The present invention relates generally to medical methods, devices, and systems. In particular, the present invention relates to methods, devices, and systems for the endovascular, percutaneous or minimally invasive surgical treatment of bodily tissues, such as tissue approximation or valve repair. More particularly, the present invention relates to repair of valves of the heart and venous valves.
Surgical repair of bodily tissues often involves tissue approximation and fastening of such tissues in the approximated arrangement. When repairing valves, tissue approximation includes coapting the leaflets of the valves in a therapeutic arrangement which may then be maintained by fastening or fixing the leaflets. Such coaptation can be used to treat regurgitation which most commonly occurs in the mitral valve.
Mitral valve regurgitation is characterized by retrograde flow from the left ventricle of a heart through an incompetent mitral valve into the left atrium. During a normal cycle of heart contraction (systole), the mitral valve acts as a check valve to prevent flow of oxygenated blood back into the left atrium. In this way, the oxygenated blood is pumped into the aorta through the aortic valve. Regurgitation of the valve can significantly decrease the pumping efficiency of the heart, placing the patient at risk of severe, progressive heart failure.
Mitral valve regurgitation can result from a number of different mechanical defects in the mitral valve or the left ventricular wall. The valve leaflets, the valve chordae which connect the leaflets to the papillary muscles, the papillary muscles or the left ventricular wall may be damaged or otherwise dysfunctional. Commonly, the valve annulus may be damaged, dilated, or weakened limiting the ability of the mitral valve to close adequately against the high pressures of the left ventricle.
The most common treatments for mitral valve regurgitation rely on valve replacement or repair including leaflet and annulus remodeling, the latter generally referred to as valve annuloplasty. A recent technique for mitral valve repair which relies on suturing adjacent segments of the opposed valve leaflets together is referred to as the “bow-tie” or “edge-to-edge” technique. While all these techniques can be very effective, they usually rely on open heart surgery where the patient's chest is opened, typically via a sternotomy, and the patient placed on cardiopulmonary bypass. The need to both open the chest and place the patient on bypass is traumatic and has associated high mortality and morbidity.
Consequently, alternative and additional methods, devices, and systems for performing the repair of mitral and other cardiac valves have been developed. Such methods, devices, and systems preferably do not require open chest access and are capable of being performed either endovascularly, i.e., using devices which are advanced to the heart from a point in the patient's vasculature remote from the heart or by a minimally invasive approach. Examples of such methods, devices and systems are provided in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,629,534 6,752,813, and U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/441,753, 10/441,531, 11/130,818, 10/441,508, 10/441,687, 10/975,555, all of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
In some instances, however, a variety of challenges are faced in desirably fixating the valve leaflets. For example, it is commonly found in cases of mitral valve regurgitation that a portion of the leaflet is moving out of phase with the other leaflets or portions of the leaflets. This can occur due to an elongation or disconnection of the structures (chordae tendinae) holding the leaflets stable and in synchrony. Such a malfunction can lead to one leaflet or portion of a leaflet to swing or “flail” above the level of healthy coaptation, thereby allowing blood to regurgitate into the right atrium. Such flailing provides a challenge to the practitioner when attempting to fix the leaflets together, particularly via an endoscopic approach. The leaflets may be difficult to grasp, and even when grasped, the leaflets may not be desirably grasped. For example, a leaflet may only be partially grasped rather than having full contact with a grasping element. This may lead to less desirable coaptation and/or eventual slippage of the leaflet from fixation.
Therefore, devices, systems and methods are desired which stabilize the tissue, to resist flailing and other movement, prior to and/or during grasping of the tissue. Further, devices, systems and methods are desired which assist in grasping the tissue, enable more desirable coaptation of tissues, provide grasping assessment, and enable the practitioner to determine if desirable grasping of the tissues has occurred, particularly prior to fixation. And still further, devices, systems and methods are desired which enable fixation assessment, enabling the practitioner to determine if desirable fixation of the tissues has occurred. These would be useful for repair of tissues in the body other than leaflets and other than heart valves. At least some of these objectives will be met by the inventions described hereinbelow.
The present invention provides a variety of devices, systems and methods for stabilizing, grasping, assessing and fixating tissues, particularly valve leaflets in the treatment of cardiac valve regurgitation, more particularly mitral valve regurgitation. Many of the devices, systems and methods utilize or are utilized in conjunction with a preferred embodiment of a fixation device having at least one proximal element and at least one distal element, wherein the tissue is grasped therebetween. It may be appreciated, however, that the devices, systems and methods of the present invention may utilize any suitable device, particularly any minimally invasive device. When treating valve leaflets, the leaflets are typically grasped to position the fixation device along the line of coaptation at a location which reduces regurgitation of the valve, such as near the center of the valve simulating a standard surgical bow-tie repair. However, more than one fixation device may be placed, and in various arrangements, as will be discussed in later sections.
To assist in desirable grasping of the tissue, a variety of devices and techniques are provided to stabilize the tissue prior to grasping. Such stabilization is aimed to assist in effectively and efficiently grasping the tissue thereby increasing the likelihood that the desired amount of tissue will be incorporated into the fixation device without necessitating multiple grasps. Further, a variety of devices and techniques are provided to improve a grasp, such as by adjusting the position of the grasped tissue between the proximal and distal elements. Once the tissue or leaflets have been grasped, it is often desired to evaluate or assess the quality of the grasp, such as the amount of purchase, orientation of the tissues and likelihood that the fixation device will maintain the grasp over time. Thus, a variety of devices and techniques are provided to assess the quality of the grasp. Further, once the tissue has been fixed by the fixation device, the quality of the fixation of the tissue may be evaluated or assessed. This can be achieved by evaluating the improvement in the medical condition being treated, such as improvement in regurgitation. It is often desired to assess the fixation prior to decoupling the fixation device from the delivery catheter so that the fixation device may be repositioned if the improvement is not satisfactory. Thus, a variety of devices and techniques are provided to assess the fixation prior to decoupling the fixation devices. Additional devices, systems and methods are also provided.
In one aspect of the present invention, methods are provided for assessing the grasp of one or more tissues by a minimally invasive device. In one embodiment, the method includes advancing a minimally invasive device having a proximal element and a distal element into a body cavity having a tissue, grasping the tissue between the proximal element and the distal element and assessing the presence of the tissue in a target area between the proximal and distal elements. Typically, the tissue comprises valve leaflets. In some embodiments, assessing the presence comprises observing the target area under fluoroscopy, ultrasound or echocardiography. In such instances, the method may further comprise enhancing the visibility of at least a portion of the proximal element and/or the distal element. Alternatively or in addition, the method may further comprise enhancing the visibility of the tissue.
In a variety of embodiments, the device includes an indicator which indicates the presence of tissue within the target area. In such instances, the method may further comprise observing the indicator. When the indicator changes shape and/or orientation based on the presence of tissue within the target area, observing the indicator may include observing the change in shape and/or orientation.
In some embodiments, the device includes an injectable enhanced visibility substance. In such instances, assessing the presence of tissue in the target area may comprise observing a flow pattern of the enhanced visibility substance. When the substance is contained in a reservoir having ports, assessing the presence of tissue in the target area may comprise observing the substance flowing through ports near the target area.
In further embodiments, the method further comprising introducing an injectable enhanced visibility substance through the device. In such instances, assessing the presence of tissue in the target area may comprise observing the absence of a flow pattern of the enhanced visibility substance. In still further embodiments, the method further includes advancing a probe into the target area. In such instances, assessing the presence of the tissue in a target area may comprise determining a depth of the probe advancement. In some embodiments, the device includes a sensor which indicates the presence of tissue within the target area, wherein the method further comprises evaluating a signal from the sensor.
In another aspect of the present invention, methods are provided for adjusting the tissue grasped between the proximal and distal element. In some embodiments, the method comprises advancing a minimally invasive device having a proximal element and a distal element into a body cavity having a tissue, grasping the tissue between the proximal element and the distal element, and adjusting the tissue between the proximal element and the distal element. Adjusting may comprise applying suction to the tissue and moving the tissue by suction forces. When the device includes a secondary grasper, adjusting may comprise grasping and moving the tissue with the secondary grasper. When the device includes a rotating component which moves the tissue between the proximal and distal elements, adjusting may comprise rotating the rotating component. When the proximal element is moveable relative to the distal element, adjusting may comprise moving the proximal element relative to the distal element. Typically, the tissue comprises valve leaflets.
In another aspect of the present invention, methods are provided for temporarily stabilizing valve leaflets. In some embodiments, the method includes advancing a minimally invasive device into a chamber of a heart having a valve with valve leaflets, temporarily stabilizing the valve leaflets by reducing movement of the valve leaflets. When the chamber comprises the left atrium, the valve comprises the mitral valve, and the device includes a stabilizer, temporarily stabilizing may comprise positioning the stabilizer against the atrial side of the leaflets so as to reduce flail of the leaflets. In some embodiments, the stabilizer comprises an expandable member, a flap or at least one loop. When the device includes at least one loop, temporarily stabilizing may comprises positioning the at least one loop against the leaflets so as to reduce movement of the leaflets. In some embodiments, temporarily stabilizing further comprises moving the at least one loop along the leaflets toward the center of the valve so as to reduce movement of the leaflets. When the chamber comprises a ventricle including chordae extending from the ventricle to the valve leaflets, temporarily stabilizing may comprise holding the chordae with the device so as to reduce movement of the valve leaflets. When the device includes an expandable member, holding the chordae may comprise expanding the expandable member against the chordae. In some embodiments, temporarily stabilizing the valve leaflets comprises temporarily slowing the natural pace of the heart with a pacing instrument.
In a further aspect of the invention, a minimally invasive device is provided comprising at least one proximal element and at least one distal element configured for grasping tissue therebetween, and an indicator which indicates a presence or absence of tissue in a target area between the at least one proximal and distal elements. In some embodiments, the indicator comprises an enhanced visibility substance. For example, the enhanced visibility substance may be disposed on or within the at least one proximal and/or the at least one distal elements. The device may further comprise a reservoir within which the enhanced visibility substance is disposed. In some embodiments, the reservoir is configured to release at least a portion of the enhanced visibility substance due to the presence of tissue in the target area between the at least one proximal and distal elements. Alternatively or in addition, the reservoir may be configured to move locations due to the presence of tissue in the target area between the at least one proximal and distal elements. Or, the device may further comprise a conduit through which the enhanced visibility substance is injectable toward the target area.
In some embodiments, the indicator is configured to change shape and/or orientation based on a presence of tissue within the target area. For example, the indicator may be configured to extend into the target area in the absence of tissue within the target area and to change shape or orientation within the target area due to the presence of tissue within the target area. In some instances, the indicator comprises a floating block, a flap, a reservoir, a loop, a slackline, a probe, a detectable element, or a combination of any of these.
In other embodiments, the indicator comprises a sensor. Examples of sensors include a conductor, a strain gauge, a radiosensor, an optical sensor, an ultrasound sensor, a magnetic sensor, an electrical resistance sensor, an infrared sensor, an intravascular ultrasound sensor, a pressure sensor or a combination of any of these. Optionally, the indicator may be configured to contact the at least one distal element forming a closed circuit when the tissue is absent within the target area.
In another aspect of the present invention, a minimally invasive device is provided comprising at least one proximal element and at least one distal element configured for grasping tissue therebetween, and an adjustment element configured to adjust a position of the tissue between the at least one proximal and distal elements. In some embodiments, the adjustment element comprises a vacuum line configured to apply suction to the tissue to adjust the position of the tissue between the at least one proximal and distal elements. In other embodiments, the adjustment element comprises a secondary grasper configured to grasp the tissue to adjust the position of the tissue between the at least one proximal and distal elements. In still other embodiments, the adjustment element comprises a rotating component configured to move the tissue between the at least one proximal and distal elements. And, in yet other embodiments, the adjustment element is configured to adjust a position of the at least one proximal element so as to move the tissue in relation to the at least one distal element.
In a further aspect of the present invention, a minimally invasive device is provided comprising at least one proximal element and at least one distal element configured for grasping tissue therebetween, and a stabilizer configured to reduce movement of the tissue prior to grasping the tissue between the at least one proximal and distal elements. When the tissue comprises a leaflet of a mitral valve, the stabilizer may comprise an expandable member, a flap, an overtube or at least one loop configured to be positioned against an atrial side of the leaflets so as to reduce flail of the leaflets. For example, the stabilizer may comprise at least one loop which is moveable toward a center of the valve so as to reduce movement of the leaflet. When the tissue comprises a leaflet having chordae extending therefrom, the stabilizer may comprise an expandable member configured to hold the chordae upon expansion so as to reduce movement of the leaflet.
In another aspect of the present invention, a system is provided for assessing quality of fixation of a tissue within a body comprising a fixation device having at least one proximal element and at least one distal element configured for grasping tissue therebetween, a catheter having a proximal end, a distal end and a lumen therethrough, the catheter configured for endoluminal advancement through at least a portion of the body to the tissue, and a shaft removably coupled to the fixation device. The shaft is configured to pass through the lumen of the catheter, and at least a portion of the shaft is flexible to allow movement of the fixation device relative to the catheter while the tissue is grasped between the at least one proximal element and the at least one distal element. In some embodiments, the shaft comprises a compression coil. Thus, the system may further include a center actuation wire configured to extend through the compression coil so as to rigidify the coil during placement of the fixation device. Optionally, the system may include a sheath extendable over at least a portion of the flexible shaft so as to rigidify the shaft during placement of the fixation device. Such rigidifying elements are then removed to allow movement of the fixation device while the tissue is grasped to evaluate the desirability of the fixation.
In another aspect of the present invention, a method of fixing a pair of valve leaflets together along their coaptation line is provided. The method comprises fixing the pair of valve leaflets together at a first location along the coaptation line with a first fixation device, and fixing the pair of valve leaflets together at a second location along the coaptation line with a second fixation device, wherein the first and second locations differ. In some embodiments, the first and second locations are adjacent to each other. Or, the first and second locations may be spaced apart, such as approximately 1 cm apart. The first and second locations may be positioned so as to provide a single orifice, double orifice or triple orifice geometry, to name a few, when a pressure gradient opens the pair of valve leaflets.
In some embodiments, the first fixation device has a first pair of grasping elements and a second pair of grasping elements. Thus, fixing the pair of valve leaflets together at the first location may comprise grasping one leaflet of the pair of valve leaflets between the first pair of grasping elements and grasping another leaflet of the pair of valve leaflets between the second pair of grasping elements. And, fixing the pair of valve leaflets together at the second location may comprise grasping one leaflet of the pair of valve leaflets between the first pair of grasping elements of the second fixation device and grasping another leaflet of the pair of valve leaflets between the second pair of grasping elements of the second fixation device. In some embodiments, the method further comprises assessing performance of the valve leaflets after the step of fixing the pair of valve leaflets together at the first location to determine need for the step of fixing the pair of valve leaflets together at the second location.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description to follow, together with the accompanying drawings.
The present invention provides devices, systems and methods for stabilizing and grasping tissues such as valve leaflets, assessing the grasp of these tissues, approximating and fixating the tissues, and assessing the fixation of the tissues to treat cardiac valve regurgitation, particularly mitral valve regurgitation.
Grasping will preferably be atraumatic providing a number of benefits. By atraumatic, it is meant that the devices and methods of the invention may be applied to the valve leaflets and then removed without causing any significant clinical impairment of leaflet structure or function. The leaflets and valve continue to function substantially the same as before the invention was applied. Thus, some minor penetration or denting of the leaflets may occur using the invention while still meeting the definition of “atraumatic”. This enables the devices of the invention to be applied to a diseased valve and, if desired, removed or repositioned without having negatively affected valve function. In addition, it will be understood that in some cases it may be necessary or desirable to pierce or otherwise permanently affect the leaflets during either grasping, fixing or both. In addition, once a leaflet is grasped, it may be desirable to further incorporate leaflet tissue to ensure that the initial grasp will result in secure tissue fixation. Furthermore, it may be desirable once the leaflet is grasped to provide the user with feedback that sufficient leaflet is incorporated, and/or to provide the user an indication of the resulting placement, both prior to releasing the fixation device thereby allowing repositioning or correction of the placement if desired.
It may be appreciated that each the steps of stabilizing, grasping, approximating, fixating and assessing may be accomplished by a separate device or a plurality of steps may be accomplished by a single device. In some embodiments, all of the steps may be achieved by a single device. Further, in some embodiments, steps are provided by separate devices which approach the tissue from different directions. For example, when treating a mitral valve, some devices may use an atrial approach while other devices use a ventricular approach. Although a number of embodiments are provided to achieve these results, a general overview of the basic features will be presented herein. Such features are not intended to limit the scope of the invention and are presented with the aim of providing a basis for descriptions of individual embodiments presented later in the application.
I. Fixation Device Overview
Many of the devices, systems and methods of the present invention utilize or are utilized in conjunction with a preferred embodiment of a fixation device described herein and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,629,534 and U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/441,531, 11/130,818, 10/975,555, all of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. The fixation device is provided by an interventional tool that is positioned near a desired treatment site and used to grasp the target tissue. In endovascular applications, the interventional tool is typically an interventional catheter. In surgical applications, the interventional tool is typically an interventional instrument. In preferred embodiments, fixation of the grasped tissue is accomplished by maintaining grasping with a portion of the interventional tool which is left behind as an implant. While the invention may have a variety of applications for tissue approximation and fixation throughout the body, it is particularly well adapted for the repair of valves, especially cardiac valves such as the mitral valve.
Referring to
The fixation device 14 is releasably attached to the shaft 12 of the interventional tool 10 at its distal end. When describing the devices of the invention herein, “proximal” shall mean the direction toward the end of the device to be manipulated by the user outside the patient's body, and “distal” shall mean the direction toward the working end of the device that is positioned at the treatment site and away from the user. With respect to the mitral valve, proximal shall refer to the atrial or upstream side of the valve leaflets and distal shall refer to the ventricular or downstream side of the valve leaflets.
The fixation device 14 typically comprises proximal elements 16 (or gripping elements) and distal elements 18 (or fixation elements) which protrude radially outward and are positionable on opposite sides of the leaflets LF as shown so as to capture or retain the leaflets therebetween. The proximal elements 16 are preferably comprised of cobalt chromium, nitinol or stainless steel, and the distal elements 18 are preferably comprised of cobalt chromium alloy (such as Elgiloy®) or stainless steel, however any suitable materials may be used. The fixation device 14 is coupleable to the shaft 12 by a coupling mechanism 17. The coupling mechanism 17 allows the fixation device 14 to detach and be left behind as an implant to hold the leaflets together in the coapted position.
In some situations, it may be desired to reposition or remove the fixation device 14 after the proximal elements 16, distal elements 18, or both have been deployed to capture the leaflets LF. Such repositioning or removal may be desired for a variety of reasons, such as to reapproach the valve in an attempt to achieve better valve function, more optimal positioning of the device 14 on the leaflets, better purchase on the leaflets, to detangle the device 14 from surrounding tissue such as chordae, to exchange the device 14 with one having a different design, or to abort the fixation procedure, to name a few. To facilitate repositioning or removal of the fixation device 14 the distal elements 18 are releasable and optionally invertible to a configuration suitable for withdrawal of the device 14 from the valve without tangling or interfering with or damaging the chordae, leaflets or other tissue.
The valve leaflets are grasped between the distal elements 18 and proximal elements 16. In some embodiments, the proximal elements 16 are flexible, resilient, and cantilevered from coupling member 19. The proximal elements are preferably resiliently biased toward the distal elements. Each proximal element 16 is shaped and positioned to be at least partially recessed within the concavity of the distal element 18 when no tissue is present. When the fixation device 14 is in the open position, the proximal elements 16 are shaped such that each proximal element 16 is separated from the engagement surface 50 near the proximal end 52 of arm 53 and slopes toward the engagement surface 50 near the free end 54 with the free end of the proximal element contacting engagement surface 50, as illustrated in
Proximal elements 16 may include a plurality of openings 63 and scalloped side edges 61 to increase grip on tissue. The proximal elements 16 optionally include frictional accessories, frictional features or grip-enhancing elements to assist in grasping and/or holding the leaflets. In preferred embodiments, the frictional accessories comprise barbs 60 having tapering pointed tips extending toward engagement surfaces 50. It may be appreciated that any suitable frictional accessories may be used, such as prongs, windings, bands, barbs, grooves, channels, bumps, surface roughening, sintering, high-friction pads, coverings, coatings or a combination of these. Optionally, magnets may be present in the proximal and/or distal elements. It may be appreciated that the mating surfaces will be made from or will include material of opposite magnetic charge to cause attraction by magnetic force. For example, the proximal elements and distal elements may each include magnetic material of opposite charge so that tissue is held under constant compression between the proximal and distal elements to facilitate faster healing and ingrowth of tissue. Also, the magnetic force may be used to draw the proximal elements 16 toward the distal elements 18, in addition to or alternatively to biasing of the proximal elements toward the distal elements. This may assist in deployment of the proximal elements 16. In another example, the distal elements 18 each include magnetic material of opposite charge so that tissue positioned between the distal elements 18 is held therebetween by magnetic force.
The fixation device 14 also includes an actuation mechanism 58. In this embodiment, the actuation mechanism 58 comprises two link members or legs 68, each leg 68 having a first end 70 which is rotatably joined with one of the distal elements 18 at a riveted joint 76 and a second end 72 which is rotatably joined with a stud 74. The legs 68 are preferably comprised of a rigid or semi-rigid metal or polymer such as Elgiloy®, cobalt chromium or stainless steel, however any suitable material may be used. While in the embodiment illustrated both legs 68 are pinned to stud 74 by a single rivet 78, it may be appreciated, however, that each leg 68 may be individually attached to the stud 74 by a separate rivet or pin. The stud 74 is joinable with an actuator rod 64 (not shown) which extends through the shaft 12 and is axially extendable and retractable to move the stud 74 and therefore the legs 68 which rotate the distal elements 18 between closed, open and inverted positions. Likewise, immobilization of the stud 74 holds the legs 68 in place and therefore holds the distal elements 18 in a desired position. The stud 74 may also be locked in place by a locking feature.
In any of the embodiments of fixation device 14 disclosed herein, it may be desirable to provide some mobility or flexibility in distal elements 18 and/or proximal elements 16 in the closed position to enable these elements to move or flex with the opening or closing of the valve leaflets. This provides shock absorption and thereby reduces force on the leaflets and minimizes the possibility for tearing or other trauma to the leaflets. Such mobility or flexibility may be provided by using a flexible, resilient metal or polymer of appropriate thickness to construct the distal elements 18. Also, the locking mechanism of the fixation device (described below) may be constructed of flexible materials to allow some slight movement of the proximal and distal elements even when locked. Further, the distal elements 18 can be connected to the coupling mechanism 19 or to actuation mechanism 58 by a mechanism that biases the distal element into the closed position (inwardly) but permits the arms to open slightly in response to forces exerted by the leaflets. For example, rather than being pinned at a single point, these components may be pinned through a slot that allowed a small amount of translation of the pin in response to forces against the arms. A spring is used to bias the pinned component toward one end of the slot.
Proximal elements 16 are typically biased outwardly toward arms 53. The proximal elements 16 may be moved inwardly toward the shaft 12 and held against the shaft 12 with the aid of proximal element lines 90 which can be in the form of sutures, wires, nitinol wire, rods, cables, polymeric lines, or other suitable structures. The proximal element lines 90 may be connected with the proximal elements 16 by threading the lines 90 in a variety of ways. When the proximal elements 16 have a loop shape, as shown in
In the open position, the fixation device 14 can engage the tissue which is to be approximated or treated. This embodiment is adapted for repair of the mitral valve using an antegrade approach from the left atrium. The interventional tool 10 is advanced through the mitral valve from the left atrium to the left ventricle. The distal elements 18 are oriented to be perpendicular to the line of coaptation and then positioned so that the engagement surfaces 50 contact the ventricular surface of the valve leaflets, thereby grasping the leaflets. The proximal elements 16 remain on the atrial side of the valve leaflets so that the leaflets lie between the proximal and distal elements. In this embodiment, the proximal elements 16 have frictional accessories, such as barbs 60 which are directed toward the distal elements 18. However, neither the proximal elements 16 nor the barbs 60 contact the leaflets at this time.
The interventional tool 10 may be repeatedly manipulated to reposition the fixation device 14 so that the leaflets are properly contacted or grasped at a desired location. Repositioning is achieved with the fixation device in the open position. In some instances, regurgitation may also be checked while the device 14 is in the open position. If regurgitation is not satisfactorily reduced, the device may be repositioned and regurgitation checked again until the desired results are achieved.
It may also be desired to invert the fixation device 14 to aid in repositioning or removal of the fixation device 14.
Once the fixation device 14 has been positioned in a desired location against the valve leaflets, the leaflets may then be captured between the proximal elements 16 and the distal elements 18.
After the leaflets have been captured between the proximal and distal elements 16, 18 in a desired arrangement, the distal elements 18 may be locked to hold the leaflets in this position or the fixation device 14 may be returned to or toward a closed position.
It may be appreciated that the fixation devices 14 of the present invention may have any or all of the above described functions and features. For example, the fixation devices 14 may or may not be moveable to an inverted position. Or, the fixation devices 14 may or may not include proximal elements 16. Thus, the above described aspects of the fixation devices 14 are simply preferred embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.
II. Stabilization of Leaflets
A variety of devices and techniques are provided to stabilize the leaflets prior to grasping. Such stabilization is aimed to assist in effectively and efficiently grasping the leaflets thereby increasing the likelihood that the desired amount of leaflet will be incorporated into the fixation device without necessitating multiple grasps. It may be appreciated that the stabilization devices and techniques may be used in combination with the above described fixation device or may be used with any suitable grasping and/or fixing device. Further, many of such stabilization techniques and devices may be used to stabilize valve leaflets, or other tissues, for any purpose.
Typically in cases of mitral valve regurgitation, a portion of the leaflet LF is moving out of phase with the other leaflets or portions of the leaflets. This can occur due to an elongation or disconnection of the structures (chordae tendinae) holding the leaflets stable and in synchrony. Such a malfunction can lead to one leaflet or portion of a leaflet to swing or “flail” above the level of healthy coaptation, thereby allowing blood to regurgitate into the right atrium.
One or more stabilizing loops 100 may be advanced from the catheter 86 and positioned against the atrial side of the leaflets LF.
It may be appreciated that more than one loop 100 may be present to stabilize the leaflets; the loops may be concentric, adjacent to each other, in separate planes or in any suitable arrangement. For example,
It may be appreciated that in any of the embodiments described above, the loops may be extended to stabilize both leaflets or may be extended to stabilize one leaflet that is flailing. This may be achieved by orientation of the catheter 86, shape of the loop 100, amount of extension of the loop 100 or any other method. The embodiments illustrated in
One or more flaps 104 may extend radially outwardly from the catheter 86, as shown, and be positioned against the atrial side of the leaflets LF. The flaps 104 may be comprised of any suitable material such as metal, polymer, or fiber, and may have any suitable form such as a solid, a mesh, or a weave. Further, the flaps 104 may have any suitable shape and may include one or more cutouts 106. As shown in
One or more expandable members 110 may extend radially outwardly from the catheter 86, as shown, and be positioned against the atrial side of the leaflets LF. The expandable member 110 may be comprised of any suitable material such as silicone or polyurethane and may have any suitable form such as a balloon.
The above described embodiments focus on mechanically stabilizing the valve leaflets. Additional embodiments focus on stabilizing the valve leaflets by physiologically slowing the motion of the leaflets. This may be achieved by slowing the natural pace of the heart. In one embodiment, illustrated in
III. Grasping Assistance
To assist in effectively and efficiently grasping the leaflets, a variety of devices and techniques are provided. Many of the devices and techniques will be described as adjuncts to the fixation device described in relation to
In some situations, one or more leaflets LF are not grasped between the proximal elements 16 and distal elements 18 in a desired position. For example, a less than desired amount of the leaflet LF may be grasped. Such decreased purchase may, for example, reduce the effectivity of the regurgitation treatment and/or increase the risk of the leaflet LF slipping out of the fixation device. Once a portion of the leaflet LF is grasped, the leaflet LF position may be adjusted; for example, the leaflet LF may be “pulled in” or advanced toward the shaft 12 of the fixation device 14 to increase the purchase. Embodiments to assist in such adjustment are provided in
Similarly, as illustrated in
In other embodiments the pre-grasper 176 is separately advanced to the tissue to leaflets LF, such as by a different approach.
Thus, the fixation elements 190 may be linked, attached, coupled or joined together to hold the leaflets LF in the coapted position. It may be appreciated that any number of single-sided fixation elements 190 may be used, some or all of which may be joinable by one or more tethers 192. Further, it may be appreciated that at least one of the single-sided fixation elements 190 may be used to grasp tissues other than valve leaflets, such as chordae, to assist in treatment of the valve. For example, the elements 190 may join leaflet to leaflet, leaflet to papillary muscle, leaflet to chordae, etc. Still further, it may be appreciated that each of the single-sided fixation elements 190 may be deployed from opposite sides of the valve, such as from an atrial approach and a ventricular approach, and joined across the valve. Thus, one single-sided fixation element 190 may be deployed on an anterior side of the valve and one on a posterior side of the valve, the elements 190 then cinched together to correct regurgitation.
Once the leaflets have been grasped, a variety of features may assist in holding the grasped leaflets within the fixation device. For example,
In another example,
IV. Grasping Assessment
Once the tissue or leaflets have been grasped, it is often desired to evaluate or assess the quality of the grasp, such as the amount of purchase, orientation of the tissues, and likelihood that the fixation device will maintain the grasp over time. Thus, a variety of devices and techniques are provided to assess the grasp. It may be appreciated that the assessment devices and techniques may be used in combination with the above described fixation devices or may be used with any suitable grasping and/or fixing device. Further, many of such assessment devices and techniques may be used to assess grasping of valve leaflets, or other tissues, for any purpose.
One method of determining quality of grasp is to visualize the grasp by means of fluoroscopy, ultrasound, echocardiography or other known visualization techniques. Using these techniques, a physician or practitioner may be able to observe an image of the fixation device and the grasped tissue to determine if the grasp is desirable. The fixation device may be visually differentiated from the surrounding tissue by enhancing the visibility of portions of the surrounding tissue, particularly the tissue intended to be grasped, such as the valve leaflets. Thus, as illustrated in
Alternatively, portions of the fixation device may have enhanced visibility to differentiate the fixation device from the surrounding tissue. For example,
In some embodiments, the fixation device includes an ultrasound receiving indicator. The ultrasound receiving indicator is typically disposed along a proximal or distal element near a target area. The indicator is used to determine the presence or absence of tissue within the target area thereby assessing the quality of the grasp. The indicator comprises a chip or other device that resonates or vibrates at a specific ultrasonic frequency which differs from the general frequency used to visualize the remainder of the fixation device and the surrounding tissue. Therefore, when the specific ultrasonic frequency is used for visualization, the indicator provides a bright visual artifact on an echocardiogram image. This indicates that the tissue is not sufficiently grasped within the target area because the indicator is freely vibrating. However, if the tissue is compressed between the proximal and distal elements within the target area, the tissue compresses the indicator, reducing or damping the vibration of the indicator. Thus, if the bright visual artifact is not seen at the specific ultrasonic frequency, it may be determined that the tissue is sufficiently grasped within the target area of the fixation device. This allows the practitioner to actively evaluate the grasp by viewing a dynamic change in the image being viewed at the time of interrogation with the specific ultrasonic frequency.
Alternatively, the indicator may comprise a chip or other device that resonates at the same general frequency used to visualize the remainder of the fixation device and the surrounding tissue. When the general frequency is used for visualization, the indicator provides a bright visual artifact on an echocardiogram image. This indicates that the tissue is not sufficiently grasped within the target area because the indicator is freely vibrating. Again, if the tissue is compressed between the proximal and distal elements within the target area, the tissue compresses the indicator, reducing or damping the vibration of the indicator. Thus, if the bright visual artifact is not seen at the general ultrasonic frequency, it may be determined that the tissue is sufficiently grasped within the target area of the fixation device. This allows the practitioner to evaluate the grasp by viewing more static images of the echocardiogram. It may be appreciated that the above described ultrasound receiving indicators may both be used with real time ultrasonic images, however one allows evaluation of the grasp based on viewing a dynamic change in an image due to interrogation with a specific ultrasonic frequency and the other allows evaluation of the grasp based on viewing a more static image at a general ultrasonic frequency.
In other embodiments, the fixation device includes a magnetic indicator. The magnetic indicator is typically disposed along a proximal or distal element near a target area. The indicator is used to determine the presence or absence of tissue within the target area thereby assessing the quality of the grasp. The indicator comprises a device, such as a ball bearing, that is movable when a magnetic field is applied. Such a magnetic field may be locally applied, such as by a catheter, or globally applied, such as by magnetic resonance imaging. Movement of the indicator may be visualized by any suitable medium, such as fluoroscopy. Such movement indicates that the tissue is not sufficiently grasped within the target area because the indicator is freely movable. However, if the tissue is compressed between the proximal and distal elements within the target area, the tissue compresses the indicator, reducing or damping the movement of the indicator. Thus, if movement is reduced or not seen when the magnetic field is applied, it may be determined that the tissue is sufficiently grasped within the target area of the fixation device. This allows the practitioner to actively evaluate the grasp.
In other embodiments, the position of a grasped leaflet within a fixation device may be determined based on the visibility of frictional elements. Such frictional elements typically have an observable shape, such as barbs, and are coated or comprised of an enhanced visibility material.
In still other embodiments, the position of a grasped leaflet within a fixation device may be determined based the visible shape of the proximal elements 16. In such embodiments, the proximal elements 16 may be comprised of segmental parts separated by hinges or flexible areas 240, as illustrated in
In additional embodiments, the position of a grasped leaflet within a fixation device may be determined based the visibility of an indicator associated with the distal elements 18. For example,
Similarly, as illustrated in
In other embodiments, the position of one or more leaflets LF within the fixation device 14 may be determined or verified prior to releasing of the proximal elements 16. For example,
Alternatively, both the mini-grippers 263 and the proximal elements 16 may be deployed simultaneously. The proximal elements 16 may then be raised or released while the mini-grippers 263 remain deployed, thereby confirming whether the leaflets are still held by the mini grippers 263. If the mini-grippers 263 still hold the leaflets, it may be determined that the leaflets are adequately positioned within the fixation device 14 since such grasping indicates that the leaflets extend to a desired distance relative to the shaft 12. Once desired grasping of the leaflets is determined, the proximal elements 16, may be re-released to grasp the leaflets between the proximal and distal elements 16, 18. The mini-grippers 263 may remain in place or be removed.
In yet other embodiments, as illustrated in
In other embodiments, the position of a grasped leaflet within a fixation device may be determined based the visibility of a released substance which is visible under visualization techniques, such as liquid contrast material or bioabsorbable polymer beads having air bubbles trapped within. In one embodiment illustrated in
Another embodiment, illustrated in
It may also be appreciated that the above described lumen 270 and conduit 272 may alternatively be used to draw suction. When a leaflet LF covers the target area, as illustrated in
Similarly, an embodiment, illustrated in
Similarly, as illustrated in
In
In
In some embodiments, the fixation device includes one or more sensors to determine the position of a grasped tissue. Typically, the sensor determines the presence or absence of tissue on or near the sensor. For example,
It may also be appreciated that sensors may be used to actuate movement of the fixation device. For example, sensors in the form of strain gauges may be disposed on each of the distal elements. Engaging the distal elements with the leaflets applied tension to the distal elements which is measurable by the strain gauges. Therefore, when the strain gauges measure a predetermined quantity, the proximal elements may be automatically lowered to grasp the leaflets therebetween. It may be appreciated that the strain gauge measurements may be used to actuate a variety of other movements or simply indicate to the practitioner that such movements are acceptable.
V. Fixation Assessment
Once the quality of the grasp of the tissue has been assessed, it is often desired to evaluate or assess the quality of the fixation of the tissue. This can be achieved by evaluating the improvement in the medical condition being treated. In the case of valve leaflet fixation, improvement in regurgitation may be evaluated. It is often desired to assess the fixation prior to decoupling the fixation device from the delivery catheter so that the fixation device may be repositioned if the improvement is not satisfactory. Thus, a variety of devices and techniques are provided to assess the fixation prior to decoupling the fixation device from the delivery catheter. It may be appreciated that the assessment devices and techniques may be used in combination with the above described fixation devices or may be used with any suitable grasping and/or fixing device. Further, many of such assessment devices and techniques may be used to assess fixation for any purpose.
Similarly,
In other embodiments, the fixation device may be decoupled from the shaft while maintaining a tether, such as a suture line, to the catheter. This allows the fixation device 14 to be evaluated while it is decoupled from the shaft but provides assistance in retrieval of the fixation device for repositioning. The tether may be present specifically for this purpose, or other elements used in the positioning of the fixation device 14 may be used as a tether, such as a lock line 92 or a proximal element line 90. Alternatively, a snare may be extended from the catheter 86 to retrieve the fixation device 14. In any case, the fixation device may be retrieved with the tether, recounted with the shaft 12 and repositioned until a satisfactory result is achieved.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example, for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be obvious that various alternatives, modifications and equivalents may be used and the above description should not be taken as limiting in scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/279,523, filed Feb. 19, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/070,936, filed Nov. 4, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/239,514, filed Sep. 22, 2011, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/575,100, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,052,592, filed Oct. 7, 2009, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/237,213, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,635,329, filed Sep. 27, 2005 which claims the benefit and priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/613,867, filed Sep. 27, 2004, the full disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2097018 | Chamberlain | Oct 1937 | A |
2108206 | Meeker | Feb 1938 | A |
3296668 | Aiken | Jan 1967 | A |
3378010 | Codling et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3671979 | Moulopoulos | Jun 1972 | A |
3779108 | Reiter | Dec 1973 | A |
3874388 | King et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4007743 | Blake | Feb 1977 | A |
4056854 | Boretos | Nov 1977 | A |
4064881 | Meredith | Dec 1977 | A |
4112951 | Hulka et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4235238 | Ogiu et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4297749 | Davis | Nov 1981 | A |
4425908 | Simon | Nov 1984 | A |
4484579 | Meno et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4487205 | Di Giovanni et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4498476 | Cerwin et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4510934 | Batra | Apr 1985 | A |
4578061 | Lemelson | Mar 1986 | A |
4641366 | Yokoyama et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4686965 | Bonnet et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4691674 | Otsuka | Sep 1987 | A |
4700179 | Fancher | Oct 1987 | A |
4710727 | Rutt | Dec 1987 | A |
4777951 | Cribier et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4809695 | Gwathmey et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4850358 | Millar | Jul 1989 | A |
4917089 | Sideris | Apr 1990 | A |
4944295 | Gwathmey et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4969890 | Sugita et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4994077 | Dobben | Feb 1991 | A |
5015249 | Nakao et al. | May 1991 | A |
5019096 | Fox, Jr. et al. | May 1991 | A |
5042707 | Taheri | Aug 1991 | A |
5047041 | Samuels | Sep 1991 | A |
5049153 | Nakao et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5052407 | Hauser | Oct 1991 | A |
5061277 | Carpentier et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5069679 | Taheri | Dec 1991 | A |
5080179 | Gien | Jan 1992 | A |
5090558 | Hatouchi | Feb 1992 | A |
5100684 | El-Nokaly | Mar 1992 | A |
5108368 | Hammerslag et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5125758 | DeWan | Jun 1992 | A |
5171252 | Friedland | Dec 1992 | A |
5171259 | Inoue | Dec 1992 | A |
5190554 | Coddington et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195968 | Lundquist et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5209756 | Seedhom et al. | May 1993 | A |
5226429 | Kuzmak | Jul 1993 | A |
5226911 | Chee et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5234437 | Sepetka | Aug 1993 | A |
5250071 | Palermo | Oct 1993 | A |
5251611 | Zehel et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5254130 | Poncet et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5261916 | Engelson | Nov 1993 | A |
5275578 | Adams | Jan 1994 | A |
5282845 | Bush et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5304131 | Paskar | Apr 1994 | A |
5306283 | Conners | Apr 1994 | A |
5306286 | Stack et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5312415 | Palermo | May 1994 | A |
5314424 | Nicholas | May 1994 | A |
5318525 | West et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5320632 | Heidmueller | Jun 1994 | A |
5325845 | Adair | Jul 1994 | A |
5327891 | Rammler | Jul 1994 | A |
5330442 | Green et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5332402 | Teitelbaum | Jul 1994 | A |
5350397 | Palermo et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5350399 | Erlebacher et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5359994 | Kreuter et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5364352 | Cimino | Nov 1994 | A |
5368564 | Savage | Nov 1994 | A |
5368601 | Sauer et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5383886 | Kensey et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5403312 | Yates et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5403326 | Harrison et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5411552 | Anderson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417699 | Klein et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417700 | Egan | May 1995 | A |
5423857 | Rosenman et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5423858 | Bolanos et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5423882 | Jackman et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5431666 | Sauer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437551 | Chalifoux | Aug 1995 | A |
5437681 | Meade et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447966 | Hermes et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450860 | O'Connor | Sep 1995 | A |
5456400 | Shichman et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5456684 | Schmidt et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5462527 | Stevens-Wright et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5472044 | Hall et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476470 | Fitzgibbons, Jr. | Dec 1995 | A |
5477856 | Lundquist | Dec 1995 | A |
5478309 | Sweezer et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5478353 | Yoon | Dec 1995 | A |
5487746 | Yu et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5507725 | Savage et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507757 | Sauer et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5520701 | Lerch | May 1996 | A |
5522873 | Jackman et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527313 | Scott et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527321 | Hinchliffe | Jun 1996 | A |
5527322 | Klein et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5536251 | Evard et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5538504 | Linden et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540705 | Meade et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542949 | Yoon | Aug 1996 | A |
5554185 | Block et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562678 | Booker | Oct 1996 | A |
5569274 | Rapacki et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571085 | Accisano, III | Nov 1996 | A |
5571137 | Marlow et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5571215 | Sterman et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575802 | McQuilkin et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582611 | Tsuruta et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584803 | Stevens et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5593424 | Northrup, III | Jan 1997 | A |
5593435 | Carpentier et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5609598 | Laufer et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5618306 | Roth et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620452 | Yoon | Apr 1997 | A |
5626588 | Sauer et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634932 | Schmidt | Jun 1997 | A |
5636634 | Kordis et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5639277 | Mariant et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640955 | Ockuly et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649937 | Bito et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5662681 | Nash et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669917 | Sauer et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5690671 | McGurk et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695504 | Gifford, III et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695505 | Yoon | Dec 1997 | A |
5702825 | Keital et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706824 | Whittier | Jan 1998 | A |
5709707 | Lock et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713910 | Gordon et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5713911 | Racene et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5715817 | Stevens-Wright et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716367 | Koike et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719725 | Nakao | Feb 1998 | A |
5722421 | Francese et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725542 | Yoon | Mar 1998 | A |
5725556 | Moser et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5738649 | Macoviak | Apr 1998 | A |
5741280 | Fleenor | Apr 1998 | A |
5749828 | Solomon et al. | May 1998 | A |
5769812 | Stevens et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769863 | Garrison | Jun 1998 | A |
5772578 | Heimberger et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782845 | Shewchuk | Jul 1998 | A |
5797927 | Yoon | Aug 1998 | A |
5797960 | Stevens et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801999 | Satou | Sep 1998 | A |
5810847 | Laufer et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810849 | Kontos | Sep 1998 | A |
5810853 | Yoon | Sep 1998 | A |
5810876 | Kelleher | Sep 1998 | A |
5814029 | Hassett | Sep 1998 | A |
5820592 | Hammerslag | Oct 1998 | A |
5820631 | Nobles | Oct 1998 | A |
5823955 | Kuck et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823956 | Roth et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824065 | Gross | Oct 1998 | A |
5827237 | Macoviak et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829447 | Stevens et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833671 | Macoviak et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836955 | Buelna et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840081 | Anderson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843031 | Hermann et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843167 | Dwyer | Dec 1998 | A |
5849019 | Yoon | Dec 1998 | A |
5853422 | Huebsch et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855271 | Eubanks et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5855614 | Stevens et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860990 | Nobles et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868733 | Ockuly et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876399 | Chia et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879307 | Chio et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885271 | Hamilton et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891160 | Williamson, IV et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5916147 | Boury | Jun 1999 | A |
5928224 | Laufer | Jul 1999 | A |
5944733 | Engelson | Aug 1999 | A |
5947363 | Bolduc et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954732 | Hart et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957949 | Leonhard et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964223 | Baran | Oct 1999 | A |
5972020 | Carpentier et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972030 | Garrison et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980455 | Daniel et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989284 | Laufer | Nov 1999 | A |
6010516 | Hulka | Jan 2000 | A |
6015417 | Reynolds, Jr. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019722 | Spence et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6022360 | Reimels et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033378 | Lundquist et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6036699 | Andreas et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048351 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059757 | Macoviak et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060628 | Aoyama et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060629 | Pham et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063106 | Gibson | May 2000 | A |
6066146 | Carroll et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068628 | Fanton et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068629 | Haissaguerre et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077214 | Mortier et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6086600 | Kortenbach | Jul 2000 | A |
6088889 | Luther et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099553 | Hart et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102887 | Altman | Aug 2000 | A |
6110145 | Macoviak | Aug 2000 | A |
6117144 | Nobles et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117159 | Huebsch et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123699 | Webster, Jr. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126658 | Baker | Oct 2000 | A |
6132447 | Dorsey | Oct 2000 | A |
6136010 | Modesitt et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143024 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159240 | Sparer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162233 | Williamson, IV et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165164 | Hill et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165183 | Kuehn et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165204 | Levinson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168614 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171320 | Monassevitch | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182664 | Cosgrove | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187003 | Buysse et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190408 | Melvin | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203531 | Ockuly et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203553 | Robertson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206893 | Klein et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206907 | Marino et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210419 | Mayenberger et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6210432 | Solem et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6245079 | Nobles et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6267746 | Bumbalough | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267781 | Tu | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269534 | Mattmann et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6269819 | Oz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277555 | Duran et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283127 | Sterman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6283962 | Tu et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299637 | Shaolian et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306133 | Tu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312447 | Grimes | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319250 | Falwell et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322559 | Daulton et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332893 | Mortier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6352708 | Duran et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355030 | Aldrich et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358277 | Duran | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368326 | Dakin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6402780 | Williamson et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6402781 | Langberg et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406420 | McCarthy et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419669 | Frazier et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6461366 | Seguin | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464707 | Bjerken | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482224 | Michler et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485489 | Teirstein et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6508828 | Akerfeldt et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6533796 | Sauer et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537314 | Langberg et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540755 | Ockuly et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551331 | Nobles et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562037 | Paton et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6562052 | Nobles et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6575971 | Hauck et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585761 | Taheri | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599311 | Biggs et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6616684 | Vidlund et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6619291 | Hlavka et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626899 | Houser et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626930 | Allen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629534 | St. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641592 | Sauer et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656221 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669687 | Saadat | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6685648 | Flaherty et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689164 | Seguin | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6695866 | Kuehn et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701929 | Hussein | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702825 | Frazier et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702826 | Liddicoat et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709382 | Homer | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709456 | Langberg et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6718985 | Hlavka et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719767 | Kimblad | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6723038 | Schroeder et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726716 | Marquez | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6740107 | Loeb et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746471 | Mortier et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752813 | Goldfarb et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755777 | Schweich et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764510 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6767349 | Ouchi | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770083 | Seguin | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6773440 | Gannoe et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6797001 | Mathis et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6797002 | Spence et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6860179 | Hopper et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875224 | Grimes | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6926715 | Hauck et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6945978 | Hyde | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6949122 | Adams et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6966914 | Abe | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6986775 | Morales et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7004970 | Cauthen, III et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011669 | Kimblad | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7048754 | Martin et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7112207 | Allen et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7226467 | Lucatero et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7288097 | Seguin | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7381210 | Zarbatany et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7464712 | Oz et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7497822 | Kugler et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7527647 | Spence | May 2009 | B2 |
7533790 | Knodel et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7563267 | Goldfarb et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7563273 | Goldfarb et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7569062 | Kuehn | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7604646 | Goldfarb et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608091 | Goldfarb et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7635329 | Goldfarb et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
8459520 | Giordano | Jun 2013 | B2 |
10624640 | Dell | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10653427 | Goldfarb | May 2020 | B2 |
20010004715 | Duran et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010005787 | Oz et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010018611 | Solem et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010022872 | Marui | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010037084 | Nardeo | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039411 | Johansson et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044568 | Langberg et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020013571 | Goldfarb | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020022848 | Garrison et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026233 | Shaknovich | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035361 | Houser et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035381 | Bardy et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042651 | Liddicoat et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055774 | Liddicoat | May 2002 | A1 |
20020055775 | Carpentier et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058995 | Stevens | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077687 | Ahn | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087148 | Brock et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087169 | Brock et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087173 | Alferness et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103532 | Langberg et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107534 | Schaefer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123802 | Snyders | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147456 | Diduch et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156526 | Hilavka et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158528 | Tsuzaki et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161378 | Downing | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169360 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183766 | Seguin | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183835 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018329 | Hooven | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030050693 | Quijano et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069570 | Witzel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069593 | Tremulis et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069636 | Solem et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074012 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078654 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083742 | Spence et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105519 | Fasol et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105520 | Alferness et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120340 | Liska | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120341 | Shennib | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130669 | Damarati | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130730 | Cohn et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144697 | Mathis et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167071 | Martin et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030171776 | Adams et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187467 | Schreck | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195562 | Collier et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208231 | Williamson, IV et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229395 | Cox | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233038 | Hassett | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002719 | Oz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019377 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019378 | Hlavka et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024414 | Downing | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030382 | St. Goar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039442 | St. Goar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039443 | Solem et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044350 | Martin et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044365 | Bachman | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049207 | Goldfarb | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049211 | Tremulis | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073302 | Rourke et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078053 | Berg et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087975 | Lucatero | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088047 | Spence et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040092962 | Thorton et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093023 | Allen et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040097878 | Anderson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040097979 | Svanidze et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106989 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111099 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122448 | Levine | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127981 | Randert et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127982 | Machold et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127983 | Mortier et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133062 | Pai et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133063 | McCarthy et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133082 | Abraham-Fuchs et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133192 | Houser et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133220 | Lashinski et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133240 | Adams et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133273 | Cox | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138744 | Lashinski et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138745 | Macoviak et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148021 | Cartledge et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040152847 | Emri et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040152947 | Schroeder et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153124 | Whitman | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153144 | Seguin | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158123 | Jayaraman | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162610 | Laiska et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167539 | Kuehn et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186486 | Roue et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186566 | Hindrichs et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193191 | Starksen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215339 | Drasler et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220593 | Greenhalgh | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040220657 | Nieminen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225300 | Goldfarb et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236354 | Seguin | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243229 | Vidlund et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249452 | Adams et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249453 | Cartledge et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004583 | Oz et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004665 | Aklog | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004668 | Aklog et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021056 | St. Goer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021057 | St. Goer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021058 | Negro | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033446 | Deem et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038508 | Gabbay | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049698 | Bolling et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055089 | Macoviak et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059351 | Cauwels et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050149014 | Hauck | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159810 | Filsoufi | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177180 | Kaganov | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197694 | Pai et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197695 | Stacchino et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216039 | Lederman | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228422 | Machold et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228495 | Macoviak | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251001 | Hassett | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267493 | Schreck et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273160 | Lashinski et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287493 | Novak et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004247 | Kute et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015003 | Moaddes et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030866 | Schreck | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030867 | Zadno | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030885 | Hyde | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058871 | Zakay et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064115 | Allen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064116 | Allen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064118 | Kimblad | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089671 | Goldfarb et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089711 | Dolan | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060135993 | Seguin | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060184203 | Martin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195012 | Mortier et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060229708 | Powell et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060252984 | Randert et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070038293 | St.Goar | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070100356 | Lucatero et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118155 | Goldfarb et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129737 | Goldfarb et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070197858 | Goldfarb | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198082 | Kapadia et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080039935 | Buch et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051703 | Thorton et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051807 | St. Goar et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080097489 | Goldfarb et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080167714 | St. Goer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183194 | Goldfarb et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080208329 | Bishop | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090043381 | Macoviak | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090156995 | Martin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163862 | Kauphusman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163934 | Raschdorf, Jr. et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177266 | Powell et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198322 | Deem et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090270858 | Hauck et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090326567 | Goldfarb et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100016958 | St. Goer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100022823 | Goldfarb | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100204662 | Orlov | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20150257883 | Basude | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20180021134 | McNiven | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180126127 | Devereux | May 2018 | A1 |
20190261997 | Goldfarb | Aug 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3504292 | Jul 1986 | DE |
0 179 562 | Jul 1989 | EP |
0 558 031 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0 684 012 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0 727 239 | Aug 1996 | EP |
1 674 040 | Jun 2006 | EP |
2 768 324 | Mar 1999 | FR |
1 598 111 | Sep 1981 | GB |
2 151 142 | Jul 1985 | GB |
2-63478 | Mar 1990 | JP |
10-234653 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11-089937 | Apr 1999 | JP |
WO 8100668 | Mar 1981 | WO |
WO 9101689 | Feb 1991 | WO |
WO 9118881 | Dec 1991 | WO |
WO 9212690 | Aug 1992 | WO |
WO 9418881 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9418893 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9515715 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9614032 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9622735 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9630072 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9725927 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9726034 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9738748 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9739688 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9748436 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9807375 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9824372 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9830153 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9832382 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9835638 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9900059 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9907354 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9913777 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9966967 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0002489 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0003651 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0003759 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0012168 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0044313 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0059382 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0060995 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0100111 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0100114 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0103651 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0126557 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0126586 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0126587 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0126588 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0126703 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0128432 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0128455 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0147438 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0149213 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0150985 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0154618 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0156512 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0166001 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0170320 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0189440 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0195831 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0195832 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0197741 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0200099 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0201999 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0203892 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0234167 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 02060352 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02062263 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02062270 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02062408 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 03001893 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03003930 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03020179 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03028558 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03037171 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03047467 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03049619 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03073910 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03073913 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03105667 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004004607 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004012583 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004012789 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004014282 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004019811 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004030570 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004037317 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004045370 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004045378 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004045463 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004047679 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004062725 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004082523 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004082538 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093730 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004112585 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2004112651 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005002424 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005018507 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005027797 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005032421 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005062931 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005112792 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006105008 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2006105009 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2006115875 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006115876 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 11/237,213 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,635,329), filed Sep. 27, 2005 (Dec. 22, 2009). |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/575,100 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,052,592), filed Oct. 7, 2009 (Nov. 8, 2011). |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,514 (Abandoned), filed Sep. 22, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936 (Abandoned), filed Nov. 4, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/279,523 (US 2019-0175203), filed Feb. 19, 2019 (Jun. 13, 2019). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/237,213, Oct. 7, 2009 Issue Fee Payment. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/237,213, Sep. 23, 2009 Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/237,213, Aug. 5, 2009 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/237,213, Jul. 24, 2009 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/237,213, Sep. 24, 2008 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/237,213, Sep. 10, 2008 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/237,213, Jun. 30, 2008 Response to Restriction Requirement. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/237,213, Jun. 23, 2008 Restriction Requirement. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/575,100, Sep. 25, 2011 Issue Fee Payment. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/575,100, Jul. 26, 2011 Notice of Aloowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/575,100, May 2, 2011 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/575,100, Feb. 1, 2011 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/575,100, Nov. 9, 2010 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/575,100, Aug. 25, 2010 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,514, Mar. 12, 2014 Notice of Abandonment. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,514, Sep. 9, 2013 Applicant Initiated Interview Summary. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,514, Aug. 12, 2013 Advisory Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,514, Aug. 2, 2013 Response after Final Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,514, May 2, 2013 Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,514, Mar. 22, 2013 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,514, Sep. 26, 2012 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,514, Aug. 22, 2012 Response to Restriction Requirement. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,514, Jul. 23, 2012 Restriction Requirement. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Feb. 22, 2019 Notice of Abandonment. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Dec. 18, 2018 Patent Board Decision—Examiner Affirmed. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Jul. 14, 2017 Reply Brief Filed. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, May 16, 2017 Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Apr. 10, 2017 Appeal Brief Filed. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Feb. 6, 2017 Notice of Appeal Filed. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Aug. 8, 2016 Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Jul. 20, 2016 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Jun. 13, 2016 Applicant Initiated Interview Summary. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Apr. 25, 2016 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Dec. 9, 2015 Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Oct. 5, 2015 Advisory Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Sep. 28, 2015 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Jul. 9, 2015 Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Jun. 15, 2015 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Feb. 13, 2015 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Jan. 22, 2015 Response to Restriction Requirement. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,936, Nov. 25, 2014 Restriction Requirement. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/279,523, Apr. 2, 2021 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/279,523, Jan. 5, 2021 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/279,523, Oct. 5, 2020 Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/279,523, Sep. 2, 2020 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/279,523, Jun. 2, 2020 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/279,523, May 15, 2020 Response to Restriction/Election Requirement. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/279,523, Mar. 25, 2020 Restriction/Election Requirement. |
Abe et al., “De Vega's annuloplasty for acquired tricuspid disease: Early and late results in 110 patients,” Ann. Thorac. Surg. (Nov. 1989) 48:670-676. |
Abe et al., “Updated: De Vega's annuloplasty for acqiuried tricuspiddisease: Early and late results in patients,” Ann. Thorac. Surg. (Dec. 1996) 62:1876-1877. |
Agricola et al., “Mitral Valve Reserve in Double Orifice Technique: an Exercise Echocardiographic Study,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 11(5):637-643 (2002). |
Alfieri et al., “An Effective Technique to Correct Anterior Mitral Leaflet Prolapse,” J. Card Surg., 14:468-470 (1999). |
Alfieri et al., “Novel Suture Device for Beating Heart Mitral Leaflet Approximation,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 74:1488-1493 (2002). |
Alfieri et al., “The double orifice technique in mitral valve repair: a simple solution for complex problems,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 122:674-681 (2001). |
Alfieri et al., “The Edge to Edge Technique,” The European Association For Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 14th Annual Meeting, Frankfurt / Germany, Oct. 7-11, 2000, Post Graduate Courses, Book of Proceedings. |
Alfieri, “The Edge-to-Edge Repair of the Mitral Valve,” [Abstract] 6th Annual New Era Cardiac Care: Innovation & Technology, Heart Surgery Forum, (Jan. 2003) pp. 103. |
Alvarez et al., “Repairing the Degenerative Mitral Valve: Ten- to Fifteen-Year Follow-up,” J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Aug. 1996) 112:238-247. |
Arisi et al., “Mitral Valve Repair with Alfieri Technique in Mitral Regurgitation of Diverse Etiology: Early Echocardiographic Results,” Circulation Supplement II, 104(17):3240 (2001). |
Bach et al., “Early improvement in congestive heart failure after correction of secondary mitral regurgitation in end-stage cardiomyopathy,” Am. Heart J., (Jun. 1995) 129:1165-1170. |
Bach et al., “Improvement following correction of secondary mitrel regurgitation in end-stage cardiomyopathy with mitral annuloplasty,” Am. J. Cardiol., (Oct. 1996) 78:966-969. |
Bailey, “Mitral Regurgitation” in Surgery of the Heart, Chapter 20, pp. 686-737 (1955). |
Bernal et al., “The Valve Racket: a new and different concept of atrioventricular valve repair,” Eur. J. Cardio-thoracic Surgery 29:1026-1029 (2006). |
Bhudia et al., “Edge-to-Edge (Alfieri) Mitral Repair: Results in Diverse Clinical Settings,” Ann Thorac Surg, 77:1598-1606 (2004). |
Bhudia, #58 Edge-to-edge mitral repair: a versatile mitral repair technique, 2003 STS Presentation, [Abstract Only]. |
Bolling et al., “Surgery for acquired heart disease” (Apr. 1995) 109:676-683. |
Borghetti et al., “Preliminary observations on haemodynamics during physiological stress conditions following ‘double-orifice’ mitral valve repair,” European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 20:262-269 (2001). |
Castedo, “Edge-to-Edge Tricuspid Repair for Redeveloped Valve Incompetence after DeVega's Annuloplasty,” Ann Thora Surg., 75:605-606 (2003). |
Dec et al., “Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy,” N. Engl. J.Med. (Dec. 1994) 331:1564-1575. |
DERWENT citing German language patent EP 684012 published Nov. 12, 1995 for: “Thread for constructing surgical seam has flexible section with two ends, with lower fastening part on thread first end having hollow cylinder with continuous hole through which surgical needle threads,” 2 pgs. |
DERWENT citing Japanese language patent JP 11089937 published Jun. 14, 1999 for: “Catheter for mitral regurgitation test—includes jet nozzles provided on rear side of large diameter spindle shaped portion attached to end of narrow diametered tube” 1 pg. |
Dottori et al., “Echocardiographic imaging of the Alfieri type mitral valve repair,” Ital. Heart J., 2(4):319-320 (2001). |
Downing et al., “Beating heart mitral valve surgery: Preliminary model and methodology,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 123(6):1141-1146 (2002). |
Extended European Search Report issued in European Application No. 05805707.6 dated Aug. 7, 2012. |
Falk et al., “Computer-Enhanced Mitral Valve Surgery: Toward a Total Endoscopic Procedure,” Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 11(3):244-249 (1999). |
Filsoufi et al., “Restoring Optimal Surface of Coaptation With a Mini Leaflet Prosthesis: A New Surgical Concept for the Correction of Mitral Valve Prolapse,” Intl. Soc. for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery 1(4):186-87 (2006). |
Frazier et al., “Early Clinical Experience with an Implantable, Intracardiac Circulatory Support Device: Operative Considerations and Physiologic Implications,” http://www.sts.org/doc/7007 accessed on Sep. 24, 2008. |
Fucci et al., “Improved results with mitral valve repair using new surgical techniques”, Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. (Nov. 1995) 9:621-627. |
Fundaro et al., “Chordal Plication and Free Edge Remodeling for Mitral Anterior Leaflet Prolapse Repair: 8-Year Follow-up,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 72:1515-1519 (2001). |
Garcia-Rinaldi et al., “Left Ventricular Volume Reduction and Reconstruction is Ischemic Cardiomyopathy,” Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 14:199-210 (1999). |
Gateliene et al., “Early and late postoperative results of mitral and tricuspid valve insufficiency surgical treatment using edge-to-edge central coaptation procedure,” Medicina (Kaunas) 38(Suppl. 2):172-175 (2002). |
Gatti et al., “The edge to edge technique as a trick to rescue an imperfect mitral valve repair,” Eur. J. Cardiothorac Surg, 22:817-820 (2002). |
Gillinov et al., “Is Minimally Invasive Heart Valve Surgery a Paradigm for the Future?” Current Cardiology Reports, 1:318-322 (1999). |
Gundry et al., “Facile Mitral Valve Repair Utilizing Leaflet Edge Approximation: Midterm Results of the Alfieri Figure of Eight Repair,” The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, Scientific Session (May 1999). |
Gupta et al., “Influence of Older Donor Grafts on Heart Transplant Survival: Lack of Recipient Effects,” http://www.sts.org/doc/7007 accessed on Sep. 24, 2008. |
Ikeda et al., “Batista's Operation with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Mitral Valve Plasty for Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy,” The Japanese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 48:746-749 (2000). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/U505/34902, dated Jul. 23, 2008, 10 pages total. |
Izzat et al., “Early Experience with Partial Left Ventriculectomy in the Asia-Pacific Region,” Annuals of Thoracic Surgery, 67:1703-1707 (1999). |
Kallner et al., “Transaortic Approach for the Alfieri Stitch,” Ann Thorac Surg, 71:378-380 (2001). |
Kameda et al., “Annuloplasty for severe mitral regurgitation due to dilated cardiomyopathy,” Am. Thorac. Surg. (Jun. 1996) 61:1829-1832. |
Kavarana et al., “Transaortic Repair of Mitral Regurgitation,” The Heart Surgery Forum, #2000-2389, 3(1):24-28 (2000). |
Kaza et al., “Ventricular Reconstruction Results in Improved Left Ventricular Function and Amelioration of Mitral Insufficiency,” Annals of Surgery, 235(6):828-832 (2002). |
Khan et al. “Blade atrial septostomy: Experience with the first 50 procedures” Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. (Aug. 1991) 23: 257-262. |
Kherani et al., “The Edge-To-Edge Mitral Valve Repair: The Columbia Presbyterian Experience,” Ann. Thorac. Surg., 78:73-76 (2004). |
Konertz et al., “Results After Partial Left Ventriculectomy in a European Heart Failure Population,” Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 14:129-135 (1999). |
Kron et al., “Surgical Relocation of the Posterior Papillary Muscle in Chronic Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation,” Annals. Of Thoracic Surgery, 74:600-601 (2002). |
Kruger et al., “P73—Edge to Edge Technique in Complex Mitral Valve Repair,” Thorac Cardiovasc Surg., 48(Suppl. 1):106 (2000). |
Langer et al., “Posterier mitral leaflet extensions: An adjunctive repair option for ischemic mitral regurgitation?” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 131:868-877 (2006). |
Lorusso et al., “‘Double-Orifice’ Technique to Repair Extensive Mitral Valve Excision Following Acute Endocarditis,” J. Card Surg, 13:24-26 (1998). |
Lorusso et al., “The double-orifice technique for mitral valve reconstruction: predictors of postoperative outcome,” Eur J. Cardiothorac Surg, 20:583-589 (2001). |
Maisano et al., “The Double Orifice Repair for Barlow Disease: A Simple Solution for Complex Repair,” Circulation 100(18):1-94 (1999). |
Maisano et al., “The double orifice technique as a standardized approach to treat mitral regurgitation due to severe myxomatous disease: surgical technique,” European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 17:201-205 (2000). |
Maisano et al., “The edge-to-edge technique: A simplified method to correct mitral insufficiency,” Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., (Mar. 1998) 13:240-246. |
Maisano et al., “The hemodynamic effects of double-orifice valve repair for mitral regurgitation: a 3D computational model,” European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 15:419-425 (1999). |
Maisano et al., “Valve repair for traumatic tricuspid regurgitation,” Eur. J. Cardio-thorac Surg, 10:867-873 (1996). |
Mantovani et al., “Edge-to-edge Repair of Congenital Familiar Tricuspid Regurgitation: Case Report,” J. Heart Valve Dis., 9:641-643 (2000). |
McCarthy et al., “Partial left ventriculectomy and mitral valve repair for end-stage congestive heart failure,” European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 13:337-343 (1998). |
McCarthy et al., “Tricuspid Valve Reapir with the Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System,” Ann. Thorac.Surg., (Jul. 1997) 64:267-268. |
Moainie et al., “Correction of Traumatic Tricuspid Regurgitation Using the Double Orifice Technique,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 73:963-965 (2002). |
Morales et al., “Development of an Off Bypass Mitral Valve Repair,” The Heart Surgery Forum #1999-4693, 2(2):115-120 (1999). |
Nakanishi et al., “Early Outcome with the Alfieri Mitral Valve Repair,” J. Cardiol., 37:263-266 (2001) [Abstract in English; Article in Japanese]. |
Nielsen et al., “Edge-to-Edge Mitral Repair: Tension of the Approximating Suture and Leaflet Deformation During Acute Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation in the Ovine Heart,” Circulation, 104(Suppl. I):I-29-I-35 (2001). |
Noera et al., “Tricuspid Valve Incompetence Caused by Nonpenetrating Thoracic Trauma”, Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 51:320-322 (1991). |
Osawa et al., “Partial Left Ventriculectomy in a 3-Year Old Boy with Dilated Cardiomyopathy,” Japanese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surg, 48:590-593 (2000). |
Park et al., “Clinical use of a blade atrial septostomy” Circulation (Oct. 1978) 58:600-608. |
Patel et al., “Epicardial Atrial Defibrillation: Novel Treatment of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation,” http://www.sts.org/doc/7007 accessed on Sep. 23, 2008. |
Privitera et al., “Alfieri Mitral Valve Repair: Clinical Outcome and Pathology,” Circulation, 106:e173-e174 (2002). |
Redaelli et al., “A Computational Study of the Hemodynamics After ‘Edge-To-Edge’ Mitral Valve Repair,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 123:565-570 (2001). |
Reul et al., “Mitral Valve Reconstruction for Mitral Insufficiency,” Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, XXXIX(6):567-599 (1997). |
Ricchi et al., “Linear segmental annuloplasty for mitral valve repair” Ann. Thorac. Surg., (Jun. 1997) 63:1805-1806. |
Robicsek et al., “The Bicuspid Aortic Valve. How Does It Function? Why Does It Fail,” http://www.sts.org/doc/7007 accessed on Sep. 24, 2008. |
Tager et al., “Long-term follow-up of rheumatic patients undergoing left-sided valve replacement with tricuspid annuloplasty—Validity of preoperative echocardiographic criteria in the decision to perform tricuspid annuloplasty,” Am. J. Cardiol., (Apr. 1998) 81:1013-1016. |
Tamura et al., “Edge to Edge Repair for Mitral Regurgitation in a Patient with Chronic Hemodialysis: Report of A Case,” Kyobu Geka. The Japanese Journal of Thoracic Surgery, 54(9):788-790 (2001). |
Tibayan et al., “Annular Geometric Remodeling in Chronic Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation,” http://www.sts.org/doc/7007 accessed on Sep. 24, 2008. |
Timek et al., “Edge-to-edge mitral repair: gradients and three-dimensional annular dynamics in vivo during inotropic stimulation,” Eur J. of Cardiothoracic Surg., 19:431-437 (2001). |
Timek, “Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair without Annuloplasty Ring in Acute Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation,” [Abstract] Clinical Science, Abstracts from Scientific Sessions, 106(19):2281 (2002). |
Totaro, “Mitral valve repair for isolated prolapse of the anterior leaflet: an 11-year follow-up,” European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 15:119-126 (1999). |
Uchida et al., “Percutaneous cardiomyotomy and valvulotomy with angioscopic guidance,” Am. Heart J., (Apr. 1991) 121:1221-1224. |
Umana et al., “‘Bow-tie’ Mitral Valve Repair Successfully Addresses Subvalvular Dysfunction in Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation,” Surgical Forum, XLVIII:279-280 (1997). |
Umana et al., “Bow-tie mitral valve repair: An Adjuvant technique for ischemic regurgitation” Ann. Thorac. Surg., (Nov. 1998) 66:1640-1646. |
Votta et al., “3-D Computational Analysis of the Stress Distribution on the Leaflets after Edge-to-Edge Repair of Mitral Regurgitation,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 11:810-822 (2002). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200323549 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60613867 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11237213 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 12575100 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16279523 | Feb 2019 | US |
Child | 16912361 | US | |
Parent | 14070936 | Nov 2013 | US |
Child | 16279523 | US | |
Parent | 13239514 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 14070936 | US | |
Parent | 12575100 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 13239514 | US |