The following disclosure relates generally to dehumidifiers and, more particularly, to methods and systems for determining dehumidifier performance.
Dehumidifiers are used in many different applications for removing moisture from air. For example, dehumidifiers are used in residential applications to reduce the level of humidity in the air for health reasons. Dehumidifiers are also frequently used in commercial or industrial applications to remove moisture from the air in restoration projects necessitated by flooding or other types of water damage.
A conventional dehumidifier typically includes a refrigeration cycle in which a compressor delivers a hot compressed gas refrigerant to a condenser. The condenser condenses the hot gas refrigerant to a hot liquid refrigerant and delivers the hot liquid refrigerant to an expansion device. The expansion device expands the hot liquid refrigerant to reduce the temperature and pressure of the liquid. The expansion device delivers the cooled liquid refrigerant to an evaporator, and the evaporator evaporates the cooled gas refrigerant. The evaporator returns the cooled gas refrigerant to the compressor to complete the refrigeration cycle. A conventional dehumidifier typically directs airflow over some of these components of the refrigeration cycle to remove the moisture from the air. More specifically, a conventional dehumidifier typically includes an air mover that directs the airflow across the evaporator to cool the airflow below the dew point temperature of the air so that water vapor in the air is condensed to liquid and removed from the air. The air mover can also direct the dehumidified airflow across the condenser to warm the air before the airflow exits the dehumidifier.
One problem associated with conventional dehumidifiers, however, is that it can be difficult to accurately determine the amount of moisture that a dehumidifier removes from the air, which is also known as the dehumidifier performance. More specifically, determining the performance of a dehumidifier can be extremely inaccurate due to the elevated temperature of the airflow exiting the dehumidifier. In certain applications, an erroneous indication of the performance of a dehumidifier can have a significant financial impact. In water restoration projects, for example, property insurers may withhold payment for the use of a dehumidifier if the performance of the dehumidifier does not meet a predetermined level.
The following summary is provided for the benefit of the reader only, and is not intended to limit the disclosure as set forth by the claims in any way. Aspects of the present disclosure are directed generally toward methods, systems, and apparatuses for determining the performance of a dehumidifier. The methods, systems, and apparatuses described herein are directed to determining dehumidifier performance based at least in part on a mass flow balance and/or an energy balance with reference to the dehumidifier of interest, thereby avoiding the measurement of certain properties (e.g., outlet relative humidity) that introduce error into conventional dehumidifier performance calculations. For example, a method for determining dehumidifier performance in accordance with one embodiment of the disclosure includes measuring an inlet temperature and an inlet relative humidity of airflow entering a dehumidifier. The method also includes determining an inlet humidity value (e.g., an inlet humidity ratio) of airflow entering the dehumidifier based on the inlet temperature and the inlet relative humidity. The method further includes measuring an outlet temperature of airflow exiting the dehumidifier, and determining an outlet humidity value (e.g., an outlet humidity ratio) of airflow exiting the dehumidifier that is based at least in part on the outlet temperature and an efficiency or performance factor of the dehumidifier. In certain embodiments, the efficiency or performance factor is based at least in part on a moisture removal rate and energy consumed (e.g., the current drawn) by the dehumidifier. The outlet humidity value can be determined based on an energy balance of the dehumidifier that takes into account the efficiency of performance factor of the dehumidifier. In other embodiments, the outlet humidity value can be determined based on a mass flow balance of the dehumidifier that takes into account the efficiency or performance factor of the dehumidifier. After determining the outlet humidity value, the method further include comparing the inlet humidity value and the outlet humidity value to determine the amount of moisture removed by the dehumidifier from airflow passing through the dehumidifier. As described in greater detail below, based on the energy and mass flow balances, the methods, apparatuses, and systems described herein can determine the dehumidifier performance without requiring the measurement of an outlet relative humidity of airflow exiting the dehumidifier.
Several embodiments are described below with reference to a dehumidifier that is configured to remove moisture from an airflow passing through the dehumidifier. Certain details are set forth in the following description and in
The present disclosure is directed generally to methods, systems, and/or apparatuses for determining the performance of a dehumidifier.
In addition to the airflow paths,
In addition to the mass flow balance,
Referring again to
The method 200 further includes determining an outlet humidity value of airflow exiting the dehumidifier (block 236). In certain embodiments, the outlet humidity value corresponds to the outlet humidity ratio of the airflow exiting the dehumidifier. Determining the outlet humidity value can include measuring an outlet temperature of the airflow exiting the dehumidifier. The “outlet” properties including the outlet temperature refer to properties of the airflow after the airflow has passed through the moisture removing components of the dehumidifier (e.g., “downstream” from the evaporator). Referring to
As explained below in greater detail below with reference to
The method 200 illustrated in
After determining the inlet humidity value and the outlet humidity value, the method 200 further includes comparing the inlet and outlet humidity values (block 238). The difference between the inlet and outlet humidity values provides an indication of the amount of moisture that a dehumidifier removes from the airflow passing through the dehumidifier (commonly called the grain depression of the dehumidifier). Accurately determining the performance of a dehumidifier provides several benefits. One benefit, for example, is an accurate indication of the amount of water removed in a water restoration project or other application. Another benefit includes accurately representing the amount of water removal to a party who is paying for the dehumidification (e.g., a property insurer) based on the amount of water removal.
{dot over (m)}in={dot over (m)}w+{dot over (m)}a (1)
where, as noted above, {dot over (m)}in refers to the total mass flow rate of air and moisture carried by the air entering the dehumidifier 102, {dot over (m)}w refers to the mass flow rate of moisture (e.g., condensate) removed from airflow exiting the dehumidifier 102, and {dot over (m)}a refers to the mass flow rate of dry air exiting the dehumidifier 102.
Also referring to
{dot over (m)}in hin+{dot over (W)}e={dot over (m)}w hw+{dot over (m)}a ha (2)
where, as noted above, {dot over (m)}inhin represents the energy of the air and moisture carried by the air entering the dehumidifier, {dot over (W)}e represents the electrical energy supplied to the dehumidifier, {dot over (m)}whw represents the energy of the moisture (e.g., condensate) removed from airflow passing through the dehumidifier, and {dot over (m)}aha represents the energy from the dry air exiting the dehumidifier. As noted above, {dot over (Q)} represents the energy lost from the dehumidifier 102 and is assumed to be negligible and therefore omitted from equation (2). In other embodiments, the energy lost {dot over (Q)} may be not negligible, and in such cases it can be measured or estimated and included as part of the performance calculation. Solving equation (1) for the dry air mass flow rate {dot over (m)}a and substituting the dry air mass flow rate {dot over (m)}a into equation (2) can be expressed by the equation:
{dot over (m)}in hin+{dot over (W)}e={dot over (m)}w hw+({dot over (m)}in−{dot over (m)}w)ha (2)
Solving equation (3) for the outlet enthalpy ha of the dry air exiting the dehumidifier can be expressed by the equation:
As described below, each of the variables in equation (4) can be determined to provide a value for the outlet enthalpy ha of the dry air, without measuring an outlet relative humidity of the airflow. For example, the total mass flow rate {dot over (m)}in can be expressed by the equation:
where {dot over (V)}in is the inlet volumetric flow rate of the airflow in ft3/min, and vin is the inlet specific volume of the airflow in ft3/lbm. The specific volume vin is a function of the inlet temperature and the inlet humidity ratio as expressed by the equation:
where Tin is the airflow inlet temperature in ° F., 459.67 is a conversion factor from degrees Fahrenheit to Rankin, Win is the inlet humidity ratio, 1.6078 is the mole fraction ratio of dry air to water, and 39.667 is the value of the product of the molecular mass of dry air and the atmospheric pressure in inches Hg.
The inlet humidity ratio Win is a function of the partial pressure of water as expressed by the equation:
where pw is the partial pressure of water, 0.62198 is the inverse of the mole fraction ratio of dry air to water, and 14.696 is atmospheric pressure in psi. The partial pressure pw of water is defined as a function of the inlet relative humidity and saturation partial pressure of water as expressed by the equation:
pw=φinpws (8)
where φin is the relative humidity of the airflow at the inlet, and pws is the saturation partial pressure of water.
The saturation partial pressure of water pws is a function of the inlet temperature according to the Hyland-Wexler Correlation (1983) as expressed by the equation:
where C1=−1.0440397(104), C2=−1.129465(101), C3=−2.7022355(10−2), C4=−1.289036(10−5), C5=−2.478068(10−9), and C6=−6.5459673(100).
Alternatively, for temperatures between 64-102° F., a polynomial fit that is accurate to within 1% may be used to determine the saturation partial pressure of water pws, as expressed by the equation:
pws=0.000268Tin2−0.02615Tin+0.88258 (10)
Based on equations (5)-(10), the value of the inlet mass flow rate {dot over (m)}in of equation (4) can be determined based on known values (e.g., constants, functions, and/or empirical data) and measured inlet temperature.
Turning next to the inlet enthalpy hin of equation (4), the enthalpy of a mixture of perfect gases equals the sum of the individual partial enthalpies of the individual gases. Therefore, the specific enthalpy of moist air h can be expressed by the equation:
h=hda+Whg (11)
where hda is the specific enthalpy for dry air in Btu/lbda, W is the humidity ratio, and hg is the specific enthalpy for saturated water vapor in Btu/lbw at the temperature of the mixture. These enthalpies can be expressed by the following approximations:
hda≈0.240t (12)
hg=1061+0.44t (13)
where t is the dry bulb temperature in ° F. Substituting equations (12) and (13) into equation (11) to solve for the inlet enthalpy hin is expressed by the equation:
hin=0.240Tin+Win(1061+0.444Tin) (14)
where Win is known from equation (7) above.
Turning next to the inlet electrical energy {dot over (W)}e of equation (4), the inlet electrical energy {dot over (W)}e can be expressed by the equation:
{dot over (W)}e=AVP.F. (15)
where A represents the current drawn by the dehumidifier in amps, V represents the voltage provided to the dehumidifier, and P.F. represents the power factor of the dehumidifier accounting for the phase lag between the voltage and current.
Turning next to the mass flow rate {dot over (m)}w of the moisture of equation (4), to solve for the mass flow rate {dot over (m)}w of the moisture, the inventors have derived a correction or performance factor ε for the dehumidifier. The performance factor ε is expressed by the equation:
The performance factor ε is intended to provide an indication of a type of efficiency of the dehumidifier based on the moisture mass flow rate {dot over (m)}w removed by the dehumidifier from the airflow and the current A drawn by the dehumidifier. Accordingly, the performance factor or efficiency ε is consistent with the units of the mass flow rate {dot over (m)}w the current A, and can be expressed in units of mass per charge. This step in the analysis is included at block 342 in the method 300 illustrated in
{dot over (m)}w=εA (17)
Accordingly, the product of the performance factor or efficiency ε and the current A can be substituted for the moisture mass flow rate {dot over (m)}w into equation (4) such that the outlet enthalpy of the dry air ha is a function of at least the current A drawn by the dehumidifier.
Turning next to the condensate enthalpy hw (i.e., the enthalpy of the moisture removed from the airflow in the dehumidifier) in equation (4), the condensate is assumed to be at the dew point temperature of the airflow since the water vapor in the airflow condenses at the dew point temperature as the airflow passes through the moisture removing device (e.g., the evaporator) of the dehumidifier. Based on this assumption, the condensate enthalpy hw is expressed by the equation:
hw≈hfin,Td=Td,in−32 (18)
where hfin,Td is the condensate enthalpy at the dew point temperature in ° F., Td,in is the dew point temperature in ° F., and 32 is a conversion factor. The dew point temperature Td,in is a function of the saturation partial pressure pw of water and is expressed by the equation:
Td,in=100.45+33.193(ln pw)+2.319(ln pw)2+0.17074(ln pw)3+1.2063 pw0.1984 (19)
With equations (5)-(19), each of the variables in equation (4) has been defined in terms of measurable properties, thereby providing a method of determining the outlet enthalpy ha of the air exiting the dehumidifier. As explained above with reference to equations (16) and (17), the outlet enthalpy ha of the exiting air is adjusted by the efficiency or performance factor ε, which adjusts the outlet enthalpy ha according to at least the current A drawn by the dehumidifier.
After determining the value for each variable in equation (4), including the efficiency ε of the dehumidifier based at least in part on the current A drawn by the dehumidifier and the moisture mass flow rate {dot over (m)}w removed by the dehumidifier, the method 300 further includes determining the outlet humidity ratio Wout based at least in part on the adjusted outlet enthalpy ha (block 344). As described above with reference to equation (14), the outlet enthalpy ha of the dry air can be expressed by the equation:
ha=0.240Tout+Wout(1061+0.444Tout) (20)
Rearranging equation (20) for the outlet humidity ratio Wout is expressed by the equation:
Accordingly, with equation (21), the outlet humidity ratio Wout determined by the method 300 is a function of the outlet enthalpy hout, which as described above has been determined based at least in part on the efficiency or performance factor ε of the dehumidifier. The outlet humidity ratio Wout can then be compared win the inlet humidity ratio Win to determine the performance of the dehumidifier. As a result, the energy balance described above with reference to
{dot over (m)}inda={dot over (m)}outda (22)
{dot over (m)}inw={dot over (m)}w+{dot over (m)}outw (23)
where {dot over (m)}inda is the mass flow rate of dry air entering the dehumidifier, {dot over (m)}outda is the mass flow rate of dry air exiting the dehumidifier, {dot over (m)}inw is the mass flow rate of moisture carried by the airflow into the dehumidifier, {dot over (m)}w is the mass flow rate of condensate out of the dehumidifier, and {dot over (m)}outw is the mass flow rate of moisture carried by the airflow out of the dehumidifier.
A humidity ratio W is generally defined as the ratio of the mass flow rate of moisture carried by air {dot over (m)}wa and the mass flow rate of dry air {dot over (m)}da as expressed by the equation:
Solving equation (24) for the mass flow of moisture carried by air {dot over (m)}wa is expressed by the equation:
{dot over (m)}wa=W{dot over (m)}da (25)
Substituting the mass flow rate of moisture carried by the air {dot over (m)}wa of equation (25) into the mass flow rates including moisture carried by the air into equation (23) is expressed by the equation:
Win{dot over (m)}da={dot over (m)}w+Wout{dot over (m)}da (26)
Solving equation (26) for Wout is expressed by the equation:
The method 400 illustrated in
where the inlet humidity ratio Win is defined by equation (7) above and the specific volume vin is defined by equation (6) above. Moreover, the term
is a constant expressed by pints/day/amps/SCFM/1381, where 1381 is a conversion factor for consistent units. The values of the efficiency or correction factor ε and {dot over (V)}in can be determined empirically for different dehumidifiers. In this manner, the outlet humidity ratio Wout is expressed as a function of the current A drawn by the system. As a result, the mass flow balance described above with reference to
Any of the methods described above with reference to
In certain embodiments, the system 500 can be incorporated into a portable apparatus, such as a handheld device, for determining the performance of a dehumidifier. For example, a user can position the system 500 at different positions relative to a dehumidifier to measure the corresponding properties to determine the dehumidifier performance, such as the inlet temperature, inlet relative humidity, outlet temperature, current drawn, or any other property or characteristic associated with the dehumidifier. The system 500 is also configured to determine the performance of the dehumidifier based on these measured properties, any of equations (1)-(28) above, and/or any other empirical data associated with the dehumidifier. In other embodiments, however, the system 500 can be onboard with a dehumidifier or otherwise carried by a dehumidifier. For example, referring to the dehumidifier 102 in
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the disclosure. For example, one or more systems or apparatuses described herein can be configured to communicate wirelessly with one another or separate dehumidifiers. More specifically, a dehumidifier including one or more sensors can wirelessly transmit the relevant measured properties to a handheld device for determining the dehumidifier performance. Moreover, aspects described in the context of particular embodiments may be combined or eliminated in other embodiments. Further, although advantages associated with certain embodiments have been described in the context of those embodiments, other embodiments may also exhibit such advantages, and not all embodiments need necessarily exhibit such advantages to fall within the scope of the disclosure. Accordingly, the disclosure is not limited except as by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1690108 | Grady | Nov 1928 | A |
1870457 | Kenney | Aug 1932 | A |
1894026 | Derry | Jan 1933 | A |
2093725 | Hull | Sep 1937 | A |
2130092 | Kettering | Sep 1938 | A |
2168975 | Herz | Feb 1940 | A |
2623364 | Munters | Dec 1952 | A |
D171429 | Thompson | Feb 1954 | S |
2719596 | Kent et al. | Oct 1955 | A |
2758390 | Munters | Aug 1956 | A |
2686956 | Loveley | May 1959 | A |
2905851 | Caussin | Sep 1959 | A |
2932178 | Armstrong et al. | Apr 1960 | A |
2959036 | Mehalick | Nov 1960 | A |
2975609 | Allander et al. | Mar 1961 | A |
3000193 | Crider | Sep 1961 | A |
3035419 | Wigert | May 1962 | A |
3097507 | Makuh | Jul 1963 | A |
3141762 | Serck-Hanssen | Jul 1964 | A |
3149479 | Peterson | Sep 1964 | A |
D212777 | Anderson | Nov 1968 | S |
3621906 | Leffert | Nov 1971 | A |
3623549 | Smith, Jr. | Nov 1971 | A |
3807493 | Stewart | Apr 1974 | A |
3820581 | Machida et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3877518 | Dreksler | Apr 1975 | A |
3968833 | Strindehag et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4000779 | Irwin | Jan 1977 | A |
4044820 | Nobles | Aug 1977 | A |
4091547 | Leigh | May 1978 | A |
4176525 | Tucker et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4183399 | Seehausen | Jan 1980 | A |
4189848 | Ko et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
D254566 | Cummins | Mar 1980 | S |
4259268 | DiRoss | Mar 1981 | A |
4280483 | Schaffer | Jul 1981 | A |
4295342 | Parro | Oct 1981 | A |
4333517 | Parro | Jun 1982 | A |
4428207 | Hall | Jan 1984 | A |
4452051 | Berger et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4502286 | Okada et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4546820 | Whipple | Oct 1985 | A |
4607498 | Dinh | Aug 1986 | A |
4615383 | Hisao | Oct 1986 | A |
4628696 | Rodgers | Dec 1986 | A |
4724901 | Munekawa | Feb 1988 | A |
4771824 | Rojey et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4827733 | Dinh | May 1989 | A |
4921041 | Akachi | May 1990 | A |
D308414 | Makihara | Jun 1990 | S |
4938035 | Dinh | Jul 1990 | A |
4942740 | Shaw et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
D310412 | Fukumoto et al. | Sep 1990 | S |
4971139 | Khattar | Nov 1990 | A |
5031411 | Gehring et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5033539 | Kohtaka | Jul 1991 | A |
5050109 | Ladd | Sep 1991 | A |
D325252 | Morris et al. | Apr 1992 | S |
5115645 | Abraham | May 1992 | A |
5117651 | Suh | Jun 1992 | A |
5219020 | Akachi | Jun 1993 | A |
D337592 | Hider et al. | Jul 1993 | S |
5265895 | Barrett | Nov 1993 | A |
5269151 | Dinh | Dec 1993 | A |
D343706 | Gurstein | Jan 1994 | S |
5333470 | Dinh | Aug 1994 | A |
5394040 | Khanh | Feb 1995 | A |
5404938 | Dinh | Apr 1995 | A |
D361178 | Piret | Aug 1995 | S |
5443624 | Claesson | Aug 1995 | A |
5448897 | Dinh | Sep 1995 | A |
D364947 | Kent et al. | Dec 1995 | S |
D368770 | Tanner et al. | Apr 1996 | S |
5548905 | Kuma et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5564184 | Dinh | Oct 1996 | A |
5582246 | Dinh | Dec 1996 | A |
D379016 | Wilson | Apr 1997 | S |
5634353 | Hallin et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649372 | Souza | Jul 1997 | A |
5684672 | Karidis et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5736647 | Matsubara et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
D394499 | Bettag et al. | May 1998 | S |
5746061 | Kramer | May 1998 | A |
5749415 | Dinh | May 1998 | A |
D395492 | Phillips et al. | Jun 1998 | S |
5794453 | Barnwell | Aug 1998 | A |
D402021 | Allen et al. | Dec 1998 | S |
5845702 | Dinh | Dec 1998 | A |
5890368 | Lakdawala | Apr 1999 | A |
5901565 | Morton, Jr. | May 1999 | A |
5921315 | Dinh | Jul 1999 | A |
5953831 | Yu | Sep 1999 | A |
5953926 | Dressler et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5992161 | O'Halloran et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
D419230 | Ciccone | Jan 2000 | S |
D420473 | Shero | Feb 2000 | S |
6021644 | Ares et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030426 | Stopyra et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035551 | Scheufler et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
D422351 | Griffin | Apr 2000 | S |
D422386 | Jaros et al. | Apr 2000 | S |
D426473 | Blackburn | Jun 2000 | S |
6101815 | van Oort et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6105278 | Gerrish et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
D441161 | Shetterly | Apr 2001 | S |
6223543 | Sandelman | May 2001 | B1 |
6237352 | Goodchild | May 2001 | B1 |
D445116 | Evans et al. | Jul 2001 | S |
D453560 | Van Brunt | Feb 2002 | S |
6447586 | Campbell | Sep 2002 | B1 |
D465018 | Gustafsson et al. | Oct 2002 | S |
6463794 | Moshe et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
D480467 | White | Oct 2003 | S |
6644060 | Dagan | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6796896 | Laiti | Sep 2004 | B2 |
D500848 | Holderfield et al. | Jan 2005 | S |
6895774 | Ares et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
D508735 | Klein | Aug 2005 | S |
6941763 | Maeda et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
D515190 | Bartholmey et al. | Feb 2006 | S |
7194870 | O'Brien et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7246503 | O'Brien et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7281389 | O'Brien et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
D565269 | Tomasiak et al. | Mar 2008 | S |
D572356 | Harber | Jul 2008 | S |
D612032 | Gildersleeve et al. | Mar 2010 | S |
20030034573 | Mulvaney | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050011255 | Weisenberger et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050011962 | Weisenberger et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050066538 | Goldberg et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050183430 | McMillan et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060214315 | Williams | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070012060 | Simons | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070107450 | Sasao et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080028776 | O'Brien et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080223050 | Bruders et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090101727 | Boudreau | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110061408 | Schnelle | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1046384 | Jul 1990 | CN |
0046528 | Mar 1982 | EP |
830554 | Mar 1998 | EP |
893657 | Jan 1999 | EP |
2687464 | Aug 1993 | FR |
1311232 | Mar 1973 | GB |
2006950 | May 1979 | GB |
60188795 | Sep 1985 | JP |
61164622 | Jul 1986 | JP |
62023418 | Jan 1987 | JP |
01041792 | Feb 1989 | JP |
6111591 | Apr 1994 | JP |
08135999 | May 1996 | JP |
09239230 | Sep 1997 | JP |
WO-9112476 | Aug 1991 | WO |
WO-9641111 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO-02-50623 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO-2008057647 | May 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100125367 A1 | May 2010 | US |