The improvements generally relate to laser-processing a metal workpiece and more particularly relate to laser-hardening the metal workpiece.
Manufacture of metal workpieces such as tools along a manufacturing line can require a hardening process to harden portions of the metal workpieces. Typically, the hardening process includes an initial step of heating the metal workpieces to a desired temperature, and then a subsequent step of quenching the heated metal workpieces, i.e., swiftly cooling down the heated metal workpieces. If done right, the quenched metal workpieces undergo a martensitic transformation, thereby increasing the hardness and brittleness of the metal workpieces.
In some manufacturing lines, the heating is performed by generating eddy currents within the metal workpiece via induction whereas the quenching is performed by rapidly immersing the heated metal workpieces in some sort of cold quenching substance. In some other manufacturing lines, the heating is performed by delivering a continuous wave (CW) laser beam to a localized portion of the metal workpiece whereas the quenching is performed by a surrounding, unheated portion of the metal workpiece which, as soon as the CW laser beam is removed, rapidly cools the localized heated portion thanks to its thermal inertia.
As useful as they can be, such hardening processes can have some drawbacks. For instance, regardless of how the metal workpieces are heated, undesirable residue (e.g., oxidation residue) tends to appear on the surface of metal workpiece after the heating step. Moreover, when a quenching substance is used in the quenching step, any excess thereof has to be cleaned as well. It is known to clean the quenchant excess and/or undesirable residue using shotblasting in some situations. Although existing hardening processes are satisfactory to a certain degree, there remains room for improvement, especially in the subsequent cleaning step.
As discussed above, manufacturing lines using induction-based hardening can have a heating station, a quenching station, and a shotblasting station to remove any quenchant excess and the undesirable residue off the surface of the hardened metal workpieces.
It was found that there is a need in the industry for manufacturing lines in which the hardening and cleaning steps can be performed within a single station, and preferably using the same equipment. Such a hardening and cleaning station would expedite the hardening and cleaning steps as it would reduce the delays in moving the metal workpieces from the hardening station to the cleaning station. The footprint of the resulting manufacturing lines would also be reduced by eliminating at least a station.
Unfortunately, off-the-shelf laser-based systems are typically designed for unique applications. For instance, as laser-hardening requires a laser beam which is powerful enough to heat the metal workpiece to the desired temperature, the laser beam cannot have too much peak power as heating the metal workpiece beyond the melting point of the metal would be highly unwelcome. Accordingly, CW laser sources are typically used for laser-hardening purposes.
In contrast, laser-cleaning requires an intense laser beam with high peak power so as to deliver high intensity onto the residue and/or the surface of the metal workpiece in order to ablate it, while minimizing the absorbed heat in the metal workpiece. To this end, high-power pulsed laser beam sources are preferred in laser-cleaning applications.
In an aspect of the present disclosure, there are described systems and methods which reconcile laser-hardening and laser-cleaning within a single station, thereby meeting a long felt need in the industry. More specifically, the proposed systems and methods involve the use of a high-power pulsed laser beam which is used in an out-of-focus region thereof to perform the laser-hardening, and then used in an in-focus region of the same high-power pulsed laser beam to perform the laser-cleaning. It is noted that the out-of-focus region can be defined as the region of the pulsed laser beam along which optical pulses of the pulsed laser beam have an intensity below a melting intensity threshold of the metal. In this region, the laser energy is primarily used to heat the metal workpiece. On the other hand, the in-focus region can be defined as the region of the pulsed laser beam along which optical pulses of the pulsed laser beam have an intensity equal to or greater than an ablation intensity threshold of the residue or of the metal workpiece. The ablation intensity threshold can be indicative of the intensity required to ablate the undesirable residue lying on the hardened metal workpiece or a portion of the metal workpiece itself. Accordingly, lower intensity optical pulses of a pulsed laser source are used to heat but not melt the metal workpiece in the hardening step whereas higher intensity optical pulses of the same pulsed laser source are used to sublimate the undesirable residue in a subsequent cleaning step.
In other embodiments, the metal workpiece is first moved within the out-of-focus region of the stationary pulsed laser beam to perform the laser-hardening and then moved within the in-focus region of the stationary pulsed laser beam to perform the laser-cleaning. In some other embodiments, the workpiece is stationary in which case the out-of-focus and in-focus regions of the pulsed laser beam are moved relative to the stationary metal workpiece to first perform the laser-hardening and then the laser-cleaning.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a method of laser-processing a metal workpiece, the method comprising: laser-hardening a portion of the metal workpiece by momentarily exposing said portion to an out-of-focus region of a pulsed laser beam, the exposed portion heating to a given temperature and quenching thereafter, the sequence of said heating and said quenching thereby hardening said exposed portion; and laser-cleaning the hardened portion by momentarily exposing said hardened portion to an in-focus region of said pulsed laser beam, thereby cleaning said hardened portion.
In accordance with a second aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a system for laser-processing a metal workpiece along a manufacturing line, the system comprising: a hardening and cleaning station having a frame located proximate said manufacturing line where said metal workpiece is conveyed; a laser-processing unit mounted to said frame and emitting a pulsed laser beam; and a controller communicatively coupled to the laser-processing unit, the controller having a processor and a memory having stored thereon instructions that when executed by the processor perform the steps of: laser-hardening a portion of the metal workpiece by momentarily exposing said portion to an out-of-focus region of a pulsed laser beam, the exposed portion heating to a given temperature and quenching thereafter, the sequence of said heating and said quenching thereby hardening said exposed portion; and laser-cleaning the hardened portion by momentarily exposing said hardened portion to an in-focus region of said pulsed laser beam, thereby cleaning said hardened portion.
Many further features and combinations thereof concerning the present improvements will appear to those skilled in the art following a reading of the instant disclosure.
In the figures,
As depicted, the system 100 includes a laser-processing unit 102 which emits a pulsed laser beam 104, and a controller 106 which is communicatively coupled to the laser-processing unit 102. The pulsed laser beam 104 is emitted along a beam path 108 which is directed towards the metal workpiece 10 to be laser-processed. The pulsed laser beam 104 has a plurality of optical pulses 110 distributed along the beam path 108. The optical pulses 110 are emitted at a given repetition rate, i.e., the number of optical pulses 110 that are emitted each second. Each optical pulse 110 has a given pulse energy, i.e. the energy carried per pulse. The pulse energy and the repetition rate of the pulsed laser beam 104 can vary from one embodiment to another. For instance, in case of a singlemode pulsed laser beam, the pulse energy can vary between about 0.2 mJ/pulse and about 5 mJ/pulse, preferably between about 0.5 mJ/pulse and about 2 mJ/pulse and most preferably between about 0.5 mJ/pulse and about 1.5 mJ/pulse. The repetition rate can range between about 50 kHz and about 2000 kHz, preferably between about 100 kHz and about 1000 kHz and most preferably between about 200 kHz and about 1000 kHz. In case of a multimode pulsed laser beam, the pulse energy can vary between about 20 mJ/pulse and about 200 mJ/pulse, and preferably about 50 mJ/pulse and about 100 mJ/pulse. In this case, the repetition rate can range between about 1 kHz and about 100 kHz, and preferably between about 2 kHz and about 50 kHz. It is noted that the multimode pulsed laser beam can have a Gaussian intensity shape, a top-hat intensity shape or any other suitable intensity shape. In an experiment, a 500 W laser-processing system was used, with a repetition rate of 500 or 1000 kHz was found to be satisfactory.
As shown, the pulsed laser beam 104 is converging and therefore defines an in-focus region 112 and out-of-focus regions 114 on either side of the in-focus region 112. As the pulse energy is conserved along the beam path 108, the optical pulses 110 of the in-focus region 112 have the same pulse energy as the optical pulses 110 of the out-of-focus regions 114. However, as a beam dimension d of the pulsed laser beam 104 changes along the beam path 108, the optical pulses 110 will have different intensity, i.e., the optical energy delivered per area unit.
The relationship by which the intensity varies along the beam path 108 is best shown in the graph 200 of
Reference is now made to
It is envisaged that either one or both of the steps 302 and 304 can comprise a relative movement between the metal workpiece 10 relative and the pulsed laser beam 104. The movement can be performed prior, during and/or after each one of the steps 302 and 304. Either one of the metal workpiece 10 or the pulsed laser beam 104 can be moved in this relative movement.
In some embodiments, the method 300 has a step of moving the metal workpiece 10 relative to the pulsed laser beam 104 prior to the steps 302 and 304. For instance, prior to step 302, the metal workpiece 10 can be moved so as to position the portion 10a within the out-of-focus region 114 of the pulsed laser beam 104. The metal workpiece 10 can then be moved, prior to step 304, so as to position the hardened portion 10b and/or the undesirable residue 12 within the in-focus region 112 of the pulsed laser beam 104. The pulsed laser beam 104 may remain stationary in such an embodiment.
In some other embodiments, the method 300 has a step of moving the pulsed laser beam 104 relative to the metal workpiece 10 prior to the steps 302 and 304. For instance, prior to the step 302, the pulsed laser beam 104 can be moved relatively to the metal workpiece 10 so that the out-of-focus region 114 of the pulsed laser beam 104 encompasses the portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10. Once laser-hardened, and prior to the step 304, the pulsed laser beam 104 can be moved again relatively to the metal workpiece 10 so that the in-focus region 112 of the pulsed laser beam 104 encompasses the hardened portion 10b and/or the undesirable residue 12 left on the hardened portion 10b of the metal workpiece 10. In this embodiment, the metal workpiece 10 may remain stationary during the steps 302 and 304.
In some embodiments, the method 300 can have a step of moving the metal workpiece 10 relative to the pulsed laser beam 104 during the steps 302 and 304. For instance, when a larger portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10 is to be laser-processed, the movement of the metal workpiece 10 can be performed in accordance with a laser-hardening path during the step 302. Examples of laser-hardening paths 120 are shown in
Of course, the geometry of the region to laser-harden can dictate which laser-hardening path 120 is preferable. For instance, the laser-hardening path of
During the step 304, the movement of the metal workpiece 10 can be performed in accordance with a laser-cleaning path. Examples of laser-cleaning paths 122 are shown in
Similarly, the method 300 can have a step of moving the pulsed laser beam 104 relative to the metal workpiece 10 during the steps 302 and 304. For instance, when a larger portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10 is to be laser-processed, the movement of the out-of-focus region 114 of the pulsed laser beam 104 can be performed in accordance with the laser-hardening paths 120 during the step 302 described with reference to
Referring back to
It will be understood that the above-described embodiments are meant to be exemplary only. For instance, both the metal workpiece 10 and the pulsed laser beam 104 may be moved simultaneously prior to, during and/or after either one or both of the steps 302 and 304.
Reference is now made to
Additionally, in this example, the hardening and cleaning station 630 has a robot arm 650 mounted to the frame 632 which can move the metal workpiece during laser-processing. In this embodiment, both the metal workpiece 10 and the pulsed laser beam 604 can be moved as desired during the laser-processing.
As discussed above, the station 603 is configured to laser-hardening a portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10. In this laser-hardening step, the station 630 momentarily exposes the portion 10a to an out-of-focus region of the pulsed laser beam 604. This causes heating of the exposed portion 10a to a given temperature and quenching thereafter. The out-of-focus region of the pulsed laser beam 604 used in the laser-hardening step can have a first beam dimension and can be moved at a first speed on the portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10. The first beam dimension and the first speed are configured to deliver a first amount of energy to the portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10.
In some embodiments, after the step of laser-hardening, the station 630 is configured to perform another step of laser-processing on the portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10. This additional step is referred to herein as a laser-tempering step. In this laser-tempering step, the station 630 is configured to yet again momentarily expose the hardened portion 10a to an out-of-focus region of the pulsed laser beam 604. This causes heating of the hardened portion 10a to a given temperature and quenching of it thereafter, thereby slightly reducing the hardness and flushing out any internal constraints that may have been induced by the laser-hardening step. The nominal power of the pulsed laser beam can be modified for the laser-tempering step. For instance, the nominal power of the pulsed laser beam can be lower in the laser-tempering step than in the laser-hardening step. The out-of-focus region of the pulsed laser beam 604 of this step can have a second beam dimension and can be moved at a second speed on the portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10. The second beam dimension and the second speed are configured to deliver a second amount of energy per area unit to the portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10. Typically, the second amount of energy delivered to the metal workpiece 10 in the laser-tempering step is smaller than the first amount of energy per area unit delivered to the metal workpiece 10 in the laser-hardening step. The first and second beam dimensions can have be similar for both the laser-hardening and the laser-tempering steps in some embodiments. In these embodiments, the second speed may be greater than the first speed thereby delivering a lesser amount of energy per area unit in the laser-tempering step than in the laser-hardening step. However, in some other embodiments, the first and second beam dimensions can differ. In some preferred embodiments, it was found useful to use, in the laser-tempering step, a second beam dimension that is larger than the first beam dimension and to move it on the portion 10a at the first speed, i.e., the same speed used in the laser-hardening step.
As discussed above, the station 630 is configured to laser-clean the hardened portion 10a by momentarily exposing the hardened portion 10a to an in-focus region of the pulsed laser beam 604, thereby cleaning the hardened portion of any undesirable matter. The in-focus region of the pulsed laser beam 604 used in the laser-cleaning step can have a third beam dimension and can be moved at a third speed on the portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10. Typically, the third beam dimension is well smaller than the first and second beam dimensions. As such, the first beam dimension and the first speed are generally configured to deliver a third amount of energy per area unit which is well above the first and second amounts of energy per area unit to the portion 10a.
In some embodiments, the station 630 is configured to laser-mark an identifier on the laser-hardened and laser-cleaned portion of the metal workpiece 10. The identifier can be a serial number, a QR code, or any other suitable type of identifier. By laser-marking an identifier on the metal workpiece 10, the metal workpieces 10 laser-processed by the station 630, or other stations, can be tracked. It is intended that the laser-tempering step and the laser-marking steps are only optional as either one of them can be omitted in at least some embodiments.
In some embodiments, the scanning head(s) 644 and/or the focal lens 646 can be omitted; the relative movement between the metal workpiece 10 and the pulsed laser beam 604 thereby relying solely on the robot arm 650. In this example, the robot arm 650 has a base 652, an articulated arm 654 having an end 654a fixedly mounted to the base 652 and an opposite free end 654b. A gripping member or otherwise holding member 656 can be articulatably mounted to the free end 654b for moving the metal workpiece 10 as desired during the laser-processing.
It is appreciated in this embodiment that the system 600 includes a temperature sensor 658 which measures the temperature of the portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10 over time, and especially during the laser-hardening step in which the portion 10a is momentarily exposed to the out-of-focus region of the pulsed laser beam 604. In such an embodiment, the temperature sensor 658 is communicatively coupled to the controller 606. Accordingly, when the monitored temperature of the portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10 exceeds a given temperature threshold, the momentary exposition is stopped, thereby allowing the heated portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10 to quench by itself. The temperature sensor 658 can be provided in the form of a pyrometer which measures the temperature of the portion 10a in a non-contact, remote fashion. In such embodiments, it can be convenient to move the line of sight 660 of the temperature sensor 658 so as to follow the movement of the pulsed laser beam 604. The step of laser-hardening can include a control loop comprising i) momentarily exposing the portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10 to the out-of-focus region of the pulsed laser beam 604, ii) measuring the temperature of the heated portion 10a, iii) comparing the measured temperature to a temperature threshold, and v) repeating the steps i), ii) and iii) until the measured temperature of the heated-portion 10 reaches and/or exceeds the temperature threshold. In this control loop, it is envisaged that at each iteration of the step ii) can include moving the out-of-focus region of the pulsed laser beam 604 according to a given laser-hardening path. The laser-hardening path can even be modified on the go so as to avoid any over-exposition of a sufficiently heated region of the metal workpiece 10. In some embodiments, the temperature sensor 658 can be used in the laser-tempering step as well. In these embodiments, the step of laser-tempering can include a control loop as well. The laser-tempering step can be deemed to be satisfactory when the measured temperature reaches the temperature threshold. It is noted that the temperature thresholds may differ for the laser-hardening and laser-tempering steps. When the measured temperatures correspond to their corresponding temperature threshold, the hardness of the corresponding portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10 can be deemed to be satisfactory, e.g., within a desired hardness range. The closed loop discussed above can be done in real-time during the laser-hardening and/or laser-tempering steps. In such embodiments, the controller can be configured to modify the laser power of the pulsed laser beam based on the measured temperature value. For instance, if the temperature sensor detects that the measured temperature value is below the threshold, the laser power can be slightly increased until the threshold is met or exceeded.
In some embodiments, the temperature sensor can be used to monitor the temperature of the portion 10a during the laser-hardening step and the laser-tempering step on the portion 10s of the metal workpiece 10. The monitored temperature can then be provided in the form of temperature profile(s) which can be stored on an accessible memory system and/or transmitted to an external network. In some embodiments, the temperature profiles for a given metal workpiece can be compared to reference temperature profiles for that given metal workpiece. When a monitored temperature profile does not satisfactorily compare to the corresponding reference profile, an alert can be generated and the portion 10a of the metal workpiece 10 may be laser-processed again to apply corrective measures, or rejected, depending on the embodiment.
The controllers 106, 606 and 706 described above can be provided as a combination of hardware and software components. The hardware components can be implemented in the form of a computing device 800, an example of which is described with reference to
Referring to
The processor 802 can be, for example, a general-purpose microprocessor or microcontroller, a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC), a digital signal processing (DSP) processor, an integrated circuit, a field programmable gate array (FPGA), a reconfigurable processor, a programmable read-only memory (PROM), or any combination thereof.
The memory 804 can include a suitable combination of any type of computer-readable memory that is located either internally or externally such as, for example, random-access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), compact disc read-only memory (CDROM), electro-optical memory, magneto-optical memory, erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), and electrically-erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), Ferroelectric RAM (FRAM) or the like.
Each I/O interface 806 enables the computing device 800 to interconnect with one or more input devices, such as position sensor(s) of the robot arm, vision camera, positions sensor(s) of the conveyor, or with one or more output devices such as a display, a database or a remote network.
Each I/O interface 806 enables the computing device 800 to communicate with other components, to exchange data with other components, to access and connect to network resources, to serve applications, and perform other computing applications by connecting to a network (or multiple networks) capable of carrying data including the Internet, Ethernet, plain old telephone service (POTS) line, public switch telephone network (PSTN), integrated services digital network (ISDN), digital subscriber line (DSL), coaxial cable, fiber optics, satellite, mobile, wireless (e.g. Wi-Fi, WiMAX), SS7 signaling network, fixed line, local area network, wide area network, and others, including any combination of these.
In some embodiments, the software application is stored on the memory 804 and accessible by the processor 802 of the computing device 800. The computing device 800 and the software application described above are meant to be examples only. Other suitable embodiments of the controller can also be provided, as it will be apparent to the skilled reader.
Using a pulsed laser beam with optical pulses of temporal durations in the nanosecond range (e.g., 100 ns) and average power of 500 W, 8660 steel workpieces, including a 8660 steel longnose plier and a 8660 steel cutter, were laser-hardened and then laser-cleaned according to the method(s) described herein. In this embodiment, the momentary exposure between the pulsed laser beam and the 8660 steel workpieces spanned between about 600 ms and about 1000 ms, which could heat the exposed portions of the 8660 steel workpieces to about 1200° C. to about 1350° C. In this example, the requirements on hardness were 60-64 HDC (750-900 HV) over a depth of about 1000 μm. Several combinations of parameters were tested to determine satisfactory parameters. For instance, the scanning speed at which the pulsed laser beam was moved in the laser-hardening step varied between about 1.5 mm/s to about 3.5 mm/s; the exposition time during which the out-of-focus region of the pulsed laser beam interacted with the portion of the 8660 steel workpiece varied between about 430 ms and about 1000 ms; the power was varied between 45% of 500 W and 85% of 500 W; the irradiance was varied between 2.9 W/mm2 and about 6.0 W/mm2; which allowed the heated portion of the 8660 steel workpiece to reach between about 900° C. and about 1350° C. In a given example, the focal point F of the pulsed laser beam was spaced-apart from the portion of the 8660 steel workpiece by about 13 cm, with the focal point F lying above the 8660 steel workpiece, the repetition rate of the pulsed laser beam was 1000 kHz and the speed at which the out-of-focus region was scanned perpendicular to the laser-hardening path was 1000 mm/s. For the 8660 longnose plier, a combination of parameter that was found to obtain satisfactory hardness includes: scanning speed of 2.5 mm/s (which gives an effective exposition time of 600 ms), power set to 85% of 500 W for an irradiance of 6.0 W/mm2, to heat up the exposed portion to 1350° C. For the 8660 longnose plier, another combination of parameter that was found to obtain satisfactory hardness includes: scanning speed of 1.5 mm/s for an exposition time of 1000 ms, power set to 65% of 500 W for an irradiance of 4.1 W/mm2, to heat up the exposed portion to 1300° C. For the 8660 steel cutter, a combination of parameter that was found to obtain satisfactory hardness includes: scanning speed of 2.5 mm/s (which gives an effective exposition time of 600 ms), power set to 65% of 500 W for an irradiance of 5.8 W/mm2, to heat up the exposed portion to 1300° C. For laser-tempering the 8660 steel workpiece, the temperature may be brought up to around 200-500 F, preferably about 350 F.
Still in this example, the total exposure time between the in-focus region of the pulsed laser beam and the 8660 steel workpieces spanned between about 6 s and 26 s while the power was varied between 100 W and 500 W. In some embodiments, a metal workpiece laser-processed according to the method described herein has been cut across the depth to allow the measurement of the hardness as a function of the depth of the metal workpiece. For instance, the following table shows different depths at which the hardness measurements were made, and the hardness measurements.
As such, it was confirmed that the method described herein in fact increase the hardness of the processed metal. As can be understood, the examples described above and illustrated are intended to be exemplary only. The scope is indicated by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63014967 | Apr 2020 | US |