The present invention relates generally to medical methods and apparatus. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and apparatus for endobronchial residual lung volume reduction by passive deflation of hyperinflated segments with functional lung volume expansion as a result.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a significant medical problem affecting 16 million people or about 6% of the U.S. population. Specific diseases in this group include chronic bronchitis, asthmatic bronchitis, and emphysema. While a number of therapeutic interventions are used and have been proposed, none are completely effective, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease remains the fourth most common cause of death in the United States. Thus, improved and alternative treatments and therapies would be of significant benefit.
Of particular interest to the present invention, lung function in patients suffering from some forms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can be improved by reducing the effective lung volume, typically by resecting diseased portions of the lung. Resection of diseased portions of the lungs both promotes expansion of the non-diseased regions of the lung and decreases the portion of inhaled air which goes into the lungs but is unable to transfer oxygen to the blood. Lung volume reduction is conventionally performed in open chest or thoracoscopic procedures where the lung is resected, typically using stapling devices having integral cutting blades.
While effective in many cases, conventional lung volume reduction surgery is significantly traumatic to the patient, even when thoracoscopic procedures are employed. Such procedures often result in the unintentional removal of healthy lung tissue, and frequently leave perforations or other discontinuities in the lung which result in air leakage from the remaining lung. Even technically successful procedures can cause respiratory failure, pneumonia, and death. In addition, many older or compromised patients are not able to be candidates for these procedures.
As an improvement over open surgical and minimally invasive lung volume reduction procedures, endobronchial lung volume reduction procedures have been proposed. For example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,258,100 and 6,679,264 describe placement of one-way valve structures in the airways leading to diseased lung regions. It is expected that the valve structures will allow air to be expelled from the diseased region of the lung while blocking reinflation of the diseased region. Thus, over time, the volume of the diseased region will be reduced and the patient condition will improve.
While promising, the use of implantable, one-way valve structures is problematic in at least several respects. The valves must be implanted prior to assessing whether they are functioning properly. Thus, if the valve fails to either allow expiratory flow from or inhibit inspiratory flow into the diseased region, that failure will only be determined after the valve structure has been implanted, requiring surgical removal. Additionally, even if the valve structure functions properly, many patients have diseased lung segments with collateral flow from adjacent, healthy lung segments. In those patients, the lung volume reduction of the diseased region will be significantly impaired, even after successfully occluding inspiration through the main airway leading to the diseased region, since air will enter collaterally from the adjacent healthy lung region. When implanting one-way valve structures, the existence of such collateral flow will only be evident after the lung region fails to deflate over time, requiring further treatment.
For these reasons, it would be desirable to provide improved and alternative methods and apparatus for effecting residual lung volume reduction in hyperinflated and other diseased lung regions. The methods and apparatus will preferably allow for passive deflation of an isolated lung region without the need to implant a one-way valve structure in the lung. The methods and apparatus will preferably be compatible with known protocols for occluding diseased lung segments and regions after deflation, such as placement of plugs and occluding members within the airways leading to such diseased segments and regions. Additionally, such methods and devices should be compatible with protocols for identifying and treating patients having diseased lung segments and regions which suffer from collateral flow with adjacent healthy lung regions. At least some of these objectives will be met by the inventions described hereinbelow.
Methods for performing minimally invasive and endobronchial lung volume reduction are described in the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,972,026; 6,083,255; 6,258,100; 6,287,290; 6,398,775; 6,527,761; 6,585,639; 6,679,264; 6,709,401; 6,878,141; 6,997,918; 2001/0051899; and 2004/0016435. Balloon catheter devices for use in body passageways have previously been described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,976,710; 4,470,407; 4,681,093 and 6,174,307, and. U.S. Pat. No. 4,976,710 describes an angioscope with a transparent occlusion balloon at its distal end. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 6,174,307 describes an endovascular catheter with a transparent portion near the distal tip that can be used to view the body passageway. Similarly, issued U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,470,407 and 4,681,093 also describe endovascular devices with a transparent expandable balloon covering the lens. Though these catheters utilize the balloons to view the passageways, their use for viewing pulmonary passageways is limited in several aspects. Practically, the use of these devices in pulmonary passageways would be limited to those passageways large enough to accommodate a similarly constructed bronchoscope. These devices are also limited by the fact that treatment is limited to the exact site of visualization, rather than at a point distal to the visualization point. Further, the flexibility of these devices would be limited by the inherent properties of a visualization catheter. Hence, it would be beneficial to have a catheter that is flexible and to use it to visualize points that are distal to the location of the distal tip of the catheter.
The present invention provides methods and apparatus for passively reducing the residual volume (the volume of air remaining after maximal exhalation) of hyperinflated or otherwise diseased lung compartments or segments. By “passively reducing,” it is meant that air can be removed from the diseased lung region without the use of a vacuum aspiration to draw the air from the region. Typically, such passive reduction will rely on a non-implanted one-way flow element, structure, or assembly which permits air to be exhaled or exhausted from the lung region while preventing or inhibiting the inspiration of air back into the lung region. By non-implanted, it is meant that some portion of the element, structure, or assembly will be temporarily placed in an airway or bronchus leading to the lung region in a manner that allows that portion to be removed later, typically within days or hours, without the need for surgical intervention Thus, the methods of the present invention will not require the permanent implantation of valves or other structures prior to actually achieving the desired residual lung volume reduction, as with the one-way implantable valve structures of the prior art.
The methods and apparatus of the present invention can be terminated and all apparatus removed should it appear for any reason that the desired residual lung volume reduction is not being achieved. Commonly, such failure can be the result of collateral flow into the diseased lung region from adjacent healthy lung region(s). In such cases, steps can be taken to limit or stop the collateral flow and allow resumption of the passive lung volume reduction protocols. In other cases, it might be desirable or necessary to employ open surgical, thoracoscopic, or other surgical procedures for lung resection.
Patients who successfully achieve residual volume reduction of hyperinflated or other diseased lung regions in accordance with the principles of the present invention will typically have those regions sealed permanently to prevent reinflation. Such sealing can be achieved by a variety of known techniques, including the application of radiofrequency or other energy for shrinking or sealing the walls of the airways feeding the lung region. Alternatively, synthetic or biological glues could be used for achieving sealing of the airway walls. Most commonly, however, expandable plugs will be implanted in the airways leading to the deflated lung region to achieve the sealing.
In a first aspect of the present invention, methods for reducing the residual volume of a hyperinflated lung compartment comprise sealingly engaging a distal end of a catheter in an airway feeding the lung compartment. Air is allowed to be expelled from the lung compartment through a passage in the catheter while the patient is exhaling, and air is blocked from re-entering the lung compartment through the catheter passage while the patient is inhaling. As the residual volume diminishes, the hyperinflated lung compartment reduces in size freeing up the previously occupied space in the thoracic cavity. Consequently, a greater fraction of the Total Lung Capacity (TLC), which is the volumetric space contained in the thoracic cavity that is occupied by lung tissue after a full inhalation becomes available for the healthier lung compartments to expand and the volume of the lung available for gas exchange commonly referred to in clinical practice as the lung's Functional Vital Capacity (FVC) or Vital Capacity (VC) increases, the result of which is effectively a functional lung volume expansion.
The hyperinflated lung compartment will usually be substantially free of collateral flow from adjacent lung compartments, and optionally the patient can be tested for the presence of such collateral flow, for example using techniques taught in copending, commonly assigned application Ser. No. 11/296,951, filed on Dec. 7, 2005; Ser. No. 11/550,660, filed on Oct. 18, 2006; and application Ser. No. 11/428,762, filed on Jul. 5, 2006, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Alternatively, the methods of the present invention for reducing residual lung volume can be performed in patients having collateral flow channels leading into the hyperinflated or other diseased lung compartment. In such cases, the collateral flow channels may first be blocked, for example, by introducing glues, occlusive particles, hydrogels or other blocking substances, as taught for example in copending application Ser. No. 11/684,950, filed on Mar. 12, 2008, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In other cases, where the flow channels are relatively small, those channels will partially or fully collapse as the residual lung volume is reduced. In such cases, the patient may be treated as if the collateral flow channels did not exist. The effectiveness of reduction in hyperinflation however will depend on the collateral resistance between the hyperinflated compartment and the neighboring compartments, as illustrated in
In all of the above methods, it may be desirable to introduce an oxygen-rich gas into the lung compartment while or after the lung volume is reduced in order to induce or promote absorption atelectasis. Absorption atelectasis promotes absorption of the remaining or residual gas in the compartment into the blood to further reduce the volume, either before or after permanent sealing of the lung volume compartment or segment.
In a second aspect, the present invention provides catheters for isolating and deflating hyperinflated and other diseased lung compartments. The catheter comprises a catheter body, an expandable occluding member on the catheter body, and a one-way flow element associated with the catheter body. The catheter body usually has a distal end, a proximal end, and at least one lumen extending from a location at or near the distal end to a location at or near the proximal end. At least a distal portion of the catheter body is adapted to be advanced into and through the airways of a lung so that the distal end can reach an airway which feeds a target lung compartment or segment to be treated. The expandable occluding member is disposed at or near the distal end of the catheter body and is adapted to be expanded in the airway which feeds the target lung compartment or segment so that said compartment or segment can be isolated with access provided only through the lumen or catheter body when the occluding member is expanded.
The catheter of the present invention can be used in conjunction with, or independent of, a viewing scope such as a bronchoscope. Since it is generally configured to be narrower than a visualization tube such as a bronchoscope, the catheter may be introduced into narrower passageways and is used to isolate a portion of lung tissue.
In one embodiment of the catheter, the expandable occluding element is disposed near the distal end of the catheter body. In this embodiment, the expandable occluding element is configured such that both the proximal and distal ends of the expandable occluding element are attached to the outer surface of the catheter body.
In another embodiment of the catheter, the expandable occluding element is disposed at the distal end of the catheter body, and is configured to form a cover over the rim of the lumen. This embodiment prevents or inhibits entry of mucus into the lumen, and prevents the catheter tip from contacting the airway wall. A method of manufacturing this embodiment of the catheter is also disclosed. One end of the occluding element is attached to the internal surface of the central passageway at the tip of the catheter. The occluding element is then inverted over the catheter body and a second end of the occluding element is attached to the outer surface of the catheter body. The expandable occluding element is optionally transparent to enable viewing the body passageway (for example during diagnostic or treatment procedures).
The one-way flow element is adapted to be disposed within or in-line with the lumen of the catheter body in order to allow flow in a distal-to-proximal direction so that air will be expelled from the isolated lung compartment or segment as the patient exhales. The one-way flow element, however, inhibits or prevents flow through the lumen in a proximal-to-distal direction so that air cannot enter the isolated lung compartment or segment while the patient is inhaling.
For the intended endobronchial deployment, the catheter body will typically have a length in the range from 20 cm to 200 cm, preferably from 80 cm to 120 cm, and a diameter near the distal end in the range from 0.1 mm to 10 mm, preferably from 1 mm to 5 mm. The expandable occluding member will typically be an inflatable balloon or cuff, where the balloon or cuff has a width in the range from 1 mm to 30 mm, preferably from 5 mm to 20 mm, when inflated. The one-way flow element is typically a conventional one-way flow valve, such as a duck-bill valve, a flap valve, or the like, which is disposed in the lumen of the catheter body, either near the distal end or at any other point within the lumen. Alternatively, the one-way flow element could be provided as a separate component, for example, in a hub which is detachably mounted at the proximal end of the catheter body. In other instances, it might be desirable to provide two or more one-way flow elements in series within the lumen or otherwise provided in-line with the lumen in order to enhance sealing in the inspiratory direction through the lumen. In a particular illustrated embodiment, a one-way flow control assembly is provided as part of an external console attached in-line with the catheter lumen. The flow-control assembly comprises a valve that is controlled electrically or through other means, sensors for sensing flow and pressure in the lumen, and a valve controller for controlling the valve based on input from the sensors. The sensors monitor flow to detect the beginning of an inhalation cycle and pressure to detect the beginning of an exhalation cycle. Based on the input from the sensors, the valve controller opens the valve at the beginning of the exhalation cycle to deflate the lung region and closes the valve at the beginning of the inhalation cycle to prevent reinflation of the lung region.
Referring to
As mentioned above, in one embodiment the expandable occluding element 15 is disposed near the distal end of the catheter body to seal the passageway, while in an alternate embodiment the expandable occluding element 15 forms a cover of the rim of the catheter lumen in order to seal the passageway, prevent or inhibit mucus entry into the lumen, and shield the passageway wall from the tip of the catheter. In the alternate embodiment, the expandable occluding element 15 may be transparent to allow viewing of the passageway. These embodiments will now be described in more detail with reference to the Figures.
In one embodiment of the catheter, as shown in
In an alternate embodiment, as shown in
Manufacture of the second embodiment of the catheter 10 is shown in
Additionally and optionally, catheter 10 is configured to be introducible into the passageway via a viewing scope such as a bronchoscope (not shown). Use of the scope, in conjunction with a catheter 10 comprising one or more transparent components as described above, enables enhanced viewing of the body passageway during diagnostic or treatment procedures, by allowing a user to view the body passageway through the transparent expandable occluding element 15. Additionally, a transparent expandable occluding element 15 could serve as a lens to be used in conjunction with the scope. When so used, light from the scope would interact with the expandable occluding element 15 in such a manner as to enable more enhanced viewing than would be obtained without the use of a transparent expandable occluding element 15. Examples of such enhanced viewing could include: obtaining wide angle or fish-eye views or a greater field of vision, telephoto properties (macro, zoom, etc.) or color filtration. These can be achieved by manipulating the material properties of the expandable occluding element 15.
The technique of using a transparent, expandable element on a catheter may also be used independently. For example, in one embodiment, a catheter may be equipped with a transparent expandable occluding element 15 similar to that shown in
The present invention relies on placement of a one-way flow element within or in-line with the lumen 18 so that flow from an isolated lung compartment or segment (as described hereinbelow) may occur in a distal-to-proximal direction but flow back into the lung compartment or segment is inhibited or blocked in the proximal-to-distal direction. As shown in
Alternatively or additionally, the one-way flow element 22 could be provided anywhere else in the lumen 18, and two, three, four, or more such valve structures could be included in order to provide redundancy.
As a third option, a one-way valve structure 26 in the form of a flap valve could be provided within the hub 20. The hub 20 could be removable or permanently fixed to the catheter body 12. Other structures for providing in-line flow control could also be utilized, as will be presently described.
In addition to the passive one-way valve structures described above, one-way flow functionality may be provided using an actively controlled one-way flow control assembly. One-way flow can be controlled by measuring the flow and pressure through the lumen and using this information to determine the beginning and end of inhalation and exhalation cycles and thereby determining whether the valve should remain open or closed. In one embodiment, the one-way flow control assembly is provided as part of an external console attached in-line with the catheter lumen. The console comprises a channel for air flow to which the proximal end of the catheter connects via a standard connector. When the patient exhales, air is forced through the catheter lumen into the console's air channel, and then exits through an exhaust port of the console. The one-way flow control assembly comprises a valve that is within or in-line with the catheter lumen and can be opened or closed by a valve controller to control the air flow through the air channel. The valve controller opens and closes the valve based on input from flow and pressure sensors within or in-line with the catheter lumen. The sensors measure the air flow and air pressure to detect the inhalation and exhalation cycles of the patient. Based on input from the sensors, the valve controller opens the valve at the beginning of the exhalation cycle, and closes the valve at the beginning of the inhalation cycle. The valve controller may control the valve electrically, magnetically, mechanically or through other means known in the art.
One-way flow assembly 70 comprises an electrically controlled valve 71, a flow sensor 73, a pressure sensor 74, and a valve controller 75. In one embodiment, valve 71, flow sensor 73, and pressure sensor 74 are disposed within air channel 61. Valve controller 75 provides one-way flow functionality by opening and closing valve 71 based on flow and pressure signals received from sensors 73 and 74, respectively. When valve 71 is closed, it prevents air from flowing into the lumen of catheter 10 (during inhalation); during exhalation, valve 71 remains open and allows air to flow out of the isolated lung compartment.
In one embodiment, valve 71 is a solenoid-based valve. Alternatively, valve 71 may be any other valve that can be opened and closed via an electrical control signal. Flow sensor 73 and pressure sensor 74, respectively, measure air flow and pressure in lumen 18. Valve controller 75 receives a flow indicator signal 76 from the flow sensor 73 and a pressure indicator signal 77 from pressure sensor 74 and produces a valve control signal 78 to open or close valve 71. Alternatively, one or more of flow sensor 73, pressure sensor 74, and valve 71 may reside within lumen 18 and be in communication with valve controller 75 via connections between the catheter 10 and console 60.
Initially, the patient may breathe normally through lumen 18 of catheter 10. Once the treatment is initiated (step 80)—which could be accomplished using the visual display 79—valve controller 75 waits for the completion of an inhalation cycle, until flow sensor 73 indicates a flow value that is greater than a specified flow threshold value. This is shown as step 81 in
In step 82 in
When flow sensor 73 senses a flow value that is less than or equal to zero, valve controller 75 closes valve 71 in step 83 in
The following steps of valve controller 75 refer to a pressure threshold value. The pressure threshold value is chosen to indicate the beginning of an exhalation cycle. This value is configurable, and in what follows, an example pressure threshold value of zero is assumed.
Ideally, it is desirable that valve controller 75 reopen valve 71 when the pressure increases to or above the pressure threshold value. Realistically, given hardware imperfections, the pressure as sensed and reported by pressure sensor 74 at the end of exhalation may fluctuate around zero, causing chatter of valve 71. To prevent valve chatter, in step 84, valve controller 75 maintains valve 71 in a closed state while the pressure remains above a specified minimum pressure value, denoted as min_pressure in
Optionally, during step 84, valve controller 75 also monitors pressure to ensure that valve 71 will open if the patient starts exhalation prior to the pressure decreasing to below min_pressure, To this end, during step 84, valve controller 75 is optionally configured to open valve 71 if pressure increases to a value that is above the pressure threshold value by an amount referred to as a safeguard offset value. The safeguard offset value is configurable.
During step 85 in
When the pressure increases to or passes the pressure threshold value, the valve controller 75 opens the valve 71 at step 86 in
Thereafter, as the patient resumes inhalation, the valve controller 75 resumes operation at Step 82 (close valve 71 and prevent airflow into the target lung compartment), for a new respiration cycle, until the lung reduction process is terminated.
Use of the endobronchial lung volume reduction catheter 10 to reduce the residual volume of a diseased region DR of a lung L is illustrated beginning in
Referring now to
As shown in
While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/703,670, filed May 4, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,314,992, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/407,709, filed Mar. 19, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,050,094), which is a continuation-in-part of International Application No. PCT/US08/56706, filed Mar. 12, 2008, which claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/685,008, filed, Mar. 12, 2007, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3322126 | Rusch et al. | May 1967 | A |
3498286 | Michael et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3669098 | Takahashi | Jun 1972 | A |
3677262 | Zukowski | Jul 1972 | A |
3768504 | Rentsch | Oct 1973 | A |
3776222 | Smiddy | Dec 1973 | A |
3794026 | Jacobs | Feb 1974 | A |
3866599 | Johnson | Feb 1975 | A |
3913568 | Carpenter | Oct 1975 | A |
4041936 | Carden | Aug 1977 | A |
4134407 | Elam | Jan 1979 | A |
4147169 | Taylor | Apr 1979 | A |
4327720 | Bronson et al. | May 1982 | A |
4327721 | Goldin et al. | May 1982 | A |
4382442 | Jones | May 1983 | A |
4453545 | Inoue | Jun 1984 | A |
4468216 | Muto | Aug 1984 | A |
4470407 | Hussein | Sep 1984 | A |
4538607 | Saul | Sep 1985 | A |
4567882 | Heller | Feb 1986 | A |
4681093 | Ono et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4716896 | Ackerman | Jan 1988 | A |
4742819 | George | May 1988 | A |
4784133 | Mackin | Nov 1988 | A |
4796639 | Snow et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4819664 | Nazari | Apr 1989 | A |
4846153 | Berci | Jul 1989 | A |
4850371 | Broadhurst et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4852568 | Kensey | Aug 1989 | A |
4862874 | Kellner | Sep 1989 | A |
4896941 | Hayashi et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4946440 | Hall | Aug 1990 | A |
4949716 | Chenoweth | Aug 1990 | A |
4955375 | Martinez | Sep 1990 | A |
4958932 | Kegelman et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4961738 | Mackin | Oct 1990 | A |
4976710 | Mackin et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5056529 | De Groot et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5143062 | Peckham | Sep 1992 | A |
5146916 | Catalani | Sep 1992 | A |
5165420 | Strickland | Nov 1992 | A |
5181913 | Erlich | Jan 1993 | A |
5246012 | Strickland | Sep 1993 | A |
5285778 | Mackin | Feb 1994 | A |
5308325 | Quinn | May 1994 | A |
5309903 | Long | May 1994 | A |
5329940 | Adair | Jul 1994 | A |
5331947 | Shturman et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5361753 | Pothmann et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5439444 | Andersen | Aug 1995 | A |
5447165 | Gustafsson | Sep 1995 | A |
5477851 | Callaghan et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5499625 | Frass et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5546935 | Champeau | Aug 1996 | A |
5573005 | Ueda et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5588424 | Insler et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598840 | Iund et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5624449 | Pham et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5642730 | Baran | Jul 1997 | A |
5645519 | Lee et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653231 | Bell | Aug 1997 | A |
5660175 | Dayal | Aug 1997 | A |
5662712 | Pathak et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5682880 | Brain | Nov 1997 | A |
5707352 | Sekins et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5752921 | Orr | May 1998 | A |
5765557 | Warters | Jun 1998 | A |
5795322 | Boudewijn | Aug 1998 | A |
5800455 | Palermo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5893841 | Glickman | Apr 1999 | A |
5897528 | Schultz | Apr 1999 | A |
5915383 | Pagan | Jun 1999 | A |
5972026 | Laufer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5997546 | Foster | Dec 1999 | A |
6083255 | Laufer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099546 | Gia | Aug 2000 | A |
6174307 | Daniel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174323 | Biggs et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
RE37117 | Palermo | Mar 2001 | E |
6258100 | Alferness et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6287290 | Perkins et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293951 | Alferness et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6346074 | Roth | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6398775 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6527761 | Soltesz et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6585639 | Kotmel et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609521 | Belani et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629951 | Laufer et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6651672 | Roth et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6679264 | Deem et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6692494 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6709401 | Perkins et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712812 | Roschak et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6722360 | Doshi | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6749606 | Keast et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6792947 | Bowden | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6878141 | Perkins et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6886558 | Tanaka | May 2005 | B2 |
6941950 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6997189 | Biggs et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6997918 | Soltesz et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011094 | Rapacki et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022088 | Keast et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7086398 | Tanaka | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7276077 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7449010 | Hayase et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7588033 | Wondka | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7744594 | Yamazaki | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7819840 | Burnside | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7883471 | Aljuri et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8137302 | Aljuri et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8551043 | Crooms | Oct 2013 | B2 |
9050094 | Aljuri | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9533116 | Aljuri et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
10314992 | Aljuri | Jun 2019 | B2 |
20010051899 | Kawashima et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020049370 | Laufer et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062120 | Perkins et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020169413 | Keren et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030051733 | Kotmel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030171332 | Abraham et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030228344 | Fields et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040016435 | Deem et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040220556 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243016 | Sanderson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050016530 | McCutcheon et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022809 | Wondka | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050187561 | Lee-Sepsick et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050288684 | Aronson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060095002 | Soltesz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060102186 | Adler | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122647 | Callaghan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129134 | Kerr | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060264772 | Aljuri et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060283462 | Fields et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005083 | Saban et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070096048 | Clerc | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142742 | Aljuri et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070225747 | Perkins et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080051719 | Nair et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080228130 | Aljuri et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228137 | Aljuri et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090241964 | Aljuri et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090260625 | Wondka | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100031964 | Turek et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110011406 | Blom et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110152678 | Aljuri et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110203594 | Brain | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110259339 | Isaza | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20170071606 | Aljuri et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0791340 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0815803 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0982044 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1078601 | Oct 2006 | EP |
2004504867 | Feb 2004 | JP |
WO-9210971 | Jul 1992 | WO |
WO-9533506 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO-9844854 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO-9848706 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO-9849191 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO-9901076 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO-9917827 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-9920332 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-9932040 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO-9934741 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO-9964109 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO-0041612 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO-0051510 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO-0062699 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-0102042 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-0103642 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-0110314 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO-0113839 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-0113908 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-03022124 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-03022221 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-2006055692 | May 2006 | WO |
WO-2006078451 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2006091597 | Aug 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice of allowance dated Mar. 24, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/358,483. |
Office action dated Oct. 2, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/358,483. |
Becker et al., Lung Volumes Before and After Lung Volume Reduction Surgery, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1998; 157:1593-1599. |
Criner et al., Effect of Lung Volume Reduction Surgery on Diaphragm Strength, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1998; 157:1578-1585. |
“European search report and opinion dated Oct. 13, 2015 for EP Application No. 08732032.1.” |
European search report and opinion dated Nov. 16, 2009 for EP Application No. 06717427.6. |
“Final Office action dated Oct. 11, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/703,670”. |
Harada et al., Re-expansion of Refractory Atelectasis Using a Bronchofiberscope with a Balloon Cuff, Chest, Dec. 1983; 84:725-728. |
International search report and written opinion dated Aug. 26, 2008 for PCT/US2008/056706. |
Kotloff et al., “Comparison of Short-term Functional Outcomes Following Unilateral and Bilateral Lung Volume Reduction Surgery,” Chest. Apr. 1998;113(4):890-5. |
Morrell et al., “Collateral ventilation and gas exchange during airway occlusion in the normal human lung,” Am Rev Respir Dis. Mar. 1993;147(3):535-539. |
“Notice of allowance dated Jan. 27, 209 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/706,670”. |
Notice of allowance dated Feb. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,709. |
“Notice of allowance dated Mar. 26, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,547.” |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 26, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/938,025. |
“Office action dated Apr. 10, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/938,025.” |
Office action dated Apr. 11, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,709. |
Office action dated Apr. 15, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/685,008. |
Office action dated Jul. 8, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,709. |
Office action dated Aug. 1, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,547. |
Office action dated Nov. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,709. |
Office action dated Nov. 24, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/685,008. |
Office action dated Dec. 17, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,709. |
Office action dated Dec. 18, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/938,025. |
Ojo et al., Lung volume reduction surgery alters management of pulmonary nodules in patients with severe COPD. Chest. Dec. 1997; 112(6): 1494-1500. |
Sclafani, “Clearing the Airways,” AARC Times, Jan. 1999, pp. 69-72. |
Snell, et al. The potential for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using bronchial prostheses. Chest. Sep. 2003; 124(3):1073-1080. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,762, filed Jul. 5, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/828,496, filed Oct. 26, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/703,670 Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2018. |
Woolcock et al., Mechanical Factors Influencing Collateral Ventilation In Human, Dog, and Pig Lungs, J Appl Physiol. Jan. 1971; 30(1):99-115. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200038612 A1 | Feb 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12407709 | Mar 2009 | US |
Child | 14703670 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14703670 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 16428544 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2008/056706 | Mar 2008 | US |
Child | 12407709 | US |