The present invention relates generally to the surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, and more particularly, to the use of implants to prevent pharyngeal wall collapse or to provide altered airway geometries to prevent possible airway obstruction during sleep.
Several forms of sleep apnea have been identified. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is caused by a blockage of the airway, usually when the soft tissue in the throat collapses and closes during sleep. Less common forms of sleep apnea include central sleep apnea (CSA), wherein the airway is not blocked but the brain fails to signal the muscles to breathe, and mixed apnea which, as the name implies, is a combination of OSA and CSA.
As shown in
With each apnea event, the brain briefly arouses the sleeping person in order to resume breathing, but sleep is consequently extremely fragmented and of poor quality. Untreated, sleep apnea can cause high blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, memory problems, weight gain, impotency, and headaches. Moreover, untreated sleep apnea may be responsible for job impairment, motor vehicle crashes, and marital discord.
According to the National Institutes of Health, sleep apnea is very common, as common as adult diabetes, and affects more than twelve million Americans. The factors that increase the risk of having OSA include being male, overweight, and over the age of forty, but sleep apnea can strike anyone at any age, even children. Because of the lack of awareness by the public and healthcare professionals, the vast majority of patients remain undiagnosed and therefore untreated, despite the fact that this serious disorder can have significant consequences.
Attempts to provide an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea have yielded unsatisfactory results. For example, electrical stimulation of the soft palate has been suggested to treat snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Such a teaching is found in Schwartz et al., “Effects of electrical stimulation to the soft palate on snoring and obstructive sleep apnea,” J. Prosthetic Dentistry, pp. 273-281 (1996). Devices to apply electrical stimulation are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,284,161 and 5,792,067. Electrical stimulation to treat sleep apnea is also discussed in Wiltfang et al., “First results on daytime submandibular electrostimulation of suprahyoidal muscles to prevent night-time hypopharyngeal collapse in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome,” International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, pp. 21-25 (1999). Such devices are appliances requiring patient adherence to a regimen of use as well as subjecting the patient to discomfort during sleep and repeated arousals during deep sleep.
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) has recently been adopted as a useful, albeit cumbersome, means of preventing sleep apnea. CPAP delivers air into the airway through a specially designed nasal mask or pillows. The mask does not breathe for the patient; the flow of air creates enough pressure when the patient inhales to keep the airway open. In effect, a pneumatic splint is formed in the airway. CPAP is considered the most effective non-surgical treatment for the alleviation of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Compliance, however, is only 50%, as patients complain about discomfort from the mask, hoses, etc. and that the equipment requires maintenance. Additionally, patients complain of discomfort such as bloating, nasal drying, and dry eyes.
Surgical treatments have also been employed. One such treatment is uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP). UPPP is discussed, for example, in Harries et al., “The surgical treatment of snoring,” Journal of Laryngology and Otology, pp. 1105-1106 (1996), which describes removal of up to 1.5 cm of the soft palate. The use of UPPP in the treatment of snoring is assessed in Cole et al., “Snoring: A review and a Reassessment,” Journal of Otolaryngology, pp. 303-306 (1995). In that procedure, about 2 cm of the trailing edge of the soft palate is removed through the use of a scalpel, laser or other surgical instrument, thereby reducing the tendency of the soft palate to flutter between the tongue and the pharyngeal wall of the throat. The procedure is frequently effective to alleviate snoring but has demonstrated limited effectiveness in moderate or severe apnea. The procedure is painful and frequently results in undesirable side effects. In particular, the reduction of the soft palate compromises the ability of the soft palate to seal off nasal passages during swallowing and speech. In an estimated 25% of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty patients, fluid escapes from the mouth into the nose while drinking.
Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) may involve lasting discomfort. For example, scar tissue on the soft palate may present a continuing irritant to the patient. In addition, UPPP is not reversible and may induce adverse side effects not justified by the benefits of the surgery. Furthermore, UPPP is targeted to the correction of deficiencies associated with the palate only and does not address issues associated with the collapse of the tongue and lateral pharyngeal walls.
Radiofrequency ablation of the soft palate, or SomnoplastySM, is similar in concept to the Laser Assisted Uvulopalotopharyngoplasty (LAUP), although a different energy source is used, and thermal lesions are produced within the tissues, rather than using a laser to ablate the tissue surface. For that reason, radiofrequency ablation appears to be growing in popularity as an alternative to LAUP. The SomnoplastySM device is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for radiofrequency ablation of palatal tissues for simple snoring and radiofrequency ablation of the base of the tongue for OSA. In some situations, radiofrequency ablation of the soft palate and base of tongue are performed together as a multi-level procedure. To date, the treatments alone or in combination have failed to provide relief to more than 50% of patients.
Another device intended to treat snoring or obstructive sleep apnea is comprised of several braided PET cylinders that are implanted to make the tissues of the tongue or uvula more rigid and less prone to deflection against the pharyngeal wall. The Pillar™ Palatal Implant System, marketed by Restore Medical of St Paul, Minn., is an implantable device that has been cleared by the FDA 510(k) process. The device is a cylindrical-shaped segment of braided polyester filaments that is permanently implanted submucosally in the soft palate. The labeled indication of the device is as follows: “The Pillar™ Palatal Implant System is intended for the reduction of the incidence of airway obstructions in patients suffering from mild to moderate OSA (obstructive sleep apnea).” The device has been associated with a number of adverse side effects, including extrusion, infection, and patient discomfort.
The Repose™ device, marketed by Influent Medical LLC of Concord, N.H., involves the use of a titanium screw that is inserted into the posterior aspect of the mandible at the floor of the mouth. A loop of suture is passed through the tongue base and attached to the mandibular bone screw. The Repose™ procedure achieves a suspension or hammock of the tongue base making it less likely for the base of the tongue to collapse against the posterior pharyngeal wall during sleep. The reported duration of beneficial effects afforded by the implant is less than a year. Due to the high activity of the tongue during wakefulness, the suture component of this device has been shown in some cases to act as a “cheese cutter” to the tongue, causing device failure and requiring subsequent removal.
Magnets have also been considered as implants for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. These devices are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. One serious complication than can potentially occur with these implants is implant migration or flipping of the magnets which can cause acute airway closure.
In summary, electrical stimulation of the musculature within the airway is ineffective since it arouses the patient from deep sleep. CPAP effectively manages OSA but has a very low patient compliance (less than 50% of patients continue the treatment). Surgical techniques and implants have also been evaluated, yet still do not provide a satisfactory and lasting solution. No one device seems capable of treating the multi-causal problem of obstructive sleep apnea. What is needed are methods and devices that reduce the burden of managing obstructive sleep apnea through a minimally invasive approach that provides long term and effective results. Ideally, the treatment should be adjustable and removable if necessary. The inventions described herein provide such treatments that offer long-term relief of OSA.
The present invention is directed to systems and methods for treating obstructive sleep apnea. One embodiment of the invention is a method for surgically treating obstructive sleep apnea, comprising the step of implanting a device into tissue space located beneath a pharyngeal wall to alter a shape of the pharyngeal wall. In one embodiment, the device retracts or alters the shape of the pharyngeal wall to resist collapse. In another embodiment, the device alters the geometry of the airway to prevent complete obstruction of the pharyngeal tissues during sleep.
The device is a retractor that has a self-supporting tissue engaging element that controls the position of the soft tissues beneath the pharyngeal wall during sleep and allows for tissue ingrowth. The tissue engaging element may, for example, be a biocompatible mesh or other suitable porous fabric. The tissue engaging element may be made through typical processing means including, but not limited to, fiber knitting, weaving, braiding, non-woven production, expansion methods (such as ePTFE) or perforation of film type products, melt blowing, extrusion, carding, or injection molding. The retractor is generally of a “sheet like” or planar shape, with the width, length and thickness dimensions of the retractor typically not equal.
The retractor may be introduced orally and implanted through the pharyngeal wall into the tissue beneath the pharyngeal wall. The retractor may alternatively be introduced through a side of a patient's neck. The retractor is placed within the soft tissues of the neck, either within tissue planes or crossing them, as deemed appropriate by the surgeon to produce sufficient refraction or alteration of the lumen of the affected region of the airway.
One embodiment of the invention is a device for altering a shape of a pharyngeal wall by implantation of the device in tissue beneath the pharyngeal wall. The device comprises a retracting element having a constrained configuration and an unconstrained configuration different from the constrained configuration, and a tissue engaging element connected to the retracting element, the tissue engaging element adapted for engaging the tissue beneath the pharyngeal wall. A shape of the pharyngeal wall is altered when the retracting element reverts from the constrained configuration to the unconstrained configuration.
Another embodiment of the invention is a method for surgically treating obstructive sleep apnea. The method includes the steps of delivering an implantable device into tissue located beneath a pharyngeal wall, and engaging the tissue beneath the pharyngeal wall with the implantable device to alter a shape of the pharyngeal wall.
The invention is further embodied by a system for treating obstructive sleep apnea by altering a shape of a pharyngeal wall. The system comprises an implantable device including a tissue engaging element and a retracting element, and a hand-held delivery system comprising a hand-piece, an actuating lever moveably connected to the hand-piece, a shaft extending distally from the hand-piece, a housing disposed at a distal end of the shaft for storing at least one implantable device, and a deployment device activatable by the lever for deploying the implantable device through the pharyngeal wall into tissue space located beneath the pharyngeal wall so as to alter a shape of the pharyngeal wall.
Another embodiment of the invention is a device for retracting a pharyngeal wall. The device includes an elongate fibrous member having a central portion for engagement with the pharyngeal wall, and having first and second retracting portions extending from the central portion, each of the first and second retracting portions having features for engaging tissue in the neck and exerting a tensile retraction force on the central portion.
a and 1b are schematic cross-sectional representations of a patient's upper airway.
a is a cross-sectional view of a pharyngeal wall showing several superimposed states of the wall.
b is a cross-sectional view of a pharyngeal wall showing two pharyngeal retractors implanted according to one embodiment of the invention.
a-6f are views of several pharyngeal retractors according to various embodiments of the invention.
a is a schematic cross-sectional representation of a patient's upper airway showing two pharyngeal retractors during an implantation process according to one embodiment of the invention.
b is a schematic cross-sectional representation of a patient's upper airway showing the two pharyngeal retractors of
a is a schematic cross-sectional representation of a patient's upper airway showing two pharyngeal retractors during an implantation process according to another embodiment of the invention.
b is a schematic cross-sectional representation of a patient's upper airway showing the two pharyngeal retractors of
The present invention is directed to a device and method of implantation that can be used to treat obstructive sleep apnea. The device can be implanted into tissue beneath the pharyngeal wall using several implantation methods described herein. The term “beneath the pharyngeal wall” refers to a space beneath the pharyngeal wall that does not exist naturally but is formed during the implantation step. The newly formed space allows the device to be implanted next to the back of the pharyngeal wall (the side that does not face the airway) and against the prevertebral fascia and musculature such as the longus capitus muscles. The device, referred to herein as a retractor or simply as the “device,” may include a flexible backing or arch-shaped retracting element attached to a tissue engaging element. The device is used to alter a characteristic of the pharyngeal wall. For example, the device may provide additional retraction means on the lateral pharyngeal walls or maintain an altered shape of the airway. The device of the invention provides retraction or support of the pharyngeal walls to allow air to flow past any obstruction that may be apparent if the pharyngeal walls are collapsed. It may also be used to change the shape of the pharyngeal airway.
a illustrates a cross-section of the pharynx at the oropharyngeal level, including the posterior pharyngeal wall (PPW) and lateral pharyngeal walls (LPW). The oropharynx is shown in solid lines in its distended (retracted) state, and is shown in dashed lines in a normal relaxed state and in a partially collapsed state. As shown in
One embodiment of the invention is an implantable device that is releasably attached to at least one trocar.
The trocar 400 may optionally have a Doppler probe (not shown) that allows detection of blood flow in any arterial structures located near the target tissues. The probe may be embedded within the distal tip 401 so as to help navigate the tissue and avoid damaging blood vessels, particularly when an approach is utilized whereby the implantable device is installed across multiple tissue planes within the affected regions of the neck.
In addition to the minimally invasive approach using a trocar, the device may alternatively be placed beneath the pharyngeal wall using an open, direct approach to the pharyngeal wall from the side of a patient's neck. A single device or more than one of the devices can be used to treat the patient.
In the embodiment shown, the implantable device 500 is covered by a protective sheath 501. Polymers such as expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), polyethylene terephalate (PET), PVDF, polyesters, polyolefins, silicones or polyurethanes are utilized in the construction of the protective sheath. The materials and construction techniques of the protective sheath are chosen so as to minimize friction and engagement of the sheath with surrounding tissue. The purpose of the protective sheath 501 is to minimize tissue drag on the implantable device during insertion and to prevent any abrasion or irritation of non-target tissues during placement of the device.
In use, the distal end 401 (
a illustrates one embodiment of an implantable device according to the invention. The device comprises a tissue engaging element shown in
The biocompatible tissue engaging element 600 is further receptive to tissue ingrowth in the form of scar tissue that embeds during healing and becomes integrated with the mesh. That scar tissue reinforces the overall tissue mass in which the tissue engaging element is implanted. The element may encourage structural ingrowth of surrounding tissue, and may also encourage cellular ingrowth of tissue.
Many medical textile designs are known to those skilled in the art of making mesh, fabrics, non-wovens, etc. for hernia repair. Medical textile products are based on fabrics, of which there are four types: woven, knitted, braided, and nonwoven. The first three of these are made from yarns, whereas the fourth can be made directly from fibers, or even from polymers such as Gore-Tex®-based products or electrostatically spun materials from polyurethane. There is, therefore, a hierarchy of structure: the performance of the final textile product is affected by the properties of polymers whose structures are modified at between two and four different levels of organization.
Of the many different types of polymers, only a few can be made into useful fibers. This is because a polymer must meet certain requirements before it can be successfully and efficiently converted into a fibrous product. For example, the polymer chains should be linear, long, and flexible. Side groups of the polymers should be simple, small, or polar. Polymers should be dissolvable or meltable for extrusion. Chains should be capable of being oriented and crystallized.
Common fiber-forming polymers include cellulosics (linen, cotton, rayon, acetate), proteins (wool, silk), polyamides, polyester (PET), olefins, vinyls, acrylics, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), aramids (Kevlar, Nomex), and polyurethanes (Lycra, Pellethane, Biomer). Each of these materials is unique in chemical structure and potential properties. For example, among the polyurethanes is an elastomeric material with high elongation and elastic recovery, whose properties nearly match those of elastin tissue fibers. This material—when extruded into fiber, fibrillar, or fabric form—derives its high elongation and elasticity from alternating patterns of crystalline hard units and noncrystalline soft units.
Although several of the materials mentioned above are used in traditional textile as well as medical applications, various polymeric materials—both absorbable and nonabsorbable—have been developed specifically for use in medical products.
The reactivity of tissues in contact with fibrous structures varies among materials and is governed by both chemical and physical characteristics. Absorbable materials typically excite greater tissue reaction, a result of the nature of the absorption process itself. Among the available materials, some are absorbed faster (e.g., polyglycolic acid, polyglactin acid) and others more slowly (e.g., polyglyconate). Semiabsorbable materials such as cotton and silk generally cause less reaction, although the tissue response may continue for an extended time. Nonabsorbable materials (e.g., nylon, polyester, polypropylene) tend to be inert and to provoke the least reaction. To minimize tissue reaction, the use of catalysts and additives is carefully controlled in medical-grade products.
As discussed, of the many types of polymers, only a few can be made into useful fibers that can then be converted into medical textile products. To make fibers, polymers are extruded by wet, dry, or melt spinning and then processed to obtain the desired texture, shape, and size. Through careful control of morphology, fibers can be manufactured with a range of mechanical properties. Tensile strength can vary from textile values (values needed for use in typical textile products such as apparel) of 2-6 g/d (gram/denier) up to industrial values (values typical of industrial products such as tire cords or belts) of 6-10 g/d. For high-performance applications, such as body armor or structural composites, novel spinning techniques can produce fibers with strengths approaching 30 g/d. Likewise, breaking extension can be varied over a broad range, from 10-40% for textile to 1-15% for industrial and 100-500% for elastomeric fibers.
Fibers or filaments are converted into yarns by twisting or entangling processes that improve strength, abrasion resistance, and handling. Yarn properties depend on those of the fibers or filaments as well as on the angle of twist. Yarns are interlaced into fabrics by various mechanical processes, including weaving, knitting, and braiding. There are three prevalent fabric structures used for medical implants or sutures: woven, in which two sets of yarns are interlaced at right angles; knitted, in which loops of yarn are intermeshed; and braided, in which three or more yarns cross one another in a diagonal pattern. Knitted fabrics can be either weft or warp knit, and braided products can include tubular structures, with or without a core, as well as ribbon.
There are also numerous medical uses for nonwoven fabrics (wipes, sponges, dressings, gowns), made directly from fibers that are needle-felted, hydroentangled, or bonded through a thermal, chemical, or adhesive process. Nonwovens may also be made directly from a polymer. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) products such as sutures and arterial grafts and electrostatically spun polyurethane used as tubular structures are examples of medical applications of polymer-to-fabric nonwovens.
The properties of fabrics depend on the characteristics of the constituent yarns or fibers and on the geometry of the formed structure. Whether a fabric is woven, knitted, braided, or nonwoven will affect its behavior. Fabrics that are woven are usually dimensionally very stable but less extensible and porous than the other structures. One disadvantage of wovens is their tendency to unravel at the edges when cut squarely or obliquely for implantation. However, the stitching technique known as a Leno weave—in which two warp threads twist around a weft—can substantially alleviate this fraying or unraveling.
Compared with woven fabrics, weft-knitted structures are highly extensible, but they are also dimensionally unstable unless additional yarns are used to interlock the loops and reduce the extension while increasing elastic recovery. Warp-knitted structures are extremely versatile, and can be engineered with a variety of mechanical properties matching those of woven fabrics. The major advantage of knitted materials is their flexibility and inherent ability to resist unraveling when cut. A potential limitation of knitted fabrics is their high porosity, which—unlike that of woven fabrics—cannot be reduced below a certain value determined by the construction. As a result, applications requiring very low porosity usually incorporate woven materials.
Typically employed in cords and sutures, braided structures can be designed using several different patterns, either with or without a core. Because the yarns criss-cross each other, braided materials are usually porous and may imbibe fluids within the interstitial spaces between yarns or filaments. To reduce their capillarity, braided materials are often treated with a biodegradable (polylactic acid) or nonbiodegradable (Teflon®) coating. Such coatings also serve to reduce chatter or noise during body movement, improve hand or feel, and help position suture knots that must be transported by pressure from a surgeon's finger from outside the body to the wound itself.
The properties of nonwoven fabrics are determined by those of the constituent polymer or fiber and by the bonding process. For instance, expanded PTFE products can be formed to meet varying porosity requirements. Because of the expanded nature of their microstructure, these materials compress easily and then expand—a suture, for example, can expand to fill the needle hole made in a tissue—allowing for tissue ingrowth in applications such as arterial and patch grafts. Polyurethane-based nonwovens produce a product that resembles collagenous material in both structure and mechanical properties, particularly compliance (extension per unit pressure or stress). The porosity of both PTFE- and polyurethane-derived nonwovens can be effectively manipulated through control of the manufacturing processes.
In one embodiment of the invention, the tissue engaging element utilized in the implantable device is fabricated by warp knitting a monofilament polypropylene yarn that is approximately 3 to 6 mils in diameter. In one exemplary embodiment, the yarn is 3.5 mils in diameter. In this embodiment, the knitted mesh preferably has 40-80 courses per inch and 7-11 wales per inch. Other designs of medical textiles may also be used.
In addition to the polymeric fibers described above, non-polymeric fibers may be used in constructing woven, braided, knitted and non-woven fabrics for use in the invention. For example, nitinol or stainless steel fibers may be used alone or in combination with other fibers such as polymeric fibers to construct a tissue engaging element having altered retraction properties.
A perforated film-type product (not shown) may alternatively be used in fabricating the tissue engaging element. In that embodiment, a polymer film is perforated with a plurality of holes to engage tissue and to allow tissue ingrowth. The size and spacing of the holes may be optimized for those functions. Further, the size and spacing of the holes may be varied over the film to promote greater tissue engagement in certain locations on the film.
The tissue engaging element may comprise a film having other types of tissue engaging features, alone or in combination with perforations. For example, the film may comprise corrugations, dimples, knurling or other embossed, molded or machined relief patterns that engage tissue that is pressed against the tissue engaging element. Full or partial perforations may include raised edges that engage surrounding tissue.
A retracting element shown in
In another embodiment, the retracting element may be substantially non-flexible. A non-flexible retracting element may be fabricated from titanium, stainless steel or ceramic. An implantable device including a non-flexible retracting element may be used to maintain a shape of a pharyngeal wall to prevent collapse.
A retracting element 601 may be attached to a tissue engaging element 600, as shown in
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the tissue engaging element, the retracting element, or both can be at least partially fabricated from resorbable synthetic polymers such as polylactide, polyglactide, polydioxanone, polycaprolactone, or co-polymers thereof. The long-term shape of the soft tissue is provided through the presence of the tissue formed around and through the tissue engaging element as the absorbable component of the implant is resorbed.
d-6f are cross-sectional views through several embodiments of a implantable device of the invention incorporating both a mesh tissue engaging element and an arch-shaped retracting element.
Alternatively, as shown in
In the embodiment shown in
Optionally, image-enhancing substances such as radio-opaque or ultrasonically sensitive materials can be layered onto any of the surfaces of the pharyngeal retractor to aid in imaging of the device during and after deployment. In another embodiment, anti-microbial agents such as triclosan or antibiotics, or pain management medicaments are applied or coated to one or more surfaces of the components that comprise the pharyngeal refractor prior to deployment. Alternatively, the agents may be included in the polymers during the fabrication processes through extrusion, blending, casting, solvent mixing or other typical polymer processing means. The agents may be included within an absorbable component to provide controlled or profiled release of the substances during wound healing.
Orientation of the implantable device in the patient may be selected depending on the particular patient anatomy. For example, an elongated device may be placed so that the device ends are in the same plane as the pharynx or in a plane parallel to the pharyngeal axis (PAX), as illustrated by the device 700 shown in
In addition to placing the implantable device using a trocar in a minimally invasive approach, the device of the invention may also be placed underneath the pharyngeal wall using an open, direct visualization approach to the pharynx from the side of a patient's neck. A similar approach to the tissue space underneath the pharyngeal wall is used to perform cervical spinal disc replacement. That approach may be used in the present invention on an outpatient basis or one night hospital stay, for example.
The implantable device of the invention may be a retractor 900 (
The view of
The fibrous elements 905 are tensioned to retract the pharyngeal wall by producing tension on tissue beneath the lateral pharyngeal wall, or a tenting effect of the lateral wall if the elements are placed with a slight posterior/lateral and anterior/lateral angle during passage. Once sufficient tension is applied, and the lateral wall is suspended, the ends of the fibrous elements 905 are trimmed flush with the surface of the skin S and are allowed to retract slightly to remain in a sub-dermal position. Alternatively, the retractor elements may be passed directly laterally to exit the lateral tissue of the neck of the patient to provide direct lateral suspension of the pharyngeal wall.
In another method of implantation, the pharyngeal retractors described above are implanted through an oral route. In its simplest embodiment, the method of implanting the device utilizes conventional surgical instruments such as a scalpel, forceps, etc with direct visualization of the pharyngeal wall though the mouth. Alternatively, the devices can be implanted using a hand-held delivery system.
The pharyngeal retractors are advanced out of the delivery system by a deployment means actuated by a lever 1097 on the hand-piece 1090. As the pharyngeal retractors are advanced out of the housing, they are deployed through a previously made incision in either the posterior or the lateral pharyngeal wall. Alternatively, the distal-most portion of the delivery system may have a sharpened edge to facilitate penetration of the pharyngeal wall during deployment of the refractor 1094. The retractors can then be set beneath the pharyngeal walls to provide constant refraction of the airway.
a and 11b illustrate the effect of implanting two of the devices of the invention to alter the shape of the pharyngeal airway. The distance between the left lateral pharyngeal surface and the right lateral surface is represented by distance A. The retractors 1120 are shown in
Upon termination of the stylus advancement, the implantable device is ejected from the cannula or stylus by a pusher that maintains the implantable device in a fixed position while the cannula/stylus is withdrawn from the penetrated tissue beneath the pharyngeal wall. Effectively, the implantable device does not move; rather, the stylus is withdrawn from around the implantable device. After deployment, the implantable device returns to its unconstrained configuration with the tips 1121a′, 1121b′ of the retractors 1120′ contracting as shown in
When the implantable device is placed in position beneath the pharyngeal wall 1030, the tips 1121a, 1121b of the device engage the pharyngeal wall so that the wall changes shape as the distance B between the tips changes. For example, the tips may engage the pharyngeal wall by pinching a portion of the wall between them. In another example, the tips 1121a, 1121b may have barbs, hooks, roughening or another tissue engaging feature to maintain engagement of the tips with the pharyngeal wall to exert a force on the wall.
After deployment of the two devices, the distance A between the lateral pharyngeal walls increases to A′, and the shape of the airway is altered to produce two small irregular channels 1140, 1141 of decreased radius of curvature in the pharyngeal wall 1130 parallel to the axis of the airway. The geometry of the channels is sufficiently small to prevent the relaxed tongue from forming a seal with the pharyngeal wall along those locations while a patient is in a sleeping state and the musculature of the tongue relaxes. While the tongue may seal with the posterior pharyngeal wall, the lateral aspects are maintained as open channels 1140, 1141, effectively allowing air to flow past the obstruction.
In another embodiment of the invention shown in
During ejection, the radius of the implantable device increases and the distance between the tips of the device increases. Since the unconstrained devices 1220′ have a distance between the ends that is greater than the distance between ends of the constrained devices, the anterior-to-posterior dimension B of the pharyngeal airway increases to B′, thereby changing the shape of the airway by increasing the radius of curvature of the wall, as shown in
While the implantable devices illustrated in
The devices, systems and surgical methods described above provide simple, minimally invasive procedures that may potentially be performed on an outpatient basis. Results of the procedures are both immediate and long-term. The implanted devices do not impact the hyoid bone or soft palate, and are therefore less likely to affect swallowing or speech. The invention furthermore uses materials with a long-term history of biocompatibility.
The foregoing Detailed Description and accompanying figures are to be understood as being in every respect illustrative and exemplary, but not restrictive, and the scope of the invention disclosed herein is not to be determined from the Description of the Invention, but rather from the Claims as interpreted according to the full breadth permitted by the patent laws. It is to be understood that the embodiments shown and described herein are only illustrative of the principles of the present invention and that various modifications may be implemented by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/228,681 filed Aug. 14, 2008. The complete disclosures of the aforementioned related U.S. patent applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3123077 | Alcamo | Mar 1964 | A |
3378010 | Codling et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
4024855 | Bucalo | May 1977 | A |
4069825 | Akiyama | Jan 1978 | A |
4290763 | Hurst | Sep 1981 | A |
4523584 | Lynch | Jun 1985 | A |
4557264 | Hinsch | Dec 1985 | A |
4839215 | Starling et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4881939 | Newman | Nov 1989 | A |
4950285 | Wilk | Aug 1990 | A |
5053047 | Yoon | Oct 1991 | A |
5067485 | Cowen | Nov 1991 | A |
5123913 | Wilk et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5192271 | Kalb et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5192274 | Bierman | Mar 1993 | A |
5269783 | Sander | Dec 1993 | A |
5284161 | Karell | Feb 1994 | A |
5311028 | Glavish | May 1994 | A |
5393984 | Glavish | Feb 1995 | A |
5483077 | Glavish | Jan 1996 | A |
5484444 | Braunschweiler et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5609559 | Weitzner | Mar 1997 | A |
5683417 | Cooper | Nov 1997 | A |
5704895 | Scott et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5792067 | Karell | Aug 1998 | A |
5843077 | Edwards | Dec 1998 | A |
5931855 | Buncke | Aug 1999 | A |
6161541 | Woodson | Dec 2000 | A |
6190401 | Green et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6241747 | Ruff | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250307 | Conrad et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6348156 | Vishnoi et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6408851 | Karell | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6431174 | Knudson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432437 | Hubbard | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6457472 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6513530 | Knudson et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6523542 | Knudson et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6578580 | Conrad et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6589549 | Shih et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599310 | Leung et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6627600 | Boutignon | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6634362 | Conrad et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638284 | Rousseau et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6716251 | Asius et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6742524 | Knudson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755868 | Rousseau | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6800082 | Rousseau | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6899105 | Krueger et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6955172 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6981944 | Jamiolkowski et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7017582 | Metzger et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7056331 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7135189 | Knapp | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146981 | Knudson et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7166570 | Hunter et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7213599 | Conrad et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7237554 | Conrad et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7261702 | Alexandre et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7288075 | Parihar et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7297102 | Smith et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7322993 | Metzger et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7337781 | Vassallo | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7360432 | Lehtonen | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360542 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367340 | Nelson et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7401611 | Conrad et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7442389 | Quelle et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7601164 | Wu | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7669603 | Knudson et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7806908 | Ruff | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7850894 | Lindh, Sr. et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857829 | Kaplan et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7888119 | Sugaya et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8142422 | Makower et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8307831 | Rousseau | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8413661 | Rousseau et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8800567 | Weadock et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20010037133 | Knudson et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020144685 | Ivanovich et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004579 | Rousseau et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030034312 | Unger et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030149445 | Knudson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149447 | Morency et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149488 | Metzger et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030176875 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040020492 | Dubrul et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040020498 | Knudson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028676 | Klein et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044366 | Bonutti et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040102796 | Hill et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040139975 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144395 | Evans et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147811 | Diederich et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040149290 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153127 | Gordon et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050038472 | Furst | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050082452 | Kirby | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050092334 | Conrad et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050115572 | Brooks et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050121039 | Brooks et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050126563 | van de Burg et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159637 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2005 | A9 |
20050165352 | Henry et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050199248 | Pflueger et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203576 | Sulamanidze et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050251255 | Metzger et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267321 | Shadduck | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267531 | Ruff et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267532 | Wu | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267571 | Spence et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050268919 | Conrad et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050279365 | Armijo et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060005843 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2006 | A9 |
20060079935 | Kolster | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083767 | Deusch et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060093644 | Quelle et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060150986 | Roue et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060185673 | Critzer et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206197 | Morsi | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060207608 | Hirotsuka et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060207612 | Jackson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060228391 | Seyedin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241339 | Cook et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060266369 | Atkinson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060289015 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070000497 | Boucher et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005109 | Popadiuk et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005110 | Collier et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070102004 | Nelson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070102010 | Lemperle et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110788 | Hissong et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070119463 | Nelson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123996 | Sugaya et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070144531 | Tomas et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070144534 | Mery et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070144535 | Hegde et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070144539 | Dineen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070190108 | Datta et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204866 | Conrad et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070209665 | Gillis et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070227545 | Conrad et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233276 | Conrad et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070246052 | Hegde et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256693 | Paraschac et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257395 | Lindh et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070261701 | Sanders | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070267027 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270631 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070272257 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288057 | Kuhnel | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070295338 | Loomas et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070295340 | Buscemi | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080023012 | Dineen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080035158 | Pflueger et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080035160 | Woodson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080053461 | Dineen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066764 | Paraschac et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066765 | Paraschac et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066767 | Paraschac et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066769 | Dineen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080078411 | Buscemi et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080146868 | Henri Robert et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080167614 | Tolkowsky et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080199824 | Hargadon | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208265 | Frazier et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221684 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080312688 | Nawrocki et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090025734 | Doelling et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090078411 | Kenison et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090165803 | Bhat et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100023055 | Rousseau | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100024830 | Rousseau et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030011 | Weadock et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037901 | Rousseau et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049227 | Hegde et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100080791 | Rousseau et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106246 | Rousseau et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100108077 | Lindh et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100132719 | Jacobs et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137794 | Knudson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137905 | Weadock et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100158854 | Puisais | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100163056 | Tschopp et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100211184 | Rousseau et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100234794 | Weadock et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234946 | Rousseau | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256443 | Griguol | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100294284 | Hohenhorst et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100319710 | Sharkawy et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110054522 | Lindh et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110100376 | Rousseau | May 2011 | A1 |
20110100377 | Weadock et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110100378 | Rousseau | May 2011 | A1 |
20110144558 | Rousseau | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110174315 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178439 | Irwin et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110238111 | Frank | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245850 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282386 | Friedrich | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120123449 | Schaller et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120160249 | Garrett | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120245629 | Gross et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130074849 | Rousseau et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130098371 | Rousseau et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103078 | Crovella et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130118505 | Rousseau et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133669 | Rousseau | May 2013 | A1 |
20130150872 | Rousseau | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130174857 | Rousseau et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130186412 | Weadock et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130319427 | Sung et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2465680 | Dec 2001 | CN |
201029957 | Mar 2008 | CN |
102198010 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102198010 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102271624 | Dec 2011 | CN |
10245076 | Apr 2004 | DE |
10245076 | Apr 2004 | DE |
2145587 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2145587 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2386252 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2517633 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2517633 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2651113 | Mar 1991 | FR |
2651113 | Mar 1991 | FR |
2007-512090 | May 1982 | JP |
11-514266 | Dec 1999 | JP |
11-514266 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-145646 | May 2001 | JP |
2003265621 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2006-508708 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2001-145646 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006-517115 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006-517115 | May 2007 | JP |
2007-512090 | May 2007 | JP |
2007-313337 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008-526286 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008-529608 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2009-006090 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2011-530385 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2005447 | Jan 1994 | RU |
2202313 | Apr 2003 | RU |
927236 | May 1982 | SU |
1697792 | Dec 1991 | SU |
927236 | Apr 1997 | SU |
WO 9713465 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9900058 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 0066050 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0121107 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 03096928 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 03096928 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004016196 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004016196 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004016196 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004016196 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004020492 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004021869 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004021870 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004021870 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004060311 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004060311 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004084709 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004084709 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004103196 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005046554 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005046554 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005051292 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005082452 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005122954 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006012188 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006072571 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006108145 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2007056583 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007075394 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007075394 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007132449 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007132449 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007134005 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007146338 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2007149469 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2007149469 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008042058 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008063218 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008118913 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009023256 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009036094 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009036094 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009036094 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2010019376 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2010019376 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2010035303 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010035303 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010051195 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2012004758 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO 2012041205 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012041205 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012064902 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2012064902 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2012170468 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO 2012170468 | Dec 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cole et al., “Snoring: A Review and a Reassessment”, J. of Otolaryngology, vol. 24, No. 5 pp. 303-306 (1995). |
Harries et al., “The Surgical treatment of snoring”, J. of Laryngology and Otology, vol. 110, Issue 12 pp. 1105-1106 (1996). |
Huang et al., “Biomechanics of snoring”, Endeavour, vol. 19(3): pp. 96-100 (1995). |
Pang, Kenny et al., “Tongue Suspension Suture in Obstructive Sleep Apnea”, Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology, vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 252-256 (2006). |
Repose Genioglossus Advancement, INFLUENT Medical, www.influ-ent.com, 1 page (2008). |
Schleef et al., “Cytokine Activation of Vascular Endothelium, Effects on Tissue-Type 1 Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor” The J. of Biological Chem., vol. 263, No. 12, pp. 5797-5803 (1988). |
Schwab et al., “Upper airway and soft tissue changes induced by CPAP in normal subject”, Am. J. Respit. Crit. Care Med., vol. 154, No. 4 pp. 1106-1116 (1996). |
Schwartz et al., “Effects of electrical stimulation to the soft palate on snoring and obstructive sleep apnea”, J. Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 76 pp. 273-281 (1996). |
Shamsuzzaman et al., “Obstructive Sleep Apnea; Implications for Cardiac and Vascular Disease”, JAMA vol. 290, No. 14 pp. 1906-1914 (2003). |
Teles et al., “Use of Palatal Lift Prosthesis on Patient Submitted to Maxillectomy: A Case Report”, Applied Cancer Res. vol. 25(3), pp. 151-154 (2005). |
The Advance System, Aspire Medical, Inc. www.aspiremedical.com, 3 pp (2008). |
The Pillar Procedure, Restore Medical, Inc. www.restoremedical.com, 2 pp (2008). |
Vicente et al., “Tongue-Base Suspension in Conjunction with Uvulopapatopharyngoplasty for Treatment of Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Long-term Follow-Up Results”, The Laryngoscope, vol. 116 pp. 1223-1227 (2006). |
Wassmuth et al., “Cautery-assisted palatal stiffening operation for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome”, Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 123, pp. 55-60 (2000). |
Wiltfang et al., “First results on daytime submandibular electrostimulation of suprahyoidal muscles to prevent night-time hypopharyngeal collapse in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome”, Intl J. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery vol. 28 pp. 21-25 (1999). |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/486,293, filed Jun. 1, 2012. |
Database WPI Week 198312, Thomson Scientific, London, GB; AN 1983-D9513K XP002693421, -& SU 927 236 A1 (Petrozazodsk Univ) May 15, 1982 abstract (see figures 7 & 8). |
Friedman et al., “A System and Method for Inserting a Medical Device for Treatment of Sleep Apnea via the Nasal Passage, and Device Therefor”, Dec. 29, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 61/203,758, p. 8 & p. 6/8. |
MacMillan Dictionary, Fiber, MacMillan Publisher, Liminted 2009-2014. |
Medtronic AIRvance System for Obstructive Sleep Apnea. http://www.medtronic.com/for-healthcare-professionals/products-therapies/ear-nose-throat/sleep-disordered-breathing-products/airvance-system-for-obstructive-sleep-apnea/index.htm. |
International Search Report re: PCT/US2012/0565677 dated Nov. 27, 2012. |
International Search Report dated Apr. 9, 2013 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/061569. |
International Search Report dated Apr. 2, 2013 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/067708. |
International Search Report dated Oct. 2, 2013 re: PCT/US2013/043238. |
International Search Report dated May 24, 2013 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/066011. |
Written Opinion dated Nov. 27, 2012 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/056577. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130174857 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12228681 | Aug 2008 | US |
Child | 13784077 | US |