Waste material may include material obtained from waste streams, such as sewage, sewage sludge, chemical wastes, food processing wastes, agricultural wastes, animal wastes including manure, and other organic waste and materials. Waste materials, collectively referred to herein as biomass, when broken down, may be used as a source of hydrocarbon, such as methane and/or other biogases, biosolids and other biofuels or bioproducts. Waste materials may also serve as a source of organic fertilizer. Unfortunately, processes to produce hydrocarbons, such as methane and/or other bioproducts or biofuels (e.g., biogases, biosolids, safe fertilizers, biosupplements) are complicated, costly and difficult to control.
As described, the invention relates generally to the field of anaerobic digestion of biomasses. More particularly, the present invention relates to the conversion of biomass to methane or other bioproducts or biofuels, such as biogases, biosolids, safe fertilizers, and biosupplements.
In various embodiments are provided one or more processes, apparatus, and systems for production of output that includes one or more biofuels or bioproducts (e.g., biogases, biosolids, fertilizer and/or biosupplements). Said output is provided by waste/biomass input into one or more digesters, generally via a feed stream. Such biofuels or bioproducts are produced via digestion of said waste materials, as further described herein. Said digester systems as described herein may yield a high biomass conversion efficiency at a high conversion rate. Conversions by digester systems described herein produce one or more bioproducts and biofuels, such as decomposed solids and biogases. In one form, a produced biofuel or bioproduct complies with a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classification as a Class A Biosolids. In addition or as an alternative, a produced biofuel or bioproduct includes one or more biogases, such as methane and hydrogen. In addition or as an alternative, a produced biofuel or bioproduct includes a safe and organic liquid fertilizer, a pathogen reduced fertilizer and/or a pathogen reduced biosupplement.
In one or more embodiments biomass digesters described herein are provided with increased efficiency that may enable reductions in digester volume and/or reactor size. In turn, such reductions should lead to reduced capital costs and reduced energy requirements, as a consequence of lower heating and mixing demands, as examples.
As described herein, in one or more forms, operating efficiency may be enhanced by a separation of phases in the digestion process, wherein each phase is identified as an isolated stage. Separation enables independent environments that may be pre-selected and optimized for each phase that includes a specific group of microorganisms involved in digestion. Separation of stages allows independent manipulation of a given stage in order to enhance production of a particular output, such one biogas over another or the co-production of one or more output products. Separation also allows one or more microbial environments to be independently manipulated for activity, inactivity and/or growth. For example, effective isolation of acidogenic microbes helps manage their normally very rapid and aggressive growth. Together, the independence of phase environments and separate control of said phases provides a more stable operation by minimizing process upsets (e.g., microbe displacement and spillover that could normally be caused by unequal microbial growth) and provides uninterrupted operating periods that should maximize biogas, biosolid and/or biofuel production.
In one or more embodiments, systems and processes described herein may provide stable anaerobic digestion and uninterrupted plant operation with reduced plant upsets, upsets that are normally due to unequal growth rates of one or more microorganism. Hence, described herein is a means for efficient manipulation of one or more desired microorganisms and their activity within a given and isolated phase.
In yet other forms, systems and processes described herein may provide greater production of desired digestion products due to, in part, to decreased plant delays, interruptions and more efficient processing of waste/biomass.
Additional embodiments, as described herein, may include systems and processes for treatment and recycling of biomass water and effluent used in the digestion process. Such treatment reduces the overall amount of water consumed in digestion processes, as described herein.
Still further embodiments described herein include more manageable environmental conditions for microorganisms, including more moderate pH for microbe preservation, avoidance of over-acidification as well as minimal operating energy requirements, particularly suitable for commercial applications. Such enhancements promote system efficiency and stability.
In many embodiments, systems and processes described herein may provide efficient and on-demand biomass digestion and output production without a need for regular biomass biosupplements. Enhanced efficiency, as described herein, allows for digestion and output production with minimal operating energy requirements. Enhanced efficiency also provides for the reliable production of one or more biogases, biofuels and/or biosolids, including safe organic fertilizer.
Still further, as described herein are provided systems and processes that may be used for production of one or more biogases, including methane and/or hydrogen, wherein said one or more biogas may be used as an energy source for the digester system described herein.
In additional embodiments, described herein are parallel operations of two or more digester systems, which may further include the feeding of methane from one system into another system. Such parallel operation and/or sharing of resources may promote production of additional methane and/or other biofuels or bioproducts, such as hydrogen, Class A Biosolids, fertilizers and/or biosupplements, in one or more of the systems.
Other embodiments described herein may include operation of digestion phases in series, thereby further enhancing biofuel or bioproduct production from a given feed stream For example, two thermophilic digester reactors may be positioned in series to enhance and more efficiently produce methane and/or hydrogen and/or other biogases from a feed stream.
Yet further embodiments, as described herein, may include a consumption of a portion of volatile solids from a given biomass feed stream for production of a biogas, such as, for example, methane and/or hydrogen, with consumption of the remaining portion for production of one or more other biogases.
One or more embodiments provided herein may include the capability to adjust the amount of volatile solids in one or more portions of the feed stream without increasing water demands in a particular digestion phase, such as the hydrolysis phase.
Those skilled in the art will further appreciate the above-noted features and enhancements together with other important aspects thereof upon reading the detailed description that follows in conjunction with the drawings.
For more complete understanding of the features and advantages of the inventions described herein, reference is now made to a description of the invention along with accompanying figures, wherein:
The invention, as described herein, may be better understood by reference to the following detailed description. The description is meant to be read with reference to the figures contained herein. This detailed description relates to examples of the invented subject matter for illustrative purposes, and is in no way meant to limit the scope of the invention. The specific aspects and embodiments discussed herein are merely illustrative of ways to make and use the invention, and do not limit the scope of the invention.
Waste material includes material obtained from waste streams, such as sewage, sewage sludge, chemical wastes, food processing wastes, agricultural wastes, animal wastes including manure, and other organic waste and materials. Waste materials, when digested may provide a high amount of one or more biogases, biosolids, and/or other biofuels and biosupplements. Waste materials may also serve as a source of organic fertilizer. Unfortunately, processes to produce such output products, including methane and safe fertilizers, are complicated, costly and difficult to control. For example, cow manure, which may be composted to produce a safe fertilizer, is difficult to process and is costly to process. The unreliability in current composting methods are evidenced by recent outbreaks of one or more pathogen infections in humans, such as Escherichia coli infection after the ingestion of spinach and lettuce that had been organically fertilized and irrigated with composted cow manure. The E. coli outbreak prompted product recalls, caused numerous infections, and even resulted in death. Pathogens that may be present in animal manure include E. coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus, to name a few.
Digestion processes have been used to treat and remove organic compounds from waste streams containing the above-mentioned waste material (also referred to herein as biomass). Biological anaerobic digestion of biomass wastes produce, in one form, methane. Conventionally, natural gas, which is about 95 percent methane, is mined from deep natural gas deposits, which is very costly. The biologic digestion process reduces carbon dioxide emissions and does not require expansive mining projects or destruction of natural resources.
Unfortunately, current biomass digestion systems are large and costly to build. For example, the size of a conventional digester is 15 to 20 times the daily waste volume. In addition, such a digester requires high level management. A biomass digester for methane production and elimination of volatile solids may also be susceptible to environmental changes and a biological upset may take months to correct. And, with a digester system upset, methane generation and volatile solid reduction may decrease dramatically or even stop. As of yet, digester systems and biomass methane generation are not viable energy options for commercial and/or farm use. The same can be said that there are currently no viable means for providing risk-free commercial grade fertilizer using biomass digester systems.
Generally, biomass for digestion is placed in a feed stream and is diluted, or otherwise adjusted, to achieve a desired solution of suspended solids. Most conventional standard multi-stage anaerobic digestion systems include two phases, an acidogenesis phase and a methanogenesis phase, each of which are physically separated. The acidogenesis stage may or may not be combined with a hydrolysis stage. Acidogenesis, as a separate stage or combined with hydrolysis, precedes the methanogenesis stage. Typically, heat is added to the acidogenic phase but not in the methanogenic phase. The methanogenesis stage may be further preceded by a thermophilic stage; however, this stage is uncommon because it involves digestion by thermophilic microbes that convert acid chains to methane and is a much more volatile process than mesophilic methanogenesis (which uses mesophilic microbes). Thermophilic methanogenesis, when present, may be separated from mesophilic methanogenesis. Such stages may be separated by temperature.
While some current systems may separate some phases, such as hydrolysis, into one or more stages (e.g., a hydrolysis phase may be separated into three stages using escalating temperatures), such systems and methods require a substantial amount of energy for heating (e.g., for heating the final stages of hydrolysis) and one or more essential microbes may be destroyed at temperatures currently used by these alternative systems. For example, some alternative system will combine hydrolysis and acidification and hydrolysis enzymes will be included in the combined phase yet acidic pH levels will result. Too low of a pH, however, may lead to over acidification. In addition, a very low pH may lend to there being a difficulty in controlling pH in one or more subsequent stages and a very low pH has been known to attenuate growth of methanogenic microbes.
In one alternative multistage anaerobic digester, a partially partitioned long rectangular container was used (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,525,229). A modified plug flow with a fixed film reactor was employed. Hydrolysis was separated at the entry chamber of the horizontal rectangular container, continuing to a second chamber for the thermophilic phase and a mesophilic phase was in the third chamber. The operating temperatures and pH were the same for the hydrolysis stage and the thermophilic stage. Unfortunately, such conditions are not found to be conducive for timely acidogenesis and biogas production. Sufficient and timely acidogenesis are needed to enhance biomass digestion and methane/biogas generation rate.
A biofilm that increases surface area for bacterial growth may appear in digestion processes and will also add to maintenance demands of a digestion system. Biofilm production has been a problem particularly in systems in which all multi-stage chambers are in fluid communication with each other, such as that of U.S. Pat. No. 5,525,229. Spillover is also a problem in such a design as that of U.S. Pat. No. 5,525,229.
As described herein, systems, methods, and apparatus are provided that overcome many shortcomings of other biomass digesters. Digesters described herein are capable of accommodating a large variety of organic waste. An improvement included herewith is increased digester efficiency (e.g., lower heating and mixing demands) that can translate into decreased digester volume and/or reactor capacity/size, reduced energy requirements during operation and cost savings.
Operating efficiency is enhanced with systems and processes described herein via a number of avenues, including separation of phases during digestion, providing uninterrupted operating periods as well as energy and water reductions. Generally, digesters as described herein include four separate stages, such that there may be a unique and independent setting for each group of microorganisms specific to each digestion stage, including hydrolysis, acidogenesis and methanogenesis, including at least one thermophilic and mesophilic phase. Feed stream is moved between each separate stage by means of one or more pumps, pipelines and control valves. A feed stream as described herein may include a biomass with or without additional water, an output after digestion and/or between digestion stages, within one or more digestion stages or output from one or more digestion stages. As further described, systems and methods herein improve overall biomass digestion, enhance generation rate of methane and/or hydrogen and output of safe organic liquid fertilizer, Class A Biosolids and other pathogen reduced fertilizers and/or biosupplements. Separate phase environments allow for optimum conditions of microbe activity and growth and minimizes digestion process upsets that would ordinarily occur with microbe displacement and spillover and/or unequal microorganism growth rates. When, in other alternative systems, microbes spill over, production is generally halted and efficiency may be significantly reduced because water and energy usage cannot be effectively managed. On the other hand, more manageable and moderate reactor conditions as described herein (e.g., pH and/or temperature), preserve microbe colonies and minimize energy requirements, both of which are particularly suitable for commercial applications.
As described herein, treatment of and recycling of water is used, which translates into a reduced amount of water consumed with the digestion process.
Still further is provided a method and system whereby methane production is sufficient to meet the energy requirements of the digester.
Referring now to
In the hydrolysis phase (block 1), which is an aerobic phase, the feed stream is typically maintained at a temperature suitable for hydrolysis, often at an optimal temperature. Generally, the temperature is at or less than about 80° F. or 85° F. Often, the temperature is between about 60° to 85° F. Biomass remains in the hydrolysis phase for a period of about 12 hours to up to about 36 hours.
In some embodiments, the hydrolysis phase includes a pretreatment stage, as previously described above. As such, pretreatment and hydrolysis may be performed in the same reactor or in alternate vessels. In some embodiments, for example when pretreatment and hydrolysis stages are combined, dwell time may be for as long as 36 hours. In alternative embodiments, said dwell times may be for as long as 28 hours or as long as 24 hours or as long as 20 hours.
Generally, mixing of the feed stream occurs initially in the hydrolysis phase. The aerobic atmosphere during hydrolysis encourages faster growth of acidogenic microbes and lends to a stabilization in the consistency and/or viscosity of the feed stream.
During hydrolysis, complex biomolecules, such as proteins, cellulose, lipids, and other complex organics are broken down into simpler molecules, often in the form of monomers, using water to split chemical bonds. With acidogenesis, a group of microorganisms begin feeding on the monomers and/or long chain fatty acids obtained from the hydrolysis stage. Acidogenic microorganisms produce volatile fatty acids. In the thermophilic stage, when present, a group of microorganisms produce acetic acid, carbon dioxide, oxygen, and methane from volatile fatty acids. In addition, thermophilic microorganisms produce acetic acid intermediates, including propionate and butyrate, as well as hydrogen and carbon dioxide. Because digestion by thermophilic microbes is more volatile, this stage is often excluded in conventional digester systems.
During the methanogenic stage, a group of microorganisms produce methane and other products comprised in biogas from the remaining long chain acids and from acetic acid products of thermophilic digestion. Biogas produced by biomass digestion typically comprises about 55-70% methane, about 25-30% carbon dioxide, and any remaining mixture includes any of nitrogen, hydrogen, and hydrogen sulfide. About 70% of methanogenesis includes a fermentation process in which amino acids and sugars are converted to acetate; a specific group of microorganisms in the thermophilic stage convert acetate to methane. Up to 30% of methanogenesis may be a redox process, using hydrogenotrophic microbes that oxidize hydrogen with carbon dioxide (the electron receptor) to produce methane and thermophilic synotroph microbes that oxidize acetate to form hydrogen and carbon dioxide.
Referring again to
The acidic phase is generally held at an elevated temperature that is higher than that of the hydrolysis phase. In some embodiments, the temperature in the acidic phase is less than 100 degrees F. The temperature may often be between about 95° and 100° F. or between about 95° and 98° F. The pH in the acidic phase is generally below about 6.5. The pH in the acidic phase may be between about 5.8 and 6.2. The retention time of the feed stream in the reaction vessel for acidogenesis may be about 12 to 24 or about 12 to 20 hours. In some embodiments, the retention may be about 16 hours. In additional embodiments, the retention may be 16 hours. It has generally been found that as dwell time approaches or exceeds about 24 hours, over acidification may occur and the control of pH may become problematic. Conditions in the acidic phase are anaerobic. Generally, conditions after the hydrolysis phase are anaerobic.
Generally, at least one airtight vessel is used for each anaerobic phase to provide independent conditions and encourage a desired microbial activity. In the acidic phase, acidogenic anaerobic microbes break down the contents in the feed stream into short chain acids and produce carbon dioxide.
In several embodiments described herein, anaerobic conditions during any anaerobic digestion phase are improved by a recirculation of anaerobic gases, such as carbon dioxide, as shown in line 2C, lines 3C and lines 4C (
In addition, a mixing system may be included to advance digestion more quickly. In one or more embodiments, a gas, such as carbon dioxide or other air or gaseous mixture may be pumped through a device, such as a mixing device or via one or more jets or diffusers, to keep the feed stream in a state of suspension. The mixing generally provides a bubbling in the mixture and the bubbling enhances microbial growth, as bubbles feed in and around microbes for optimum microbial activity and gas generation. In addition or as an alternative, the mixing device may also generate a stable mixing pattern to keep the contents in a stable suspension. The gas, such as carbon dioxide or other air mixture, also provides a blanket on the surface of the biomass during the acidic phase (e.g., the gas collection zone or freeboard section) and may be used to displace oxygen away from the microbes.
Gas recirculation and/or auxiliary mixing in a reaction vessel will generally occur with each anaerobic phase (e.g., acidic, thermophilic, mesophilic) as depicted in
Auxiliary mixing methods that may be used include low energy air mixing (continuous and or discontinuous), pump and jet mixing, a gas lift mixing, mechanical mixing, and/or hydraulic mixing.
While other conventional systems and processes often combine the acidic stage with the methanogenesis stage, the problem is that such systems when combining these stages are subject to a higher concentration of carbon dioxide in the biogas produced therefrom. As described herein, the separation of an acidic stage from a phase for biogas and methane production reduces the concentration of carbon dioxide in the biogas produced therefrom, thereby reducing contaminants in the biogas.
Referring again to
The pH and temperature changes will curtail the acidogenesis reaction, diminish the population of acid microbes in the feed stream, retard growth of any surviving acid microbes, and stabilize the feed stream, particularly as it enters the thermophilic stage.
Temperature in the thermophilic phase is increased by passing the feed stream through a heating element, such as a heat exchanger (block 3A) or by heating the feed stream in the thermophilic reaction vessel. Generally, the heating element of 2A and of 3A are separate elements. In one form, a single element is used to heat and cool effluent, wherein the shell side of a conventional heat exchanger can heat effluent passing there-through, and the tube side of the heat exchanger can cool effluent received from a second source. In another embodiment, the same element heats the post acidic phase effluent and cools the post thermophilic phase effluent via respective tube and shell sides. In another embodiment heat of a pre-acidogenic feed stream and a post-thermophilic feed stream are achieved through the same element. While in further embodiments as depicted in
The thermophilic reactor is a constantly mixed reactor. The vessel may be a single vessel. As an alternative, the thermophilic phase may comprise multiple vessels, as well as vessels in series or in parallel, as depicted in
The retention time of the feed stream in the thermophilic stage is from about 24 to 96 hours. In alternative embodiments, the retention time may be from about 24 to about 28 hours. In still other embodiments, the dwell time is from about 30 to 35 hours. To reduce energy demands, the dwell time may be kept to 48 hours or less. A higher temperature will generally reduce the dwell time. For example, in one embodiment to maximize methane production efficiency, the retention time is 31 hours with a temperature of 130° or 131° F. In yet another embodiment, the temperature of the thermophilic stage is as high as 160° F. while the dwell time is reduced in order to achieve Class A Biosolids (block 14) and fertilizer and/or biosupplements (block 13). And, in yet another embodiment, with a temperature of 125° F., the dwell time for producing Class A Biosolids and fertilizer and/or biosupplements (block 13) approaches 3 days.
As with previous phases, the one or more vessels of the thermophilic phase are generally fed at a volatile solid loading rate. The feed rate is typically constant and the rate a function of the biomass contents. In one or more embodiments, the feed rate may be up to 2.66 lb/ft3. Other feed rates, may also be used. Said feed rates generally depend on one or more implementations as described herein. For example, systems and processes described herein may handle higher feed rates that alternative systems, due in part to one or more adjustment systems included herein, such as a dissolved oxygen adjustment system and a pH adjustment system.
The thermophilic phase begins the initial production of biogas (block 11,
In one or more embodiments, recirculation includes a gas recirculating line with one or more control valves routed via a recirculation compressor or blower. Recirculation may be in combination with a mixing device, such as a gas lifting mixing device, as previously described, or any alternate mixing system, alone or in combination. The mixing system ensures that contents in each reactor, such as the thermophilic reactor, are thoroughly mixed and in suspension. Mixing action may also produce a bubbling condition that contributes to a hospitable environment for thermophilic microbes to inhabit. Recirculated biogas also provides a gas blanket on the surface to displace oxygen and maintain an anaerobic atmosphere.
Recirculation of a biogas may operate in parallel with a dissolved air system, as described below and as shown in a system of
The thermophilic phase at the dwell time and temperature levels described herein yield Class A Biosolids (see, e.g., Alternate Flow, lines 19,
As described herein, in one form is a digester that includes a multi-phased, multi-stage, process that maintains an independent microbial environment within each phase of the digestion process. Independent environments allow for optimization of conditions for enhanced production of one or more desired end products. A separate stage for acidogenic microbes, such as E. coli, L. mesenteroides, and C. butyricum and others, is preferred because acidic microbes need a slightly acidic pH and a temperature just below human body temperature in order to thrive with rapid growth and consume the biomass feed stream. Acid microbes are aggressive in their growth and propagation. In contrast, methane producing microbes, such as M. bakeri, M. bryantii and M. formicicum, that are slower growing and need an independent stage for optimal growth so that acid microbes, which manifest rapid aggressive growth, will not displace the slower growing methane and syntropic microbes, particularly if acid microbes are commingled with the latter.
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) may be monitored and controlled during the digestion process described herein. Monitoring and adjusting of BOD level, which is an assessment of the difference between an initial and a final dissolved oxygen level, helps promote efficient operating parameters. BOD and COD are both essentially a measure of oxygen level, and when in decline may be indicative of a reduction in a desired microbe population that consumes dissolved oxygen in that reaction. Swings or fluctuations in BOD measurements may signal an impending plant upset. A rise in ammonia content is also associated with a high BOD and COD and is generally detrimental to the operating stability of the digestion system. On the other hand, some embodiments may desire a slightly elevated ammonia amount, particularly those systems that operate digestion phases in parallel (e.g.,
High BOD and COD measurements may be adjusted for by use of a separate adjustment system, which may include addition of dissolved air or oxygen. Generally one or more COD measurements are made and converted to adjust the BOD level in a reaction vessel. As referred to herein, a dissolved air adjustment system (or DAS) circulates (and may recirculate) oxygen or air as a means for controlling BOD. Oxygen adjustment is generally made in either or both of the thermophilic and mesophilic stages. In one or more embodiments, oxygen adjustment is provided by a dissolved air system installed in at least one of a thermophilic and/or mesophilic reactor, as depicted schematically in
A dissolved air system as represented in
Referring again to
The mesophilic phase of the process is a second phase of biogas generation, depicted as block 11 and/or block 16. The vessel(s) used with the mesophilic phase are generally constantly fed at a loading rate that is a function of the individual biomass feed streams used in the process. For the mesophilic phase, a different set of operating parameters are generally used as compared with those of the thermophilic phase. The mesophilic stage is generally cooler than the thermophilic stage. In one or more embodiments, the feed stream is cooled before entry into the mesophilic phase. For example, as described herein, the temperature in the mesophilic stage is generally about or less than 100° F. In many embodiments, the temperature is in a range of between about 94° F. and about 100° F. In some embodiments, the temperature is at or about 95° F.
pH in the mesophilic phase is typically less than about 7.5. In several embodiments, the pH is from about 6.8 to 7.2. Retention time is generally from about 95 to about 170 hours. Often, the retention time is between about 100 to 115 hours. In one or more embodiment, the temperature of the mesophilic phase is 95° F. with a hydraulic retention time of 108 hours. It has been found that too low a retention (e.g., less than about 95 hours) may reduce the maximal amount of biogas capable of being achieved. On the other hand, too high a retention time (e.g., greater than about 170 hours) will also reduce biogas production. In some embodiments, however, maximal biogas production may not be required or desired, possibly because biogas supply is in surplus, in which case retention time may be prolonged and/or biomass feed stream may be slowed down.
Control and monitoring of pH takes place by inclusion of an adjustment system, similar to that described with adjustment of pH for the thermophilic phase, as depicted in block 9 of
As with the thermophilic phase, biogas produced during the mesophilic phase may be routed via a pipeline (generally with control valves) to a treating phase (block 10,
Recirculation in the mesophilic phase includes the use of one or more of the mixing devices described previously, which provide mixing and a bubbling action in the mesophilic reaction vessel. Mixing prevents the settling of solids and prevents stratification which can lead to upset conditions. Gas recirculation, as described herein, may use gas produced in the particular vessel itself or may introduce an additional gas. Gas may or may not be compressed and then recirculated. Two representative mixing systems 200 and 202 are depicted in
Systems represented by
Referring back to
Referring now to
Referring briefly to
Biogas obtained from either or both of thermophilic phase and/or mesophilic phase will generally be treated by a treating phase (blocks 10, 10A and/or 10B in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
A representative example of a stripping vessel is illustrated schematically in
Referring now to
The effluent stream from the thermophilic and/or mesophilic phases, rich in nutrients and minerals, generally includes a large amount of nitrogen, typically inorganic nitrogen in the form of ammonia. Nitrogen is one of the primary elements in soil biosupplements and fertilizers. To recycle liquid in the effluent (line 12,
Nitrogen, in the form of ammonia is generally removed from the effluent via nitrification. Nitrification sequentially oxidizes ammonia to one or more forms of nitrate. Nitrification can be accomplished by various methods known to one of skill in the relevant art. As described herein, dentrification closely follows nitrification to preserve nitrogen where desired. During denitrification, nitrates are converted to gaseous nitrogen via passage through a filter, such as a cation bed type filter (block 8,
Separation of solids from effluent generally includes transport of the feed stream by pump and pipeline to a liquid-solid separation process (block 5,
While alternative methods may be used (e.g., conventional methods, such as reverse osmosis), a preferred method of nitrification as described herein involves a biological contactor (block 7,
As discussed previously, criteria for classification of processed biosolids is provided by the EPA (e.g., 40 C.F.R. §503). In addition, 40 C.F.R. §503.32 (a)(3) describes alternatives to achieve Class A status. Applying said standards to the process and system described herein, one residence time at the thermophilic phase has been calculated to be at or about 24 hours at or about 130-132° F. to provide pathogen reduced biosolids when a feed stream has about a 7% solids content. Moreover, the liquid portion of the stream, also experiencing pathogen destruction from the thermophilic phase of the process, will provide a pathogen reduced liquid fertilizer at the completion of only a 24 hour residence time. Pathogen reduction has been found to be significantly enhanced with a sodium bicarbonate injection upon exiting the acidic phase (block 2,
As is understood by one skilled in the relevant art, dwell time and temperatures, particularly in the thermophilic and mesophilic phases, as well as distribution and flow path of the feed stream will be adjusted to produce the desired quantity of biogas, fertilizer and/or biosupplements. For example, a large portion of the feed stream may be diverted to a dewatering system after the thermophilic phase for recovery of pathogen reduced organic fertilizer, while the remaining portion moves through the mesophilic phase to generate additional biogas, in addition to that generated during the thermophilic phase. As an alternative, biogas production may be maintained at a level that is just enough to provide for energy requirements for the digestion system.
As described herein, a multi-phase digestion system and process allows for an optimal microbial environment at each phase of the digestion process. Moreover, optimizing each phase means that the system and process herein provides for a significant reduction in dwell time in each phase and increased biomass conversion efficiency as compared with alternative systems and processes. Additional benefits are that the multi-phase system and process allows for a reduction in reactor size capacity, while providing for the same or even more quantity of biogas, fertilizer and/or biosupplements. A reduced reactor volume and capacity reduces capital costs, lowers heating and mixing demands and overall energy expenditures for heating and mixing of the feed stream during operational periods. In one form, a higher conversion efficiency as described herein yields a greater amount of produced biogas, a cleaner effluent, a reduced volume of non-decomposed effluent solids, and an increased volume of Class A Biosolids.
In one or more embodiments is disclosed a method of producing methane gas that includes stripping methane from other gases in a biogas mixture that is obtained from either or both thermophilic and/or mesophilic phases.
In addition is disclosed herein a method of producing Class A Biosolids that includes a post-mesophilic stage of dewatering stage in which the recovered liquid is transferred to a liquid container or pipe and the post-mesophilic stage products after dewatering include Class A Biosolids.
Still further is disclosed herein a method of producing pathogen reduced liquid fertilizer that includes performing mesophilic digestion on the acetic acid in solution, transferring the post-mesophilic stage effluent to a dewatering stage; and separating liquid from solid in the dewatering stage, whereby the liquid is obtained in the form of a liquid fertilizer.
Even further is disclosed herein a method of recycling water in a biomass digestion process that includes transferring post-mesophilic stage effluent to a dewatering stage, separating liquid from solid in the dewatering stage, transferring the separated liquid to a biological contactor, filtering the liquid through one or more times (e.g., first with a biological contactor and after with an earth filter) and re-entering the filtered water into an initial phase of the biomass digestion process.
Still further is provided herein a system for generating a biogas, biosolids and pathogen reduced liquid fertilizer that includes aerobic hydrolysis, anaerobic acidogenesis, at least one phase of anaerobic thermophilic methanogenesis, at least one phase of mesophilic methanogenesis, a pH adjustment system to neutralize a feed stream prior to or during acidogenesis and/or thermophilic methanogenesis, at least one heat exchanger in cooperation with acidogenesis, thermophilic methanogenesis and/or mesophilic methanogenesis, a mixing device in cooperation with acidogenesis, thermophilic methanogenesis and/or mesophilic methanogenesis, a gas lifting device in cooperation with thermophilic methanogenesis and/or mesophilic methanogenesis, a means for diverting at least a portion of a feed stream after thermophilic methanogenesis and/or mesophilic methanogenesis, a dewatering system, a biogas treating system and optionally a liquid recycling system.
Described herein is a biomass digestion system that produces one or more biofuels, including organic fertilizer and/or organic biosupplements, with a reduced amount of pathogens.
Enhancements provided and described herein include more manageable, efficient and controllable digestion processes and systems, each having more moderate and modifiable reactor conditions (e.g., TSS, pH and/or temperature), which removes the potential for over-acidification and assists in isolating acidogenic microbes in order to manage their rapid and aggressive growth. In addition, efficient and timely biomass digestion is obtained without the need for regular biomass supplements.
While specific alternatives to steps of the invention have been described herein, additional alternatives not specifically disclosed but known in the art are intended to fall within the scope of the invention. Thus, it is understood that other applications of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the described embodiment and after consideration of the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/258,925 filed Oct. 27, 2008, which claims the benefit for priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/982,672 filed Oct. 25, 2007, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/078,835 filed Jul. 8, 2008, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2128617 | Lawlor | Aug 1938 | A |
2370390 | Berryman | Feb 1945 | A |
3671018 | McKibben et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3932282 | Ettelt | Jan 1976 | A |
4022665 | Ghosh et al. | May 1977 | A |
4040953 | Ort | Aug 1977 | A |
4100023 | McDonald | Jul 1978 | A |
4111847 | Stiles | Sep 1978 | A |
4136970 | Cabrera et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4288550 | Ishida et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4293506 | Lipert | Oct 1981 | A |
4297216 | Ishida et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4318993 | Ghosh et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4342650 | Erickson et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4356131 | Lipert | Oct 1982 | A |
4367206 | Pinto | Jan 1983 | A |
4386157 | Beggs et al. | May 1983 | A |
4396402 | Ghosh | Aug 1983 | A |
4415452 | Heil et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4429043 | Paton | Jan 1984 | A |
4435188 | Dedenon et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4446983 | Gerber | May 1984 | A |
4480035 | Roychowdhury | Oct 1984 | A |
4491549 | Fischer et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4510243 | Haga et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4522721 | Ishida et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4569804 | Murphy | Feb 1986 | A |
4595296 | Parks | Jun 1986 | A |
4604206 | Sullivan | Aug 1986 | A |
4663089 | Lowry et al. | May 1987 | A |
4683814 | Plovanich et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4722741 | Hayes et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4779990 | Hjort et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4816121 | Keefer | Mar 1989 | A |
4818405 | Vroom et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4828667 | Silvestri et al. | May 1989 | A |
4839051 | Higa | Jun 1989 | A |
4872959 | Herbst et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4915840 | Rozich | Apr 1990 | A |
4919813 | Weaver | Apr 1990 | A |
4921800 | Vatsala | May 1990 | A |
4935398 | Sie et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4982023 | Han et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4987922 | Andrepont et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5015384 | Burke | May 1991 | A |
5063156 | Glassner et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5068486 | Han et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5103863 | Powers | Apr 1992 | A |
5104419 | Funk | Apr 1992 | A |
5176161 | Peters et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5192673 | Jain et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5221652 | Tierney et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5244550 | Inoue | Sep 1993 | A |
5372690 | Gardner-Clayson et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5401291 | Inoue | Mar 1995 | A |
5464539 | Ueno et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5500123 | Srivastava | Mar 1996 | A |
5525229 | Shih | Jun 1996 | A |
5529692 | Kubler | Jun 1996 | A |
5543437 | Benham et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545325 | Hsu et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5558755 | Gardner-Clayson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560819 | Taguchi | Oct 1996 | A |
5591342 | Delporte et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5593590 | Steyskal | Jan 1997 | A |
5630942 | Steiner | May 1997 | A |
5637312 | Tock et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640994 | Jacobsen | Jun 1997 | A |
5647965 | Crose et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5702499 | Timmenga | Dec 1997 | A |
5735600 | Wyness et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746919 | Dague et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755976 | Kortmann | May 1998 | A |
5762418 | Van Drie | Jun 1998 | A |
5782950 | Kanitz et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5810903 | Branconnier et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821111 | Grady et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5834264 | Sanford et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842783 | Boasso et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5919289 | Misawa et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928493 | Morkovsky et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5942424 | Woodward et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5968352 | Ditzler | Oct 1999 | A |
5971036 | Rehmer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6036357 | Van Drie | Mar 2000 | A |
6039782 | Sota et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6083386 | Lloyd | Jul 2000 | A |
6090266 | Roychowdhury | Jul 2000 | A |
6113786 | Burke | Sep 2000 | A |
6113789 | Burke | Sep 2000 | A |
6129844 | Dobelmann | Oct 2000 | A |
6139710 | Powell | Oct 2000 | A |
6156211 | Gonzalez-Martin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6180396 | Ono et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200475 | Chen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6237629 | Zelch | May 2001 | B1 |
6264174 | Chang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273927 | Yang | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280636 | Locklair | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6309547 | Burke | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6330831 | Lynnworth et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333014 | Filippi | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338239 | Hirata et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340581 | Gaddy | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342378 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6372140 | Kelly | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6387554 | Verykios | May 2002 | B1 |
6395252 | Getty et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395521 | Miura | May 2002 | B1 |
6402955 | Ookata | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6409788 | Sower | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6432284 | Narayanan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447683 | Gubb et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448068 | Seibert et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6454944 | Raven | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6497741 | Sower | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6554977 | Hu et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6616843 | Behmann et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629773 | Parks | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645442 | Kaneko et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6660518 | Maekawa | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6755967 | Voll | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764600 | Cha et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6780304 | Maget | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6824682 | Branson | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6860996 | Noike et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6866779 | Burke | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6887692 | Paterek | May 2005 | B2 |
6893566 | Fassbender | May 2005 | B2 |
6902667 | Dunne | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6905600 | Lee, Jr. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908555 | Arnett et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6921485 | Kilian et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6942998 | Ooteghem | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6971323 | Capote et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6972077 | Tipton et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6991769 | Kaneko et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7045063 | Zhang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7074251 | Rogers et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7077208 | Harrington et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083956 | Paterek | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7089684 | Genier | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104279 | Raftis et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7138046 | Roychowdhury | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7169821 | Branson | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7192987 | Van Egmond et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7211185 | Powell | May 2007 | B2 |
7216593 | Capote et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7232669 | Lin et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7237435 | Motzer et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7255890 | Sanz Gutierrez | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258790 | Brune et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258800 | Herbst | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7267475 | Steele | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272912 | Hill | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7282141 | Koopmans et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7288684 | Brandvold et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7297274 | Wilkie | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7309592 | Offerman et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7374675 | Koopmans et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7462287 | Berrak et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7524419 | Koopmans et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7563939 | Denton | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7624969 | Schletz et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7632400 | Yamasaki et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
8092680 | Johnson | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20020079266 | Ainsworth et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030205277 | Raftis et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030222030 | Woytowich et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040007527 | Pedersen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040011734 | Cha et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040133057 | Jiang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040182779 | Kilian et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040217058 | Cadera et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050064567 | Lay et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050139546 | Burke | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050224338 | Kin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060033220 | Singh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060060526 | Binning et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070948 | Wickham | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060102007 | Martin | May 2006 | A1 |
20060249021 | Rogers | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060254977 | Koopmans et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060254979 | Koopmans et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060254980 | Koopmans et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060275895 | Jensen et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070057389 | Davis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070062866 | Wilson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069403 | Schletz et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070167533 | Pawlak et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070218540 | Guiot et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070234796 | Tshishiku | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270512 | Edwards | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070299145 | Lattner | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080029459 | Yamasaki et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080074944 | Blechschmitt et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080223731 | Lee | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090032473 | Ueki et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090107913 | Johnson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090126543 | Kitagawa et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090152203 | Denton | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090166300 | Osborn et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090242424 | Behr | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101367571 | Feb 2009 | CN |
1053976 | Nov 2000 | EP |
2440139 | Jan 2008 | GB |
1474098 | Apr 1989 | SU |
200827303 | Jul 2008 | TW |
WO-9219543 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO-2004046051 | Jun 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
40 C.F.R. §503.32-40, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; printed 2009. |
Advanced Technology Program (APT) Project Brief, Selective Liquid-Phase Oxidation of Methane to Methanol, Open Competition 1-Chemistry and Materials, Sponsored by UOP, LLC, Oct. 1, 2004, 1 pg. |
Ahring, B. K., Microbiology of Anaerobic Digestion, In B. K. Ahring (Ed.), Biomethanation I, Heidelberg, DE: Springer-Verlag, 2003; pp. 3-7. |
Ahring, B. K., Kinetics and Modeling of Anaerobic Digestion Process, In B. K. Ahring (Ed.), Biomethanation I, Heidelberg, DE: Springer-Verlag, 2003; pp. 77-85. |
Ahring, B. K., Monitoring and Control of Anaerobic Reactors, Biomethanation II, Heidelberg, DE: Springer-Verlag, 2003; pp. 148-149. |
Ahring, B. K., Metabolic Interactions Between Methanogenic Consortia and Anerobic Respiring Bacteria, in B. K. Ahring (Ed.), Biomethanation I, Heidelberg, DE: Springer-Verlag, 2003; pp. 41-43. |
Becker, H., Carbonating Cow Manure, The Latest Strategy in Fighting E. coli and other Microbes, Feb. 9, 2000, US Department of Agriculture website, http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr/2000/000209b.htm?pf=1. |
Burke, D. A., Dairy Waste Anaerobic Digestion Handbook, Jun. 2001, Environmental Energy Company, Olympia, WA. |
Burke, D. A., Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process, Environmental Energy Company, Olympia, Washington, 1997, pp. 1-8. |
Ferry, J., G., Minireview: Methane from Acetate, Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 174, No. 17, Sep. 1992, pp. 5489-5495. |
Fitzpatrick, Terry., LCM-The Low Cost Methanol Technology, Oct. 20, 2010, pp. 1-10, Synetix, UK. |
Hattori, S. et. al., Thermacetogenium phaeum gen. nov., sp. nov., a strictly anaerobic, thermophilic, syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacterium. Int. J. of Systematic Evol. Microbiol., 2000;50:1601-1609. |
Horn, et al., Hydrogenotrophic Methanogenesis by Moderately Acid-To-Methanogens of a Methane-Emitting Acidic Peat, Appl. Environ Microbiol. 2003;60(1):74-83. |
Jones, et al., Methane Generation From Livestock Waste, 2001, 14 pp., http://www.wcasfmra.org/biogas—docs/Purdue%20Biogas%20Basics.pdf.pdf. |
Kim, B. J., et al., Anaerobic Digestion and Acid Hydrolysis of Nitrocellulose, US Army Corps of Engineers CERL Technical Report 99/45, Apr. 1999, pp. 33-57. |
Lieberman, et al., Converting Methane to Methanol: Structural Insight into the Reaction Center of Particulate Methane Monooxygenase, 3 pp., Oct. 28, 2003, http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/research/highlights—archive/pmmo.html. |
Mirabal, S. T., An Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Production Technologies Using Renewable Energy Resources, A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, 2003, 49 pp. |
Moring, D, Biomass Waste-to-Energy 101: Methane Digestion and Biomass Gasification, EPA Waste-to-Energy Workshop Oct. 24, 2007, 38 pp. |
Rice, Steven F., Application of the GRI 1.2 Methane Oxidation Model to Methane and Methanol Oxidation in Supercritical Water, Sandia National Labs, Livermore, CA, Combustion Research Facility, 1997, 4 pgs. |
Schink, B., Energetics of Syntrophic Cooperation in Methanogenic Degradation, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 1997;61(2):262-280. |
Shekhar, C., Methanol: The New Hydrogen, MIT Technology Review, Mar. 27, 2006, 4 pp., http://www.technologyreview.com/printer—friendly—article.aspx?id=16629. |
Sung, S., et al., Performance of Temperature-phased Anaerobic Digestion (TPAD) System Treating Dairy Cattle Wastes, Tamkang J Science and Engr., 2001;4(4):301-310. |
The Free Dictionary by Farlex, definition of “mesophil”, 1 pg., Aug. 21, 2007, http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/mesophil. |
Tuckerman, M. E., The meaning of heterogeneous equilibrium, Nov. 16, 2006, 3 pp., from http://www.nyu.edu/classes/tuckerman/honors.chem/lectures/lecture—21/node6.html. |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, EPA 832-F-00-015, Sep. 2000. |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, EPA 832-F-06-031, Sep. 2006. |
Wilson, C.A., et al., The Effect of Temperature on the Performance and Stability of Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion, Water Science and Technology, 2008;57(2):297-304. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2008/081330 mailed Feb. 23, 2009. |
Coogee Energy, Methanol Process Description, retrieved Jul. 3, 2008, 3 pgs. Coogee Energy website http;//www.coogeeenergy.com/au.methanol/process.htm. |
The Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, Sources of Methanol, Apr. 2004, 2 pgs., IAG website http://www.iags.org/methanolsources.htm. |
Schlicht, A. The GasLifter, a Time-Honored, Proven Anaerobic Digester Mixing System, Sep. 2001, 12 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120122196 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60982672 | Oct 2007 | US | |
61078835 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12258925 | Oct 2008 | US |
Child | 13346368 | US |