Patent Grant
11586188
The present disclosure relates to methods and systems for data collection in industrial environments, as well as methods and systems for leveraging collected data for monitoring, remote control, autonomous action, and other activities in industrial environments.
Heavy industrial environments, such as environments for large scale manufacturing (such as manufacturing of aircraft, ships, trucks, automobiles, and large industrial machines), energy production environments (such as oil and gas plants, renewable energy environments, and others), energy extraction environments (such as mining, drilling, and the like), construction environments (such as for construction of large buildings), and others, involve highly complex machines, devices and systems and highly complex workflows, in which operators must account for a host of parameters, metrics, and the like in order to optimize design, development, deployment, and operation of different technologies in order to improve overall results. Historically, data has been collected in heavy industrial environments by human beings using dedicated data collectors, often recording batches of specific sensor data on media, such as tape or a hard drive, for later analysis. Batches of data have historically been returned to a central office for analysis, such as undertaking signal processing or other analysis on the data collected by various sensors, after which analysis can be used as a basis for diagnosing problems in an environment and/or suggesting ways to improve operations. This work has historically taken place on a time scale of weeks or months, and has been directed to limited data sets.
The emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) has made it possible to connect continuously to, and among, a much wider range of devices. Most such devices are consumer devices, such as lights, thermostats, and the like. More complex industrial environments remain more difficult, as the range of available data is often limited, and the complexity of dealing with data from multiple sensors makes it much more difficult to produce “smart” solutions that are effective for the industrial sector. A need exists for improved methods and systems for data collection in industrial environments, as well as for improved methods and systems for using collected data to provide improved monitoring, control, intelligent diagnosis of problems and intelligent optimization of operations in various heavy industrial environments.
Industrial system in various environments have a number of challenges to utilizing data from a multiplicity of sensors. Many industrial systems have a wide range of computing resources and network capabilities at a location at a given time, for example as parts of the system are upgraded or replaced on varying time scales, as mobile equipment enters or leaves a location, and due to the capital costs and risks of upgrading equipment. Additionally, many industrial systems are positioned in challenging environments, where network connectivity can be variable, where a number of noise sources such as vibrational noise and electro-magnetic (EM) noise sources can be significant an in varied locations, and with portions of the system having high pressure, high noise, high temperature, and corrosive materials. Many industrial processes are subject to high variability in process operating parameters and non-linear responses to off-nominal operations. Accordingly, sensing requirements for industrial processes can vary with time, operating stages of a process, age and degradation of equipment, and operating conditions. Previously known industrial processes suffer from sensing configurations that are conservative, detecting many parameters that are not needed during most operations of the industrial system, or that accept risk in the process, and do not detect parameters that are only occasionally utilized in characterizing the system. Further, previously known industrial systems are not flexible to configuring sensed parameters rapidly and in real-time, and in managing system variance such as intermittent network availability. Industrial systems often use similar components across systems such as pumps, mixers, tanks, and fans. However, previously known industrial systems do not have a mechanism to leverage data from similar components that may be used in a different type of process, and/or that may be unavailable due to competitive concerns. Additionally, previously known industrial systems do not integrate data from offset systems into the sensor plan and execution in real time.
The present disclosure describes a monitoring system for collecting data related to an industrial process, the monitoring system, according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure, can include a data collector communicatively coupled to each one of a plurality of input channels utilizing one of a plurality of collector routes, wherein each input channel comprises data corresponding to an element of a first industrial machine, and wherein each of the plurality of collector routes comprises a distinct data collection routine, a data storage circuit structured to store a plurality of detection values that corresponds to the plurality of input channels, and a data marketplace circuit structured to communicate at least a portion of the detection values to a data marketplace, wherein the data marketplace circuit performs at least one of self-organizing the data marketplace and automating the data marketplace.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein at least one of the plurality of detection values comprises vibration data, the system further comprising a data analysis circuit structured to detect a noise pattern in response to the vibration data.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the data storage circuit is further structured to store a plurality of noise patterns from a plurality of industrial machines in a library of noise patterns.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the data storage circuit further receives at least a portion of the plurality of noise patterns in the library of noise patterns from the data marketplace.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the data analysis circuit is further structured to analyze the plurality of detection values to determine if the detected noise pattern matches a noise pattern stored in the library of noise patterns.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the data analysis circuit is further structured to determine if the detected noise pattern matches a noise pattern stored in the library of noise patterns by performing operations including: wherein the detected noise pattern is determined from the plurality of detection values, and wherein the matching noise pattern in the library of noise patterns is from a second industrial machine.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the matching noise pattern in the library of noise patterns is characteristic of a machine performance category, and wherein if the noise pattern from the first industrial machine matches the noise pattern of the second industrial machine, then an alarm condition is set to indicate the first industrial machine is experiencing a condition characteristic of the machine performance category of the second industrial machine.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the second industrial machine is located at a facility offset from a location of the first industrial machine.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the data marketplace is organized based on a machine-learning self-organizing facility that learns based on measures of marketplace success with respect to stored detection values.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the data marketplace utilizes a self-organizing data pool comprising data collected by the data collector.
The present disclosure describes a computer-implemented method for collecting data related to an industrial process, the computer-implemented method, according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure, can include utilizing one of a plurality of collector routes to collect input from each one of a plurality of input channels, wherein each input channel comprises data corresponding to an element of a first industrial machine, and wherein each of the plurality of collector routes comprises a distinct data collection routine, storing a plurality of detection values that corresponds to the plurality of input channels, communicating at least a portion of the detection values to a self-organizing data marketplace, and automating the self-organizing data marketplace.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein at least one of the plurality of detection values comprises vibration data, the method further comprising detecting a noise pattern in response to the vibration data.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the computer-enabled method further comprises storing a plurality of noise patterns from a plurality of industrial machines in a library of noise patterns.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the computer-enabled method further comprises analyzing the plurality of detection values to determine if the detected noise pattern matches a noise pattern stored in the library of noise patterns.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the matching noise pattern in the library of noise patterns is characteristic of a machine performance category, further comprising setting an alarm condition to indicate the first industrial machine is experiencing a condition characteristic of the machine performance category of a second industrial machine when the noise pattern from the first industrial machine matches the noise pattern of the second industrial machine.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the second industrial machine is located at a facility offset from a location of the first industrial machine.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the self-organizing data marketplace is organized based on a machine-learning self-organizing facility that learns based on measures of marketplace success with respect to stored detection values.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the data marketplace utilizes a self-organizing data pool comprising data collected by the data collector.
The present disclosure describes monitoring apparatus for collecting data related to an industrial process, the apparatus, according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure, can include a data collector component communicatively coupled to each one of a plurality of input channels utilizing one of a plurality of collector routes, wherein each input channel comprises data corresponding to an element of a first industrial machine, and wherein each of the plurality of collector routes comprises a distinct data collection routine, a data storage component configured to store a plurality of detection values that corresponds to the plurality of input channels, and a data marketplace component configured to communicate at least a portion of the detection values to a data marketplace, wherein the data marketplace component is further configured to perform at least one of self-organizing the data marketplace and automating the data marketplace.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein at least one of the plurality of detection values comprises vibration data, the apparatus further comprising a data analysis component configured to detect a noise pattern in response to the vibration data.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the data storage component is further configured to store a plurality of noise patterns from a plurality of industrial machines in a library of noise patterns.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the data analysis component is further configured to analyze the plurality of detection values to determine if the detected noise pattern matches a noise pattern stored in the library of noise patterns.
Methods and systems are provided herein for data collection in industrial environments, as well as for improved methods and systems for using collected data to provide improved monitoring, control, and intelligent diagnosis of problems and intelligent optimization of operations in various heavy industrial environments. These methods and systems include methods, systems, components, devices, workflows, services, processes, and the like that are deployed in various configurations and locations, such as: (a) at the “edge” of the Internet of Things, such as in the local environment of a heavy industrial machine; (b) in data transport networks that move data between local environments of heavy industrial machines and other environments, such as of other machines or of remote controllers, such as enterprises that own or operate the machines or the facilities in which the machines are operated; and (c) in locations where facilities are deployed to control machines or their environments, such as cloud-computing environments and on-premises computing environments of enterprises that own or control heavy industrial environments or the machines, devices or systems deployed in them. These methods and systems include a range of ways for providing improved data include a range of methods and systems for providing improved data collection, as well as methods and systems for deploying increased intelligence at the edge, in the network, and in the cloud or premises of the controller of an industrial environment.
Methods and systems are disclosed herein for continuous ultrasonic monitoring, including providing continuous ultrasonic monitoring of rotating elements and bearings of an energy production facility; for cloud-based systems including machine pattern recognition based on the fusion of remote, analog industrial sensors or machine pattern analysis of state information from multiple analog industrial sensors to provide anticipated state information for an industrial system; for on-device sensor fusion and data storage for industrial IoT devices, including on-device sensor fusion and data storage for an Industrial IoT device, where data from multiple sensors are multiplexed at the device for storage of a fused data stream; and for self-organizing systems including a self-organizing data marketplace for industrial IoT data, including a self-organizing data marketplace for industrial IoT data, where available data elements are organized in the marketplace for consumption by consumers based on training a self-organizing facility with a training set and feedback from measures of marketplace success, for self-organizing data pools, including self-organization of data pools based on utilization and/or yield metrics, including utilization and/or yield metrics that are tracked for a plurality of data pools, a self-organized swarm of industrial data collectors, including a self-organizing swarm of industrial data collectors that organize among themselves to optimize data collection based on the capabilities and conditions of the members of the swarm, a self-organizing collector, including a self-organizing, multi-sensor data collector that can optimize data collection, power and/or yield based on conditions in its environment, a self-organizing storage for a multi-sensor data collector, including self-organizing storage for a multi-sensor data collector for industrial sensor data, a self-organizing network coding for a multi-sensor data network, including self-organizing network coding for a data network that transports data from multiple sensors in an industrial data collection environment.
Methods and systems are disclosed herein for training artificial intelligence (“AI”) models based on industry-specific feedback, including training an AI model based on industry-specific feedback that reflects a measure of utilization, yield, or impact, where the AI model operates on sensor data from an industrial environment; for an industrial IoT distributed ledger, including a distributed ledger supporting the tracking of transactions executed in an automated data marketplace for industrial IoT data; for a network-sensitive collector, including a network condition-sensitive, self-organizing, multi-sensor data collector that can optimize based on bandwidth, quality of service, pricing, and/or other network conditions; for a remotely organized universal data collector that can power up and down sensor interfaces based on need and/or conditions identified in an industrial data collection environment; and for a haptic or multi-sensory user interface, including a wearable haptic or multi-sensory user interface for an industrial sensor data collector, with vibration, heat, electrical, and/or sound outputs.
Methods and systems are disclosed herein for a presentation layer for augmented reality and virtual reality (AR/VR) industrial glasses, where heat map elements are presented based on patterns and/or parameters in collected data; and for condition-sensitive, self-organized tuning of AR/VR interfaces based on feedback metrics and/or training in industrial environments.
In embodiments, a system for data collection, processing, and utilization of signals from at least a first element in a first machine in an industrial environment includes a platform including a computing environment connected to a local data collection system having at least a first sensor signal and a second sensor signal obtained from at least the first machine in the industrial environment. The system includes a first sensor in the local data collection system configured to be connected to the first machine and a second sensor in the local data collection system. The system further includes a crosspoint switch in the local data collection system having multiple inputs and multiple outputs including a first input connected to the first sensor and a second input connected to the second sensor. Throughout the present disclosure, wherever a crosspoint switch, multiplexer (MUX) device, or other multiple-input multiple-output data collection or communication device is described, any multi-sensor acquisition device is also contemplated herein. In certain embodiments, a multi-sensor acquisition device includes one or more channels configured for, or compatible with, an analog sensor input. The multiple outputs include a first output and second output configured to be switchable between a condition in which the first output is configured to switch between delivery of the first sensor signal and the second sensor signal and a condition in which there is simultaneous delivery of the first sensor signal from the first output and the second sensor signal from the second output. Each of multiple inputs is configured to be individually assigned to any of the multiple outputs, or combined in any subsets of the inputs to the outputs. Unassigned outputs are configured to be switched off, for example by producing a high-impedance state.
In embodiments, the first sensor signal and the second sensor signal are continuous vibration data about the industrial environment. In embodiments, the second sensor in the local data collection system is configured to be connected to the first machine. In embodiments, the second sensor in the local data collection system is configured to be connected to a second machine in the industrial environment. In embodiments, the computing environment of the platform is configured to compare relative phases of the first and second sensor signals. In embodiments, the first sensor is a single-axis sensor and the second sensor is a three-axis sensor. In embodiments, at least one of the multiple inputs of the crosspoint switch includes internet protocol, front-end signal conditioning, for improved signal-to-noise ratio. In embodiments, the crosspoint switch includes a third input that is configured with a continuously monitored alarm having a pre-determined trigger condition when the third input is unassigned to or undetected at any of the multiple outputs.
In embodiments, the local data collection system includes multiple multiplexing units and multiple data acquisition units receiving multiple data streams from multiple machines in the industrial environment. In embodiments, the local data collection system includes distributed complex programmable hardware device (“CPLD”) chips each dedicated to a data bus for logic control of the multiple multiplexing units and the multiple data acquisition units that receive the multiple data streams from the multiple machines in the industrial environment. In embodiments, the local data collection system is configured to provide high-amperage input capability using solid state relays. In embodiments, the local data collection system is configured to power-down at least one of an analog sensor channel and a component board.
In embodiments, the local data collection system includes a phase-lock loop band-pass tracking filter configured to obtain slow-speed revolutions per minute (“RPMs”) and phase information. In embodiments, the local data collection system is configured to digitally derive phase using on-board timers relative to at least one trigger channel and at least one of the multiple inputs. In embodiments, the local data collection system includes a peak-detector configured to autoscale using a separate analog-to-digital converter for peak detection. In embodiments, the local data collection system is configured to route at least one trigger channel that is raw and buffered into at least one of the multiple inputs. In embodiments, the local data collection system includes at least one delta-sigma analog-to-digital converter that is configured to increase input oversampling rates to reduce sampling rate outputs and to minimize anti-aliasing filter requirements. In embodiments, the distributed CPLD chips each dedicated to the data bus for logic control of the multiple multiplexing units and the multiple data acquisition units includes as high-frequency crystal clock reference configured to be divided by at least one of the distributed CPLD chips for at least one delta-sigma analog-to-digital converter to achieve lower sampling rates without digital resampling.
In embodiments, the local data collection system is configured to obtain long blocks of data at a single relatively high-sampling rate as opposed to multiple sets of data taken at different sampling rates. In embodiments, the single relatively high-sampling rate corresponds to a maximum frequency of about forty kilohertz. In embodiments, the long blocks of data are for a duration that is in excess of one minute. In embodiments, the local data collection system includes multiple data acquisition units each having an onboard card set configured to store calibration information and maintenance history of a data acquisition unit in which the onboard card set is located. In embodiments, the local data collection system is configured to plan data acquisition routes based on hierarchical templates.
In embodiments, the local data collection system is configured to manage data collection bands. In embodiments, the data collection bands define a specific frequency band and at least one of a group of spectral peaks, a true-peak level, a crest factor derived from a time waveform, and an overall waveform derived from a vibration envelope. In embodiments, the local data collection system includes a neural net expert system using intelligent management of the data collection bands. In embodiments, the local data collection system is configured to create data acquisition routes based on hierarchical templates that each include the data collection bands related to machines associated with the data acquisition routes. In embodiments, at least one of the hierarchical templates is associated with multiple interconnected elements of the first machine. In embodiments, at least one of the hierarchical templates is associated with similar elements associated with at least the first machine and a second machine. In embodiments, at least one of the hierarchical templates is associated with at least the first machine being proximate in location to a second machine.
In embodiments, the local data collection system includes a graphical user interface (“GUI”) system configured to manage the data collection bands. In embodiments, the GUI system includes an expert system diagnostic tool. In embodiments, the platform includes cloud-based, machine pattern analysis of state information from multiple sensors to provide anticipated state information for the industrial environment. In embodiments, the platform is configured to provide self-organization of data pools based on at least one of the utilization metrics and yield metrics. In embodiments, the platform includes a self-organized swarm of industrial data collectors. In embodiments, the local data collection system includes a wearable haptic user interface for an industrial sensor data collector with at least one of vibration, heat, electrical, and sound outputs.
In embodiments, multiple inputs of the crosspoint switch include a third input connected to the second sensor and a fourth input connected to the second sensor. The first sensor signal is from a single-axis sensor at an unchanging location associated with the first machine. In embodiments, the second sensor is a three-axis sensor. In embodiments, the local data collection system is configured to record gap-free digital waveform data simultaneously from at least the first input, the second input, the third input, and the fourth input. In embodiments, the platform is configured to determine a change in relative phase based on the simultaneously recorded gap-free digital waveform data. In embodiments, the second sensor is configured to be movable to a plurality of positions associated with the first machine while obtaining the simultaneously recorded gap-free digital waveform data. In embodiments, multiple outputs of the crosspoint switch include a third output and fourth output. The second, third, and fourth outputs are assigned together to a sequence of tri-axial sensors each located at different positions associated with the machine. In embodiments, the platform is configured to determine an operating deflection shape based on the change in relative phase and the simultaneously recorded gap-free digital waveform data.
In embodiments, the unchanging location is a position associated with the rotating shaft of the first machine. In embodiments, tri-axial sensors in the sequence of the tri-axial sensors are each located at different positions on the first machine but are each associated with different bearings in the machine. In embodiments, tri-axial sensors in the sequence of the tri-axial sensors are each located at similar positions associated with similar bearings but are each associated with different machines. In embodiments, the local data collection system is configured to obtain the simultaneously recorded gap-free digital waveform data from the first machine while the first machine and a second machine are both in operation. In embodiments, the local data collection system is configured to characterize a contribution from the first machine and the second machine in the simultaneously recorded gap-free digital waveform data from the first machine. In embodiments, the simultaneously recorded gap-free digital waveform data has a duration that is in excess of one minute.
In embodiments, a method of monitoring a machine having at least one shaft supported by a set of bearings includes monitoring a first data channel assigned to a single-axis sensor at an unchanging location associated with the machine. The method includes monitoring second, third, and fourth data channels each assigned to an axis of a three-axis sensor. The method includes recording gap-free digital waveform data simultaneously from all of the data channels while the machine is in operation and determining a change in relative phase based on the digital waveform data.
In embodiments, the tri-axial sensor is located at a plurality of positions associated with the machine while obtaining the digital waveform. In embodiments, the second, third, and fourth channels are assigned together to a sequence of tri-axial sensors each located at different positions associated with the machine. In embodiments, the data is received from all of the sensors simultaneously. In embodiments, the method includes determining an operating deflection shape based on the change in relative phase information and the waveform data. In embodiments, the unchanging location is a position associated with the shaft of the machine. In embodiments, the tri-axial sensors in the sequence of the tri-axial sensors are each located at different positions and are each associated with different bearings in the machine. In embodiments, the unchanging location is a position associated with the shaft of the machine. The tri-axial sensors in the sequence of the tri-axial sensors are each located at different positions and are each associated with different bearings that support the shaft in the machine.
In embodiments, the method includes monitoring the first data channel assigned to the single-axis sensor at an unchanging location located on a second machine. The method includes monitoring the second, the third, and the fourth data channels, each assigned to the axis of a three-axis sensor that is located at the position associated with the second machine. The method also includes recording gap-free digital waveform data simultaneously from all of the data channels from the second machine while both of the machines are in operation. In embodiments, the method includes characterizing the contribution from each of the machines in the gap-free digital waveform data simultaneously from the second machine.
In embodiments, a method for data collection, processing, and utilization of signals with a platform monitoring at least a first element in a first machine in an industrial environment includes obtaining, automatically with a computing environment, at least a first sensor signal and a second sensor signal with a local data collection system that monitors at least the first machine. The method includes connecting a first input of a crosspoint switch of the local data collection system to a first sensor and a second input of the crosspoint switch to a second sensor in the local data collection system. The method includes switching between a condition in which a first output of the crosspoint switch alternates between delivery of at least the first sensor signal and the second sensor signal and a condition in which there is simultaneous delivery of the first sensor signal from the first output and the second sensor signal from a second output of the crosspoint switch. The method also includes switching off unassigned outputs of the crosspoint switch into a high-impedance state.
In embodiments, the first sensor signal and the second sensor signal are continuous vibration data from the industrial environment. In embodiments, the second sensor in the local data collection system is connected to the first machine. In embodiments, the second sensor in the local data collection system is connected to a second machine in the industrial environment. In embodiments, the method includes comparing, automatically with the computing environment, relative phases of the first and second sensor signals. In embodiments, the first sensor is a single-axis sensor and the second sensor is a three-axis sensor. In embodiments, at least the first input of the crosspoint switch includes internet protocol front-end signal conditioning for improved signal-to-noise ratio.
In embodiments, the method includes continuously monitoring at least a third input of the crosspoint switch with an alarm having a pre-determined trigger condition when the third input is unassigned to any of multiple outputs on the crosspoint switch. In embodiments, the local data collection system includes multiple multiplexing units and multiple data acquisition units receiving multiple data streams from multiple machines in the industrial environment. In embodiments, the local data collection system includes distributed CPLD chips each dedicated to a data bus for logic control of the multiple multiplexing units and the multiple data acquisition units that receive the multiple data streams from the multiple machines in the industrial environment. In embodiments, the local data collection system provides high-amperage input capability using solid state relays.
In embodiments, the method includes powering down at least one of an analog sensor channel and a component board of the local data collection system. In embodiments, the local data collection system includes an external voltage reference for an A/D zero reference that is independent of the voltage of the first sensor and the second sensor. In embodiments, the local data collection system includes a phase-lock loop band-pass tracking filter that obtains slow-speed RPMs and phase information. In embodiments, the method includes digitally deriving phase using on-board timers relative to at least one trigger channel and at least one of multiple inputs on the crosspoint switch.
In embodiments, the method includes auto-scaling with a peak-detector using a separate analog-to-digital converter for peak detection. In embodiments, the method includes routing at least one trigger channel that is raw and buffered into at least one of multiple inputs on the crosspoint switch. In embodiments, the method includes increasing input oversampling rates with at least one delta-sigma analog-to-digital converter to reduce sampling rate outputs and to minimize anti-aliasing filter requirements. In embodiments, the distributed CPLD chips are each dedicated to the data bus for logic control of the multiple multiplexing units and the multiple data acquisition units and each include a high-frequency crystal clock reference divided by at least one of the distributed CPLD chips for at least one delta-sigma analog-to-digital converter to achieve lower sampling rates without digital resampling. In embodiments, the method includes obtaining long blocks of data at a single relatively high-sampling rate with the local data collection system as opposed to multiple sets of data taken at different sampling rates. In embodiments, the single relatively high-sampling rate corresponds to a maximum frequency of about forty kilohertz. In embodiments, the long blocks of data are for a duration that is in excess of one minute. In embodiments, the local data collection system includes multiple data acquisition units and each data acquisition unit has an onboard card set that stores calibration information and maintenance history of a data acquisition unit in which the onboard card set is located.
In embodiments, the method includes planning data acquisition routes based on hierarchical templates associated with at least the first element in the first machine in the industrial environment. In embodiments, the local data collection system manages data collection bands that define a specific frequency band and at least one of a group of spectral peaks, a true-peak level, a crest factor derived from a time waveform, and an overall waveform derived from a vibration envelope. In embodiments, the local data collection system includes a neural net expert system using intelligent management of the data collection bands. In embodiments, the local data collection system creates data acquisition routes based on hierarchical templates that each include the data collection bands related to machines associated with the data acquisition routes. In embodiments, at least one of the hierarchical templates is associated with multiple interconnected elements of the first machine. In embodiments, at least one of the hierarchical templates is associated with similar elements associated with at least the first machine and a second machine. In embodiments, at least one of the hierarchical templates is associated with at least the first machine being proximate in location to a second machine.
In embodiments, the method includes controlling a GUI system of the local data collection system to manage the data collection bands. The GUI system includes an expert system diagnostic tool. In embodiments, the computing environment of the platform includes cloud-based, machine pattern analysis of state information from multiple sensors to provide anticipated state information for the industrial environment. In embodiments, the computing environment of the platform provides self-organization of data pools based on at least one of the utilization metrics and yield metrics. In embodiments, the computing environment of the platform includes a self-organized swarm of industrial data collectors. In embodiments, each of multiple inputs of the crosspoint switch is individually assignable to any of multiple outputs of the crosspoint switch.
Methods and systems described herein for industrial machine sensor data streaming, collection, processing, and storage may be configured to operate and integrate with existing data collection, processing and storage systems and may include a method for capturing a plurality of streams of sensed data from sensors deployed to monitor aspects of an industrial machine associated with at least one moving part of the machine; at least one of the streams contains a plurality of frequencies of data. The method may include identifying a subset of data in at least one of the plurality of streams that corresponds to data representing at least one predefined frequency. The at least one predefined frequency is represented by a set of data collected from alternate sensors deployed to monitor aspects of the industrial machine associated with the at least one moving part of the machine. The method may further include processing the identified data with a data processing facility that processes the identified data with an algorithm configured to be applied to the set of data collected from alternate sensors. Lastly, the method may include storing the at least one of the streams of data, the identified subset of data, and a result of processing the identified data in an electronic data set.
Methods and systems described herein for industrial machine sensor data streaming, collection, processing, and storage may be configured to operate and integrate with existing data collection, processing, and storage systems and may include a method for applying data captured from sensors deployed to monitor aspects of an industrial machine associated with at least one moving part of the machine. The data is captured with predefined lines of resolution covering a predefined frequency range and is sent to a frequency matching facility that identifies a subset of data streamed from other sensors deployed to monitor aspects of the industrial machine associated with at least one moving part of the machine. The streamed data includes a plurality of lines of resolution and frequency ranges. The subset of data identified corresponds to the lines of resolution and predefined frequency range. This method may include storing the subset of data in an electronic data record in a format that corresponds to a format of the data captured with predefined lines of resolution and signaling to a data processing facility the presence of the stored subset of data. This method may, optionally, include processing the subset of data with at least one set of algorithms, models and pattern recognizers that corresponds to algorithms, models and pattern recognizers associated with processing the data captured with predefined lines of resolution covering a predefined frequency range.
Methods and systems described herein for industrial machine sensor data streaming, collection, processing, and storage may be configured to operate and integrate with existing data collection, processing and storage systems and may include a method for identifying a subset of streamed sensor data, the sensor data captured from sensors deployed to monitor aspects of an industrial machine associated with at least one moving part of the machine, the subset of streamed sensor data at predefined lines of resolution for a predefined frequency range, and establishing a first logical route for communicating electronically between a first computing facility performing the identifying and a second computing facility, wherein identified subset of the streamed sensor data is communicated exclusively over the established first logical route when communicating the subset of streamed sensor data from the first facility to the second facility. This method may further include establishing a second logical route for communicating electronically between the first computing facility and the second computing facility for at least one portion of the streamed sensor data that is not the identified subset. Additionally, this method may further include establishing a third logical route for communicating electronically between the first computing facility and the second computing facility for at least one portion of the streamed sensor data that includes the identified subset and at least one other portion of the data not represented by the identified subset.
Methods and systems described herein for industrial machine sensor data streaming, collection, processing, and storage may be configured to operate and integrate with existing data collection, processing and storage systems and may include a first data sensing and processing system that captures first data from a first set of sensors deployed to monitor aspects of an industrial machine associated with at least one moving part of the machine, the first data covering a set of lines of resolution and a frequency range. This system may include a second data sensing and processing system that captures and streams a second set of data from a second set of sensors deployed to monitor aspects of the industrial machine associated with at least one moving part of the machine, the second data covering a plurality of lines of resolution that includes the set of lines of resolution and a plurality of frequencies that includes the frequency range. The system may enable selecting a portion of the second data that corresponds to the set of lines of resolution and the frequency range of the first data, and processing the selected portion of the second data with the first data sensing and processing system.
Methods and systems described herein for industrial machine sensor data streaming, collection, processing, and storage may be configured to operate and integrate with existing data collection, processing and storage systems and may include a method for automatically processing a portion of a stream of sensed data. The sensed data is received from a first set of sensors deployed to monitor aspects of an industrial machine associated with at least one moving part of the machine. The sensed data is in response to an electronic data structure that facilitates extracting a subset of the stream of sensed data that corresponds to a set of sensed data received from a second set of sensors deployed to monitor the aspects of the industrial machine associated with the at least one moving part of the machine. The set of sensed data is constrained to a frequency range. The stream of sensed data includes a range of frequencies that exceeds the frequency range of the set of sensed data, the processing comprising executing an algorithm on a portion of the stream of sensed data that is constrained to the frequency range of the set of sensed data, the algorithm configured to process the set of sensed data.
Methods and systems described herein for industrial machine sensor data streaming, collection, processing, and storage may be configured to operate and integrate with existing data collection, processing and storage systems and may include a method for receiving first data from sensors deployed to monitor aspects of an industrial machine associated with at least one moving part of the machine. This method may further include detecting at least one of a frequency range and lines of resolution represented by the first data; receiving a stream of data from sensors deployed to monitor the aspects of the industrial machine associated with the at least one moving part of the machine. The stream of data includes: (1) a plurality of frequency ranges and a plurality of lines of resolution that exceeds the frequency range and the lines of resolution represented by the first data; (2) a set of data extracted from the stream of data that corresponds to at least one of the frequency range and the lines of resolution represented by the first data; and (3) the extracted set of data which is processed with a data processing algorithm that is configured to process data within the frequency range and within the lines of resolution of the first data.
Detailed embodiments of the present disclosure are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the disclosure, which may be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present disclosure in virtually any appropriately detailed structure.
Methods and systems described herein for industrial machine sensor data streaming, collection, processing, and storage may be configured to operate with existing data collection, processing, and storage systems while preserving access to existing format/frequency range/resolution compatible data. While the industrial machine sensor data streaming facilities described herein may collect a greater volume of data (e.g., longer duration of data collection) from sensors at a wider range of frequencies and with greater resolution than existing data collection systems, methods and systems may be employed to provide access to data from the stream of data that represents one or more ranges of frequency and/or one or more lines of resolution that are purposely compatible with existing systems. Further, a portion of the streamed data may be identified, extracted, stored, and/or forwarded to existing data processing systems to facilitate operation of existing data processing systems that substantively matches operation of existing data processing systems using existing collection-based data. In this way, a newly deployed system for sensing aspects of industrial machines, such as aspects of moving parts of industrial machines, may facilitate continued use of existing sensed data processing facilities, algorithms, models, pattern recognizers, user interfaces, and the like.
Through identification of existing frequency ranges, formats, and/or resolution, such as by accessing a data structure that defines these aspects of existing data, higher resolution streamed data may be configured to represent a specific frequency, frequency range, format, and/or resolution. This configured streamed data can be stored in a data structure that is compatible with existing sensed data structures so that existing processing systems and facilities can access and process the data substantially as if it were the existing data. One approach to adapting streamed data for compatibility with existing sensed data may include aligning the streamed data with existing data so that portions of the streamed data that align with the existing data can be extracted, stored, and made available for processing with existing data processing methods. Alternatively, data processing methods may be configured to process portions of the streamed data that correspond, such as through alignment, to the existing data, with methods that implement functions substantially similar to the methods used to process existing data, such as methods that process data that contain a particular frequency range or a particular resolution and the like.
Methods used to process existing data may be associated with certain characteristics of sensed data, such as certain frequency ranges, sources of data, and the like. As an example, methods for processing bearing sensing information for a moving part of an industrial machine may be capable of processing data from bearing sensors that fall into a particular frequency range. This method can thusly be at least partially identifiable by these characteristics of the data being processed. Therefore, given a set of conditions, such as moving device being sensed, industrial machine type, frequency of data being sensed, and the like, a data processing system may select an appropriate method. Also, given such a set of conditions, an industrial machine data sensing and processing facility may configure elements, such as data filters, routers, processors, and the like, to handle data meeting the conditions.
With reference to
Intelligent systems 118 may include cognitive systems 120, such as enabling a degree of cognitive behavior as a result of the coordination of processing elements, such as mesh, peer-to-peer, ring, serial, and other architectures, where one or more node elements is coordinated with other node elements to provide collective, coordinated behavior to assist in processing, communication, data collection, or the like. The MANET 20 depicted in
Intelligent systems may include machine learning systems 122, such as for learning on one or more data sets. The one or more data sets may include information collected using local data collection systems 102 or other information from input sources 116, such as to recognize states, objects, events, patterns, conditions, or the like that may, in turn, be used for processing by the host system 112 as inputs to components of the platform 100 and portions of the industrial IoT data collection, monitoring and control system 10, or the like. Learning may be human-supervised or fully-automated, such as using one or more input sources 116 to provide a data set, along with information about the item to be learned. Machine learning may use one or more models, rules, semantic understandings, workflows, or other structured or semi-structured understanding of the world, such as for automated optimization of control of a system or process based on feedback or feed forward to an operating model for the system or process. One such machine learning technique for semantic and contextual understandings, workflows, or other structured or semi-structured understandings is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,200,775 to Moore, issued 12 Jun. 2012, and hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Machine learning may be used to improve the foregoing, such as by adjusting one or more weights, structures, rules, or the like (such as changing a function within a model) based on feedback (such as regarding the success of a model in a given situation) or based on iteration (such as in a recursive process). Where sufficient understanding of the underlying structure or behavior of a system is not known, insufficient data is not available, or in other cases where preferred for various reasons, machine learning may also be undertaken in the absence of an underlying model; that is, input sources may be weighted, structured, or the like within a machine learning facility without regard to any a priori understanding of structure, and outcomes (such as those based on measures of success at accomplishing various desired objectives) can be serially fed to the machine learning system to allow it to learn how to achieve the targeted objectives. For example, the system may learn to recognize faults, to recognize patterns, to develop models or functions, to develop rules, to optimize performance, to minimize failure rates, to optimize profits, to optimize resource utilization, to optimize flow (such as flow of traffic), or to optimize many other parameters that may be relevant to successful outcomes (such as outcomes in a wide range of environments). Machine learning may use genetic programming techniques, such as promoting or demoting one or more input sources, structures, data types, objects, weights, nodes, links, or other factors based on feedback (such that successful elements emerge over a series of generations). For example, alternative available sensor inputs for a data collection system 102 may be arranged in alternative configurations and permutations, such that the system may, using generic programming techniques over a series of data collection events, determine what permutations provide successful outcomes based on various conditions (such as conditions of components of the platform 100, conditions of the network 110, conditions of a data collection system 102, conditions of an environment 104), or the like. In embodiments, local machine learning may turn on or off one or more sensors in a multi-sensor data collector 102 in permutations over time, while tracking success outcomes such as contributing to success in predicting a failure, contributing to a performance indicator (such as efficiency, effectiveness, return on investment, yield, or the like), contributing to optimization of one or more parameters, identification of a pattern (such as relating to a threat, a failure mode, a success mode, or the like) or the like. For example, a system may learn what sets of sensors should be turned on or off under given conditions to achieve the highest value utilization of a data collector 102. In embodiments, similar techniques may be used to handle optimization of transport of data in the platform 100 (such as in the network 110) by using generic programming or other machine learning techniques to learn to configure network elements (such as configuring network transport paths, configuring network coding types and architectures, configuring network security elements), and the like.
In embodiments, the local data collection system 102 may include a high-performance, multi-sensor data collector having a number of novel features for collection and processing of analog and other sensor data. In embodiments, a local data collection system 102 may be deployed to the industrial facilities depicted in
In embodiments, the main Mux board and/or the MUX option board then connects to the mother (e.g., with 4 simultaneous channels) and daughter (e.g., with 4 additional channels for 8 total channels) analog boards 1110 via cables where some of the signal conditioning (such as hardware integration) occurs. The signals then move from the analog boards 1110 to an anti-aliasing board (not shown) where some of the potential aliasing is removed. The rest of the aliasing removal is done on the delta sigma board 1112. The delta sigma board 1112 provides more aliasing protection along with other conditioning and digitizing of the signal. Next, the data moves to the Jennic™ board 1114 for more digitizing as well as communication to a computer via USB or Ethernet. In embodiments, the Jennic™ board 1114 may be replaced with a pic board 1118 for more advanced and efficient data collection as well as communication. Once the data moves to the computer software 1102, the computer software 1102 can manipulate the data to show trending, spectra, waveform, statistics, and analytics.
In embodiments, the system is meant to take in all types of data from volts to 4-20 mA signals. In embodiments, open formats of data storage and communication may be used. In some instances, certain portions of the system may be proprietary especially some of research and data associated with the analytics and reporting. In embodiments, smart band analysis is a way to break data down into easily analyzed parts that can be combined with other smart bands to make new more simplified yet sophisticated analytics. In embodiments, this unique information is taken and graphics are used to depict the conditions because picture depictions are more helpful to the user. In embodiments, complicated programs and user interfaces are simplified so that any user can manipulate the data like an expert.
In embodiments, the system in essence, works in a big loop. The system starts in software with a general user interface (“GUI”) 1124. In embodiments, rapid route creation may take advantage of hierarchical templates. In embodiments, a GUI is created so any general user can populate the information itself with simple templates. Once the templates are created the user can copy and paste whatever the user needs. In addition, users can develop their own templates for future ease of use and to institutionalize the knowledge. When the user has entered all of the user's information and connected all of the user's sensors, the user can then start the system acquiring data.
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include unique electrostatic protection for trigger and vibration inputs. In many critical industrial environments where large electrostatic forces, which can harm electrical equipment, may build up, for example rotating machinery or low-speed balancing using large belts, proper transducer and trigger input protection is required. In embodiments, a low-cost but efficient method is described for such protection without the need for external supplemental devices.
Typically, vibration data collectors are not designed to handle large input voltages due to the expense and the fact that, more often than not, it is not needed. A need exists for these data collectors to acquire many varied types of RPM data as technology improves and monitoring costs plummet. In embodiments, a method is using the already established OptoMOS™ technology which permits the switching up front of high voltage signals rather than using more conventional reed-relay approaches. Many historic concerns regarding non-linear zero crossing or other non-linear solid-state behaviors have been eliminated with regard to the passing through of weakly buffered analog signals. In addition, in embodiments, printed circuit board routing topologies place all of the individual channel input circuitry as close to the input connector as possible. In embodiments, a unique electrostatic protection for trigger and vibration inputs may be placed upfront on the Mux and DAQ hardware in order to dissipate the built up electric charge as the signal passed from the sensor to the hardware. In embodiments, the Mux and analog board may support high-amperage input using a design topology comprising wider traces and solid state relays for upfront circuitry.
In some systems multiplexers are afterthoughts and the quality of the signal coming from the multiplexer is not considered. As a result of a poor quality multiplexer, the quality of the signal can drop as much as 30 dB or more. Thus, substantial signal quality may be lost using a 24-bit DAQ that has a signal to noise ratio of 110 dB and if the signal to noise ratio drops to 80 dB in the Mux, it may not be much better than a 16-bit system from 20 years ago. In embodiments of this system, an important part at the front of the Mux is upfront signal conditioning on Mux for improved signal-to-noise ratio. Embodiments may perform signal conditioning (such as range/gain control, integration, filtering, etc.) on vibration as well as other signal inputs up front before Mux switching to achieve the highest signal-to-noise ratio.
In embodiments, in addition to providing a better signal, the multiplexer may provide a continuous monitor alarming feature. Truly continuous systems monitor every sensor all the time but tend to be expensive. Typical multiplexer systems only monitor a set number of channels at one time and switch from bank to bank of a larger set of sensors. As a result, the sensors not being currently collected are not being monitored; if a level increases the user may never know. In embodiments, a multiplexer may have a continuous monitor alarming feature by placing circuitry on the multiplexer that can measure input channel levels against known alarm conditions even when the data acquisition (“DAQ”) is not monitoring the input. In embodiments, continuous monitoring Mux bypass offers a mechanism whereby channels not being currently sampled by the Mux system may be continuously monitored for significant alarm conditions via a number of trigger conditions using filtered peak-hold circuits or functionally similar that are in turn passed on to the monitoring system in an expedient manner using hardware interrupts or other means. This, in essence, makes the system continuously monitoring, although without the ability to instantly capture data on the problem like a true continuous system. In embodiments, coupling this capability to alarm with adaptive scheduling techniques for continuous monitoring and the continuous monitoring system's software adapting and adjusting the data collection sequence based on statistics, analytics, data alarms and dynamic analysis may allow the system to quickly collect dynamic spectral data on the alarming sensor very soon after the alarm sounds.
Another restriction of typical multiplexers is that they may have a limited number of channels. In embodiments, use of distributed complex programmable logic device (“CPLD”) chips with dedicated bus for logic control of multiple Mux and data acquisition sections enables a CPLD to control multiple mux and DAQs so that there is no limit to the number of channels a system can handle. Interfacing to multiple types of predictive maintenance and vibration transducers requires a great deal of switching. This includes AC/DC coupling, 4-20 interfacing, integrated electronic piezoelectric transducer, channel power-down (for conserving op-amp power), single-ended or differential grounding options, and so on. Also required is the control of digital pots for range and gain control, switches for hardware integration, AA filtering and triggering. This logic can be performed by a series of CPLD chips strategically located for the tasks they control. A single giant CPLD requires long circuit routes with a great deal of density at the single giant CPLD. In embodiments, distributed CPLDs not only address these concerns but offer a great deal of flexibility. A bus is created where each CPLD that has a fixed assignment has its own unique device address. In embodiments, multiplexers and DAQs can stack together offering additional input and output channels to the system. For multiple boards (e.g., for multiple Mux boards), jumpers are provided for setting multiple addresses. In another example, three bits permit up to 8 boards that are jumper configurable. In embodiments, a bus protocol is defined such that each CPLD on the bus can either be addressed individually or as a group.
Typical multiplexers may be limited to collecting only sensors in the same bank. For detailed analysis, this may be limiting as there is tremendous value in being able to simultaneously review data from sensors on the same machine. Current systems using conventional fixed bank multiplexers can only compare a limited number of channels (based on the number of channels per bank) that were assigned to a particular group at the time of installation. The only way to provide some flexibility is to either overlap channels or incorporate lots of redundancy in the system both of which can add considerable expense (in some cases an exponential increase in cost versus flexibility). The simplest Mux design selects one of many inputs and routes it into a single output line. A banked design would consist of a group of these simple building blocks, each handling a fixed group of inputs and routing to its respective output. Typically, the inputs are not overlapping so that the input of one Mux grouping cannot be routed into another. Unlike conventional Mux chips which typically switch a fixed group or banks of a fixed selection of channels into a single output (e.g., in groups of 2, 4, 8, etc.), a cross point Mux allows the user to assign any input to any output. Previously, crosspoint multiplexers were used for specialized purposes such as RGB digital video applications and were as a practical matter too noisy for analog applications such as vibration analysis; however more recent advances in the technology now make it feasible. Another advantage of the crosspoint Mux is the ability to disable outputs by putting them into a high impedance state. This is ideal for an output bus so that multiple Mux cards may be stacked, and their output buses joined together without the need for bus switches.
In embodiments, this may be addressed by use of an analog crosspoint switch for collecting variable groups of vibration input channels and providing a matrix circuit so the system may access any set of eight channels from the total number of input sensors.
In embodiments, the ability to control multiple multiplexers with use of distributed CPLD chips with dedicated bus for logic control of multiple Mux and data acquisition sections is enhanced with a hierarchical multiplexer which allows for multiple DAQ to collect data from multiple multiplexers. A hierarchical Mux may allow modularly output of more channels, such as 16, 24 or more to multiple of eight channel card sets. In embodiments, this allows for faster data collection as well as more channels of simultaneous data collection for more complex analysis. In embodiments, the Mux may be configured slightly to make it portable and use data acquisition parking features, which turns SV3X DAQ into a protected system embodiment.
In embodiments, once the signals leave the multiplexer and hierarchical Mux they move to the analog board where there are other enhancements. In embodiments, power saving techniques may be used such as: power-down of analog channels when not in use; powering down of component boards; power-down of analog signal processing op-amps for non-selected channels; powering down channels on the mother and the daughter analog boards. The ability to power down component boards and other hardware by the low-level firmware for the DAQ system makes high-level application control with respect to power-saving capabilities relatively easy. Explicit control of the hardware is always possible but not required by default. In embodiments, this power saving benefit may be of value to a protected system, especially if it is battery operated or solar powered.
In embodiments, in order to maximize the signal to noise ratio and provide the best data, a peak-detector for auto-scaling routed into a separate A/D will provide the system the highest peak in each set of data so it can rapidly scale the data to that peak. For vibration analysis purposes, the built-in A/D convertors in many microprocessors may be inadequate with regards to number of bits, number of channels or sampling frequency versus not slowing the microprocessor down significantly. Despite these limitations, it is useful to use them for purposes of auto-scaling. In embodiments, a separate A/D may be used that has reduced functionality and is cheaper. For each channel of input, after the signal is buffered (usually with the appropriate coupling: AC or DC) but before it is signal conditioned, the signal is fed directly into the microprocessor or low-cost A/D. Unlike the conditioned signal for which range, gain and filter switches are thrown, no switches are varied. This permits the simultaneous sampling of the auto-scaling data while the input data is signal conditioned, fed into a more robust external A/D, and directed into on-board memory using direct memory access (DMA) methods where memory is accessed without requiring a CPU. This significantly simplifies the auto-scaling process by not having to throw switches and then allow for settling time, which greatly slows down the auto-scaling process. Furthermore, the data may be collected simultaneously, which assures the best signal-to-noise ratio. The reduced number of bits and other features is usually more than adequate for auto-scaling purposes. In embodiments, improved integration using both analog and digital methods create an innovative hybrid integration which also improves or maintains the highest possible signal to noise ratio.
In embodiments, a section of the analog board may allow routing of a trigger channel, either raw or buffered, into other analog channels. This may allow a user to route the trigger to any of the channels for analysis and trouble shooting. Systems may have trigger channels for the purposes of determining relative phase between various input data sets or for acquiring significant data without the needless repetition of unwanted input. In embodiments, digitally controlled relays may be used to switch either the raw or buffered trigger signal into one of the input channels. It may be desirable to examine the quality of the triggering pulse because it may be corrupted for a variety of reasons including inadequate placement of the trigger sensor, wiring issues, faulty setup issues such as a dirty piece of reflective tape if using an optical sensor, and so on. The ability to look at either the raw or buffered signal may offer an excellent diagnostic or debugging vehicle. It also can offer some improved phase analysis capability by making use of the recorded data signal for various signal processing techniques such as variable speed filtering algorithms.
In embodiments, once the signals leave the analog board, the signals move into the delta-sigma board where precise voltage reference for A/D zero reference offers more accurate direct current sensor data. The delta sigma's high speeds also provide for using higher input oversampling for delta-sigma A/D for lower sampling rate outputs to minimize antialiasing filter requirements. Lower oversampling rates can be used for higher sampling rates. For example, a 3rd order AA filter set for the lowest sampling requirement for 256 Hz (Fmax of 100 Hz) is then adequate for Fmax ranges of 200 and 500 Hz. Another higher-cutoff AA filter can then be used for Fmax ranges from 1 kHz and higher (with a secondary filter kicking in at 2.56× the highest sampling rate of 128 kHz). In embodiments, a CPLD may be used as a clock-divider for a delta-sigma A/D to achieve lower sampling rates without the need for digital resampling. In embodiments, a high-frequency crystal reference can be divided down to lower frequencies by employing a CPLD as a programmable clock divider. The accuracy of the divided down lower frequencies is even more accurate than the original source relative to their longer time periods. This also minimizes or removes the need for resampling processing by the delta-sigma A/D.
In embodiments, the data then moves from the delta-sigma board to the Jennic™ board where phase relative to input and trigger channels using on-board timers may be digitally derived. In embodiments, the Jennic™ board also has the ability to store calibration data and system maintenance repair history data in an on-board card set. In embodiments, the Jennic™ board will enable acquiring long blocks of data at high-sampling rate as opposed to multiple sets of data taken at different sampling rates so it can stream data and acquire long blocks of data for advanced analysis in the future.
In embodiments, after the signal moves through the Jennic™ board it may then be transmitted to the computer. In embodiments, the computer software will be used to add intelligence to the system starting with an expert system GUI. The GUI will offer a graphical expert system with simplified user interface for defining smart bands and diagnoses which facilitate anyone to develop complex analytics. In embodiments, this user interface may revolve around smart bands, which are a simplified approach to complex yet flexible analytics for the general user. In embodiments, the smart bands may pair with a self-learning neural network for an even more advanced analytical approach. In embodiments, this system may use the machine's hierarchy for additional analytical insight. One critical part of predictive maintenance is the ability to learn from known information during repairs or inspections. In embodiments, graphical approaches for back calculations may improve the smart bands and correlations based on a known fault or problem.
In embodiments, there is a smart route which adapts which sensors it collects simultaneously in order to gain additional correlative intelligence. In embodiments, smart operational data store (“ODS”) allows the system to elect to gather data to perform operational deflection shape analysis in order to further examine the machinery condition. In embodiments, adaptive scheduling techniques allow the system to change the scheduled data collected for full spectral analysis across a number (e.g., eight), of correlative channels. In embodiments, the system may provide data to enable extended statistics capabilities for continuous monitoring as well as ambient local vibration for analysis that combines ambient temperature and local temperature and vibration levels changes for identifying machinery issues.
In embodiments, a data acquisition device may be controlled by a personal computer (PC) to implement the desired data acquisition commands. In embodiments, the DAQ box may be self-sufficient and can acquire, process, analyze and monitor independent of external PC control. Embodiments may include secure digital (SD) card storage. In embodiments, significant additional storage capability may be provided by utilizing an SD card. This may prove critical for monitoring applications where critical data may be stored permanently. Also, if a power failure should occur, the most recent data may be stored despite the fact that it was not off-loaded to another system.
A current trend has been to make DAQ systems as communicative as possible with the outside world usually in the form of networks including wireless. In the past it was common to use a dedicated bus to control a DAQ system with either a microprocessor or microcontroller/microprocessor paired with a PC. In embodiments, a DAQ system may comprise one or more microprocessor/microcontrollers, specialized microcontrollers/microprocessors, or dedicated processors focused primarily on the communication aspects with the outside world. These include USB, Ethernet and wireless with the ability to provide an IP address or addresses in order to host a webpage. All communications with the outside world are then accomplished using a simple text based menu. The usual array of commands (in practice more than a hundred) such as InitializeCard, AcquireData, StopAcquisition, RetrieveCalibration Info, and so on, would be provided.
In embodiments, intense signal processing activities including resampling, weighting, filtering, and spectrum processing may be performed by dedicated processors such as field-programmable gate array (“FPGAs”), digital signal processor (“DSP”), microprocessors, micro-controllers, or a combination thereof. In embodiments, this subsystem may communicate via a specialized hardware bus with the communication processing section. It will be facilitated with dual-port memory, semaphore logic, and so on. This embodiment will not only provide a marked improvement in efficiency but can significantly improve the processing capability, including the streaming of the data as well other high-end analytical techniques. This negates the need for constantly interrupting the main processes which include the control of the signal conditioning circuits, triggering, raw data acquisition using the A/D, directing the A/D output to the appropriate on-board memory and processing that data.
Embodiments may include sensor overload identification. A need exists for monitoring systems to identify when the sensor is overloading. There may be situations involving high-frequency inputs that will saturate a standard 100 mv/g sensor (which is most commonly used in the industry) and having the ability to sense the overload improves data quality for better analysis. A monitoring system may identify when their system is overloading, but in embodiments, the system may look at the voltage of the sensor to determine if the overload is from the sensor, enabling the user to get another sensor better suited to the situation, or gather the data again.
Embodiments may include radio frequency identification (“RFID”) and an inclinometer or accelerometer on a sensor so the sensor can indicate what machine/bearing it is attached to and what direction such that the software can automatically store the data without the user input. In embodiments, users could put the system on any machine or machines and the system would automatically set itself up and be ready for data collection in seconds.
Embodiments may include ultrasonic online monitoring by placing ultrasonic sensors inside transformers, motor control centers, breakers and the like and monitoring, via a sound spectrum, continuously looking for patterns that identify arcing, corona and other electrical issues indicating a break down or issue. Embodiments may include providing continuous ultrasonic monitoring of rotating elements and bearings of an energy production facility. In embodiments, an analysis engine may be used in ultrasonic online monitoring as well as identifying other faults by combining the ultrasonic data with other parameters such as vibration, temperature, pressure, heat flux, magnetic fields, electrical fields, currents, voltage, capacitance, inductance, and combinations (e.g., simple ratios) of the same, among many others.
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include use of an analog crosspoint switch for collecting variable groups of vibration input channels. For vibration analysis, it is useful to obtain multiple channels simultaneously from vibration transducers mounted on different parts of a machine (or machines) in multiple directions. By obtaining the readings at the same time, for example, the relative phases of the inputs may be compared for the purpose of diagnosing various mechanical faults. Other types of cross channel analyses such as cross-correlation, transfer functions, Operating Deflection Shape (“ODS”) may also be performed.
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include precise voltage reference for A/D zero reference. Some A/D chips provide their own internal zero voltage reference to be used as a mid-scale value for external signal conditioning circuitry to ensure that both the A/D and external op-amps use the same reference. Although this sounds reasonable in principle, there are practical complications. In many cases these references are inherently based on a supply voltage using a resistor-divider. For many current systems, especially those whose power is derived from a PC via USB or similar bus, this provides for an unreliable reference, as the supply voltage will often vary quite significantly with load. This is especially true for delta-sigma A/D chips which necessitate increased signal processing. Although the offsets may drift together with load, a problem arises if one wants to calibrate the readings digitally. It is typical to modify the voltage offset expressed as counts coming from the A/D digitally to compensate for the DC drift. However, for this case, if the proper calibration offset is determined for one set of loading conditions, they will not apply for other conditions. An absolute DC offset expressed in counts will no longer be applicable. As a result, it becomes necessary to calibrate for all loading conditions which becomes complex, unreliable, and ultimately unmanageable. In embodiments, an external voltage reference is used which is simply independent of the supply voltage to use as the zero offset.
In embodiments, the system provides a phase-lock-loop band pass tracking filter method for obtaining slow-speed RPMs and phase for balancing purposes to remotely balance slow speed machinery, such as in paper mills, as well as offering additional analysis from its data. For balancing purposes, it is sometimes necessary to balance at very slow speeds. A typical tracking filter may be constructed based on a phase-lock loop or PLL design; however, stability and speed range are overriding concerns. In embodiments, a number of digitally controlled switches are used for selecting the appropriate RC and damping constants. The switching can be done all automatically after measuring the frequency of the incoming tach signal. Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include digital derivation of phase relative to input and trigger channels using on-board timers. In embodiments, digital phase derivation uses digital timers to ascertain an exact delay from a trigger event to the precise start of data acquisition. This delay, or offset, then, is further refined using interpolation methods to obtain an even more precise offset which is then applied to the analytically determined phase of the acquired data such that the phase is “in essence” an absolute phase with precise mechanical meaning useful for among other things, one-shot balancing, alignment analysis, and so on.
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include signal processing firmware/hardware. In embodiments, long blocks of data may be acquired at high-sampling rate as opposed to multiple sets of data taken at different sampling rates. Typically, in modern route collection for vibration analysis, it is customary to collect data at a fixed sampling rate with a specified data length. The sampling rate and data length may vary from route point to point based on the specific mechanical analysis requirements at hand. For example, a motor may require a relatively low sampling rate with high resolution to distinguish running speed harmonics from line frequency harmonics. The practical trade-off here though is that it takes more collection time to achieve this improved resolution. In contrast, some high-speed compressors or gear sets require much higher sampling rates to measure the amplitudes of relatively higher frequency data although the precise resolution may not be as necessary. Ideally, however, it would be better to collect a very long sample length of data at a very high-sampling rate. When digital acquisition devices were first popularized in the early 1980's, the A/D sampling, digital storage, and computational abilities were not close to what they are today, so compromises were made between the time required for data collection and the desired resolution and accuracy. It was because of this limitation that some analysts in the field even refused to give up their analog tape recording systems, which did not suffer as much from these same digitizing drawbacks. A few hybrid systems were employed that would digitize the play back of the recorded analog data at multiple sampling rates and lengths desired, though these systems were admittedly less automated. The more common approach, as mentioned earlier, is to balance data collection time with analysis capability and digitally acquire the data blocks at multiple sampling rates and sampling lengths and digitally store these blocks separately. In embodiments, a long data length of data can be collected at the highest practical sampling rate (e.g., 102.4 kHz; corresponding to a 40 kHz Fmax) and stored. This long block of data can be acquired in the same amount of time as the shorter length of the lower sampling rates utilized by a priori methods so that there is no effective delay added to the sampling at the measurement point, always a concern in route collection. In embodiments, analog tape recording of data is digitally simulated with such a precision that it can be in effect considered continuous or “analog” for many purposes, including for purposes of embodiments of the present disclosure, except where context indicates otherwise.
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include storage of calibration data and maintenance history on-board card sets. Many data acquisition devices which rely on interfacing to a PC to function store their calibration coefficients on the PC. This is especially true for complex data acquisition devices whose signal paths are many and therefore whose calibration tables can be quite large. In embodiments, calibration coefficients are stored in flash memory which will remember this data or any other significant information for that matter, for all practical purposes, permanently. This information may include nameplate information such as serial numbers of individual components, firmware or software version numbers, maintenance history, and the calibration tables. In embodiments, no matter which computer the box is ultimately connected to, the DAQ box remains calibrated and continues to hold all of this critical information. The PC or external device may poll for this information at any time for implantation or information exchange purposes.
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include rapid route creation taking advantage of hierarchical templates. In the field of vibration monitoring, as well as parametric monitoring in general, it is necessary to establish in a database or functional equivalent the existence of data monitoring points. These points are associated a variety of attributes including the following categories: transducer attributes, data collection settings, machinery parameters and operating parameters. The transducer attributes would include probe type, probe mounting type and probe mounting direction or axis orientation. Data collection attributes associated with the measurement would involve a sampling rate, data length, integrated electronic piezoelectric probe power and coupling requirements, hardware integration requirements, 4-20 or voltage interfacing, range and gain settings (if applicable), filter requirements, and so on. Machinery parametric requirements relative to the specific point would include such items as operating speed, bearing type, bearing parametric data which for a rolling element bearing includes the pitch diameter, number of balls, inner race, and outer-race diameters. For a tilting pad bearing, this would include the number of pads and so on. For measurement points on a piece of equipment such as a gearbox, needed parameters would include, for example, the number of gear teeth on each of the gears. For induction motors, it would include the number of rotor bars and poles; for compressors, the number of blades and/or vanes; for fans, the number of blades. For belt/pulley systems, the number of belts as well as the relevant belt-passing frequencies may be calculated from the dimensions of the pulleys and pulley center-to-center distance. For measurements near couplings, the coupling type and number of teeth in a geared coupling may be necessary, and so on. Operating parametric data would include operating load, which may be expressed in megawatts, flow (either air or fluid), percentage, horsepower, feet-per-minute, and so on. Operating temperatures both ambient and operational, pressures, humidity, and so on, may also be relevant. As can be seen, the setup information required for an individual measurement point can be quite large. It is also crucial to performing any legitimate analysis of the data. Machinery, equipment, and bearing specific information are essential for identifying fault frequencies as well as anticipating the various kinds of specific faults to be expected. The transducer attributes as well as data collection parameters are vital for properly interpreting the data along with providing limits for the type of analytical techniques suitable. The traditional means of entering this data has been manual and quite tedious, usually at the lowest hierarchical level (for example, at the bearing level with regards to machinery parameters), and at the transducer level for data collection setup information. It cannot be stressed enough, however, the importance of the hierarchical relationships necessary to organize data—both for analytical and interpretive purposes as well as the storage and movement of data. Here, we are focusing primarily on the storage and movement of data. By its nature, the aforementioned setup information is extremely redundant at the level of the lowest hierarchies; however, because of its strong hierarchical nature, it can be stored quite efficiently in that form. In embodiments, hierarchical nature can be utilized when copying data in the form of templates. As an example, hierarchical storage structure suitable for many purposes is defined from general to specific of company, plant or site, unit or process, machine, equipment, shaft element, bearing, and transducer. It is much easier to copy data associated with a particular machine, piece of equipment, shaft element or bearing than it is to copy only at the lowest transducer level. In embodiments, the system not only stores data in this hierarchical fashion, but robustly supports the rapid copying of data using these hierarchical templates. Similarity of elements at specific hierarchical levels lends itself to effective data storage in hierarchical format. For example, so many machines have common elements such as motors, gearboxes, compressors, belts, fans, and so on. More specifically, many motors can be easily classified as induction, DC, fixed or variable speed. Many gearboxes can be grouped into commonly occurring groupings such as input/output, input pinion/intermediate pinion/output pinion, 4-posters, and so on. Within a plant or company, there are many similar types of equipment purchased and standardized on for both cost and maintenance reasons. This results in an enormous overlapping of similar types of equipment and, as a result, offers a great opportunity for taking advantage of a hierarchical template approach.
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include smart bands. Smart bands refer to any processed signal characteristics derived from any dynamic input or group of inputs for the purposes of analyzing the data and achieving the correct diagnoses. Furthermore, smart bands may even include mini or relatively simple diagnoses for the purposes of achieving a more robust and complex one. Historically, in the field of mechanical vibration analysis, Alarm Bands have been used to define spectral frequency bands of interest for the purposes of analyzing and/or trending significant vibration patterns. The Alarm Band typically consists of a spectral (amplitude plotted against frequency) region defined between a low and high frequency border. The amplitude between these borders is summed in the same manner for which an overall amplitude is calculated. A Smart Band is more flexible in that it not only refers to a specific frequency band but can also refer to a group of spectral peaks such as the harmonics of a single peak, a true-peak level or crest factor derived from a time waveform, an overall derived from a vibration envelope spectrum or other specialized signal analysis technique or a logical combination (AND, OR, XOR, etc.) of these signal attributes. In addition, a myriad assortment of other parametric data, including system load, motor voltage and phase information, bearing temperature, flow rates, and the like, can likewise be used as the basis for forming additional smart bands. In embodiments, Smart Band symptoms may be used as building blocks for an expert system whose engine would utilize these inputs to derive diagnoses. Some of these mini-diagnoses may then in turn be used as Smart-Band symptoms (smart bands can include even diagnoses) for more generalized diagnoses.
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include a neural net expert system using smart bands. Typical vibration analysis engines are rule-based (i.e., they use a list of expert rules which, when met, trigger specific diagnoses). In contrast, a neural approach utilizes the weighted triggering of multiple input stimuli into smaller analytical engines or neurons which in turn feed a simplified weighted output to other neurons. The output of these neurons can be also classified as smart bands which in turn feed other neurons. This produces a more layered approach to expert diagnosing as opposed to the one-shot approach of a rule-based system. In embodiments, the expert system utilizes this neural approach using smart bands; however, it does not preclude rule-based diagnoses being reclassified as smart bands as further stimuli to be utilized by the expert system. From this point-of-view, it can be overviewed as a hybrid approach, although at the highest level it is essentially neural.
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include use of database hierarchy in analysis smart band symptoms and diagnoses may be assigned to various hierarchical database levels. For example, a smart band may be called “Looseness” at the bearing level, trigger “Looseness” at the equipment level, and trigger “Looseness” at the machine level. Another example would be having a smart band diagnosis called “Horizontal Plane Phase Flip” across a coupling and generate a smart band diagnosis of “Vertical Coupling Misalignment” at the machine level.
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include expert system GUIs. In embodiments, the system undertakes a graphical approach to defining smart bands and diagnoses for the expert system. The entry of symptoms, rules, or more generally smart bands for creating a particular machine diagnosis, may be tedious and time consuming. One means of making the process more expedient and efficient is to provide a graphical means by use of wiring. The proposed graphical interface consists of four major components: a symptom parts bin, diagnoses bin, tools bin, and graphical wiring area (“GWA”). In embodiments, a symptom parts bin includes various spectral, waveform, envelope and any type of signal processing characteristic or grouping of characteristics such as a spectral peak, spectral harmonic, waveform true-peak, waveform crest-factor, spectral alarm band, and so on. Each part may be assigned additional properties. For example, a spectral peak part may be assigned a frequency or order (multiple) of running speed. Some parts may be pre-defined or user defined such as a 1×, 2×, 3× running speed, 1×, 2×, 3× gear mesh, 1×, 2×, 3× blade pass, number of motor rotor bars×running speed, and so on.
In embodiments, the diagnoses bin includes various pre-defined as well as user-defined diagnoses such as misalignment, imbalance, looseness, bearing faults, and so on. Like parts, diagnoses may also be used as parts for the purposes of building more complex diagnoses. In embodiments, the tools bin includes logical operations such as AND, OR, XOR, etc. or other ways of combining the various parts listed above such as Find Max, Find Min, Interpolate, Average, other Statistical Operations, etc. In embodiments, a graphical wiring area includes parts from the parts bin or diagnoses from the diagnoses bin and may be combined using tools to create diagnoses. The various parts, tools and diagnoses will be represented with icons which are simply graphically wired together in the desired manner.
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include a graphical approach for back-calculation definition. In embodiments, the expert system also provides the opportunity for the system to learn. If one already knows that a unique set of stimuli or smart bands corresponds to a specific fault or diagnosis, then it is possible to back-calculate a set of coefficients that when applied to a future set of similar stimuli would arrive at the same diagnosis. In embodiments, if there are multiple sets of data, a best-fit approach may be used. Unlike the smart band GUI, this embodiment will self-generate a wiring diagram. In embodiments, the user may tailor the back-propagation approach settings and use a database browser to match specific sets of data with the desired diagnoses. In embodiments, the desired diagnoses may be created or custom tailored with a smart band GUI. In embodiments, after that, a user may press the GENERATE button and a dynamic wiring of the symptom-to-diagnosis may appear on the screen as it works through the algorithms to achieve the best fit. In embodiments, when complete, a variety of statistics are presented which detail how well the mapping process proceeded. In some cases, no mapping may be achieved if, for example, the input data was all zero or the wrong data (mistakenly assigned) and so on. Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include bearing analysis methods. In embodiments, bearing analysis methods may be used in conjunction with a computer aided design (“CAD”), predictive deconvolution, minimum variance distortionless response (“MVDR”) and spectrum sum-of-harmonics.
In recent years, there has been a strong drive to save power which has resulted in an influx of variable frequency drives and variable speed machinery. In embodiments, a bearing analysis method is provided. In embodiments, torsional vibration detection and analysis is provided utilizing transitory signal analysis to provide an advanced torsional vibration analysis for a more comprehensive way to diagnose machinery where torsional forces are relevant (such as machinery with rotating components). Due primarily to the decrease in cost of motor speed control systems, as well as the increased cost and consciousness of energy-usage, it has become more economically justifiable to take advantage of the potentially vast energy savings of load control. Unfortunately, one frequently overlooked design aspect of this issue is that of vibration. When a machine is designed to run at only one speed, it is far easier to design the physical structure accordingly so as to avoid mechanical resonances both structural and torsional, each of which can dramatically shorten the mechanical health of a machine. This would include such structural characteristics as the types of materials to use, their weight, stiffening member requirements and placement, bearing types, bearing location, base support constraints, etc. Even with machines running at one speed, designing a structure so as to minimize vibration can prove a daunting task, potentially requiring computer modeling, finite-element analysis, and field testing. By throwing variable speeds into the mix, in many cases, it becomes impossible to design for all desirable speeds. The problem then becomes one of minimization, e.g., by speed avoidance. This is why many modem motor controllers are typically programmed to skip or quickly pass through specific speed ranges or bands. Embodiments may include identifying speed ranges in a vibration monitoring system. Non-torsional, structural resonances are typically fairly easy to detect using conventional vibration analysis techniques. However, this is not the case for torsion. One special area of current interest is the increased incidence of torsional resonance problems, apparently due to the increased torsional stresses of speed change as well as the operation of equipment at torsional resonance speeds. Unlike non-torsional structural resonances which generally manifest their effect with dramatically increased casing or external vibration, torsional resonances generally show no such effect. In the case of a shaft torsional resonance, the twisting motion induced by the resonance may only be discernible by looking for speed and/or phase changes. The current standard methodology for analyzing torsional vibration involves the use of specialized instrumentation. Methods and systems disclosed herein allow analysis of torsional vibration without such specialized instrumentation. This may consist of shutting the machine down and employing the use of strain gauges and/or other special fixturing such as speed encoder plates and/or gears. Friction wheels are another alternative, but they typically require manual implementation and a specialized analyst. In general, these techniques can be prohibitively expensive and/or inconvenient. An increasing prevalence of continuous vibration monitoring systems due to decreasing costs and increasing convenience (e.g., remote access) exists. In embodiments, there is an ability to discern torsional speed and/or phase variations with just the vibration signal. In embodiments, transient analysis techniques may be utilized to distinguish torsionally induced vibrations from mere speed changes due to process control. In embodiments, factors for discernment might focus on one or more of the following aspects: the rate of speed change due to variable speed motor control would be relatively slow, sustained and deliberate; torsional speed changes would tend to be short, impulsive and not sustained; torsional speed changes would tend to be oscillatory, most likely decaying exponentially, process speed changes would not; and smaller speed changes associated with torsion relative to the shaft's rotational speed which suggest that monitoring phase behavior would show the quick or transient speed bursts in contrast to the slow phase changes historically associated with ramping a machine's speed up or down (as typified with Bode or Nyquist plots).
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include improved integration using both analog and digital methods. When a signal is digitally integrated using software, essentially the spectral low-end frequency data has its amplitude multiplied by a function which quickly blows up as it approaches zero and creates what is known in the industry as a “ski-slope” effect. The amplitude of the ski-slope is essentially the noise floor of the instrument. The simple remedy for this is the traditional hardware integrator, which can perform at signal-to-noise ratios much greater than that of an already digitized signal. It can also limit the amplification factor to a reasonable level so that multiplication by very large numbers is essentially prohibited. However, at high frequencies where the frequency becomes large, the original amplitude which may be well above the noise floor is multiplied by a very small number (1/f) that plunges it well below the noise floor. The hardware integrator has a fixed noise floor that although low floor does not scale down with the now lower amplitude high-frequency data. In contrast, the same digital multiplication of a digitized high-frequency signal also scales down the noise floor proportionally. In embodiments, hardware integration may be used below the point of unity gain where (at a value usually determined by units and/or desired signal to noise ratio based on gain) and software integration may be used above the value of unity gain to produce an ideal result. In embodiments, this integration is performed in the frequency domain. In embodiments, the resulting hybrid data can then be transformed back into a waveform which should be far superior in signal-to-noise ratio when compared to either hardware integrated or software integrated data. In embodiments, the strengths of hardware integration are used in conjunction with those of digital software integration to achieve the maximum signal-to-noise ratio. In embodiments, the first order gradual hardware integrator high pass filter along with curve fitting allow some relatively low frequency data to get through while reducing or eliminating the noise, allowing very useful analytical data that steep filters kill to be salvaged.
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include adaptive scheduling techniques for continuous monitoring. Continuous monitoring is often performed with an up-front Mux whose purpose it is to select a few channels of data among many to feed the hardware signal processing, A/D, and processing components of a DAQ system. This is done primarily out of practical cost considerations. The tradeoff is that all of the points are not monitored continuously (although they may be monitored to a lesser extent via alternative hardware methods). In embodiments, multiple scheduling levels are provided. In embodiments, at the lowest level, which is continuous for the most part, all of the measurement points will be cycled through in round-robin fashion. For example, if it takes 30 seconds to acquire and process a measurement point and there are 30 points, then each point is serviced once every 15 minutes; however, if a point should alarm by whatever criteria the user selects, its priority level can be increased so that it is serviced more often. As there can be multiple grades of severity for each alarm, so can there me multiple levels of priority with regards to monitoring. In embodiments, more severe alarms will be monitored more frequently. In embodiments, a number of additional high-level signal processing techniques can be applied at less frequent intervals. Embodiments may take advantage of the increased processing power of a PC and the PC can temporarily suspend the round-robin route collection (with its multiple tiers of collection) process and stream the required amount of data for a point of its choosing. Embodiments may include various advanced processing techniques such as envelope processing, wavelet analysis, as well as many other signal processing techniques. In embodiments, after acquisition of this data, the DAQ card set will continue with its route at the point it was interrupted. In embodiments, various PC scheduled data acquisitions will follow their own schedules which will be less frequency than the DAQ card route. They may be set up hourly, daily, by number of route cycles (for example, once every 10 cycles) and also increased scheduling-wise based on their alarm severity priority or type of measurement (e.g., motors may be monitored differently than fans).
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include data acquisition parking features. In embodiments, a data acquisition box used for route collection, real time analysis and in general as an acquisition instrument can be detached from its PC (tablet or otherwise) and powered by an external power supply or suitable battery. In embodiments, the data collector still retains continuous monitoring capability and its on-board firmware can implement dedicated monitoring functions for an extended period of time or can be controlled remotely for further analysis. Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include extended statistical capabilities for continuous monitoring.
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include ambient sensing plus local sensing plus vibration for analysis. In embodiments, ambient environmental temperature and pressure, sensed temperature and pressure may be combined with long/medium term vibration analysis for prediction of any of a range of conditions or characteristics. Variants may add infrared sensing, infrared thermography, ultrasound, and many other types of sensors and input types in combination with vibration or with each other. Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include a smart route. In embodiments, the continuous monitoring system's software will adapt/adjust the data collection sequence based on statistics, analytics, data alarms and dynamic analysis. Typically, the route is set based on the channels the sensors are attached to. In embodiments, with the crosspoint switch, the Mux can combine any input Mux channels to the (e.g., eight) output channels. In embodiments, as channels go into alarm or the system identifies key deviations, it will pause the normal route set in the software to gather specific simultaneous data, from the channels sharing key statistical changes, for more advanced analysis. Embodiments include conducting a smart ODS or smart transfer function.
Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include smart ODS and one or more transfer functions. In embodiments, due to a system's multiplexer and crosspoint switch, an ODS, a transfer function, or other special tests on all the vibration sensors attached to a machine/structure can be performed and show exactly how the machine's points are moving in relationship to each other. In embodiments, 40-50 kHz and longer data lengths (e.g., at least one minute) may be streamed, which may reveal different information than what a normal ODS or transfer function will show. In embodiments, the system will be able to determine, based on the data/statistics/analytics to use, the smart route feature that breaks from the standard route and conducts an ODS across a machine, structure or multiple machines and structures that might show a correlation because the conditions/data directs it. In embodiments, for the transfer functions there may be an impact hammer used on one channel and then compared against other vibration sensors on the machine. In embodiments, the system may use the condition changes such as load, speed, temperature or other changes in the machine or system to conduct the transfer function. In embodiments, different transfer functions may be compared to each other over time. In embodiments, difference transfer functions may be strung together like a movie that may show how the machinery fault changes, such as a bearing that could show how it moves through the four stages of bearing failure and so on. Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may include a hierarchical Mux.
With reference to
In embodiments, the machine 2020 can further include a housing 2100 that can contain a drive motor 2110 that can drive a shaft 2120. The shaft 2120 can be supported for rotation or oscillation by a set of bearings 2130, such as including a first bearing 2140 and a second bearing 2150. A data collection module 2160 can connect to (or be resident on) the machine 2020. In one example, the data collection module 2160 can be located and accessible through a cloud network facility 2170, can collect the waveform data 2010 from the machine 2020, and deliver the waveform data 2010 to a remote location. A working end 2180 of the drive shaft 2120 of the machine 2020 can drive a windmill, a fan, a pump, a drill, a gear system, a drive system, or other working element, as the techniques described herein can apply to a wide range of machines, equipment, tools, or the like that include rotating or oscillating elements. In other instances, a generator can be substituted for the motor 2110, and the working end of the drive shaft 2120 can direct rotational energy to the generator to generate power, rather than consume it.
In embodiments, the waveform data 2010 can be obtained using a predetermined route format based on the layout of the machine 2020. The waveform data 2010 may include data from the single-axis sensor 2030 and the three-axis sensor 2050. The single-axis sensor 2030 can serve as a reference probe with its one channel of data and can be fixed at the unchanging location 2040 on the machine under survey. The three-axis sensor 2050 can serve as a tri-axial probe (e.g., three orthogonal axes) with its three channels of data and can be moved along a predetermined diagnostic route format from one test point to the next test point. In one example, both sensors 2030, 2050 can be mounted manually to the machine 2020 and can connect to a separate portable computer in certain service examples. The reference probe can remain at one location while the user can move the tri-axial vibration probe along the predetermined route, such as from bearing-to-bearing on a machine. In this example, the user is instructed to locate the sensors at the predetermined locations to complete the survey (or portion thereof) of the machine.
With reference to
In further examples, the sensors and data acquisition modules and equipment can be integral to, or resident on, the rotating machine. By way of these examples, the machine can contain many single-axis sensors and many tri-axial sensors at predetermined locations. The sensors can be originally installed equipment and provided by the original equipment manufacturer or installed at a different time in a retrofit application. The data collection module 2160, or the like, can select and use one single-axis sensor and obtain data from it exclusively during the collection of waveform data 2010 while moving to each of the tri-axial sensors. The data collection module 2160 can be resident on the machine 2020 and/or connect via the cloud network facility 2170.
With reference to
In embodiments, a second reference sensor can be used, and a fifth channel of data can be collected. As such, the single-axis sensor can be the first channel and tri-axial vibration can occupy the second, the third, and the fourth data channels. This second reference sensor, like the first, can be a single-axis sensor, such as an accelerometer. In embodiments, the second reference sensor, like the first reference sensor, can remain in the same location on the machine for the entire vibration survey on that machine. The location of the first reference sensor (i.e., the single-axis sensor) may be different than the location of the second reference sensors (i.e., another single-axis sensor). In certain examples, the second reference sensor can be used when the machine has two shafts with different operating speeds, with the two reference sensors being located on the two different shafts. In accordance with this example, further single-axis reference sensors can be employed at additional but different unchanging locations associated with the rotating machine.
In embodiments, the waveform data can be transmitted electronically in a gap-free free format at a significantly high rate of sampling for a relatively longer period of time. In one example, the period of time is 60 seconds to 120 seconds. In another example, the rate of sampling is 100 kHz with a maximum resolvable frequency (Fmax) of 40 kHz. It will be appreciated in light of this disclosure that the waveform data can be shown to approximate more closely some of the wealth of data available from previous instances of analog recording of waveform data.
In embodiments, sampling, band selection, and filtering techniques can permit one or more portions of a long stream of data (i.e., one to two minutes in duration) to be under sampled or over sampled to realize varying effective sampling rates. To this end, interpolation and decimation can be used to further realize varying effective sampling rates. For example, oversampling may be applied to frequency bands that are proximal to rotational or oscillational operating speeds of the sampled machine, or to harmonics thereof, as vibration effects may tend to be more pronounced at those frequencies across the operating range of the machine. In embodiments, the digitally-sampled data set can be decimated to produce a lower sampling rate. It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that decimate in this context can be the opposite of interpolate. In embodiments, decimating the data set can include first applying a low-pass filter to the digitally-sampled data set and then undersampling the data set.
In one example, a sample waveform at 100 Hz can be undersampled at every tenth point of the digital waveform to produce an effective sampling rate of 10 Hz, but the remaining nine points of that portion of the waveform are effectively discarded and not included in the modeling of the sample waveform. Moreover, this type of bare undersampling can create ghost frequencies due to the undersampling rate (i.e., 10 Hz) relative to the 100 Hz sample waveform.
Most hardware for analog-to-digital conversions uses a sample-and-hold circuit that can charge up a capacitor for a given amount of time such that an average value of the waveform is determined over a specific change in time. It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that the value of the waveform over the specific change in time is not linear but more similar to a cardinal sinusoidal (“sinc”) function; therefore, it can be shown that more emphasis can be placed on the waveform data at the center of the sampling interval with exponential decay of the cardinal sinusoidal signal occurring from its center.
By way of the above example, the sample waveform at 100 Hz can be hardware-sampled at 10 Hz and therefore each sampling point is averaged over 100 milliseconds (e.g., a signal sampled at 100 Hz can have each point averaged over 10 milliseconds). In contrast to the effective discarding of nine out of the ten data points of the sampled waveform as discussed above, the present disclosure can include weighing adjacent data. The adjacent data can refer to the sample points that were previously discarded and the one remaining point that was retained. In one example, a low pass filter can average the adjacent sample data linearly, i.e., determining the sum of every ten points and then dividing that sum by ten. In a further example, the adjacent data can be weighted with a sinc function. The process of weighting the original waveform with the sinc function can be referred to as an impulse function, or can be referred to in the time domain as a convolution.
The present disclosure can be applicable to not only digitizing a waveform signal based on a detected voltage, but can also be applicable to digitizing waveform signals based on current waveforms, vibration waveforms, and image processing signals including video signal rasterization. In one example, the resizing of a window on a computer screen can be decimated, albeit in at least two directions. In these further examples, it will be appreciated that undersampling by itself can be shown to be insufficient. To that end, oversampling or upsampling by itself can similarly be shown to be insufficient, such that interpolation can be used like decimation but in lieu of only undersampling by itself.
It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that interpolation in this context can refer to first applying a low pass filter to the digitally-sampled waveform data and then upsampling the waveform data. It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that real-world examples can often require the use of use non-integer factors for decimation or interpolation, or both. To that end, the present disclosure includes interpolating and decimating sequentially in order to realize a non-integer factor rate for interpolating and decimating. In one example, interpolating and decimating sequentially can define applying a low-pass filter to the sample waveform, then interpolating the waveform after the low-pass filter, and then decimating the waveform after the interpolation. In embodiments, the vibration data can be looped to purposely emulate conventional tape recorder loops, with digital filtering techniques used with the effective splice to facilitate longer analyses. It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that the above techniques do not preclude waveform, spectrum, and other types of analyses to be processed and displayed with a GUI of the user at the time of collection. It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that newer systems can permit this functionality to be performed in parallel to the high-performance collection of the raw waveform data.
With respect to time of collection issues, it will be appreciated that older systems using the compromised approach of improving data resolution, by collecting at different sampling rates and data lengths, do not in fact save as much time as expected. To that end, every time the data acquisition hardware is stopped and started, latency issues can be created, especially when there is hardware auto-scaling performed. The same can be true with respect to data retrieval of the route information (i.e., test locations) that is often in a database format and can be exceedingly slow. The storage of the raw data in bursts to disk (whether solid state or otherwise) can also be undesirably slow.
In contrast, the many embodiments include digitally streaming the waveform data 2010, as disclosed herein, and also enjoying the benefit of needing to load the route parameter information while setting the data acquisition hardware only once. Because the waveform data 2010 is streamed to only one file, there is no need to open and close files, or switch between loading and writing operations with the storage medium. It can be shown that the collection and storage of the waveform data 2010, as described herein, can be shown to produce relatively more meaningful data in significantly less time than the traditional batch data acquisition approach. An example of this includes an electric motor about which waveform data can be collected with a data length of 4K points (i.e., 4,096) for sufficiently high resolution in order to, among other things, distinguish electrical sideband frequencies. For fans or blowers, a reduced resolution of 1K (i.e., 1,024) can be used. In certain instances, 1K can be the minimum waveform data length requirement. The sampling rate can be 1,280 Hz and that equates to an Fmax of 500 Hz. It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that oversampling by an industry standard factor of 2.56 can satisfy the necessary two-times (2×) oversampling for the Nyquist Criterion with some additional leeway that can accommodate anti-aliasing filter-rolloff. The time to acquire this waveform data would be 1,024 points at 1,280 hertz, which are 800 milliseconds.
To improve accuracy, the waveform data can be averaged. Eight averages can be used with, for example, fifty percent overlap. This would extend the time from 800 milliseconds to 3.6 seconds, which is equal to 800 msec×8 averages×0.5 (overlap ratio)+0.5×800 msec (non-overlapped head and tail ends). After collection at Fmax=500 Hz waveform data, a higher sampling rate can be used. In one example, ten times (10×) the previous sampling rate can be used and Fmax=10 kHz. By way of this example, eight averages can be used with fifty percent (50%) overlap to collect waveform data at this higher rate that can amount to a collection time of 360 msec or 0.36 seconds. It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that it can be necessary to read the hardware collection parameters for the higher sampling rate from the route list, as well as permit hardware auto-scaling, or the resetting of other necessary hardware collection parameters, or both. To that end, a few seconds of latency can be added to accommodate the changes in sampling rate. In other instances, introducing latency can accommodate hardware autoscaling and changes to hardware collection parameters that can be required when using the lower sampling rate disclosed herein. In addition to accommodating the change in sampling rate, additional time is needed for reading the route point information from the database (i.e., where to monitor and where to monitor next), displaying the route information, and processing the waveform data. Moreover, display of the waveform data and/or associated spectra can also consume significant time. In light of the above, 15 seconds to 20 seconds can elapse while obtaining waveform data at each measurement point.
In further examples, additional sampling rates can be added but this can make the total amount time for the vibration survey even longer because time adds up from changeover time from one sampling rate to another and from the time to obtain additional data at different sampling rate. In one example, a lower sampling rate is used, such as a sampling rate of 128 Hz where Fmax=50 Hz. By way of this example, the vibration survey would, therefore, require an additional 36 seconds for the first set of averaged data at this sampling rate, in addition to others mentioned above, and consequently the total time spent at each measurement point increases even more dramatically. Further embodiments include using similar digital streaming of gap free waveform data as disclosed herein for use with wind turbines and other machines that can have relatively slow speed rotating or oscillating systems. In many examples, the waveform data collected can include long samples of data at a relatively high-sampling rate. In one example, the sampling rate can be 100 kHz and the sampling duration can be for two minutes on all of the channels being recorded. In many examples, one channel can be for the single-axis reference sensor and three more data channels can be for the tri-axial three channel sensor. It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that the long data length can be shown to facilitate detection of extremely low frequency phenomena. The long data length can also be shown to accommodate the inherent speed variability in wind turbine operations. Additionally, the long data length can further be shown to provide the opportunity for using numerous averages such as those discussed herein, to achieve very high spectral resolution, and to make feasible tape loops for certain spectral analyses. Many multiple advanced analytical techniques can now become available because such techniques can use the available long uninterrupted length of waveform data in accordance with the present disclosure.
It will also be appreciated in light of the disclosure that the simultaneous collection of waveform data from multiple channels can facilitate performing transfer functions between multiple channels. Moreover, the simultaneous collection of waveform data from multiple channels facilitates establishing phase relationships across the machine so that more sophisticated correlations can be utilized by relying on the fact that the waveforms from each of the channels are collected simultaneously. In other examples, more channels in the data collection can be used to reduce the time it takes to complete the overall vibration survey by allowing for simultaneous acquisition of waveform data from multiple sensors that otherwise would have to be acquired, in a subsequent fashion, moving sensor to sensor in the vibration survey.
The present disclosure includes the use of at least one of the single-axis reference probe on one of the channels to allow for acquisition of relative phase comparisons between channels. The reference probe can be an accelerometer or other type of transducer that is not moved and, therefore, fixed at an unchanging location during the vibration survey of one machine. Multiple reference probes can each be deployed as at suitable locations fixed in place (i.e., at unchanging locations) throughout the acquisition of vibration data during the vibration survey. In certain examples, up to seven reference probes can be deployed depending on the capacity of the data collection module 2160 or the like. Using transfer functions or similar techniques, the relative phases of all channels may be compared with one another at all selected frequencies. By keeping the one or more reference probes fixed at their unchanging locations while moving or monitoring the other tri-axial vibration sensors, it can be shown that the entire machine can be mapped with regard to amplitude and relative phase. This can be shown to be true even when there are more measurement points than channels of data collection. With this information, an operating deflection shape can be created that can show dynamic movements of the machine in 3 D, which can provide an invaluable diagnostic tool. In embodiments, the one or more reference probes can provide relative phase, rather than absolute phase. It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that relative phase may not be as valuable absolute phase for some purposes, but the relative phase the information can still be shown to be very useful.
In embodiments, the sampling rates used during the vibration survey can be digitally synchronized to predetermined operational frequencies that can relate to pertinent parameters of the machine such as rotating or oscillating speed. Doing this, permits extracting even more information using synchronized averaging techniques. It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that this can be done without the use of a key phasor or a reference pulse from a rotating shaft, which is usually not available for route collected data. As such, non-synchronous signals can be removed from a complex signal without the need to deploy synchronous averaging using the key phasor. This can be shown to be very powerful when analyzing a particular pinion in a gearbox or generally applied to any component within a complicated mechanical mechanism. In many instances, the key phasor or the reference pulse is rarely available with route collected data, but the techniques disclosed herein can overcome this absence. In embodiments, there can be multiple shafts running at different speeds within the machine being analyzed. In certain instances, there can be a single-axis reference probe for each shaft. In other instances, it is possible to relate the phase of one shaft to another shaft using only one single-axis reference probe on one shaft at its unchanging location. In embodiments, variable speed equipment can be more readily analyzed with relatively longer duration of data relative to single speed equipment. The vibration survey can be conducted at several machine speeds within the same contiguous set of vibration data using the same techniques disclosed herein. These techniques can also permit the study of the change of the relationship between vibration and the change of the rate of speed that was not available before.
In embodiments, there are numerous analytical techniques that can emerge from because raw waveform data can be captured in a gap-free digital format as disclosed herein. The gap-free digital format can facilitate many paths to analyze the waveform data in many ways after the fact to identify specific problems. The vibration data collected in accordance with the techniques disclosed herein can provide the analysis of transient, semi-periodic and very low frequency phenomena. The waveform data acquired in accordance with the present disclosure can contain relatively longer streams of raw gap-free waveform data that can be conveniently played back as needed, and on which many and varied sophisticated analytical techniques can be performed. A large number of such techniques can provide for various forms of filtering to extract low amplitude modulations from transient impact data that can be included in the relatively longer stream of raw gap-free waveform data. It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that in past data collection practices, these types of phenomena were typically lost by the averaging process of the spectral processing algorithms because the goal of the previous data acquisition module was purely periodic signals; or these phenomena were lost to file size reduction methodologies due to the fact that much of the content from an original raw signal was typically discarded knowing it would not be used.
In embodiments, there is a method of monitoring vibration of a machine having at least one shaft supported by a set of bearings. The method includes monitoring a first data channel assigned to a single-axis sensor at an unchanging location associated with the machine. The method also includes monitoring a second, third, and fourth data channel assigned to a three-axis sensor. The method further includes recording gap-free digital waveform data simultaneously from all of the data channels while the machine is in operation; and determining a change in relative phase based on the digital waveform data. The method also includes the tri-axial sensor being located at a plurality of positions associated with the machine while obtaining the digital waveform. In embodiments, the second, third, and fourth channels are assigned together to a sequence of tri-axial sensors each located at different positions associated with the machine. In embodiments, the data is received from all of the sensors on all of their channels simultaneously.
The method also includes determining an operating deflection shape based on the change in relative phase information and the waveform data. In embodiments, the unchanging location of the reference sensor is a position associated with a shaft of the machine. In embodiments, the tri-axial sensors in the sequence of the tri-axial sensors are each located at different positions and are each associated with different bearings in the machine. In embodiments, the unchanging location is a position associated with a shaft of the machine and, wherein, the tri-axial sensors in the sequence of the tri-axial sensors are each located at different positions and are each associated with different bearings that support the shaft in the machine. The various embodiments include methods of sequentially monitoring vibration or similar process parameters and signals of a rotating or oscillating machine or analogous process machinery from a number of channels simultaneously, which can be known as an ensemble. In various examples, the ensemble can include one to eight channels. In further examples, an ensemble can represent a logical measurement grouping on the equipment being monitored whether those measurement locations are temporary for measurement, supplied by the original equipment manufacturer, retrofit at a later date, or one or more combinations thereof.
In one example, an ensemble can monitor bearing vibration in a single direction. In a further example, an ensemble can monitor three different directions (e.g., orthogonal directions) using a tri-axial sensor. In yet further examples, an ensemble can monitor four or more channels where the first channel can monitor a single-axis vibration sensor, and the second, the third, and the fourth channels can monitor each of the three directions of the tri-axial sensor. In other examples, the ensemble can be fixed to a group of adjacent bearings on the same piece of equipment or an associated shaft. The various embodiments provide methods that include strategies for collecting waveform data from various ensembles deployed in vibration studies or the like in a relatively more efficient manner. The methods also include simultaneously monitoring of a reference channel assigned to an unchanging reference location associated with the ensemble monitoring the machine. The cooperation with the reference channel can be shown to support a more complete correlation of the collected waveforms from the ensembles. The reference sensor on the reference channel can be a single-axis vibration sensor, or a phase reference sensor that can be triggered by a reference location on a rotating shaft or the like. As disclosed herein, the methods can further include recording gap-free digital waveform data simultaneously from all of the channels of each ensemble at a relatively high rate of sampling so as to include all frequencies deemed necessary for the proper analysis of the machinery being monitored while it is in operation. The data from the ensembles can be streamed gap-free to a storage medium for subsequent processing that can be connected to a cloud network facility, a local data link, Bluetooth™ connectivity, cellular data connectivity, or the like.
In embodiments, the methods disclosed herein include strategies for collecting data from the various ensembles including digital signal processing techniques that can be subsequently applied to data from the ensembles to emphasize or better isolate specific frequencies or waveform phenomena. This can be in contrast with current methods that collect multiple sets of data at different sampling rates, or with different hardware filtering configurations including integration, that provide relatively less post-processing flexibility because of the commitment to these same (known as a priori hardware configurations). These same hardware configurations can also be shown to increase time of the vibration survey due to the latency delays associated with configuring the hardware for each independent test. In embodiments, the methods for collecting data from various ensembles include data marker technology that can be used for classifying sections of streamed data as homogenous and belonging to a specific ensemble. In one example, a classification can be defined as operating speed. In doing so, a multitude of ensembles can be created from what conventional systems would collect as only one. The many embodiments include post-processing analytic techniques for comparing the relative phases of all the frequencies of interest not only between each channel of the collected ensemble but also between all of the channels of all of the ensembles being monitored, when applicable.
With reference to
The machine 2400 can also have tri-axial (e.g., orthogonal axes) sensors 2480, such as a tri-axial sensor 2482, a tri-axial sensor 2484, and more as needed. In many examples, the tri-axial sensors 2480 can be positioned in the machine 2400 at locations that allow for the sensing of one of each of the bearing packs in the sets of bearings 2420 that is associated with the rotating or oscillating components of the machine 2400. The machine 2400 can also have temperature sensors 2500, such as a temperature sensor 2502, a temperature sensor 2504, and more as needed. The machine 2400 can also have a tachometer sensor 2510 or more as needed that each detail the RPMs of one of its rotating components. By way of the above example, the first sensor ensemble 2450 can survey the above sensors associated with the first machine 2400. To that end, the first ensemble 2450 can be configured to receive eight channels. In other examples, the first sensor ensemble 2450 can be configured to have more than eight channels, or less than eight channels as needed. In this example, the eight channels include two channels that can each monitor a single-axis reference sensor signal and three channels that can monitor a tri-axial sensor signal. The remaining three channels can monitor two temperature signals and a signal from a tachometer. In one example, the first ensemble 2450 can monitor the single-axis sensor 2462, the single-axis sensor 2464, the tri-axial sensor 2482, the temperature sensor 2502, the temperature sensor 2504, and the tachometer sensor 2510 in accordance with the present disclosure. During a vibration survey on the machine 2400, the first ensemble 2450 can first monitor the tri-axial sensor 2482 and then move next to the tri-axial sensor 2484.
After monitoring the tri-axial sensor 2484, the first ensemble 2450 can monitor additional tri-axial sensors on the machine 2400 as needed and that are part of the predetermined route list associated with the vibration survey of the machine 2400, in accordance with the present disclosure. During this vibration survey, the first ensemble 2450 can continually monitor the single-axis sensor 2462, the single-axis sensor 2464, the two temperature sensors 2502, 2504, and the tachometer sensor 2510 while the first ensemble 2450 can serially monitor the multiple tri-axial sensors 2480 in the pre-determined route plan for this vibration survey.
With reference to
The machine 2600 can also have tri-axial (e.g., orthogonal axes) sensors 2680, such as a tri-axial sensor 2682, a tri-axial sensor 2684, a tri-axial sensor 2686, a tri-axial sensor 2688, and more as needed. In many examples, the tri-axial sensors 2680 can be positioned in the machine 2600 at locations that allow for the sensing of one of each of the bearing packs in the sets of bearings 2620 that is associated with the rotating or oscillating components of the machine 2600. The machine 2600 can also have temperature sensors 2700, such as a temperature sensor 2702, a temperature sensor 2704, and more as needed. The machine 2600 can also have a tachometer sensor 2710 or more as needed that each detail the RPMs of one of its rotating components.
By way of the above example, the second sensor ensemble 2650 can survey the above sensors associated with the second machine 2600. To that end, the second ensemble 2650 can be configured to receive eight channels. In other examples, the second sensor ensemble 2650 can be configured to have more than eight channels or less than eight channels as needed. In this example, the eight channels include one channel that can monitor a single-axis reference sensor signal and six channels that can monitor two tri-axial sensor signals. The remaining channel can monitor a temperature signal. In one example, the second ensemble 2650 can monitor the single-axis sensor 2662, the tri-axial sensor 2682, the tri-axial sensor 2684, and the temperature sensor 2702. During a vibration survey on the machine 2600 in accordance with the present disclosure, the second ensemble 2650 can first monitor the tri-axial sensor 2682 simultaneously with the tri-axial sensor 2684 and then move onto the tri-axial sensor 2686 simultaneously with the tri-axial sensor 2688.
After monitoring the tri-axial sensors 2680, the second ensemble 2650 can monitor additional tri-axial sensors (in simultaneous pairs) on the machine 2600 as needed and that are part of the predetermined route list associated with the vibration survey of the machine 2600 in accordance with the present disclosure. During this vibration survey, the second ensemble 2650 can continually monitor the single-axis sensor 2662 at its unchanging location and the temperature sensor 2702 while the second ensemble 2650 can serially monitor the multiple tri-axial sensors in the pre-determined route plan for this vibration survey.
With continuing reference to
The many embodiments also include a fourth machine 2950 having rotating or oscillating components 2960, or both, each supported by a set of bearings 2970 including a bearing pack 2972, a bearing pack 2974, a bearing pack 2976, and more as needed. The fourth machine 2950 can be also monitored by the third sensor ensemble 2850 when the user moves it to the fourth machine 2950. The many embodiments also include a fifth machine 3000 having rotating or oscillating components 3010, or both. The fifth machine 3000 may not be explicitly monitored by any sensor or any sensor ensembles in operation but it can create vibrations or other impulse energy of sufficient magnitude to be recorded in the data associated with any one of the machines 2400, 2600, 2800, 2950 under a vibration survey.
The many embodiments include monitoring the first sensor ensemble 2450 on the first machine 2400 through the predetermined route as disclosed herein. The many embodiments also include monitoring the second sensor ensemble 2650 on the second machine 2600 through the predetermined route. The locations of machine 2400 being close to machine 2600 can be included in the contextual metadata of both vibration surveys. The third ensemble 2850 can be moved between machine 2800, machine 2950, and other suitable machines. The machine 3000 has no sensors onboard as configured, but could be monitored as needed by the third sensor ensemble 2850. The machine 3000 and its operational characteristics can be recorded in the metadata in relation to the vibration surveys on the other machines to note its contribution due to its proximity.
The many embodiments include hybrid database adaptation for harmonizing relational metadata and streaming raw data formats. Unlike older systems that utilized traditional database structure for associating nameplate and operational parameters (sometimes deemed metadata) with individual data measurements that are discrete and relatively simple, it will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that more modern systems can collect relatively larger quantities of raw streaming data with higher sampling rates and greater resolutions. At the same time, it will also be appreciated in light of the disclosure that the network of metadata with which to link and obtain this raw data or correlate with this raw data, or both, is expanding at ever-increasing rates.
In one example, a single overall vibration level can be collected as part of a route or prescribed list of measurement points. This data collected can then be associated with database measurement location information for a point located on a surface of a bearing housing on a specific piece of the machine adjacent to a coupling in a vertical direction. Machinery analysis parameters relevant to the proper analysis can be associated with the point located on the surface. Examples of machinery analysis parameters relevant to the proper analysis can include a running speed of a shaft passing through the measurement point on the surface. Further examples of machinery analysis parameters relevant to the proper analysis can include one of, or a combination of: running speeds of all component shafts for that piece of equipment and/or machine, bearing types being analyzed such as sleeve or rolling element bearings, the number of gear teeth on gears should there be a gearbox, the number of poles in a motor, slip and line frequency of a motor, roller bearing element dimensions, number of fan blades, or the like. Examples of machinery analysis parameters relevant to the proper analysis can further include machine operating conditions such as the load on the machines and whether load is expressed in percentage, wattage, air flow, head pressure, horsepower, and the like. Further examples of machinery analysis parameters include information relevant to adjacent machines that might influence the data obtained during the vibration study.
It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that the vast array of equipment and machinery types can support many different classifications, each of which can be analyzed in distinctly different ways. For example, some machines, like screw compressors and hammer mills, can be shown to run much noisier and can be expected to vibrate significantly more than other machines. Machines known to vibrate more significantly can be shown to require a change in vibration levels that can be considered acceptable relative to quieter machines.
The present disclosure further includes hierarchical relationships found in the vibrational data collected that can be used to support proper analysis of the data. One example of the hierarchical data includes the interconnection of mechanical componentry such as a bearing being measured in a vibration survey and the relationship between that bearing, including how that bearing connects to a particular shaft on which is mounted a specific pinion within a particular gearbox, and the relationship between the shaft, the pinion, and the gearbox. The hierarchical data can further include in what particular spot within a machinery gear train that the bearing being monitored is located relative to other components in the machine. The hierarchical data can also detail whether the bearing being measured in a machine is in close proximity to another machine whose vibrations may affect what is being measured in the machine that is the subject of the vibration study.
The analysis of the vibration data from the bearing or other components related to one another in the hierarchical data can use table lookups, searches for correlations between frequency patterns derived from the raw data, and specific frequencies from the metadata of the machine. In some embodiments, the above can be stored in and retrieved from a relational database. In embodiments, National Instrument's Technical Data Management Solution (TDMS) file format can be used. The TDMS file format can be optimized for streaming various types of measurement data (i.e., binary digital samples of waveforms), as well as also being able to handle hierarchical metadata.
The many embodiments include a hybrid relational metadata—binary storage approach (HRM-BSA). The HRM-BSA can include a structured query language (SQL) based relational database engine. The structured query language based relational database engine can also include a raw data engine that can be optimized for throughput and storage density for data that is flat and relatively structureless. It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that benefits can be shown in the cooperation between the hierarchical metadata and the SQL relational database engine. In one example, marker technologies and pointer sign-posts can be used to make correlations between the raw database engine and the SQL relational database engine. Three examples of correlations between the raw database engine and the SQL relational database engine linkages include: (1) pointers from the SQL database to the raw data; (2) pointers from the ancillary metadata tables or similar grouping of the raw data to the SQL database; and (3) independent storage tables outside the domain of either the SQL database or raw data technologies.
With reference to
The present disclosure can include markers that can be applied to a time mark or a sample length within the raw waveform data. The markers generally fall into two categories: preset or dynamic. The preset markers can correlate to preset or existing operating conditions (e.g., load, head pressure, air flow cubic feet per minute, ambient temperature, RPMs, and the like.). These preset markers can be fed into the data acquisition system directly. In certain instances, the preset markers can be collected on data channels in parallel with the waveform data (e.g., waveforms for vibration, current, voltage, etc.). Alternatively, the values for the preset markers can be entered manually.
For dynamic markers such as trending data, it can be important to compare similar data like comparing vibration amplitudes and patterns with a repeatable set of operating parameters. One example of the present disclosure includes one of the parallel channel inputs being a key phasor trigger pulse from an operating shaft that can provide RPM information at the instantaneous time of collection. In this example of dynamic markers, sections of collected waveform data can be marked with appropriate speeds or speed ranges.
The present disclosure can also include dynamic markers that can correlate to data that can be derived from post processing and analytics performed on the sample waveform. In further embodiments, the dynamic markers can also correlate to post-collection derived parameters including RPMs, as well as other operationally derived metrics such as alarm conditions like a maximum RPM. In certain examples, many modem pieces of equipment that are candidates for a vibration survey with the portable data collection systems described herein do not include tachometer information. This can be true because it is not always practical or cost-justifiable to add a tachometer even though the measurement of RPM can be of primary importance for the vibration survey and analysis. It will be appreciated that for fixed speed machinery obtaining an accurate RPM measurement can be less important especially when the approximate speed of the machine can be ascertained before-hand; however, variable-speed drives are becoming more and more prevalent. It will also be appreciated in light of the disclosure that various signal processing techniques can permit the derivation of RPM from the raw data without the need for a dedicated tachometer signal.
In many embodiments, the RPM information can be used to mark segments of the raw waveform data over its collection history. Further embodiments include techniques for collecting instrument data following a prescribed route of a vibration study. The dynamic markers can enable analysis and trending software to utilize multiple segments of the collection interval indicated by the markers (e.g., two minutes) as multiple historical collection ensembles, rather than just one as done in previous systems where route collection systems would historically store data for only one RPM setting. This could, in turn, be extended to any other operational parameter such as load setting, ambient temperature, and the like, as previously described. The dynamic markers, however, that can be placed in a type of index file pointing to the raw data stream can classify portions of the stream in homogenous entities that can be more readily compared to previously collected portions of the raw data stream
The many embodiments include the hybrid relational metadata-binary storage approach that can use the best of pre-existing technologies for both relational and raw data streams. In embodiments, the hybrid relational metadata—binary storage approach can marry them together with a variety of marker linkages. The marker linkages can permit rapid searches through the relational metadata and can allow for more efficient analyses of the raw data using conventional SQL techniques with pre-existing technology. This can be shown to permit utilization of many of the capabilities, linkages, compatibilities, and extensions that conventional database technologies do not provide.
The marker linkages can also permit rapid and efficient storage of the raw data using conventional binary storage and data compression techniques. This can be shown to permit utilization of many of the capabilities, linkages, compatibilities, and extensions that conventional raw data technologies provide such as TMDS (National Instruments), UFF (Universal File Format such as UFF58), and the like. The marker linkages can further permit using the marker technology links where a vastly richer set of data from the ensembles can be amassed in the same collection time as more conventional systems. The richer set of data from the ensembles can store data snapshots associated with predetermined collection criterion and the proposed system can derive multiple snapshots from the collected data streams utilizing the marker technology. In doing so, it can be shown that a relatively richer analysis of the collected data can be achieved. One such benefit can include more trending points of vibration at a specific frequency or order of running speed versus RPM, load, operating temperature, flow rates, and the like, which can be collected for a similar time relative to what is spent collecting data with a conventional system.
In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from machines, elements of the machines and the environment of the machines including heavy duty machines deployed at a local job site or at distributed job sites under common control. The heavy-duty machines may include earthmoving equipment, heavy duty on-road industrial vehicles, heavy duty off-road industrial vehicles, industrial machines deployed in various settings such as turbines, turbomachinery, generators, pumps, pulley systems, manifold and valve systems, and the like. In embodiments, heavy industrial machinery may also include earth-moving equipment, earth-compacting equipment, hauling equipment, hoisting equipment, conveying equipment, aggregate production equipment, equipment used in concrete construction, and piledriving equipment. In examples, earth moving equipment may include excavators, backhoes, loaders, bulldozers, skid steer loaders, trenchers, motor graders, motor scrapers, crawler loaders, and wheeled loading shovels. In examples, construction vehicles may include dumpers, tankers, tippers, and trailers. In examples, material handling equipment may include cranes, conveyors, forklift, and hoists. In examples, construction equipment may include tunnel and handling equipment, road rollers, concrete mixers, hot mix plants, road making machines (compactors), stone crashers, pavers, slurry seal machines, spraying and plastering machines, and heavy-duty pumps. Further examples of heavy industrial equipment may include different systems such as implement traction, structure, power train, control, and information. Heavy industrial equipment may include many different powertrains and combinations thereof to provide power for locomotion and to also provide power to accessories and onboard functionality. In each of these examples, the platform 100 may deploy the local data collection system 102 into the environment 104 in which these machines, motors, pumps, and the like, operate and directly connected integrated into each of the machines, motors, pumps, and the like.
In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from machines in operation and machines in being constructed such as turbine and generator sets like Siemens™ SGT6-5000F™ gas turbine, an SST-900™ steam turbine, an SGen6-1000A™ generator, and an SGen6-100A™ generator, and the like. In embodiments, the local data collection system 102 may be deployed to monitor steam turbines as they rotate in the currents caused by hot water vapor that may be directed through the turbine but otherwise generated from a different source such as from gas-fired burners, nuclear cores, molten salt loops and the like. In these systems, the local data collection system 102 may monitor the turbines and the water or other fluids in a closed loop cycle in which water condenses and is then heated until it evaporates again. The local data collection system 102 may monitor the steam turbines separately from the fuel source deployed to heat the water to steam. In examples, working temperatures of steam turbines may be between 500 and 650° C. In many embodiments, an array of steam turbines may be arranged and configured for high, medium, and low pressure, so they may optimally convert the respective steam pressure into rotational movement.
The local data collection system 102 may also be deployed in a gas turbines arrangement and therefore not only monitor the turbine in operation but also monitor the hot combustion gases feed into the turbine that may be in excess of 1,500° C. Because these gases are much hotter than those in steam turbines, the blades may be cooled with air that may flow out of small openings to create a protective film or boundary layer between the exhaust gases and the blades. This temperature profile may be monitored by the local data collection system 102. Gas turbine engines, unlike typical steam turbines, include a compressor, a combustion chamber, and a turbine all of which are journaled for rotation with a rotating shaft. The construction and operation of each of these components may be monitored by the local data collection system 102.
In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from water turbines serving as rotary engines that may harvest energy from moving water and are used for electric power generation. The type of water turbine or hydro-power selected for a project may be based on the height of standing water, often referred to as head, and the flow (or volume of water) at the site. In this example, a generator may be placed at the top of a shaft that connects to the water turbine. As the turbine catches the naturally moving water in its blade and rotates, the turbine sends rotational power to the generator to generate electrical energy. In doing so, the platform 100 may monitor signals from the generators, the turbines, the local water system, flow controls such as dam windows and sluices. Moreover, the platform 100 may monitor local conditions on the electric grid including load, predicted demand, frequency response, and the like, and include such information in the monitoring and control deployed by platform 100 in these hydroelectric settings.
In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from energy production environments, such as thermal, nuclear, geothermal, chemical, biomass, carbon-based fuels, hybrid-renewable energy plants, and the like. Many of these plants may use multiple forms of energy harvesting equipment like wind turbines, hydro turbines, and steam turbines powered by heat from nuclear, gas-fired, solar, and molten salt heat sources. In embodiments, elements in such systems may include transmission lines, heat exchangers, desulphurization scrubbers, pumps, coolers, recuperators, chillers, and the like. In embodiments, certain implementations of turbomachinery, turbines, scroll compressors, and the like may be configured in arrayed control so as to monitor large facilities creating electricity for consumption, providing refrigeration, creating steam for local manufacture and heating, and the like, and that arrayed control platforms may be provided by the provider of the industrial equipment such as Honeywell and their Experion™ PKS platform. In embodiments, the platform 100 may specifically communicate with and integrate the local manufacturer-specific controls and may allow equipment from one manufacturer to communicate with other equipment. Moreover, the platform 100 provides allows for the local data collection system 102 to collect information across systems from many different manufacturers. In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from marine industrial equipment, marine diesel engines, shipbuilding, oil and gas plants, refineries, petrochemical plant, ballast water treatment solutions, marine pumps and turbines, and the like.
In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from heavy industrial equipment and processes including monitoring one or more sensors. By way of this example, sensors may be devices that may be used to detect or respond to some type of input from a physical environment, such as an electrical, heat, or optical signal. In embodiments, the local data collection system 102 may include multiple sensors such as, without limitation, a temperature sensor, a pressure sensor, a torque sensor, a flow sensor, a heat sensor, a smoke sensor, an arc sensor, a radiation sensor, a position sensor, an acceleration sensor, a strain sensor, a pressure cycle sensor, a pressure sensor, an air temperature sensor, and the like. The torque sensor may encompass a magnetic twist angle sensor. In one example, the torque and speed sensors in the local data collection system 102 may be similar to those discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,352,149 to Meachem, issued 8 Jan. 2013 and hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. In embodiments, one or more sensors may be provided such as a tactile sensor, a biosensor, a chemical sensor, an image sensor, a humidity sensor, an inertial sensor, and the like.
In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from sensors that may provide signals for fault detection including excessive vibration, incorrect material, incorrect material properties, trueness to the proper size, trueness to the proper shape, proper weight, trueness to balance. Additional fault sensors include those for inventory control and for inspections such as to confirm that parts are packaged to plan, parts are to tolerance in a plan, occurrence of packaging damage or stress, and sensors that may indicate the occurrence of shock or damage in transit. Additional fault sensors may include detection of the lack of lubrication, over lubrication, the need for cleaning of the sensor detection window, the need for maintenance due to low lubrication, the need for maintenance due to blocking or reduced flow in a lubrication region, and the like.
In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 that includes aircraft operations and manufacture including monitoring signals from sensors for specialized applications such as sensors used in an aircraft's Attitude and Heading Reference System (AHRS), such as gyroscopes, accelerometers, and magnetometers. In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from image sensors such as semiconductor charge coupled devices (CCDs), active pixel sensors, in complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) or N-type metal-oxide-semiconductor (NMOS, Live MOS) technologies. In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from sensors such as an infra-red (IR) sensor, an ultraviolet (UV) sensor, a touch sensor, a proximity sensor, and the like. In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from sensors configured for optical character recognition (OCR), reading barcodes, detecting surface acoustic waves, detecting transponders, communicating with home automation systems, medical diagnostics, health monitoring, and the like.
In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from sensors such as a Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) sensor, such as STMicroelectronics™ LSM303AH smart MEMS sensor, which may include an ultra-low-power high-performance system-in-package featuring a 3D digital linear acceleration sensor and a 3D digital magnetic sensor.
In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from additional large machines such as turbines, windmills, industrial vehicles, robots, and the like. These large mechanical machines include multiple components and elements providing multiple subsystems on each machine. To that end, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from individual elements such as axles, bearings, belts, buckets, gears, shafts, gear boxes, cams, carriages, camshafts, clutches, brakes, drums, dynamos, feeds, flywheels, gaskets, pumps, jaws, robotic arms, seals, sockets, sleeves, valves, wheels, actuators, motors, servomotor, and the like. Many of the machines and their elements may include servomotors. The local data collection system 102 may monitor the motor, the rotary encoder, and the potentiometer of the servomechanism to provide three-dimensional detail of position, placement, and progress of industrial processes.
In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from gear drives, powertrains, transfer cases, multispeed axles, transmissions, direct drives, chain drives, belt-drives, shaft-drives, magnetic drives, and similar meshing mechanical drives. In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from fault conditions of industrial machines that may include overheating, noise, grinding gears, locked gears, excessive vibration, wobbling, under-inflation, over-inflation, and the like. Operation faults, maintenance indicators, and interactions from other machines may cause maintenance or operational issues may occur during operation, during installation, and during maintenance. The faults may occur in the mechanisms of the industrial machines but may also occur in infrastructure that supports the machine such as its wiring and local installation platforms. In embodiments, the large industrial machines may face different types of fault conditions such as overheating, noise, grinding gears, excessive vibration of machine parts, fan vibration problems, problems with large industrial machines rotating parts.
In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor signals from industrial machinery including failures that may be caused by premature bearing failure that may occur due to contamination or loss of bearing lubricant. In another example, a mechanical defect such as misalignment of bearings may occur. Many factors may contribute to the failure such as metal fatigue, therefore, the local data collection system 102 may monitor cycles and local stresses. By way of this example, the platform 100 may monitor the incorrect operation of machine parts, lack of maintenance and servicing of parts, corrosion of vital machine parts, such as couplings or gearboxes, misalignment of machine parts, and the like. Though the fault occurrences cannot be completely stopped, many industrial breakdowns may be mitigated to reduce operational and financial losses. The platform 100 provides real-time monitoring and predictive maintenance in many industrial environments wherein it has been shown to present a cost-savings over regularly-scheduled maintenance processes that replace parts according to a rigid expiration of time and not actual load and wear and tear on the element or machine. To that end, the platform 100 may provide reminders of, or perform some, preventive measures such as adhering to operating manual and mode instructions for machines, proper lubrication, and maintenance of machine parts, minimizing or eliminating overrun of machines beyond their defined capacities, replacement of worn but still functional parts as needed, properly training the personnel for machine use, and the like.
In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 to monitor multiple signals that may be carried by a plurality of physical, electronic, and symbolic formats or signals. The platform 100 may employ signal processing including a plurality of mathematical, statistical, computational, heuristic, and linguistic representations and processing of signals and a plurality of operations needed for extraction of useful information from signal processing operations such as techniques for representation, modeling, analysis, synthesis, sensing, acquisition, and extraction of information from signals. In examples, signal processing may be performed using a plurality of techniques, including but not limited to transformations, spectral estimations, statistical operations, probabilistic and stochastic operations, numerical theory analysis, data mining, and the like. The processing of various types of signals forms the basis of many electrical or computational process. As a result, signal processing applies to almost all disciplines and applications in the industrial environment such as audio and video processing, image processing, wireless communications, process control, industrial automation, financial systems, feature extraction, quality improvements such as noise reduction, image enhancement, and the like. Signal processing for images may include pattern recognition for manufacturing inspections, quality inspection, and automated operational inspection and maintenance. The platform 100 may employ many pattern recognition techniques including those that may classify input data into classes based on key features with the objective of recognizing patterns or regularities in data. The platform 100 may also implement pattern recognition processes with machine learning operations and may be used in applications such as computer vision, speech and text processing, radar processing, handwriting recognition, CAD systems, and the like. The platform 100 may employ supervised classification and unsupervised classification. The supervised learning classification algorithms may be based to create classifiers for image or pattern recognition, based on training data obtained from different object classes. The unsupervised learning classification algorithms may operate by finding hidden structures in unlabeled data using advanced analysis techniques such as segmentation and clustering. For example, some of the analysis techniques used in unsupervised learning may include K-means clustering, Gaussian mixture models, Hidden Markov models, and the like. The algorithms used in supervised and unsupervised learning methods of pattern recognition enable the use of pattern recognition in various high precision applications. The platform 100 may use pattern recognition in face detection related applications such as security systems, tracking, sports related applications, fingerprint analysis, medical and forensic applications, navigation and guidance systems, vehicle tracking, public infrastructure systems such as transport systems, license plate monitoring, and the like.
In embodiments, the platform 100 may include the local data collection system 102 deployed in the environment 104 using machine learning to enable derivation-based learning outcomes from computers without the need to program them. The platform 100 may, therefore, learn from and make decisions on a set of data, by making data-driven predictions and adapting according to the set of data. In embodiments, machine learning may involve performing a plurality of machine learning tasks by machine learning systems, such as supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning. Supervised learning may include presenting a set of example inputs and desired outputs to the machine learning systems. Unsupervised learning may include the learning algorithm itself structuring its input by methods such as pattern detection and/or feature learning. Reinforcement learning may include the machine learning systems performing in a dynamic environment and then providing feedback about correct and incorrect decisions. In examples, machine learning may include a plurality of other tasks based on an output of the machine learning system. In examples, the tasks may also be classified as machine learning problems such as classification, regression, clustering, density estimation, dimensionality reduction, anomaly detection, and the like. In examples, machine learning may include a plurality of mathematical and statistical techniques. In examples, the many types of machine learning algorithms may include decision tree based learning, association rule learning, deep learning, artificial neural networks, genetic learning algorithms, inductive logic programming, support vector machines (SVMs), Bayesian network, reinforcement learning, representation learning, rule-based machine learning, sparse dictionary learning, similarity and metric learning, learning classifier systems (LCS), logistic regression, random forest, K-Means, gradient boost and adaboost, K-nearest neighbors (KNN), a priori algorithms, and the like. In embodiments, certain machine learning algorithms may be used (such as genetic algorithms defined for solving both constrained and unconstrained optimization problems that may be based on natural selection, the process that drives biological evolution). By way of this example, genetic algorithms may be deployed to solve a variety of optimization problems that are not well suited for standard optimization algorithms, including problems in which the objective functions are discontinuous, not differentiable, stochastic, or highly nonlinear. In an example, the genetic algorithm may be used to address problems of mixed integer programming, where some components restricted to being integer-valued. Genetic algorithms and machine learning techniques and systems may be used in computational intelligence systems, computer vision, Natural Language Processing (NLP), recommender systems, reinforcement learning, building graphical models, and the like. By way of this example, the machine learning systems may be used to perform intelligent computing based control and be responsive to tasks in a wide variety of systems (such as interactive websites and portals, brain-machine interfaces, online security and fraud detection systems, medical applications such as diagnosis and therapy assistance systems, classification of DNA sequences, and the like). In examples, machine learning systems may be used in advanced computing applications (such as online advertising, natural language processing, robotics, search engines, software engineering, speech and handwriting recognition, pattern matching, game playing, computational anatomy, bioinformatics systems and the like). In an example, machine learning may also be used in financial and marketing systems (such as for user behavior analytics, online advertising, economic estimations, financial market analysis, and the like).
Additional details are provided below in connection with the methods, systems, devices, and components depicted in connection with
Combination of inputs (including selection of what sensors or input sources to turn “on” or “off”) may be performed under the control of machine-based intelligence, such as using a local cognitive input selection system 4004, an optionally remote cognitive input selection system 4114, or a combination of the two. The cognitive input selection systems 4004, 4014 may use intelligence and machine learning capabilities described elsewhere in this disclosure, such as using detected conditions (such as conditions informed by the input sources 116 or sensors), state information (including state information determined by a machine state recognition system 4020 that may determine a state), such as relating to an operational state, an environmental state, a state within a known process or workflow, a state involving a fault or diagnostic condition, or many others. This may include optimization of input selection and configuration based on learning feedback from the learning feedback system 4012, which may include providing training data (such as from the host processing system 112 or from other data collection systems 102 either directly or from the host 112) and may include providing feedback metrics, such as success metrics calculated within the analytic system 4018 of the host processing system 112. For example, if a data stream consisting of a particular combination of sensors and inputs yields positive results in a given set of conditions (such as providing improved pattern recognition, improved prediction, improved diagnosis, improved yield, improved return on investment, improved efficiency, or the like), then metrics relating to such results from the analytic system 4018 can be provided via the learning feedback system 4012 to the cognitive input selection systems 4004, 4014 to help configure future data collection to select that combination in those conditions (allowing other input sources to be de-selected, such as by powering down the other sensors). In embodiments, selection and de-selection of sensor combinations, under control of one or more of the cognitive input selection systems 4004, may occur with automated variation, such as using genetic programming techniques, based on learning feedback 4012, such as from the analytic system 4018, effective combinations for a given state or set of conditions are promoted, and less effective combinations are demoted, resulting in progressive optimization and adaptation of the local data collection system to each unique environment. Thus, an automatically adapting, multi-sensor data collection system is provided, where cognitive input selection is used (with feedback) to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, or other performance parameters of the data collection system within its particular environment. Performance parameters may relate to overall system metrics (such as financial yields, process optimization results, energy production or usage, and the like), analytic metrics (such as success in recognizing patterns, making predictions, classifying data, or the like), and local system metrics (such as bandwidth utilization, storage utilization, power consumption, and the like). In embodiments, the analytic system 4018, the state system 4020 and the cognitive input selection system 4114 of a host may take data from multiple data collection systems 102, such that optimization (including of input selection) may be undertaken through coordinated operation of multiple systems 102. For example, the cognitive input selection system 4114 may understand that if one data collection system 102 is already collecting vibration data for an X-axis, the X-axis vibration sensor for the other data collection system might be turned off, in favor of getting Y-axis data from the other data collector 102. Thus, through coordinated collection by the host cognitive input selection system 4114, the activity of multiple collectors 102, across a host of different sensors, can provide for a rich data set for the host processing system 112, without wasting energy, bandwidth, storage space, or the like. As noted above, optimization may be based on overall system success metrics, analytic success metrics, and local system metrics, or a combination of the above.
Methods and systems are disclosed herein for cloud-based, machine pattern analysis of state information from multiple industrial sensors to provide anticipated state information for an industrial system. In embodiments, machine learning may take advantage of a state machine, such as tracking states of multiple analog and/or digital sensors, feeding the states into a pattern analysis facility, and determining anticipated states of the industrial system based on historical data about sequences of state information. For example, where a temperature state of an industrial machine exceeds a certain threshold and is followed by a fault condition, such as breaking down of a set of bearings, that temperature state may be tracked by a pattern recognizer, which may produce an output data structure indicating an anticipated bearing fault state (whenever an input state of a high temperature is recognized). A wide range of measurement values and anticipated states may be managed by a state machine, relating to temperature, pressure, vibration, acceleration, momentum, inertia, friction, heat, heat flux, galvanic states, magnetic field states, electrical field states, capacitance states, charge and discharge states, motion, position, and many others. States may comprise combined states, where a data structure includes a series of states, each of which is represented by a place in a byte-like data structure. For example, an industrial machine may be characterized by a genetic structure, such as one that provides pressure, temperature, vibration, and acoustic data, the measurement of which takes one place in the data structure, so that the combined state can be operated on as a byte-like structure, such as a structure for compactly characterizing the current combined state of the machine or environment, or compactly characterizing the anticipated state. This byte-like structure can be used by a state machine for machine learning, such as pattern recognition that operates on the structure to determine patterns that reflect combined effects of multiple conditions. A wide variety of such structure can be tracked and used, such as in machine learning, representing various combinations, of various length, of the different elements that can be sensed in an industrial environment. In embodiments, byte-like structures can be used in a genetic programming technique, such as by substituting different types of data, or data from varying sources, and tracking outcomes over time, so that one or more favorable structures emerges based on the success of those structures when used in real world situations, such as indicating successful predictions of anticipated states, or achievement of success operational outcomes, such as increased efficiency, successful routing of information, achieving increased profits, or the like. That is, by varying what data types and sources are used in byte-like structures that are used for machine optimization over time, a genetic programming-based machine learning facility can “evolve” a set of data structures, consisting of a favorable mix of data types (e.g., pressure, temperature, and vibration), from a favorable mix of data sources (e.g., temperature is derived from sensor X, while vibration comes from sensor Y), for a given purpose. Different desired outcomes may result in different data structures that are best adapted to support effective achievement of those outcomes over time with application of machine learning and promotion of structures with favorable results for the desired outcome in question by genetic programming. The promoted data structures may provide compact, efficient data for various activities as described throughout this disclosure, including being stored in data pools (which may be optimized by storing favorable data structures that provide the best operational results for a given environment), being presented in data marketplaces (such as being presented as the most effective structures for a given purpose), and the like.
In embodiments, a platform is provided having cloud-based, machine pattern analysis of state information from multiple analog industrial sensors to provide anticipated state information for an industrial system. In embodiments, the host processing system 112, such as disposed in the cloud, may include the state system 4020, which may be used to infer or calculate a current state or to determine an anticipated future state relating to the data collection system 102 or some aspect of the environment in which the data collection system 102 is disposed, such as the state of a machine, a component, a workflow, a process, an event (e.g., whether the event has occurred), an object, a person, a condition, a function, or the like. Maintaining state information allows the host processing system 112 to undertake analysis, such as in one or more analytic systems 4018, to determine contextual information, to apply semantic and conditional logic, and perform many other functions as enabled by the processing architecture 4024 described throughout this disclosure.
In embodiments, a platform is provided having cloud-based policy automation engine for IoT, with creation, deployment, and management of IoT devices. In embodiments, the platform 100 includes (or is integrated with, or included in) the host processing system 112, such as on a cloud platform, a policy automation engine 4032 for automating creation, deployment, and management of policies to IoT devices. Polices, which may include access policies, network usage policies, storage usage policies, bandwidth usage policies, device connection policies, security policies, rule-based policies, role-based polices, and others, may be required to govern the use of IoT devices. For example, as IoT devices may have many different network and data communications to other devices, policies may be needed to indicate to what devices a given device can connect, what data can be passed on, and what data can be received. As billions of devices with countless potential connections are expected to be deployed in the near future, it becomes impossible for humans to configure policies for IoT devices on a connection-by-connection basis. Accordingly, an intelligent policy automation engine 4032 may include cognitive features for creating, configuring, and managing policies. The policy automation engine 4032 may consume information about possible policies, such as from a policy database or library, which may include one or more public sources of available policies. These may be written in one or more conventional policy languages or scripts. The policy automation engine 4032 may apply the policies according to one or more models, such as based on the characteristics of a given device, machine, or environment. For example, a large machine, such as a machine for power generation, may include a policy that only a verifiably local controller can change certain parameters of the power generation, thereby avoiding a remote “takeover” by a hacker. This may be accomplished in turn by automatically finding and applying security policies that bar connection of the control infrastructure of the machine to the Internet, by requiring access authentication, or the like. The policy automation engine 4032 may include cognitive features, such as varying the application of policies, the configuration of policies, and the like (such as features based on state information from the state system 4020). The policy automation engine 4032 may take feedback, as from the learning feedback system 4012, such as based on one or more analytic results from the analytic system 4018, such as based on overall system results (such as the extent of security breaches, policy violations, and the like), local results, and analytic results. By variation and selection based on such feedback, the policy automation engine 4032 can, over time, learn to automatically create, deploy, configure, and manage policies across very large numbers of devices, such as managing policies for configuration of connections among IoT devices.
Methods and systems are disclosed herein for on-device sensor fusion and data storage for industrial IoT devices, including on-device sensor fusion and data storage for an industrial IoT device, where data from multiple sensors is multiplexed at the device for storage of a fused data stream. For example, pressure and temperature data may be multiplexed into a data stream that combines pressure and temperature in a time series, such as in a byte-like structure (where time, pressure, and temperature are bytes in a data structure, so that pressure and temperature remain linked in time, without requiring separate processing of the streams by outside systems), or by adding, dividing, multiplying, subtracting, or the like, such that the fused data can be stored on the device. Any of the sensor data types described throughout this disclosure can be fused in this manner and stored in a local data pool, in storage, or on an IoT device, such as a data collector, a component of a machine, or the like.
In embodiments, a platform is provided having on-device sensor fusion and data storage for industrial IoT devices. In embodiments, a cognitive system is used for a self-organizing storage system 4028 for the data collection system 102. Sensor data, and in particular analog sensor data, can consume large amounts of storage capacity, in particular where a data collector 102 has multiple sensor inputs onboard or from the local environment. Simply storing all the data indefinitely is not typically a favorable option, and even transmitting all of the data may strain bandwidth limitations, exceed bandwidth permissions (such as exceeding cellular data plan capacity), or the like. Accordingly, storage strategies are needed. These typically include capturing only portions of the data (such as snapshots), storing data for limited time periods, storing portions of the data (such as intermediate or abstracted forms), and the like. With many possible selections among these and other options, determining the correct storage strategy may be highly complex. In embodiments, the self-organizing storage system 4028 may use a cognitive system, based on learning feedback 4012, and use various metrics from the analytic system 4018 or other system of the host cognitive input selection system 4114, such as overall system metrics, analytic metrics, and local performance indicators. The self-organizing storage system 4028 may automatically vary storage parameters, such as storage locations (including local storage on the data collection system 102, storage on nearby data collection systems 102 (such as using peer-to-peer organization) and remote storage, such as network-based storage), storage amounts, storage duration, type of data stored (including individual sensors or input sources 116, as well as various combined or multiplexed data, such as selected under the cognitive input selection systems 4004, 4014), storage type (such as using RAM, Flash, or other short-term memory versus available hard drive space), storage organization (such as in raw form, in hierarchies, and the like), and others. Variation of the parameters may be undertaken with feedback, so that over time the data collection system 102 adapts its storage of data to optimize itself to the conditions of its environment, such as a particular industrial environment, in a way that results in its storing the data that is needed in the right amounts and of the right type for availability to users.
In embodiments, the local cognitive input selection system 4004 may organize fusion of data for various onboard sensors, external sensors (such as in the local environment) and other input sources 116 to the local collection system 102 into one or more fused data streams, such as using the multiplexer 4002 to create various signals that represent combinations, permutations, mixes, layers, abstractions, data-metadata combinations, and the like of the source analog and/or digital data that is handled by the data collection system 102. The selection of a particular fusion of sensors may be determined locally by the cognitive input selection system 4004, such as based on learning feedback from the learning feedback system 4012, such as various overall system, analytic system and local system results and metrics. In embodiments, the system may learn to fuse particular combinations and permutations of sensors, such as in order to best achieve correct anticipation of state, as indicated by feedback of the analytic system 4018 regarding its ability to predict future states, such as the various states handled by the state system 4020. For example, the input selection system 4004 may indicate selection of a sub-set of sensors among a larger set of available sensors, and the inputs from the selected sensors may be combined, such as by placing input from each of them into a byte of a defined, multi-bit data structure (such as a combination by taking a signal from each at a given sampling rate or time and placing the result into the byte structure, then collecting and processing the bytes over time), by multiplexing in the multiplexer 4002, such as a combination by additive mixing of continuous signals, and the like. Any of a wide range of signal processing and data processing techniques for combination and fusing may be used, including convolutional techniques, coercion techniques, transformation techniques, and the like. The particular fusion in question may be adapted to a given situation by cognitive learning, such as by having the cognitive input selection system 4004 learn, based on feedback 4012 from results (such as feedback conveyed by the analytic system 4018), such that the local data collection system 102 executes context-adaptive sensor fusion.
In embodiments, the analytic system 4018 may apply to any of a wide range of analytic techniques, including statistical and econometric techniques (such as linear regression analysis, use similarity matrices, heat map based techniques, and the like), reasoning techniques (such as Bayesian reasoning, rule-based reasoning, inductive reasoning, and the like), iterative techniques (such as feedback, recursion, feed-forward and other techniques), signal processing techniques (such as Fourier and other transforms), pattern recognition techniques (such as Kalman and other filtering techniques), search techniques, probabilistic techniques (such as random walks, random forest algorithms, and the like), simulation techniques (such as random walks, random forest algorithms, linear optimization and the like), and others. This may include computation of various statistics or measures. In embodiments, the analytic system 4018 may be disposed, at least in part, on a data collection system 102, such that a local analytic system can calculate one or more measures, such as measures relating to any of the items noted throughout this disclosure. For example, measures of efficiency, power utilization, storage utilization, redundancy, entropy, and other factors may be calculated onboard, so that the data collection 102 can enable various cognitive and learning functions noted throughout this disclosure without dependence on a remote (e.g., cloud-based) analytic system.
In embodiments, the host processing system 112, a data collection system 102, or both, may include, connect to, or integrate with, a self-organizing networking system 4030, which may comprise a cognitive system for providing machine-based, intelligent or organization of network utilization for transport of data in a data collection system, such as for handling analog and other sensor data, or other source data, such as among one or more local data collection systems 102 and a host system 112. This may include organizing network utilization for source data delivered to data collection systems, for feedback data, such as analytic data provided to or via a learning feedback system 4012, data for supporting a marketplace (such as described in connection with other embodiments), and output data provided via output interfaces and ports 4010 from one or more data collection systems 102.
Methods and systems are disclosed herein for a self-organizing data marketplace for industrial IoT data, including where available data elements are organized in the marketplace for consumption by consumers based on training a self-organizing facility with a training set and feedback from measures of marketplace success. A marketplace may be set up initially to make available data collected from one or more industrial environments, such as presenting data by type, by source, by environment, by machine, by one or more patterns, or the like (such as in a menu or hierarchy). The marketplace may vary the data collected, the organization of the data, the presentation of the data (including pushing the data to external sites, providing links, configuring APIs by which the data may be accessed, and the like), the pricing of the data, or the like, such as under machine learning, which may vary different parameters of any of the foregoing. The machine learning facility may manage all of these parameters by self-organization, such as by varying parameters over time (including by varying elements of the data types presented), the data sourced used to obtain each type of data, the data structures presented (such as byte-like structures, fused or multiplexed structures (such as representing multiple sensor types), and statistical structures (such as representing various mathematical products of sensor information), among others), the pricing for the data, where the data is presented, how the data is presented (such as by APIs, by links, by push messaging, and the like), how the data is stored, how the data is obtained, and the like. As parameters are varied, feedback may be obtained as to measures of success, such as number of views, yield (e.g., price paid) per access, total yield, per unit profit, aggregate profit, and many others, and the self-organizing machine learning facility may promote configurations that improve measures of success and demote configurations that do not, so that, over time, the marketplace is progressively configured to present favorable combinations of data types (e.g., those that provide robust prediction of anticipated states of particular industrial environments of a given type), from favorable sources (e.g., those that are reliable, accurate and low priced), with effective pricing (e.g., pricing that tends to provide high aggregate profit from the marketplace). The marketplace may include spiders, web crawlers, and the like to seek input data sources, such as finding data pools, connected IoT devices, and the like that publish potentially relevant data. These may be trained by human users and improved by machine learning in a manner similar to that described elsewhere in this disclosure.
In embodiments, a platform is provided having a self-organizing data marketplace for industrial IoT data. Referring to
In embodiments, a cognitive data packaging system 4110 of the marketplace 4102 may use machine-based intelligence to package data, such as by automatically configuring packages of data in batches, streams, pools, or the like. In embodiments, packaging may be according to one or more rules, models, or parameters, such as by packaging or aggregating data that is likely to supplement or complement an existing model. For example, operating data from a group of similar machines (such as one or more industrial machines noted throughout this disclosure) may be aggregated together, such as based on metadata indicating the type of data or by recognizing features or characteristics in the data stream that indicate the nature of the data. In embodiments, packaging may occur using machine learning and cognitive capabilities, such as by learning what combinations, permutations, mixes, layers, and the like of input sources 116, sensors, information from data pools 4120 and information from data collection systems 102 are likely to satisfy user requirements or result in measures of success. Learning may be based on learning feedback 4012, such as learning based on measures determined in an analytic system 4018, such as system performance measures, data collection measures, analytic measures, and the like. In embodiments, success measures may be correlated to marketplace success measures, such as viewing of packages, engagement with packages, purchase or licensing of packages, payments made for packages, and the like. Such measures may be calculated in an analytic system 4018, including associating particular feedback measures with search terms and other inputs, so that the cognitive packaging system 4110 can find and configure packages that are designed to provide increased value to consumers and increased returns for data suppliers. In embodiments, the cognitive data packaging system 4110 can automatically vary packaging, such as using different combinations, permutations, mixes, and the like, and varying weights applied to given input sources, sensors, data pools and the like, using learning feedback 4012 to promote favorable packages and de-emphasize less favorable packages. This may occur using genetic programming and similar techniques that compare outcomes for different packages. Feedback may include state information from the state system 4020 (such as about various operating states, and the like), as well as about marketplace conditions and states, such as pricing and availability information for other data sources. Thus, an adaptive cognitive data packaging system 4110 is provided that automatically adapts to conditions to provide favorable packages of data for the marketplace 4102.
In embodiments, a cognitive data pricing system 4112 may be provided to set pricing for data packages. In embodiments, the data pricing system 4112 may use a set of rules, models, or the like, such as setting pricing based on supply conditions, demand conditions, pricing of various available sources, and the like. For example, pricing for a package may be configured to be set based on the sum of the prices of constituent elements (such as input sources, sensor data, or the like), or to be set based on a rule-based discount to the sum of prices for constituent elements, or the like. Rules and conditional logic may be applied, such as rules that factor in cost factors (such as bandwidth and network usage, peak demand factors, scarcity factors, and the like), rules that factor in utilization parameters (such as the purpose, domain, user, role, duration, or the like for a package) and many others. In embodiments, the cognitive data pricing system 4112 may include fully cognitive, intelligent features, such as using genetic programming including automatically varying pricing and tracking feedback on outcomes. Outcomes on which tracking feedback may be based include various financial yield metrics, utilization metrics and the like that may be provided by calculating metrics in an analytic system 4018 on data from the data transaction system 4114.
Methods and systems are disclosed herein for self-organizing data pools which may include self-organization of data pools based on utilization and/or yield metrics, including utilization and/or yield metrics that are tracked for a plurality of data pools. The data pools may initially comprise unstructured or loosely structured pools of data that contain data from industrial environments, such as sensor data from or about industrial machines or components. For example, a data pool might take streams of data from various machines or components in an environment, such as turbines, compressors, batteries, reactors, engines, motors, vehicles, pumps, rotors, axles, bearings, valves, and many others, with the data streams containing analog and/or digital sensor data (of a wide range of types), data published about operating conditions, diagnostic and fault data, identifying data for machines or components, asset tracking data, and many other types of data. Each stream may have an identifier in the pool, such as indicating its source, and optionally its type. The data pool may be accessed by external systems, such as through one or more interfaces or APIs (e.g., RESTful APIs), or by data integration elements (such as gateways, brokers, bridges, connectors, or the like), and the data pool may use similar capabilities to get access to available data streams. A data pool may be managed by a self-organizing machine learning facility, which may configure the data pool, such as by managing what sources are used for the pool, managing what streams are available, and managing APIs or other connections into and out of the data pool. The self-organization may take feedback such as based on measures of success that may include measures of utilization and yield. The measures of utilization and yield that may include may account for the cost of acquiring and/or storing data, as well as the benefits of the pool, measured either by profit or by other measures that may include user indications of usefulness, and the like. For example, a self-organizing data pool might recognize that chemical and radiation data for an energy production environment are regularly accessed and extracted, while vibration and temperature data have not been used, in which case the data pool might automatically reorganize, such as by ceasing storage of vibration and/or temperature data, or by obtaining better sources of such data. This automated reorganization can also apply to data structures, such as promoting different data types, different data sources, different data structures, and the like, through progressive iteration and feedback.
In embodiments, a platform is provided having self-organization of data pools based on utilization and/or yield metrics. In embodiments, the data pools 4120 may be self-organizing data pools 4120, such as being organized by cognitive capabilities as described throughout this disclosure. The data pools 4120 may self-organize in response to learning feedback 4012, such as based on feedback of measures and results, including calculated in an analytic system 4018. Organization may include determining what data or packages of data to store in a pool (such as representing particular combinations, permutations, aggregations, and the like), the structure of such data (such as in flat, hierarchical, linked, or other structures), the duration of storage, the nature of storage media (such as hard disks, flash memory, SSDs, network-based storage, or the like), the arrangement of storage bits, and other parameters. The content and nature of storage may be varied, such that a data pool 4120 may learn and adapt, such as based on states of the host system 112, one or more data collection systems 102, storage environment parameters (such as capacity, cost, and performance factors), data collection environment parameters, marketplace parameters, and many others. In embodiments, pools 4120 may learn and adapt, such as by variation of the above and other parameters in response to yield metrics (such as return on investment, optimization of power utilization, optimization of revenue, and the like).
Methods and systems are disclosed herein for training AI models based on industry-specific feedback, including training an AI model based on industry-specific feedback that reflects a measure of utilization, yield, or impact, and where the AI model operates on sensor data from an industrial environment. As noted above, these models may include operating models for industrial environments, machines, workflows, models for anticipating states, models for predicting fault and optimizing maintenance, models for self-organizing storage (on devices, in data pools and/or in the cloud), models for optimizing data transport (such as for optimizing network coding, network-condition-sensitive routing, and the like), models for optimizing data marketplaces, and many others.
In embodiments, a platform is provided having training AI models based on industry-specific feedback. In embodiments, the various embodiments of cognitive systems disclosed herein may take inputs and feedback from industry-specific and domain-specific sources 116 (such as relating to optimization of specific machines, devices, components, processes, and the like). Thus, learning and adaptation of storage organization, network usage, combination of sensor and input data, data pooling, data packaging, data pricing, and other features (such as for a marketplace 4102 or for other purposes of the host processing system 112) may be configured by learning on the domain-specific feedback measures of a given environment or application, such as an application involving IoT devices (such as an industrial environment). This may include optimization of efficiency (such as in electrical, electromechanical, magnetic, physical, thermodynamic, chemical and other processes and systems), optimization of outputs (such as for production of energy, materials, products, services and other outputs), prediction, avoidance and mitigation of faults (such as in the aforementioned systems and processes), optimization of performance measures (such as returns on investment, yields, profits, margins, revenues and the like), reduction of costs (including labor costs, bandwidth costs, data costs, material input costs, licensing costs, and many others), optimization of benefits (such as relating to safety, satisfaction, health), optimization of work flows (such as optimizing time and resource allocation to processes), and others.
Methods and systems are disclosed herein for a self-organized swarm of industrial data collectors, including a self-organizing swarm of industrial data collectors that organize among themselves to optimize data collection based on the capabilities and conditions of the members of the swarm. Each member of the swarm may be configured with intelligence, and the ability to coordinate with other members. For example, a member of the swarm may track information about what data other members are handling, so that data collection activities, data storage, data processing, and data publishing can be allocated intelligently across the swarm, taking into account conditions of the environment, capabilities of the members of the swarm, operating parameters, rules (such as from a rules engine that governs the operation of the swarm), and current conditions of the members. For example, among four collectors, one that has relatively low current power levels (such as a low battery), might be temporarily allocated the role of publishing data, because it may receive a dose of power from a reader or interrogation device (such as an RFID reader) when it needs to publish the data. A second collector with good power levels and robust processing capability might be assigned more complex functions, such as processing data, fusing data, organizing the rest of the swarm (including self-organization under machine learning, such that the swarm is optimized over time, including by adjusting operating parameters, rules, and the like based on feedback), and the like. A third collector in the swarm with robust storage capabilities might be assigned the task of collecting and storing a category of data, such as vibration sensor data, that consumes considerable bandwidth. A fourth collector in the swarm, such as one with lower storage capabilities, might be assigned the role of collecting data that can usually be discarded, such as data on current diagnostic conditions, where only data on faults needs to be maintained and passed along. Members of a swarm may connect by peer-to-peer relationships by using a member as a “master” or “hub,” or by having them connect in a series or ring, where each member passes along data (including commands) to the next, and is aware of the nature of the capabilities and commands that are suitable for the preceding and/or next member. The swarm may be used for allocation of storage across it (such as using memory of each memory as an aggregate data store. In these examples, the aggregate data store may support a distributed ledger, which may store transaction data, such as for transactions involving data collected by the swarm, transactions occurring in the industrial environment, or the like. In embodiments, the transaction data may also include data used to manage the swarm, the environment, or a machine or components thereof. The swarm may self-organize, either by machine learning capability disposed on one or more members of the swarm, or based on instructions from an external machine learning facility, which may optimize storage, data collection, data processing, data presentation, data transport, and other functions based on managing parameters that are relevant to each. The machine learning facility may start with an initial configuration and vary parameters of the swarm relevant to any of the foregoing (also including varying the membership of the swarm), such as iterating based on feedback to the machine learning facility regarding measures of success (such as utilization measures, efficiency measures, measures of success in prediction or anticipation of states, productivity measures, yield measures, profit measures, and others). Over time, the swarm may be optimized to a favorable configuration to achieve the desired measure of success for an owner, operator, or host of an industrial environment or a machine, component, or process thereof.
Referencing
Methods and systems are disclosed herein for an industrial IoT distributed ledger, including a distributed ledger supporting the tracking of transactions executed in an automated data marketplace for industrial IoT data. A distributed ledger may distribute storage across devices, using a secure protocol, such as those used for cryptocurrencies (such as the Blockchain™ protocol used to support the Bitcoin™ currency). A ledger or similar transaction record, which may comprise a structure where each successive member of a chain stores data for previous transactions, and a competition can be established to determine which of alternative data stored data structures is “best” (such as being most complete), can be stored across data collectors, industrial machines or components, data pools, data marketplaces, cloud computing elements, servers, and/or on the IT infrastructure of an enterprise (such as an owner, operator or host of an industrial environment or of the systems disclosed herein). The ledger or transaction may be optimized by machine learning, such as to provide storage efficiency, security, redundancy, or the like.
In embodiments, the cognitive data marketplace 4102 may use a secure architecture for tracking and resolving transactions, such as a distributed ledger 4104, wherein transactions in data packages are tracked in a chained, distributed data structure, such as a Blockchain™, allowing forensic analysis and validation where individual devices store a portion of the ledger representing transactions in data packages. The distributed ledger 4104 may be distributed to IoT devices, to data pools 4120, to data collection systems 102, and the like, so that transaction information can be verified without reliance on a single, central repository of information. The transaction system 4114 may be configured to store data in the distributed ledger 4104 and to retrieve data from it (and from constituent devices) in order to resolve transactions. Thus, a distributed ledger 4104 for handling transactions in data, such as for packages of IoT data, is provided. In embodiments, the self-organizing storage system 4028 may be used for optimizing storage of distributed ledger data, as well as for organizing storage of packages of data, such as IoT data, that can be presented in the marketplace 4102.
Methods and systems are disclosed herein for a network-sensitive collector, including a network condition-sensitive, self-organizing, multi-sensor data collector that can optimize based on bandwidth, quality of service, pricing and/or other network conditions. Network sensitivity can include awareness of the price of data transport (such as allowing the system to pull or push data during off-peak periods or within the available parameters of paid data plans), the quality of the network (such as to avoid periods where errors are likely), the quality of environmental conditions (such as delaying transmission until signal quality is good, such as when a collector emerges from a shielded environment, avoiding wasting use of power when seeking a signal when shielded, such as by large metal structures typically of industrial environments), and the like.
Methods and systems are disclosed herein for a remotely organized universal data collector that can power up and down sensor interfaces based on need and/or conditions identified in an industrial data collection environment. For example, interfaces can recognize what sensors are available and interfaces and/or processors can be turned on to take input from such sensors, including hardware interfaces that allow the sensors to plug in to the data collector, wireless data interfaces (such as where the collector can ping the sensor, optionally providing some power via an interrogation signal), and software interfaces (such as for handling particular types of data). Thus, a collector that is capable of handling various kinds of data can be configured to adapt to the particular use in a given environment. In embodiments, configuration may be automatic or under machine learning, which may improve configuration by optimizing parameters based on feedback measures over time.
Methods and systems are disclosed herein for self-organizing storage for a multi-sensor data collector, including self-organizing storage for a multi-sensor data collector for industrial sensor data. Self-organizing storage may allocate storage based on application of machine learning, which may improve storage configuration based on feedback measure over time. Storage may be optimized by configuring what data types are used (e.g., byte-like structures, structures representing fused data from multiple sensors, structures representing statistics or measures calculated by applying mathematical functions on data, and the like), by configuring compression, by configuring data storage duration, by configuring write strategies (such as by striping data across multiple storage devices, using protocols where one device stores instructions for other devices in a chain, and the like), and by configuring storage hierarchies, such as by providing pre-calculated intermediate statistics to facilitate more rapid access to frequently accessed data items. Thus, highly intelligent storage systems may be configured and optimized, based on feedback, over time.
Methods and systems are disclosed herein for self-organizing network coding for a multi-sensor data network, including self-organizing network coding for a data network that transports data from multiple sensors in an industrial data collection environment. Network coding, including random linear network coding, can enable highly efficient and reliable transport of large amounts of data over various kinds of networks. Different network coding configurations can be selected, based on machine learning, to optimize network coding and other network transport characteristics based on network conditions, environmental conditions, and other factors, such as the nature of the data being transported, environmental conditions, operating conditions, and the like (including by training a network coding selection model over time based on feedback of measures of success, such as any of the measures described herein).
In embodiments, a platform is provided having a self-organizing network coding for multi-sensor data network. A cognitive system may vary one or more parameters for networking, such as network type selection (e.g., selecting among available local, cellular, satellite, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth™, NFC, Zigbee® and other networks), network selection (such as selecting a specific network, such as one that is known to have desired security features), network coding selection (such as selecting a type of network coding for efficient transport[such as random linear network coding, fixed coding, and others]), network timing selection (such as configuring delivery based on network pricing conditions, traffic and the like), network feature selection (such as selecting cognitive features, security features, and the like), network conditions (such as network quality based on current environmental or operation conditions), network feature selection (such as enabling available authentication, permission and similar systems), network protocol selection (such as among HTTP, IP, TCP/IP, cellular, satellite, serial, packet, streaming, and many other protocols), and others. Given bandwidth constraints, price variations, sensitivity to environmental factors, security concerns, and the like, selecting the optimal network configuration can be highly complex and situation dependent. The self-organizing networking system 4030 may vary combinations and permutations of these parameters while taking input from a learning feedback system 4012 such as using information from the analytic system 4018 about various measures of outcomes. In the many examples, outcomes may include overall system measures, analytic success measures, and local performance indicators. In embodiments, input from a learning feedback system 4012 may include information from various sensors and input sources 116, information from the state system 4020 about states (such as events, environmental conditions, operating conditions, and many others, or other information) or taking other inputs. By variation and selection of alternative configurations of networking parameters in different states, the self-organizing networking system may find configurations that are well-adapted to the environment that is being monitored or controlled by the host system 112, such as the instance where one or more data collection systems 102 are located and that are well-adapted to emerging network conditions. Thus, a self-organizing, network-condition-adaptive data collection system is provided.
Referring to
In embodiments (
Methods and systems are disclosed herein for a presentation layer for AR/VR industrial glasses, where heat map elements are presented based on patterns and/or parameters in collected data. Methods and systems are disclosed herein for condition-sensitive, self-organized tuning of AR/VR interfaces based on feedback metrics and/or training in industrial environments. In embodiments, any of the data, measures, and the like described throughout this disclosure can be presented by visual elements, overlays, and the like for presentation in the AR/VR interfaces, such as in industrial glasses, on AR/VR interfaces on smart phones or tablets, on AR/VR interfaces on data collectors (which may be embodied in smart phones or tablets), on displays located on machines or components, and/or on displays located in industrial environments.
In embodiments, a platform is provided having heat maps displaying collected data for AR/VR. In embodiments, a platform is provided having heat maps 4204 displaying collected data from a data collection system 102 for providing input to an AR/VR interface 4208. In embodiments, the heat map interface 4304 is provided as an output for a data collection system 102, such as for handling and providing information for visualization of various sensor data and other data (such as map data, analog sensor data, and other data), such as to one or more components of the data collection system 102 or to another system, such as a mobile device, tablet, dashboard, computer, AR/VR device, or the like. A data collection system 102 may be provided in a form factor suitable for delivering visual input to a user, such as the presentation of a map that includes indicators of levels of analog and digital sensor data (such as data indicating levels of rotation, vibration, heating or cooling, pressure, and many other conditions). In such cases, data collection systems 102 may be integrated with equipment, or the like that are used by individuals responsible for operating or monitoring an industrial environment. In embodiments, signals from various sensors or input sources (or selective combinations, permutations, mixes, and the like, as managed by one or more of the cognitive input selection systems 4004, 4014) may provide input data to a heat map. Coordinates may include real world location coordinates (such as geo-location or location on a map of an environment), as well as other coordinates, such as time-based coordinates, frequency-based coordinates, or other coordinates that allow for representation of analog sensor signals, digital signals, input source information, and various combinations, in a map-based visualization, such that colors may represent varying levels of input along the relevant dimensions. For example, if a nearby industrial machine is overheating, the heat map interface may alert a user by showing a machine in bright red. If a system is experiencing unusual vibrations, the heat map interface may show a different color for a visual element for the machine, or it may cause an icon or display element representing the machine to vibrate in the interface, calling attention to the element. Clicking, touching, or otherwise interacting with the map can allow a user to drill down and see underlying sensor or input data that is used as an input to the heat map display. Thus, through various forms of display, a data collection system 102 may inform users of the need to attend to one or more devices, machines, or other factors, such as those in an industrial environment, without requiring them to read text-based messages or input. The heat map interface, and selection of what outputs should be provided, may be considered in the cognitive input selection systems 4004, 4014. For example, user behavior (such as responses to inputs or displays) may be monitored and analyzed in an analytic system 4018, and feedback may be provided through the learning feedback system 4012, so that signals may be provided based on the right collection or package of sensors and inputs, at the right time and in the right manner, to optimize the effectiveness of the heat map UI 4304. This may include rule-based or model-based feedback (such as feedback providing outputs that correspond in some logical fashion to the source data that is being conveyed). In embodiments, a cognitive heat map system may be provided, where selection of inputs or triggers for heat map displays, selection of outputs, colors, visual representation elements, timing, intensity levels, durations and other parameters (or weights applied to them) may be varied in a process of variation, promotion and selection (such as selection using genetic programming) with feedback based on real world responses to feedback in actual situations or based on results of simulation and testing of user behavior. Thus, an adaptive heat map interface for a data collection system 102, or data collected thereby 102, or data handled by a host processing system 112, is provided, which may learn and adapt feedback to satisfy requirements and to optimize the impact on user behavior and reaction, such as for overall system outcomes, data collection outcomes, analytic outcomes, and the like.
In embodiments, a platform is provided having automatically tuned ARNR visualization of data collected by a data collector. In embodiments, a platform is provided having an automatically tuned ARVR visualization system 4308 for visualization of data collected by a data collection system 102, such as the case where the data collection system 102 has an ARNR interface 4208 or provides input to an ARNR interface 4308 (such as a mobile phone positioned in a virtual reality or AR headset, a set of AR glasses, or the like). In embodiments, the ARNR system 4308 is provided as an output interface of a data collection system 102, such as a system for handling and providing information for visualization of various sensor data and other data (such as map data, analog sensor data, and other data), such as to one or more components of the data collection system 102 or to another system, such as a mobile device, tablet, dashboard, computer, AR/VR device, or the like. A data collection system 102 may be provided in a form factor suitable for delivering AR or VR visual, auditory, or other sensory input to a user, such as by presenting one or more displays such as 3D-realistic visualizations, objects, maps, camera overlays, or other overlay elements, maps and the like that include or correspond to indicators of levels of analog and digital sensor data (such as data indicating levels of rotation, vibration, heating or cooling, pressure and many other conditions, to input sources 116, or the like). In such cases, data collection systems 102 may be integrated with equipment, or the like that are used by individuals responsible for operating or monitoring an industrial environment.
In embodiments, signals from various sensors or input sources (or selective combinations, permutations, mixes, and the like as managed by one or more of the cognitive input selection systems 4004, 4014) may provide input data to populate, configure, modify, or otherwise determine the AR/VR element. Visual elements may include a wide range of icons, map elements, menu elements, sliders, toggles, colors, shapes, sizes, and the like, for representation of analog sensor signals, digital signals, input source information, and various combinations. In many examples, colors, shapes, and sizes of visual overlay elements may represent varying levels of input along the relevant dimensions for a sensor or combination of sensors. In further examples, if a nearby industrial machine is overheating, an AR element may alert a user by showing an icon representing that type of machine in flashing red color in a portion of the display of a pair of AR glasses. If a system is experiencing unusual vibrations, a virtual reality interface showing visualization of the components of the machine (such as an overlay of a camera view of the machine with 3D visualization elements) may show a vibrating component in a highlighted color, with motion, or the like, to ensure the component stands out in a virtual reality environment being used to help a user monitor or service the machine. Clicking, touching, moving eyes toward, or otherwise interacting with a visual element in an AR/VR interface may allow a user to drilldown and see underlying sensor or input data that is used as an input to the display. Thus, through various forms of display, a data collection system 102 may inform users of the need to attend to one or more devices, machines, or other factors (such as in an industrial environment), without requiring them to read text-based messages or input or divert attention from the applicable environment (whether it is a real environment with AR features or a virtual environment, such as for simulation, training, or the like).
The AR/VR output interface 4208, and selection and configuration of what outputs or displays should be provided, may be handled in the cognitive input selection systems 4004, 4014. For example, user behavior (such as responses to inputs or displays) may be monitored and analyzed in an analytic system 4018, and feedback may be provided through the learning feedback system 4012, so that AR/VR display signals may be provided based on the right collection or package of sensors and inputs, at the right time and in the right manner, to optimize the effectiveness of the AR/VR UI 4308. This may include rule-based or model-based feedback (such as providing outputs that correspond in some logical fashion to the source data that is being conveyed). In embodiments, a cognitively tuned AR/VR interface control system 4308 may be provided, where selection of inputs or triggers for AR/VR display elements, selection of outputs (such as colors, visual representation elements, timing, intensity levels, durations and other parameters [or weights applied to them]) and other parameters of a VR/AR environment may be varied in a process of variation, promotion and selection (such as the use of genetic programming) with feedback based on real world responses in actual situations or based on results of simulation and testing of user behavior. Thus, an adaptive, tuned AR/VR interface for a data collection system 102, or data collected thereby 102, or data handled by a host processing system 112, is provided, which may learn and adapt feedback to satisfy requirements and to optimize the impact on user behavior and reaction, such as for overall system outcomes, data collection outcomes, analytic outcomes, and the like.
As noted above, methods and systems are disclosed herein for continuous ultrasonic monitoring, including providing continuous ultrasonic monitoring of rotating elements and bearings of an energy production facility. Embodiments include using continuous ultrasonic monitoring of an industrial environment as a source for a cloud-deployed pattern recognizer. Embodiments include using continuous ultrasonic monitoring to provide updated state information to a state machine that is used as an input to a cloud-deployed pattern recognizer. Embodiments include making available continuous ultrasonic monitoring information to a user based on a policy declared in a policy engine. Embodiments include storing continuous ultrasonic monitoring data with other data in a fused data structure on an industrial sensor device. Embodiments include making a stream of continuous ultrasonic monitoring data from an industrial environment available as a service from a data marketplace. Embodiments include feeding a stream of continuous ultrasonic monitoring data into a self-organizing data pool. Embodiments include training a machine learning model to monitor a continuous ultrasonic monitoring data stream where the model is based on a training set created from human analysis of such a data stream, and is improved based on data collected on performance in an industrial environment.
Embodiments include a swarm of data collectors that include at least one data collector for continuous ultrasonic monitoring of an industrial environment and at least one other type of data collector. Embodiments include using a distributed ledger to store time-series data from continuous ultrasonic monitoring across multiple devices. Embodiments include collecting a stream of continuous ultrasonic data in a self-organizing data collector, a network-sensitive data collector, a remotely organized data collector, a data collector having self-organized storage and the like. Embodiments include using self-organizing network coding to transport a stream of ultrasonic data collected from an industrial environment. Embodiments include conveying an indicator of a parameter of a continuously collected ultrasonic data stream via an interface where the interface is one of a sensory interface of a wearable device, a heat map visual interface of a wearable device, an interface that operates with self-organized tuning of the interface layer, and the like.
As noted above, methods and systems are disclosed herein for cloud-based, machine pattern recognition based on fusion of remote analog industrial sensors. Embodiments include taking input from a plurality of analog sensors disposed in an industrial environment, multiplexing the sensors into a multiplexed data stream, feeding the data stream into a cloud-deployed machine learning facility, and training a model of the machine learning facility to recognize a defined pattern associated with the industrial environment. Embodiments include using a cloud-based pattern recognizer on input states from a state machine that characterizes states of an industrial environment. Embodiments include deploying policies by a policy engine that govern what data can be used by what users and for what purpose in cloud-based, machine learning. Embodiments include using a cloud-based platform to identify patterns in data across a plurality of data pools that contain data published from industrial sensors. Embodiments include training a model to identify preferred sensor sets to diagnose a condition of an industrial environment, where a training set is created by a human user and the model is improved based on feedback from data collected about conditions in an industrial environment.
Embodiments include a swarm of data collectors that is governed by a policy that is automatically propagated through the swarm. Embodiments include using a distributed ledger to store sensor fusion information across multiple devices. Embodiments include feeding input from a set of data collectors into a cloud-based pattern recognizer that uses data from multiple sensors for an industrial environment. The data collectors may be self-organizing data collectors, network-sensitive data collectors, remotely organized data collectors, a set of data collectors having self-organized storage, and the like. Embodiments include a system for data collection in an industrial environment with self-organizing network coding for data transport of data fused from multiple sensors in the environment. Embodiments include conveying information formed by fusing inputs from multiple sensors in an industrial data collection system in an interface such as a multi-sensory interface, a heat map interface, an interface that operates with self-organized tuning of the interface layer, and the like.
As noted above, methods and systems are disclosed herein for cloud-based, machine pattern analysis of state information from multiple analog industrial sensors to provide anticipated state information for an industrial system. Embodiments include using a policy engine to determine what state information can be used for cloud-based machine analysis. Embodiments include feeding inputs from multiple devices that have fused and on-device storage of multiple sensor streams into a cloud-based pattern recognizer to determine an anticipated state of an industrial environment. Embodiments include making an output, such as anticipated state information, from a cloud-based machine pattern recognizer that analyzes fused data from remote, analog industrial sensors available as a data service in a data marketplace. Embodiments include using a cloud-based pattern recognizer to determine an anticipated state of an industrial environment based on data collected from data pools that contain streams of information from machines in the environment. Embodiments include training a model to identify preferred state information to diagnose a condition of an industrial environment, where a training set is created by a human user and the model is improved based on feedback from data collected about conditions in an industrial environment. Embodiments include a swarm of data collectors that feeds a state machine that maintains current state information for an industrial environment. Embodiments include using a distributed ledger to store historical state information for fused sensor states a self-organizing data collector that feeds a state machine that maintains current state information for an industrial environment. Embodiments include a data collector that feeds a state machine that maintains current state information for an industrial environment where the data collector may be a network sensitive data collector, a remotely organized data collector, a data collector with self-organized storage, and the like. Embodiments include a system for data collection in an industrial environment with self-organizing network coding for data transport and maintains anticipated state information for the environment. Embodiments include conveying anticipated state information determined by machine learning in an industrial data collection system in an interface where the interface may be one or more of a multisensory interface, a heat map interface an interface that operates with self-organized tuning of the interface layer, and the like.
As noted above, methods and systems are disclosed herein for a cloud-based policy automation engine for IoT, with creation, deployment, and management of IoT devices, including a cloud-based policy automation engine for IoT, enabling creation, deployment and management of policies that apply to IoT devices. Policies can relate to data usage to an on-device storage system that stores fused data from multiple industrial sensors, or what data can be provided to whom in a self-organizing marketplace for IoT sensor data. Policies can govern how a self-organizing swarm or data collector should be organized for a particular industrial environment, how a network-sensitive data collector should use network bandwidth for a particular industrial environment, how a remotely organized data collector should collect, and make available, data relating to a specified industrial environment, or how a data collector should self-organize storage for a particular industrial environment. Policies can be deployed across a set of self-organizing pools of data that contain data streamed from industrial sensing devices to govern use of data from the pools or stored on a device that governs use of storage capabilities of the device for a distributed ledger. Embodiments include training a model to determine what policies should be deployed in an industrial data collection system. Embodiments include a system for data collection in an industrial environment with a policy engine for deploying policy within the system and, optionally, self-organizing network coding for data transport, wherein in certain embodiments, a policy applies to how data will be presented in a multi-sensory interface, a heat map visual interface, or in an interface that operates with self-organized tuning of the interface layer.
As noted above, methods and systems are disclosed herein for on-device sensor fusion and data storage for industrial IoT devices, such as an industrial data collector, including self-organizing, remotely organized, or network-sensitive industrial data collectors, where data from multiple sensors is multiplexed at the device for storage of a fused data stream. Embodiments include a self-organizing marketplace that presents fused sensor data that is extracted from on-device storage of IoT devices. Embodiments include streaming fused sensor information from multiple industrial sensors and from an on-device data storage facility to a data pool. Embodiments include training a model to determine what data should be stored on a device in a data collection environment. Embodiments include a self-organizing swarm of industrial data collectors that organize among themselves to optimize data collection, where at least some of the data collectors have on-device storage of fused data from multiple sensors. Embodiments include storing distributed ledger information with fused sensor information on an industrial IoT device. Embodiments include a system for data collection with on-device sensor fusion, such as of industrial sensor data and, optionally, self-organizing network coding for data transport, where data structures are stored to support alternative, multi-sensory modes of presentation, visual heat map modes of presentation, and/or an interface that operates with self-organized tuning of the interface layer.
As noted above, methods and systems are disclosed herein for a self-organizing data marketplace for industrial IoT data, where available data elements are organized in the marketplace for consumption by consumers based on training a self-organizing facility with a training set and feedback from measures of marketplace success. Embodiments include organizing a set of data pools in a self-organizing data marketplace based on utilization metrics for the data pools. Embodiments include training a model to determine pricing for data in a data marketplace. The data marketplace is fed with data streams from a self-organizing swarm of industrial data collectors, a set of industrial data collectors that have self-organizing storage, or self-organizing, network-sensitive, or remotely organized industrial data collectors. Embodiments include using a distributed ledger to store transactional data for a self-organizing marketplace for industrial IoT data. Embodiments include using self-organizing network coding for data transport to a marketplace for sensor data collected in industrial environments. Embodiments include providing a library of data structures suitable for presenting data in alternative, multi-sensory interface modes in a data marketplace, in heat map visualization, and/or in interfaces that operate with self-organized tuning of the interface layer.
As noted above, methods and systems are disclosed herein for self-organizing data pools such as those that self-organize based on utilization and/or yield metrics that may be tracked for a plurality of data pools. In embodiments, the pools contain data from self-organizing data collectors. Embodiments include training a model to present the most valuable data in a data marketplace, where training is based on industry-specific measures of success. Embodiments include populating a set of self-organizing data pools with data from a self-organizing swarm of data collectors. Embodiments include using a distributed ledger to store transactional information for data that is deployed in data pools, where the distributed ledger is distributed across the data pools. Embodiments include populating a set of self-organizing data pools with data from a set of network-sensitive or remotely organized data collectors or a set of data collectors having self-organizing storage. Embodiments include a system for data collection in an industrial environment with self-organizing pools for data storage and self-organizing network coding for data transport, such as a system that includes a source data structure for supporting data presentation in a multi-sensory interface, in a heat map interface, and/or in an interface that operates with self-organized tuning of the interface layer.
As noted above, methods and systems are disclosed herein for training AI models based on industry-specific feedback, such as that reflects a measure of utilization, yield, or impact, where the AI model operates on sensor data from an industrial environment. Embodiments include training a swarm of data collectors, or data collectors, such as remotely organized, self-organizing, or network-sensitive data collectors, based on industry-specific feedback or network and industrial conditions in an industrial environment, such as to configure storage. Embodiments include training an AI model to identify and use available storage locations in an industrial environment for storing distributed ledger information. Embodiments include training a remote organizer for a remotely organized data collector based on industry-specific feedback measures. Embodiments include a system for data collection in an industrial environment with cloud-based training of a network coding model for organizing network coding for data transport or a facility that manages presentation of data in a multi-sensory interface, in a heat map interface, and/or in an interface that operates with self-organized tuning of the interface layer.
As noted above, methods and systems are disclosed herein for a self-organized swarm of industrial data collectors that organize among themselves to optimize data collection based on the capabilities and conditions of the members of the swarm. Embodiments include deploying distributed ledger data structures across a swarm of data. Data collectors may be network-sensitive data collectors configured for remote organization or have self-organizing storage. Systems for data collection in an industrial environment with a swarm can include a self-organizing network coding for data transport. Systems include swarms that relay information for use in a multi-sensory interface, in a heat map interface, and/or in an interface that operates with self-organized tuning of the interface layer.
As noted above, methods and systems are disclosed herein for an industrial IoT distributed ledger, including a distributed ledger supporting the tracking of transactions executed in an automated data marketplace for industrial IoT data. Embodiments include a self-organizing data collector that is configured to distribute collected information to a distributed ledger. Embodiments include a network-sensitive data collector that is configured to distribute collected information to a distributed ledger based on network conditions. Embodiments include a remotely organized data collector that is configured to distribute collected information to a distributed ledger based on intelligent, remote management of the distribution. Embodiments include a data collector with self-organizing local storage that is configured to distribute collected information to a distributed ledger. Embodiments include a system for data collection in an industrial environment using a distributed ledger for data storage and self-organizing network coding for data transport, wherein data storage is of a data structure supporting a haptic interface for data presentation, a heat map interface for data presentation, and/or an interface that operates with self-organized tuning of the interface layer.
As noted above, methods and systems are disclosed herein for a self-organizing collector, including a self-organizing, multi-sensor data collector that can optimize data collection, power and/or yield based on conditions in its environment, and is optionally responsive to remote organization. Embodiments include a self-organizing data collector that organizes at least in part based on network conditions. Embodiments include a self-organizing data collector with self-organizing storage for data collected in an industrial data collection environment. Embodiments include a system for data collection in an industrial environment with self-organizing data collection and self-organizing network coding for data transport. Embodiments include a system for data collection in an industrial environment with a self-organizing data collector that feeds a data structure supporting a haptic or multi-sensory wearable interface for data presentation, a heat map interface for data presentation, and/or an interface that operates with self-organized tuning of the interface layer.
As noted above, methods and systems are disclosed herein for a network-sensitive collector, including a network condition-sensitive, self-organizing, multi-sensor data collector that can optimize based on bandwidth, quality of service, pricing, and/or other network conditions. Embodiments include a remotely organized, network condition-sensitive universal data collector that can power up and down sensor interfaces based on need and/or conditions identified in an industrial data collection environment, including network conditions. Embodiments include a network-condition sensitive data collector with self-organizing storage for data collected in an industrial data collection environment. Embodiments include a network-condition sensitive data collector with self-organizing network coding for data transport in an industrial data collection environment. Embodiments include a system for data collection in an industrial environment with a network-sensitive data collector that relays a data structure supporting a haptic wearable interface for data presentation, a heat map interface for data presentation, and/or an interface that operates with self-organized tuning of the interface layer.
As noted above, methods and systems are disclosed herein for a remotely organized universal data collector that can power up and down sensor interfaces based on need and/or conditions identified in an industrial data collection environment. Embodiments include a remotely organized universal data collector with self-organizing storage for data collected in an industrial data collection environment. Embodiments include a system for data collection in an industrial environment with remote control of data collection and self-organizing network coding for data transport. Embodiments include a remotely organized data collector for storing sensor data and delivering instructions for use of the data in a haptic or multi-sensory wearable interface, in a heat map visual interface, and/or in an interface that operates with self-organized tuning of the interface layer.
As noted above, methods and systems are disclosed herein for self-organizing storage for a multi-sensor data collector, including self-organizing storage for a multi-sensor data collector for industrial sensor data. Embodiments include a system for data collection in an industrial environment with self-organizing data storage and self-organizing network coding for data transport. Embodiments include a data collector with self-organizing storage for storing sensor data and instructions for translating the data for use in a haptic wearable interface, in a heat map presentation interface, and/or in an interface that operates with self-organized tuning of the interface layer.
In embodiments, as illustrated in
In embodiments, the response circuit 8110 may initiate a variety of actions based on the sensor status provided by the data analysis circuit 8108. The response circuit 8110 may adjust a sensor scaling value (e.g., from 100 mV/gram to 10 mV/gram). The response circuit 8110 may select an alternate sensor from a plurality available. The response circuit 8110 may acquire data from a plurality of sensors of different ranges. The response circuit 8110 may recommend an alternate sensor. The response circuit 8110 may issue an alarm or an alert.
In embodiments, the response circuit 8110 may cause the data acquisition circuit 8104 to enable or disable the processing of detection values corresponding to certain sensors based on the component status. This may include switching to sensors having different response rates, sensitivity, ranges, and the like; accessing new sensors or types of sensors, accessing data from multiple sensors, and the like. Switching may be undertaken based on a model, a set of rules, or the like. In embodiments, switching may be under control of a machine learning system, such that switching is controlled based on one or more metrics of success, combined with input data, over a set of trials, which may occur under supervision of a human supervisor or under control of an automated system. Switching may involve switching from one input port to another (such as to switch from one sensor to another). Switching may involve altering the multiplexing of data, such as combining different streams under different circumstances. Switching may involve activating a system to obtain additional data, such as moving a mobile system (such as a robotic or drone system), to a location where different or additional data is available, such as positioning an image sensor for a different view or positioning a sonar sensor for a different direction of collection, or to a location where different sensors can be accessed, such as moving a collector to connect up to a sensor at a location in an environment by a wired or wireless connection. This switching may be implemented by directing changes to the multiplexer (MUX) control circuit 8114.
In embodiments, the response circuit 8110 may make recommendations for the replacement of certain sensors in the future with sensors having different response rates, sensitivity, ranges, and the like. The response circuit 8110 may recommend design alterations for future embodiments of the component, the piece of equipment, the operating conditions, the process, and the like.
In embodiments, the response circuit 8110 may recommend maintenance at an upcoming process stop or initiate a maintenance call where the maintenance may include the replacement of the sensor with the same or an alternate type of sensor having a different response rate, sensitivity, range, and the like. In embodiments, the response circuit 8110 may implement or recommend process changes—for example to lower the utilization of a component that is near a maintenance interval, operating off-nominally, or failed for purpose but is still at least partially operational, to change the operating speed of a component (such as to put it in a lower-demand mode), to initiate amelioration of an issue (such as to signal for additional lubrication of a roller bearing set, or to signal for an alignment process for a system that is out of balance), and the like.
In embodiments, the data analysis circuit 8108 and/or the response circuit 8110 may periodically store certain detection values and/or the output of the multiplexers and/or the data corresponding to the logic control of the MUX in the data storage circuit 8136 to enable the tracking of component performance over time. In embodiments, based on sensor status, as described elsewhere herein, recently measured sensor data and related operating conditions such as RPMs, component loads, temperatures, pressures, vibrations, or other sensor data of the types described throughout this disclosure in the data storage circuit 8136 enable the backing out of overloaded/failed sensor data. The signal evaluation circuit 8108 may store data at a higher data rate for greater granularity in future processing, the ability to reprocess at different sampling rates, and/or to enable diagnosing or post-processing of system information where operational data of interest is flagged, and the like.
In embodiments, as shown in
In embodiments, as shown in
In embodiments as illustrated in
In embodiments, as shown in
The monitoring application 8150 may select subsets of the detection values to be jointly analyzed. Subsets for analysis may be selected based on a single type of sensor, component, or a single type of equipment in which a component is operating. Subsets for analysis may be selected or grouped based on common operating conditions such as size of load, operational condition (e.g., intermittent or continuous), operating speed or tachometer output, common ambient environmental conditions such as humidity, temperature, air or fluid particulate, and the like. Subsets for analysis may be selected based on the effects of other nearby equipment such as nearby machines rotating at similar frequencies, nearby equipment producing electromagnetic fields, nearby equipment producing heat, nearby equipment inducing movement or vibration, nearby equipment emitting vapors, chemicals or particulates, or other potentially interfering or intervening effects.
In embodiments, the monitoring application 8150 may analyze the selected subset. In an example, data from a single sensor may be analyzed over different time periods such as one operating cycle, several operating cycles, a month, a year, the life of the component, or the like. Data from multiple sensors of a common type measuring a common component type may also be analyzed over different time periods. Trends in the data such as changing rates of change associated with start-up or different points in the process may be identified. Correlation of trends and values for different sensors may be analyzed to identify those parameters whose short-term analysis might provide the best prediction regarding expected sensor performance. This information may be transmitted back to the monitoring device to update sensor models, sensor selection, sensor range, sensor scaling, sensor sampling frequency, types of data collected, and the like, and be analyzed locally or to influence the design of future monitoring devices.
In embodiments, the monitoring application 8150 may have access to equipment specifications, equipment geometry, component specifications, component materials, anticipated state information for a plurality of sensors, operational history, historical detection values, sensor life models, and the like for use analyzing the selected subset using rule-based or model-based analysis. The monitoring application 8150 may provide recommendations regarding sensor selection, additional data to collect, data to store with sensor data, and the like. The monitoring application 8150 may provide recommendations regarding scheduling repairs and/or maintenance. The monitoring application 8150 may provide recommendations regarding replacing a sensor. The replacement sensor may match the sensor being replaced or the replacement sensor may have a different range, sensitivity, sampling frequency, and the like.
In embodiments, the monitoring application 8150 may include a remote learning circuit structured to analyze sensor status data (e.g., sensor overload or sensor failure) together with data from other sensors, failure data on components being monitored, equipment being monitored, output being produced, and the like. The remote learning system may identify correlations between sensor overload and data from other sensors.
An example monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment includes a data acquisition circuit that interprets a number of detection values, each of the detection values corresponding to input received from at least one of a number of input sensors, a MUX having inputs corresponding to a subset of the detection values, a MUX control circuit that interprets a subset of the number of detection values and provides the logical control of the MUX and the correspondence of MUX input and detected values as a result, where the logic control of the MUX includes adaptive scheduling of the select lines, a data analysis circuit that receives an output from the MUX and data corresponding to the logic control of the MUX resulting in a component health status, an analysis response circuit that performs an operation in response to the component health status, where the number of sensors includes at least two sensors such as a temperature sensor, a load sensor, a vibration sensor, an acoustic wave sensor, a heat flux sensor, an infrared sensor, an accelerometer, a tri-axial vibration sensor, and/or a tachometer. In certain further embodiments, an example system includes: where at least one of the number of detection values may correspond to a fusion of two or more input sensors representing a virtual sensor; where the system further includes a data storage circuit that stores at least one of component specifications and anticipated component state information and buffers a subset of the number of detection values for a predetermined length of time; where the system further includes a data storage circuit that stores at least one of a component specification and anticipated component state information and buffers the output of the MUX and data corresponding to the logic control of the MUX for a predetermined length of time; where the data analysis circuit includes a peak detection circuit, a phase detection circuit, a bandpass filter circuit, a frequency transformation circuit, a frequency analysis circuit, a PLL circuit, a torsional analysis circuit, and/or a bearing analysis circuit; where operation further includes storing additional data in the data storage circuit; where the operation includes at least one of enabling or disabling one or more portions of the MUX circuit; and/or where the operation includes causing the MUX control circuit to alter the logical control of the MUX and the correspondence of MUX input and detected values. In certain embodiments, the system includes at least two multiplexers; control of the correspondence of the multiplexer input and the detected values further includes controlling the connection of the output of a first multiplexer to an input of a second multiplexer; control of the correspondence of the multiplexer input and the detected values further comprises powering down at least a portion of one of the at least two multiplexers; and/or control of the correspondence of MUX input and detected values includes adaptive scheduling of the select lines. In certain embodiments, a data response circuit analyzes the stream of data from one or both MUXes, and recommends an action in response to the analysis.
An example testing system includes the testing system in communication with a number of analog and digital input sensors, a monitoring device including a data acquisition circuit that interprets a number of detection values, each of the number of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors, a MUX having inputs corresponding to a subset of the detection values, a MUX control circuit that interprets a subset of the number of detection values and provides the logical control of the MUX and control of the correspondence of MUX input and detected values as a result, where the logic control of the MUX includes adaptive scheduling of the select lines, and a user interface enabled to accept scheduling input for select lines and display output of MUX and select line data.
In embodiments, information about the health or other status or state information of or regarding a component or piece of industrial equipment may be obtained by looking at both the amplitude and phase or timing of data signals relative to related data signals, timers, reference signals or data measurements. An embodiment of a data monitoring device 8500 is shown in
The selection of the plurality of sensors 8506 for a data monitoring device 8500 designed for a specific component or piece of equipment may depend on a variety of considerations such as accessibility for installing new sensors, incorporation of sensors in the initial design, anticipated operational and failure conditions, reliability of the sensors, and the like. The impact of failure may drive the extent to which a component or piece of equipment is monitored with more sensors and/or higher capability sensors being dedicated to systems where unexpected or undetected failure would be costly or have severe consequences.
Depending on the type of equipment, the component being measured, the environment in which the equipment is operating and the like, sensors 8506 may comprise one or more of, without limitation, a vibration sensor, a thermometer, a hygrometer, a voltage sensor, a current sensor, an accelerometer, a velocity detector, a light or electromagnetic sensor (e.g., determining temperature, composition and/or spectral analysis, and/or object position or movement), an image sensor, a structured light sensor, a laser-based image sensor, an acoustic wave sensor, a displacement sensor, a turbidity meter, a viscosity meter, a load sensor, a tri-axial sensor, an accelerometer, a tachometer, a fluid pressure meter, an air flow meter, a horsepower meter, a flow rate meter, a fluid particle detector, an acoustical sensor, a pH sensor, and the like, including, without limitation, any of the sensors described throughout this disclosure and the documents incorporated by reference.
The sensors 8506 may provide a stream of data over time that has a phase component, such as relating to acceleration or vibration, allowing for the evaluation of phase or frequency analysis of different operational aspects of a piece of equipment or an operating component. The sensors 8506 may provide a stream of data that is not conventionally phase-based, such as temperature, humidity, load, and the like. The sensors 8506 may provide a continuous or near continuous stream of data over time, periodic readings, event-driven readings, and/or readings according to a selected interval or schedule.
In embodiments, as illustrated in
In an embodiment, as illustrated in
The signal evaluation circuit 8508 may include one or more components such as a phase detection circuit 8528 to determine a phase difference between two time-based signals, a phase lock loop circuit 8530 to adjust the relative phase of a signal such that it is aligned with a second signal, timer or reference signal, and/or a band pass filter circuit 8532 which may be used to separate out signals occurring at different frequencies. An example band pass filter circuit 8532 includes any filtering operations understood in the art, including at least a low-pass filter, a high-pass filter, and/or a band pass filter—for example to exclude or reduce frequencies that are not of interest for a particular determination, and/or to enhance the signal for frequencies of interest. Additionally, or alternatively, a band pass filter circuit 8532 includes one or more notch filters or other filtering mechanism to narrow ranges of frequencies (e.g., frequencies from a known source of noise). This may be used to filter out dominant frequency signals such as the overall rotation, and may help enable the evaluation of low amplitude signals at frequencies associated with torsion, bearing failure and the like.
In embodiments, understanding the relative differences may be enabled by a phase detection circuit 8528 to determine a phase difference between two signals. It may be of value to understand a relative phase offset, if any, between signals such as when a periodic vibration occurs relative to a relative rotation of a piece of equipment. In embodiments, there may be value in understanding where in a cycle shaft vibrations occur relative to a motor control input to better balance the control of the motor. This may be particularly true for systems and components that are operating at relative slow RPMs. Understanding of the phase difference between two signals or between those signals and a timer may enable establishing a relationship between a signal value and where it occurs in a process or rotation. Understanding relative phase differences may help in evaluating the relationship between different components of a system such as in the creation of a vibrational model for an Operational Deflection Shape (ODS).
The signal evaluation circuit 8544 may perform frequency analysis using techniques such as a digital Fast Fourier transform (FFT), Laplace transform, Z-transform, wavelet transform, other frequency domain transform, or other digital or analog signal analysis techniques, including, without limitation, complex analysis, including complex phase evolution analysis. An overall rotational speed or tachometer may be derived from data from sensors such as rotational velocity meters, accelerometers, displacement meters and the like. Additional frequencies of interest may also be identified. These may include frequencies near the overall rotational speed as well as frequencies higher than that of the rotational speed. These may include frequencies that are nonsynchronous with an overall rotational speed. Signals observed at frequencies that are multiples of the rotational speed may be due to bearing induced vibrations or other behaviors or situations involving bearings. In some instances, these frequencies may be in the range of one times the rotational speed, two times the rotational speed, three times the rotational speed, and the like, up to 3.15 to 15 times the rotational speed, or higher. In some embodiments, the signal evaluation circuit 8544 may select RC components for a band pass filter circuit 8532 based on overall rotational speed to create a band pass filter circuit 8532 to remove signals at expected frequencies such as the overall rotational speed, to facilitate identification of small amplitude signals at other frequencies. In embodiments, variable components may be selected, such that adjustments may be made in keeping with changes in the rotational speed, so that the band pass filter may be a variable band pass filter. This may occur under control of automatically self-adjusting circuit elements, or under control of a processor, including automated control based on a model of the circuit behavior, where a rotational speed indicator or other data is provided as a basis for control.
In embodiments, rather than performing frequency analysis, the signal evaluation circuit 8544 may utilize the time-based detection values to perform transitory signal analysis. These may include identifying abrupt changes in signal amplitude including changes where the change in amplitude exceeds a predetermined value or exists for a certain duration. In embodiments, the time-based sensor data may be aligned with a timer or reference signal allowing the time-based sensor data to be aligned with, for example, a time or location in a cycle. Additional processing to look at frequency changes over time may include the use of Short-Time Fourier Transforms (STFT) or a wavelet transform.
In embodiments, frequency-based techniques and time-based techniques may be combined, such as using time-based techniques to determine discrete time periods during which given operational modes or states are occurring and using frequency-based techniques to determine behavior within one or more of the discrete time periods.
In embodiments, the signal evaluation circuit may utilize demodulation techniques for signals obtained from equipment running at slow speeds such as paper and pulp machines, mining equipment, and the like. A signal evaluation circuit employing a demodulation technique may comprise a band-pass filter circuit, a rectifier circuit, and/or a low pass circuit prior to transforming the data to the frequency domain.
The response circuit 85108710 may further comprise evaluating the results of the signal evaluation circuit 85088544 and, based on certain criteria, initiating an action. Criteria may include a predetermined maximum or minimum value for a detection value from a specific sensor, a value of a sensor's corresponding detection value over time, a change in value, a rate of change in value, and/or an accumulated value (e.g., a time spent above/below a threshold value, a weighted time spent above/below one or more threshold values, and/or an area of the detected value above/below one or more threshold values). The criteria may include a sensor's detection values at certain frequencies or phases where the frequencies or phases may be based on the equipment geometry, equipment control schemes, system input, historical data, current operating conditions, and/or an anticipated response. The criteria may comprise combinations of data from different sensors such as relative values, relative changes in value, relative rates of change in value, relative values over time, and the like. The relative criteria may change with other data or information such as process stage, type of product being processed, type of equipment, ambient temperature and humidity, external vibrations from other equipment, and the like. The relative criteria may include level of synchronicity with an overall rotational speed, such as to differentiate between vibration induced by bearings and vibrations resulting from the equipment design. In embodiments, the criteria may be reflected in one or more calculated statistics or metrics (including ones generated by further calculations on multiple criteria or statistics), which in turn may be used for processing (such as on board a data collector or by an external system), such as to be provided as an input to one or more of the machine learning capabilities described in this disclosure, to a control system (which may be an on-board data collector or remote, such as to control selection of data inputs, multiplexing of sensor data, storage, or the like), or as a data element that is an input to another system, such as a data stream or data package that may be available to a data marketplace, a SCADA system, a remote control system, a maintenance system, an analytic system, or other system.
In an illustrative and non-limiting example, an alert may be issued if the vibrational amplitude and/or frequency exceeds a predetermined maximum value, if there is a change or rate of change that exceeds a predetermined acceptable range, and/or if an accumulated value based on vibrational amplitude and/or frequency exceeds a threshold. Certain embodiments are described herein as detected values exceeding thresholds or predetermined values, but detected values may also fall below thresholds or predetermined values—for example where an amount of change in the detected value is expected to occur, but detected values indicate that the change may not have occurred. For example, and without limitation, vibrational data may indicate system agitation levels, properly operating equipment, or the like, and vibrational data below amplitude and/or frequency thresholds may be an indication of a process that is not operating according to expectations. Except where the context clearly indicates otherwise, any description herein describing a determination of a value above a threshold and/or exceeding a predetermined or expected value is understood to include determination of a value below a threshold and/or falling below a predetermined or expected value.
The predetermined acceptable range may be based on anticipated system response or vibration based on the equipment geometry and control scheme such as number of bearings, relative rotational speed, influx of power to the system at a certain frequency, and the like. The predetermined acceptable range may also be based on long term analysis of detection values across a plurality of similar equipment and components and correlation of data with equipment failure. Based on vibration phase information, a physical location of a problem may be identified. Based on the vibration phase information system design flaws, off-nominal operation, and/or component or process failures may be identified. In some embodiments, an alert may be issued based on changes or rates of change in the data over time such as increasing amplitude or shifts in the frequencies or phases at which a vibration occurs. In some embodiments, an alert may be issued based on accumulated values such as time spent over a threshold, weighted time spent over one or more thresholds, and/or an area of a curve of the detected value over one or more thresholds. In embodiments, an alert may be issued based on a combination of data from different sensors such as relative changes in value, or relative rates of change in amplitude, frequency of phase in addition to values of non-phase sensors such as temperature, humidity and the like. For example, an increase in temperature and energy at certain frequencies may indicate a hot bearing that is starting to fail. In embodiments, the relative criteria for an alarm may change with other data or information such as process stage, type of product being processed on equipment, ambient temperature and humidity, external vibrations from other equipment and the like.
In embodiments, response circuit 8510 may cause the data acquisition circuit 8504 to enable or disable the processing of detection values corresponding to certain sensors based on the some of the criteria discussed above. This may include switching to sensors having different response rates, sensitivity, ranges, and the like; accessing new sensors or types of sensors, and the like. Switching may be undertaken based on a model, a set of rules, or the like. In embodiments, switching may be under control of a machine learning system, such that switching is controlled based on one or more metrics of success, combined with input data, over a set of trials, which may occur under supervision of a human supervisor or under control of an automated system. Switching may involve switching from one input port to another (such as to switch from one sensor to another). Switching may involve altering the multiplexing of data, such as combining different streams under different circumstances. Switching may involve activating a system to obtain additional data, such as moving a mobile system (such as a robotic or drone system), to a location where different or additional data is available (such as positioning an image sensor for a different view or positioning a sonar sensor for a different direction of collection) or to a location where different sensors can be accessed (such as moving a collector to connect up to a sensor that is disposed at a location in an environment by a wired or wireless connection). The response circuit 8510 may make recommendations for the replacement of certain sensors in the future with sensors having different response rates, sensitivity, ranges, and the like. The response circuit 8510 may recommend design alterations for future embodiments of the component, the piece of equipment, the operating conditions, the process, and the like.
In embodiments, the response circuit 8510 may recommend maintenance at an upcoming process stop or initiate a maintenance call. The response circuit 8510 may recommend changes in process or operating parameters to remotely balance the piece of equipment. In embodiments, the response circuit 8510 may implement or recommend process changes—for example to lower the utilization of a component that is near a maintenance interval, operating off-nominally, or failed for purpose but still at least partially operational, to change the operating speed of a component (such as to put it in a lower-demand mode), to initiate amelioration of an issue (such as to signal for additional lubrication of a roller bearing set, or to signal for an alignment process for a system that is out of balance), and the like.
In embodiments, as shown in
In embodiments, based on relevant operating conditions and/or failure modes which may occur in as sensor values approach one or more criteria, the signal evaluation circuit 8544 may store data in the data storage circuit 8542 based on the fit of data relative to one or more criteria, such as those described throughout this disclosure. Based on one sensor input meeting or approaching specified criteria or range, the signal evaluation circuit 8544 may store additional data such as RPMs, component loads, temperatures, pressures, vibrations or other sensor data of the types described throughout this disclosure. The signal evaluation circuit 8544 may store data at a higher data rate for greater granularity in future processing, the ability to reprocess at different sampling rates, and/or to enable diagnosing or post-processing of system information where operational data of interest is flagged, and the like.
In embodiments, as shown in
In embodiments, as illustrated in
The monitoring application may then analyze the selected data set. For example, data from a single component may be analyzed over different time periods such as one operating cycle, several operating cycles, a month, a year, or the like. Data from multiple components of the same type may also be analyzed over different time periods. Trends in the data such as changes in frequency or amplitude may be correlated with failure and maintenance records associated with the same component or piece of equipment. Trends in the data such as changing rates of change associated with start-up or different points in the process may be identified. Additional data may be introduced into the analysis such as output product quality, output quantity (such as per unit of time), indicated success or failure of a process, and the like. Correlation of trends and values for different types of data may be analyzed to identify those parameters whose short-term analysis might provide the best prediction regarding expected performance. This information may be transmitted back to the monitoring device to update types of data collected and analyzed locally or to influence the design of future monitoring devices.
In an illustrative and non-limiting example, the monitoring device may be used to collect and process sensor data to measure mechanical torque. The monitoring device may be in communication with or include a high resolution, high speed vibration sensor to collect data over an extended period of time, enough to measure multiple cycles of rotation. For gear driven equipment, the sampling resolution should be such that the number of samples taken per cycle is at least equal to the number of gear teeth driving the component. It will be understood that a lower sampling resolution may also be utilized, which may result in a lower confidence determination and/or taking data over a longer period of time to develop sufficient statistical confidence. This data may then be used in the generation of a phase reference (relative probe) or tachometer signal for a piece of equipment. This phase reference may be used to align phase data such as vibrational data or acceleration data from multiple sensors located at different positions on a component or on different components within a system. This information may facilitate the determination of torque for different components or the generation of an Operational Deflection Shape (ODS), indicating the extent of mechanical deflection of one or more components during an operational mode, which in turn may be used to measure mechanical torque in the component.
The higher resolution data stream may provide additional data for the detection of transitory signals in low speed operations. The identification of transitory signals may enable the identification of defects in a piece of equipment or component.
In an illustrative and non-limiting example, the monitoring device may be used to identify mechanical jitter for use in failure prediction models. The monitoring device may begin acquiring data when the piece of equipment starts up through ramping up to operating speed and then during operation. Once at operating speed, it is anticipated that the torsional jitter should be minimal and changes in torsion during this phase may be indicative of cracks, bearing faults and the like. Additionally, known torsions may be removed from the signal to facilitate in the identification of unanticipated torsions resulting from system design flaws or component wear. Having phase information associated with the data collected at operating speed may facilitate identification of a location of vibration and potential component wear. Relative phase information for a plurality of sensors located throughout a machine may facilitate the evaluation of torsion as it is propagated through a piece of equipment.
An example system data collection in an industrial environment includes a data acquisition circuit that interprets a number of detection values from a number of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit, each of the number of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors, a signal evaluation circuit that obtains at least one of a vibration amplitude, a vibration frequency and a vibration phase location corresponding to at least one of the input sensors in response to the number of detection values, and a response circuit that performs at least one operation in response to at the at least one of the vibration amplitude, the vibration frequency and the vibration phase location. Certain further embodiments of an example system include: where the signal evaluation circuit includes a phase detection circuit, or a phase detection circuit and a phase lock loop circuit and/or a band pass filter; where the number of input sensors includes at least two input sensors providing phase information and at least one input sensor providing non-phase sensor information; the signal evaluation circuit further aligning the phase information provided by the at least two of the input sensors; where the at least one operation is further in response to at least one of: a change in magnitude of the vibration amplitude; a change in frequency or phase of vibration; a rate of change in at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase; a relative change in value between at least two of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase; and/or a relative rate of change between at least two of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency, and vibration phase; the system further including an alert circuit, where the at least one operation includes providing an alert and where the alert may be one of haptic, audible and visual; a data storage circuit, where at least one of the vibration amplitude, vibration frequency, and vibration phase is stored periodically to create a vibration history, and where the at least one operation includes storing additional data in the data storage circuit (e.g., as a vibration fingerprint for a component); where the storing additional data in the data storage circuit is further in response to at least one of: a change in magnitude of the vibration amplitude; a change in frequency or phase of vibration; a rate of change in the vibration amplitude, frequency or phase; a relative change in value between at least two of vibration amplitude, frequency and phase; and a relative rate of change between at least two of vibration amplitude, frequency and phase; the system further comprising at least one of a multiplexing (MUX) circuit whereby alternative combinations of detection values may be selected based on at least one of user input, a detected state, and a selected operating parameter for a machine; where each of the number of detection values corresponds to at least one of the input sensors; where the at least one operation includes enabling or disabling the connection of one or more portions of the multiplexing circuit; a MUX control circuit that interprets a subset of the number of detection values and provides the logical control of the MUX and the correspondence of MUX input and detected values as a result; and/or where the logic control of the MUX includes adaptive scheduling of the select lines.
An example method of monitoring a component, includes receiving time-based data from at least one sensor, phase-locking the received data with a reference signal, transforming the received time-based data to frequency data, filtering the frequency data to remove tachometer frequencies, identifying low amplitude signals occurring at high frequencies, and activating an alarm if a low amplitude signal exceeds a threshold.
An example system for data collection, processing, and utilization of signals in an industrial environment includes a plurality of monitoring devices, each monitoring device comprising a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values from a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors; a signal evaluation circuit structured to obtain at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and a vibration phase location corresponding to at least one of the input sensors in response to the corresponding at least one of the plurality of detection values; a data storage facility for storing a subset of the plurality of detection values; a communication circuit structured to communicate at least one selected detection value to a remote server; and a monitoring application on the remote server structured to: receive the at least one selected detection value; jointly analyze a subset of the detection values received from the plurality of monitoring devices; and recommend an action.
In certain further embodiments, an example system includes: for each monitoring device, the plurality of input sensors include at least one input sensor providing phase information and at least one input sensor providing non-phase input sensor information and where joint analysis includes using the phase information from the plurality of monitoring devices to align the information from the plurality of monitoring devices; where the subset of detection values is selected based on data associated with a detection value including at least one: common type of component, common type of equipment, and common operating conditions and further selected based on one of anticipated life of a component associated with detection values, type of the equipment associated with detection values, and operational conditions under which detection values were measured; and/or where the analysis of the subset of detection values includes feeding a neural net with the subset of detection values and supplemental information to learn to recognize various operating states, health states, life expectancies and fault states utilizing deep learning techniques, wherein the supplemental information comprises one of component specification, component performance, equipment specification, equipment performance, maintenance records, repair records and an anticipated state model.
An example system for data collection in an industrial environment includes a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values from a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors; a signal evaluation circuit structured to obtain at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location corresponding to at least one of the input sensors in response to the corresponding at least one of a plurality of detection values; a multiplexing circuit whereby alternative combinations of the detection values may be selected based on at least one of user input, a detected state and a selected operating parameter for a machine, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to at the at least one of the vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location.
An example system for data collection in a piece of equipment, includes a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values from a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors; a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal based on a first detected value of the plurality of detection values; a signal evaluation circuit structured to obtain at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location corresponding to a second detected value comprising: a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between a second detection value of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to at the at least one of the vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location.
An example system for bearing analysis in an industrial environment, includes a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values from a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors; a data storage for storing specifications and anticipated state information for a plurality of bearing types and buffering the plurality of detection values for a predetermined length of time; a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal based on a first detected value of the plurality of detection values; a bearing analysis circuit structured to analyze buffered detection values relative to specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a life prediction comprising: a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between a second detection value of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; and a signal evaluation circuit structured to obtain at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location corresponding to a second detected value: and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to at the at least one of the vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location.
An example motor monitoring system includes: a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values from a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors; a data storage circuit structured to store specifications, system geometry, and anticipated state information for the motor and motor components, store historical motor performance and buffer the plurality of detection values for a predetermined length of time; a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal based on a first detected value of the plurality of detection values; a motor analysis circuit structured to analyze buffered detection values relative to specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a motor performance parameter comprising: a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between a second detection value of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; and a signal evaluation circuit structured to obtain at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location corresponding to a second detected value and analyze the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location relative to buffered detection values, specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a motor performance parameter; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to at the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location and motor performance parameter.
An example system for estimating a vehicle steering system performance parameter, includes: a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values from a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors; a data storage circuit structured to store specifications, system geometry, and anticipated state information for the vehicle steering system, the rack, the pinion, and the steering column, store historical steering system performance and buffer the plurality of detection values for a predetermined length of time;
a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal based on a first detected value of the plurality of detection values; a steering system analysis circuit structured to analyze buffered detection values relative to specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a steering system performance parameter comprising: a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between a second detection value of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; and a signal evaluation circuit structured to obtain at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location corresponding to a second detected value and analyze the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location relative to buffered detection values, specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a steering system performance parameter; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to at the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location and the steering system performance parameter.
An example system for estimating a health parameter a pump performance parameter includes a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values from a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors; a data storage circuit structured to store specifications, system geometry, and anticipated state information for the pump and pump components associated with the detection values, store historical pump performance and buffer the plurality of detection values for a predetermined length of time; a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal based on a first detected value of the plurality of detection values; a pump analysis circuit structured to analyze buffered detection values relative to specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a pump performance parameter comprising: a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between a second detection value of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; and a signal evaluation circuit structured to obtain at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location corresponding to a second detected value and analyze the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location relative to buffered detection values, specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a pump performance parameter; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to at the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location and the pump performance parameter, wherein the pump is one of a water pump in a car and a mineral pump.
An example system for estimating a drill performance parameter for a drilling machine, includes: a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values from a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors; a data storage circuit structured to store specifications, system geometry, and anticipated state information for the drill and drill components associated with the detection values, store historical drill performance and buffer the plurality of detection values for a predetermined length of time; a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal based on a first detected value of the plurality of detection values; a drill analysis circuit structured to analyze buffered detection values relative to specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a drill performance parameter comprising: a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between a second detection value of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; and a signal evaluation circuit structured to obtain at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location corresponding to a second detected value and analyze the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location relative to buffered detection values, specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a drill performance parameter; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to at the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location and the drill performance parameter, wherein the drilling machine is one of an oil drilling machine and a gas drilling machine.
An example system for estimating a conveyor health parameter, includes: a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values from a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors; a data storage circuit structured to store specifications, system geometry, and anticipated state information for a conveyor and conveyor components associated with the detection values, store historical conveyor performance and buffer the plurality of detection values for a predetermined length of time; a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal based on a first detected value of the plurality of detection values; a conveyor analysis circuit structured to analyze buffered detection values relative to specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a conveyor performance parameter comprising: a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between a second detection value of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; and a signal evaluation circuit structured to obtain at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location corresponding to a second detected value and analyze the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location relative to buffered detection values, specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a conveyor performance parameter; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to at the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location and the conveyor performance parameter.
An example system for estimating an agitator health parameter, includes: a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values from a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors; a data storage circuit structured to store specifications, system geometry, and anticipated state information for an agitator and agitator components associated with the detection values, store historical agitator performance and buffer the plurality of detection values for a predetermined length of time; a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal based on a first detected value of the plurality of detection values; an agitator analysis circuit structured to analyze buffered detection values relative to specifications and anticipated state information resulting in an agitator performance parameter comprising: a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between a second detection value of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; and a signal evaluation circuit structured to obtain at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location corresponding to a second detected value and analyze the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location relative to buffered detection values, specifications and anticipated state information resulting in an agitator performance parameter; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to at the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location and the agitator performance parameter, wherein the agitator is one of a rotating tank mixer, a large tank mixer, a portable tank mixers, a tote tank mixer, a drum mixer, a mounted mixer and a propeller mixer.
An example system for estimating a compressor health parameter, includes: a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values from a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors; a data storage circuit structured to store specifications, system geometry, and anticipated state information for a compressor and compressor components associated with the detection values, store historical compressor performance and buffer the plurality of detection values for a predetermined length of time; a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal based on a first detected value of the plurality of detection values; a compressor analysis circuit structured to analyze buffered detection values relative to specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a compressor performance parameter comprising: a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between a second detection value of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; and a signal evaluation circuit structured to obtain at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location corresponding to a second detected value and analyze the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location relative to buffered detection values, specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a compressor performance parameter; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to at the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location and the compressor performance parameter.
An example system for estimating an air conditioner health parameter, includes: a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values from a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors; a data storage circuit structured to store specifications, system geometry, and anticipated state information for an air conditioner and air conditioner components associated with the detection values, store historical air conditioner performance and buffer the plurality of detection values for a predetermined length of time; a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal based on a first detected value of the plurality of detection values; an air conditioner analysis circuit structured to analyze buffered detection values relative to specifications and anticipated state information resulting in an air conditioner performance parameter comprising: a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between a second detection value of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; and a signal evaluation circuit structured to obtain at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location corresponding to a second detected value and analyze the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location relative to buffered detection values, specifications and anticipated state information resulting in an air conditioner performance parameter; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to at the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location and the air conditioner performance parameter.
An example system for estimating a centrifuge health parameter, includes: a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values from a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors; a data storage circuit structured to store specifications, system geometry, and anticipated state information for a centrifuge and centrifuge components associated with the detection values, store historical centrifuge performance and buffer the plurality of detection values for a predetermined length of time; a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal based on a first detected value of the plurality of detection values; a centrifuge analysis circuit structured to analyze buffered detection values relative to specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a centrifuge performance parameter comprising: a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between a second detection value of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; and a signal evaluation circuit structured to obtain at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location corresponding to a second detected value and analyze the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location relative to buffered detection values, specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a centrifuge performance parameter; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to at the at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location and the centrifuge performance parameter.
In embodiments, information about the health of a component or piece of industrial equipment may be obtained by comparing the values of multiple signals at the same point in a process. This may be accomplished by aligning a signal relative to other related data signals, timers, or reference signals. An embodiment of a data monitoring device 8700, 8718 is shown in
The data monitoring device may include a plurality of sensors 8706 communicatively coupled to a controller 8702. The plurality of sensors 8706 may be wired to ports on the data acquisition circuit 8704. The plurality of sensors 8706 may be wirelessly connected to the data acquisition circuit 8704 which may be able to access detection values corresponding to the output of at least one of the plurality of sensors 8706 where the sensors 8706 may be capturing data on different operational aspects of a piece of equipment or an operating component. In embodiments, as illustrated in
The selection of the plurality of sensors 87068724 for connection to a data monitoring device 87008718 designed for a specific component or piece of equipment may depend on a variety of considerations such as accessibility for installing new sensors, incorporation of sensors in the initial design, anticipated operational and failure conditions, resolution desired at various positions in a process or plant, reliability of the sensors, and the like. The impact of a failure, time response of a failure (e.g., warning time and/or off-nominal modes occurring before failure), likelihood of failure, and/or sensitivity required and/or difficulty to detect failed conditions may drive the extent to which a component or piece of equipment is monitored with more sensors and/or higher capability sensors being dedicated to systems where unexpected or undetected failure would be costly or have severe consequences.
The signal evaluation circuit 8708 may process the detection values to obtain information about a component or piece of equipment being monitored. Information extracted by the signal evaluation circuit 8708 may comprise information regarding what point or time in a process corresponds with a detection value where the point in time is based on a timing signal generated by the timer circuit 8714. The start of the timing signal may be generated by detecting an edge of a control signal such as a rising edge, falling edge or both where the control signal may be associated with the start of a process. The start of the timing signal may be triggered by an initial movement of a component or piece of equipment. The start of the timing signal may be triggered by an initial flow through a pipe or opening or by a flow achieving a predetermined rate. The start of the timing signal may be triggered by a state value indicating a process has commenced—for example the state of a switch, button, data value provided to indicate the process has commenced, or the like. Information extracted may comprise information regarding a difference in phase, determined by the phase detection circuit 8712, between a stream of detection value and the time signal generated by the timer circuit 8714. Information extracted may comprise information regarding a difference in phase between one stream of detection values and a second stream of detection values where the first stream of detection values is used as a basis or trigger for a timing signal generated by the timer circuit.
Depending on the type of equipment, the component being measured, the environment in which the equipment is operating and the like, sensors 87068724 may comprise one or more of, without limitation, a thermometer, a hygrometer, a voltage sensor, a current sensor, an accelerometer, a velocity detector, a light or electromagnetic sensor (e.g., determining temperature, composition and/or spectral analysis, and/or object position or movement), an image sensor, a displacement sensor, a turbidity meter, a viscosity meter, a load sensor, a tri-axial sensor, a tachometer, a fluid pressure meter, an air flow meter, a horsepower meter, a flow rate meter, a fluid particle detector, an acoustical sensor, a pH sensor, and the like.
The sensors 87068724 may provide a stream of data over time that has a phase component, such as acceleration or vibration, allowing for the evaluation of phase or frequency analysis of different operational aspects of a piece of equipment or an operating component. The sensors 87068724 may provide a stream of data that is not phase based such as temperature, humidity, load, and the like. The sensors 87068724 may provide a continuous or near continuous stream of data over time, periodic readings, event-driven readings, and/or readings according to a selected interval or schedule.
In embodiments, as illustrated in
The response circuit 8710 may further comprise evaluating the results of the signal evaluation circuit 8708 and, based on certain criteria, initiating an action. The criteria may include a sensor's detection values at certain frequencies or phases relative to the timer signal where the frequencies or phases of interest may be based on the equipment geometry, equipment control schemes, system input, historical data, current operating conditions, and/or an anticipated response. Criteria may include a predetermined maximum or minimum value for a detection value from a specific sensor, a cumulative value of a sensor's corresponding detection value over time, a change in value, a rate of change in value, and/or an accumulated value (e.g., a time spent above/below a threshold value, a weighted time spent above/below one or more threshold values, and/or an area of the detected value above/below one or more threshold values). The criteria may comprise combinations of data from different sensors such as relative values, relative changes in value, relative rates of change in value, relative values over time, and the like. The relative criteria may change with other data or information such as process stage, type of product being processed, type of equipment, ambient temperature and humidity, external vibrations from other equipment, and the like.
Certain embodiments are described herein as detected values exceeding thresholds or predetermined values, but detected values may also fall below thresholds or predetermined values—for example where an amount of change in the detected value is expected to occur, but detected values indicate that the change may not have occurred. For example, and without limitation, vibrational data may indicate system agitation levels, properly operating equipment, or the like, and vibrational data below amplitude and/or frequency thresholds may be an indication of a process that is not operating according to expectations. Except where the context clearly indicates otherwise, any description herein describing a determination of a value above a threshold and/or exceeding a predetermined or expected value is understood to include determination of a value below a threshold and/or falling below a predetermined or expected value.
The predetermined acceptable range may be based on anticipated system response or vibration based on the equipment geometry and control scheme such as number of bearings, relative rotational speed, influx of power to the system at a certain frequency, and the like. The predetermined acceptable range may also be based on long term analysis of detection values across a plurality of similar equipment and components and correlation of data with equipment failure.
In some embodiments, an alert may be issued based on the some of the criteria discussed above. In an illustrative example, an increase in temperature and energy at certain frequencies may indicate a hot bearing that is starting to fail. In embodiments, the relative criteria for an alarm may change with other data or information such as process stage, type of product being processed on equipment, ambient temperature and humidity, external vibrations from other equipment and the like. In an illustrative and non-limiting example, the response circuit 8710 may initiate an alert if a vibrational amplitude and/or frequency exceeds a predetermined maximum value, if there is a change or rate of change that exceeds a predetermined acceptable range, and/or if an accumulated value based on vibrational amplitude and/or frequency exceeds a threshold.
In embodiments, response circuit 8710 may cause the data acquisition circuit 8704 to enable or disable the processing of detection values corresponding to certain sensors based on the some of the criteria discussed above. This may include switching to sensors having different response rates, sensitivity, ranges, and the like; accessing new sensors or types of sensors, and the like. This switching may be implemented by changing the control signals for a multiplexer circuit 8736 and/or by turning on or off certain input sections of the multiplexer circuit 8736. The response circuit 8710 may make recommendations for the replacement of certain sensors in the future with sensors having different response rates, sensitivity, ranges, and the like. The response circuit 8710 may recommend design alterations for future embodiments of the component, the piece of equipment, the operating conditions, the process, and the like.
In embodiments, the response circuit 8710 may recommend maintenance at an upcoming process stop or initiate a maintenance call. The response circuit 8710 may recommend changes in process or operating parameters to remotely balance the piece of equipment. In embodiments, the response circuit 8710 may implement or recommend process changes—for example to lower the utilization of a component that is near a maintenance interval, operating off-nominally, or failed for purpose but still at least partially operational. In an illustrative example, vibration phase information, derived by the phase detection circuit 8712 relative to a timer signal from the timer circuit 8714, may be indicative of a physical location of a problem. Based on the vibration phase information, system design flaws, off-nominal operation, and/or component or process failures may be identified.
In embodiments, based on relevant operating conditions and/or failure modes which may occur in as sensor values approach one or more criteria, the signal evaluation circuit 8708 may store data in the data storage circuit 8716 based on the fit of data relative to one or more criteria. Based on one sensor input meeting or approaching specified criteria or range, the signal evaluation circuit 8708 may store additional data such as RPMs, component loads, temperatures, pressures, vibrations in the data storage circuit 8716. The signal evaluation circuit 8708 may store data at a higher data rate for greater granularity in future processing, the ability to reprocess at different sampling rates, and/or to enable diagnosing or post-processing of system information where operational data of interest is flagged, and the like.
In embodiments, as shown in
In embodiments, as shown in
In embodiments as illustrated in
In embodiments, a monitoring application 8776 on a remote server 8774 may receive and store one or more of detection values, timing signals and data coming from a plurality of the various monitoring devices 8768. The monitoring application 8776 may then select subsets of the detection values, timing signals and data to be jointly analyzed. Subsets for analysis may be selected based on a single type of component or a single type of equipment in which a component is operating. Subsets for analysis may be selected or grouped based on common operating conditions such as size of load, operational condition (e.g., intermittent, continuous, process stage), operating speed or tachometer, common ambient environmental conditions such as humidity, temperature, air or fluid particulate, and the like. Subsets for analysis may be selected based on the effects of other nearby equipment such as nearby machines rotating at similar frequencies.
The monitoring application 8776 may then analyze the selected subset. In an illustrative example, data from a single component may be analyzed over different time periods such as one operating cycle, several operating cycles, a month, a year, the life of the component or the like. Data from multiple components of the same type may also be analyzed over different time periods. Trends in the data such as changes in frequency or amplitude may be correlated with failure and maintenance records associated with the same or a related component or piece of equipment. Trends in the data such as changing rates of change associated with start-up or different points in the process may be identified. Additional data may be introduced into the analysis such as output product quality, indicated success or failure of a process, and the like. Correlation of trends and values for different types of data may be analyzed to identify those parameters whose short-term analysis might provide the best prediction regarding expected performance. This information may be transmitted back to the monitoring device to update types of data collected and analyzed locally or to influence the design of future monitoring devices.
In an illustrative and non-limiting example, a monitoring device 8768 may be used to collect and process sensor data to measure mechanical torque. The monitoring device 8768 may be in communication with or include a high resolution, high speed vibration sensor to collect data over a period of time sufficient to measure multiple cycles of rotation. For gear driven components, the sampling resolution of the sensor should be such that the number of samples taken per cycle is at least equal to the number of gear teeth driving the component. It will be understood that a lower sampling resolution may also be utilized, which may result in a lower confidence determination and/or taking data over a longer period of time to develop sufficient statistical confidence. This data may then be used in the generation of a phase reference (relative probe) or tachometer signal for a piece of equipment. This phase reference may be used directly or used by the timer circuit 8714 to generate a timing signal to align phase data such as vibrational data or acceleration data from multiple sensors located at different positions on a component or on different components within a system. This information may facilitate the determination of torque for different components or the generation of an Operational Deflection Shape (ODS).
A higher resolution data stream may also provide additional data for the detection of transitory signals in low speed operations. The identification of transitory signals may enable the identification of defects in a piece of equipment or component operating a low RPMs.
In an illustrative and non-limiting example, the monitoring device may be used to identify mechanical jitter for use in failure prediction models. The monitoring device may begin acquiring data when the piece of equipment starts up, through ramping up to operating speed, and then during operation. Once at operating speed, it is anticipated that the torsional jitter should be minimal or within expected ranges, and changes in torsion during this phase may be indicative of cracks, bearing faults, and the like. Additionally, known torsions may be removed from the signal to facilitate in the identification of unanticipated torsions resulting from system design flaws, component wear, or unexpected process events. Having phase information associated with the data collected at operating speed may facilitate identification of a location of vibration and potential component wear, and/or may be further correlated to a type of failure for a component. Relative phase information for a plurality of sensors located throughout a machine may facilitate the evaluation of torsion as it is propagated through a piece of equipment.
In embodiments, the monitoring application 8776 may have access to equipment specifications, equipment geometry, component specifications, component materials, anticipated state information for plurality of component types, operational history, historical detection values, component life models, and the like for use in analyzing the selected subset using rule-based or model-based analysis. In embodiments, the monitoring application 8776 may feed a neural net with the selected subset to learn to recognize various operating state, health states (e.g., lifetime predictions) and fault states utilizing deep learning techniques. In embodiments, a hybrid of the two techniques (model-based learning and deep learning) may be used.
In an illustrative and non-limiting example, component health of: conveyors and lifters in an assembly line; water pumps on industrial vehicles; factory air conditioning units; drilling machines, screw drivers, compressors, pumps, gearboxes, vibrating conveyors, mixers and motors situated in the oil and gas fields; factory mineral pumps; centrifuges, and refining tanks situated in oil and gas refineries; and compressors in gas handling systems may be monitored using the phase detection and alignment techniques, data monitoring devices and data collection systems described herein.
In an illustrative and non-limiting example, the component health of equipment to promote chemical reactions deployed in chemical and pharmaceutical production lines (e.g. rotating tank/mixer agitators, mechanical/rotating agitators, and propeller agitators) may be evaluated using the phase detection and alignment techniques, data monitoring devices and data collection systems described herein.
In an illustrative and non-limiting example, the component health of vehicle steering mechanisms and/or vehicle engines may be evaluated using the phase detection and alignment techniques, data monitoring devices and data collection systems described herein.
An example monitoring system for data collection, includes a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit; a signal evaluation circuit comprising: a timer circuit structured to generate at least one timing signal; and a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between at least one of the plurality of detection values and at least one of the timing signals from the timer circuit; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to the relative phase difference. In certain further embodiments, an example system includes:
wherein the at least one operation is further in response to at least one of: a change in amplitude of at least one of the plurality of detection values; a change in frequency or relative phase of at least one of the plurality of detection values; a rate of change in both amplitude and relative phase of at least one the plurality of detection values; and a relative rate of change in amplitude and relative phase of at least one the plurality of detection values; wherein the at least one operation comprises issuing an alert; wherein the alert may be one of haptic, audible and visual; a data storage circuit, wherein the relative phase difference and at least one of the detection values and the timing signal are stored; wherein the at least one operation further comprises storing additional data in the data storage circuit; wherein the storing additional data in the data storage circuit is further in response to at least one of: a change in the relative phase difference and a relative rate of change in the relative phase difference; wherein the data acquisition circuit further comprises at least one multiplexer circuit (MUX) whereby alternative combinations of detection values may be selected based on at least one of user input and a selected operating parameter for a machine, wherein each of the plurality of detection values corresponds to at least one of the input sensors; wherein the at least one operation comprises enabling or disabling one or more portions of the multiplexer circuit, or altering the multiplexer control lines; wherein the data acquisition circuit comprises at least two multiplexer circuits and the at least one operation comprises changing connections between the at least two multiplexer circuits; and/or the system further comprising a MUX control circuit structured to interpret a subset of the plurality of detection values and provide the logical control of the MUX and the correspondence of MUX input and detected values as a result, wherein the logic control of the MUX comprises adaptive scheduling of the select lines.
An example system for data collection, includes: a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit; a signal evaluation circuit comprising: a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal based on a first detected value of the plurality of detection values; and a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between a second detection value of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; and a phase response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to the phase difference. In certain further embodiments, an example system includes wherein the at least one operation is further in response to at least one of: a change in amplitude of at least one of the plurality of detection values; a change in frequency or relative phase of at least one of the plurality of detection values; a rate of change in both amplitude and relative phase of at least one the plurality of detection values and a relative rate of change in amplitude and relative phase of at least one the plurality of detection values; wherein the at least one operation comprises issuing an alert; wherein the alert may be one of haptic, audible and visual; where the system, further includes a data storage circuit; wherein the relative phase difference and at least one of the detection values and the timing signal are stored; wherein the at least one operation further includes storing additional data in the data storage circuit; wherein the storing additional data in the data storage circuit is further in response to at least one of: a change in the relative phase difference and a relative rate of change in the relative phase difference; wherein the data acquisition circuit further includes at least one multiplexer (MUX) circuit whereby alternative combinations of detection values may be selected based on at least one of user input and a selected operating parameter for a machine; wherein each of the plurality of detection values corresponds to at least one of the input sensors; wherein the at least one operation comprises enabling or disabling one or more portions of the multiplexer circuit, or altering the multiplexer control lines; wherein the data acquisition circuit comprises at least two multiplexer circuits and the at least one operation comprises changing connections between the at least two multiplexer circuits; where the system further comprising a MUX control circuit structured to interpret a subset of the plurality of detection values and provide the logical control of the MUX and the correspondence of MUX input and detected values as a result; and/or wherein the logic control of the MUX comprises adaptive scheduling of the select lines.
An example system for data collection, processing, and utilization of signals in an industrial environment includes a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit; a signal evaluation circuit comprising: a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal based on a first detected value of the plurality of detection values; and a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between a second detection value of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; a data storage facility for storing a subset of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; a communication circuit structured to communicate at least one selected detection value and the timing signal to a remote server; and a monitoring application on the remote server structured to receive the at least one selected detection value and the timing signal; jointly analyze a subset of the detection values received from the plurality of monitoring devices; and recommend an action. In certain embodiments, the example system further includes wherein joint analysis comprises using the timing signal from each of the plurality of monitoring devices to align the detection values from the plurality of monitoring devices and/or wherein the subset of detection values is selected based on data associated with a detection value comprising at least one: common type of component, common type of equipment, and common operating conditions.
An example system for data collection in an industrial environment, includes: a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit, the data acquisition circuit comprising a multiplexer circuit whereby alternative combinations of the detection values may be selected based on at least one of user input, a detected state and a selected operating parameter for a machine, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input sensors; a signal evaluation circuit comprising: a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal; and a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between at least one of the plurality of detection values and a signal from the timer circuit; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to the phase difference.
An example monitoring system for data collection in a piece of equipment, includes a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit; a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal based on a first detected value of the plurality of detection values; a signal evaluation circuit structured to obtain at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location corresponding to a second detected value comprising: a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between a second detection value of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to at the at least one of the vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location.
A monitoring system for bearing analysis in an industrial environment, the monitoring device includes: a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of a plurality of input sensors communicatively coupled to the data acquisition circuit; a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal a data storage for storing specifications and anticipated state information for a plurality of bearing types and buffering the plurality of detection values for a predetermined length of time; a timer circuit structured to generate a timing signal based on a first detected value of the plurality of detection values; a bearing analysis circuit structured to analyze buffered detection values relative to specifications and anticipated state information resulting in a life prediction comprising: a phase detection circuit structured to determine a relative phase difference between a second detection value of the plurality of detection values and the timing signal; a signal evaluation circuit structured to obtain at least one of vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location corresponding to a second detected value: and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to at the at least one of the vibration amplitude, vibration frequency and vibration phase location.
In embodiments, information about the health or other status or state information of or regarding a component or piece of industrial equipment may be obtained by monitoring the condition of various components throughout a process. Monitoring may include monitoring the amplitude of a sensor signal measuring attributes such as temperature, humidity, acceleration, displacement and the like. An embodiment of a data monitoring device 9000 is shown in
The plurality of sensors 9006 may be wired to ports on the data acquisition circuit 9004. The plurality of sensors 9006 may be wirelessly connected to the data acquisition circuit 9004. The data acquisition circuit 9004 may be able to access detection values corresponding to the output of at least one of the plurality of sensors 9006 where the sensors 9006 may be capturing data on different operational aspects of a piece of equipment or an operating component.
The selection of the plurality of sensors 9006 for a data monitoring device 9000 designed for a specific component or piece of equipment may depend on a variety of considerations such as accessibility for installing new sensors, incorporation of sensors in the initial design, anticipated operational and failure conditions, resolution desired at various positions in a process or plant, reliability of the sensors, power availability, power utilization, storage utilization, and the like. The impact of a failure, time response of a failure (e.g., warning time and/or off-optimal modes occurring before failure), likelihood of failure, extent of impact of failure, and/or sensitivity required and/or difficulty to detection failure conditions may drive the extent to which a component or piece of equipment is monitored with more sensors and/or higher capability sensors being dedicated to systems where unexpected or undetected failure would be costly or have severe consequences.
The signal evaluation circuit 9008 may process the detection values to obtain information about a component or piece of equipment being monitored. Information extracted by the signal evaluation circuit 9008 may comprise information regarding a peak value of a signal such as a peak temperature, peak acceleration, peak velocity, peak pressure, peak weight bearing, peak strain, peak bending, or peak displacement. The peak detection may be done using analog or digital circuits. In embodiments, the peak detection circuit 9012 may be able to distinguish between “local” or short term peaks in a stream of detection values and a “global” or longer term peak. In embodiments, the peak detection circuit 9012 may be able to identify peak shapes (not just a single peak value) such as flat tops, asymptotic approaches, discrete jumps in the peak value or rapid/steep climbs in peak value, sinusoidal behavior within ranges and the like. Flat topped peaks may indicate saturation at of a sensor. Asymptotic approaches to a peak may indicate linear system behavior. Discrete jumps in value or steep changes in peak value may indicate quantized or nonlinear behavior of either the sensor doing the measurement or the behavior of the component. In embodiments, the system may be able to identify sinusoidal variations in the peak value within an envelope, such as an envelope established by line or curve connecting a series of peak values. It should be noted that references to “peaks” should be understood to encompass one or more “valleys,” representing a series of low points in measurement, except where context indicates otherwise.
In embodiments, a peak value may be used as a reference for an analog-to-digital conversion circuit 9014.
In an illustrative and non-limiting example, a temperature probe may measure the temperature of a gear as it rotates in a machine. The peak temperature may be detected by a peak detection circuit 9012. The peak temperature may be fed into an analog-to-digital converter circuit 9014 to appropriately scale a stream of detection values corresponding to temperature readings of the gear as it rotates in a machine. The phase of the stream of detection values corresponding to temperature relative to an orientation of the gear may be determined by the phase detection circuit 9016. Knowing where in the rotation of the gear a peak temperature is occurring may allow the identification of a bad gear tooth.
In some embodiments, two or more sets of detection values may be fused to create detection values for a virtual sensor. A peak detection circuit may be used to verify consistency in timing of peak values between at least one of the two or more sets of detection values and the detection values for the virtual sensor.
In embodiments, the signal evaluation circuit 9008 may be able to reset the peak detection circuit 9012 upon start-up of the monitoring device 9000, upon edge detection of a control signal of the system being monitored, based on a user input, after a system error and the like. In embodiments, the signal evaluation circuit 9008 may discard an initial portion of the output of the peak detection circuit 9012 prior to using the peak value as a reference value for an analog-to-digital conversion circuit to allow the system to fully come on line.
Depending on the type of equipment, the component being measured, the environment in which the equipment is operating and the like, sensors 9006 may comprise one or more of, without limitation, a vibration sensor, a thermometer, a hygrometer, a voltage sensor, a current sensor, an accelerometer, a velocity detector, a light or electromagnetic sensor (e.g. determining temperature, composition and/or spectral analysis, and/or object position or movement), an image sensor, a structured light sensor, a laser-based image sensor, an acoustic wave sensor, a displacement sensor, a turbidity meter, a viscosity meter, a load sensor, a tri-axial sensor, an accelerometer, a tachometer, a fluid pressure meter, an air flow meter, a horsepower meter, a flow rate meter, a fluid particle detector, an acoustical sensor, a pH sensor, and the like, including, without limitation, any of the sensors described throughout this disclosure and the documents incorporated by reference.
The sensors 9006 may provide a stream of data over time that has a phase component, such as relating to acceleration or vibration, allowing for the evaluation of phase or frequency analysis of different operational aspects of a piece of equipment or an operating component. The sensors 9006 may provide a stream of data that is not conventionally phase-based, such as temperature, humidity, load, and the like. The sensors 9006 may provide a continuous or near continuous stream of data over time, periodic readings, event-driven readings, and/or readings according to a selected interval or schedule.
In embodiments, as illustrated in
In embodiments, the response circuit 9710 may initiate a variety of actions based on the sensor status provided by the overload detection circuit 9712. The response circuit 9710 may continue using the sensor if the sensor status is “sensor healthy.” The response circuit 9710 may adjust a sensor scaling value (e.g., from 100 mV/gram to 10 mV/gram). The response circuit 9710 may increase an acquisition range for an alternate sensor. The response circuit 9710 may back sensor data out of previous calculations and evaluations such as bearing analysis, torsional analysis and the like. The response circuit 9710 may use projected or anticipated data (based on data acquired prior to overload/failure) in place of the actual sensor data for calculations and evaluations such as bearing analysis, torsional analysis and the like. The response circuit 9710 may issue an alarm. The response circuit 9710 may issue an alert that may comprise notification that the sensor is out of range together with information regarding the extent of the overload such as “overload range—data response may not be reliable and/or linear”, “destructive range—sensor may be damaged,” and the like. The response circuit 9710 may issue an alert where the alert may comprise information regarding the effect of sensor load such as “unable to monitor machine health” due to sensor overload/failure,” and the like.
In embodiments, the response circuit 9710 may cause the data acquisition circuit 9704 to enable or disable the processing of detection values corresponding to certain sensors based on the sensor statues described above. This may include switching to sensors having different response rates, sensitivity, ranges, and the like; accessing new sensors or types of sensors, accessing data from multiple sensors, recruiting additional data collectors (such as routing the collectors to a point of work, using routing methods and systems disclosed throughout this disclosure and the documents incorporated by reference) and the like. Switching may be undertaken based on a model, a set of rules, or the like. In embodiments, switching may be under control of a machine learning system, such that switching is controlled based on one or more metrics of success, combined with input data, over a set of trials, which may occur under supervision of a human supervisor or under control of an automated system. Switching may involve switching from one input port to another (such as to switch from one sensor to another). Switching may involve altering the multiplexing of data, such as combining different streams under different circumstances. Switching may involve activating a system to obtain additional data, such as moving a mobile system (such as a robotic or drone system), to a location where different or additional data is available (such as positioning an image sensor for a different view or positioning a sonar sensor for a different direction of collection) or to a location where different sensors can be accessed (such as moving a collector to connect up to a sensor that is disposed at a location in an environment by a wired or wireless connection). This switching may be implemented by changing the control signals for a multiplexor circuit 9731 and/or by turning on or off certain input sections of the multiplexor circuit 9731.
In embodiments, the response circuit 9710 may make recommendations for the replacement of certain sensors in the future with sensors having different response rates, sensitivity, ranges, and the like. The response circuit 9710 may recommend design alterations for future embodiments of the component, the piece of equipment, the operating conditions, the process, and the like.
In embodiments, the response circuit 9710 may recommend maintenance at an upcoming process stop or initiate a maintenance call where the maintenance may include the replacement of the sensor with the same or an alternate type of sensor having a different response rate, sensitivity, range and the like. In embodiments, the response circuit 9710 may implement or recommend process changes—for example to lower the utilization of a component that is near a maintenance interval, operating off-nominally, or failed for purpose but still at least partially operational, to change the operating speed of a component (such as to put it in a lower-demand mode), to initiate amelioration of an issue (such as to signal for additional lubrication of a roller bearing set, or to signal for an alignment process for a system that is out of balance), and the like.
In embodiments, the signal evaluation circuit 9708 and/or the response circuit 9710 may periodically store certain detection values in the data storage circuit 9716 to enable the tracking of component performance over time. In embodiments, based on sensor status, as described elsewhere herein recently measured sensor data and related operating conditions such as RPMs, component loads, temperatures, pressures, vibrations or other sensor data of the types described throughout this disclosure in the data storage circuit 9716 to enable the backing out of overloaded/failed sensor data. The signal evaluation circuit 9708 may store data at a higher data rate for greater granularity in future processing, the ability to reprocess at different sampling rates, and/or to enable diagnosing or post-processing of system information where operational data of interest is flagged, and the like.
In embodiments as shown in
In embodiments, as shown in
In embodiments, as illustrated in
In embodiments, as shown in
The monitoring application 9736 may select subsets of the detection values to be jointly analyzed. Subsets for analysis may be selected based on a single type of sensor, component or a single type of equipment in which a component is operating. Subsets for analysis may be selected or grouped based on common operating conditions such as size of load, operational condition (e.g., intermittent, continuous), operating speed or tachometer, common ambient environmental conditions such as humidity, temperature, air or fluid particulate, and the like. Subsets for analysis may be selected based on the effects of other nearby equipment such as nearby machines rotating at similar frequencies, nearby equipment producing electromagnetic fields, nearby equipment producing heat, nearby equipment inducing movement or vibration, nearby equipment emitting vapors, chemicals or particulates, or other potentially interfering or intervening effects.
In embodiments, the monitoring application 9736 may analyze the selected subset. In an illustrative example, data from a single sensor may be analyzed over different time periods such as one operating cycle, several operating cycles, a month, a year, the life of the component or the like. Data from multiple sensors of a common type measuring a common component type may also be analyzed over different time periods. Trends in the data such as changing rates of change associated with start-up or different points in the process may be identified. Correlation of trends and values for different sensors may be analyzed to identify those parameters whose short-term analysis might provide the best prediction regarding expected sensor performance. This information may be transmitted back to the monitoring device to update sensor models, sensor selection, sensor range, sensor scaling, sensor sampling frequency, types of data collected and analyzed locally or to influence the design of future monitoring devices.
In embodiments, the monitoring application 9736 may have access to equipment specifications, equipment geometry, component specifications, component materials, anticipated state information for a plurality of sensors, operational history, historical detection values, sensor life models and the like for use analyzing the selected subset using rule-based or model-based analysis. The monitoring application 9736 may provide recommendations regarding sensor selection, additional data to collect, or data to store with sensor data. The monitoring application 9736 may provide recommendations regarding scheduling repairs and/or maintenance. The monitoring application 9736 may provide recommendations regarding replacing a sensor. The replacement sensor may match the sensor being replaced or the replacement sensor may have a different range, sensitivity, sampling frequency and the like.
In embodiments, the monitoring application 9736 may include a remote learning circuit structured to analyze sensor status data (e.g., sensor overload, sensor faults, sensor failure) together with data from other sensors, failure data on components being monitored, equipment being monitored, product being produced, and the like. The remote learning system may identify correlations between sensor overload and data from other sensors.
Clause 1: In embodiments, a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment, the monitoring system comprising: a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of a plurality of input sensors; a data storage circuit structured to store sensor specifications, anticipated state information and detected values; a signal evaluation circuit comprising: an overload identification circuit structured to determine a sensor overload status of at least one sensor in response to the plurality of detection values and at least one of anticipated state information and sensor specification; a sensor fault detection circuit structured to determine one of a sensor fault status and a sensor validity status of at least one sensor in response to the plurality of detection values and at least one of anticipated state information and sensor specification; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to one of a sensor overload status, a sensor health status, and a sensor validity status. A monitoring system of clause 1, the system further comprising a mobile data collector for collecting data from the plurality of input sensors. 3. The monitoring system of clause 1, wherein the at least one operation comprises issuing an alert or an alarm. 4. The monitoring system of clause 1, wherein the at least one operation further comprises storing additional data in the data storage circuit. 5. The monitoring system of clause 1, the system further comprising a multiplexor (MUX) circuit. 6. The monitoring system of clause 5, wherein the at least one operation comprises at least one of enabling or disabling one or more portions of the multiplexer circuit and altering the multiplexer control lines. 7. The monitoring system of clause 5, the system further comprising at least two multiplexer (MUX) circuits and the at least one operation comprises changing connections between the at least two multiplexer circuits. 8. The monitoring system of clause 7, the system further comprising a MUX control circuit structured to interpret a subset of the plurality of detection values and provide the logical control of the MUX and the correspondence of MUX input and detected values as a result, wherein the logic control of the MUX comprises adaptive scheduling of the multiplexer control lines. 9. A system for data collection, processing, and component analysis in an industrial environment comprising: a plurality of monitoring devices, each monitoring device comprising: a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of a plurality of input sensors; a data storage for storing specifications and anticipated state information for a plurality of sensor types and buffering the plurality of detection values for a predetermined length of time; a signal evaluation circuit comprising: an overload identification circuit structured to determine a sensor overload status of at least one sensor in response to the plurality of detection values and at least one of anticipated state information and sensor specification; a sensor fault detection circuit structured to determine one of a sensor fault status and a sensor validity status of at least one sensor in response to the plurality of detection values and at least one of anticipated state information and sensor specification; and a response circuit structured to perform at least one operation in response to one of a sensor overload status, a sensor health status, and a sensor validity status; a communication circuit structured to communicate with a remote server providing one of the sensor overload status, the sensor health status, and the sensor validity status and a portion of the buffered detection values to the remote server; and a monitoring application on the remote server structured to: receive the at least one selected detection value and one of the sensor overload status, the sensor health status, and the sensor validity status; jointly analyze a subset of the detection values received from the plurality of monitoring devices; and recommend an action. 10. The system of clause 9, with at least one of the monitoring devices further comprising a mobile data collector for collecting data from the plurality of input sensors. 11. The system of clause 9, wherein the at least one operation comprises issuing an alert or an alarm. 12. The monitoring system of clause 9, wherein the at least one operation further comprises storing additional data in the data storage circuit. 13. The system of clause 9, with at least one of the monitoring devices further comprising further comprising a multiplexor (MUX) circuit. 14. The system of clause 13, wherein the at least one operation comprises at least one of enabling or disabling one or more portions of the multiplexer circuit and altering the multiplexer control lines. 15. The system of clause 9, at least one of the monitoring devices further comprising at least two multiplexer (MUX) circuits and the at least one operation comprises changing connections between the at least two multiplexer circuits. 16. The monitoring system of clause 15, the system further comprising a MUX control circuit structured to interpret a subset of the plurality of detection values and provide the logical control of the MUX and the correspondence of MUX input and detected values as a result, wherein the logic control of the MUX comprises adaptive scheduling of the multiplexer control lines. 17. The system of clause 9, wherein the monitoring application comprises a remote learning circuit structured to analyze sensor status data together sensor data and identify correlations between sensor overload and data from other systems. 18. The system of clause 9, the monitoring application structured to subset detection values based on one of the sensor overload status, the sensor health status, the sensor validity status, the anticipated life of a sensor associated with detection values, the anticipated type of the equipment associated with detection values, and operational conditions under which detection values were measured. 19. The system of clause 9, wherein the supplemental information comprises one of sensor specification, sensor historic performance, maintenance records, repair records and an anticipated state model. 20. The system of clause 19, wherein the analysis of the subset of detection values comprises feeding a neural net with the subset of detection values and supplemental information to learn to recognize various sensor operating states, health states, life expectancies and fault states utilizing deep learning techniques.
Referring to
In embodiments, the foregoing neural network may be configured to connect with a DAQ instrument and other data collectors that may receive analog signals from one or more sensors. The foregoing neural networks may also be configured to interface with, connect to, or integrate with expert systems that can be local and/or available through one or more cloud networks. In embodiments,
In
In
In
The foregoing neural networks may have a variety of nodes or neurons, which may perform a variety of functions on inputs, such as inputs received from sensors or other data sources, including other nodes. Functions may involve weights, features, feature vectors, and the like. Neurons may include perceptrons, neurons that mimic biological functions (such as of the human senses of touch, vision, taste, hearing, and smell), and the like. Continuous neurons, such as with sigmoidal activation, may be used in the context of various forms of neural net, such as where back propagation is involved.
In many embodiments, an expert system or neural network may be trained, such as by a human operator or supervisor, or based on a data set, model, or the like. Training may include presenting the neural network with one or more training data sets that represent values, such as sensor data, event data, parameter data, and other types of data (including the many types described throughout this disclosure), as well as one or more indicators of an outcome, such as an outcome of a process, an outcome of a calculation, an outcome of an event, an outcome of an activity, or the like. Training may include training in optimization, such as training a neural network to optimize one or more systems based on one or more optimization approaches, such as Bayesian approaches, parametric Bayes classifier approaches, k-nearest-neighbor classifier approaches, iterative approaches, interpolation approaches, Pareto optimization approaches, algorithmic approaches, and the like. Feedback may be provided in a process of variation and selection, such as with a genetic algorithm that evolves one or more solutions based on feedback through a series of rounds.
In embodiments, a plurality of neural networks may be deployed in a cloud platform that receives data streams and other inputs collected (such as by mobile data collectors) in one or more industrial environments and transmitted to the cloud platform over one or more networks, including using network coding to provide efficient transmission. In the cloud platform, optionally using massively parallel computational capability, a plurality of different neural networks of several types (including modular forms, structure-adaptive forms, hybrids, and the like) may be used to undertake prediction, classification, control functions, and provide other outputs as described in connection with expert systems disclosed throughout this disclosure. The different neural networks may be structured to compete with each other (optionally including the use of evolutionary algorithms, genetic algorithms, or the like), such that an appropriate type of neural network, with appropriate input sets, weights, node types and functions, and the like, may be selected, such as by an expert system, for a specific task involved in a given context, workflow, environment process, system, or the like.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a feed forward neural network, which moves information in one direction, such as from a data input, like an analog sensor located on or proximal to an industrial machine, through a series of neurons or nodes, to an output. Data may move from the input nodes to the output nodes, optionally passing through one or more hidden nodes, without loops. In embodiments, feedforward neural networks may be constructed with various types of units, such as binary McCulloch-Pitts neurons, the simplest of which is a perceptron.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a radial basis function (RBF) neural network, which may be preferred in some situations involving interpolation in a multi-dimensional space (such as where interpolation is helpful in optimizing a multi-dimensional function, such as for optimizing a data marketplace as described here, optimizing the efficiency or output of a power generation system, a factory system, or the like, or other situation involving multiple dimensions). In embodiments, each neuron in the RBF neural network stores an example from a training set as a “prototype.” Linearity involved in the functioning of this neural network offers RBF the advantage of not typically suffering from problems with local minima or maxima.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a radial basis function (RBF) neural network, such as one that employs a distance criterion with respect to a center (e.g., a Gaussian function). A radial basis function may be applied as a replacement for a hidden layer (such as a sigmoidal hidden layer transfer) in a multi-layer perceptron. An RBF network may have two layers, such as the case where an input is mapped onto each RBF in a hidden layer. In embodiments, an output layer may comprise a linear combination of hidden layer values representing, for example, a mean predicted output. The output layer value may provide an output that is the same as or similar to that of a regression model in statistics. In classification problems, the output layer may be a sigmoid function of a linear combination of hidden layer values, representing a posterior probability. Performance in both cases is often improved by shrinkage techniques, such as ridge regression in classical statistics. This corresponds to a prior belief in small parameter values (and therefore smooth output functions) in a Bayesian framework. RBF networks may avoid local minima, because the only parameters that are adjusted in the learning process are the linear mapping from hidden layer to output layer. Linearity ensures that the error surface is quadratic and therefore has a single minimum. In regression problems, this can be found in one matrix operation. In classification problems, the fixed non-linearity introduced by the sigmoid output function may be handled using an iteratively re-weighted least squares function or the like.
RBF networks may use kernel methods such as support vector machines (SVM) and Gaussian processes (where the RBF is the kernel function). A non-linear kernel function may be used to project the input data into a space where the learning problem can be solved using a linear model.
In embodiments, an RBF neural network may include an input layer, a hidden layer, and a summation layer. In the input layer, one neuron appears in the input layer for each predictor variable. In the case of categorical variables, N−1 neurons are used, where N is the number of categories. The input neurons may, in embodiments, standardize the value ranges by subtracting the median and dividing by the interquartile range. The input neurons may then feed the values to each of the neurons in the hidden layer. In the hidden layer, a variable number of neurons may be used (determined by the training process). Each neuron may consist of a radial basis function that is centered on a point with as many dimensions as a number of predictor variables. The spread (e.g., radius) of the RBF function may be different for each dimension. The centers and spreads may be determined by training. When presented with a vector of input values from the input layer, a hidden neuron may compute a Euclidean distance of the test case from the neuron's center point and then apply the RBF kernel function to this distance, such as using the spread values. The resulting value may then be passed to the summation layer. In the summation layer, the value coming out of a neuron in the hidden layer may be multiplied by a weight associated with the neuron and may add to the weighted values of other neurons. This sum becomes the output. For classification problems, one output is produced (with a separate set of weights and summation units) for each target category. The value output for a category is the probability that the case being evaluated has that category. In training of an RBF, various parameters may be determined, such as the number of neurons in a hidden layer, the coordinates of the center of each hidden-layer function, the spread of each function in each dimension, and the weights applied to outputs as they pass to the summation layer. Training may be used by clustering algorithms (such as k-means clustering), by evolutionary approaches, and the like.
In embodiments, a recurrent neural network may have a time-varying, real-valued (more than just zero or one) activation (output). Each connection may have a modifiable real-valued weight. Some of the nodes are called labeled nodes, some output nodes, and others hidden nodes. For supervised learning in discrete time settings, training sequences of real-valued input vectors may become sequences of activations of the input nodes, one input vector at a time. At each time step, each non-input unit may compute its current activation as a nonlinear function of the weighted sum of the activations of all units from which it receives connections. The system can explicitly activate (independent of incoming signals) some output units at certain time steps.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a self-organizing neural network, such as a Kohonen self-organizing neural network, such as for visualization of views of data, such as low-dimensional views of high-dimensional data. The self-organizing neural network may apply competitive learning to a set of input data, such as from one or more sensors or other data inputs from or associated with an industrial machine. In embodiments, the self-organizing neural network may be used to identify structures in data, such as unlabeled data, such as in data sensed from a range of vibration, acoustic, or other analog sensors in an industrial environment, where sources of the data are unknown (such as where vibrations may be coming from any of a range of unknown sources). The self-organizing neural network may organize structures or patterns in the data, such that they can be recognized, analyzed, and labeled, such as identifying structures as corresponding to vibrations induced by the movement of a floor, or acoustic signals created by high frequency rotation of a shaft of a somewhat distant machine.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a recurrent neural network, which may allow for a bi-directional flow of data, such as where connected units (e.g., neurons or nodes) form a directed cycle. Such a network may be used to model or exhibit dynamic temporal behavior, such as those involved in dynamic systems including a wide variety of the industrial machines and devices described throughout this disclosure, such as a power generation machine operating at variable speeds or frequencies in variable conditions with variable inputs, a robotic manufacturing system, a refining system, or the like, where dynamic system behavior involves complex interactions that an operator may desire to understand, predict, control and/or optimize. For example, the recurrent neural network may be used to anticipate the state (such as a maintenance state, a fault state, an operational state, or the like), of an industrial machine, such as one performing a dynamic process or action. In embodiments, the recurrent neural network may use internal memory to process a sequence of inputs, such as from other nodes and/or from sensors and other data inputs from the industrial environment, of the various types described herein. In embodiments, the recurrent neural network may also be used for pattern recognition, such as for recognizing an industrial machine based on a sound signature, a heat signature, a set of feature vectors in an image, a chemical signature, or the like. In a non-limiting example, a recurrent neural network may recognize a shift in an operational mode of a turbine, a generator, a motor, a compressor, or the like (such as a gear shift) by learning to classify the shift from a training data set consisting of a stream of data from tri-axial vibration sensors and/or acoustic sensors applied to one or more of such machines.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a modular neural network, which may comprise a series of independent neural networks (such as ones of various types described herein) that are moderated by an intermediary. Each of the independent neural networks in the modular neural network may work with separate inputs, accomplishing subtasks that make up the task the modular network as whole is intended to perform. For example, a modular neural network may comprise a recurrent neural network for pattern recognition, such as to recognize what type of industrial machine is being sensed by one or more sensors that are provided as input channels to the modular network and an RBF neural network for optimizing the behavior of the machine once understood. The intermediary may accept inputs of each of the individual neural networks, process them, and create output for the modular neural network, such an appropriate control parameter, a prediction of state, or the like.
Combinations among any of the pairs, triplets, or larger combinations, of the various neural network types described herein, are encompassed by the present disclosure. This may include combinations where an expert system uses one neural network for recognizing a pattern (e.g., a pattern indicating a problem or fault condition) and a different neural network for self-organizing an activity or workflow based on the recognized pattern (such as providing an output governing autonomous control of a system in response to the recognized condition or pattern). This may also include combinations where an expert system uses one neural network for classifying an item (e.g., identifying a machine, a component, or an operational mode) and a different neural network for predicting a state of the item (e.g., a fault state, an operational state, an anticipated state, a maintenance state, or the like). Modular neural networks may also include situations where an expert system uses one neural network for determining a state or context (such as a state of a machine, a process, a work flow, a marketplace, a storage system, a network, a data collector, or the like) and a different neural network for self-organizing a process involving the state or context (e.g., a data storage process, a network coding process, a network selection process, a data marketplace process, a power generation process, a manufacturing process, a refining process, a digging process, a boring process, or other process described herein).
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a physical neural network where one or more hardware elements is used to perform or simulate neural behavior. In embodiments, one or more hardware neurons may be configured to stream voltage values that represent analog vibration sensor data voltage values, to calculate velocity information from analog sensor inputs representing acoustic, vibration or other data, to calculation acceleration information from sensor inputs representing acoustic, vibration, or other data, or the like. One or more hardware nodes may be configured to stream output data resulting from the activity of the neural net. Hardware nodes, which may comprise one or more chips, microprocessors, integrated circuits, programmable logic controllers, application-specific integrated circuits, field-programmable gate arrays, or the like, may be provided to optimize the speed, input/output efficiency, energy efficiency, signal to noise ratio, or other parameter of some part of a neural net of any of the types described herein. Hardware nodes may include hardware for acceleration of calculations (such as dedicated processors for performing basic or more sophisticated calculations on input data to provide outputs, dedicated processors for filtering or compressing data, dedicated processors for decompressing data, dedicated processors for compression of specific file or data types (e.g., for handling image data, video streams, acoustic signals, vibration data, thermal images, heat maps, or the like), and the like. A physical neural network may be embodied in a data collector, such as a mobile data collector described herein, including one that may be reconfigured by switching or routing inputs in varying configurations, such as to provide different neural net configurations within the data collector for handling different types of inputs (with the switching and configuration optionally under control of an expert system, which may include a software-based neural net located on the data collector or remotely). A physical, or at least partially physical, neural network may include physical hardware nodes located in a storage system, such as for storing data within an industrial machine or in an industrial environment, such as for accelerating input/output functions to one or more storage elements that supply data to or take data from the neural net. A physical, or at least partially physical, neural network may include physical hardware nodes located in a network, such as for transmitting data within, to or from an industrial environment, such as for accelerating input/output functions to one or more network nodes in the net, accelerating relay functions, or the like. In embodiments of a physical neural network, an electrically adjustable resistance material may be used for emulating the function of a neural synapse. In embodiments, the physical hardware emulates the neurons, and software emulates the neural network between the neurons. In embodiments, neural networks complement conventional algorithmic computers. They are versatile and can be trained to perform appropriate functions without the need for any instructions, such as classification functions, optimization functions, pattern recognition functions, control functions, selection functions, evolution functions, and others.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a multilayered feed forward neural network, such as for complex pattern classification of one or more items, phenomena, modes, states, or the like. In embodiments, a multilayered feedforward neural network may be trained by an optimization technical, such as a genetic algorithm, such as to explore a large and complex space of options to find an optimum, or near-optimum, global solution. For example, one or more genetic algorithms may be used to train a multilayered feedforward neural network to classify complex phenomena, such as to recognize complex operational modes of industrial machines, such as modes involving complex interactions among machines (including interference effects, resonance effects, and the like), modes involving non-linear phenomena, such as impacts of variable speed shafts, which may make analysis of vibration and other signals difficult, modes involving critical faults, such as where multiple, simultaneous faults occur, making root cause analysis difficult, and others. In embodiments, a multilayered feed forward neural network may be used to classify results from ultrasonic monitoring or acoustic monitoring of an industrial machine, such as monitoring an interior set of components within a housing, such as motor components, pumps, valves, fluid handling components, and many others, such as in refrigeration systems, refining systems, reactor systems, catalytic systems, and others.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a feedforward, back-propagation multi-layer perceptron (MLP) neural network, such as for handling one or more remote sensing applications, such as for taking inputs from sensors distributed throughout various industrial environments. In embodiments, the MLP neural network may be used for classification of physical environments, such as mining environments, exploration environments, drilling environments, and the like, including classification of geological structures (including underground features and above ground features), classification of materials (including fluids, minerals, metals, and the like), and other problems. This may include fuzzy classification.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a structure-adaptive neural network, where the structure of a neural network is adapted, such as based on a rule, a sensed condition, a contextual parameter, or the like. For example, if a neural network does not converge on a solution, such as classifying an item or arriving at a prediction, when acting on a set of inputs after some amount of training, the neural network may be modified, such as from a feedforward neural network to a recurrent neural network, such as by switching data paths between some subset of nodes from unidirectional to bi-directional data paths. The structure adaptation may occur under control of an expert system, such as to trigger adaptation upon occurrence of a trigger, rule or event, such as recognizing occurrence of a threshold (such as an absence of a convergence to a solution within a given amount of time) or recognizing a phenomenon as requiring different or additional structure (such as recognizing that a system is varying dynamically or in a non-linear fashion). In one non-limiting example, an expert system may switch from a simple neural network structure like a feedforward neural network to a more complex neural network structure like a recurrent neural network, a convolutional neural network, or the like upon receiving an indication that a continuously variable transmission is being used to drive a generator, turbine, or the like in a system being analyzed.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use an autoencoder, autoassociator or Diabolo neural network, which may be similar to a multilayer perceptron (“MLP”) neural network, such as where there may be an input layer, an output layer and one or more hidden layers connecting them. However, the output layer in the auto-encoder may have the same number of units as the input layer, where the purpose of the MLP neural network is to reconstruct its own inputs (rather than just emitting a target value). Therefore, the auto encoders may operate as an unsupervised learning model. An auto encoder may be used, for example, for unsupervised learning of efficient codings, such as for dimensionality reduction, for learning generative models of data, and the like. In embodiments, an auto-encoding neural network may be used to self-learn an efficient network coding for transmission of analog sensor data from an industrial machine over one or more networks. In embodiments, an auto-encoding neural network may be used to self-learn an efficient storage approach for storage of streams of analog sensor data from an industrial environment.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a probabilistic neural network (“PNN”), which in embodiments may comprise a multi-layer (e.g., four-layer) feedforward neural network, where layers may include input layers, hidden layers, pattern/summation layers and an output layer. In an embodiment of a PNN algorithm, a parent probability distribution function (PDF) of each class may be approximated, such as by a Parzen window and/or a non-parametric function. Then, using the PDF of each class, the class probability of a new input is estimated, and Bayes' rule may be employed, such as to allocate it to the class with the highest posterior probability. A PNN may embody a Bayesian network and may use a statistical algorithm or analytic technique, such as Kernel Fisher discriminant analysis technique. The PNN may be used for classification and pattern recognition in any of a wide range of embodiments disclosed herein. In one non-limiting example, a probabilistic neural network may be used to predict a fault condition of an engine based on collection of data inputs from sensors and instruments for the engine.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a time delay neural network (TDNN), which may comprise a feedforward architecture for sequential data that recognizes features independent of sequence position. In embodiments, to account for time shifts in data, delays are added to one or more inputs, or between one or more nodes, so that multiple data points (from distinct points in time) are analyzed together. A time delay neural network may form part of a larger pattern recognition system, such as using a perceptron network. In embodiments, a TDNN may be trained with supervised learning, such as where connection weights are trained with back propagation or under feedback. In embodiments, a TDNN may be used to process sensor data from distinct streams, such as a stream of velocity data, a stream of acceleration data, a stream of temperature data, a stream of pressure data, and the like, where time delays are used to align the data streams in time, such as to help understand patterns that involve understanding of the various streams (e.g., where increases in pressure and acceleration occur as an industrial machine overheats).
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a convolutional neural network (referred to in some cases as a CNN, a ConvNet, a shift invariant neural network, or a space invariant neural network), wherein the units are connected in a pattern similar to the visual cortex of the human brain. Neurons may respond to stimuli in a restricted region of space, referred to as a receptive field. Receptive fields may partially overlap, such that they collectively cover the entire (e.g., visual) field. Node responses can be calculated mathematically, such as by a convolution operation, such as using multilayer perceptrons that use minimal preprocessing. A convolutional neural network may be used for recognition within images and video streams, such as for recognizing a type of machine in a large environment using a camera system disposed on a mobile data collector, such as on a drone or mobile robot. In embodiments, a convolutional neural network may be used to provide a recommendation based on data inputs, including sensor inputs and other contextual information, such as recommending a route for a mobile data collector. In embodiments, a convolutional neural network may be used for processing inputs, such as for natural language processing of instructions provided by one or more parties involved in a workflow in an environment. In embodiments, a convolutional neural network may be deployed with a large number of neurons (e.g., 100,000, 500,000 or more), with multiple (e.g., 4, 5, 6 or more) layers, and with many (e.g., millions) parameters. A convolutional neural net may use one or more convolutional nets.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a regulatory feedback network, such as for recognizing emergent phenomena (such as new types of faults not previously understood in an industrial environment).
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a self-organizing map (“SOM”), involving unsupervised learning. A set of neurons may learn to map points in an input space to coordinates in an output space. The input space can have different dimensions and topology from the output space, and the SOM may preserve these while mapping phenomena into groups.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a learning vector quantization neural net (“LVQ”). Prototypical representatives of the classes may parameterize, together with an appropriate distance measure, in a distance-based classification scheme.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use an echo state network (“ESN”), which may comprise a recurrent neural network with a sparsely connected, random hidden layer. The weights of output neurons may be changed (e.g., the weights may be trained based on feedback). In embodiments, an ESN may be used to handle time series patterns, such as, in an example, recognizing a pattern of events associated with a gear shift in an industrial turbine, generator, or the like.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a bi-directional, recurrent neural network (“BRNN”), such as using a finite sequence of values (e.g., voltage values from a sensor) to predict or label each element of the sequence based on both the past and the future context of the element. This may be done by adding the outputs of two RNNs, such as one processing the sequence from left to right, the other one from right to left. The combined outputs are the predictions of target signals, such as those provided by a teacher or supervisor. A bi-directional RNN may be combined with a long short-term memory RNN.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a hierarchical RNN that connects elements in various ways to decompose hierarchical behavior, such as into useful subprograms. In embodiments, a hierarchical RNN may be used to manage one or more hierarchical templates for data collection in an industrial environment.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a stochastic neural network, which may introduce random variations into the network. Such random variations can be viewed as a form of statistical sampling, such as Monte Carlo sampling.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a genetic scale recurrent neural network. In such embodiments, a RNN (often a LS™) is used where a series is decomposed into a number of scales where every scale informs the primary length between two consecutive points. A first order scale consists of a normal RNN, a second order consists of all points separated by two indices and so on. The Nth order RNN connects the first and last node. The outputs from all the various scales may be treated as a committee of members, and the associated scores may be used genetically for the next iteration.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a committee of machines (“CoM”), comprising a collection of different neural networks that together “vote” on a given example. Because neural networks may suffer from local minima, starting with the same architecture and training, but using randomly different initial weights often gives different results. A CoM tends to stabilize the result.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use an associative neural network (“ASNN”), such as involving an extension of committee of machines that combines multiple feed forward neural networks and a k-nearest neighbor technique. It may use the correlation between ensemble responses as a measure of distance amid the analyzed cases for the kNN. This corrects the bias of the neural network ensemble. An associative neural network may have a memory that can coincide with a training set. If new data become available, the network instantly improves its predictive ability and provides data approximation (self-learns) without retraining. Another important feature of ASNN is the possibility to interpret neural network results by analysis of correlations between data cases in the space of models.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use an instantaneously trained neural network (“ITNN”), where the weights of the hidden and the output layers are mapped directly from training vector data.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a spiking neural network, which may explicitly consider the timing of inputs. The network input and output may be represented as a series of spikes (such as a delta function or more complex shapes). SNNs can process information in the time domain (e.g., signals that vary over time, such as signals involving dynamic behavior of industrial machines). They are often implemented as recurrent networks.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a dynamic neural network that addresses nonlinear multivariate behavior and includes learning of time-dependent behavior, such as transient phenomena and delay effects. Transients may include behavior of shifting industrial components, such as variable speeds of rotating shafts or other rotating components.
In embodiments, cascade correlation may be used as an architecture and supervised learning algorithm, supplementing adjustment of the weights in a network of fixed topology. Cascade-correlation may begin with a minimal network, then automatically trains and adds new hidden units one by one, creating a multi-layer structure. Once a new hidden unit has been added to the network, its input-side weights may be frozen. This unit then becomes a permanent feature-detector in the network, available for producing outputs or for creating other, more complex feature detectors. The cascade-correlation architecture may learn quickly, determine its own size and topology, and retain the structures it has built even if the training set changes and requires no back-propagation.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a neuro-fuzzy network, such as involving a fuzzy inference system in the body of an artificial neural network. Depending on the type, several layers may simulate the processes involved in a fuzzy inference, such as fuzzification, inference, aggregation and defuzzification. Embedding a fuzzy system in a general structure of a neural net as the benefit of using available training methods to find the parameters of a fuzzy system.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a compositional pattern-producing network (“CPPN”), such as a variation of an associative neural network (“ANN”) that differs the set of activation functions and how they are applied. While typical ANNs often contain only sigmoid functions (and sometimes Gaussian functions), CPPNs can include both types of functions and many others. Furthermore, CPPNs may be applied across the entire space of possible inputs, so that they can represent a complete image. Since they are compositions of functions, CPPNs in effect encode images at infinite resolution and can be sampled for a particular display at whatever resolution is optimal.
This type of network can add new patterns without re-training. In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a one-shot associative memory network, such as by creating a specific memory structure, which assigns each new pattern to an orthogonal plane using adjacently connected hierarchical arrays.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a hierarchical temporal memory (“HTM”) neural network, such as involving the structural and algorithmic properties of the neocortex. HTM may use a biomimetic model based on memory-prediction theory. HTM may be used to discover and infer the high-level causes of observed input patterns and sequences.
In embodiments, methods and systems described herein that involve an expert system or self-organization capability may use a holographic associative memory (“HAM”) neural network, which may comprise an analog, correlation-based, associative, stimulus-response system. Information may be mapped onto the phase orientation of complex numbers. The memory is effective for associative memory tasks, generalization and pattern recognition with changeable attention.
In embodiments, various embodiments involving network coding may be used to code transmission data among network nodes in neural net, such as where nodes are located in one or more data collectors or machines in an industrial environment.
Clause 1. In embodiments, an expert system for processing a plurality of inputs collected from sensors in an industrial environment, comprising: A modular neural network, where the expert system uses one type of neural network for recognizing a pattern and a different neural network for self-organizing an activity in the industrial environment. 2. A system of clause 1, wherein the pattern indicates a fault condition of a machine. 3. A system of clause 1, wherein the self-organized activity governs autonomous control of a system in the environment. 4. A system of clause 3, wherein the expert system organizes the activity based at least in part on the recognized pattern. 5. An expert system for processing a plurality of inputs collected from sensors in an industrial environment, comprising: a modular neural network, where the expert system uses one neural network for classifying an item and a different neural network for predicting a state of the item. 6. A system of clause 5, wherein classifying an item includes at least one of identifying a machine, a component, and an operational mode of a machine in the environment. 7. A system of clause 5, wherein predicting a state includes predicting at least one of a fault state, an operational state, an anticipated state, and a maintenance state. 8. An expert system for processing a plurality of inputs collected from sensors in an industrial environment, comprising: a modular neural network, where the expert system uses one neural network for determining at least one of a state and a context and a different neural network for self-organizing a process involving the at least one state or context. 9. A system of clause 8, wherein the stat or context includes at least one state of a machine, a process, a workflow, a marketplace, a storage system, a network, and a data collector. 10. A system of clause 8, wherein the self-organized process includes at least one of a data storage process, a network coding process, a network selection process, a data marketplace process, a power generation process, a manufacturing process, a refining process, a digging process, and a boring process. 11. An expert system for processing a plurality of inputs collected from sensors in an industrial environment, comprising: a modular neural network, comprising at least two neural networks selected from the group consisting of feed forward neural networks, radial basis function neural networks, self-organizing neural networks, Kohonen self-organizing neural networks, recurrent neural networks, modular neural networks, artificial neural networks, physical neural networks, multi-layered neural networks, convolutional neural networks, a hybrids of a neural networks with another expert system, auto-encoder neural networks, probabilistic neural networks, time delay neural networks, convolutional neural networks, regulatory feedback neural networks, radial basis function neural networks, recurrent neural networks, Hopfield neural networks, Boltzmann machine neural networks, self-organizing map (“SOM”) neural networks, learning vector quantization (“LVQ”) neural networks, fully recurrent neural networks, simple recurrent neural networks, echo state neural networks, long short-term memory neural networks, bi-directional neural networks, hierarchical neural networks, stochastic neural networks, genetic scale RNN neural networks, committee of machines neural networks, associative neural networks, physical neural networks, instantaneously trained neural networks, spiking neural networks, neocognitron neural networks, dynamic neural networks, cascading neural networks, neuro-fuzzy neural networks, compositional pattern-producing neural networks, memory neural networks, hierarchical temporal memory neural networks, deep feed forward neural networks, gated recurrent unit (“GCU”) neural networks, auto encoder neural networks, variational auto encoder neural networks, de-noising auto encoder neural networks, sparse auto-encoder neural networks, Markov chain neural networks, restricted Boltzmann machine neural networks, deep belief neural networks, deep convolutional neural networks, deconvolutional neural networks, deep convolutional inverse graphics neural networks, generative adversarial neural networks, liquid state machine neural networks, extreme learning machine neural networks, echo state neural networks, deep residual neural networks, support vector machine neural networks, neural Turing machine neural networks, and holographic associative memory neural networks. 12. A system for collecting data in an industrial environment, comprising A physical neural network embodied in a mobile data collector, wherein the mobile data collector is adapted to be reconfigured by routing inputs in varying configurations, such that different neural net configurations are enabled within the data collector for handling different types of inputs. 13. A system of clause 12, wherein reconfiguration occurs under control of an expert system. 14. A system of clause 13, wherein the expert system includes a software-based neural net. 15. A system of clause 14, wherein the software-based system is located on the data collector. 16. A system of clause 14, wherein the software-based system is located remotely from the data collector. 17. A system for processing data collected from an industrial environment, the system comprising: a plurality of neural networks deployed in a cloud platform that receives data streams and other inputs collected from one or more industrial environments and transmitted to the cloud platform over one or more networks, wherein the neural networks are of different types. 18. A system of clause 17, wherein the plurality of neural networks includes at least one modular neural network. 19. A system of clause 17, wherein the plurality of neural networks includes at least one structure-adaptive neural network. 20. A system of clause 17, wherein the neural networks are structured to compete with each other under control of an expert system, such as by processing input data sets from the same industrial environment to provide outputs and comparing the outputs to at least one measure of success. 21. A system of clause 20, wherein a genetic algorithm is used to facilitate variation and selection for the competing neural networks. 22. A system of clause 20, wherein the measure of success includes at least one of the following measures: a measure of predictive accuracy, a measure of classification accuracy, an efficiency measure, a profit measure, a maintenance measure, a safety measure, and a yield measure. 23. A system, comprising: a network coding system for coding transmission of data among network nodes in neural network, wherein the nodes comprise hardware devices located in at least one of one or more data collectors, one or more storage systems, and one or more network devices located in an industrial environment.
Within the data collection, monitoring, and control environment of the industrial IoT are large and various sensor sets, which make efficient setup and timely changes to sensor data collection a challenge. Continuous collection from all sensors may be impossible given the large number of sensors and limited resources, such as limited availability of power and limited data collection and management facilities, including various limitations in availability and performance of sensor data collection devices, input/output interfaces, data transfer facilities, data storage, data analysis facilities, and the like. The number of sensors collected from at any given time must therefore be limited in an intelligent but timely manner, both at the time of setting up initial collection and during the process of collection, including handling rapid changes to a present collection scheme based on a change in state of a system, operational conditions (e.g., an alert condition, change in operational mode, etc.), or the like. Embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein may therefore include rapid route creation and modification for routing collectors, such as by taking advantage of hierarchical templates, execution of smart route changes, monitoring and responding to changes in operational conditions, and the like.
In embodiments, rapid route creation and modification for data collection in an industrial environment may take advantage of hierarchical templates. Templates may be used to take advantage of ‘like’ machinery that can utilize the same hierarchical sensor routing scheme. For example, among many possible types of machines about which data may be collected, the members of a certain class of motor, such as a stepper motor class, may have very similar sensor routing needs, such as for routine operations, routine maintenance, and failure mode detection, that may be described in a common hierarchy of sensor collection routines. The user installing a new stepper motor may then use the ‘stepper motor hierarchical routing template’ for the new motor. After installation, the stepper motor hierarchical routing template may then be used to change the routing schemes for changing conditions. The user may optionally make adjustments to the template as needed per unique motor functions, applications, environments, modes, and the like. The use of a template for deploying a routing scheme greatly reduces the time a user requires to configure the routing scheme for a new motor, or to deploy new routing technologies on an existing system that utilizes traditional sensor collection methods. Once the hierarchical routing template is in place, the sensor collection routine may be changed quickly based on the template, thus allowing for rapid route modification under changing conditions, such as: a change in the operating mode of the stepper motor that requires a different subset of sensors for monitoring, a limit alert or failure indication that requires a more focused subset of sensors for use in diagnosing the problem, and the like. Hierarchical routing templates thus allow for rapid deployment of sensor routing configurations, as well as allowing the sensed industrial environment to be altered dynamically as conditions change.
A functional hierarchy of routing templates may include different hierarchical configurations for a component, machine, system, industrial environment, and the like, including all sensors and a plurality of configurations formed from a subset of all sensors. At a system level, an ‘all-sensor’ configuration may include: a connection map to all sensors in a system, mapping to all onboard instrumentation sensors (e.g., monitoring points reporting within a machine or set of machines), mapping to an environment's sensors (e.g., monitoring points around the machines/equipment, but not necessarily onboard), mapping to available sensors on data collectors (e.g., data collectors that can be flexibly provisioned for particular data among different kinds), a unified map combining different individual mappings, and the like. A routing configuration may be provided, such as to indicate how to implement an operational routing scheme, a scheduled maintenance routing scheme (e.g., collecting from a greater set of overall sensors than in operational mode, but distributed across the system, or a focused sensor set for specific components, functions, and modes), one or more failure mode routing schemes for multiple focused sensor collection groups targeting different failure mode analyses (e.g., for a motor, one failure mode may be for bearings, another for startup speed-torque, where a different subset of sensor data is needed based on the failure mode, such as detected in anomalous readings taken during operations or maintenance), power savings (e.g., weather conditions necessitating reduced plant power), and the like.
As noted, hierarchical templates may also be conditional (e.g., rule-based), such as templates with conditional routing based on parameters, such as sensed data during a first collection period, where a subsequent routing configuration is varied. Within the hierarchy, nodes in a graph or tree may indicate forks by which conditional logic may be used, such as to select a given subset of sensors for a given operational mode. Thus, the hierarchical template may be associated with a rule-based or model-based expert system, which may facilitate automated routing based on the hierarchical template and based on observed conditions, such as based on a type of machine and its operational state, environmental context, or the like. In a non-limiting example, a hierarchical template may have an initial collection configuration and a conditional hierarchy in place to switch from the initial collection configuration to a second collection configuration based on the sensed conditions of an initial sensor collection. Continuing this example, among various possible machines, a conveyor system may have a plurality of sensors for collection in an initial collection, but once the first data is collected and analyzed, if the conveyor is determined to be in an idle state (such as due to the absence of a signal above a minimum threshold on a motion sensor), then the system may switch to a sensor data collection regime that is appropriate for the idles state of the conveyor (e.g., using a very small subset of the plurality of sensors, such as just using the motion sensor to detect departure from the idle state, at which point the original regime may be renewed and the rest of a sensor set may be re-engaged). Thus, when the collection of sensor data detects a changed condition to a state, an operational mode, an environmental condition, or the like, the sensor data collection may be switched to an appropriate configuration.
Hierarchical templates for one collector may be based on coordination of routing with that of other collectors. For instance, a collector might be set up to perform vibration analysis while another collector is set up to perform pressure or temperature on each machine in a set of similar machines, rather than having each machine collect all of the data on each machine, where otherwise setup for different sensor types may be required for each collector for each machine. Factors such as the duration of sampling required, the time required to set up a given sensor, the amount of power consumed, the time available for collection as a whole, the data rate of input/output of a sensor and/or the collector, the bandwidth of a channel (wired or wireless) available for transmission of collected data, and the like can be considered in arranging the coordination of the routing of two or more collectors, such that various parallel and serial configurations may be undertaken to achieve an overall effectiveness. This may include optimizing the coordination using an expert system, such as a rule-based optimization, a model-based optimization, or optimization using machine learning.
A machine learning system may create a hierarchical template structure for improved routing, such as for teaching the system the default operating conditions (e.g., normal operations mode, systems online and average production), peak operations mode (max capability), slack production, and the like. The machine learning system may create a new hierarchical template based on monitored conditions, such as a template based on a production level profile, a rate of production profile, a detected failure mode pattern analysis, and the like. The application of a new machine learning created template may be based on a mode matching between current production conditions and a machine learning template condition (e.g., the machine learning system creates a new template for a new production profile, and applies that new template whenever that new profile is detected).
Rapid route creation may be enabled using one or more hierarchical routing templates, such as when a routing template pre-establishes a routing scheme for different conditions, and when a trigger event executes a change in the sensor routing scheme to accommodate the condition. In embodiments, the trigger event may be an automatic change in routing based on a trigger that indicates a possible failure mode that forces a change in routing scheme from operational to failure mode analysis; a human-executed change in routing scheme based on received sensor data; a learned routing change based on machine learning of when to trigger a change (e.g., as based on a machine being fed with a set of human-executed or human-supervised changes); a manual routing change (e.g., optional to automatic/rapid automatic change); a human executed change based on observed device performance; and the like. Routing changes may include: changing from an operational mode to an accelerated maintenance, a failure mode analysis, a power saving mode a high-performance/high-output mode (e.g., for peak power in a generation plant), and the like.
Switching hierarchical template configurations may be executed based on connectivity with end-device sensors. In a highly automated collection routing environment (e.g., an indoor networked assembly plant) different routing collection configurations may be employed for fixed and flexible industrial layouts. In a fixed industrial layout, such as a layout with a high degree of wired connectivity between end-device sensors, automated collectors, and networks, there may be different routing configurations for a network routing hierarchy portion, a collector sensor-collection hierarchy portion, a storage portion, and the like. For a more flexible industrial layout with various wired and wireless connections between end-device sensors, automated collectors, and networks, there may be different schemes. For instance, a moderately automated collection routing environment may include: automatic collection and periodic network connection; a robot-carried collector for periodic collection (e.g., a ground-based robot, a drone, an underwater device, a robot with network connection, a robot with intermittent network connection, a robot that periodically uploads collection); a routing scheme with periodic collection and automated routing; a scheme only collecting periodically but routed directly upon collection; a routing scheme with periodic collection and periodic automated routing to collect periodically; and, over longer periods of time, periodically routing multiple collections; and the like. For a lower degree of automated collection routing, there may be a combination of: automatic collection and human-aided collectors (e.g., humans collecting alone, humans aided by robots), scheduled collection and human-aided collectors (e.g., humans initiating collection, humans aided by robots for collection initiation, human launching a drone to collect data at a remote site), and the like.
In embodiments, and referring to
In embodiments, evaluation of the current routing templates may be based on operational mode routing collection schemes, such as a normal operational mode, a peak operational mode, an idle operational mode, a maintenance operational mode, a power saving operational mode, and the like. As a result of monitoring, the data collector may switch from a current routing template collection routine because the data analysis circuit determines a change in operating modes, such as the operating mode changing from an operational mode to an accelerated maintenance mode, the operating mode changing from an operational mode to a failure mode analysis mode, the operating mode changing from an operational mode to a power-saving mode, the operating mode changing from an operational mode to a high-performance mode, and the like. The data collector may switch from a current routing template collection routine based on a sensed change in a mode of operation, such as a failure condition, a performance condition, a power condition, a temperature condition, a vibration condition, and the like. The evaluation of the current routing template collection routine may be based on a collection routine with respect to a collection parameter, such as network availability, sensor availability, a time-based collection routine (e.g., on a schedule, over time), and the like.
In embodiments, a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; a data storage structured to store a plurality of collector route templates and sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels, wherein the plurality of collector route templates each comprise a different sensor collection routine; a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels; and a data analysis circuit structured to receive output data from the plurality of input channels and evaluate a current routing template collection routine based on the received output data, wherein the data collector is configured to switch from the current routing template collection routine to an alternative routing template collection routine based on the content of the output data. In embodiments, the system is deployed locally on the data collector, in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, and the like. Each of the input channels may correspond to a sensor located in the environment. The evaluation of the current routing template may be based on operational mode routing collection schemes. The operational mode is at least one of a normal operational mode, a peak operational mode, an idle operational mode, a maintenance operational mode, and a power saving operational mode. The data collector may switch from the current routing template collection routine because the data analysis circuit determines a change in operating modes, such as where the operating mode changes from an operational mode to an accelerated maintenance mode, from an operational mode to a failure mode analysis mode, from an operational mode to a power saving mode, from an operational mode to high-performance mode, and the like. The data collector may switch from the current routing template collection routine based on a sensed change in a mode of operation, such as where the sensed change is a failure condition, a performance condition, a power condition, a temperature condition, a vibration condition, and the like. The evaluation of the current routing template collection routine may be based on a collection routine with respect to a collection parameter, such as where the parameter is network availability, sensor availability, a time-based collection routine (e.g., where a routine collects sensor data on a schedule, evaluates sensor data over time).
In embodiments, a computer-implemented method for implementing a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: providing a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store a plurality of collector route templates and sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels, wherein the plurality of collector route templates each comprise a different sensor collection routine; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels; and providing a data analysis circuit structured to receive output data from the plurality of input channels and evaluate a current routing template collection routine based on the received output data, wherein the data collector is configured to switch from the current routing template collection routine to an alternative routing template collection routine based on the content of the output data. In embodiments, the computer-implemented method is deployed locally on the data collector, such as deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, where each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
In embodiments, one or more non-transitory computer-readable media comprising computer executable instructions that, when executed, may cause at least one processor to perform actions comprising: providing a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store a plurality of collector route templates and sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels, wherein the plurality of collector route templates each comprise a different sensor collection routine; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels; and providing a data analysis circuit structured to receive output data from the plurality of input channels and evaluate a current routing template collection routine based on the received output data, wherein the data collector is configured to switch from the current routing template collection routine to an alternative routing template collection routine based on the content of the output data. In embodiments, the instructions may be deployed locally on the data collector, such as deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, where each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
In embodiments, a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; a data storage structured to store a plurality of collector route templates, sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels, wherein the plurality of collector route templates each comprise a different sensor collection routine; a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels; and a machine learning data analysis circuit structured to receive output data from the plurality of input channels and evaluate a current routing template collection routine based on the received output data received over time, wherein the machine learning data analysis circuit learns received output data patterns, wherein the data collector is configured to switch from the current routing template collection routine to an alternative routing template collection routine based on the learned received output data patterns. In embodiments, the monitoring system may be deployed locally on the data collector, such as deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, where each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment. The machine learning data analysis circuit may include a neural network expert system. The evaluation of the current routing template may be based on operational mode routing collection schemes. The operational mode may be at least one of a normal operational mode, a peak operational mode, an idle operational mode, a maintenance operational mode, and a power saving operational mode. The data collector may switch from the current routing template collection routine because the data analysis circuit determines a change in operating modes, such as where the operating mode changes from an operational mode to an accelerated maintenance mode, from an operational mode to a failure mode analysis mode, from an operational mode to a power saving mode, from an operational mode to high-performance mode, and the like. The data collector may switch from the current routing template collection routine based on a sensed change in a mode of operation, such as where the sensed change is a failure condition, a performance condition, a power condition, a temperature condition, a vibration condition, and the like. The evaluation of the current routing template collection routine may be based on a collection routine with respect to a collection parameter, such as where the parameter is network availability, a sensor availability, a time-based collection routine (collects sensor data on a schedule, evaluates sensor data over time).
In embodiments, a computer-implemented method for implementing a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: providing a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store a plurality of collector route templates, sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels, wherein the plurality of collector route templates each comprise a different sensor collection routine; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels; and providing a machine learning data analysis circuit structured to receive output data from the plurality of input channels and evaluate a current routing template collection routine based on the received output data received over time, wherein the machine learning data analysis circuit learns received output data patterns, wherein the data collector is configured to switch from the current routing template collection routine to an alternative routing template collection routine based on the learned received output data patterns. In embodiments, the method may be deployed locally on the data collector, such as deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, where each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
In embodiments, one or more non-transitory computer-readable media comprising computer executable instructions that, when executed, may cause at least one processor to perform actions comprising: providing a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store a plurality of collector route templates, sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels, wherein the plurality of collector route templates each comprise a different sensor collection routine; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels; and providing a machine learning data analysis circuit structured to receive output data from the plurality of input channels and evaluate a current routing template collection routine based on the received output data received over time, wherein the machine learning data analysis circuit learns received output data patterns, wherein the data collector is configured to switch from the current routing template collection routine to an alternative routing template collection routine based on the learned received output data patterns. In embodiments, the instructions may be deployed locally on the data collector, such as deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, where each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
In embodiments, a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; a data storage structured to store a collector route template, sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels, wherein the collector route template comprises a sensor collection routine; a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels; and a data analysis circuit structured to receive output data from the plurality of input channels and evaluate the received output data with respect to a rule, wherein the data collector is configured to modify the sensor collection routine based on the application of the rule to the received output data. In embodiments, the system may be deployed locally on the data collector, such as deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, where each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment. The rule may be based on an operational state of a machine with respect to which the input channels provide information, on an anticipated state of a machine with respect to which the input channels provide information, on a detected fault condition of a machine with respect to which the input channels provide information, and the like. The evaluation of the received output data may be based on operational mode routing collection schemes, where the operational mode is at least one of a normal operational mode, a peak operational mode, an idle operational mode, a maintenance operational mode, and a power saving operational mode. The data collector may modify the sensor collection routine because the data analysis circuit determines a change in operating modes, such as where the operating mode changes from an operational mode to an accelerated maintenance mode, from an operational mode to a failure mode analysis mode, from an operational mode to a power saving mode, from an operational mode to high-performance mode, and the like. The data collector may modify the sensor collection routine based on a sensed change in a mode of operation, such as where the sensed change is a failure condition, a performance condition, a power condition, a temperature condition, a vibration condition, and the like. The evaluation of the received output data may be based on a collection routine with respect to a collection parameter, wherein the parameter is a network availability, a sensor availability, a time-based collection routine (e.g., collects sensor data on a schedule or over time), and the like.
In embodiments, a computer-implemented method for implementing a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: providing a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store a collector route template, sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels, wherein the collector route template comprises a sensor collection routine; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels; and providing a data analysis circuit structured to receive output data from the plurality of input channels and evaluate the received output data with respect to a rule, wherein the data collector is configured to modify the sensor collection routine based on the application of the rule to the received output data. In embodiments, the method may be deployed locally on the data collector, such as deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, where each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
In embodiments, one or more non-transitory computer-readable media comprising computer executable instructions that, when executed, may cause at least one processor to perform actions comprising: providing a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store a collector route template, sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels, wherein the collector route template comprises a sensor collection routine; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels; and providing a data analysis circuit structured to receive output data from the plurality of input channels and evaluate the received output data with respect to a rule, wherein the data collector is configured to modify the sensor collection routine based on the application of the rule to the received output data. In embodiments, the instructions may be deployed locally on the data collector, such as deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, where each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
Rapid route creation and modification in an industrial environment may employ smart route changes based on incoming data or alarms, such as changes enabling dynamic selection of data collection for analysis or correlation. Smart route changes may enable the system to alter current routing of sensor data based on incoming data or alarms. For instance, a user may set up a routing configuration that establishes a schedule of sensor collection for analysis, but when the analysis (or an alarm) indicates a special need, the system may change the sensor routing to address that need. For example, in the case where a change in a motor vibration profile (as one example among any of the machines described throughout this disclosure), such as rapidly increasing the peak amplitude of shaking on at least one axis of a vibration sensor set, that indicates a potential early failure of the motor, the system may change the routing to collect more focused data collection for analysis, such as initiating collection on more axes of the motor, initiating collection on additional bearings of the motor, and/or initiating collection using other sensors (such as temperature or heat flux sensors), that may confirm an initial hypothesis that the failure mode is occurring or otherwise assist in analysis of the state or operational condition of the machine.
Detected operational mode changes may trigger a rapid route change. For instance, an operational mode may be detected as the result of a single-point sensor out-of-range detection, an analysis determination, and the like, and generate a routing change. An analysis determination may be detected from a sensor end-point, such as through a single-point sensor analysis, a multiple-point sensor analysis, an analysis domain analysis (e.g., through a time profile, frequency profile, correlated multi-point determination), and the like. In another instance, a maintenance mode may be detected during routine maintenance, where a routing change increases data collection to capture data at a higher rate under an anomalous condition. A failure mode may be detected, such as through an alarm that indicates near-term potential for a failure of a machine that triggers increased data capture rate for analysis. Performance-based modes may be detected, such as detecting a level of output rate (e.g., peak, slack, idle), which may then initiate changes in routing to accommodate the analysis needs for the different performance monitoring and metrics associated with the state. For example, if a high peak speed is detected for a motor, a conveyor, an assembly line, a generator, a turbine, or the like, relative to historical measurements over some time period, additional sensors may be engaged to watch for failures that are typically associated with peak speeds, such as overheating (as measured by engaging a temperature or heat flux sensor), excessive noise (as measured by an acoustic or noise sensor), excessive shaking (as measured by one or more vibration sensors), or the like.
Alarm detections may trigger a rapid route change. Alarm sources may include a front-end collector, local intelligence resource, back-end data analysis process, ambient environment detector, network quality detector, power quality detector, heat, smoke, noise, flooding, and the like. Alarm types may include a single-instance anomaly detection, multiple-instance anomaly detection, simultaneous multi-sensor detection, time-clustered sensor detection (e.g., a single sensor or multiple sensors), frequency-profile detection (e.g., increasing rate of anomaly detection such as an alarm increasing in its occurrence over time, a change in a frequency component of a sensor output such as a motor's physical vibration profile changing over time), and the like.
A machine learning system may change routing based on learned alarm pattern analysis. The machine learning system may learn system alarm condition patterns, such as alarm conditions expected under normal operating conditions, under peak operating conditions, expected over time based on age of components (e.g., new, during operational life, during extended life, during a warrantee period), and the like. The machine learning system may change routing based on a change in an alarm pattern, such as a system operating normally but experiencing a peak operating alarm pattern (e.g., a system running when it should not be), a system is new but experiencing an older profile (e.g., detection of infant mortality), and the like. The machine learning system may change routing based on a current alarm profile vs. an expected change in production condition. For example, a plant, system, or component is experiencing above average alarm conditions just before a ramp-up of production (e.g., could be foretelling of above average failures during increased production), just before going slack (e.g., could be an opportunity to ramp up maintenance procedures based on increased data taking routing scheme), after an unplanned event (e.g., weather, power outage, restart), and the like.
A rapid route change action may include: an increased rate of sampling (e.g., to a single sensor, to multiple sensors), an increase in the number of sensors being sampled (e.g., simultaneous sampling of other sensors on a device, coordinated sampling of similar sensors on near-by devices), generating a burst of sampling (e.g., sampling at a high rate for a period of time), and the like. Actions may be executed on a schedule, coordinated with a trigger, based on an operational mode, and the like. Triggered actions may include: anomalous data, an exceeded threshold level, an operational event trigger (e.g., at startup condition such as for startup motor torque), and the like.
A rapid route change may switch between routing schemes, such as an operational routing scheme (e.g., a subset of sensor collection for normal operations), a scheduled maintenance routing scheme (e.g., an increased and focused set of sensor collection than for normal operations), and the like. The distribution of sensor data may be changed, such as to distribute sensor collection across the system, such as for a sensor collection set for specific components, functions, and modes. A failure mode routing scheme may entail multiple focused sensor collection groups targeting different failure mode analyses (e.g., for a motor, one failure mode may be for bearings, another for startup speed-torque) where a different subset of sensor data may be needed based on the failure mode (e.g., as detected in anomalous readings taken during operations or maintenance). Power saving mode routing may be executed when weather conditions necessitate reduced plant power.
Dynamic adjustment of route changes may be executed based on connectivity factors, such as the factors associated with the collector or network availability and bandwidth. For example, routing may be changed for a device associated with an alarm detection, where changing routing for targeted devices on the network frees up bandwidth. Changes to routing may have a duration, such as only for a pre-determined period of time and then switching back, maintaining a change until user-directed, changing duration based on network availability, and the like.
In embodiments, and referring to
In embodiments, an alarm state may indicate a detection mode, such as an operational mode detection comprising an out-of-range detection, a maintenance mode detection comprising an alarm detected during maintenance, a failure mode detection (e.g., where the controller communicates a failure mode detection facility), a power mode detection wherein the alarm state is indicative of a power related limitation data of the anticipated state information, a performance mode detection wherein the alarm state is indicative of a high-performance limitation data of the anticipated state information, and the like. The monitoring system may further include the analysis circuit setting the alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for an alternate input channel in the first group of input channels, such as where the setting of the alarm state for the first input channel and the alternate input channel are determined to be a multiple-instance anomaly detection, wherein the second routing of input channels comprises the first input channel and a second input channel, wherein the sensor data from the first input channel and the second input channel contribute to simultaneous data analysis. The second routing of input channels may include a change in a routing collection parameter, such as where the routing collection parameter is an increase in sampling rate, an increase in the number of channels being sampled, a burst sampling of at least one of the plurality of input channels, and the like.
In embodiments, and referring to
In embodiments, a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels, wherein the data acquisition circuit acquires sensor data from a first route of input channels for the plurality of input channels; a data storage structured to store sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels; a data analysis circuit structured to evaluate the sensor data with respect to stored anticipated state information, wherein the anticipated state information comprises an alarm threshold level, and wherein the data analysis circuit sets an alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for a first input channel in the first group of input channels; and a response circuit structured to change the routing of the input channels for data collection from the first routing of input channels to an alternate routing of input channels, wherein the alternate routing of input channels comprise the first input channel and a group of input channels related to the first input channel. In embodiments, the system may be deployed locally on the data collector, deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, wherein each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment. The group of input channels may be related to the first input channel are at least in part taken from the plurality of input channels not included in the first routing of input channels. An alarm state may indicate a detection mode, such as where the detection mode is an operational mode detection comprising an out-of-range detection, the detection mode is a maintenance mode detection comprising an alarm detected during maintenance, the detection mode is a failure mode detection. The controller may communicate the failure mode detection facility, such as where the detection mode is a power mode detection and the alarm state is indicative of a power related limitation data of the anticipated state information, the detection mode is a performance mode detection and the alarm state is indicative of a high-performance limitation data of the anticipated state information, and the like. The analysis circuit may set the alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for an alternate input channel in the first group of input channels, such as where the setting of the alarm state for the first input channel and the alternate input channel are determined to be a multiple-instance anomaly detection, wherein the alternate routing of input channels comprises the first input channel and a second input channel, wherein the sensor data from the first input channel and the second input channel contribute to simultaneous data analysis. The alternate routing of input channels may include a change in a routing collection parameter, such as for an increase in sampling rate, an increase in the number of channels being sampled, a burst sampling of at least one of the plurality of input channels, and the like.
In embodiments, a computer-implemented method for implementing a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: providing a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels, wherein the data acquisition circuit acquires sensor data from a first route of input channels for the plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels; providing a data analysis circuit structured to evaluate the sensor data with respect to stored anticipated state information, wherein the anticipated state information comprises an alarm threshold level, and wherein the data analysis circuit sets an alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for a first input channel in the first group of input channels; and providing a response circuit structured to change the routing of the input channels for data collection from the first routing of input channels to an alternate routing of input channels, wherein the alternate routing of input channels comprise the first input channel and a group of input channels related to the first input channel. In embodiments, the system may be deployed locally on the data collector, deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, wherein each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
In embodiments, one or more non-transitory computer-readable media comprising computer executable instructions that, when executed, may cause at least one processor to perform actions may comprise: providing a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels, wherein the data acquisition circuit acquires sensor data from a first route of input channels for the plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels; providing a data analysis circuit structured to evaluate the sensor data with respect to stored anticipated state information, wherein the anticipated state information comprises an alarm threshold level, and wherein the data analysis circuit sets an alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for a first input channel in the first group of input channels; and providing a response circuit structured to change the routing of the input channels for data collection from the first routing of input channels to an alternate routing of input channels, wherein the alternate routing of input channels comprise the first input channel and a group of input channels related to the first input channel. In embodiments, the instructions may be deployed locally on the data collector, deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, wherein each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
In embodiments, a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels, wherein the data acquisition circuit acquires sensor data from a first route of input channels for the plurality of input channels; a data storage structured to store sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels; a data analysis circuit structured to evaluate the sensor data with respect to stored anticipated state information, wherein the anticipated state information comprises an alarm threshold level, and wherein the data analysis circuit sets an alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for a first input channel in the first group of input channels and transmits the alarm state across a network to a routing control facility; and a response circuit structured to change the routing of the input channels for data collection from the first routing of input channels to an alternate routing of input channels upon reception of a routing change indication from the routing control facility, wherein the alternate routing of input channels comprise the first input channel and a group of input channels related to the first input channel, wherein the data collector automatically executes the change in routing of the input channels if a communication parameter of the network between the data collector and the routing control facility is not met. In embodiments, the instructions may be deployed locally on the data collector, deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, wherein each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment. The communication parameter may be a time-period parameter within which the routing control facility must respond. The communication parameter may be a network availability parameter, such as a network connection parameter or bandwidth requirement. The group of input channels related to the first input channel may be at least in part taken from the plurality of input channels not included in the first routing of input channels. The alarm state may indicate a detection mode, such as an operational mode detection comprising an out-of-range detection, a maintenance mode detection comprising an alarm detected during maintenance, and the like. The detection mode may be a failure mode detection, such as when the controller communicates the failure mode detection facility, the alarm state is indicative of a power related limitation data of the anticipated state information, the detection mode is a performance mode detection where the alarm state is indicative of a high-performance limitation data of the anticipated state information, and the like. The analysis circuit may set the alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for an alternate input channel in the first group of input channels, such as where the setting of the alarm state for the first input channel and the alternate input channel are determined to be a multiple-instance anomaly detection, wherein the alternate routing of input channels comprises the first input channel and a second input channel, wherein the sensor data from the first input channel and the second input channel contribute to simultaneous data analysis. The alternate routing of input channels may be a change in a routing collection parameter, such as an increase in sampling rate, is an increase in the number of channels being sampled, a burst sampling of at least one of the plurality of input channels, and the like.
In embodiments, a computer-implemented method for implementing a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: providing a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels, wherein the data acquisition circuit acquires sensor data from a first route of input channels for the plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels; providing a data analysis circuit structured to evaluate the sensor data with respect to stored anticipated state information, wherein the anticipated state information comprises an alarm threshold level, and wherein the data analysis circuit sets an alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for a first input channel in the first group of input channels and transmits the alarm state across a network to a routing control facility; and providing a response circuit structured to change the routing of the input channels for data collection from the first routing of input channels to an alternate routing of input channels upon reception of a routing change indication from the routing control facility, wherein the alternate routing of input channels comprise the first input channel and a group of input channels related to the first input channel, wherein the data collector automatically executes the change in routing of the input channels if a communication parameter of the network between the data collector and the routing control facility is not met. In embodiments, the instructions may be deployed locally on the data collector, deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, wherein each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
In embodiments, one or more non-transitory computer-readable media comprising computer executable instructions that, when executed, may cause at least one processor to perform actions comprising: providing a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels, wherein the data acquisition circuit acquires sensor data from a first route of input channels for the plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels; providing a data analysis circuit structured to evaluate the sensor data with respect to stored anticipated state information, wherein the anticipated state information comprises an alarm threshold level, and wherein the data analysis circuit sets an alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for a first input channel in the first group of input channels and transmits the alarm state across a network to a routing control facility; and providing a response circuit structured to change the routing of the input channels for data collection from the first routing of input channels to an alternate routing of input channels upon reception of a routing change indication from the routing control facility, wherein the alternate routing of input channels comprise the first input channel and a group of input channels related to the first input channel, wherein the data collector automatically executes the change in routing of the input channels if a communication parameter of the network between the data collector and the routing control facility is not met. In embodiments, the instructions may be deployed locally on the data collector, deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, wherein each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
In embodiments, a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: a first and second data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels, wherein the data acquisition circuit acquires sensor data from a first route of input channels for the plurality of input channels; a data storage structured to store sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels; a data analysis circuit structured to evaluate the sensor data with respect to stored anticipated state information, wherein the anticipated state information comprises an alarm threshold level, and wherein the data analysis circuit sets an alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for a first input channel in the first group of input channels; a communication circuit structured to communicate with a second data collector, wherein the second data collector transmits a state message related to a first input channel from the first route of input channels; and a response circuit structured to change the routing of the input channels for data collection from the first routing of input channels to an alternate routing of input channels based on the state message from the second data collector, wherein the alternate routing of input channel comprise the first input channel and a group of input channels related to the first input sensor. In embodiments, the system may be deployed locally on the data collector, deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, wherein each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment. The set state message transmitted from the second data collector may be from a second input channel that is mounted in proximity to the first input channel. The set alarm transmitted from the second controller may be from a second input sensor that is part of a related group of input sensors comprising the first input sensor. The group of input channels related to the first input channel may be at least in part taken from the plurality of input channels not included in the first routing of input channels. The alarm state may indicate a detection mode, such as where the detection mode is an operational mode detection comprising an out-of-range detection, a maintenance mode detection comprising an alarm detected during maintenance, is a failure mode detection, and the like. The controller may communicate the failure mode detection facility, such as where the detection mode is a power mode detection and the alarm state is indicative of a power related limitation data of the anticipated state information, the detection mode is a performance mode detection where the alarm state is indicative of a high-performance limitation data of the anticipated state information, and the like. The analysis circuit may set the alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for an alternate input channel in the first group of input channels, such as where the setting of the alarm state for the first input channel and the alternate input channel are determined to be a multiple-instance anomaly detection, wherein the alternate routing of input channels comprises the first input channel and a second input channel, wherein the sensor data from the first input channel and the second input channel contribute to simultaneous data analysis. The alternate routing of input channels may be a change in a routing collection parameter, such as an increase in sampling rate, an increase in the number of channels being sampled, a burst sampling of at least one of the plurality of input channels, and the like.
In embodiments, a computer-implemented method for implementing a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: providing a first and second data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels, wherein the data acquisition circuit acquires sensor data from a first route of input channels for the plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels; providing a data analysis circuit structured to evaluate the sensor data with respect to stored anticipated state information, wherein the anticipated state information comprises an alarm threshold level, and wherein the data analysis circuit sets an alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for a first input channel in the first group of input channels; providing a communication circuit structured to communicate with a second data collector, wherein the second data collector transmits a state message related to a first input channel from the first route of input channels, and providing a response circuit structured to change the routing of the input channels for data collection from the first routing of input channels to an alternate routing of input channels based on the state message from the second data collector, wherein the alternate routing of input channel comprise the first input channel and a group of input channels related to the first input sensor. In embodiments, the method may be deployed locally on the data collector, deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, wherein each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
In embodiments, one or more non-transitory computer-readable media comprising computer executable instructions that, when executed, may cause at least one processor to perform actions comprising: providing a first and second data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels, wherein the data acquisition circuit acquires sensor data from a first route of input channels for the plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels; providing a data analysis circuit structured to evaluate the sensor data with respect to stored anticipated state information, wherein the anticipated state information comprises an alarm threshold level, and wherein the data analysis circuit sets an alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for a first input channel in the first group of input channels; providing a communication circuit structured to communicate with a second data collector, wherein the second data collector transmits a state message related to a first input channel from the first route of input channels, and providing a response circuit structured to change the routing of the input channels for data collection from the first routing of input channels to an alternate routing of input channels based on the state message from the second data collector, wherein the alternate routing of input channel comprise the first input channel and a group of input channels related to the first input sensor. In embodiments, the instructions may be deployed locally on the data collector, deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, wherein each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
In embodiments, a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channel, wherein the data acquisition circuit acquires sensor data from a first group of input channels from the plurality of input channels; a data storage structured to store sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels; a data analysis circuit structured to evaluate the sensor data with respect to stored anticipated state information, wherein the anticipated state information comprises an alarm threshold level, and wherein the data analysis circuit sets an alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for a first input channel in the first group of input channel; and a response circuit structured to change the input channels being collected from the first group of input channels to an alternative group of input channels, wherein the alternate group of input channels comprise the first input channel and a group of input channels related to the first input sensor. In embodiments, the system may be deployed locally on the data collector, deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, wherein each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment. The group of input sensors related to the first input sensor may be at least in part taken from the plurality of input sensors not included in the first group of input sensors. The first group of input channels related to the first input channel may be at least in part taken from the plurality of input channels not included in the first routing of input channels. The alarm state may indicate a detection mode, such as where the detection mode is an operational mode detection comprising an out-of-range detection, a maintenance mode detection comprising an alarm detected during maintenance. The detection mode may be a failure mode detection, such as where the controller communicates the failure mode detection facility. The detection mode may be a power mode detection where the alarm state is indicative of a power related limitation data of the anticipated state information. The detection mode may be a performance mode detection, where the alarm state is indicative of a high-performance limitation data of the anticipated state information. The analysis circuit may set the alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for an alternate input channel in the first group of input channels, such as when the setting of the alarm state for the first input channel and the alternate input channel are determined to be a multiple-instance anomaly detection, wherein the alternate routing of input channels comprises the first input channel and a second input channel, wherein the sensor data from the first input channel and the second input channel contribute to simultaneous data analysis. An alternative group of input channels may include a change in a routing collection parameter, such as where the routing collection parameter is an increase in sampling rate, an increase in the number of channels being sampled, a burst sampling of at least one of the plurality of input channels, and the like.
In embodiments, a computer-implemented method for implementing a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: providing a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channel, wherein the data acquisition circuit acquires sensor data from a first group of input channels from the plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels; providing a data analysis circuit structured to evaluate the sensor data with respect to stored anticipated state information, wherein the anticipated state information comprises an alarm threshold level, and wherein the data analysis circuit sets an alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for a first input channel in the first group of input channel; and providing a response circuit structured to change the input channels being collected from the first group of input channels to an alternative group of input channels, wherein the alternate group of input channels comprise the first input channel and a group of input channels related to the first input sensor. In embodiments, the method may be deployed locally on the data collector, deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, wherein each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
In embodiments, one or more non-transitory computer-readable media comprising computer executable instructions that, when executed, may cause at least one processor to perform actions comprising: providing a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channel, wherein the data acquisition circuit acquires sensor data from a first group of input channels from the plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels; providing a data analysis circuit structured to evaluate the sensor data with respect to stored anticipated state information, wherein the anticipated state information comprises an alarm threshold level, and wherein the data analysis circuit sets an alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for a first input channel in the first group of input channel; and providing a response circuit structured to change the input channels being collected from the first group of input channels to an alternative group of input channels, wherein the alternate group of input channels comprise the first input channel and a group of input channels related to the first input sensor. In embodiments, the instructions may be deployed locally on the data collector, deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, wherein each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
In embodiments, a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; a data storage structured to store a plurality of collector route templates, sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels, wherein the plurality of collector route templates each comprise a different sensor collection routine; a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels, wherein the data acquisition circuit acquires sensor data from a first route of input channels; and a data analysis circuit structured to evaluate the sensor data with respect to stored anticipated state information, wherein the anticipated state information comprises an alarm threshold level, and wherein the data analysis circuit sets an alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for a first input channel in the first group of input channels, wherein the data collector is configured to switch from a current routing template collection routine to an alternate routing template collection routine based on a setting of an alarm state. In embodiments, the system may be deployed locally on the data collector, deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, wherein each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment. The setting of the alarm state may be based on operational mode routing collection schemes, such as where the operational mode is at least one of a normal operational mode, a peak operational mode, an idle operational mode, a maintenance operational mode, and a power saving operational mode. The alarm threshold level may be associated with a sensed change to one of the plurality of input channels, such as where the sensed change is a failure condition, is a performance condition, a power condition, a temperature condition, a vibration condition, and the like. The alarm state may indicate a detection mode, such as where the detection mode is an operational mode detection comprising an out-of-range detection, a maintenance mode detection comprising an alarm detected during maintenance, and the like. The detection mode may be a power mode detection, where the alarm state is indicative of a power related limitation data of the anticipated state information. The detection mode may be a performance mode detection, where the alarm state is indicative of a high-performance limitation data of the anticipated state information. The analysis circuit may set the alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for an alternate input channel, such as wherein the setting of the alarm state is determined to be a multiple-instance anomaly detection. The alternate routing template may be a change to an input channel routing collection parameter. The routing collection parameter may be an increase in sampling rate, such as an increase in the number of channels being sampled, a burst sampling of at least one of the plurality of input channels, and the like.
In embodiments, a computer-implemented method for implementing a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: providing a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store a plurality of collector route templates, sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels, wherein the plurality of collector route templates each comprise a different sensor collection routine; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels, wherein the data acquisition circuit acquires sensor data from a first route of input channels; and providing a data analysis circuit structured to evaluate the sensor data with respect to stored anticipated state information, wherein the anticipated state information comprises an alarm threshold level, and wherein the data analysis circuit sets an alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for a first input channel in the first group of input channels, wherein the data collector is configured to switch from a current routing template collection routine to an alternate routing template collection routine based on a setting of an alarm state. In embodiments, the system may be deployed locally on the data collector, deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, wherein each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
In embodiments, one or more non-transitory computer-readable media comprising computer executable instructions that, when executed, may cause at least one processor to perform actions comprising: providing a data collector communicatively coupled to a plurality of input channels; providing a data storage structured to store a plurality of collector route templates, sensor specifications for sensors that correspond to the input channels, wherein the plurality of collector route templates each comprise a different sensor collection routine; providing a data acquisition circuit structured to interpret a plurality of detection values, each of the plurality of detection values corresponding to at least one of the input channels, wherein the data acquisition circuit acquires sensor data from a first route of input channels; and providing a data analysis circuit structured to evaluate the sensor data with respect to stored anticipated state information, wherein the anticipated state information comprises an alarm threshold level, and wherein the data analysis circuit sets an alarm state when the alarm threshold level is exceeded for a first input channel in the first group of input channels, wherein the data collector is configured to switch from a current routing template collection routine to an alternate routing template collection routine based on a setting of an alarm state. In embodiments, the instructions may be deployed locally on the data collector, deployed in part locally on the data collector and in part on a remote information technology infrastructure component apart from the collector, wherein each of the input channels correspond to a sensor located in the environment.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may use ambient, local and vibration noise for prediction of outcomes, events, and states. A library may be populated with each of the three noise types for various conditions (e.g., start up, shut down, normal operation, other periods of operation as described elsewhere herein). In other embodiments, the library may be populated with noise patterns representing the aggregate ambient, local, and/or vibration noise. Analysis (e.g., filtering, signal conditioning, spectral analysis, trend analysis) may be performed on the aggregate noise to obtain a characteristic noise pattern and identify changes in noise pattern as possible indicators of a changed condition. A library of noise patterns may be generated with established vibration fingerprints and local and ambient noise that can be sorted by a parameter (see parameters herein), or other parameters/features of the local and ambient environment (e.g., company type, industry type, products, robotic handling unit present/not present, operating environment, flow rates, production rates, brand or type of auxiliary equipment (e.g., filters, seals, coupled machinery)). The library of noise patterns may be used by an expert system, such as one with machine learning capacity, to confirm a status of a machine, predict when maintenance is required (e.g., off-nominal measurement, artifacts in signal), predict a failure or an imminent failure, predict/diagnose a problem, and the like.
Based on a current noise pattern, the library may be consulted or used to seed an expert system to predict an outcome, event, or state based on the noise pattern. Based on the prediction, the expert system may one or more of trigger an alert of a failure, imminent failure, or maintenance event, shut down equipment/component/line, initiate maintenance/lubrication/alignment, deploy a field technician, recommend a vibration absorption/dampening device, modify a process to utilize backup equipment/component, modify a process to preserve products/reactants, etc., generate/modify a maintenance schedule, or the like.
For example, a noise pattern for a thermic heating system in a pharmaceutical plant or cooking system may include local, ambient, and vibration noise. The ambient noise may be a result of, for example, various pumps to pump fuel into the system. Local noise may be a result of a local security camera chirping with every detection of motion. Vibration noise may result from the combustion machinery used to heat the thermal fluid. These noise sources may form a noise pattern which may be associated with a state of the thermic system. The noise pattern and associated state may be stored in a library. An expert system used to monitor the state of the thermic heating system may be seeded with noise patterns and associated states from the library. As current data are received into the expert system, it may predict a state based on having learned noise patterns and associated states.
In another example, a noise pattern for boiler feed water in a refinery may include local and ambient noise. The local noise may be attributed to the operation of, for example, a feed pump feeding the feed water into a steam drum. The ambient noise may be attributed to nearby fans. These noise sources may form a noise pattern which may be associated with a state of the boiler feed water. The noise pattern and associated state may be stored in a library. An expert system used to monitor the state of the boiler may be seeded with noise patterns and associated states from the library. As current data are received into the expert system, it may predict a state based on having learned noise patterns and associated states.
In yet another example, a noise pattern for a storage tank in a refinery may include local, ambient, and vibration noise. The ambient noise may be a result of, for example, a pump that pumps a product into the tank. Local noise may be a result of a fan ventilating the tank room. Vibration noise may result from line noise of a power supply into the storage tank. These noise sources may form a noise pattern which may be associated with a state of the storage tank. The noise pattern and associated state may be stored in a library. An expert system used to monitor the state of the storage tank may be seeded with noise patterns and associated states from the library. As current data are received into the expert system, it may predict a state based on having learned noise patterns and associated states.
In another example, a noise pattern for condensate/make-up water system in a power station may include vibration and ambient noise. The ambient noise may be attributed to nearby fans. The vibration noise may be attributed to the operation of the condenser. These noise sources may form a noise pattern which may be associated with a state of the condensate/make-up water system. The noise pattern and associated state may be stored in a library. An expert system used to monitor the state of the condensate/make-up water system may be seeded with noise patterns and associated states from the library. As current data are received into the expert system, it may predict a state based on having learned noise patterns and associated states.
A library of noise patterns may be updated if a changed parameter resulted in a new noise pattern or if a predicted outcome or state did not occur in the absence of mitigation of a diagnosed problem. A library of noise patterns may be updated if a noise pattern resulted in an alternative state than what was predicted by the library. The update may occur after just one time that the state that actually occurred did not match the predicted state from the library. In other embodiments, it may occur after a threshold number of times. In embodiments, the library may be updated to apply one or more rules for comparison, such as rules that govern how many parameters to match along with the noise pattern, or the standard deviation for the match in order to accept the predicted outcome. For example, a baffle may be replaced in a static agitator in a pharmaceutical processing plant which may result in a changed noise pattern. In another example, as the seal on a pressure cooker in a food processing plant ages, the noise pattern associated with the pressure cooker may change.
In embodiments, the library of vibration fingerprints, noise sources and/or noise patterns may be available for subscription. The libraries may be used in offset systems to improve operation of the local system. Subscribers may subscribe at any level (e.g., component, machinery, installation, etc.) in order to access data that would normally not be available to them, such as because it is from a competitor, or is from an installation of the machinery in a different industry not typically considered. Subscribers may search on indicators/predictors based on or filtered by system conditions, or update an indicator/predictor with proprietary data to customize the library. The library may further include parameters and metadata auto-generated by deployed sensors throughout an installation, onboard diagnostic systems and instrumentation and sensors, ambient sensors in the environment, sensors (e.g., in flexible sets) that can be put into place temporarily, such as in one or more mobile data collectors, sensors that can be put into place for longer term use, such as being attached to points of interest on devices or systems, and the like.
In embodiments, a third party (e.g., RMOs, manufacturers) can aggregate data at the component level, equipment level, factory/installation level and provide a statistically valid data set against which to optimize their own systems. For example, when a new installation of a machine is contemplated, it may be beneficial to review a library for best data points to acquire in making state predictions. For example, a particular sensor package may be recommended to reliably determine if there will be a failure. For example, if vibration noise of equipment coupled with particular levels of local noise or other ambient sensed conditions reliably is an indicator of imminent failure, a given vibration transducer/temp/microphone package observing those elements may be recommended for the installation. Knowing such information may inform the choice to rent or buy a piece of machinery or associated warranties and service plans, such as based on knowing the quantity and depth of information that may be needed to reliably maintain the machinery.
In embodiments, manufacturers may utilize the library to rapidly collect in-service information for machines to draft engineering specifications for new customers.
In embodiments, noise and vibration data may be used to remotely monitor installs and automatically dispatch a field crew.
In embodiments, noise and vibration data may be used to audit a system. For example, equipment running outside the range of a licensed duty cycle may be detected by a suite of vibration sensors and/or ambient/local noise sensors. In embodiments, alerts may be triggered of potential out-of-warranty violations based on data from vibration sensors and/or ambient/local noise sensors.
In embodiments, noise and vibration data may be used in maintenance. This may be particularly useful where multiple machines are deployed that may vibrationally interact with the environment, such as two large generating machines on the same floor or platform with each other, such as in power generation plants.
Referring to FIG. In embodiments, a monitoring system 10800 for data collection in an industrial environment, may include a plurality of sensors 10802 selected among vibration sensors, ambient environment condition sensors and local sensors for collecting non-vibration data proximal to a machine in the environment, the plurality of sensors 10802 communicatively coupled to a data collector 10804, a data collection circuit 10808 structured to collect output data 10810 from the plurality of sensors 10802, and a machine learning data analysis circuit 10812 structured to receive the output data 10810 and learn received output data patterns 10814 predictive of at least one of an outcome and a state. The state may correspond to an outcome relating to a machine in the environment, an anticipated outcome relating to a machine in the environment, an outcome relating to a process in the environment, or an anticipated outcome relating to a process in the environment. The system may be deployed on the data collector 10804 or distributed between the data collector 10804 and a remote infrastructure. The data collector 10804 may include the data collection circuit 10808. The ambient environment condition or local sensors include one or more of a noise sensor, a temperature sensor, a flow sensor, a pressure sensor, a chemical sensor, a vibration sensor, an acceleration sensor, an accelerometer, a Pressure sensor, a force sensor, a position sensor, a location sensor, a velocity sensor, a displacement sensor, a temperature sensor, a thermographic sensor, a heat flux sensor, a tachometer sensor, a motion sensor, a magnetic field sensor, an electrical field sensor, a galvanic sensor, a current sensor, a flow sensor, a gaseous flow sensor, a non-gaseous fluid flow sensor, a heat flow sensor, a particulate flow sensor, a level sensor, a proximity sensor, a toxic gas sensor, a chemical sensor, a CBRNE sensor, a pH sensor, a hygrometer, a moisture sensor, a densitometer, an imaging sensor, a camera, an SSR, a triax probe, an ultrasonic sensor, a touch sensor, a microphone, a capacitive sensor, a strain gauge, an EMF meter, and the like.
In embodiments, a monitoring system 10800 for data collection in an industrial environment may include a data collection circuit 10808 structured to collect output data 10810 from a plurality of sensors 10802 selected among vibration sensors, ambient environment condition sensors and local sensors for collecting non-vibration data proximal to a machine in the environment, the plurality of sensors 10802 communicatively coupled to a data collection circuit 10808, and a machine learning data analysis circuit 10812 structured to receive the output data 10810 and learn received output data patterns 10814 predictive of at least one of an outcome and a state, wherein the monitoring system 10800 is structured to determine if the output data matches a learned received output data pattern. The machine learning data analysis circuit 10812 may be structured to learn received output data patterns 10814 by being seeded with a model 10816. The model 10816 may be a physical model, an operational model, or a system model. The machine learning data analysis circuit 10812 may be structured to learn received output data patterns 10814 based on the outcome or the state. The monitoring system 10700 keeps or modifies operational parameters or equipment based on the predicted outcome or the state. The data collection circuit 10808 collects more or fewer data points from one or more of the plurality of sensors 10802 based on the learned received output data patterns 10814, the outcome or the state. The data collection circuit 10808 changes a data storage technique for the output data based on the learned received output data patterns 10814, the outcome, or the state. The data collector 10804 changes a data presentation mode or manner based on the learned received output data patterns 10814, the outcome, or the state. The data collection circuit 10808 applies one or more filters (low pass, high pass, band pass, etc.) to the output data. The data collection circuit 10808 adjusts the weights/biases of the machine learning data analysis circuit 10812, such as in response to the learned received output data patterns 10814. The monitoring system 10800 removes/re-tasks under-utilized equipment based on one or more of the learned received output data patterns 10814, the outcome, or the state. The machine learning data analysis circuit 10812 may include a neural network expert system. The machine learning data analysis circuit 10812 may be structured to learn received output data patterns 10814 indicative of progress/alignment with one or more goals/guidelines, wherein progress/alignment of each goal/guideline is determined by a different subset of the plurality of sensors 10802. The machine learning data analysis circuit 10812 may be structured to learn received output data patterns 10814 indicative of an unknown variable. The machine learning data analysis circuit 10812 may be structured to learn received output data patterns 10814 indicative of a preferred input sensor among available input sensors. The machine learning data analysis circuit 10812 may be disposed in part on a machine, on one or more data collection circuits 10808, in network infrastructure, in the cloud, or any combination thereof. The output data 10810 from the vibration sensors forms a vibration fingerprint, which may include one or more of a frequency, a spectrum, a velocity, a peak location, a wave peak shape, a waveform shape, a wave envelope shape, an acceleration, a phase information, and a phase shift. The data collection circuit 10808 may apply a rule regarding how many parameters of the vibration fingerprint to match or the standard deviation for the match in order to identify a match between the output data 10810 and the learned received output data pattern. The state may be one of a normal operation, a maintenance required, a failure, or an imminent failure. The monitoring system 10800 may trigger an alert, shut down equipment/component/line, initiate maintenance/lubrication/alignment based on the predicted outcome or state, deploy a field technician based on the predicted outcome or state, recommend a vibration absorption/dampening device based on the predicted outcome or state, modify a process to utilize backup equipment/component based on the predicted outcome or state, and the like. The monitoring system 10800 may modify a process to preserve products/reactants, etc. based on the predicted outcome or state. The monitoring system 10800 may generate or modify a maintenance schedule based on the predicted outcome or state. The data collection circuit 10808 may include the data collection circuit 10808. The system may be deployed on the data collection circuit 10808 or distributed between the data collection circuit 10808 and a remote infrastructure.
In embodiments, a monitoring system 10800 for data collection in an industrial environment may include a data collection circuit 10808 structured to collect output data 10810 from a plurality of sensors 10802 selected among vibration sensors, ambient environment condition sensors and local sensors for collecting non-vibration data proximal to a machine in the environment, the plurality of sensors 10802 communicatively coupled to the data collection circuit 10808, and a machine learning data analysis circuit 10812 structured to receive the output data 10810 and learn received output data patterns 10814 predictive of at least one of an outcome and a state, wherein the monitoring system 10800 is structured to determine if the output data matches a learned received output data pattern and keep or modify operational parameters or equipment based on the determination.
In embodiments, a monitoring system 10800 for data collection in an industrial environment may include a data collection circuit 10808 structured to collect output data 10810 from the plurality of sensors 10802 selected among vibration sensors, ambient environment condition sensors and local sensors for collecting non-vibration data proximal to a machine in the environment, the plurality of sensors 10802 communicatively coupled to the data collection circuit 10808, and a machine learning data analysis circuit 10812 structured to receive the output data 10810 and learn received output data patterns 10814 predictive of at least one of an outcome and a state, wherein the output data 10810 from the vibration sensors forms a vibration fingerprint. The vibration fingerprint may include one or more of a frequency, a spectrum, a velocity, a peak location, a wave peak shape, a waveform shape, a wave envelope shape, an acceleration, a phase information, and a phase shift. The data collection circuit 10808 may apply a rule regarding how many parameters of the vibration fingerprint to match or the standard deviation for the match in order to identify a match between the output data 10810 and the learned received output data pattern. The monitoring system 10800 may be structured to determine if the output data matches a learned received output data pattern and keep or modify operational parameters or equipment based on the determination.
In embodiments (
In embodiments, a monitoring system for data collection in an industrial environment may include a data collection circuit 10808 structured to collect output data 10810 from a plurality of sensors 10802, the sensors selected among vibration sensors, ambient environment condition sensors and local sensors for collecting non-vibration data proximal to a machine in the environment, the plurality of sensors 10802 communicatively coupled to the data collection circuit 10808, wherein the output data 10810 from the vibration sensors is in the form of a vibration fingerprint, a data structure 10820 comprising a plurality of vibration fingerprints and associated outcomes, and a machine learning data analysis circuit 10812 structured to receive the output data 10810 and learn received output data patterns 10814 predictive of an outcome or a state based on processing of the vibration fingerprints. The machine learning data analysis circuit 10812 may be seeded with one of the plurality of vibration fingerprints from the data structure 10820. The data structure 10820 may be updated if a changed parameter resulted in a new vibration fingerprint or if a predicted outcome did not occur in the absence of mitigation. The data structure 10820 may be updated when the learned received output data patterns 10814 do not reliably predict the outcome or the state. The system may be deployed on the data collection circuit or distributed between the data collection circuit and a remote infrastructure.
In embodiments, a monitoring system 10800 for data collection in an industrial environment may include a data collection circuit 10808 structured to collect output data 10810 from a plurality of sensors 10802 selected among vibration sensors, ambient environment condition sensors and local sensors for collecting non-vibration data proximal to a machine in the environment, the plurality of sensors 10802 communicatively coupled to a data collection circuit 10808, wherein the output data 10810 from the plurality of sensors 10802 is in the form of a noise pattern, a data structure 10820 comprising a plurality of noise patterns and associated outcomes, and a machine learning data analysis circuit 10812 structured to receive the output data 10810 and learn received output data patterns 10814 predictive of an outcome or a state based on processing of the noise patterns.
The term industrial system (and similar terms) as utilized herein should be understood broadly. Without limitation to any other aspect or description of the present disclosure, an industrial system includes any large scale process system, mechanical system, chemical system, assembly line, oil and gas system (including, without limitation, production, transportation, exploration, remote operations, offshore operations, and/or refining), mining system (including, without limitation, production, exploration, transportation, remote operations, and/or underground operations), rail system (yards, trains, shipments, etc.), construction, power generation, aerospace, agriculture, food processing, and/or energy generation. Certain components may not be considered industrial individually, but may be considered industrially in an aggregated system—for example a single fan, motor, and/or engine may be not an industrial system, but may be a part of a larger system and/or be accumulated with a number of other similar components to be considered an industrial system and/or a part of an industrial system. In certain embodiments, a system may be considered an industrial system for some purposes but not for other purposes—for example a large data server farm may be considered an industrial system for certain sensing operations, such as temperature detection, vibration, or the like, but not an industrial system for other sensing operations such as gas composition. Additionally, in certain embodiments, otherwise similar looking systems may be differentiated in determining whether such system are industrial systems, and/or which type of industrial system. For example, one data server farm may not, at a given time, have process stream flow rates that are critical to operation, while another data server farm may have process stream flow rates that are critical to operation (e.g., a coolant flow stream), and accordingly one data farm server may be an industrial system for a data collection and/or sensing improvement process or system, while the other is not. Accordingly, the benefits of the present disclosure may be applied in a wide variety of systems, and any such systems may be considered an industrial system herein, while in certain embodiments a given system may not be considered an industrial system herein. One of skill in the art, having the benefit of the disclosure herein and knowledge about a contemplated system ordinarily available to that person, can readily determine which aspects of the present disclosure will benefit a particular system, how to combine processes and systems from the present disclosure to enhance operations of the contemplated system. Certain considerations for the person of skill in the art, in determining whether a contemplated system is an industrial system and/or whether aspects of the present disclosure can benefit or enhance the contemplated system include, without limitation: the accessibility of portions of the system to positioning sensing devices; the sensitivity of the system to capital costs (e.g., initial installation) and operating costs (e.g., optimization of processes, reduction of power usage); the transmission environment of the system (e.g., availability of broadband internet; satellite coverage; wireless cellular access; the electro-magnetic (“EM”) environment of the system; the weather, temperature, and environmental conditions of the system; the availability of suitable locations to run wires, network lines, and the like; the presence and/or availability of suitable locations for network infrastructure, router positioning, and/or wireless repeaters); the availability of trained personnel to interact with computing devices; the desired spatial, time, and/or frequency resolution of sensed parameters in the system; the degree to which a system or process is well understood or modeled; the turndown ratio in system operations (e.g., high load differential to low load; high flow differential to low flow; high temperature operation differential to low temperature operation); the turndown ratio in operating costs (e.g., effects of personnel costs based on time (day, season, etc.); effects of power consumption cost variance with time, throughput, etc.); the sensitivity of the system to failure, down-time, or the like; the remoteness of the contemplated system (e.g., transport costs, time delays, etc.); and/or qualitative scope of change in the system over the operating cycle (e.g., the system runs several distinct processes requiring a variable sensing environment with time; time cycle and nature of changes such as periodic, event driven, lead times generally available, etc.). While specific examples of industrial systems and considerations are described herein for purposes of illustration, any system benefitting from the disclosures herein, and any considerations understood to one of skill in the art having the benefit of the disclosures herein, are specifically contemplated within the scope of the present disclosure.
The term sensor (and similar terms) as utilized herein should be understood broadly. Without limitation to any other aspect or description of the present disclosure, sensor includes any device configured to provide a sensed value representative of a physical value (e.g., temperature, force, pressure) in a system, or representative of a conceptual value in a system at least having an ancillary relationship to a physical value (e.g., work, state of charge, frequency, phase, etc.).
Example and non-limiting sensors include vibration, acceleration, noise, pressure, force, position, location, velocity, displacement, temperature, heat flux, speed, rotational speed (e.g., a tachometer), motion, accelerometers, magnetic field, electrical field, galvanic, current, flow (gas, fluid, heat, particulates, particles, etc.), level, proximity, gas composition, fluid composition, toxicity, corrosiveness, acidity, pH, humidity, hygrometer measures, moisture, density (bulk or specific), ultrasound, imaging, analog, and/or digital sensors. The list of sensed values is a non-limiting example, and the benefits of the present disclosure in many applications can be realized independent of the sensor type, while in other applications the benefits of the present disclosure may be dependent upon the sensor type.
The sensor type and mechanism for detection may be any type of sensor understood in the art. Without limitation, an accelerometer may be any type and scaling, for example 500 mV per g (1 g=9.8 m/s2), 100 mV, 1 V per g, 5 V per g, 10 V per g, 10 MV per g, as well as any frequency capability. It will be understood for accelerometers, and for all sensor types, that the scaling and range may be competing (e.g., in a fixed-bit or low bit A/D system), and/or selection of high resolution scaling with a large range may drive up sensor and/or computing costs, which may be acceptable in certain embodiments, and may be prohibitive in other embodiments. Example and non-limiting accelerometers include piezo-electric devices, high resolution and sampling speed position detection devices (e.g., laser based devices), and/or detection of other parameters (strain, force, noise, etc.) that can be correlated to acceleration and/or vibration. Example and non-limiting proximity probes include electro-magnetic devices (e.g., Hall effect, Variable Reluctance, etc.), a sleeve/oil film device, and/or determination of other parameters than can be correlated to proximity. An example vibration sensor includes a tri-axial probe, which may have high frequency response (e.g., scaling of 100 MV/g). Example and non-limiting temperature sensors include thermistors, thermocouples, and/or optical temperature determination.
A sensor may, additionally or alternatively, provide a processed value (e.g., a de-bounced, filtered, and/or compensated value) and/or a raw value, with processing downstream (e.g., in a data collector, controller, plant computer, and/or on a cloud-based data receiver). In certain embodiments, a sensor provides a voltage, current, data file (e.g., for images), or other raw data output, and/or a sensor provides a value representative of the intended sensed measurement (e.g., a temperature sensor may communicate a voltage or a temperature value). Additionally or alternatively, a sensor may communicate wirelessly, through a wired connection, through an optical connection, or by any other mechanism. The described examples of sensor types and/or communication parameters are non-limiting examples for purposes of illustration.
Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, a sensor is a distributed physical device—for example where two separate sensing elements coordinate to provide a sensed value (e.g., a position sensing element and a mass sensing element may coordinate to provide an acceleration value). In certain embodiments, a single physical device may form two or more sensors, and/or parts of more than one sensor. For example, a position sensing element may form a position sensor and a velocity sensor, where the same physical hardware provides the sensed data for both determinations.
The term smart sensor, smart device (and similar terms) as utilized herein should be understood broadly. Without limitation to any other aspect or description of the present disclosure, a smart sensor includes any sensor and aspect thereof as described throughout the present disclosure. A smart sensor includes an increment of processing reflected in the sensed value communicated by the sensor, including at least basic sensor processing (e.g., de-bouncing, filtering, compensation, normalization, and/or output limiting), more complex compensations (e.g., correcting a temperature value based on known effects of current environmental conditions on the sensed temperature value, common mode or other noise removal, etc.), a sensing device that provides the sensed value as a network communication, and/or a sensing device that aggregates a number of sensed values for communication (e.g., multiple sensors on a device communicated out in a parseable or deconvolutable manner or as separate messages; multiple sensors providing a value to a single smart sensor, which relays sensed values on to a data collector, controller, plant computer, and/or cloud-based data receiver). The use of the term smart sensor is for purposes of illustration, and whether a sensor is a smart sensor can depend upon the context and the contemplated system, and can be a relative description compared to other sensors in the contemplated system. Thus, a given sensor having identical functionality may be a smart sensor for the purposes of one contemplated system, and just a sensor for the purposes of another contemplated system, and/or may be a smart sensor in a contemplated system during certain operating conditions, and just a sensor for the purposes of the same contemplated system during other operating conditions.
The terms sensor fusion, fused sensors, and similar terms, as utilized herein, should be understood broadly, except where context indicates otherwise, without limitation to any other aspect or description of the present disclosure. A sensor fusion includes a determination of second order data from sensor data, and further includes a determination of second order data from sensor data of multiple sensors, including involving multiplexing of streams of data, combinations of batches of data, and the like from the multiple sensors. Second order data includes a determination about a system or operating condition beyond that which is sensed directly. For example, temperature, pressure, mixing rate, and other data may be analyzed to determine which parameters are result-effective on a desired outcome (e.g., a reaction rate). The sensor fusion may include sensor data from multiple sources, and/or longitudinal data (e.g., taken over a period of time, over the course of a process, and/or over an extent of components in a plant—for example tracking a number of assembled parts, a virtual slug of fluid passing through a pipeline, or the like). The sensor fusion may be performed in real-time (e.g., populating a number of sensor fusion determinations with sensor data as a process progresses), off-line (e.g., performed on a controller, plant computer, and/or cloud-based computing device), and/or as a post-processing operation (e.g., utilizing historical data, data from multiple plants or processes, etc.). In certain embodiments, a sensor fusion includes a machine pattern recognition operation—for example where an outcome of a process is given to the machine and/or determined by the machine, and the machine pattern recognition operation determines result-effective parameters from the detected sensor value space to determine which operating conditions were likely to be the cause of the outcome and/or the off-nominal result of the outcome (e.g., process was less effective or more effective than nominal, failed, etc.). In certain embodiments, the outcome may be a quantitative outcome (e.g., 20% more product was produced than a nominal run) or a qualitative outcome (e.g., product quality was unacceptable, component X of the contemplated system failed during the process, component X of the contemplated system required a maintenance or service event, etc.).
In certain embodiments, a sensor fusion operation is iterative or recursive—for example an estimated set of result effective parameters is updated after the sensor fusion operation, and a subsequent sensor fusion operation is performed on the same data or another data set with an updated set of the result effective parameters. In certain embodiments, subsequent sensor fusion operations include adjustments to the sensing scheme—for example higher resolution detections (e.g., in time, space, and/or frequency domains), larger data sets (and consequent commitment of computing and/or networking resources), changes in sensor capability and/or settings (e.g., changing an A/D scaling, range, resolution, etc.; changing to a more capable sensor and/or more capable data collector, etc.) are performed for subsequent sensor fusion operations. In certain embodiments, the sensor fusion operation demonstrates improvements to the contemplated system (e.g., production quantity, quality, and/or purity, etc.) such that expenditure of additional resources to improve the sensing scheme are justified. In certain embodiments, the sensor fusion operation provides for improvement in the sensing scheme without incremental cost—for example by narrowing the number of result effective parameters and thereby freeing up system resources to provide greater resolution, sampling rates, etc., from hardware already present in the contemplated system. In certain embodiments, iterative and/or recursive sensor fusion is performed on the same data set, a subsequent data set, and/or a historical data set. For example, high resolution data may already be present in the system, and a first sensor fusion operation is performed with low resolution data (e.g., sampled from the high resolution data set), such as to allow for completion of sensor fusion processing operations within a desired time frame, within a desired processor, memory, and/or network utilization, and/or to allow for checking a large number of variables as potential result effective parameters. In a further example, a greater number of samples from the high resolution data set may be utilized in a subsequent sensor fusion operation in response to confidence that improvements are present, narrowing of the potential result effective variables, and/or a determination that higher resolution data is required to determine the result effective parameters and/or effective values for such parameters.
The described operations and aspects for sensor fusion are non-limiting examples, and one of skill in the art, having the benefit of the disclosures herein and information ordinarily available about a contemplated system, can readily design a system to utilize and/or benefit from a sensor fusion operation. Certain considerations for a system to utilize and/or benefit from a sensor fusion operation include, without limitation: the number of components in the system; the cost of components in the system; the cost of maintenance and/or down-time for the system; the value of improvements in the system (production quantity, quality, yield, etc.); the presence, possibility, and/or consequences of undesirable system outcomes (e.g., side products, thermal and/or luminary events, environmental benefits or consequences, hazards present in the system); the expense of providing a multiplicity of sensors for the system; the complexity between system inputs and system outputs; the availability and cost of computing resources (e.g., processing, memory, and/or communication throughput); the size/scale of the contemplated system and/or the ability of such a system to generate statistically significant data; whether offset systems exist, including whether data from offset systems is available and whether combining data from offset systems will generate a statistically improved data set relative to the system considered alone; and/or the cost of upgrading, improving, or changing a sensing scheme for the contemplated system. The described considerations for a contemplated system that may benefit from or utilize a sensor fusion operation are non-limiting illustrations.
Certain systems, processes, operations, and/or components are described in the present disclosure as “offset systems” or the like. An offset system is a system distinct from a contemplated system, but having relevance to the contemplated system. For example, a contemplated refinery may have an “offset refinery,” which may be a refinery operated by a competitor, by a same entity operating the contemplated refinery, and/or a historically operated refinery that no longer exists. The offset refinery bears some relevant relationship to the contemplated refinery, such as utilizing similar reactions, process flows, production volumes, feed stock, effluent materials, or the like. A system which is an offset system for one purpose may not be an offset system for another purpose. For example, a manufacturing process utilizing conveyor belts and similar motors may be an offset process for a contemplated manufacturing process for the purpose of tracking product movement, understanding motor operations and failure modes, or the like, but may not be an offset process for product quality if the products being produced have distinct quality outcome parameters. Any industrial system contemplated herein may have an offset system for certain purposes. One of skill in the art, having the benefit of the present disclosure and information ordinarily available for a contemplated system, can readily determine what is disclosed by an offset system or offset aspect of a system.
Any one or more of the terms computer, computing device, processor, circuit, and/or server include a computer of any type, capable to access instructions stored in communication thereto such as upon a non-transient computer readable medium, whereupon the computer performs operations of systems or methods described herein upon executing the instructions. In certain embodiments, such instructions themselves comprise a computer, computing device, processor, circuit, and/or server. Additionally or alternatively, a computer, computing device, processor, circuit, and/or server may be a separate hardware device, one or more computing resources distributed across hardware devices, and/or may include such aspects as logical circuits, embedded circuits, sensors, actuators, input and/or output devices, network and/or communication resources, memory resources of any type, processing resources of any type, and/or hardware devices configured to be responsive to determined conditions to functionally execute one or more operations of systems and methods herein.
Certain operations described herein include interpreting, receiving, and/or determining one or more values, parameters, inputs, data, or other information. Operations including interpreting, receiving, and/or determining any value parameter, input, data, and/or other information include, without limitation: receiving data via a user input; receiving data over a network of any type; reading a data value from a memory location in communication with the receiving device; utilizing a default value as a received data value; estimating, calculating, or deriving a data value based on other information available to the receiving device; and/or updating any of these in response to a later received data value. In certain embodiments, a data value may be received by a first operation, and later updated by a second operation, as part of the receiving a data value. For example, when communications are down, intermittent, or interrupted, a first operation to interpret, receive, and/or determine a data value may be performed, and when communications are restored an updated operation to interpret, receive, and/or determine the data value may be performed.
Certain logical groupings of operations herein, for example methods or procedures of the current disclosure, are provided to illustrate aspects of the present disclosure. Operations described herein are schematically described and/or depicted, and operations may be combined, divided, re-ordered, added, or removed in a manner consistent with the disclosure herein. It is understood that the context of an operational description may require an ordering for one or more operations, and/or an order for one or more operations may be explicitly disclosed, but the order of operations should be understood broadly, where any equivalent grouping of operations to provide an equivalent outcome of operations is specifically contemplated herein. For example, if a value is used in one operational step, the determining of the value may be required before that operational step in certain contexts (e.g., where the time delay of data for an operation to achieve a certain effect is important), but may not be required before that operation step in other contexts (e.g., where usage of the value from a previous execution cycle of the operations would be sufficient for those purposes). Accordingly, in certain embodiments an order of operations and grouping of operations as described is explicitly contemplated herein, and in certain embodiments re-ordering, subdivision, and/or different grouping of operations is explicitly contemplated herein.
Referencing
The example system 10902 further includes a sensor communication circuit 10920 (reference
In certain embodiments, sensor data values 10948 are provided to a data collector 10910, which may be in communication with multiple sensors 10908 and/or with a controller 10914. In certain embodiments, a plant computer 10912 is additionally or alternatively present. In the example system, the controller 10914 is structured to functionally execute operations of the sensor communication circuit 10920, pattern recognition circuit 10922, and/or the sensor learning circuit 10924, and is depicted as a separate device for clarity of description. Aspects of the controller 10914 may be present on the sensors 10908, the data collector 10910, the plant computer 10912, and/or on a cloud computing device 10916. In certain embodiments, all aspects of the controller 10914 may be present in another device depicted on the system 10902. The plant computer 10912 represents local computing resources, for example processing, memory, and/or network resources, that may be present and/or in communication with the industrial system 10904. In certain embodiments, the cloud computing device 10916 represents computing resources externally available to the industrial system 10904, for example over a private network, intra-net, through cellular communications, satellite communications, and/or over the internet. In certain embodiments, the data collector 10910 may be a computing device, a smart sensor, a MUX box, or other data collection device capable to receive data from multiple sensors and to pass-through the data and/or store data for later transmission. An example data collector 10910 has no storage and/or limited storage, and selectively passes sensor data therethrough, with a subset of the sensor data being communicated at a given time due to bandwidth considerations of the data collector 10910, a related network, and/or imposed by environmental constraints. In certain embodiments, one or more sensors and/or computing devices in the system 10902 are portable devices—for example a plant operator walking through the industrial system may have a smart phone, which the system 10902 may selectively utilize as a data collector 10910, sensor 10908—for example to enhance communication throughput, sensor resolution, and/or as a primary method for communicating sensor data values 10948 to the controller 10914.
The example system 10902 further includes a pattern recognition circuit 10922 that determines a recognized pattern value 10930 in response to at least a portion of the sensor data values 10948.
The example system 10902 further includes a sensor learning circuit 10924 that updates the sensed parameter group 10928 in response to the recognized pattern value 10930. The example sensor communication circuit 10920 further adjusts the interpreting the sensor data values 10948 in response to the updated sensed parameter group 10928.
An example system 10902 further includes the pattern recognition circuit 10922 and the sensor learning circuit 10924 iteratively performing the determining the recognized pattern value 10930 and the updating the sensed parameter group 10928 to improve a sensing performance value 10934. For example, the pattern recognition circuit 10922 may add sensors, remove sensors, and/or change sensor setting to modify the sensed parameter group 10928 based upon sensors which appear to be effective or ineffective predictors of the recognized pattern value 10930, and the sensor learning circuit 10924 may instruct a continued change (e.g., while improvement is still occurring), an increased or decreased rate of change (e.g., to converge more quickly on an improved sensed parameter group 10928), and/or instruct a randomized change to the sensed parameter group 10928 (e.g., to ensure that all potentially result effective sensors are being checked, and/or to avoid converging into a local optimal value).
Example and non-limiting options for the sensing performance value 10934 include: a signal-to-noise performance for detecting a value of interest in the industrial system (e.g., a determination that the prediction signal for the value is high relative to noise factors for one or more sensors of the sensed parameter group 10928, and/or for the sensed parameter group 10928 as a whole); a network utilization of the sensors in the industrial system (e.g., the sensor learning circuit 10924 may score a sensed parameter group 10928 relatively high where it is as effective or almost as effective as another sensed parameter group 10928, but results in lower network utilization); an effective sensing resolution for a value of interest in the industrial system (e.g., the sensor learning circuit 10924 may score a sensed parameter group 10928 relatively high where it provides a responsive prediction of the output value to smaller changes in input values); a power consumption value for a sensing system in the industrial system, the sensing system including the sensors (e.g., the sensor learning circuit 10924 may score a sensed parameter group 10928 relatively high where it is as effective or almost as effective as another sensed parameter group 10928, but results in lower power consumption); a calculation efficiency for determining the secondary value (e.g., the sensor learning circuit 10924 may score a sensed parameter group 10928 relatively high where it is as effective or almost as effective as another sensed parameter group 10928 in determining the secondary value 10932, but results in fewer processor cycles, lower network utilization, and/or lower memory utilization including stored memory requirements as well as intermediate memory utilization such as buffers); an accuracy and/or a precision of the secondary value (e.g., the sensor learning circuit 10924 may score a sensed parameter group 10928 relatively high where it provides a highly accurate and/or highly precise determination of the secondary value 10932); a redundancy capacity for determining the secondary value (e.g., the sensor learning circuit 10924 may score a sensed parameter group 10928 relatively high where it provides similar capability and/or resource utilization, but provides for additional sensing redundancy, such as being more robust to gaps in data from one or more of the sensors in the sensed parameter group 10928); and/or a lead time value for determining the secondary value 10932 (e.g., the sensor learning circuit 10924 may score a sensed parameter group 10928 relatively high where it provides an improved or sufficient lead time in the secondary value 10932 determination—for example to assist in avoiding over-temperature operation, spoiling an entire production run, determining whether a component has sufficient service life to complete a production run, etc.) Example and non-limiting calculation efficiency values include one or more determinations such as: processor operations to determine the secondary value 10932; memory utilization for determining the secondary value 10932; a number of sensor inputs from the number of sensors for determining the secondary value 10932; and/or supporting memory, such as long-term storage or buffers for supporting the secondary value 10932.
Example systems include one or more, or all, of the sensors 10908 as analog sensors and/or as remote sensors. An example system includes the secondary value 10932 being a value such as: a virtual sensor output value; a process prediction value (e.g., a success value for a production run, an overtemperature value, an overpressure value, a product quality value, etc.); a process state value (e.g., a stage of the process, a temperature at a time and location in the process); a component prediction value (e.g., a component failure prediction, a component maintenance or service prediction, a component response to an operating change prediction); a component state value (a remaining service life or maintenance interval for a component); and/or a model output value having the sensor data values 10948 from the fused number of sensors 10926 as an input. An example system includes the fused number of sensors 10926 being one or more of the combinations of sensors such as: a vibration sensor and a temperature sensor; a vibration sensor and a pressure sensor; a vibration sensor and an electric field sensor; a vibration sensor and a heat flux sensor; a vibration sensor and a galvanic sensor; and/or a vibration sensor and a magnetic sensor.
An example sensor learning circuit 10924 further updates the sensed parameter group 10928 by performing an operation such as: updating a sensor selection of the sensed parameter group 10928 (e.g., which sensors are sampled); updating a sensor sampling rate of at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group (e.g., how fast the sensors provide information, and/or how fast information is passed through the network); updating a sensor resolution of at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group (e.g., changing or requesting a change in a sensor resolution, utilizing additional sensors to provide greater effective resolution); updating a storage value corresponding to at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group (e.g., storing data from the sensor at a higher or lower resolution, and/or over a longer or shorter time period); updating a priority corresponding to at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group (e.g., moving a sensor up to a higher priority—for example, if environmental conditions prevent data receipt from all planned sensors, and/or reducing a time lag between creation of the sensed data and receipt at the sensor learning circuit 10924); and/or updating at least one of a sampling rate, sampling order, sampling phase, and/or a network path configuration corresponding to at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group.
An example pattern recognition circuit 10922 further determines the recognized pattern value 10930 by performing an operation such as: determining a signal effectiveness of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to a value of interest 10950 (e.g., determining that a sensor value is a good predictor of the value of interest 10950); determining a sensitivity of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group 10928 and the updated sensed parameter group 10928 relative to the value of interest 10950 (e.g., determining the relative sensitivity of the determined value of interest to small changes in operating conditions based on the selected sensed parameter group 10928); determining a predictive confidence of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group 10928 and the updated sensed parameter group 10928 relative to the value of interest 10950; determining a predictive delay time of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group 10928 and the updated sensed parameter group 10928 relative to the value of interest 10950; determining a predictive accuracy of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group 10928 and the updated sensed parameter group 10928 relative to the value of interest 10950; determining a classification precision of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group 10928 (e.g., determining the accuracy of classification of a pattern by a machine classifier based on use of the at least one sensor); determining a predictive precision of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group 10928 and the updated sensed parameter group 10928 relative to the value of interest 10950; and/or updating the recognized pattern value 10930 in response to external feedback, which may be received as external data 10952 (e.g., where an outcome is known, such as a maintenance event, product quality determination, production outcome determination, etc., the detection of the recognized pattern value 10930 is thereby improved according to the conditions of the system before the known outcome occurred). Example and non-limiting values of interest 10950 include: a virtual sensor output value; a process prediction value; a process state value; a component prediction value; a component state value; and/or a model output value having the sensor data values from the fused plurality of sensors as an input.
An example pattern recognition circuit 10922 further accesses cloud-based data 10954 including a second number of sensor data values, the second number of sensor data values corresponding to at least one offset industrial system. An example sensor learning circuit 10924 further accesses the cloud-based data 10954 including a second updated sensor parameter group corresponding to the at least one offset industrial system. Accordingly, the pattern recognition circuit 10922 can improve pattern recognition in the system based on increased statistical data available from an offset system. Additionally, or alternatively, the sensor learning circuit 10924 can improve more rapidly and with greater confidence based upon the data from the offset system—including determining which sensors in the offset system found to be effective in predicting system outcomes.
An example system includes an industrial system including an oil refinery. An example oil refinery includes one or more compressors for transferring fluids throughout the plant, and/or for pressurizing fluid streams (e.g., for reflux in a distillation column). Additionally, or alternatively, the example oil refinery includes vacuum distillation, for example, to fractionate hydrocarbons. The example oil refinery additionally includes various pipelines in the system for transferring fluids, bringing in feedstock, final product delivery, and the like. An example system includes a number of sensors configured to determine each aspect of a distillation column—for example temperatures of various fluid streams, temperatures, and compositions of individual contact trays in the column, measurements of the feed and reflux, as well as of the effluent or separated products. The design of a distillation column is complex, and optimal design can depend upon the sizing of boilers, compressors, the contact conditions within the column, as well as the composition of feedstock, all of which can vary significantly. Additionally, the optimal position for effective sensing of conditions in a pipeline can vary with fluid flow rates, environmental conditions (e.g., causing variation in heat transfer rates), the feedstock utilized, and other factors. Additionally, wear or loss of capability in a boiler, compressor, or other operating equipment can change the system response and capabilities, rendering a single point optimization—including where sensors should be positioned and how they should sample data—to be non-optimal as the system ages.
Provision of multiple sensors throughout the system can be costly, not necessarily because the sensors are expensive, but because the sensors provide data which may be prohibitive to transmit, store, and utilize. Cost may involve costs of transmitting over networks, as well as costs of operations, such as numbers of input/output operations (and time required to undertake such operations). The example system includes providing a large number of sensors throughout the system, and determining which of the sensors are effective for control and optimization of the distillation process. Additionally, as the feedstock and/or environmental conditions change, the optimal sensor package for both optimization and control may change. The example system utilizes a pattern recognition circuit to determine which sensors, including sensor fusion operations (including selection of groups, selection of multiplexing and combination, and the like), are effective in controlling the desired parameters of the distillation, and in determining the optimal values for temperatures, flow rates, entry trays for feed and reflux, and/or reflux rates. Additionally, the sensor learning circuit is capable, over time and/or utilizing offset oil refineries, to rapidly converge on various sensor packages that are appropriate for a multiplicity of operating conditions. If an unexpected operating condition occurs—for example an off-nominal operation of a compressor, the sensor learning circuit is capable of migrating the system to the correct sensing and operating conditions for the unexpected operating condition. The ability to flexibly utilize a multiplicity of sensors allows for the system to be flexible in response to changing conditions without providing for excessive capability in transmission and storage of sensor data. Accordingly, operations of the distillation column are improved and can be optimized for a large number of operating conditions. Additionally, alerts for the distillation column, based upon recognition of patterns indicating off-nominal operation, can be readily prepared to adjust or shut down the process before significant product quality loss and/or hazardous conditions develop. Example sensor fusion operations for a refinery include vibration information combined with temperatures, pressures, and/or composition (e.g., to determine compressor performance); temperature and pressure, temperature and composition, and/or composition and pressure (e.g., to determine feedstock variance, contact tray performance, and/or a component failure).
An example refinery system includes storage tanks and/or boiler feed water. Example system determinations include a sensor fusion to determine a storage tank failure and/or off-nominal operation, such as through a temperature and pressure fusion, and/or a vibration determination with a non-vibration determination (e.g., detecting leaks, air in the system, and/or a feed pump issue). Certain further example system determinations include a sensor fusion to determine a boiler feed water failure, such as through a sensor fusion including flow rate, pressure, temperature, and/or vibration. Any one or more of these parameters can be utilized to determine a system leak, failure, wear of a feed pump, scaling, and/or to reduce pumping losses while maintaining system flow rates. Similarly, an example industrial system includes a power generation system having a condensate and/or make-up water system, where a sensor fusion provides for a sensed parameter group and prediction of failures, maintenance, and the like.
An example industrial system includes an irrigation system for a field or a system of fields. Irrigation systems are subject to significant variability in the system (e.g., inlet pressures and/or water levels, component wear and maintenance) as well as environmental variability (e.g., types and distribution of crops planted, weather, soil moisture, humidity, seasonal variability in the sun, cloud coverage, and/or wind variance). Additionally, irrigation systems tend to be remotely located where high bandwidth network access, maintenance facilities, and/or even personnel for oversight are not readily available. An example system includes a multiplicity of sensors capable of detecting conditions for the irrigation system, without requiring that all of the sensors transmit or store data on a continuous basis. The pattern recognition circuit can readily determine the most important set of sensors to effectively predict patterns and those system conditions requiring a response (e.g., irrigation cycles, positioning, and the like). The sensor learning circuit provides for responsive migration of the sensed parameter group to variability, which may occur on slower (e.g., seasonal, climate change, etc.) or faster cycles (e.g., equipment failure, weather conditions, step change events such as planting or harvesting). Additionally, alerts for remote facilities can be readily prepared with confidence that the correct sensor package is in place for determining an off-nominal condition (e.g., imminent failure or maintenance requirement for a pump).
An example industrial system includes a chemical or pharmaceutical plant. Chemical plants require specific operating conditions, flow rates, temperatures, and the like to maintain proper temperatures, concentrations, mixing, and the like throughout the system. In many systems, there are numerous process steps, and an off-nominal or uncoordinated operation in one part of the process can result in reduced yields, a failed process, and/or a significant reduction in production capacity as coordinated processes must respond (or as coordinated processes fail to respond). Accordingly, a very large number of systems are required to minimally define the system, and in certain embodiments a prohibitive number of sensors are required, from a data transmission and storage viewpoint, to keep sensing capability for a broad range of operating conditions. Additionally, the complexity of the system results in difficulty optimizing and coordinating system operations even where sufficient sensors are present. In certain embodiments, the pattern recognition circuit can determine the sensing parameter groups that provide high resolution understanding of the system, without requiring that all of the sensors store and transmit data continuously. Further, the utilization of a sensor fusion provides for the opportunity to abstract desired outputs, for example “maximize yield” or “minimize an undesirable side reaction” without requiring a full understanding from the operator of which sensors and system conditions are most effective to achieve the abstracted desired output. Example components in a chemical or pharmaceutical plan amenable to control and predictions based on a sensor fusion operation include an agitator, a pressure reactor, a catalytic reactor, and/or a thermic heating system. Example sensor fusion operations to determine sensed parameter groups and tune the pattern recognition circuit include, without limitation, a vibration sensor combined with another sensor type, a composition sensor combined with another sensor type, a flow rate determination combined with another sensor type, and/or a temperature sensor combined with another sensor type. The sensor fusion best suited for a particular application can be converged upon by the sensor learning circuit, but also depends upon the type of component that is subject to predictions, as well as the type of desired outputs pursued by the operator. For example, agitators are amenable to vibration sensing, as well as uniformity of composition detection (e.g., high resolution temperature), expected reaction rates in a properly mixed system, and the like. Catalytic reactors are amenable to temperature sensing (based on the reaction thermodynamics), composition detection (e.g., for expected reactants, as well as direct detection of catalytic material), flow rates (e.g., gross mechanical failure, reduced volume of beads, etc.), and/or pressure detection (e.g., indicative of or coupled with flow rate changes).
An example industrial system includes a food processing system. Example food processing systems include pressurization vessels, stirrers, mixers, and/or thermic heating systems. Control of the process is critical to maintain food safety, product quality, and product consistency. However, most input parameters to the food processing system are subject to high variability—for example basic food products are inherently variable as natural products, with differing water content, protein content, and aesthetic variation. Additionally, labor cost management, power cost management, and variability in supply water, etc., provide for a complex process where determination of the process control variables, sensed parameters to determine these, and optimization of sensing in response to process variation are a difficult problem to resolve. Food processing systems are often cost conscious, and capital costs (e.g., for a robust network and computing system for optimization) are not readily incurred. Further, a food processing system may manufacture a wide variety of products on similar or the same production facilities—for example, to support an entire product line and/or due to seasonal variations. Accordingly, a sensor setup for one process may not support another process well. An example system includes the pattern recognition circuit determining the sensing parameter groups that provide a strong signal response in target outcomes even in light of high variability in system conditions. The pattern recognition circuit can provide for numerous sensed group parameter options available for different process conditions without requiring extensive computing or data storage resources. Additionally, the sensor learning circuit provides for rapid response of the sensing system to changes in the process conditions, including updating the sensed group parameter options to pursue abstracted target outputs without the operator having to understand which sensed parameters best support the output goals. The sensor fusion best suited for a particular application can be converged upon by the sensor learning circuit, but also depends upon the type of component that is subject to predictions, as well as the type of desired outputs pursued by the operator. For example, control of and predictions for pressurization vessels, stirrers, mixers, and/or thermic heating systems are amenable to a sensor fusion with a temperature determination combined with a non-temperature determination, a vibration determination combined with a non-vibration determination, and/or a heat map combined with a rate of change in the heat map and/or a non-heat map determination. An example system includes a sensor fusion with a vibration determination and a non-vibration determination, wherein predictive information for a mixer and/or a stirrer is provided. An example system includes a sensor fusion with a pressure determination, a temperature determination, and/or a non-pressure determination, wherein predictive information for a pressurization vessel is provided.
Referencing
An example procedure 10936 includes an operation to iteratively perform the determining the recognized pattern value and the updating the sensed parameter group to improve a sensing performance value (e.g., by repeating operations 10940 to 10944 periodically, at selected intervals, and/or in response to a system change). An example procedure 10936 includes determining the sensing performance value by determining: a signal-to-noise performance for detecting a value of interest in the industrial system; a network utilization of the plurality of sensors in the industrial system; an effective sensing resolution for a value of interest in the industrial system; a power consumption value for a sensing system in the industrial system, the sensing system including the plurality of sensors; a calculation efficiency for determining the secondary value; an accuracy and/or a precision of the secondary value; a redundancy capacity for determining the secondary value; and/or a lead time value for determining the secondary value.
An example procedure 10936 includes the operation 10944 to update the sensed parameter group by performing at least one operation such as: updating a sensor selection of the sensed parameter group; updating a sensor sampling rate of at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group; updating a sensor resolution of at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group; updating a storage value corresponding to at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group; updating a priority corresponding to at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group; and/or updating at least one of a sampling rate, sampling order, sampling phase, and a network path configuration corresponding to at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group. An example procedure 10936 includes the operation 10942 to determine the recognized pattern value by performing at least one operation such as: determining a signal effectiveness of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to a value of interest; determining a sensitivity of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to the value of interest; determining a predictive confidence of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to the value of interest; determining a predictive delay time of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to the value of interest; determining a predictive accuracy of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to the value of interest; determining a predictive precision of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to the value of interest; and/or updating the recognized pattern value in response to external feedback.
Clause 1. In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment, the system comprising: an industrial system comprising a plurality of components, and a plurality of sensors each operatively coupled to at least one of the plurality of components; a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values in response to a sensed parameter group; a pattern recognition circuit structured to determine a recognized pattern value in response to at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values; and a sensor learning circuit structured to update the sensed parameter group in response to the recognized pattern value; wherein the sensor communication circuit is further structured to adjust the interpreting of the plurality of sensor data values in response to the updated sensed parameter group. 2. The system of clause 1, wherein the sensed parameter group comprises a fused plurality of sensors, and wherein the recognized pattern value further includes a secondary value comprising a value determined in response to the fused plurality of sensors. 3. The system of clause 2, wherein the pattern recognition circuit and sensor learning circuit are further structured to iteratively perform the determining the recognized pattern value and the updating the sensed parameter group to improve a sensing performance value. 4. The system of clause 3, wherein the sensing performance value comprises at least one performance determination selected from the performance determinations consisting of: a signal-to-noise performance for detecting a value of interest in the industrial system; a network utilization of the plurality of sensors in the industrial system; an effective sensing resolution for a value of interest in the industrial system; and a power consumption value for a sensing system in the industrial system, the sensing system including the plurality of sensors. 5. The system of clause 3, wherein the sensing performance value comprises a signal-to-noise performance for detecting a value of interest in the industrial system. 6. The system of clause 3, wherein the sensing performance value comprises a network utilization of the plurality of sensors in the industrial system. 7. The system of clause 3, wherein the sensing performance value comprises an effective sensing resolution for a value of interest in the industrial system. 8. The system of clause 3, wherein the sensing performance value comprises a power consumption value for a sensing system in the industrial system, the sensing system including the plurality of sensors. 9. The system of clause 3, wherein the sensing performance value comprises a calculation efficiency for determining the secondary value. 10 The system of clause 9, wherein the calculation efficiency comprises at least one of: processor operations to determine the secondary value, memory utilization for determining the secondary value, a number of sensor inputs from the plurality of sensors for determining the secondary value, and supporting data long-term storage for supporting the secondary value. 11. The system of clause 3, wherein the sensing performance value comprises one of an accuracy and a precision of the secondary value. 12. The system of clause 3, wherein the sensing performance value comprises a redundancy capacity for determining the secondary value. 13. The system of clause 3, wherein the sensing performance value comprises a lead time value for determining the secondary value. 14. The system of clause 13, wherein the secondary value comprises a component overtemperature value. 15. The system of clause 13, wherein the secondary value comprises one of a component maintenance time, a component failure time, and a component service life. 16. The system of clause 13, wherein the secondary value comprises an off nominal operating condition affecting a product quality produced by an operation of the industrial system. 17. The system of clause 1, wherein the plurality of sensors comprises at least one analog sensor. 18. The system of clause 1, wherein at least one of the sensors comprises a remote sensor. 19. The system of clause 2, wherein the secondary value comprises at least one value selected from the values consisting of: a virtual sensor output value; a process prediction value; a process state value; a component prediction value; a component state value; and a model output value having the sensor data values from the fused plurality of sensors as an input. 20. The system of clause 2, wherein the fused plurality of sensors further comprises at least one pairing of sensor types selected from the pairings consisting of: a vibration sensor and a temperature sensor; a vibration sensor and a pressure sensor; a vibration sensor and an electric field sensor; a vibration sensor and a heat flux sensor; a vibration sensor and a galvanic sensor; and a vibration sensor and a magnetic sensor. 21. The system of clause 1, wherein the sensor learning circuit is further structured to update the sensed parameter group by performing at least one operation selected from the operations consisting of: updating a sensor selection of the sensed parameter group; updating a sensor sampling rate of at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group; updating a sensor resolution of at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group; updating a storage value corresponding to at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group; updating a priority corresponding to at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group; and updating at least one of a sampling rate, sampling order, sampling phase, and a network path configuration corresponding to at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group. 22. The system of clause 21, wherein the pattern recognition circuit is further structured to determine the recognized pattern value by performing at least one operation selected from the operations consisting of: determining a signal effectiveness of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to a value of interest; determining a sensitivity of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to the value of interest; determining a predictive confidence of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to the value of interest; determining a predictive delay time of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to the value of interest; determining a predictive accuracy of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to the value of interest; determining a predictive precision of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to the value of interest; and updating the recognized pattern value in response to external feedback. 23. The system of clause 22, wherein the value of interest comprises at least one value selected from the values consisting of: a virtual sensor output value; a process prediction value; a process state value; a component prediction value; a component state value; and a model output value having the sensor data values from the fused plurality of sensors as an input. 24. The system of clause 2, wherein the pattern recognition circuit is further structured to access cloud-based data comprising a second plurality of sensor data values, the second plurality of sensor data values corresponding to at least one offset industrial system. 25. The system of clause 24, wherein the sensor learning circuit is further structured to access the cloud-based data comprising a second updated sensor parameter group corresponding to the at least one offset industrial system. 26. A method, comprising: providing a plurality of sensors to an industrial system comprising a plurality of components, each of the plurality of sensors operatively coupled to at least one of the plurality of components; interpreting a plurality of sensor data values in response to a sensed parameter group, the sensed parameter group comprising a fused plurality of sensors from the plurality of sensors; determining a recognized pattern value comprising a secondary value determined in response to the plurality of sensor data values; updating the sensed parameter group in response to the recognized pattern value; and adjusting the interpreting the plurality of sensor data values in response to the updated sensed parameter group. 27. The method of clause 26, further comprising iteratively performing the determining the recognized pattern value and the updating the sensed parameter group to improve a sensing performance value. 28. The method of clause 27, further comprising determining the sensing performance value in response to determining at least one of: a signal-to-noise performance for detecting a value of interest in the industrial system; a network utilization of the plurality of sensors in the industrial system.
an effective sensing resolution for a value of interest in the industrial system; a power consumption value for a sensing system in the industrial system, the sensing system including the plurality of sensors; a calculation efficiency for determining the secondary value, wherein the calculation efficiency comprises at least one of: processor operations to determine the secondary value, memory utilization for determining the secondary value, a number of sensor inputs from the plurality of sensors for determining the secondary value, and supporting data long-term storage for supporting the secondary value; one of an accuracy and a precision of the secondary value; a redundancy capacity for determining the secondary value; and a lead time value for determining the secondary value. 29. The method of clause 27, wherein updating the sensed parameter group comprises performing at least one operation selected from the operations consisting of: updating a sensor selection of the sensed parameter group; updating a sensor sampling rate of at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group; updating a sensor resolution of at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group; updating a storage value corresponding to at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group; updating a priority corresponding to at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group; and updating at least one of a sampling rate, sampling order, sampling phase, and a network path configuration corresponding to at least one sensor from the sensed parameter group. 30. The method of clause 27, wherein determining the recognized pattern value comprises performing at least one operation selected from the operations consisting of: determining a signal effectiveness of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to a value of interest; determining a sensitivity of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to the value of interest; determining a predictive confidence of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to the value of interest; determining a predictive delay time of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to the value of interest; determining a predictive accuracy of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to the value of interest; determining a predictive precision of at least one sensor of the sensed parameter group and the updated sensed parameter group relative to the value of interest; and updating the recognized pattern value in response to external feedback. 31. A system for data collection in an industrial environment, the system comprising: an industrial system comprising a plurality of components, and a plurality of sensors each operatively coupled to at least one of the plurality of components; a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values in response to a sensed parameter group, wherein the sensed parameter group comprises a fused plurality of sensors; a means for recognizing a pattern value in response to the sensed parameter group; and a means for updating the sensed parameter group in response to the recognized pattern value. 32. The system of clause 31, further comprising a means for iteratively updating the sensed parameter group. 33. The system of clause 32, further comprising a means for accessing at least one of external data and a second plurality of sensor data values corresponding to an offset industrial system, and wherein the means for iteratively updating the sensed parameter group is further responsive to the at least one of external data and the second plurality of sensor data values. 34. The system of clause 33, further comprising a means for accessing a second sensed parameter group corresponding to the offset industrial system, and wherein the means for iteratively updating is further responsive to the second sensed parameter group. 35. A system for data collection in an industrial environment, the system comprising: an industrial system comprising a plurality of components, and a plurality of sensors each operatively coupled to at least one of the plurality of components; a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values in response to a sensed parameter group; a pattern recognition circuit structured to determine a recognized pattern value in response to at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values, wherein the recognized pattern value includes a secondary value comprising a value determined in response to the at least a portion of the plurality of sensors; a sensor learning circuit structured to update the sensed parameter group in response to the recognized pattern value; wherein the sensor communication circuit is further structured to adjust the interpreting the plurality of sensor data values in response to the updated sensed parameter group; and wherein the pattern recognition circuit and the sensor learning circuit are further structured to iteratively perform the determining the recognized pattern value and the updating the sensed parameter group to improve a sensing performance value, wherein the sensing performance value comprises a signal-to-noise performance for detecting a value of interest in the industrial system. 36. The system of clause 35, wherein the sensed parameter group comprises a fused plurality of sensors, and wherein the secondary value comprises a value determined in response to the fused plurality of sensors. 37. The system of clause 36, wherein the secondary value comprises at least one value selected from the values consisting of: a virtual sensor output value; a process prediction value; a process state value; a component prediction value; a component state value; and a model output value having the sensor data values from the fused plurality of sensors as an input. 38. A system for data collection in an industrial environment, the system comprising: an industrial system comprising a plurality of components, and a plurality of sensors each operatively coupled to at least one of the plurality of components; a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values in response to a sensed parameter group; a pattern recognition circuit structured to determine a recognized pattern value in response to a least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values, wherein the recognized pattern value includes a secondary value comprising a value determined in response to the at least a portion of the plurality of sensors; a sensor learning circuit structured to update the sensed parameter group in response to the recognized pattern value; wherein the sensor communication circuit is further structured to adjust the interpreting the plurality of sensor data values in response to the updated sensed parameter group; and wherein the pattern recognition circuit and the sensor learning circuit are further structured to iteratively perform the determining the recognized pattern value and the updating the sensed parameter group to improve a sensing performance value, wherein the sensing performance value comprises a network utilization of the plurality of sensors in the industrial system. 39. The system of clause 37, wherein the sensed parameter group comprises a fused plurality of sensors, and wherein the secondary value comprises a value determined in response to the fused plurality of sensors. 40. The system of clause 39, wherein the secondary value comprises at least one value selected from the values consisting of: a virtual sensor output value; a process prediction value; a process state value; a component prediction value; a component state value; and a model output value having the sensor data values from the fused plurality of sensors as an input. 41. A system for data collection in an industrial environment, the system comprising: an industrial system comprising a plurality of components, and a plurality of sensors each operatively coupled to at least one of the plurality of components; a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values in response to a sensed parameter group; a pattern recognition circuit structured to determine a recognized pattern value in response to at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values, wherein the recognized pattern value includes a secondary value comprising a value determined in response to the at least a portion of the plurality of sensors; a sensor learning circuit structured to update the sensed parameter group in response to the recognized pattern value; wherein the sensor communication circuit is further structured to adjust the interpreting the plurality of sensor data values in response to the updated sensed parameter group; and wherein the pattern recognition circuit and the sensor learning circuit are further structured to iteratively perform the determining the recognized pattern value and the updating the sensed parameter group to improve a sensing performance value, wherein the sensing performance value comprises an effective sensing resolution for a value of interest in the industrial system. 42. The system of clause 41, wherein the sensed parameter group comprises a fused plurality of sensors, and wherein the secondary value comprises a value determined in response to the fused plurality of sensors. 43. The system of clause 42, wherein the secondary value comprises at least one value selected from the values consisting of: a virtual sensor output value; a process prediction value; a process state value; a component prediction value; a component state value; and a model output value having the sensor data values from the fused plurality of sensors as an input. 44. A system for data collection in an industrial environment, the system comprising: an industrial system comprising a plurality of components, and a plurality of sensors each operatively coupled to at least one of the plurality of components; a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values in response to a sensed parameter group; a pattern recognition circuit structured to determine a recognized pattern value in response to a least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values, wherein the recognized pattern value includes a secondary value comprising a value determined in response to the at least a portion of the plurality of sensors; a sensor learning circuit structured to update the sensed parameter group in response to the recognized pattern value; wherein the sensor communication circuit is further structured to adjust the interpreting the plurality of sensor data values in response to the updated sensed parameter group; and wherein the pattern recognition circuit and the sensor learning circuit are further structured to iteratively perform the determining the recognized pattern value and the updating the sensed parameter group to improve a sensing performance value, wherein the sensing performance value comprises a power consumption value for a sensing system in the industrial system, the sensing system including the plurality of sensors. 45. The system of clause 44, wherein the sensed parameter group comprises a fused plurality of sensors, and wherein the secondary value comprises a value determined in response to the fused plurality of sensors. 46. The system of clause 45, wherein the secondary value comprises at least one value selected from the values consisting of: a virtual sensor output value; a process prediction value; a process state value; a component prediction value; a component state value; and a model output value having the sensor data values from the fused plurality of sensors as an input.
Referencing
The example system 11000 further includes a sensor communication circuit 11018 (reference
In certain embodiments, sensor data values 11034 are provided to a data collector 11008, which may be in communication with multiple sensors 11006 and/or with a controller 11012. In certain embodiments, a plant computer 11010 is additionally or alternatively present. In the example system, the controller 11012 is structured to functionally execute operations of the sensor communication circuit 11018, pattern recognition circuit 11020, and/or the system characterization circuit 11022, and is depicted as a separate device for clarity of description. Aspects of the controller 11012 may be present on the sensors 11006, the data collector 11008, the plant computer 11010, and/or on a cloud computing device 11014. In certain embodiments, all aspects of the controller 11012 may be present in another device depicted on the system 11000. The plant computer 11010 represents local computing resources, for example processing, memory, and/or network resources, that may be present and/or in communication with the industrial system 11000. In certain embodiments, the cloud computing device 11014 represents computing resources externally available to the industrial system 11000, for example over a private network, intra-net, through cellular communications, satellite communications, and/or over the internet. In certain embodiments, the data collector 11008 may be a computing device, a smart sensor, a MUX box, or other data collection device capable to receive data from multiple sensors and to pass-through the data and/or store data for later transmission. An example data collector 11008 has no storage and/or limited storage, and selectively passes sensor data therethrough, with a subset of the sensor data being communicated at a given time due to bandwidth considerations of the data collector 11008, a related network, and/or imposed by environmental constraints. In certain embodiments, one or more sensors and/or computing devices in the system 11000 are portable devices—for example a plant operator walking through the industrial system may have a smart phone, which the system 11000 may selectively utilize as a data collector 11008, sensor 11006—for example to enhance communication throughput, sensor resolution, and/or as a primary method for communicating sensor data values 11034 to the controller 11012.
The example system 11000 further includes a pattern recognition circuit 11020 that determines a recognized pattern value 11028 in response to at least a portion of the sensor data values 11034, and a system characterization circuit 11022 that provides a system characterization value 11030 for the industrial system in response to the recognized pattern value 11028. The system characterization value 11030 includes any value determined from the pattern recognition operations of the pattern recognition circuit 11020, including determining that a system condition of interest is present, a component condition of interest is present, an abstracted condition of the system or a component is present (e.g., a product quality value; an operation cost value; a component health, wear, or maintenance value; a component capacity value; and/or a sensor saturation value) and/or is predicted to occur within a time frame (e.g., calendar time, operational time, and/or a process stage) of interest. Pattern recognition operations include determining that operations compatible with a previously known pattern, operations similar to a previously known pattern and/or extrapolated from previously known pattern information (e.g., a previously known pattern includes a temperature response for a first component, and a known or estimated relationship between components allows for a determination that a temperature for a second component will exceed a threshold based upon the pattern recognition for the first component combined with the known or estimated relationship).
Non-limiting descriptions of a number of examples of a system characterization value 11030 are described following. An example system characterization value 11030 includes a predicted outcome for a process associated with the industrial system—for example a product quality description, a product quantity description, a product variability description (e.g., the expected variability of a product parameter predicted according to the operating conditions of the system), a product yield description, a net present value (NPV) for a process, a process completion time, a process chance of completion success, and/or a product purity result. The predicted outcome may be a batch prediction (e.g., a single run, or an integer number of runs, of the process, and the associated predicted outcome), a time based prediction (e.g., the projected outcome of the process over the next day, the next three weeks, until a scheduled shutdown, etc.), a production defined prediction (e.g., the projected outcome over the next 1,000 units, over the next 47 orders, etc.), and/or a rate of change based outcome (e.g., projected for 3 component failures per month, an emissions output per year, etc.). An example system characterization value 11030 includes a predicted future state for a process associated with the industrial system—for example an operating temperature at a given future time, an energy consumption value, a volume in a tank, an emitted noise value at a school adjacent to the industrial system, and/or a rotational speed of a pump. The predicted future state may be time based (e.g., at 4 PM on Thursday), based on a state of the process (e.g., during the third stage, during system shutdown, etc.), and/or based on a future state of particular interest (e.g., peak energy consumption, highest temperature value, maximum noise value, time or process stage when a maximum number of personnel will be within 50 feet of a sensitive area, time or process stage when an aspect of the system redundancy is at a lowest point—e.g., for determining high risk points in a process, etc.). An example system characterization value 11030 includes a predicted off-nominal operation for the process associated with the industrial system—for example when a component capacity of the system will exceed nominal parameters (although, possibly, not experience a failure), when any parameter in the system will be three standard deviations away from normal operations, when a capacity of a component will be under-utilized, etc. An example system characterization value 11030 includes a prediction value for one of the number of components—for example an operating condition at a point in time and/or process stage. An example system characterization value 11030 includes a future state value for one of the number of components. The predicted future state of a component may be time based, based on a state of the process, and/or based on a future state of particular interest (e.g., a highest or lowest value predicted for the component). An example system characterization value 11030 includes an anticipated maintenance health state information for one of the number of components, including at a particular time, a process stage, a lowest value predicted until a next maintenance event, etc. An example system characterization value 11030 includes a predicted maintenance interval for at least one of the number of components (e.g., based on current usage, anticipated usage, planned process operations, etc.). An example system characterization value 11030 includes a predicted off-nominal operation for one of the number of components—for example at a selected time, a process stage, and/or a future state of particular interest. An example system characterization value 11030 includes a predicted fault operation for one of the plurality of components—for example at a selected time, a process stage, any fault occurrence predicted based on current usage, anticipated usage, planned process operations, and/or a future state of particular interest. An example system characterization value 11030 includes a predicted exceedance value for one of the number of components, where the exceedance value includes exceedance of a design specification, and/or exceedance of a selected threshold. An example system characterization value 11030 includes a predicted saturation value for one of the plurality of sensors for example at a selected time, a process stage, any saturation occurrence predicted based on current usage, anticipated usage, planned process operations, and/or a future state of particular interest.
Any values for the prediction value 11030 may be raw values (e.g., a temperature value), derivative values (e.g., a rate of change of a temperature value), accumulated values (e.g., a time spent above one or more temperature thresholds) including weighted accumulated values, and/or integrated values (e.g., an area over a temperature-time curve at a temperature value or temperature trajectory of interest). The provided examples list temperature, but any prediction value 11030 may be utilized, including at least vibration, system throughput, pressure, etc. In certain embodiments, combinations of one or more prediction values 11030 may be utilized.
It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that combining prediction values 11030 can create particularly powerful combinations for system analysis, control, and risk management, which are specifically contemplated herein. For example, a first prediction value may indicate a time or process stage for a maximum flow rate through the system, and a second prediction value may determine the predicted state of one or more components of the system that is present at that particular time or process stage. In another example, a first prediction value indicates a lowest margin of the system in terms of capacity to deliver (e.g., by determining a point in the process wherein at least one component has a lowest operating margin, and/or where a group of components have a statistically lower operating margin due to the risk induced by a number of simultaneous low operating margins), and a second prediction value testing a system risk (e.g., loss of inlet water, loss of power, increase in temperature, change in environmental conditions that reduce or increase heat transfer, or that preclude the emission of certain effluents), and the combined risk of separate events can be assessed on the total system risk. Additionally, the prediction values may be operated with a sensitivity check (e.g., varying system conditions within margins to determine if some failure may occur), wherein the use of the prediction value allows for the sensitivity check to be performed with higher resolution at high risk points in the process.
An example system 11000 further includes a system collaboration circuit 11024 that interprets external data 11036, and where the pattern recognition circuit 11020 further determines the recognized pattern value 11028 further in response to the external data 11036. External data 11036 includes, without limitation, data provided from outside the system 11000 and/or outside the controller 11012. Non-limiting example external data 11036 include entries from an operator (e.g., indicating a failure, a fault, and/or a service event). An example pattern recognition circuit 11020 further iteratively improves pattern recognition operations in response to the external data 11036 (e.g., where an outcome is known, such as a maintenance event, product quality determination, production outcome determination, etc., the detection of the recognized pattern value 11028 is thereby improved according to the conditions of the system before the known outcome occurred). Example and non-limiting external data 11036 include data such as: an indicated process success value; an indicated process failure value; an indicated component maintenance event; an indicated component failure event; an indicated process outcome value; an indicated component wear value; an indicated process operational exceedance value; an indicated component operational exceedance value; an indicated fault value; and/or an indicated sensor saturation value.
An example system 11000 further includes a system collaboration circuit 11024 that interprets cloud-based data 11032 including a second number of sensor data values, the second number of sensor data values corresponding to at least one offset industrial system, and where the pattern recognition circuit 11020 further determines the recognized pattern value 11028 further in response to the cloud-based data 11032. An example pattern recognition circuit 11020 further iteratively improves pattern recognition operations in response to the cloud-based data 11032. An example sensed parameter group 11026 includes a triaxial vibration sensor, a vibration sensor and a second sensor that is not a vibration sensor, the second sensor being a digital sensor, and/or a number of analog sensors.
An example system includes an industrial system including an oil refinery. An example oil refinery includes one or more compressors for transferring fluids throughout the plant, and/or for pressurizing fluid streams (e.g., for reflux in a distillation column). Additionally, or alternatively, the example oil refinery includes vacuum distillation, for example to fractionate hydrocarbons. The example oil refinery additionally includes various pipelines in the system for transferring fluids, bringing in feedstock, final product delivery, and the like. An example system includes a number of sensors configured to determine each aspect of a distillation column—for example temperatures of various fluid streams, temperatures, and compositions of individual contact trays in the column, measurements of the feed and reflux, as well as of the effluent or separated products. The design of a distillation column is complex, and optimal design can depend upon the sizing of boilers, compressors, the contact conditions within the column, as well as the composition of feedstock, which can vary significantly. Additionally, the optimal position for effective sensing of conditions in a pipeline can vary with fluid flow rates, environmental conditions (e.g., causing variation in heat transfer rates), the feedstock utilized, and other factors. Additionally, wear or loss of capability in a boiler, compressor, or other operating equipment can change the system response and capabilities, rendering a single point optimization, including where sensors should be positioned and how they should sample data, to be non-optimal as the system ages.
Provision of multiple sensors throughout the system can be costly, not necessarily because the sensors are expensive, but because the sensors provide data that may be prohibitive to transmit, store, and utilize. The example system includes providing a large number of sensors throughout the system, and predicting the future states of components, process variables, products, and/or emissions for the system. The example system utilizes a pattern recognition circuit to determine not only the future predicted state of parameters, but when the future predicted state of parameters will be of interest, and/or will combine with other future predicted state of parameters to create additional risks or opportunities.
Additionally, the system characterization circuit and the system collaboration circuit can improve predictions and/or system characterizations over time, and/or utilizing offset oil refineries, to more robustly make predictions or system characterizations, which can provide for earlier detection, longer term planning for overall enterprise optimization, and/or to allow the industrial system to operate closer to margins. If an unexpected operating condition occurs—for example an off-nominal operation of a compressor, the sensor collaboration circuit is able to migrate the system prediction and improve the capability to detect the conditions that caused the unexpected operating condition in the system, and/or in offset systems. Additionally, alerts for the distillation column, based upon predictions indicating off-nominal operation, marginal operation, high risk operation, and/or upcoming maintenance or potential failures, can be readily prepared to provide visibility to risks that otherwise may not be apparent by simply looking at system capacities and past experience without rigorous analysis.
Example sensor fusion operations for a refinery include vibration information combined with temperatures, pressures, and/or composition (e.g., to determine compressor performance); temperature and pressure, temperature and composition, and/or composition, and pressure (e.g., to determine feedstock variance, contact tray performance, and/or a component failure).
An example refinery system includes storage tanks and/or boiler feed water. Example system determinations include a sensor fusion to determine a storage tank failure and/or off-nominal operation, such as through a temperature and pressure fusion, and/or a vibration determination with a non-vibration determination (e.g., detecting leaks, air in the system, and/or a feed pump issue). Certain further example system predictions include a sensor fusion to determine a boiler feed water failure, such as through a sensor fusion including flow rate, pressure, temperature, and/or vibration. Any one or more of these parameters can be utilized to predict a system leak, failure, wear of a feed pump, and/or scaling.
Similarly, an example industrial system includes a power generation system having a condensate and/or make-up water system, where a sensor fusion provides for a sensed parameter group and prediction of failures, maintenance, and the like. The system characterization circuit, utilizing sensor fusion and/or a continuous machine learning process, can predict failures, off-nominal operations, component health, and/or maintenance events for, without limitation, compressors, piping, storage tanks, and/or boiler feed water for an oil refinery.
An example industrial system includes an irrigation system for a field or a system of fields. Irrigation systems are subject to significant variability in the system (e.g., inlet pressures and/or water levels, component wear and maintenance) as well as environmental variability (e.g., types and distribution of crops planted, weather, soil moisture, humidity, seasonal variability in the sun, cloud coverage, and/or wind variance). Additionally, irrigation systems tend to be remotely located where high bandwidth network access, maintenance facilities, and/or even personnel for oversight are not readily available. An example system includes a multiplicity of sensors capable to enable prediction of conditions for the irrigation system, without requiring that all of the sensors transmit or store data on a continuous basis. The pattern recognition circuit can readily determine the most important set of sensors to effectively predict patterns and thus system conditions requiring a response (e.g., irrigation cycles, positioning, and the like). Additionally, alerts for remote facilities can be readily prepared, with confidence that the correct sensor package is in place for predicting an off-nominal condition (e.g., imminent failure or maintenance requirement for a pump). In certain embodiments, the system may determine an off-nominal process condition such as water feed availability being below normal (e.g., based upon recognized pattern conditions such as recent precipitation history, water production history from the irrigation system or other systems competing for the same water feed), structured news alerts or external data, etc., and update the sensed parameter group, for example to confirm the water feed availability (e.g., a water level sensor in a relevant location), to confirm that acceptable conditions are available that water delivery levels can be dropped (e.g., a humidity sensor, and/or a prompt to a user), and/or to confirm that sufficient available secondary sources are available (e.g., an auxiliary water level sensor).
An example industrial system includes a chemical or pharmaceutical plant. Chemical plants require specific operating conditions, flow rates, temperatures, and the like to maintain proper temperatures, concentrations, mixing, and the like throughout the system. In many systems, there are numerous process steps, and an off-nominal or uncoordinated operation in one part of the process can result in reduced yields, a failed process, and/or a significant reduction in production capacity as coordinated processes must respond (or as coordinated processes fail to respond). Accordingly, a very large number of systems are required to minimally define the system, and in certain embodiments a prohibitive number of sensors are required, from a data transmission and storage viewpoint, to keep sensing capability for a broad range of operating conditions. Additionally, the complexity of the system results in difficulty optimizing and coordinating system operations even where sufficient sensors are present. In certain embodiments, the pattern recognition circuit can predict the sensing parameter groups that provide high resolution understanding of the system, without requiring that all of the sensors store and transmit data continuously. Further, the pattern recognition circuit can highlight the predicted system risks and capacity limitations for upcoming process operations, where the risks are buried in the complex process. Accordingly, this means it can confidently be operated closer to margins, at a lower cost, and/or maintenance or system upgrades can be performed before failures or capacity limitations are experienced.
Further, the utilization of a sensor fusion provides for the opportunity to abstract desired predictions, such as “maximize quality” or “minimize and undesirable side reaction” without requiring a full understanding from the operator of which sensors and system conditions are most effective to achieve the abstracted desired output. Further, the predictive nature of the pattern recognition circuit allows for changes in the process to support the desired outcome to be implemented before the process is committed to a sub-optimal outcome. Example components in a chemical or pharmaceutical plan amenable to control and predictions based on operations of the pattern recognition circuit and/or a sensor fusion operation include an agitator, a pressure reactor, a catalytic reactor, and/or a thermic heating system. Example sensor fusion operations to determine sensed parameter groups and tune the pattern recognition circuit include, without limitation, a vibration sensor combined with another sensor type, a composition sensor combined with another sensor type, a flow rate determination combined with another sensor type, and/or a temperature sensor combined with another sensor type. For example, agitators are amenable to vibration sensing, as well as uniformity of composition detection (e.g., high resolution temperature), expected reaction rates in a properly mixed system, and the like. Catalytic reactors are amenable to temperature sensing (based on the reaction thermodynamics), composition detection (e.g., for expected reactants, as well as direct detection of catalytic material), flow rates (e.g., gross mechanical failure, reduced volume of beads, etc.), and/or pressure detection (e.g., indicative of or coupled with flow rate changes).
An example industrial system includes a food processing system. Example food processing systems include pressurization vessels, stirrers, mixers, and/or thermic heating systems. Control of the process is critical to maintain food safety, product quality, and product consistency. However, most input parameters to the food processing system are subject to high variability—for example basic food products are inherently variable as natural products, with differing water content, protein content, and other aesthetic variation. Additionally, labor cost management, power cost management, and variability in supply water, etc., provide for a complex process where determination of the predictive variables, sensed parameters to determine these, and optimization of predicting in response to process variation are a difficult problem to resolve. Food processing systems are often cost conscious, and capital costs (e.g., for a robust network and computing system for optimization) are not readily incurred. Further, a food processing system may manufacture wide variance of products on similar or the same production facilities, for example to support an entire product line and/or due to seasonal variations, and accordingly a predictive operation for one process may not support another process well. Example systems include the pattern recognition circuit determining the sensing parameter groups that provide a strong signal response in target outcomes even in light of high variability in system conditions. The pattern recognition circuit can provide for numerous sensed group parameter options available for different process conditions without requiring extensive computing or data storage resources, and accordingly achieve relevant predictions for a wide variety of operating conditions. For example, control of and predictions for pressurization vessels, stirrers, mixers, and/or thermic heating systems are amenable to operations of the pattern recognition circuit, and/or a sensor fusion with a temperature determination combined with a non-temperature determination, a vibration determination combined with a non-vibration determination, and/or a heat map combined with a rate of change in the heat map and/or a non-heat map determination. An example system includes a pattern recognition circuit operation and/or a sensor fusion with a vibration determination and a non-vibration determination, wherein predictive information for a mixer and/or a stiffer is provided; and/or with a pressure determination, a temperature determination, and/or a non-pressure determination, wherein predictive information for a pressurization vessel is provided.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may include an expert system graphical user interface in which a user may, by interacting with a graphical user interface element, set a parameter of a data collection band for collection by a data collector. The parameter may relate to at least one of setting a frequency range for collection and setting an extent of granularity for collection.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may include an expert system graphical user interface in which a user may, by interacting with a graphical user interface element, identify a set of sensors among a larger set of available sensors for collection by a data collector. The user interface may include views of available data collectors, their capabilities, one or more corresponding smart bands, and the like.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may include an expert system graphical user interface in which a user may, by interacting with a graphical user interface element, select a set of inputs to be multiplexed among a set of available inputs.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may include an expert system graphical user interface in which a user may, by interacting with a graphical user interface element, select a component of an industrial machine displayed in the graphical user interface for data collection, view a set of sensors that are available to provide data about the industrial machine, and select a subset of sensors for data collection.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may include an expert system graphical user interface in which a user may, by interacting with a graphical user interface element, view a set of indicators of fault conditions of one or more industrial machines, where the fault conditions are identified by application of an expert system to data collected from a set of data collectors. In embodiments, the fault conditions may be identified by manufacturers of portions of the one or more industrial machines. The fault conditions may be identified by analysis of industry trade data, third-party testing agency data, industry standards, and the like. In embodiments, a set of indicators of fault conditions of one or more industrial machines may include indicators of stress, vibration, heat, wear, ultrasonic signature, operational deflection shape, and the like, optionally including any of the widely varying conditions that can be sensed by the types of sensors described throughout this disclosure and the documents incorporated herein by reference.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may include an expert graphical user interface that enables a user to select from a list of component parts of an industrial machine for establishing smart-band monitoring and in response thereto presents the user with at least one smart-band definition of an acceptable range of values for at least one sensor of the industrial machine and a list of correlated sensors from which data will be gathered and analyzed when an out of acceptable range condition is detected from the at least one sensor.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may include an expert graphical user interface that enables a user to select from a list of conditions of an industrial machine for establishing smart-band monitoring and, in response thereto, presents the user with at least one smart-band definition of an acceptable range of values for at least one sensor of the industrial machine and a list of correlated sensors from which data will be gathered and analyzed when an out of acceptable range condition is detected from the at least one sensor.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may include an expert graphical user interface that enables a user to select from a list of reliability measures of an industrial machine for establishing smart-band monitoring and, in response thereto, presents the user with at least one smart-band definition of an acceptable range of values for at least one sensor of the industrial machine and a list of correlated sensors from which data will be gathered and analyzed when an out of acceptable range condition is detected from the at least one sensor. In the system, the reliability measures may include one or more of industry average data, manufacturer's specifications, material specifications, recommendations, and the like. In embodiments, reliability measures may include measures that correlate to failures, such as stress, vibration, heat, wear, ultrasonic signature, operational deflection shape effect, and the like. In embodiments, manufacturer's specifications may include cycle count, working time, maintenance recommendations, maintenance schedules, operational limits, material limits, warranty terms, and the like. In embodiments, the sensors in the industrial environment may be correlated to manufacturer's specifications by associating a condition being sensed by the sensor to a specification type. In embodiments, a non-limiting example of correlating a sensor to a manufacturer's specification may include a duty cycle specification being correlated to a sensor that detects revolutions of a moving part. In embodiments, a temperature specification may correlate to a thermal sensor disposed to sense an ambient temperature proximal to the industrial machine.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may include an expert graphical user interface that automatically creates a smart-band group of sensors disposed in the industrial environment in response to receiving a condition of the industrial environment for monitoring and an acceptable range of values for the condition.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may include an expert graphical user interface that presents a representation of components of an industrial machine deployable in the industrial environment on an electronic display, and in response to a user selecting one or more of the components, searches a database of industrial machine failure modes for modes involving the selected component(s) and conditions associated with the failure mode(s) to be monitored, and further identifies a plurality of sensors in, on, or available to be disposed on the presented machine representation from which data will automatically be captured when the condition(s) to be monitored are detected to be outside of an acceptable range. In embodiments, the identified plurality of sensors includes at least one sensor through which the condition(s) will be monitored.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may route data from a plurality of sensors in the industrial environment to wearable haptic stimulators that present the data from the sensors as human detectable stimuli including at least one of tactile, vibration, heat, sound, and force. In embodiments, the haptic stimulus represents an effect on the machine resulting from the sensed data. In embodiments, a bending effect may be presented as bending a finger of a haptic glove. In embodiments, a vibrating effect may be presented as vibrating a haptic arm band. In embodiments, a heating effect may be presented as an increase in temperature of a haptic wrist band. In embodiments, an electrical effect (e.g., over voltage, current, and others) may be presented as a change in sound of a phatic audio system.
In embodiments, an industrial machine operator haptic user interface may be adapted to provide haptic stimuli to the operator that is responsive to the operator's control of the machine, wherein the stimuli indicate an impact on the machine as a result of the operator's control and interaction with objects in the environment as a result thereof. In embodiments, sensed conditions of the machine that exceed an acceptable range may be presented to the operator through the haptic user interface. In embodiments, the sensed conditions of the machine that are within an acceptable range may not be presented to the operator through the haptic user interface. In embodiments, the sensed conditions of the machine that are within an acceptable range may presented as natural language representations of confirmation of the operator control. In embodiments, at least a portion of the haptic user interface is worn by the operator. In embodiments, a wearable haptic user interface device may include force exerting devices along the outer legs of a device operator's uniform. When a vehicle that the operator is controlling approaches an obstacle along a lateral side of the vehicle, an inflatable bellows may be inflated, exerting pressure against the leg of the operator closest to the side of the vehicle approaching the obstacle. The bellows may continue to be inflated, thereby exerting additional pressure on the operator's leg that is consistent with the proximity of the obstacle. The pressure may be pulsed when contact with the obstacle is imminent. In another example, an arm band of an operator may vibrate in coordination with vibration being experienced by a portion of the vehicle that the operator is controlling. These are merely examples and not intended to be limiting or restrictive of the ways in which a wearable haptic feedback user device may be controlled to indicate conditions that are sensed by a system for data collection in an industrial environment.
In embodiments, a haptic user interface safety system worn by a user in an industrial environment may be adapted to indicate proximity to the user of equipment in the environment by stimulating a portion of the user with at least one of pressure, heat, impact, electrical stimuli and the like, the portion of the user being stimulated may be closest to the equipment. In embodiments, at least one of the type, strength, duration, and frequency of the stimuli is indicative of a risk of injury to the user.
In embodiments, a wearable haptic user interface device, that may be worn by a user in an industrial environment, may broadcast its location and related information upon detection of an alert condition in the industrial environment. The alert condition may be proximal to the user wearing the device, or not proximal but related to the user wearing the device. A user may be an emergency responder, so the detection of a situation requiring an emergency responded, the user's haptic device may broadcast the user's location to facilitate rapid access to the user or by the user to the emergency location. In embodiments, an alert condition may be determined from monitoring industrial machine sensors may be presented to the user as haptic stimuli, with the severity of the alert corresponding to a degree of stimuli. In embodiments, the degree of stimuli may be based on the severity of the alert, the corresponding stimuli may continue, be repeated, or escalate, optionally including activating multiple stimuli concurrently, send alerts to additional haptic users, and the like until an acceptable response is detected, e.g., through the haptic UI. The wearable haptic user device may be adapted to communicate with other haptic user devices to facilitate detecting the acceptable response.
In embodiments, a wearable haptic user interface for use in an industrial environment may include gloves, rings, wrist bands, watches, arm bands, head gear, belts, necklaces, shirts (e.g., uniform shirt), footwear, pants, ear protectors, safety glasses, vests, overalls, coveralls, and any other article of clothing or accessory that can be adapted to provide haptic stimuli.
In embodiments, wearable haptic device stimuli may be correlated to a sensor in an industrial environment. Non-limiting examples include a vibration of a wearable haptic device in response to vibration detected in an industrial environment; increasing or decreasing the temperature of a wearable haptic device in response to a detected temperature in an industrial environment; producing sound that changes in pitch responsively to changes in a sensed electrical signal, and the like. In embodiments, a severity of wearable haptic device stimuli may correlate to an aspect of a sensed condition in the industrial environment. Non-limiting examples include moderate or short-term vibration for a low degree of sensed vibration; strong or long-term vibration stimulation for an increase in sensed vibration; aggressive, pulsed, and/or multi-mode stimulation for a high amount of sensed vibration. Wearable haptic device stimuli may also include lighting (e.g., flashing, color changes, and the like), sound, odor, tactile output, motion of the haptic device (e.g., inflating/deflating a balloon, extension/retraction of an articulated segment, and the like), force/impact, and the like.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may interface with wearable haptic feedback user devices to relay data collected from fuel handling systems in a power generation application to the user via haptic stimulation. Fuel handling for power generation may include solid fuels, such as woodchips, stumps, forest residue, sticks, energy willow, peat, pellets, bark, straw, agro biomass, coal, and solid recovery fuel. Handling systems may include receiving stations that may also sample the fuel, preparation stations that may crush or chip wood-based fuel or shred waste-based fuel. Fuel handling systems may include storage and conveying systems, feed and ash removal systems and the like. Wearable haptic user interface devices may be used with fuel handling systems by providing an operator feedback on conditions in the handling environment that the user is otherwise isolated from. Sensors may detect operational aspects of a solid fuel feed screw system. Conditions like screw rotational rate, weight of the fuel, type of fuel, and the like may be converted into haptic stimuli to a user while allowing the user to use his hands and provide his attention to operate the fuel feed system.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may interface with wearable haptic feedback user devices to relay data collected from suspension systems of a truck and/or vehicle application to the user via haptic stimulation. Haptic simulation may be correlated with conditions being sensed by the vehicle suspension system. In embodiments, road roughness may be detected and converted into vibration-like stimuli of a wearable haptic arm band. In embodiments, suspension forces (contraction and rebound) may be converted into stimuli that present a scaled down version of the forces to the user through a wearable haptic vest.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may interface with wearable haptic feedback user devices to relay data collected from hydroponic systems in an agriculture application to the user via haptic stimulation. In embodiments, sensors in hydroponic systems, such as temperature, humidity, water level, plant size, carbon dioxide/oxygen levels, and the like may be converted to wearable device haptic stimuli. As an operator wearing haptic feedback clothing walks through a hydroponic agriculture facility, sensors proximal to the operator may signal to the haptic feedback clothing relevant information, such as temperature or a measure of actual temperature versus desired temperature that the haptic clothing may convert into haptic stimuli. In an example, a wrist band may include a thermal stimulator that can change temperature quickly to track temperature data or a derivative thereof from sensors in the agriculture environment. As a user walks through the facility, the haptic feedback wristband may change temperature to indicate a degree to which proximal temperatures are complying with expected temperatures.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may interface with wearable haptic feedback user devices to relay data collected from robotic positioning systems in an automated production line application to the user via haptic stimulation. Haptic feedback may include receiving a positioning system indicator of accuracy and converting it to an audible signal when the accuracy is acceptable, and another type of stimuli when the accuracy is not acceptable.
Referring to
Clause 1. In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment, comprising: a plurality of wearable haptic stimulators that produce stimuli selected from the list of stimuli consisting of tactile, vibration, heat, sound, force, odor, and motion; a plurality of sensors deployed in the industrial environment to sense conditions in the environment; a processor logically disposed between the plurality of sensors and the wearable haptic stimulators, the processor receiving data from the sensors representative of the sensed condition, determining at least one haptic stimulation that corresponds to the received data, and sending at least one signal for instructing the wearable haptic stimulators to produce the at least one stimulation. 2. The system of clause 1, wherein the haptic stimulation represents an effect on a machine in the industrial environment resulting from the condition. 3. The system of clause 2, wherein a bending effect is presented as bending a haptic device. 4. The system of clause 2, wherein a vibrating effect is presented as vibrating a haptic device. 5. The system of clause 2, wherein a heating effect is presented as an increase in temperature of a haptic device. 6. The system of clause 2, wherein an electrical effect is presented as a change in sound produced by a haptic device. 7. The system of clause 2, wherein at least one of the plurality of wearable haptic stimulators are selected from the list consisting of a glove, ring, wrist band, wristwatch, arm band, head gear, belt, necklace, shirt, footwear, pants, overalls, coveralls, and safety goggles. 8. The system of clause 2, wherein the at least one signal comprises an alert of a condition of interest in the industrial environment. 9. The system of clause 8, wherein the at least one stimulation produced in response to the alert signal is repeated by at least one of the plurality of wearable haptic stimulators until an acceptable response is detected. 10. An industrial machine operator haptic user interface that is adapted to provide the operator haptic stimuli responsive to the operator's control of the machine based on at least one sensed condition of the machine that indicates an impact on the machine as a result of the operator's control and interaction with objects in the environment as a result thereof. 11. The user interface of clause 10, wherein a sensed condition of the machine that exceeds an acceptable range of data values for the condition is presented to the operator through the haptic user interface. 12. The user interface of clause 10, wherein a sensed condition of the machine that is within an acceptable range of data values for the condition is presented as natural language representations of confirmation of the operator control via an audio haptic stimulator. 13. The user interface of clause 10, wherein at least a portion of the haptic user interface is worn by the operator. 14. The system of clause 10, wherein a vibrating sensed condition is presented as vibrating stimulation by the haptic user interface. 15. The system of clause 10, wherein a temperature-based sensed condition is presented as heat stimulation by the haptic user interface. 16. A haptic user interface safety system worn by a user in an industrial environment, wherein the interface is adapted to indicate proximity to the user of equipment in the environment by haptic stimulation via a portion of the haptic user interface that is closest to the equipment, wherein at least one of the type, strength, duration, and frequency of the stimulation is indicative of a risk of injury to the user. 17. The haptic user interface of clause 16, wherein the haptic stimulation is selected from a list consisting of pressure, heat, impact, and electrical stimulation. 18. The haptic user interface of clause 16 wherein the haptic user interface further comprises a wireless transmitter that broadcasts a location of the user. 19. The haptic user interface of clause 18, wherein the wireless transmitter broadcasts a location of the user in response to indicating proximity of the user to the equipment. 20. The haptic user interface of clause 16, wherein the proximity to the user of equipment in the environment is based on sensor data provided to the haptic user interface from a system adapted to collect data in an industrial environment, wherein the system is adapted based on a data collection template associated with a user safety condition in the industrial environment.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may facilitate presenting a graphical element indicative of industrial machine sensed data on an augmented reality (AR) display. The graphical element may be adapted to represent a position of the sensed data on a scale of acceptable values of the sensed data. The graphical element may be positioned proximal to a sensor detected in the field of view being augmented that captured the sensed data in the AR display. The graphical element may be a color and the scale may be a color scale ranging from cool colors (e.g., greens, blues) to hot colors (e.g., yellow, red) and the like. Cool colors may represent data values closer to the midpoint of the acceptable range and the hot colors representing data values close to or outside of a maximum or minimum value of the range.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may present, in an AR display, data being collected from a plurality of sensors in the industrial environment as one of a plurality graphical effects (e.g., colors in a range of colors) that correlate the data being collected from each sensor to a scale of values within an acceptable range compared to values outside of the acceptable range. In embodiments, the plurality of graphical effects may overlay a view of the industrial environment and placement of the plurality of graphical effects may correspond to locations in the view of the environment at which a sensor is located that is producing the corresponding sensor data. In embodiments, a first set of graphical effects (e.g., hot colors) represent components for which multiple sensors indicate values outside acceptable ranges.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may facilitate presenting, in an AR display information being collected by sensors in the industrial environment as a heat map overlaying a visualization of the environment so that regions of the environment with sensor data suggestive of a greater potential of failure are overlaid with a graphic effect that is different than regions of the environment with sensor data suggestive of a lesser potential of failure. In embodiments, the heat map is based on data currently being sensed. In embodiments, the heat map is based on data from prior failures. In embodiments, the heat map is based on changes in data from an earlier period, such as data that suggest an increased likelihood of machine failure. In embodiments, the heat map is based on a preventive maintenance plan and a record of preventive maintenance in the industrial environment.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may facilitate presenting information being collected by sensors in the industrial environment as a heat map overlaying a view of the environment, such as a live view as may be presented in an AR display. Such a system may include presenting an overlay that facilitates a call to action, wherein the overlay is associated with a region of the heat map. The overlay may comprise a visual effect of a part or subsystem of the environment on which the action is to be performed. In embodiments, the action to be performed is maintenance related and may be part-specific.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may facilitate updating, in an AR view of a portion of the environment, a heat map of aspects of the industrial environment based on a change to operating instructions for at least one aspect of a machine in the industrial environment. The heat map may represent compliance with operational limits for portions of machines in the industrial environment. In embodiments, the heat map may represent a likelihood of component failure as a result of the change to operation instructions.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may facilitate presenting, as a heat map in an AR view of a portion of the environment, a degree or measure of coverage of sensors in the industrial environment for a data collection template that identifies select sensors in the industrial environment for a data collection activity.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may facilitate displaying a heat map overlaying a view, such as a live view, of an industrial environment of failure-related data for various portions of the environment. The failure-related data may comprise a difference between an actual failure rate of the various portions and another failure rate. Another failure rate may be a rate of failure of comparable portions elsewhere in the environment, and/or average failure rate of comparable portions across a plurality of environments, such as an industry average, manufacturer failure rate estimate, and the like.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may facilitate displaying a heat map related to data collected from robotic arms and hands for production line robotic handling in an augmented reality view of a portion of the environment. A heat map related to data collected from robotic arms and hands may represent data from sensors disposed in—for example, the fingers of a robotic hand. Sensor may collect data, such as applied pressure when pinching an object, resistance (e.g., responsive to a robotic touch) of an object, multi-axis forces presented to the finger as it performs an operation, such as holding a tool and the like, temperature of the object, total movement of the finger from initial point of contact until a resistance threshold is met, and other hand position/use conditions. Heat maps of this data may be presented in an augmented reality view of a robotic production environment so that a user may make a visual assessment of, for example, how the relative positioning of the robotic fingers impacts the object being handled.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may facilitate displaying a heat map related to data collected from linear bearings for production line robotic handling in an augmented reality view of a portion of the environment. Linear bearings, as with most bearings, may not be visible while in use. However, assessing their operation may benefit from representing data from sensors that capture information about the bearings while in use in an augmented reality display. In embodiments, sensors may be placed to detect forces being placed on portions of the bearings by the rotating member or elements that the bearings support. These forces may be presented as heat maps that correspond to relative forces, on a visualization of the bearings in an augmented reality view of a robot handling machine that uses linear bearings.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may facilitate displaying a heat map related to data collected from boring machinery for mining in an augmented reality view of a portion of the environment. Boring machinery, and in particular multi-tip circular boring heads may experience a range of rock formations at the same time. Sensors may be placed proximal to each boring tip that may detect forces experienced by the tips. The data may be collected by a system adapted to collect data in an industrial environment and provided to an augmented reality system that may display the data as heat maps or the like in a view of the boring machine.
Referring to
Clause 1. In embodiments, an augmented reality (AR) system in which industrial machine sensed data is presented in a view of the industrial machine as heat maps of data collected from sensors in the view, wherein the heat maps are positioned proximal to a sensor capturing the sensed data that is visible in the AR display. 2. The system of clause 1, wherein the heat maps are based on a comparison of real time data collected from sensors with an acceptable range of values for the data. 3. The system of clause 1, wherein the heat maps are based on trends of sensed data. 4. The system of clause 1, wherein the heat maps represent a measure of coverage of sensors in the industrial environment in response to a condition of interest that is calculated from data collected by sensors in the industrial environment. 5. The system of clause 1, wherein the heat maps of data collected from sensors in the view is based on data collected by a system adapted to collect data in the industrial environment by routing data from a plurality of sensors to a plurality of data collectors via at least one of an analog crosspoint switch, a multiplexer, and a hierarchical multiplexer. 6. The system of clause 1, wherein the heat maps present different collected data values as different colors. 7. The system of clause 1, wherein data collected from a plurality of sensors is combined to produce a heat map. 8. A system for data collection in an industrial environment, comprising: an augmented reality display that presents data being collected from a plurality of sensors in the industrial environment as one of a plurality of colors, wherein the colors correlate the data being collected from each sensor to a color scale with cool colors mapping to values of the data within an acceptable range and hot colors mapping to values of the data outside of the acceptable range, wherein the plurality of colors overlay a view of the industrial environment and placement of the plurality of colors corresponds to locations in the view of the environment at which a sensor is located that is producing the corresponding sensor data. 9. The system of clause 8, wherein hot colors represent components for which multiple sensors indicate values outside typical ranges. 10. The system of clause 8, wherein the plurality of colors is based on a comparison of real time data collected from sensors with an acceptable range of values for the data. 11. The system of clause 8, wherein the plurality of colors is based on trends of sensed data. 12. The system of clause 8, wherein the plurality of colors represents a measure of coverage of sensors in the industrial environment in response to a condition of interest that is calculated from data collected by sensors in the industrial environment. 13. A method comprising, presenting information being collected by sensors in an industrial environment as a heat map overlaying a view of the environment so that regions of the environment with sensor data suggestive of a greater potential of failure are overlaid with a heat map that is different than regions of the environment with sensor data suggestive of a lesser potential of failure. 14. The method of clause 13, wherein the heat map is based on data currently being sensed. 15. The method of clause 13, wherein the heat map is based on data from prior failure data. 16. The method of clause 13, wherein the heat map is based on changes in data from an earlier period that suggest an increased likelihood of machine failure. 17. The method of clause 13, wherein the heat map is based on a preventive maintenance plan and a record of preventive maintenance in the industrial environment. 18. The method of clause 13, wherein the heat map represents an actual failure rate versus a reference failure rate. 19. The method of clause 18, wherein the reference failure rate is an industry average failure rate. 20. The method of clause 18, wherein the reference failure rate is a manufacturer's failure rate estimate.
In embodiments, a system for data collection and visualization thereof in an industrial environment may include an augmented reality and/or virtual reality (AR/VR) display in which data values output by sensors disposed in a field of view in the AR/VR display are displayed with visual attributes that indicate a degree of compliance of the data to an acceptable range or values for the sensed data. In embodiments, the visual attributes may provide near real-time portrayal of trends of the sensed data and/or of derivatives thereof. In embodiments, the visual attributes may be the actual data being captured, or the derived data, such as a trend of the data and the like.
In embodiments, a system for data collection and visualization thereof in an industrial environment may include an AR/VR display in which trends of data values output by sensors disposed in a field of view in the AR/VR are displayed with visual attributes that indicate a degree of severity of the trend. In embodiments, other data or analysis that could be displayed may include: data from sensors that exceed an acceptable range, data from sensors that are part of a smart band selected by the user, data from sensors that are monitored for triggering a smart band collection action, data from sensors that sense an aspect of the environment that meets preventive maintenance criteria, such as a PM action is upcoming soon, a PM action was recently performed or is overdue for PM. Other data for such AR/VR visualization may include data from sensors for which an acceptable range has recently been changed, expanded, narrowed and the like. Other data for such AR/VR visualization that may be particularly useful for an operator of an industrial machine (digging, drilling, and the like) may include analysis of data from sensors, such as for example impact on an operating element (torque, force, strain, and the like).
In embodiments, a system for data collection and visualization thereof in an industrial environment that may include presentation of visual attributes that represent collected data in an AR/VR environment may do so for pumps in a mining application. Mining application pumps may provide water and remove liquefied waste from a mining site. Pump performance may be monitored by sensors detecting pump motors, regulators, flow meters, and the like. Pump performance monitoring data may be collected and presented as a set of visual attributes in an augmented reality display. In an example, pump motor power consumption, efficiency, and the like may be displayed proximal to a pump viewed through an augmented reality display.
In embodiments, a system for data collection and visualization thereof in an industrial environment that may include presentation of visual attributes that represent collected data in an AR/VR environment may do so for energy storage in a power generation application. Power generation energy storage may be monitored with sensors that capture data related to storage and use of stored energy. Information such as utilization of individual energy storage cells, energy storage rate (e.g., battery charging and the like), stored energy consumption rate (e.g., KWH being supplied by an energy storage system), storage cell status, and the like may be captured and converted into augmented reality viewable attributes that may be presented in an augmented reality view of an energy storage system.
In embodiments, a system for data collection and visualization thereof in an industrial environment that may include presentation of visual attributes that represent collected data in an AR/VR environment may do so for feed water systems in a power generation application. Sensors may be disposed in an industrial environment, such as power generation for collecting data about feed water systems. Data from those sensors may be captured and processed by the system for data collection. Results of this processing may include trends of the data, such as feed water cooling rates, flow rates, pressure and the like. These trends may be presented on an augmented reality view of a feed water system by applying a map of sensors with physical elements visible in the view and then retrieving data from the mapped sensors. The retrieved data (and derivatives thereof) may be presented in the augmented reality view of the feed water system.
Referring to
Clause 1 In embodiments, a system for data collection and visualization thereof in an industrial environment in which data values output by sensors disposed in a field of view in an electronic display are displayed in the electronic display with visual attributes that indicate a degree of compliance of the data to an acceptable range or values for the sensed data. 2. The system of clause 1, wherein the view in the electronic display is a view in an augmented reality display of the industrial environment. 3. The system of clause 1, wherein the visual attributes are indicative of a trend of the sensed data over time relative to the acceptable range. 4. The system of clause 1, wherein the data values are disposed in the electronic display proximal to the sensors from which the data values are output. 5. The system of clause 1, wherein the visual attributes further comprise an indication of a smart band set of sensors associated with the sensor from which the data values are output. 6. A system for data collection and visualization thereof in an industrial environment in which data values output by select sensors disposed in an augmented reality view of the industrial environment are displayed with visual attributes that indicate a degree of compliance of the data to an acceptable range or values for the sensed data. 7. The system of clause 6, wherein the sensors are selected based on a data collection template that facilitates configuring sensor data routing resources in the system. 8. The system of clause 7, wherein the select sensors are indicated in the template as part of a group of smart band sensors. 9. The system of clause 7, wherein the select sensors are sensors that are monitored for triggering a smart band data collection action. 10. The system of clause 6, wherein the select sensors are sensors that sense an aspect of the environment associated with preventive maintenance criteria. 11. The system of clause 6, wherein the visual attributes further indicate if the acceptable range has been expanded or narrowed within the past 72 hours. 12. A system for data collection and visualization thereof in an industrial environment in which trends of data values output by select sensors disposed in a field of view of the industrial environment depicted in an augmented reality display are displayed with visual attributes that indicate a degree of severity of the trend. 13. The system of clause 12, wherein sensors are selected when data from the sensors exceed an acceptable range of values. 14. The system of clause 14, wherein sensors are selected based on the sensors being part of a smart band group of sensors. 15. The system of clause 12, wherein the visual attributes further indicate a compliance of the trend with an acceptable range of data values. 16. The system of clause 12, wherein the system for data collection is adapted to route data from the select sensors to a controller of the augmented reality display based on a data collection template that facilitates configuring routing resources of the system for data collection. 17. The system of clause 12, wherein the sensors are selected in response to the sensor data being configured in a smart band data collection template as an indication for triggering a smart band data collection action. 18. The system of clause 12, wherein the sensors are selected in response to preventive maintenance criteria. 19. The system of clause 18, wherein the preventive maintenance criteria are selected from the list consisting of a preventive maintenance action is scheduled, a preventive maintenance action has been completed in the last 72 hours, a preventive maintenance action is overdue.
In embodiments, machine learning can vary and select landing and engagement modes by variation and selection, including testing security of various forms of attachment. Machine learning can be, or be initiated using, a set of rules for landing and engagement, a set of models (which may be populated with information about machines, infrastructure elements and other features of an industrial environment), a training set (including one created by having human operators land a set of drones and engage with sensors), or by deep learning approach fusing various vision and other sensors through a large set of trial landing and engagement events.
In embodiments, a camera 11788 may have object recognition capabilities (including pattern recognition improved by machine learning, rule-based pattern matching to library of images of machines and other features, or a hybrid or combination of techniques).
In embodiments, sensor-based recognition of industrial machines may be provided, where a machine is recognized based on sensor signatures (e.g., based on matching to known vibration patterns, heat signatures, sounds, and the like that characterize generators, turbomachines, compressors, pumps, motors, etc.). This may occur based on rules, models, or the like, with machine learning (including deep learning or learning based on human-generated training sets), or various combinations of these.
In embodiments, the mobile platforms may contain one or more multi-sensor data collectors (MDC) 11790 may be disposed on one or more articulating robotic arms 11782, which may move from the interior to the exterior of the drone 11730. In embodiments, the drone may have one or more of its own articulating robotic arm(s) 11782, such as for picking up and placing individual sensors, attaching sensors to a point of sensing, attaching sensors to power sources, reading sensors, or the like.
In embodiments, the MDC 11790 can swap in and out various sensors, both at the point of sensing and by interacting with a central station 11792, where the drone 11730 can replenish the MDC 11790 with new or different sensors, can re-stock any disposable or consumable elements (such as test strips, biological sensors, or the like) or the like. Replenishment and re-stocking can be undertaken with control elements described throughout this disclosure that involve selection of sensor sets, including rule-based, model-based, and machine learning control within an expert system.
In embodiments, a drone 11730 can be paired with the central station 11792, such as for wireless re-charging, re-stocking of sensors, secure file downloads (e.g., requiring physical connection and verification), or the like. The central station 11792 may have network communication with a remote operator (including an expert system) and/or with local operators, such as via one or more applications, such as mobile applications, for controlling elements of the drone 11730 or central station 11792 or for reporting or otherwise using information collected by the drone 11730 or the central station 11792.
In embodiments, the central station 11792 can have a 3D printer, such as for printing suitable connectors for interfacing with machines, for printing disposable or consumable elements used in sensors, for printing elements such as end members for assisting with landing, and the like.
In embodiments, the MDC 11790 has interface ports for various forms of interface, including physical interfaces (e.g., USB ports, firewire ports, lighting ports, and the like) and wireless interfaces (e.g., Bluetooth, Bluetooth Low Energy, NFC, WiFi and the like).
In embodiments, MDC 11790 interfaces can include electrical probes, such as for detecting voltages and currents, such as for detecting and processing operating signatures of electrical components of an industrial machine.
In embodiments, the MDC 11790 carries or accesses (such as within the drone 11730, or the central station 11792) various connectors to allow it to interface with a wide variety of machines and equipment.
In embodiments, the camera 11788 can identify a suitable interface port for an industrial machine and select and under user remote control or automatically (optionally under control of an expert system disposed on the drone 11730 or located remotely) use the appropriate connector for the interface port, such as to establish data communication (e.g., with an onboard diagnostic or other instrumentation system), to establish a power connection, or the like.
In embodiments, the robotic arm 11782 of the MDC 11790 can insert one or more cables or connectors as needed, such as ones retrieved from storage of the drone 11730 or from a central station. The central station can print a new connector interface as needed.
In embodiments, the drone 11730 is self-organizing and can be part of a self-organizing swarm that includes intelligent collective routing of several drones 11730 for data collection. The drone 11730 can have and interact with a secure physical interface for data collection, such as one that requires local presence in order to get access to control features.
The drone 11730 may use wireless communication, including by a cognitive, ad hoc mobile network of a mesh network of drones 11730, which mesh network may also include other devices, such as a master controller (e.g., a mobile device with human interface).
In embodiments, the drone 11730 has a touch screen display for user interaction and mobile application interaction.
In embodiments, the drone 11730 can use the MDC 11790 to collect data that is relevant to placement of sensors for instrumentation of machines (e.g., collect vibration data from a set of possible locations and select a preferred location for data collection, then dispose a semi-permanent vibration sensor there for future data gathering).
Intelligent routing can include machine-based mapping, including referencing a pre-existing map or blueprint of an industrial environment and using machine learning to update the map based on detected conditions (e.g., detecting by camera, IR, sonar, LIDAR, etc., the presence of features, machines, obstacles, or the like, whether fixed or transient and updating the map and any relevant routes to reflect changing features).
In embodiments, the drone 11730 may include a facility for sensor-based detection of biological signatures (e.g., IR-sensing for base-level recognition of presence of humans, such as for safety), as well as other physiological sensors, such as for identity (e.g., using biometric authentication of a human before permitting access to collected data or control functions) and human status conditions (such as determining health status, alertness or other conditions of humans in the environment). In embodiments, the drone 11730 may store or handle emergency first aid items, such as for delivery to a point of emergency in case that an emergency health status is determined.
In embodiments, the drone 11730 can have collision detection and avoidance (LIDAR; IR, etc.), such as to avoid collisions with other drones 11730, equipment, infrastructure, or human workers.
In another embodiment, the system in
In another embodiment, the system in
In another embodiment, the data acquisition system of
In embodiments, the mobile attaching drone sensor 11840 can be removably attached to a portion of a vehicle and can move freely around the undercarriage of a vehicle. It can also be placed there as a sensing module by the mobile robotic sensor system of
In embodiments, the mobile attaching sensor 11840 may take the form of a swimming device that can travel through fluid, or a multi-pedal unit with chemically-adhesive or magnetic or vacuum-adhesive pods or feet that allow it to move freely on the surface of a target to be sensed.
In embodiments, the modular sensors shown in
The sensors deployed on the various drones, mobile platforms, robots, and the like may take numerous forms. For instance, a set of roller bearing sensors may be integrated within the roller bearing itself, using the energy off the motion of the roller bearing to generate an inductive force sufficient to generate data signals to communicate to a data circuit the state of the roller bearing, such as velocity, rotations per unit time, as well as analog data indicating any minor perturbations in the smooth rotation of the bearing over time. A deformation sensor can take the form of a passive (visual, infrared) or active scanning (Lidar, sonar) system that captures data from a target and compares it to historical data on the shape or orientation of the component to detect variations. Camera sensors are configured with a lens to capture continuous and still visible and invisible photon information cast upon or reflected by a target. Ultraviolet sensors can similarly capture continuous and still frame information about a target and its surrounds. Infrared sensors can capture light and heat emission data from a target. Audio sensors such as directional and omnichannel microphones can measure the frequency and amplitude of sonic wave data emitting from a target or its environment, and this data can be compared over time to detect anomalies when the amplitude or quality of the sound generated by the target exceeds or varies from predetermined or historical levels. Vibration sensors can be used in a similar manner, capturing extremely low frequency sound as well as physical perturbations and rhythms of a target over time. Viscosity sensors can be installed in-line in the lubrication system of a system or vehicle or can be movable and make ad-hoc measurements and evaluations of the continuous or instantaneous viscosity of the lubricating material for a target. Chemical sensors can vary widely in what analyte (target chemical) they detect, and in the case of vehicles or stationary machinery, can be configured with variable receptors capable of capturing and recognizing numerous conditions of a target. Specific target sensors such as rust sensors or overheat sensors can sense when a target such as an apparatus, metal structure or chemical lubricant has started to change chemically over time. These chemical sensors can be multi- or single-purpose, and can be integrated within a structure, such as the frame or chassis of a vehicle or the stationary or movable portions of an assembly line, or the mechanical motive power of an engine or robotic machinery. Or they can be attached to a portable self-propelled data acquisition system that is deployed to measure the target. When activated these chemical sensors make contact or take samples from the target and perform chemical analysis and report the state of the results to a data circuit. A solid chemical sensor can take solid chemical samples (rather than gaseous or liquid samples) and determine the presence of a particular chemical or the composition by detecting multiple chemicals in a sample. A pH sensor can be used to detect the level of acidity of a target and can be used to determine specific changes in the environment of a target, the fluid conditions surrounding a target, or the state of an operational fluid such as a coolant or lubricant in a target, and similarly, fluid, and gaseous chemical sensors perform additional component and presence detection on these targets. A lubricant sensor can be as simple as an indicator of whether sufficient lubricant is still present (by detecting chafing or a lack of distance between conductive or hard components) or can use a combination of chemical, pressure, visual, olfactory, or vibrational feedback tests (vibrating the target and measuring response) to determine the instant or continuous presence or quantity of lubricant in a target. Contaminant sensors can look for the presence of foreign or damaged elements added to the surface, substance or fluid contents of a target, such as a lubricant which has been contaminated with metal particles from component wear, or when a lubricant or motive fluid such as in a pneumatic has been contaminated due to the breaking of a seal. Particulate sensors can detect the presence of specific types of particles within a fluid or on a target. Weight or mass sensors can determine the continuous or changing weight of a component, and can be on coarse scale such as a weighing device for weighing large machinery down to an integrated MEMS scale that determines the continuous and instantaneous changes in weight of a target that may lose mass over time due to damage or abrasion or evaporation, sublimation, etc. A rotation sensor can be optical, audio-based, or use numerous other techniques to detect the periodic acceleration, velocity, and frequency of rotation of a target. Temperature sensors can be configured to measure coarse environmental temperature in a general area as well as fine environmental temperatures, precise temperature of a region of a target component and can be disposed throughout an engine, a robotic system, or any stationary or moving component. Temperature sensors can also be mobile and deployed to take periodic or ad-hoc measurements of a target component, surface, material, or system to determine if it is operating in a correct temperature range. Position sensors can be as simple as interrupted visual reflections, to visual systems with image-recognition algorithms being performed on continuous video, to magnetic or mechanical switch systems that durably detect either precisely or coarsely the position of various moveable elements with respect to one another. Ultrasonic sensors can be used for a variety of distance, shape, solidity, and orientation measurements by projecting ultrasonic energy in the direction of a target or group of targets or measuring the reflected ultrasonic energy reflected by those targets. Ultrasonic sensors may comprise multiple emitters and receivers in order to add dimensions and precision to the measurements and even produce 2D or 3D outlines of a region for further analysis. A radiation sensor can detect the presence of forms of radioactivity as alpha, beta, gamma, or x-ray radiation and some can identify the directional source, the field and area of the radiation and the intensity. An x-ray radiograph can actively determine structure, structural changes and structural defects as well as providing a visual depiction of otherwise obscured physical characteristics of a target. Similarly, a gamma-ray radiograph can be used to penetrate solid targets such as steel or other metallic objects and so determine the characteristics of physical features such as joints, welds, depths, rough edges, and thicknesses in load bearing and pressurized targets. Various forms of high-resolution scanning technologies exist including scanning tunneling microscopes, photon tunneling microscope, scanning probe microscopes, and these measurement devices have been miniaturized and non-destructive forms of these devices can be brought in contact with a target to be measured, such as via a movable robot or drone 11730, and then used to perform extremely high resolution (atomic-scale) measurements and analysis of the structure and characteristics of a target. A displacement meter can be implemented using capacitive effects, mechanical measurement or laser measurement and can be used similarly to a position meter to measure the location of a movable target and can be used, for instance, to measure the ‘play’ or changing displacement of a wearing physical target over time. A magnetic particle inspector can be used to determine if a fluid such as a lubricant, an immersive fluid container, a coolant, or a pneumatic fluid, for instance, contain trace elements of ferromagnetic particles, which could be an indication of the decay or failure of a metal component. An ultraviolet particle detector can be used to detect contamination such as in gaseous targets. A load sensor such as a static load sensor (measuring systems at rest) or an axial load sensor that detects, such as magnetically, the pushing and pulling forces along a beam and can be used to determine the forces on an axle or other torque-transmitting tube or shaft. An accelerometer can be microscopic in size, implemented as a MEMS device, or packaged as a larger industrial device and can provide multiple dimensions of acceleration and gravitation data about or in proximity to a target, and can be useful for instance to detect if a device is level, or in addition to other data collection, the amount of force being applied to a target over time. A speed sensor can be used to measure translational, displacement or rotational velocity or speed. A rotational sensor can be used to measure the speed, period, frequency, even or uneven motion of a rotating element such as a tire, a gear, an armature, or a gyro. A moisture sensing device can detect the liquid, condensation or H2O content of the target or its environment. A humidity sensor can measure the degree of water vapor in the atmosphere in the vicinity of a target. Ammeters, voltmeters, flux meters, and electric field detectors can be used to measure electromagnetic effects, fields and levels of a target or in the vicinity of a target, or the electronic or magnetic emission of a target, or the potential energy stored in a target. A gear box sensor can measure numerous attributes of an industrial gear box for general translation of motive power in a robotic or assembly line environment as well as numerous complex vehicular gear assemblies including vehicle transmissions and differentials. Measurements can include the precise position of all internal gears, the state of wear of gear elements and teeth, various chemical, temperature, pressure, contamination, coolant level, fluid level, vacuum level, seal level, torsion, torque, force, shear stress, cycle count, tooth gap, wear, and any other changing physical attribute. A gear wear sensor and “tooth decay” sensor can specifically measure and convey the degree to which gears have worn down or that the teeth of the gears have been chipped, cracked, flaked off or otherwise reduced from original condition, and this can be accomplished through visual or other emitting signal sensors, audio sensors (measuring change in sonic quality based on the change in impact of teeth), laser sensors (measuring the periodic interruption of a precise beam across each gear path), power transmission measurement (measuring loss of power from one gear to the next via torque or force measurement) and numerous other techniques. A transmission input speed sensor measures the rotational velocity of the shaft entering the transmission and can do this with rotational position sensors plotted against time. Transmission output speed sensors measure the rotational velocity of the shaft delivering motive force out of the transmission. A manifold airflow sensor or mass air flow sensor can be used to measure the air density or intake airflow of an engine and thus determine the amount of engine load, torque, or power output. Other types of engine load sensors can be used to determine how much power or torque is being delivered from an engine, such as by measuring the delivered axle speed vs. the expected axle speed or by measuring the work being produced. A throttle position sensor measures the position of an engine throttle regulating the amount of fuel and air entering an engine, and can be measured using various techniques such as hall effect sensing, inductive, mechanical position sensing, magneto resistive sensing, and other techniques. A coolant temperature sensor measures the coolant temperature in various positions, over time or instantaneously in a liquid or gas cooled target system. A speed sensor can measure rotational or linear speed or speed of an overall vehicle over a path or a moving part in rotational or translational motion. A brake sensor can measure various aspects of a vehicular or robotic braking system the degree to which a brake activation switch (such as a vehicular brake pedal) is depressed, or the degree to which a brake is activated or the degree to which a brake is making frictional or other speed-suppressing contact with the motion system. A fluid temperature sensor can measure the temperature of any fluid such as a gaseous, pressurized, lubricant, cooling, fuel, or transported substance and can measure it in a single location or in various locations throughout the body of the fluid, and such measurements can be achieved through integrated contact sensors, dispersed contact sensors around the perimeter of a container, or through active or passive measurement such as infrared sensing or measuring the effect of applied energy to a portion of a fluid and the reflected or measured effect, such as with a laser thermometer. An emitting thermometer tool can be directed to various portions of a three-dimensional fluid chamber to be measured. A tool load sensor can be used to determine the amount of power being delivered from a tool and the resistance of the moving parts against the expected unloaded power of that device. A bearing sensor can measure the forces in portions or throughout or at periodic intervals in a bearing and thus allow a system to measure the change in these forces over time, as well as measure other aspects of a mechanical bearing such as position, service life, rotational count, change in average velocity, sonic changes, vibrational changes, chemical changes, color changes, surface changes, contamination changes, and numerous other attributes relevant to change of the bearing and its potential performance over time. A standstill counter can measure when and how often and for how long and how rapidly a movable target is stationary and in what internal position (as in a rotational or movable element) or relative position (as in a device that interfaces with another device) the moveable target is holding still, which can amongst other things indicate a location where a device, by sitting in that specific position may develop a fault or unwanted physical asymmetry. A hydraulic pump or power unit sensor can sense the pressure within the hydraulic fluid that provides power and also help detect, based on non-linearity or other specific signals that the hydraulic fluid is aged, compromised, contaminated, oxygenated or otherwise at fault. Hydraulic pump and power unit sensors can also sense other aspects of a pump or power unit including service duration, displacement, current position, divergence from duty cycle, change in range of motion or velocity curve of motion over time, resistance, fluid temperatures and chemical state of the fluid enclosure, enclosure integrity, and other intrinsic aspects of the pump. An oxygen sensor can sense the presence, quantity, or density of oxygen in the environment or in a target container. Gas sensors can detect specific types of gas compositions using either a consumable chemical reagent or a solid-state chemical sensor and can detect the presence, quantity or density of a particular gas or combination of gasses in an environment or target container. Oil sensors can detect the presence of oil, its viscosity, its level of pollution, and its pressure in a target area or container. A chemical analysis sensor can use consumable or permanent sensors to analyze a sample and determine the presence of a single chemical molecule or element or the composition of a sample and the specific multiple chemicals that make it up and their relative quantities. Chemical analysis sensors use various techniques including spectral analysis, exposure to lights, combination with consumable test strips, solid-state chemical sensors, and other techniques to establish the chemical makeup of a target. Pressure detectors can detect the pressure in an environment (such as barometric pressure) or can be movably linked to an openable shaft such as with an inflatable object or tire with a tire stem or a pneumatic device or a gas-filled device such as a refrigerant unit, and can measure the pressure therein. Pressure detectors can also be permanently installed within a compressed or vacuum chamber and communicate their measurements through a wired or wireless channel. A vacuum detector can measure the level the relative state of pressure of the interior and can also produce a result simply indicative of whether a predetermined level of vacuum exists in a chamber. A densitometer can measure the optical density e.g., degree of darkness of a sample, by projecting one or more forms of light on it and measuring absorption. A torque sensor can measure the dynamic or static torque of a rotating element using techniques such as magneto elastic sensing, strain gauges, or surface acoustic waves. Engine sensors can measure numerous aspects of an engine, including pressures, temperatures, relative positions, velocities, accelerations, fluid dynamics, power transfer, and numerous other states in a vehicle or other power-generating engine. Exhaust and exhaust gas sensors can measure the output of an exhaust system for attributes such as relative chemical composition, presence of specific chemicals, pressure, velocity, quantity of specific particles, particle count, and quantity of specific pollutants. Exhaust sensors can be disposed within the one or more pipes or channels through which exhaust exits, and can be composed of numerous different sensors including catalytic sensors, optical sensors, mechanical and chemical sensors that analyze the exhaust. A crankshaft sensor or crankshaft position sensor can use optical, magnetic, electrical, electromechanical, or other techniques to establish and report the real-time velocity of a crankshaft or its position relative to other components including the specific position of the pistons in a reciprocating motor. A camshaft position sensor can use optical, magnetic, electrical, electromechanical, or other techniques to establish the position of the camshaft and can feed this back to ignition and fuel delivery systems in a feedback loop as well as provide the information to an external system for analysis. A capacitive pressure sensor uses capacitive electrical effects to measure the pressure inside a target chamber. A piezo-resistive sensor can be used to measure strain and distortion of surfaces and devices under load. A wireless sensor can encompass a wide range of different sensing units that deliver the information they sense over a wireless connection. A wireless pressure sensor performs pressure sensing and delivers the results over a wireless connection. A fuel sensor can use pressure, optical sensing, mechanical sensing with a float, weight, or displacement sensing to determine the level of fuel within a tank, and other types of fuel sensors can sense fuel flow as it passes through a channel or into a chamber. A gyro sensor can measure angular or rotational velocity and can produce signals useful for physical stabilization and motion sensing. Mechanical position sensors measure physical displacement, angular displacement, relative position or orientation using mechanical, optical, magnetic, electrical, or other sensing techniques. MEMS (Micro-electrical-mechanical) are microfabricated sensors which can be integrated into objects to be measured or integrated in mobile sensing devices and MEMS sensors encompass various sensing devices including pressure sensors, magnetic field sensing, accelerometers, fluid quantity sensors, microscanning sensors, micromirror steering devices for sensing, ultrasound transducing, as well as MEMS devices that harvest energy which can be used to power the transmission of sensor data. An injector sensor may sense characteristics of a fuel delivery such as the quantity, speed, or timing of fuel injection. An NOx sensor detects the pollutant nitrogen oxide such as in exhaust systems. A variable valve timing sensor can be used in feedback systems to verify and help control the timing of valve lifting in an engine equipped with variable valve control for fuel efficiency and performance optimization. A tank pressure sensor can detect evaporative leaks in a gasoline or diesel fuel tank due to an absent gas cap, and in other tank applications such as pressurized tanks can detect how full a gaseous tank is. A fuel flow sensor is a specialized fluid flow sensor, both of which can measure the quantity of a gas or liquid passing through a region in a unit time, such as water or fuel or gasses in a pipe or flue. An oil pressure sensor can be located in various places in an engine, transmission, gearbox, or other sealed lubricating system to help determine the performance and sufficiency of the lubricant. A damper sensor or throttle position sensor measures the position of a partial valve system and can measure the degree of flow permitted in an intake, exhaust and other flow damper or throttle engine or industrial system. A particulate sensor or particulate matter sensor can detect specific air quality conditions such as the presence of particulates and dust. An air temperature sensor can be located in various portions of an engine to receive data that can help optimize the air/fuel mixture in an engine. A coolant temperature sensor can sense the temperature of coolant passing through an area or stored in a chamber and help determine if a cooling system is operating as intended. An in-cylinder pressure sensor can capture data about the instantaneous pressure in a motor cylinder and so optimize the combustion in an engine. An engine speed sensor can sense the rotational motion of the crankshaft using optical or magneto-electric sensing. A knock sensor uses vibration sensing to measure the magnitude and timing of detonation in an engine and can be used to adjust the ignition timing. A drive shaft sensor can measure numerous aspects of a power-delivering shaft including angular velocity, power transfer, and may incorporate specific sensors for various modes of vibration such as a torsional vibration sensor, a transverse vibration sensor, a critical speed vibration sensor which detects vibration at the natural frequency of the object leading to failure modes, and a component failure vibration sensor which can detect failure modes in u-joints or bolts. An angular sensor can measure the angular position of a mechanical body with respect to a reference point. A powertrain sensor encompasses various sensors throughout the engine-transmission-driveshaft-differential-wheel system. An engine sensor can include a power sensor encompassing various sensors that detect the level of power being delivered by the engine. Engine oil sensors can sense oil pressure, temperature, viscosity, and flow. A load sensor can sense weight or strain in a static configuration. A frequency sensor can measure various frequencies or provide positive confirmation that a signal or input is maintaining a particular frequency. A transfer case sensor in four-wheel or all-wheel drive vehicles can detect the position of the gears (high or low). A differential sensor such as a rear wheel speed sensor indicates the axle speeds of the rear wheels, such as for an antilock braking system. Various other sensors in the rear differential can detect conditions such as lubricant sufficiency, seal, power transfer, slip, etc., A tire pressure gauge is a specialized form of pressure gauge and can be integrated with a hub or rim in the valve stem or can be non-integrated and connected to the valve stem as needed. A tire damage gauge can sense pressure loss, traction loss, or using other sensor techniques determine various attributes of a tire such as wear, tear, balding, splitting, puncture, and the like. A tire vibration or balance sensor can sense when a wheel is not smoothly rotating. Hub and rim integrity sensors can measure and detect the structural integrity and stability of wheels through chemical, electromagnetic, optical, or visual sensing. Air, fluid and lubricant leak sensors can detect the loss of air or fluid through various means including pressure change over time, visual detection of a puncture, emission of gas or liquid from the exterior of the containing vessel, or temperature gradient detection such as with infrared sensing. Lubricant leak sensors can also detect a loss of lubricant through increased noise due to abrasion, fine measures of distances and contacts between parts, vibrations, and off-balance motions in a system.
The sensors described herein can deliver their instantaneous or continuous sensor data via numerous data transmission techniques, including techniques such as low-distance wireless transmission where the power to emit the transmission is provided by an inductive or mechanical generator which is powered by the motion or energy being sensed. The sensor data can be delivered via a single wire or even body-current transmission protocol over any practical energy emission device. For instance, a pressure sensor embedded within a ferrometallic block could use the fluctuations in temperature to induce a tiny magnetic flux in the block, which flux is then measured in another area of the block by a sensor communicating via a conventional Wi-Fi or Ethernet network. MEMS devices integrated in the sensing components can perform energy harvesting in order to power the transmission of the sensor data over a network.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment having a self-sufficient data acquisition box for capturing and analyzing data in an industrial environment comprises a data circuit for analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, a network communication interface, a network control circuit for sending and receiving information related to the sensor inputs to an external system and a data filter circuit configured to dynamically adjust what portion of the information is sent based on instructions received over the network communication interface. In embodiments, the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in a roller bearing assembly such as rust, micropitting, macropitting, gear teeth breakage, fretting, case-core separation, plastic deformation, scuffing, polishing, adhesion, abrasion, subcase fatigue, erosion, corrosion, electric discharge, cavitation, cracking, scoring, profile pitting, and spalling.
In embodiments, the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in a gear box such as micropitting, macropitting, gear tooth wear, tooth breakage, spalling, fretting, case-core separation, plastic deformation, scuffing, polishing, adhesion, abrasion, subcase fatigue, erosion, electric discharge, cavitation, rust, corrosion, and cracking.
In embodiments, the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in a hydraulic pump such as fluid aeration, overheating, over-pressurization, lubricating film loss, depressurization, shaft failure, vacuum seal failure, large particle contamination, small particle contamination, rust, corrosion, cavitation, shaft galling, seizure, bushing wear, channel seal loss, and implosion.
In embodiments, the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in an engine such as imbalance, gasket failure, camshaft, spring breakage, valve breakage, valve scuffing, valve leakage, clutch slipping, gear interference, belt slipping, belt teeth breakage, belt breakage, gear tooth failure, oil seal failure, aftercooler, intercooler, or radiator failure, rod failure, sensor failure, crankshaft failure, bearing seizure, overload at low RPM, cranking, full stop, high RPM, overspeed, piston disintegration, shock overload, torque overload, surface fatigue, critical speed failure, weld failure, and material failures including micropitting, macropitting, gear teeth breakage, fretting, case-core separation, plastic deformation, scuffing, polishing, adhesion, abrasion, subcase fatigue, rust, erosion, corrosion, electric discharge, cavitation, cracking, scoring, profile pitting and spalling.
In embodiments, the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in a vehicle chassis, body or frame such as imbalance, gasket failure, spring breakage, lubricant seal failure, sensor failure, bearing seizure, shock overload, surface fatigue, weld failure, spring failure, strut failure, control arm failure, kingpin failure, tie-rod and end failure, pinion bearing failure, pinion gear failure, and material failures including micropitting, macropitting, fretting, rust, erosion, corrosion, electric discharge, cavitation, cracking, scoring, profile pitting and spalling.
In embodiments, the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in a powertrain, propeller shaft, drive shaft, final drive, or wheel end, such as imbalance, gasket failure, camshaft failure, gear box failure, spring breakage, valve breakage, valve scuffing, belt teeth breakage, belt breakage, gear tooth failure, oil seal failure, rod failure, sensor failure, crankshaft failure, bearing seizure, overload at low RPM, cranking, full stop, high RPM, overspeed, piston disintegration, shock overload, torque overload, surface fatigue, critical speed failure, yoke damage, weld failure, u-joint failure, CV joint failure, differential failure, axle shaft failure, spring failure, strut failure, control arm failure, kingpin failure, tie-rod & end failure, pinion bearing failure, ring gear failure, pinion gear failure, spider gear failure, wheel bearing failure, and material failures including micropitting, macropitting, gear teeth breakage, fretting, case-core separation, plastic deformation, scuffing, polishing, adhesion, abrasion, subcase fatigue, rust, erosion, corrosion, electric discharge, cavitation, cracking, scoring, profile pitting and spalling.
In embodiments, the sensor input can be a roller-bearing sensor, deformation sensor, camera, ultraviolet sensor, infrared sensor, audio sensor, vibration sensor, viscosity sensor, chemical sensor, contaminant sensor, particulate sensor, weight sensor, rotation sensor, temperature sensor, position sensor, ultrasonic sensor, solid chemical sensor, pH sensor, fluid chemical sensor, lubricant sensor, radiation sensor, x-ray radiograph, gamma-ray radiograph, scanning tunneling microscope, photon-tunneling microscope, scanning probe microscope, laser displacement meter, magnetic particle inspector, ultraviolet particle detector, load sensor, static load sensor, axial load sensor, accelerometer, speed sensor, rotational sensor, moisture, humidity, ammeter, voltmeter, flux meter, and electric field detector, gear box sensor, gear wear sensor, “tooth decay” sensor, rotation sensors, transmission input sensor, transmission output sensor, manifold airflow sensor (determines engine load and thus affects gearbox), engine load sensors, throttle position sensor, coolant temperature sensor, speed sensor, brake sensor, fluid temperature sensor, tool load sensor, bearing sensor, standstill counter, hydraulic pump sensor, oxygen sensors, gas sensors, oil sensors, chemical analysis, pressure detector, vacuum detector, densitometer, torque sensor, engine sensor, exhaust sensors, exhaust gas sensor, crankshaft position sensor, camshaft position sensor, capacitive pressure sensor, piezo-resistive sensor, wireless sensor, wireless pressure sensor, chemical sensors, oxygen sensor, fuel sensor, gyro sensor, mechanical position sensors, accelerometer, mems sensors, digital sensors, mass air flow sensor, manifold absolute pressure sensor, throttle control sensor, injector sensor, NOx sensor, variable valve timing sensor, tank pressure sensor, fuel level sensor, fuel flow sensor, fluid flow sensor, damper sensor, torque sensor, particulate sensor, air flow meter, air temperature sensor, coolant temperature sensor, in-cylinder pressure sensor, engine speed sensor, knock sensor, drive shaft sensor, angular sensor, transverse vibration sensor, torsional vibration sensor, critical speed vibration sensor, powertrain sensor, engine sensors: power sensor, oil pressure, oil temperature, oil viscosity, oil flow sensor, load sensor (structural analysis), vibration sensor, frequency sensor, audio sensor, transfer case sensor, differential sensor, tire pressure gauge, tire damage gauge, tire vibration sensor, hub and rim integrity sensors, air leak sensors, fluid leak sensors, and lubricant leak sensors.
In embodiments, the sensor inputs additionally comprise microphones or vibration sensors configured to detect vibrational or audio-frequency conditions in movable or rotational components, such as whirring, howling, growling, whining, rumbling, clunking, rattling, wheel hopping, and chattering.
In embodiments, the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in a production line gear box, such as micropitting, macropitting, gear tooth wear, tooth breakage, spalling, fretting, case-core separation, plastic deformation, scuffing, polishing, adhesion, abrasion, subcase fatigue, erosion, electric discharge, cavitation, corrosion, and cracking.
In embodiments, the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in a production line vibrator such as moisture penetration, contamination, micropitting, macropitting, gear tooth wear, tooth breakage, spalling, fretting, case-core separation, plastic deformation, scuffing, polishing, adhesion, abrasion, subcase fatigue, rust, erosion, electric discharge, cavitation, corrosion, and cracking.
In embodiments, analyzing comprises detecting anomalies in the received data. In embodiments, the data filter circuit executes stored procedures to create digests of the information. In embodiments, the system discards the data underlying the digests of the information after a user-configurable time period.
In embodiments analyzing comprises determining what data to store, determining what data to transmit, determining what data to summarize, determining what data to discard, or determining the accuracy of the received data.
In embodiments, the system is configured to communicate with a plurality of other similarly configured systems and store the information when the amount of storage used by the system exceeds a threshold.
In embodiments, the system is configured to execute the instructions received via the network communication interface using a virtual machine.
In embodiments, the system further comprises a digitally signed code execution environment to decrypt and run the instructions it receives via the network interface.
In embodiments, the system further comprises multiple distinct cryptographically protected memory segments.
In embodiments, the at least one of the memory segments is made available for public interaction with the stored data via a public key-private key management system.
In embodiments, the system further comprises a conditioning circuit for converting signals to a form suitable for input to an analog-to-digital converter.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment having a self-sufficient data acquisition box for capturing and analyzing data in an industrial process, comprises a data circuit for analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, a network control circuit for sending and receiving information related to the sensor inputs to an external system, and a storage device, where the data circuit continuously monitors sensor inputs and stores them in an embedded data cube and where the data acquisition box dynamically determines what information to send based on statistical analysis of historical data.
In embodiments, the system further comprises a plurality of network communication interfaces. In embodiments, the network control circuit bridges another similarly configured system from one network to another using the plurality of network communication interfaces. In embodiments, the analyzing further comprises detecting anomalies in the information. In embodiments, the data circuit executes stored procedures to create digests of the information. In embodiments, the data circuit supplies digest data to one client and non-digest data to another client simultaneously. In embodiments, the data circuit stores digests of historical anomalies and discards at least a portion of the information. In embodiments, the data circuit provides client query access to the embedded data cube in real time. In embodiments, the data circuit supports client requests in the form of a SQL query. In embodiments, the data circuit supports client requests in the form of a OLAP query. In embodiments, the system further comprises a conditioning circuit for converting signals to a form suitable for input to an analog-to-digital converter.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment having a self-sufficient data acquisition box for capturing and analyzing data in an industrial process comprises a data circuit for analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, and a network control circuit for sending and receiving information related to the sensor inputs to an external system, the system is configured to provide sensor data to a plurality of other similarly configured systems, and the system dynamically reconfigures where it sends data and the and the quantity it sends based on the availability of the other similarly configured systems.
In embodiments, the system further comprises a plurality of network communication interfaces. In embodiments, the network control circuit bridges another similarly configured system from one network to another using the plurality of network communication interfaces. In embodiments, the dynamic reconfiguration is based on requests received over the one or more network communication interfaces. In embodiments, the dynamic reconfiguration is based on requests made by a remote user. In embodiments, the dynamic reconfiguration is based on an analysis of the type of data acquired by the data acquisition box. In embodiments, the dynamic reconfiguration is based on an operating parameter of at least one of the system and one of the similarly configured systems. In embodiments, the network control circuit sends sensor data in packets designed to be stored and forwarded by the other similarly configured systems. In embodiments, when a fault is detected in the system, the network control circuit forwards a at least a portion of its stored information for to another similarly configured system. In embodiments, the network control circuit determines how to route information through a network of similarly configured systems connected, based on the source of the information request. In embodiments, the network control circuit decides how to route data in a network of similarly configured systems, based on how frequently information is being requested. In embodiments, the decides how to route data in a network of similarly configured systems, based how much data is being requested over a given period. In embodiments, the network control circuit implements a network of similarly configured systems using an intercommunication protocol such as multi-hop, mesh, serial, parallel, ring, real-time and hub-and-spoke. In embodiments, after a configurable time period, the system stores only digests of the information and discards the underlying information. In embodiments, the system further comprises a conditioning circuit for converting signals to a form suitable for input to an analog-to-digital converter.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment having a self-sufficient data acquisition box for capturing and analyzing data in an industrial process, comprises a data circuit for analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, a network control circuit for sending and receiving information related to the sensor inputs to an external system, where the system provides sensor data to one or more similarly configured systems and where the data circuit dynamically reconfigures the route by which it sends data based on how many other devices are requesting the information.
In embodiments, the system further comprises a plurality of network communication interfaces. In embodiments, the network control circuit bridges another similarly configured system from one network to another using the plurality of network communication interfaces. Where the network control circuit implements a network of similarly configured systems using an intercommunication protocol such as multi-hop, mesh, serial, parallel, ring, real-time and hub-and-spoke. In embodiments, the system continuously provides a single copy of its information to another similarly configured system and directs requesters of its information to the another similarly configured system. In embodiments, the another similarly configured system has different operational characteristics than the system. In embodiments, the different operational characteristics can be power, storage, network connectivity, proximity, reliability, duty cycle. In embodiments, after a configurable time period, the system stores only digests of the information and discards the underlying information.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment having a self-sufficient data acquisition box for capturing and analyzing data in an industrial process comprises a data circuit for analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, a network control circuit for sending and receiving information related to the sensor inputs to an external system, where the system provides sensor data to one or more similarly configured systems and where the data circuit dynamically nominates a similarly configured system capable of providing sensor data to replace the system.
In embodiments, the nomination is triggered by the detection of a system failure mode. In embodiments, when the system is unable to supply a requested signal, it nominates another similarly configured system to supply similar but not identical information to a requestor. In embodiments, the system indicates to the requestor that the new signal is different than the original. In embodiments, the network control circuit implements a network of similarly configured systems using an intercommunication protocol such as multi-hop, mesh, serial, parallel, ring, real-time and hub-and-spoke. In embodiments, after a configurable time period, the system stores only digests of the information and discards the underlying information. In embodiments, the network control circuit self-arranges the system into a redundant storage network with one or more similarly configured systems. In embodiments, the network control circuit self-arranges the system into a fault-tolerant storage network with one or more similarly configured systems. In embodiments, the network control circuit self-arranges the system into a hierarchical storage network with one or more similarly configured systems. In embodiments, the network control circuit self-arranges the system into a hierarchical data transmission configuration in order to reduce upstream traffic. In embodiments, the network control circuit self-arranges the system into a matrixed network configuration with multiple redundant data paths in order to increase reliability of information transmission. In embodiments, the network control circuit self-arranges the system into a matrixed network configuration with multiple redundant data paths in order to increase reliability of information transmission. In embodiments, the system accumulates data received from other similarly configured systems while an upstream network connection is unavailable, and then sends all accumulated data once the upstream network connection is restored. In embodiments, the accumulated data is committed to a remote database. In embodiments, the system rearranges its position in a mesh network topology with other similarly configured systems in order to minimize the amount of data it must relay from the other systems. In embodiments, the system rearranges its position in a mesh network topology with other similarly configured systems in order to minimize the amount of data it must send through other the other systems.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment having a self-sufficient data acquisition box for capturing and analyzing data in an industrial process comprises a data circuit for analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, a network control circuit for sending and receiving information related to the sensor inputs to an external system, where the system provides sensor data to one or more similarly configured systems and where the system and the one or more similarly configured systems are arranged as a consolidated virtual information provider.
In embodiments, the system and each of the similarly configured systems multiplex their information. In embodiments, the system and each of the similarly configured systems provide a single unified information source to a requestor. In embodiments, the system and each of the similarly configured systems further comprise an intelligent agent circuit that combines the data between systems. In embodiments, the system and each of the similarly configured systems further comprise an intelligent agent circuit that chooses what data to collect or store based on a machine learning algorithm. In embodiments, the machine learning algorithm further comprises a feedback function that takes as input what data is used by an external system. In embodiments, the machine learning algorithm further comprises a control function that adjusts the degree of precision, frequency of capture, or information stored based on an analysis of requests for data over time. In embodiments, the machine learning algorithm further comprises a feedback function that adjusts what sensor data is captured based on an analysis of requests for information over time. In embodiments, the machine learning algorithm further comprises a feedback function that adjusts what sensor data is captured based on historical use of information. In embodiments, the machine learning algorithm further comprises a feedback function that adjusts what sensor data is captured based on what information was most indicative of a failure mode. In embodiments, the machine learning algorithm further comprises a feedback function that adjusts what sensor data is captured based on detected combinations of information coincident with a failure mode. In embodiments, the network control circuit implements a network of similarly configured systems using an intercommunication protocol such as multi-hop, mesh, serial, parallel, ring, real-time and hub-and-spoke. In embodiments, the network control circuit self-arranges the system into network communication with similarly configured systems using an intercommunication protocol such as multi-hop, mesh, serial, parallel, ring, real-time and hub-and-spoke. In embodiments, after a configurable time period, the system stores only digests of the information and discards the underlying information.
A system for data collection in an industrial environment having a self-sufficient data acquisition box for capturing and analyzing data in an industrial environment, the system comprising: a data circuit for analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs; a network communication interface; a network control circuit for sending and receiving information related to the sensor inputs to an external system; and a data filter circuit configured to dynamically adjust what portion of the information is sent based on instructions received over the network communication interface.
Wherein the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in a roller bearing assembly selected from the group consisting of rust, micropitting, macropitting, gear teeth breakage, fretting, case-core separation, plastic deformation, scuffing, polishing, adhesion, abrasion, subcase fatigue, erosion, corrosion, electric discharge, cavitation, cracking, scoring, profile pitting, and spalling.
Wherein the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in a gear box selected from the group consisting of micropitting, macropitting, gear tooth wear, tooth breakage, spalling, fretting, case-core separation, plastic deformation, scuffing, polishing, adhesion, abrasion, subcase fatigue, erosion, electric discharge, cavitation, rust, corrosion, and cracking.
Wherein the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in a hydraulic pump selected from the group consisting of fluid aeration, overheating, over-pressurization, lubricating film loss, depressurization, shaft failure, vacuum seal failure, large particle contamination, small particle contamination, rust, corrosion, cavitation, shaft galling, seizure, bushing wear, channel seal loss, and implosion.
Wherein the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in an engine selected from the group consisting of imbalance, gasket failure, camshaft, spring breakage, valve breakage, valve scuffing, valve leakage, clutch slipping, gear interference, belt slipping, belt teeth breakage, belt breakage, gear tooth failure, oil seal failure, aftercooler, intercooler, or radiator failure, rod failure, sensor failure, crankshaft failure, bearing seizure, overload at low RPM, cranking, full stop, high RPM, overspeed, piston disintegration, shock overload, torque overload, surface fatigue, critical speed failure, weld failure, and material failures including micropitting, macropitting, gear teeth breakage, fretting, case-core separation, plastic deformation, scuffing, polishing, adhesion, abrasion, subcase fatigue, rust, erosion, corrosion, electric discharge, cavitation, cracking, scoring, profile pitting, spalling.
Wherein the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in a vehicle chassis, body or frame selected from the group consisting of imbalance, gasket failure, spring breakage, lubricant seal failure, sensor failure, bearing seizure, shock overload, surface fatigue, weld failure, spring failure, strut failure, control arm failure, kingpin failure, tie-rod & end failure, pinion bearing failure, pinion gear failure, and material failures including micropitting, macropitting, fretting, rust, erosion, corrosion, electric discharge, cavitation, cracking, scoring, profile pitting, spalling.
Wherein the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in a powertrain, propeller shaft, drive shaft, final drive, or wheel end, selected from the group consisting of imbalance, gasket failure, camshaft failure, gear box failure, spring breakage, valve breakage, valve scuffing, belt teeth breakage, belt breakage, gear tooth failure, oil seal failure, rod failure, sensor failure, crankshaft failure, bearing seizure, overload at low RPM, cranking, full stop, high RPM, overspeed, piston disintegration, shock overload, torque overload, surface fatigue, critical speed failure, yoke damage, weld failure, u-joint failure, CV joint failure, differential failure, axle shaft failure, spring failure, strut failure, control arm failure, kingpin failure, tie-rod & end failure, pinion bearing failure, ring gear failure, pinion gear failure, spider gear failure, wheel bearing failure, and material failures including micropitting, macropitting, gear teeth breakage, fretting, case-core separation, plastic deformation, scuffing, polishing, adhesion, abrasion, subcase fatigue, rust, erosion, corrosion, electric discharge, cavitation, cracking, scoring, profile pitting, and spalling.
Wherein the sensor inputs are selected from the group consisting of roller bearing sensor, deformation sensor, camera, ultraviolet sensor, infrared sensor, audio sensor, vibration sensor, viscosity sensor, chemical sensor, contaminant sensor, particulate sensor, weight sensor, rotation sensor, temperature sensor, position sensor, ultrasonic sensor, solid chemical sensor, pH sensor, fluid chemical sensor, lubricant sensor, radiation sensor, x-ray radiograph, gamma-ray radiograph, scanning tunneling microscope, photon tunneling microscope, scanning probe microscope, laser displacement meter, magnetic particle inspector, ultraviolet particle detector, load sensor, static load sensor, axial load sensor, accelerometer, speed sensor, rotational sensor, moisture, humidity, ammeter, voltmeter, flux meter, and electric field detector, gear box sensor, gear wear sensor, “tooth decay” sensor, rotation sensors, transmission input sensor, transmission output sensor, manifold airflow sensor (determines engine load and thus affects gearbox), engine load sensors, throttle position sensor, coolant temperature sensor, speed sensor, brake sensor, fluid temperature sensor, tool load sensor, bearing sensor, standstill counter, hydraulic pump sensor, oxygen sensors, gas sensors, oil sensors, chemical analysis, pressure detector, vacuum detector, densitometer, torque sensor, engine sensor, exhaust sensors, exhaust gas sensor, crankshaft position sensor, camshaft position sensor, capacitive pressure sensor, piezo-resistive sensor, wireless sensor, wireless pressure sensor, chemical sensors, oxygen sensor, fuel sensor, gyro sensor, mechanical position sensors, accelerometer, mems sensors, digital sensors, mass air flow sensor, manifold absolute pressure sensor, throttle control sensor, injector sensor, NOx sensor, variable valve timing sensor, tank pressure sensor, fuel level sensor, fuel flow sensor, fluid flow sensor, damper sensor, torque sensor, particulate sensor, air flow meter, air temperature sensor, coolant temperature sensor, in-cylinder pressure sensor, engine speed sensor, knock sensor, drive shaft sensor, angular sensor, transverse vibration sensor, torsional vibration sensor, critical speed vibration sensor, powertrain sensor, engine sensors: power sensor, oil pressure, oil temperature, oil viscosity, oil flow sensor, load sensor (structural analysis), vibration sensor, frequency sensor, audio sensor, transfer case sensor, differential sensor, tire pressure gauge, tire damage gauge, tire vibration sensor, hub and rim integrity sensors, air leak sensors, fluid leak sensors, and lubricant leak sensors.
Wherein the sensor inputs additionally comprise microphones or vibration sensors configured to detect vibrational or audio-frequency conditions in movable or rotational components selected from the list consisting of whirring, howling, growling, whining, rumbling, clunking, rattling, wheel hopping, chattering.
Wherein the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in a production line gear box selected from the group consisting of micropitting, macropitting, gear tooth wear, tooth breakage, spalling, fretting, case-core separation, plastic deformation, scuffing, polishing, adhesion, abrasion, subcase fatigue, erosion, electric discharge, cavitation, corrosion, and cracking.
Wherein the data circuit is configured to analyze data indicative of a fatigue or wear failure mode in a production line vibrator selected from the group consisting of moisture penetration, contamination, micropitting, macropitting, gear tooth wear, tooth breakage, spalling, fretting, case-core separation, plastic deformation, scuffing, polishing, adhesion, abrasion, subcase fatigue, rust, erosion, electric discharge, cavitation, corrosion, and cracking.
Wherein the analyzing further comprises detecting anomalies in the received data.
Wherein the data filter circuit executes stored procedures to create digests of the information.
Wherein the system discards the data underlying the digests of the information after a user-configurable time period.
Wherein the analyzing further comprises determining what data to store, determining what data to transmit, determining what data to summarize, determining what data to discard, or determining the accuracy of the received data.
Wherein the system is configured to communicate with a plurality of other similarly configured systems and store the information when the amount of storage used by the system exceeds a threshold.
Wherein the system is configured to execute the instructions received via the network communication interface using a virtual machine.
Wherein the system further comprises a digitally signed code execution environment to decrypt and run the instructions it receives via the network interface.
Wherein the system further comprises multiple distinct cryptographically protected memory segments.
Wherein the at least one of the memory segments is made available for public interaction with the stored data via a public key-private key management system.
Wherein the system further comprises a conditioning circuit for converting signals to a form suitable for input to an analog-to-digital converter.
A system for data collection in an industrial environment having a self-sufficient data acquisition box for capturing and analyzing data in an industrial process, the system comprising: a data circuit for analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs; a network control circuit for sending and receiving information related to the sensor inputs to an external system; a storage device; where the data circuit continuously monitors sensor inputs and stores them in an embedded data cube; and where the data acquisition box dynamically determines what information to send based on statistical analysis of historical data.
Wherein the system further comprises a plurality of network communication interfaces.
Wherein the network control circuit bridges another similarly configured system from one network to another using the plurality of network communication interfaces.
Wherein the analyzing further comprises detecting anomalies in the information.
Wherein the data circuit executes stored procedures to create digests of the information.
Wherein the data circuit supplies digest data to one client and non-digest data to another client simultaneously.
Wherein the data circuit stores digests of historical anomalies and discards at least a portion of the information.
Wherein the data circuit provides client query access to the embedded data cube in real time.
Wherein the data circuit supports client requests in the form of a SQL query.
Wherein the data circuit supports client requests in the form of a OLAP query.
Wherein the system further comprises a conditioning circuit for converting signals to a form suitable for input to an analog-to-digital converter.
A system for data collection in an industrial environment having a self-sufficient data acquisition box for capturing and analyzing data in an industrial process, the system comprising: a data circuit for analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs; a network control circuit for sending and receiving information related to the sensor inputs to an external system; wherein the system is configured to provide sensor data to a plurality of other similarly configured systems; and wherein the system dynamically reconfigures where it sends data and the and the quantity it sends based on the availability of the other similarly configured systems.
Wherein the system further comprises a plurality of network communication interfaces.
Wherein the network control circuit bridges another similarly configured system from one network to another using the plurality of network communication interfaces.
Wherein the dynamic reconfiguration is based on requests received over the one or more network communication interfaces.
Wherein the dynamic reconfiguration is based on requests made by a remote user.
Wherein the dynamic reconfiguration is based on an analysis of the type of data acquired by the data acquisition box.
Wherein the dynamic reconfiguration is based on an operating parameter of at least one of the system and one of the similarly configured systems.
Wherein the network control circuit sends sensor data in packets designed to be stored and forwarded by the other similarly configured systems.
Wherein, when a fault is detected in the system, the network control circuit forwards a at least a portion of its stored information for to another similarly configured system.
Wherein the network control circuit determines how to route information through a network of similarly configured systems connected, based on the source of the information request.
Wherein the network control circuit decides how to route data in a network of similarly configured systems, based on how frequently information is being requested.
Wherein the decides how to route data in a network of similarly configured systems, based how much data is being requested over a given period.
Wherein the network control circuit implements a network of similarly configured systems using an intercommunication protocol selected from the list consisting of multi-hop, mesh, serial, parallel, ring, real-time and hub-and-spoke.
Wherein, after a configurable time period, the system stores only digests of the information and discards the underlying information.
Wherein the system further comprises a conditioning circuit for converting signals to a form suitable for input to an analog-to-digital converter.
A system for data collection in an industrial environment having a self-sufficient data acquisition box for capturing and analyzing data in an industrial process, the system comprising: a data circuit for analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs; a network control circuit for sending and receiving information related to the sensor inputs to an external system; wherein the system provides sensor data to one or more similarly configured systems; wherein the data circuit dynamically reconfigures the route by which it sends data based on how many other devices are requesting the information.
Wherein the system further comprises a plurality of network communication interfaces.
Wherein the network control circuit bridges another similarly configured system from one network to another using the plurality of network communication interfaces.
Where the network control circuit implements a network of similarly configured systems using an intercommunication protocol selected from the list consisting of multi-hop, mesh, serial, parallel, ring, real-time and hub-and-spoke.
Wherein the system continuously provides a single copy of its information to another similarly configured system and directs requesters of its information to the another similarly configured system.
Wherein the another similarly configured system has different operational characteristics than the system.
Wherein different operational characteristics are selected from the list consisting of power, storage, network connectivity, proximity, reliability, duty cycle.
Wherein, after a configurable time period, the system stores only digests of the information and discards the underlying information.
A system for data collection in an industrial environment having a self-sufficient data acquisition box for capturing and analyzing data in an industrial process, the system comprising: a data circuit for analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs; a network control circuit for sending and receiving information related to the sensor inputs to an external system; wherein the system provides sensor data to one or more similarly configured systems; and wherein the data circuit dynamically nominates a similarly configured system capable of providing sensor data to replace the system.
Wherein the nomination is triggered by the detection of a system failure mode.
Wherein, when the system is unable to supply a requested signal it nominates another similarly configured system to supply similar but not identical information to a requestor.
Wherein the system indicates to the requestor that the new signal is different than the original.
Where the network control circuit implements a network of similarly configured systems using an intercommunication protocol selected from the list consisting of multi-hop, mesh, serial, parallel, ring, real-time and hub-and-spoke.
Wherein, after a configurable time period, the system stores only digests of the information and discards the underlying information.
Wherein the network control circuit self-arranges the system into a redundant storage network with one or more similarly configured systems.
Wherein the network control circuit self-arranges the system into a fault-tolerant storage network with one or more similarly configured systems.
Wherein the network control circuit self-arranges the system into a hierarchical storage network with one or more similarly configured systems.
Wherein the network control circuit self-arranges the system into a hierarchical data transmission configuration in order to reduce upstream traffic.
Wherein the network control circuit self-arranges the system into a matrixed network configuration with multiple redundant data paths in order to increase reliability of information transmission.
Wherein the network control circuit self-arranges the system into a matrixed network configuration with multiple redundant data paths in order to increase reliability of information transmission.
Wherein the system accumulates data received from other similarly configured systems while an upstream network connection is unavailable, and then sends all accumulated data once the upstream network connection is restored.
Wherein the accumulated data is committed to a remote database.
Wherein the system rearranges its position in a mesh network topology with other similarly configured systems in order to minimize the amount of data it must relay from the other systems.
Wherein the system rearranges its position in a mesh network topology with other similarly configured systems in order to minimize the amount of data it must send through other the other systems.
A system for data collection in an industrial environment having a self-sufficient data acquisition box for capturing and analyzing data in an industrial process, the system comprising: a data circuit for analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs; a network control circuit for sending and receiving information related to the sensor inputs to an external system; wherein the system provides sensor data to one or more similarly configured systems; and wherein the system and the one or more similarly configured systems are arranged as a consolidated virtual information provider.
Wherein the system and each of the similarly configured systems multiplex their information.
Wherein the system and each of the similarly configured systems provide a single unified information source to a requestor.
Wherein the system and each of the similarly configured systems further comprise an intelligent agent circuit that combines the data between systems.
Wherein the system and each of the similarly configured systems further comprise an intelligent agent circuit that chooses what data to collect or store based on a machine learning algorithm.
Wherein the machine learning algorithm further comprises a feedback function that takes as input what data is used by an external system.
Wherein the machine learning algorithm further comprises a control function that adjusts the degree of precision, frequency of capture, or information stored based on an analysis of requests for data over time.
Wherein the machine learning algorithm further comprises a feedback function that adjusts what sensor data is captured based on an analysis of requests for information over time.
Wherein the machine learning algorithm further comprises a feedback function that adjusts what sensor data is captured based on historical use of information.
Wherein the machine learning algorithm further comprises a feedback function that adjusts what sensor data is captured based on what information was most indicative of a failure mode.
Wherein the machine learning algorithm further comprises a feedback function that adjusts what sensor data is captured based on detected combinations of information coincident with a failure mode.
Wherein the network control circuit implements a network of similarly configured systems using an intercommunication protocol selected from the list consisting of multi-hop, mesh, serial, parallel, ring, real-time and hub-and-spoke.
Wherein the network control circuit self-arranges the system into network communication with similarly configured systems using an intercommunication protocol selected from the list consisting of multi-hop, mesh, serial, parallel, ring, real-time and hub-and-spoke.
Wherein, after a configurable time period, the system stores only digests of the information and discards the underlying information.
Disclosed herein are methods and systems for data collection in an industrial environment featuring self-organization functionality. Such data collection systems and methods may facilitate intelligent, situational, context-aware collection, summarization, storage, processing, transmitting, and/or organization of data, such as by one or more data collectors (such as any of the wide range of data collector embodiments described throughout this disclosure), a central headquarters or computing system, and the like. The described self-organization functionality of data collection in an industrial environment may improve various parameters of such data collection, as well as parameters of the processes, applications, and products that depend on data collection, such as data quality parameters, consistency parameters, efficiency parameters, comprehensiveness parameters, reliability parameters, effectiveness parameters, storage utilization parameters, yield parameters (including financial yield, output yield, and reduction of adverse events), energy consumption parameters, bandwidth utilization parameters, input/output speed parameters, redundancy parameters, security parameters, safety parameters, interference parameters, signal-to-noise parameters, statistical relevancy parameters, and others. The self-organization functionality may optimize across one or more such parameters, such as based on a weighting of the value of the parameters; for example, a swarm of data collectors may be managed (or manage itself) to provide a given level of redundancy for critical data, while not exceeding a specified level of energy usage, e.g., per data collector or a group of data collectors or the entire swarm of data collectors. This may include using a variety of optimization techniques described throughout this disclosure and the documents incorporated herein by reference.
In embodiments, such methods and systems for data collection in an industrial environment can include one or more data collectors, e.g., arranged in a cooperative group or “swarm” of data collectors, that collect and organize data in conjunction with a data pool in communication with a computing system, as well as supporting technology components, services, processes, modules, applications and interfaces, for managing the data collection (collectively referred to in some cases as a data collection system 12004). Examples of such components include, but are not limited to, a model-based expert system, a rule-based expert system, an expert system using artificial intelligence (such as a machine learning system, which may include a neural net expert system, a self-organizing map system, a human-supervised machine learning system, a state determination system, a classification system, or other artificial intelligence system), or various hybrids or combinations of any of the above. References to a self-organizing method or system should be understood to encompass utilization of any one of the foregoing or suitable combinations, except where context indicates otherwise.
The data collection systems and methods of the present disclosure can be utilized with various types of data, including but not limited to vibration data, noise data and other sensor data of the types described throughout this disclosure. Such data collection can be utilized for event detection, state detection, and the like, and such event detection, state detection, and the like can be utilized to self-organize the data collection systems and methods, as further discussed herein. The self-organization functionality may include managing data collector(s), both individually or in groups, where such functionality is directed at supporting an identified application, process, or workflow, such as confirming progress toward or/alignment with one or more objectives, goals, rules, policies, or guidelines. The self-organization functionality may also involve managing a different goal/guideline, or directing data collectors targeted to determining an unknown variable based on collection of other data (such as based on a model of the behavior of a system that involves the variable), selecting preferred sensor inputs among available inputs (including specifying combinations, fusions, or multiplexing of inputs), and/or specifying a specific data collector among available data collectors.
A data collector may include any number of items, such as sensors, input channels, data locations, data streams, data protocols, data extraction techniques, data transformation techniques, data loading techniques, data types, frequency of sampling, placement of sensors, static data points, metadata, fusion of data, multiplexing of data, self-organizing techniques, and the like as described herein. Data collector settings may describe the configuration and makeup of the data collector, such as by specifying the parameters that define the data collector. For example, data collector settings may include one or more frequencies to measure. Frequency data may further include at least one of a group of spectral peaks, a true-peak level, a crest factor derived from a time waveform, and an overall waveform derived from a vibration envelope, as well as other signal characteristics described throughout this disclosure. Data collectors may include sensors measuring or data regarding one or more wavelengths, one or more spectra, and/or one or more types of data from various sensors and metadata. Data collectors may include one or more sensors or types of sensors of a wide range of types, such as described throughout this disclosure and the documents incorporated by reference herein. Indeed, the sensors described herein may be used in any of the methods or systems described throughout this disclosure. For example, one sensor may be an accelerometer, such as one that measures voltage per G of acceleration (e.g., 100 mV/G, 500 mV/G, 1 V/G, 5 V/G, 10 V/G). In embodiments, a data collector may alter the makeup of the subset of the plurality of sensors used in a data collector based on optimizing the responsiveness of the sensor, such as for example choosing an accelerometer better suited for measuring acceleration of a lower speed gear system or drill/boring device versus one better suited for measuring acceleration of a higher speed turbine in a power generation environment. Choosing may be done intelligently, such as for example with a proximity probe and multiple accelerometers disposed on a specific target (e.g., a gear system, drill, or turbine) where while at low speed one accelerometer is used for measuring in the data collector and another is used at high speeds. Accelerometers come in various types, such as piezo-electric crystal, low frequency (e.g., 10 V/G), high speed compressors (10 MV/G), MEMS, and the like. In another example, one sensor may be a proximity probe which can be used for sleeve or tilt-pad bearings (e.g., oil bath), or a velocity probe. In yet another example, one sensor may be a solid state relay (SSR) that is structured to automatically interface with another routed data collector (such as a mobile or portable data collector) to obtain or deliver data. In another example, a data collector may be routed to alter the makeup of the plurality of available sensors, such as by bringing an appropriate accelerometer to a point of sensing, such as on or near a component of a machine. In still another example, one sensor may be a triax probe (e.g., a 100 MV/G triax probe), that in embodiments is used for portable data collection. In some embodiments, of a triax probe, a vertical element on one axis of the probe may have a high frequency response while the ones mounted horizontally may influence limit the frequency response of the whole triax. In another example, one sensor may be a temperature sensor and may include a probe with a temperature sensor built inside, such as to obtain a bearing temperature. In still additional examples, sensors may be ultrasonic, microphone, touch, capacitive, vibration, acoustic, pressure, strain gauges, thermographic (e.g., camera), imaging (e.g., camera, laser, IR, structured light), a field detector, an EMF meter to measure an AC electromagnetic field, a gaussmeter, a motion detector, a chemical detector, a gas detector, a CBRNE detector, a vibration transducer, a magnetometer, positional, location-based, a velocity sensor, a displacement sensor, a tachometer, a flow sensor, a level sensor, a proximity sensor, a pH sensor, a hygrometer/moisture sensor, a densitometric sensor, an anemometer, a viscometer, or any analog industrial sensor and/or digital industrial sensor. In a further example, sensors may be directed at detecting or measuring ambient noise, such as a sound sensor or microphone, an ultrasound sensor, an acoustic wave sensor, and an optical vibration sensor (e.g., using a camera to see oscillations that produce noise). In still another example, one sensor may be a motion detector.
Data collectors may be of or may be configured to encompass one or more frequencies, wavelengths or spectra for particular sensors, for particular groups of sensors, or for combined signals from multiple sensors (such as involving multiplexing or sensor fusion). Data collectors may be of or may be configured to encompass one or more sensors or sensor data (including groups of sensors and combined signals) from one or more pieces of equipment/components, areas of an installation, disparate but interconnected areas of an installation (e.g., a machine assembly line and a boiler room used to power the line), or locations (e.g., a building in one geographic location and a building in a separate, different geographic location). Data collector settings, configurations, instructions, or specifications (collectively referred to herein using any one of those terms) may include where to place a sensor, how frequently to sample a data point or points, the granularity at which a sample is taken (e.g., a number of sampling points per fraction of a second), which sensor of a set of redundant sensors to sample, an average sampling protocol for redundant sensors, and any other aspect that would affect data acquisition.
Within the data collection system 12004, the self-organization functionality can be implemented by a neural net, a model-based system, a rule-based system, a machine learning system, and/or a hybrid of any of those systems. Further, the self-organizing functionality may be performed in whole or in part by individual data collectors, a collection or group of data collectors, a network-based computing system, a local computing system comprising one or more computing devices, a remote computing system comprising one or more computing devices, and a combination of one or more of these components. The self-organization functionality may be optimized for a particular goal or outcome, such as predicting and managing performance, health, or other characteristics of a piece of equipment, a component, or a system of equipment or components. Based on continuous or periodic analysis of sensor data, as patterns/trends are identified, or outliers appear, or a group of sensor readings begin to change, etc., the self-organization functionality may modify the collection of data intelligently, as described herein. This may occur by triggering a rule that reflects a model or understanding of system behavior (e.g., recognizing a shift in operating mode that calls for different sensors as velocity of a shaft increases) or it may occur under control of a neural net (either in combination with a rule-based approach or on its own), where inputs are provided such that the neural net over time learns to select appropriate collection modes based on feedback as to successful outcomes (e.g., successful classification of the state of a system, successful prediction, successful operation relative to a metric). For example only, when an assembly line is reconfigured for a new product or a new assembly line is installed in a manufacturing facility, data from the current data collector(s) may not accurately predict the state or metric of operation of the system, thus, the self-organization functionality may begin to iterate to determine if a new data collector, type of sensed data, format of sensed data, etc. is better at predicting a state or metric. Based on offset system data, such as from a library or other data structure, certain sensors, frequency bands or other data collectors may be used in the system initially and data may be collected to assess performance. As the self-organization functionality iterates, other sensors/frequency bands may be accessed to determine their relative weight in identifying performance metrics. Over time, a new frequency band may be identified (or a new collection of sensors, a new set of configurations for sensors, or the like) as a better or more suitable gauge of performance in the system and the self-organization functionality may modify its data collector(s) based on this iteration. For example only, perhaps an older boring tool in an energy extraction environment dampens one or more vibration frequencies while a different frequency is of higher amplitude and present during optimal performance than what was seen in the present system. In this example, the self-organization functionality may alter the data collectors from what was originally proposed, e.g., by the data collection system, to capture the higher amplitude frequency that is present in the current system.
The self-organization functionality, in embodiments involving a neural net or other machine learning system, may be seeded and may iterate, e.g., based on feedback and operation parameters, such as described herein. Certain feedback may include utilization measures, efficiency measures (e.g., power or energy utilization, use of storage, use of bandwidth, use of input/output use of perishable materials, use of fuel, and/or financial efficiency, financial such as reduction of costs), measures of success in prediction or anticipation of states (e.g., avoidance and mitigation of faults), productivity measures (e.g., workflow), yield measures, and profit measures. Certain parameters may include storage parameters (e.g., data storage, fuel storage, storage of inventory), network parameters (e.g., network bandwidth, input/output speeds, network utilization, network cost, network speed, network availability), transmission parameters (e.g., quality of transmission of data, speed of transmission of data, error rates in transmission, cost of transmission), security parameters (e.g., number and/or type of exposure events, vulnerability to attack, data loss, data breach, access parameters), location and positioning parameters (e.g., location of data collectors, location of workers, location of machines and equipment, location of inventory units, location of parts and materials, location of network access points, location of ingress and egress points, location of landing positions, location of sensor sets, location of network infrastructure, location of power sources), input selection parameters, data combination parameters (e.g., for multiplexing, extraction, transformation, loading), power parameters (e.g., of individual data collectors, groups of data collectors, or all potentially available data collectors), states (e.g., operational modes, availability states, environmental states, fault modes, health states, maintenance modes, anticipated states), events, and equipment specifications. With respect to states, operating modes may include, mobility modes (direction, speed, acceleration, and the like), type of mobility modes (e.g., rolling, flying, sliding, levitation, hovering, floating), performance modes (e.g., gears, rotational speeds, heat levels, assembly line speeds, voltage levels, frequency levels), output modes, fuel conversion modes, resource consumption modes, and financial performance modes (e.g., yield, profitability). Availability states may refer to anticipating conditions that could cause machine to go offline or require backup. Environmental states may refer to ambient temperature, ambient humidity/moisture, ambient pressure, ambient wind/fluid flow, presence of pollution or contaminants, presence of interfering elements (e.g., electrical noise, vibration), power availability, and power quality, among other parameters. Anticipated states may include achieving or not achieving a desired goal, such as a specified/threshold output production rate, a specified/threshold generation rate, an operational efficiency/failure rate, a financial efficiency/profit goal, a power efficiency/resource utilization, an avoidance of a fault condition (e.g., overheating, slow performance, excessive speed, excessive motion, excessive vibration/oscillation, excessive acceleration, expansion/contraction, electrical failure, running out of stored power/fuel, overpressure, excessive radiation/melt down, fire, freezing, failure of fluid flow (e.g., stuck valves, frozen fluids), mechanical failures (e.g., broken component, worn component, faulty coupling, misalignment, asymmetries/deflection, damaged component (e.g., deflection, strain, stress, cracking), imbalances, collisions, jammed elements, and lost or slipping chain or belt), avoidance of a dangerous condition or catastrophic failure, and availability (online status)).
The self-organization functionality may comprise or be seeded with a model that predicts an outcome or state given a set of data, which may comprise inputs from sensors, such as via a data collector, as well as other data, such as from system components, from external systems and from external data sources. For example, the model may be an operating model for an industrial environment, machine, or workflow. In another example, the model may be for anticipating states, for predicting fault, for optimizing maintenance, for optimizing data transport (such as for optimizing network coding, network-condition-sensitive routing), for optimizing data marketplaces, and the like.
The self-organization functionality may result in any number of downstream actions based on analysis of data from the data collector(s). In an embodiment, the self-organization functionality may determine that the system should either keep or modify operational parameters, equipment or a weighting of a neural net model given a desired goal, such as a specified/threshold output production rate, specified/threshold generation rate, an operational efficiency/failure rate, a financial efficiency/profit goal, a power efficiency/resource utilization, an avoidance of a fault condition, an avoidance of a dangerous condition or catastrophic failure, and the like. In embodiments, the adjustments may be based on determining context of an industrial system, such as understanding a type of equipment, its purpose, its typical operating modes, the functional specifications for the equipment, the relationship of the equipment to other features of the environment (including any other systems that provide input to or take input from the equipment), the presence and role of operators (including humans and automated control systems), and ambient or environmental conditions. For example, in order to achieve a profit goal in a distribution environment (e.g., a power distribution environment), a generator or system of generators may need to operate at a certain efficiency level. The self-organization functionality may be seeded with a model for operation of the system of generators in a manner that results in a specified profit goal, such as indicating an on/off state for individual generator(s) in the power generation system based on the time of day, current market sale price for the fuel consumed by the generators, current demand or anticipated future demand, and the like. As it acquires data and iterates, the model predicts whether the profit goal will be achieved given the current data, and determine whether the data or type of data being collected is appropriate, sufficient, etc. for the model. Based on the results of the iteration, a recommendation may be made (or a control instruction may be automatically provided) to gather different/additional data, organize the data differently, direct different data collectors to collect new data, etc. and/or to operate a subset of the generators at a higher output (but less efficient) rate, power on additional generators, maintain a current operational state, or the like. Further, as the system iterates, one or more additional sensors may be sampled in the model to determine if their addition to the self-organization functionality would improve predicting a state or otherwise assisting with the goals of the data collection efforts.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may include a plurality of input sensors, such as any of those described herein, communicatively coupled to a data collector having one or more processors. The data collection system may include a plurality of individual data collectors structured to operate together to determine at least one subset of the plurality of sensors from which to process output data. The data collection system may also include a machine learning circuit structured to receive output data from the at least one subset of the plurality of sensors and learn received output data patterns indicative of a state. In some embodiments, the data collection system may alter the at least one subset of the plurality of sensors, or an aspect thereof, based on one or more of the learned received output data patterns and the state. In certain embodiments, the machine learning circuit is seeded with a model that enables it to learn data patterns. The model may be a physical model, an operational model, a system model, and the like. In other embodiments, the machine learning circuit is structured for deep learning wherein input data is fed to the circuit with no or minimal seeding and the machine learning data analysis circuit learns based on output feedback. For example, a metal tooling system in a manufacturing environment may operate to manufacture parts using machine tools such as lathes, milling machines, grinding machines, boring tools, and the like. Such machines may operate at various speeds and output rates, which may affect the longevity, efficiency, accuracy, etc. of the machine. The data collector may acquire various parameters to evaluate the environment of the machine tools, e.g., speed of operation, heat generation, vibration, and conformity with a part specification. The system can utilize such parameters and iterate towards a prediction of state, output rate, etc. based on such feedback. Further, the system may self-organize such that the data collector(s) collect additional/different data from which such predictions may be made.
There may be a balance of multiple goals/guidelines in the self-organization functionality of data collection system. For example, a repair and maintenance organization (RMO) may have operating parameters designed for maintenance of a machine in a manufacturing facility, while the owner of the facility may have particular operating parameters for the machine that are designed for meeting a production goal. These goals, in this example relating to a maintenance goal or a production output, may be tracked by a different data collectors or sensors. For example, maintenance of a machine may be tracked by sensors including a temperature sensor, a vibration transducer, and a strain gauge while the production goal of a machine may be tracked by sensors including a speed sensor and a power consumption meter. The data collection system may (optionally using a neural net, machine learning system, deep learning system, or the like, which may occur under supervision by one or more supervisors (human or automated) intelligently manage data collectors aligned with different goals and assign weights, parameter modifications, or recommendations based on a factor, such as a bias towards one goal or a compromise to allow better alignment with all goals being tracked, for example. Compromises among the goals delivered to the data collection system may be based on one or more hierarchies or rules relating to the authority, role, criticality, or the like of the applicable goals. In embodiments, compromises among goals may be optimized using machine learning, such as a neural net, deep learning system, or other artificial intelligence system as described throughout this disclosure. For example, in a power plant where a turbine is operating, the data collection system may manage multiple data collectors, such as one directed to detecting the operational status of the turbine, one directed at identifying a probability of hitting a production goal, and one directed at determining if the operation of the turbine is meeting a fuel efficiency goal. Each of these data collectors may be populated with different sensors or data from different sensors (e.g., a vibration transducer to indicate operational status, a flow meter to indicate production goal, and a fuel gauge to indicate a fuel efficiency) whose output data are indicative of an aspect of a particular goal. Where a single sensor or a set of sensors is helpful for more than one goal, overlapping data collectors (having some sensors in common and other sensors not in common) may take input from that sensor or set of sensors, as managed by the data collection system. If there are constraints on data collection (such as due to power limitations, storage limitations, bandwidth limitations, input/output processing capabilities, or the like), a rule may indicate that one goal (e.g., a fuel utilization goal or a pollution reduction goal that is mandated by law or regulation) takes precedence, such that the data collection for the data collectors associated with that goal are maintained as others are paused or shut down. Management of prioritization of goals may be hierarchical or may occur by machine learning. The data collection system may be seeded with models, or may not be seeded at all, in iterating towards a predicted state (e.g., meeting a goal) given the current data it has acquired. In this example, during operation of the turbine the plant owner may decide to bias the system towards fuel efficiency. All of the data collectors may still be monitored, but as the self-organization functionality iterates and predicts that the system will not collect or is not collecting data sufficient to determine whether the system is or is not meeting a particular goal, the data collection system may recommend or implement changes directed at collecting the appropriate data. Further, the plant owner may structure the system with a bias towards a particular goal such that the recommended changes to data collection parameters affecting such goal are made in favor of making other recommended changes.
In embodiments, the data collection system may continue iterating in a deep-learning fashion to arrive at a distribution of data collectors, after being seeded with more than one data collection data type, that optimizes meeting more than one goal. For example, there may be multiple goals tracked for a refining environment, such as refining efficiency and economic efficiency. Refining efficiency for the refining system may be expressed by comparing fuel put into the system, which can be obtained by knowing the amount of and quality of the fuel being used, and the amount of the refined product output from the system, which is calculated using the flow out of the system. Economic efficiency of the refining system may be expressed as the ratio between costs to run the system, including fuel, labor, materials and services, and the refined product output from the system for a period of time. Data used to track refining efficiency may include data from a flow meter, quality data point(s), and a thermometer, and data used to track economic efficiency may be a flow of product output from the system and costs data. These data may be used in the data collection system to predict states; however, the self-organization functionality of the system may iterate towards a data collection strategy that is optimized to predict states related to both thermal and economic efficiency. The new data collection schema may include data used previously in the individual data collectors but may also use new data from different sensors or data sources.
The iteration of the data collection system may be governed by rules, in some embodiments. For example, the data collection system may be structured to collect data for seeding at a pre-determined frequency. The data collection system may be structured to iterate at least a number of times, such as when a new component/equipment/fuel source is added, when a sensor goes off-line, or as standard practice. For example, when a sensor measuring the rotation of a boring tool in an offshore drilling operation goes off-line and the data collection system begins acquiring data from a new sensor or data collector measuring the same data points, the data collection system may be structured to iterate for a number of times before the state is utilized in or allowed to affect any downstream actions. The data collection system may be structured to train off-line or train in situ/online. The data collection system may be structured to include static and/or manually input data in its data collectors. For example, a data collection system associated with such a boring tool may be structured to iterate towards predicting a distance bored based on a duration of operation, wherein the data collector(s) include data regarding the speed of the boring tools, a distance sensor, a temperature sensor, and the like.
In embodiments, the data collection system may be overruled. In embodiments, the data collection system may revert to prior settings, such as in the event the self-organization functionality fails, such as if the collected data is insufficient or inappropriately collected, if uncertainty is too high in a model-based system, if the system is unable to resolve conflicting rules in rule-based system, or the system cannot converge on a solution in any of the foregoing. For example, sensor data on a power generation system used by the data collection system may indicate a non-operational state (such as a seized turbine), but output sensors and visual inspection, such as by a drone, may indicate normal operation. In this event, the data collection system may revert to an original data collection schema for seeding the self-organization functionality. In another example, one or more point sensors on a refrigeration system may indicate imminent failure in a compressor, but the data collector self-organized to collect data associated towards determining a performance metric did not identify the failure. In this event, the data collector(s) will revert to an original setting or a version of the data collector setting that would have also identified the imminent failure of the compressor.
In embodiments, the data collection system may change data collector settings in the event that a new component is added that makes the system closer to a different system. For example, a vacuum distillation unit is added to an oil and gas refinery to distill naphthalene, but the current data collector settings for the data collection system are derived from a refinery that distills kerosene. In this example, a data structure with data collector settings for various systems may be searched for a system that is more closely matched to the current system. When a new system is identified as more closely matched, such as one that also distill naphthalene, the new data collector settings (which sensors to use, where to direct them, how frequently to sample, what types of data and points are needed, etc. as described herein) are used to seed the data collection system to iterate towards predicting a state for the system. In embodiments, the data collection system may change data collector settings in the event that a new set of data is available from a third party library. For example, a power generation plant may have optimized a specific turbine model to operate in a highly efficient way and deposited the data collector settings in a data structure. The data structure may be continuously scanned for new data collectors that better aid in monitoring power generation and thus, result in optimizing the operation of the turbine.
In embodiments, the data collection system may utilize self-organization functionality to uncover unknown variables. For example, the data collection system may iterate to identify a missing variable to be used for further iterations. For example, an under-utilized tank in a legacy condensate/make-up water system of a power station may have an unknown capacity because it is inaccessible and no documentation exists on the tank. Various aspects of the tank may be measured by a swarm of data collectors to arrive at an estimated volume (e.g., flow into a downstream space, duration of a dye traced solution to work through the system), which can then be fed into the data collection system as a new variable.
In embodiments, the data collection system node may be on a machine, on a data collector (or a group of them), in a network infrastructure (enterprise or other), or in the cloud. In embodiments, there may be distributed neurons across nodes (e.g., machine, data collector, network, cloud).
In an aspect, and as illustrated in
The targets 12002 can be any form of machinery or component thereof in an industrial environment 12000. Examples of such industrial environments 12000 include but are not limited to factories, pipelines, construction sites, ocean oil rigs, ships, airplanes or other aircraft, mining environments, drilling environments, refineries, distribution environments, manufacturing environments, energy source extraction environments, offshore exploration sites, underwater exploration sites, assembly lines, warehouses, power generation environments, and hazardous waste environments, each of which may include one or more targets 12002. Targets 12002 can take any form of item or location at which a sensor can obtain data. Examples of such targets 12002 include but are not limited to machines, pipelines, equipment, installations, tools, vehicles, turbines, speakers, lasers, automatons, computer equipment, industrial equipment, and switches.
The self-organization functionality of the data collection system 12004 can be performed at or by any of the components of the data collection system 12004. In embodiments, a data collector 12008 or the swarm 12006 of data collectors 12008 can self-organize without assistance from other components and based on, e.g., the data sensed by its associated sensors and other knowledge. In embodiments, the network 12010 can self-organize without assistance from other components and based on, e.g., the data sensed by the data collectors 12008 or other knowledge. Similarly, the computing system 12012 and/or the data pool 12014 without assistance from other components and based on, e.g., the data sensed by the data collectors 12008 or other knowledge. It should be appreciated that any combination or hybrid-type self-organization system can also be implemented.
For example only, the data collection system 12004 can perform or enable various methods or systems for data collection having self-organization functionality in an industrial environment 12000. These methods and systems can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, e.g., received from or sensed by sensors at the data collector(s) 12008. The methods and systems can also include sampling the received data and self-organizing at least one of: (i) a storage operation of the data; (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs.
In aspects, the storage operation can include storing the data in a local database, e.g., of a data collector 12008, a computing system 12012, and/or a data pool 12014. The data can also be summarized over a given time period to reduce a size of the sensed data. The summarized data can be sent to one or more data acquisition boxes, to one or more data centers, and/or to other components of the system or other, separate systems. Summarizing the data over a given time period to reduce the size of the data, in some aspects, can include determining a speed at which data can be sent via a network (e.g., network 12010), wherein the size of the summarized data corresponds to the speed at which data can be sent continuously in real time via the network. In such aspects, or others, the summarized data can be continuously sent, e.g., to an external device via the network.
In various implementations, the methods and systems can include committing the summarized data to a local ledger, identifying one or more other accessible signal acquisition instruments on an accessible network, and/or synchronizing the summarized data at the local ledger with at least one of the other accessible signal acquisition instruments (e.g., data collectors 12008). In embodiments, receiving a remote stream of sensor data from one or more other accessible signal acquisition instruments via a network can be included. An advertisement message to a potential client indicating availability of at least one of the locally stored data, the summarized data, and the remote stream of sensor data can also or alternatively be sent.
The methods and systems can include identifying one or more other accessible signal acquisition instruments (e.g., data collectors 12008) on an accessible network (e.g., 12010), nominating at least one of the one or more other accessible signal acquisition instruments as a logical communication hub, and providing the logical communication hub with a list of available data and their associated sources. The list of available data and their associated sources can be provided to the logical communication hub utilizing a hybrid peer-to-peer communications protocol.
In some aspects, the storage operation can include storing the data in a local database and automatically organizing at least one parameter of the data pool utilizing machine learning. The organizing can be based at least in part on receiving information regarding at least one of an accuracy of classification and an accuracy of prediction of an external machine learning system that uses data from the data pool (e.g., data pool 12014).
The present disclosure describes a method for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, sampling data received from the sensor inputs and self-organizing at least one of: (i) a storage operation of the data; (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs.
The present disclosure describes a system for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the system according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include a data collector for handling a plurality of sensor inputs from sensors in the industrial environment and for generating data associated with the plurality of sensor inputs, and a self-organizing system for self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a data collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs.
The present disclosure describes a method for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, sampling data received from the sensor inputs; and self-organizing at least one of: (i) a storage operation of the data; (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs, wherein the storage operation includes storing the data in a local database, and summarizing the data over a given time period to reduce a size of the data.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the method further includes sending the summarized data to one or more data acquisition boxes.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the method further includes sending the summarized data to one or more data centers.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein summarizing the data over a given time period to reduce the size of the data includes determining a speed at which data can be sent via a network, wherein the size of the summarized data corresponds to the speed at which data can be sent continuously in real time via the network.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the method further includes continuously sending the summarized data to an external device via the network.
The present disclosure describes a method for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, sampling data received from the sensor inputs and self-organizing at least one of: (i) a storage operation of the data; (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs, wherein the storage operation includes storing the data in a local database, summarizing the data over a given time period to reduce a size of the data, committing the summarized data to a local ledger, identifying one or more other accessible signal acquisition instruments on an accessible network, and synchronizing the summarized data at the local ledger with at least one of the other accessible signal acquisition instruments. A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the method further includes receiving a remote stream of sensor data from one or more other accessible signal acquisition instruments via a network.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the method further includes sending an advertisement message to a potential client indicating availability of at least one of the locally stored data, the summarized data, and the remote stream of sensor data.
The present disclosure describes a method for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs; sampling data received from the sensor inputs, self-organizing at least one of: (i) a storage operation of the data (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs, wherein the storage operation includes storing the data in a local database, and summarizing the data over a given time period to reduce a size of the data, identifying one or more other accessible signal acquisition instruments on an accessible network, nominating at least one of the one or more other accessible signal acquisition instruments as a logical communication hub, and providing the logical communication hub with a list of available data and their associated sources.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the list of available data and their associated sources is provided to the logical communication hub utilizing a hybrid peer-to-peer communications protocol.
The present disclosure describes a method for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, sampling data received from the sensor inputs, and self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs, wherein the storage operation includes storing the data in a local database, summarizing the data over a given time period to reduce a size of the data, storing the data in a local database, and automatically organizing at least one parameter of the database utilizing machine learning, wherein the organizing is based at least in part on receiving information regarding at least one of an accuracy of classification and an accuracy of prediction of an external machine learning system that uses data from the database.
In aspects, the collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs can include receiving instructions directing a mobile data collector unit (e.g., data collector 12008) to operate sensors at a target (e.g., 12002), wherein at least one of the plurality of sensors is arranged in the mobile data collector unit. A communication can be transmitted to one or more other mobile data collector units (12008) regarding the instructions. The swarm 12006 or portion thereof can self-organize a distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units (e.g., data collectors 12008) at the target 12002.
In aspects, self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector units at the target 12002 comprises utilizing a machine learning algorithm to determine a respective target location for each of the mobile data collector units. The machine learning algorithm can utilize one or more of a plurality of features to determine the respective target locations. Examples of the features can include: battery life of the mobile data collector units (data collectors 12008), a type of the target 12002 being sensed, a type of signal being sensed, a size of the target 12002, a number of mobile data collector units (data collectors 12008) needed to cover the target 12002, a number of data points needed for the target 12002, a success in prior accomplishment of signal capture, information received from a headquarters or other components from which the instructions are received, and historical information regarding the sensors operated at the target 12002.
In implementations, self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target location can include proposing a target location for the mobile data collector unit(s), transmitting the target location to at least one other mobile data collector units, receiving confirmation that there is no contention for the target location, directing one of the mobile data collector units to the target location, and collecting sensor data at the target location from the directed mobile data collector unit.
Self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target location can also include, in certain embodiments, proposing a target location for the mobile data collector unit, transmitting the target location to at least one of the one or more other mobile data collector units, receiving a proposal for a new target location, directing the mobile data collector unit to the new target location, and collecting sensor data at the new target location from the mobile data collector unit.
In additional or alternative aspects, self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target location can comprise proposing a target location for the mobile data collector unit, determining that at least one of the one or more other mobile data collector units is at or moving to the target location, determining a new target location based on the at least one of the one or more other mobile data collector units being at or moving to the target location, directing the mobile data collector unit to the new target location, and collecting sensor data at the new target location from the mobile data collector unit.
Self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target location can further comprise determining a type of the sensors to operate at the target 12002, receiving confirmation that there is no contention for the type of sensors, directing the mobile data collector unit to operate the type of sensors at the target 12002, and collecting sensor data from the type of sensors at the target 12002 from the mobile data collector unit.
In aspects, self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target location can include determining a type of the sensors to operate at the target, transmitting the type of the sensors to at least one of the one or more other mobile data collector units, receiving a proposal for a new type of the sensors, directing the mobile data collector unit to operate the new type of sensors at the target, and collecting sensor data from the new type of sensors at the target from the mobile data collector unit.
Self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target location can include determining a type of the sensors to operate at the target, determining that at least one of the one or more other mobile data collector units is operating or can operate the type of the sensors at the target, determining a new type of the sensors based on the at least one of the one or more other mobile data collector units operating or being capable of operating the type of the sensors at the target, directing the mobile data collector unit to operate the new type of sensors at the target, and collecting sensor data from the new type of sensors at the target from the mobile data collector unit.
Self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target location, in some implementations, can comprise utilizing a swarm optimization algorithm to allocate areas of sensor responsibility amongst the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units. Examples of the swarm optimization algorithm include but are not limited to Genetic Algorithms (GA), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Differential Evolution (DE), Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), Glowworm Swarm Optimization (GSO), and Cuckoo Search Algorithm (CSA), Genetic Programming (GP), Evolution Strategy (ES), Evolutionary Programming (EP), Firefly Algorithm (FA), Bat Algorithm (BA) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), or combinations thereof.
The present disclosure describes a method for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, sampling data received from the sensor inputs, and self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs.
The present disclosure describes a system for data collection in an industrial environment having automated self-organization, the system according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include a data collector for handling a plurality of sensor inputs from sensors in the industrial environment and for generating data associated with the plurality of sensor inputs, and a self-organizing system for self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a data collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs.
The present disclosure describes a method for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs; sampling data received from the sensor inputs and self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs, wherein the collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs includes receiving instructions directing a mobile data collector unit to operate sensors at a target, wherein at least one of the plurality of sensors is arranged in the mobile data collector unit, transmitting a communication to one or more other mobile data collector units regarding the instructions, and self-organizing a distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target includes utilizing a machine learning algorithm to determine a respective target location for each of the mobile data collector units.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the machine learning algorithm utilizes one or more of a plurality of features to determine the respective target locations, the plurality of features including: battery life of the mobile data collector units, a type of the target being sensed, a type of signal being sensed, a size of the target, a number of mobile data collector units needed to cover the target, a number of data points needed for the target, a success in prior accomplishment of signal capture, information received from a headquarters from which the instructions are received, and historical information regarding the sensors operated at the target.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target location includes proposing a target location for the mobile data collector unit, transmitting the target location to at least one of the one or more other mobile data collector units, receiving confirmation that there is no contention for the target location, directing the mobile data collector unit to the target location, and collecting sensor data at the target location from the mobile data collector unit.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target location includes proposing a target location for the mobile data collector unit, transmitting the target location to at least one of the one or more other mobile data collector units, receiving a proposal for a new target location, directing the mobile data collector unit to the new target location and collecting sensor data at the new target location from the mobile data collector unit.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target location includes proposing a target location for the mobile data collector unit, determining that at least one of the one or more other mobile data collector units is at or moving to the target location, determining a new target location based on the at least one of the one or more other mobile data collector units being at or moving to the target location, directing the mobile data collector unit to the new target location and collecting sensor data at the new target location from the mobile data collector unit.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target location includes determining a type of the sensors to operate at the target, receiving confirmation that there is no contention for the type of sensors, directing the mobile data collector unit to operate the type of sensors at the target, and collecting sensor data from the type of sensors at the target from the mobile data collector unit.
The present disclosure describes a method for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, sampling data received from the sensor inputs, and self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs, wherein the collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs includes receiving instructions directing a mobile data collector unit to operate sensors at a target, wherein at least one of the plurality of sensors is arranged in the mobile data collector unit, transmitting a communication to one or more other mobile data collector units regarding the instructions, self-organizing a distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target, wherein self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target location includes determining a type of the sensors to operate at the target, transmitting the type of the sensors to at least one of the one or more other mobile data collector units, receiving a proposal for a new type of the sensors, directing the mobile data collector unit to operate the new type of sensors at the target and collecting sensor data from the new type of sensors at the target from the mobile data collector unit.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target location includes determining a type of the sensors to operate at the target, determining that at least one of the one or more other mobile data collector units is operating or can operate the type of the sensors at the target, determining a new type of the sensors based on the at least one of the one or more other mobile data collector units operating or being capable of operating the type of the sensors at the target, directing the mobile data collector unit to operate the new type of sensors at the target, and collecting sensor data from the new type of sensors at the target from the mobile data collector unit.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein self-organizing the distribution of the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units at the target location includes utilizing a swarm optimization algorithm to allocate areas of sensor responsibility amongst the mobile data collector unit and the one or more other mobile data collector units.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the swarm optimization algorithm is one or more types of Genetic Algorithms (GA), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Differential Evolution (DE), Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), Glowworm Swarm Optimization (GSO), and Cuckoo Search Algorithm (CSA), Genetic Programming (GP), Evolution Strategy (ES), Evolutionary Programming (EP), Firefly Algorithm (FA), Bat Algorithm (BA) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO).
In aspects, the selection operation can comprise receiving a signal relating to at least one condition of the industrial environment 12000 and, based on the signal, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed and a frequency of the sampling. The at least one condition of the industrial environment can be a signal-to-noise ratio of the sampled data. The selection operation can include identifying a target signal to be sensed. Additionally, the selection operation further can include identifying one or more non-target signals in a same frequency band as the target signal to be sensed and, based on the identified one or more non-target signals, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed and a frequency of the sampling.
The selection operation can comprise identifying other data collectors sensing in a same signal band as the target signal to be sensed, and, based on the identified other data collectors, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed and a frequency of the sampling. In implementations, the selection operation can further comprise identifying a level of activity of a target associated with the target signal to be sensed and, based on the identified level of activity, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed and a frequency of the sampling.
The selection operation can further comprise receiving data indicative of environmental conditions near a target associated with the target signal, comparing the received environmental conditions of the target with past environmental conditions near the target or another target similar to the target, and, based on the comparison, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed and a frequency of the sampling. At least a portion of the received sampling data can be transmitted to another data collector according to a predetermined hierarchy of data collection.
The selection operation further comprises, in some aspects, receiving data indicative of environmental conditions near a target associated with the target signal, transmitting at least a portion of the received sampling data to another data collector according to a predetermined hierarchy of data collection, receiving feedback via a network connection relating to a quality or sufficiency of the transmitted data, analyzing the received feedback, and, based on the analysis of the received feedback, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed, the frequency of sampling, the data stored, and the data transmitted.
Additionally, or alternatively, the selection operation can comprise receiving data indicative of environmental conditions near a target associated with the target signal, transmitting at least a portion of the received sampling data to another data collector according to a predetermined hierarchy of data collection, receiving feedback via a network connection relating to one or more yield metrics of the transmitted data, analyzing the received feedback, and, based on the analysis of the received feedback, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed, the frequency of sampling, the data stored, and the data transmitted.
In implementations, the selection operation can include receiving data indicative of environmental conditions near a target associated with the target signal, transmitting at least a portion of the received sampling data to another data collector according to a predetermined hierarchy of data collection, receiving feedback via a network connection relating to power utilization, analyzing the received feedback, and based on the analysis of the received feedback, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed, the frequency of sampling, the data stored, and the data transmitted.
The selection operation can also or alternatively comprise receiving data indicative of environmental conditions near a target associated with the target signal, transmitting at least a portion of the received sampling data to another data collector according to a predetermined hierarchy of data collection, receiving feedback via a network connection relating to a quality or sufficiency of the transmitted data, analyzing the received feedback, and, based on the analysis of the received feedback, executing a dimensionality reduction algorithm on the sensed data. The dimensionality reduction algorithm can be one or more of a Decision Tree, Random Forest, Principal Component Analysis, Factor Analysis, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Identification based on correlation matrix, Missing Values Ratio, Low Variance Filter, Random Projections, Nonnegative Matrix Factorization, Stacked Auto-encoders, Chi-square or Information Gain, Multidimensional Scaling, Correspondence Analysis, Factor Analysis, Clustering, and Bayesian Models. The dimensionality reduction algorithm can be performed at a data collector 12008, a swarm 12006 of data collectors 12008, a network 12010, a computing system 12012, a data pool 12014, or combination thereof. In aspects, executing the dimensionality reduction algorithm can comprise sending the sensed data to a remote computing device.
In aspects, a system for self-organizing collection and storage of data collection in a power generation environment can include a data collector for handling a plurality of sensor inputs from various sensors. Such sensors can be a component of the data collector, external to the data collector (e.g., external sensors or components of different data collector(s)), or a combination thereof. The plurality of sensor inputs can be configured to sense at least one of an operational mode, a fault mode, and a health status of at least one target system. Examples of such target systems include but are not limited to a fuel handling system, a power source, a turbine, a generator, a gear system, an electrical transmission system, a transformer, a fuel cell, and an energy storage device/system. The system can also include a self-organizing system that can be configured for self-organizing at least one of: (i) a storage operation of the data; (ii) a data collection operation of the sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor input, as is described herein.
In aspects, the system can include a swarm 12006 of mobile data collectors (e.g., data collectors 12008). Further, in additional or alternative aspects, the self-organizing system can generate, iterate, optimize, etc. a storage specification for organizing storage of the data. The storage specification, e.g., can specify which data will be stored for local storage in the power generation environment, and which data will be output for streaming via a network connection (e.g., network 12010) from the power generation environment. Other data collection, generation, and/or storage operations can be performed or enabled by the system, as is described herein.
In a non-limiting example, the system can include a plurality of sensors configured to sense various parameters in the environment of a turbine as a target system. Vibration sensors, temperature sensors, acoustic sensors, strain gauges, and accelerometers, and the like may be utilized by the system to generate data regarding the operation of the turbine. As mentioned herein, any and all of the storage operation, the data collection operation, and the selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs may be adapted, optimized, learned, or otherwise self-organized by the system.
In aspects, a system for self-organizing collection and storage of data collection in energy source extraction environment can include a data collector for handling a plurality of sensor inputs from various sensors. Examples of such energy source extraction environments include a coal mining environment, a metal mining environment, a mineral mining environment, and an oil drilling environment, although other extraction environments are contemplated by the present disclosure. The sensors utilized can be a component of the data collector, external to the data collector (e.g., external sensors or components of different data collector(s)), or a combination thereof. The plurality of sensor inputs can be configured to sense at least one of an operational mode, a fault mode, and a health status of at least one target system. Examples of such target systems include but are not limited to a hauling system, a lifting system, a drilling system, a mining system, a digging system, a boring system, a material handling system, a conveyor system, a pipeline system, a wastewater treatment system, and a fluid pumping system.
The system can also include a self-organizing system that can be configured for self-organizing at least one of: (i) a storage operation of the data; (ii) a data collection operation of the sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor input, as is described herein. In aspects, the system can include a swarm 12006 of mobile data collectors (e.g., data collectors 12008). Further, in additional or alternative aspects, the self-organizing system can generate, iterate, optimize, etc. a storage specification for organizing storage of the data. The storage specification, e.g., can specify which data will be stored for local storage in the power generation environment, and which data will be output for streaming via a network connection (e.g., network 12010) from the power generation environment. Other data collection, generation, and/or storage operations can be performed or enabled by the system, as is described herein.
In a non-limiting example, the system can include a plurality of sensors configured to sense various parameters in the environment of a fluid pumping system as a target system. Vibration sensors, flow sensors, pressure sensors, temperature sensors, acoustic sensors, and the like may be utilized by the system to generate data regarding the operation of the fluid pumping system. As mentioned herein, any and all of the storage operation, the data collection operation, and the selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs may be adapted, optimized, learned, or otherwise self-organized by the system.
In implementations, a system for self-organizing collection and storage of data collection in a manufacturing environment can include a data collector for handling a plurality of sensor inputs from various sensors. Such sensors can be a component of the data collector, external to the data collector (e.g., external sensors or components of different data collector(s)), or a combination thereof. The plurality of sensor inputs can be configured to sense at least one of an operational mode, a fault mode, and a health status of at least one target system. Examples of such target systems include but are not limited to a power system, a conveyor system, a generator, an assembly line system, a wafer handling system, a chemical vapor deposition system, an etching system, a printing system, a robotic handling system, a component assembly system, an inspection system, a robotic assembly system, and a semi-conductor production system. The system can also include a self-organizing system that can be configured for self-organizing at least one of: (i) a storage operation of the data; (ii) a data collection operation of the sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor input, as is described herein.
In aspects, the system can include a swarm 12006 of mobile data collectors (e.g., data collectors 12008). Further, in additional or alternative aspects, the self-organizing system can generate, iterate, optimize, etc. a storage specification for organizing storage of the data. The storage specification, e.g., can specify which data will be stored for local storage in the power generation environment, and which data will be output for streaming via a network connection (e.g., network 12010) from the power generation environment. Other data collection, generation, and/or storage operations can be performed or enabled by the system, as is described herein.
In a non-limiting example, the system can include a plurality of sensors configured to sense various parameters in the environment of a wafer handling system as a target system. Vibration sensors, fluid flow sensors, pressure sensors, gas sensors, temperature sensors, and the like may be utilized by the system to generate data regarding the operation of the wafer handling system. As mentioned herein, any and all of the storage operation, the data collection operation, and the selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs may be adapted, optimized, learned, or otherwise self-organized by the system.
Also disclosed are embodiments of an additional or alternative system for self-organizing collection and storage of data collection in refining environment. Such system(s) can include a data collector for handling a plurality of sensor inputs from various sensors. Examples of such refining environments include a chemical refining environment, a pharmaceutical refining environment, a biological refining environment, and a hydrocarbon refining environment, although other refining environments are contemplated by the present disclosure. The sensors utilized can be a component of the data collector, external to the data collector (e.g., external sensors or components of different data collector(s)), or a combination thereof. The plurality of sensor inputs can be configured to sense at least one of an operational mode, a fault mode, and a health status of at least one target system. Examples of such target systems include but are not limited to a power system, a pumping system, a mixing system, a reaction system, a distillation system, a fluid handling system, a heating system, a cooling system, an evaporation system, a catalytic system, a moving system, and a container system.
The system can also include a self-organizing system that can be configured for self-organizing at least one of: (i) a storage operation of the data; (ii) a data collection operation of the sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor input, as is described herein. In aspects, the system can include a swarm 12006 of mobile data collectors (e.g., data collectors 12008). Further, in additional or alternative aspects, the self-organizing system can generate, iterate, optimize, etc. a storage specification for organizing storage of the data. The storage specification, e.g., can specify which data will be stored for local storage in the power generation environment, and which data will be output for streaming via a network connection (e.g., network 12010) from the power generation environment. Other data collection, generation, and/or storage operations can be performed or enabled by the system, as is described herein.
In a non-limiting example, the system can include a plurality of sensors configured to sense various parameters in the refining environment of a heating system as a target system. Temperature sensors, fluid flow sensors, pressure sensors, and the like may be utilized by the system to generate data regarding the operation of the heating system. As mentioned herein, any and all of the storage operation, the data collection operation, and the selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs may be adapted, optimized, learned, or otherwise self-organized by the system.
In aspects, a system for self-organizing collection and storage of data collection in a distribution environment can include a data collector for handling a plurality of sensor inputs from various sensors. Such sensors can be a component of the data collector, external to the data collector (e.g., external sensors or components of different data collector(s)), or a combination thereof. The plurality of sensor inputs can be configured to sense at least one of an operational mode, a fault mode, and a health status of at least one target system. Examples of such target systems include but are not limited to a power system, a conveyor system, a robotic transport system, a robotic handling system, a packing system, a cold storage system, a hot storage system, a refrigeration system, a vacuum system, a hauling system, a lifting system, an inspection system, and a suspension system. The system can also include a self-organizing system that can be configured for self-organizing at least one of: (i) a storage operation of the data; (ii) a data collection operation of the sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor input, as is described herein.
In aspects, the system can include a swarm 12006 of mobile data collectors (e.g., data collectors 12008). Further, in additional or alternative aspects, the self-organizing system can generate, iterate, optimize, etc. a storage specification for organizing storage of the data. The storage specification, e.g., can specify which data will be stored for local storage in the power generation environment, and which data will be output for streaming via a network connection (e.g., network 12010) from the power generation environment. Other data collection, generation, and/or storage operations can be performed or enabled by the system, as is described herein.
In a non-limiting example, the system can include a plurality of sensors configured to sense various parameters in the distribution environment of a refrigeration system as a target system. Power sensors, temperature sensors, vibration sensors, strain gauges, and the like may be utilized by the system to generate data regarding the operation of the turbine. As mentioned herein, any and all of the storage operation, the data collection operation, and the selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs may be adapted, optimized, learned, or otherwise self-organized by the system.
The present disclosure describes a method for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, sampling data received from the sensor inputs, and self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs.
The present disclosure describes a system for data collection in an industrial environment having automated self-organization, the system according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include a data collector for handling a plurality of sensor inputs from sensors in the industrial environment and for generating data associated with the plurality of sensor inputs, and a self-organizing system for self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a data collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs.
The present disclosure describes a method for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, sampling data received from the sensor inputs, and self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs, wherein the selection operation includes receiving a signal relating to at least one condition of the industrial environment, based on the signal, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed and a frequency of the sampling.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the at least one condition of the industrial environment is a signal-to-noise ratio of the sampled data.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the selection operation includes identifying a target signal to be sensed.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the selection operation further includes identifying one or more non-target signals in a same frequency band as the target signal to be sensed, and based on the identified one or more non-target signals, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed and a frequency of the sampling.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the selection operation further includes identifying other data collectors sensing in a same signal band as the target signal to be sensed, and based on the identified other data collectors, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed and a frequency of the sampling.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the selection operation further includes identifying a level of activity of a target associated with the target signal to be sensed, and based on the identified level of activity, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed and a frequency of the sampling.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the selection operation further includes receiving data indicative of environmental conditions near a target associated with the target signal, comparing the received environmental conditions of the target with past environmental conditions near the target or another target similar to the target, and based on the comparison, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed and a frequency of the sampling.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the selection operation further includes transmitting at least a portion of the received sampling data to another data collector according to a predetermined hierarchy of data collection.
The present disclosure describes a method for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, sampling data received from the sensor inputs, and self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs, wherein the selection operation includes identifying a target signal to be sensed, receiving a signal relating to at least one condition of the industrial environment, based on the signal, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed and a frequency of the sampling, receiving data indicative of environmental conditions near a target associated with the target signal, transmitting at least a portion of the received sampling data to another data collector according to a predetermined hierarchy of data collection, receiving feedback via a network connection relating to a quality or sufficiency of the transmitted data, analyzing the received feedback, and based on the analysis of the received feedback, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed, the frequency of sampling, the data stored, and the data transmitted.
The present disclosure describes a method for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, sampling data received from the sensor inputs, and self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs, wherein the selection operation includes identifying a target signal to be sensed, receiving a signal relating to at least one condition of the industrial environment, based on the signal, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed and a frequency of the sampling, receiving data indicative of environmental conditions near a target associated with the target signal, transmitting at least a portion of the received sampling data to another data collector according to a predetermined hierarchy of data collection, receiving feedback via a network connection relating to one or more yield metrics of the transmitted data, analyzing the received feedback, and based on the analysis of the received feedback, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed, the frequency of sampling, the data stored, and the data transmitted.
The present disclosure describes a method for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, sampling data received from the sensor inputs, and self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs, wherein the selection operation includes identifying a target signal to be sensed, receiving a signal relating to at least one condition of the industrial environment, based on the signal, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed and a frequency of the sampling, receiving data indicative of environmental conditions near a target associated with the target signal, transmitting at least a portion of the received sampling data to another data collector according to a predetermined hierarchy of data collection, receiving feedback, via a network connection relating to power utilization, analyzing the received feedback, and based on the analysis of the received feedback, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed, the frequency of sampling, the data stored, and the data transmitted.
The present disclosure describes a method for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, sampling data received from the sensor inputs, and self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs, wherein the selection operation includes identifying a target signal to be sensed, receiving a signal relating to at least one condition of the industrial environment, based on the signal, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed and a frequency of the sampling, receiving data indicative of environmental conditions near a target associated with the target signal, transmitting at least a portion of the received sampling data to another data collector according to a predetermined hierarchy of data collection, receiving feedback via a network connection relating to a quality or sufficiency of the transmitted data, analyzing the received feedback, and based on the analysis of the received feedback, executing a dimensionality reduction algorithm on the sensed data.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the dimensionality reduction algorithm is one or more of a Decision Tree, Random Forest, Principal Component Analysis, Factor Analysis, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Identification based on correlation matrix, Missing Values Ratio, Low Variance Filter, Random Projections, Nonnegative Matrix Factorization, Stacked Auto-encoders, Chi-square or Information Gain, Multidimensional Scaling, Correspondence Analysis, Factor Analysis, Clustering, and Bayesian Models.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the dimensionality reduction algorithm is performed at a data collector.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein executing the dimensionality reduction algorithm includes sending the sensed data to a remote computing device.
The present disclosure describes a method for data collection in an industrial environment having self-organization functionality, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include analyzing a plurality of sensor inputs, sampling data received from the sensor inputs, and self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a collection operation of sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs, wherein the selection operation includes identifying a target signal to be sensed, receiving a signal relating to at least one condition of the industrial environment, based on the signal, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed and a frequency of the sampling, receiving data indicative of environmental conditions near a target associated with the target signal, transmitting at least a portion of the received sampling data to another data collector according to a predetermined hierarchy of data collection, receiving feedback via a network connection relating to at least one of a bandwidth and a quality or of the network connection, analyzing the received feedback, and based on the analysis of the received feedback, changing at least one of the sensor inputs analyzed, the frequency of sampling, the data stored, and the data transmitted.
The present disclosure describes a system for self-organizing collection and storage of data collection in a power generation environment, the system according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include a data collector for handling a plurality of sensor inputs from sensors in the power generation environment, wherein the plurality of sensor inputs is configured to sense at least one of an operational mode, a fault mode, and a health status of at least one target system selected from a group consisting of a fuel handling system, a power source, a turbine, a generator, a gear system, an electrical transmission system, and a transformer, and a self-organizing system for self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a data collection operation of the sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the self-organizing system organizes a swarm of mobile data collectors to collect data from a plurality of target systems.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the self-organizing system generates a storage specification for organizing storage of the data, the storage specification specifying data for local storage in the power generation environment and specifying data for streaming via a network connection from the power generation environment.
The present disclosure describes a system for self-organizing collection and storage of data collection in an energy source extraction environment, the system according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include a data collector for handling a plurality of sensor inputs from sensors in the energy extraction environment, wherein the plurality of sensor inputs is configured to sense at least one of an operational mode, a fault mode, and a health status of at least one target system selected from a group consisting of a hauling system, a lifting system, a drilling system, a mining system, a digging system, a boring system, a material handling system, a conveyor system, a pipeline system, a wastewater treatment system, and a fluid pumping system, and a self-organizing system for self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a data collection operation of the sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the self-organizing system organizes a swarm of mobile data collectors to collect data from a plurality of target systems.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the self-organizing system generates a storage specification for organizing storage of the data, the storage specification specifying data for local storage in the energy extraction environment and specifying data for streaming via a network connection from the energy extraction environment.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the energy source extraction environment is a coal mining environment.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the energy source extraction environment is a metal mining environment.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the energy source extraction environment is a mineral mining environment.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the energy source extraction environment is an oil drilling environment.
The present disclosure describes a system for self-organizing collection and storage of data collection in a manufacturing environment, the system according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include a data collector for handling a plurality of sensor inputs from sensors in the power generation environment, wherein the plurality of sensor inputs is configured to sense at least one of an operational mode, a fault mode, and a health status of at least one target system selected from a group consisting of a power system, a conveyor system, a generator, an assembly line system, a wafer handling system, a chemical vapor deposition system, an etching system, a printing system, a robotic handling system, a component assembly system, an inspection system, a robotic assembly system, and a semi-conductor production system, and a self-organizing system for self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a data collection operation of the sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the self-organizing system organizes a swarm of mobile data collectors to collect data from a plurality of target systems.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the self-organizing system generates a storage specification for organizing the storage of the data, the storage specification specifying data for local storage in the manufacturing environment and specifying data for streaming via a network connection from the manufacturing environment.
The present disclosure describes a system for self-organizing collection and storage of data collection in a refining environment, the system according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include a data collector for handling a plurality of sensor inputs from sensors in the power generation environment, wherein the plurality of sensor inputs is configured to sense at least one of an operational mode, a fault mode and a health status of at least one target system selected from a group consisting of a power system, a pumping system, a mixing system, a reaction system, a distillation system, a fluid handling system, a heating system, a cooling system, an evaporation system, a catalytic system, a moving system, and a container system, and a self-organizing system for self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a data collection operation of the sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the self-organizing system organizes a swarm of mobile data collectors to collect data from a plurality of target systems.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the self-organizing system generates a storage specification for organizing the storage of the data, the storage specification specifying data for local storage in the refining environment and specifying data for streaming via a network connection from the refining environment.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the refining environment is a chemical refining environment.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the refining environment is a pharmaceutical refining environment.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the refining environment is a biological refining environment.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the refining environment is a hydrocarbon refining environment.
The present disclosure describes a system for self-organizing collection and storage of data collection in a distribution environment, the system according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include a data collector for handling a plurality of sensor inputs from sensors in the distribution environment, wherein the plurality of sensor inputs is configured to sense at least one of an operational mode, a fault mode and a health status of at least one target system selected from a group consisting of a power system, a conveyor system, a robotic transport system, a robotic handling system, a packing system, a cold storage system, a hot storage system, a refrigeration system, a vacuum system, a hauling system, a lifting system, an inspection system, and a suspension system, and a self-organizing system for self-organizing at least one of (i) a storage operation of the data, (ii) a data collection operation of the sensors that provide the plurality of sensor inputs, and (iii) a selection operation of the plurality of sensor inputs.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the self-organizing system organizes a swarm of mobile data collectors to collect data from a plurality of target systems.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the self-organizing system generates a storage specification for organizing the storage of the data, the storage specification specifying data for local storage in the distribution environment and specifying data for streaming via a network connection from the distribution environment.
Referencing
In certain embodiments, sensor data values 12244 are provided to a data collector 12208, which may be in communication with multiple sensors 12206 and/or with a controller 12212. In certain embodiments, a plant computer 12210 is additionally or alternatively present. In the example system, the controller 12212 is structured to functionally execute operations of the sensor communication circuit 12224, sensor data storage profile circuit 12524, sensor data storage implementation circuit 12256, storage planning circuit 12258, and/or haptic feedback circuit 12230. The controller 12212 is depicted as a separate device for clarity of description. Aspects of the controller 12212 may be present on the sensors 12206, the data collector 12208, the plant computer 12210, and/or on a cloud computing device 12214. In certain embodiments described throughout this disclosure, all aspects of the controller 12212 or other controllers may be present in another device depicted on the system 12200. The plant computer 12210 represents local computing resources, for example processing, memory, and/or network resources, that may be present and/or in communication with the industrial system 12200. In certain embodiments, the cloud computing device 12214 represents computing resources externally available to the industrial system 12202, for example over a private network, intra-net, through cellular communications, satellite communications, and/or over the internet. In certain embodiments, the data collector 12208 may be a computing device, a smart sensor, a MUX box, or other data collection device capable to receive data from multiple sensors and to pass-through the data and/or store data for later transmission. An example data collector 12208 has no storage and/or limited storage, and selectively passes sensor data therethrough, with a subset of the sensor data being communicated at a given time due to bandwidth considerations of the data collector 12208, a related network, and/or imposed by environmental constraints. In certain embodiments, one or more sensors and/or computing devices in the system 12200 are portable devices such as the user associated device 12216 associated with a user 12218, for example a plant operator walking through the industrial system may have a smart phone, which the system 12200 may selectively utilize as a data collector 12208, sensor 12206—for example to enhance communication throughput, sensor resolution, and/or as a primary method for communicating sensor data values 12244 to the controller 12212. The system 12200 depicts the controller 12212, the sensors 12206, the data collector 12208, the plant computer 12210, and/or the cloud computing device 12214 having a memory storage for storing sensor data thereon, any one or more of which may not have a memory storage for storing sensor data thereon.
The example system 12200 further includes a mesh network 12220 having a plurality of network nodes depicted thereupon. The mesh network 12220 is depicted in a single location for convenience of illustration, but it will be understood that any network infrastructure that is within the system 12200, and/or within communication with the system 12200, including intermittently, is contemplated within the system network. Additionally, any or all of the cloud server 12214, plant computer 12210, controller 12212, data collector 12208, any network capable sensor 12206, and/or user associated device 12218 may be a part of the network for the system, including a mesh network 12220, during at least certain operating conditions of the system 12200. Additionally, or alternatively, the system 12200 may utilize a hierarchical network, a peer-to-peer network, a peer-to-peer network with one or more super-nodes, combinations of these, hybrids of these, and/or may include multiple networks within the system 12200 or in communication with the system. It will be appreciated that certain features and operations of the present disclosure are beneficial to only one or more than one of these types of networks, certain features and operations of the present disclosure are beneficial to any type of network, and certain features and operations are particularly beneficial to combinations of these networks, and/or to networks having multiple networking options within the network, where the benefits relate to the utilization of options of any type, or where the benefits relate to one or more options being of a specific network type.
Referencing
The example controller 12212 includes a transmission environment circuit 12226 that determines transmission conditions 12254 corresponding to the communication of the at least a portion of the number of sensor data values 12252 to the storage target computing device. Transmission conditions 12254 include any conditions affecting the transmission of the data. For example, referencing
Referencing
An example transmission condition 12254 includes a node in a mesh or hierarchical network detected as malicious (e.g., from another supervisory process, heuristically, or as indicated to the system 12200); a peer node has experienced a bandwidth or connectivity change 12296 (e.g., mesh network peer that was forwarding packets has lost connectivity, gained additional bandwidth, had a reduction in available bandwidth, and/or has regained connectivity). An example transmission condition 12254 includes a change in a cost of transmitting information 12298 (e.g., cost has increased or decreased, where cost may be a direct cost parameter such as a data transmission subscription cost, or an abstracted cost parameter reflecting overall system priorities, and/or a current cost of delivering information over a network hop has changed), a change has been made in a hierarchical network arrangement (e.g., network arrangement change 12300) such as to balance bandwidth use in a network tree; and/or a change in a permission scheme 12302 (e.g., a portion of the network relaying sampling data has had a change in permissions, authorization level, or credentials). Certain further example transmission conditions 12254 include the availability of an additional connection type 12304 (e.g., a higher-bandwidth network connection type has become available, and/or a lower-cost network connection type has become available); a change has been made in a network topology 12306 (e.g., a node has gone offline or online, a mesh change has occurred, and/or a hierarchy change has occurred); and/or a data collection client changed a preference or a requirement 12308 (e.g., a data frequency requirement for at least one of the number of sensor values; a data type requirement for at least one of the number of sensor values; a sensor target for data collection; and/or a data collection client has changed the storage target computing device, which may change the network delivery outcomes and routing).
The example controller 12212 includes a network management circuit 12230 that updates the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 in response to the transmission conditions 12254. For example, where the transmission conditions 12254 indicate that a current routing, protocol, delivery frequency, delivery rate, and/or any other parameter associated with communicating the sensor data 12252 is no longer cost effective, possible, optimal, and/or where an improvement is available, the network management circuit 12230 updates the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 in response to a lower cost, possible, optimal, and/or improved transmission condition. The example system collaboration circuit 12228 is further responsive to the updated sensor data transmission protocol 12232—for example, implementing subsequent communications of the sensor data 12252 in compliance with the updated sensor data transmission protocol 12232, providing a communication to the network management circuit 12230 indicating which aspects of the updated sensor data transmission protocol 12232 cannot be or are not being followed, and/or providing an alert (e.g., to an operator, a network node, controller 12212, and/or the network management circuit 12230) indicating that a change is requested, indicating that a change is being implemented, and/or indicating that a requested change cannot be or is not being implemented.
An example system 12200 includes the transmission conditions 12254 being environmental conditions 12272 relating to sensor communication of the number of sensor data values 12252, where the network management circuit 12230 further analyzes the environmental conditions 12272, and where updating the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 includes modifying the manner in which the number of sensor data values are transmitted from the number of sensors 12206 to the storage target computing device. An example system further includes a data collector 12208 communicatively coupled to at least a portion of the number of sensors 12206 and responsive to the sensor data transmission protocol 12232, where the system collaboration circuit 12228 further receives the number of sensor data values 12244 from the at least a portion of the number of sensors, and where the transmission conditions 12254 correspond to at least one network parameter corresponding to the communication of the number of sensor data values from the at least a portion of the number of sensors. Referencing
An example network management circuit 12230 further updates the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 to adjust a network transmission parameter (e.g., any network parameter 12276) for at least a portion of the number of sensor values. For example, certain network parameters that are not control variables and/or are not currently being controlled are transmission conditions 12254, and certain network parameters are control variables and subject to change in response to the data transmission protocol 12232, and/or the network management circuit 12230 can optionally take control of certain network parameters to make them control variables. An example network management circuit 12230 further updates the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 to change any one or more of: a frequency of data transmitted; a quantity of data transmitted; a destination of data transmitted (including a target or intermediate destination, and/or a routing); a network protocol used to transmit the data; and/or a network path (e.g., providing a redundant path to transmit the data (e.g., where high noise, high network loss, and/or critical data are involved, the network management circuit 12230 may determine that the system operations are improved with redundant pathing for some of the data)). An example network management circuit 12230 further updates the sensor data transmission protocol 12232, such as to: bond an additional network path to transmit the data (e.g., the network management circuit 12230 may have authority to bring additional network resources online, and/or selectively access additional network resources); re-arrange a hierarchical network to transmit the data (e.g., add or remove a hierarchy layer, change a parent-child relationship, etc., for example, to provide critical data with additional paths, fewer layers, and/or a higher priority path); rebalance a hierarchical network to transmit the data; and/or reconfigure a mesh network to transmit the data. An example network management circuit 12230 further updates the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 to delay a data transmission time, and/or delay the data transmission time to a lower cost transmission time.
An example network management circuit further updates the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 to reduce the amount of information sent at one time over the network and/or updates the sensor data transmission protocol to adjust a frequency of data sent from a second data collector (e.g., an offset data collector within or not within the direct purview of the network management circuit 12230, but where network resource utilization from the second data collector competes with utilization of the first data collector).
An example network management circuit 12230 further adjusts an external data access frequency 12234—for example where the expert system 12242 and/or the machine learning algorithm 12248 access external data 12246 to make continuous improvements to the system (e.g., accessing information outside of the sensor data values 12244, and/or from offset systems or aggregated cloud based data), and/or an external data access timing (12236). The control of external data 12246 access allows for control of network utilization when the system is low on resources, when high fidelity and/or frequency of sensor data values 12244 is prioritized, and/or shifting of resource utilization into lower cost portions of the operating space of the system. In certain embodiments, the system collaboration circuit 12228 accesses the external data 12246, and is responsive to the adjusted external data access frequency 12234 and/or external data access timing value 12236. An example network management circuit 12230 further adjusts a network utilization value 12238—for example to keep system utilization operations below a threshold to reserve margin and/or to avoid the need for capital cost upgrades to the system due to capacity limitations. An example network management circuit 12230 adjusts the network utilization value 12238 to utilize bandwidth at a lower cost bandwidth time—for example when competing traffic is lower, when network utilization does not adversely affect other system processes, and/or when power consumption costs are lower.
An example network management circuit further 12230 enables utilizing a high-speed network, and/or requests a higher cost bandwidth access, for example when system process improvements are sufficient that higher costs are justified, to meet a minimum delivery requirement for data, and/or to move aging data from the system before it becomes obsolete or must be deleted to make room for subsequent data.
An example network management circuit 12230 further includes an expert system 12242, where the updating the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 is further in response to operations of the expert system 12242. The self-organized, network-sensitive data collection system may manage or optimize any such parameters or factors noted throughout this disclosure, individually or in combination, using an expert system, which may involve a rule-based optimization, optimization based on a model of performance, and/or optimization using machine learning/artificial intelligence, optionally including deep learning approaches, or a hybrid or combination of the above. Referencing
An example network management circuit 12230 further includes a machine learning algorithm 12248, where updating the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 is further in response to operations of the machine learning algorithm 12248. An example machine learning algorithm 12248 utilizes a machine learning optimization routine, and upon determining that an improved sensor data transmission protocol 12232 is available, the network management circuit 12230 provides the updated sensor data transmission protocol 12232 which is utilized by the system collaboration circuit 12228. In certain embodiments, the network management circuit 12230 may perform various operations such as supplying a sensor data transmission protocol 12232 which is utilized by the system collaboration circuit 12228 to produce real-world results, applies modeling to the system (either first principles modeling based on system characteristics, a model utilizing actual operating data for the system, a model utilizing actual operating data for an offset system, and/or combinations of these) to determine what an outcome of a given sensor data transmission protocol 12232 will be or would have been (including, for example, taking extra sensor data beyond what is utilized to support a process operated by the system, and/or utilizing external data 12246 and/or benchmarking data 12240), and/or applying randomized changes to the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 to ensure that an optimization routine does not settle into a local optimum or non-optimal condition.
An example machine learning algorithm 12248 further utilizes feedback data including the transmission conditions 12254, at least a portion of the number of sensor values 12244; and/or where the feedback data includes benchmarking data 12240. Referencing
Referencing
Yet another example system includes an industrial system including a number of components, and a number of sensors each operatively coupled to at least one of the number of components; a sensor communication circuit that interprets a number of sensor data values from the number of sensors; a system collaboration circuit that communicates at least a portion of the number of sensor data values over a network having a number of nodes to a storage target computing device according to a sensor data transmission protocol; a transmission environment circuit that determines transmission feedback corresponding to the communication of the at least a portion of the number of sensor data values over the network; and a network management circuit updates the sensor data transmission protocol in response to the transmission feedback. The example system collaboration circuit is further responsive to the updated sensor data transmission protocol.
Referencing
In certain embodiments, updating the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 includes the network management circuit 12230 providing instructions to reduce a quantity of data sent over the network; providing instructions to adjust a frequency of data capture sent over the network; providing instructions to time-shift delivery of at least a portion of the number of sensor values sent over the network (e.g., utilizing intermediate storage); providing instructions to change a network protocol corresponding to the network; providing instructions to reduce a throughput of at least one device coupled to the network; providing instructions to reduce a bandwidth use of the network; providing instructions to compress data corresponding to at least a portion of the number of sensor values sent over the network; providing instructions to condense data corresponding to at least a portion of the number of sensor values sent over the network (e.g., providing a relevant subset, reduced sample rate data, etc.); providing instructions to summarize data (e.g., providing a statistical description, an aggregated value, etc.) corresponding to at least a portion of the number of sensor values sent over the network; providing instructions to encrypt data corresponding to at least a portion of the number of sensor values sent over the network (e.g., to enable using an alternate, less secure network path, and/or to access another network path requiring encryption); providing instructions to deliver data corresponding to at least a portion of the number of sensor values to a distributed ledger; providing instructions to deliver data corresponding to at least a portion of the number of sensor values to a central server (e.g., the plant computer 12210 and/or cloud server 12214); providing instructions to deliver data corresponding to at least a portion of the number of sensor values to a super-node; and providing instructions to deliver data corresponding to at least a portion of the number of sensor values redundantly across a number of network connections. In certain embodiments, updating the sensor data transmission includes providing instructions to deliver data corresponding to at least a portion of the number of sensor values to one of the components (e.g., where one or more components 12204 in the system has memory storage and is communicatively accessible to the sensor 12206, the data collector 12208, and/or the network), and/or where the one of the components is communicatively coupled to the sensor providing the data corresponding to at least a portion of the number of sensor values (e.g., where the data to be stored on the component 12204 is the component the data was measured for, or is in proximity to the sensor 12206 taking the data).
An example network includes a mesh network where the network management circuit 12230 further updates the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 to provide instructions to eject (e.g., remove from the mesh map, take it out of service, etc.) one of the number of nodes from the mesh network. An example network includes a peer-to-peer network, where the network management circuit 12230 further updates the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 to provide instructions to eject one of the number of nodes from the peer-to-peer network.
An example network management circuit 12230 further updates the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 to cache (e.g., as a sensor data cache 12260) at least a portion of the number of sensor values 12252. In certain further embodiments, the network management circuit 12230 further updates the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 to communicate the cached sensor values 12260 in response to at least one of: a determination that the cached data is requested (e.g., a user, model, machine learning algorithm, expert system, etc. has requested the data); a determination that the network feedback indicates communication of the cached data is available (e.g., a prior limitation on the network leading the network management circuit 12230 to direct caching is now lifted or improved); and/or a determination that higher priority data is present that requires utilization of cache resources holding the cached data 12260.
An example system 12200 for self-organized, network-sensitive data collection in an industrial environment includes an industrial system 12202 having a number of components 12204 and a number of sensors 12206 each operatively coupled to at least one of the number of components 12204. A sensor communication circuit 12224 interprets the number of sensor data values 12244 from the number of sensors at a predetermined frequency. The system collaboration circuit 12228 that communicates at least a portion of the number of sensor data values 12252 over a network having a number of nodes to a storage target computing device according to the sensor data transmission protocol 12232, where the sensor data transmission protocol 12232 includes a predetermined hierarchy of data collection and the predetermined frequency. An example data management circuit 12230 adjusts the predetermined frequency in response to transmission conditions 12254, and/or in response to benchmarking data 12240.
Referring to
An example transmission feedback includes a feedback value such as: a change in transmission pricing, a change in storage pricing, a loss of connectivity, a reduction of bandwidth, a change in connectivity, a change in network availability, a change in network range, a change in wide area network (WAN) connectivity, and/or a change in wireless local area network (WLAN) connectivity.
An example system includes an assembly line industrial system having a number of vibrating components, such as motors, conveyors, fans, and/or compressors. The system includes a number of sensors that determine various parameters related to the vibrating components, including determination of diagnostic and/or process related information (proper operation, off-nominal operation, operating speed, imminent servicing or failure, etc.) of one or more of the components. Example sensors, without limitation, include noise, vibration, acceleration, temperature, and/or shaft speed sensors. The sensor information is conveyed to a target storage system, including at least partially through a network communicatively coupled to the assembly line industrial system. The example system includes a network management circuit that determines a sensor data transmission protocol to control flow of data from the sensors to the target storage system. The network management circuit, a related expert system, and/or a related machine learning algorithm, updates the sensor data transmission protocol to ensure efficient network utilization, sufficient delivery of data to support system control, diagnostics, and/or other determinations planned for the data outside of the system, to reduce resource utilization of data transmission, and/or to respond to system noise factors, variability, and/or changes in the system or related aspects such as cost or environment parameters. The example system includes improvement of system operations to ensure that diagnostics, controls, or other data dependent operations can be completed, to reduce costs while maintaining performance, and/or to increase system capability over time or process cycles.
An example system includes an automated robotic handling system, including a number of components such as actuators, gear boxes, and/or rail guides. The system includes a number of sensors that determine various parameters related to the components, including without limitation actuator position and/or feedback sensors, vibration, acceleration, temperature, imaging sensors, and/or spatial position sensors (e.g., within the handling system, a related plant, and/or GPS-type positioning). The sensor information is conveyed to a target storage system, including at least partially through a network communicatively coupled to the automated robotic handling system. The example system includes a network management circuit that determines a sensor data transmission protocol to control flow of data from the sensors to the target storage system. The network management circuit, a related expert system, and/or a related machine learning algorithm, updates the sensor data transmission protocol to ensure efficient network utilization, sufficient delivery of data to support system control, diagnostics, improvement and/or efficiency updates to handling efficiency, and/or other determinations planned for the data outside of the system, to reduce resource utilization of data transmission, and/or to respond to system noise factors, variability, and/or changes in the system or related aspects such as cost or environment parameters. The example system includes improvement of system operations to ensure that diagnostics, controls, or other data dependent operations can be completed, to reduce costs while maintaining performance, and/or to increase system capability over time or process cycles.
An example system includes a mining operation, including a surface and/or underground mining operation. The example mining operation includes components such as an underground inspection system, pumps, ventilation, generators and/or power generation, gas composition or quality systems, and/or process stream composition systems (e.g., including determination of desired material compositions, and/or composition of effluent streams for pollution and/or regulatory control). Various sensors are present in an example system to support control of the operation, determine status of the components, support safe operation, and/or to support regulatory compliance. The sensor information is conveyed to a target storage system, including at least partially through a network communicatively coupled to the mining operation. In certain embodiments, the network infrastructure of the mining operation exhibits high variability, due to, without limitation, significant environmental variability (e.g., pit or shaft condition variability) and/or intermittent availability—e.g., shutting off electronics during certain mining operations, difficulty in providing network access to portions of the mining operation, and/or the desirability to include mobile or intermittently available devices within the network infrastructure. The example system includes a network management circuit that determines a sensor data transmission protocol to control flow of data from the sensors to the target storage system. The network management circuit, a related expert system, and/or a related machine learning algorithm, updates the sensor data transmission protocol to ensure efficient network utilization, sufficient delivery of data to support system control, diagnostics, improvement and/or efficiency updates to handling efficiency, support for financial and/or regulatory compliance, and/or other determinations planned for the data outside of the system, to reduce resource utilization of data transmission, and/or to respond to system noise factors, variability, network infrastructure challenges, and/or changes in the system or related aspects such as cost or environment parameters.
An example system includes an aerospace system, such as a plane, helicopter, satellite, space vehicle or launcher, orbital platform, and/or missile. Aerospace systems have numerous systems supported by sensors, such as engine operations, control surface status and vibrations, environmental status (internal and external), and telemetry support. Additionally, aerospace systems have high variability in both the number of sensors of varying types (e.g., a small number of fuel pressure sensors, but a large number of control surface sensors) as well as the sampling rates for relevant determinations of sensors of varying types (e.g., 1-second data may be sufficient for internal cabin pressure, but weather radar or engine speed sensors may require much higher time resolution). Computing power on an aerospace application is at a premium due to power consumption and weight considerations, and accordingly iterative, recursive, deep learning, expert system, and/or machine learning operations to improve any systems on the aerospace system, including sensor data taking and transmission of sensor information, are driven in many embodiments to computing devices outside of the aerospace vehicle of the system (e.g., through offline learning, post-processing, or the like). Storage capacity on an aerospace application is similarly at a premium, such that long-term storage of sensor data on the aerospace vehicle is not a cost-effective solution for many embodiments. Additionally, network communication from an aerospace vehicle may be subject to high variability and/or bandwidth limitations as the vehicle moves rapidly through the environment and/or into areas where direct communication with ground-based resources is not practical. Further, certain aerospace applications have significant competition for available network resources—for example in environments with a large number of passengers where passenger utilization of a network infrastructure consumes significant bandwidth. Accordingly, it can be seen that operations of a network management circuit, a related expert system, and/or a related machine learning algorithm, to update the sensor data transmission protocol can significantly enhance sensing operations in various aerospace systems. Additionally, certain aerospace applications have a high number of offset systems, enhancing the ability of an expert system or machine learning algorithm to improve sensor data capture and transmission operations, and/or to manage the high variability in sensed parameters (frequency, data rate, and/or data resolution) for the system across operating conditions.
An example system includes an oil or gas production system, such as a production platform (onshore or offshore), pumps, rigs, drilling equipment, blenders, and the like. Oil and gas production systems exhibit high variability in sensed variable types and sensing parameters, such as vibration (e.g., pumps, rotating shafts, fluid flow through pipes, etc.—which may be high frequency or low frequency), gas composition (e.g., of a wellhead area, personnel zone, near storage tanks, etc.—where low frequency may typically be acceptable, and/or it may be acceptable that no data is taken during certain times such as when personnel are not present), and/or pressure values (which may vary significantly both in required resolution and frequency or sampling rate depending upon operations currently occurring in the system). Additionally, oil and gas production systems have high variability in network infrastructure, both according to the system (e.g., an offshore platform versus a long-term ground-based production facility) and according to the operations being performed by the system (e.g., a wellhead in production may have limited network access, while a drilling or fracturing operation may have significant network infrastructure at a site during operations). Accordingly, it can be seen that operations of a network management circuit, a related expert system, and/or a related machine learning algorithm, to update the sensor data transmission protocol can significantly enhance sensing operations in various oil or gas production systems.
The present disclosure describes system for self-organized, network-sensitive data collection in an industrial environment, the system according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include an industrial system including a plurality of components, and a plurality of sensors each operatively coupled to at least one of the plurality of components, a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values from the plurality of sensors, a system collaboration circuit structured to communicate at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values to a storage target computing device according to a sensor data transmission protocol, a transmission environment circuit structured to determine transmission conditions corresponding to the communication of the at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values to the storage target computing device, a network management circuit structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol in response to the transmission conditions, and wherein the system collaboration circuit is further responsive to the updated sensor data transmission protocol.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the transmission conditions include environmental conditions relating to sensor communication of the plurality of sensor data values, and wherein the network management circuit is further structured to analyze the environmental conditions, and wherein updating the sensor data transmission protocol includes modifying the manner in which the plurality of sensor data values is transmitted from the plurality of sensors to the storage target computing device.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein a data collector communicatively coupled to at least a portion of the plurality of sensors and responsive to the sensor data transmission protocol, wherein the system collaboration circuit is structured to receive the plurality of sensor data values from the at least a portion of the plurality of sensors, and wherein the transmission conditions correspond to at least one network parameter corresponding to the communication of the plurality of sensor data values from the at least a portion of the plurality of sensors.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to modify the data collector to adjust a data collection rate for at least one of the plurality of sensors.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to modify a multiplexing schedule of the data collector.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to command an intermediate storage operation for at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to command further data collection for at least a portion of the plurality of sensors.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to modify the data collector to implement a multiplexing schedule.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to adjust a network transmission parameter for at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the adjusted network transmission parameter includes at least one parameter selected from the parameters consisting of a timing parameter, a protocol selection, a file type selection, a streaming parameter selection, and a compression parameter.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to change a frequency of data transmitted.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to change a quantity of data transmitted.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to change a destination of data transmitted.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to change a network protocol used to transmit the data.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to add a redundant network path to transmit the data.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to bond an additional network path to transmit the data.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to re-arrange a hierarchical network to transmit the data.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to rebalance a hierarchical network to transmit the data.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to reconfigure a mesh network to transmit the data.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to delay a data transmission time.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to delay the data transmission time to a lower cost transmission time.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to reduce the amount of information sent at one time over the network.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to adjust a frequency of data sent from a second data collector.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to adjust an external data access frequency, and wherein the system collaboration circuit is responsive to the adjusted external data access frequency.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to adjust an external data access timing value, and wherein the system collaboration circuit is responsive to the adjusted external data access timing value.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to adjust a network utilization value.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to adjust the network utilization value to utilize bandwidth at a lower cost bandwidth time.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to enable utilizing a high-speed network.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to request a higher cost bandwidth access, and to update the sensor transmission protocol in response to the higher cost bandwidth access.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit further includes an expert system, and wherein the updating the sensor data transmission protocol is further in response to operations of the expert system.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit further includes a machine learning algorithm, and wherein the updating the sensor data transmission protocol is further in response to operations of the machine learning algorithm.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the machine learning algorithm is further structured to utilize feedback data including the transmission conditions.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the feedback data further includes at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the feedback data further includes benchmarking data.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the benchmarking data further includes data selected from the list consisting of: a network efficiency, a data efficiency, a comparison with offset data collectors, a throughput efficiency, a data efficacy, a data quality, a data precision, a data accuracy, and a data frequency.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the benchmarking data further includes data selected from the list consisting of: an environmental response, a mesh networking coherence, a data coverage, a target coverage, a signal diversity, a critical response, and a motion efficiency.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the transmission conditions corresponding to the communication comprise at least one condition selected from the conditions consisting of a mesh network needs to rearrange to balance throughput, a parent node in a hierarchically arranged network has had a change in connectivity, a network super-node in a hybrid peer-to-peer application-layer network has been replaced, and a node in a mesh or hierarchical network has been detected as malicious.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the transmission conditions corresponding to the communication comprise at least one condition selected from the conditions consisting of a mesh network peer forwarding packets has lost connectivity, a mesh network peer forwarding packets has gained additional bandwidth, a mesh network peer forwarding packets has had a reduction in bandwidth, and a mesh network peer forwarding packets has regained connectivity.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the transmission conditions corresponding to the communication comprise at least one condition selected from the conditions consisting of a cost of transmitting information has changed dynamically, a change has been made in a hierarchical network arrangement to balance bandwidth use in a network tree, a portion of the network relaying sampling data has had a change in permissions, authorization level, or credentials, a current cost of delivering information over a network hop has changed, a higher-bandwidth network connection type has become available, a lower-cost network connection type has become available, and a change has been made in a network topology.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the transmission conditions corresponding to the communication include at least one condition selected from the conditions consisting of a data collection client has changed a data frequency requirement for at least one of the plurality of sensor values, a data collection client has changed a data type requirement for at least one of the plurality of sensor values, a data collection client has changed a sensor target for data collection, and a data collection client has changed the storage target computing device.
The present disclosure describes system for self-organized, network-sensitive data collection in an industrial environment, the system according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include an industrial system including a plurality of components, and a plurality of sensors each operatively coupled to at least one of the plurality of components, a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values from the plurality of sensors, a system collaboration circuit structured to communicate at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values over a network having a plurality of nodes to a storage target computing device according to a sensor data transmission protocol, a transmission environment circuit structured to determine transmission feedback corresponding to the communication of the at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values over the network, and a network management circuit structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol in response to the transmission feedback, wherein the system collaboration circuit is further responsive to the updated sensor data transmission protocol.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the system collaboration circuit is further structured to send an alert to at least one of the plurality of nodes in response to the updated sensor data transmission protocol.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein updating the sensor data transmission includes at least one operation selected from the operations consisting of providing instructions to rearrange a mesh network including the plurality of nodes, providing instructions to rearrange a hierarchical data network including the plurality of nodes, rearranging a peer-to-peer data network including the plurality of nodes and rearranging a hybrid peer-to-peer data network including the plurality of nodes.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein updating the sensor data transmission includes at least one operation selected from the operations consisting of providing instructions to reduce a quantity of data sent over the network, providing instructions to adjust a frequency of data capture sent over the network, providing instructions to time-shift delivery of at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values sent over the network, and providing instructions to change a network protocol corresponding to the network.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein updating the sensor data transmission includes at least one operation selected from the operations consisting of providing instructions to reduce a throughput of at least one device coupled to the network, providing instructions to reduce a bandwidth use of the network, providing instructions to compress data corresponding to at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values sent over the network, providing instructions to condense data corresponding to at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values sent over the network, providing instructions to summarize data corresponding to at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values sent over the network, and providing instructions to encrypt data corresponding to at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values sent over the network.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein updating the sensor data transmission includes at least one operation selected from the operations consisting of providing instructions to deliver data corresponding to at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values to a distributed ledger, providing instructions to deliver data corresponding to at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values to a central server, providing instructions to deliver data corresponding to at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values to a super-node and providing instructions to deliver data corresponding to at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values redundantly across a plurality of network connections.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein updating the sensor data transmission includes providing instructions to deliver data corresponding to at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values to one of the plurality of components.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the one of the plurality of components is communicatively coupled to the sensor providing the data corresponding to at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the system collaboration circuit is further structured to interpret a quality of service commitment, and wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol further in response to the quality of service commitment.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the system collaboration circuit is further structured to interpret a service level agreement, and wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol further in response to the service level agreement.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to provide instructions to increase a quality of service value.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network includes a mesh network, and wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to provide instructions to eject one of the plurality of nodes from the mesh network.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network includes a peer-to-peer network, and wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to provide instructions to eject one of the plurality of nodes from the peer-to-peer network.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to cache at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit is further structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol to communicate the cached at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values in response to at least one of a determination that the cached data is requested, a determination that the network feedback indicates communication of the cached data is available, and a determination that higher priority data is present that requires utilization of cache resources holding the cached data.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the system further includes a data collector configured to receive the at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values, wherein the at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values includes data provided by a plurality of the sensors, and wherein the transmission feedback includes network performance information corresponding to the data collector.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the system further includes a data collector configured to receive the at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values, wherein the at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values includes data provided by a plurality of the sensors, a second data collector communicatively coupled to the network, and wherein the transmission feedback includes network performance information corresponding to the second data collector.
The present disclosure describes system for self-organized, network-sensitive data collection in an industrial environment, the system according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include an industrial system including a plurality of components, and a plurality of sensors each operatively coupled to at least one of the plurality of components, a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values from the plurality of sensors at a predetermined frequency, a system collaboration circuit structured to communicate at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values over a network having a plurality of nodes to a storage target computing device according to a sensor data transmission protocol, the sensor data transmission protocol including a predetermined hierarchy of data collection and the predetermined frequency, a transmission environment circuit structured to determine transmission feedback corresponding to the communication of the at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values over the network, and a network management circuit structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol in response to the transmission feedback and further in response to benchmarking data, wherein the system collaboration circuit is further responsive to the updated sensor data transmission protocol.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein updating the sensor data transmission includes at least one operation selected from the operations consisting of providing an instruction to change the sensors of the plurality of sensors, providing an instruction to adjust the predetermined frequency, providing an instruction to adjust a quantity of the plurality of sensor data values that are stored, providing an instruction to adjust a data transmission rate of the communication of the at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values, providing an instruction to adjust a data transmission time of the communication of the at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values, and providing an instruction to adjust a networking method of the communication over the network.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the benchmarking data further includes data selected from the list consisting of a network efficiency, a data efficiency, a comparison with offset data collectors, a throughput efficiency, a data efficacy, a data quality, a data precision, a data accuracy, and a data frequency.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the benchmarking data further includes data selected from the list consisting of an environmental response, a mesh networking coherence, a data coverage, a target coverage, a signal diversity, a critical response, and a motion A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the benchmarking data further includes data selected from the list consisting of a quality of service commitment, a quality of service guarantee, a service level agreement, and a predetermined quality of service value.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the benchmarking data further includes data selected from the list consisting of a network interference value, a network obstruction value, and an area of impeded network connectivity.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the transmission feedback includes a communication interference value selected from the values consisting of an interference caused by a component of the system, an interference caused by one of the sensors, an interference caused by a metallic object, an interference caused by a physical obstruction, an attenuated signal caused by a low power condition, and an attenuated signal caused by a network traffic demand in a portion of the network.
The present disclosure describes a system for self-organized, network-sensitive data collection in an industrial environment, the system according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include an industrial system including a plurality of components, and a plurality of sensors each operatively coupled to at least one of the plurality of components, a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values from the plurality of sensors at a predetermined frequency, a system collaboration circuit structured to communicate at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values over a network having a plurality of nodes to a storage target computing device according to a sensor data transmission protocol, a transmission environment circuit structured to determine transmission feedback corresponding to the communication of the at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values over the network, a network management circuit structured to update the sensor data transmission protocol in response to the transmission feedback and a network notification circuit structured to provide an alert value in response to the updated sensor data transmission protocol, wherein the system collaboration circuit is further responsive to the updated sensor data transmission protocol.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the transmission feedback includes at least one feedback value selected from the values consisting of: a change in transmission pricing, a change in storage pricing, a loss of connectivity, a reduction of bandwidth, a change in connectivity, a change in network availability, a change in network range, a change in wide area network (WAN) connectivity, and a change in wireless local area network (WLAN) connectivity.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit further includes an expert system, and wherein the updating the sensor data transmission protocol is further in response to operations of the expert system.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system includes at least one system selected from the systems consisting of: a rule-based system, a model-based system, a neural-net system, a Bayesian-based system, a fuzzy logic-based system, and a machine learning system.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the network management circuit further includes a machine learning algorithm, and wherein the updating the sensor data transmission protocol is further in response to operations of the machine learning algorithm.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the machine learning algorithm is further structured to utilize feedback data including the transmission conditions.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the feedback data further includes at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the feedback data further includes benchmarking data.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the benchmarking data further includes data selected from the list consisting of: a network efficiency, a data efficiency, a comparison with offset data collectors, a throughput efficiency, a data efficacy, a data quality, a data precision, a data accuracy, and a data frequency.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the benchmarking data further includes data selected from the list consisting of: an environmental response, a mesh networking coherence, a data coverage, a target coverage, a signal diversity, a critical response, and a motion efficiency.
Referencing
The example system 12500 further includes a sensor communication circuit 12522 (reference
In certain embodiments, sensor data values 12542 are provided to a data collector 12508, which may be in communication with multiple sensors 12506 and/or with a controller 12512. In certain embodiments, a plant computer 12510 is additionally or alternatively present. In the example system, the controller 12512 is structured to functionally execute operations of the sensor communication circuit 12522, sensor data storage profile circuit 12524, sensor data storage implementation circuit 12526, storage planning circuit 12528, and/or haptic feedback circuit 12530. The controller 12512 is depicted as a separate device for clarity of description. Aspects of the controller 12512 may be present on the sensors 12506, the data collector 12508, the plant computer 12510, and/or on a cloud computing device 12514. In certain embodiments described throughout this disclosure, all aspects of the controller 12512 or other controllers may be present in another device depicted on the system 12500. The plant computer 12510 represents local computing resources, for example processing, memory, and/or network resources, that may be present and/or in communication with the industrial system 12500. In certain embodiments, the cloud computing device 12514 represents computing resources externally available to the industrial system 12502, for example over a private network, intra-net, through cellular communications, satellite communications, and/or over the internet. In certain embodiments, the data collector 12508 may be a computing device, a smart sensor, a MUX box, or other data collection device capable to receive data from multiple sensors and to pass-through the data and/or store data for later transmission. An example data collector 12508 has no storage and/or limited storage, and selectively passes sensor data therethrough, with a subset of the sensor data being communicated at a given time due to bandwidth considerations of the data collector 12508, a related network, and/or imposed by environmental constraints. In certain embodiments, one or more sensors and/or computing devices in the system 12500 are portable devices—for example a plant operator walking through the industrial system may have a smart phone, which the system 12500 may selectively utilize as a data collector 12508, sensor 12506—for example to enhance communication throughput, sensor resolution, and/or as a primary method for communicating sensor data values 12542 to the controller 12512. The system 12500 depicts the controller 12512, the sensors 12506, the data collector 12508, the plant computer 12510, and/or the cloud computing device 12514 having a memory storage for storing sensor data thereon, any one or more of which may not have a memory storage for storing sensor data thereon. In certain embodiments, the sensor data storage profile circuit 12524 prepares a data storage profile 12532 that directs sensor data to memory storage, including moving sensor data in a controlled manner from one memory storage to another. Sensor data stored on various devices consumes memory on the device, transferring the stored data between device consumes network and/or communication bandwidth in the system 12500, and/or operations on sensor data such as processing, compression, statistical analysis, summarization, and/or provision of alerts consumes processor cycles as well as memory to support operations such as buffer files, intermediate data, and the like. Accordingly, improved or optimal configuration and/or updating of the data storage profile 12532 provides for lower utilization of system resources and/or allows for the storage of sensor data with higher resolution, over longer time frames, and/or from a larger number of sensors.
Referencing
For example, data from a temperature sensor may be planned to be stored locally on a sensor having storage capacity, and transmitted in bursts to a data controller. The data controller may be instructed to transmit the sensor data to the cloud computing device on a schedule, for example as the data controller memory reaches a threshold, as network communication capacity is available, at the conclusion of a process, and/or upon request. Additionally or alternatively, data from the sensors may be changed on a device or upon transfer of the data (e.g., just before transfer, just after transfer, or on a schedule). For example, the data storage profile 12532 may describe storing high resolution, high precision, and/or high-sampling rate data, and reducing the storage of the data set after a period of time, a selected event, and/or confirmation of a successful process or that the high resolution data is no longer needed. Accordingly, higher resolution data and/or data from a large number of sensors may be available for utilization, such as by a sensor fusion operation or the like, while the long-term memory utilization is also managed. Each of the sensor data sets may be treated individually for memory storage characteristics, and/or sensors may be grouped for similar treatment (e.g., sensors having similar data characteristics and/or impact on the system, sensors cooperating in a sensor fusion operation, a group of sensors utilized for a model or a virtual sensor, etc.). In certain embodiments, sensor data from a single sensor may be treated distinctly according to an update of the data storage profile 12532, a time or process stage at which the data is taken, and/or a system condition such as a network issue, a fault condition, or the like. Additionally or alternatively, a single set of sensor data may be stored in multiple places in the system, for example where the same data is utilized in several separate sensor fusion operations, and the resource consumption from storing multiple sets of the same data is lower than a processor or network utilization to utilize a single stored data set in several separate processes.
Referencing
The example controller 12512 further includes a sensor data storage implementation circuit 12526 that stores at least a portion of the number of sensor data values in response to the data storage profile 12532. An example controller 12512 includes the data storage profile 12532 having a storage location definition 12534 corresponding to at least one of the number of sensor data values 12542, including at least one location such as: a sensor storage location (e.g., data stored for a period of time on the sensor, and/or on a portable device for a user 12518 in proximity to the industrial system 12502 where the portable device is adapted by the system as a sensor), a sensor communication device storage location (e.g., a data collector 12508, MUX device, smart sensor in communication with other sensors, and/or on a portable device for a user 12518 in proximity to the industrial system 12502 or a network of the industrial system 12502 where the portable device is adapted by the system as a communication device to transfer sensor data between components in the system, etc.), a regional network storage location (e.g., on a plant computer 12510 and/or controller 12512), and/or a global network storage location (e.g., on a cloud computing device 12514).
An example controller 12512 includes the data storage profile 12532 including a storage time definition 12536 corresponding to at least one of the number of sensor data values 12542, including at least one time value such as: a time domain description over which the corresponding at least one of the number of sensor data values is to be stored (e.g., times and locations for the data, which may include relative time to some aspect such as the time of data sampling, a process stage start or stop time, etc., or an absolute time such as midnight, Saturday, the first of the month, etc.); a time domain storage trajectory including a number of time values corresponding to a number of storage locations over which the corresponding at least one of the number of sensor data values is to be stored (e.g., the flow of the sensor data through the system across a number of devices, with the time for each storage transfer including a relative or absolute time description); a process description value over which the corresponding at least one of the number of sensor data values is to be stored (e.g., including a process description and the planned storage location for data values during the described process portion; the process description can include stages of a process, and identification of which process is related to the storage plan, and the like); and/or a process description trajectory including a number of process stages corresponding to a number of storage locations over which the corresponding at least one of the number of sensor data values is to be stored (e.g., the flow of the sensor data through the system across a number of devices, with process stage and/or process identification for each storage transfer).
An example controller 12512 includes the data storage profile 12532 including a data resolution description 12540 corresponding to at least one of the number of sensor data values 12544, where the data resolution description 12540 includes a value such as: a detection density value corresponding to the at least one of the number of sensor data values (e.g., detection density may be time sampling resolution, spatial sampling resolution, precision of the sampled data, and/or a processing operation to be applied that may affect the available resolution, such as filtering and/or lossy compression of the data); a detection density value corresponding to a more than one of the number of the sensor data values (e.g., a group of sensors having similar detection density values, a secondary data value determined from a group of sensors having a specified detection density value, etc.); a detection density trajectory including a number of detection density values of the at least one of the number of sensor data values, each of the number of detection density values corresponding to a time value (e.g., any of the detection density concepts combined with any of the time domain concepts); a detection density trajectory including a number of detection density values of the at least one of the number of sensor data values, each of the number of detection density values corresponding to a process stage value (e.g., any of the detection density concepts combined with any of the process description or stage concepts); and/or a detection density trajectory comprising a number of detection density values of the at least one of the number of sensor data values, each of the number of detection density values corresponding to a storage location value (e.g., detection density can be varied according to the device storing the data).
An example sensor data storage profile circuit 12524 further updates the data storage profile 12532 after the operations of the sensor data storage implementation circuit 12526, where the sensor data storage implementation circuit 12526 further stores the portion of the number of sensor data values 12544 in response to the updated data storage profile 12532. For example, during operations of a system at a first point in time, the sensor data storage implementation circuit 12526 utilizes a currently existing data storage profile sensor data storage implementation circuit 12526, which may be based on initial estimates of the system performance, desired data from an operator of the system, and/or from a previous operation of the sensor data storage profile circuit 12524. During operations of the system, the sensor data storage implementation circuit 12526 stores data according to the data storage profile 12532, and the sensor data storage profile circuit 12524 determines parameters for the data storage profile 12532 which may result in improved performance of the system. An example sensor data storage profile circuit 12524 tests various parameters for the data storage profile 12532, for example utilizing a machine learning optimization routine, and upon determining that an improved data storage profile 12532 is available, the sensor data storage profile circuit 12524 provides the updated data storage profile 12532 which is utilized by the sensor data storage implementation circuit 12526. In certain embodiments, the sensor data storage profile circuit 12524 may perform various operations such as supplying an intermediate data storage profile 12532 which is utilized by the sensor data storage implementation circuit 12526 to produce real-world results, applies modeling to the system (either first principles modeling based on system characteristics, a model utilizing actual operating data for the system, a model utilizing actual operating data for an offset system, and/or combinations of these) to determine what an outcome of a given data storage profile 12532 will be or would have been (including, for example, taking extra sensor data beyond what is utilized to support a process operated by the system), and/or applying randomized changes to the data storage profile 12532 to ensure that an optimization routine does not settle into a local optimum or non-optimal condition.
An example sensor data storage profile circuit 12524 further updates the data storage profile 12532 in response to external data 12544 and/or cloud-based data 12538, including data such as: an enhanced data request value (e.g., an operator, model, optimization routine, and/or other process requests enhanced data resolution for one or more parameters); a process success value (e.g., indicating that current storage practice provides for sufficient data availability and/or system performance; and/or that current storage practice may be over-capable, and one or more changes to reduce system utilization may be available); a process failure value (e.g., indicating that current storage practices may not provide for sufficient data availability and/or system performance, which may include additional operations or alerts to an operator to determine whether the data transmission and/or availability contributed to the process failure); a component service value (e.g., an operation to adjust the data storage to ensure higher resolution data is available to improve a learning algorithm predicting future service events, and/or to determine which factors may have contributed to premature service); a component maintenance value (e.g., an operation to adjust the data storage to ensure higher resolution data is available to improve a learning algorithm predicting future maintenance events, and/or to determine which factors may have contributed to premature maintenance); a network description value (e.g., a change in the network, for example by identification of devices, determination of protocols, and/or as entered by a user or operator, where the network change results in a capability change and potentially a distinct optimal storage plan for sensor data); a process feedback value (e.g., one or more process conditions detected); a network feedback value (e.g., one or more network changes as determined by actual operations of the network—e.g., a loss or reduction in communication of one or more devices, a network communication volume change, a transmission noise value change on the network, etc.); a sensor feedback value (e.g., metadata such as a sensor fault, capability change; and/or based on the detected data from the system, for example an anomalous reading, rate of change, or off-nominal condition indicating that enhanced or reduced resolution, sampling time, etc. should change the storage plan); and/or a second data storage profile, where the second data storage profile was generated for an offset system.
An example storage planning circuit 12528 determines a data configuration plan 12546 and updates the data storage profile 12532 in response to the data configuration plan 12546, where the sensor data storage implementation circuit 12526 further stores at least a portion of the number of sensor data values in response to the updated data storage profile 12532. An example data configuration plan 12546 includes a value such as: a data storage structure value (e.g., a data type, such as integer, string, a comma delimited file, how many bits are committed to the values, etc.); a data compression value (e.g., whether to compress data, a compression model to use, and/or whether segments of data can be replaced with summary information, polynomial or other curve fit summarizations, etc.); a data write strategy value (e.g., whether to store values in a distributed manner or on a single device, which network communication and/or operating system protocols to utilize); a data hierarchy value (e.g., which data is favored over other data where storage constraints and/or communication constraints will limit the stored data—the limits may be temporal, such as data will not be in the intended location at the intended time, or permanent, such as some data will need to be compressed in a lossy manner, and/or lost); an enhanced access value determined for the data (e.g., the data is of a type for reports, searching, modeling access, and/or otherwise tagged, where enhanced access includes where the data is stored for scope of availability, indexing of data, summarization of data, topical reports of data, which may be stored in addition to the raw or processed sensor data); and/or an instruction value corresponding to the data (e.g., a placeholder indicating where data can be located, an interface to access the data, metadata indicating units, precision, time frames, processes in operation, faults present, outcomes, etc.).
It can be seen that the provision of control over data flow and storage through the system allows for improvement generally, and movement toward optimization over time, of data management throughout the system. Accordingly, more data of a higher resolution can be accumulated, and in a more readily accessible manner, than previously known systems with fixed or manually configurable data storage and flow for a given utilization of resources such as storage space, communication bandwidth, power consumption, and/or processor execution cycles. Additionally, the system can respond to process variations that affect the optimal or beneficial parameters for controlling data flow and storage. One of skill in the art, having the benefit of the disclosures herein, will recognize that combinations of control of data storage schemes with data type control and knowledge about process operations for a system create powerful combinations in certain contemplated embodiments. For example, data of a higher resolution can be maintained for a longer period and made available if a need for the data arises, without incurring the full cost of storing the data permanently and/or communicating the data throughout every layer of the system.
In an embodiment, in an underground mining inspection system, certain detailed data regarding toxic gas concentrations, temperatures, noise, etc. may need to be captured and stored for regulatory purposes, but for ongoing operational purposes, perhaps only a single data point regarding one or more toxic gases is needed periodically. In this embodiment, the data storage profile for the system may indicate that only certain sensor data aligned with regulatory needs be stored in a certain manner that is long term and optionally only available as needed, while other sensor data required operationally be stored in a more accessible manner.
In another embodiment involving automotive brakes for fleet vehicles, data regarding brake use and performance may be acquired at high resolution and stored in a first data storage that is not transmitted throughout the network, while lower resolution data are transmitted periodically and/or in near real time to a fleet control and maintenance application. Should the application or other user require higher resolution data, it may be accessed from the first data storage.
In a further embodiment of manufacturing body and frame components of trucks and cars, certain detailed data regarding paint color, surface curvature, and other quality control measures may be captured and stored at high resolution, but for ongoing operational purposes, only low resolution data regarding throughput are transmitted. In this embodiment, the data storage profile for the system may indicate that only certain sensor data aligned with quality control needs be stored in a certain manner that is long term and optionally only available as needed, while other sensor data required operationally be stored in a more accessible manner.
In another example, data types, resolution, and the like can be configured and changed as the data flows through the system, according to values that are beneficial for the individual components handling the data, according to the utilized networking resources for the data, and/or according to accompanying data (e.g., a model, virtual sensor, and/or sensor fusion operation) where higher capability data would not improve the precision of the process utilizing the accompanying data.
In an embodiment, in rail condition monitoring systems, as rail condition data are acquired, each component of the system may require different resolutions of the same data. Continuing with this example, as real-time rail traffic data are acquired, these data may be stored and/or transmitted at low resolution in order to quickly disseminate the data throughout the system, while utilization and load data may be stored and utilized at higher resolution to track rail use fees and need for rail maintenance at a more granular level.
In another embodiment of a hydraulic pump operating in a tractor, as the tractor is in the field and does not have access to a network, data from on-board sensors may be acquired and stored in a local manner on the tractor at low resolution, but when the tractor regains access, data may be acquired and transmitted at high resolution.
In yet another embodiment of an actuator in a robotic handling unit in an automotive plant, data regarding the actuator may flow into multiple downstream systems, such as a production tracking system that utilizes the actuator data alone and an energy efficiency tracking system that utilizes the data in a sensor fusion with data from environmental sensors. Resolution of the actuator data may be configured differently as it is transmitted to each of these systems for their disparate uses.
In still another embodiment of a generator in a mine, data may be acquired regarding the performance of the generator, carbon monoxide levels near the generator and a cost for running the generator. Each component of a control system overseeing the mine may require different resolutions of the same data. Continuing with this example, as carbon monoxide data are acquired, these data may be stored and/or transmitted at low resolution in order to quickly disseminate the data throughout the system in order to properly alert workers. Performance and cost data may be stored and utilized at higher resolution to track economic efficiency and lifetime maintenance needs.
In an additional embodiment, sensors on a truck's wheel end may monitor lubrication, noise (e.g., grinding, vibration) and temperature. While in the field, sensor data may be transmitted remotely at low resolution for remote monitoring, but when within a threshold distance from a fleet maintenance facility, data may be transmitted at high resolution.
In another example, accompanying information for the data allows for efficient downstream processing (e.g., by a downstream device or process accessing the data) including unpackaging the data, readily determining where related higher capability data may be present in the system, and/or streamlining operations utilizing the data (e.g., reporting, modeling, alerting, and/or performing a sensor fusion or other system analysis). An embodiment includes storing high capability (e.g., high-sampling rate, high precision, indexed, etc.) in a first storage device in the system (e.g., close to the sensors in the network layer to preserve network communication resources) and sending lower capability data up the network layers (e.g., to a cloud-computing device), where the lower capability data includes accompanying information to access the stored high capability data, including accompanying data that may be accessible to a user (e.g., a header, message box, or other organically interfaceable accompanying data) and/or accessible to an automated process (e.g., structured data, XML, populated fields, or the like) where the process can utilize the accompanying data to automatically request, retrieve, or access the high capability data. In certain embodiments, accompanying data may further include information about the content, precision, sampling time, calibrations (e.g., de-bouncing, filtering, or other processing applied) such that an accessing component or user can determine without retrieving the high capability data whether such data will meet the desired parameters.
In an embodiment, vibration noise from vibration sensors attached to vibrators on an assembly line may be stored locally in a high resolution format while a low resolution version of the same data with accompanying information regarding the availability of ambient and local noise data for a sensor fusion may be transmitted to a cloud-based server. If a resident process on the server requires the high resolution data, such as a machine learning process, the server may retrieve the data at that time.
In another embodiment of an airplane engine, performance data aggregated from a plurality of sensors may be transmitted while in flight along with accompanying information to a remote site. The accompanying information, such as a header with metadata relating to historical plane information, may allow the remote site to efficiently analyze the performance data in the context of the historical data without having to access additional databases.
In a further embodiment of a coal crusher in a power generation facility, data accompanying low quality sensor data regarding the size of coal exiting the crusher may include information about the precision in the size measurement such that a technician can determine if the higher resolution data are needed to confirm a determination that the crusher needs to come offline for maintenance.
In yet a further embodiment of a drilling machine or production platform employed in oil and gas production, high capability data may be acquired and stored locally regarding parameters of the drill's and platform's operation, but only low capability data are transmitted off-site to conserve bandwidth. Along with the low capability data, accompanying information may include instructions on how an automated off-site process can automatically access the high capability data in the event that it is required.
In still a further embodiment, temperature sensors on a pump employed in oil & gas production or mining may be stored locally in a high resolution format while a low resolution version of the same data with accompanying information regarding the availability of noise and energy use data for a sensor fusion may be transmitted to a cloud-based server. If a resident process on the server requires the high resolution data, such as a machine learning process, the server may retrieve the data at that time.
In another embodiment of a gearbox in an automatic robotic handling unit or an agricultural setting, performance data aggregated from a plurality of sensors may be transmitted while in use along with accompanying information to a remote site. The accompanying information, such as a header with metadata relating to historical gearbox information, may allow the remote site to efficiently analyze the performance data in the context of the historical data without having to access additional databases.
In a further embodiment of a ventilation system in a mine, data accompanying low quality sensor data regarding the size of particulates in the air may include information about the precision in the size measurement such that a technician can determine if the higher resolution data are needed to confirm a determination that the ventilation system requires maintenance.
In yet a further embodiment of a rolling bearing employed in agriculture, high capability data may be acquired and stored locally regarding parameters of the rolling bearing's operation, but only low capability data are transmitted off-site to conserve bandwidth. Along with the low capability data, accompanying information may include instructions on how an automated off-site process can automatically access the high capability data in the event that it is required.
In a further embodiment of a stamp mill in a mine, data accompanying low quality sensor data regarding the size of mineral deposits exiting the stamp mill may include information about the precision in the size measurement such that a technician can determine if the higher resolution data are needed to confirm a determination that the stamp mill requires a change in an operation parameter.
Referencing
Referencing
An example system 12500 further includes a haptic feedback circuit 12530 that determines a haptic feedback instruction 12548 in response to at least one of the number of sensor values 12542 and/or the data storage profile 12532, and a haptic feedback device 12516 responsive to the haptic feedback instruction 12548. Example and non-limiting haptic feedback instructions 12548 include an instruction such as: a vibration command; a temperature command; a sound command; an electrical command; and/or a light command. Example and non-limiting operations of the haptic feedback circuit 12530 include feedback that data is stored or being stored on the haptic feedback device 12516 and/or on a portable device associated with the user 12518 in communication with the haptic feedback device 12516 (e.g., user 12518 traverses through the system 12500 with a smart phone, which the system 12500 utilizes to store sensor data, and provides a haptic feedback instructions 12548 to notify the user 12518 that the smart phone is currently being utilized by the system 12500, for example allowing the user 12518 to remain in communication with the sensor, data controller, or other transmitting device, and/or allowing the user to actively cancel or enable the data transfer). Additionally or alternatively, the haptic feedback device 12516 may be the smart phone (e.g., utilizing vibration, sound, light, or other haptic aspects of the smart phone), and/or the haptic feedback device 12516 may include data storage and/or communication capabilities.
In certain embodiments, the haptic feedback circuit 12530 provides a haptic feedback instruction 12548 as an alert or notification to the user 12518, for example to alert or notify the user 12518 that a process has commenced or is about to start, that an off-nominal operation is detected or predicted, that a component of the system requires or is predicted to require maintenance, that an aspect of the system is in a condition that the user 12518 may want to be aware of (e.g., a component is still powered, has high potential energy of any type, is at a high pressure, and/or is at a high temperature where the user 12518 may be in proximity to the component), that a data storage related aspect of the system is in a noteworthy condition (e.g., a data storage component of the system is at capacity, out of communication, is in a fault condition, has lost contact with a sensor, etc.), to request a response from the user 12518 (e.g., an approval to start a process, data transfer, process rate change, clear a fault, etc.) In certain embodiments, the haptic feedback circuit 12530 configures the haptic feedback instruction 12548 to provide an intuitive feedback to the user 12518. For example, an alert value may provide a more rapid, urgent, and/or intermittent vibration mode relative to an informational notification; a temperature based alert or notification may utilize a temperature based haptic feedback (e.g., an overtemperature vessel notification may provide a warm or cold haptic feedback) and/or flashing a color that is associated with the temperature (e.g., flashing red for an overtemperature or blue for an under-temperature); an electrically based notification may provide an electrically associated haptic feedback (e.g., a sound associated with electricity such as a buzzing or sparking sound, or even a mild electrical feedback such as when a user is opening a panel for a component that is still powered); providing a vibration feedback for a bearing, motor, or other rotating or vibrating component that is operating off-nominally; and/or providing a requested feedback to the user based upon sensed data (e.g., transmitting a vibration profile to the haptic feedback device that is analogous to the detected vibration in a requested component for example allowing an expert user to diagnose the component without physical contact; providing a haptic feedback for a requested component for example if the user is double checking a lockout/tagout operation before entering a component, opening a panel, and/or entering a potentially hazardous area). The provided examples for operations of the haptic feedback circuit 12530 are non-limiting illustrations.
Referencing
An example system includes the network coding circuit 12568 further determining a network definition value 12572, and providing the network coding value 12570 further in response to the network definition value 12572. Example network definition values 12572 include values such as: a network feedback value (e.g., transfer rates, up time, synchronization availability, etc.); a network condition value (e.g., presence of noise, transmission/receiver capability, drop-outs, etc.); a network topology value (e.g., the communication flow and connectivity of devices; operating systems, protocols, and storage types of devices; available computing resources on devices; the location and function of devices in the system); an intermittently available network device value (e.g., a known or observed availability for the device over time or process stage; predicted availability of the device; prediction of known noise factors for the device, such as process operations that reduce device availability); and/or a network cost description value (e.g., resource utilization of the device, including relative cost or impact of processing, memory, and/or communication resources; power utilization and cost of power consumption for devices; available power for the device and a cost description for externalities related to consuming the power—such as for a battery where the power itself may not be expensive but the power in the specific location has a cost associated with replacement, including availability or access to the device during operations).
An example system includes the network coding circuit 12568 further providing the network coding value 12570 such that the sensor data storage implementation circuit stores a first portion of the number of sensor data values 12542 utilizing a first network coding value 12570, and a second portion of the number of sensor data values 12542 utilizing a second network coding value 12570 (e.g., the network coding values 12570 can vary with the data being transmitted, the transmitting device, and/or over time or process stage). Example and non-limiting network coding values include: a network type selection (e.g., public, private, wireless, wired, intranet, external, internet, cellular, etc.), a network selection (e.g., which one or more of an available number of networks will be utilized), a network coding selection (e.g., packet definitions, encoding techniques, linear, randomized linear, convolution, triangulated, etc.), a network timing selection (e.g., synchronization and sequencing of data transmissions between devices), a network feature selection (e.g., turning on or off network support devices or repeaters; enabling, disabling, or adjusting security selections; increasing or decreasing a power of a device, etc.), a network protocol selection (e.g., TCP/IP, FTP, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Ethernet, and/or routing protocols); a packet size selection (including header and/or parity information); and/or a packet ordering selection (e.g., determining how to transmit the various sensor information that may be on a device, and/or determining the packet to data value correspondence). An example network coding circuit 12568 further adjusts the network coding value 12570 to provide an intermediate network coding value (e.g., as a test coding value on the system, and/or as a modeled coding value being run off-line), to compare a performance indicator 12574 corresponding to each of the network coding value 12570 and the intermediate network coding value, and to provide an updated network coding value (e.g., as the network coding value 12570) in response to the comparison of the performance indicators 12574.
An example system includes an industrial system having a number of components, and a number of sensors each operatively coupled to at least one of the number of components. The number of sensors provide a number of sensor values, and the system further includes a number of organizing structures such as a controller, a data collector, a plant computer, a cloud-based server and/or global computing device, and/or a network layer, where the organizing structures are configured for self-organizing storage of at least a portion of the number of sensor values. For example, operations of the controller 12512 provide for storage and distribution of sensor data values to reduce consumption of resources (processor, network, and/or memory) for storing sensor data. The self-organizing operations include management of the stored sensor data over time, including providing sensor information to system components in time to complete operations therefore (e.g., control, improvement, modeling, and/or machine learning for process operations of the system). Additionally, data security, including long-term security due to storage media, geographic, and/or unauthorized access, is considered throughout the data storage life cycle. An example system further includes the organizing structures providing enhanced resolution of the number of sensor values in response to at least one of an enhanced data request value or an alert value corresponding to the industrial system. The system provides enhanced resolution by controlling the storage processes to address system impact, including keeping lower resolution, summary, or other accessibility data available, and storing higher resolution data in a lower resource utilization manner which is available upon request and/or at a time appropriate to system operations. Example enhanced resolution includes: an enhanced spatial resolution, an enhanced time domain resolution, a greater number of the number of sensor values than a standard resolution of the number of sensor values, and/or a greater precision of at least one of the number of sensor values than a standard resolution of the number of sensor values. An example system further includes a network layer, where the organizing structures are configured for self-organizing network coding for communication of the number of sensor values on the network layer. An example system further includes a haptic feedback device of a user in proximity to at least one of the industrial system or the network layer, and where the organizing structures are configured for providing haptic feedback to the haptic feedback device, and/or for configuring the haptic feedback to provide an intuitive alert to the user.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values; a sensor data storage profile circuit structured to determine a data storage profile, the data storage profile comprising a data storage plan for the plurality of sensor data values; and a sensor data storage implementation circuit structured to store at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values in response to the data storage profile. In embodiments, the data storage profile may include a storage location definition corresponding to at least one of the plurality of sensor data values, the storage location definition comprising at least one location selected from the locations consisting of: a sensor storage location, a sensor communication device storage location, a regional network storage location, and a global network storage location. The data storage profile may include a storage time definition corresponding to at least one of the plurality of sensor data values, the storage time definition comprising at least one time value selected from the time values consisting of: a time domain description over which the corresponding at least one of the plurality of sensor data values is to be stored; a time domain storage trajectory comprising a plurality of time values corresponding to a plurality of storage locations over which the corresponding at least one of the plurality of sensor data values is to be stored; a process description value over which the corresponding at least one of the plurality of sensor data values is to be stored; and a process description trajectory comprising a plurality of process stages corresponding to a plurality of storage locations over which the corresponding at least one of the plurality of sensor data values is to be stored. The data storage profile may include a data resolution description corresponding to at least one of the plurality of sensor data values, wherein the data resolution description comprises at least one of: a detection density value corresponding to the at least one of the plurality of sensor data values; a detection density value corresponding to a plurality of the at least one of the plurality of the sensor data values; a detection density trajectory comprising a plurality of detection density values of the at least one of the plurality of sensor data values, each of the plurality of detection density values corresponding to a time value; a detection density trajectory comprising a plurality of detection density values of the at least one of the plurality of sensor data values, each of the plurality of detection density values corresponding to a process stage value; and a detection density trajectory comprising a plurality of detection density values of the at least one of the plurality of sensor data values, each of the plurality of detection density values corresponding to a storage location value. The sensor data storage profile circuit may be further structured to update the data storage profile after the operations of the sensor data storage implementation circuit, and wherein the sensor data storage implementation circuit is further structured to store the portion of the plurality of sensor data values in response to the updated data storage profile. The sensor data storage profile circuit may be further structured to update the data storage profile in response to external data, the external data comprising at least one data value selected from the data values consisting of: an enhanced data request value; a process success value; a process failure value; a component service value; a component maintenance value; a network description value; a process feedback value; a network feedback value; a sensor feedback value; and a second data storage profile, the second data storage profile generated for an offset system. A storage planning circuit may be structured to determine a data configuration plan, to update the data storage profile in response to the data configuration plan, and wherein the sensor data storage implementation circuit is further structured to store the at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values in response to the updated data storage profile. The data configuration plan may include at least one value selected from the values consisting of: a data storage structure value; a data compression value; a data write strategy value; a data hierarchy value; an enhanced access value determined for the data; and an instruction value corresponding to the data. A haptic feedback circuit may be structured to determine a haptic feedback instruction in response to at least one of the plurality of sensor values or the data storage profile; and a haptic feedback device responsive to the haptic feedback instruction. The haptic feedback instruction may include at least one instruction selected from the instructions consisting of: a vibration command; a temperature command; a sound command; an electrical command; and a light command. The data storage plan may be generated by a rule-based expert system utilizing feedback, wherein the feedback relates to one or more of an aspect of the industrial environment or the plurality of sensor data values. The data storage plan may be generated by a model-based expert system utilizing feedback, wherein the feedback relates to one or more of an aspect of the industrial environment or the plurality of sensor data values. The data storage plan may be generated by an iterative expert system utilizing feedback, wherein the feedback relates to one or more of an aspect of the industrial environment or the plurality of sensor data values. The data storage plan may be generated by a deep learning machine system utilizing feedback, wherein the feedback relates to one or more of an aspect of the industrial environment or the plurality of sensor data values. The data storage plan may be based on one or more an underlying physical media type of the storage, a type of device or system on which storage resides, and a mechanism by which storage can be accessed for reading or writing data. The underlying physical media may be one of a tape media, a hard disk drive media, a flash memory media, a non-volatile memory, an optical media, and a one-time programmable memory. The data storage plan may account for or specifies a parameter relating to the underlying physical media comprising one or more of a storage duration, a power usage, a reliability, a redundancy, a thermal performance factor, a robustness to environmental conditions, an input/output speed and capability, a writing speed, a reading speed, a data file organization, an operating system, a read-write life cycle, a data error rate, and a data compression aspect related to or inherent to the underlying physical media or a media controller. The data storage plan may include one or more of a storage type plan, a storage media plan, a storage access plan, a storage protocol plan, a storage writing protocol plan, a storage security plan, a storage location plan, and a storage backup plan.
In embodiments, a system for data collection in an industrial environment may comprise: a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values; a sensor data storage profile circuit structured to determine a data storage profile, the data storage profile comprising a data storage plan for the plurality of sensor data values; a network coding circuit structured to provide a network coding value in response to the plurality of sensor data values and the data storage profile; and a sensor data storage implementation circuit structured to store at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values in response to the data storage profile and the network coding value. The network coding circuit may be structured to determine a network definition value, and to provide the network coding value further in response to the network definition value, wherein the network definition value comprises at least one value selected from the values consisting of: a network feedback value; a network condition value; a network topology value; an intermittently available network device value; and a network cost description value. The network coding circuit may be structured to provide the network coding value such that the sensor data storage implementation circuit stores a first portion of the plurality of sensor data values utilizing a first network coding value, and a second portion of the plurality of sensor data values utilizing a second network coding value. The network coding value may include at least one of the values selected from the values consisting of: a network type selection, a network selection, a network coding selection, a network timing selection, a network feature selection, a network protocol selection, a packet size selection, and a packet ordering selection. The network coding circuit may be further structured to adjust the network coding value to provide an intermediate network coding value, to compare a performance indicator corresponding to each of the network coding value and the intermediate network coding value, and to provide an updated network coding value in response to the comparison of the performance indicators.
In embodiments, a system may comprise: an industrial system comprising a plurality of components, and a plurality of sensors each operatively coupled to at least one of the plurality of components; the plurality of sensors providing a plurality of sensor values; and a means for self-organizing storage of at least a portion of the plurality of sensor values. In embodiments, a means may be provided for enhancing resolution of the plurality of sensor values in response to at least one of an enhanced data request value or an alert value corresponding to the industrial system; and wherein the enhanced resolution comprises at least one of an enhanced spatial resolution, an enhanced time domain resolution, a greater number of the plurality of sensor values than a standard resolution of the plurality of sensor values, and a greater precision of at least one of the plurality of sensor values than the standard resolution of the plurality of sensor values. The system may include a network layer, and a means for self-organizing network coding for communication of the plurality of sensor values on the network layer. The system may include a means for providing haptic feedback to a haptic feedback device of a user in proximity to at least one of the industrial system or the network layer. The system may include a means for configuring the haptic feedback to provide an intuitive alert to the user.
In embodiments, a system for self-organizing data storage for data collected from a mine may comprise: a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values; a sensor data storage profile circuit structured to determine a data storage profile, the data storage profile comprising a data storage plan for the plurality of sensor data values; and a sensor data storage implementation circuit structured to store at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values in response to the data storage profile. In embodiments, the system may include a self-organizing data storage for data collected from an assembly line, including: a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values; a sensor data storage profile circuit structured to determine a data storage profile, the data storage profile comprising a data storage plan for the plurality of sensor data values; and a sensor data storage implementation circuit structured to store at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values in response to the data storage profile.
In embodiments, a system for self-organizing data storage for data collected from an agricultural system may comprise: a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values; a sensor data storage profile circuit structured to determine a data storage profile, the data storage profile comprising a data storage plan for the plurality of sensor data values; and a sensor data storage implementation circuit structured to store at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values in response to the data storage profile.
In embodiments, a system for self-organizing data storage for data collected from an automotive robotic handling unit may comprise: a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values; a sensor data storage profile circuit structured to determine a data storage profile, the data storage profile comprising a data storage plan for the plurality of sensor data values; and a sensor data storage implementation circuit structured to store at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values in response to the data storage profile.
In embodiments, a system for self-organizing data storage for data collected from an automotive system may comprise: a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values; a sensor data storage profile circuit structured to determine a data storage profile, the data storage profile comprising a data storage plan for the plurality of sensor data values; and a sensor data storage implementation circuit structured to store at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values in response to the data storage profile.
In embodiments, a system for self-organizing data storage for data collected from an automotive robotic handling unit may include: a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values; a sensor data storage profile circuit structured to determine a data storage profile, the data storage profile comprising a data storage plan for the plurality of sensor data values; and a sensor data storage implementation circuit structured to store at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values in response to the data storage profile.
In embodiments, a system for self-organizing data storage for data collected from an aerospace system may comprise: a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values; a sensor data storage profile circuit structured to determine a data storage profile, the data storage profile comprising a data storage plan for the plurality of sensor data values; and a sensor data storage implementation circuit structured to store at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values in response to the data storage profile.
In embodiments, a system for self-organizing data storage for data collected from a railway may include: a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values; a sensor data storage profile circuit structured to determine a data storage profile, the data storage profile comprising a data storage plan for the plurality of sensor data values; and a sensor data storage implementation circuit structured to store at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values in response to the data storage profile.
In embodiments, a system for self-organizing data storage for data collected from an oil and gas production system may comprise: a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values; a sensor data storage profile circuit structured to determine a data storage profile, the data storage profile comprising a data storage plan for the plurality of sensor data values; and a sensor data storage implementation circuit structured to store at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values in response to the data storage profile.
In embodiments, a system for self-organizing data storage for data collected from a power generation system, the system comprising: a sensor communication circuit structured to interpret a plurality of sensor data values; a sensor data storage profile circuit structured to determine a data storage profile, the data storage profile comprising a data storage plan for the plurality of sensor data values; and a sensor data storage implementation circuit structured to store at least a portion of the plurality of sensor data values in response to the data storage profile.
In embodiments, methods and systems are provided for data collection in or relating to one or more machines deployed in an industrial environment using self-organized network coding for network transmission of sensor data in a network. In embodiments, network coding may be used to specify and manage the manner in which packets (including streams of packets as noted in various embodiments disclosed throughout this disclosure and the documents incorporated by reference) are relayed from a sender (e.g., a data collector, instrumentation system, computer, or the like in an industrial environment where data is collected, such as from sensors or instruments on, in or proximal to industrial machines or from data storage in the environment) to a receiver (e.g., another data collector (such as in a swarm or coordinated group), instrumentation system, computer, storage, or the like in the industrial environment, or to a remote computer, server, cloud platform, database, data pool, data marketplace, mobile device (e.g., mobile phone, personal computer, tablet, or the like), or other network-connected device of system), such as via one or more network infrastructure elements (referred to in some cases herein as nodes), such as access points, switches, routers, servers, gateways, bridges, connectors, physical interfaces and the like, using one or more network protocols, such as IP-based protocols, TCP/IP, UDP, HTTP, Bluetooth, Bluetooth Low Energy, cellular protocols, LTE, 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G, CDMA, TDSM, packet-based protocols, streaming protocols, file transfer protocols, broadcast protocols, multi-cast protocols, unicast protocols, and others. For situations involving bi-directional communication, any of the above-referenced devices or systems, or others mentioned throughout this disclosure, may play the role of sender or receiver, or both. Network coding may account for availability of networks, including the availability of multiple alternative networks, such that a transmission may be delivered across different networks, either separated into different components or sending the same components redundantly. Network coding may account for bandwidth and spectrum availability; for example, a given spectrum may be divided (such as with sub-dividing spectrum by frequency, by time-division multiplexing, and other techniques). Networks or components thereof may be virtualized, such as for purposes of provisioning of network resources, specification of network coding for a virtualized network, or the like. Network coding may include a wide variety of approaches as described in Appendix A, and in connection with Figures in Appendix A.
In embodiments, one or more network coding systems or methods of the present disclosure may use self-organization, such as to configure network coding parameters for one or more transmissions over one or more networks using an expert system, which may comprise a model-based system (such as automatically selecting network coding parameters or configuration based on one or more defined or measured parameters relating to a transmission, such as parameters of the data or content to be transmitted, the sender, the receiver, the available network infrastructure components, the conditions of the network infrastructure, the conditions of the industrial environment, or the like). A model may, for example, account for parameters relating to file size, numbers of packets, size of a stream, criticality of a data packet or stream, value of a packet or stream, cost of transmission, reliability of a transmission, quality of service, quality of transmission, quality of user experience, financial yield, availability of spectrum, input/output speed, storage availability, storage reliability, and many others as noted throughout this disclosure. In embodiments, the expert system may comprise a rule-based system, where one or more rules is executed based on detection of a condition or parameter, calculation of a variable, or the like, such as based on any of the above-noted parameters. In embodiments, the expert system may comprise a machine learning system, such as a deep learning system, such as based on a neural network, a self-organizing map, or other artificial intelligence approach (including any noted throughout this disclosure or the documents incorporated by reference). A machine learning system in any of the embodiments of this disclosure may configure one or more inputs, weights, connections, functions (including functions of individual neurons or groups of neurons in a neural net) or other parameters of an artificial intelligence system. Such configuration may occur with iteration and feedback, optionally involving human supervision, such as by feeding back various metrics of success or failure. In the case of network coding, configuration may involve setting one or more coding parameters for a network coding specification or plan, such as parameters for selection of a network, selection one or more nodes, selection of data path, configuration of timers or timing parameters, configuration of redundancy parameters, configuration of coding types (including use of regenerating codes, such as for use of network coding for distributed storage, such as in peer-to-peer networks, such as a peer-to-peer network of data collectors, or a storage network for a distributed ledger, as noted elsewhere in this disclosure), coefficients for coding (including linear algebraic coefficients), parameters for random or near-random linear network coding (including generation of near random coefficients for coding), session configuration parameters, or other parameters noted in the network coding embodiments described below, throughout this disclosure, and in the documents incorporated herein by reference. For example, a machine learning system may configure the selection of a protocol for a transmission, the selection of what network(s) will be used, the selection of one or more senders, the selection of one or more routes, the configuration of one or more network infrastructure nodes, the selection of a destination receiver, the configuration of a receiver, and the like. In embodiments, each one of these may be configured by an individual machine learning system, or the same system may configure an overall configuration by adjusting various parameters of one or more of the above under iteration, through a series of trials, optionally seeded by a training set, which may be based on human configuration of parameters, or by model-based and/or rule-based configuration. Feedback to a machine learning system may comprise various measures, including transmission success or failure, reliability, efficiency (including cost-based, energy-based and other measures of efficiency, such as measuring energy per bit transmitted, energy per bit stored, or the like), quality of transmission, quality of service, financial yield, operational effectiveness, success at prediction, success at classification, and others. In embodiments, a machine learning system may configure network coding parameters by predicting network behavior or characteristics and may learn to improve prediction using any of the techniques noted above. In embodiments, a machine learning system may configure network coding parameters by classification of one or more network elements and/or one or more network behaviors and may learn to improve classification, such as by training and iteration over time. Such machine-based prediction and/or classification may be used for self-organization, including by model-based, rule-based, and machine learning-based configuration. Thus, self-organization of network coding may use or comprise various combinations or permutations of model-based systems, rule-based systems, and a variety of different machine-learning systems (including classification systems, prediction systems, and deep learning systems, among others).
As described in US patent application 2017/0013065, entitled “Cross-session network communication configuration,” network coding may involve methods and systems for data communication over a data channel on a data path between a first node and a second node and may include maintaining data characterizing one or more current or previous data communication connections traversing the data channel and initiating a new data communication connection between the first node and the second node including configuring the new data communication connection at least in part according to the maintained data. The maintained data may characterize one or more data channels on one or more data paths between the first node and the second node over which said one or more current or previous data communication connections pass. The maintained data may characterize an error rate of the one or more data channels. The maintained data may characterize a bandwidth of the one or more data channels. The maintained data may characterize a round trip time of the one or more data channels. The maintained data may characterize communication protocol parameters of the one or more current or previous data communication connections.
The communication protocol parameters may include one or more of a congestion window size, a block size, an interleaving factor, a port number, a pacing interval, a round trip time, and a timing variability. The communication protocol parameters may include two or more of a congestion window size, a block size, an interleaving factor, a port number, a pacing interval, a round trip time, and a timing variability.
The maintained data may characterize forward error correction parameters associated with the one or more current or previous data communication connections. The forward error correction parameters may include a code rate. Initiating the new data communication connection may include configuring the new data communication connection according to first data of the maintained data, the first data is maintained at the first node, and initiating the new data communication connection includes providing the first data from the first node to the second node for configuring the new data communication connection.
Initiating the new data communication connection may include configuring the new data communication connection according to first data of the maintained data, the first data is maintained at the first node, and initiating the new data communication connection includes accessing first data at the first node for configuring the new data communication connection. Any one of these elements of maintained data, including various parameters of communication protocol, error correction parameters, connection parameters, and others, may be provided to the expert system for supporting self-organization of network coding, including for execution of rules to set network coding parameters based on the maintained data, for population of a model, or for configuration of parameters of a neural net or other artificial intelligence system.
Initiating the new data communication connection may include configuring the new data communication connection according to first data of the maintained data, the first data being maintained at the first node, and initiating the new data communication connection includes accepting a request from the first node for establishing the new data communication connection between the first node and the second node, including receiving, at the second node, at least one message from the first node comprising the first data for configuring said connection. The method may include maintaining the new data communication connection between the first node and the second node, including maintaining communication parameters, including initializing said communication parameters according the first data received in the at least one message from the first node.
Maintaining the new data communication connection may include adapting the communication parameters according to feedback from the first node. The feedback from the first node may include feedback messages received from the first node. The feedback may include feedback derived from a plurality of feedback messages received from the first node. Feedback may relate to any of the types of feedback noted above, and may be used for self-organizing the data communication connection using the expert system.
In some examples, one or more training communication connections over a data channel on a data path are employed prior to establishment of data communication connections over the data channel on the data path. The training communication connections are used to collect information about the data channel which is then used when establishing the data communication connections. In other examples, no training communication connections are employed and information about the data channel is obtained from one or more previous or current data communication connection over the data channel on the data path.
The present disclosure describes a method for data communication over a data channel on a data path between a first node and a second node, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include maintaining data characterizing one or more current or previous data communication connections traversing the data channel, and initiating a new data communication connection between the first node and the second node including configuring the new data communication connection at least in part according to the maintained data, wherein the configuration of the new data communication connection is configured by an expert system.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system uses at least one of a rule and a model to set a parameter of the configuration.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system is a machine learning system that iteratively configures at least one of a set of inputs, a set of weights, and a set of functions based on feedback relating to the data channel.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system takes a plurality of inputs from a data collector that accepts data about a machine operating in an industrial environment
As described in US patent application 2017/0012861, entitled “Multi-path network communication,” self-organized network coding under control of an expert system may involve methods and systems for data communication between a first node and a second node over a number of data paths coupling the first node and the second node and may include transmitting messages between the first node and the second node over the number of data paths, including transmitting a first subset of the messages over a first data path of the number of data paths and transmitting a second subset of the messages over a second data path of the number of data paths. In situations where the first data path has a first latency and the second data path has a second latency substantially larger than the first latency, and messages of the first subset of the messages are chosen to have first message characteristics and messages of the second subset are chosen to have second message characteristics, different from the first message characteristics.
Messages having the first message characteristics, targeted for data paths of lower latency, may include time critical messages; for example, in an industrial environment, messages relating to a critical fault condition of a machine (e.g., overheating, excessive vibration, or any of the other fault conditions described throughout this disclosure) or relating to a safety hazard, or a time-critical operational step on which other processes depend (e.g., completion of a catalytic reaction, completion of a sub-assembly, or the like in a high-value, high-speed manufacturing process, a refining process, or the like) may be designated as time critical (such as by a rule that can be parsed or processed by a rules engine) or may be learned to be time-critical by the expert system, such as based on feedback regarding outcomes over time, including outcomes for similar machines having similar data in similar industrial environments. The first subset of the messages and the second subset of the messages may be determined from a portion of the messages available at the first node at a time of transmission. At a subsequent time of transmission, additional messages made available to the first node may be divided into the first subset and the second subset based on message characteristics associated with the additional messages. Division into subsets and selection of what subsets are targeted to what data path may be undertaken by an expert system. Messages having the first message characteristics may be associated with an initial subset of a data set and messages having the second message characteristics may be associated with a subsequent subset of the data set. The methods and systems described herein for selecting inputs for data collection and for multiplexing data may be organized, such as by an expert system, to configure inputs for the alternative channels, such as by providing streaming elements that have real-time significance to the first data path and providing other elements, such as for long-term, predictive maintenance, to the other data path. In embodiments, the messages of the second subset may include messages that are at most n messages ahead of a last acknowledged message in a sequential transmission order associated with the messages, wherein n is determined based on a buffer size at one of the first and second nodes.
Messages having the first message characteristics may include acknowledgement messages and messages having the second message characteristics may include data messages. Messages having the first message characteristics may include supplemental data messages. The supplemental data messages may include data messages may include redundancy data and messages having the second message characteristics may include original data messages. The first data path may include a terrestrial data path and the second data path may include a satellite data path. The terrestrial data path may include one or more of a cellular data path, a digital subscriber line (DSL) data path, a fiber optic data path, a cable internet based data path, and a wireless local area network data path. The satellite data path may include one or more of a low earth orbit satellite data path, a medium earth orbit satellite data path, and a geostationary earth orbit satellite data path. The first data path may include a medium earth orbit satellite data path or a low earth orbit satellite data path and the second data path may include a geostationary orbit satellite data path.
The method may further include, for each path of the number of data paths, maintaining an indication of successful and unsuccessful delivery of the messages over the data path and adjusting a congestion window for the data path based on the indication, which may occur under control of an expert system, including based on feedback of outcomes of a set of transmissions. The method may further include, for each path of the number of data paths, maintaining, at the first node, an indication of whether a number of messages received at the second node is sufficient to decode data associated with the messages, wherein the indication is based on feedback received at the first node over the number of data paths.
In another general aspect, a system for data communication between a number of nodes over a number of data paths coupling the number of nodes includes a first node configured to transmit messages to a second node over the number of data paths including transmitting a first subset of the messages over a first data path of the number of data paths, and transmitting a second subset of the messages over a second data path of the number of data paths.
In embodiments, the first subset of the messages and the second subset of the messages for the respective data paths may be determined from a portion of the messages available at a first node at a time of transmission. At a subsequent time of transmission, additional messages made available to the first node may be divided into a first subset and a second subset based on message characteristics associated with the additional messages. Messages having the first message characteristics may be associated with an initial subset of a data set and messages having the second message characteristics may be associated with a subsequent subset of the data set.
In embodiments, the messages of the second subset may include messages that are at most n messages ahead of a last acknowledged message in a sequential transmission order associated with the messages, wherein n is determined based on a receive buffer size at the second node. Messages having the first message characteristics may include acknowledgement messages and messages having the second message characteristics may include data messages. Messages having the first message characteristics may include supplemental data messages. The supplemental data messages may include data messages including redundancy data and messages having the second message characteristics may include original data messages.
The first node may be further configured to, for each path of the number of data paths, maintain an indication of successful and unsuccessful delivery of the messages over the data path and adjust a congestion window for the data path based on the indication. The first node may be further configured to maintain an aggregate indication of whether a number of messages received at the second node over the number of data paths is sufficient to decode data associated with the messages and to transmit supplemental messages based on the aggregate indication, wherein the aggregate indication is based on feedback from the second node received at the first node over the number of data paths.
The present disclosure describes a method for data communication between a first node and a second node over a plurality of data paths coupling the first node and the second node, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include transmitting messages between the first node and the second node over the plurality of data paths including transmitting a first subset of the messages over a first data path of the plurality of data paths, and transmitting a second subset of the messages over a second data path of the plurality of data paths, wherein the first data path has a first latency and the second data path has a second latency substantially larger than the first latency, and messages of the first subset of the messages are chosen to have first message characteristics and messages of the second subset are chosen to have second message characteristics, different from the first message characteristics, wherein the selection of the first and second subset of message characteristics is performed automatically under control of an expert system.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system uses at least one of a rule and a model to set a parameter of the selection.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system is a machine learning system that iteratively configures at least one of a set of inputs, a set of weights, and a set of functions based on feedback relating to at least one of the data paths.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system takes a plurality of inputs from a data collector that accepts data about a machine operating in an industrial environment.
As described in US patent application 2017/0012868, entitled “Multiple protocol network communication,” self-organized network coding under control of an expert system may involve methods and systems for data communication between a first node and a second node over one or more data paths coupling the first node and the second node and may include transmitting messages between the first node and the second node over the data paths, including transmitting at least some of the messages over a first data path using a first communication protocol, transmitting at least some of the messages over a second data path using a second communication protocol, determining that the first data path is altering a flow of messages over the first data path due to the messages being transmitted using the first communication protocol, and in response to the determining, adjusting a number of messages sent over the data paths, including decreasing a number of the messages transmitted over the first data path and increasing a number of messages transmitted over the second data path. Determination that the first data path is altering a flow of messages and/or adjusting the number of messages sent over the data paths may occur under control of an expert system, such as a rule-based system, a model-based system, a machine learning system (including deep learning) or a hybrid of any of those, where the expert system takes inputs relating to one or more of the data paths, the nodes, the communication protocols used, or the like. The data paths may be among devices and systems in an industrial environment, such as instrumentation systems of industrial machines, one or more mobile data collectors (optionally coordinated in a swarm), data storage systems (including network-attached storage), servers and other information technology elements, any of which may have or be associated with one or more network nodes. The data paths may be among any such devices and systems and devices and systems in a network of any kind (such as switches, routers, and the like) or between those and ones located in a remote environment, such as in an enterprise's information technology system, in a cloud platform, or the like.
Determining that the first data path is altering the flow of messages over the first data path may include determining that the first data path is limiting a rate of messages transmitted using the first communication protocol. Determining that the first data path is altering the flow of messages over the first data path may include determining that the first data path is dropping messages transmitted using the first communication protocol at a higher rate than a rate at which the second data path is dropping messages transmitted using the second communication protocol. The first communication protocol may be the User Datagram Protocol (UDP), and the second communication protocol may be the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), or vice versa. Other protocols as described throughout this disclosure may be used.
The messages may be initially equally divided or divided according to some predetermined allocation (such as by type, as noted in connection with other embodiments) across the first data path and the second data path, such as using a load balancing technique. The messages may be initially divided across the first data path and the second data path according to a division of the messages across the first data path and the second data path in one or more prior data communication connections. The messages may be initially divided across the first data path and the second data path based on a probability that the first data path will alter a flow of messages over the first data path due to the messages being transmitted using the first communication protocol.
The messages may be divided across the first data path and the second data path based on message type. The message type may include one or more of acknowledgement messages, forward error correction messages, retransmission messages, and original data messages. Decreasing a number of the messages transmitted over the first data path and increasing a number of messages transmitted over the second data path may include sending all of the messages over the second path and sending none of the messages over the first path.
At least some of the number of data paths may share a common physical data path. The first data path and the second data path may share a common physical data path. The adjusting of the number of messages sent over the number of data paths may occur during an initial phase of the transmission of the messages. The adjusting of the number of messages sent over the number of data paths may repeatedly occur over a duration of the transmission of the messages. The adjusting of the number of messages sent over the number of data paths may include increasing a number of the messages transmitted over the first data path and decreasing a number of messages transmitted over the second data path.
In some examples, the parallel transmission over TCP and UDP is handled differently from conventional load balancing techniques, because TCP and UDP both share a low-level data path and nevertheless have very different protocol characteristics.
In some examples, approaches respond to instantaneous network behavior and learn the network's data handling policy and state by probing for changes. In an industrial environment, this may include learning policies relating to authorization to use aspects of a network; for example, a SCADA system may allow a data path to be used only by a limited set of authorized users, services, or applications, because of the sensitivity of underlying machines or processes that are under control (including remote control) via the SCADA system and concern over potential for cyberattacks. Unlike conventional load-balancers, which assume each data path is unique and does not affect the other, approaches may recognize that TCP and UDP share a low-level data path and directly affect each other. Additionally, TCP provides in-order delivery and retransmits data (along with flow control, congestion control, etc.) whereas UDP does not. This uniqueness requires additional logic provided by the methods and systems disclosed herein that may include mapping specific message types to each communication protocol, such as based at least in part on the different properties of the protocols (e.g., expect longer jitter over TCP, expect out-of-order delivery on UDP). For example, the system may refrain from coding over packets sent through TCP, since it is reliable, but may send forward error correction over UDP to add redundancy and save bandwidth. In some examples, a larger ACK interval is used for ACKing TCP data.
By employing the techniques described herein, approaches distribute data over TCP and UDP data paths to achieve optimal or near-optimal throughput, such as in situations where a network provider's policies treat UDP unfairly (as compared to conventional systems that simply use UDP if possible and fall back to TCP if not).
A method for data communication between a first node and a second node over a plurality of data paths coupling the first node and the second node, the method comprising: transmitting messages between the first node and the second node over the plurality of data paths including transmitting at least some of the messages over a first data path of the plurality of data paths using a first communication protocol, and transmitting at least some of the messages over a second data path of the plurality of data paths using a second communication protocol; determining that the first data path is altering a flow of messages over the first data path due to the messages being transmitted using the first communication protocol, and in response to the determining, adjusting a number of messages sent over the plurality of data paths including decreasing a number of the messages transmitted over the first data path and increasing a number of messages transmitted over the second data path, wherein altering the flow of messages is performed automatically under control of an expert system.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system uses at least one of a rule and a model to set a parameter of the alteration of the flow.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system is a machine learning system that iteratively configures at least one of a set of inputs, a set of weights, and a set of functions based on feedback relating to at least one of the data paths.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system takes a plurality of inputs from a data collector that accepts data about a machine operating in an industrial environment.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the first communication protocol is User Datagram Protocol (UDP).
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the second communication protocol is Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the messages are initially divided across the first data path and the second data path using a load balancing technique.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the messages are initially divided across the first data path and the second data path according to a division of the messages across the first data path and the second data path in one or more prior data communication connections.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the messages are initially divided across the first data path and the second data path based on a probability that the first data path will alter a flow of messages over the first data path due to the messages being transmitted using the first communication protocol.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the probability is determined by an expert system.
As described in US patent application 2017/0012884, entitled “Message reordering timers,” self-organized network coding under control of an expert system may involve methods and systems for data communication from a first node to a second node over a data channel coupling the first node and the second node and may include receiving data messages at the second node, the messages belonging to a set of data messages transmitted in a sequential order from the first node, sending feedback messages from the second node to the first node, the feedback messages characterizing a delivery status of the set of data messages at the second node, including maintaining a set of one or more timers according to occurrences of a number of delivery order events, the maintaining including modifying a status of one or more timers of the set of timers based on occurrences of the number of delivery order events, and deferring sending of said feedback messages until expiry of one or more of the set of one or more timers. The data channels may be among devices and systems in an industrial environment, such as instrumentation systems of industrial machines, one or more mobile data collectors (optionally coordinated in a swarm), data storage systems (including network-attached storage), servers and other information technology elements, any of which may have or be associated with one or more network nodes. The data channels may be among any such devices and systems and devices and systems in a network of any kind (such as switches, routers, and the like) or between those and ones located in a remote environment, such as in an enterprise's information technology system, in a cloud platform, or the like. Determination that timers are required, configuration of timers, and initiation of the user of timers may occur under control of an expert system, such as a rule-based system, a model-based system, a machine learning system (including deep learning) or a hybrid of any of those, where the expert system takes inputs relating to one or more of the types of communications occurring, the data channels, the nodes, the communication protocols used, or the like.
The set of one or more timers may include a first timer and the first timer may be started upon detection of a first delivery order event, the first delivery order event being associated with receipt of a first data message associated with a first position in the sequential order prior to receipt of one or more missing messages associated with positions preceding the first position in the sequential order. The method may include sending the feedback messages indicating a successful delivery of the set of data messages at the second node upon detection of a second delivery order event, the second delivery order event being associated with receipt of the one or more missing messages prior to expiry of the first timer. The method may include sending said feedback messages indicating an unsuccessful delivery of the set of data messages at the second node upon expiry of the first timer prior to any of the one or more missing messages being received. The set of one or more timers may include a second timer and the second timer is started upon detection of a second delivery order event, the second delivery order event being associated with receipt of some but not all of the missing messages prior to expiry of the first timer. The method may include sending feedback messages indicating an unsuccessful delivery of the set of data messages at the second node upon expiry of the second timer prior to receipt of the missing messages. The method may include sending feedback messages indicating a successful delivery of the set of data messages at the second node upon detection of a third delivery order event, the third delivery order event being associated with receipt of the missing messages prior to expiry of the second timer.
In another general aspect, a method for data communication from a first node to a second node over a data channel coupling the first node and the second node includes receiving, at the first node, feedback messages indicative of a delivery status of a set of data messages transmitted in a sequential order to the second node from the second node, maintaining a size of a congestion window at the first node including maintaining a set of one or more timers according to occurrences of a number of feedback events, the maintaining including modifying a status of one or more timers of the set of timers based on occurrences of the number of feedback events, and delaying modification of the size of the congestion window until expiry of one or more of the set of one or more timers.
The set of one or more timers may include a first timer and the first timer may be started upon detection of a first feedback event, the first feedback event being associated with receipt of a first feedback message indicating successful delivery of a first data message having first position in the sequential order prior to receipt of one or more feedback messages indicating successful delivery of one or more other data messages having positions preceding the first position in the sequential order. The method may include cancelling modification of the congestion window upon detection of a second feedback event, the second feedback event being associated with receipt of one or more feedback messages indicating successful delivery of the one or more other data messages prior to expiry of the first timer. The method may include modifying the congestion window upon expiry of the first timer prior to receipt of any feedback message indicating successful delivery of the one or more other data messages.
The set of one or more timers may include a second timer and the second timer may be started upon detection of a third feedback event, the third feedback event being associated with receipt of one or more feedback messages indicating successful delivery of some but not all of the one or more other data messages prior to expiry of the first timer. The method may include modifying the size of the congestion window upon expiry of the second timer prior to receipt of one or more feedback messages indicating successful delivery of the one or more other data messages. The method may include cancelling modification of the size of the congestion window upon detection of a fourth feedback event, the fourth feedback event being associated with receipt one or more feedback messages indicating successful delivery of the one or more other data messages prior to expiry of the second timer.
In another general aspect, a system for data communication between a number of nodes over a data channel coupling the number of nodes includes a first node of the number of nodes configured to receive, at the first node, feedback messages indicative of a delivery status of a set of data messages transmitted in a sequential order to the second node from the second node, maintain a size of a congestion window at the first node including maintaining a set of one or more timers according to occurrences of a number of feedback events, the maintaining including modifying a status of one or more timers of the set of timers based on occurrences of the number of feedback events, and delaying modification of the size of the congestion window until expiry of one or more of the set of one or more timers.
The present disclosure describes a method for data communication from a first node to a second node over a data channel coupling the first node and the second node, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include determining, using an expert system, based on at least one condition of the data channel, whether one or more timers will be used to manage the data communication and, upon such determination receiving data messages at the second node, the messages belonging to a set of data messages transmitted in a sequential order from the first node, sending feedback messages from the second node to the first node, the feedback messages characterizing a delivery status of the set of data messages at the second node, including maintaining a set of one or more timers according to occurrences of a plurality of delivery order events, the maintaining including modifying a status of one or more timers of the set of timers based on occurrences of the plurality of delivery order events, and deferring sending of said feedback messages until expiry of one or more of the set of one or more timers.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system uses at least one of a rule and a model to set a parameter of the determination whether to use one or more timers.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system is a machine learning system that iteratively configures at least one of a set of inputs, a set of weights, and a set of functions based on feedback relating to at least one of the data paths.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system takes a plurality of inputs from a data collector that accepts data about a machine operating in an industrial environment.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the set of one or more timers includes a first timer and the first timer is started upon detection of a first delivery order event, the first delivery order event being associated with receipt of a first data message associated with a first position in the sequential order prior to receipt of one or more missing messages associated with positions preceding the first position in the sequential order.
As described in US patent application 2017/0012885, entitled, “Network Communication Recoding Node,” self-organized network coding under control of an expert system may involve methods and systems for modifying redundancy information associated with encoded data passing from a first node to a second node over data paths and may include receiving first encoded data including first redundancy information at an intermediate node from the first node via a first channel connecting the first node and the intermediate node, the first channel having first channel characteristics, and transmitting second encoded data including second redundancy information from the intermediate node to the second node via a second channel connecting the intermediate node and the second node, the second channel having second channel characteristics. A degree of redundancy associated with the second redundancy information may be determined by modifying the first redundancy information based on one or both of the first channel characteristics and the second channel characteristics without decoding the first encoded data. The data paths may be among devices and systems in an industrial environment (each acting as one or more nodes for sending, receiving, or transmitting data), such as instrumentation systems of industrial machines, one or more mobile data collectors (optionally coordinated in a swarm), data storage systems (including network-attached storage), servers and other information technology elements, any of which may have or be associated with one or more network nodes. The data paths may be among any such devices and systems and devices and systems in a network of any kind (such as switches, routers, and the like) or between those and ones located in a remote environment, such as in an enterprise's information technology system, in a cloud platform, or the like. Modifying the redundancy information may occur by or under control of an expert system, such as a rule-based system, a model-based system, a machine learning system (including deep learning) or a hybrid of any of those, where the expert system takes inputs relating to one or more of the data paths, the nodes, the communication protocols used, or the like. Redundancy may result from (and may be identified at least in part based on), the combination or multiplexing of data from a set of data inputs, such as described throughout this disclosure.
Modifying the first redundancy information may include adding redundancy information to the first redundancy information. Modifying the first redundancy information may include removing redundancy information from the first redundancy information. The second redundancy information may be further formed by modifying the first redundancy information based on feedback from the second node indicative of successful or unsuccessful delivery of the encoded data to the second node. The first encoded data and the second encoded data may be encoded, such as using a random linear network code or a substantially random linear network code. Modifying the first redundancy information based on one or both of the first channel characteristics and the second channel characteristics may include modifying the first redundancy information based on one or more of a block size, a congestion window size, and a pacing rate associated with the first channel characteristics and/or the second channel characteristics.
The method may include sending a feedback message from the intermediate node to the first node acknowledging receipt of one or more messages at the intermediate node. The method may include receiving a feedback message from the second node at the intermediate node and, in response to receiving the feedback message, transmitting additional redundancy information to the second node.
In another general aspect, a system for modifying redundancy information associated with encoded data passing from a first node to a second node over a number of data paths includes an intermediate node configured to receive first encoded data including first redundancy information from the first node via a first channel connecting the first node and the intermediate node, the first channel having first channel characteristics and transmit second encoded data including second redundancy information from the intermediate node to the second node via a second channel connecting the intermediate node and the second node, the second channel having second channel characteristics. A degree of redundancy associated with the second redundancy information is determined by modifying the first redundancy information based on one or both of the first channel characteristics and the second channel characteristics without decoding the first encoded data.
The present disclosure describes a method for modifying redundancy information associated with encoded data passing from a first node to a second node over a plurality of data paths, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include receiving first encoded data including first redundancy information at an intermediate node from the first node via a first channel connecting the first node and the intermediate node, the first channel having first channel characteristics, transmitting second encoded data including second redundancy information from the intermediate node to the second node via a second channel connecting the intermediate node and the second node, the second channel having second channel characteristics, wherein a degree of redundancy associated with the second redundancy information is determined by modifying the first redundancy information based on one or both of the first channel characteristics and the second channel characteristics without decoding the first encoded data, including modifying the first redundancy information based on one or more of a block size, a congestion window size, and a pacing rate associated with the first channel characteristics and/or the second channel characteristics, wherein modifying the first redundancy information occurs under control of an expert system.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system uses at least one of a rule and a model to set a parameter of the modification of the redundancy information.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system is a machine learning system that iteratively configures at least one of a set of inputs, a set of weights, and a set of functions based on feedback relating to at least one of the data paths.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system takes a plurality of inputs from a data collector that accepts data about a machine operating in an industrial environment.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein modifying the first redundancy information includes adding redundancy information to the first redundancy information.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein modifying the first redundancy information includes removing redundancy information from the first redundancy information.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the second redundancy information is further formed by modifying the first redundancy information based on feedback from the second node indicative of successful or unsuccessful delivery of the encoded data to the second node.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the first encoded data and the second encoded data are encoded using a random linear network code.
As described in US patent application 2017/0012905, entitled “Error correction optimization,” self-organized network coding under control of an expert system may involve methods and systems for data communication between a first node and a second node over a data path coupling the first node and the second node and may include transmitting a segment of data from the first node to the second node over the data path as a number of messages, the number of messages being transmitted according to a transmission order. A degree of redundancy associated with each message of the number of messages is determined based on a position of said message in the transmission order. The data paths may be among devices and systems in an industrial environment (each acting as one or more nodes for sending, receiving, or transmitting data), such as instrumentation systems of industrial machines, one or more mobile data collectors (optionally coordinated in a swarm), data storage systems (including network-attached storage), servers and other information technology elements, any of which may have or be associated with one or more network nodes. The data paths may be among any such devices and systems and devices and systems in a network of any kind (such as switches, routers, and the like) or between those and ones located in a remote environment, such as in an enterprise's information technology system, in a cloud platform, or the like. Determining a transmission order may occur by or under control of an expert system, such as a rule-based system, a model-based system, a machine learning system (including deep learning) or a hybrid of any of those, where the expert system takes inputs relating to one or more of the data paths, the nodes, the communication protocols used, or the like. Redundancy may result from (and may be identified at least in part based on), the combination or multiplexing of data from a set of data inputs, such as described throughout this disclosure.
The degree of redundancy associated with each message of the number of messages may increase as the position of the message in the transmission order is non-decreasing. Determining the degree of redundancy associated with each message of the number of messages based on the position (i) of the message in the transmission order is further based on one or more of delay requirements for an application at the second node, a round trip time associated with the data path, a smoothed loss rate (P) associated with the channel, a size (N) of the data associated with the number of messages, a number (ai) of acknowledgement messages received from the second node corresponding to messages from the number of messages, a number (fi) of in-flight messages of the number of messages, and an increasing function (g(i)) based on the index of the data associated with the number of messages.
The degree of redundancy associated with each message of the number of messages may be defined as: (N+g(i)−ai)/(1−p)−fi. g(i) may be defined as a maximum of a parameter m and N−i. g(i) may be defined as N−p(i) where p is a polynomial, with integer rounding as needed. The method may include receiving, at the first node, a feedback message from the second node indicating a missing message at the second node and, in response to receiving the feedback message, sending a redundancy message to the second node to increase a degree of redundancy associated with the missing message. The method may include maintaining, at the first node, a queue of preemptively computed redundancy messages and, in response to receiving the feedback message, removing some or all of the preemptively computed redundancy messages from the queue and adding the redundancy message to the queue for transmission. The redundancy message may be generated and sent on-the-fly in response to receipt of the feedback message.
The method may include maintaining, at the first node, a queue of preemptively computed redundancy messages for the number of messages and, in response to receiving a feedback message indicating successful delivery of the number of messages, removing any preemptively computed redundancy messages associated with the number of messages from the queue of preemptively computed redundancy messages. The degree of redundancy associated with each of the messages may characterize a probability of correctability of an erasure of the message. The probability of correctability may depend on a comparison of between the degree of redundancy and a loss probability.
The present disclosure describes a method for data communication between a first node and a second node over a data path coupling the first node and the second nod, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include transmitting a segment of data from the first node to the second node over the data path as a plurality of messages, the plurality of messages being transmitted according to a transmission order, wherein a degree of redundancy associated with each message of the plurality of messages is determined based on a position of said message in the transmission order, wherein the transmission order is determined under control of an expert system.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system uses at least one of a rule and a model to set a parameter of the transmission order.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system is a machine learning system that iteratively configures at least one of a set of inputs, a set of weights, and a set of functions based on feedback relating to at least one of the data paths.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system takes a plurality of inputs from a data collector that accepts data about a machine operating in an industrial environment.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the degree of redundancy associated with each message of the plurality of messages increases as the position of the message in the transmission order is non-decreasing.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein determining the degree of redundancy associated with each message of the plurality of messages based on the position (i) of the message in the transmission order is further based on one or more of application delay requirements, a round trip time associated with the data path, a smoothed loss rate (P) associated with the channel, a size (N) of the data associated with the plurality of messages, a number (ai) of acknowledgement messages received from the second node corresponding to messages from the plurality of messages, a number (fi) of in-flight messages of the plurality of messages, and an increasing function (g(i)) based on the index of the data associated with the plurality of messages.
As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/935,885, entitled, “Packet Coding Based Network Communication,” self-organized network coding under control of an expert system may involve methods and systems for data communication between a first node and a second node over a path and may include estimating a rate at which loss events occur, where a loss event is either an unsuccessful delivery of a single packet to the second data node or an unsuccessful delivery of a plurality of consecutively transmitted packets to the second data node, and sending redundancy messages at the estimated rate at which loss events occur. An expert system may be used to estimate the rate at which loss events occur.
A method for data communication from a first node to a second node over a data channel coupling the first node and the second node such as in an industrial environment, includes receiving messages at the first node, from the second node, including receiving messages comprising data that depend at least in part of characteristics of the channel coupling the first node and the second node, transmitting messages from the first node to the second node, including applying forward error correction according to parameters determined from the received messages, the parameters determined from the received messages including at least two of a block size, an interleaving factor, and a code rate. The method may occur under control of an expert system.
The present disclosure describes a method for data communication from a first node in an industrial environment to a second node over a data channel coupling the first node and the second node, the method according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include receiving messages at the first node from the second node, including receiving messages including data that depend at least in part of characteristics of the channel coupling the first node and the second node, transmitting messages from the first node to the second node, including applying error correction according to parameters determined from the received messages, the parameters determined from the received messages including at least two of a block size, an interleaving factor, and a code rate, wherein applying the error correction occurs under control of an expert system.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system uses at least one of a rule and a model to set a parameter of the error correction.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure may include situations wherein the expert system is a machine learning system that iteratively configures at least one of a set of inputs, a set of weights, and a set of functions based on feedback relating to at least one of the data paths.
As depicted in
Within the cloud platform 13000, various components may be deployed in a wide range of architectures and arrangements. In embodiments, devices 13006 may connect to, integrate with, or be deployed within a cloud computing environment 13068, the policy automation engine 13002, the data marketplace 13008, the data collectors 13020, as well as systems and capabilities for self-organization 13012, machine learning 13014 and rights management 13016. Devices 13006 may connect to or integrate with the policy automation engine 13002, data marketplace 13008, data collectors 13020 and systems or capabilities for self-organization 13012, machine learning 13014 and rights management 13016, either directly or through the cloud computing environment 13068.
Devices 13006 may be IoT devices, including IoT devices, such as for collecting, exchanging and managing information relating to machines, personnel, equipment, infrastructure elements, components, parts, inventory, assets, and other features of a wide range of industrial environments, such as those described throughout this disclosure. Devices 13006 may also connect via various protocols 13004, such as networking protocols, streaming protocols, file transfer protocols, data transformation protocols, software operating system protocols, and the like. Devices may connect to the policy automation engine 13002, such as for executing policies that may be deployed within the cloud platform 13000, such as governing activities, permissions, rules, and the like within the platform 13000. Devices 13006 may also connect to data streams 13010 within the data marketplace 13008.
Data pools 13070 may connect to or integrate with the cloud computing environment 13068, data collectors 13020 and the data marketplace 13008, policy automation engine 13002, self-organization 13012, machine learning 13014 and rights management 13016 capabilities. Data pools 13070 may be included within the cloud computing environment 30 or be external to the cloud computing environment 13068. As a result, connections to the data pools 13070 may be made directly to the data pools 13070, through cloud connections to the data pools 13070 or through a combination of direct and cloud connections to the data pools 13070. Data pools 13070 may also be included within the data marketplace 13008 or external to the data marketplace 13008.
Data pools 13070 may include a multiplexer (MUX) 13022 and also connect to self-organization 13012, machine learning 13014 and rights management capabilities. The MUX 13022 may connect to sensors 13024, collect data from sensors 13024 and integrate data collected from sensors 13024 into a single set of data. In an exemplary and non-limiting embodiment, data pools 13070, data collectors 13020 and sensors 13024 may be included within an industrial environment 13018.
A policy automation engine 13002 and data marketplace 13008 may be used in a variety of industrial environments 13018. Industrial environments 13018 may include aerospace environments, agriculture environment, assembly line environments, automotive environments, and chemical and pharmaceutical environments. Industrial environments 13018 may also include food processing environments, industrial component environments, mining environments, oil and gas environments, particularly oil and gas production environments, truck and car environments and the like.
Similarly, devices 13006 may include a variety of devices that may operate within the industrial environments or that may collect data with respect to other such devices. Among many examples, devices 13006 may include agitators, including turbine agitators, airframe control surface vibration devices, catalytic reactors and compressors. Devices 13006 may also include conveyors and lifters, disposal systems, drive trains, fans, irrigation systems and motors. Devices 13006 may also include pipelines, electric powertrains, production platforms, pumps, such as water pumps, robotic assembly systems, thermic heating systems, tracks, transmission systems and turbines. Devices 13006 may operate within a single industrial environment 13018 or multiple industrial environments 13018. For example, a pipeline device may operate within an oil and gas environment, while a catalytic reactor may operate in either an oil and gas production environment or a pharmaceutical environment.
The policy automation engine 13002 may be a cloud-based policy automation engine 13002. A policy automation engine 13002 may be used to create, deploy, and/or manage an interconnected set of policies 13030, rules 13028 and protocols 13004, such as policies relating to security, authorization, permissions, and the like. For example, policies may govern what users, applications, services, systems, devices, or the like may access an IoT device, may read data from an IoT device, may subscribe to a stream from an IoT device, may write data to an IoT device, may establish a network connection with an IoT device, may provision an IoT device, may collaborate with an IoT device, or the like.
The policy automation engine 13002 may generate and manage policies 13030. The policy generation engine may be the centralized policy management system for the cloud platform 13000.
Policies 13030 generated and managed by the policy automation engine 13002 may deploy a large number of rules 13028 to permit access to and use of different aspects of IoT devices. Policies 13030 may include IoT device creation policies 13032, IoT device deployment policies 13034, IoT device management policies 13036 and the like. The policies 13030 may be communicated to devices 13006 through protocols 13004 or directly from the policy automation engine 13002.
For example, in an exemplary and non-limiting embodiment, the policy automation engine 13002 may manage policies 13030 and create protocols 13004 that specify and enforce roles 13026 and permissions 13074 for workers, related to how the workers may use data provided by IoT devices. Workers may be human workers or machine workers.
In additional exemplary and non-limiting embodiments, policies 13030 may be used to automate remediation processes. Remediation processes may be performed when a system is partially disabled, when equipment fails and when an entire system may be disabled. Remediation processes may include instructions to initiate system restarts, bypass or replace equipment, notify appropriate stakeholders of the condition and the like. The policy automation engine 13002 may also include policies 13030 that specify the roles 13026 and permissions 13074 required for users 13072 to initiate or otherwise act upon the remediation or other processes.
The policy automation engine 13002 may also specify and detect conditions. Conditions may determine when policies 13030 are distributed or otherwise acted upon. Conditions may include individual conditions, sets of conditions, independent conditions, interdependent conditions, and the like.
In an exemplary and non-limiting embodiment of an independent condition, the policy automation engine 13002 may determine that the failure of a non-critical device 13006 does not require notification of the system operator. In an exemplary and non-limiting embodiment of an interdependent set of conditions, the policy automation engine 13002 may determine that the failure of two non-critical system devices 13006 does require notification of the system operator, as the failure of two non-critical system devices 13006 may be an early indicator of a possible system-wide failure.
As depicted in
Policies 13030 may provide input to rules 13028 and provide information related to how roles 13026, permissions 13074 and uses 130280 are defined. Policies 13030 may receive policy inputs 13048 and incorporate policy inputs 13048 as policy parameters that are included within policies 13030. Policies 13030 may provide inputs to protocols 13004 and be included within protocols 13004 that are used to create, deploy and manage devices 13006.
Compliance policies 13050 may include data ownership policies, data analysis policies, data use policies, data format policies, data transmission policies, data security policies, data privacy policies, information sharing policies, jurisdictional policies, and the like. Data transmission policies may include cross-jurisdictional data transmission policies.
Data ownership policies may indicate policies 13030 that manage who controls data, who can use data, how the data can be used and the like. Data analysis policies may indicate what data holders can do with data that they are permitted to access, as well as determine what data they can look at and what data may be combined with other data. For example, a data holder may look at aggregated user data but not individual user data. Data use policies may indicate how data may be used and under what circumstances data may be used. Data format policies may indicate standard formats and mandated formats permitted for the handling of data. Data transmission policies, including cross-jurisdictional data transmission policies, may determine the policies 13030 that specify how inter-jurisdictional and intra-jurisdictional transmission of data may be handled. Data security policies may determine how data at rest, for example stored data, as well transmitted data is required to be secured.
Data privacy policies may determine how data may or may not be shared, for example within an organization and external to an organization. Information sharing policies may determine how data may be sold, shared and under what circumstances information can be sold and shared. Jurisdictional policies may determine who controls data, when and where the data may be controlled, for data within and transmitted across boundaries.
FCAPS policies 13052 may include fault management policies, configuration management policies, accounting management policies, provisioning management policies, and security management policies. Fault management policies may specify policies 13030 used to handle device faults. Configuration management policies may specify policies used to configure devices 13006. Accounting management policies may specify policies 13030 used for device accounting purposes, such as reporting, billing and the like. Provisioning management policies may specify policies 13030 used to provision services on devices 13006. Security management policies may specify policies 13030 used to secure devices 13006.
Policy inputs 13048 may be received from a policy input interface 13046. Policy inputs 13048 may include standards-based policy inputs 13044 and other policy inputs 13048. Standards-based policy inputs 13044 may include inputs related to standard data formats, standard rule sets and other standards-related information set by standards bodies, for example.
Other policy inputs 13048 may include a wide range of information related industry-specific policies, cross-industry policies, manufacturer-specific policies, device-specific policies 13030 and the like. Policy inputs 13048 may connect to a cloud computing environment 13068 and be provided through a policy input interface 13046. The policy input interface 13046 may collect policy inputs 13048 provided by machines or entered by human operators.
As depicted in
The data marketplace 13008 may connect to data pools 13070 directly, for example if the data marketplace 13008 and data pools 13070 are located in the same physical location. The data marketplace 13008 may connect to data pools 13070 via a cloud networking environment 30, for example if the data marketplace 13008 and data pools 13070 are located in different physical locations.
The data marketplace 13008 may connect to and receive inputs. The data marketplace 13008 may receive marketplace inputs through data interfaces, for example one or more data collectors 13020. The data collectors 13020 may be multiplexing data collectors. Inputs received through the data collectors 13020 may be received as one or more than one data streams 13010 from one or more than one data collectors 13020 and integrated into additional data streams 13010 by the multiplexer (MUX) 13022.
The data streams 13010 may also include data from the data pools 60. Data marketplace inputs, data streams 13010 and data pools 13070 may include metrics and measures of success of the data marketplace 13008. The metrics and measures of success of the data marketplace 13008 may then be used by the machine learning capability 13014 to configure one or more parameters of the data marketplace 13008.
Inputs may be consortia inputs 13054. Consortia inputs 13054 may be received from consortia. Consortia may include energy consortia, healthcare consortia, manufacturing consortia, smart city consortia, transportation consortia and the like. Consortia may be pre-existing consortia or new consortia.
In an exemplary and non-limiting embodiment, new consortia may be formed as a result of the data marketplace 13008 making available particular data types and data combinations. The data brokering engine 13042 may allow consortia members to trade information. The data brokering engine 13042 may allow consortia members to trade information based on information value, as calculated by the marketplace value rating engine 13040, for example.
The data marketplace 13008 may also connect to self-organization 13012, machine learning 13014 and rights management 13016 capabilities. Rights management capabilities 13016 may include rights.
Rights may include business strategy and solution rights, liaison rights 13058, marketing rights 13078, security rights 13060, technology rights 13062, testbed rights 13064 and the like. Business strategy and solution lifecycle rights may include business strategy and planning rights, industrial internet system design rights, project management rights, solution evaluation and contractual aspects rights. Liaison rights 13058 may include standards organization rights, open-source community rights, certification and testing body rights and governmental organization rights. Marketing rights 13078 may include communication rights, energy rights, healthcare rights, marketing-security rights, retail operation rights, smart factory rights and thought leadership rights. Security rights 13060 may include driving rights that drive industry consensus, promote security best practices and accelerate the adoption of security best practices.
Technology rights 13062 may include architecture rights, connectivity rights, distributed data management and interoperability rights, industrial analytics rights, innovation rights, IT/OT rights, safety rights, vocabulary rights, use case rights and liaison rights 13058. Testbed rights 13064 may include rights to implement of specific use cases and scenarios, as well as rights to produce testable outcomes to confirm that an implementation conforms to expected results, for example. Testbed rights 13064 may also include rights to explore untested or existing technologies working together, for example interoperability testing, generate new and potentially disruptive products and services and generate requirements and priorities for standards organizations, consortia and other stakeholder groups.
The rights management capability may assign different rights to different participants in the data marketplace 13008. In an exemplary and non-limiting embodiment, manufacturers or remote maintenance organizations (RMOs). Participants may be assigned rights to information based on their equipment or proprietary methods. The data marketplace 13008 may then ensure that only the appropriate data streams 13010 are made available to the market, based on the assigned rights.
The rights management capability 13016 may manage permissions to access the data in the marketplace 13008. One or more parameters of the rights management capability 13016 may be automatically configured by the machine learning capability 13014 and may be based on a metric of success of the data marketplace 13008. The machine learning engine 13014 may also use the metric and measure of success to configure a user interface. The user interface may present a data element of the user of the data marketplace 13008. The user interface may also present one or more mechanisms by which a user of the data marketplace 13008 may obtain access to one or more of the data elements.
The data payment allocation engine 13038 may allocate data marketplace payments. The data payment allocation engine 13038 may allocate data marketplace payments according to the value of a data stream 13010, the value of a contribution to a data stream 13010 and the like. This type of payment allocation may allow the data marketplace 13008 to allocate payments to data contributors, based on the value of the data contributions.
For example, contributors of data to a higher-value data stream 13010 may receive higher payments than contributors of data to lower-value data streams 13010. Similarly, data marketplace participants, for example IoT device manufacturers and system integrators, may be rated or ranked by the value of the data or the power of the configurations they provide and support.
The data marketplace 13008 may be a self-organizing data marketplace. A self-organizing data marketplace may self-organize using self-organization capabilities 13012. Self-organization capabilities 13012 may be learned, developed and optimized using artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. AI capabilities may be provided by the machine learning 13014 capability, for example. Self-organization may occur via an expert system and may be based on the application of a model, one or more rules, or the like. Self-organization may occur via a neural network or deep learning system, such as by optimizing variations of the organization of the data pool over time based on feedback to one or more measures of success. Self-organization may occur by a hybrid or combination of a rule-based system, model-based system, and neural network or other AI system. Various capabilities may be self-organized, such as how data elements are presented in the user interface of the marketplace, what data elements are presented, what data streams are obtained as inputs to the marketplace, how data elements are described, what metadata is provided with data elements, how data elements are stored (such as in a cache or other “hot” storage or in slower, but less expensive storage locations), where data elements are stored (such as in edge elements of a network), how data elements are combined, fused or multiplexed, or the like. Feedback to self-organization may include various metrics and measures of success, such as profit measures, yield measures, ratings (such as by users, purchasers, licensees, reviewers, and the like), indicators of interest (such as clickstream activity, time spent on a page, time spent reviewing elements and links to data elements), and others as described throughout this disclosure.
Data marketplace inputs 13056, data streams 13010 and data pools 13070 may be organized, based on metrics and measures of success of the data marketplace 13056. Data marketplace inputs 13056, data streams 13010 and data pools 13070 may be organized by the self-organization capability 13012, allowing the marketplace inputs 13056, data streams 13010, and data pools 60 to be organized automatically, without requiring interaction by a user of the data marketplace. 13008.
The metric and measure of success may also be used to configure the data brokering engine 13042 to execute a transaction among at least two marketplace participants. The machine learning engine 13014 may use the metric of success to configure the data brokering engine 13042 automatically, without requiring user intervention. The metric of success may also be used by a pricing engine, for example the marketplace value rating engine 13040, to set the price of one or more data elements within the data marketplace 13008.
In an exemplary and non-limiting embodiment, the self-organizing data marketplace may self-organize to determine which type of data streams 13010 are the most valuable and offer the most valuable and other data streams 13010 for sale. The calculation of data stream value may be performed by the marketplace value rating engine 13040.
In embodiments, a policy automation system for a data collection system in an industrial environment may comprise: a policy input interface structured to receive policy inputs relating to definition of at least one parameter of at least one of a rule, a policy and a protocol, wherein the at least one parameter defines at least one of a configuration for a data collection device, an access policy for accessing data from the data collection device, and collection policy for collection of data by the device; and a policy automation engine for taking the inputs and automatically configuring and deploying at least one of the rule, the policy and the protocol within the system for data collection. In embodiments, the at least one parameter may define at least one of an energy utilization policy, a cost-based policy, a data writing policy, and a data storage policy. The parameter may relate to a policy selected from among compliance, fault, configuration, accounting, provisioning and security policies for defining how devices are created, deployed and managed. The compliance policies may include data ownership policies. The data ownership policies may specify who owns data. The data ownership policies may specify how owners may use data. The compliance policies may include data analysis policies. The data analysis policies may specify what data holders may access, how data holders may use data, and how data may be combined with other data by data holders. The compliance policies may include data use policies, data format policies, and the like. The data format policies may include standard data format policies, mandated data format policies. The compliance policies may include data transmission policies. The data transmission policies may include inter-jurisdictional transmission data transmission policies. The compliance policies may include data security policies, data privacy policies, information sharing policies, and the like. The data security policies may include at rest data security policies, transmitted data security policies, and the like. The information sharing policies may include policies specifying when information may be sold, when information may be shared, and the like. The compliance policies may include jurisdictional policies. The jurisdictional policies may include policies specifying who controls data. The jurisdictional policies may include policies specifying when data may be controlled. The jurisdictional policies may include policies specifying how data transmitted across boundaries is controlled.
In embodiments, a policy automation system for a data collection system in an industrial environment may comprise: a policy automation engine for enabling configuration of a plurality of policies applicable to collection and utilization of data handled by a plurality of network connected devices deployed in a plurality of industrial environments, wherein the policy automation engine is hosted on information technology infrastructure elements that are located separately from the industrial environment, wherein upon configuration of a policy in the policy automation engine, the policy is automatically deployed across a plurality of devices in the plurality of industrial environments, wherein the policy sets configuration parameters relating to what data is collected by the data collection system and relating to access permissions for the collected data. The policies may include a plurality of policies selected among compliance, fault, configuration, accounting, provisioning and security policies for defining how devices are created, deployed and managed, and the plurality of policies communicatively coupled to policies. A policy input interface may be structured to receive policy inputs used as an input to at least one of a rule, policy and protocol definition, such as where the policy automation system a centralized source of policies for creating, deploying and managing policies for devices within an industrial environment.
In embodiments, a policy automation system for a data collection system in an industrial environment may comprise: a policy automation engine for enabling configuration of a plurality of policies applicable to collection and utilization of data handled by a plurality of network connected devices deployed in a plurality of industrial environments, wherein the policy automation engine is hosted on information technology infrastructure elements that are located separately from the industrial environment, wherein upon configuration of a policy in the policy automation engine, the policy is automatically deployed across a plurality of devices in the plurality of industrial environments, wherein the policy sets configuration parameters relating to what data is collected by the data collection system and relating to access permissions for the collected data, wherein the policy automation system is communicatively coupled to a plurality of devices through a cloud network connection. The cloud network connection may be a privately-owned cloud connection, a publicly provided cloud connection, a publicly provided cloud connection, the primary connection between the policy automation system and device, the primary connection between the policy automation system and device, an intranet cloud connection, connecting devices within a single enterprise, an extranet cloud connection, connecting devices among multiple enterprises, a secure cloud network connection, secured by a virtual private network (VPN) connection, and the like.
In embodiments, a data marketplace for a data collection system in an industrial environment may comprise: an input interface structured to receive marketplace inputs; at least one of a data pool and a data stream to provide collected data within the marketplace; and data streams that include data from data pools. In embodiments, at least one parameter of the marketplace may be automatically configured by a machine learning facility based on a metric of success of the marketplace. The inputs may include a plurality of data streams from a plurality of industrial data collectors. The data collectors may be multiplexing data collectors. The inputs may include consortia inputs. A consortium may be an existing consortium, a new consortium, a new consortium related to a data stream through a common interest, and the like. The metrics and measures of success may include profit measures, yield measures, ratings, indicators of interest, and the like. The ratings may include user ratings, purchaser ratings, licensee ratings, reviewer ratings, and the like. The indicators of interest may include clickstream activity, time spent on a page, time spent reviewing elements, links to data elements, and the like.
In embodiments, a data marketplace for a data collection system in an industrial environment may comprise: an input system structured to receive a plurality of data inputs relating to data sensed from or about one or more industrial machines; at least one of a data pool and a data stream to provide collected data within the marketplace; and a self-organization system for organizing at least one of the data inputs and the data pools based on a metric of success of the marketplace. In embodiments, the self-organization system may optimize variations of the organization of the data pool over time. The optimized variations may be based on feedback to one or more measures of success. The self-organization system may organize how data elements are presented in the user interface of the marketplace. The self-organization system may select what data elements are presented, what data streams are obtained as inputs to the marketplace, how data elements are described, what metadata is provided with data elements, a storage method for data elements, a location within a communication network for the storage elements (such as in edge elements of a network), a data element combination method, and the like. A storage method may include a cache or other “hot” storage method. A storage method may include slower, but less expensive storage locations. The data element combination method may be a data fusion method, a data multiplexing method, and the like. The self-organization system may receive feedback data, such as where feedback data includes success metrics and measures. Success metrics and measures may include profit measures, include yield measures, ratings, indicators of interest, and the like. Ratings include ratings may be provided by users, purchasers, by licensees, reviewers. Success metrics and measures may include indicators of interest. Indicators of interest may include clickstream activity, time spent on a page activity, time spent reviewing elements, time spent reviewing elements, links to data elements, and the like. The self-organization system may determine the value of data streams. The value of data streams may determine which data streams are offered for sale by the data marketplace. The ratings may include user ratings. The ratings may include purchaser ratings, licensee ratings, reviewer ratings, and the like.
In embodiments, a data marketplace for a data collection system in an industrial environment may comprise: an input interface structured to receive data inputs from or about one or more of a plurality of industrial machines; at least one of a data pool and a data stream to provide collected data within the marketplace; and a rights management engine for managing permissions to access the data in the marketplace. In embodiments, at least one parameter of the rights management engine may be automatically configured by a machine learning facility based on a metric of success of the marketplace. The rights management engine may assign rights to participants of the data marketplace. The rights may include business strategy and solution rights, liaison rights, marketing rights, security rights, technology rights, testbed rights, and the like. The metrics and measures of success may include profit measures, yield measures, ratings, and the like. The ratings may include user ratings, purchaser ratings, include licensee ratings, reviewer ratings, and the like. The metrics and measures success may include indicators of interest, such as where interest includes clickstream activity, time spent on a page, time spent reviewing elements, and links to data elements.
In embodiments, a data marketplace for a data collection system in an industrial environment may comprise: an input interface structured to receive data inputs from or about one or more of a plurality of industrial machines; at least one of a data pool and a data stream to provide collected data within the marketplace; and a data brokering engine configured to execute a data transaction among at least two marketplace participants. In embodiments, at least one parameter of the data brokering engine may be automatically configured by a machine learning facility based on a metric of success of the marketplace. A data transaction input may include a marketplace value rating. A marketplace value rating may be assigned to a marketplace participant. A marketplace value rating may be assigned to a marketplace participant is assigned based on the value of input provided by the participant to the marketplace. A data transaction may be a trade transaction, a sale transaction, is a payment transaction, and the like. The metrics and measures of success may include profit measures, yield measures, ratings, and the like. The ratings may include user ratings. The ratings may include purchaser ratings, licensee ratings, reviewer ratings, and the like. The metrics and measures success may include indicators of interest. The indicators of interest may include clickstream activity, time spent on a page, include time spent reviewing elements, links to data elements, and the like.
In embodiments, a data marketplace for a data collection system in an industrial environment may comprise: an input interface structured to receive data inputs from or about one or more of a plurality of industrial machines; at least one of a data pool and a data stream to provide collected data within the marketplace; and a pricing engine for setting a price for at least one data element within the marketplace. In embodiments, pricing may be automatically configured for the pricing engine by a machine learning facility based on a metric of success of the marketplace. The metrics and measures of success may include profit measures, yield measures, include ratings, and the like. The ratings may include user ratings. The ratings may include purchaser ratings, licensee ratings, reviewer ratings, and the like. The metrics and measures success may include indicators of interest. The indicators of interest may include clickstream activity, time spent on a page, include time spent reviewing elements, links to data elements, and the like.
In embodiments, a data marketplace for a data collection system in an industrial environment may comprise: an input interface structured to receive data inputs from or about one or more of a plurality of industrial machines; at least one of a data pool and a data stream to provide collected data within the marketplace; and a user interface for presenting a data element and at least one mechanism by which a party using the marketplace can obtain access to the at least one data stream or data pool. In embodiments, pricing may be automatically configured for the pricing engine by a machine learning facility based on a metric of success of the marketplace. The metrics and measures of success may include profit measures, yield measures, include ratings, and the like. The ratings may include user ratings. The ratings may include purchaser ratings, licensee ratings, reviewer ratings, and the like. The metrics and measures success may include indicators of interest. The indicators of interest may include clickstream activity, time spent on a page, include time spent reviewing elements, links to data elements, and the like.
In embodiments, a data collection system in an industrial environment may comprise: a policy automation system for a data collection system in an industrial environment, comprising: a plurality of rules selected among roles, permissions and uses, the plurality of rules communicatively coupled to policies, protocols, and policy inputs; a plurality of policies selected among compliance, fault, configuration, accounting, provisioning, and security policies for defining how devices are created, deployed and managed, the plurality of policies communicatively coupled to policies, protocols and policy inputs and a policy input interface structured to receive policy inputs used as an input to at least one of a rule, policy and protocol definition.
In embodiments, a data marketplace may comprise: an input interface structured to receive marketplace inputs; a plurality of data pools to store collected data, including marketplace inputs and make collected data available for use by the marketplace; and data streams that include data from data pools.
As described herein and in Appendix B attached hereto, intelligent industrial equipment and systems may be configured in various networks, including self-forming networks, private networks, Internet-based networks, and the like. One or more of the smart heating systems as described in Appendix B that may incorporate hydrogen production, storage, and use may be configured as nodes in such a network. In embodiments, a smart heating system may be configured with one or more network ports, such as a wireless network port that facilitate connection through Wi-Fi and other wired and/or wireless communication protocols as described. The smart heating system includes a smart hydrogen production system and a smart hydrogen storage system, and the like described in Appendix B and may be configured individually or as an integral system connected as one or more nodes in a network of industrial equipment and systems. By way of this example, a smart heating system may be disposed in an on-site industrial equipment operations center, such as a portable trailer equipped with communication capabilities and the like. Such deployed smart heating system may be configured, manually, automatically, or semi-automatically to join a network of devices, such as industrial data collection, control, and monitoring nodes and participate in network management, communication, data collection, data monitoring, control, and the like.
In another example of a smart heating system participating in a network of industrial equipment monitoring, control, and data collection devices in that a plurality of the smart heating systems may be configured into a smart heating system sub-network. In embodiments, data generated by the sub-network of devices may be communicated over the network of industrial equipment using the methods and systems described herein.
In embodiments, the smart heating system may participate in a network of industrial equipment as described herein. By way of this example, one or more of the smart heating systems, as depicted in
In embodiments, one or more smart heating systems described in Appendix B may incorporate, integrate, use, or connect with facilities, platforms, modules, and the like that may enable the smart heating system to perform functions such as analytics, self-organizing storage, data collection and the like that may improve data collection, deploy increased intelligence, and the like. Various data analysis techniques, such as machine pattern recognition of data, collection, generation, storage, and communication of fusion data from analog industrial sensors, multi-sensor data collection and multiplexing, self-organizing data pools, self-organizing swarm of industrial data collectors, and others described herein may be embodied in, enabled by, used in combination with, and derived from data collected by one or more of the smart heating systems.
In embodiments, a smart heating system may be configured with local data collection capabilities for obtaining long blocks of data (i.e., long duration of data acquisition), such as from a plurality of sensors, at a single relatively high-sampling rate as opposed to multiple sets of data taken at different sampling rates. By way of this example, the local data collection capabilities may include planning data acquisition routes based on historical templates and the like. In embodiments, the local data collection capabilities may include managing data collection bands, such as bands that define a specific frequency band and at least one of a group of spectral peaks, true-peak level, crest factor and the like.
In embodiments, one or more smart heating systems may participate as a self-organizing swarm of IoT devices that may facilitate industrial data collection. The smart heating systems may organize with other smart heating systems, IoT devices, industrial data collectors, and the like to organize among themselves to optimize data collection based on the capabilities and conditions of the smart heating system and needs to sense, record, and acquire information from and around the smart heating systems. In embodiments, one or more smart heating systems may be configured with processing intelligence and capabilities that may facilitate coordinating with other members, devices, or the like of the swarm. In embodiments, a smart heating system member of the swarm may track information about what other smart heating systems in a swarm are handling and collecting to facilitate allocating data collection activities, data storage, data processing and data publishing among the swarm members.
In embodiments, a plurality of smart heating systems may be configured with distinct burners but may share a common hydrogen production system and/or a common hydrogen storage system. In embodiments, the plurality of smart heating systems may coordinate data collection associated with the common hydrogen production and/or storage systems so that data collection is not unnecessarily duplicated by multiple smart heating systems. In embodiments, a smart heating system that may be consuming hydrogen may perform the hydrogen production and/or storage data collection so that as smart heating system may prepare to consume hydrogen, they coordinate with other smart heating systems to ensure that their consumption is tracked, even if another smart heating system performs the data collection, handling, and the like. In embodiments, smart heating systems in a swarm may communicate among each other to determine which smart heating system will perform hydrogen consumption data collection and processing when each smart heating system prepares to stop consumption of hydrogen, such as when heating, cooking, or other use of the heat is nearing completion and the like. By way of this example when a plurality of smart heating systems is actively consuming hydrogen, data collection may be performed by a first smart heating system, data analytics may be performed by a second smart heating system, and data and data analytics recording or reporting may be performed by a third smart heating system. By allocating certain data collection, processing, storage, and reporting functions to different smart heating systems, certain smart heating systems with sufficient storage, processing bandwidth, communication bandwidth, available energy supply and the like may be allocated an appropriate role. When a smart heating system is nearing an end of its heating time, cooking time, or the like, it may signal to the swarm that it will be going into power conservation mode soon and, therefore, it may not be allocated to perform data analysis or the like that would need to be interrupted by the power conservation mode.
In embodiments, another benefit of using a swarm of smart heating systems as disclosed herein is that data storage capabilities of the swarm may be utilized to store more information than could be stored on a single smart heating system by sharing the role of storing data for the swarm.
In embodiments, the self-organizing swarm of smart heating systems includes one of the systems being designated as a master swarm participant that may facilitate decision making regarding the allocation of resources of the individual smart heating systems in the swarm for data collection, processing, storage, reporting and the like activities.
In embodiments, the methods and systems of self-organizing swarm of industrial data collectors may include a plurality of additional functions, capabilities, features, operating modes, and the like described herein. In embodiments, a smart heating system may be configured to perform any or all of these additional features, capabilities, functions, and the like without limitation.
The terms “a” or “an,” as used herein, are defined as one or more than one. The term “another,” as used herein, is defined as at least a second or more. The terms “including” and/or “having,” as used herein, are defined as comprising (i.e., open transition).
While only a few embodiments of the present disclosure have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that many changes and modifications may be made thereunto without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure as described in the following claims. All patent applications and patents, both foreign and domestic, and all other publications referenced herein are incorporated herein in their entireties to the full extent permitted by law.
While only a few embodiments of the present disclosure have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that many changes and modifications may be made thereunto without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure as described in the following claims. All patent applications and patents, both foreign and domestic, and all other publications referenced herein are incorporated herein in their entireties to the full extent permitted by law.
The methods and systems described herein may be deployed in part or in whole through a machine that executes computer software, program codes, and/or instructions on a processor. The present disclosure may be implemented as a method on the machine, as a system or apparatus as part of or in relation to the machine, or as a computer program product embodied in a computer readable medium executing on one or more of the machines. In embodiments, the processor may be part of a server, cloud server, client, network infrastructure, mobile computing platform, stationary computing platform, or other computing platform. A processor may be any kind of computational or processing device capable of executing program instructions, codes, binary instructions, and the like. The processor may be or may include a signal processor, digital processor, embedded processor, microprocessor, or any variant such as a co-processor (math co-processor, graphic co-processor, communication co-processor, and the like) and the like that may directly or indirectly facilitate execution of program code or program instructions stored thereon. In addition, the processor may enable execution of multiple programs, threads, and codes. The threads may be executed simultaneously to enhance the performance of the processor and to facilitate simultaneous operations of the application. By way of implementation, methods, program codes, program instructions, and the like described herein may be implemented in one or more thread. The thread may spawn other threads that may have assigned priorities associated with them; the processor may execute these threads based on priority or any other order based on instructions provided in the program code. The processor, or any machine utilizing one, may include non-transitory memory that stores methods, codes, instructions, and programs as described herein and elsewhere. The processor may access a non-transitory storage medium through an interface that may store methods, codes, and instructions as described herein and elsewhere. The storage medium associated with the processor for storing methods, programs, codes, program instructions, or other type of instructions capable of being executed by the computing or processing device may include but may not be limited to one or more of a CD-ROM, DVD, memory, hard disk, flash drive, RAM, ROM, cache, and the like.
A processor may include one or more cores that may enhance speed and performance of a multiprocessor. In embodiments, the process may be a dual core processor, quad core processors, other chip-level multiprocessor and the like that combine two or more independent cores (called a die).
The methods and systems described herein may be deployed in part or in whole through a machine that executes computer software on a server, client, firewall, gateway, hub, router, or other such computer and/or networking hardware. The software program may be associated with a server that may include a file server, print server, domain server, internet server, intranet server, cloud server, and other variants such as secondary server, host server, distributed server, and the like. The server may include one or more of memories, processors, computer readable transitory and/or non-transitory media, storage media, ports (physical and virtual), communication devices, and interfaces capable of accessing other servers, clients, machines, and devices through a wired or a wireless medium, and the like. The methods, programs, or codes as described herein and elsewhere may be executed by the server. In addition, other devices required for execution of methods as described in this application may be considered as a part of the infrastructure associated with the server.
The server may provide an interface to other devices including, without limitation, clients, other servers, printers, database servers, print servers, file servers, communication servers, distributed servers, social networks, and the like. Additionally, this coupling and/or connection may facilitate remote execution of program across the network. The networking of some or all of these devices may facilitate parallel processing of a program or method at one or more locations without deviating from the scope of the disclosure. In addition, any of the devices attached to the server through an interface may include at least one storage medium capable of storing methods, programs, code, and/or instructions. A central repository may provide program instructions to be executed on different devices. In this implementation, the remote repository may act as a storage medium for program code, instructions, and programs.
The software program may be associated with a client that may include a file client, print client, domain client, internet client, intranet client, and other variants such as secondary client, host client, distributed client, and the like. The client may include one or more of memories, processors, computer readable transitory and/or non-transitory media, storage media, ports (physical and virtual), communication devices, and interfaces capable of accessing other clients, servers, machines, and devices through a wired or a wireless medium, and the like. The methods, programs, or codes as described herein and elsewhere may be executed by the client. In addition, other devices required for execution of methods as described in this application may be considered as a part of the infrastructure associated with the client.
The client may provide an interface to other devices including, without limitation, servers, other clients, printers, database servers, print servers, file servers, communication servers, distributed servers, and the like. Additionally, this coupling and/or connection may facilitate remote execution of a program across the network. The networking of some or all of these devices may facilitate parallel processing of a program or method at one or more location without deviating from the scope of the disclosure. In addition, any of the devices attached to the client through an interface may include at least one storage medium capable of storing methods, programs, applications, code, and/or instructions. A central repository may provide program instructions to be executed on different devices. In this implementation, the remote repository may act as a storage medium for program code, instructions, and programs.
Various embodiments described in this document relate to communication protocols that improve aspects of communication between nodes on a data network. These aspects include, for instance, average, worst case, or variability in communication delay, channel utilization, and/or error rate. These embodiments are primarily described in the context of packet switched networks, and more particularly in the context of Internet Protocol (IP) based packet switched networks. However, it should be understood that at least some of the embodiments are more generally applicable to data communication that does not use packet switching or IP, for instance based on circuit-switched of other forms of data networks.
Furthermore, various embodiments are described in the context of data being sent from a “server” to a “client.” It should be understood that these terms are used very broadly, roughly analogous to “data source” and “data destination”. Furthermore, in at least some applications of the techniques, the nodes are peers, and may alternate roles as “server” and “client” or may have both roles (i.e., as data source and data destination) concurrently. However, for the sake of exposition, examples where there is a predominant direction of data flow from a “server” node to a “client” node are described with the understanding that the techniques described in these examples are applicable to many other situations.
One example for a client-server application involves a server passing multimedia (e.g., video and audio) data, either recorded or live, to a client for presentation to a user. Improved aspects of communication from the client to the server in such an example can reduced communication delay, for instance providing faster startup, reduced instances of interrupted playback, reduced instances of bandwidth reduction, and/or increased quality by more efficient channel utilization (e.g., by avoiding use of link capacity in retransmissions or unnecessary forward error correction). This example is useful for exposition of a number of embodiments. However, it must be recognized that this is merely one of many possible uses of the approached described below.
Referring to
Generally, data units 201 (e.g., encoding of multimedia frames or other units of application data) generated by the server application 212 are passed to the TCP module 216. The TCP module assembles data payloads 202, for example, concatenating multiple data units 201 and/or by dividing data units 201 into multiple data payloads 202. In the discussion below, these payloads are referred to in some instances as the “original” or “uncoded” “packets” or original or uncoded “payloads”, which are communicated to the client (i.e., destination) node in the network. Therefore, it should be understood that the word “packet” is not used with any connotation other than being a unit of communication. In the TCP embodiment illustrated in
TCP implements a variety of features, including retransmission of lost packets, maintaining order of packets, and congestion control to avoid congestion at nodes or links along the path through the network and to provide fair allocation of the limited bandwidth between and within the networks at intermediate nodes. For example, TCP implements a “window protocol” in which only a limited number (or range of sequence numbers) of packets are permitted to be transmitted for which end-to-end acknowledgments have not yet been received. Some implementations of TCP adjust the size of the window, for example, starting initially with a small window (“slow start”) to avoid causing congestion. Some implementations of TCP also control a rate of transmission of packets, for example, according to the round-trip-time and the size of the window.
The description below details one or more alternatives to conventional TCP-based communication as illustrated in
It should also be understood that the network configuration illustrated in
A number of the alternatives to conventional TCP make use of a Packet Coding (PC) approach. Furthermore, a number of these approaches make use of Packet Coding essentially at the Transport Layer. Although different embodiments may have different features, these implementations are generically referred to below as Packet Coding Transmission Control Protocol (PC-TCP). Other embodiments are also described in which the same or similar PC approaches are used at other layers, for instance, at a data link layer (e.g., referred to as PC-DL), and therefore it should be understood that in general features described in the context of embodiments of PC-TCP may also be incorporated in PC-DL embodiments.
Before discussing particular features of PC-TCP in detail, a number of embodiments of overall system architectures are described. The later description of various embodiments of PC-TCP should be understood to be applicable to any of these system architectures, and others.
Architectures and Applications
Transport Layer Architectures
Kernel Implementation
Referring to
One software implementation of the PC-TCP modules 316 or 326, is software modules that are integrated into the operating system (e.g., into the “kernel”, for instance, of a Unix-based operating system) in much the same manner that a conventional TCP module is integrated into the operating system. Alternative software implementations are discussed below.
Referring to
Alternative Software Implementations
The description above includes modules generically labeled “PC-TCP”. In the description below, a number of different implementations of these modules are presented. It should be understood that, in general, any instance of a PC-TCP module may be implemented using any of the described or other approaches.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
It should be understood that these software implementations are not exhaustive. Furthermore, as discussed further below, in some implementations, a PC-TCP module of any of the architectures or examples described in this document may be split among multiple hosts and/or network nodes, for example, using a proxy architecture.
Proxy Architectures
Conventional Proxy Node
Referring to
Referring to
In some embodiments, the communication architecture of
Referring to
It should be understood that the proxy architecture shown in
Integrated Proxy
Referring to
Second Alternative Proxy Node
In examples of the first alternative proxy node approach introduced above, communication between the client node and the proxy node uses conventional techniques (e.g., TCP/IP), while communication between the proxy node and the server node (or its proxy) uses PC-TCP 1127. Such an approach may mitigate congestion and/or packet error or loss on the link between the server node and the proxy node, however, it would not generally mitigate issues that arise on the link between the proxy node and the client node. For example, the client node and the proxy node may be linked by a wireless channel (e.g., WiFi, cellular, etc.), which may introduce a greater degree of errors than the link between the server and the proxy node over a wired network.
Referring to
Examples of such a proxy approach are illustrated in
Referring to
Intermediate Proxy
Referring to
Note that parameters of the two PC-TCP channels that are bridged at the intermediate node 1620 do not have to be the same. For example, the bridged channels may differ in their forward error correction code rate, block size, congestion window size, pacing rate, etc. In cases in which a retransmission protocol is used to address packet errors or losses that are not correctable with forward error correction coding, the PC-TCP modules at the intermediate node request or service such retransmission requests.
In
Referring to
Recoding Node
Referring to
In
In general, the recoding PC-TCP module maintains separate communication characteristics on the inbound and outbound PC-TCP channels. Therefore, although it does not decode the payload data, it does provide control and, in general, the PC-TCP channels may differ in their forward error correction code rate, block size, congestion window size, pacing rate, etc.
Multipath Transmission
Single Endpoint Pair
In examples described above, a single path links the server node 111 and the client node 125. The possibility of using conventional TCP concurrently with PC-TCP between two nodes was introduced. More generally, communication between a pair of PC-TCP modules (i.e., one at the server node 111 and one at the client node 125) may follow different paths.
Internet protocol itself supports packets passing from one node to another following different paths and possibly being delivered out of order. Multiple data paths or channels can link a pair of PC-TCP modules and be used for a single session. Beyond native multi-path capabilities of IP networks, PC-TCP modules may use multiple explicit paths for a particular session. For example, without intending to be exhaustive, combinations of the following types of paths may be used:
Uncoded TCP and PC Over UDP
PC Over Conventional TCP and UDP
PC-TCP Over Wireless LAN (e.g., WiFi, 802.11) and Cellular Data (e.g., 3G, LTE)
PC-TCP concurrently over multiple wireless base stations (e.g., via multiple wireless LAN access points)
In some examples, Network Coding is used such that the multiple paths from a server node to a client node pass through one or more intermediate nodes at which the data is recoded, thereby causing information for different data units to effectively traverse different paths through the network.
One motivation for multipath connection between a pair of endpoints addresses possible preferential treatment of TCP traffic rather than UDP traffic. Some networks (e.g. certain public Wi-Fi, cable television networks, etc.) may limit the rate of UDP traffic, or drop UDP packets preferentially compared to TCP (e.g., in the case of congestion). It may be desirable to be able to detect such scenarios efficiently without losing performance. In some embodiments, a PC-TCP session initially establishes and divides the transmitted data across both a TCP and a UDP connection. This allows comparison of the throughput achieved by both connections while sending distinct useful data on each connection. An identifier is included in the initial TCP and UDP handshake packets to identify the two connections as belonging to the same coded PC-TCP session, and non-blocking connection establishment can be employed so as to allow both connections to be opened at the outset without additional delay. The transmitted data is divided across the two connections using e.g. round-robin (sending alternating packets or runs of packets on each connection) or load-balancing/back pressure scheduling (sending each packet to the connection with the shorter outgoing data queue). Such alternation or load balancing can be employed in conjunction with techniques for dealing with packet reordering. Pacing rate and congestion window size can be controller separately for the UDP and the TCP connection, or can be controlled together. By controlling the two connections together (e.g., using only a single congestion window to regulate the sum of the number of packets in flight on both the TCP and UDP connections) may provide a greater degree of “fairness” as compared to separate control.
In some examples, the adjustment of the fraction of messages transmitted over each data path/protocol is determined according to the relative performance/throughput of the data paths/protocols. In some examples, the adjustment of allocation of messages occurs only during an initial portion of the transmission. In other examples, the adjustment of allocation of messages occurs on an ongoing basis throughout the transmission. In some examples, the adjustment reverses direction (e.g., when a data path stops preferentially dropping UDP messages, the number of messages transmitted over that data path may increase).
In some embodiments the PC-TCP maintains both the UDP based traffic and the TCP based traffic for the duration of the session. In other embodiments, the PC-TCP module compares the behavior of the UCP and TCP traffic, for example over a period specified in terms of time interval or number of packets, where these quantities specifying the period can be set as configuration parameters and/or modified based on previous coded TCP sessions, e.g. the comparison period can be reduced or eliminated if information on relative TCP/UDP performance is available from recent PC-TCP sessions. If the UDP connection achieves better throughput, the PC-TCP session can shift to using UDP only. If the TCP connection achieves better throughput, the PC-TCP session can shift to using TCP. In some embodiments, different types of traffic are sent over the TCP link rather than the UDP link. In one such example, the UDP connection is used to send some forward error correction for packets where it is beneficial to reduce retransmission delays, e.g. the last block of a file or intermediate blocks of a stream. In this example, the uncoded packets may be sent over a TCP stream with forward error correction packets sent over UDP. If the receiver can use the forward error correction packets to recover from erasures in the TCP stream, a modified implementation of the TCP component of the receiver's PC-TCP module may be able to avoid using a TCP-based error recovery procedure. On the other hand, non-delivery of a forward error correction packet does not cause an erasure of the data that is to be recovered at the receiver, and therefore unless there is an erasure both on the UDP path and on the TCP path, dropping of a UDP packet does not cause delay.
Distributed Source
In some examples, multiple server nodes communicate with a client node. One way this can be implemented is with there being multiple communication sessions each involving one server node and one client node. In such an implementation, there is little or no interaction between a communication session between one server node and the client node and another communication session between another server node and the client node. In some examples, each server node may have different parts of a multimedia file, with each server providing its parts for combination at the client node.
Distributed Content Delivery
In some examples, there is some relationship between the content provided by different servers to the client. One example of such a relationship is use of a distributed RAID approach in which redundancy information (e.g., parity information) for data units at one or more servers is stored at and provided from another server. In this way, should a data unit not reach the client node from one of the server nodes, the redundancy information may be preemptively sent or requested from the other node, and the missing data unit reconstructed.
In some examples, random linear coding is performed on data units before they are distributed to multiple server nodes as an alternative to use of distributed RAID. Then each server node establishes a separate communication session with the client node for delivery of part of the coded information. In some of these examples, the server nodes have content that has already been at least partially encoded and then cached, thereby avoiding the necessity of repeating that partial encoding for different client nodes that will received the same application data units. In some examples, the server nodes may implement some of the functionality of the PC modules for execution during communication sessions with client nodes, for example, having the ability to encode further redundancy information in response to acknowledgment information (i.e., negative acknowledgement information) received from a client node.
In some implementations, the multiple server nodes are content delivery nodes to which content is distributed using any of a variety of known techniques. In other implementations, these multiple server nodes are intermediary nodes at which content from previous content delivery sessions was cached and therefore available without requiring re-delivery of the content from the ultimate server node.
In some examples of distributed content delivery, each server to client connection is substantially independent, for example, with independently determined communication parameters (e.g., error correction parameters, congestion window size, pacing rate, etc.). In other examples, at least some of the parameters are related, for example, with characteristics determined on one server-to-client connection being used to determine how the client node communicates with other server nodes. For example, packet arrival rate, loss rate, and differences in one-way transmission rate, may be measured on one connections and these parameters may be used in optimizing multipath delivery of data involving other server nodes. One manner of optimization may involve load balancing across multiple server nodes or over communication links on the paths from the server nodes to the client nodes.
In some implementations, content delivery from distributed server nodes making use of PC-TCP, either using independent sessions or using coordination between sessions, may achieve the performance of conventional distributed content delivery but requiring a smaller number of server nodes. This advantage may arise due to PC-TCP providing lower latency and/or lower loss rates than achieved with conventional TCP.
Multicast
Further Illustrative Examples
In an exemplary embodiment depicted in
In embodiments, such as the exemplary embodiments shown in
In embodiments, such as the exemplary embodiments shown in
In embodiments, at least some network servers 408 may comprise PC-TCP proxies and may communicate with any PC-TCP servers or devices using PC-TCP. In other embodiments, network servers may communicate with PC-TCP servers or devices using conventional TCP and/or other transport protocols running over UDP.
In exemplary embodiments as depicted in
The exemplary placements of networking devices in the communication scenarios described above should not be taken as limitations. It should be recognized that PC-TCP proxies can be placed in any network device and may support any type of data connection. That is, any type of end-user device, switching device, routing device, storage device, processing device and the like, may comprise PC-TCP proxies. Also PC-TCP proxies may reside only in the end-nodes of a communication path and/or only at two nodes along a connection path. However, PC-TCP proxies may also reside in more than two nodes of a communication path and may support multi-cast communications and multipath communications. PC-TCP proxies may be utilized in point-to-point communication networks, multi-hop networks, meshed networks, broadcast networks, storage networks, and the like.
Packet Coding (PC)
The description above focuses on architectures in which a packet coding approach is deployed, and in particular architectures in which a transport layer PC-TCP approach is used. In the description below, a number of features of PC-TCP are described. It should be understood that in general, unless otherwise indicated, these features are compatible with one another and can be combined in various combinations to address particular applications and situations.
Data Characteristics
As introduced above, data units (e.g., audio and/or video frames) are generally used to form data packets, for example, with one data unit per data packet, with multiple data units per data packet, or in some instances separating individual data units into multiple data packets. In some applications, the data units and associated data frames form a stream (e.g., a substantially continuous sequence made available over time without necessarily having groupings or boundaries in the sequence), while in other applications, the data units and associated data frames form one or more batches (e.g., a grouping of data that is required as a whole by the recipient).
In general, stream data is generated over time at a source and consumed at a destination, typically at a substantially steady rate. An example of a stream is a multimedia stream associated with person-to-person communication (e.g., a multimedia conference). Delay (also referred to as latency) and variability in delay (also referred to as jitter) are important characteristics of the communication of data units from a source to a destination.
An extreme example of a batch is delivery of an entire group of data, for example, a multiple gigabyte sized file. In some such examples, reducing the overall time to complete delivery (e.g., by maximizing throughput) of the batch is of primary importance. One example of batch delivery that may have very sensitive time (and real-time update) restraints is database replication.
In some applications, the data forms a series of batches that require delivery from a source to a destination. Although delay in start of delivery and/or completion of delivery of a batch of data units may be important, in many applications overall throughput may be most important. An example of batch delivery includes delivery of portions of multimedia content, for instance, with each batch corresponding to sections of viewing time (e.g., 2 seconds of viewing time or 2 MB per batch), with content being delivered in batches to the destination where the data units in the batches are buffered and used to construct a continuous presentation of the content. As a result, an important consideration is the delivery of the batches in a manner than provides continuity between batches for presentation, without “starving” the destination application because a required batch has not arrived in time. In practice, such starving may cause “freezing” of video presentation in multimedia, which is a phenomenon that is all too familiar to today's users of online multimedia delivery. Another important consideration is reduction in the initial delay in providing the data units of the first batch to the destination application. Such delay is manifested, for example, in a user having to wait for initial startup of video presentation after selecting multimedia for online delivery. Another consideration in some applications is overall throughput. This may arise, for example, if the source application has control over a data rate of the data units, for example, being able to provide a higher fidelity version of the multimedia content if higher throughput can be achieved. Therefore, an important consideration may be providing a sufficiently high throughput in order to enable delivery of a high fidelity version of the content (e.g., as opposed to greatly compressed version or a backed-off rate of the content resulting in lower fidelity).
Various packet coding approaches described below, or selection of configuration parameters of those approaches, address considerations that are particularly relevant to the nature of the characteristics of the data being transported. In some examples, different approaches or parameters are set in a single system based on a runtime determination of the nature of the characteristics of the data being transported.
Channel Characteristics
In general, the communication paths that link PC-TCP source and destination endpoints exhibit both relatively stationary or consistent channel characteristics, as well as transient characteristics. Relatively stationary or consistent channel characteristics can include, for example, capacity (e.g., maximum usable throughput), latency (e.g., transit time of packets from source to destination, variability in transit time), error rate (e.g., average packet erasure or error rate, burst characteristics of erasures/errors). In general, such relatively stationary or consistent characteristics may depend on the nature of the path, and more particularly on one or more of the links on the path. For example, a path with a link passing over a 4G cellular channel may exhibit very different characteristics than a path that passes over a cable television channel and/or a WiFi link in a home. As discussed further below, at least some of the approaches to packet coding attempt to address channel characteristic differences between types of communication paths. Furthermore, at least some of the approaches include aspects that track relatively slow variation in characteristics, for example, adapting to changes in average throughput, latency, etc.
Communication characteristics along a path may also exhibit substantial transient characteristics. Conventional communication techniques include aspects that address transient characteristics resulting from congestion along a communication path. It is well known that as congestion increases, for example at a node along a communication path, it is important that traffic is reduced at that node in order to avoid an unstable situation, for instance, with high packet loss resulting from buffer overruns, which then further increases data rates due to retransmission approaches. One common approach to addressing congestion-based transients uses an adaptive window size of “in flight” packets that have not yet been acknowledged by their destinations. The size of the window is adapted at each of the sources to avoid congestion-based instability, for example, by significantly reducing the size of the window upon detection of increased packet erasure rates.
In addressing communication over a variety of channels, it has been observed that transients in communication characteristics may not be due solely to conventional congestion effects, and that conventional congestion avoidance approaches may not be optimal or even desirable. Some effects that may affect communication characteristics, and that may therefore warrant adaptation of the manner in which data is transmitted can include one or more of the follow:
Effects resulting from cell handoff in cellular systems, including interruptions in delivery of packets or substantial reordering of packets delivered after handoff;
Effects resulting from “half-duplex” characteristics of certain wireless channels, for example, in WiFi channels in which return packets from a destination may be delayed until the wireless channel is acquired for upstream (i.e., portable device to access point) communication;
Effects of explicit data shaping devices, for example, intended to throttle certain classes of communication, for instance, based on a service provider's belief that class of communication is malicious or is consuming more than a fair share of resources.
Although transient effects, which may not be based solely on congestion, may be tolerated using conventional congestion avoidance techniques, one or more of the approaches described below are particularly tailored to such classes of effects with the goal of maintaining efficient use of a channel without undue “over-reaction” upon detection of a transient situation, while still avoiding causing congestion-based packet loss.
Inter-Packet Coding
In general, the coding approaches used in embodiments described in this document make use of inter-packet coding in which redundancy information is sent over the channel such that the redundancy information in one packet is generally dependent on a set of other packets that have been or will be sent over the channel. Typically, for a set of N packets of information, a total of N+K packets are sent in a manner that erasure or any K of the packets allows reconstruction of the original N packets of information. In general, a group of N information packets, or a group of N+K packets including redundancy information (depending on context), is referred to below as a “block” or a “coding block”. One example of such a coding includes N information packets without further coding, and then K redundancy packets, each of which depends on the N information packets. However it should be understood more than K of the packets (e.g., each of the N+K packets) may in some embodiments depend on all the N information packets.
Forward Error Correction and Repair Retransmission
Inter-packet coding in various embodiments described in this document use one or both of pre-emptive transmission of redundant packets, generally referred to as forward error correction (FEC), and transmission of redundant packets upon an indication that packets have or have a high probability of having been erased based on feedback, which is referred to below as repair and/or retransmission. The feedback for repair retransmission generally comes from the receiver, but more generally may come from a node or other channel element on the path to the receiver, or some network element having information about the delivery of packets along the path. In the FEC mode, K redundant packets may be transmitted in order to be tolerant of up to K erasures of the N packets, while in the repair mode, in some examples, for each packet that the transmitter believes has been or has high probability of having been erased, a redundant packet it transmitted from the transmitter, such that if in a block of N packets, K packets are believed to have been erased based on feedback, the transmitter sends at least an additional K packets.
As discussed more fully below, use of a forward error correction mode versus a repair mode represents a tradeoff between use of more channel capacity for forward error correction (i.e., reduced throughout of information) versus incurring greater latency in the presence of erasures for repair retransmission. As introduced above, the data characteristics being transmitted may determine the relative importance of throughput versus latency, and the PC-TCP modules may be configured or adapted accordingly.
If on average the packet erasure rate E is less than K/(N+K), then “on average” the N+K packets will experience erasure of K or fewer of the packets and the remaining packets will be sufficient to reconstruct the original N. Of course even if E is not greater than K/(N+K), random variability, non-stationarity of the pattern of erasures etc. results in some fraction of the sets of N+K packets having greater than K erasures, so that there is insufficient information to reconstruct the N packets at the destination. Therefore, even using FEC, at least some groups of N information packets will not be reconstructable. Note, for example, with E=0.2, N=8, and K=2, even though only 2 erasures may be expected on average, the probability of more than 2 erasures is greater than 30%, and even with E=0.1 this probability is greater than 7%, therefore the nature (e.g., timing, triggering conditions etc.) of the retransmission approaches may be significant, as discussed further below. Also as discussed below, the size of the set of packets that are coded together is significant. For example, increasing N by a factor of 10 to K+N=100 reduces the probably of more than the average number of 20 erasures (i.e., too many erasures to reconstruct the N=80 data packets) from over 7% to less than 0.1%.
Also as discussed further below, there is a tradeoff between use of large blocks of packets (i.e., large N) versus smaller blocks. For a particular code rate R=N/(N+K), longer blocks yield a higher probability of being able to fully recover the N information packets in the presence of random errors. Accordingly, depending on the data characteristics, the PC-TCP modules may be configured to adapt to achieve a desired tradeoff.
In general, in embodiments that guarantee delivery of the N packets, whether or not FEC is used, repair retransmission approaches are used to provide further information for reconstructing the N packets. In general, in preferred embodiments, the redundancy information is formed in such a manner that upon an erasure of a packet, the redundancy information that is sent from the transmitter does not depend on the specific packets that were erased, and is nevertheless suitable for repairing the erasure independent of which packet was erased.
Random Linear Coding
In general, a preferred approach to inter-packet coding is based on Random Linear Network Coding (RLNC) techniques. However, it should be understood that although based on this technology, not all features that may be associated with this term are necessarily incorporated. In particular, as described above in the absence of intermediate nodes that perform recoding, there is not necessarily a “network” aspect to the approach. Rather, redundancy information is generally formed by combining the information packets into coded packets using arithmetic combinations, and more specifically, as sums of products of coefficients and representation of the information packets over arithmetic fields, such as finite fields (e.g., Galois Fields of order pn). In general, the code coefficients are chosen from a sufficiently large finite field in a random or pseudo-random manner, or in another way that the combinations of packets have a very low probability or frequency of being linearly dependent. The code coefficients, or a compressed version (e.g., as a reference into a table shared by the transmitter and receiver), are included in each transmitted combination of data units (or otherwise communicated to the receiver) and used for decoding at the receiver. Very generally, the original information packets may be recovered at a receiver by inverting the arithmetic combinations. For example, a version of Gaussian Elimination may be used to reconstruct the original packets from the coded combinations. A key feature of this approach is that for a set of N information packets, as soon at the receiver has at least N linearly independent combinations of those information packets in received packets, it can reconstruct the original data units. The term “degree of freedom” is generally used below to refer to a number of independent linear combinations, such that if N degrees of freedom have been specified for N original packets, then the N original packets can be reconstructed; while if fewer than N degrees of freedom are available, it may not be possible to fully reconstruct any of the N original packets. If N+K linearly independent linear combinations are sent, then any N received combinations (i.e., N received degrees of freedom) are sufficient to reconstruct the original information packets.
In some examples, the N+K linearly independent combinations comprise N selections of the N “uncoded” information packets (essentially N−1 zero coefficients and one unit coefficient for each uncoded packet), and K coded packets comprising the random arithmetic combination with N non-zero coefficients for the N information packets. The N uncoded packets are transmitted first, so that in the absence of erasures they should be completely received as soon as possible. In the case of one erasure of the original N packets, the receiver must wait for the arrival of one redundant packet (in addition to the N−1 original packets), and once that packet has arrived, the erased packet may be reconstructed. In the case of forward error correction, the K redundant packets follow (e.g., immediately after) the information packets, and the delay incurred in reconstructing the erased information packet depends on the transmission time of packets. In the case of repair retransmission, upon detection of an erasure or high probability of an erasure, the receiver provides feedback to the transmitter, which sends the redundancy information upon receiving the feedback. Therefore, the delay in being able to reconstruct the erased packet depends on the round-trip-time from the receiver to the transmitter and back.
As discussed in more detail below, feedback from the receiver to the transmitter may be in the form of acknowledgments sent from the receiver to the transmitter. This feedback in acknowledgements at least informs the transmitter of a number of the N+K packets of a block that have been successfully received (i.e., the number of received degrees of freedom), and may provide further information that depends on the specific packets that have been received at the receiver although such further information is not essential.
As introduced above, packets that include the combinations of original packets generally also include information needed to determine the coefficients used to combine the original packets, and information needed to identify which original packets were used in the combination (unless this set, such as all the packets of a block, is implicit). In some implementations, the coefficients are explicitly represented in the coded packets. In some embodiments, the coefficients are encoded with reference to shared information at the transmitter and the receiver. For instance, tables of pre-generated (e.g., random, pseudo random, or otherwise selected) coefficients, or sets of coefficients, may be stored and references into those tables are used to determine the values of the coefficients. The size of such a table determines the number of parity packets that can be generated while maintaining the linear independence of the sets of coefficients. It should be understood that yet other ways may be used to determine the coefficients.
Another feature of random linear codes is that packets formed as linear combinations of data units may themselves be additively combined to yield combined linear combinations of data units. This process is referred to in some instances as “recoding”, as distinct from decoding and then repeating encoding.
There are alternatives to the use of RLNC, which do not necessarily achieve similar optimal (or provably optimum, or near optimal) throughput as RLNC, but that give excellent performance in some scenarios when implemented as described herein. For example, various forms of parity check codes can be used. Therefore, it should be understood that RLNC, or any particular aspect of RLNC, is not an essential feature of all embodiments described in this document.
Batch Transmission
As introduced above, in at least some applications, data to be transmitted from a transmitter to a receiver forms a batch (i.e., as opposed to a continuous stream), with an example of a batch being a file or a segment (e.g., a two second segment of multimedia) of a file.
In an embodiment of the PC-TCP modules, the batch is transferred from the transmitter to the receiver as a series of blocks, with each block being formed from a series of information packets. In general, each block has the same number of information packets, however use of same size blocks is not essential.
The transmitter PC-TCP module generally receives the data units from the source application and forms the information packets of the successive blocks of the batch. These information packets are queued at the transmitter and transmitted on the channel to the receiver. In general, at the transmitter, the dequeueing and transmission of packets to the receiver makes use of congestion control and/or rate control mechanisms described in more detail below. The transmitter PC-TCP also retains the information packets (or sufficient equivalent information) to construct redundancy information for the blocks. For instance the transmitter PC-TCP buffers the information packets for each block for which there remains the possibility of an unrecovered erasure of a packet during transit from the transmitter to the receiver.
In general, the receiver provides feedback to the transmitter. Various approaches to determining when to provide the feedback and what information to provide with the feedback are described further below. The feedback provides the transmitter with sufficient information to determine that a block has been successfully received and/or reconstructed at the receiver. When such success feedback for a block has been received, the transmitter no longer needs to retain the information packets for the block because there is no longer the possibility that redundancy information for the block will need to be sent to the receiver.
The feedback from the receiver to the transmitter may also indicate that a packet is missing. Although in some cases the indication that a packet is missing is a premature indication of an erasure, in this embodiment the transmitter uses this missing feedback to trigger sending redundant information for a block. In some examples, the packets for a block are numbered in sequence of transmission, and the feedback represents the highest number received and the number of packets (i.e., the number of degrees of freedom) received (or equivalently the number of missing packets or remaining degrees of freedom needed) for the block. The transmitter addresses missing packet feedback for a block through the transmission of redundant repair blocks, which may be used by the receiver to reconstruct the missing packets and/or original packets of the block.
As introduced above, for each block, the transmitter maintains sufficient information to determine the highest index of a packet received at the receiver, the number of missing packets transmitted prior to that packet, and the number of original or redundancy packets after the highest index received that have been transmitted (i.e., are “in flight” unless erased in transit) or queued for transmission at the transmitter.
When the transmitter receives missing packet feedback for a block, if the number of packets for the block that are “in flight” or queue would not be sufficient if received successfully (or are not expected to be in view of the erasure rate), the transmitter computes (or retrieves precomputed) a new redundant packet for the block and queues it for transmission. Such redundancy packets are referred to as repair packets. In order to reduce the delay in reconstructing a block of packets at the receiver, the repair packets are sent preferentially to the information packets for later blocks. For instance, the repair packets are queued in a separate higher-priority queue that is used to ensure transmission of repair packets preferentially to the queue of information packets.
In some situations, feedback from the receiver may have indicated that a packet is missing. However, that packet may later arrive out of order, and therefore a redundant packet for that block that was earlier computed and queued for transmission is no longer required to be delivered to the receiver. If that redundant packet has not yet been transmitted (i.e., it is still queued), that packet may be removed from the queue thereby avoiding wasted use of channel capacity for a packet that will not serve to pass new information to the receiver.
In the approach described above, redundancy packets are sent as repair packets in response to feedback from the receiver. In some examples, some redundancy packets are sent pre-emptively (i.e., as forward error correction) in order to address possible packet erasures. One approach to send such forward error correction packets for each block. However, if feedback has already been received at the transmitter that a sufficient number of original and/or coded packets for a block have been received, then there is no need to send further redundant packets for the block.
In an implementation of this approach, the original packets for all the blocks of the batch are sent first, while repair packets are being preferentially sent based on feedback from the receiver. After all the original packets have been transmitted, and the queue of repair packets is empty, the transmitter computes (or retrieves precomputed) redundancy packets for blocks for which the transmitter has not yet received feedback that the blocks have been successfully received, and queues those blocks as forward error correction packets for transmission in the first queue. In general, because the repair blocks are sent with higher priority that the original packets, the blocks for which success feedback has not yet been received are the later blocks in the batch (e.g., a trailing sequence of blocks of the batch).
In various versions of this approach, the number and order of transmission of the forward error correction packets are determined in various ways. A first way uses the erasure rate to determine how many redundant packets to transmit. One approach is to send at least one redundant packet for each outstanding block. Another approach is to send a number of redundancy packets for each outstanding block so that based on an expectation of the erasure rate of the packets that are queued and in flight for the block will yield a sufficient number of successfully received packets in order to reconstruct the block. For example, if a further n packets are needed to reconstruct a block (e.g., a number n<N packets of the original N packets with N−n packets having been erased), then n+k packets are sent, for instance, with n+k≥n/E, where E is an estimate of the erasure rate on the channel.
Another way of determining the number and order of forward error correction packets addresses the situation in which a block transmission time is substantially less than the round-trip-time for the channel. Therefore, the earliest of the blocks for which the transmitter has not received success feedback may in fact have the success feedback in flight from the receiver to the transmitter, and therefore sending forward error correction packets may be wasteful. Similarly, even if feedback indicating missing packet feedback for a block is received sufficiently early, the transmitter may still send a repair packet without incurring more delay in complete reconstruction of the entire batch than would be achieved by forward error correction.
In an example, the number of forward error correction packets queued for each block is greater for later blocks in the batch than for earlier ones. A motivation for this can be understood by considering the last block of the batch where it should be evident that it is desirable to send a sufficient number of forward error correction packets to ensure high probability of the receiver having sufficient information to reconstruct the block without the need from transmission of a repair packet and the associated increase in latency. On the other hand, it is preferable to send fewer forward error correction packets for the previous (or earlier) block because in the face of missing packet feedback from the receiver, the transmitter may be able to send a repair packet before forward error correction packets for all the later blocks have been sent, thereby not incurring a delay in overall delivery of the batch.
In one implementation, after all the original packets have been sent, and the transmitter is in the forward error correction phase in which it computes and sends the forward error correction packets, if the transmitter receives a missing packet feedback from the receiver, it computes and sends a repair packet for the block in question (if necessary) as described above, and clears the entire queue of forward error correction packets. After the repair packet queue is again empty, the transmitter again computes and queues forward error correction packets for the blocks for which it has not yet received success feedback. In an alternative somewhat equivalent implementation, rather than clearing the forward error correction queue upon receipt of a missing packet feedback, the transmitter removes forward error correction packets from the queue as they are no longer needed based on feedback from the receiver. In some examples, if success feedback is received for a block for which there are queued forward error correction packets, those forward error correction packets are removed from the queue. In some examples, the feedback from the receiver may indicate that some but not all of the forward error correction packets in the queue are no longer needed, for example, because out-of-order packets were received but at least some of the original packets are still missing.
An example of the way the transmitter determines how many forward error correction packets to send is that the transmitter performs a computation:
(N+g(i)−ai)/(1−p)−fi
where
p=smoothed loss rate,
N=block size,
i=block index defined as number of blocks from last block,
ai=number of packets acked from block i,
fi=packets in-flight from block i, and
g(i)=a decreasing function of i,
to determine the number of FEC packets for a block.
In some examples, g(i) is determined as a maximum of a configurable parameter, m and N−i. In some examples, g(i) is determined as N−p(i) where p is a polynomial, with integer rounding as needed
It should be understood that in some alternative implementations, at least some forward error correction packets may be interspersed with the original packets. For example, if the erasure rate for the channel is relatively high, then at least some number of redundancy packets may be needed with relatively high probability for each block, and there is an overall advantage to preemptively sending redundant FEC packets as soon as possible, in addition to providing the mechanism for feedback based repair that is described above.
It should be also understood that use of subdivision of a batch into blocks is not necessarily required in order to achieve the goal of minimizing the time to complete reconstruction of the block at the receiver. However, if the forward error correction is applied uniformly to all the packets of the batch, then the preferential protection of later packets would be absent, and therefore, latency caused by erasure of later packets may be greater than using the approach described above. However, alternative approaches to non-uniform forward error protection (i.e., introduction of forward error correction redundancy packets) may be used. For example, in the block based approach described above, packets of the later blocks each contribute to a greater number of forward error correction packets than do earlier ones, and an alternative approach to achieving this characteristic may be to use a non-block based criterion to construction of the redundancy packets in the forward error correction phase. However, the block based approach described above has advantages of relative simplicity and general robustness, and therefore even if marginally “suboptimal” provides an overall advantageous technical solution to minimizing the time to complete reconstruction within the constraint of throughput and erasure on the channel linking the transmitter and receiver.
Another advantage of using a block-based approach is that, for example, when a block within the batch, say the mth block of M blocks of the batch has an erasure, the repair packet that is sent from the transmitter depends only on the N original packets of the mth block. Therefore, as soon as the repair packet arrives, and the available (i.e., not erased) N−1 packets of the block arrive, the receiver has the information necessary to repair the block. Therefore, by constructing the repair packet without contribution of packets in later blocks of the batch, the latency of the reconstruction of the block is reduced. Furthermore, by having the repair packets depend on only N original packets, the computation required to reconstruct the packets of the block is less than if the repair packets depend on more packets.
It should be understood that even in the block based transmission of a batch of packets, the blocks are not necessarily uniform in size, and are not necessarily disjoint. For example, blocks may overlap (e.g., by 50%, 75%, etc.) thereby maintaining at least some of the advantages of reduced complexity in reconstruction and reduced buffering requirements as compared to treating the batch as one block. An advantage of such overlapping blocks may be a reduced latency in reconstruction because repair packets may be sent that do not require waiting for original packets at the receiver prior to reconstruction. Furthermore, non-uniform blocks may be beneficial, for example, to increase the effectiveness of forward error correction for later block in a batch by using longer blocks near the end of a batch as compared to near the beginning of a batch.
In applications in which the entire batch is needed by the destination application before use, low latency of reconstruction may be desirable to reduce buffering requirements in the PC-TCP module at the receiver (and at the transmitter). For example, all packets that may contribute to a later received repair packet are buffered for their potential future use. In the block based approach, once a block is fully reconstructed, then the PC-TCP module can deliver and discard those packets because they will not affect future packet reconstruction.
Although described as an approach to delivery of a batch of packets, the formation of these batches may be internal to the PC-TCP modules, whether or not such batches are formed at the software application level. For example, the PC-TCP module at the transmitter may receive the original data units that are used to form the original packets via a software interface from the source application. The packets are segmented into blocks of N packets as described above, and the packets queued for transmission. In one embodiment, as long as the source application provides data units sufficiently quickly to keep the queue from emptying (or from emptying for a threshold amount of time), the PC-TCP module stays in the first mode (i.e., prior to sending forward error correction packets) sending repair packets as needed based on feedback information from the receiver. When there is a lull in the source application providing data units, then the PC-TCP module declares that a batch has been completed, and enters the forward error correction phase described above. In some examples, the batch formed by the PC-TCP module may in fact correspond to a batch of data units generated by the source application as a result of a lull in the source application providing data units to the PC-TCP module while it computes data units for a next batch, thereby inherently synchronizing the batch processing by the source application and the PC-TCP modules.
In one such embodiment, the PC-TCP module remains in the forward error correction mode for the declared batch until that entire batch has been successfully reconstructed at the receiver. In another embodiment, if the source application begins providing new data units before the receiver has provided feedback that the previous batch has been successfully reconstructed, the transmitter PC-TCP module begins sending original packets for the next batch at a lower priority than repair or forward error correction packets for the previous batch. Such an embodiment may reduce the time to the beginning of transmission of the next batch, and therefore reduces the time to successful delivery of the next batch.
In the embodiments in which the source application does not necessarily provide the data in explicit batches, the receiver PC-TCP module provides the data units in order to the destination application without necessarily identifying the block or batch boundaries introduced at the transmitter PC-TCP module. That is, in at least some implementations, the transmitter and receiver PC-TCP modules provide a reliable channel for the application data units without exposing the block and batch structure to the applications.
As described above for certain embodiments, the transmitter PC-TCP module reacts to missing packet feedback from the receiver PC-TCP module to send repair packets. Therefore, it should be evident that the mechanism by which the receiver sends such feedback may affect the overall behavior of the protocol. For example, in one example, the receiver PC-TCP module sends a negative acknowledgment as soon as it observes a missing packet. Such an approach may provide the lowest latency for reconstruction of the block. However, as introduced above, missing packets may be the result of out-of-order delivery. Therefore, a less aggressive generation of missing packet feedback, for example, by delay in transmission of a negative acknowledgment, may reduce the transmission of unnecessary repair packets with only a minimal increase in latency in reconstruction of that block. However, such delay in sending negative acknowledgements may have an overall positive impact on the time to successfully reconstruct the entire block because later blocks are not delayed by unnecessary repair packets. Alternative approaches to generation of acknowledgments are described below.
In some embodiments, at least some of the determination of when to send repair packets is performed at the transmitter PC-TCP. For example, the receiver PC-TCP module may not delay the transmission of missing packet feedback, and it is the transmitter PC-TCP module that delays the transmission of a repair packet based on its weighing of the possibility of the missing packet feedback being based on out-of-order delivery as opposed to erasure.
Protocol Parameters
Communication between two PC-TCP endpoints operates according to parameters, some of which are maintained in common by the endpoints, and some of which are local to the sending and/or the receiving endpoint. Some of these parameters relate primarily to forward error correction aspects of the operation. For example, such parameters include the degree of redundancy that is introduced through the coding process. As discussed below, further parameters related to such coding relate to the selection of packets for use in the combinations. A simple example of such selection is segmentation of the sequence of input data units into “frames” that are then independently encoded. In addition to the number of such packets for combination (e.g., frame length), other parameters may relate to overlapping and/or interleaving of such frames of data units and/or linear combinations of such data units.
Further parameters relate generally to transport layer characteristics of the communication approach. For example, some parameters relate to congestion avoidance, for example, representing a size of a window of unacknowledged packets, transmission rate, or other characteristics related to the timing or number of packets sent from the sender to the receiver of the PC-TCP communication.
As discussed further below, communication parameters (e.g., coding parameters, transport parameters) may be set in various ways. For example, parameters may be initialized upon establishing a session between two PC-TCP endpoints. Strategies for setting those parameters may be based on various sources of information, for example, according to knowledge of the communication path linking the sender and receiver (e.g., according to a classification of path type, such as 3G wireless versus cable modem), or experienced communication characteristics in other sessions (e.g., concurrent or prior sessions involving the same sender, receiver, communication links, intermediate nodes, etc.). Communication parameters may be adapted during the course of a communication session, for example, in response to observed communication characteristics (e.g., congestion, packet loss, round-trip time, etc.)
Transmission Control
Some aspects of the PC-TCP approaches relate to control of transmission of packets from a sender to a receiver. These aspects are generally separate from aspects of the approach that determine what is sent in the packets, for example, to accomplish forward error correction, retransmission, or the order in which the packets are sent (e.g., relative priority of forward error correction packets version retransmission packets). Given a queue of packets that are ready for transmission from the sender to the receiver, these transmission aspects generally relate to flow and/or congestion control.
Congestion Control
Current variants of TCP, including binary increase congestion control (BIC) and cubic-TCP, have been proposed to address the inefficiencies of classical TCP in networks with high losses, large bandwidths and long round-trip times. BIC-TCP and CUBIC algorithms have been used because of their stability. After a backoff, BIC increases the congestion window linearly then logarithmically to the window size just before backoff (denoted by Wmax) and subsequently increases the window in an anti-symmetric fashion exponentially then linearly. CUBIC increases the congestion window following backoff according to a cubic function with inflection point at Wmax. These increase functions cause the congestion window to grow slowly when it is close to Wmax, promoting stability. On the other hand, other variants such as HTCP and FAST TCP have the advantage of being able to partially distinguish congestion and non-congestion losses through the use of delay as a congestion signal.
An alternative congestion control approach is used in at least some embodiments. In some such embodiments, we identify a concave portion of the window increase function as Wconcave(t)=Wmax+c1 (t−k)3 and a convex portion of the window increase function as Wconvex(t)=Wmax+c2(t−k)3 where c1 and c2 are positive tunable parameters and
and W is the window size just after backoff.
This alternative congestion control approach can be flexibly tuned for different scenarios. For example, a larger value of c1 causes the congestion window to increase more rapidly up to Wmax and a large value of c2 causes the congestion window to increase more rapidly beyond Wmax.
Optionally, delay is used as an indicator to exit slow start and move to the more conservative congestion avoidance phase, e.g. when a smoothed estimate of RTT exceeds a configured threshold relative to the minimum observed RTT for the connection. We can also optionally combine the increase function of CUBIC or other TCP variants with the delay-based backoff function of HTCP.
In some embodiments, backoff is smoothed by allowing a lower rate of transmission until the number of packets in flight decreases to the new window size. For instance, a threshold, n, is set such that once n packets have been acknowledged following a backoff, then one packet is allowed to be sent for every two acknowledged packets, which is roughly half of the previous sending rate. This is akin to a hybrid window and rate control scheme.
Transmission Rate Control
Pacing Control by Sender
In at least some embodiments, pacing is used to regulate and/or spread out packet transmissions, making the transmission rate less bursty. While pacing can help to reduce packet loss from buffer overflows, previous implementations of pacing algorithms have not shown clear advantages when comparing paced TCP implementations to non-paced TCP implementations. However, in embodiments where the data packets are coded packets as described above, the combination of packet coding and pacing may have advantages. For example, since one coded packet may be used to recover multiple possible lost packets, we can use coding to more efficiently recover from any spread out packet losses that may result from pacing. In embodiments, the combination of packet coding and pacing may have advantages compared to uncoded TCP with selective acknowledgements (SACK).
Classical TCP implements end-to-end congestion control based on acknowledgments. Variants of TCP designed for high-bandwidth connections increase the congestion window (and consequently the sending rate) quickly to probe for available bandwidth but this can result in bursts of packet losses when it overshoots, if there is insufficient buffering in the network.
A number of variants of TCP use acknowledgment feedback to determine round-trip time and/or estimate available bandwidth, and they differ in the mechanisms with which this information is used to control the congestion window and/or sending rate. Different variants have scenarios in which they work better or worse than others.
In one general approach used in one or more embodiments, a communication protocol may use smoothed statistics of intervals between acknowledgments of transmitted packets (e.g., a smoothed “ack interval”) to guide a transmission of packets, for example, by controlling intervals (e.g., an average interval or equivalently an average transmission rate) between packet transmissions. Broadly, this guiding of transmission intervals is referred to herein as “pacing”.
In some examples, the pacing approach is used in conjunction with a window-based congestion control algorithm. Generally, the congestion window controls the number of unacknowledged packets that can be sent, in some examples using window control approaches that are the same or similar to those used in known variants of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). In embodiments, the window control approach is based on the novel congestion control algorithms described herein.
A general advantage of one or more aspects is to improve functioning of a communication system, for instance, as measured by total throughput, or delay and/or variation in delay. These aspects address a technical problem of congestion, and with it packet loss, in a network by using “pacing” to reduce that congestion.
An advantage of this aspect is that the separate control of pacing can prevent packets in the congestion window from being transmitted too rapidly compared to the rate at which they are getting through to the other side. Without separate pacing control, at least some conventional TCP approaches would permit bursts of overly rapid transmission of packets, which might result in packet loss at an intermediate node on the communication path. These packet losses may be effectively interpreted by the protocol as resulting from congestion, resulting in the protocol reducing the window size. However, the window size may be appropriate, for example, for the available bandwidth and delay of the path, and therefore reducing the window size may not be necessary. On the other hand, reducing the peak transmission rate can have the effect of avoiding packet loss, for example, by avoiding overflow of intermediate buffers on the path.
Another advantage of at least some implementations is prevention of large bursts of packet losses under convex window increase functions for high-bandwidth scenarios, by providing an additional finer level of control over the transmission process.
At least some implementations of the approach can leverage the advantages of existing high-bandwidth variants of TCP such as H-TCP and CUBIC, while preventing large bursts of packet losses under their convex window increase functions and providing a more precise level of control. For example, pacing control may be implemented to pace the rate of providing packets from the existing TCP procedure to the channel, with the existing TCP procedure typically further or separately limiting the presentation of packets to the communication channel based, for instance, on its window-based congestion control procedure.
In practice, a particular example in which separating pacing from window control has been observed to significantly outperform conventional TCP on 4G LTE.
Referring to
In
Functionally, one may consider two elements of the protocol as being loss recovery and rate/congestion control. Loss recovery can be implemented either using conventional retransmissions or using coding or as a combination of retransmission and coding. Rate/congestion control may aim to avoid overrunning the receiver and/or the available channel capacity, and may be implemented using window control with or without pacing, or direct rate control.
The channel 1050 coupling the transport layers in general may include lower layer protocol software at the source and destination, and a series of communication links coupling computers and other network nodes on a path from the source to the destination.
As compared to conventional approaches, as shown in
In embodiments, the acks that are transmitted on a return channel, from the destination to the source, may also be paced, and may also utilize coding to recover from erasures and bursty losses. In embodiments, packet coding and transmission control of the acks may be especially useful if there is congestion on the return channel.
In one implementation, the rate control element 1040 may maintain an average (i.e., smoothed) inter-packet delivery interval, estimated based on the acknowledgement intervals (accounting for the number of packets acknowledged in each ack). In some implementations this averaging may be computed as a decaying average of past sample inter-arrival times. This can be refined by incorporating logic for discarding large sample values based on the determination of whether they are likely to have resulted from a gap in the sending times or losses in the packet stream, and by setting configurable upper and lower limits on the estimated interval commensurate with particular characteristics of different known networks. The rate control element 1040 may then use this smoothed inter-acknowledgement time to set a minimum inter-transmission time, for example, as a fraction of the inter-acknowledgement time. This fraction can be increased with packet loss and with rate of increase of RTT (which may be indicators that the current sending rate may be too high), and decreased with rate of decrease of RTT under low loss, e.g. using a control algorithm such as proportional control whose parameters can be adjusted to trade off between stability and responsiveness to change. Upper and lower limits on this fraction can be made configurable parameters, say 0.2 and 0.95. Transmission packets are then limited to be presented to the channel 1050 with inter-transmission times of at least this set minimum. In other implementations inter-transmission intervals are controlled to maintain a smoothed average interval or rate based on a smoothed inter-acknowledgement interval or rate.
In addition to the short timescale adjustments of the pacing interval with estimated delivery interval, packet loss rate and RTT described above, there can also be a longer timescale control loop that modulates the overall aggressiveness of the pacing algorithm based on a smoothed loss rate calculated over a longer timescale, with, a higher loss rate indicating that pacing may be too aggressive. The longer timescale adjustment can be applied across short duration connections by having the client maintain state across successive connections and include initializing information in subsequent connection requests. This longer timescale control may be useful for improving adaptation to diverse network scenarios that change dynamically on different timescales.
Referring to
It should be recognized that although the description above focuses on a single direction of communication, in general, a bidirectional implementation would include a corresponding path from the destination application to the source application. In some implementations, both directions include corresponding rate control elements 1040, while in other applications, only one direction (e.g., from the source to the destination application) may implement the rate control. For example, introduction of the rate control element 1040 at a server, or another device or network node on the path between the source application and the transport layer 1080 at the destination, may not require modification of the software at the destination.
Pacing by Receiver
As described above, the sender can use acks to estimate the rate/interval with which packets are reaching the receiver, the loss rate and the rate of change of RTT, and adjust the pacing interval accordingly. However, this estimated information may be noisy if acks are lost or delayed. On the other hand, such information can be estimated more accurately at the receiver with OWTT in place of RTT. By basing the pacing interval on the rate of change of OWTT rather than its actual value, the need for synchronized clocks on sender and receiver may be obviated. The pacing interval can be fed back to the sender by including it as an additional field in the acks. The choice as to whether the pacing calculations are done at the sender or the receiver, or done every n packets rather than upon every packet reception, may also be affected by considerations of sender/receiver CPU/load.
Error Control
Classical TCP performs poorly on networks with packet losses. Congestion control can be combined with coding such that coded packets are sent both for forward error correction (FEC) to provide protection against an anticipated level of packet loss, as well as for recovering from actual losses indicated by feedback from the receiver.
While the simple combination of packet coding and congestion control has been suggested previously, the prior art does not adequately account for differences between congestion-related losses, bursty and/or random packet losses. Since congestion-related loss may occur as relatively infrequent bursts, it may be inefficient to protect against this type of loss using FEC.
In at least some embodiments, the rates at which loss events occur are estimated. A loss event may be defined as either an isolated packet loss or a burst of consecutive packet losses. In some examples, the source PC-TCP may send FEC packets at the estimated rate of loss events, rather than the estimated rate of packet loss. This embodiment is an efficient way to reduce non-useful FEC packets, since it may not be disproportionately affected by congestion-related loss.
In an exemplary embodiment, the code rate and/or packet transmission rate of FEC can be made tunable in order to trade-off between the useful throughput seen at the application layer (also referred to as goodput) and recovery delay. For instance, the ratio of the FEC rate to the estimated rate of loss events can be made a tunable parameter that is set with a priori knowledge of the underlying communications paths or dynamically adjusted by making certain measurements of the underlying communications paths.
In another exemplary embodiment, the rate at which loss bursts of up to a certain length occur may be estimated, and appropriate burst error correcting codes for FEC, or codes that correct combinations of burst and isolated errors, may be used.
In another exemplary embodiment, the FEC for different blocks can be interleaved to be more effective against bursty loss.
In other exemplary embodiments, data packets can be sent preferentially over FEC packets. For instance, FEC packets can be sent at a configured rate or estimated loss rate when there are no data packets to be sent, and either not sent or sent at a reduced rate when there are data packets to be sent. In one implementation, FEC packets are placed in a separate queue which is cleared when there are data packets to be sent.
In other exemplary embodiments, the code rate/amount of FEC in each block and/or the FEC packet transmission rate can be made a tunable function of the block number and/or the number of packets in flight relative to the number of unacknowledged degrees of freedom of the block, in addition to the estimated loss rate. FEC packets for later blocks can be sent preferentially over FEC for earlier blocks, so as to minimize recovery delay at the end of a connection, e.g., the number of FEC packets sent from each block can be a tunable function of the number of blocks from the latest block that has not been fully acknowledged. The sending interval between FEC packets can be an increasing function of the number of packets in flight relative to the number of unacknowledged degrees of freedom of the corresponding block, so as to trade-off between sending delay and probability of losing FEC packets in scenarios where packet loss probability increases with transmission rate.
In other exemplary embodiments, a variable randomly chosen fraction of the coding coefficients of a coded packet can be set to 1 or 0 in order to reduce encoding complexity without substantially affecting erasure correction performance. In a systematic code, introducing 0 coefficients only after one or more densely coded packets (i.e. no or few 0 coefficients) may be important for erasure correction performance. For instance, an initial FEC packet in a block could have each coefficient set to 1 with probability 0.5 and to a uniformly random value from the coding field with probability 0.5. Subsequent FEC packets in the block could have each coefficient set to 0 with probability 0.5 and to uniformly random value with probability 0.5.
Packet Reordering
As introduced above, packets may be received out of order on some networks, for example, due to packets traversing multiple paths, parallel processing in some networking equipment, reconfiguration of a path (e.g., handoff in cellular networks). Generally, conventional TCP reacts to out of order packets by backing off the size of the congestion window. Such a backoff may unnecessarily hurt performance if there is no congestion necessitating a backoff.
In some embodiments, in an approach to handling packet reordering that does not result from congestions, a receiver observing a gap in the sequence numbers of its received packets may delay sending an acknowledgment for a limited time. When a packet is missing, the receiver does not immediately know if the packet has been lost (erased), or merely reordered. The receiver delays sending an acknowledgement that indicates the gap to see if the gap is filled by subsequent packet arrivals. In some examples, upon observing a gap, the receiver starts a first timer for a configurable “reordering detection” time interval, e.g. 20 ms. If a packet from the gap is subsequently received within this time interval, the receiver starts a second timer for a configurable “gap filling” time interval, e.g. 30 ms. If the first timer or the second timer expire prior to the gap being filled, an acknowledgement that indicates the gap is sent to the source.
Upon receiving the acknowledgment that indicates the gap in received packets the source, in at least some embodiments, the sender determines whether a repair packet should be sent to compensate for the gap in the received packets, for example, if a sufficient number of FEC packets have not already been sent.
In another aspect, a sender may store relevant congestion control state information (including the congestion window) prior to backoff, and a record of recent packet losses. If the sender receives an ack reporting a gap/loss and then subsequently one or more other acks reporting that the gap has been filled by out of order packet receptions, any backoff caused by the earlier ack can be reverted by restoring the stored state from before backoff.
In another aspect, a sender observing a gap in the sequence numbers of its received acks may delay congestion window backoff for a limited time. When an ack is missing, the sender does not immediately know if a packet has been lost or if the ack is merely reordered. The sender delays backing off its congestion window to see if the gap is filled by subsequent ack arrivals. In some examples, upon observing a gap, the sender starts a first timer for a configurable “reordering detection” time interval, e.g. 20 ms. If an ack from the gap is subsequently received within this time interval, the sender starts a second timer for a configurable “gap filling” time interval, e.g. 30 ms. If the first timer or the second timer expires prior to the gap being filled, congestion window backoff occurs.
In some examples, instead of using time intervals, packet sequence numbers are used. For example, sending of an ack can be delayed until a packet which is a specified number of sequence numbers ahead of the reference lost packet is received. Similarly, backing off can be delayed until an acknowledgment of a packet which is a specified number of sequence numbers ahead of the reference lost packet is received. In some examples, these approaches have the advantage of being able to take into account subsequently received/acknowledged reordered packets by shifting the sequence number of the reference lost packet as holes in the packet sequence get filled.
These methods for correcting packet reordering may be especially useful for multipath versions of the protocol, where there may be a large amount of reordering.
Acknowledgements
Delayed Acknowledgements
In at least some implementations, conventional TCP sends one acknowledgment for every two data packets received. Such delayed acking reduces ack traffic compared to sending an acknowledgment for every data packet. This reduction in ack traffic is particularly beneficial when there is contention on the return channel, such as in Wi-Fi networks, where both data and ack transmissions contend for the same channel.
It is possible to reduce ack traffic further by increasing the ack interval to a value n>2, i.e. sending one acknowledgment for every n data packets. However, reducing the frequency with which acks are received by the sender can cause delays in transmission (when the congestion window is full) or backoff (if feedback on losses is delayed), which can hurt performance.
In one aspect, the sender can determine whether, or to what extent, delayed acking should be allowed based in part on its remaining congestion window (i.e. its congestion window minus the number of unacknowledged packets in flight), and/or its remaining data to be sent. For example, delayed acking can be disallowed if there is any packet loss, or if the remaining congestion window is below some (possibly tunable) threshold. Alternatively, the ack interval can be reduced with the remaining congestion window. As another example, delayed acking can be allowed if the amount of remaining data to be sent is smaller than the remaining congestion window, but disallowed for the last remaining data packet so that there is no delay in acknowledging the last data packet. This information can be sent in the data packets as a flag indicating whether delayed acking is allowed, or for example, as an integer indicating the allowed ack interval.
Using relevant state information at the sender to influence delayed acking may allow an increase in the ack interval beyond the conventional value of 2, while mitigating the drawbacks described above that a larger ack interval across the board might have.
To additionally limit the ack delay, each time an ack is sent, a delayed ack timer can be set to expire with a configured delay, say 25 ms. Upon expiration of the timer, any data packets received since the last ack may be acknowledged, even if fewer packets than the ack interval n have arrived. If no packets have been received since the last ack, an ack may be sent upon receipt of the next data packet.
Parameter Control
Initialization
In some embodiments, to establish a session parameters for the PC-TCP modules are set to a predefine set of default parameters. In other embodiments, approaches that attempt to select better initial parameters are used. Approaches include use of parameter values from other concurrent or prior PC-TCP sessions, parameters determined from characteristics of the communication channel, for example, selected from stored parameters associated with different types of channels, or parameters determined by the source or destination application according to the nature of the data to be transported (e.g., batch versus stream).
Tunable Coding
Referring to
a link traversing private links on a server local area network,
a link traversing the public Internet,
a link traversing a fixed (i.e., wireline) portion of a cellular telephone network,
and a link traversing a wireless radio channel to the user's device (e.g., a cellular telephone channel or satellite link or wireless LAN).
The channel 2452 may be treated as carrying a series of data units, which may but do not necessarily correspond directly to Internet Protocol (IP) packets. For example, in some implementations multiple data units are concatenated into an IP packet, while in other implementations, each data unit uses a separate IP packet or only part of an IP packet. It should be understood that in yet other implementations, the Internet Protocol is not used—the techniques described below do not depend on the method of passing the data units over the channel 2452.
A transmitter 2421 couples the server application 2411 to the channel 2452, and a receiver 2481 couples the channel 2452 to the client application 2491. Generally, the transmitter 2421 accepts input data units from the server application 2411. In general, these data units are passed over the channel 2452, as well as retained for a period of time in a buffer 2423. From time to time, an error control (EC) component 2425 may compute a redundancy data unit from a subset of the retained input data units in the buffer 2423, and may pass that redundancy data unit over the channel 2452. The receiver 2481 accepts data units from the channel 2452. In general, the channel 2452 may erase and reorder the data units. Erasures may correspond to “dropped” data units that are never received at the receiver, as well as corrupted data units that are received, but are known to have irrecoverable errors, and therefore are treated for the most part as dropped units. The receiver may retain a history of received input data units and redundancy data units in a buffer 2483. An error control component 2485 at the receiver 2481 may use the received redundancy data units to reconstruct erased input data units that may be missing in the sequence received over the channel. The receiver 2481 may pass the received and reconstructed input data units to the client application. In general, the receiver may pass these input data units to the client application in the order they were received at the transmitter.
In general, if the channel has no erasures or reordering, the receiver can provide the input data units to the client application with delay and delay variation that may result from traversal characteristics of the channel. When data units are erased in the channel 2452, the receiver 2481 may make use of the redundancy units in its buffer 2483 to reconstruct the erased units. In order to do so, the receiver may have to wait for the arrival of the redundancy units that may be useful for the reconstruction. The way the transmitter computes and introduces the redundancy data units generally affects the delay that may be introduced to perform the reconstruction.
The way the transmitter computes and introduces the redundancy data units as part of its forward error correction function can also affect the complexity of the reconstruction process at the receiver, and the utilization of the channel. Furthermore, regardless of the nature of the way the transmitter introduces the redundancy data units onto the channel, statistically there may be erased data units for which there is insufficient information in the redundancy data units to reconstruct the erased unit. In such cases, the error control component 2485 may request a retransmission of information from the error control component 2425 of the transmitter 2421. In general, this retransmitted information may take the form of further redundancy information that depends on the erased unit. This retransmission process introduces a delay before the erased unit is available to the receiver. Therefore, the way the transmitter introduces the redundancy information also affects the statistics such as how often retransmission of information needs to be requested, and with it the delay in reconstructing the erased unit that cannot be reconstructed using the normally introduced redundancy information.
In some embodiments, the error control component 2485 may provide information to the error control component 2425 to affect the way the transmitter introduces the redundancy information. In general, this information may be based on one or more of the rate of (or more generally the pattern of) erasures on units on the channel, rate of (or more generally timing pattern of) and the state of the available units in the buffer 2483 and/or the state of unused data in the client application 2491. For example, the client application may provide a “play-out time” (e.g., in milliseconds) of the data units that the receiver has already provided to the client application such that if the receiver were to not send any more units, the client application would be “starved” for input units at that time. Note that in other embodiments, rather than or in addition to receiving information from the receiver, the error control component 2425 at the transmitter may get feedback from other places, for example, from instrumented nodes in the network that pass back congestion information.
Referring to
In a number of embodiments the redundancy units are computed as random linear combinations of past input units. Although the description below focuses on such approaches, it should be understood that the overall approach is applicable to other computations of redundancy information, for example, using low density parity check (LDPC) codes and other error correction codes. In the approach shown in
In
For a particular rate of code (e.g., rate R=⅔), in an example, feedback received may result in changes of the parameters, for example, between (p,q)=(2,1) or (4,2) or (8,4) depending on of the amount of data buffered at the receiver, and therefore depending on the tolerance of the receiver to reconstruction delay.
Note that it is not required that q=p(1−R)/R is an integer, as it is in the examples shown in
In a variant of the approach described above, different input data units have different “priorities” or “importances” such that they are protected to different degrees than other input data units. For example, in video coding, data units representing an independently coded video frame may be more important than data units representing a differentially encoded video frame. For example, if the priority levels are indexed i=1, 2, . . . , then a proportion ρi≤1, where Σiρi=1, of the redundancy data units may be computed using data units with priority≤i. For example, for a rate R code, with blocks of input data units of length p, on average ρip(1−R)/R redundancy data units per block are computed from input data units with priority≤i.
The value of D should generally be no more than the target playout delay of the streaming application minus an appropriate margin for communication delay variability. The playout delay is the delay between the time a message packet is transmitted and the time it should be available at the receiver to produce the streaming application output. It can be expressed in units of time, or in terms of the number of packets transmitted in that interval. D can be initially set based on the typical or desired playout delay of the streaming application, and adapted with additional information from the receiver/application. Furthermore, choosing a smaller value reduces the memory and complexity at the expense of erasure correction capability.
The parameter d specifies the minimum separation between a message packet and a parity involving that message packet. Since a parity involving a message packet that has not yet been received is not useful for recovering earlier message packets involved in that parity, setting a minimum parity delay can improve decoding delay when packet reordering is expected/observed to occur, depending partly also on the parity interval.
Referring to
Cross-Session Parameter Control
In some embodiments, the control of transport layer sessions uses information across connections, for example, across concurrent sessions or across sessions occurring at different times.
Standard TCP implements end-to-end congestion control based on acknowledgments. A new TCP connection that has started up but not yet received any acknowledgments uses initial configurable values for the congestion window and retransmission timeout. These values may be tuned for different types of network settings.
Some applications, for instance web browser applications, may use multiple connections between a client application (e.g., the browser) and a server application (e.g., a particular web server application at a particular server computer). Conventionally, when accessing the information to render a single web “page”, the client application may make many separate TCP sessions between the client and server computers, and using conventional TCP control, each session is controlled substantially independently. This independent control includes separate congestion control.
One approach to addressing technical problems that are introduced by having such multiple sessions is the SPDY Protocol (see, e.g., SPDY Protocol—Draft 3.1, accessible at http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol/spdy-protocol-draft3-1). The SPDY protocol is an application layer protocol that manipulates HTTP traffic, with particular goals of reducing web page load latency and improving web security. Generally, SPDY effectively provides a tunnel for the HTTP and HTTPS protocols. When sent over SPDY, HTTP requests are processed, tokenized, simplified and compressed. The resulting traffic is then sent over a single TCP session, thereby avoiding problems and inefficiencies involved in use of multiple concurrent TCP sessions between a particular client and server computer.
In a general aspect, a communication system maintains information related to communication between computers or network nodes. For example, the maintained information can include bandwidth to and/or from the other computer, current or past congestion window sizes, pacing intervals, packet loss rates, round-trip time, timing variability, etc. The information can include information for currently active sessions and/or information about past sessions. One use of the maintained information may be to initialize protocol parameters for a new session between computers for which information has been maintained. For example, the congestion window size or a pacing rate for a new TCP or UDP session may be initialized based on the congestion window size, pacing interval, round-trip time and loss rate of other concurrent or past sessions.
Referring to
In one use scenario, when a client 1290 seeks to establish a communication session (e.g., a transport layer protocol session), it consults its communication information 1295 to see if it has current information that is relevant to the session it seeks to establish. For example, the client may have other concurrent sessions with a server with which it wants to communicate, or with which it may have recently had such sessions. As another example, the client 1290 may use information about other concurrent or past sessions with other servers. When the client 1290 sends a request to a server 1210 or a proxy 1212 to establish a session, relevant information for that session is also made available to one or both of the endpoints establishing the session. There are various ways in which the information may be made available to the server. For example the information may be included with the request itself. As another example, the server may request the information if it does not already hold the information in its communication information 1215. As another example, the server may request the information from a remote or third party database, which has been populated with information from the client or from servers that have communicated with the client. In any case, the communication session between the client and the server is established using parameters that are determined at least in part by the communication information available at the client and/or server.
In some examples, the communication session may be established using initial values of packet pacing interval, congestion window, retransmission timeout and forward error correction. Initial values suitable for different types of networks (e.g. Wi-Fi, 4G), network operators and signal strength can be prespecified, and/or initial values for successive connections can be derived from measured statistics of earlier connections between the same endpoints in the same direction. For example:
The initial congestion window can be increased from its default value if the packet throughput of the previous connection is sufficiently larger than the ratio of the default initial congestion window to the minimum round-trip time of the previous connection. The congestion window can subsequently be adjusted downwards if the initial received acks from the new connection indicate that the available rate has decreased compared to the previous connection.
The initial pacing interval can be set e.g. as MAX(k1*congestion window/previous round-trip time, k2/previous packet throughput), where k1 and k2 are configurable parameters, or, with receiver pacing, as k* previous pacing interval, where k increases with the loss rate of the previous connection.
Forward error correction parameters such as code rate can be set as k*previous loss rate, where k is a configurable parameter. The initial retransmission timeout can be increased from its default value if the minimum round-trip time of the previous connection is larger.
Multi-Path
For each path, the algorithms described above that embody transmission and congestion control, forward error correction, sender based pacing, receiver based pacing, stream based parameter tuning, detection and correction for missing and out of order packets, use of information across multiple TCP connections, fast connection start and stop, TCP/UDP fallback, cascaded coding, recoding by intermediate nodes, and coding of the ACKs can be employed to improve the overall end-to-end throughput over the multiple paths between the source node and destination node. When losses are detected and FEC is used, the extra coded packets can be sent over any or all of the paths. For instance, coded packets sent to repair losses can be sent preferentially over lower latency paths to reduce recovery delay. The destination node will decode any N of packets that are received over all of the paths and assemble them into a block of N original packets by recreating any missing packets from the ones received. If less than N different coded packets are received across all paths, then the destination node will request the number of missing packets x where x=N−number of packets received be retransmitted. Any set of x different coded packet can be retransmitted over any path and then used to reconstruct the missing packets in the block of N.
When there are networks with large differences in round trip time (RTT) latencies, the packets received over the lower RTT latencies will need to be buffered at the receiver in order to be combined with the higher RTT latency packets. The choice of packets sent on each path can be controlled so as to reduce the extent of reordering and associated buffering on the receiver side, e.g. among the packets available to be sent, earlier packets can be sent preferentially on higher latency paths and later packets can be sent preferentially on lower latency paths.
Individual congestion control loops may be employed on each path to adapt to the available bandwidth and congestion on the path. An additional overall congestion control loop may be employed to control the total sending window or rate across all the paths of a multi-path connection, for fairness with single-path connections.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In some examples, other types of messages may be preferentially sent over the low latency data path. For example, acknowledgement messages, retransmission messages, and/or other time critical messages may be transmitted over the low latency data path while other data messages are transmitted over the higher latency data path.
In some examples, additional data paths with different characteristics (e.g., latencies) can also be included in the communication system, with messages being balanced over any of a number of data paths based on characteristics of the messages (e.g., message type) and characteristics of the data paths.
In some examples, other types of messages may be preferentially sent over the low latency data path. For example, acknowledgement messages, retransmission messages, and/or other time critical messages may be transmitted over the low latency data path while other data messages are transmitted over the higher latency data path.
In some examples, additional data paths with different characteristics (e.g., latencies) can also be included in the communication system, with messages being balanced over any of a number of data paths based on characteristics of the messages (e.g., message type) and characteristics of the data paths.
Alternatives and Implementations
In the document above, certain features of the packet coding and transmission control protocols are described individually, or in isolation, but it should be understood that there are certain advantages that may be gained by combining multiple features together. Preferred embodiments for the packet coding and transmission control protocols described may depend on whether the transmission links and network nodes traversed between communication session end-points belong to certain fiber or cellular carriers (e.g. AT&T, T-Mobile, Sprint, Verizon, Level 3) and/or end-user Internet Service Providers (ISPs) (e.g. AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, Time Warner, Century Link, Charter, Cox) or are over certain wired (e.g. DSL, cable, fiber-to-the-curb/home (FTTx)) or wireless (e.g. WiFi, cellular, satellite) links. In embodiments, probe transmissions may be used to characterize the types of network nodes and transmission links communication signals are traversing and the packet coding and transmission control protocol may be adjusted to achieve certain performance. In some embodiments, data transmissions may be monitored to characterize the types of network nodes and transmission links communication signals are traversing and the packet coding and transmission control protocol may be adjusted to achieve certain performance. In at least some embodiments, quantities such as round-trip-time (RTT), one-way transmission times (OWTT), congestion window, pacing rate, packet loss rate, number of overhead packets, and the like may be monitored continuously, intermittently, in response to a trigger signal or event, and the like. In at least some embodiments, combinations of probe transmissions and data transmissions may be used to characterize network and communication session performance in real time.
In at least some embodiments, network and communication parameters may be stored in the end-devices of communication sessions and/or they may be stored in network resources such as servers, switches, nodes, computers, databases and the like. These network and communication parameters may be used by the packet coding and transmission control protocol to determine initial parameter settings for the protocol to reduce the time it may take to adjust protocol parameters to achieve adequate performance. In embodiments, the network and communication parameters may be tagged and/or associated with certain geographical locations, network nodes, network paths, equipment types, carrier networks, service providers, types of transmission paths and the like. In embodiments, the end-devices may be configured to automatically record and/or report protocol parameter settings and to associate those settings with certain locations determined using GPS-type location identification capabilities resident in those devices. In embodiments, the end-devices may be configured to automatically record and/or report protocol parameters settings and to associate those settings with certain carrier networks, ISP equipment traversed, types of wired and/or wireless links and the like.
In at least some embodiments, a packet coding and transmission control protocol as described above may adjust more than one parameter to achieve adequate or improved network performance. Improved network performance may be characterized by less delay in delivering data packets, less delay in completing file transfers, higher quality audio and video signal delivery, more efficient use of network resources, less power consumed by the end-users, more end-users supported by existing hardware resources and the like.
In at least some embodiments, certain modules or features of the packet coding and transmission control protocol may be turned on or off depending on the data's path through a network. In some embodiments, the order in which certain features are implemented or controlled may be adjusted depending on the data's path through a network. In some embodiments, the probe transmissions and/or data transmissions may be used in open-loop or closed-loop control algorithms to adjust the adjustable parameters and/or the sequence of feature implementation in the packet coding and transmission control protocol.
It should be understood that examples which involve monitoring to control the protocol can in general involve aspects that are implemented at the source, the destination, or at a combination of the source and the destination. Therefore, it should be evident that although embodiments are described above in which features are described as being implemented at particular endpoints, alternative embodiments involve implementation of those features at different endpoints. Also, as described above, monitoring to control the protocol can in general involve aspects that are implemented intermediate nodes or points in the network. Therefore, it should be evident that although embodiments are described above in which features are described as being implemented at particular endpoints, alternative embodiments involve implementation of those features at different nodes, including intermediate nodes, throughout the network.
In addition to the use of monitored parameters for control of the protocols, the data may be used for other purposes. For example, the data may support network analytics that are used, for example, to control or provision the network as a whole.
The PC-TCP approaches may be adapted to enhance existing protocols and procedures, and in particular protocols and procedures used in content delivery, for example, as used in coordinated content delivery networks. For instance, monitored parameters may be used to direct a client to the server or servers that can deliver an entire unit of content as soon as possible rather than merely direct the client to a least loaded server or to server accessible over a least congested path. A difference in such an new approach is that getting an entire file as fast as possible may require packets to be sent from multiple servers and/or servers that are not geographically the closest, over multiple links, and using new acknowledgement protocols that coordinate the incoming data while requiring a minimum of retransmissions or FEC overhead. Coordinating may include waiting for gaps in strings of packets (out-of-order packets) to be filled in by later arriving packets and/or by coded packets. In addition, the PC-TCP approaches may improve the performance of wireless, cellular, and satellite links, significantly improving the end-to-end network performance.
Some current systems use “adaptive bit rates” to try to preserve video transmission through dynamic and/or poorly performing links. In some instances, the PC-TCP approaches described above replace adaptive bit rate schemes and may be able to present a very high data rate to a user for a long period of time. In other instances, the PC-TCP approaches are used in conjunction with currently-available adaptive bit rate schemes to support higher data rates on average than could be supported by adaptive bit rate schemes alone. In some instances, the PC-TCP approaches may include integrated bit rate adjustments as part of its feature set and may use any and/or all of the previously identified adjustable parameters and/or monitored parameters to improve the performance of a combined PC-TCP and bit-rate adaptive solution.
Certain embodiments described following relate to heating, and more particularly to cooking and recipes, including by use of intelligent devices, and in a context of the IoT.
With the emergence of the IoT, opportunities exist for unlocking value surrounding a wide range of devices. To date, such opportunities have been limited for many users, particularly in rural areas of developing countries, by the absence of robust energy and communications infrastructure. The same problems with infrastructure also limit the ability of users to access more basic features of certain devices; for example, rather than using modem cooking systems, such as with gas burners, many rural users still cook over fires, using wood or other biofuel. A need exists for devices that meet basic needs, such as for modern cooking capability, without reliance on infrastructure, and an opportunity exists to expand the capabilities of basic cooking devices to provide a much wider range of capabilities that will serve other needs and provide other benefits to users of cooking devices.
Many industrial environments are similarly isolated from conventional energy and communications infrastructure. For example, offshore drilling platforms, industrial mining environments, pipeline operations, large-scale agricultural environments, marine exploration environments (e.g., deep ocean exploration), marine and other large-scale transportation environments (such as ships, boats, submarines, aircraft and spacecraft) are often entirely isolated from the traditional power grid, or require very expensive power transmission cables to receive power from traditional sources. Other industrial environments are isolated for other reasons, such as to maintain “clean room” isolation during semi-conductor manufacturing, pharmaceutical preparation, or handling of hazardous materials, where interfaces like outlets and switches for delivering conventional power potentially provide points of penetration or escape for contaminants or biologically active materials. For these environments, a need exists for cooking systems that provide improved independence from conventional power sources. Also, in many of these environments fire is a significant hazard, among other things because of the presence of fire hazards and significant restrictions on egress for personnel. In those cases, storage of fuel for cooking in an environment presents a risk, because the fuel can exacerbate the extent of a fire, potentially resulting in disastrous consequences. Accordingly, such platforms and environments, such as oil drilling platforms, may use diesel generators to power cooking and other systems, because diesel is perceived as presenting lower risk than propane, gasoline, or other fuel sources; however, diesel fuel also burns and remains a significant hazard. A need exists for safer mechanisms for providing cooking capability in isolated industrial environments.
Intelligent cooking systems are disclosed herein, including an intelligent cooking system that is provided with processing, communications, and other information technology components, for remote monitoring and control and various value-added features and services, embodiments of which use an electrolyzer, optionally a solar-powered electrolyzer, to produce hydrogen as an on-demand fuel stream for a heating element, such as a burner, of the cooking system.
Embodiments of cooking systems disclosed herein include ones for consumer and commercial use, such as for cooking meals in homes and in restaurants, which may include various embodiments of cooktops, stoves, toasters, ovens, grills and the like. Embodiments of cooking systems also include industrial cooking systems, such as for heating, drying, curing, and cooking not only food products and ingredients, but also a wide variety of other products and components that are manufactured in and/or used in the industrial environments. These may include systems and components used in assembly lines (such as for heating, drying, curing, or otherwise treating parts or materials at one stage of production, such as to treat coatings, polymers, or the like that are coated, dispersed, painted, or otherwise disposed on components), in semi-conductor manufacturing and preparation (such as for heating or curing layers of a semi-conductor process, including in robotic assembly processes), in tooling processes (such as for curing injection molds and other molds, tools, dies, or the like), in extrusion processes (such as for curing, heating or otherwise treating results of extrusion), and many others. These may also include systems and components used in various industrial environments for servicing personnel, such as on ships, submarines, offshore drilling platforms, and other marine platforms, on large equipment, such as on mining or drilling equipment, cranes, or agricultural equipment, in energy production environments, such as oil, gas, hydro-power, wind power, solar power, and other environments. Accordingly, while certain embodiments are disclosed for specific environments, references to cooking systems should be understood to encompass any of these consumer, commercial and industrial systems for cooking, heating, curing, and treating, except where context indicates otherwise.
Provided herein is an intelligent cooking system leveraging hydrogen technology plus cloud-based value-added-services derived from profiling, analytics, and the like. The smart hydrogen technology cooking system provides a standardized framework enabling other intelligent devices, such as smart-home devices and IoT devices to connect to the platform to further enrich the overall intelligence of contextual knowledge that enables providing highly relevant value-added-services. The intelligent cooking system device (referred to herein in some cases as the “cooktop”), may be enabled with processing, communications, and other information technology components and interfaces for enabling a variety of features, benefits, and value added services including ones based on user profiling, analytics, remote monitoring, remote processing and control, and autonomous control. Interfaces that allow machine-to-machine or user-to-machine communication with other devices and the cloud (such as trough application programming interfaces) enables the cooking system to contribute data that is valuable for analytics (e.g., on users of the cooking system and on various consumer, commercial and industrial processes that involve the cooking system), as well as for monitoring, control and operation of other devices and systems. Through similar interfaces, the monitoring, control and/or operation of the cooking system, and its various capabilities, can benefit from or be based on data received from other devices (e.g., IoT devices) and from other data sources, such as from the cloud. For example, the cooking system may track its usage, such as to determine when to send a signal for refueling the cooking system itself, to send a signal for re-supplying one or more ingredients, components or materials (such as based on detected patterns of usage of the same over time periods), to determine and provide guidance on usage of the cooking system (such as to suggest training or improvements in usage to improve efficiency or efficacy), and the like. These may include results based on applying machine learning to the use of the fuel, the use of the cooking system, or the like.
In embodiments, the intelligent cooking system may be fueled by a hydrogen generator, referred to herein in some cases as the electrolyzer, an independent fuel source that does not require traditional connections to the electrical power grid, to sources of gas (e.g., natural gas lines), or to periodic sources of supply of conventional fuels (such as refueling oil, propane, diesel, or other fuel tanks). The electrolyzer may operate on a water source to separate hydrogen and oxygen components and subsequently provide the hydrogen component as a source of fuel, such as an on-demand source of fuel, for the intelligent cooking system. In embodiments, the electrolyzer may be powered by a renewable energy source, such as a solar power source, a wind power source, a hydropower source, or the like, thereby providing complete independence from the need for traditional power infrastructure. Methods and systems describing the design, manufacturing, assembly, deployment, and use of an electrolyzer are included herein. Among other benefits, the electrolyzer allows storage of water, rather than flammable materials like oil, propane, and diesel, as a source of energy for powering cooking systems in various isolated or sensitive industrial environments, such as on or in ships, submarines, drilling platforms, mining environments, pipeline environments, exploration environments, agricultural environments, clean room environments, air- and space-craft environments, and others. Intelligent features of the cooking system can include control of the electrolyzer, such as remote and/or autonomous control, such as to provide a precise amount of hydrogen fuel (converted from water) at the exact point and time it is required. In embodiments, mechanisms may be provided for capturing and returning products of the electrolyzer, such as to return any unused hydrogen and oxygen into water form (or directing them for other use, such as using them as a source of oxygen for breathing).
Methods and systems describing the design, manufacturing, assembly, deployment, and use of a smart hydrogen-based cooking system are included herein. Processing hardware and software modules for operating various capabilities of the cooking system may be distributed, such as having modules or components that are located in sub-systems of the cooking system (e.g., the burners or other heating elements, temperature controls, or the like), having modules or components located in proximity to a user interface for the cooking system (e.g., associated with a control panel), having modules or components located in proximity to a communications port for the cooking system (e.g., an integrated wireless access point, cellular communications chip, or the like, or a docking port for a communications devices, such as a smart phone), having modules or components located in nearby devices, such as other smart devices (e.g., a NEST® thermostat), gateways, access points, beacons, or the like, and/or having modules or components located on servers, such as in the cloud or in a hosted remote control facility.
In embodiments, the cooking system may have a mobile docking facility, such as for docking a smart phone or other control device (such as a specialized device used in an industrial process, such as a processor-enabled tool or piece of equipment), which may include power for charging the smart phone or other device, as well as data communications between the cooking system and the smart phone, such as to allow the smart phone to be used (such as via an app, browser feature, or control feature of the phone) as a controller for the cooking system.
In embodiments, the cooking system may include various hardware components, which may include associated sensors for monitoring operation, processing and data storage capabilities, and communication capabilities. The hardware components may include one or more burners or heating elements, (e.g., gas burners, electric burners, induction burners, convection elements, grilling elements, radiative elements, and the like), one or more fuel conduits, one or more level indicators for indicating fuel level, one or more safety detectors (such as gas leak detectors, temperature sensors, smoke detectors, or the like). In embodiments, a gas burner may include an on-demand gas-LPG hybrid burner, which can burn conventional fuel like liquid propane, but which can also burn fuel generated on demand, such as hydrogen produced by the electrolyzer. In embodiments, the burner may be a consumer cooktop burner having an appropriate power capability, such as being able to produce 20,000 British Thermal Unit (“BTU”).
In embodiments, the cooking system may include a user interface that facilitates intuitive, contextual, intelligence-driven, and personalized experience, embodied in a dashboard, wizard, application interface (optionally including or integrating with one more associated smartphone tablet or browser-based applications or interfaces for one or more IoT devices), control panel, touch screen display, or the like. The user interface may include distributed components as described above for other software and hardware components. The application interface may include interface elements appropriate for cooking foods (such are recipes) or for using the cooking system for various consumer, commercial or industrial processes (such as recipes for making semi-conductor elements, for curing a coating or injection mold, and many others).
Methods and systems describing the design, manufacturing, assembly, deployment and use of a solar-powered hydrogen production facility in conjunction with a hydrogen-based cooking system are included herein.
Methods and systems describing the design, manufacturing, assembly, deployment and use of a commercial hydrogen-based cooking system that is suitable for use in a range of restaurants, cafeterias, mobile kitchens, and the like are included herein.
Methods and systems describing the design, manufacturing, assembly, deployment and use of an industrial hydrogen-based cooking system that is suitable for use as a food cooking system in various isolated industrial environments are included herein.
Methods and systems describing the design, manufacturing, assembly, deployment and use of an industrial hydrogen-based cooking system that is suitable for use as a heating, drying, curing, treating or other cooking system in various industrial environments are included herein, such as for manufacturing and treating components and materials in industrial production processes, including automated, robotic processes that may include system elements that connect and coordinate with the intelligent cooking system, including in machine-to-machine configurations that enable application of machine learning to the system.
Methods and systems describing the design, manufacturing, assembly, deployment and use of a low-pressure hydrogen storage system are described herein. The low-pressure hydrogen storage system may be combined with solar-powered hydrogen generation. In embodiments, the cooking system may receive fuel from the low-pressure hydrogen storage tank, which may safely store hydrogen produced by the electrolyzer. In embodiments, the hydrogen may be used immediately upon completion of electrolyzing, such that no or almost no hydrogen fuel needs to be stored.
Methods and systems describing the architecture, design, and implementation of a cloud-based platform for providing value-added-services derived from profiling, analytics, and the like in conjunction with a smart hydrogen-based cooking system are included herein. The cloud-based platform may further provide communications, synchronization among smart-home devices and third parties, security of electronic transactions and data, and the like. In embodiments, the cooking system may comprise a connection to a smart home, including to one or more gateways, hubs, or the like, or to one or more IoT devices. The cooking system may itself comprise a hub or gateway for other IoT devices, for home automation functions, commercial automation functions, industrial automation functions, or the like.
Methods and systems describing an intelligent user interface for a cloud-based platform for providing value-added services (“VAS”) in conjunction with a smart hydrogen-based cooking system are included herein. The intelligent user interface may comprise an electronic wizard that may provide a contextual and intelligence driven personalized experience dashboard for computing devices that connect to a smart-home network or a commercial or industrial network based around the smart hydrogen-based cooking system. The architecture, design and implementation of the platform may be described herein.
Methods and systems for configuring, deploying, and providing value added services via a cloud-based platform that operates in conjunction with a smart hydrogen-based cooking system and a plurality of interconnected devices (e.g., mobile devices, Internet servers, and the like) to prepare profiling, analytics, intelligence, and the like for the VAS are described herein. In embodiments, the cooking system may include various VAS, such as ones delivered by a cloud-based platform and/or other IoT devices. For example, among many possibilities, the cooking system may provide recipes, allow ordering of ingredients, components or materials, track usage of ingredients to prompt re-orders, allow feedback on recipes, provide recommendations for recipes (including based on other users, such as using collaborative filtering), provide guidance on operation, or the like. The architecture, design, and implementation of these methods and systems and of the value-added-services themselves may further be described herein.
In embodiments, through a user interface, such as a wizard, various benefits, features, and services may be enabled, such as various cooking system utilities (e.g., a liquid propane gas gauge utility, a cooking assistance utility, a detector utility (such as for leakage, overheating, or smoke, or the like), a remote control utility, or the like). Services for shopping (e.g., a shopping cart or food ordering service), for health (such as providing health indices for foods, and personalized suggestions and recommendations), for infotainment (such as playing music, videos or podcasts while cooking), for nutrition (such as providing personalized nutrition information, nutritional search capabilities, or the like) and shadow cooking (such as providing remote materials on how to cook, as well as enabling broadcasting of the user, such as in a personalized cooking channel that is broadcast from the cooking system, or the like).
Methods and systems for profiling, analytics, and intelligence related to deployment, use, and service of a plurality of hydrogen-based cooking systems that are deployed in a range of environments including urban, rural, commercial, and industrial settings are described herein. Urban settings may include rural villages, low cost housing arrangements, apartments, housing projects, and the like where several end users (e.g., individual households, common kitchens, and the like) may be physically proximal (e.g., apartments in a building, and the like). The physical proximity can facilitate shared access to platform components, such as a hydrolyser or low pressure stored hydrogen, and the like. To the extent that individual cooktop deployments may communicate through local or Internet-based network access, additional benefits arise around topics such as, planning for demand loading, and the like. An example may include generating and storing more hydrogen during the week when people tend to cook a home than on the weekend, or using shared information about recipes to facilitate bulk delivery of fresh items to an apartment building, multiple proximal restaurants, and the like. In embodiments, the cooking system may enable and benefit from analytics, such as for profiling, recording or analyzing users, usage of the device, maintenance and repair histories, patterns relating to problems or faults, energy usage patterns, cooking patterns, and the like.
These methods and systems may further perform profiling, analytics, and intelligence related to deployment, use and service of solar-powered electrolyzers that generate hydrogen that is stored in a low-pressure hydrogen storage system.
Methods and systems related to extending the capabilities and access to content and/or VAS of a smart hydrogen-based cooking system through intelligent networking and development of transaction channels are described herein.
Methods and systems of an ecosystem based around the methods and systems of generating hydrogen via solar-powered electrolyzers, storing the generated hydrogen in low pressure storage systems, distribution and use of the stored hydrogen by one or more individuals, and the like, are described herein. In embodiments, the cooking system, or a collection of cooking systems, may provide information to a broader business ecosystem, such as informing suppliers of foods or other materials or components of aggregate information about usage, informing advertisers, managers and manufacturers about consumption patterns, and the like. Accordingly, the cooking system may comprise a component of a business ecosystem that includes various parties that provide various commodities, information, and devices.
Another embodiment of smart cooking technology described herein may include an intelligent, computerized knob or dial suitable for direct use with any of the cooking systems, probes, single burner and other heating elements, and the like described herein. Such a smart knob or dial may include all electronics and power necessary for independent operation and control of the smart systems described herein.
In embodiments, the cooking system is an industrial cooking system used to provide heat in a manufacturing process. In embodiments, the industrial cooking system is used in at least one of a semi-conductor manufacturing process, a coating process, a molding process, a tooling process, an extrusion process, a pharmaceutical manufacturing process and an industrial food manufacturing process.
In embodiments, a smart knob is adapted to store instructions for a plurality of different cooking systems. In embodiments, a smart knob is configured to initiate a handshake with a cooking system based on which the knob automatically determines which instructions should be used to control the cooking system. In embodiments, a smart knob is configured with a machine learning facility that is configured to improve the control of the cooking system by the smart knob over a period of use based on feedback from at least one user of the cooking system.
In embodiments, a smart knob is configured to initiate a handshake with a cooking system to access at least one value-added service based on a profile of a user.
While the foregoing written description enables one skilled in the art to make and use what is considered presently to be the best mode thereof, those skilled in the art will understand and appreciate the existence of variations, combinations, and equivalents of the specific embodiment, method, and examples herein. The disclosure should therefore not be limited by the above described embodiment, method, and examples, but by all embodiments and methods within the scope and spirit of the disclosure.
The methods and systems described herein may be deployed in part or in whole through a machine that executes computer software, program codes, and/or instructions on a processor. The present disclosure may be implemented as a method on the machine, as a system or apparatus as part of or in relation to the machine, or as a computer program product embodied in a computer readable medium executing on one or more of the machines. In embodiments, the processor may be part of a server, cloud server, client, network infrastructure, mobile computing platform, stationary computing platform, or other computing platform. A processor may be any kind of computational or processing device capable of executing program instructions, codes, binary instructions, and the like. The processor may be or may include a signal processor, digital processor, embedded processor, microprocessor, or any variant such as a co-processor (math co-processor, graphic co-processor, communication co-processor, and the like) and the like that may directly or indirectly facilitate execution of program code or program instructions stored thereon. In addition, the processor may enable execution of multiple programs, threads, and codes. The threads may be executed simultaneously to enhance the performance of the processor and to facilitate simultaneous operations of the application. By way of implementation, methods, program codes, program instructions, and the like described herein may be implemented in one or more thread. The thread may spawn other threads that may have assigned priorities associated with them; the processor may execute these threads based on priority or any other order based on instructions provided in the program code. The processor, or any machine utilizing one, may include non-transitory memory that stores methods, codes, instructions, and programs as described herein and elsewhere. The processor may access a non-transitory storage medium through an interface that may store methods, codes, and instructions as described herein and elsewhere. The storage medium associated with the processor for storing methods, programs, codes, program instructions, or other type of instructions capable of being executed by the computing or processing device may include but may not be limited to one or more of a CD-ROM, DVD, memory, hard disk, flash drive, RAM, ROM, cache, and the like.
A processor may include one or more cores that may enhance speed and performance of a multiprocessor. In embodiments, the process may be a dual core processor, quad core processors, other chip-level multiprocessor and the like that combine two or more independent cores (called a die).
The methods and systems described herein may be deployed in part or in whole through a machine that executes computer software on a server, client, firewall, gateway, hub, router, or other such computer and/or networking hardware. The software program may be associated with a server that may include a file server, print server, domain server, internet server, intranet server, cloud server, and other variants such as secondary server, host server, distributed server, and the like. The server may include one or more of memories, processors, computer readable transitory and/or non-transitory media, storage media, ports (physical and virtual), communication devices, and interfaces capable of accessing other servers, clients, machines, and devices through a wired or a wireless medium, and the like. The methods, programs, or codes as described herein and elsewhere may be executed by the server. In addition, other devices required for execution of methods as described in this application may be considered as a part of the infrastructure associated with the server.
The server may provide an interface to other devices including, without limitation, clients, other servers, printers, database servers, print servers, file servers, communication servers, distributed servers, social networks, and the like. Additionally, this coupling and/or connection may facilitate remote execution of program across the network. The networking of some or all of these devices may facilitate parallel processing of a program or method at one or more locations without deviating from the scope of the disclosure. In addition, any of the devices attached to the server through an interface may include at least one storage medium capable of storing methods, programs, code, and/or instructions. A central repository may provide program instructions to be executed on different devices. In this implementation, the remote repository may act as a storage medium for program code, instructions, and programs.
The software program may be associated with a client that may include a file client, print client, domain client, internet client, intranet client, and other variants such as secondary client, host client, distributed client, and the like. The client may include one or more of memories, processors, computer readable transitory and/or non-transitory media, storage media, ports (physical and virtual), communication devices, and interfaces capable of accessing other clients, servers, machines, and devices through a wired or a wireless medium, and the like. The methods, programs, or codes as described herein and elsewhere may be executed by the client. In addition, other devices required for execution of methods as described in this application may be considered as a part of the infrastructure associated with the client.
The client may provide an interface to other devices including, without limitation, servers, other clients, printers, database servers, print servers, file servers, communication servers, distributed servers, and the like. Additionally, this coupling and/or connection may facilitate remote execution of a program across the network. The networking of some or all of these devices may facilitate parallel processing of a program or method at one or more location without deviating from the scope of the disclosure. In addition, any of the devices attached to the client through an interface may include at least one storage medium capable of storing methods, programs, applications, code, and/or instructions. A central repository may provide program instructions to be executed on different devices. In this implementation, the remote repository may act as a storage medium for program code, instructions, and programs.
In embodiments, one or more of the controllers, circuits, systems, data collectors, storage systems, network elements, components, or the like as described throughout this disclosure may be embodied in or on an integrated circuit, such as an analog, digital, or mixed signal circuit, such as a microprocessor, a programmable logic controller, an application-specific integrated circuit, a field programmable gate array, or other circuit, such as embodied on one or more chips disposed on one or more circuit boards, such as to provide in hardware (with potentially accelerated speed, energy performance, input-output performance, or the like) one or more of the functions described herein. This may include setting up circuits with up to billions of logic gates, flip-flops, multiplexers, and other circuits in a small space, facilitating high speed processing, low power dissipation, and reduced manufacturing cost compared with board-level integration. In embodiments, a digital IC, typically a microprocessor, digital signal processor, microcontroller, or the like may use Boolean algebra to process digital signals to embody complex logic, such as involved in the circuits, controllers, and other systems described herein. In embodiments, a data collector, an expert system, a storage system, or the like may be embodied as a digital integrated circuit (“IC”), such as a logic IC, memory chip, interface IC (e.g., a level shifter, a serializer, a deserializer, and the like), a power management IC and/or a programmable device; an analog integrated circuit, such as a linear IC, RF IC, or the like, or a mixed signal IC, such as a data acquisition IC (including A/D converters, D/A converter, digital potentiometers) and/or a clock/timing IC.
The methods and systems described herein may be deployed in part or in whole through network infrastructures. The network infrastructure may include elements such as computing devices, servers, routers, hubs, firewalls, clients, personal computers, communication devices, routing devices and other active and passive devices, modules and/or components as known in the art. The computing and/or non-computing device(s) associated with the network infrastructure may include, apart from other components, a storage medium such as flash memory, buffer, stack, RAM, ROM, and the like. The processes, methods, program codes, instructions described herein and elsewhere may be executed by one or more of the network infrastructural elements. The methods and systems described herein may be configured for use with any kind of private, community, or hybrid cloud computing network or cloud computing environment, including those which involve features of software as a service (“SaaS”), platform as a service (“PaaS”), and/or infrastructure as a service (“IaaS”).
The methods, program codes, and instructions described herein and elsewhere may be implemented on a cellular network having multiple cells. The cellular network may either be frequency division multiple access (“FDMA”) network or code division multiple access (“CDMA”) network. The cellular network may include mobile devices, cell sites, base stations, repeaters, antennas, towers, and the like. The cell network may be a GSM, GPRS, 3G, EVDO, mesh, or other network types.
The methods, program codes, and instructions described herein and elsewhere may be implemented on or through mobile devices. The mobile devices may include navigation devices, cell phones, mobile phones, mobile personal digital assistants, laptops, palmtops, netbooks, pagers, electronic books readers, music players and the like. These devices may include, apart from other components, a storage medium such as a flash memory, buffer, RAM, ROM and one or more computing devices. The computing devices associated with mobile devices may be enabled to execute program codes, methods, and instructions stored thereon. Alternatively, the mobile devices may be configured to execute instructions in collaboration with other devices. The mobile devices may communicate with base stations interfaced with servers and configured to execute program codes. The mobile devices may communicate on a peer-to-peer network, mesh network, or other communications network. The program code may be stored on the storage medium associated with the server and executed by a computing device embedded within the server. The base station may include a computing device and a storage medium. The storage device may store program codes and instructions executed by the computing devices associated with the base station.
The computer software, program codes, and/or instructions may be stored and/or accessed on machine readable transitory and/or non-transitory media that may include: computer components, devices, and recording media that retain digital data used for computing for some interval of time; semiconductor storage known as random access memory (“RAM”); mass storage typically for more permanent storage, such as optical discs, forms of magnetic storage like hard disks, tapes, drums, cards and other types; processor registers, cache memory, volatile memory, non-volatile memory; optical storage such as CD, DVD; removable media such as flash memory (e.g., USB sticks or keys), floppy disks, magnetic tape, paper tape, punch cards, standalone RAM disks, zip drives, removable mass storage, off-line, and the like; other computer memory such as dynamic memory, static memory, read/write storage, mutable storage, read only, random access, sequential access, location addressable, file addressable, content addressable, network attached storage, storage area network, bar codes, magnetic ink, and the like.
The methods and systems described herein may transform physical and/or or intangible items from one state to another. The methods and systems described herein may also transform data representing physical and/or intangible items from one state to another.
The elements described and depicted herein, including in flow charts and block diagrams throughout the Figures, imply logical boundaries between the elements. However, according to software or hardware engineering practices, the depicted elements and the functions thereof may be implemented on machines through computer executable transitory and/or non-transitory media having a processor capable of executing program instructions stored thereon as a monolithic software structure, as standalone software modules, or as modules that employ external routines, code, services, and so forth, or any combination of these, and all such implementations may be within the scope of the present disclosure. Examples of such machines may include, but may not be limited to, personal digital assistants, laptops, personal computers, mobile phones, other handheld computing devices, medical equipment, wired or wireless communication devices, transducers, chips, calculators, satellites, tablet PCs, electronic books, gadgets, electronic devices, devices having artificial intelligence, computing devices, networking equipment, servers, routers, and the like. Furthermore, the elements depicted in the flow chart and block diagrams or any other logical component may be implemented on a machine capable of executing program instructions. Thus, while the foregoing drawings and descriptions set forth functional aspects of the disclosed systems, no particular arrangement of software for implementing these functional aspects should be inferred from these descriptions unless explicitly stated or otherwise clear from the context. Similarly, it will be appreciated that the various steps identified and described above may be varied, and that the order of steps may be adapted to particular applications of the techniques disclosed herein. All such variations and modifications are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure. As such, the depiction and/or description of an order for various steps should not be understood to require a particular order of execution for those steps, unless required by a particular application, or explicitly stated or otherwise clear from the context.
The methods and/or processes described above, and steps associated therewith, may be realized in hardware, software or any combination of hardware and software suitable for a particular application. The hardware may include a general-purpose computer and/or dedicated computing device or specific computing device or particular aspect or component of a specific computing device. The processes may be realized in one or more microprocessors, microcontrollers, embedded microcontrollers, programmable digital signal processors or other programmable device, along with internal and/or external memory. The processes may also, or instead, be embodied in an application specific integrated circuit, a programmable gate array, programmable array logic, or any other device or combination of devices that may be configured to process electronic signals. It will further be appreciated that one or more of the processes may be realized as a computer executable code capable of being executed on a machine-readable medium.
The computer executable code may be created using a structured programming language such as C, an object oriented programming language such as C++, or any other high-level or low-level programming language (including assembly languages, hardware description languages, and database programming languages and technologies) that may be stored, compiled or interpreted to run on one of the above devices, as well as heterogeneous combinations of processors, processor architectures, or combinations of different hardware and software, or any other machine capable of executing program instructions.
Thus, in one aspect, methods described above and combinations thereof may be embodied in computer executable code that, when executing on one or more computing devices, performs the steps thereof. In another aspect, the methods may be embodied in systems that perform the steps thereof, and may be distributed across devices in a number of ways, or all of the functionality may be integrated into a dedicated, standalone device or other hardware. In another aspect, the means for performing the steps associated with the processes described above may include any of the hardware and/or software described above. All such permutations and combinations are intended to fall within the scope of the present disclosure.
While the disclosure has been disclosed in connection with the preferred embodiments shown and described in detail, various modifications and improvements thereon will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the spirit and scope of the present disclosure is not to be limited by the foregoing examples, but is to be understood in the broadest sense allowable by law.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the disclosure (especially in the context of the following claims) is to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the disclosure, and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the disclosure unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the disclosure.
Implementations of approaches described above may include software implementations, which use software instructions stored on non-transitory machine-readable media. The procedures and protocols as described above in the text and figures are sufficient for one skilled in the art to implement them in such software implementations. In some examples, the software may execute on a client node (e.g., a smartphone) using a general-purpose processor that implements a variety of functions on the client node. Software that executes on end nodes or intermediate network nodes may use processors that are dedicated to processing network traffic, for example, being embedded in network processing devices. In some implementations, certain functions may be implemented in hardware, for example, using Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), and/or Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), thereby reducing the load on a general purpose processor.
Note that in some diagrams and figures in this disclosure, networks such as the internet, carrier networks, internet service provider networks, local area networks (LANs), metro area networks (MANs), wide area networks (WANs), storage area networks (SANs), backhaul networks, cellular networks, satellite networks and the like, may be depicted as clouds. Also note, that certain processes may be referred to as taking place in the cloud and devices may be described as accessing the cloud. In these types of descriptions, the cloud should be understood to be some type of network comprising networking equipment and wireless and/or wired links.
The description above may refer to a client device communicating with a server, but it should be understood that the technology and techniques described herein are not limited to those exemplary devices as the end-points of communication connections or sessions. The end-points may also be referred to as, or may be, senders, transmitters, transceivers, receivers, servers, video servers, content servers, proxy servers, cloud storage units, caches, routers, switches, buffers, mobile devices, tablets, smart phones, handsets, computers, set-top boxes, modems, gaming systems, nodes, satellites, base stations, gateways, satellite ground stations, wireless access points, and the like. The devices at any of the end-points or intermediate nodes of communication connections or sessions may be commercial media streaming boxes such as those implementing Apple TV, Roku, Chromecast, Amazon Fire, Slingbox, and the like, or they may be custom media streaming boxes. The devices at the any of the end-points or intermediate nodes of communication connections or sessions may be smart televisions and/or displays, smart appliances such as hubs, refrigerators, security systems, power panels and the like, smart vehicles such as cars, boats, busses, trains, planes, carts, and the like, and may be any device on the Internet of Things (IoT). The devices at any of the end-points or intermediate nodes of communication connections or sessions may be single-board computers and/or purpose built computing engines comprising processors such as ARM processors, video processors, system-on-a-chip (SoC), and/or memory such as random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), or any kind of electronic memory components.
Communication connections or sessions may exist between two routers, two clients, two network nodes, two servers, two mobile devices, and the like, or any combination of potential nodes and/or end-point devices. In many cases, communication sessions are bi-directional so that both end-point devices may have the ability to send and receive data. While these variations may not be stated explicitly in every description and exemplary embodiment in this disclosure, it should be understood that the technology and techniques we describe herein are intended to be applied to all types of known end-devices, network nodes and equipment and transmission links, as well as to future end-devices, network nodes and equipment and transmission links with similar or improved performance.
The methods and systems described herein may be deployed in part or in whole through a machine that executes computer software, program codes, and/or instructions on a processor. The present disclosure may be implemented as a method on the machine, as a system or apparatus as part of or in relation to the machine, or as a computer program product embodied in a computer readable medium executing on one or more of the machines. In embodiments, the processor may be part of a server, cloud server, client, network infrastructure, mobile computing platform, stationary computing platform, or other computing platforms. A processor may be any kind of computational or processing device capable of executing program instructions, codes, binary instructions, and the like. The processor may be or may include a signal processor, digital processor, embedded processor, microprocessor, or any variant such as a co-processor (math co-processor, graphic co-processor, communication co-processor, and the like) and the like that may directly or indirectly facilitate execution of program code or program instructions stored thereon. In addition, the processor may enable execution of multiple programs, threads, and codes. The threads may be executed simultaneously to enhance the performance of the processor and to facilitate simultaneous operations of the application. By way of implementation, methods, program codes, program instructions and the like described herein may be implemented in one or more thread. The thread may spawn other threads that may have assigned priorities associated with them; the processor may execute these threads based on priority or any other order based on instructions provided in the program code. The processor, or any machine utilizing one, may include non-transitory memory that stores methods, codes, instructions, and programs as described herein and elsewhere. The processor may access a non-transitory storage medium through an interface that may store methods, codes, and instructions as described herein and elsewhere. The storage medium associated with the processor for storing methods, programs, codes, program instructions or other type of instructions capable of being executed by the computing or processing device may include but may not be limited to one or more of a CD-ROM, DVD, memory, hard disk, flash drive, RAM, ROM, cache, and the like.
A processor may include one or more cores that may enhance speed and performance of a multiprocessor. In embodiments, the process may be a dual core processor, quad core processors, other chip-level multiprocessor and the like that combine two or more independent cores (called a die).
The methods and systems described herein may be deployed in part or in whole through a machine that executes computer software on a server, client, firewall, gateway, hub, router, or other such computer and/or networking hardware. The software program may be associated with a server that may include a file server, print server, domain server, internet server, intranet server, cloud server, and other variants such as secondary server, host server, distributed server, and the like. The server may include one or more of memories, processors, computer readable transitory and/or non-transitory media, storage media, ports (physical and virtual), communication devices, and interfaces capable of accessing other servers, clients, machines, and devices through a wired or a wireless medium, and the like. The methods, programs, or codes as described herein and elsewhere may be executed by the server. In addition, other devices required for execution of methods as described in this application may be considered as a part of the infrastructure associated with the server.
The server may provide an interface to other devices including, without limitation, clients, other servers, printers, database servers, print servers, file servers, communication servers, distributed servers, social networks, and the like. Additionally, this coupling and/or connection may facilitate remote execution of program across the network. The networking of some or all of these devices may facilitate parallel processing of a program or method at one or more location without deviating from the scope of the disclosure. In addition, any of the devices attached to the server through an interface may include at least one storage medium capable of storing methods, programs, code and/or instructions. A central repository may provide program instructions to be executed on different devices. In this implementation, the remote repository may act as a storage medium for program code, instructions, and programs.
The software program may be associated with a client that may include a file client, print client, domain client, internet client, intranet client and other variants such as secondary client, host client, distributed client, and the like. The client may include one or more of memories, processors, computer readable transitory and/or non-transitory media, storage media, ports (physical and virtual), communication devices, and interfaces capable of accessing other clients, servers, machines, and devices through a wired or a wireless medium, and the like. The methods, programs, or codes as described herein and elsewhere may be executed by the client. In addition, other devices required for execution of methods as described in this application may be considered as a part of the infrastructure associated with the client.
The client may provide an interface to other devices including, without limitation, servers, other clients, printers, database servers, print servers, file servers, communication servers, distributed servers, and the like. Additionally, this coupling and/or connection may facilitate remote execution of program across the network. The networking of some or all of these devices may facilitate parallel processing of a program or method at one or more location without deviating from the scope of the disclosure. In addition, any of the devices attached to the client through an interface may include at least one storage medium capable of storing methods, programs, applications, code and/or instructions. A central repository may provide program instructions to be executed on different devices. In this implementation, the remote repository may act as a storage medium for program code, instructions, and programs.
The methods and systems described herein may be deployed in part or in whole through network infrastructures. The network infrastructure may include elements such as computing devices, servers, routers, hubs, firewalls, clients, personal computers, communication devices, routing devices and other active and passive devices, modules and/or components as known in the art. The computing and/or non-computing device(s) associated with the network infrastructure may include, apart from other components, a storage medium such as flash memory, buffer, stack, RAM, ROM, and the like. The processes, methods, program codes, instructions described herein and elsewhere may be executed by one or more of the network infrastructural elements. The methods and systems described herein may be adapted for use with any kind of private, community, or hybrid cloud computing network or cloud computing environment, including those which involve features of software as a service (“SaaS”), platform as a service (“PaaS”), and/or infrastructure as a service (“IaaS”).
The methods, program codes, and instructions described herein and elsewhere may be implemented on a cellular network having multiple cells. The cellular network may either be frequency division multiple access (“FDMA”) network or code division multiple access (“CDMA”) network. The cellular network may include mobile devices, cell sites, base stations, repeaters, antennas, towers, and the like. The cell network may be a GSM, GPRS, 3G, EVDO, mesh, or other network types.
The methods, program codes, and instructions described herein and elsewhere may be implemented on or through mobile devices. The mobile devices may include navigation devices, cell phones, mobile phones, mobile personal digital assistants, laptops, palmtops, netbooks, pagers, electronic books readers, music players and the like. These devices may include, apart from other components, a storage medium such as a flash memory, buffer, RAM, ROM and one or more computing devices. The computing devices associated with mobile devices may be enabled to execute program codes, methods, and instructions stored thereon. Alternatively, the mobile devices may be configured to execute instructions in collaboration with other devices. The mobile devices may communicate with base stations interfaced with servers and configured to execute program codes. The mobile devices may communicate on a peer-to-peer network, mesh network, or other communications network. The program code may be stored on the storage medium associated with the server and executed by a computing device embedded within the server. The base station may include a computing device and a storage medium. The storage device may store program codes and instructions executed by the computing devices associated with the base station.
The computer software, program codes, and/or instructions may be stored and/or accessed on machine readable transitory and/or non-transitory media that may include: computer components, devices, and recording media that retain digital data used for computing for some interval of time; semiconductor storage known as random access memory (“RAM”); mass storage typically for more permanent storage, such as optical discs, forms of magnetic storage like hard disks, tapes, drums, cards and other types; processor registers, cache memory, volatile memory, non-volatile memory; optical storage such as CD, DVD; removable media such as flash memory (e.g. USB sticks or keys), floppy disks, magnetic tape, paper tape, punch cards, standalone RAM disks, zip drives, removable mass storage, off-line, and the like; other computer memory such as dynamic memory, static memory, read/write storage, mutable storage, read only, random access, sequential access, location addressable, file addressable, content addressable, network attached storage, storage area network, bar codes, magnetic ink, and the like.
The methods and systems described herein may transform physical and/or intangible items from one state to another. The methods and systems described herein may also transform data representing physical and/or intangible items from one state to another.
The elements described and depicted herein, including in flow charts and block diagrams throughout the figures, imply logical boundaries between the elements. However, according to software or hardware engineering practices, the depicted elements and the functions thereof may be implemented on machines through computer executable transitory and/or non-transitory media having a processor capable of executing program instructions stored thereon as a monolithic software structure, as standalone software modules, or as modules that employ external routines, code, services, and so forth, or any combination of these, and all such implementations may be within the scope of the present disclosure. Examples of such machines may include, but may not be limited to, personal digital assistants, laptops, personal computers, mobile phones, other handheld computing devices, medical equipment, wired or wireless communication devices, transducers, chips, calculators, satellites, tablet PCs, electronic books, gadgets, electronic devices, devices having artificial intelligence, computing devices, networking equipment, servers, routers, and the like. Furthermore, the elements depicted in the flow chart and block diagrams or any other logical component may be implemented on a machine capable of executing program instructions. Thus, while the foregoing drawings and descriptions set forth functional aspects of the disclosed systems, no particular arrangement of software for implementing these functional aspects should be inferred from these descriptions unless explicitly stated or otherwise clear from the context. Similarly, it will be appreciated that the various steps identified and described above may be varied and that the order of steps may be adapted to particular applications of the techniques disclosed herein. All such variations and modifications are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure. As such, the depiction and/or description of an order for various steps should not be understood to require a particular order of execution for those steps, unless required by a particular application, or explicitly stated or otherwise clear from the context.
The methods and/or processes described above, and steps associated therewith, may be realized in hardware, software or any combination of hardware and software suitable for a particular application. The hardware may include a general-purpose computer and/or dedicated computing device or specific computing device or particular aspect or component of a specific computing device. The processes may be realized in one or more microprocessors, microcontrollers, embedded microcontrollers, programmable digital signal processors or other programmable devices, along with internal and/or external memory. The processes may also, or instead, be embodied in an application specific integrated circuit, a programmable gate array, programmable array logic, or any other device or combination of devices that may be configured to process electronic signals. It will further be appreciated that one or more of the processes may be realized as a computer executable code capable of being executed on a machine-readable medium.
The computer executable code may be created using a structured programming language such as C, an object oriented programming language such as C++, or any other high-level or low-level programming language (including assembly languages, hardware description languages, and database programming languages and technologies) that may be stored, compiled or interpreted to run on one of the above devices, as well as heterogeneous combinations of processors, processor architectures, or combinations of different hardware and software, or any other machine capable of executing program instructions.
Thus, in one aspect, methods described above and combinations thereof may be embodied in computer executable code that, when executing on one or more computing devices, performs the steps thereof. In another aspect, the methods may be embodied in systems that perform the steps thereof, and may be distributed across devices in a number of ways, or all of the functionality may be integrated into a dedicated, standalone device or other hardware. In another aspect, the means for performing the steps associated with the processes described above may include any of the hardware and/or software described above. All such permutations and combinations are intended to fall within the scope of the present disclosure.
While the disclosure has been disclosed in connection with the preferred embodiments shown and described in detail, various modifications and improvements thereon will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the spirit and scope of the present disclosure is not to be limited by the foregoing examples but is to be understood in the broadest sense allowable by law.
The use of the terms “a,” “an.” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the disclosure (especially in the context of the following claims) is to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. Recitations of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein may be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the disclosure and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the disclosure unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the disclosure.
Any element in a claim that does not explicitly state “means for” performing a specified function, or “step for” performing a specified function, is not to be interpreted as a “means” or “step” clause as specified in 35 U.S.C. § 112(f). In particular, any use of “step of” in the claims is not intended to invoke the provision of 35 U.S.C. § 112(f).
Persons of ordinary skill in the art may appreciate that numerous design configurations may be possible to enjoy the functional benefits of the inventive systems. Thus, given the wide variety of configurations and arrangements of embodiments of the present invention the scope of the invention is reflected by the breadth of the claims below rather than narrowed by the embodiments described above.
It is to be understood that the foregoing description is intended to illustrate and not to limit the scope of the invention, some aspects of which are defined by the scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of, and is a continuation of, U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 16/143,328, filed Sep. 26, 2018, entitled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR INTELLIGENT MANAGEMENT OF DATA COLLECTION BANDS IN A HIGH VOLUME INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENT. U.S. Ser. No. 16/143,328 claims the benefit of, and is a continuation of, U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 15/973,406, filed May 7, 2018, entitled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETECTION IN AN INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS DATA COLLECTION ENVIRONMENT WITH LARGE DATA SETS. U.S. Ser. No. 15/973,406 is a bypass continuation-in-part of International Application Number PCT/US17/31721, filed May 9, 2017, entitled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR THE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS, published on Nov. 16, 2017, as WO 2017/196821, which claims priority to: U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/333,589, filed May 9, 2016, entitled STRONG FORCE INDUSTRIAL IOT MATRIX; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/350,672, filed Jun. 15, 2016, entitled STRATEGY FOR HIGH SAMPLING RATE DIGITAL RECORDING OF MEASUREMENT WAVEFORM DATA AS PART OF AN AUTOMATED SEQUENTIAL LIST THAT STREAMS LONG-DURATION AND GAP-FREE WAVEFORM DATA TO STORAGE FOR MORE FLEXIBLE POST-PROCESSING; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/412,843, filed Oct. 26, 2016, entitled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR THE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/427,141, filed Nov. 28, 2016, entitled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR THE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS. U.S. Ser. No. 15/973,406 also claims priority to: U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/540,557, filed Aug. 2, 2017, entitled SMART HEATING SYSTEMS IN AN INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/562,487, filed Sep. 24, 2017, entitled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR THE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/583,487, filed Nov. 8, 2017, entitled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR THE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS. U.S. Ser. No. 16/143,328 claims the benefit of, and is a bypass continuation of, International Application Number PCT/US18/45036, filed Aug. 2, 2018, entitled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETECTION IN AN INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS DATA COLLECTION ENVIRONMENT WITH LARGE DATA SETS. International Application Number PCT/US18/45036 claims the benefit of, and is a continuation of, U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 15/973,406, filed May 7, 2018, entitled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETECTION IN AN INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS DATA COLLECTION ENVIRONMENT WITH LARGE DATA SETS. International Application Number PCT/US18/45036 claims priority to: U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/540,557, filed Aug. 2, 2017, entitled SMART HEATING SYSTEMS IN AN INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/540,513, filed Aug. 2, 2017, entitled SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SMART HEATING SYSTEM THAT PRODUCES AND USES HYDROGEN FUEL; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/562,487, filed Sep. 24, 2017, entitled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR THE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/583,487, filed Nov. 8, 2017, entitled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR THE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS. U.S. Ser. No. 16/143,328 claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/583,487, filed Nov. 8, 2017, entitled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR THE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS. All of the foregoing applications are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3706982 | Gehman | Dec 1972 | A |
| 3714822 | Lutz | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3731526 | Games | May 1973 | A |
| 3758764 | Harner | Sep 1973 | A |
| 4060716 | Pekrul et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4074142 | Jackson | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4605928 | Georgiou | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4620304 | Faran et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4665398 | Lynch et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4740736 | Sidman et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4852083 | Niehaus et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4881071 | Monterosso et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4945540 | Kaneko | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4980844 | Demjanenko et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4985857 | Bajpai et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4991429 | Stacey et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5045851 | Davis et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5072366 | Simcoe | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5123011 | Hein et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5155802 | Mueller et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5157629 | Sato et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5182760 | Montgomery | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5276620 | Bottesch | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5311562 | Palusamy et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5386373 | Keeler et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5407265 | Hamidieh et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5455778 | Ide et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5465162 | Nishii et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5469150 | Sitte | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5541914 | Krishnamoorthy et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5543245 | Andrieu et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5548584 | Beck et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5548597 | Kayama et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5566092 | Wang et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5568356 | Schwartz | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5629870 | Farag et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5650951 | Staver | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5663894 | Seth et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5701394 | Arita et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5710723 | Hoth et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5715821 | Faupel | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5724475 | Kirsten | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5788789 | Cooper | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5794224 | Yufik | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5809490 | Guiver et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5825646 | Keeler et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5842034 | Bolstad et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5852793 | Board et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5854994 | Canada et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5864773 | Barna et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5874790 | Macks | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5884224 | McNabb et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5895857 | Robinson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5917352 | Dunlap et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917428 | Discenzo et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5924499 | Birchak et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5941305 | Thrasher et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5991308 | Fuhrmann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6003030 | Kenner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6034662 | Kim | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6078847 | Eidson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6084911 | Ishikawa | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6141355 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6184713 | Agrawal et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6198246 | Yutkowitz | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6222456 | Tice | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6272479 | Farry et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6298308 | Reid et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6298454 | Schleiss et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6301572 | Harrison | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6330525 | Hays et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6344747 | Lunghofer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6385513 | Murray et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6388597 | Maezawa et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6421341 | Han et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6426602 | McCann et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6434512 | Discenzo | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6446058 | Brown | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6448758 | Krahn et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6484109 | Lofall | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6502042 | Eid et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6502125 | Kenner et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6554978 | Vandenborre | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6581048 | Werbos | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6628567 | Prosser et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6633782 | Schleiss et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6678268 | Francis et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6694049 | Woodall | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6735579 | Woodall | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6737958 | Satyanarayana | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6789030 | Coyle et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6795794 | Anastasio et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6853920 | Hsiung et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6856600 | Russell et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6865509 | Hsiung et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6970758 | Shi et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6977889 | Kawaguchi et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6977890 | Oohashi et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6982974 | Saleh et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 7027981 | Bizjak | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7043728 | Galpin | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7058712 | Yasko et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7072295 | Benson et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7135888 | Hutton et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7142990 | Bouse et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7174176 | Liu | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7206646 | Blevins et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7218974 | Rumi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7225037 | Shani | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7228241 | Butas et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7249284 | Shah et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7525360 | Wang et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7539549 | Discenzo et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
| 7557702 | Eryurek et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7581434 | Discenzo et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7591183 | King | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7596803 | Barto et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7657333 | Bradford et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7710153 | Masleid et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
| 7836168 | Vasko et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7896012 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
| 8044793 | Eryurek et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8057646 | Hinatsu et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8060017 | Schlicht et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8102188 | Chan et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8200775 | Moore | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8229682 | El-Refaie et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8352149 | Meacham | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8506656 | Turocy | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 8571904 | Guru et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8615374 | Discenzo | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8682930 | Das et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8700360 | Garimella et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8713476 | Martyn | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8761911 | Chapman et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
| 8766925 | Perlin et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8799800 | Hood et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8924033 | Goutard et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8977578 | Cruz-Albrecht et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
| 9092593 | Nasle | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9104189 | Berges Gonzalez et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9104271 | Adams et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
| 9225783 | Stephanson | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9314190 | Giuffrida et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
| 9403279 | Smith et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9432298 | Smith | Aug 2016 | B1 |
| 9435684 | Baldwin | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9518459 | Bermudez et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
| 9557438 | Wessling et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9567099 | Poux et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9596298 | Bekiroglu et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
| 9604649 | Pastor et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
| 9617914 | Minto et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9619999 | Stephanson | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9621173 | Xiu | Apr 2017 | B1 |
| 9645575 | Watson | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9696198 | Turner et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9721210 | Brown | Aug 2017 | B1 |
| 9729639 | Sustaeta et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9755984 | Feroz et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
| 9759213 | Bassett et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9760174 | Letendre | Sep 2017 | B1 |
| 9800646 | Stamatakis et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
| 9804588 | Blevins et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9824311 | Cruz-Albrecht et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
| 9843536 | Miller | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9846752 | Nasle | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9874923 | Brown et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
| 9912733 | T et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9916702 | Rudenko et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9976986 | Wayman et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9979664 | Ho et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9992088 | Ho et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
| 10045373 | Wang et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10073447 | Uchida et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 10097403 | Anand et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10120374 | Hosek et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10168248 | Morey et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
| 10268191 | Lockwood et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
| 10338553 | Cella et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10382556 | Ferre et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10394210 | Cella et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10401846 | Chen et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10409926 | Mehta et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10476985 | Spina et al. | Nov 2019 | B1 |
| 10545472 | Cella et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10545473 | Cella et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10545474 | Cella et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10560388 | Ho et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| 10564638 | Lockwood et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
| 10678225 | Kidd et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10706693 | Castillo Canales et al. | Jul 2020 | B1 |
| 10732582 | Weast et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10739746 | Aparicio Ojea et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10807804 | Kulick et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10824140 | Cella et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 10831093 | Lablans | Nov 2020 | B1 |
| 10983507 | Cella et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 11009865 | Cella | May 2021 | B2 |
| 11029680 | Cella et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
| 11327475 | Cella et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
| 11372394 | Cella et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
| 20010015918 | Bhatnagar | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010035912 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020004694 | McLeod et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020013664 | Strackeljan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020018545 | Crichlow | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032544 | Reid et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020075883 | Dell et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077711 | Belvins et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020084815 | Murphy et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020109568 | Wohlfarth | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020129661 | Clarke et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152037 | Sunshine et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174708 | Mattes | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020177878 | Poore et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020178277 | Laksono | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020181799 | Matsugu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030028268 | Eryurek et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030054960 | Bedard | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069648 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030070059 | Dally et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083756 | Hsiung et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088529 | Klinker et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030094992 | Geysen | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030101575 | Green et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030118081 | Philips et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030137648 | Van et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030147351 | Greenlee | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149456 | Rottenberg et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030151397 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158795 | Markham et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030165398 | Waldo et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030174681 | Gilberton et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200022 | Streichsbier et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229471 | Guralnik et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040019461 | Bouse et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040024568 | Eryurek et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044744 | Grosner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068416 | Solomon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093516 | Hornbeek et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040102924 | Jarrell et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040109065 | Tokunaga | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040120359 | Frenzel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040138832 | Judd | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040165783 | Reynolds et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172147 | Dillon | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186927 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040194557 | Nagase | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205097 | Toumazou et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040259563 | Morton et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267395 | Discenzo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050007249 | Eryurek et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010462 | Dausch et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010958 | Rakib et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050011266 | Robinson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050011278 | Brown et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090756 | Wolf et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050100172 | Schliep et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050132808 | Brown et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050162258 | King | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050165581 | Roba et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050200497 | Smithson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050204820 | Treiber et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240289 | Hoyte et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246140 | Oconnor et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060006997 | Rose-Pehrsson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060010230 | Karklins et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060020202 | Mathew et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060026164 | Jung et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060028993 | Yang et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060034569 | Shih et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060056372 | Karaoguz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060069689 | Karklins et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060073013 | Emigholz et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129340 | Straznicky | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060150738 | Leigh | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060152636 | Matsukawa et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060155900 | Sagues et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167638 | Murphy et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178762 | Wroblewski et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060223634 | Feldman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224254 | Rumi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224545 | Keith | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229739 | Morikawa | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241907 | Armstrong et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060250959 | Porat | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259163 | Hsiung et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271617 | Hughes et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271677 | Mercier | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060274153 | Levien et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060279279 | Foley | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070025382 | Jones et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070034019 | Doihara et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070047444 | Leroy et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070056379 | Nassar et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070076590 | Galpin et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078802 | Bestgen et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070111661 | Bargroff et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118286 | Wang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135984 | Breed et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070204023 | Ohta | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070207752 | Behzad | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208483 | Rabin | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070228300 | Smith | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070260656 | Wiig | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070270671 | Gal | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070277613 | Iwatsubo et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070280332 | Srikanteswara et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070296368 | Woodland et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080049747 | McNaughton et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080079029 | Williams | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080101683 | Zombo et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080112140 | Wong | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080141072 | Kalgren et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080156094 | Holmes et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080162302 | Sundaresan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080169914 | Albertson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080170853 | Rakib et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080194975 | MacQuarrie et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080209046 | Karkanias et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080224845 | Bires | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080234964 | Miyasaka et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243342 | Breed | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080252481 | Vacar et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080262759 | Bosl et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080278197 | Murotake | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288321 | Dillon et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080319279 | Ramsay et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080320182 | Rugo et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090003599 | Hart et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090031419 | Laksono | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090055126 | Yanovich et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090061775 | Warren et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090063026 | Laubender | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090063739 | Weddle | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090064250 | Nakata | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090066505 | Jensen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090071264 | Wray | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090083019 | Nasle | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090084657 | Brandt et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090089682 | Baier et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090093975 | Judd | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090135761 | Khandekar et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090147673 | Niigata | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171950 | Lunenfeld | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090194274 | Del et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204232 | Guru et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204234 | Sustaeta et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204237 | Sustaeta et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204245 | Sustaeta et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204267 | Sustaeta et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090210081 | Sustaeta et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222541 | Monga et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222921 | Mukhopadhyay et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228224 | Spanier et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090243732 | Tarng et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090256734 | Wu | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090256817 | Perlin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090303197 | Bonczek et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100027426 | Nair et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100030521 | Akhrarov et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100060296 | Jiang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100064026 | Brown et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100082126 | Matsushita | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100094981 | Cordray et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100101860 | Wassermann et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100114514 | Wang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100114806 | Harrison et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138026 | Sugishima et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100148940 | Gelvin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100149007 | Zushi et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100156632 | Hyland et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100169030 | Parlos | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100212422 | Allen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100216523 | Sebastiano et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100241601 | Carson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100241891 | Beasley | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100245105 | Smith | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249976 | Aharoni et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100256795 | McLaughlin et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100262398 | Baek et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100262401 | Sterzing et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100268470 | Kamal et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100271199 | Belov et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100278086 | Pochiraju et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100280343 | Huiku | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100316232 | Acero et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318641 | Bullard et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110019693 | Fu et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110055087 | Chen-Ritzo et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110061015 | Drees et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110071794 | Bronczyk et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110071963 | Piovesan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110078089 | Hamm et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110078222 | Wegener | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110092164 | Spanhake | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125921 | Karenos et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110126047 | Anderson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110157077 | Martin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110178737 | Hudson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110181437 | Gershinsky et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184547 | Loutfi | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110185366 | Klingenberg et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110208361 | Hildebrand et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282508 | Goutard et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110288796 | Peczalski et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120013497 | Katsuki et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120025526 | Luo et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120028577 | Rodriguez et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120065901 | Bechhoefer et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120072136 | Hedin | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120095574 | Greenlee | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101912 | Sen et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120109851 | Sanders | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120111978 | Murphy et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120130659 | Chaves | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120166363 | He et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120197596 | Comi | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120219089 | Murakami et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120232847 | Horton et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120239317 | Lin | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120245436 | Rutkove et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120246055 | Schlifstein et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120254803 | Grist et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120265359 | Das et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284291 | Brown et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120296899 | Adams | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120303625 | Ciodaru et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120323741 | Rangachari et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120330495 | Geib et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130003238 | Bush et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130027015 | Park | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130027561 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130060524 | Liao | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130115535 | Delfino et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130117438 | Gupta et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130124719 | Espinosa | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130163619 | Stephanson | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130164092 | Kondo | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130179124 | Patel et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130184927 | Daniel et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130184928 | Kerkhof et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130211555 | Lawson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130211559 | Lawson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130212613 | Velasco et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130217598 | Ludwig et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130218451 | Yamada | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130218493 | Weddle et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130218521 | Weddle et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130227181 | Martin et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130243963 | Rina et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130245795 | McGreevy et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130282149 | Kuntagod et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130297377 | Easo et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130311832 | Lad et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130313827 | Lovmand et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130326053 | Bauer et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140012791 | Grichnik et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140018999 | Adams et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140032605 | Aydin et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140046614 | Pettersson | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140047064 | Maturana et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140067289 | Baldwin | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140074433 | Crepet | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140079248 | Short et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140097691 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140100738 | Itatsu et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140100912 | Bursey | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140120972 | Hartman | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140143579 | Grokop et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140155751 | Banjanin et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140161135 | Acharya et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140167810 | Neti et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140176203 | Matheny et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140188434 | Steinbrecher et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140198615 | Ray | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201571 | Hosek et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140210473 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140222971 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140251688 | Turner et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140251836 | Feeney | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140262392 | Petrossians et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140271449 | McAlister et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140278312 | Blevins et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140279574 | Gettings et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140280678 | Blevins et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140282257 | Nixon et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140288876 | Donaldson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140304201 | Hyldgaard et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140309821 | Poux et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140313303 | Davis et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140314099 | Dress | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140324367 | Garvey et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140324389 | Baldwin et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140336791 | Asenjo et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140336878 | Yanai et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140337277 | Asenjo et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140354284 | Pai et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140376405 | Erickson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140378810 | Davis et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140379102 | Tian et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150016185 | King Liu et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150020088 | Velasco et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150040051 | Fuhrmann et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150046127 | Chen et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150046697 | Galpin et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150055633 | Wu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150059442 | Liljenberg et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150067119 | Estevez et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150070145 | Mar et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150080044 | McHenry et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150097707 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150112488 | Hoehn et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150120230 | Banhegyesi | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150121468 | Park et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150134954 | Walley et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150142384 | Chao et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150151960 | Mc Cleland et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150153757 | Meagher | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150154136 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150180760 | Rickard | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150180986 | Bisdikian et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150185716 | Wichmann et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150186483 | Tappan et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150192439 | Mihelich et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150223731 | Sahin | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150229530 | Silvers | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150233731 | Torpy et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150237563 | Maric et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150248375 | Houel et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150249806 | Gabel | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150271106 | Walker et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150277399 | Maturana et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150277406 | Maturana et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150278839 | Hansen | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150282288 | Bezel et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150288257 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150302664 | Miller | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150317197 | Blair | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150323510 | Huynh et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150323936 | Junk | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150330640 | Stork Genannt Wersborg | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150330950 | Bechhoefer | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150331805 | Daga et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150331928 | Ghaemi | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150354607 | Avni | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150355245 | Ordanis | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150379510 | Smith | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160007102 | Raza et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160011692 | Heim et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160026172 | Steele et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160026173 | Willis et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160026729 | Gil et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160028605 | Gil et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160047204 | Donderici et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160048110 | Hilemon et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160048399 | Shaw | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160054284 | Washburn | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160054951 | Mathur et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160078695 | McClintic et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160091398 | Pluemer | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160097674 | Zusman | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160098647 | Nixon et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160104330 | Rudenko et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160130928 | Torrione | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160135109 | Hampel et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160138492 | Levy et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160142160 | Walker et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160143541 | He et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160147204 | Wichmann et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160153806 | Ciasulli et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160161028 | Arai et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160163186 | Davidson et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160171846 | Brav et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160182309 | Maturana et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160187864 | Choe et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160196124 | Vedula et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160196375 | Nasle | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160196758 | Causevic et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160209831 | Pal | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160210834 | Dayal | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160215614 | Song et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160217384 | Leonard et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160219024 | Verzun et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160219348 | Formo et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160220198 | Proud | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160245027 | Gumus et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160245686 | Pal et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160255420 | McCleland et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160256063 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160258836 | Raman et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160262687 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160273354 | Chen et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160275376 | Kant | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160275414 | Towal | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160282820 | Perez et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160282872 | Ahmed et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160301991 | Loychik et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160302019 | Smith et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160305236 | Forsberg et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310062 | Larson | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160328979 | Postrel | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160330137 | Avci | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160334306 | Chiu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160337127 | Schultz et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160350671 | Morris et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160356125 | Bello et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160359680 | Parandehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160378086 | Plymill et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160379282 | Hill et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170003677 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170004697 | Boerhout | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170006135 | Siebel et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170012861 | Blumenthal et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170012868 | Ho et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170012884 | Ho et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170012885 | Ho | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170012905 | Ho et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170030349 | Bassett et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170031348 | Willis et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170032281 | Hsu | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170037691 | Savage et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170037721 | Lovorn et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170046458 | Meagher et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170053461 | Pal et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170068782 | Pillai et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170070842 | Kulp et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170074715 | Bartos et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170075320 | Day et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170075552 | Berenbaum et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170082101 | Urdaneta et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170096889 | Blanckaert et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170097615 | Mazur et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170097617 | Tegnell et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170102678 | Nixon et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170102693 | Kidd et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170104736 | Seul et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170114626 | Bardapurkar et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170124487 | Szeto et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170130700 | Sakaguchi et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170132910 | Chen et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170147674 | Procops et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170149605 | Strasser | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170152729 | Gleitman et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170163436 | McLaughlin et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170170924 | Soro et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170173458 | Billington et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170175645 | Devarakonda et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170176033 | Tan et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170180221 | Appel et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170200092 | Kisilev | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170205451 | Moinuddin | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170206464 | Clayton et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170207926 | Gil et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170222999 | Banga et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170223046 | Singh | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170238072 | Mackie et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170239594 | Bowers et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170244749 | Shulman et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170249282 | Novet | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170257653 | Farré Guiu et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170284186 | Samuel et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170284902 | Nolan et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170300753 | Billi et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170307466 | Brennan et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170310338 | Hori | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170310747 | Cohn et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170312614 | Tran et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170329307 | Castillo-Effen et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170331577 | Parkvall et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170331670 | Parkvall et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170332049 | Zhang | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170336447 | Valenti et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170338835 | Priller et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170339022 | Hegde et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170352010 | Son et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170353537 | Crabtree et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170371311 | Aparicio Ojea et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170372534 | Steketee et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180007055 | Infante-Lopez et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180007131 | Cohn et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180023986 | Kruusmaa et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180034694 | Farnham | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180035134 | Pang et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180035195 | Bjelosevic et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180052428 | Abramov | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180054490 | Wadhwa et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180059685 | Baroudi et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180062553 | Van et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180066658 | Philippe | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180082501 | Kochhar et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180095455 | Silva et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180096243 | Patil et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180124547 | Patil | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180135401 | Dykstra et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180142905 | Plourde et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180183874 | Cook | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180188704 | Cella et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180188714 | Cella et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180189684 | Vasvani | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180191867 | Siebel et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180203442 | Kotlyarov | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180210425 | Cella et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180247515 | Brady et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180255381 | Cella et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180278489 | Frackelton et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180279952 | Orron et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180281191 | Sinyavskiy et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180282633 | Van De Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180284093 | Brown et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180284741 | Cella et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180288158 | Nolan et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180292811 | Baseman et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180300610 | Pye et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180349508 | Bequet et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180364785 | Hu et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180375743 | Lee et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190020741 | Knaappila | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190021039 | Sudarsan et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190024495 | Wise et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190025805 | Cella et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190025806 | Cella et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190025812 | Cella et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190025813 | Cella et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190033845 | Cella et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190033846 | Cella et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190033847 | Cella et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190033850 | B R et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190036946 | Ruvio et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190041840 | Cella et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190056107 | Desai et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190098377 | Kallus et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190137987 | Cella et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190137988 | Cella et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190140906 | Furuichi et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190163848 | McGranahan et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190171187 | Cella et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190174207 | Cella et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190203653 | Bryan et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190204818 | Ogata et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190304037 | Kawano et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190324431 | Cella et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190326906 | Camacho Cardenas et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190339688 | Cella et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190349426 | Smith et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190354096 | Pal | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20200004561 | Kottler et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200034538 | Woodward et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200034638 | Brewington et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200045146 | Ito | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200067789 | Khuti et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200103894 | Cella et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200133257 | Cella et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200150643 | Cella et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200150644 | Cella et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200150645 | Cella et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200201292 | Cella et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200244297 | Zalewski et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200284092 | Arkenstedt et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200301408 | Elbsat et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200304376 | Finkler et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200311559 | Chattopadhyay et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200359233 | Pergal | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20200387136 | Pöschmann et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20200410590 | Regmi et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20210085861 | Patel et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210096551 | Sayyarrodsari et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210199534 | Bidwell et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
| 20210294904 | Hicks et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
| 20220197255 | Cella et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1319967 | Oct 2001 | CN |
| 1716827 | Jan 2006 | CN |
| 2751314 | Jan 2006 | CN |
| 201138454 | Oct 2008 | CN |
| 101694577 | Apr 2010 | CN |
| 201945429 | Aug 2011 | CN |
| 102445604 | May 2012 | CN |
| 202583862 | Dec 2012 | CN |
| 102298364 | Mar 2013 | CN |
| 103164516 | Jun 2013 | CN |
| 103220552 | Jul 2013 | CN |
| 203202640 | Sep 2013 | CN |
| 204178215 | Feb 2015 | CN |
| 104579552 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 102762156 | Jun 2015 | CN |
| 104951292 | Sep 2015 | CN |
| 205301926 | Jun 2016 | CN |
| 106855492 | Jun 2017 | CN |
| 29806131 | Jul 1998 | DE |
| 0897111 | Feb 1999 | EP |
| 1248216 | Oct 2002 | EP |
| 2983056 | Feb 2016 | EP |
| 2003345435 | Dec 2003 | JP |
| 2012230924 | Nov 2012 | JP |
| 2013541729 | Nov 2013 | JP |
| 2014170552 | Sep 2014 | JP |
| 2014203274 | Oct 2014 | JP |
| 2015531076 | Oct 2015 | JP |
| 2019511819 | Apr 2019 | JP |
| 6921108 | Jul 2021 | JP |
| 20090103188 | Oct 2009 | KR |
| 20110009615 | Jan 2011 | KR |
| 20120111514 | Oct 2012 | KR |
| 9412917 | Jun 1994 | WO |
| 03090091 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| 2006014479 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2010138831 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| 2013123445 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| 2016068929 | May 2016 | WO |
| 2016137848 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| 2016182964 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| 2016187112 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| 2017098193 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| 2017136489 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| 2017196821 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| 2017198327 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| 2017196821 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| 2018142598 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| 2019028269 | Feb 2019 | WO |
| 2019094721 | May 2019 | WO |
| 2019094729 | May 2019 | WO |
| 2019094721 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Lee et al., Industrial Big Data Analytics and Cyber-Physical Systems for Future Maintenance & Service Innovation, 2015, Procedia CIRP 38, pp. 3-7 (Year: 2015). |
| IEEE Xplore Search Results, Jul. 10, 2021, 1 pp. (Year: 2021). |
| Google Search History, Jul. 12, 2021, 1 pp. (Year: 2021). |
| PCT/US18/45036, International Application Serial No. PCT/US18/45036, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 13, 2020, Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016, LLC, 164 pages. |
| Azad, A.K.M. , et al., “Energy-Balanced Transmission Policies for Wireless Sensor Networks”, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing vol. 10, Issue 7, 2011, pp. 927-940. |
| Bal, Mert , “An Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks Framework for Production Monitoring”, IEEE, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Behere, Sagar , “A Generic Framework for Robot Motor Planning and Control”, Master's Thesis in Computer Science, at the Systems, Control and Robotics Master's Program Royal Institute of Technology, 2010, 71 pages. |
| Carey, W.M. , et al., “Abstract of Carey”, IEEE Xplore_Search_Results, 1977, 1 page. |
| Carey, W.M. , et al., “The Acoustic Background Noise of an Operating Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor”, EBR-II, 1977, ICASSP 77, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 2, 1977, pp. 393-396. |
| Chudasama, Shaktising R., et al., “Packet size optimization in wireless sensor network using cross-layer design approach”, 2014 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Delhi, India,, 2014, pp. 2506-2511. |
| Dang, Quoc Khanh , et al., “Sensor Saturation Compensated Smoothing Algorithm for Inertial Sensor Based Motion Tracking”, Sensors 2014, 14, 2014, pp. 8167-8188. |
| Dasarathy, Belur V., “Industrial Applications of Multi-Sensor Multi-Source Information Fusion”, IEEE, 2000, 7 pages. |
| Geeta, D.D , et al., “Fault tolerance in wireless sensor network using hand-off and dynamic power adjustment approach”, Journal of Network and Computer Applications 36, 2013, pp. 1174-1185. |
| Kalore, Sushil Vilas , et al., “A Review on Efficient Routing Techniques in Wireless Sensor Networks”, 2015 International Conference on Advances in Computer Engineering and Applications (ICACEA) IMS Engineering College, Ghaziabad, India, 2015, 5 pages. |
| Koushanfar, Farinza, et al., “Fault Tolerance Techniques for Wireless Ad Hoc Sensor Networks”, IEEE, 2002, 6 pages. |
| Lincoln, Adrian , “What is operating deflection shape (ODS) analysis”, Prosig Noise & Vibration Blog, https://blog.prosig.com/2014/09/01 /what-is-operating-deflection-shape-ods-analysis/, Sep. 1, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Prandi, Luciano , et al., “A Low-Power 3-Axis Digital-Output MEMS Gyroscope with Single Drive and Multiplexed Angular Rate Readout”, ISSCC 2011 / Session 6 / Sensors & Energy Harvesting, 2011, 3 pages. |
| Raghunandan, G.H. , et al., “A Comparative Analysis of Routing Techniques for Wireless Sensor Networks”, Proceedings of the National Conference on Innovations in Emerging Technology—2011 Kongu Engineering College, Perundurai, Erode, Tamilnadu, India.17 & 18, 2011, pp. 17-22. |
| Roselin, J. , et al., “Energy Balanced Dynamic Deployment Optimization to Enhance Reliable Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Network International Journal of Engineering and Technology (IJET)”, vol. 5 No. 4, 2013, 11 pages. |
| Wikipedia Entry , “Petroleum Product”, (snapshot taken of Jan. 21, 2016 entry taken using Wayback machine; web.archive.org/web/ 20160121063510/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroleum_product), 2016, 3 pages. |
| “Maxi High-Current, 25Q, SPDT, CMOS Analog Switches”, 2007, 12 pages. |
| Bouchoucha, et al., “Distributed Estimation Based on Observations Prediction in Wireless Sensor Networks”, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 22, No. 10, 2015, pp. 1530-1533. |
| Dagar, et al., “Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Network: A Survey'”, International Journal of Information and Computation Technology. ISSN 0974-2239 vol. 3, No. 3, 2013, pp. 167-174. |
| Di Maio, et al., “Fault Detection in Nuclear Power Plants Components by a Combination of Statistical Methods”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 62, No. 4, 2013, pp. 833-845. |
| Dimakis, et al., “Network Coding for Distributed Storage System”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 56, No. 9, 2010, 13 pages. |
| Gelenbe, et al., “Abstract of Gelenbe”, Oct. 28, 2008, pp. 1. |
| Gelenbe, et al., “Adaptive QoS Routing for Significant Events in Wireless Sensor Networks”, 2008 5th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems, Atlanta, GA,, Oct. 28, 2008, pp. 410-415. |
| Gelenbe, “Users and Services in Intelligent Networks”, IEE Proc. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 153, No. 3, 2006, pp. 213-220. |
| Kreibich, et al., “Quality-Based Multiple-Sensor Fusion in an Industrial Wireless Sensor Network for MCM”, Sep. 2014, IEEE Transaction on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, No. 9,, 2014, pp. 4903-4911. |
| Ngai, et al., “Information-Aware Traffic Reduction for Wireless Sensor Networks”, 2009 IEEE 34th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN 2009), Zurich, Switzerland, 2009, pp. 451-458. |
| Niazi, et al., “A Novel Agent-Based Simulation Framework for Sensing in Complex Adaptive Environments”, Feb. 2011, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 11, No. 2, 2011, pp. 404-412. |
| Orfanus, et al., “An Approach for Systematic Design of Emergent Self-Organization in Wireless Sensor Networks”, 2009 IEEE, 2009 Computation World: Future Computing, Service Computation, Cognitive, Adaptive, Content, Patterns, 2009, pp. 92-98. |
| Pereira, et al., “A New Alternative Real-Time Method To Monitoring Dough Behavior During Processing Using Wireless Sensor”, International Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 9, Issue 4, 2013, pp. 505-509. |
| Saavedra, et al., “Vibration analysis of rotors for the identification of shaft misalignment Part 2: experimental validation”, Instn Meeh. Engrs vol. 218 PartC: J. Mechanical Engineering Science, 2004, 13 pages. |
| Soleimani, et al., “Abstract of Soleimani Reference”, 2016, 1 page. |
| Soleimani, et al., “RF Channel Modelling and Multi-Hop Routing for Wireless Sensor Networks Located on Oil Rigs”, IET Wireless Sensor Systems, vol. 6, Issue 5, 2016, pp. 173-179. |
| Sorensen, “Sigma-Delta Conversion Used for Motor Control”, Analog Devices technical articl, 2015, 6 pages. |
| PCT/US17/31721, “International Application Serial No. PCT/US17/31721, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 11, 2017”, 23 pages. |
| PCT/US18/45036, “International Application Serial No. PCT/US18/45036, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 21, 2019”, Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016, LLC, 186 pages. |
| PCT/US18/45036, “International Application Serial No. PCT/US18/45036, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, Where Applicable, Protest Fee dated Jan. 14, 2019”, Strong Force Iot Portfolio 2016, LLC, 7 pages. |
| PCT/US18/60034, “International Application Serial No. PCT/US18/60034, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 16, 2019”, Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016, LLC, 23 pages. |
| PCT/US18/60034, “International Application Serial No. PCT/US18/60034, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, Where Applicable, Protest Fee dated Mar. 26, 2019”, Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016, LLC, 7 pages. |
| PCT/US18/60043, “International Application Serial No. PCT/US18/60043, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, Where Applicable, Protest Fee dated Feb. 13, 2019”, Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016, LLC, 7 pages. |
| PCT/US2018/060043, “International Application Serial No. PCT/US2018/060043, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 2, 2019”, Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016, LLC, 29 pages. |
| Reinhardt, “Designing Sensor Networks for Smart Spaces, Unified Interfacing and Energy-Efficient Communication Between Wireless Sensor and Actuator Nodes”, Vom Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik der Technischen Universitat Darmstadt, 2011, 165 pages. |
| Ferry, et al., “Towards a Big Data Platform for Managing Machine Generated Data in the Cloud”, 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Emden, 2017, pp. 263-270. |
| Goundar, et al., Abstract of: “Real Time Condition Monitoring System for Industrial Motors”, 2nd Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (APWC on CSE), https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7476232 (accessed Apr. 24, 2020), 2015, 1 page. |
| Goundar, et al., “Real Time Condition Monitoring System for Industrial Motors”, 2nd Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (APWC on CSE), 2015, 9 pages. |
| PCT/US18/60034, “International Application Serial No. PCT/US18/60034, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 22, 2020”, Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016, LLC, 17 pages. |
| PCT/US18/60043, “International Application Serial No. PCT/US18/60043, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 22, 2020”, Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016, LLC, 23 pages. |
| Rodrigues, et al., “RELOAD/CoAP Architecture with Resource Aggregation/Disaggregation Service”, IEEE 27th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Workshop: From M2M Communications to Internet of Things, 2016, 6 pages. |
| 18840994.0 , “European Application Serial No. 18840994.0 , Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 29, 2021”, Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016, LLC, 13 pages. |
| Borge, S.B., et al., “Multiple Mobile Nodes for Efficient Data Collection from Clusters in Wireless Sensor Network”, 2014 IEEE Global Conference on Wireless Computing and Networking, pp. 153-156. |
| Farnahm, Tim , “Proactive wireless sensor network for industrial IoT”, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2017, 6 pages. |
| GOOGLE , “Google Search History”, Jul. 13, 2021, 1 page. |
| GOOGLE , “Google Search History”, Jul. 21, 2021, 1 page. |
| Han, Hong-Gui , et al., “A soft computing method to predict sludge volume index based on a recurrent self-organizing neural network”, Applied Soft Computing, vol. 38, Jan. 2016, pp. 477-486. |
| Kim, Hyung-Won , et al., “Low Power Routing and Channel Allocation of Wireless Video Sensor Networks Using Wireless Link Utilization”, Ad Hoc & Sensor Wireless Networks, vol. 30, 2016, pp. 83-112. |
| Linnenberg, Tobias , et al., “A market-based multi-agent-system for decentralized power and grid control”, Sep. 1, 2011, IEEE, 2011, pp. 1-8. |
| Mulder, Jacob , et al., “Mobile Sensor Networks for Inspection Tasks in Harsh Industrial Environments”, 2010, pp. 1599-1618. |
| Wang, Jie-Sheng , et al., “SOM Neural Network Fault Diagnosis Method of Polymerization Kettle Equipment Optimized by Improved PSO Algorithm”, The Scientific World Journal, 2012, 12 pages. |
| ABB , “Symphony Plus Condition Monitoring”, 2014, 8 pages. |
| Al-Karaki, Jamal N., et al., “Routing Techniques in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey”, downloaded from the internet “file:///C:/Users/olopez/Documents/e-Red 20Folder/16060107/Karaki.pdf”, 2004, pp. 6-28. |
| Burkle, Axel, et al., “Towards Autonomous Micro UAV Swarms”, J Intell Robot Syst, 2011, 15 pages. |
| Chang, Yongping, et al., “ICA-ANN Method in Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Machinery”, 2012 IEEE, Published in 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2012, pp. 236-240. |
| Rimell, Andrew N., et al., “Variation between manufacturers' declared vibration emission values and those measured under simulated workplace conditions for a range of hand-held power tools typically found in the construction industry”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 38, 2008, pp. 661-675. |
| Saldivar, Alfredo Alan Flores, et al., “Abstract”, 1 page, 2016. |
| Saldivar, Alfredo Alan Flores, et al., “Self-Organizing Tool for Smart Design With Predictive Customer Needs and Wants to Realize Industry 4.0”, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2016, pp. 5317-5324. |
| Somasundara, A.A., et al., “Mobile element scheduling for efficient data collection in wireless sensor networks with dynamic deadlines”, 25th IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium, 2004, pp. 296-305. |
| Zhang, Yingfeng, et al., “Agent and Cyber-Physical System Based Self-Organizing and Self-Adaptive Intelligent Shopfloor”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 13, No. 2, Apr. 2017, pp. 737-747. |
| Niyato, Dusit, et al., “Smart Data Pricing Models for the Internet of Things: A Bundling Strategy Approach”, IEEE Network, 2016, pp. 18-25. |
| Salahshoor, Karim, et al., Fault Detection and Diagnosis of an Industrial Steam Turbine Using a Distributed Configuration of Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems, Feb. 4, 2011, pp. 1280-1293. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190041846 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62333589 | May 2016 | US | |
| 62350672 | Jun 2016 | US | |
| 62412843 | Oct 2016 | US | |
| 62427141 | Nov 2016 | US | |
| 62540557 | Aug 2017 | US | |
| 62562487 | Sep 2017 | US | |
| 62583487 | Nov 2017 | US | |
| 62540513 | Aug 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16143328 | Sep 2018 | US |
| Child | 16152660 | US | |
| Parent | 15973406 | May 2018 | US |
| Child | 16143328 | US | |
| Parent | PCT/US2018/045036 | Aug 2018 | US |
| Child | 16143328 | US | |
| Parent | 15973406 | May 2018 | US |
| Child | PCT/US2018/045036 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/US2017/031721 | May 2017 | US |
| Child | 15973406 | US |
