1. Field of the Invention
This invention is concerned with novel sterilization techniques, particularly with techniques involved with sterilization of multi-component medical device implants of which components have varying degrees of resiliency dependent on the sterilization technique.
2. Related Art
Sterilization is a key step in providing safe and efficacious products, particularly for implantable medical devices.
Currently medical devices are terminally sterilized using a variety of methods, such as ethylene oxide, gamma sterilization. For products that are in a liquid form, sub-micron filters may be used to sterilize the product. However, there are some devices that might require combinations of components that may not be compatible with the same sterilization method. For example, a mixture of a growth factor with a scaffold. In this instance, the two components may be separately sterilized or aseptically processed using the appropriate method and are then brought together aseptically at the final stage of processing. Due to the open nature of the aseptic processing, there is always a chance of contamination, leading to the rejection of the product lot.
Alternately, the combined product may be terminally sterilized, wherein the final product may be sterilized by conventional sterilization techniques such as by ethylene oxide or gamma irradiation. However, terminal sterilization techniques may affect the efficacy or other physical properties of the combined medical device.
Therefore, there is a need for novel methods and devices that are adaptable to sterilizing multiple components that have different degrees of resiliency to sterilization techniques such as may occur when a single terminal sterilization technique is used on a combination of components of a device that may be adequate for one of the components but may destroy the efficacy of the other component(s). One such advance in sterilization techniques is provided for by the invention hereinafter disclosed.
One embodiment of this invention is directed to a method of sterilization of a multi-component medical device comprising:
A major advantage of this invention is that medical devices that have components of different resiliencies to particular sterilization techniques may be combined by tailoring the sterilization techniques to a particular component. In this way the susceptibility of one component to lose its strength or efficiency is not compromised by the effects of a single sterilization step for both components.
One embodiment of the invention is found in
As used herein, the term carrier is intended to encompass items that are capable of carrying a biologic agent. The carrier is not restricted to any particular form and may be embodied as a gel, a non-porous solid, or porous solids such as foams, sponges, and scaffolds, for example.
Another embodiment of this invention is depicted in
In operation, with reference to the embodiment of
Yet another embodiment of this invention is depicted in
In operation, ethylene oxide sterilization is used to sterilize the contents 200 in housing 100. Therefore all components in the system at this point should be amenable to ethylene oxide sterilization. The ethylene oxide sterilization may be accomplished under this scenario by first introducing the ethylene oxide at port 300 and allowing it to flow through manifold 320 with stopcock 360 sufficiently opened to permit this while not drawing too much of the flow in order to permit flow of ethylene oxide through pouches 100 and out manifold 400 with stopcock 460 opened. After a sufficient time is allowed for sterilization, stopcocks 460 and 360 are closed.
When the biologic agent is ready to be introduced into the sterilized kit, the agent with any appropriate binder is introduced through port 300 with stopcock 360 open to allows wells 330 to fill with the agent composition. Once the appropriate level of agent is reached in wells 330, stopcock 460 is opened to allow the agent to enter housing 100 and contact item 200. After a sufficient amount of contact time between the agent and item 200 has been reached so as to insure item 200 contains an effective amount of the biologic agent, stop-cock 360 is switched to a dry nitrogen source and dry nitrogen enters at point A and flows through the system until all the moisture is driven out through point B. At this stage stopcock 460 is closed and the system pressurized with dry nitrogen to an appropriate pressure. Tubes 340 and 420 leading to each of housing 100 are then sealed using conventional techniques such as by radio-frequency sealing. Individual pouches 100 thus sealed and removed from manifold 320 and 400. Pouches 100 may be placed into another packet and sealed or provided individually for shipping.
While the above embodiments may have been described by a particular sterilization technique for the carrier, one skilled in the art will understand that other sterilization techniques may be used in place of the above demonstrated techniques.
Examples of suitable materials for the carrier include those made of biocompatible materials including those which are non-bioabsorbable (i.e., not able to be readily degraded in the body, whereby the degraded components may be absorbed into or passed out of the body) and bioabsorbable. The biocompatible material may be synthetic or natural.
Examples of synthetic biocompatible materials include but are not limited to polyesters of [alpha]-hydroxycarboxylic acids, such as poly(L-lactide) (PLLA), polyglycolide (PGA), self-reinforced PLLA and self-reinforced PGA; poly-p-dioxanone (abbreviated as PDO or PDS); polyhydroxy acids, poly(ortho esters); poly(beta-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB); poly (PHB-hydroxyvaleric acid), pseudo-poly(aminoacids) or polyiminocarbonates; poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene carbonate); poly-caprolactone (PCL); polyvinyl alcohol (PVA); polyethylene oxide (PEO); polymers disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,333,029 and 6,355,699; and any other bioresorbable and biocompatible polymer, co-polymer or mixture of polymers or co-polymers that are utilized in the construction of prosthetic implants (e.g. 85:15 PLLA:PGA, 90:10 PGA:PLLA, or any polymer or co-polymer listed above in combination with a non-degradable material, or any combination of the above at any co-polymer ratio.) In addition, as new biocompatible, bioresorbable materials are developed, it is expected that at least some of them will be useful materials with this invention. It should be understood that the above materials are identified by way of example only, and the present invention is not limited to any particular material.
Natural biocompatible materials are intended to encompass naturally occurring polymers, as well as synthetic modifications or derivatives thereof. Examples of natural biocompatible materials include but are not limited to collagen, recombinant collagen, laminin, elastin, fibronectin, fibrinogen, thrombospondin, gelatin, polysaccharides, poly-1-amino acids, hyaluronic acid, cellulose, alginates, chondroitin sulfate, chitosan, chitin, keratin, silk, small intestine submucosa (“SIS”), and combinations thereof. These materials can be further treated or modified to enhance their mechanical, or degradation or tissue inducing properties by introducing cross-linking agents or changing the hydrophobicity of the side residues or treating with additional components.
Examples of biocompatible, non-bioabsorbable materials include but are not limited to biocompatible metals, including but not limited to stainless steel, cobalt chrome, titanium and titanium alloys; or bio-inert ceramics, including but not limited to alumina, zirconia and calcium sulfate; or non-biodegradable polymers, including but not limited to polyethylene, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), silicone, polyethylene oxide (PEO), polyethylene glycol (PEG), and polyurethanes.
A preferred modified and treated collagen based bioabsorbable material is mineralized forms of collagen including HEALOS® mineralized bone graft product available from DePuy Spine, Inc. Another preferred bioabsorbable material is SIS.
Examples of suitable biologic agents are those that have biologic activity and are capable of being filter sterilized and include but are not limited to chemotactic agents; therapeutic agents (e.g., antibiotics, antimicrobials, steroidal and non-steroidal analgesics and anti-inflammatories, anti-rejection agents such as immunosuppressants and anti-cancer drugs); various proteins (e.g., short chain peptides, active or inactive peptides, bone morphogenic proteins, glycoproteins and lipoproteins); cell attachment mediators; biologically active ligands; integrin binding sequence; ligands; various growth and/or differentiation agents (e.g., epidermal growth factor, IGF-I, IGF-II, TGF-β I-III, growth and differentiation factors, vascular endothelial growth factors, fibroblast growth factors, platelet derived growth factors, insulin-like growth factor and transforming growth factors), parathyroid hormone, parathyroid hormone related peptide, bFGF; TGF-β superfamily factors; bone morphogenetic proteins; BMP-2; BMP-4; BMP-6; BMP-7, BMP-12; sonic hedgehog; GDF5 (also referred to as BMP-14 or MP-52 or rhGDF-5 or CDMP-1); GDF-6; GDF-8; CDMP-2; CDMP-3; PDGF; small molecules or protein equivalents that affect the upregulation of specific growth factors or other processes occurring during a healing response (e.g. TP508 and Chrysalin® both available from OrthoLogic, Tempe, Ariz.); tenascin-C; hyaluronic acid; chondroitin sulfate; fibronectin; decorin; thromboelastin; thrombin-derived peptides; heparin-binding domains; heparin; heparin sulfate; DNA fragments and DNA plasmids as sole constituents or when incorporated into appropriate vectors, such as viral constructs.
Preferably the biologic agent is in liquid form and is filtered sterilized by conventional techniques when introduced through the housing to be combined with the previously sterilized carrier. Such sterilizing filters are available from Millipore, Corporation, Billerica, Mass., USA which provide a large variety of filter having pore sizes of 0.22 microns or less which prevent introduction of living organisms.
Examples of suitable housing materials include but are not limited to polymeric or metallic materials. Preferred polymeric materials include but are not limited to polycarbonates, polyolefin (TYVEK®), polyester (MYLAR®), and polyethylene for example.
The following examples are intended as are intended to be illustrative and not limitative of the present invention.
A pad of Healos® mineralized collagen bone graft is placed in a polycarbonate housing. The housing is sealed using a water vapor permeable membrane and terminally sterilized using e-beam sterilization. A filter sterilized, buffered-solution containing 0.5 mg/cc rh-GDF-5 is introduced through the membrane onto the Healos® pad. The housing and scaffold with the rh-GDF-5 is then frozen and is ready for shipment to the user site.
The same process is followed as in Example 1, except that at the end of the process the housing and the scaffold with the GDF-5 is lyophilized and placed into a vacuum-sealed pouch.
The same process is followed as in Example 2, except that the lyophilized package is placed into a sterile mylar outer pouch aseptically.
A PLGA foam is placed in a Tyvek® pouch that has a polypropylene tube connected to a 0.22 micron filter. The entire assembly is sterilized using ethylene oxide. A buffered solution containing BMP-2 is introduced into the foam through the filter and then allowed to air dry. The polypropylene tube is then sealed using RF technology to create a sealed housing unit.
The same process as in Example 2, except that the housing unit contains two filters. One filter is used for introducing the liquid and a separate one is used for the lyophilization.
It should be understood that the foregoing disclosure and description of the present invention are illustrative and explanatory thereof and various changes in the size, shape and materials as well as in the description of the preferred embodiment may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4882149 | Spector | Nov 1989 | A |
5023087 | Yau-Young | Jun 1991 | A |
5522155 | Jones | Jun 1996 | A |
5596814 | Zingle et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5674292 | Tucker | Oct 1997 | A |
5724988 | Dennehey et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732837 | Jones | Mar 1998 | A |
5824084 | Muschler | Oct 1998 | A |
6028242 | Tucker | Feb 2000 | A |
6049026 | Muschler | Apr 2000 | A |
D425205 | Henigan et al. | May 2000 | S |
D430939 | Zukor et al. | Sep 2000 | S |
6127143 | Gunasekaran | Oct 2000 | A |
6333029 | Vyakarnam et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355699 | Vyakarnam et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6372494 | Naughton et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6468543 | Gilbertson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6800245 | Erbe et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
20020068267 | Horowitz et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020161449 | Muschler | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020179537 | Sukavaneshvar et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030108597 | Chancellor et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030143258 | Knaack et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030161816 | Fraser et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030185803 | Kadiyala | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220245 | Hubbell et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040071668 | Bays et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040120849 | Stewart et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143344 | Malaviya et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040197373 | Gertzman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050058632 | Hedrick et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050205498 | Sowemimo-Coker et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060062825 | Maccecchini | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060205652 | Zamora et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1348453 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1988500172 | Jan 1988 | JP |
1992500817 | Feb 1992 | JP |
2002515288 | May 2002 | JP |
2003104302 | Apr 2003 | JP |
WO 8607265 | Dec 1986 | WO |
WO 9101135 | Feb 1991 | WO |
9640297 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9800174 | Jan 1998 | WO |
9959500 | Nov 1999 | WO |
0240963 | May 2002 | WO |
02006810 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02068010 | Sep 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060093513 A1 | May 2006 | US |