This application relates to tools for use in spinal surgery, and in particular to minimally invasive methods and devices for introducing a spinal fixation element to one or more spinal anchor sites within a patient's spine.
For a number of known reasons, spinal fixation devices are used in orthopedic surgery to align and/or fix a desired relationship between adjacent vertebral bodies. Such devices typically include a spinal fixation element, such as a relatively rigid fixation rod, that is coupled to adjacent vertebrae by attaching the element to various anchoring devices, such as hooks, bolts, wires, or screws. The fixation elements can have a predetermined contour that has been designed according to the properties of the target implantation site, and once installed, the instrument holds the vertebrae in a desired spatial relationship, either until desired healing or spinal fusion has taken place, or for some longer period of time.
Spinal fixation elements can be anchored to specific portions of the vertebrae. Since each vertebra varies in shape and size, a variety of anchoring devices have been developed to facilitate engagement of a particular portion of the bone. Pedicle screw assemblies, for example, have a shape and size that is configured to engage pedicle bone. Such screws typically include a threaded shank that is adapted to be threaded into a vertebra, and a head portion having a rod-receiving element, usually in the form of a U-shaped slot formed in the head. A set-screw, plug, or similar type of fastening mechanism is used to lock the fixation element, e.g., a spinal rod, into the rod-receiving head of the pedicle screw. In use, the shank portion of each screw is threaded into a vertebra, and once properly positioned, a rod is seated through the rod-receiving member of each screw and the rod is locked in place by tightening a cap or other fastener mechanism to securely interconnect each screw and the fixation rod.
Recently, the trend in spinal surgery has been moving toward providing minimally invasive devices and methods for implanting spinal fixation devices. One such method, for example, is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,530,929 of Justis et al. and it utilizes two percutaneous access devices for implanting an anchoring device, such as a spinal screw, into adjacent vertebrae. A spinal rod is then introduced through a third incision a distance apart from the percutaneous access sites, and the rod is transversely moved into the rod-engaging portion of each spinal screw. The percutaneous access devices can then be used to apply closure mechanisms to the rod-engaging heads to lock the rod therein. While this procedure offers advantages over prior art invasive techniques, the transverse introduction of the rod can cause significant damage to surrounding tissue and muscle. Moreover, the use of three separate access sites can undesirably lengthen the surgical procedure, and increase patient trauma and recovery time.
Accordingly, there remains a need for improved minimally invasive devices and methods for introducing a spinal fixation element into a patient's spine.
The present invention generally provides methods for introducing a spinal fixation element into a receiver head of adjacent spinal anchors. In one embodiment, the method utilizes at least two percutaneous access devices, each of which has a proximal end positioned outside a patient's body and a distal end coupled to a spinal anchor. The access device preferably includes at least one sidewall opening extending from the distal end through at least a portion of the percutaneous access device. In use, a spinal fixation element is positioned through the sidewall opening(s) in at least two adjacent percutaneous access devices such that the spinal fixation element extends in an orientation that is substantially transverse to a longitudinal axis of each percutaneous access device. The spinal fixation element is then advanced in the substantially transverse orientation to seat the spinal fixation element in or adjacent to the receiver head of at least two spinal anchors that are preferably implanted within adjacent vertebrae.
In an exemplary embodiment, each percutaneous access device includes first and second opposed sidewall openings, and at least one of the first and second sidewall openings extends from the distal end and terminates at a position distal to the proximal end. The percutaneous access devices can also optionally include a cannula, sleeve, or similar device disposed therearound that is effective to prevent removal of each percutaneous device from the spinal anchor coupled thereto. The sleeve preferably includes at least one sidewall opening formed therein that is adapted to align with the at least one sidewall opening in the percutaneous access device.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a percutaneous access system for introducing a spinal fixation element into a patient's body is provided. The system includes at least two spinal anchors that are adapted to be disposed in bone, at least one elongate, generally cylindrical hollow tube having at least one sidewall opening extending from the distal end thereof and terminating at a position distal to the proximal end, and a spinal fixation element. The system can also include at least one sleeve which is adapted to be slidably disposed around at least a portion of one of the hollow tubes. The sleeve(s) preferably includes at least one sidewall opening formed therein that is adapted to align with the sidewall opening(s) formed in the hollow tube. The system can also include a driver mechanism having a proximal handle portion, and a distal end that is adapted to couple to a spinal anchor such that rotation of the driver mechanism is effective to thread the spinal anchor into bone. The driver mechanism is preferably adapted to be disposed through the hollow tube(s).
The present invention provides minimally invasive methods and devices for introducing a spinal fixation element into a surgical site in a patient's spinal column. In general, the method involves positioning a spinal fixation element through openings formed in at least two adjacent percutaneous access devices such that the spinal fixation element extends between the at least two adjacent percutaneous access devices in a lengthwise orientation. The spinal fixation element can then be advanced in a distal direction to seat the spinal fixation element in the receiver heads of the adjacent spinal anchors, or to otherwise position the spinal fixation element in relation to the adjacent spinal anchors. A fastening element or other closure mechanism can optionally be applied to each spinal anchor to engage the spinal fixation element within the receiver heads of the adjacent anchors, or to otherwise directly or indirectly connect the spinal fixation element to the anchors.
While a variety of devices can be used to perform the methods of the present invention,
The percutaneous access device 12 also preferably includes at least one sidewall opening or slot 14, and more preferably two opposed sidewall openings (only one opening 14 is shown), formed therein and extending proximally from the distal end 12b thereof. The openings 14 allow a spinal fixation element to be positioned lengthwise between two adjacent devices 12 such that the spinal fixation element extends in an orientation that is substantially transverse to the longitudinal axis L of the access devices 12, i.e., that crosses the longitudinal axis L of the access devices 12. The exact position of the spinal fixation element with respect to the longitudinal axis L will of course vary depending on the configuration of the spinal fixation element. The shape and size of the openings 14 can also vary depending on the configuration of the spinal fixation element, but the openings 14 preferably have a generally elongate shape with a width w that is sufficient to accommodate the diameter of the spinal fixation element. The openings 14 preferably extend over about half of the length, or more than half of the length, of the percutaneous access device 12. This allows a proximal portion of each opening 14 to be positioned outside a patient's body while the device 12 is in use, thus allowing a spinal fixation element to be externally positioned through the openings 14 and then moved distally to be implanted. A person skilled in the art will appreciate that the percutaneous access device 12 can include any number of sidewall openings having any shape that is sufficient to allow a spinal fixation element to be positioned therethrough.
Continuing to refer to
Still referring to
The procedure preferably begins by forming an incision through the tissue located adjacent to the desired implant site. While the location, shape, and size of the incision will depend on the type and quantity of spinal anchors being implanted,
As shown in
The opposed ends of the incision can then be dilated to provide a pathway for delivery of a spinal anchor to each implant site.
Once the incision 62 is dilated to the proper size, an anchor can be delivered to each anchor site, as shown in
Once the vertebra 60 is prepared, a spinal anchor can be implanted at each implant site. An access device 12, 12′ can be mated to each anchor 50, 50′ after insertion of the anchor 50, 50′ into bone 60, 60′, but more preferably each percutaneous access device 12, 12′ is attached to the anchor 50, 50′ prior to insertion of the anchor 50, 50′ into bone 60, 60′ to provide a passageway for a driver tool for driving the anchor 50 into bone 60, 60′.
In another embodiment, a sleeve can be placed over each access device 12, 12′, either prior to or after the devices 12, 12′, 50, 50′ are implanted, to prevent the devices 12, 12′ from becoming disengaged from the anchors 50, 50′ to which they are attached. The sleeve (not shown), is preferably in the form of a cannula that has substantially the same configuration as each access device 12, 12′. The use of a sleeve is particularly desirable where the access devices 12, 12′ utilize pin members that engage corresponding detents formed on an outer surface of each screw head 52, 52′, as the sleeve will prevent the pin members from becoming disengaged from the detents. The sleeve can also optionally serve as an access device, allowing access devices 12, 12′ to be detached and removed from the anchors 50, 50′.
After the anchors are implanted, as shown in
The spinal fixation element 70 is then moved distally toward the distal end 12b, 12b′ of the percutaneous access devices 12, 12′. As the spinal fixation element 70 moves distally, it will advantageously pass between the muscles, thus eliminating the need to cut or tear tissue. The method is also particularly advantageous in that the percutaneous access devices 12, 12′ direct the spinal fixation element 70 into the receiver heads 52, 52′ of the adjacent spinal anchors 50, 50′, thus allowing the spinal fixation element to be properly positioned without the necessity for direct visual access to the surgical site.
Movement of the spinal fixation element 70 in the distal direction can be achieved using pusher shaft 80, as shown in
Once the spinal fixation element 70 is fully seated in the receiver heads 52, 52′ of the adjacent spinal anchors 50, 50′, as shown in
An exemplary compression tool 100 is shown in
Once properly positioned, a closure mechanism can be applied, preferably via the access devices 12, 12′, to each anchor head 50, 50′ to retain the spinal fixation element 70 within the receiver heads 52, 52′. A variety of closure mechanisms and tools for delivering closure mechanisms are known in the art and they can be used with the present invention. By way of non-limiting example,
A person skilled in the art will appreciate that the spinal fixation element 70 does not need to be directly attached to each anchor 50, 50′, and that it can be indirectly attached to the anchors 50, 50′ using, for example, a band clamp, or slotted or offset connectors.
Once the fixation element 70 is secured in relation to the implants 50, 50′, the access devices 12, 12′ can be removed (if attached) from the implants 50, 50′, leaving only a single, relatively small incision in the patient where each access device 12, 12′ and the spinal fixation element 70 was introduced. This is particularly advantageous in that it reduces the amount of trauma caused to the patient, and it minimizes the damage to muscle surrounding the surgical site.
As previously stated, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that the method can be performed in any sequence using any of the steps. Moreover, the access devices of the present invention can be used to deliver multiple spinal fixation elements simultaneously or sequentially, and/or to perform a variety of other surgical procedures not illustrated or described herein.
One skilled in the art will appreciate further features and advantages of the invention based on the above-described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be limited by what has been particularly shown and described, except as indicated by the appended claims. All publications and references cited herein are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2320709 | Arneson | Jun 1943 | A |
3246646 | Murphy | Apr 1966 | A |
3552799 | Koranda | Jan 1971 | A |
4263899 | Burgin | Apr 1981 | A |
4461281 | Carson | Jul 1984 | A |
4545374 | Jacobson | Oct 1985 | A |
4573448 | Kambin | Mar 1986 | A |
4686966 | Tsai et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4765311 | Kulik et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4872451 | Moore et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4887020 | Graham et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4913134 | Luque | Apr 1990 | A |
4961740 | Ray et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5015255 | Kuslich | May 1991 | A |
5024659 | Sjostrom | Jun 1991 | A |
5052372 | Shapiro | Oct 1991 | A |
5084053 | Ender et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5171279 | Mathews | Dec 1992 | A |
5231973 | Dickie et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5242443 | Kambin | Sep 1993 | A |
5242446 | Steffee et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5324290 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5395317 | Kambin | Mar 1995 | A |
5439464 | Shapiro | Aug 1995 | A |
5484440 | Allard | Jan 1996 | A |
5520610 | Giglio et al. | May 1996 | A |
5569248 | Mathews | Oct 1996 | A |
5647873 | Errico | Jul 1997 | A |
5728097 | Mathews | Mar 1998 | A |
5749884 | Benderev et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762629 | Kambin | Jun 1998 | A |
5766221 | Benderev | Jun 1998 | A |
5817094 | Errico | Oct 1998 | A |
5910141 | Morrison et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5928139 | Koros et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931777 | Sava | Aug 1999 | A |
5954635 | Foley | Sep 1999 | A |
5984923 | Breard | Nov 1999 | A |
6033406 | Mathews | Mar 2000 | A |
6139493 | Koros et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6159179 | Simonson | Dec 2000 | A |
6183472 | Lutz | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200322 | Branch et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6224545 | Cocchia et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6226548 | Foley et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235028 | Brumfield | May 2001 | B1 |
6299616 | Beger et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331179 | Freid | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6371968 | Kogasaka et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6440133 | Beale et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6485491 | Farris et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6520907 | Foley | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530926 | Davison | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530929 | Justis et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540749 | Schafer et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554831 | Rivard et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6607530 | Carl et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6652527 | Zucherman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6660006 | Markworth et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6740086 | Richelsoph | May 2004 | B2 |
6740089 | Haider | May 2004 | B2 |
6743231 | Gray et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6793656 | Mathews | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6821277 | Teitelbaum | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6849064 | Hamada | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6929647 | Cohen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7083621 | Shaolian et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7179225 | Shluzas et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7250052 | Landry et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7306603 | Boehm et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20010001119 | Lombardo | May 2001 | A1 |
20020011600 | Kurahashi et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020049368 | Ritland | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020068975 | Teitelbaum | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082600 | Shaolian | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020116000 | Zucherman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116006 | Cohen | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123668 | Ritland | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138077 | Ferree | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161368 | Foley et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169448 | Vanacker | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198526 | Shaolian | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030060826 | Foley et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030083657 | Drewry et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030083688 | Simonson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030083689 | Simonson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030130659 | Haider | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030191371 | Smith et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195549 | Davison | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195550 | Davison | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195551 | Davison | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199885 | Davison | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208203 | Lim | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229347 | Sherman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040039384 | Boehm | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040082961 | Teitelbaum | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040138662 | Landry et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143265 | Landry et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162560 | Raynor et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172022 | Landry et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040260284 | Parker | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267277 | Zannis et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050038434 | Mathews | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065517 | Chin | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085813 | Spitler et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050171540 | Lim et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182410 | Jackson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192570 | Jackson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192579 | Jackson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3434807 | Dec 1985 | DE |
10027988 | Jan 2002 | DE |
100 27 988.0 | Oct 2002 | DE |
29810798 | May 2004 | DE |
0528562 | Feb 1993 | EP |
1190678 | Mar 2002 | EP |
2729291 | Jan 1995 | FR |
2796545 | Jul 1999 | FR |
WO-9205742 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO-9308745 | May 1993 | WO |
WO-2004004100 | May 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050131422 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |