999), 251-259. |
Kaplan, D.L., et al., “Spiderless Spider Webs”, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 20, (2002), 239-240. |
Kawai, et al., “Accelerated tissue regeneration through incorporation of basic fibroblast growth factor-impregnated gelatin microspheres into artificial dermis”, Biomaterials, 21(5), (Mar. 2000), 489-499. |
Kawasuji, M., et al., “Therapeutic Angiogenesis with Intramyocardial Administration of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor”, Ann Thorac Surg, 69, Abstract downloaded from the Internet at www.ats.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/69/4/1155, (2000), pp. 1155-1161. |
Kelley, et al., “Restraining Infarct Expansion Preserves Left Ventricular Geometry and Function After Acute Anteroapical Infarction”, Circulation, 99, (1999), pp. 135-142. |
Kelly, E. B., “Advances in Mammalian and Stem Cell Cloning”, Genetic Engineering News, vol. 23, No. 7, (Apr. 1, 2003), pp. 17-18 & 68. |
Khademhosseini, et al., “Microscale Technologies for Tissue Engineering and Biology”, PNAS, vol. 103, No. 8, (Feb. 21, 2006), pp. 2480-2487. |
Kim, D., et al., “Glow Discharge Plasma Deposition (GDPD) Technique for the Local Controlled Delivery of Hirudin from Biomaterials”, Pharmaceutical Research, 15(5), (1998), pp. 783-786. |
Kim, Ung-Jin, et al., “Structure and Properties of Silk Hydrogels”, Biomacromolecules, vol. 5(3), (2004), 786-792. |
Kinart, et al., “Electrochemical Studies of 2-hydroxy-3-(3,4-dimethyl-9-oxo-9H-thioxanthen-2-yloxy)N,N,N-trimethyl-1-propanium chloride”, J. Electroanal. Chem, 294, (1990), pp. 293-297. |
Kipshidze, Nicholas, et al., “Therapeutic angiogenesis for critical limb ischemia to limit or avoid amputation”, University of Wisconsin Medical School, The Journal of Invasive Cardiology, vol. 11, No. 1, (Jan. 1999), 25-28. |
Klein, S., et al., “Fibroblast Growth Factors as Angiogenesis Factors: New Insights Into Their Mechanism of Action”, Regulation of Angiogenesis, I.D. Goldberg and E.M. Rosen (eds.), 79, (1997), pp. 159-192. |
Klugherz, Bruce D., et al., “Gene delivery from a DNA controlled-release stent in porcine coronary arteries”, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 18, (Nov. 2000), 1181-1184. |
Kohilas, K, et al., “Effect of prosthetic titanium wear debris on mitogen-induced monocyte and lymphoid activation”, John Hopkins University, Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery, (Apr. 1999), 95-103. |
Kweon, H. Y., et al., “Preparation of semi-interpenetrating polymer networks composed of silk fibroin and poly(ethyleneglycol) macromer”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, NY, vol. 80, (Jan. 2001), 1848-1853. |
Kwok, C., et al., “Design of Infection-Resistant Antibiotic-Releasing Polymers: I. Fabrication and Formulation”, Journal of Controlled Release, 62, (1999), pp. 289-299. |
Laboratory of Liposome Research, “Liposomes: General Properties”, downloaded from the Internet on Feb. 9, 2006 at www.unizh.ch/onkwww/lipos.htm. |
Laham, R. J., “Intrapericardial Delivery of Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Induces Neovascularization in a Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia”, J. Pharmacol Exper Therap, 292(2), (2000), pp. 795-802. |
Leibovich, S. J., et al., “Macrophage-Induced Angiogenesis is Mediated by Tumour Necrosis Factor-α”, Nature, vol. 329, (Oct. 15, 1987), pp. 630-632. |
Leor, J., et al., “Bioengineered Cardiac Grafts—A New Approach to Repair the Infarcted Myocardium?”, Circulation, 102[suppl III], (2000), pp. III-56-III-61. |
Leor, J., et al., “Gene Transfer and Cell Transplant: An Experimental Approach to Repair a ‘Broken Heart’”, Cardiovascular Research, 35, (1997), pp. 431-441. |
Leroux, J. C., et al., “An Investigation on the Role of Plasma and Serum Opsonins on the Internalization of Biodegradable poly(D,L-lactic acid) Nanoparticles by Human Monocytes”, Life Sci., 57(7), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed, (1995), pp. 695-703. |
Lewin, B , “Repressor is Controlled by a Small Molecule Inducer”, Genes VII, Oxford University Press, 7th ed., (2000), pp. 277-280. |
Li, et al., “Cell Therapy to Repair Broken Hearts”, Can. J. Cardiol., vol. 14, No. 5, (May 1998), pp. 735-744. |
Li, W. W., et al., “Lessons to be Learned from Clinical Trials of Angiogenesis Modulators in Ischemic Diseases”, Angiogenesis in Health & Disease: Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Applications, Rubanyi, G. (ed), Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, (2000), Chapter 33. |
Li, J., et al., “PR39, A Peptide Regulator of Angiogenesis”, Nature Medicine, 6(1), (Jan. 2000), pp. 49-55. |
Li, B., et al., “VEGF and PIGF promote adult vasculogenesis by enhancing EPC recruitment and vessel formation at the site of tumor neovascularization”, The FASEB Journal, vol. 20, (2006), 1495-1497. |
Li., Y. Y., et al., “Differential Expression of Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinases in the Failing Human Heart”, Circulation, 98(17), (1998), pp. 1728-1734. |
Lindsey, M., et al., “Selective Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibition Reduces Left Ventricular Remodeling but does not Inhibit Angiogenesis after Myocardial Infarction”, Circulation, 105(6), (2002), pp. 753-758. |
Long, D. M., et al., “Self-Cleaving Catalytic RNA”, FASEB Journal, 7, (1993), pp. 25-30. |
Lopez, J. J., et al., “Angiogenic potential of perivascular delivered aFGF in a porcine model of chronic myocardial ischemia”, The American Physiological Society, 0363-6135/98, (1998), H930-H936. |
Lopez, J. J., et al., “VEGF Administration in Chronic Myocardial Ischemia in Pigs”, Cardiovasc. Res., 40(2), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed, 1 page, (1998), pp. 272-281. |
Lu, L., et al., “Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds for Cartilage Tissue Engineering”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Carl T. Brighton (ed.). No. 391S, (2001), pp. S251-270. |
Luo, Y., et al., “Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel Films: New Biomaterials for Drug Delivery”, Journal of Controlled Release, 69, (2000), pp. 169-184. |
Lutolf, M, et al., “Synthesis and Physicochemical Characterization of End-Linked Polyethylene glycol)-co-peptide Hydrogels Formed by Michael-Type Addition”, Biomacromolecules, vol. 4, (2003), 713-722. |
Lyman, M. D., et al., “Characterization of the Formation of Interfacially Photopolymerized Thin Hydrogels in Contact with Arterial Tissue”, Biomaterials, 17(3), (1996), pp. 359-364. |
Mansour, S., et al., “Disruption of the proto-oncogene int-2 in mouse embryo-derived stem cells: a general strategy for targeting mutations to non-selectable genes”, Nature, 336, (1988), pp. 348-352. |
Martin, S. L., et al., “Total Synthesis and Expression in Escherichia Coli of a Gene Encoding Human Tropoelastin”, Gene, (1995), Abstract. |
McDevitt, T., et al., “In vitro Generation of Differentiated Cardiac Myofibers on Micropatterned Laminin Surfaces”, J. Biomed Mater Res., 60, (2002), pp. 472-479. |
Meinel, L., et al., “The Inflammatory Responses to Silk Films In Vitro and In Vivo”, Biomaterials, vol. 26, (2005), 147-155. |
Mogan, L., “Rationale of platelet gel to augment adaptive remodeling of the injured heart”, J Extra Corpor Technol, 36(2), (Jun. 2004), 191-196. |
Narmoneva, D. A., et al., “Self-assembling short oligopeptides and the promotion of angiogenesis”, Biomaterials, 26, (2005), pp. 4837-4846. |
Nazarov, R., et al., “Porous 3-D Scaffolds from Regenerated Silk Fibroin”, Biomacromolecules, vol. 5(3), (2004), 718-726. |
Nguyen, K. T., et al., “Photopolymerizable Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications”, Biomaterials, 23, (2002), pp. 4307-4314. |
Nikolic, S. D., et al., “New Angiogenic Implant Therapy Improves Function of the Ischemic Left Venticle”, Supplement to Circulation; Abstracts From Scientific Sessions 2000, 102(18), (Oct. 2000), pp. II-689, Abstract 3331. |
Nikolic, Serjan D., et al., “Novel means to improve coronary blood flow”, Clinical Science, Abstracts from Scientific Sessions, (2000), II-689. |
Nitinol Technical Information, “NiTi Smart Sheets”, downloaded from the Internet on Dec. 10, 2002 at: http://www.sma-inc.com/information.html, 1 page. |
Nose, et al., “A novel cadherin cell adhesion molecule: its expression patterns associated with implantation and organogenesis of mouse embryos”, Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 103 (No. 6, Pt. 2), The Rockefeller University Press, (Dec. 1986), 2649-2658. |
Ohyanagi, H., et al., “Kinetic Studies of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Transport into or from Perfluorochemical Particles”, Proc. ISAO, vol. 1 (Artificial Organs vol. 2 (Suppl.)), (1977), pp. 90-92. |
Ozbas, B., et al., “Salt-Triggered Peptide Folding and Consequent Self-Assembly into Hydrogels with Tunable Modulus”, Macromolecules, 37(19), (2004), pp. 7331-7337. |
Ozbas-Turan, S., “Controlled Release of Interleukin-2 from Chitosan Microspheres”, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 91(5), (May 2002), pp. 1245-1251. |
Palmiter, R., et al., “Germ-Line Transformation of Mice”, Ann. Rev. Genet., 20, (1986), pp. 465-499. |
Patrick, C. R., “Mixing and Solution Properties of Organofluorine Compounds”, Preparation, Properties and Industrial Applications of Organofluorine Compounds, Chapter 10, R.E. Banks (ed.), 1st edition, Ellis-Horwood Ltd., Chichester:England, (1982), pp. 323-342. |
Peattie, R. A., et al., “Stimulation of In Vivo Angiogenesis by Cytokine-Loaded Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel Implants”, Biomaterials, 25(14), Abstract downloaded from: www.sciencedirect.com, (Jun. 2004). |
Penta, K., et al., “Del1 Induces Integrin Signaling and Angiogenesis by Ligation of aVβ3”, J. Biolog. Chem., 274(16), (Apr. 1999), pp. 11101-11109. |
Perin, E. C., et al., “Transendocardial, Autologous Bone Marrow Cell Transplantation for Severe, Chronic, Ischemic Heart Failure”, Circulation, (2003). |
Pouzet, B., et al., “Is Skeletal Myoblast Transplantation Clinically Relevant in the Era of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors?”, Circulation, 104 [suppl I], (Sep. 2001), pp. I-223-I-228. |
Prather, et al., “Nuclear Transplantation in Early Pig Embryos”, Biol. Reprod., 41, (1989), pp. 414-418. |
Quellec, P., et al., “Protein Encapsulation Within Polyethylene Glycol-coated Nanospheres. I. Physicochemical Characterization”, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 42(1), (1998)), Abstract. |
Ramirez-Solis, R., et al., “Gene Targeting in Embryonic Stem Cells”, Methods in Enzymology, 225, (1993), pp. 855-878. |
Ritter, A. B., et al., “Elastic modulus, distensibility, and compliance (capacitance)”, Biomedical Engineering Principles, Chapter 4, (2005), 187-191. |
Rowley, et al., “Alginate Hydrogels as Synthetic Extracelllular Matrix Materials”, Biomaterials, 20(1), (1999), 45-53. |
Sawhney, A. S., et al., “Bioerodible Hydrogels Based on Photopolymerized Poly(ethylene glycol)-co-poly(a-hydroxy acid) Diacrylate Macromers”, Macromolecules, 26(4), (1993), pp. 581-587. |
Sbaa-Ketata, E., et al., “Hyaluronan-Derived Oligosaccharides Enhance SDF-1-Dependent Chemotactic Effect on Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic CD34+ Cells”, Stem Cells, 20(6), Letter to the Editor downloaded from the Internet at www.stemcells.alphamedpress.org/cgi/content/full/20/6/585, (2002), 585-587. |
Seeger, J. M., et al., “Improved in vivo endothelialization of prosthetic grafts by surface modification with fibronectin”, J Vasc Surg, vol. 8, No. 4, (Oct. 1988), 47682 (Abstract ony). |
Segura, T, et al., “Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels: A Strategy to Functionalize and Pattern”, Biomaterials, vol. 26(4), (Feb. 2005), 359-371. |
Segura, T., et al., “DNA delivery from hyaluronic acid-collagen hydrogels via a substrate-mediated approach”, Biomaterials, vol. 26, (2005), 1575-1584. |
Segura, T., et al., “Substrate-Mediated DNA Delivery: Role of the Cationic Polymer Structure and Extent of Modification”, Journal of Controlled Release, 93, (2003), pp. 69-84. |
Segura, T., et al., “Surface-Tethered DNA Complexes for Enhanced Gene Delivery”, Bioconjugate Chem, 13(3), (2002), pp. 621-629. |
Shibasaki, F., et al., “Suppression of Signalling Through Transcription Factor NF-AT by Interactions Between Calcineurin and BcI-2”, Nature, 386(6626), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=Text&DB=pubmed, (1997). |
Shin, H., et al., “Attachment, Proliferation, and Migration of Marrow Stromal Osteoblasts Cultured on Biomimetic Hydrogels Modified with an Osteopontin-Derived Peptide”, Biomaterials, 25, (2004), pp. 895-906. |
Shin, H., et al., “In vivo bone and soft tissue response to injectable, biodegradable oligo(poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate) hydrogels”, Biomaterials 24, Elseview Science Ltd., (3201-3211), 2003. |
Shu, Z, et al., “Disulfide-crosslinked hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogel films: a covalent mimic of the extracellular matrix for in vitro cell growth”, Biomaterials, vol. 24(21), (Sep 2003), 3825-3834. |
Shu, Zheng, et al., “In situ crosslinkable hyaluronan hydrogels for tissue engineering”, Biomaterials, vol. 25, No. 7-8, (Mar. 2004), 1339-1348. |
Simons, M., et al., “Clinical trials in coronary angiogenesis: Issues, problems, consensus, An expert panel summary”, Angiogenesis Research Center, American Heart Association, Inc. (Sep. 12, 2000), 1-14. |
Spenlehauer, G, et al., “In vitro and in vivo degradation of poly(D,L lactide/glycolide) type microspheres made by solvent evaporation method”, Biomaterials, vol. 10, (Oct. 1989), 557-563. |
Spinale, F. G., “Matrix Metalloproteinases—Regulation and Dysregulation in the Failing Heart”, Circ. Res., 90, (2002), pp. 520-530. |
Springer, M., et al., “Angiogenesis Monitored by Perfusion with a Space-Filling Microbead Suspension”, Mol. Ther., 1(1), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed, (2000), pp. 82-87. |
Staatz, WD, et al., “Identification of a tetrapeptide recognition sequence for the alpha 2 beta 1 integrin in collagen”, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1991, 266(12), pp. 7363-7367. |
Storm, G., et al., “Surface Modification of Nanoparticles to Oppose Uptake by the Mononuclear Phagocyte System”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 17(1), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at www.sciencedirect.com, (Oct. 1995), pp. 31-48. |
Strauer, B., et al., “Repair of Infarcted Myocardium by Autologous Intracoronary Mononuclear Bone Marrow Cell Transplantation in Humans”, Circulation, 106, (2002), pp. 1913-1918. |
Tybulewicz, V., et al., “Neonatal lethality and lymphopenia in mice with a homozygous disruption of the c-abl proto-oncogene”, Cell, 65(7), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at www.sciencedirect.com, (Jun. 1991), pp. 1153-1163. |
Unger, E. F., et al., “Effects of a Single Intracoronary Injection of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor in Stable angina Pectoris”, Am. J. Cardiol, 85(12), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at www.sciencedirect.com, (Jun. 2000), pp. 1414-1419. |
Urbich, C., et al., “Endothelial Progenitor Cells: Characterization and Role in Vascular Biology”, Circulation Research, vol. 95, (2004), 343-353. |
Van Der Giessen, Willem J., et al., “Marked inflammatory sequelae to implantation of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable polymers in porcine coronary arteries”, Dept. of Cardiology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Circulation, vol. 94, No. 7, (Oct. 1, 1996), 1690-1697. |
Van Luyn, M. J., et al., “Cardiac Tissue Engineering: Characteristics of In Unison Contracting Two- and Three-Dimensional Neonatal Rat Ventricle Cell (Co)-Cultures”, Biomaterials, 23, (2002), pp. 4793-4801. |
Vercruysse, K. P., et al., “Synthesis and in Vitro Degradation of New Polyvalent Hydrazide Cross-Linked Hydrogels of Hyaluronic Acid”, Bioconjugate Chem, 8(5), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/abstract.cgi/bcches/1997/8/i05/abs/bc9701095.html, (1997), pp. 686-694. |
Visscher, G.E., et al., “Tissue response to biodegradable injectable microcapsules”, Journal of Biomaterials Applications, vol. 2, (Jul. 1987), 118-119. |
Vlodavsky, I. , et al., “Extracellular Matrix-resident Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor: Implication for the Control of Angiogenesis”, J. Cell Biochem, 45(2), Abstract downloaded from the Internet at vvww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed, (Feb. 1991), pp. 167-176. |
Wang, M., et al., “Mechanical Properties of Electrospun Silk Fibers”, Macromolecules, vol. 37(18), (2004), 6856-6864. |
Wasielewski, “Ischamische Erkrankungen, Gefassneubildung anregen”, Deutsche Apotheker Zeitung, vol. 140, No. 3, Stuttgart (DE), (Jan. 20, 2000), 232-233. |
Wilensky, R., et al., “Direct intraarterial wall injection of microparticles via a catheter: a potential drug delivery strategy following angioplasty”, American Heart Journal, 122, (1991), p. 1136. |
Witzenbichler, B., et al., “Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-C (VEGF-C/VEGF-2) Promotes Angiogenesis in the Setting of Tissue lschemia”, AM Pathol., 153(2), (Aug. 1998), pp. 381-394. |
Yager, P., et al., “Silk Protein Project”, wvvw.faculty.washington.edu/yagerp/silkprojecthome.html, (Aug. 23, 1997), pp. 1-16. |
Yamamoto, N., et al., “Histologic evidence that basic fibroblast growth factor enhances the angiogenic effects of transmyocardial laser revascularization”, Basic Research in Cardiology, vol. 95, No. 1, (Feb. 1, 2000), 55-63. |
Yeo, L.Y. , et al., “AC Electrospray Biomaterials Synthesis”, Biomaterials, (2005), 7 pages. |
Zervas, L., et al., “On Cysteine and Cystine Peptides. II. S-Acylcysteines in Peptide Synthesis”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 85(9), (May 1963), pp. 1337-1341. |
Zheng, Shu, et al., “In situ crosslinkable hyaluronan hydrogels for tissue engineering”, Biomaterials, Elsevier Science Publishers, vol. 25, No. 7-8, (2004), 1339-1348. |
Zheng, W., “Mechanisms of coronary angiogenesis in response to stretch; role of VEGF and TGF-Beta”, AM J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280(2), (Feb. 2001), H909-H917. |
Zimmermann, W., et al., “Engineered Heart Tissue for Regeneration of Diseased Hearts”, Biomaterials, 25, (2004), pp. 1639-1647. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action mailed Dec. 4, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/507,860. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action mailed Dec. 4, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,328. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action mailed Oct. 23, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/110,223. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action mailed Oct. 16, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/468,956. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/114,717. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action mailed May 31, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/559,438. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Examination Report dated Feb. 20, 2013 for European Appln. No. 12151788.2, 4 pages. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Restriction requirement mailed Jul. 3, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,324. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final office action dated Jan. 18, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/963,397. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action mailed Jul. 2, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/938,752. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Final office action mailed Apr. 22, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/792,960. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/756,092. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non final office action dated Apr. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/559,423. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Japanese office action dated Oct. 9, 2012 for JP Appln. No. 2009-514330. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Non-final Office Action mailed Aug. 28, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,324. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 23, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/559,438. |
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 30, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/559,423. |
Chemcas.Org, MSDS 4-amino-2,2,6,6-tetramethlypiperidine-1-oxyl (4-amino-TEMPO) CAS No. 14691-88-4 at www.chemcas.org/drug/analytical/cas/14691-88-4-asp, (Sep. 2, 1997), 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130251764 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13472324 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 13888143 | US | |
Parent | 11566643 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 13472324 | US |