Field of the Disclosure
The present subject matter relates to systems and techniques for determining when a seal on a container or the like was broken. More particularly, the present subject matter relates to the use of an environmentally sensitive material to determine when a seal on a container or the like was broken.
Description of Related Art
It is common to keep employ a sealed container or environment for any of a number of applications. For example, medication is frequently provided in a sealed container, such as a blister pack, which may have a number of individual sealed cells that must be broken to access a dose of medication. It may be advantageous to be able to determine when the seal on a cell was broken, for example, a subject may be under the orders of a doctor or medical care provider to ingest a dose of medication at a particular time. If the subject is not within a facility under the control of the doctor or medical care provider (e.g., a hospital or nursing home), it may be difficult for the doctor or medical care provider to know whether the subject has ingested the medication at the proper time. Accordingly, in this case, it would be advantageous to provide systems and methods that may be used to determine when a particular seal was broken.
There are several aspects of the present subject matter which may be embodied separately or together in the devices and systems described and claimed below. These aspects may be employed alone or in combination with other aspects of the subject matter described herein, and the description of these aspects together is not intended to preclude the use of these aspects separately or the claiming of such aspects separately or in different combinations as may be set forth in the claims appended hereto.
In one aspect, a system for determining when a seal of a sealed container was broken includes a sealed container and an electrical circuit. The sealed container includes a seal that separates the interior of the container from the outside environment. An environmentally sensitive conductor of the circuit is positioned within the interior of the sealed container. The conductor has an electrical property with a known initial value that changes in a predictable manner as a function of time and exposure to the outside environment. After the seal has been broken, a present value of the electrical property may be used to determine the time at which the seal was broken and the conductor was exposed to the outside environment.
In another aspect, a system for determining when a seal of a sealed container was broken includes a sealed container and an electrical circuit. The sealed container includes a seal that separates the interior of the container from the outside environment. An environmentally stable conductor and an environmentally sensitive conductor of the circuit are positioned within the interior of the sealed container. The environmentally sensitive conductor has an electrical property with a known initial value that changes in a predictable manner as a function of time and exposure to the outside environment. After the seal has been broken, a present value of the electrical property may be used to determine the time at which the seal was broken and the environmentally sensitive conductor was exposed to the outside environment.
In yet another aspect, a method of determining when a seal of a sealed container was broken includes providing a sealed container having a seal that separates an environmentally sensitive conductor positioned within an interior of the container from an outside environment. The conductor has an electrical property with a known initial value that changes in a predictable manner as a function of time and exposure to the outside environment. The seal is broken, thereby exposing the conductor to the outside environment and allowing the value of the electrical property to change. The time at which the seal was broken is then determined based on the present value and the initial value of the electrical property.
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention, which may be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention in virtually any appropriate manner.
According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a system for determining when a seal of a sealed container or package or the like is broken may include a circuit 10 of the type shown in
The circuit 10 of
In one embodiment, the first and second conductors 16 and 18 are resistors, with the first conductor 16 having a resistance that remains generally uniform before and after being exposed to the environment outside of the sealed container 12. As for the second conductor 18, it has a resistance that changes as a function of time after being exposed to the environment outside of the sealed container 12. The second conductor 18 may be sensitive to any one or more environmental factors. For example, the second conductor 18 may be configured to react to a liquid or gas in the outside environment by corroding to some degree in order to change its resistance. A second conductor 18 formed of a conductive metal may at least partially convert to an oxide or other non-conducting compound as a mechanism for changing its resistance. An organic conductor (e.g., polyaniline) may have its structure attacked as a mechanism for changing its resistance. Hence, depending on the nature of the outside environment to which the second conductor 18 is to be exposed, a particular material may be selected for the second conductor 18 to elicit a desirable reaction and predictable resistance change.
While, in one embodiment, the conductors 16 and 18 are provided as resistors (and the discussion which follows refers to resistance as the variable electrical property of the second conductor 18), it should be understood that the conductors may be other electrical components. For example, the conductors 16 and 18 may be capacitors (e.g., a second conductor 18 comprising a capacitor with a wet dielectric layer that dries out over time when exposed to the outside environment) or inductors or transistors or diodes, provided that one of the conductors has an electrical property that is variable in a predictable manner in the presence of certain environmental conditions. In another embodiment, the second conductor 18 may be a battery, such as a zinc-air battery, which only produces a voltage when it is exposed to the atmosphere. In such an embodiment, if a current is being drawn by the associated circuit 10, then the voltage of the second conductor/battery 18 will decrease over time in a predictable manner. If conductors other than resistors are used and a variable electrical property other than resistance is monitored (e.g., capacitance or inductance), it may be advantageous for the electrical circuit to be differently configured than as shown in
If the two conductors 16 and 18 are provided as resistors, placing them in parallel renders the resistance between points A and B equal to a combination of the resistance of the conductors 16 and 18. In particular, the total resistance R0 is equal to the product of the two resistances divided by the sum of the two resistances.
When the seal 14 and first conductor 16 are broken at time T, the resistance of the first conductor 16 essentially becomes infinite (i.e., an open circuit), as no current will flow therethrough. At that time, all of the current between points A and B will flow through the second conductor 18, such that the resistance between points A and B instantaneously becomes the resistance R2 of the second conductor 18. This is illustrated in
When the seal 14 and first conductor 16 are broken, the outside environment is allowed to enter into the interior of the sealed container or package 12 and contact the second conductor 18. As the outside environment acts upon the second conductor 18, the resistance (or other variable electrical property) of the second conductor 18 will change over time, as described above. In the embodiment shown in
If the initial resistance of the second conductor 18 (before it is acted upon by the outside environment) and the manner in which the resistance of the second conductor 18 changes over time are known, then the resistance of the second conductor 18 at a particular time may be used to determine when the seal 14 and first conductor 16 were broken (i.e., when the second conductor 18 was first exposed to the outside environment and its resistance started to change). For example, assume that the measured resistance of the second conductor 18 is twice that of the initial resistance of the second conductor 18. Assume also that it is known how the resistance of the second conductor 18 will change after being exposed to environmental conditions of the type to which the second conductor 18 is exposed after the seal 14 and first conductor 16 have been broken. With these three pieces of information (i.e., the initial resistance of the second conductor 18, the measured resistance of the second conductor 18, and the way in which the resistance of the second conductor 18 changes as a function of time and exposure to the environment), it is possible to determine how long the second conductor 18 has been exposed to the outside environment. From there, one may count backwards from the current time to ascertain the time at which the seal 14 and the first conductor 16 were broken.
In use, the input/output port 28 is set as an output and the capacitor 24 is initially charged to or near the system supply voltage V0. The input/output port 28 is then set as an input and the time required for the voltage V on the capacitor 24 to drop from V0 to a threshold value VT (i.e., a value at which a processor or controller associated with the input/output port 28 reads the input as a digital 0 instead of a digital 1) is determined. If only the second conductor 18 is functional (on account of the first conductor 16 being broken, typically along with an associated seal), current will flow through the second conductor 18, with the voltage V on the capacitor 24 dropping at a rate which depends upon the resistance of the second conductor 18. Knowing the time taken for the voltage V on the capacitor 24 to drop to the threshold value VT and the relationship between capacitor voltage and conductor resistance, the present resistance of the second conductor 18 may be derived, which may be used to determine the time at which the first conductor 16 and the seal associated therewith were broken, as described above.
in which t is the amount of time that the capacitor 24 has been discharging, R is the resistance of the second conductor 18 and C is the capacitance of the capacitor 24.
Equation (1) may be rearranged to isolate the voltages as follows:
which may be further rearranged to:
As shown in equation (4), the resistance R is inversely related to the time t by a multiplier which may be expressed as a value k as follows:
Finally, equation (4) may be rewritten using k:
Rk=−t (6),
which shows that resistance R changes linearly with time, i accordance with the resistance profile shown in
In the embodiment of
While
In one embodiment, the monitoring device is associated with or incorporates a separate processor or controller or the like that is responsible for data communication. The processor/controller may take any of a variety of suitable forms, from something relatively simple (e.g., a printed electronic device that is configured to communicate with a telephone or other device using a near field communication-compatible “tag talks first” protocol) or something more sophisticated that can accommodate a more complex data link, such as WiFi. It may be advantageous to be particularly aware of power consumption when selecting a paired monitoring device and processor/controller, in which case simpler options (e.g., a simple microcontroller that is running relatively slowly or an RFID link that is powered by the reading device or processor or controller) may be preferred.
Each cell 34 is closed or overlaid by a cover or seal 36 through which medication within the cell 34 may be accessed. In one embodiment, the seal 36 is a thin sheet of material, such as a metallic foil or the like, which may be broken to allow a medication to pass out of the cell 34. In such an embodiment, a base of the cell 34 may be pressed toward the frangible seal 36 by a user until the force on the seal 36 exceeds the strength of the seal 36, at which point the seal 36 breaks and the medication may be removed from the cell 34. Alternatively, the cell 34 may remain untouched, while the seal 36 is directly engaged and broken to remove medication from the cell 34. If the medication container is provided with a plurality of cells, it may be preferred for a single seal to overlay all of the cells, but it is also within the scope of the present disclosure for two or more cells of the same medication container to be provided with separate seals. For example, in one embodiment, different cells are each overlaid by separate, non-frangible (e.g., hinged) covers or seals.
In the embodiment of
Accessing a cell 34 through the seal 36 to remove the medication disrupts the circuit 10 at the location of the cell 34, particularly by severing or breaking the first conductor 16 at the cell 34. Breaking the seal 36 and the first conductor 16 exposes the second conductor 18 to the outside environment, causing the resistance of the second conductor 18 to change as a function of time. As described above in greater detail, the resistance of the second conductor 18 at a particular time may be measured and then used to determine the time at which the seal 36 of the medication container was broken. If the medication container includes a plurality of cells, each may include its own associated circuit, thereby allowing a doctor or medical care provider to separately monitor the status of each cell. This may be especially advantageous if the various cells contain different medications that are to be ingested by a subject at particular times.
Preferably, the first conductor 16 is frangible and configured such that, when the handles 38 and 40 are separated apart to break the seal on the package or container, the first conductor 16 will also break. Breaking the seal and the first conductor 16 exposes the second conductor 18 to the outside environment, causing the resistance of the second conductor 18 to change as a function of time. As described above in greater detail, the resistance of the second conductor 18 at a particular time may be measured and then used to determine the time at which the seal of the package or container was broken. In a particular embodiment, the first conductor 16 is associated with a sealed passage that exposes the second conductor 18 to atmospheric oxygen when the seal is broken, but the second conductor 18 may be configured to react to other outside environmental conditions without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Regardless of the particular embodiment, a system of the type shown in
The conductor 44 is environmentally sensitive, such that at least one of its electrical properties will change as a function of time after being exposed to the environment outside of a sealed container, similar to the second conductor 18 of
The initial resistance of the conductor 44 is known, with the resistance of the conductor 44 being equal to this initial resistance when the seal of the associated sealed container or package is intact. When the seal is broken and the conductor 44 is exposed to the outside environment, the resistance of the conductor 44 will increase according to any of a number of possible profiles, such as by increasing linearly or exponentially with time and exposure to the outside environment. Although not illustrated in
Providing only an environmentally sensitive conductor 44 (rather than also incorporating an environmentally stable conductor into the circuit 42) may make it more difficult to detect the change in electrical property of the conductor 44, due to the elimination of a clear step change in the property, of the type shown in
Accessing a cell 34 through the seal 36 to remove the medication exposes the conductor 44 to the outside environment, causing the resistance of the conductor 44 to change as a function of time. As described above in greater detail, the resistance of the conductor 44 at a particular time may be measured and then used to determine the time at which the seal 36 of the medication container was broken. If the medication container includes a plurality of cells, each may include its own associated circuit, thereby allowing a doctor or medical care provider to separately monitor the status of each cell. This may be especially advantageous if the various cells contain different medications that are to be ingested by a subject at particular times.
It will be understood that the embodiments described above are illustrative of some of the applications of the principles of the present subject matter. Numerous modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter, including those combinations of features that are individually disclosed or claimed herein. For these reasons, the scope hereof is not limited to the above description but is as set forth in the following claims, and it is understood that claims may be directed to the features hereof, including as combinations of features that are individually disclosed or claimed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4429792 | Machbitz | Feb 1984 | A |
4526474 | Simon | Jul 1985 | A |
4617557 | Gordon | Oct 1986 | A |
4660991 | Simon | Apr 1987 | A |
5181189 | Hafner et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5313439 | Albeck | May 1994 | A |
5412372 | Parkhurst et al. | May 1995 | A |
5642731 | Kehr et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5836474 | Wessberg | Nov 1998 | A |
5871831 | Zeiter et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5905653 | Higham et al. | May 1999 | A |
6294999 | Yarin et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6339732 | Phoon et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6411567 | Niemiec et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6664887 | Fuchs | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6824739 | Arney | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6961285 | Niemiec et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973371 | Benouali | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7252208 | Alvino et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7298343 | Forster et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7828147 | Caracciolo et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8072334 | Forster et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8704716 | Kato et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8751039 | Macoviak et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8960440 | Kronberg | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9172130 | Forster | Oct 2015 | B2 |
20010028308 | De La Huerga et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020017996 | Niemiec et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020111542 | Warkentin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030007421 | Niemiec et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030046563 | Ma | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063524 | Niemiec et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030111479 | Taneja et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030121930 | Layer et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040078879 | Zach | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050062238 | Broadfield et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050162979 | Ostergaard et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050237222 | Bogash et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050241983 | Snyder et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050252924 | Pieper et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256830 | Siegel et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060071774 | Brown et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079996 | Benouali | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060124656 | Popovich, Jr. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060144749 | Arnold et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060202830 | Scharfeld et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070018819 | Streeb et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070246396 | Brollier | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080223936 | Mickle et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090210247 | Chudy et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090218846 | Nguyen | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090278626 | Lee | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090278688 | Tuttle | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090294521 | De La Huerga et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090309704 | Chang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100089791 | Rosenbaum et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114367 | Barrett et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100187243 | Layer et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100314282 | Bowers | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110037485 | Kiy | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120003928 | Geboers et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120109397 | Shim | May 2012 | A1 |
20120125994 | Heath et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120228192 | Niven | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120229279 | Conley et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130044007 | Paavilainen | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130195326 | Bear et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222135 | Stein et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130285681 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140039445 | Austin et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140048442 | Maijala et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052467 | Maijala et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140166529 | Fung et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140243749 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140262918 | Chu | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288942 | Blochet | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140340198 | Kawase et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140354433 | Buco et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140360898 | Kantor et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150048100 | Dickie et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150048102 | Dickie et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150048170 | Forster | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150274402 | Elliott | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150283036 | Aggarwal et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150286852 | Sengstaken, Jr. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150325336 | Maples | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150339566 | Forster | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150347712 | Flori et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150347713 | Seeger | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150356845 | Forster | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160019452 | Forster | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160106622 | Van De Wouw et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160132661 | Dixit et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160137380 | Kosaka | May 2016 | A1 |
20160143807 | Ika et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160147976 | Jain | May 2016 | A1 |
20160158108 | Gofer et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160367435 | Ahmadi | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170011240 | Forster | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170053095 | Blum et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170165151 | Schmid et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170337157 | Rothschild | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180012117 | Forster | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180042105 | Anderson | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180156756 | Forster | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180319519 | Stange et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202046575 | Nov 2011 | CN |
1758050 | Feb 2007 | EP |
2026253 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2006002667 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2008000279 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2009116108 | Sep 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 11, 2016 for International Application No. PCT/US2015/064888 filed Dec. 10, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 5, 2016 for International Application No. PCT/US2016/039714 filed Jun. 28, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 4, 2016 for International Application No. PCT/US2016/039720 filed Jun. 28, 2016. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 29, 2015 for International Application No. PCT/US2015/038763 filed Jul. 1, 2015. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Jan. 10, 2017 for International Application No. PCT/US2015/038763 filed Jul. 1, 2015. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 13, 2017 for International Application No. PCT/US2015/064888 filed Dec. 10, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 28, 2017 for International Application No. PCT/US2017/041125 filed Jul. 7, 2017. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 8, 2019 for International Application No. PCT/US2017/041125 filed Jul. 7, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160171850 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |