Methods and devices for adapting charge initiation for an implantable defibrillator

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10052487
  • Patent Number
    10,052,487
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 17, 2012
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 21, 2018
    5 years ago
Abstract
Adaptive methods for initiating charging of the high power capacitors of an implantable medical device for therapy delivery after the patient experiences a non-sustained arrhythmia, and devices that perform such methods. The adaptive methods and devices adjust persistence criteria used to analyze an arrhythmia prior to initiating a charging sequence to deliver therapy. Some embodiments apply a specific sequence of X-out-of-Y criteria, persistence criteria, and last event criteria before starting charging for therapy delivery.
Description
FIELD

The present invention relates generally to implantable cardiac systems that detect, sense and classify cardiac signals. More particularly, the present invention relates to implantable medical devices that can adapt the initiation of a therapeutic therapy for patients who experience recurring non-sustained arrhythmic episodes.


BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a difficult clinical problem for the physician. Its evaluation and treatment are complicated because it often occurs in life-threatening situations that dictate rapid diagnosis and treatment. VT is defined as three or more beats of ventricular origin in succession at a rate greater than 100 beats/minute. The rhythm is frequently regular, but on occasion it may be modestly to wholly irregular. The arrhythmia may be either well-tolerated or associated with grave, life-threatening hemodynamic compromise. The hemodynamic consequences of VT depend largely on the presence or absence or myocardial dysfunction (such as might result from ischemia or infarction) and on the rate of VT.


VT can be referred to as sustained or nonsustained. Sustained VT refers to an episode that lasts at least 30 seconds and generally requires termination by antiarrhythmic drugs, antitachycardia pacing techniques or electrical cardioversion. Nonsustained VT refers to episodes that are longer than three beats but terminate spontaneously generally within 30 seconds.


Implantable cardiac rhythm management devices are an effective treatment in managing irregular cardiac rhythms in particular patients. Implantable cardiac rhythm management devices are capable of recognizing and treating arrhythmias with a variety of therapies. For the reasons stated above, and for other reasons stated below, which will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading and understanding the present specification, there is a need in the art for providing a method for adapting the initiation of a therapeutic therapy for those patients who experience recurring non-sustained arrhythmic episodes.


SUMMARY

The present invention, in an illustrative embodiment, includes a method of cardiac treatment using an implanted medical device system having implanted electrodes and an energy storage system for storing electric charge for use in cardiac stimulus, the method comprising determining that cardiac stimulus is indicated at a first time, initiating a charging operation for the energy storage system, determining whether the cardiac stimulus is no longer indicated at a second time after the first time but prior to delivery of the indicated cardiac stimulus, and, if the cardiac stimulus is no longer indicated, changing a threshold used to determine whether cardiac stimulus is indicated. The second time may occur prior to completion of the charging operation, and/or after completion of the charging operation. The determining step may be performed repeatedly during the charging operation. If the cardiac stimulus continues to be indicated during the charging operation, the determining step may be performed at least once after the charging operation is completed. If the determining step fails, the method may further include delivering cardiac stimulus.


Another illustrative embodiment includes a method of cardiac treatment using an implantable medical device system having implanted electrodes and an energy storage system for storing charge for performing cardiac electrical stimulus, the method comprising capturing a predetermined number of selected cardiac events using the implanted electrodes, determining whether a threshold proportion of the predetermined number of selected cardiac events are abnormal, and, if treatment is indicated: initiating a charging operation for the energy storage system, and determining whether cardiac rhythm has returned to normal and, if so, increasing the threshold proportion. The threshold proportion may be, at least initially, in the range of 70-80%. The step of increasing the threshold proportion may include increasing the predetermined number. The illustrative method may further comprise determining if treatment is indicated if: at least the threshold proportion of the predetermined number of selected events are abnormal, and at least the threshold proportion of the predetermined number of selected events is abnormal for at least a threshold number of events out of a preselected number of events. If the threshold proportion is increased, the method may also include increasing the threshold number and the preselected number.


Yet another illustrative embodiment includes a method of cardiac treatment using an implantable medical device system having implanted electrodes and an energy storage system for storing charge for performing cardiac electrical stimulus, the method comprising capturing a predetermined number of selected cardiac events using the implanted electrodes, observing whether a cardiac condition exists for at least one of the selected cardiac events, determining whether the cardiac condition persists for at least a threshold duration or threshold number of cardiac events, and, if so: initiating a charging operation for the energy storage system, and determining whether cardiac condition has terminated prior to delivery of cardiac stimulus and, if so, extending the threshold duration or increasing the threshold number.


Another illustrative embodiment includes a method of operating an implantable electrical device disposed for providing cardiac stimulus to a patient's heart, the method comprising observing electrical activity in a patient's thorax to discern cardiac function, using the discerned cardiac function to establish a metric related to the patient's cardiac function, determining whether treatment is indicated by comparing the metric to a threshold, preparing to deliver treatment by charging an energy storage means coupled to the operational circuitry, observing whether treatment continues to be indicated, and: if treatment continues to be indicated, discharging energy from the energy storage means to the patient, or, if treatment is no longer indicated, changing the threshold. The metric may be related to a proportion of cardiac events that are abnormal within a set of cardiac events, and/or the metric may be related to a duration of time or a number of sensed cardiac events in which a malignant cardiac condition is detected.


Yet another illustrative embodiment includes a method of operation for an implantable medical device having an energy storage system for storing and delivering therapeutic cardiac stimulus, the method comprising observing cardiac function using implanted electrodes by capturing signals from the implanted electrodes and analyzing the captured signals using operational circuitry associated with the implantable medical device, determining whether electrical cardiac stimulus is likely indicated using a first metric; if so, verifying that electrical cardiac stimulus is indicated using a second metric; if so, initiating a charging operation for the energy storage system; after initiating the charging operation, at least once checking that one of the first metric or the second metric continues to indicate electrical cardiac stimulus, and, if not, modifying a threshold used for comparison with either: the first metric in the determining step, and/or the second metric in the verifying step, to cause the threshold to become more rigorous. The checking step may be performed at least once during the charging operation. The checking step may also be performed at least once after the charging operation is completed.


Another illustrative embodiment includes a method of operating an implantable medical device, the method comprising observing a first threshold to determine whether a patient in which the medical device is implanted likely needs cardiac stimulus, and, if so, observing a second threshold to determine whether the cardiac stimulus is currently indicated, and, if so, initiating a charging sequence for an energy storage system configured for stimulus delivery to the patient; if not, returning to the step of observing the first threshold. The method may include, if the charging sequence is initiated, performing the following steps if the charging sequence is completed: observing a third threshold to determine whether cardiac stimulus is currently indicated; and if so, delivering cardiac stimulus to the patient using implanted electrodes; if not, observing the first threshold to determine whether the patient likely needs cardiac stimulus. If the patient still likely needs cardiac stimulus, the method may include returning to the step of observing the third threshold, or if the patient no longer likely needs cardiac stimulus, adjusting at least one of the first threshold and the second threshold. The method may further include observing whether the first threshold remains crossed during a time period between initiation and completion of the charging sequence and: if so, continuing the charging sequence until completion; or, if not, stopping the charging sequence and changing at least one of the first threshold and the second threshold.


Yet another illustrative embodiment includes a method of cardiac treatment using an implanted medical device system having implanted electrodes and an energy storage system for storing electric charge for use in cardiac electrical stimulus, the method comprising A) determining whether an abnormal event threshold is crossed, the abnormal event threshold being crossed if a specified number of abnormal events occur within a selected number of most recent detected cardiac events, and, if so: determining whether the abnormal event threshold has been exceeded for a threshold number of most recent events and observing whether a most recent events is abnormal, and, if so, initiating a charge sequence for the energy storage system. Once the charge sequence is complete, the method may further include B) determining whether a most recent event is abnormal and, if so, delivering therapeutic energy to the patient; and if not, determining whether the abnormal event threshold remains exceeded when measured from a most recent event; and: if so, waiting for a next cardiac event and again performing step B); or if not, raising the threshold number of most recent events and returning to step A). The method may further include determining whether the abnormal event threshold continues to be crossed while the charge sequence is being performed. Another illustrative embodiment includes a method of operating an implanted medical device system having implanted electrodes and an energy storage system for storing electric charge for use in cardiac electrical stimulus, the method comprising observing a cardiac rate for a patient, and if the cardiac rate exceeds a predetermined rate threshold, performing the above method.


Another illustrative embodiment includes a method of operation for an implanted medical device having implanted electrodes, an energy storage system for storing and delivering cardiac stimulus to a patient, and operational circuitry for operating the device, the method comprising capturing a number of cardiac events, determining whether a first cardiac event, along with a set of previously captured cardiac events, indicates a malignant cardiac condition and, if so, flagging the first cardiac event, observing whether a threshold number of cardiac events within a set of cardiac events have been flagged; if so, initiating a charging sequence for charging the energy storage system in preparation for delivery of electrical cardiac stimulus. The illustrative method further includes, after the charging sequence is initiated, at least once observing whether treatment of the patient continues to be indicated due to a malignant cardiac condition; and, if treatment is no longer indicated, modifying the size of the threshold number and/or the set of cardiac events.


Another illustrative embodiment includes a method including implanting an implantable electrical device in the patient, wherein the device is configured to operate as noted in any the above illustrative embodiments.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A-1B illustrate, respectively, representative subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardiac treatment systems;



FIG. 2 shows an illustrative method for delivering therapy;



FIG. 3 depicts a charge initiation scheme in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the present invention;



FIGS. 4A-4C depict heart rhythm sections where each individual cardiac event is characterized;



FIG. 5 depicts a charge initiation sequence where an illustrative cardiac rhythm management device is unable to sense during charging;



FIG. 6 depicts a charge initiation sequence where an illustrative cardiac rhythm management device is able to sense during charging; and



FIG. 7 illustrates a dual testing approach for charging and therapy delivery decisions.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following detailed description should be read with reference to the drawings, in which like elements in different drawings are numbered identically. The drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, depict selected embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize that many of the examples provided have suitable alternatives that may be utilized.


The present invention is generally related to implantable cardiac treatment systems that provide therapy for patients who are experiencing particular arrhythmias including, for example, ventricular tachycardia. The present invention is directed toward therapy delivery architectures for use in cardiac rhythm devices, as well as devices incorporating such architectures. In particular, the present invention is suited for implantable cardiac treatment systems capable of detecting and treating harmful arrhythmias.


To date, implantable cardiac treatment systems have been either epicardial systems or transvenous systems such as the transvenous system implanted generally as shown in FIG. 1B. However, as further explained herein, the present invention is also adapted to function with a subcutaneous implantable cardiac treatment system as shown in FIG. 1A.



FIG. 1A illustrates a subcutaneously placed implantable cardiac treatment system, in particular, an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) system. In this illustrative embodiment, the heart 10 is monitored using a canister 12 coupled to a lead system 14. The canister 12 may include an electrode 16 thereon, while the lead system 14 connects to sensing electrodes 18, 20, and a coil electrode 22 that may serve as a shock or stimulus delivery electrode as well as a sensing electrode. The system may be implanted subcutaneously as illustrated, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,647,292 and 6,721,597, the disclosures of which are both incorporated herein by reference. By subcutaneous placement, it is meant that electrode placement does not require insertion of an electrode into a heart chamber, in or on the heart muscle, or the patient's vasculature.



FIG. 1B illustrates a transvenous ICD system. The heart 30 is monitored and treated by a system including a canister 32 coupled to a lead system 34 including atrial electrodes 36 and ventricular electrodes 38. A number of configurations for the electrodes may be used, including placement within the heart, adherence to the heart, or disposition within the patient's vasculature.


The present invention may be embodied by operational circuitry including select electrical components provided within the canister 2 (FIG. 1A) or canister 11 (FIG. 1B). In such embodiments, the operational circuitry may be configured to enable the methods to be performed. In some similar embodiments, the present invention may be embodied in readable instruction sets such as a program encoded in machine or controller readable media, wherein the readable instruction sets are provided to enable the operational circuitry to perform the analysis discussed in the described embodiments. Further embodiments may include a controller or microcontroller adapted to read and execute the described methods.


The cardiac rhythm management device, whether subcutaneous or transvenous, senses cardiac signals from the patient's heart. The manner in which the data is collected and the type of data collected is dependent on the cardiac rhythm management device being used. Moreover, the cardiac rhythm management device may be programmed to, or may automatically adapt to, optimally detect a particular form of data which is sought by the cardiac rhythm management device.



FIG. 2 shows an illustrative method for delivering therapy. As shown, the method includes a first step of observing cardiac function, as shown at 50. The method determines whether treatment is indicated, as shown at 52. Treatment may be indicated by a number of different methods, for example, by reliance upon any number of characteristics or features of the sensed cardiac function. For the illustrative method, treatment may be indicated by the use of a defined threshold. The threshold utilized may take any number of forms depending upon the device's functionality. For example, the threshold may relate to cardiac event rates, cardiac event intervals, lack of cardiac events (asystole or fibrillation), cardiac event morphology (QRS width being an example), or event-to-event correlation.


If treatment is indicated, the method goes on to begin a charging operation, as shown at 54. The initiation of the charge is stored in an associated energy system (sometimes a capacitor or bank of capacitors). During and/or after the charging operation is completed, the method then includes the step of determining whether treatment is still indicated, as shown at 56. If treatment is still indicated when charging is complete (and/or at intermediate times during charging, if so enabled) then the therapy is delivered as shown at 58. If step 56 is performed while charging is occurring, then charging may continue until charging is completed. If treatment is no longer indicated when step 56 is performed, then the method includes changing the threshold, as shown at 60. In an illustrative embodiment, the threshold may be changed to make the threshold more rigorous for satisfying. By making the threshold more rigorous, it is believed that it is less likely that a charge initiation will commence (step 52) without ultimately delivering a therapy (step 58).


The following illustrative example, encompassing FIGS. 3 and 4A-4C, with further illustration shown in FIGS. 5-6, is a relatively complete example. It should be understood that the claims which follow recite parts of the illustrative methods shown, and that not all steps or aspects of the illustrative example are necessary to the invention. Instead, the relatively complete example shown in FIGS. 3-6 is aiding the understanding of those of skill in the art.



FIG. 3 depicts a charge initiation method in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the present invention. The illustrative cardiac rhythm management device detects cardiac information, as shown at 70, which includes raw signal data from the patient. This raw signal data may be preprocessed by the device, if so required or desired. Preprocessing steps may include smoothing of the detected data, differentiation, filtering and/or other preprocessing methodologies known in the art.


Detected data, whether preprocessed or raw, is then classified as being either a cardiac event (a heartbeat) or not a cardiac event (extraneous noise). This classification may merely be an initial determination. In particular embodiments, sensed events may then be secondarily examined in an additional waveform appraisal phase. The waveform appraisal phase further appraises the sensed cardiac events and substantiates the classification of those detected signals as true cardiac events. Illustrative details of an example waveform appraisal method are disclosed in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/858,598, filed Jun. 1, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,248,921 and titled METHOD AND DEVICES FOR PERFORMING CARDIAC WAVEFORM APPRAISAL, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.


Whether from the raw or appraised cardiac data, the illustrative cardiac rhythm management device may then calculate a patient's representative cardiac rate, as shown at 72. In one embodiment, the cardiac rate is calculated from the average R-R interval between four (4) consecutive sensed cardiac events. Other methods known in the art for calculating a patient's cardiac rate may also be utilized.


The illustrative cardiac rhythm management device then assesses whether the cardiac rate is tachyarrhythmic, as shown at 74. Cardiac rates in excess of 100 bpm are defined as tachyarrhythmias in adults. For most patients, however, a higher cardiac rate threshold is more indicative of a pathologic tachyarrhythmia. Some illustrative embodiments of the invention account for this inconsistency with patients by permitting a physician to adjust the cardiac rate threshold to meet the needs of a particular patient. For example, a physician may adjust the cardiac rate threshold to 120 bpm, instead of 100 bpm, to indicate tachyarrhythmia. This attribute is particularly beneficial for children, who generally have higher pathologic tachyarrhythmic thresholds (around 180 bpm) than adults.


When a patient's cardiac rate is below the tachyarrhythmic threshold, the illustrative cardiac rhythm management device takes no further action other than to continue monitoring the patient's cardiac rate. However, in instances where a patient's cardiac rate does exceed the threshold, the illustrative device then further evaluates the individual cardiac events giving rise to the tachyarrhythmic rate. In particular, the illustrative device first employs an X out of Y counter, as shown at 76.


The individual cardiac events giving rise to a tachyarrhythmic rate are hereinafter defined as “malignant cardiac events” and are the X constituent in the counter. The Y constituent for the counter comprises the total number of cardiac events being evaluated (whether malignant or non-malignant). In a preferred embodiment, the cardiac rhythm management device requires eighteen (18) malignant cardiac events out of twenty-four (24) total detected events to prompt the cardiac rhythm management device to initiate a second level of evaluation, as shown by the decision at 78. Alternative X out of Y quotients may also be used with the present invention.


If the X out of Y counter requirement is not met, then the device continues to monitor the patient's cardiac rate until the X out of Y counter requirement is satisfied, if ever. Once the counter requirement is satisfied, the device evaluates the persistence of the malignant cardiac events, as shown at 80.


The persistence condition of the illustrative embodiment is a gate-keeper step. As the gate-keeper, the persistence condition is the last condition that must be satisfied prior to the illustrative device initiates the charging of its capacitors for therapy delivery, as shown at 82. It is believed that the persistence condition will reduce the number of unnecessary device charge initiations. This is particularly true for those patients who suffer from non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Reducing inappropriate charges increases the longevity of the device's batteries and ultimately the longevity of the device itself. This subsequently benefits the patient by reducing the frequency of device replacements.


The illustrative persistence condition evaluates a cardiac rhythm's persistence in satisfying the X out of Y counter requirement. Specifically, the persistence condition evaluates two questions relating to the X out of Y counter:

    • (1) Is the X out of Y counter requirement satisfied sequentially for a defined ‘x’ number of times?
    • (2) Does the last cardiac event in the final X out of Y counter requirement indicate a malignant cardiac event?


In an illustrative embodiment, the persistence condition is (at least initially) satisfied when the X out of Y counter requirement is satisfied sequentially for two (2) times. Examples illustrating the persistence condition are depicted in FIGS. 4A-4C.



FIGS. 4A-4C depict heart rhythm sections where each individual cardiac event is characterized. More specifically, the FIGS. depict a sequence 90 of cardiac events where the “M” symbol represents a malignant cardiac event and the “E” symbol represents a non-malignant cardiac event.


In FIG. 4A, nineteen (19) malignant events are shown in twenty-four (24) cardiac events. According to an 18 out of 24 counter requirement, the section of cardiac events depicted satisfies the X out of Y counter requirement. Since the counter requirement is satisfied, the device may then evaluate the persistence condition. In doing so, the device flags this X out of Y counter as the first success for evaluating the persistence condition.



FIG. 4B similarly depicts the sequence 90 of twenty-four (24) cardiac events in FIG. 4A, but additionally includes a newly sensed twenty-fifth (25) cardiac event that is malignant, forming another sequence 92B of twenty-four (24) cardiac events. With the addition of the new cardiac event, the cardiac rhythm management device again evaluates the X out of Y counter requirement. Now, the last sequence 92B of twenty-four (24) cardiac events includes twenty (20) malignant events. Thus, the X out of Y counter requirement is again satisfied and the device flags this successive X out of Y counter. The illustrative device's operational circuitry then evaluates the persistence condition. The first inquiry of the persistence condition is satisfied because two sequential X out of Y counter requirements were met. Additionally, the second inquiry of the persistence condition is satisfied because the last cardiac event in the second and final X out of Y counter requirement was a malignant event. As a result, the illustrative device's operational circuitry then initiates the charging of the device's capacitors for therapy delivery.



FIG. 4C also depicts the sequence 90 of twenty-four (24) cardiac events in FIG. 4A, but instead includes a newly sensed twenty-fifth (25) cardiac event that is normal, or at least non-malignant, forming another sequence 92C of twenty-four (24) cardiac events. When the cardiac rhythm management device again evaluates the X out of Y counter requirement, it observes that the last sequence 92B of twenty-four (24) cardiac events include eighteen (18) malignant events. Thus, the X out of Y counter requirement is again satisfied and the device flags this successive X out of Y counter. The illustrative device's operational circuitry then evaluates the persistence condition. The first inquiry of the persistence condition is satisfied because two sequential X out of Y counter requirements were met. However, the second inquiry of the persistence condition fails. Specifically, the last cardiac event in the second and final X out of Y counter requirement was not a malignant event. Thus, the device refrains from charge initiation.


Once the gate-keeping function of the persistence condition is satisfied, the device begins to charge its capacitors. FIGS. 5 and 6 depict two alternative scenarios for charging. FIG. 5 depicts a charge initiation sequence where an illustrative cardiac rhythm management device is unable to sense during charging. More specifically, once the device initiates its charging cycle, as shown at 100, the device cannot sense, as shown during time period 102. The method resumes once the device charge is completed, as shown at 104. Since the illustrative cardiac rhythm management device cannot sense during charging, the device must wait until the capacitors are fully charged before the operational circuitry may resume sensing. Immediately following charge completion 104, however, the device reconfirms that therapy delivery is necessary as shown at 106.


In one embodiment, the reconfirmation process is deemed successful if two consecutive malignant events occur within six (6) contiguous cardiac events, with the six (6) events being the most recent events available for evaluation. If the conditions set forth in the reconfirmation process 106 are satisfied, then the capacitors are again charged to their fullest (if necessary) as shown at 108, and therapy is delivered to the patient, as shown at 110.


Alternatively, if the reconfirmation process 106 fails, the device again employs an X out of Y counter requirement, as shown at 112, and must again satisfy the persistence condition, as shown at 114. If at any time the persistence condition and the reconfirmation process are satisfied, then the capacitors are again charged to their fullest, as shown at 108, and therapy is delivered to the patient, as shown at 110. However, if the patient converts to a normal sinus rhythm after charging (or otherwise fails the X out of Y counter requirement), then the parameters set for the persistence condition are modified, as shown at 116, and the capacitors are bled of their charge, as shown at 118.


In addition to being a gate-keeper, the persistence condition is also adaptive to the particular needs of a patient. If a patient frequently suffers from non-sustained tachyarrhythmias, the persistence conditions may be adjusted to help eliminate premature charge initiations. In one embodiment, the first inquiry is further defined to account for this adaptability:

    • (1) Is the X out of Y counter requirement satisfied sequentially for (3*n)+2 times, where n is an integer with limits between 0 and 5, and further wherein n starts at 0 and increases one integer with each aborted charge initiation?


      The second inquiry remains the same. With this expanded definition, the persistence condition's first inquiry requires:
  • two (2) sequential X out of Y counter requirements satisfied if the device has never aborted a charge initiation;
  • five (5) sequential X out of Y counter requirements satisfied if the device has aborted a charge initiation once;
  • eight (8) sequential X out of Y counter requirements satisfied if the device has aborted a charge initiation twice;
  • eleven (11) sequential X out of Y counter requirements satisfied if the device has aborted a charge initiation three times;
  • fourteen (14) sequential X out of Y counter requirements satisfied if the device has aborted a charge initiation four times; and
  • seventeen (17) sequential X out of Y counter requirements satisfied if the device has aborted a charge initiation five times.


    In all other aspects, the illustrative persistence condition operates as described in detail above with reference to FIGS. 3 and 4A-4C.



FIG. 6 illustrates a portion of the charge initiation sequence where the operational circuitry can sense cardiac events while the device is charging. Cardiac events that are sensed during charging are evaluated and assessed similarly to those being sensed when the device is not charging or otherwise preparing to deliver therapy. Therefore, the cardiac rhythm management device may calculate a cardiac rate and evaluate the frequency of malignant events during the charging cycle. As such, after the device initiates its charging, as shown at 130, the device begins monitoring the X out of Y requirement, as shown at 132. If at any time during the device's charge cycle the patient converts to a normal sinus rhythm after charging (or otherwise fails the X out of Y counter requirement), then the device stops charging, as shown at 134. Additionally, the capacitors are bled of their charge and the parameters set for the persistence condition are modified, as shown at 136, by applying the expanded definition for the first inquiry described above. The method then returns to detection and rate calculation, as shown at 138. Alternatively, if the patient remains in a tachyarrhythmic state throughout the charge cycle, then the device reconfirms that therapy delivery is necessary through the reconfirmation process, following a method similar to that shown in FIG. 5, as indicated at 140.


In the above illustrative embodiment shown in FIGS. 3-6, the term “malignant event” was defined as an event indicative of a tachyarrhythmic rate. In other embodiments, any detected cardiac event that, upon analysis, is indicative of a malignant condition (i.e. a cardiac condition requiring intervention) may be considered a malignant event. An example of a malignant event satisfying other criteria may be an event or series of events having a morphology (for example, shape, QRS width, consecutive event correlation waveform analysis, etc.) indicative of a malignant arrhythmia. Some examples of analysis for providing such determinations are shown in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/856,084, filed May 27, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,330,757 and titled METHOD FOR DISCRIMINATING BETWEEN VENTRICULAR AND SUPRAVENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In an example in U.S. Pat. No. 7,330,757, analysis may include tiered assessment including identifying an event as indicative of malignant arrhythmia if it indicates a rate that exceeds a high rate boundary or if the event indicates a rate that is between a low rate boundary and the high rate boundary and the event meets detection enhancement criteria which are discussed throughout the '757 patent.


In alternative embodiments, several portions of the method may be modified. For example, the X out of Y count requirement may be changed to use different parameters (instead of 18 out of 24, other ratios may be used). In yet another embodiment, rather than an X out of Y counter requirement, a group of cardiac events may be analyzed to determine a group correlation waveform score. If the correlation is sufficiently low, it may be determined that cardiac function is erratic to a degree indicating a need for therapeutic delivery. In yet another modification, the persistence conditions themselves may also change. For example, the persistence condition may require longer or shorter analytical periods, consideration of morphology, noise considerations, or the like.


In some embodiments, other conditions may be modified after a patient has spontaneously recovered from a non-sustained tachyarrhythmia or other malignant condition. For instance, rather than altering the persistence condition, the X of Y counter requirement may be changed. More specifically, if an illustrative method begins with an 18 out of 24 counter requirement, the X out of Y counter requirement may extend to a larger number, higher percentage, or other requirement. For example, the 18 out of 24 counter requirement may adjust to 20 out of 24 and/or 21 out of 27. This change may be further incremented with each successive non-sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia. For example, after the first aborted charge, the 18 out of 24 counter requirement becomes 21 out of 27, which becomes 24 out of 30 on the second aborted charge and 27 out of 33 on the third aborted charge. In alternative illustrative embodiments, more than one rule for a given persistence condition may be changed at the same time.


Some embodiments may make use of a pure rate-driven shocking determination which does not make use of the X out of Y counter requirement. For example, if the cardiac rate observed to initiate the method shown in FIG. 3 (the query “tachyarrhythmic rate?”) exceeds a predetermined threshold, it may be determined that therapy is appropriate. Then, at a later time (e.g., during charging of the illustrative device's energy storage system or after charging is complete) the rate may be checked again. Re-checking the conditions giving rise to a decision to deliver therapy at a later time may reveal that stimulus is no longer indicated. In response, a system may raise the threshold cardiac rate for shocking, or may extend a relevant time period in which such a threshold cardiac rate must be held to initiate charging.



FIG. 7 illustrates a dual testing approach for charging and therapy delivery decisions. The method begins by observing the patient's cardiac function, as shown at 200. The method then determines, as shown at 202, whether treatment is likely indicated. If treatment is not indicated, the method returns to observing cardiac function as shown at 200, where the method waits until a next cardiac event is sensed for evaluation.


If treatment is likely indicated at 202, the method next verifies that treatment is needed, as shown at 204, using a different metric than that used in step 202. One method of separating out these two steps is to observe event intervals to determine whether treatment is likely indicated (step 202) and, if so, to perform further analysis (possibly combining noise and average interval analysis) to verify that the event intervals do indeed indicate malignancy. Other first and second steps (202, 204) may be performed without deviating from the scope of the invention.


Yet another example of a first and second tier for analysis is a system wherein multiple vector views are available, for example as shown in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/901,258, filed Jul. 27, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,392,085 and titled MULTIPLE ELECTRODE VECTORS FOR IMPLANTABLE CARDIAC TREATMENT DEVICES, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. For example, a first sensing vector may be used for the first determination that treatment is likely indicated at 202. Additionally, a second, different sensing vector may then be used to verify that treatment is indicated at 204.


If treatment is likely indicated at 202 and a need for treatment is verified at 204, the method next includes the step of initiating the charging operation of the associated energy storage device or system (often a capacitor or group of capacitors), as shown at 206. The method next goes to a charge instruction block 208 which includes steps that are performed if the device/system is able to perform sensing and analysis operations during charging of the system's energy storage device. If sensing and analysis operations cannot be performed during charging, the method goes directly to step 214, which is explained below.


In the charge instruction block 208, the method determines whether the energy storage system is completed charging, as shown at 210. If not, the method includes observing whether treatment is still likely indicated, as shown at 212. The metric for determining whether treatment is still likely indicated in step 212 may be that of either of steps 202 or 204, or may be a yet a different metric. If treatment is still likely indicated, the method continues charging at 210 and iterates this loop until charging is complete. Once charging is complete, the method determines whether a need for treatment can be verified again, as shown at step 214. As with step 212, a metric previously used in one of steps 202, 204, or 212 may be used in step 214, or a new metric may be chosen. If the last verification step 214 is successful, then therapy is delivered as shown at 216.


If verification step 214 fails, then the stored energy may be non-therapeutically discharged, as shown at 218, in any suitable manner. Alternatively, if desired, the capacitors may continue to hold charge for a predetermined time period to assure that re-charging is not needed. One suitable manner for discharge is to use the stored energy to perform diagnostic or maintenance type functions for the device or, if the device is used for pacing, to use the energy to provide pacing energy.


Next, a threshold is adjusted, as shown at 220. Several thresholds may be adjusted, but preferably adjustment is performed on a threshold used in at least one of the preliminary steps 202, 204 that are used to make a determination that charging should be initiated at step 206. The threshold may be made more rigorous such that a decision to initiate charging at 206 becomes more difficult. The method then returns to observing cardiac function as shown at 200.


Returning to step 212, in the charge instruction block 208, if treatment is no longer likely indicated at step 212, the method terminates charging, as shown at 222, and discharges the energy storage in any suitable manner, as shown at 224. The method then goes to step 220 and adjusts a threshold as before.


As used herein, the term metric may indicate any suitable measurement or result from an analytical procedure. Example metrics include event rates, X out of Y counter ratios, and correlation results. Further metrics include a time period in which a condition (such as a cardiac tachyarrhythmia) persists or a how often an X out of Y counter is flagged.


A threshold may be rendered more rigorous in response to an aborted charge initiation. Thus, at least ostensibly, subsequent tachyarrhythmic events must be more sustainable to cross an adjusted threshold for initiating the device's charging cycle. Examples of adjustable thresholds include metrics such as event rate, X out of Y counter ratios, number of time intervals during which a malignant condition is detected, and the number of X out of Y counter flags set.


Numerous characteristics and advantages of the invention covered by this document have been set forth in the foregoing description. It will be understood, however, that this disclosure is, in many aspects, only illustrative. Changes may be made in details, particularly in matters of shape, size and arrangement of parts without exceeding the scope of the invention. The invention's scope is defined, of course, in the language in which the claims are expressed.

Claims
  • 1. A method of avoiding inappropriate therapy delivery to a patient in an implantable defibrillator, the implantable defibrillator comprising a number of implantable electrodes and operational circuitry for performing cardiac signal analysis and therapy delivery using the implantable electrodes, the method comprising, at a first time: detecting cardiac events in a patient using the implantable electrodes;filling an X-out-of-Y filter with data related to the detected cardiac events and using the X-out-of-Y filter to determine that X exceeds a predetermined treatment threshold;when X exceeds the predetermined treatment threshold, using a predetermined persistence threshold, N, and applying a persistence rule calling for X to exceed the predetermined treatment threshold for at least N consecutive cardiac events;when the persistence rule is met, initiating a charging sequence to charge a capacitor for therapy delivery;after initiating the charging sequence but before therapy delivery, determining that the cardiac signal data of the patient no longer indicates a need for therapy; andupon determining, after initiating the charging sequence but before therapy delivery, that the cardiac signal data of the patient no longer indicates a need for therapy, modifying N to increase the quantity of consecutive cardiac events required to meet the persistence threshold and storing N for use in the future; andthe method further comprising, at a second time:detecting cardiac events in the patient using the implantable electrodes;filling the X-out-of-Y filter with data related to the detected cardiac events and using the X-out-of-Y filter to determine that X exceeds a predetermined treatment threshold;when X exceeds the predetermined treatment threshold, applying the persistence rule calling for X to exceed the predetermined treatment threshold for at least N consecutive cardiac events, wherein N, when applied at the second time, is modified in view of the occurrence of the first time; andfinding that the persistence rule is not met due to the increase in N at least once.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the X-out-of-Y filter is filled by increasing X when a detected cardiac event, when analyzed by the operational circuitry, is found to exceed a rate threshold.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the X-out-of-Y filter is filled by increasing X when a detected event, when analyzed by the operational circuitry, meets one of the two following criteria: the detected event indicates a rate that exceeds a fast rate threshold; orthe detected event indicates a rate below the fast rate threshold but above a low rate threshold and meets detection enhancement criteria that indicate a malignant arrhythmia.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one of the electrodes is disposed on a lead that is emplaced transvenously in the patient.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein all of the electrodes are disposed subcutaneously in the patient without entering the heart or contacting cardiac tissue.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the X-out-of-Y filter is applied by using an 18-out-of-24 rule as the predetermined treatment threshold.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 further comprising, after finding that the persistence rule is not met due to the increase in N at least once, detecting at least one cardiac event and finding that the persistence rule is met using the increased N, and initiating the charging sequence a second time.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 further comprising, after initiating the charging sequence a second time, delivering therapy to the patient.
  • 9. An implantable defibrillator comprising a number of implantable electrodes and operational circuitry for performing cardiac signal analysis and therapy delivery using the implantable electrodes, the operational circuitry being configured to perform the following: at a first time: detecting cardiac events in a patient using the implantable electrodes;filling an X-out-of-Y filter with data related to the detected cardiac events and using the X-out-of-Y filter to determine that X exceeds a predetermined treatment threshold;when X exceeds the predetermined treatment threshold, using a predetermined persistence threshold, N, and applying a persistence rule calling for X to exceed the predetermined treatment threshold for at least N consecutive cardiac events;when the persistence rule is met, initiating a charging sequence to charge a capacitor for therapy delivery;after initiating the charging sequence but before therapy delivery, determining that the cardiac signal data of the patient no longer indicates a need for therapy; andupon determining, after initiating the charging sequence but before therapy delivery, that the cardiac signal data of the patient no longer indicates a need for therapy, modifying N to increase the quantity of consecutive cardiac events required to meet the persistence threshold and storing N for use in the future; andat a second time: detecting cardiac events in the patient using the implantable electrodes;filling the X-out-of-Y filter with data related to the detected cardiac events and using the X-out-of-Y filter to determine that X exceeds a predetermined treatment threshold;when X exceeds the predetermined treatment threshold, applying the persistence rule calling for X to exceed the predetermined treatment threshold for at least N consecutive cardiac events, wherein N, when applied at the second time, is modified in view of the occurrence of the first time; andfinding that the persistence rule is not met due to the increase in N at least once.
  • 10. The implantable defibrillator of claim 9 wherein the operational circuitry is further configured such that the X-out-of-Y filter is filled by increasing X when a detected cardiac event, when analyzed by the operational circuitry, is found to exceed a rate threshold.
  • 11. The implantable defibrillator of claim 9 wherein the operational circuitry is further configured such that the X-out-of-Y filter is filled by increasing X when a detected event, when analyzed by the operational circuitry, meets one of the two following criteria: the detected event indicates a rate that exceeds a fast rate threshold; orthe detected event indicates a rate below the fast rate threshold but above a low rate threshold and meets detection enhancement criteria that indicate a malignant arrhythmia.
  • 12. The implantable defibrillator of claim 9 wherein the operational circuitry is configured to apply the X-out-of-Y filter by using an 18-out-of-24 rule as the predetermined treatment threshold.
  • 13. The implantable defibrillator of claim 9 wherein the operational circuitry is configured to detect at least one cardiac event and find that the persistence rule is met after finding that the persistence rule is not met due to the increase in N at least once, and in response to finding that the persistence rule is met using the increased N, initiate the charging sequence a second time.
  • 14. The implantable defibrillator of claim 13 further comprising, after initiating the charging sequence a second time, delivering therapy to the patient.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/359,072, filed Jan. 23, 2009 and published as US Patent Application Publication Number 2009-0131998, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,249,702, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/042,911, filed Jan. 25, 2005 and now U.S. Pat. No. 8,160,697, each of which is titled METHOD FOR ADAPTING CHARGE INITIATION FOR AN IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR, the entire disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference. The present application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/043,012, filed Jan. 25, 2005 and now U.S. Pat. No. 8,229,563, which is titled DEVICES FOR ADAPTING CHARGE INITIATION FOR AN IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR.

US Referenced Citations (221)
Number Name Date Kind
3653387 Ceier Apr 1972 A
3710374 Kelly Jan 1973 A
3911925 Tillery, Jr. Oct 1975 A
4030509 Heilman et al. Jun 1977 A
4157720 Greatbatch Jun 1979 A
4164946 Langer Aug 1979 A
4184493 Langer et al. Jan 1980 A
4191942 Long Mar 1980 A
4210149 Heilman et al. Jul 1980 A
RE30387 Denniston, III et al. Aug 1980 E
4223678 Langer et al. Sep 1980 A
4248237 Kenny Feb 1981 A
4254775 Langer Mar 1981 A
4291707 Heilman et al. Sep 1981 A
4300567 Kolenik et al. Nov 1981 A
4314095 Moore et al. Feb 1982 A
4375817 Engle et al. Mar 1983 A
4402322 Duggan Sep 1983 A
4407288 Langer et al. Oct 1983 A
4424818 Doring et al. Jan 1984 A
4450527 Sramek May 1984 A
4548209 Wielders et al. Oct 1985 A
4567900 Moore Feb 1986 A
4595009 Leinders Jun 1986 A
4602637 Elmqvist et al. Jul 1986 A
4603705 Speicher et al. Aug 1986 A
4693253 Adams Sep 1987 A
4727877 Kallok Mar 1988 A
4750494 King Jun 1988 A
4765341 Mower et al. Aug 1988 A
4768512 Imran Sep 1988 A
4779617 Whigham Oct 1988 A
4800883 Winstrom Jan 1989 A
4830005 Woskow May 1989 A
4830006 Haluska et al. May 1989 A
4880005 Pless et al. Nov 1989 A
4940054 Grevis et al. Jul 1990 A
4944300 Saksena Jul 1990 A
4949719 Pless et al. Aug 1990 A
5000189 Throne et al. Mar 1991 A
5044374 Lindemans et al. Sep 1991 A
5105810 Collins et al. Apr 1992 A
5105826 Smits et al. Apr 1992 A
5109842 Adinolfi May 1992 A
5117824 Keimel et al. Jun 1992 A
5129392 Bardy et al. Jul 1992 A
5133353 Hauser Jul 1992 A
5144946 Weinberg et al. Sep 1992 A
5184615 Nappholz et al. Feb 1993 A
5184616 Weiss Feb 1993 A
5191901 Dahl et al. Mar 1993 A
5193535 Bardy et al. Mar 1993 A
5203348 Dahl et al. Apr 1993 A
5215081 Ostroff Jun 1993 A
5215098 Steinhaus et al. Jun 1993 A
5217021 Steinhaus et al. Jun 1993 A
5230337 Dahl et al. Jul 1993 A
5255692 Neubauer et al. Oct 1993 A
5261400 Bardy Nov 1993 A
5271411 Ripley et al. Dec 1993 A
5275621 Mehra Jan 1994 A
5277190 Moulton Jan 1994 A
5280792 Leong et al. Jan 1994 A
5300106 Dahl et al. Apr 1994 A
5312441 Mader et al. May 1994 A
5313953 Yomtov et al. May 1994 A
5331966 Bennett et al. Jul 1994 A
5342402 Olson et al. Aug 1994 A
5342407 Dahl et al. Aug 1994 A
5351696 Riff et al. Oct 1994 A
5354316 Keimel Oct 1994 A
5366496 Dahl et al. Nov 1994 A
5370667 Alt Dec 1994 A
5376103 Anderson et al. Dec 1994 A
5376104 Sakai et al. Dec 1994 A
5385574 Hauser et al. Jan 1995 A
5391200 KenKnight et al. Feb 1995 A
5405363 Kroll et al. Apr 1995 A
5411031 Yomtov May 1995 A
5411539 Neisz May 1995 A
5411547 Causey, III May 1995 A
5413591 Knoll May 1995 A
5423326 Wang et al. Jun 1995 A
5431693 Schroeppel Jul 1995 A
5439485 Mar et al. Aug 1995 A
5447519 Peterson Sep 1995 A
5447521 Anderson et al. Sep 1995 A
5458623 Lu et al. Oct 1995 A
5464431 Adams et al. Nov 1995 A
5476503 Yang Dec 1995 A
5509923 Middleman et al. Apr 1996 A
5509928 Acken Apr 1996 A
5513645 Jacobson et al. May 1996 A
5531765 Pless Jul 1996 A
5531766 Kroll et al. Jul 1996 A
5534019 Paspa Jul 1996 A
5534022 Hoffmann et al. Jul 1996 A
5545186 Olson et al. Aug 1996 A
5597956 Ito et al. Jan 1997 A
5601607 Adams Feb 1997 A
5603732 Dahl et al. Feb 1997 A
5607455 Armstrong Mar 1997 A
5618287 Fogarty et al. Apr 1997 A
5620477 Pless et al. Apr 1997 A
5643328 Cooke et al. Jul 1997 A
5645586 Meltzer Jul 1997 A
5658317 Haefner et al. Aug 1997 A
5658319 Kroll Aug 1997 A
5658321 Fayram et al. Aug 1997 A
5674260 Weinberg Oct 1997 A
5690648 Fogarty et al. Nov 1997 A
5690683 Haefner et al. Nov 1997 A
5697953 Kroll et al. Dec 1997 A
5713926 Hauser et al. Feb 1998 A
5755736 Gillberg et al. May 1998 A
5766226 Pedersen Jun 1998 A
5776169 Schroeppel Jul 1998 A
5779645 Olson et al. Jul 1998 A
5814090 Latterell et al. Sep 1998 A
5817134 Greenhut Oct 1998 A
5827326 Kroll et al. Oct 1998 A
5836975 DeGroot Nov 1998 A
5836976 Min et al. Nov 1998 A
5843132 Ilvento Dec 1998 A
5857977 Caswell et al. Jan 1999 A
5895414 Sanchez-Zambrano Apr 1999 A
5904705 Kroll et al. May 1999 A
5919211 Adams Jul 1999 A
5919222 Hjelle et al. Jul 1999 A
5925069 Graves et al. Jul 1999 A
5935154 Westlund Aug 1999 A
5941831 Turcott Aug 1999 A
5941904 Johnston et al. Aug 1999 A
5957956 Kroll et al. Sep 1999 A
6014586 Weinberg et al. Jan 2000 A
6026325 Weinberg et al. Feb 2000 A
6058328 Levine et al. May 2000 A
6061592 Nigam May 2000 A
6093173 Balceta et al. Jul 2000 A
6095987 Shmulewitz et al. Aug 2000 A
6115628 Stadler et al. Sep 2000 A
H1905 Hill Oct 2000 H
6128531 Campbell-Smith Oct 2000 A
6144866 Miesel et al. Nov 2000 A
6144879 Gray Nov 2000 A
6148230 Kenknight Nov 2000 A
6169923 Kroll Jan 2001 B1
6185450 Seguine et al. Feb 2001 B1
6223078 Marcovecchio Apr 2001 B1
6236882 Lee et al. May 2001 B1
6266554 Hsu et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266567 Ishikawa et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272377 Sweeney et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278894 Salo et al. Aug 2001 B1
6280462 Hauser et al. Aug 2001 B1
6308095 Hsu et al. Oct 2001 B1
6334071 Lu Dec 2001 B1
6345198 Mouchawar et al. Feb 2002 B1
6377844 Graen Apr 2002 B1
6381493 Stadler et al. Apr 2002 B1
6393316 Gillberg et al. May 2002 B1
6411844 Kroll et al. Jun 2002 B1
6438410 Hsu et al. Aug 2002 B2
6445949 Kroll Sep 2002 B1
6449503 Hsu Sep 2002 B1
6487443 Olson et al. Nov 2002 B2
6493579 Gilkerson et al. Dec 2002 B1
6493584 Lu Dec 2002 B1
6516225 Florio Feb 2003 B1
6539257 KenKnight Mar 2003 B1
6567691 Stadler May 2003 B1
6574505 Warren Jun 2003 B1
6587720 Hsu et al. Jul 2003 B2
6587723 Sloman Jul 2003 B1
6625490 McClure et al. Sep 2003 B1
6636762 Begemann Oct 2003 B2
6636764 Fain et al. Oct 2003 B1
6647292 Bardy et al. Nov 2003 B1
6658293 Vonk Dec 2003 B2
6684100 Sweeney et al. Jan 2004 B1
6687540 Marcovecchio Feb 2004 B2
6699200 Cao et al. Mar 2004 B2
6708062 Ericksen et al. Mar 2004 B2
6718198 Conley et al. Apr 2004 B2
6721597 Bardy et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728572 Hsu et al. Apr 2004 B2
6728575 Hedberg Apr 2004 B2
6731978 Olson et al. May 2004 B2
6745076 Wohlgemuth et al. Jun 2004 B2
6754528 Bardy et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760615 Ferek-Petric Jul 2004 B2
6766190 Ferek-Petric Jul 2004 B2
6778860 Ostroff et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788974 Bardy et al. Sep 2004 B2
6834204 Ostroff et al. Dec 2004 B2
6865417 Rissmann et al. Mar 2005 B2
6866044 Bardy et al. Mar 2005 B2
6879856 Stadler et al. Apr 2005 B2
7016730 Ternes Mar 2006 B2
7027856 Zhou et al. Apr 2006 B2
7103404 Stadler et al. Sep 2006 B2
7447544 Kroll Nov 2008 B1
8160697 Warren et al. Apr 2012 B2
8229563 Warren et al. Jul 2012 B2
8249702 Warren et al. Aug 2012 B2
20010027330 Sullivan et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020188215 Ferek-Petric Dec 2002 A1
20030144700 Brown et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040015197 Gunderson Jan 2004 A1
20040093035 Schwartz et al. May 2004 A1
20040171959 Stadler et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040215240 Lovett et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040230229 Lovett et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040254611 Palreddy et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254613 Ostroff et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004615 Sanders Jan 2005 A1
20050049644 Warren et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050154421 Ousdigian Jul 2005 A1
20060036288 Bocek et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060079796 Marcovecchio et al. Apr 2006 A1
20120323290 Warren et al. Dec 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (46)
Number Date Country
2005325670 Aug 2012 AU
2766866 Jan 2011 CA
29801807 Jun 1998 DE
0095727 Dec 1983 EP
0316616 May 1989 EP
0316616 May 1989 EP
0347353 Dec 1989 EP
0517494 Dec 1992 EP
0518599 Dec 1992 EP
0518599 Dec 1992 EP
0536873 Dec 1992 EP
0517494 Mar 1993 EP
0554208 Aug 1993 EP
0554208 Jan 1994 EP
0586858 Mar 1994 EP
0627237 Dec 1994 EP
0641573 Mar 1995 EP
0641573 Mar 1995 EP
0677301 Oct 1995 EP
0917887 May 1999 EP
0923130 Jun 1999 EP
1000634 May 2000 EP
1046409 Oct 2000 EP
1046409 Oct 2000 EP
2008528103 Jul 2008 JP
WO-8901802 Mar 1989 WO
WO-9319809 Oct 1993 WO
WO-9729802 Aug 1997 WO
WO-9825349 Jun 1998 WO
WO-9903534 Jan 1999 WO
WO-9937362 Jul 1999 WO
WO-9953991 Oct 1999 WO
WO-0222208 Mar 2000 WO
WO-0041766 Jul 2000 WO
WO-0050120 Aug 2000 WO
WO-0143649 Jun 2001 WO
WO-0156166 Aug 2001 WO
WO-0222208 Mar 2002 WO
WO-0224275 Mar 2002 WO
WO-0224275 May 2002 WO
WO-02068046 Sep 2002 WO
WO-03018121 Mar 2003 WO
WO-2004093974 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004091720 Oct 2004 WO
WO-2004093974 Dec 2004 WO
WO-2006081027 Aug 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (118)
Entry
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/755,185, Final Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2008”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Advisory Action dated May 15, 2008”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Advisory Action dated Nov. 1, 2010”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Appeal Brief filed Jan. 24, 2011”, 29 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Applicant's Summary of Examiner Interview filed Jul. 10, 2008”, 1 pg.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Examiner Interview Summary dated Apr. 22, 2008”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jun. 12, 2008”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2008”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Final Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2010”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2008”, 21 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Final Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2011”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Final Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2009”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2010”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 14, 2011”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2007”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 20, 2011”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment dated Jul. 17, 2009”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Jan. 16, 2009 to Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 16, 2008”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Feb. 10, 2010 to Final Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2009”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Apr. 25, 2008 to Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2008”, 20 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Apr. 30, 2009 to Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 2, 2009”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Jun. 3, 2010 to Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2010”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Jul. 14, 2011 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 14, 2011”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Aug. 14, 2009 to Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment dated Jul. 17, 2009”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Oct. 19, 2010 to Final Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2010”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Oct. 22, 2007 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2007”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Nov. 17, 2008 to Final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2008”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Response filed Dec. 7, 2011 to Final Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2011”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 2, 2009”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,911, Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 16, 2008”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Advisory Action dated Nov. 1, 2010”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Appeal Brief filed Feb. 18, 2011”, 21 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Applicant's Summary of Examiner Interview filed Jul. 10, 2008”, 1 pg.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Examiner Interview Summary dated Apr. 22, 2008”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jun. 13, 2008”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2008”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2010”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Final Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2008”, 23 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2009”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2010”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Non Final Office Action dated May 12, 2011”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2007”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2011”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 26, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Notice of Non Compliant Amendment dated Jul. 17, 2009”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Jan. 16, 2009 to Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 16, 2008”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Jan. 27, 2012 to Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2011”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Feb. 9, 2010 to Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2009”, 18 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Apr. 25, 2008 to Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2008”, 22 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Apr. 30, 2009 to Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 2, 2009”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Jun. 3, 2010 to Non Final Office Action dared Mar. 3, 2010”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Aug. 11, 2011 to Non Final Office Action dated May 12, 2011”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Aug. 14, 2009 to Notice of Non Compliant Amendment dated Jul. 17, 2009”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Oct. 19, 2010 to Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2010”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Oct. 26, 2007 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2007”, 18 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Response filed Nov. 25, 2008 to Final Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2008”, 18 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 2, 2009”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,012, Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 16, 2008”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,072, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 26, 2012”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,072, Preliminary Amendment filed Dec. 15, 2009”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,072, Response filed Jan. 19, 2012 to Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 21, 2011”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,072, Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 21, 2011”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,513 , Response filed Dec. 9, 2013 to Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2013”, 20 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,513, Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2013”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,513, Preliminary Amendment filed Nov. 30, 2012”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,513, Response filed Jun. 7, 2013 to Restriction Requirement dated May 31, 2013”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,513, Response filed Aug. 6, 2013 to Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 11, 2013”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,513, Restriction Requirement dated May 31, 2013”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,513, Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 11, 2013”, 16 pgs.
“Australian Application Serial No. 2005325670, Office Action dated Nov. 12, 2010”, 6 pgs.
“Australian Application Serial No. 2012211492, First Examiner Report dated Dec. 24, 2012”, 7 pgs.
“Australian Application Serial No. 2012211492, Response filed Apr. 29, 2013 to First Examiner Report dated Dec. 24, 2012”, 76 pgs.
“Australian Application Serial No. 2012211492, Subsequent Examiners Report dated Jul. 1, 2013”, 4 pgs.
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,587,938, Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2013”, 5 pgs.
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,587,938, Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2013”, 4 pgs.
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,587,938, Response filed Jul. 12, 2013 to Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2013”, 17 pgs.
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200580047119.3, Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2011”, English only, 5 pgs.
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200580047119.3, Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2010”, w/English translation, 27 pgs.
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200580047119.3, Response filed Apr. 18, 2011 to Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2010”, w/English translation, 13 pgs.
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201010173002.2, Response filed Apr. 18, 2011 to Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2010”, 9 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 05855365.2, Office Action dated May 8, 2009”, 3 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 05855365.2, Office Action dated Aug. 26, 2011”, 4 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 05855365.2, Response filed Sep. 15, 2009 to Office Action dated May 8, 2009”, 7 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 05855365.2, Response filed Dec. 12, 2011 to Office Action dated Aug. 26, 2011”, 9 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/046794, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 31, 2007”, 8 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/046794, International Search Report dated Aug. 30, 2006”, 4 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/046794, Written Opinion dated Aug. 30, 2006”, 7 pgs.
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2007-552143, Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2011”, 3 pgs.
Anderson, Mark H, et al., “Performance of Basic Ventricular Tachycardia Detection Algorithms in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Implications for Device Programming”, Pace, vol. 20 Part I, (Dec. 20, 1997), 2975-2983.
Bardy, Gust H, et al., “Multicenter Experience with a Pectoral Unipolar Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator”, JACC, vol. 28, No. 2, (Aug. 1996), 400-410.
Betts, Tim R, et al., “Inappropriate Shock Therapy in a Heart Failure Defibrillator”, Pace, vol. 24, No. 2, (Feb. 2001), 238-240.
Boriani, Guiseppe, et al., “Cardioverter-Defibrillator Oversensing Due to Double Counting of Ventricular Tachycardia Electrograms”, International Journal of Cardiology, 66, (1998), 91-95.
Callans, David J, et al., “Unique Sensing Errors in Third-Generation Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators”, JACC, vol. 22, No. 4, (Oct. 4, 1993), 1135-1140.
Friedman, Richard A, et al., “Implantable Defibrillators in Children: From Whence to Shock”, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 12, No. 3, (Mar. 2001), 361-362.
Gradaus, Rainer, et al., “Nonthoracotomy Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Placement in Children: Use of Subcutaneous Array Leads and Abdominally Placed Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Children”, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 12(3), (Mar. 2001), 356-360.
Gunderson, et al., “An Algorithm to Predict Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead Failure”, JACC, vol. 44, No. 9 (Nov. 2004), 1898-1902.
Higgins, Steven L, et al., “The First Year Experience with the Dual Chamber ICD”, Pace, vol. 23, (Jan. 2000), 18-25.
Jaïs, Pierre, “Pacemaker Syndrome Induced by the Mode Switching Algorithm of a DDDR Pacemaker”, PACE, vol. 22, Part I, (1999), 682-685.
Jones, Gregory K, et al., “Considerations for Ventricular Fibrillation Detection by Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators”, American Heart Journal, vol. 127, No. 4, Part 2, (Apr. 1994), 1107-1110.
Kelly, Patricia A, et al., “Oversensing During Ventricular Pacing in Patients with a Third-Generation Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator”, JACC, vol. 23, No. 7, (Jun. 1994), 1531-1534.
Leung, Sum-Kin, et al., “Apparent Extension of the Atrioventricular Interval Due to Sensor-Based Algorithm Against Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias”, PACE, vol. 17, Part I, (Mar. 1994), 321-330.
Li, Huagui, et al., “The Mean Ventricular Fibrillation Cycle Length: A Potentially Useful Parameter for Progranuning Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators”, PACE, vol. 21, (Sep. 1998), 1789-1794.
Mirowski, M, et al., “Automatic Detection and Defibrillation of Lethal Arrhythmias—A New Concept”, JAMA, vol. 213, No. 4, (Jul. 27, 1970), 615-616.
Nair, Mohan, et al., “Automatic Arrhythmia Identification Using Analysis of the Atrioventricular Association”, Circulation, 95(4), (Feb. 1997), 967-973.
Newman, David, et al., “Use of Telemetry Functions in the Assessment of Implanted Antitachycardia Device Efficacy”, The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 70, (Sep. 1, 1992), 616-621.
Olson, Walter H, et al., “Onset and Stability for Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Detection in an Implantable Pacer-Cardioverter-Defibrillator”, IEEE, (1987), 167-170.
Schaumann, Anselm, et al., “Enhanced Detection Criteria in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators to Avoid Inappropriate Therapy”, The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 78 (5A), (Sep. 12, 1996), 42-50.
Schreieck, Jurgen, et al., “Inappropriate Shock Delivery Due to Ventricular Double Detection with a Biventricular Pacing Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator”, PACE, vol. 24, No. 7, (Jul. 2001), 1154-1157.
Schuder, John C, “Completely Implanted Defibrillator”, JAMA, vol. 214, No. 6, (Nov. 9, 1970), 1123 pg.
Schuder, John C, et al., “Experimental Ventricular Defibrillation with an Automatic and Completely Implanted System”, Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Int. Organs, vol. 16, (1970), 207-212.
Schuder, John C, et al., “Standby Implanted Defibrillators”, Arch Intern. Med, vol. 127, (Feb. 1971), 317 pg.
Schuder, John C, “The Role of an Engineering Oriented Medical Research Group in Developing Improved Methods & Devices for Achieving Ventricular Defibrillation: The University of Missouri Experience”, PACE, vol. 16, Part I, (Jan. 1993), 95-124.
Schuder, John C, et al., “Transthoracic Ventricular Defibrillation in the Dog with Truncated and Untruncated Exponential Stimuli”, IEEE Trans. on Bio-Medical Engin., vol. BME-18, No. 6, (Nov. 1971), 410-415.
Schwake, H., et al., “Komplikationen mit Sonden bei 340 Patienten mit einem implantierbaren Kardioverter/Defibrilator”, Z Kardiol, vol. 88, No. 8, (1999), 559-565.
Theuns, D, et al., “Initial Clinical Experience with a New Arrhythmia Detection Algorithm in Dual Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators”, Europace, vol. 3, (Jul. 2001), 181-186.
Tietze, U, et al., “Halbleiter-Schaltungstechnik”, © Springer-Verlag (Berlin, Germany), (1991), 784-786.
Valenzuela, Terrence D, et al., “Outcomes of Rapid Defibrillation by Security Officers After Cardiac Arrest in Casinos”, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 343, No. 17, (Oct. 26, 2000), 1206-1209.
Walters, R A, et al., “Analog to Digital Conversion Techniques in Implantable Devices”, Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 13, No. 4, (1991), 1674-1676.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120316612 A1 Dec 2012 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 12359072 Jan 2009 US
Child 13588808 US
Parent 11042911 Jan 2005 US
Child 12359072 US