Methods and systems for automated transportation of items between variable endpoints

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9147173
  • Patent Number
    9,147,173
  • Date Filed
    Monday, October 31, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 29, 2015
    9 years ago
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • US
    • 700 245000
    • 700 247000
    • 700 248000
    • 700 258000
    • 700 259000
    • 701 050000
    • 414 467000
  • International Classifications
    • G06F7/70
    • G06Q10/08
    • G06Q50/28
    • Term Extension
      542
Abstract
An automated system for transporting items between variable endpoints includes a guidance system for identifying the endpoints and at least one autonomous mobile robot interacting with the guidance system for automatically moving items between the endpoints. The at least one robot is configured to (a) collect an item to be transported at a source end point, (b) travel to a destination endpoint utilizing the guidance system to locate the destination endpoint, (c) deliver the item to the destination endpoint, and (d) repeat (a) through (c) for a given set of items. The guidance system is dynamically reconfigurable to identify new endpoints.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present application relates generally to transportation of items and, more particularly, to automated methods and systems for transporting items between variable endpoints.


BRIEF SUMMARY

An automated system for transporting items between variable endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments includes a guidance system for identifying the endpoints and at least one autonomous mobile robot interacting with the guidance system for automatically moving items between the endpoints. The at least one robot is configured to (a) collect an item to be transported at a source endpoint, (b) travel to a destination endpoint utilizing the guidance system to locate the destination endpoint, (c) deliver the item to the destination endpoint, and (d) repeat (a) through (c) for a given set of items. The guidance system is dynamically reconfigurable to identify new endpoints.


A method of transporting items between endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments includes the steps of: establishing a source endpoint and a destination endpoint; activating at least one autonomous mobile robot to automatically (a) travel to a source endpoint, (b) collect an item to be transported, (c) travel to the destination endpoint with the item, (d) deliver the item to the destination endpoint, and (e) repeat (a) through (d) for a given set of items; and changing the location of one or both of the source and destination endpoints, wherein the at least one robot dynamically adapts to changed endpoints to repeat steps (a)-(e).





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram illustrating use of a navigation system by robots to locate endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments.



FIG. 2 is a simplified diagram illustrating use of beacons or passive tags by robots to locate endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments.



FIG. 3 is a simplified diagram illustrating use of beacons and markers by robots to locate endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments.



FIG. 4 is a simplified diagram illustrating use of markers by robots to locate endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of various components of an exemplary robot in accordance with one or more embodiments.





Like or identical reference numbers are used to identify common or similar elements.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Various embodiments disclosed herein are generally directed to material handling methods and systems. In particular, automated methods and systems are provided for transporting items between variable endpoints. An automated system in accordance with one or more embodiments includes a guidance system for identifying the endpoints and one or more autonomous mobile robots or platforms interacting with the guidance system for automatically moving items between the endpoints. Each robot is configured to (a) collect an item to be transported at a source end point, (b) travel to a destination endpoint utilizing the guidance system to locate the destination endpoint, (c) deliver the item to the destination endpoint, and (d) repeat (a) through (c) for a given set of items. The guidance system is dynamically reconfigurable to identify new endpoints. The guidance system can mark a complete route or just the end points of a route for the robot.


Advantages of automated systems in accordance with various embodiments can include flexibility, minimal infrastructure, no programming needed, and adaptability to unstructured environments.


The automated system can be used across broad market segments. Automated systems in accordance with various embodiments can also be operated under a variety of conditions including the following. (1) The terrain is rough, e.g., outdoor environments where conventional material handling systems are difficult to use. (2) The surface over which material must travel cannot support heavy weight, e.g., the weight of trucks, forklifts or other mechanized solutions. (3) The workspace is unstructured and dynamic. In addition to most outdoor spaces, this description includes indoor spaces, where the workflow changes frequently or large objects (e.g., pallets) are often repositioned. (4) The pickup point or the drop off point or both, change during operations. (5) Obstruction of the workspace created by a fixed conveyor system is unacceptable. (6) Material must be moved long distances and system utilization is low to moderate. (7) The initial cost of the material-handling system is required to be low.


Platform


The form of an autonomous robot in a particular implementation can vary depending on payload and environmental factors. By way of example, if the robot operates on a flat surface inside a building, it can use a two-wheeled, differential drive mobility system. If it operates on a rough terrain, e.g., a construction site, it may use a tracked platform able to traverse inclines and loose soil.


Behaviors


The autonomous robots move items from a source or load point to a sink or unload point. The robot's basic behaviors depend on its relationship to the source and sink points and whether it is carrying a load. The following table describes some exemplary behaviors triggered by position and load status:














Position
Load status
Behavior







Source
Loaded
Move toward sink



Empty
Stop, wait to be loaded


Intermediate
[Don't
Proceed along the route until an



care]
endpoint is reached


Sink
Loaded
Stop, wait to be unloaded



Empty
Move toward source









Beyond the basic behaviors outlined in the table, autonomous robots in accordance with various embodiments may have additional behaviors that are activated at intermediate positions along the route. These behaviors deal with obstacles (including other robots) discovered along the way.


Queuing


In accordance with one or more embodiments, each autonomous robot includes a sensor or other mechanism for detecting the presence of other nearby robots. If a robot encounters an obstacle along its route, it either stops or attempts to go around the obstacle. However, if the obstacle is another robot then the robot stops, thus forming a queue. Queues develop near endpoints of the route when robots wait to be loaded or unloaded.


Avoidance


If a robot encounters an obstacle along a route that is not another robot, the robot may attempt to continue toward its destination by skirting the object. The robot can include a wide-angle range sensor (see below) to provide it knowledge of obstructions on and near its route. This may make it possible for the robot to depart from a direct route and then return once the obstacle has been passed. However, whether the robot attempts to go around an obstacle or wait for the obstacle to move is a user choice. In generally uncluttered environments, it will be safe for a robot to search for an alternate route by itself. In more complex environments—especially those with non-geometric hazards—finding a safe alternative to the marked route may not be safe. Thus the user can instruct the robot whether to wait when the route is blocked.


Sensing


Route: In accordance with one or more embodiments, robots can navigate between source and sink using a guidance system such as a beacon marking the route's endpoints or a continuous route marker.


The beacon can be active (e.g., an IR emitter) or passive (e.g., a pattern recognized by an onboard camera). If a beacon is used, each robot should maintain a line of sight between the beacons, i.e., both beacons should be visible to the robot at nearly all times. The robot moves directly from one beacon toward the other unless an obstacle intervenes as described above.


The beacons can establish a coordinate system, where the beacon is the origin of the system. Angular encoding can be used to specify the axes of the coordinate system. The coordinate system enables robots to queue along a particular ray whose origin is the beacon. Angle encoding can also enable other useful properties.


A route marker indicating a robot's path may be used in situations where either a line of sight between beacons does not exist or traveling in a straight path between beacons is not desired. For example, a route marker might enable a robot to avoid a ditch at a construction site.


The route marker can be a worker-positioned tape or line, e.g., comprising a retro-reflective material that enables the robot to acquire it at a distance. The tape or line need not be permanently installed on the floor.


The robot can illuminate the tape or line using, e.g., conventional IR LEDs. In one or more embodiments, the robot detects the tape or line using a position-sensitive detector composed of discrete components (i.e., not a camera) to servo on the tape or line. The detector measures the degree of retro-reflectivity in view to eliminate false positives.


In some embodiments, the robots servo on the line directly. In other embodiments, the robots can servo at any selected offset with respect to the line. Offset servoing enables two important properties. When placing the line to mark the robot's path, workers need not allow space between line and objects. Any time the robot finds its path partially blocked by an object, it will increase its offset from the line so that it can follow the line without colliding with the object. A second feature enabled by offset following allows two robots that meet while traveling along the line in opposite directions to avoid collision. When the robots determine that a collision is imminent, each can offset its position relative to the line. They can thus pass without obstructing each other.


Obstacles: In order to move safely along its route, each robot is equipped with a sensor such as a wide-angle range sensor.


Robot: Each robot can be equipped with a sensor able to distinguish between obstacles and other robots at relatively short range. By way of example, this sensor can be an active IR emitter on one robot that is detected by a receiver on the other robot. The components of this system on the two robots can be arranged such that the following robot detects the robot in front only when the two are physically close.


Load: To allow autonomous operation, each robot can further include a sensor capable of detecting when the robot carries a load. The robot uses the output from this sensor to decide whether to wait at an end point or traverse to the opposite endpoint (see table above).


Manipulation: Robots may optionally include a mechanism enabling a robot to load and unload itself.


User interface: The interface for each robot is preferably simple and intuitive such that the workers themselves are able to setup material handling system wherever necessary. In one or more embodiments, no programming is required.


Implementation Examples

Automated material handling systems can have a wide range of applications, including, by way of example, the following:
















Current
Automated
System


Application
Practice
Solution
Advantages







Produce picker
Laborers in
Workers
The automated


conveyor
the field pick
establish
system



produce and
routes for
eliminates the



place it in a
one or more
time workers



basket or
autonomous
spend in transit



sling.
robots. The
and eliminates



Periodically,
robots travel
the need to carry



they carry
along crop
heavy loads.



the
rows and stop




produce
at the




from the
collection




field to a
point.




truck or
Periodically a




other
robot arrives




collection
at the place




point.
where a





worker is





picking. The





worker places





just-picked





produce on





the robot then





continues





picking.



Truck Loading
Trucks back
Robots move
The automated



up to the
products into
system reduces



loading dock.
the trucks. A
the time and



Workers move
worker in the
number of



items from a
loading area
workers needed



warehouse or
places items
to load a truck.



other facility
onto a robot
Reduced loading



into the
and dispatches
time translates



loading area.
it to the
directly into cost



There the
correct truck.
savings



items may be
A worker in
especially in



staged into
the truck
situations where



orders or
packs the
customers must



loaded
truck.
pay the trucking



directly onto

company for idle



the trucks.

time while trucks



In either case,

are loaded.



workers make





a large





number of





back and





forth trips





to move





items into





trucks.




Baggage
At small
Ticket agents
The automated


Handling
airports ticket
place luggage
system enables



agents collect
on robots
more timely



luggage onto
queued in the
departures by



a tray or pull
ticket area.
reducing the



cart as
Bags then
loading



passengers
move
bottleneck. It also



check in.
immediately
makes more



Eventually,
to the
efficient use of



a batch of
aircraft
airline personnel.



bags is
loading area.
Bags can be



hauled out

loaded onto the



to the

airplane as



airplane.

passengers



Loading

arrive and need



cannot begin

not be loaded en



until the

mass just before



batch arrives.

takeoff.


Contract
Work is
When a new
The automated


Manufacturing
typically
contract job
system improves



performed on
begins routes
the efficiency of



the
are established
low-volume



subassemblies
between the
manufacturing by



of a product at
various stations
providing the



several
where the work
benefits of



different
will be done.
automatic



assembly
The robots
conveyor



stations. The
automatically
systems where



particular
carry
they cannot



stations
subassemblies
now be used.



involved and
from each




the flow of
station to the




work pieces
next.




among them





may change





with each





contract job.





Because





workflow is





frequently





scrambled,





fixed





conveyor





systems





cannot be





used.




Stocking
Workers
Workers mark
The automated


shelves in
place
the start and
system eliminates


stores
merchandise
end points of
multiple round



on stocking
a route. A
trips. Workers



carts then
worker in the
need set up a



push the
store's storage
route only once,



carts to the
area loads
then the robot



correct area
robots with
will follow it



of the store.
the proper
however many



Popular items
items. After
times necessary.



or items that
the robots




do not stack
have




well may
delivered




require
their cargo




many trips.
to the proper





areas (using





an optional





AutoOffLoad





feature)





workers can





stock the





shelves.



Construction
Obstructions
Workers set
The automated


site material
or soft
up a route for
system saves


delivery
surfaces at
robots to
time by relieving



construction
follow. A
workers of the



sites often
worker at one
need to manually



prevent trucks
end of the route
cart material from



from delivering
loads robots
the delivery truck



material to the
with material,
to the work point.



place where it
and a worker at




will be used.
the work point




In these cases
unloads them.




workers may





need to make





repeated trips





to carry or





cart item from





the delivery





point to the





work area.




Landscaping
Trucks filled
A route is
The automated


site material
with plants
established
system reduces


delivery
and other
with drop off
the time needed



items arrive
points indicated.
to distribute



at a
The robots are
plants at



landscaping
loaded at the
landscaping



site. Because
truck then
sites.



trucks cannot
automatically




drive on the
carry plants to




lawn all
the proper point




materials
and drop them




must be
off.




carried or





handcarted





to the places





where they





will be





installed.




Debris removal
Workers
Robots
The automated



tear out
continuously
system



walls,
carry debris
eliminates the



fixtures,
away from the
time workers



and other
work area as
spend in transit



items in
it is generated.
hauling debris.



preparation

Because the



for new

work area never



construction.

becomes



The work

cluttered with



area becomes

debris



filled with

demolition



debris. Carts

proceeds



are brought in,

more



loaded with

efficiently.



debris, and it





is moved to a





dumpster,





usually





located





outdoors.




Consumer leaf
Removing
The
The automated


collection
fallen leaves
homeowner
system makes



typically
places a
raking faster



involves
beacon at the
and easier.



raking the
point where




leaves into a
the leaves are




pile, placing
to be deposited.




the pile on a
An automated




wheelbarrow
robot repeatedly




or tarp, then
travels between




moving the
the leaf deposit




wheelbarrow
point and the




or tarp to a
place where the




collection
owner is raking.




point.
The robot





dumps the





leaves using





an optional





dumping





mechanism.










FIGS. 1-4 illustrate various possible guidance systems that can be used by robots to locate endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments. In FIG. 1, the guidance system comprises a SLAM navigation system that gives robots 10 a global coordinate frame. In this formulation destinations are coordinates, thus no physical markers are necessary.


As shown in FIG. 2, beacons or passive tags 12 visible from a large distance mark each possible destination. This method allows the robot to reach any inbox or outbox without the need of a global frame.



FIG. 3 shows a guidance system combining shorter-range beacons 12 with “highways” established by markers 14 attached to the floor to give the robots a rough global frame. This arrangement simplifies range sensor requirements compared to SLAM.


In FIG. 4, robots are guided by marker 16 laid on the ground, in some cases temporarily.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of various components of an exemplary robot 10. The robot 10 includes a chassis and a drive subsystem 52 for maneuvering the chassis. It further includes a guidance subsystem 54 on the chassis for interacting with the guidance system. In some embodiments, the subsystem 54 includes one or more marker detecting sensors able to detect the position of a marker such as a retro-reflective tape laid on the ground. By way of example, the marker detecting sensors can each comprise a photodiode-based sensor and one or more radiation sources (e.g., LEDs) to servo on the marker.


In some embodiments, the guidance subsystem 54 comprises a plurality of beacons, each having a radio frequency or other (e.g., infrared) beacon transmitter. In this case, the guidance subsystem 54 includes one or more sensors for detecting signals from beacons.


The robot includes an obstacle detection subsystem 56 for detecting other robots and obstacles.


The robot includes a microprocessor-based controller subsystem 58 for controlling operation of the robot in performing programmed behaviors. A power supply 50 for all the subsystems can include one or more rechargeable batteries.


In some embodiments, the drive subsystem 52 takes the form of a differential drive comprising two coaxial wheels and a roller for balance. The wheels are driven together or independently by one or more motors and a drive train controlled by the controller subsystem 58.


The obstacle detection subsystem 56 can include one or more range sensors to detect other robots and obstacles. In some embodiments, the range sensor is a wide-angle (120 degree) range sensor. Raw range sensor data (in the form of a list of angle and range readings) supplied by the sensor is processed by a computer processor (e.g., a processor in the controller subsystem 58) to return the position of other robots and obstacles.


The controller subsystem 58 is configured (e.g., programmed) to perform various functions, including transporting items between endpoints. The controller subsystem 58 is responsive to the output of guidance subsystem 54 and the output of obstacle detection subsystem 56. The controller subsystem 58 controls the drive subsystem 52 to maneuver the robot to prescribed endpoint locations.


Having thus described several illustrative embodiments, it is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to form a part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. While some examples presented herein involve specific combinations of functions or structural elements, it should be understood that those functions and elements may be combined in other ways according to the present disclosure to accomplish the same or different objectives. In particular, acts, elements, and features discussed in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from similar or other roles in other embodiments. Additionally, elements and components described herein may be further divided into additional components or joined together to form fewer components for performing the same functions.


The processes the robots are programmed to perform as described above may be implemented in software, hardware, firmware, or any combination thereof. The processes are preferably implemented in one or more computer programs executing on the programmable controller subsystem, which includes a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including, e.g., volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), and input and output devices. Each computer program can be a set of instructions (program code) in a code module resident in a random access memory. Until required, the set of instructions may be stored in another computer memory (e.g., in a hard disk drive, or in a removable memory such as an optical disk, external hard drive, memory card, or flash drive) or stored on another computer system and downloaded via the Internet or other network.


Accordingly, the foregoing description and attached drawings are by way of example only, and are not intended to be limiting.

Claims
  • 1. An automated dynamically reconfigurable system for transporting items between changeable source and destination endpoints, comprising: a guidance system for identifying the changeable source and destination endpoints; andat least one autonomous mobile robot interacting with the guidance system for automatically moving items between the source and destination endpoints, said at least one robot being configured to (a) collect an item to be transported at a source endpoint, (b) travel to a destination endpoint utilizing the guidance system to located the destination endpoint, (c) deliver the item to the destination endpoint, and (d) repeat (a) through (c) for a given set of items;wherein the guidance system is dynamically reconfigurable while the at least one autonomous robot is in operation to identify new endpoints by changing the source endpoint at which items are to be collected and/or the destination endpoint to which items collected at the source endpoint are to be delivered, and the at least one autonomous mobile robot is configured to automatically detect and dynamically adapt to the new source and/or destination endpoints while in operation in real time upon changing of the source and/or destination endpoints and without the at least one autonomous robot being previously programmed or reprogrammed by an operator with the new source and/or destination endpoints.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the guidance system defines a route to the endpoints comprising route markers that are detectable by the at least one robot to guide the at least one robot to the endpoints.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein each marker comprises a retro-reflective material and the at least one robot each include a marker detecting sensor for detecting the retro-reflective material.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the marker detecting sensor comprises a photodiode-based sensor and one or more radiation sources to servo on the marker.
  • 5. The system of claim 2, wherein the at least one robot is configured to servo on the marker at an offset position relative to the marker, wherein the offset position can be automatically changed to avoid colliding with another robot servoing on the marker.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the guidance system comprises a plurality of beacons, each identifying a different endpoint.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the guidance system comprises a plurality of beacons, each identifying a series of intermediate locations leading to an endpoint.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the guidance system comprises a plurality of beacons, and wherein each beacon includes an infrared emitter and the at least one robot includes a sensor for detecting signals from beacons.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the guidance system comprises a plurality of beacons, and wherein each beacon displays a unique pattern and the at least one robot includes a camera system that can recognize the pattern.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one robot includes a range sensor to detect obstacles or other robots in its travel path.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the at least one robot is configured to change its travel path to avoid the obstacle or other robot blocking its travel path or to wait until the travel path is unblocked.
  • 12. The system of claim 10, wherein the range sensor is capable of distinguishing between detected obstacles and detected robots.
  • 13. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one robot comprises a plurality of robots, and each of the robots is configured to detect the presence of other robots and to form a queue when another robot is detected in its travel path at an end point.
  • 14. The system of claim 1, wherein one of the at least one robot includes a mechanism to load or unload items at endpoints.
  • 15. The system of claim 1, wherein the robot enables items to be manually loaded or unloaded at endpoints.
  • 16. The system of claim 1, wherein each robot comprises: a chassis;an apparatus on the chassis for carrying an item;a drive subsystem for maneuvering the chassis;a subsystem on the chassis for interacting with the guidance system;an obstacle detection subsystem on the chassis;a controller on the chassis responsive to the subsystem for interacting with the guidance system and the obstacle detection subsystem and being configured to control the drive subsystem to travel between endpoints.
  • 17. A method of transporting items using an autonomous mobile robot between changeable source and destination endpoints established at given locations, said method implemented in a microprocessor-based controller in the autonomous mobile robot, the method comprising the steps of: (a) controlling the autonomous mobile robot to automatically identify and travel to a source endpoint to collect an item at the source endpoint to be transported;(b) controlling the autonomous mobile robot to automatically identify and travel to a destination endpoint with the item to deliver the item to the destination endpoint;(c) repeating (a) and (b) for a given set of items; and(d) controlling the autonomous mobile robot to automatically detect a changed location of one or both of the source and destination endpoints, and to dynamically adapt to the changed location of the one or both of the source and destination endpoints in real time while the autonomous mobile robot is in operation to repeat steps (a) through (c), without previous programming or reprogramming of the autonomous mobile by an operator with the changed location of the source and/or destination endpoints.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the source endpoint and a destination endpoint comprises defining a route between the endpoints using route markers that are detectable by the at least one robot to guide the at least one robot to the endpoints.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein each marker comprises a retro-reflective material and the at least one robot includes a marker detecting sensor for detecting the retro reflective material.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the marker detecting sensor comprises a photodiode-based sensor and one or more radiation sources to servo on the marker.
  • 21. The method of claim 18, further comprising controlling the autonomous mobile robot to servo on the marker at an offset position relative to the marker, wherein the offset position can be automatically changed to avoid colliding with another robot servoing on the marker.
  • 22. The method of claim 17, wherein the source and a destination endpoint comprises placing a plurality of beacons at selected locations, each identifying a different endpoint.
  • 23. The method of claim 17, wherein the source endpoint and destination endpoint comprises placing a plurality of beacons at selected locations, each identifying a series of intermediate locations leading to an endpoint.
  • 24. The method of claim 17, wherein the source and destination endpoints are established by placing a plurality of beacons at selected locations, and wherein each beacon includes an infrared emitter and the at least one robot includes a sensor for detecting signals from beacons.
  • 25. The method of claim 17, wherein the establishing the source and destination endpoints are established by placing a plurality of beacons at selected locations, and wherein each beacon displays a unique pattern and the at least one robot includes a camera system that can recognize the pattern.
  • 26. The method of claim 17, wherein the at least one robot includes a range sensor to detect obstacles or other robots in its travel path.
  • 27. The method of claim 26, wherein the at least one robot is configured to change its travel path to avoid the obstacle or other robot blocking its travel path or to wait until the travel path is unblocked.
  • 28. The method of claim 26, wherein the range sensor is capable of distinguishing between detected obstacles and detected robots.
  • 29. The method of claim 17, wherein the at least one robot comprises a plurality of robots, and each of the robots is configured to detect the presence of other robots and to form a queue when another robot is detected in its travel path at an end point.
  • 30. The method of claim 17, wherein one of the at least one robot includes a mechanism to load or unload items at endpoints.
  • 31. The method of claim 17, further comprising manually loading or unloading items at endpoints.
  • 32. The method of claim 17, wherein each robot comprises: a chassis;an apparatus on the chassis for carrying an item;a drive subsystem for maneuvering the chassis;a subsystem on the chassis for interacting with the guidance system;an obstacle detection subsystem on the chassis;a controller on the chassis responsive to the subsystem for interacting with the guidance system and the obstacle detection subsystem and being configured to control the drive subsystem to travel between endpoints.
US Referenced Citations (129)
Number Name Date Kind
3821504 Shomaker et al. Jun 1974 A
3913758 Faircloth et al. Oct 1975 A
4155198 Kelley May 1979 A
4217073 Propst Aug 1980 A
4401236 Germaine Aug 1983 A
4476651 Drury Oct 1984 A
4522546 Ringer Jun 1985 A
4700301 Dyke Oct 1987 A
4749327 Roda Jun 1988 A
4793096 Todd, Sr. Dec 1988 A
4854802 deGroot Aug 1989 A
4869637 deGroot Sep 1989 A
4994970 Noji et al. Feb 1991 A
5016541 Feaster, Jr. May 1991 A
5020964 Hyatt et al. Jun 1991 A
5020965 Tanaka et al. Jun 1991 A
5046914 Holland et al. Sep 1991 A
5051906 Evans, Jr. et al. Sep 1991 A
5081941 Weeks Jan 1992 A
5085553 Bouwens et al. Feb 1992 A
5160235 Bikow Nov 1992 A
5181818 Tanaka et al. Jan 1993 A
5211523 Andrada Galan et al. May 1993 A
5315517 Kawase et al. May 1994 A
5332363 Tanaka et al. Jul 1994 A
5348063 Handleman Sep 1994 A
5348361 Ilchuk Sep 1994 A
5403142 Stewart Apr 1995 A
5427492 Tanaka et al. Jun 1995 A
5496143 Breyer Mar 1996 A
5688102 Vieselmeyer Nov 1997 A
5769589 Lubbers Jun 1998 A
5819863 Zollinger et al. Oct 1998 A
5842306 Onosaka et al. Dec 1998 A
5959423 Nakanishi et al. Sep 1999 A
5974348 Rocks Oct 1999 A
5988971 Fossey et al. Nov 1999 A
6164537 Mariani et al. Dec 2000 A
6186730 Place Feb 2001 B1
6212821 Adam et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216631 Wissner-Gross Apr 2001 B1
6243987 Hessel Jun 2001 B1
6255793 Peless et al. Jul 2001 B1
6336051 Pangels et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347920 Place Feb 2002 B1
6389329 Colens May 2002 B1
6417641 Peless et al. Jul 2002 B2
6431818 Place Aug 2002 B1
6481948 Spears Nov 2002 B2
6496755 Wallach et al. Dec 2002 B2
6508033 Hessel et al. Jan 2003 B2
6532404 Colens Mar 2003 B2
6543983 Felder et al. Apr 2003 B1
6611738 Ruffner Aug 2003 B2
6638004 Berger et al. Oct 2003 B2
6658324 Bancroft et al. Dec 2003 B2
6667592 Jacobs et al. Dec 2003 B2
6729836 Stingel, III et al. May 2004 B2
6850024 Peless et al. Feb 2005 B2
6854209 Van Horssen et al. Feb 2005 B2
6857493 Shupp et al. Feb 2005 B2
6915607 Tagawa et al. Jul 2005 B2
6950722 Mountz Sep 2005 B2
6984952 Peless et al. Jan 2006 B2
6988518 Rackers Jan 2006 B2
6997663 Siebenga Feb 2006 B2
7069111 Glenn et al. Jun 2006 B2
7086820 Blake Aug 2006 B1
7137770 Ueda Nov 2006 B2
7184855 Stingel, III et al. Feb 2007 B2
7198312 Blaho Apr 2007 B2
7200465 Stingel, III et al. Apr 2007 B2
7261511 Felder et al. Aug 2007 B2
7274167 Kim Sep 2007 B2
7343222 Solomon Mar 2008 B2
7400108 Minor et al. Jul 2008 B2
7506472 Leyns et al. Mar 2009 B2
7559736 Mohan Jul 2009 B1
7579803 Jones et al. Aug 2009 B2
7610122 Anderson Oct 2009 B2
7613544 Park et al. Nov 2009 B2
20010008112 Opitz Jul 2001 A1
20020120364 Colens Aug 2002 A1
20020146306 Morrell Oct 2002 A1
20020182046 Schempf et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030030398 Jacobs et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030118487 Pressman et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030165373 Felder et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030199944 Chapin et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040139692 Jacobsen et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050090961 Bonk et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050126144 Koselka et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050135912 Schempf et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050135913 Visser Jun 2005 A1
20050238465 Razumov Oct 2005 A1
20050246056 Marks et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050254924 Swetman et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050254927 Swetman et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050268987 Rackers Dec 2005 A1
20060045679 Ostendorff Mar 2006 A1
20060072988 Hariki et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095169 Minor et al. May 2006 A1
20060120834 Pressman et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060213167 Koselka et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060221769 Van Loenen et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060257236 Stingel et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060293810 Nakamoto Dec 2006 A1
20070017181 Jacobsen et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070042803 Anderson Feb 2007 A1
20070129849 Zini et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070140821 Garon et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070152619 Sugiyama et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070219720 Trepagnier et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080046130 Faivre et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080131254 Cope et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080279663 Alexander Nov 2008 A1
20090012667 Matsumoto et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090021351 Beniyama et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090054222 Zhang et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090148034 Higaki et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090175709 Okabe et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090214324 Grinnell et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090254217 Pack et al. Oct 2009 A1
20110025454 Pomerantz et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110301757 Jones et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120114187 Duarte May 2012 A1
20130110281 Jones et al. May 2013 A1
20130110341 Jones et al. May 2013 A1
20130325159 Kilibarda et al. Dec 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (14)
Number Date Country
3828447 Mar 1990 DE
0195191 Sep 1986 EP
0774702 May 1997 EP
S61204714 Sep 1986 JP
03-285602 Dec 1991 JP
07-065908 Mar 1995 JP
11-077579 Mar 1999 JP
2006-346767 Dec 2006 JP
2007-508667 Apr 2007 JP
2009-511288 Mar 2009 JP
9422094 Sep 1994 WO
9959042 Nov 1999 WO
2007004551 Jan 2007 WO
2009024246 Feb 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinon for PCT/US20121057513, dated Mar. 4, 2013.
European Examination Report for EP09711619, dated Nov. 4, 2013.
SICK LMS 200 Technical Description, Jun. 2003 [online] [retrieved Sep. 11, 2014]. Retrieved from: http://www.sick-automation.ru/images/File/pdf/LMS%20Technicai%20Description.pdf.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130110281 A1 May 2013 US