The invention relates to treating incontinence in a male patient using a surgical sling secured internally to support a urethra, including methods, implants (e.g., slings), insertion tools, and related systems.
For patients with urinary incontinence, lives are perpetually interrupted by thoughts of ensuring that they have ready access to a restroom. Everyday activities such as attending a theater or sporting event can become unpleasant. Sufferers often begin to avoid social situations in an effort to reduce the stress associated with their condition.
A variety of treatment options are currently available for urinary incontinence. One type of surgical procedure found to be an especially successful treatment option for incontinence in both men and women, is a sling procedure. Sling procedures typically entail surgically implanting a biocompatible implant or “sling” to support the bladder neck or urethra. Sling procedures are discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,112,344; 5,611,515; 5,842,478; 5,860,425; 5,899,909; 6,039,686; 6,042,534; 6,110,101; 6,478,727; 6,638,211; and PCT Publication Nos. WO 02/39890 and WO 02/069781.
An implant for placement in a male patient may require greater strength, different (e.g., larger) dimensions, and better retention ability in tissue, relative to implants useful on a female patient. Also, methods of placement of such an implant can involve different tissue paths, incisions, and placement of implant features at alternate anatomy.
United States patent publication 2006/0287571 (U.S. Ser. No. 11/347,047) describes procedures to implant a urethral sling in a male anatomy. Described methods involve placement of a sling below a bulbous urethra, for example in contact with a corpus spongiosum. Steps of exemplified methods include creating a medial (e.g., perineal) incision, dissecting bulbospongiosus muscle to expose corpus spongiosum, and placing a central support portion of a sling in contact with the corpus spongiosum. Extension portions of the sling are extended through tissue paths to locations at which the extension portions can be secured to the patient, to thereby support the sling in place.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/223,846, filed Aug. 8, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,144,426, by Ogdahl et al., titled SURGICAL ARTICLES AND METHODS FOR TREATING PELVIC CONDITIONS describes, inter alia, methods and devices for treating urinary incontinence in male patients. The methods involve a sling that includes two “soft tissue anchors” at opposite ends of a mesh strip. The sling is placed internally in a male patient through a medial incision, the sling supporting the urethra and the soft tissue anchors being placed internally, e.g., at opposing obturator foramen.
As with other established medical treatments, there is ongoing incentive and benefit in finding still improved treatments for urinary incontinence. Improvements may be in the form of new method steps, improved implants, improved insertion tools, and related systems and procedures.
Methods as described are useful to treat urinary incontinence in a male by placing an implant to support the urethra. The implant includes a central support portion, extension portions extending from the central support portion, and soft tissue anchors. According to the method, the soft tissue anchors are placed at locations of soft tissue in a region of an obturator foramen. Placing a soft tissue anchor and a distal end of an extension portion at a region of an obturator foramen, preferably at tissue of endopelvic fascia, short of muscle tissue of the obturator foramen, i.e., on the bladder side of the obturator foramen, can allow placement of soft tissue anchors at locations away from nerves and blood vessels of the obturator foramen, and also away from the bladder.
Embodiments of the invention also relate at least in part to methods of treating urinary incontinence in a male patient by placing a sling (implant) to support a urethra, wherein the sling includes at least four soft tissue anchors located at ends of extension portions, two soft tissue anchors at distal ends of extension portions on opposing (e.g., left and right) sides of an implant.
Insertion tools can be used according to the methods, with implants as described. The insertion tools include a handle and elongate structure (e.g., one or multiple needles) extending from the handle to a location distal from the handle, that can engage one or two soft tissue anchors. E.g., the insertion tool can include two distal tip structures capable of engaging two soft tissue anchors on one side of an implant simultaneous, to allow handling and manipulation of the two soft tissue anchors and allow a user to place the two soft tissue anchors at soft tissue, together, in one step.
In one aspect the invention relates to an implant for treating urinary incontinence in a male. The implant includes: a central support portion comprising two opposing sides and two opposing ends, and capable of supporting a urethra; at least two extension portions extending from opposing sides of the central support portion, each extension portion comprising a proximal end attached to the central support portion, and a distal end; and four soft tissue anchors, each located at a distal end of an extension portion. When the central support portion is placed to support the urethra, the extension portions are capable of extending from the central support portion to soft tissue at a region of an obturator foramen.
In another aspect the invention relates to an insertion tool useful to place a sling for urinary incontinence. The insertion tool includes: a handle; a first needle comprising a proximal end and a distal end, the proximal end connected to the handle and the distal end adapted to engage a soft tissue anchor; and a second needle comprising a proximal end and a distal end, the proximal end connected to the handle and the distal end adapted to engage a soft tissue anchor.
In another aspect the invention relates to a method of treating urinary incontinence in a male. The method includes providing an implant comprising: a central support portion comprising two opposing sides and two opposing ends, and capable of supporting a urethra; at least two extension portions extending from opposing sides of the central support portion, each extension portion comprising a proximal end attached to the central support portion, and a distal end; and four soft tissue anchors, each located at a distal end of an extension portion, two on a right side of the implant and two on a left side of the implant. When the central support portion is placed to support the urethra, the extension portions are capable of extending from the central support portion to soft tissue at a legion of an obturator foramen. The method further includes providing an insertion tool comprising: a first needle comprising a proximal end and a distal end, the proximal end connected to the handle and the distal end adapted to engage a soft tissue anchor; and a second needle comprising a proximal end and a distal end, the proximal end connected to the handle and the distal end adapted to engage a soft tissue anchor. The method further includes creating a medial incision at a perineum, placing the central support portion to support a urethra, engaging the two needle tips with two soft tissue anchors on a right side of the implant and placing the soft tissue anchors through tissue paths extending toward a region of an obturator foramen on one side of the patient, and engaging the two needle tips with two soft tissue anchors on a left side of the implant and placing the soft tissue anchors through tissue paths extending toward a region of an obturator foramen on another side of the patient.
The entireties of the content of all patent documents cited herein are incorporated herein by reference.
The following description is meant to be illustrative only and not limiting. Other embodiments of this invention will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of this description.
The present invention is directed to surgical instruments, assemblies, and implantable articles for treating urinary incontinence in a male patient, e.g., stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Described are various features of surgical implants, surgical tools, surgical systems, surgical kits, and surgical methods, useful for installing implants. Useful implants can include a tissue support portion (or “central support portion”) that can be used to support a urethra. Useful implants also include one or more extension portions (otherwise known as “end” portions or “arms”) attached to the tissue support portion. Soft tissue anchors are attached at distal ends of extension portions, including at least two soft tissue anchors at distal ends of one or more extension portion on a first (“right”) side of an implant and at least two soft tissue anchors at distal ends of one or more extension portion on a second (“left”) side of an implant.
Methods as described are useful to treat incontinence in a male by placing an implant below a urethra, to support (i.e., support or approximate) the urethra. Soft tissue anchors are used to secure the implant at a desired supportive location, by securing the soft tissue anchors to internal soft tissue at regions of an obturator foramen. According to exemplary techniques, a physician (e.g., surgeon) is able place an implant at a location to support a male urethra, between locations at opposite obturator foramen, the implant being anchored internally by soft tissue anchors, the soft tissue anchors being placed at opposing regions of opposing obturator foramen. When the implant is placed, two soft tissue anchors, each located at a distal end of an extension portion, extend from the central support portion (below the urethra) to a region of an obturator foramen on one side of a patient, and two soft tissue anchors, each located at a distal end of an extension portion, extend to a region of an obturator foramen on an opposite side of a patient.
As used herein, tissue at a “region of an obturator foramen” refers to soft tissue within or proximal to an obturator foramen or surrounding pubic bone, specifically including endopelvic fascia, musculature (including musculature of the obturator foramen), and nearby ligaments, tendons, and muscle tissues. “Endopelvic fascia” refers to soft tissue between a bladder and a pelvic bone (i.e., musculature of the pelvic bone), including soft tissue that covers muscle attached to the pelvic floor and the obturator foramen, on the bladder side of the pelvic bone. Accordingly, endopelvic fascia includes tissue that is reached by creating a tissue path beginning at a location below a male urethra (e.g., below a bulbous urethra, optionally beginning at a corpus spongiosum or a bulbospongiosus muscle at a location below a bulbous urethra) and extending toward an obturator foramen to a location near but not in contact with (short of) the obturator internus muscle or nearby muscle tissues, as well as tissue that is proximate to such a tissue path.
An exemplary method of installing a male urethral sling can include a step of creating a perineal (e.g., medial) incision at the external male perineum; creating opposing tissue paths from the medial incision, below the urethra, to regions of the patient's left and right obturator foramen; and installing a urethral sling that includes extension portions with soft tissue anchors at distal ends, at regions of the opposing left and right obturator foramen. The implant includes at least two soft tissue anchors at distal ends of extension portions on each side of the implant, and the method includes placing at least two soft tissue anchors at a region of an obturator foramen on one side of the patient, and placing at least two soft tissue anchors at a region of an obturator foramen on a second (opposite) side of the patient.
Preferred methods of the invention can treat urinary incontinence in a male by supporting (meaning to support, position, re-position, or approximate) tissue of a urethra or a urethral sphincter complex, in any way that improves coaptation of the urethra, resulting in improved continence. According to one embodiment, a central support portion of a sling may be placed below the bulbospongiosus muscle and tensioned to re-position pelvic tissue and improve continence.
In preferred embodiments, a urethral sling can be installed in a male patient with the central support portion of the sling in direct contact with the corpus spongiosum. See U.S. Publication No. 2006-0287571. For example, a method of can include providing a medial incision at the perineum of a male patient to a expose bulbospongiosus muscle, optionally and preferably dissecting through bulbospongiosus muscle to expose s corpus spongiosum, and placing a central support portion of a urethral sling in contact with the corpus spongiosum. Optionally the central support portion can be fixed to the corpus spongiosum, such as by use of a medical attachment in the form of a suture, staple, adhesive, or the like.
An insertion tool can engage soft tissue anchors on the implant, two soft tissue anchors on a right side of the implant and two soft tissue anchors on a left side of the implant. The insertion tool can be used to create a tissue path extending to a region of an obturator foramen, or to place the soft tissue anchors within a previously-prepared tissue path. The sling can be tensioned to approximate tissue at or around the urethra, to improve continence, and tension can optionally and preferably be maintained chronically.
In the exemplary embodiment, approximation of the corpus spongiosum can cause movement or relative movement of or between the urethra and the rhabdosphincter to allow the rhabdosphincter to better coapt the urethra and achieve improved or complete continence. Again not wishing to be bound by theory, approximating the corpus spongiosum may have the therapeutic effect of lifting and rotating (in a clockwise direction when viewed in the cross-section of
Preferably, the soft tissue anchors include lateral extensions (e.g., two, of the same size and shape and form, extending in opposite directions from opposite sides of the base). The urethral sling may be placed using one or more insertion tools as described, by installing extension portions of the sling between the medial incision and regions of obturator foramen, with the central support portion of the sling positioned below the urethra. The extension portions may be pushed through the tissue path at the lead of an insertion tool that engages soft tissue anchors and pushes the soft tissue anchors through tissue. The tissue support portion (central portion) of the urethral sling may be placed as desired, below the male urethra, to support the urethra, optionally with approximation, compression, or a combination of approximation and compression. Adjustment of the implant can be performed based on the location (point of entry) and depth of insertion of soft tissue anchors within soft tissue of the opposing regions of obturator foramen. The central support portion may be placed below the bulbospongiosus muscle or below the corpus spongiosum, as desired. The sling may optionally include a widened central support portion that is placed to contact the corpus spongiosum, and the support portion and sling are used to approximate the urethra to improve continence, e.g., without the need for compression of the urethra. See, e.g., United States Publ. No. 2006/0287571 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,422,557.
Implant useful according to described methods can include a central support portion, extension portions extending from the central support portion, and soft tissue anchors at distal ends of the extension portions. In particular, implants can include at least four soft tissue anchors, each located at an end of an extension portions, e.g., two soft tissue anchors, each located at an end of one or more extension portion on, a right side of an implant; and two soft tissue anchors, each located at an end of one or more extension portion, on a left side of an implant.
The implant may include portions or sections that are synthetic or of biological material (e.g., porcine, cadaveric, etc.). Extension portions may be, e.g., a synthetic mesh such as a polypropylene mesh. The central support portion may be synthetic (e.g., a polypropylene mesh) or biologic. Examples of implant products that may be similar to those useful according to the present description, include those sold commercially by American Medical Systems, Inc., of Minnetonka Minn., under the trade names Apogee® and Perigee® for use in treating pelvic prolapse (including vaginal vault prolapse, cystocele, enterocele, etc.), and Sparc®, Bioarc®, and Monarc® for treating urinary incontinence.
Exemplary implants can include a tissue support portion for placing in contact with tissue to be supported and one or more “extension” portions, the tissue support portion being useful to support a specific type of pelvic tissue such as the urethra, bladder, or vaginal tissue (anterior, posterior, apical, etc.). The tissue support portion can be sized and shaped to contact the desired tissue when installed, e.g., as a “sling” or “hammock,” to contact and support pelvic tissue. A tissue support portion that is located between two or more extension or extension portions is sometimes referred to herein as a “central support portion” or a “support portion.”
A central support portion is located between two (or more, e.g., four) opposing elongate extension portions. The central support portion may be integral with the extension portions as the same material, having the same (total) width and thickness, or may be of another material having different width and thickness dimensions. The central support portion is attachable to or integral with the extension portions and can be composed of a porous or non-porous plastic materials, a biologic material, or the like, such as a thermoplastic (e.g., polypropylene).
Extension portions are elongate pieces of material having a proximal end attached to the central support portion, and that extend away from the central support portion to a distal end. One or more soft tissue anchors can be connected to the distal end. The extension portion and soft tissue anchor (or anchors) can reach and be connected to a region of an obturator foramen to provide support for the central support portion. Two or more (e.g., four) extension portions can extend from the central support portion.
Examples of useful implants include supportive portions that include or consist of: a central support portion; either two or four elongate extension portions extending from the central support portion; and four soft tissue anchors, each soft tissue anchor at an end of an extension portion. The term “supportive portions” refers to portions of an implant that function to support tissue after the implant has been implanted, and specifically includes extension portions, central support portions, and soft tissue anchors, and does not include optional or appurtenant features of an implant such as a sheath, or a tensioning suture or other tensioning device. Examples of these implants include a central support portion and two extension portions, each extending from an opposite side of the central support portion and each having two soft tissue anchors located (side-by-side) at the ends of the extension portions. Other examples include a central support portion and four extension portions, two extension portions extending from each of opposite sides of the central support portion, and each of the four extension portions having a soft tissue anchor located at the distal end of the extension portion. With such implants, other optional feature may also be included, such as one or more tensioning sutures.
An implant may be integral, monolithic, or a composite of different components or segments of different synthetic or non-synthetic (e.g., “biologic”) components. Suitable non-synthetic materials include allografts, homografts, heterografts, autologous tissues, cadaveric fascia, autodennal grafts, dermal collagen grafts, autofascial heterografts, whole skin grafts, porcine dermal collagen, lyophilized aortic homografts, preserved dural homografts, bovine pericardium and fascia lata. Suitable synthetic materials for a sling include polymerics, metals, and plastics and any combination of such materials.
Examples of synthetic sling materials include polypropylene, cellulose, polyvinyl, silicone, polytetrafluoroethylene, polygalactin, Silastic, carbon-fiber, polyethylene, nylon, polyester (e.g. dacron) PLLA and PGA. The sling material may be resorbable, absorbable, or non-absorbable. Optionally, some portions may be absorbable and other portions may be non-absorbable. Commercial examples of synthetic materials useful in a urethral sling include Marlex™ (polypropylene) available from Bard of Covington, R.I., Prolene™ (polypropylene) and Mersilene (polyethylene terephthalate) Hernia Mesh available from Ethicon, of New Jersey, Gore-Tex™ (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene) available from W. L. Gore and associates, Phoenix, Ariz., and the polypropylene sling available in the SPARC™ sling system, available from American Medical Systems, Inc. of Minnetonka, Minn. Commercial examples of absorbable materials include Dexon™ (polyglycolic acid) available from Davis and Geck of Danbury, Conn., and Vicryl™ available from Ethicon. Other examples of suitable materials include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Publ. No. 2002/0072694.
Dimensions of an extension portion according to the invention can allow an extension portion to reach between a central support portion placed to support pelvic tissue (at an end of the extension portion connected to the tissue support portion) and a location at which the distal end of the extension portion attaches to pelvic tissue. A distal end of an extension portion, can include one or more soft tissue anchor tip that can be attached to tissue at a region of an obturator foramen, such as muscle, ligament, fascia, or other soft tissue. The length of the extension portion, therefore, can be in a range that allows placement of a tissue support portion as desired to support a urethra, while the soft tissue anchors are installed in tissue of a region of an obturator foramen.
The length of an implant (“length” refers to a dimension generally between opposing extension portions, including lengths of two opposing extension portions and a central support portion) between distal ends of extension portions, can be sufficient to place the central support portion below a urethra, to support the urethra, and to place opposing soft tissue anchors at opposing regions of a patient's obturator foramen. Exemplary lengths of an implant (L1 at
Placing a distal end of an extension portion at endopelvic fascia, short of muscle tissue of the obturator foramen, i.e., on the bladder side of the obturator foramen, can allow placement of soft tissue anchors at locations away from nerves and blood vessels of the obturator foramen, and also away from the bladder. Placing a distal end of an extension portion at endopelvic fascia, short of muscle tissue of the obturator foramen also allows for an extension portion of an implant to be slightly shorter than extension portions designed to anchor at obturator foramen musculature (e.g., obturator internus muscle or obturator externus muscle), or extension portions designed to pass through the obturator foramen (e.g., to an external incision).
Not illustrated at
Exemplary widths of an extension portion can be as desired, and may be based on factors including the number of extension portions extended from one side of a central support portion of an implant.
A preferred sling for placement against a corpus spongiosum may also include a central support portion that is wider than the one or more extension portions of an implant. A widened central support portion can provide improved mechanical and frictional engagement between the central support portion and the corpus spongiosum. A widened central support portion provides a larger area of contact between the sling and corpus spongiosum, and can have a reduced tendency to fold or deform upon tensioning of the sling. A suture can be used to attach the central support portion to the corpus spongiosum to further improve the area of contact and prevent folding, such as at a location on the anterior side of the central support portion. A suture may also be useful to prevent movement of the sling relative to the corpus spongiosum during or after installation or tensioning.
Exemplary widths of a central support portion can be as desired to support a male urethra as described herein, and may vary based on factors such as whether extended portions are desired, extending (forward and backward) beyond the total widths of the one or more extension portions on each side of a central support portion.
An implant as described can include one or multiple soft tissue anchors located at distal ends of each extension portion. A soft tissue anchor can in general be a structure connected to a distal end of an extension portion, that can be implanted into soft tissue in a manner that will maintain the position of the soft tissue anchor and the attached implant. Preferred soft tissue anchors can also be designed to engage an end of an insertion tool (e.g., elongate needle, elongate tube, etc.) so the insertion tool can be used to push the soft tissue anchor through tissue or a pre-formed tissue path, for implantation. The soft tissue anchor may engage the insertion tool at an internal channel of the soft tissue anchor, at an external location such as at the base, or at a lateral extension, as desired. Examples of soft tissue anchors are described, e.g., in U.S. Ser. No. 12/223,846, filed Aug. 8, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,144,426, by Ogdahl et al., titled SURGICAL ARTICLES AND METHODS FOR TREATING PELVIC CONDITIONS.
A soft tissue anchor can be made of any useful material, generally including materials that can be molded or formed to a desired structure and connected to or attached to an end of an extension portion of an implant. Useful materials can include plastics such as polyethylene, polypropylene, and other thermoplastic or thermoformable materials, as well as metals, ceramics, and other types of biocompatible and optionally bioabsorbable or bioresorbable materials. Exemplary bioabsorbable materials include, e.g., polyglycolic acid (PGA), polylactide (PLA), copolymers of PGA and PLA.
A soft tissue anchor can be located at a distal end of an extension portion, or along a length of an extension portion. Either type can have any general shape or design to allow an extension portion to be placed in and secured to soft tissue. Examples of useful soft tissue anchors can include one or more lateral extensions (e.g., teeth, barbs, hooks, tines, etc.) that can increase the force required to remove the soft tissue anchor from tissue after insertion into the tissue, i.e. the “pullout force.” At the same time, an extension portion can be designed to exhibit a reduced or relatively low “insertion force,” which is the amount of force used to insert the soft tissue anchor into tissue.
According to exemplary embodiments, a soft tissue anchor designed to attach to a distal end of an extension portion can have structure that includes a base having a proximal base end and a distal base end. The proximal base end can be connected (e.g., directly or indirectly) to a distal end of an extension portion. The base extends from the proximal base end to the distal base end and can optionally include an internal channel extending from the proximal base end at least partially along a length of the base toward the distal base end. An optional internal channel can be designed to interact with (i.e., engage) a distal end of an insertion tool to allow the insertion tool to be used to place the soft tissue anchor at a location within pelvic tissue of the patient.
Optionally, additional soft tissue anchors can be located at an extension portion, along a length of the extension portion at a location between a proximal end of an extension portion (attached to a central support portion) and a distal end of a support portion. These soft tissue anchors can extend from a surface or edge of an extension portion and can provide added support of the central support portion by increasing resistance to movement of the extension portion away from tissue of a region of obturator foramen. These soft tissue anchors may be in the form of a barb, hook, tooth, wedge, arrow, or otherwise-shaped structural feature that contacts soft tissue (fascia, e.g., endopelvic fascia) between a urethra and a location of a distal end of an installed extension portion, i.e., a location at a region of an obturator foramen. These soft tissue anchors can be made of materials as described herein, and can be constructed to adhere to or otherwise be attached to a surface or edge of an extension portion, with one or more extension portion being structured to contact and frictionally engage tissue.
Referring to
Referring to
One or more insertion tool can be used to install an implant as described, by methods described. Various types of insertion tools are known that will be understood to be useful for placing an implant as described, having soft tissue anchors, to treat incontinence. These types of tools and modifications thereof can be used according to this description to install an implant. Examples of useful tools include those types of tools that generally include a thin elongate needle (optionally multiple needles, as described herein) attached to a handle; a handle attached to one end (a proximal end) of the needle; and a distal end of the needle adapted to engage a soft tissue anchor that allows the needle to push one or more soft tissue anchor through a tissue passage and insert the soft tissue anchor within tissue of the pelvic region. This class of tool can be used with a soft tissue anchor that includes an internal channel designed to engage a distal end of an insertion tool. Other general types of insertion tools will also be useful but may engage a soft tissue anchor hi a manner that does not involve an internal channel of a soft tissue anchor. These alternate insertion tools may for example contact or grasp a proximal base end of a soft tissue anchor in the absence of an internal channel extending from the proximal base end toward the distal base end, such as by grasping an external surface of the base. An alternate insertion tool may contact or grasp a side of the base, a lateral extension, or any other portion of the soft tissue anchor or base, in a way that allows the insertion tool to hold the soft tissue anchor and insert the soft tissue anchor at a desired location within tissue of the pelvic region.
Exemplary insertion tools for treatment of incontinence and vaginal prolapse are described, e.g., in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/834,943, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,500,945, Ser. No. 10/306,179, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,070,556; Ser. No. 11/347,553, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,422,557; Ser. No. 11/398,368, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,740,576; Ser. No. 10/840,646, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,351,197; PCT application number 2006/028828; and PCT application number 2006/0260618; among others. Tools described in those patent documents are designed for placement of an implant in a pelvic region for the treatment of prolapse, male or female incontinence, etc. The tools of the above referenced patent documents may be curved in two or three dimensions, and may include, for example, a two-dimensionally curved needle for placing an extension portion of an implant through a tissue path that passes from a region of the urethra to a region of an obturator foramen.
In certain embodiments, a tool can include a handle or a portion of a handle that exhibits a non-circular form when viewed along the longitudinal axis of the handle. The non-circular cross-section can be, e.g., an oval, rectangle, rhombus, etc., having one dimension “width” that is greater than the dimension perpendicular to that “width.” The non-circular form will provide surfaces on the handle for a surgeon to place pressure onto and to achieve a grip. The non-circular cross-sectional form can also preferably define a midplane that is a plane that includes the longitudinal axis of the handle and extends along the widest dimension of the handle when viewed in cross section.
Exemplary insertion tools can be similar to or can include features of tools described in the above-referenced patent documents. For use according to methods described herein, those insertion tools may be modified to allow the insertion tool to be used to accommodate implants as described, having two soft tissue anchors at ends of one or more extension portions, e.g., as illustrated at
Exemplary insertion tools having two needles may include two needles that extend side-by-side in parallel or along identical curves from a proximal end connected to a handle to a distal end having a tip or other surface useful to engage a soft tissue anchor. According to these embodiments, two needles can optionally and preferably both connect to the handle at locations of a plane defined by a midplane of the handle. Exemplary sets of two curved needles can include the same curve (e.g., can be co-planar, parallel, or contained by a single curved plane). Each needle can include a distal end (tip) that engages a soft tissue anchor in a manner that allows the needle to push the soft tissue anchor through a tissue path and place the soft tissue anchor at a desired location of soft tissue at a region of an obturator foramen. Two engaging surfaces (tip) supported by a single handle allow the insertion tool to engage both soft tissue anchors simultaneously to push both soft tissue anchors into place in a single step.
An example of an embodiment of an insertion tool is shown at
The invention also relates to surgical assemblies or kits for treating incontinence, including an implant and insertion tool as described and illustrated. An exemplary kit can include an implant as shown at
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/227,534, filed Mar. 27, 2014, which is a divisional application of Ser. No. 12/533,515, filed Jul. 31, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,727,963, which claims benefit from U.S. Provisional Patent Application having Ser. No. 61/085,247, filed on Jul. 31, 2008, by Knoll, and titled INSTRUMENT AND METHOD FOR PLACEMENT OF MALE INCONTINENCE REPAIR SLING, the entire contents of which are all incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2738790 | Todt et al. | Mar 1956 | A |
3124136 | Usher | Mar 1964 | A |
3182662 | Shirodkar | May 1965 | A |
3311110 | Singerman et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3384073 | Van Winkle, Jr. | May 1968 | A |
3472232 | Earl | Oct 1969 | A |
3580313 | McKnight | May 1971 | A |
3763860 | Clarke | Oct 1973 | A |
3789828 | Schulte | Feb 1974 | A |
3858783 | Kapitanov et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3924633 | Cook et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3995619 | Glatzer | Dec 1976 | A |
4019499 | Fitzgerald | Apr 1977 | A |
4037603 | Wendorff | Jul 1977 | A |
4128100 | Wendorff | Dec 1978 | A |
4172458 | Pereyra | Oct 1979 | A |
4235238 | Ogiu et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4246660 | Wevers | Jan 1981 | A |
4441497 | Paudler | Apr 1984 | A |
4509516 | Richmond | Apr 1985 | A |
4548202 | Duncan | Oct 1985 | A |
4632100 | Somers et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4775380 | Seedhom et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4857041 | Annis et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4865031 | O'Keeffe | Sep 1989 | A |
4873976 | Schreiber | Oct 1989 | A |
4920986 | Biswas | May 1990 | A |
4932962 | Yoon et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4938760 | Burton et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4969892 | Burton et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5007894 | Enhorning | Apr 1991 | A |
5012822 | Schwarz | May 1991 | A |
5013292 | Lemay | May 1991 | A |
5013316 | Goble et al. | May 1991 | A |
5019032 | Robertson | May 1991 | A |
5032508 | Naughton et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5036867 | Biswas | Aug 1991 | A |
5053043 | Gottesman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5085661 | Moss | Feb 1992 | A |
5112344 | Petros | May 1992 | A |
5123428 | Schwarz | Jun 1992 | A |
5141520 | Goble et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5149329 | Richardson | Sep 1992 | A |
5188636 | Fedotov | Feb 1993 | A |
5209756 | Seedhom et al. | May 1993 | A |
5250033 | Evans et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5256133 | Spitz | Oct 1993 | A |
5269783 | Sander | Dec 1993 | A |
5281237 | Gimpelson | Jan 1994 | A |
5328077 | Lou | Jul 1994 | A |
5337736 | Reddy | Aug 1994 | A |
5362294 | Seitzinger | Nov 1994 | A |
5368595 | Lewis | Nov 1994 | A |
5370650 | Tovey et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5370662 | Stone et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376097 | Phillips | Dec 1994 | A |
5383904 | Totakura et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386836 | Biswas | Feb 1995 | A |
5403328 | Shallman | Apr 1995 | A |
5413598 | Moreland | May 1995 | A |
5439467 | Benderev et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5474543 | McKay | Dec 1995 | A |
5518504 | Polyak | May 1996 | A |
5520700 | Beyar et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520703 | Essig | May 1996 | A |
5527342 | Pietrzak et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5544664 | Benderev et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5562689 | Green et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571139 | Jenkins, Jr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582188 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591163 | Thompson | Jan 1997 | A |
5591206 | Moufarrege | Jan 1997 | A |
5611515 | Benderev et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5628756 | Barker, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633286 | Chen | May 1997 | A |
5643320 | Lower et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5669935 | Rosenman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5683349 | Makower et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697931 | Thompson | Dec 1997 | A |
5709708 | Thal | Jan 1998 | A |
5725541 | Anspach, III et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741282 | Anspach, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5782916 | Pintauro et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785640 | Kresch et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5807403 | Beyar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5836314 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836315 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840011 | Landgrebe et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842478 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860425 | Benderev et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5899909 | Claren et al. | May 1999 | A |
5919232 | Chaffringeon et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922026 | Chin | Jul 1999 | A |
5925047 | Errico et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5934283 | Willem et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935122 | Fourkas et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944732 | Raulerson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954057 | Li | Sep 1999 | A |
5972000 | Beyar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980558 | Wiley | Nov 1999 | A |
5984927 | Wenstrom, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988171 | Sohn et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997554 | Thompson | Dec 1999 | A |
6010447 | Kardjian | Jan 2000 | A |
6027523 | Schmieding | Feb 2000 | A |
6030393 | Corlew | Feb 2000 | A |
6031148 | Hayes et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036701 | Rosenman | Mar 2000 | A |
6039686 | Kovac | Mar 2000 | A |
6042534 | Gellman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042536 | Tihon et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042583 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048351 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050937 | Benderev | Apr 2000 | A |
6053935 | Brenneman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056688 | Benderev et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068591 | Bruckner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071290 | Compton | Jun 2000 | A |
6074341 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077216 | Benderev et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6099538 | Moses | Aug 2000 | A |
6099551 | Gabbay | Aug 2000 | A |
6099552 | Adams | Aug 2000 | A |
6106545 | Egan | Aug 2000 | A |
6110101 | Tihon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117067 | Gil-Vernet | Sep 2000 | A |
6127597 | Beyar et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6168611 | Risvi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200330 | Benderev et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221005 | Bruckner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6241736 | Sater et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264676 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273852 | Lehe et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6302840 | Benderev | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306079 | Trabucco | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322492 | Kovac | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328686 | Kovac | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328744 | Harari et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334446 | Beyar | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352553 | van der Burg et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6382214 | Raz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387041 | Harari et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406423 | Scetbon | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406480 | Beyar et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414179 | Banville | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423080 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6451024 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475139 | Miller | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478727 | Scetbon | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6482214 | Sidor, Jr. et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491703 | Ulmsten | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494906 | Owens | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502578 | Raz et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6506190 | Walshe | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6530943 | Hoepffner et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6575897 | Ory | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582443 | Cabak et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592515 | Thierfelder | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592610 | Beyar | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596001 | Stormby et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599235 | Kovac | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599323 | Melican et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602260 | Harari et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612977 | Staskin | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6638210 | Berger | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638211 | Suslian et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638284 | Rousseau et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641524 | Kovac | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6641525 | Rocheleau | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648921 | Anderson | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652450 | Neisz et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6673010 | Skiba et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685629 | Therin | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689047 | Gellman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691711 | Raz | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699175 | Miller | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702827 | Lund | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6752814 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755781 | Gellman | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6802807 | Anderson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6830052 | Carter et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6881184 | Zappala | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6884212 | Thierfelder et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908425 | Luscombe | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908473 | Skiba et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911002 | Fierro | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911003 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6932759 | Kammerer | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936052 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6953428 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960160 | Browning | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6971986 | Staskin et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974462 | Sater | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981944 | Jamiolkowski | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6981983 | Rosenblatt et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6991597 | Gellman et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7014607 | Gellman | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025063 | Snitkin | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025772 | Gellman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037255 | Inman | May 2006 | B2 |
7048682 | Neisz et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056333 | Walshe | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7070556 | Anderson | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7070558 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083568 | Neisz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7083637 | Tannhauser | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7087065 | Ulmsten et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112210 | Ulmsten et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7121997 | Kammerer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131943 | Kammerer | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7131944 | Jaquetin | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7175591 | Kaladelfos | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7198597 | Siegel et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7226407 | Kammerer | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7226408 | Harari et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229404 | Bouffier | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229453 | Anderson | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235043 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7261723 | Smith et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7297102 | Smith et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299803 | Kovac | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7303525 | Watschke et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7326213 | Benderev et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7347812 | Mellier | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351197 | Montpetit et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357773 | Watschke et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7364541 | Chu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371245 | Evans et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7387634 | Benderev | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7393320 | Montpetit et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7407480 | Staskin | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7410460 | Benderev | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7413540 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7422557 | Arnal | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7431690 | Bryon et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7494495 | Delorme et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7500945 | Cox | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513865 | Bourne et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7527588 | Zaddem et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7588598 | Delorme et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601118 | Smith et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611454 | De Leval | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621864 | Suslian et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7637860 | MacLean | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7686759 | Sater | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691050 | Gellman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7722527 | Bouchier et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7722528 | Arnal et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740576 | Hodroff | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753839 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762942 | Neisz et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766926 | Bosely et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789821 | Browning | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20010049467 | Lehe et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007222 | Desai | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020128670 | Ulmsten et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147382 | Neisz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151909 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161382 | Neisz | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004581 | Rousseau | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036676 | Scetbon | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030176875 | Anderson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040015057 | Rocheleau et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040073235 | Lund | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040133217 | Watschke | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144395 | Evans | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040225181 | Chu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230206 | Gellman et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267088 | Krammerer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050000523 | Beraud | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004427 | Cervigni | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038451 | Rao et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050131391 | Chu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131393 | Chu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050199249 | Karram | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050245787 | Cox et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256530 | Petros | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050277806 | Cristalli | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278037 | Delorme et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283189 | Rosenblatt et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015010 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060028828 | Phillips | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058575 | Zaddem | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058578 | Browning | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089524 | Chu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089525 | Mamo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122457 | Kovac | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173237 | Jacquetin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195007 | Anderson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195010 | Arnal | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195011 | Arnal | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060217589 | Wan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229493 | Weiser | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229596 | Weiser et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060252980 | Arnal et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287571 | Gozzi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070015953 | MacLean | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070068538 | Anderson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078295 | landgrebe | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070173864 | Chu | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080004490 | Bosley, Jr. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027271 | Maccarone | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039678 | Montpetit et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080300607 | Meade et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005634 | Rane | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012353 | Beyer | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090171142 | Chu | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090221868 | Evans | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100298630 | Wignall | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110230709 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002241673 | Nov 2005 | AU |
2404459 | Aug 2005 | CA |
2305815 | Feb 1973 | DE |
4220283 | May 1994 | DE |
19544162 | Apr 1997 | DE |
10211360 | Sep 2003 | DE |
20016866 | Mar 2007 | DE |
0248544 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0470308 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0650703 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0643945 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0632999 | Jan 1995 | EP |
1093758 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1060714 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1342450 | Sep 2003 | EP |
2787990 | Jul 2000 | FR |
2852813 | Jan 2004 | FR |
2268690 | Jan 1994 | GB |
2353220 | Oct 2000 | GB |
1299162 | Apr 1998 | IT |
1225547 | Apr 1986 | SU |
1342486 | Oct 1987 | SU |
WO9317635 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO9319678 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO9511631 | May 1995 | WO |
WO9525469 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO9716121 | May 1997 | WO |
WO9730638 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO9747244 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO9819606 | May 1998 | WO |
WO9835606 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9835616 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9835632 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9842261 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO9853746 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO916381 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO9937217 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO9952450 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO9953844 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO9959477 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO0064370 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO0013601 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO0018319 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO0017304 | May 2000 | WO |
WO0040158 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO0057812 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO0074594 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0074613 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0074633 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0106951 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0126581 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0139670 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0145588 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0145589 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0156499 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO0228312 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0230293 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0232284 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0234124 | May 2002 | WO |
WO0238079 | May 2002 | WO |
WO0239890 | May 2002 | WO |
WO02058563 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02062237 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02069781 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02071953 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02078552 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO02089704 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO03017848 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO03028585 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO03037215 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03041613 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03047435 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO03068107 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO03075792 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO03092546 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO03096929 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO2004012626 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004016196 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004017862 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2004034912 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2005037132 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005079702 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005122954 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006015031 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO2006108145 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO2007014241 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007016083 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007027592 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2007059199 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2007081955 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO2007097994 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2007137226 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007146784 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2007149348 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2007149555 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2008057261 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008124056 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2009005714 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2009017680 | Feb 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“We're staying ahead of the curve” Introducing the IVS Tunneller Device for Tension Free Procedures, Tyco Healthcare, 3 pages (2002). |
Advantage A/T™, Surgical Mesh Sling Kit, Boston Scientific, 6 pages (2002). |
Albert H. Aldridge, B.S., M.D., F.A.C.S., Transplantation of Fascia for Relief of Urinary Stress Incontinence, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, V. 44, pp. 398-411, (1948). |
Amundsen, Cindy L. et al., Anatomical Correction of Vaginal Vault Prolapse by Uterosacral Ligament Fixation in Women Who Also Require a Pubovaginal Sling, The Journal of Urology, vol. 169, pp. 1770-1774, (May 2003). |
Araki, Tohru et al., The Loop-Loosening Procedure for Urination Difficulties After Stamey Suspension of the Vesical Neck, The Journal of Urology, vol. 144, pp. 319-323 (Aug. 1990). |
Asmussen, M. et.al., Simultaneous Urethro-Cystometry With a New Technique, Scand J Urol Nephrol 10, p. 7-11 (1976). |
Beck, Peter R. et al., Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence With Anterior Colporrhaphy, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 59 (No. 3), pp. 269-274 (Mar. 1982). |
Benderev, Theodore V., MD, A Modified Percutaneous Outpatient Bladder Neck Suspension System, Journal of Urology, vol. 152, pp. 2316-2320 (Dec. 1994). |
Benderev, Theodore V., MD, Anchor Fixation and Other Modifications of Endoscopic Bladder Neck Suspension, Urology, vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 409-418 (Nov. 1992). |
Bergman, Arieh et al., Three Surgical Procedures for Genuine Stress Incontinence: Five-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Randomized Study, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 173 No. 1, pp. 66-71 (Jul. 1995). |
Blaivas, Jerry et al., Pubovaginal Fascial Sling for the Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence, The Journal of Urology, vol. 145, pp. 1214-1218 (Jun. 1991). |
Blaivas, Jerry et al., Type III Stress Urinary Incontinence: Importance of Proper Diagnosis and Treatment, Surgical Forum, pp. 473-475, (1984). |
Blaivas, Jerry, Commentary: Pubovaginal Sling Procedure, Experience with Pubovaginal Slings, pp. 93-101 (1990). |
Boyles, Sarah Hamilton et al., Procedures for Urinary Incontinence in the United States, 1979-1997, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 189, No. 1, pp. 70-75 (Jul. 2003). |
Bryans, Fred E., Marlex Gauze Hammock Sling Operation With Cooper's Ligament Attachment in the Management of Recurrent Urinary Stress Incontinence, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 133, pp. 292-294 (Feb. 1979). |
Burch, John C., Urethrovaginal Fixation to Cooper's Ligament for Correction of Stress Incontinence, Cystocele, and Prolapse, Am. J. Obst. & Gyn, vol. 31, pp. 281-290 (1961). |
Capio™ CL—Transvaginal Suture Capturing Device—Transvaginal Suture Fixation to Cooper's Ligament for Sling Procedures, Boston Scientific, Microvasive®, 8 pages, (2002). |
Cervigni, Mauro et al., The Use of Synthetics in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Voiding Dysfunction and Female Urology, vol. 11, pp. 429-435 (2001). |
Choe, Jong M. et al., Gore-Tex Patch Sling: 7 Years Later, Urology, vol. 54, pp. 641-646 (1999). |
Cook/Ob Gyn®, Urogynecology, Copyright Cook Urological Inc., pp. 1-36 (1996). |
Dargent, D. et al., Insertion of a Suburethral Sling Through the Obturator Membrane in the Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, vol. 30, pp. 576-582 (2002). |
Das, Sakti et al., Laparoscopic Colpo-Suspension, The Journal of Urology, vol. 154, pp. 1119-1121 (Sep. 1995). |
Debodinance, Philipp et al., “Tolerance of Synthetic Tissues in Touch With Vaginal Scars: Review to the Point of 287 Cases”, Europeon Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 87 (1999) pp. 23-30. |
Decter, Ross M., Use of the Fascial Sling for Neurogenic Incontinence: Lessons Learned, The Journal of Urology, vol. 150, pp. 683-686 (Aug. 1993). |
Delancey, John, MD, Structural Support of the Urethra as it Relates to Stress Urinary Incontinence: The Hammock Hypothesis, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 170 No. 6, pp. 1713-1723 (Jun. 1994). |
Delorme, Emmanuel, Trans-Obturator Sling: A Minimal Invasive Procedure to Treat Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, Progres en Urologie, vol. 11, pp. 1306-1313 (2001) English Abstract attached. |
Diana, et al., Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse With Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy Using Prolene Mesh, American Journal of Surgery, vol. 179, pp. 126-128, (Feb. 2000). |
Eglin et al., Transobturator Subvesical Mesh. Tolerance and short-term results of a 103 case continuous series, Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite, vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 14-19 (Jan. 2003). |
Enzelsberger, H. et al., Urodynamic and Radiologic Parameters Before and After Loop Surgery for Recurrent Urinary Stress Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 69, pp. 51-54 (1990). |
Eriksen, Bjarne C. et al., Long-Term Effectiveness of the Burch Colposuspension in Female Urinary Stress Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 69, pp. 45-50 (1990). |
Falconer, C. et al., Clinical Outcome and Changes in Connective Tissue Metabolism After Intravaginal Slingplasty in Stress Incontinence Women, International Urogynecology Journal, pp. 133-137 (1966). |
Falconer, C. et al., Influence of Different Sling Materials of Connective Tissue Metabolism in Stress Urinary Incontinent Women, International Urogynecology Journal, Supp. 2, pp. S19-S23 (2001). |
Farnsworth, B.N., Posterior Intravaginal Slingplasty (Infracoccygeal Sacropexy) for Sever Posthysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse—A Preliminary Report on Efficacy and Safety, Int Urogynecology J, vol. 13, pp. 4-8 (2002). |
Farquhar, Cynthia M. et al., Hysterectomy Rates in the United States 1990-1997, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 99, No. 2, pp. 229-234 (Feb. 2002). |
Fidela, Marie R. et al., Pelvic Support Defects and Visceral and Sexual Function in Women Treated With Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension and Pelvic Reconstruction, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 175, No. 6 (Dec. 1996). |
Flood, C.G. et al., Anterior Colporrhaphy Reinforce With Marlex Mesh for the Treatment of Cystoceles, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 9, pp. 200-204 (1998). |
Gilja, Ivan et al., A Modified Raz Bladder Neck Suspension Operation (Transvaginal Burch), The Journal of Urology, vol. 153, pp. 1455-1457 (May 1995). |
Gittes, Ruben F. et al., No-Incision Pubovaginal Suspension for Stress Incontinence, The Journal of Urology, vol. 138 (Sep. 1987). |
Guner, et al., Transvaginal Sacrospinous Colpopexy for Marked Uterovaginal and Vault Prolapse, Inter J of Gynec & Obstetrics, vol. 74, pp. 165-170 (2001). |
Gynecare TVT Tension-Free Support for Incontinence, The tension-free solution to female Incontinence, Gynecare Worldwide,6 pages, (2002). |
Handa, Victoria L. et al, Banked Human Fascia Lata for the Suburethral Sling Procedure: A Preliminary Report, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 88 No. 6, 5 pages (Dec. 1996). |
Heit, Michael et al., Predicting Treatment Choice for Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 101, No. 6, pp. 1279-1284 (Jun. 2003). |
Henriksson, L. et al., A Urodynamic Evaluation of the Effects of Abdominal Urethrocystopexy and Vaginal Sling Urethroplasty in Women With Stress Incontinence, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. vol. 131, No. 1, pp. 77-82 (Mar. 1, 1978). |
Hodgkinson, C. Paul et.al., Urinary Stress Incontinence in the Female, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Henry Ford Hospital, vol. 10, No. 5, p. 493-499, (Nov. 1957). |
Holschneider, C. H., et al., The Modified Pereyra Procedure in Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 15-year Review, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 573-578 (Apr. 1994). |
Horbach, Nicollette S., et al., Instruments and Methods, A Suburethral Sling Procedure with Polytetrafluoroethylene for the Treatment of Genuine Stress Incontinence in Patients with Low Urethral Closure Pressure, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 648-652 (Apr. 1998). |
Ingelman-Sunberg, A. et al., Surgical Treatment of Female Urinary Stress Incontinence, Contr. Gynec. Obstet., vol. 10, pp. 51-69 (1983). |
IVS Tunneller—A Universal instrument for anterior and posterior intra-vaginal tape placement, Tyco Healthcare, 4 pages (Aug. 2002). |
IVS Tunneller—ein universelles Instrument fur die Intra Vaginal Schlingenplastik, Tyco Healthcare, 4 pages (2001). |
Jeffcoate, T.N.A. et al., The Results of the Aldridge Sling Operation for Stress Incontinence, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, pp. 36-39 (1956). |
Jones, N.H.J. Reay et al., Pelvic Connective Tissue Resilience Decreases With Vaginal Delivery, Menopause and Uterine Prolapse, Br J Surg, vol. 90, No. 4, pp. 466-472 (Apr. 2003). |
Julian, Thomas, The Efficacy of Marlex Mesh in the Repair of Sever, Recurrent Vaginal Prolapse of the Anterior Midvaginal Wall, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 175, No. 6, pp. 1472-1475 (Dec. 1996). |
Karram, Mickey et al., Patch Procedure: Modified Transvaginal Fascia Lata Sling for Recurrent for Severe Stress Urinary Incontinence, vol. 75, pp. 461-463 (Mar. 1990). |
Karram, Mickey M. et al., Chapter 19 Surgical Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse, Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, (Walters & Karram eds.) pp. 235-256 (Mosby 1999). |
Kersey, J., The Gauze Hammock Sling Operation in the Treatment of Stress Incontintence, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 90, pp. 945-949 (Oct. 1983). |
Klutke, Carl et al., The Anatomy of Stress Incontinence: Magentic Resonance Imaging of the Female Bladder Neck and Urethra, The Journal of Urology, vol. 143, pp. 563-566 (Mar. 1990). |
Klutke, John James et al., Transvaginal Bladder Neck Suspension to Cooper's Ligament: A Modified Pereyra Procedure, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 88, No. 2, pp. 294-296 (Aug. 1996). |
Klutke, John M.D. et al, The promise of tension-free vaginal tape for female SUI, Contemporary Urology, 7 pages (Oct. 2000). |
Korda, A. et al., Experience With Silastic Slings for Female Urinary Incontience, Aust NZ J. Obstet Gynaecol, vol. 29, pp. 150-154 (May 1989). |
Kovac, S. Robert, et al, Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling for Recurrent Urinary Incontinence, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 89, No. 4, pp. 624-627 (Apr. 1997). |
Kovac, S. Robert, et al, Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling: A Long Term Cure for SUI?, Contemporary OB/GYN, 10 pages (Feb. 1998). |
Kovac, S. Robert, Follow-up of the Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling Operation for Recurrent Urinary Incontinence (Kovac Procedure), Journal of Pelvic Surgery, pp. 156-160 (May 1999). |
Kovac, Stephen Robert, M.D., Cirriculum Vitae, pp. 1-33 (Jun. 18, 1999). |
Leach, Gary E., et al., Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel Report on Surgical Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, American Urological Association, vol. 158, pp. 875-880 (Sep. 1997). |
Leach, Gary E., MD, Bone Fixation Technique for Transvaginal Needle Suspension, Urology vol. XXXI, No. 5, pp. 388-390 (May 1988). |
Lichtenstein, Irving L. et al, The Tension Free Hernioplasty, The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 157 pp. 188-193 (Feb. 1989). |
Loughlin, Kevin R. et al., Review of an 8-Year Experience With Modifications of Endoscopic Suspension of the Bladder Neck for Female Stress Incontinence, The Journal of Uroloyg, vol. 143, pp. 44-45 (1990). |
Luber, Karl M. et al., The Demographics of Pelvic Floor Disorders; Current Observations and Future Projections, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 184, No. 7, pp. 1496-1503 (Jun. 2001). |
Mage, Technique Chirurgicale, L'Interpostion D'Un Treillis Synthetique Dans La Cure Par Vote Vaginale Des Prolapsus Genitaux, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol. 28, pp. 825-829 (1999). |
Marchionni, Mauro et al., True Incidence of Vaginal Vault Prolapse—Thirteen Years of Experience, Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 44, No. 8, pp. 679-684 (Aug. 199). |
Marinkovic, Serge Peter et al., Triple Compartment Prolapse: Sacrocolpopexy With Anterior and Posterior Mesh Extensions, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, vol. 110, pp. 323-326 (Mar. 2003). |
Marshall, Victor Fray et al. The Correction of Stress Incontinence by Simple Vesicourethral Suspension, Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 88, pp. 509-518 (1949). |
McGuire, Edward J. et al., Pubovaginal Sling Procedure for Stress Incontinence, The Journal of Urology, vol. 119, pp. 82-84 (Jan. 1978). |
McGuire, Edward J. et al., Abdominal Procedures for Stress Incontinence, Urologic Clinics of North America, pp. 285-290, vol. 12, No. 2 (May 1985). |
McGuire, Edward J. et al., Experience With Pubovaginal Slings for Urinary Incontinence at The University of Michigan, Journal of Urology, vol. 138, pp. 90-93(1987). |
McGuire, Edwared J. et al., Abdominal Fascial Slings, Slings, Raz Female Urology, pp. 369-375 (1996). |
McGuire™ Suture Buide, The McGuire™ Suture Guide, a single use instrument designed for the placement of a suburethral sling, Bard, 2 pages (2001). |
McIndoe, G. A. et al., The Aldridge Sling Procedure in the Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence, Aust. N Z Journal of Obstet Gynecology, pp. 238-239 (Aug. 1987). |
McKiel, Charles F. Jr., et al, Marshall-Marchetti Procedure Modification, vol. 96, pp. 737-739 (Nov. 1966). |
Migliari, Roberto et al., Tension-Free Vaginal Mesh Repair for Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse, Eur Urol, vol. 38, pp. 151-155 (Oct. 1999). |
Migliari, Roberto et al., Treatment Results Using a Mixed Fiber Mesh in Patients With Grade IV Cystocele, Journal of Urology, vol. 161, pp. 1255-1258 (Apr. 1999). |
Moir, J. Chassar et.al., The Gauze-Hammock Operation, The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of British Commonwealth, vol. 75 No. 1, pp. 1-9 (Jan. 1968). |
Morgan, J. E., A Sling Operation, Using Marlex Polypropylene Mesh, for the Treatment of Recurrent Stress Incontinence, Am. J. Obst. & Gynecol, pp. 369-377 (Feb. 1970). |
Morgan, J. E. et al., The Marlex Sling Operation for the Treatment of Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 16-Year Review, American Obstetrics Gynecology, vol. 151, No. 2, pp. 224-226 (Jan. 1998). |
Morley, George W. et al., Sacrospinous Ligament Fixations for Eversion of the Vagina, Am J Obstet Gyn, vol. 158, No. 4, pp. 872-881 (Apr. 1988). |
Narik, G. et.al., A Simplified Sling Operation Suitable for Routine Use, Gynecological and Obstetrical Clinic, University of Vienna, vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 400-405, (Aug. 1, 1962). |
Natale, F. et al., Tension Free Cystocele Repair (TCR): Long-Term Follow-Up, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 11, supp. 1, p. S51 (Oct. 2000). |
Nichols, David H., The Mersilene Mesh Gauze-Hammock for Severe Urinary Stress Incontinence, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 41, pp. 88-93 (Jan. 1973). |
Nicita, Giulio, A New Operation for Genitourinary Prolapse, Journal of Urology, vol. 160, pp. 741-745 (Sep. 1998). |
Niknejad, Kathleen et al., Autologous and Synthetic Urethral Slings for Female Incontinence, Urol Clin N Am, vol. 29, pp. 597-611 (2002). |
Norris, Jeffrey P. et al., Use of Synthetic Material in Sling Surgery: A Minimally Invasive Approach, Journal of Endourology, vol. 10, pp. 227-230 (Jun. 1996). |
O'Donnell, Pat, Combined Raz Urethral Suspension and McGuire Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence, Journal Arkansas Medical Society, vol. 88, pp. 389-392 (Jan. 1992). |
Ostergard, Donald R. et al., Urogynecology and Urodynamics Theory and Practice, pp. 569-579 (1996). |
Paraiso et al., Laparoscopic Surgery for Enterocele, Vaginal Apex Prolapse and Rectocele, Int. Urogynecol J, vol. 10, pp. 223-229 (1999). |
Parra, R. O., et al, Experience With a Simplified Technique for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, British Journal of Urology, pp. 615-617 (1990). |
Pelosi, Marco Antonio III et al., Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling: Laparoscopic Assessment of a Transvaginal Operation for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence, Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advaned Surgical Techniques, vol. 9, No. 1 pp. 45-50 (1999). |
Pereyra, Armand J. et al, Pubourethral Supports in Perspective: Modified Pereyra Procedure for Urinary Incontinence, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 643-648 (May 1982). |
Pereyra, Armand J., M.D., F.A.C.S., A Simplified Surgical Procedure for Correction of Stress Incontinence in Women, West.J.Surg., Obst. & Gynec, p. 223-226, (Jul.-Aug. 1959). |
Peter E. Papa Petros et al., Cure of Stress Incontinence by Repair of External Anal Sphincter, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, p. 75 (1990). |
Peter Petros et al., Anchoring the Midurethra Restores Bladder-Neck Anatomy and Continence, The Lancet, vol. 354, pp. 997-998 (Sep. 18, 1999). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., An Anatomical Basis for Success and Failure of Female Incontinence Surgery, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 55-60 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., An Analysis of Rapid Pad Testing and the History for the Diagnosis of Stress Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 71, pp. 529-536 (1992). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., An Integral Therory of Female Urinary Incontinence, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 69 Sup. 153, pp. 7-31 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Bladder Instability in Women: A Premature Activation of the Micturition Reflex, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 235-239 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Cough Transmission Ratio: An Indicator of Suburethral Vaginal Wall Tension Rather Than Urethral Closure, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 37-39 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Cure of Urge Incontinence by the Combined Intravaginal Sling and Tuck Operation, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 61-62 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS III—(With Midline “Tuck”), Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, p. 69-71 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Medium-Term Follow-Up of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Operation Indicates Minimal Deterioration of Urinary Continence With Time, (3 pages) (1999). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Non Stress Non Urge Female Urinary Incontinence—Diagnosis and Cure: A Preliminary Report, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 69-70 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Part I: Theoretical, Morphological, Radiographical Correlations and Clinical Perspective, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 5-28 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Part II: The Biomechanics of Vaginal Tissue and Supporting Ligaments With Special Relevance to the Pathogenesis of Female Urinary Incontinence, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 29-40 plus cover sheet (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Part III: Surgical Principles Deriving From the Theory, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 41-52 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Part IV: Surgical Applications of the Theory—Development of the Intravaginal Sling Pklasty (IVS) Procedure, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 53-54 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Pinch Test for Diagnosis of Stress Urinary Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 33-35 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et at, Pregnancy Effects on the Intravaginal Sling Operation, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 77-79 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Autogenic Ligament Procedure: A Technique for Planned Formation of an Artificial Neo-Ligament, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 43-51 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Combined Intravaginal Sling and Tuck Operation an Ambulatory Procedure for Cure of Stress and Urge Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 53-59 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS II—(With Bilateral “Tucks”), Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 61-67 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Free Graft Procedure for Cure of the Tethered Vagina Syndrome, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 85-87(1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS IV—(With “Double Breasted” Unattached Vaginal Flap Repair and “Free” Vaginal Tapes), Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, p. 73-75 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS V—(With “Double Breasted” Unattached Vaginal Flap Repair and Permanent Sling)., Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 77-79 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Intravaginal Slingplasty Operation, a Minimally Invasive Technique for Cure of Urinary Incontinence in the Female, Aust. NZ J Obstet Gynaecol, vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 453-461 (1996). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS VI—Further Development of the “Double Breasted” Vaginal Flap Repair—Attached Flap, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 81-84 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Posterior Fornix Syndrome: A Multiple Symptom Complex of Pelvic Pain and Abnormal Urinary Symptoms Deriving From Laxity in the Posterior Fornix of Vagina, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 89-93 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Role of a Lax Posterior Vaginal Fornix in the Causation of Stress and Urgency Symptoms: A Preliminary Report, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 71-73 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Tethered Vagina Syndrome, Post Surgical Incontinence and I-Plasty Operation for Cure, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 63-67 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Tuck Procedure: A Simplified Vaginal Repair for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 41-42 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Urethral Pressure Increase on Effort Originates From Within the Urethra, and Continence From Musculovaginal Closure, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, pp. 337-350 (1995). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa, Development of Generic Models for Ambulatory Vaginal Surgery—Preliminary Report, International Urogynecology Journal, pp. 20-27 (1998). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa, New Ambulatory Surgical Methods Using an Anatomical Classification of Urinary Dysfunction Improve Stress, Urge and Abnormal Emptying, Int. Urogynecology Journal Pelvic Floor Dystfunction, vol. 8 (5), pp. 270-278, (1997). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa, Vault Prolapse II; Restoration of Dynamic Vaginal Supports by Infracoccygeal Sacropexy, An Axial Day-Case Vaginal Procedure, Int Urogynecol J, vol. 12, pp. 296-303 (2001). |
Rackley, Raymond R. et al., Tension-Free Vaginal Tape and Percutaneous Vaginal Tape Sling Procedures, Techniques in Urology, vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 90-100 (2001). |
Rackley, Raymond R. M.D., Synthetic Slings: Five Steps for Successful Placement, Urology Times, p. 46,48,49 (Jun. 2000). |
Raz, Shlomo, et al., The Raz Bladder Neck Suspension Results in 206 Patients, The Journal of Urology, pp. 845-846 (1992). |
Raz, Shlomo, Female Urology, pp. 80-86, 369-398, 435-442 (1996). |
Raz, Shlomo, MD, Modified Bladder Neck Suspension for Female Stress Incontinence, Urology, vol. XVII, No. 1, pp. 82-85 (Jan. 1981). |
Richardson, David A. et al., Delayed Reaction to the Dacron Buttress Used in Urethropexy, The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, pp. 689-692, vol. 29, No. 9 (Sep. 1984). |
Richter, K., Massive Eversion of the Vagina: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Therapy of the “True” Prolapse of the Vaginal Stump, Clin obstet gynecol, vol. 25, pp. 897-912 (1982). |
Ridley, John H., Appraisal of the Goebell-Frangenheim-Stoeckel Sling Procedure, American Journal Obst & Gynec., vol. 95, No. 5, pp. 741-721 (Jul. 1, 1986). |
Roberts, Henry, M.D., Cystourethrography in Women, Deptment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Liverpool, May 1952, vol. XXXV, No. 293, pp. 253-259. |
Sabre™ Bioabsorbable Sling, Generation Now, Mentor, 4 pages (May 2002). |
Sabre™ Surgical Procedure, Mentor, 6 pages (Aug. 2002). |
Sanz, Luis E. et al., Modification of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy Using a Suture Anchor System, The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 48, No. 7, pp. 496-500 (Jul. 2003). |
Seim, Arnfinn et al., A Study of Female Urinary Incontinence in General Practice—Demography, Medical History, and Clinical Findings, Scand J Urol Nephrol, vol. 30, pp. 465-472 (1996). |
Sergent, F. et al., Prosthetic Restoration of the Pelvic Diaphragm in Genital Urinary Prolapse Surgery: Transobturator and Infacoccygeal Hammock Technique, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol. 32, pp. 120-126 (Apr. 2003). |
Sloan W. R. et al., Stress Incontinence of Urine: A Retrospective Study of the Complications and Late Results of Simple Suprapubic Suburethral Fascial Slings, The Journal of Urology, vol. 110, pp. 533-536 (Nov. 1973). |
Spencer, Julia R. et al., A Comparison of Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck With Suprapubic Vesicourethropexy for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence, The Journal of Urology, vol. 137, pp. 411-415 (Mar. 1987). |
Stamey, Thomas A., M.D., Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck for Urinary Incontinence in Females, Ann. Surgery, vol. 192 No. 4, pp. 465-471 (Oct. 1980). |
Stanton, Stuart L., Suprapubic Approaches for Stress Incontinence in Women, Journal of American Geriatrics Society, vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 348-351 (Mar. 1990). |
Stanton, Stuart, Springer-Veglag, Surgery of Female Incontinence, pp. 105-113 (1986). |
Staskin, David R. et al., The Gore-Tex Sling Procedure for Female Sphincteric Incontinence: Indications, Technique, and Results, World Journal of Urology, vol. 15, pp. 295-299 (1997). |
Studdiford, William E., Transplantation of Abdominal Fascia for the Relief of Urinary Stress Incontinence, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, pp. 764-775 (1944). |
Subak, Leslee L. et al., Cost of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in the United States, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 98, No. 4, pp. 646-651 (Oct. 2001). |
Sullivan, Eugene S. et al., Total Pelvic Mesh Repair a Ten-Year Experience, Dis. Colon Rectum, vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 857-863 (Jun. 2001). |
Swift, S.E., et al., Case-Control Study of Etiologic Factors in the Development of Sever Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Int Urogynecol J, vol. 12, pp. 187-192 (2001). |
TVT Tension-free Vaginal Tape, Gynecare, Ethicon, Inc., 23 pages (1999). |
Ulmsten, U. et al., A Multicenter Study of Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT) for Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 9, pp. 210-213 (1998). |
Ulmsten, U. et al., An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure Under Local Anesthesia for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 7, pp. 81-86 (May 1996). |
Ulmsten, U., Female Urinary Incontinence—A Symptom, Not a Urodynamic Disease. Some Theoretical and Practical Aspects on the Diagnosis a Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 6, pp. 2-3 (1995). |
Ulmsten, Ulf et al., A Three Year Follow Up of Tension Free Vaginal Tape for Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 106, pp. 345-350 (1999). |
Ulmsten, Ulf et al., Different Biochemical Composition of Connective Tissue in Continent, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, pp. 455-457 (1987). |
Ulmsten, Ulf et al., Intravaginal Slingplasty (IVS): An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, Scand J Urol Nephrol, vol. 29, pp. 75-82 (1995). |
Ulmsten, Ulf et al., The Unstable Female Urethra, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 144 No. 1, pp. 93-97 (Sep. 1, 1982). |
Vesica® Percutaneous Bladder. Neck Stabilization Kit, A New Approach to Bladder Neck Suspenison, Microvasive® Boston Scientific Corporation, 4 pages (1995). |
Vesica® Sling Kits, Simplifying Sling Procedures, Microvasive® Boston Scientific Corporation, 4 pages (1998). |
Villet, R., Réponse De R. Villet Á L 'Article de D. Dargent et al., Gynécolgie Obstétrique & Fertilité, vol. 31, p. 96 (2003). |
Walters, Mark D., Percutaneous Suburethral Slings: State of the Art, Presented at the conference of the American Urogynecologic Society, Chicago, 29 pages (Oct. 2001). |
Waxman, Steve et al., Advanced Urologic Surgery for Urinary Incontinence, The Female Patient, pp. 93-100, vol. 21 (Mar. 1996). |
Weber, Anne M. et al., Anterior Vaginal Prolapse: Review of Anatomy and Techniques of Surgical Repair, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 311-318 (Feb. 1997). |
Webster, George et al., Voiding Dysfunction Following Cystourethropexy: Its Evaluation and Management, The Journal of Urology, vol. 144, pp. 670-673 (Sep. 1990). |
Winter, Chester C., Peripubic Urethropexy for Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women, Urology, vol. XX, No. 4, pp. 408-411 (Oct. 1982). |
Winters et al., Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy and Abdominal Enterocele Repair in the Management of Vaginal Vault Prolapse, Urology, vol. 56, supp. 6A, pp. 55-63 (2000). |
Woodside, Jeffrey R. et al., Suprapubic Endoscopic Vesical Neck Suspension for the Management of Urinary Incontinence in Myelodysplastic Girls, The Journal of Urology, vol. 135, pp. 97-99 (Jan. 1986). |
Zacharin, Robert et al., Pulsion Enterocele: Long-Term Results of an Abdominoperineal Technique, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 55 No. 2, pp. 141-148 (Feb. 1980). |
Zacharin, Robert, The Suspensory Mechanism of the Female Urethra, Journal of Anatomy, vol. 97, Part 3, pp. 423-427 (1963). |
Zimmern, Phillippe E. et al., Four-Corner Bladder Neck Suspension, Vaginal Surgery for the Urologist, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 29-36 (Apr. 1994). |
Le point sur l'incontinence urinaire, Expertise et Practiques en Urologie, No. 3. Dr. Sophie Conquy [Hospital Cochin, Paris]. pp. 17-19. |
Mouly, Patrick et al., Vaginal Reconstruction of a Complete Vaginal Prolapse: The Trans Obturator Repair, Journal of Urology, vol. 169, p. 183 (Apr. 2003). |
Pourdeyhimi, B, Porosity of Surgical Mesh Fabrics: New Technology, J. Biomed. Mater. Res.: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 23, No. A1, pp. 145-152 (1989). |
Drutz, H.P. et al., Clinical and Urodynamic Re-Evaluation of Combined Abdominovaginal Marlex Sling Operations for Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 1, pp. 70-73 (1990). |
Petros, Papa PE et al., An Integral Theory and its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence, Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, Supplement 153: p. 1 (1993). |
Mentor Porges, Uratape, ICS/IUGA Symp, Jul. 2002. |
Mascio, “Therapy of Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women Using Mitek® GII Anchors”, Mitek® Brochure, 1993, 5 pages. |
Uromed Corporation, “Access Instrument System(TM) with Allo Sling(TM) Fascia”, Apr. 1, 1999, 6 pages. |
Visco, et al., “Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy”, American Journal of Obstetric Gynecology, vol. 184, Feb. 2001, pp. 297-302. |
Webster, “Female Urinary Incontinence”, Urologic Surgery J.B. Lippincott Company: Philadelphia, 1983, pp. 665-679. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150230906 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61085247 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12533515 | Jul 2009 | US |
Child | 14227534 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14227534 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 14703375 | US |