Methods and devices for reducing paravalvular leakage

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11399939
  • Patent Number
    11,399,939
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, August 14, 2019
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 2, 2022
    a year ago
  • Inventors
    • Wypych; Rick (Bellevue, WA, US)
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Scherbel; Todd J
    Agents
    • Shay Glenn LLP
    • Zlogar; Thomas M.
Abstract
Methods and devices for reducing paravalvular leakage associated with a replacement mitral valve. The methods can include monitoring for paravalvular leakage between a replacement mitral valve and tissue proximate the mitral valve annulus; if a sufficient amount of paravalvular leakage is observed, deploying a tissue reshaping device at least partially within a coronary sinus; remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device to remodel at least one of mitral valve annulus tissue, at least one mitral valve leaflet, and left atrium tissue in an attempt to reduce the paravalvular leakage; and monitoring for a reduction in paravalvular leakage after the remodeling step.
Description
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.


BACKGROUND

Paravalvular leak is a complication associated with the implantation of a prosthetic heart valve (e.g., a replacement mitral valve), whether implanted surgically or with a transcatheter approach. Paravalvular leak refers to blood flowing through a channel or space between the implanted valve and cardiac tissue as a result of a lack of appropriate sealing. Paravalvular leaks are generally considered more common with replacement mitral valves than with replacement aortic valves. Some leaks may be characterized as small, non-significant leaks, but larger leaks can lead to heart failure and increased risk of infectious endocarditis. Significant leaks are currently treated either surgically or using the transcatheter deployment of occlusion devices, such as plugs. Existing techniques can be complicated because the follow up corrective procedure manipulates tissue adjacent the replacement valve, which can cause disruption or dislodgement of the replacement valve. Alternative methods and devices for minimizing or reducing paravalvular leakage associated with the implantation of a replacement heart valve are therefore needed.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

Some embodiments are methods of reducing paravalvular leakage associated with a replacement mitral valve, comprising: monitoring for paravalvular leakage between a replacement mitral valve and tissue proximate the mitral valve annulus; if a sufficient amount of paravalvular leakage is observed, deploying a tissue reshaping device at least partially within a coronary sinus; remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device to remodel at least one of mitral valve annulus tissue, at least one mitral valve leaflet, and left atrium tissue in an attempt to reduce the paravalvular leakage; and monitoring for a reduction in paravalvular leakage after the remodeling step.


After monitoring for a reduction in paravalvular leakage after the remodeling step, if the monitored paravalvular leakage has been sufficiently reduced, the methods can include maintaining the remodeling of the coronary sinus with the tissue reshaping device and maintaining the remodeling of the at least one of the mitral valve annulus tissue, mitral valve leaflets, and left atrium tissue to maintain the reduced paravalvular leakage. The maintaining step can comprise releasing the tissue reshaping device from a delivery device to implant the tissue reshaping device. The method can further comprise releasing the replacement mitral valve from a delivery device.


The methods can further comprise, if the monitored paravalvular leakage has been sufficiently reduced, releasing the tissue reshaping device from a delivery device.


The methods can further comprise, if the monitored paravalvular leakage has been sufficiently reduced, releasing the replacement mitral valve from a delivery device. The methods can further comprise monitoring paravalvular leakage after releasing the replacement mitral valve from the device to determine if paravalvular leakage increased to an undesired amount as a result of releasing the replacement mitral valve from the delivery device, and if so, repeating the remodeling and monitoring steps.


The methods can further comprise, after monitoring for paravalvular leakage after the remodeling step, if the paravalvular leakage has not been reduced by a desired amount, further remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device to further remodel at least one of mitral valve annulus tissue, mitral valve leaflets, and left atrium tissue in an attempt to reduce paravalvular leakage, and further monitoring paravalvular leakage. If paravalvular leakage has not been sufficiently reduced, the methods can repeat the further remodeling and further monitoring steps until the paravalvular leakage has been reduced by a desired amount. If the paravalvular leakage has been reduced by a desired amount, the methods can include releasing the tissue reshaping device from a delivery device to thereby implant the tissue reshaping device and maintain the reduced paravalvular leakage. If the paravalvular leakage has been reduced by a desired amount, the methods can include releasing the mitral valve replacement from a delivery device.


Remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device can comprise plicating coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device. Deploying a tissue reshaping device can comprise anchoring a first anchor of the tissue reshaping device within the coronary sinus, and wherein plicating coronary sinus tissue can comprise proximally pulling on the tissue reshaping device after the first anchor is anchored within the coronary sinus. The methods can further comprise anchoring a second anchor of the tissue reshaping device against tissue when the monitored paravalvular leakage has been reduced to a desired amount. Deploying a tissue reshaping device can comprise anchoring first and second anchors, and wherein plicating coronary sinus tissue can comprise proximally pulling on a portion of the tissue reshaping device after the first and second anchors are anchored.


Remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device can comprise reducing the curvature of at least a portion of the coronary sinus.


Remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device can comprise increasing the curvature of at least a portion of the coronary sinus.


Remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device can be at least partially caused by pulling on the tissue reshaping device.


Remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device can be at least partially caused by straightening at least a portion of the tissue reshaping device.


Remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device can be at least partially caused by increasing the curvature of at least a portion of the tissue reshaping device.


The methods can further comprise, prior to the first monitoring step, expanding the replacement mitral valve into contact with at least one of left atrial tissue, mitral valve annulus tissue, native mitral valve leaflet tissue, and left ventricular tissue. The expanded replacement mitral valve can remain secured to a delivery device when the remodeling step is initiated.


If a certain degree of paravalvular leakage is observed after the first monitoring step, the methods can further comprise delivering the tissue reshaping device to the coronary sinus.


Monitoring for paravalvular leakage between the replacement mitral valve and tissue proximate the mitral valve annulus can comprise monitoring blood flow between the replacement mitral valve and tissue using an imaging modality, such as fluoroscopy.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a view illustrating the proximity of a coronary sinus and native mitral valve.



FIG. 2 illustrates exemplary paravalvular leakage occurring after at least partially expanding a replacement mitral valve.



FIG. 3 illustrates the deployment of a first anchor of an exemplary remodeling device in the coronary sinus.



FIG. 4 illustrates remodeling tissue in an attempt to reduce paravalvular leakage between the replacement heart valve and native tissue.



FIG. 5 illustrates a fully deployed exemplary tissue remodeling device, which is maintaining the remodeling of tissue and maintain a reduction in paravalvular leakage.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The disclosure herein describes methods and devices for reducing paravalvular leakage associated with a replacement heart valve, and generally a replacement mitral valve. There may, however, be ways in which the methods and devices herein can be utilized to reduce paravalvular leakage associated with other types of replacement heart valves. When used herein, “leakage,” or any derivative of “leakage,” refers to paravalvular leakage.


The methods herein monitor for paravalvular leakage associated with the deployment of a replacement heart valve. The monitoring may occur during the procedure in which a replacement heart valve is implanted, or it may occur subsequent to the procedure that implants the replacement heart valve. For example, leakage may be monitored subsequent to the procedure if, for example, the patient presents with post-procedure symptoms suggestive of leakage, even if leakage was not observed during the implantation procedure.


The methods herein may be used to reduce any degree of leakage, whether it is considered significant or non-significant leakage.


The methods herein include at least one step to reduce the monitored paravalvular leakage if a sufficient amount of paravalvular leakage has been observed. The amount of leakage that is determined to be significant enough to warrant a subsequent leakage reducing step may depend on a variety of factors, such as a subjective analysis of the physician observing the leakage. When the disclosure herein refers to taking one or more steps to reduce leakage if a sufficient amount of leakage is observed, the disclosure is not indefinite or vague, but merely refers to the fact that some degree of leakage will lead to a decision to carry out a subsequent step to attempt to reduce the leakage. Physicians currently trained to monitor for paravalvular leakage, whether during a replacement valve implantation procedure or otherwise, can make, for example, a subjective assessment about whether a sufficient amount of leakage has been observed. In some instances, the amount of leakage that is determined to be sufficient to warrant intervention may be minimal or non-significant, but in some instances the amount of leakage that is determined to be sufficient to warrant intervention may be considered significant.


Methods herein include, if a sufficient amount of paravalvular leakage is observed, deploying a tissue reshaping device at least partially within a coronary sinus, and remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device to remodel at least one of mitral valve annulus tissue, at least one mitral valve leaflet, and left atrium tissue in an attempt to reduce the paravalvular leakage. The methods utilize a device positioned at least partially within the coronary sinus to attempt to reduce leakage. This is partly due to the proximity between a portion of the coronary sinus and the mitral valve annulus. If the method is used for a heart valve other than the mitral valve, the method generally includes deploying a device in proximity to a replacement heart valve, and using the device to remodel annulus tissue or tissue proximate to the native valve annulus.


After remodeling at least one of mitral valve annulus tissue, at least one mitral valve leaflet, and left atrium tissue in an attempt to reduce the paravalvular leakage, the method includes monitoring for a reduction in paravalvular leakage. This monitoring step determines whether any observed leakage has been sufficiently reduced, or if additional steps should be taken to further reduce the leakage. Again, whether any observed leakage has been sufficiently reduced may be determined using a variety of methods, and may be a subjective determination. The specification and claims herein are not indefinite or vague when referring to a sufficient amount of reduction, but are rather describing that there is some amount of reduction that will lead to a determination (automatically or not) that some monitored leakage has been sufficient reduced.



FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate exemplary paravalvular leakage that can occur after implantation of an exemplary replacement mitral valve. FIG. 1 illustrates native mitral valve 10 and coronary sinus 20, which is in proximity to mitral valve 10. Mitral valve 10 includes annulus 12, anterior leaflet 14, and posterior leaflet 16.



FIG. 2 illustrates replacement heart valve 30 in a deployed configuration within the native annulus 20. In this exemplary method the native leaflets 12 and 14 have not been excised, but in other methods the native leaflets may first be excised. Replacement heart valve 30 may be positioned surgically or minimally invasively, using techniques and replacement valves known in the art.



FIG. 2 illustrates replacement heart valve 30 in a fully deployed configuration and positioned within the native mitral valve annulus, but in some embodiments paravalvular leakage can be monitored before the replacement valve is considered to be fully deployed. For example, the methods herein can monitor for leakage when the replacement heart valve is substantially or mostly deployed but before final deployment has occurred (e.g., before release from a delivery system; before expansion of a portion of the replacement heart valve, etc.).


Exemplary replacement valves and methods of delivery and implantation that can be part of methods herein (but without limitation) can be found in the following references, which are incorporated by reference herein: U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,039,757; 8,795,356; 9,084,676; and 9,370,418.



FIG. 2 illustrates observed paravalvular leakage 40 between replacement mitral valve 30 and one more of at least one mitral valve leaflet and the mitral valve annulus. In this example, leakage 40 is shown as a plurality of leakage sites, but the leakage can occur at any location or locations between the replacement valve and native tissue. For example without limitation, the leakage can have one or more of a crescent, oval, or circular configuration, or any other configuration. The leakage 40 may be observed during the procedure that implants replacement valve 30, or it may be observed in a separate monitoring procedure subsequent in time to the implantation procedure.


If the monitoring step occurs during the replacement valve implantation procedure, monitoring for paravalvular leakage may be performed using fluoroscopy, such as with contrast dye, which is known in the art. The physician can look for dye movement between the replacement valve and tissue, indicating paravalvular leakage. If a sufficient amount of leakage is observed, one or more steps can then be taken in an attempt to reduce the leakage, examples of which are provided below.


The monitoring step may occur in a separate procedure subsequent to the replacement heart valve implantation procedure. For example, after the replacement heart valve procedure, a patient may present with symptoms suggestive of paravalvular leakage, and a procedure may be performed to monitor for leakage. Exemplary known techniques that can be used to monitor for paravalvular leakage include, for example, transthoracic echocardiography (“TTE”) and transesophageal echocardiography (“TEE”), which produce images of the heart. If a sufficient amount of leakage is observed, one or more steps can then be taken to reduce the leakage, examples of which are provided below.



FIGS. 3-5 illustrate a merely exemplary method in which observed paravalvular leakage is reduced. FIGS. 3-5 also illustrate a merely exemplary device that may be used to reduce observed paravalvular leakage. The method in FIGS. 3-5 utilizes the proximity of the coronary sinus and the mitral valve to remodel tissue proximate to the replacement heart valve to reduce paravalvular leakage. In this embodiment, the method includes deploying a tissue reshaping device at least partially within a coronary sinus, and remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device to remodel at least one of mitral valve annulus tissue, at least one native leaflet, and left atrium tissue, in an attempt to reduce the paravalvular leakage.


The exemplary method in FIGS. 3-5 includes the use of device 50 that includes first anchor 52 and second anchor 56, and an elongate member 54 extending between the first and second anchors. An example of device 50 that can be used in the method of FIGS. 3-5 is the Carillon® Mitral Contour System®, traditionally used to treat mitral valve regurgitation, but which can be used in this alternative method of reducing paravalvular leakage associated with a replacement mitral heart valve. Device 50 is merely an exemplary device that can be used to reduce leakage, and is shown only by way of example. Other devices can be positioned at least partially within a coronary sinus may be able to reduce leakage by remodeling coronary sinus.


Device 50 is delivered to coronary sinus 20 within delivery device 60 with anchors 52 and 56 in delivery configurations. Depending on when the monitoring step occurs, device 50 can be initially delivered to the coronary sinus at any time before, during or after the implantation of replacement valve 30, including during a subsequent procedure.


After delivery device 60 is positioned in the coronary sinus, it is moved proximally to expose first anchor 52, allowing first anchor 52 to expand, as shown in FIG. 3. An optional locking step may be performed on the distal anchor 52, as is described in the references incorporated herein that describe one or more aspects of the Carillon® device. After first anchor 52 is anchored in place, a tensioning force, generally in the proximal direction, is applied to the proximal end of device 50 by the delivery system, as is shown in FIG. 4. The tensioning force remodels the coronary sinus, as shown in FIG. 4. Because the coronary sinus is in proximity to the mitral valve annulus, remodeling the coronary sinus causes remodeling of at least one of the mitral valve annulus tissue, at least one mitral valve leaflet, and left atrium tissue in an attempt to reduce the paravalvular leakage. Remodeling at least one of mitral valve annulus tissue, at least one mitral valve leaflet, and left atrium tissue remodels the interface between the replacement heart valve 30 and native tissue, creating a more effective seal between the replacement heart valve and native tissue. Creating a more effective seal reduces paravalvular leakage.


After some remodeling has occurred, as shown in FIG. 4, a monitoring step is then performed that monitors for a reduction in paravalvular leakage after the remodeling step. This monitoring step is performed to determine if the remodeling has caused a sufficient reduction in paravalvular leakage. This monitoring step can be performed using a variety of techniques, such as, without limitation, fluoroscopy, TTE, or TEE, or any combination thereof.


If, after this monitoring step, it is determined that paravalvular leakage has been sufficiently reduced (e.g., through a subjective assessment, through an automatic assessment, etc.), the method can then include maintaining the remodeling of the coronary sinus with the tissue reshaping device and maintaining the remodeling of the at least one of the mitral valve annulus tissue, at least one mitral valve leaflet, and left atrium tissue to maintain the reduced paravalvular leakage. In this embodiment, maintaining the remodeling of tissue comprises releasing second anchor 56 and anchoring it in place in the coronary sinus, as is shown in FIG. 5. In this exemplary embodiment, anchoring second anchor 56 comprises allowing second anchor 56 to self-expand, followed by an optional locking step to lock second anchor 56 in a locked configuration. Device 50 is then released from the delivery system, and the delivery system is removed from the patient.


Method steps that can be performed during the use and deployment of a tissue reshaping device according to the methods herein can be found in any of U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,976,995; 6,960,229; 7,351,260; 8,062,358; 7,311,729; 7,837,729; and U.S. Pub. No. 2006/0276891, all of which are incorporated by reference herein. Additional exemplary details of a tissue reshaping device that can be incorporated into device 50 can also be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,976,995; 6,960,229; 7,351,260; 8,062,358; 7,311,729; 7,837,729; U.S. Pub. No. 2006/0276891.


In some embodiments, the remodeling to reduce leakage may take place during the procedure that implants the replacement valve, and in some cases the replacement mitral valve remains secured to its own delivery system until a sufficient degree of leakage reduction has occurred. The replacement valve may then be released from its own delivery system, and further monitoring for leakage may occur. Releasing the replacement valve may cause some slight movement with respect to the native valve, possibly causing some leakage to occur that did not exist prior to the release of the replacement valve. Monitoring for leakage and optional further remodeling can thus take place at any point during or after the replacement valve implantation procedure. The disclosure herein thus includes methods that can monitor and attempt to reduce leakage (including a further reduction in leakage) at any time during a replacement valve implantation procedure, of thereafter.


If, after the remodeling step (such as shown in FIG. 4), monitoring for paravalvular leakage reveals that paravalvular leakage has not been reduced by a desired amount, the method can further remodel coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device (or optionally with a different kind of tissue reshaping device if, for example, it is determined that a different type of device may reduce leakage better in a particular situation) to further remodel at least one of mitral valve annulus tissue, at least one native leaflet, and left atrium tissue in an attempt to reduce paravalvular leakage, and further monitoring paravalvular leakage.


The remodeling step, an example of which is shown in FIG. 4, may include plicating coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device. Plicating (or remodeling of another type) may occur before or after a second anchor (such as exemplary second anchor 56) is anchored in place, such as is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,976,995, issued Dec. 20, 2005, which is incorporated by reference herein.


The manner in which the coronary sinus is remodeled may depend on the tissue reshaping device and/or the manner in which it is deployed.


In some embodiments, remodeling coronary sinus tissue with a tissue reshaping device comprises reducing the curvature of at least a portion of the coronary sinus. Exemplary methods of remodeling the coronary sinus that can reduce the curvature of at least a portion of the coronary sinus can be found in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,976,995, which is incorporated by reference herein.


In some embodiments, remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device comprises increasing the curvature of at least a portion of the coronary sinus. Exemplary methods of remodeling the coronary sinus that can increase the curvature of at least a portion of the coronary sinus can be found in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,569,198, which is incorporated by reference herein.


In some embodiments, remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device is at least partially caused by pulling on, or tensioning, the tissue reshaping device. Examples of tensioning a reshaping device can be found in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,351,260, which is incorporated by reference herein.


In some embodiments, remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device is at least partially caused by straightening at least a portion of the tissue reshaping device. Examples of at least partially straightening device can be found in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,976,995.


In some embodiments, remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device is at least partially caused by increasing the curvature of at least a portion of the tissue reshaping device, examples of which can be found in, at least, U.S. Pat. No. 7,351,260.


The act of delivering the tissue reshaping device to the coronary sinus can occur at any time relative to when the replacement valve is initially positioned within the native annulus. For example, the tissue reshaping device can be delivered to the coronary sinus before the replacement heart valve is delivered to the native annulus, after the replacement heart is initially expanded but before the replacement valve is released from a delivery system, or even after the replacement valve has been implanted and optionally released from a delivery system.


Device 50 shown in FIGS. 3-5 is merely an example of a tissue reshaping device that can be used to remodel tissue used in the methods herein to reduce paravalvular leakage. Other exemplary tissue remodeling devices and their methods of deployment that can be used to reduce paravalvular leakage can be found in the following references, all of which are incorporated by reference herein: U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,210,432; 6,402,781; 6,997,951; 7,192,442; 6,569,198; 7,192,443; 7,473,274; and U.S. Pub. No. 2003/0078465.


In some embodiments the methods can include monitoring for paravalvular leakage between an existing replacement heart valve and a second, or subsequently-delivered, replacement device configured to interface with the first replacement heart valve (optionally within the first replacement heart valve). That is, the methods herein can monitor for and reduce paravalvular leakage between two or more separate, non-native structures.

Claims
  • 1. A method of reducing paravalvular leakage associated with a replacement mitral valve, comprising: in a patient in which a replacement mitral valve has been positioned proximate to a mitral valve annulus, intravascularly delivering a tissue reshaping device within a delivery device to a coronary sinus;deploying at least a portion of the tissue reshaping device in the coronary sinus from the delivery device; andapplying a force to the tissue reshaping device to cause coronary sinus tissue to be remodeled and thereby remodel at least one of mitral valve annulus tissue, at least one mitral valve leaflet, or left atrial tissue,wherein remodeling at least one of mitral valve annulus tissue, at least one mitral valve leaflet, or left atrial tissue attempts to reduce paravalvular leakage around the replacement mitral valve.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein deploying at least a portion of the tissue reshaping device comprises allowing a distal anchor of the tissue reshaping device to expand within the coronary sinus.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein deploying at least a portion of the tissue reshaping device comprises allowing a proximal anchor of the tissue reshaping device to expand within the coronary sinus at a time subsequent to allowing the distal anchor to expand, the proximal anchor axially spaced and proximal to the distal anchor.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising monitoring for paravalvular leakage around the replacement mitral valve at a time prior to deploying at least a portion of the tissue reshaping device.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, further comprising performing a second monitoring for paravalvular leakage around the replacement mitral valve after remodeling at least one of mitral valve annulus tissue, at least one mitral valve leaflet, or left atrial tissue.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein if the second monitoring step indicates leakage has been reduced, maintaining the remodeling of the coronary sinus with the tissue reshaping device.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein maintaining the remodeling of the coronary sinus comprises allowing a proximal anchor of the tissue reshaping device to expand from the delivery device.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein maintaining the remodeling of the coronary sinus comprises locking an anchor of the tissue reshaping device in an expanded and locked configuration.
  • 9. The method of claim 6, wherein if the second monitoring indicates leakage has been reduced, releasing the tissue reshaping device from the delivery device.
  • 10. The method of claim 5, wherein if the second monitoring indicates leakage has been not reduced, applying additional force to the tissue reshaping device in an attempt to further reduce paravalvular leakage around the replacement mitral valve.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein applying a force to the tissue reshaping device comprises applying a proximally directed pulling force on the tissue reshaping device.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the proximally directed pulling force is applied at a time subsequent to anchoring a distal anchor of the tissue reshaping device in the coronary sinus.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, further comprising releasing the replacement mitral valve from a valve delivery device and thereby implanting the replacement mitral valve.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device comprises reducing the curvature of at least a portion of the coronary sinus.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device comprises increasing the curvature of at least a portion of the coronary sinus.
  • 16. The method of claim 1, wherein remodeling coronary sinus tissue with the tissue reshaping device is at least partially caused by straightening at least a portion of the tissue reshaping device.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, further comprising, at a time prior to the deploying step, expanding the replacement mitral valve into contact with one or more of left atrial tissue, mitral valve annulus tissue, native mitral valve leaflet tissue, or left ventricular tissue.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the expanded replacement mitral valve remains secured to a replacement mitral valve delivery device when the deploying step is initiated.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/453,734, filed Mar. 8, 2017, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (323)
Number Name Date Kind
3620212 Fannon, Jr. et al. Nov 1971 A
3786806 Johnson et al. Jan 1974 A
3890977 Wilson Jun 1975 A
3974526 Dardik et al. Aug 1976 A
3995623 Blake et al. Dec 1976 A
4055861 Carpentier et al. Nov 1977 A
4164046 Cooley Aug 1979 A
4485816 Krumme Dec 1984 A
4550870 Krumme et al. Nov 1985 A
4588395 Lemelson May 1986 A
4830023 de Toledo et al. May 1989 A
5061277 Carpentier et al. Oct 1991 A
5099838 Bardy Mar 1992 A
5104404 Wolff Apr 1992 A
5197978 Hess Mar 1993 A
5250071 Palermo Oct 1993 A
5261916 Engelson Nov 1993 A
5265601 Mehra Nov 1993 A
5344426 Lau et al. Sep 1994 A
5350420 Cosgrove et al. Sep 1994 A
5411549 Peters May 1995 A
5433727 Sideris Jul 1995 A
5441515 Khosravi et al. Aug 1995 A
5449373 Pinchasik et al. Sep 1995 A
5454365 Bonutti Oct 1995 A
5458615 Klemm et al. Oct 1995 A
5474557 Mai Dec 1995 A
5507295 Skidmore Apr 1996 A
5507802 Imran Apr 1996 A
5514161 Limousin May 1996 A
5554177 Kieval et al. Sep 1996 A
5562698 Parker Oct 1996 A
5575818 Pinchuk Nov 1996 A
5584867 Limousin et al. Dec 1996 A
5601600 Ton Feb 1997 A
5617854 Munsif Apr 1997 A
5662703 Yurek et al. Sep 1997 A
5676671 Inoue Oct 1997 A
5733325 Robinson et al. Mar 1998 A
5733328 Fordenbacher Mar 1998 A
5741297 Simon Apr 1998 A
5752969 Cunci et al. May 1998 A
5800519 Sandock Sep 1998 A
5824071 Nelson et al. Oct 1998 A
5836882 Frazin Nov 1998 A
5871501 Leschinsky et al. Feb 1999 A
5891193 Robinson et al. Apr 1999 A
5895391 Farnholtz Apr 1999 A
5899882 Waksman et al. May 1999 A
5908404 Elliot Jun 1999 A
5928258 Khan et al. Jul 1999 A
5935161 Robinson et al. Aug 1999 A
5954761 Machek et al. Sep 1999 A
5961545 Lentz et al. Oct 1999 A
5978705 KenKnight et al. Nov 1999 A
5984944 Forber Nov 1999 A
6001118 Daniel et al. Dec 1999 A
6007519 Rosselli Dec 1999 A
6015402 Sahota Jan 2000 A
6022371 Killion Feb 2000 A
6027517 Crocker et al. Feb 2000 A
6045497 Schweich, Jr. et al. Apr 2000 A
6053900 Brown et al. Apr 2000 A
6056775 Borghi et al. May 2000 A
6077295 Limon et al. Jun 2000 A
6077297 Robinson et al. Jun 2000 A
6080182 Shaw et al. Jun 2000 A
6086611 Duffy et al. Jul 2000 A
6096064 Routh Aug 2000 A
6099549 Bosma et al. Aug 2000 A
6099552 Adams Aug 2000 A
6129755 Mathis et al. Oct 2000 A
6159220 Gobron et al. Dec 2000 A
6162168 Schweich, Jr. et al. Dec 2000 A
6171320 Monassevitch Jan 2001 B1
6183512 Howanec et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190406 Duerig et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200336 Pavcnik et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210432 Solem et al. Apr 2001 B1
6228098 Kayan et al. May 2001 B1
6241757 An et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254628 Wallace et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267783 Letendre et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275730 KenKnight et al. Aug 2001 B1
6306141 Jervis Oct 2001 B1
6312446 Huebsch et al. Nov 2001 B1
6334864 Amplatz et al. Jan 2002 B1
6342067 Mathis et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345198 Mouchawar et al. Feb 2002 B1
6352553 van der Burg et al. Mar 2002 B1
6352561 Leopold et al. Mar 2002 B1
6358195 Green et al. Mar 2002 B1
6368345 Dehdashtian et al. Apr 2002 B1
6395017 Dwyer et al. May 2002 B1
6402781 Langberg et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409750 Hyodoh et al. Jun 2002 B1
6419696 Ortiz et al. Jul 2002 B1
6442427 Boute et al. Aug 2002 B1
6464720 Boatman et al. Oct 2002 B2
6478776 Rosenman et al. Nov 2002 B1
6503271 Duerig et al. Jan 2003 B2
6537314 Langberg et al. Mar 2003 B2
6556873 Smits Apr 2003 B1
6562066 Martin May 2003 B1
6562067 Mathis May 2003 B2
6569198 Wilson et al. May 2003 B1
6589208 Ewers et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599314 Mathis et al. Jul 2003 B2
6602288 Cosgrove et al. Aug 2003 B1
6602289 Colvin et al. Aug 2003 B1
6623521 Steinke et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626899 Houser et al. Sep 2003 B2
6629534 Goar et al. Oct 2003 B1
6629994 Gomez et al. Oct 2003 B2
6643546 Mathis et al. Nov 2003 B2
6648881 KenKnight et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652538 Kayan et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652571 White et al. Nov 2003 B1
6656221 Taylor et al. Dec 2003 B2
6676702 Mathis Jan 2004 B2
6689164 Seguin Feb 2004 B1
6709425 Gambale et al. Mar 2004 B2
6716158 Raman et al. Apr 2004 B2
6718985 Hlavka et al. Apr 2004 B2
6721598 Holland et al. Apr 2004 B1
6723038 Schroeder et al. Apr 2004 B1
6733521 Chobotov et al. May 2004 B2
6743219 Dwyer et al. Jun 2004 B1
6764510 Vidlund et al. Jul 2004 B2
6773446 Dwyer et al. Aug 2004 B1
6776784 Ginn Aug 2004 B2
6790231 Liddicoat et al. Sep 2004 B2
6793673 Kowalsky et al. Sep 2004 B2
6797001 Mathis et al. Sep 2004 B2
6798231 Iwasaki et al. Sep 2004 B2
6800090 Alferness et al. Oct 2004 B2
6805128 Pless et al. Oct 2004 B1
6810882 Langberg et al. Nov 2004 B2
6821297 Snyders Nov 2004 B2
6824562 Mathis et al. Nov 2004 B2
6827690 Bardy Dec 2004 B2
6881220 Edwin et al. Apr 2005 B2
6890353 Cohn et al. May 2005 B2
6899734 Castro et al. May 2005 B2
6908478 Alferness et al. Jun 2005 B2
6908482 McCarthy et al. Jun 2005 B2
6926690 Renati Aug 2005 B2
6935404 Duerig et al. Aug 2005 B2
6949122 Adams et al. Sep 2005 B2
6955689 Ryan et al. Oct 2005 B2
6960229 Mathis et al. Nov 2005 B2
6964683 Kowalsky et al. Nov 2005 B2
6966926 Mathis Nov 2005 B2
6976995 Mathis et al. Dec 2005 B2
7004958 Adams et al. Feb 2006 B2
7087064 Hyde Aug 2006 B1
7128073 van der Burg et al. Oct 2006 B1
7152605 Khairkhahan et al. Dec 2006 B2
7175653 Gaber Feb 2007 B2
7179282 Alferness et al. Feb 2007 B2
7270676 Alferness et al. Sep 2007 B2
7276078 Spenser et al. Oct 2007 B2
7309354 Mathis et al. Dec 2007 B2
7311729 Mathis et al. Dec 2007 B2
7316708 Gordon et al. Jan 2008 B2
7364588 Mathis et al. Apr 2008 B2
7452375 Mathis et al. Nov 2008 B2
7503931 Kowalsky et al. Mar 2009 B2
7591826 Alferness et al. Sep 2009 B2
7608102 Adams et al. Oct 2009 B2
7635387 Reuter et al. Dec 2009 B2
7637946 Solem et al. Dec 2009 B2
7674287 Alferness et al. Mar 2010 B2
7758639 Mathis Jul 2010 B2
7814635 Gordon et al. Oct 2010 B2
7828841 Mathis et al. Nov 2010 B2
7828842 Nieminen et al. Nov 2010 B2
7828843 Alferness et al. Nov 2010 B2
7837728 Nieminen et al. Nov 2010 B2
7837729 Gordon et al. Nov 2010 B2
7887582 Mathis et al. Feb 2011 B2
7955384 Rafiee et al. Jun 2011 B2
8006594 Hayner et al. Aug 2011 B2
8062358 Mathis et al. Nov 2011 B2
8075608 Gordon et al. Dec 2011 B2
8172898 Alferness et al. May 2012 B2
8182529 Gordon et al. May 2012 B2
8250960 Hayner et al. Aug 2012 B2
8439971 Reuter et al. May 2013 B2
8795356 Quadri et al. Aug 2014 B2
8974525 Nieminen et al. Mar 2015 B2
9039757 McLean et al. May 2015 B2
9084676 Chau et al. Jul 2015 B2
9320600 Nieminen et al. Apr 2016 B2
9370418 Pintor et al. Jun 2016 B2
9408695 Mathis et al. Aug 2016 B2
9474608 Mathis et al. Oct 2016 B2
9526616 Nieminen et al. Dec 2016 B2
9597186 Nieminen et al. Mar 2017 B2
9827098 Mathis et al. Nov 2017 B2
9827099 Mathis et al. Nov 2017 B2
9827100 Mathis et al. Nov 2017 B2
9956076 Mathis et al. May 2018 B2
9956077 Nieminen et al. May 2018 B2
10052205 Mathis et al. Aug 2018 B2
10166102 Nieminen et al. Jan 2019 B2
10327900 Mathis et al. Jun 2019 B2
10390953 Wypych Aug 2019 B2
10449048 Nieminen et al. Oct 2019 B2
10456257 Mathis et al. Oct 2019 B2
10456259 Mathis et al. Oct 2019 B2
11109971 Nieminen et al. Sep 2021 B2
20010018611 Solem et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010041899 Foster Nov 2001 A1
20010044568 Langberg et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010049558 Liddicoat et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020010507 Ehr et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020016628 Langberg et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020042621 Liddicoat et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020042651 Liddicoat et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049468 Streeter et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020055774 Liddicoat May 2002 A1
20020065554 Streeter May 2002 A1
20020095167 Liddicoat et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020138044 Streeter et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020151961 Lashinski et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156526 Hlavka et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161377 Rabkin et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161393 Demond et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020183837 Streeter et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020183838 Liddicoat et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020183841 Cohn et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020188170 Santamore et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020193827 McGuckin et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030018358 Saadat Jan 2003 A1
20030040771 Hyodoh et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030069636 Solem et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030078465 Pai et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030078654 Taylor et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030083613 Schaer May 2003 A1
20030088305 Van Schie et al. May 2003 A1
20030093148 Bolling et al. May 2003 A1
20030130730 Cohn et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030135267 Solem et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040019377 Taylor et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040039443 Solem et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040073302 Rourke et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040098116 Callas et al. May 2004 A1
20040102839 Cohn et al. May 2004 A1
20040102840 Solem et al. May 2004 A1
20040127982 Machold et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040133220 Lashinski et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040133240 Adams et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040133273 Cox Jul 2004 A1
20040138744 Lashinski et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040148019 Vidlund et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040148020 Vidlund et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040148021 Cartledge et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153147 Mathis Aug 2004 A1
20040158321 Reuter et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172046 Hlavka et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040176840 Langberg Sep 2004 A1
20040193191 Starksen et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193260 Alferness et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040220654 Mathis et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040220657 Nieminen et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040243227 Starksen et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260342 Vargas et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260384 Allen Dec 2004 A1
20050004667 Swinford et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027351 Reuter et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050033419 Alferness et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050060030 Lashinski et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050085903 Lau Apr 2005 A1
20050096740 Langberg et al. May 2005 A1
20050107810 Morales et al. May 2005 A1
20050137449 Nieminen et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137450 Aronson et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137451 Gordon et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149182 Alferness et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050177228 Solem et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050197692 Pai et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197693 Pai et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197694 Pai et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209690 Mathis et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216077 Mathis et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050222678 Lashinski et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050261704 Mathis Nov 2005 A1
20050272969 Alferness et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060030882 Adams et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041305 Lauterjung Feb 2006 A1
20060116758 Swinford et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142854 Alferness et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060161169 Nieminen et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060167544 Nieminen et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060271174 Nieminen et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070027533 Douk Feb 2007 A1
20070066879 Mathis et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073391 Bourang et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070173926 Bobo, Jr. et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070239270 Mathis et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080015407 Mathis et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015679 Mathis et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015680 Mathis et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080071364 Kaye et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080221673 Bobo et al. Sep 2008 A1
20100030330 Bobo et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100280602 Mathis Nov 2010 A1
20110066234 Gordon et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110106117 Mathis et al. May 2011 A1
20120123532 Mathis May 2012 A1
20120197389 Alferness et al. Aug 2012 A1
20140275757 Goodwin et al. Sep 2014 A1
20170165058 Rothstein et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170189185 Nieminen et al. Jul 2017 A1
20180078365 Zhang et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180256330 Wypych Sep 2018 A1
20190262136 Nieminen et al. Aug 2019 A1
20200008943 Mathis et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200253732 Nieminen et al. Aug 2020 A1
20210298732 Nieminen et al. Sep 2021 A1
20210330460 Mathis et al. Oct 2021 A1
20210393403 Nieminen et al. Dec 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (49)
Number Date Country
0893133 Jan 1999 EP
0903110 Mar 1999 EP
0968688 Jan 2000 EP
1050274 Nov 2000 EP
1095634 May 2001 EP
1177779 Feb 2002 EP
2181670 May 2010 EP
0741604 Dec 1955 GB
2754067 Mar 1998 JP
2000-308652 Nov 2000 JP
2001-503291 Mar 2001 JP
2003-503101 Jan 2003 JP
2003-521310 Jul 2003 JP
9902455 Dec 2000 SE
WO9856435 Dec 1998 WO
WOOO44313 Aug 2000 WO
WOOO60995 Oct 2000 WO
WOOO74603 Dec 2000 WO
WO0100111 Jan 2001 WO
WO0119292 Mar 2001 WO
WO0150985 Jul 2001 WO
WO0154618 Aug 2001 WO
WO0187180 Nov 2001 WO
WO0200099 Jan 2002 WO
WO0201999 Jan 2002 WO
WO0205888 Jan 2002 WO
WO0219951 Mar 2002 WO
WO0234118 May 2002 WO
WO0247539 Jun 2002 WO
WO02053206 Jul 2002 WO
WO02060352 Aug 2002 WO
WO02062263 Aug 2002 WO
WO02062270 Aug 2002 WO
WO02062408 Aug 2002 WO
WO02076284 Oct 2002 WO
WO02078576 Oct 2002 WO
WO02096275 Dec 2002 WO
WO03015611 Feb 2003 WO
WO03037171 May 2003 WO
WO03049647 Jun 2003 WO
WO03049648 Jun 2003 WO
WO03055417 Jul 2003 WO
WO03059198 Jul 2003 WO
WO03063735 Aug 2003 WO
WO2004045463 Jun 2004 WO
WO2004084746 Oct 2004 WO
WO2005046531 May 2005 WO
WO2005058206 Jun 2005 WO
WO2006002492 Jan 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Halees; An additional maneuver to repair mitral paravalvular leak; European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery; 39(3); pp. 410-411 ; Mar. 2011 (Year: 2011).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190365537 A1 Dec 2019 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15453734 Mar 2017 US
Child 16540699 US