This application describes methods and instruments for performing surgical maneuvers across one or more segments of the spinal column. More particularly, the surgical maneuvers are performed on the anterior column and posterior column of the spine with the patient positioned in the lateral decubitus position.
The spinal column is a highly complex system of bones and connective tissues that provide support for the body and protect the delicate spinal cord and nerves. The spinal column includes a series of vertebral bodies stacked one atop the other, each vertebral body including an inner or central portion of relatively weak cancellous bone and an outer portion of relatively strong cortical bone. Situated between each vertebral body is an intervertebral disc that cushions and dampens compressive forces exerted upon the spinal column. A vertebral canal containing the spinal cord is located behind the vertebral bodies.
There are many types of spinal column disorders including scoliosis (abnormal lateral curvature of the spine), excess kyphosis (abnormal forward curvature of the spine), excess lordosis (abnormal backward curvature of the spine), spondylolisthesis (forward displacement of one vertebra over another), and other disorders caused by abnormalities, disease or trauma, such as ruptured or slipped discs, degenerative disc disease, fractured vertebrae, and the like. Patients that suffer from such conditions usually experience extreme and debilitating pain, as well as diminished nerve function.
A noteworthy trend in the medical community is the move away from performing surgery via traditional, “open” techniques in favor of “minimally invasive” or “minimal access” techniques. Open surgical techniques are generally undesirable in that they typically require large incisions and high amounts of tissue displacement to gain access to the surgical target site, which produces concomitantly high amounts of pain, lengthened hospitalization (increasing health care costs), and high morbidity in the patient population. Less-invasive surgical techniques (including so-called minimal access and minimally invasive techniques) are gaining favor due to the fact that they involve accessing surgical target sites via incisions of substantially smaller size with greatly reduced tissue displacement requirements. This, in turn, reduces the pain, morbidity, and cost associated with such procedures. One such minimally invasive approach, a lateral trans-psoas approach to the spine, developed by NuVasive®, Inc., San Diego, Calif. (XLIF®) has demonstrated great success in reducing patient morbidity, shortening the duration of hospitalization, and speeding recovery time if it is employed.
In some instances, it is desirable to perform a lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedure with supplemental posterior fixation. This may require re-positioning the patient from the lateral decubitus position to the prone position which can significantly increase operative time among other things. It is therefore advantageous to perform so-called “single position spine surgery” in which the lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedure and the posterior fixation procedure are performed while maintaining the patient in the lateral decubitus position. In some instances, patient pathology (for example, spondylolisthesis) presents significant challenges to single position spine surgery. What is needed are methods and instruments that facilitate single position surgery in a wide variety of pathologies. The present invention addresses the aforementioned needs.
In one aspect of the invention, a spinal procedure comprises attaching a first reduction instrument to a first guide assembly and a second guide assembly; attaching the first guide assembly to a first pedicle; attaching the second guide assembly to a second pedicle; moving the first reduction instrument to reduce an orientation of the spine; and following the reduction of the orientation of the spine, at least one of inserting an interbody implant into the spine and attaching a rod to the spine.
In a further aspect of the invention, a spinal procedure comprises attaching a first reduction instrument to a pair of first guide assemblies; attaching a second reduction instrument to a pair of second guide assemblies; attaching the first guide assemblies to upside pedicles; attaching the second guide assemblies to downside pedicles; moving the first reduction instrument to reduce an orientation of the spine; locking an angle and position of the first reduction instrument upon achieving a desired reduction; and following the desired reduction, at least one of inserting an interbody implant into the spine and attaching a rod to the spine.
In yet another aspect of the invention, a spinal reduction instrument comprises a body having: a pair of racks; and translational slots in the racks; a fixed attachment assembly pivotally attached to the racks, wherein the fixed attachment assembly is configured to: prevent rotation thereof relative to the body; and engage a first guide assembly; a translating attachment assembly pivotally attached to the racks, wherein the translating attachment assembly is configured to: translate in the translational slots; and engage a second guide assembly.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following drawings, description and claims.
Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure. The methods and instruments disclosed herein boast a variety of inventive features and components that warrant patent protection, both individually and in combination.
Broadly, the present invention provides methods and apparatus for spinal surgical procedures. Some exemplary methods include lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures and posterior fixation procedures. In exemplary procedures, the patient is maintained in a lateral decubitus position.
In order to gain direct physical and fluoroscopic access to bilateral posterior anatomy, it is helpful to position the patient appropriately at the onset of the case. In an embodiment, the patient can be centered on the table in an anterior-posterior direction, with the greater trochanter of the patient positioned at the table break. Next, the patient can be rolled slightly in the anterior direction, such as approximately 15 degrees. By way of example only, this may be measured at the intercrestal line with a digital protractor or virtual plumb line (e.g., via a smartphone app). The patient may then be secured to the OR table (e.g., with surgical tape). The bed can then be tilted in the posterior direction to counter act the forward roll of the patient until a true anterior/posterior (AP) fluoroscopic image is obtained.
After the patient is oriented and secured in the desired position, the surgical levels and skin approach can be localized. According to an exemplary implementation, AP fluoroscopy can be used to find the midline at the spinous process and the skin is marked, such as about 5.5 cm above and below that point with longitudinal lines (such as for a Wiltse paramedial approach). Lateral fluoroscopic images may then be used to determine cephalad/caudal angles through the pedicles and this line may be projected posteriorly to intersect the Wiltse lines. Once completed for the upper and lower spinal levels of the surgical procedure, the exact skin approach is known and the surgical procedure may commence.
According to a first exemplary embodiment, a lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedure (by way of example only, an XLIF® procedure) may be performed followed by posterior fixation (by way of example only, bilateral pedicle screw fixation via open, percutaneous, and minimally invasive techniques) while the patient remains in the lateral decubitus position. According to one exemplary implementation (described below) posterior fixation may be effectuated utilizing a minimally invasive posterior fixation system.
For purposes of illustration, systems and methods of the present invention will be described for use in conjunction with a minimally invasive posterior fixation system utilized with a patient positioned in the lateral decubitus position. It is to be appreciated, however, that such systems and techniques are contemplated for use with open as well as percutaneous posterior fixation systems as well.
Bilateral pedicle screws may be placed in the lateral decubitus position using a biplanar, or anterior-posterior, fluoroscopic view of the pedicles. Using the previously mapped and marked Wiltse incisions, incisions can be made, tissue can be retracted (e.g., with a Wheatlaner retractor), the fascia can be divided, and the facet and transverse processes can be located using blunt finger dissection. A pedicle access instrument 10 (
If satisfied, the pedicle access instrument 10 may be tapped into position to set the tip 13, and the C-arm may be moved to the A/P position to take an AP image. If, in the A/P position, the tip 13 is positioned on the lateral aspect of the pedicle and on/near the 9 o'clock position (i.e., the upside or contralateral pedicle as it relates to the surface of the OR bed) or on/near the 3 o'clock position (i.e., the downside or ipsilateral pedicle), the tip may be advanced until it is at least fully engaged with the cortex of the bone. The C-arm may then be repositioned to the lateral position and the pedicle access instrument 10 may be advanced into the pedicle.
According to one or more exemplary implementations, it is contemplated that the techniques described herein may be used with a navigated guidance system (e.g. NuVasive® Guidance™). The navigated guidance system may include one or more orthogonal tilt sensor adapters 20 (
Once the pedicle access instrument 10 has advanced to the desired depth (e.g., 30 mm), a stylet may be removed and a guide wire may be advanced to the desired depth. This process can be repeated on the contralateral pedicle of the same level and then advanced to the next level; however, it is contemplated that the process may be repeated in any order. Once all guide wires are in place, an AP image may be obtained to confirm angles match the expectation of convergence.
In
In
In accordance with exemplary embodiments, with the C-arm in the lateral position, the pedicle angle may then be matched to the navigated guidance system feedback and the tap may be advanced into the pedicle. The tilt sensor clip may then be attached to a screwdriver via a screw driver adapter and the screwdriver may be advanced into the pedicle until the final desired depth is achieved. According to some implementations, the steps of preparing a pilot hole, advancing a tap, and placing a pedicle screw may be performed in conjunction with intraoperative neuromonitoring techniques, for example dynamic or basic screw stimulation using, by way of example only, a NuVasive® NVM5® intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring device. The remainder of the posterior spinal fixation procedure may be completed per specific technique.
Once the pedicle screws have been properly seated, a reduction instrument 60 (
The fixed attachment assembly 63 can be positioned between the distal ends of each of the racks 65 and can be pivotably attached to each rack via a swivel pin 63a (
Each connector 63b, 64b can have a respective guide cavity 63c, 64c into which a proximal end of a respective guide assembly can be received (
Adjacent to the fixed attachment assembly 63 can be a locking assembly 69. The locking assembly can be comprised of an angular body 69a and a thumbwheel 69b. The angular body 69a can be carried between the parallel racks 65 and may be attached to the connector of the fixed attachment assembly. In an embodiment, the fixed attachment assembly 63 and the locking assembly 69 are in a fixed relationship (e.g. via welding) with one another such that as the fixed attachment assembly moves about the swivel pin 64a, the angular body 69a moves with it. The angular body can include two outwardly facing lateral sides, at least one of which may include a plurality of dimples arranged in a generally-arced fashion. The thumbwheel 69b of the locking assembly can be threaded and include a tip that is sized and dimensioned for disposal through the rounded openings 67a on the parallel rack 65 and into one dimple of the angular body 69a. Tightening the thumbwheel 69b can lock the fixed attachment assembly 63 into one position.
In use, the reduction instrument 60 (with the locking assembly 69 in an unlocked configuration) can be attached, via the fixed attachment assembly 63, to a first guide assembly 70 at a first vertebral level, and can be attached, via the translating attachment assembly 64, to a second guide assembly 70 on an adjacent vertebral level. The attachment assemblies 63, 64 can be attached to the guide assemblies in the manner described above. The handle 62 may then pushed downward (e.g., toward the spine), causing the body 61 of the reduction instrument 60 to pivot around the translating attachment assembly 64, thereby lifting the fixed translation assembly 63. Thus, the screw, the guide, and ultimately the vertebra can be lifted upward (i.e., reduced) to the desired position. Once in the desired position, the thumbwheel 69b of the locking assembly 69 can be tightened until the pin firmly seats into the dimple corresponding to the desired angular position of the fixed attachment assembly (i.e., reduction correction). This can secure the reduction in place while the lateral lumbar interbody implant and spinal rods are placed. A lock screw can be introduced via a lock screw inserter (not shown) and attached to the pedicle screw. The reduction instrument 60 can then be removed and the lock screw tightened via a final tightening device (not shown).
Bilateral pedicle screws can be placed in the lateral decubitus position using an oblique, or en fasse, fluoroscopic view of the pedicles. If the oblique view is intended, it is advantageous to flip the C-arm to an “over-the-top” configuration so that both pedicles (pedicles ipsilateral and contralateral to the bed surface) can be viewed in the oblique projection.
The patient positioning and preparation steps can be the same as discussed above and, as such, will not be repeated here.
Downside pedicles can be targeted first, again having measured and marked the Wiltse incision previously. After confirming true lateral patient position, the orthogonal C-arm reticle tilt sensor can be used to align the C-arm to the templated pedicle angle. Images can be taken with a radiopaque marker on the skin directly over the pedicle, and proper visualization can be confirmed.
Using the previously mapped and marked Wiltse incisions, incisions can be made, tissue can be retracted (e.g., with a Wheatlaner retractor), the fascia can be divided, and the facet and transverse processes can be located using blunt finger dissection. The tip of a pedicle access instrument (e.g., a NuVasive® IPAS™ instrument) may be delivered to a surgical target site (e.g., the sulcus of the transverse process and the superior articular process junction) such that an oblique fluoroscopic image may be taken to: 1) localize the target spinal level; 2) assess the angles of approach; and 2) evaluate depth at the tip of the localizing instrument. Adjustments and additional localizing fluoroscopic x-ray shots may be made until the desired starting point is confirmed. Next, the C-arm may be brought to lateral position.
Once the pedicle access instrument has advanced to the desired depth (e.g., 30 mm), the stylett may be removed, and a guide wire may be advanced to the desired depth. This process can be repeated on all of the ipsilateral screws until all of the levels are cannulated with guide wires before moving on to contralateral pedicles.
To properly visualize the upside (contralateral) pedicles, the C-arm can be reversed at the joints to enable “over-the-top” orientation. To ensure sterility of the C-arm, a tunnel C-arm drape can be connected to a ¾ drape with loban. The sheet can then be clamped to the drapes at the level of the lateral aspect of the patient to provide a sterile barrier for the arc of the C-arm. The C-arm then arcs over the patient to the templated pedicle angle, as measured by the orthogonal C-arm reticle tilt sensor. The guide wires can be placed in a similar fashion as described above with respect to the down side pedicles and repeated until all pedicles are cannulated and guide wires are placed. Once all guide wires are in place, AP and lateral images may be obtained to confirm angles match the expectation of convergence.
The tilt sensor clip may then be attached to a tap via a tap adapter. With the C-arm in the lateral position, the pedicle angle may then be matched to the navigated guidance system feedback and the tap may be advanced into the pedicle. The tilt sensor clip may then be attached to a screwdriver via a screw driver adapter and the screwdriver may be advanced into the pedicle until the final desired depth is achieved. According to some implementations, the steps of preparing a pilot hole, advancing a tap, and placing a pedicle screw may be performed in conjunction with intraoperative neuromonitoring techniques, for example dynamic or basic screw stimulation using, by way of example only, a NuVasive® NVM5® intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring device. The remainder of the posterior spinal fixation procedure may be completed per specific technique.
According to another embodiment, pedicle screws may be placed in a minimally invasive fashion prior to the lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedure with the remainder of the posterior spinal fixation procedure. One advantage of such a methodology is the ability to reduce a spondylolisthesis from the lateral decubitus position leveraging pedicle screws.
The patient positioning, C-arm orientation, and incision mapping steps may be performed in the manner as set forth above or any other manner known in the art. All pedicle screws may then be placed at the desired levels. This may be done using one of the bilateral or oblique fluoroscopy techniques described above.
According to one exemplary implementation, with the C-arm placed in the lateral position, the reduction instrument (described in regards to
It should be understood, of course, that the foregoing relates to exemplary embodiments of the invention and that modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/985,655, filed May 21, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/158,925, filed May 19, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,974,577, (the contents being incorporated herein by reference), which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/165,078, filed May 21, 2015 (the contents being incorporated herein by reference).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4282217 | Baglioni et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4316169 | Teranishi et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4450899 | Jakobsson et al. | May 1984 | A |
5217497 | Mehdian | Jun 1993 | A |
5360431 | Puno et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5474555 | Puno et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5496321 | Puno et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5681319 | Biedermann et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5716356 | Biedermann et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5910141 | Morrison et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5941885 | Jackson | Aug 1999 | A |
6059786 | Jackson | May 2000 | A |
6139549 | Keller | Oct 2000 | A |
6179841 | Jackson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189422 | Stihl | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6224598 | Jackson | May 2001 | B1 |
6251112 | Jackson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258090 | Jackson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6379356 | Jackson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6440132 | Jackson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440133 | Beale et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6485494 | Haider | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6530929 | Justis et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6554834 | Crozet et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6648888 | Shluzas | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6723100 | Biedermann et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726687 | Jackson | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6743231 | Gray et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6884244 | Jackson | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7008422 | Foley et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011660 | Sherman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7073415 | Casutt et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7094239 | Michelson | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7160300 | Jackson | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7179261 | Sicvol et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188626 | Foley et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7204838 | Jackson | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7250052 | Landry et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7278995 | Nichols et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
D560128 | Diederich et al. | Jan 2008 | S |
7470279 | Jackson | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7476240 | Raymond et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7491208 | Pond, Jr. et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7491218 | Landry et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7520879 | Justis et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7527638 | Anderson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7559931 | Stone | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7563264 | Landry et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7574318 | Hsieh | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7588575 | Colleran et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7588588 | Spitler et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7608081 | Abdelgany | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7618422 | Goodwin | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621918 | Jackson | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7648521 | Hestad | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651502 | Jackson | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7678139 | Garamszegi et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691132 | Landry et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708743 | Anderson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7708763 | Selover et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7717921 | Rezach | May 2010 | B2 |
7717944 | Foley et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7744629 | Hestad et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7749233 | Farr et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758617 | Iott et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763055 | Foley | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7771430 | Jones et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7811288 | Jones et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7854751 | Sicvol et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7862595 | Foley et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7867259 | Foley et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7909835 | Oribe et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914558 | Landry et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918857 | Dziedzic et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7918858 | Stad et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7918878 | Songer et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7922727 | Songer et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927334 | Miller et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7931654 | Jones et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7931673 | Hestad et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7947045 | Hestad et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7955355 | Chin | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967821 | Sicvol et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7985242 | Forton et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8002798 | Chin et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8034084 | Landry et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8052720 | Kuester et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062340 | Berrevoets et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066739 | Jackson | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075592 | Landry et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8100915 | Jackson | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8100951 | Justis et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105361 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8137355 | Hestad | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8137356 | Hestad et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8137387 | Garamszegi | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8152810 | Jackson | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8162948 | Jackson | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8177817 | Fallin | May 2012 | B2 |
8192439 | Songer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8192440 | Jones et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8231635 | Sharifi-Mehr et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8262662 | Beardsley et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8273089 | Jackson | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277453 | Kave | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8277491 | Selover et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8292892 | Jackson | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8303595 | Jones | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8308728 | Iott et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8317796 | Stihl et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8361124 | Sherman et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8377067 | Jackson | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8460300 | Hestad et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8460308 | Marino et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8470008 | Dickinson et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8496685 | Landry et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8512343 | Dziedzic | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8518082 | Sicvol et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8608746 | Kolb et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8617427 | Jiang et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
RE44813 | Beale et al. | Mar 2014 | E |
8663298 | Keyer et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8679128 | Seelig | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9101401 | Dalton | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9198698 | Doose | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9480504 | Schafer et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9974577 | Smith et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
10028772 | Meyer | Jul 2018 | B2 |
20020133159 | Jackson | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072751 | Jackson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030199872 | Markworth et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030224327 | Constantino | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030225408 | Nichols et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236529 | Shluzas et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040039383 | Jackson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049196 | Jackson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040147937 | Dunbar, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040158247 | Sitiso et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167523 | Jackson | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040254576 | Dunbar, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267275 | Cournoyer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050176468 | Iacono et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182410 | Jackson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192570 | Jackson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192579 | Jackson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228380 | Moore et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245928 | Colleran et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060036254 | Lim | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060069391 | Jackson | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074418 | Jackson | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089651 | Trudeau et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095035 | Jones et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100622 | Jackson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111712 | Jackson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111713 | Jackson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111715 | Jackson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060200132 | Chao et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229614 | Foley et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247630 | Iott et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276789 | Jackson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293684 | Shluzas et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293692 | Whipple et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070043378 | Kumar et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055240 | Matthis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070065692 | Ryoo et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070213722 | Jones et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070270811 | Dewey | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288002 | Carls et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288007 | Burkus et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299450 | Her et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080009864 | Forton et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015601 | Castro et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039844 | Jackson | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045957 | Landry et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045970 | Saidha et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051794 | Dec et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080086132 | Biedermann et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091213 | Jackson | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080172062 | Donahue et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080234678 | Gutierrez et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243190 | Dziedzic et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275456 | Vonwiller et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288005 | Jackson | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300638 | Beardsley et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030419 | Runco et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030420 | Runco et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090105712 | Dauster et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090157125 | Hoffman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171394 | Abdou | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174467 | Kim | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090216281 | Vonwiller et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216328 | Birkmeyer et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228053 | Kolb et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228054 | Hoffman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228055 | Jackson | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240292 | Butler et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090254125 | Predick | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090275994 | Phan et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090306721 | Kirschman | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004696 | Jackson | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100024487 | Khoo | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036434 | Ely | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057126 | Hestad | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063552 | Chin et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100121385 | Blain et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137991 | Ainsworth et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160921 | Sun et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100238572 | Tao et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100292742 | Stad et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100294595 | Osburn | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100331901 | Iott et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004222 | Biedermann et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110034961 | Runco et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040328 | Miller et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040335 | Stihl et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110077692 | Jackson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087293 | Ferreira et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106187 | Foley et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110137358 | Manninen | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184469 | Ballard et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202137 | Keith et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110218583 | Smith et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110234466 | Yamada | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238117 | Geist et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245836 | Hamada | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110257692 | Sandstrom et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282402 | Chao et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120016425 | Shaffrey et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120078316 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120100497 | Joo | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120123431 | Robinson | May 2012 | A1 |
20120158070 | Jackson | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165876 | Nichols et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120191144 | Peultier et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203288 | Lange et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120271365 | Daubs et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277800 | Jackson | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130035728 | Jackson | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130035729 | Hammer | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130072987 | Justis et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130090697 | George | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110124 | Gleason et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130150887 | McLean et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130184763 | McClintock et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130296949 | Sicvol et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130296950 | Landry et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304130 | Jackson | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140031872 | Jackson | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031873 | Jackson | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140039567 | Hoefer et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058465 | Nichols et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140074106 | Shin | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140100613 | Iott et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100617 | Sandstrom et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100618 | Kolb et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140107708 | Biedermann et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140163625 | Meyer et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140194939 | Seelig | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202012102895 | Jul 2014 | DE |
234787 | Sep 1987 | EP |
1839606 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1891904 | Feb 2008 | EP |
2070485 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2462889 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2574297 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2719347 | Apr 2014 | EP |
2920663 | Mar 2009 | FR |
2003265492 | Sep 2003 | JP |
WO2002094114 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO2012127267 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO2012127268 | Sep 2012 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200261123 A1 | Aug 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62165078 | May 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15985655 | May 2018 | US |
Child | 16866518 | US | |
Parent | 15158925 | May 2016 | US |
Child | 15985655 | US |