1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to medical methods and apparatus. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and systems for controlling the deployment of needles using visual feedback from an ultrasonic or other image.
Current medical treatments of organs and tissues within a patient's body often use a needle or other elongate body for delivery of energy, therapeutic agents or the like. Optionally the methods use ultrasound imaging to observe and identify a treatment target and the position of the needle relative to the treatment target.
Of particular interest to the present invention, a treatment for uterine fibroids has recently been proposed which relies on the transvaginal positioning of a treatment device in the patient's uterus. A radiofrequency or other energy or therapeutic delivery needle is deployed from the device into the fibroid, and energy and/or therapeutic substances are delivered in order to ablate or treat the fibroid. To facilitate locating the fibroids and positioning the needles within the fibroids, the device includes an on-board ultrasonic imaging array with a field of view in a generally lateral direction from an axial shaft. A curved needle is advanced from the shaft and into the field of view so that the needle can be visualized and directed into the tissue and the targeted fibroid. The geometry of the needle deployment is advantageous since it permits the location and treatment of fibroids which are laterally adjacent to the shaft.
While effective and very beneficial for patients, such needle ablation and treatment protocols face several challenges. First, initial deployment of the needle can be difficult, particularly for physicians who have less experience. While the physician can view the tissue and target anatomy in real time on an imaging screen, it can be difficult to precisely predict the path the needle will take and assess its final treatment position. While the needle can certainly be partially or fully retracted and redeployed, it would be advantageous to minimize the number of deployments required before treatment is effected.
A second challenge comes after the needle has been deployed. While the position of the needle can be observed on the ultrasonic or other visual image, the treatment volume resulting from energy or other therapeutic delivery can be difficult to predict. As with initial positioning, experience will help but the need to exercise judgment and conjecture is best reduced.
A third challenge is in assuring that nearby sensitive tissue structures, such as the serosa surrounding the myometrium, are not unintentionally damaged. As with judging the treatment volume, predicting the safety margin of the treatment can be difficult.
For these reasons, it would be desirable to provide improved systems and methods for the deployment of energy delivery and other needles within ultrasonic or other imaging fields of view in energy delivery or other therapeutic protocols. It would be particularly useful to provide the treating physician with information which would assist in initial deployment of a needle in order to improve the likelihood that the needle will be properly positioned relative to a targeted anatomy to be treated. It would also be desirable, once the needle has been deployed, to provide feedback to the physician to assist in accurately predicting a treatment volume. Such information should allow the physician, if necessary, to reposition the needle in order to increase the likelihood of fully treating the anatomy. Furthermore, it would be desirable to provide feedback to the physician allowing the physician to assess a safety margin so that sensitive tissue structures are not damaged. All such feedback other information are preferably provided visually on the ultrasonic or other imaging screen so that the needle position can be quickly predicted, assessed, and treatment initiated. At least some of these objectives will be met by the inventions described hereinafter.
2. Description of the Background Art
U.S. Patent Publication No. 2006/0189972, published on Aug. 24, 2006 and commonly assigned with the present application, describes probes useful for both imaging and treating uterine fibroids, which probes could be used in the systems and methods of the present application. Other commonly assigned applications describing probes useful for treating uterine fibroids in the systems and methods of the present invention include application Ser. No. 11/409,496, filed on Apr. 20, 2006; Ser. No. 11/564,164, filed on Nov. 20, 2006; Ser. No. 11/620,594, filed on Jan. 5, 2007; and copending provisional application No. 60/938,140, filed on May 15, 2007, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Other related, commonly assigned applications are Ser. No. 11/620,569, filed Jan. 5, 2007; and Ser. No. 11/775,452, filed on Jul. 10, 2007. The full disclosures of each of these commonly owned, pending applications are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention provides both methods and systems for deploying one or more needles in tissue. The needles are usually intended to deliver a therapy to the tissue, most typically being adapted to deliver radiofrequency, plasma, heat, or other energy to ablate or otherwise modify the tissue or a targeted anatomy within the tissue. In other embodiments of the present invention, however, particularly those relating to initial needle deployment, the needles could also be intended for biopsy or have other diagnostic purposes.
One or more needles are deployed in tissue where the tissue is being imaged so that at least a portion of the needle (once deployed) and at least one anatomical feature within the tissue will be visible, preferably on a display screen in real time before, after, and/or during needle deployment. In a first specific aspect of the present invention, the image is overlaid with projected needle treatment information. By “projected,” it is meant that the needle treatment information is predicted or calculated based on known or determined system information. For example, the shape of the needle and mechanics of the needle deployment system may be used to predict the path that the needle may take into tissue, as described in greater detail below. The treatment volume and safety boundaries or margins may be calculated or predicted based on the energy delivery characteristics of the system together with the anticipated tissue characteristics. The information overlaid on the image will allow a user, typically a treating physician, to evaluate the predicted and/or actual needle positions relative to both treatment efficacy and safety.
In the exemplary embodiments, at least one needle will be deployed from a probe where the probe may be introduced to the uterus or other body cavity or lumen. Exemplary anatomical features that may be imaged and subsequently treated or biopsied include fibroids, tumors, encapsulated tissue masses, pseudoencapsulated tissue masses, and the like. Of particular interest to the present invention, the probe may be positioned in the uterus and the needle deployed to a location proximate or into a fibroid located in the myometrium surrounding the uterus. In such cases, it will usually be desirable to also image the serosa which surrounds the myometrium and/or other sensitive anatomical features that could be damaged by the energy-mediated or other therapeutic treatment.
Thus, in a first specific aspect of the present invention, the projected needle information will include at least a projected safety boundary which provides a visual image of the treatment volume that can be provided through the needle. In such cases, evaluating can comprise confirming that the serosa or other sensitive tissue or anatomical structure is outside of the projected safety boundary (where tissue within the projected safety boundary is at risk of tissue damage). The projected safety boundary will usually provide a minimum distance between the needle and the serosa or other sensitive anatomical feature which is at least 0.5 cm, often being at least 0.7 cm, and preferably being at least 1 cm.
In a second specific aspect of the present invention, the projected needle treatment information will comprise a projected needle deployment path. The projected needle deployment path will typically find use prior to needle deployment where the treating physician can manipulate the probe which carries the needle so that the projected needle treatment path visible on the display screen is aligned so that the needle will enter or at least be reasonably close to the targeted anatomy to be treated. The projected needle treatment information will be based on the known mechanical characteristics of the needle and may vary for different needles. In some instances, it will be desirable to actually test individual needles which are being used so that their individual characteristics are known, but this will usually not be necessary. It will be appreciated that the actual needle entry path, while predictable within certain tolerances, may differ from the projected path due to differences in the tissue characteristics, small differences in the deployment mechanisms, differences in the needle characteristics, or other reasons. In such instances, the methods and systems of the present invention will allow for inputting the actual treatment position so that the safety and treatment boundaries can be predicted based on the actual needle position, not the predicted needle position. For example, the physician may locate a known point or artifact on the needle which appears in the visual image. By then “clicking on” that point or otherwise feeding that positional information back into the imaging and control system, the system can recalculate the actual needle position and, based on the actual position, calculate the safety and treatment boundaries.
In a third specific aspect of the present invention, the projected needle treatment information comprises a projected therapy region. The projected therapy region will be a boundary or volume which is shown on the visual display to allow the treating physician to assess whether the target region to be treated will likely be effectively treated based on the needle position. As just discussed, usually the projected needle treatment information is preferably based on the actual needle position but could also be based on the projected needle position. Thus, it may be possible for the treating physician to rely on a projected therapy region (as well as a projected safety boundary) while the projected needle position is being manipulated relative to the targeted anatomy to be treated. After actual deployment, the system can recalculate both the projected therapy region and the projected safety boundary to allow the treating physician to confirm both that the treatment will likely be effective and that the serosa and/or other sensitive tissue structures will not be damaged.
In a further specific aspect of the present invention, the treatment system will provide for an interlock or enablement step before treatment can be delivered to the tissue. For example, the system may require the treating physician to acknowledge that either or both of the safety boundary and treatment volumes have been observed and evaluated to determine that the treatment will be safe and/or effective. Without such acknowledgement, the system could preclude energy delivery until such time as the treating physician acknowledges evaluation of the safety and/or effectiveness. In other instances, the system could be modified to assess the projected boundaries relative to the targeted treatment anatomies and the sensitive tissue anatomy, although such fully automated systems are not presently preferred.
The methods of the present invention will preferably employ the uterine fibroid treatment probes, such as those described in the commonly owned, copending applications incorporated herein by reference above. These treatment probes comprise a shaft having both an imaging transducer and a deployable needle near the distal end. The needle is configured so that it may be selectively advanced in a generally lateral direction within the field of image of the transducer, typically an ultrasonic imaging array. After the needle has been advanced into the tissue, and the safety and effectiveness of the needle position have been confirmed, therapy may be administered through the needle, such as radiofrequency tissue treatment or other energy or non-energy mediated treatments. Exemplary energy treatment modalities include radiofrequency, microwave, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), liquid infusion, plasma infusion, vapor, cryotherapy, and the like.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a needle is deployed in tissue by first positioning a probe having a deployable needle proximate a surface of the tissue. An image of the tissue is provided in real time, and a projected needle path is overlaid on the image. Prior to actually deploying the needle, the probe is repositioned to align the projected needle path on the real time image with anatomical feature. After the probe has been repositioned to optimize the position of the projected needle path within the anatomical feature, the needle may be deployed from the probe. After the needle has been actually deployed, the actual needle position may be fed back into the imaging system by marking a location on an image of the needle. Based on the actual needle position provided by the marked location, the projected safety boundary may be calculated by the system and overlaid on the image. Based on the projected safety boundary, the physician may visually confirm that sensitive anatomic structures are safe. Usually, the tissue image will also be overlaid with a projected treatment boundary based on the marked location. The physician may then also visually confirm that at least a portion of the anatomical feature to be treated is within the projected treatment boundary. The system may also be programmed so that the treatment device will be enabled only if the sensitive anatomic structures are outside of the safety boundary, typically by requiring the treating physician to acknowledge that the anatomical structures are safe.
Systems for deploying needles in tissue in accordance with the principles of the present invention comprise a probe and a system controller. The probe includes one or more deployable needles and an imaging transducer, where the needle(s) is (are) configured to be advanced into an image field produced by the imaging transducer. The system controller includes a screen for displaying the image produced by the transducer, where the system controller provides for an overlay on the screen with projected needle treatment information. The projected needle treatment information may comprise a projected needle path, where the physician can manipulate the probe to align the projected needle path with a target anatomy in the image field visible on the screen. The needle information may further comprise a projected treatment boundary and/or projected safety boundary. In such instances, the system may require the physician to confirm that the projected or actual needle position is safe and/or effective prior to enabling a therapy. Usually, the system will be able to update the projected needle information based on the actual needle position. In exemplary systems, the system controller further includes a generator for producing a therapy to be delivered through the needle, such as a radiofrequency, microwave, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), vapor, liquid infusion, and cryotherapy. Systems may employ needle arrays comprising multiple needles.
Methods for treating fibroids and other anatomical features further comprise deploying at least one needle in the uterus proximate, usually within, the anatomical feature. The methods may deploy multiple needles in needle arrays. Radiofrequency energy is delivered into the feature through an exposed portion or portions of the needle, where no exposed needle portion is closer than 0.5 cm to the serosa, usually being no closer than 0.7 cm, and preferably being no closer than 1 cm. such methods can achieve effecting treatment of many or most fibroids or other features without damaging the serosa.
As illustrated in
The treatment probe 14 typically includes a shaft 20 having a handle 22 at its proximal end. A needle 24 and imaging array 26 are provided at the distal end of the shaft 20, as described in more detail with reference to
The probe 14 generally includes a rigid or other delivery shaft 20, an ultrasound imaging transducer 26, and an echogenic curved needle 24 with an artifact/feature 100 at a distal end 51 (
The needle 24 is a solid tip electrically conductive needle intended for radiofrequency tissue ablation. As discussed elsewhere, it could also be intended for delivery of other forms of energy or be a hollow core needle intended for substance delivery or injection. The exemplary needle 24 generally comprises a two-piece construction including an elongate hollow body 48 (as best seen in
The handle 24 further includes a longitudinally movable slider 72 for enabling the advancement and retraction of the needle 14 to and from within a needle guide 44. The ultrasound imaging transducer 26 may optionally be present on an imaging insert replaceably disposed within the axial passage of the shaft 20. A sealing element 30 may be provided between the ultrasound imaging transducer 26 and the shaft handle 24 to ensure sufficient sealing around the insert at a proximal end. It will be appreciated that the above depictions are for illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect the actual shape, size, or dimensions of the system 10. Furthermore, the ultrasound array may be parallel to an axis of the shaft 20 or may be slightly inclined as illustrated in
Referring now to
The next step in the protocol of
The treating physician continues to visually assess the position of the needle guidelines 70 relative to the fibroid F until they are acceptably aligned, as shown in
Referring now to
Based on these desired clearance distances, the system projects treatment and safety overlays on the actual image of the needle 24, as shown in
Once the needle has been repositioned or redeployed so that the treatment region 92 sufficiently covers the fibroid F while the safety boundary does not encroach upon the serosa S as shown in
While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/245,567, filed on Oct. 3, 2008, which claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/979,613, filed on Oct. 12, 2007, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4289132 | Rieman | Sep 1981 | A |
4671292 | Matzuk | Jun 1987 | A |
4802487 | Martin et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4936281 | Stasz | Jun 1990 | A |
5372587 | Hammerslag et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5456689 | Kresch | Oct 1995 | A |
5471988 | Fujio et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5492126 | Hennige et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5527331 | Kresch et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531676 | Edwards et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5607389 | Edwards et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5649911 | Trerotola | Jul 1997 | A |
5662664 | Gordon et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5666954 | Chapelon et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5697897 | Buchholtz et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5730752 | Alden et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741287 | Alden et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5769880 | Truckai et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5860974 | Abele | Jan 1999 | A |
5863294 | Alden | Jan 1999 | A |
5873828 | Fujio et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876340 | Tu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5876399 | Chia et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891137 | Chia et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906615 | Thompson | May 1999 | A |
5908385 | Chechelski et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5916198 | Dillow | Jun 1999 | A |
5957941 | Ream | Sep 1999 | A |
5964740 | Ouchi | Oct 1999 | A |
5979452 | Fogarty et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5979453 | Savage et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984942 | Alden et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002968 | Edwards | Dec 1999 | A |
6007499 | Martin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6032673 | Savage et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039748 | Savage et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6055449 | Navab | Apr 2000 | A |
6059766 | Greff | May 2000 | A |
6077257 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6141577 | Rolland et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146378 | Mikus et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146380 | Racz et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149598 | Tanaka | Nov 2000 | A |
6158250 | Tibbals, Jr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171249 | Chin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190383 | Schmaltz et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193714 | McGaffigan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6211153 | Garnick et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216029 | Paltieli | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238336 | Ouchi | May 2001 | B1 |
6254601 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280441 | Ryan | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6296639 | Truckai et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306129 | Little et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311084 | Cormack et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315741 | Martin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325758 | Carol et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6379348 | Onik | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6405732 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419648 | Vitek et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419653 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6419673 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425867 | Vaezy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432067 | Martin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447477 | Burney et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6461296 | Desai | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463331 | Edwards | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482203 | Paddock et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485413 | Boppart et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6506154 | Ezion et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506156 | Jones et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506171 | Vitek et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507747 | Gowda et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508815 | Strulet et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522142 | Freundlich | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540677 | Angelsen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6543272 | Vitek | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6544176 | Mikus et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6550482 | Burbank et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554780 | Sampson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559644 | Froundlich et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6569159 | Edwards et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572613 | Ellnnan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579298 | Bruneau et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589237 | Woloszko et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592559 | Pakter et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602251 | Burbank et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610054 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6612988 | Maor et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6613004 | Vitek et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6613005 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6623481 | Garbagnati et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626854 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626855 | Weng et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632193 | Davison et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635055 | Cronin | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635065 | Burbank et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638275 | McGaffigan | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638286 | Burbank et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6645162 | Friedman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6645202 | Pless et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652516 | Gough | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660002 | Edwards et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6660024 | Flaherty et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6663624 | Edwards et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663626 | Truckai et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6666833 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6679855 | Horn et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685639 | Wang et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6689128 | Sliwa, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692490 | Edwards | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701931 | Sliwa, Jr. et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6705994 | Vortman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712815 | Sampson et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716184 | Vaezy et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719755 | Sliwa, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728571 | Barbato | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6730081 | Desai | May 2004 | B1 |
6733458 | Steins et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6735461 | Vitek et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743184 | Sampson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6746447 | Davison et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764488 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6773431 | Eggers et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786870 | Miyaki et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6790180 | Vitek | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805128 | Pless et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6805129 | Pless et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6813520 | Truckai et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6832996 | Woloszko et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837887 | Woloszko et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6837888 | Ciarrocca et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840935 | Lee | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6921398 | Carmel et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6936048 | Hurst | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6994706 | Chornenky et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7171255 | Holupka et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7247141 | Makin et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
8088072 | Munrow et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20010014805 | Burbank et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010035189 | Dobak | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051802 | Woloszko et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002393 | Mitchell | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020022835 | Lee | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020052600 | Davison et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068871 | Mendlein et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077550 | Rabiner et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020183735 | Edwards et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009164 | Woloszko et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014046 | Edwards | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028111 | Vaezy et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030032896 | Bosley et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030130575 | Desai et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130655 | Woloszko et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030195420 | Mendlein et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195496 | Maguire et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199472 | Al-Hendy et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216725 | Woloszko et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216759 | Burbank et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040002699 | Ryan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006336 | Swanson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030268 | Weng et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049121 | Yaron | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054366 | Davison et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040120668 | Loeb | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143252 | Hurst | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153057 | Davison | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040175399 | Schiffman | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176760 | Qiu | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193028 | Jones et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215182 | Lee | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230190 | Dahla et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254572 | McIntyre et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050038340 | Vaezy et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050085730 | Flesch et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107781 | Ostrovsky et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124882 | Ladabaum et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149013 | Lee | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159676 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177209 | Leung et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197577 | Makin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215990 | Govari | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216039 | Lederman | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228288 | Hurst | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050255039 | Desai | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256405 | Makin et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060010207 | Akerman et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060058680 | Solomon | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060178665 | Sloan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184049 | Tsujita | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189972 | Grossman | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060241368 | Fichting et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070006215 | Epstein et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070083082 | Kiser et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070161905 | Munrow | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070249936 | Deckman et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249939 | Gerbi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080015664 | Podhajsky | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033493 | Deckman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20100305439 | Shai et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9811834 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9814169 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9943366 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0000098 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0180723 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0195819 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0211639 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0180723 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 03005882 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03065908 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 03005882 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004002293 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004002550 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004020011 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004035110 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004035110 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004064658 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004002550 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004002293 | Jul 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120078134 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60979613 | Oct 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12245567 | Oct 2008 | US |
Child | 13307304 | US |