The present invention relates generally to implantable cardiac systems that detect, sense and classify cardiac signals. More particularly, the present invention relates to implantable medical devices that can adapt the initiation of a therapeutic therapy for patients who experience recurring non-sustained arrhythmic episodes.
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a difficult clinical problem for the physician. Its evaluation and treatment are complicated because it often occurs in life-threatening situations that dictate rapid diagnosis and treatment. VT is defined as three or more beats of ventricular origin in succession at a rate greater than 100 beats/minute. The rhythm is frequently regular, but on occasion it may be modestly to wholly irregular. The arrhythmia may be either well-tolerated or associated with grave, life-threatening hemodynamic compromise. The hemodynamic consequences of VT depend largely on the presence or absence or myocardial dysfunction (such as might result from ischemia or infarction) and on the rate of VT.
VT can be referred to as sustained or nonsustained. Sustained VT refers to an episode that lasts at least 30 seconds and generally requires termination by antiarrhythmic drugs, antitachycardia pacing techniques or electrical cardioversion. Nonsustained VT refers to episodes that are longer than three beats but terminate spontaneously generally within 30 seconds.
Implantable cardiac rhythm management devices are an effective treatment in managing irregular cardiac rhythms in particular patients. Implantable cardiac rhythm management devices are capable of recognizing and treating arrhythmias with a variety of therapies. For the reasons stated above, and for other reasons stated below, which will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading and understanding the present specification, there is a need in the art for providing a method for adapting the initiation of a therapeutic therapy for those patients who experience recurring non-sustained arrhythmic episodes.
The present invention, in an illustrative embodiment, includes a method of cardiac treatment using an implanted medical device system having implanted electrodes and an energy storage system for storing electric charge for use in cardiac stimulus, the method comprising determining that cardiac stimulus is indicated at a first time, initiating a charging operation for the energy storage system, determining whether the cardiac stimulus is no longer indicated at a second time after the first time but prior to delivery of the indicated cardiac stimulus, and, if the cardiac stimulus is no longer indicated, changing a threshold used to determine whether cardiac stimulus is indicated. The second time may occur prior to completion of the charging operation, and/or after completion of the charging operation. The determining step may be performed repeatedly during the charging operation. If the cardiac stimulus continues to be indicated during the charging operation, the determining step may be performed at least once after the charging operation is completed. If the determining step fails, the method may further include delivering cardiac stimulus.
Another illustrative embodiment includes a method of cardiac treatment using an implantable medical device system having implanted electrodes and an energy storage system for storing charge for performing cardiac electrical stimulus, the method comprising capturing a predetermined number of selected cardiac events using the implanted electrodes, determining whether a threshold proportion of the predetermined number of selected cardiac events are abnormal, and, if treatment is indicated: initiating a charging operation for the energy storage system, and determining whether cardiac rhythm has returned to normal and, if so, increasing the threshold proportion. The threshold proportion may be, at least initially, in the range of 70-80%. The step of increasing the threshold proportion may include increasing the predetermined number. The illustrative method may further comprise determining if treatment is indicated if: at least the threshold proportion of the predetermined number of selected events are abnormal, and at least the threshold proportion of the predetermined number of selected events is abnormal for at least a threshold number of events out of a preselected number of events. If the threshold proportion is increased, the method may also include increasing the threshold number and the preselected number.
Yet another illustrative embodiment includes a method of cardiac treatment using an implantable medical device system having implanted electrodes and an energy storage system for storing charge for performing cardiac electrical stimulus, the method comprising capturing a predetermined number of selected cardiac events using the implanted electrodes, observing whether a cardiac condition exists for at least one of the selected cardiac events, determining whether the cardiac condition persists for at least a threshold duration or threshold number of cardiac events, and, if so: initiating a charging operation for the energy storage system, and determining whether cardiac condition has terminated prior to delivery of cardiac stimulus and, if so, extending the threshold duration or increasing the threshold number.
Another illustrative embodiment includes a method of operating an implantable electrical device disposed for providing cardiac stimulus to a patient's heart, the method comprising observing electrical activity in a patient's thorax to discern cardiac function, using the discerned cardiac function to establish a metric related to the patient's cardiac function, determining whether treatment is indicated by comparing the metric to a threshold, preparing to deliver treatment by charging an energy storage means coupled to the operational circuitry, observing whether treatment continues to be indicated, and: if treatment continues to be indicated, discharging energy from the energy storage means to the patient, or, if treatment is no longer indicated, changing the threshold. The metric may be related to a proportion of cardiac events that are abnormal within a set of cardiac events, and/or the metric may be related to a duration of time or a number of sensed cardiac events in which a malignant cardiac condition is detected.
Yet another illustrative embodiment includes a method of operation for an implantable medical device having an energy storage system for storing and delivering therapeutic cardiac stimulus, the method comprising observing cardiac function using implanted electrodes by capturing signals from the implanted electrodes and analyzing the captured signals using operational circuitry associated with the implantable medical device, determining whether electrical cardiac stimulus is likely indicated using a first metric; if so, verifying that electrical cardiac stimulus is indicated using a second metric; if so, initiating a charging operation for the energy storage system; after initiating the charging operation, at least once checking that one of the first metric or the second metric continues to indicate electrical cardiac stimulus, and, if not, modifying a threshold used for comparison with either: the first metric in the determining step, and/or the second metric in the verifying step, to cause the threshold to become more rigorous. The checking step may be performed at least once during the charging operation. The checking step may also be performed at least once after the charging operation is completed.
Another illustrative embodiment includes a method of operating an implantable medical device, the method comprising observing a first threshold to determine whether a patient in which the medical device is implanted likely needs cardiac stimulus, and, if so, observing a second threshold to determine whether the cardiac stimulus is currently indicated, and, if so, initiating a charging sequence for an energy storage system configured for stimulus delivery to the patient; if not, returning to the step of observing the first threshold. The method may include, if the charging sequence is initiated, performing the following steps if the charging sequence is completed: observing a third threshold to determine whether cardiac stimulus is currently indicated; and if so, delivering cardiac stimulus to the patient using implanted electrodes; if not, observing the first threshold to determine whether the patient likely needs cardiac stimulus. If the patient still likely needs cardiac stimulus, the method may include returning to the step of observing the third threshold, or if the patient no longer likely needs cardiac stimulus, adjusting at least one of the first threshold and the second threshold. The method may further include observing whether the first threshold remains crossed during a time period between initiation and completion of the charging sequence and: if so, continuing the charging sequence until completion; or, if not, stopping the charging sequence and changing at least one of the first threshold and the second threshold.
Yet another illustrative embodiment includes a method of cardiac treatment using an implanted medical device system having implanted electrodes and an energy storage system for storing electric charge for use in cardiac electrical stimulus, the method comprising A) determining whether an abnormal event threshold is crossed, the abnormal event threshold being crossed if a specified number of abnormal events occur within a selected number of most recent detected cardiac events, and, if so: determining whether the abnormal event threshold has been exceeded for a threshold number of most recent events and observing whether a most recent events is abnormal, and, if so, initiating a charge sequence for the energy storage system. Once the charge sequence is complete, the method may further include B) determining whether a most recent event is abnormal and, if so, delivering therapeutic energy to the patient; and if not, determining whether the abnormal event threshold remains exceeded when measured from a most recent event; and: if so, waiting for a next cardiac event and again performing step B); or if not, raising the threshold number of most recent events and returning to step A). The method may further include determining whether the abnormal event threshold continues to be crossed while the charge sequence is being performed. Another illustrative embodiment includes a method of operating an implanted medical device system having implanted electrodes and an energy storage system for storing electric charge for use in cardiac electrical stimulus, the method comprising observing a cardiac rate for a patient, and if the cardiac rate exceeds a predetermined rate threshold, performing the above method.
Another illustrative embodiment includes a method of operation for an implanted medical device having implanted electrodes, an energy storage system for storing and delivering cardiac stimulus to a patient, and operational circuitry for operating the device, the method comprising capturing a number of cardiac events, determining whether a first cardiac event, along with a set of previously captured cardiac events, indicates a malignant cardiac condition and, if so, flagging the first cardiac event, observing whether a threshold number of cardiac events within a set of cardiac events have been flagged; if so, initiating a charging sequence for charging the energy storage system in preparation for delivery of electrical cardiac stimulus. The illustrative method further includes, after the charging sequence is initiated, at least once observing whether treatment of the patient continues to be indicated due to a malignant cardiac condition; and, if treatment is no longer indicated, modifying the size of the threshold number and/or the set of cardiac events.
Another illustrative embodiment includes a method including implanting an implantable electrical device in the patient, wherein the device is configured to operate as noted in any the above illustrative embodiments.
The following detailed description should be read with reference to the drawings, in which like elements in different drawings are numbered identically. The drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, depict selected embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize that many of the examples provided have suitable alternatives that may be utilized.
The present invention is generally related to implantable cardiac treatment systems that provide therapy for patients who are experiencing particular arrhythmias including, for example, ventricular tachycardia. The present invention is directed toward therapy delivery architectures for use in cardiac rhythm devices, as well as devices incorporating such architectures. In particular, the present invention is suited for implantable cardiac treatment systems capable of detecting and treating harmful arrhythmias.
To date, implantable cardiac treatment systems have been either epicardial systems or transvenous systems such as the transvenous system implanted generally as shown in
The present invention may be embodied by operational circuitry including select electrical components provided within the canister 2 (
The cardiac rhythm management device, whether subcutaneous or transvenous, senses cardiac signals from the patient's heart. The manner in which the data is collected and the type of data collected is dependent on the cardiac rhythm management device being used. Moreover, the cardiac rhythm management device may be programmed to, or may automatically adapt to, optimally detect a particular form of data which is sought by the cardiac rhythm management device.
If treatment is indicated, the method goes on to begin a charging operation, as shown at 54. The initiation of the charge is stored in an associated energy system (sometimes a capacitor or bank of capacitors). During and/or after the charging operation is completed, the method then includes the step of determining whether treatment is still indicated, as shown at 56. If treatment is still indicated when charging is complete (and/or at intermediate times during charging, if so enabled) then the therapy is delivered as shown at 58. If step 56 is performed while charging is occurring, then charging may continue until charging is completed. If treatment is no longer indicated when step 56 is performed, then the method includes changing the threshold, as shown at 60. In an illustrative embodiment, the threshold may be changed to make the threshold more rigorous for satisfying. By making the threshold more rigorous, it is believed that it is less likely that a charge initiation will commence (step 52) without ultimately delivering a therapy (step 58).
The following illustrative example, encompassing
Detected data, whether preprocessed or raw, is then classified as being either a cardiac event (a heartbeat) or not a cardiac event (extraneous noise). This classification may merely be an initial determination. In particular embodiments, sensed events may then be secondarily examined in an additional waveform appraisal phase. The waveform appraisal phase further appraises the sensed cardiac events and substantiates the classification of those detected signals as true cardiac events. Illustrative details of an example waveform appraisal method are disclosed in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/858,598, filed Jun. 1, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,248,921 and titled METHOD AND DEVICES FOR PERFORMING CARDIAC WAVEFORM APPRAISAL, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Whether from the raw or appraised cardiac data, the illustrative cardiac rhythm management device may then calculate a patient's representative cardiac rate, as shown at 72. In one embodiment, the cardiac rate is calculated from the average R-R interval between four (4) consecutive sensed cardiac events. Other methods known in the art for calculating a patient's cardiac rate may also be utilized.
The illustrative cardiac rhythm management device then assesses whether the cardiac rate is tachyarrhythmic, as shown at 74. Cardiac rates in excess of 100 bpm are defined as tachyarrhythmias in adults. For most patients, however, a higher cardiac rate threshold is more indicative of a pathologic tachyarrhythmia. Some illustrative embodiments of the invention account for this inconsistency with patients by permitting a physician to adjust the cardiac rate threshold to meet the needs of a particular patient. For example, a physician may adjust the cardiac rate threshold to 120 bpm, instead of 100 bpm, to indicate tachyarrhythmia. This attribute is particularly beneficial for children, who generally have higher pathologic tachyarrhythmic thresholds (around 180 bpm) than adults.
When a patient's cardiac rate is below the tachyarrhythmic threshold, the illustrative cardiac rhythm management device takes no further action other than to continue monitoring the patient's cardiac rate. However, in instances where a patient's cardiac rate does exceed the threshold, the illustrative device then further evaluates the individual cardiac events giving rise to the tachyarrhythmic rate. In particular, the illustrative device first employs an X out of Y counter, as shown at 76.
The individual cardiac events giving rise to a tachyarrhythmic rate are hereinafter defined as “malignant cardiac events” and are the X constituent in the counter. The Y constituent for the counter comprises the total number of cardiac events being evaluated (whether malignant or non-malignant). In a preferred embodiment, the cardiac rhythm management device requires eighteen (18) malignant cardiac events out of twenty-four (24) total detected events to prompt the cardiac rhythm management device to initiate a second level of evaluation, as shown by the decision at 78. Alternative X out of Y quotients may also be used with the present invention.
If the X out of Y counter requirement is not met, then the device continues to monitor the patient's cardiac rate until the X out of Y counter requirement is satisfied, if ever. Once the counter requirement is satisfied, the device evaluates the persistence of the malignant cardiac events, as shown at 80.
The persistence condition of the illustrative embodiment is a gate-keeper step. As the gate-keeper, the persistence condition is the last condition that must be satisfied prior to the illustrative device initiates the charging of its capacitors for therapy delivery, as shown at 82. It is believed that the persistence condition will reduce the number of unnecessary device charge initiations. This is particularly true for those patients who suffer from non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Reducing inappropriate charges increases the longevity of the device's batteries and ultimately the longevity of the device itself. This subsequently benefits the patient by reducing the frequency of device replacements.
The illustrative persistence condition evaluates a cardiac rhythm's persistence in satisfying the X out of Y counter requirement. Specifically, the persistence condition evaluates two questions relating to the X out of Y counter:
In an illustrative embodiment, the persistence condition is (at least initially) satisfied when the X out of Y counter requirement is satisfied sequentially for two (2) times. Examples illustrating the persistence condition are depicted in
In
Once the gate-keeping function of the persistence condition is satisfied, the device begins to charge its capacitors.
In one embodiment, the reconfirmation process is deemed successful if two consecutive malignant events occur within six (6) contiguous cardiac events, with the six (6) events being the most recent events available for evaluation. If the conditions set forth in the reconfirmation process 106 are satisfied, then the capacitors are again charged to their fullest (if necessary) as shown at 108, and therapy is delivered to the patient, as shown at 110.
Alternatively, if the reconfirmation process 106 fails, the device again employs an X out of Y counter requirement, as shown at 112, and must again satisfy the persistence condition, as shown at 114. If at any time the persistence condition and the reconfirmation process are satisfied, then the capacitors are again charged to their fullest, as shown at 108, and therapy is delivered to the patient, as shown at 110. However, if the patient converts to a normal sinus rhythm after charging (or otherwise fails the X out of Y counter requirement), then the parameters set for the persistence condition are modified, as shown at 116, and the capacitors are bled of their charge, as shown at 118.
In addition to being a gate-keeper, the persistence condition is also adaptive to the particular needs of a patient. If a patient frequently suffers from non-sustained tachyarrhythmias, the persistence conditions may be adjusted to help eliminate premature charge initiations. In one embodiment, the first inquiry is further defined to account for this adaptability:
In the above illustrative embodiment shown in
In alternative embodiments, several portions of the method may be modified. For example, the X out of Y count requirement may be changed to use different parameters (instead of 18 out of 24, other ratios may be used). In yet another embodiment, rather than an X out of Y counter requirement, a group of cardiac events may be analyzed to determine a group correlation waveform score. If the correlation is sufficiently low, it may be determined that cardiac function is erratic to a degree indicating a need for therapeutic delivery. In yet another modification, the persistence conditions themselves may also change. For example, the persistence condition may require longer or shorter analytical periods, consideration of morphology, noise considerations, or the like.
In some embodiments, other conditions may be modified after a patient has spontaneously recovered from a non-sustained tachyarrhythmia or other malignant condition. For instance, rather than altering the persistence condition, the X of Y counter requirement may be changed. More specifically, if an illustrative method begins with an 18 out of 24 counter requirement, the X out of Y counter requirement may extend to a larger number, higher percentage, or other requirement. For example, the 18 out of 24 counter requirement may adjust to 20 out of 24 and/or 21 out of 27. This change may be further incremented with each successive non-sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia. For example, after the first aborted charge, the 18 out of 24 counter requirement becomes 21 out of 27, which becomes 24 out of 30 on the second aborted charge and 27 out of 33 on the third aborted charge. In alternative illustrative embodiments, more than one rule for a given persistence condition may be changed at the same time.
Some embodiments may make use of a pure rate-driven shocking determination which does not make use of the X out of Y counter requirement. For example, if the cardiac rate observed to initiate the method shown in
If treatment is likely indicated at 202, the method next verifies that treatment is needed, as shown at 204, using a different metric than that used in step 202. One method of separating out these two steps is to observe event intervals to determine whether treatment is likely indicated (step 202) and, if so, to perform further analysis (possibly combining noise and average interval analysis) to verify that the event intervals do indeed indicate malignancy. Other first and second steps (202, 204) may be performed without deviating from the scope of the invention.
Yet another example of a first and second tier for analysis is a system wherein multiple vector views are available, for example as shown in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/901,258, filed Jul. 27, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,392,085 and titled MULTIPLE ELECTRODE VECTORS FOR IMPLANTABLE CARDIAC TREATMENT DEVICES, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. For example, a first sensing vector may be used for the first determination that treatment is likely indicated at 202. Additionally, a second, different sensing vector may then be used to verify that treatment is indicated at 204.
If treatment is likely indicated at 202 and a need for treatment is verified at 204, the method next includes the step of initiating the charging operation of the associated energy storage device or system (often a capacitor or group of capacitors), as shown at 206. The method next goes to a charge instruction block 208 which includes steps that are performed if the device/system is able to perform sensing and analysis operations during charging of the system's energy storage device. If sensing and analysis operations cannot be performed during charging, the method goes directly to step 214, which is explained below.
In the charge instruction block 208, the method determines whether the energy storage system is completed charging, as shown at 210. If not, the method includes observing whether treatment is still likely indicated, as shown at 212. The metric for determining whether treatment is still likely indicated in step 212 may be that of either of steps 202 or 204, or may be a yet a different metric. If treatment is still likely indicated, the method continues charging at 210 and iterates this loop until charging is complete. Once charging is complete, the method determines whether a need for treatment can be verified again, as shown at step 214. As with step 212, a metric previously used in one of steps 202, 204, or 212 may be used in step 214, or a new metric may be chosen. If the last verification step 214 is successful, then therapy is delivered as shown at 216.
If verification step 214 fails, then the stored energy may be non-therapeutically discharged, as shown at 218, in any suitable manner. Alternatively, if desired, the capacitors may continue to hold charge for a predetermined time period to assure that re-charging is not needed. One suitable manner for discharge is to use the stored energy to perform diagnostic or maintenance type functions for the device or, if the device is used for pacing, to use the energy to provide pacing energy.
Next, a threshold is adjusted, as shown at 220. Several thresholds may be adjusted, but preferably adjustment is performed on a threshold used in at least one of the preliminary steps 202, 204 that are used to make a determination that charging should be initiated at step 206. The threshold may be made more rigorous such that a decision to initiate charging at 206 becomes more difficult. The method then returns to observing cardiac function as shown at 200.
Returning to step 212, in the charge instruction block 208, if treatment is no longer likely indicated at step 212, the method terminates charging, as shown at 222, and discharges the energy storage in any suitable manner, as shown at 224. The method then goes to step 220 and adjusts a threshold as before.
As used herein, the term metric may indicate any suitable measurement or result from an analytical procedure. Example metrics include event rates, X out of Y counter ratios, and correlation results. Further metrics include a time period in which a condition (such as a cardiac tachyarrhythmia) persists or a how often an X out of Y counter is flagged.
A threshold may be rendered more rigorous in response to an aborted charge initiation. Thus, at least ostensibly, subsequent tachyarrhythmic events must be more sustainable to cross an adjusted threshold for initiating the device's charging cycle. Examples of adjustable thresholds include metrics such as event rate, X out of Y counter ratios, number of time intervals during which a malignant condition is detected, and the number of X out of Y counter flags set.
Numerous characteristics and advantages of the invention covered by this document have been set forth in the foregoing description. It will be understood, however, that this disclosure is, in many aspects, only illustrative. Changes may be made in details, particularly in matters of shape, size and arrangement of parts without exceeding the scope of the invention. The invention's scope is defined, of course, in the language in which the claims are expressed.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/359,072, filed Jan. 23, 2009 and published as US Patent Application Publication Number 2009-0131998, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,249,702, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/042,911, filed Jan. 25, 2005 and now U.S. Pat. No. 8,160,697, each of which is titled METHOD FOR ADAPTING CHARGE INITIATION FOR AN IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR, the entire disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference. The present application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/043,012, filed Jan. 25, 2005 and now U.S. Pat. No. 8,229,563, which is titled DEVICES FOR ADAPTING CHARGE INITIATION FOR AN IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3653387 | Ceier | Apr 1972 | A |
3710374 | Kelly | Jan 1973 | A |
3911925 | Tillery, Jr. | Oct 1975 | A |
4030509 | Heilman et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4157720 | Greatbatch | Jun 1979 | A |
4164946 | Langer | Aug 1979 | A |
4184493 | Langer et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4191942 | Long | Mar 1980 | A |
4210149 | Heilman et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
RE30387 | Denniston, III et al. | Aug 1980 | E |
4223678 | Langer et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4248237 | Kenny | Feb 1981 | A |
4254775 | Langer | Mar 1981 | A |
4291707 | Heilman et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4300567 | Kolenik et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4314095 | Moore et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4375817 | Engle et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4402322 | Duggan | Sep 1983 | A |
4407288 | Langer et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4424818 | Doring et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4450527 | Sramek | May 1984 | A |
4548209 | Wielders et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4567900 | Moore | Feb 1986 | A |
4595009 | Leinders | Jun 1986 | A |
4602637 | Elmqvist et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4603705 | Speicher et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4693253 | Adams | Sep 1987 | A |
4727877 | Kallok | Mar 1988 | A |
4750494 | King | Jun 1988 | A |
4765341 | Mower et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4768512 | Imran | Sep 1988 | A |
4779617 | Whigham | Oct 1988 | A |
4800883 | Winstrom | Jan 1989 | A |
4830005 | Woskow | May 1989 | A |
4830006 | Haluska et al. | May 1989 | A |
4880005 | Pless et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4940054 | Grevis et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4944300 | Saksena | Jul 1990 | A |
4949719 | Pless et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5000189 | Throne et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5044374 | Lindemans et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5105810 | Collins et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5105826 | Smits et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5109842 | Adinolfi | May 1992 | A |
5117824 | Keimel et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5129392 | Bardy et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5133353 | Hauser | Jul 1992 | A |
5144946 | Weinberg et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5184615 | Nappholz et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5184616 | Weiss | Feb 1993 | A |
5191901 | Dahl et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5193535 | Bardy et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5203348 | Dahl et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5215081 | Ostroff | Jun 1993 | A |
5215098 | Steinhaus et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5217021 | Steinhaus et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5230337 | Dahl et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5255692 | Neubauer et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5261400 | Bardy | Nov 1993 | A |
5271411 | Ripley et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5275621 | Mehra | Jan 1994 | A |
5277190 | Moulton | Jan 1994 | A |
5280792 | Leong et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5300106 | Dahl et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5312441 | Mader et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313953 | Yomtov et al. | May 1994 | A |
5331966 | Bennett et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5342402 | Olson et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342407 | Dahl et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5351696 | Riff et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5354316 | Keimel | Oct 1994 | A |
5366496 | Dahl et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370667 | Alt | Dec 1994 | A |
5376103 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376104 | Sakai et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5385574 | Hauser et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5391200 | KenKnight et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5405363 | Kroll et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5411031 | Yomtov | May 1995 | A |
5411539 | Neisz | May 1995 | A |
5411547 | Causey, III | May 1995 | A |
5413591 | Knoll | May 1995 | A |
5423326 | Wang et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5431693 | Schroeppel | Jul 1995 | A |
5439485 | Mar et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447519 | Peterson | Sep 1995 | A |
5447521 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5458623 | Lu et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464431 | Adams et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5476503 | Yang | Dec 1995 | A |
5509923 | Middleman et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5509928 | Acken | Apr 1996 | A |
5513645 | Jacobson et al. | May 1996 | A |
5531765 | Pless | Jul 1996 | A |
5531766 | Kroll et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534019 | Paspa | Jul 1996 | A |
5534022 | Hoffmann et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545186 | Olson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5597956 | Ito et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601607 | Adams | Feb 1997 | A |
5603732 | Dahl et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607455 | Armstrong | Mar 1997 | A |
5618287 | Fogarty et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620477 | Pless et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5643328 | Cooke et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645586 | Meltzer | Jul 1997 | A |
5658317 | Haefner et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658319 | Kroll | Aug 1997 | A |
5658321 | Fayram et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5674260 | Weinberg | Oct 1997 | A |
5690648 | Fogarty et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690683 | Haefner et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697953 | Kroll et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5713926 | Hauser et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5755736 | Gillberg et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766226 | Pedersen | Jun 1998 | A |
5776169 | Schroeppel | Jul 1998 | A |
5779645 | Olson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5814090 | Latterell et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817134 | Greenhut | Oct 1998 | A |
5827326 | Kroll et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5836975 | DeGroot | Nov 1998 | A |
5836976 | Min et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843132 | Ilvento | Dec 1998 | A |
5857977 | Caswell et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5895414 | Sanchez-Zambrano | Apr 1999 | A |
5904705 | Kroll et al. | May 1999 | A |
5919211 | Adams | Jul 1999 | A |
5919222 | Hjelle et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5925069 | Graves et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935154 | Westlund | Aug 1999 | A |
5941831 | Turcott | Aug 1999 | A |
5941904 | Johnston et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5957956 | Kroll et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6014586 | Weinberg et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026325 | Weinberg et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6058328 | Levine et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061592 | Nigam | May 2000 | A |
6093173 | Balceta et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6095987 | Shmulewitz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115628 | Stadler et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
H1905 | Hill | Oct 2000 | H |
6128531 | Campbell-Smith | Oct 2000 | A |
6144866 | Miesel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6144879 | Gray | Nov 2000 | A |
6148230 | Kenknight | Nov 2000 | A |
6169923 | Kroll | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185450 | Seguine et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6223078 | Marcovecchio | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236882 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6266554 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266567 | Ishikawa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272377 | Sweeney et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278894 | Salo et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280462 | Hauser et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6308095 | Hsu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6334071 | Lu | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6345198 | Mouchawar et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6377844 | Graen | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381493 | Stadler et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393316 | Gillberg et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411844 | Kroll et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6438410 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6445949 | Kroll | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449503 | Hsu | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6487443 | Olson et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6493579 | Gilkerson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493584 | Lu | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6516225 | Florio | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6539257 | KenKnight | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6567691 | Stadler | May 2003 | B1 |
6574505 | Warren | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587720 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6587723 | Sloman | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6625490 | McClure et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636762 | Begemann | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6636764 | Fain et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647292 | Bardy et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658293 | Vonk | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6684100 | Sweeney et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687540 | Marcovecchio | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699200 | Cao et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708062 | Ericksen et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6718198 | Conley et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6721597 | Bardy et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728572 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728575 | Hedberg | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6731978 | Olson et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6745076 | Wohlgemuth et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6754528 | Bardy et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760615 | Ferek-Petric | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766190 | Ferek-Petric | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6778860 | Ostroff et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788974 | Bardy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6834204 | Ostroff et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6865417 | Rissmann et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6866044 | Bardy et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879856 | Stadler et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7016730 | Ternes | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027856 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7103404 | Stadler et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7447544 | Kroll | Nov 2008 | B1 |
8160697 | Warren et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8229563 | Warren et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8249702 | Warren et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20010027330 | Sullivan et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020188215 | Ferek-Petric | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030144700 | Brown et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040015197 | Gunderson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040093035 | Schwartz et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040171959 | Stadler et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215240 | Lovett et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230229 | Lovett et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254611 | Palreddy et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254613 | Ostroff et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004615 | Sanders | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049644 | Warren et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050154421 | Ousdigian | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060036288 | Bocek et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060079796 | Marcovecchio et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20120323290 | Warren et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005325670 | Aug 2012 | AU |
2766866 | Jan 2011 | CA |
29801807 | Jun 1998 | DE |
0095727 | Dec 1983 | EP |
0316616 | May 1989 | EP |
0316616 | May 1989 | EP |
0347353 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0517494 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0518599 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0518599 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0536873 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0517494 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0554208 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0554208 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0586858 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0627237 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0641573 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0641573 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0677301 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0917887 | May 1999 | EP |
0923130 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1000634 | May 2000 | EP |
1046409 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1046409 | Oct 2000 | EP |
2008528103 | Jul 2008 | JP |
WO-8901802 | Mar 1989 | WO |
WO-9319809 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO-9729802 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO-9825349 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO-9903534 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO-9937362 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO-9953991 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO-0222208 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO-0041766 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO-0050120 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO-0143649 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO-0156166 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0222208 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-0224275 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-0224275 | May 2002 | WO |
WO-02068046 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO-03018121 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-2004093974 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2004091720 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO-2004093974 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO-2006081027 | Aug 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/755,185, Final Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2008”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Advisory Action dated May 15, 2008”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Advisory Action dated Nov. 1, 2010”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Appeal Brief filed Jan. 24, 2011”, 29 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Applicant's Summary of Examiner Interview filed Jul. 10, 2008”, 1 pg. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Examiner Interview Summary dated Apr. 22, 2008”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jun. 12, 2008”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2008”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Final Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2010”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2008”, 21 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Final Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2011”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Final Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 14, 2011”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2007”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 20, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment dated Jul. 17, 2009”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Jan. 16, 2009 to Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 16, 2008”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Feb. 10, 2010 to Final Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2009”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Apr. 25, 2008 to Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2008”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Apr. 30, 2009 to Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 2, 2009”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Jun. 3, 2010 to Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2010”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Jul. 14, 2011 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 14, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Aug. 14, 2009 to Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment dated Jul. 17, 2009”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Oct. 19, 2010 to Final Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Oct. 22, 2007 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2007”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Nov. 17, 2008 to Final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2008”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Dec. 7, 2011 to Final Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2011”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 2, 2009”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 16, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Advisory Action dated Nov. 1, 2010”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Appeal Brief filed Feb. 18, 2011”, 21 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Applicant's Summary of Examiner Interview filed Jul. 10, 2008”, 1 pg. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Examiner Interview Summary dated Apr. 22, 2008”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jun. 13, 2008”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2008”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2010”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Final Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2008”, 23 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2009”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Non Final Office Action dated May 12, 2011”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2007”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2011”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 26, 2012”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Notice of Non Compliant Amendment dated Jul. 17, 2009”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Jan. 16, 2009 to Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 16, 2008”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Jan. 27, 2012 to Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Feb. 9, 2010 to Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2009”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Apr. 25, 2008 to Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2008”, 22 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Apr. 30, 2009 to Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 2, 2009”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Jun. 3, 2010 to Non Final Office Action dared Mar. 3, 2010”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Aug. 11, 2011 to Non Final Office Action dated May 12, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Aug. 14, 2009 to Notice of Non Compliant Amendment dated Jul. 17, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Oct. 19, 2010 to Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Oct. 26, 2007 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2007”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Nov. 25, 2008 to Final Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2008”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 2, 2009”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 16, 2008”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,072, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 26, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,072, Preliminary Amendment filed Dec. 15, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,072, Response filed Jan. 19, 2012 to Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 21, 2011”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,072, Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 21, 2011”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,513 , Response filed Dec. 9, 2013 to Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2013”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,513, Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,513, Preliminary Amendment filed Nov. 30, 2012”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,513, Response filed Jun. 7, 2013 to Restriction Requirement dated May 31, 2013”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,513, Response filed Aug. 6, 2013 to Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 11, 2013”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,513, Restriction Requirement dated May 31, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,513, Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 11, 2013”, 16 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2005325670, Office Action dated Nov. 12, 2010”, 6 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2012211492, First Examiner Report dated Dec. 24, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2012211492, Response filed Apr. 29, 2013 to First Examiner Report dated Dec. 24, 2012”, 76 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2012211492, Subsequent Examiners Report dated Jul. 1, 2013”, 4 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,587,938, Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,587,938, Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2013”, 4 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,587,938, Response filed Jul. 12, 2013 to Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2013”, 17 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200580047119.3, Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2011”, English only, 5 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200580047119.3, Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2010”, w/English translation, 27 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200580047119.3, Response filed Apr. 18, 2011 to Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2010”, w/English translation, 13 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201010173002.2, Response filed Apr. 18, 2011 to Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2010”, 9 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 05855365.2, Office Action dated May 8, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 05855365.2, Office Action dated Aug. 26, 2011”, 4 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 05855365.2, Response filed Sep. 15, 2009 to Office Action dated May 8, 2009”, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 05855365.2, Response filed Dec. 12, 2011 to Office Action dated Aug. 26, 2011”, 9 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/046794, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 31, 2007”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/046794, International Search Report dated Aug. 30, 2006”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/046794, Written Opinion dated Aug. 30, 2006”, 7 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2007-552143, Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
Anderson, Mark H, et al., “Performance of Basic Ventricular Tachycardia Detection Algorithms in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Implications for Device Programming”, Pace, vol. 20 Part I, (Dec. 20, 1997), 2975-2983. |
Bardy, Gust H, et al., “Multicenter Experience with a Pectoral Unipolar Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator”, JACC, vol. 28, No. 2, (Aug. 1996), 400-410. |
Betts, Tim R, et al., “Inappropriate Shock Therapy in a Heart Failure Defibrillator”, Pace, vol. 24, No. 2, (Feb. 2001), 238-240. |
Boriani, Guiseppe, et al., “Cardioverter-Defibrillator Oversensing Due to Double Counting of Ventricular Tachycardia Electrograms”, International Journal of Cardiology, 66, (1998), 91-95. |
Callans, David J, et al., “Unique Sensing Errors in Third-Generation Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators”, JACC, vol. 22, No. 4, (Oct. 4, 1993), 1135-1140. |
Friedman, Richard A, et al., “Implantable Defibrillators in Children: From Whence to Shock”, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 12, No. 3, (Mar. 2001), 361-362. |
Gradaus, Rainer, et al., “Nonthoracotomy Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Placement in Children: Use of Subcutaneous Array Leads and Abdominally Placed Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Children”, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 12(3), (Mar. 2001), 356-360. |
Gunderson, et al., “An Algorithm to Predict Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead Failure”, JACC, vol. 44, No. 9 (Nov. 2004), 1898-1902. |
Higgins, Steven L, et al., “The First Year Experience with the Dual Chamber ICD”, Pace, vol. 23, (Jan. 2000), 18-25. |
Jaïs, Pierre, “Pacemaker Syndrome Induced by the Mode Switching Algorithm of a DDDR Pacemaker”, PACE, vol. 22, Part I, (1999), 682-685. |
Jones, Gregory K, et al., “Considerations for Ventricular Fibrillation Detection by Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators”, American Heart Journal, vol. 127, No. 4, Part 2, (Apr. 1994), 1107-1110. |
Kelly, Patricia A, et al., “Oversensing During Ventricular Pacing in Patients with a Third-Generation Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator”, JACC, vol. 23, No. 7, (Jun. 1994), 1531-1534. |
Leung, Sum-Kin, et al., “Apparent Extension of the Atrioventricular Interval Due to Sensor-Based Algorithm Against Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias”, PACE, vol. 17, Part I, (Mar. 1994), 321-330. |
Li, Huagui, et al., “The Mean Ventricular Fibrillation Cycle Length: A Potentially Useful Parameter for Progranuning Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators”, PACE, vol. 21, (Sep. 1998), 1789-1794. |
Mirowski, M, et al., “Automatic Detection and Defibrillation of Lethal Arrhythmias—A New Concept”, JAMA, vol. 213, No. 4, (Jul. 27, 1970), 615-616. |
Nair, Mohan, et al., “Automatic Arrhythmia Identification Using Analysis of the Atrioventricular Association”, Circulation, 95(4), (Feb. 1997), 967-973. |
Newman, David, et al., “Use of Telemetry Functions in the Assessment of Implanted Antitachycardia Device Efficacy”, The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 70, (Sep. 1, 1992), 616-621. |
Olson, Walter H, et al., “Onset and Stability for Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Detection in an Implantable Pacer-Cardioverter-Defibrillator”, IEEE, (1987), 167-170. |
Schaumann, Anselm, et al., “Enhanced Detection Criteria in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators to Avoid Inappropriate Therapy”, The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 78 (5A), (Sep. 12, 1996), 42-50. |
Schreieck, Jurgen, et al., “Inappropriate Shock Delivery Due to Ventricular Double Detection with a Biventricular Pacing Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator”, PACE, vol. 24, No. 7, (Jul. 2001), 1154-1157. |
Schuder, John C, “Completely Implanted Defibrillator”, JAMA, vol. 214, No. 6, (Nov. 9, 1970), 1123 pg. |
Schuder, John C, et al., “Experimental Ventricular Defibrillation with an Automatic and Completely Implanted System”, Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Int. Organs, vol. 16, (1970), 207-212. |
Schuder, John C, et al., “Standby Implanted Defibrillators”, Arch Intern. Med, vol. 127, (Feb. 1971), 317 pg. |
Schuder, John C, “The Role of an Engineering Oriented Medical Research Group in Developing Improved Methods & Devices for Achieving Ventricular Defibrillation: The University of Missouri Experience”, PACE, vol. 16, Part I, (Jan. 1993), 95-124. |
Schuder, John C, et al., “Transthoracic Ventricular Defibrillation in the Dog with Truncated and Untruncated Exponential Stimuli”, IEEE Trans. on Bio-Medical Engin., vol. BME-18, No. 6, (Nov. 1971), 410-415. |
Schwake, H., et al., “Komplikationen mit Sonden bei 340 Patienten mit einem implantierbaren Kardioverter/Defibrilator”, Z Kardiol, vol. 88, No. 8, (1999), 559-565. |
Theuns, D, et al., “Initial Clinical Experience with a New Arrhythmia Detection Algorithm in Dual Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators”, Europace, vol. 3, (Jul. 2001), 181-186. |
Tietze, U, et al., “Halbleiter-Schaltungstechnik”, © Springer-Verlag (Berlin, Germany), (1991), 784-786. |
Valenzuela, Terrence D, et al., “Outcomes of Rapid Defibrillation by Security Officers After Cardiac Arrest in Casinos”, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 343, No. 17, (Oct. 26, 2000), 1206-1209. |
Walters, R A, et al., “Analog to Digital Conversion Techniques in Implantable Devices”, Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 13, No. 4, (1991), 1674-1676. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120316612 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12359072 | Jan 2009 | US |
Child | 13588808 | US | |
Parent | 11042911 | Jan 2005 | US |
Child | 12359072 | US |