The present invention relates to a method and a device to physically stabilize a load combination comprising stapled unit loads, such as at least two standard containers on top of each other or for instance loads loaded on pallets stacked on top of each other, and at least one Automatically or semi-automatically Guided Vehicle (AGV) below the loads, together with mechanisms for fixation thereof to each other and/or to the vehicle, during transport of the loads in all directions on the ground.
If the load is comprised of containers, they may be at least two standard containers (FEU=Forty feet Equivalent Unit containers or TEU=Twenty feet Equivalent Unit containers) applied one on top of another or in line, possibly both, possibly in a cassette and on top of at least one AGV. If more than one AGV is utilized, they are commonly controlled by common software. More specifically the invention deals with the issue of enhancing stability of such items (AGV+load), where the load is applied on/in and engaged to the upper side of a framework or cassette framework, the latter of which together lately has become named C-AGV, which is short for Cassette-AGV, being in turn on its bottom side on request carried by the AGV or the AGVs, each in tum comprising one or more bogies provided for the drivability of the whole unit. On top of each bogie, the frame of the AGV is provided with mechanisms for jacking (bringing the cassette into a transport position), for driving, and for braking.
The wheel-base and the traction of each bogie must at least in an initial position of introduction be held within the inner limits (as seen from above) of the transport system comprising the framework to be lifted and transported together with the loads. The transport system is mainly designed for use in ports or the like shunting areas, but can of course be scaled up or down for other more or less similar possible uses.
AGVs of the kind here meant are normally used in areas where transport of articles, such as containers of standardized volume, is frequently performed in large numbers, such as in ports or harbors. It is normally not allowed for people to stay in areas where loads of this kind are handled. Such areas are often heavy industrial applications where two or more AGVs may be utilized in order to be able to bear more load. When loads of standardized volume are stowed in height of at least two items at a time, it is required either to mechanically fix them to each other or to guide them in cell guides or the like. This creates or at least enhances a risk during transport of whole units of exposing them to unwanted momentum of inertia during actions such as start and stop of movement backward and forward, mostly, but also sidew2ays, stopping and turning during transport forward in curves, especially when exposed to heavy side winds.
Since demands on transport speeds and acceleration continuously over time are increased, this is of course troublesome. Combining different effects (e.g., side winds, side acceleration, vehicle dynamics, slope), whole loads are in the risk zone of turning over. Since staff handling standardized goods seldom are aware of the actual weight of each item (container or pallet) or for that matter its mass distribution, a unit load having a substantially higher or even unbalanced weight than another such load situated below it may be loaded atop a much lighter unit load. This imposes dangerous risks for instability of whole units (AGV+load), since the items are meant to be transported at speeds of up to at least 6 m/s in the main transport direction and up to between 2 and 3 m/s in directions sideways. Side forces that results can be considerable, especially if maximum turning radii are utilized and heavy winds are blowing. In the future, even higher transport speeds are to be expected, and thus the problems will become larger. Sideways acceleration or retardation in sideways transport of at least 1 m/s2, most likely up until 6 m/s2, for emergency operation in today's ranges of transport speed are in the range of possible figures. Collapses directly or indirectly due to these reasons are simply not an issue, due to the high demands on productivity. The goods to be transported simply must reach their respective destinations as soon as possible, preferably on time, and of course without any damage whatsoever.
As for the state of the art, it is relevant neither to the problem solved nor to the technical solution described in this application. Stiff steerable shafts or steerable wheels make no contribution whatsoever to the issue of stability.
For example, DE 102007050824A1 shows a towed vehicle for carrying a predetermined load, towed behind a lorry or the like. The vehicle in question comprises wheel pairs at distinct positions of the chassis thereof, being independently controllable so as to be able to maneuver the entire combination as well as possible.
Another example is WO 94/02890 where an AGV is depicted, which in order to be steerable and controllable comprises pairs of shafts at each end thereof which are individually pivotable in a horizontal plane.
The publication TTS Review, May 2009, p.14 gives a better picture of the state of the art as depicted in
Nothing is considered to deal with a problem that, even from the widest possible view, comes close to solving the problems addressed by this application.
An object of the present invention is therefore considered to lie in enhancing the stability of a unit comprising a flexibly integrated arrangement of loads (such as containers or pallets) indirectly and displaceably standing on the ground and atop each other to be randomly translated thereon. The loads can be either loaded on an AGV frame or on a cassette to constitute a unit to be transported. In the case of a load on a cassette, the vehicle can be driven in below the load, lift it, and drive away in any direction freely chosen.
According to aspects of the invention, the AGV to be arranged below the unit load is provided with at least one wheel-bogie, which in turn is provided with at least three wheels or pairs of wheels, the bogie being controllably pivotable in the horizontal plane in relation to a frame of the AGV while each wheel being controllably pivotable at its respective fixation point in relation to the bogie, whereby during transport in all possible directions of the load, each bogie can be translated to a position in relation to its position of introduction that the wheels define a considerably larger traction than they do when they are maintained in their initial position before pivoting of the bogie.
This gives the bogie or bogies of the AGV, with the use of thereto belonging control software, the possibility of being displaced to a position in which the traction of the bogie becomes wider than that of a drive-in width in relation to the load in its longitudinal direction, which with its containers, pallets or the like is to be lifted and transported to its future position. This enhances the stability of the whole unit both when transporting it at a given path longitudinally in curves, possibly affected by side-wind, and when transporting it in a direction 90° deviant to this direction and in all directions in between.
In embodiments shown below, frame beams of the AGV are there only to hold the bogies together as a common unit. 4. Provided an appropriate coordination of two independent bogies (that could be considered as a vehicle together), the function of the frame 4 can be taken by the cassette. The AGV has been provided with a jacking mechanism that independently acts directly on the unit loads and makes the total height of the transported unit loads lower, which also contributes to the transport stability of the unit as a whole.
Controllability is much improved by using the invention. The center of the turning radius of the complete unit can be translated to any point from directly below each of the pivot points of each bogie to any point in a very wide circumference to it.
According to a further embodiment of the invention, the bogies' main dimensions differ from each other in that the dimension as seen from above is rectangular instead of being essentially square. This means that the bogies when in line with the frames thereof are longer in that direction than in a direction 90° deviant from the same.
By controlling the angular position of each bogie to be a value of between 45° and 75° where the wheels are pivotable to an extent larger than +/−45°, it is possible to maximize the traction of the bogie even further. This will of course enhance stability of the complete unit even more. Finally, by an appropriate design of the wheels steering, an angular position of the bogie of 90° can be achieved, which during certain conditions allows to reach a better loading of the wheels in comparison to the 45° configuration.
The invention will in the following be described with reference to drawings of a preferred embodiment of the invention, in which:
a, 6b, 6c are schematic views of AGVs having their bogies and wheels displaced in different patterns,
a, 7b, 7c, 7d, 7e are schematic views of a bogie of an AGV showing yet another lot of possible positions and patterns for the bogies and wheels,
a, 8b, 8c, 8d each show different ways to displace the bogies and wheels when it is desired that an AGV is to “crab” in all directions between sideways and straight forward, and
According to
According to
The position of the AGV shown in
From
In order to show the device from all possible directions and in all possible positions
Below
a, 7b, 7c, 7d, 7e show examples of different positions (as previously mentioned) of the bogies and wheels in comparison to the outer limitation of the cassette. Especially
a, 8b, 8c, 8d show different bogie and wheel configurations to accomplish a “crablike” movement of the whole CLU, which may be of use in certain circumstances.
Finally,
The invention is not to be seen to be limited by the above described embodiment, but should instead be considered so by the enclosed patent claims and the description as a whole.
This application claims the benefit of the filing dates of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/447,267 filed on Feb. 28, 2011, and International Application No. PCT/EP2011/052952 filed on Feb. 28, 2011, both of which are incorporated here by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61447267 | Feb 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2011/052952 | Feb 2011 | US |
Child | 13406001 | US |