This application is related to the following United States patent applications:
All of the foregoing applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
This invention relates to the field of software and computer network systems. In particular, the invention relates to electronic systems associated with financial transactions.
In traditional paper payment systems, an organization or an individual initiates payment by sending a physical check to the party to whom a debt is owed. The check may be sent in response to an invoice from the party to whom the debt is owed. A newer approach is electronic payment. For example, in the consumer context, individuals may be able to make payment by way of electronic banking. Payment instructions are sent electronically from the individual's computer system to the individual's bank. Payment is then effected by the bank.
Numerous systems now exist relating to accounting and bill payment. For example, computer software is used to track invoices and print payment checks. Payments may be made by wire transfer, with instructions requesting funds of the payer in one financial institution to be transferred to an account of the party to whom payment is to be effected.
Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are used for managing the purchases of goods and services. Such systems may have databases of complex and extensive sets of information, such as addresses of various suppliers and similar information related to purchasing. Sellers also use electronic accounting and record keeping systems which may assist in the receipt and tracking receipt of payment for goods and services. Prior systems require considerable amounts of effort to update and maintain, and may lack compatibility with the systems used by parties with whom an organization wishes to engage in transactions. There is thus a need for improved systems to facilitate transactions between buyers and sellers.
An embodiment of the invention is directed to a computer implemented business method in an electronic system in which payment information is exchanged between a buyer and a seller. Approval is received from the buyer of an electronic invoice received by the buyer. At a time when no agreed upon discount is available based on the invoice or pre-agreed terms between the buyer and the seller, a request is received from the buyer to offer the seller early payment in exchange for a discount of the amount owed. The discount is based on an annual hurdle rate provided to the system by the buyer. The early payment is to be made on days from among a set of one or more days of the week configured in the system by the buyer. The offer is presented to the seller on the seller's user interface, and a clickable button is provided for the seller to indicate selection of such offer. The clickable button may include an indication thereon that payment to the seller is to be made immediately. Such indication may include a phrase such as “pay me now.” The electronic system may include a set of computers communicating over a network. The system may include an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system and early payment may be effected by the ERP system.
According to an embodiment of the invention, initially only information regarding a first available payment date is presented to the seller, and information regarding other possible payment dates for such transaction is not initially shown to the seller. According to another embodiment of the invention, the invoice may be approved by the buyer after expiration of a discount term.
A user interface window may be provided for the buyer. The user interface window may include an entry cell for the annual hurdle rate, a calculated daily discount rate that is based on the annual hurdle rate, and a list of days of the week in which individual days can be selected by the buyer as days for payment for the offer to the seller. In another embodiment, the seller's acceptance of the offer for early payment is received through the clickable button, and in response to such acceptance, electronic payment is effected from the buyer to the seller.
Another embodiment of the invention may include presenting a list of invoices to the seller on the user interface. The list of invoices are ones for which the buyer and any other buyers have offered the seller early payment in exchange for a discount of the amount owed at a time when no agreed upon discount is available based on the invoice or pre-agreed terms between the buyer and the seller. Clickable buttons are provided to the seller on the seller user interface. Each button is associated with an indication of a respective invoice. The buttons allow the seller to select the corresponding offer.
According to an embodiment of the invention, the manual payment request is made to an ERP system for the adjusted discount amount. Upon success of the request, a credit memo is issued for the discount amount and the credit memo is posted to the ERP system.
Another embodiment of the invention is directed to a computer implemented business system. The computer implemented business system includes computer program instructions for exchanging payment information between at least a buyer and at least a seller. The business system also includes a user interface screen for the buyer for configuring an offer to the seller of early payment in exchange for a discount of the amount owed. The user interface screen includes a field to receive an annual hurdle rate from the buyer, and a field to receive selection from the buyer of a set of one or more days of the week. The system also includes computer program instructions for presenting the offer to the seller on the seller's user interface at a time when no agreed upon discount is available based on the invoice or pre-agreed terms between the buyer and the seller. The system also includes an interface screen including a clickable button for, the seller to indicate selection of such offer. Further, the system includes computer program instructions to automatically cause the discounted payment to be effected on a day in the selected set of days.
In another embodiment of the invention, in an electronic system in which payment information is exchanged between buyers and at least a seller, an identification of a date upon which a seller would like to receive early payment is received through a computer input associated with the seller. An identification of the amount of payment the seller would like to receive is also received from the seller. Invoices upon which corresponding offers may be made in order to receive the payment upon the desired date are automatically identified. The invoices do not currently have associated agreed-upon terms that would yield the desired payment at the desired date. Through a portion of the system associated with the buyer, the buyer is offered the discount in exchange for the early payment of the invoices. According to an embodiment of the invention, an identification of a particular buyer is received and the invoices identified are invoices of the particular buyer.
According to an embodiment of the invention, the total payment and total discount for the identified invoices are displayed. A list of the identified invoices may also be displayed to the seller, including, according to an embodiment of the invention, the current payment, discounted payment and discount rate for each respective invoice in the list. Such method may be implemented in the computer implemented business system including computer program instructions and a user interface screen with applicable instructions and applicable input fields to receive the respective information, such as the identification of a date upon which the seller would like to receive the early payment and identification of the amount of payment the seller would like to receive early.
Another embodiment of the invention is directed to a relationship between a buyer and a seller where there is a standard discount term, and there is also a discount term in a respective invoice. An electronic invoice which includes a discount term associated with early payment is received from the seller. The discount term from the invoice is compared with the standard discount term. Payment is then automatically effected from the buyer to the seller based on the more favorable of the discount term from the invoice and the standard discount term. The method may include effecting payment based on a discount term included in a purchase order associated with the transaction, if it is determined the purchase order is more favorable than either of the discount term from the invoice or the standard discount term.
Another embodiment of the invention is directed to a method related to enrollment of a new seller in the system. In an electronic system in which payment information is exchanged between a buyer and a seller, a set of multiple different payment terms which may apply to transactions between a new seller and buyer is presented as a process of enrollment of a new seller. Each payment term includes a discount rate, discount date upon which payment is due to receive the discount, and a net payment due date. After the enrollment, payment is automatically effected from a seller to the buyer based on the selected payment term. If payment is made on a date between the discount date and the net payment date, the discount rate is prorated according to the date upon which the payment is made between the discount date and the net payment date.
An embodiment of the invention is directed to a system for dynamically adjusting the terms of payment in a transaction based on electronic notification of events associated with respective transactions. For example, early payments may be made after receipt of electronic notification of an event such as approval of the respective invoice or release of the payment for the invoice. An offer is made for an adjustment of the terms that apply to payment at a time after the respective event. An entity, such as a buyer, may send requests to a set of entities, such as sellers, for offers of terms different than the established terms between such entity and the respective other entities. After acceptance of an offer, payment is then effected under the newly agreed upon terms.
The buyer and seller may negotiate the new terms for payment based on different factors. For example, based on a simple time value of money based on a selected interest rate calculation, the change in the payment amount can be calculated based on the number of days earlier or later than the originally agreed-upon settlement date that payments occur. An interest rate may be used that is extrapolated from the discount provided in the seller's original terms, or the original terms in the original agreement between the buyer and the seller. For additional description, see United States patent publication System and Method for Varying Electronic Settlements Between Buyers and Suppliers With Dynamic Discount Terms, application Ser. No. 10/155,806, filed May 24, 2002, (now abandoned), publication number US 2003-0020863, publication date Nov. 27, 2003, invented by Don Holm, Duc Lam, and Xuan McRae which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The following is a description of various embodiments of the invention. Such processes, structures, systems and architectures may be combined with the processes, structures, systems, and architectures described in the above-referenced patent disclosures or implemented separately, according to various embodiments of the invention.
Certain embodiments of the invention are directed to discounts management which help to provide the buyer the capabilities to identify, capture and track early payment discounts.
Basic discount management functionalities may include:
E-file terms normalization involves changing the terms on the e-file invoice to the advantage of the buyer. The normalization process takes the best of the submitted invoice terms with the supplier's standard terms. For example, an invoice submitted through e-file has the terms 1%10Net30 while that supplier's standard terms with the buyer are Net60. The normalized terms will be 1%10Net60.
Another place for discounts is in the area of the buyer offering additional early payment terms (presumably better than the supplier's standard terms) for PO-flip and blank invoice. For PO-flip, the supplier can either accept the PO terms or accept any of the newly offered early payment terms. For blank invoices, the supplier can choose from either the standard terms or any of the newly offered early payment terms.
Another place for discounts is the buyer offering early immediate payment (“pay me now,” or “PMN”) to the suppliers. If invoice terms have no discounts (i.e., Net60), the buyer can offer the supplier PMN options. These are discounts on a declining scale for different days the supplier wants early payment. PMN options can also be offered on approved invoices that have missed discounts. In this scenario, the approval date is past the terms' discount date.
Also, early payment may be offered from the suppliers on a set of invoices. The supplier will make an offer for the total discount amounts desired by a certain date for a set of invoices. In particular, the offer is made on approved invoices only.
Terms may include: standard terms, early payment terms, PMN terms, and early payment offer terms.
Standard Terms
A vendor will have existing standard terms with a buyer. The standard terms are recorded in the ERP vendor record. A second type of standard terms are those that appear on a purchase order (PO). This might be the same as the terms recorded in the vendor record or they could be provided differently, depending on the PO creation process. In either case, the terms on the PO will be considered as the standard terms for the corresponding invoice automatically created from the PO (invoice flip). The standard terms can be accessed from the database directory associated with the buyers and sellers or from the PO.
Early Payment Terms
Early payment terms are presumably better terms than the standard terms that a buyer is willing to offer to the supplier. These new early payment terms for the supplier are maintained in the database. Early payment terms will be offered in addition to the PO terms (for PO-flip) and the standard terms (for blank invoice).
Normal Early Payment Terms
Use of normal early payment terms is the conventional payment term expressed in the order “discount term/net term.” A discount term says what percentage of the bill may be deducted if the invoice is paid within a shorter time interval. A net term says how long the invoice has to be paid in full. For example, payment terms of “1%/10Net30” would be considered early payment terms for suppliers that have standard terms of “Net45.”
Adjustable Early Payment Terms
Adjustable early payment terms is a combination of the conventional payment term along with a declining discount rate for the time interval starting at the end of the discount term period and ending with the net term. For example, the terms “Adjustable 1%/10Net30” may look like
The discount rate of decline is the discount term percentage divided by the time interval of the slope. In the above example, the rate of decline is 0.05%/day (i.e., 1%/[30 days−10 days]). The discount percentage on a daily basis would be as follows.
Day 1-10: 1% Discount
Day 11: 0.95% Discount
Day 12: 0.90% Discount
Day . . . : . . . % Discount
Day 29: 0.05% Discount
Day 30: 0% Discount
Adjustable early payment terms can also be referred to as ASAP terms. For example, Adjustable 1%/10Net30 may be used as the same as 1%/10Net30 ASAP.
Day 10: 1% Discount
Day 09: 1.05% Discount
Day 08: 1.10% Discount
Day 07: . . . % Discount
Day 02: 1.40% Discount
Day 01: 1.45% Discount
Day 00: 1.50% Discount
Adjustable early payment terms with both incline and decline slopes can also be referred to as Extended ASAP (EASAP) terms. For example, Adjustable 1%/10Net30 may be used as the same as 1%/10Net30 EASAP. Thus, according to an embodiment of the invention, early payment is effected in accordance with an additional discount at a time in advance of the final date 202 at which a discount is available according to standard terms, and the additional discount is inversely proportional to the number of days remaining from the day of payment until the final date 202 at which a discount is otherwise available according to the standard terms. For example an additional discount of up to 0.5% is available at day 00 as shown above where the total discount is 1.5%. This additional discount goes down to zero of day 10, where the total discount is 1%. According to another embodiment of the invention, the discount is inversely proportional to the number of days remaining until final due date for payment 203. An example of this may be the combining of the incline and decline slopes described above.
Immediate payment PMN terms can be based on annual hurdle rate, number of calendar days per year, and pay cycle.
The above parameters are used to calculate the discount offers on a per invoice basis. To calculate the discount offers, first determine the daily discount rate:
daily discount rate=annual hurdle rate/number of calendar days per year
The discount is calculated from the scheduled pay date back to today. The discount is 0 on the scheduled pay date. The discount for each day is calculated as:
discount=invoice amount times number of days until scheduled pay date times daily discount rate
The discount offers can be continuous daily pay cycle or on a weekly pay cycle. For instance, the buyer existing ERP pay cycle may run every seven days. If the buyer wishes, then the offers can be available only on those days (401a and 401b) as shown in
PMN offers are made on approved invoices that have no discounts or have missed discounts. Invoices with adjustable terms already have a slope built into them and hence do not have PMN offers.
In this example, the buyer has configured for daily payment:
Buyer's Settings:
Annual hurdle rate: 8%
Number of calendar days: 360
Daily Rate: 0.08/360=0.022
Daily payment
Invoice:
Amount $100
Submitted on: Jan. 1, 2003
Terms: 1%/10Net30
Approved on: Jan. 15, 2003
Scheduled Pay Date: Jan. 31, 2003
On Jan. 15, 2003, the discount offers to the supplier will be:
On Jan. 16, 2003, the discount offers to the supplier will be:
In this example, the buyer wants to make the PMN offers in line with pay cycle on Friday. Hence, discounts will only be offered on these days.
Buyer's Settings:
Annual hurdle rate: 8%
Number of calendar days: 360
Daily Rate: 0.08/360=0.022
Pay cycle is every Friday
(17th, 24th, 31st)
Invoice:
Amount $100
Submitted on: Jan. 3, 2001
Terms: 1%/10Net30
Approved on: Jan. 15, 2003
Scheduled Pay Date: Jan. 31, 2003
On Jan. 15, 2003, the discount offers to the supplier will be:
On Jan. 24, 2003, the discount offers to the supplier will be:
Early Payment Offer Terms
Terms for an early payment offer include a discount percentage on the total amount of a collection of invoices if payment is made within a pay date. The supplier offers this discount to the buyer. This offer includes multiple invoices combined for payment on a single date. The invoices may have different due dates, and thus the number of days early the payment is to be made, and the effective discount rate, may be different for each invoice. The following is an example:
Pay By Date: Jun. 30, 2002
Invoices Total: $999,342.00
Estimated Payment: $996,210.54
Total Discount: $3,131.46
Average Rate: 0.32%
Buyer Configuration
The buyer may set up configuration information to enable the discount management functionality. The buyer can configure these areas or a subset thereof: early payment terms for PO-flip and blank invoice forms; immediate early payment (“PMN”) programs; and/or E-file normalization.
Buyer Discount Programs
The buyer will be able to create new discount programs through the use of a wizard consisting of multiple screens. The discount program may have the following characteristics:
A screen may show the summary view of all the discount programs available to the buyer. From such a screen, the buyer can, according to an embodiment of the invention, click on “New Program” to get a program creation wizard; edit a particular discount program; activate/deactivate functionalities (e.g., PMN, early payment terms, e-file normalization) of a program.
A screen to initiate editing of programs is provided according to an embodiment of the invention. The screen may provide a description of each functionality and the current terms, e.g., PMN with an annual hurdle rate of 7.75% and daily discount rate of 0.021%; supplier discount terms of 1% 10/Net 30; 1.5% 10/Net 45; 2% 10/Net 60; whether e-file normalization is active.
Early Immediate Payment (“PMN”)
A screen allowing the buyer to edit the PMN section of a program is shown in
Thus, an embodiment of the invention includes a computer implemented business system comprising computer program instructions for exchanging payment information between at least a buyer and at least a seller, and a user interface screen for the buyer for configuring an offer to the seller of early payment in exchange for a discount of the amount owed. The user interface screen includes a field to receive an annual hurdle rate from the buyer, and a field to receive selection from the buyer of a set of one or more days of the week.
The system includes computer program instructions for presenting the offer to the seller on the seller's user interface at a time when no agreed upon discount is available based on the invoice or pre-agreed terms between the buyer and the seller. The system also includes a user interface screen 601 including a clickable button 602 for the seller to indicate selection of such offer and computer program instructions to automatically cause the discounted payment to be effected on a day in the selected set of days.
The PMN portion of the discount program consists of the following attributes, according to an embodiment of the invention:
The discount pay cycle will determine which days to make PMN offer on. It is based on the schedule for the pay cycle. If the schedule is for the pay cycle to be daily, offers will be made for payment on every banking business day. If the schedule is for the pay cycle to be weekly, offers will be made for payment on selected days. If the actual date is on a banking holiday, no offer will be made for payment on that day. The system provides the buyer the opportunity to select the respective day or days of the week upon which the payment is to be made.
PMN options are available on approved invoices that have:
General Process Flow
The general process flow of PMN is:
1. Invoice approved status upload from ERP to system.
2. Figure out which “program” the invoice falls into.
3. Generate and save the offers on the disburser side (buyer system).
4. Send the “program” details/offers for the invoice to the collector (seller system).
5. Collector receives invoice's program details.
6. Generate and save the offers on the collector side.
7a. Supplier does not accept PMN. Invoice will be paid through normal process. End of process.
7b. Supplier accepts PMN.
8. Offer acceptance message to disburser.
9. Disburser schedule early payment for invoice.
10. Disburser back office swipes through all scheduled early payment invoice. Activate early payment issuance instruction to the ERP system.
The following is the flow between states related to PMN status. The status “INI” (initial) is reached when the offer is made. The disburser back office will generate the offer and save this status. This will be sent to the collector side as well. When the supplier accepts an offer from the collector user interface, the status will be changed to “ACP” for acceptance. When the invoice is paid, then the status will be changed to “PD” for paid. If no offer is accepted, the status will be changed to “EXP” when the invoice paid status is processed on the collector side.
When the supplier clicks on the “Pay Me Now” button, the next screen will show the first early payment day and the associated discount rate. The supplier can confirm to accept this early payment date or click on “More Options” to see the complete list of early payment days.
If the supplier clicks on the “More Options,” the supplier will be presented with another screen 701, the complete list 702 of all early payment days and associated discount rates as shown in
Early Payment Discount Offer by Seller
In addition to accepting the early immediate payment PMN terms offered by the buyer, the supplier can make an early payment discount offer on a set of approved invoices. A screen in the seller's user interface may include the “Early Payment Offer” button. The “Early Payment Offer” button may be available on early payment screens.
Buyer system 801 checks whether the invoice matches any PMN program (block 805). If no PMN program is found, the process is completed (block 806). If the invoice matches a PMN program, the invoice is caused to reference this version of the PMN program (block 807). PMN offers are generated and saved to the database (block 808), and a PMN program is sent for an invoice (block 809). A PMN message is sent from buyer system 801 to collector system 802. The invoice is referenced in seller system 802 (block 810), and PMN offers are generated and saved to the database (block 811).
Thus,
If supplier has not accepted such an offer, the PMN program is updated for the invoice (block 915), and PMN offers are generated and saved to the database (block 916). Next, seller system 902 sends a PMN program update commit for the respective invoices (block 917), and buyer system 901 receives this update (block 918).
According to an embodiment of the invention, the supplier will see the screen 1001 shown in
Thus, an embodiment of the invention includes a user interface screen for configuring offers to sellers of discounts in exchange for early payment including a field for identification of a date upon which the seller would like to receive the early payment and a field for identification of the amount of payment the seller would like to receive early. The system also includes computer program instructions for automatically identifying invoices upon which corresponding offers may be made in order to receive the payment upon the desired date. The invoices do not currently have associated agreed-upon terms that would yield the desired payment at the desired date. The system further includes computer program instructions for offering to the buyer the discount in exchange for the early payment.
For the specified total amount that the supplier would like to be collected and desired annual cost of capital, the system determines which invoices 1101 will be part of this offer. This is displayed as shown in
A screen 1201 allowing the buyer to edit the early payment terms section of a program is shown in
Buyer New Discount Program Wizard
A first page of a wizard may allow the buyer to choose the supplier group for this program. A second step of the wizard may provide configuration of a PMN function.
A third step of the wizard may allow for configuration of the early payment terms for PO-flip and blank invoice forms. Supplier discount terms allow approved suppliers to select from a list of buyer approved discount terms while creating an invoice. Available discount terms are selected from a box, and selected terms are shown in a neighboring box.
The fourth step of the wizard may allow for configuration of the e-file normalization section.
Early Payment Terms for PO-Flip and Blank Invoice Forms
The buyer will be able to turn on or off the availability of early payment terms for PO-flip and blank invoice form for a discount program. Additionally, the buyer will be able to define the list of terms as well.
The early payment terms portion of the discount program has the following attributes:
In the user interface, the buyer can check/uncheck the flag (e.g. “active”) to make early payment terms active/inactive for the associated discount program. The buyer will be able to add or remove terms from the selected list in the user interface.
E-File Normalization
An embodiment of the invention is directed to “e-file normalization.” The user interface allows activation of e-file normalization. The e-file normalization screen will show the active flag. The buyer can check/uncheck the checkbox.
E-File Discount Capture
The e-file discount functionality is normalizing the submitted invoice terms and the supplier's standard terms to the buyer's advantage. Normalization is done by taking the better of both discount (if any) terms and net components of the payment terms. These normalized terms will be saved in the existing invoice terms field. A new field will be created to store the submitted e-file terms.
Thus, in an electronic system in which payment information is exchanged between a buyer and a seller, an electronic invoice is received from the seller, the system has a stored standard discount term with respect to transactions between the buyer and seller, and the invoice includes a discount term associated with early payment. The discount term from the invoice is compared with the standard discount term, and payment from the buyer to the seller is automatically effected based on the more favorable of the discount term from the invoice and the standard discount term.
The following is the set of rules to follow during normalization executed in this order:
Which “standard terms” to normalize will be based on the following set of rules:
The invoice is posted (line 1314). If the e-file terms (those terms on the invoice) are better than the standard terms negotiated between the buyer and the seller (block 1313), then the better of those terms are selected and used (block 1312). These terms are then provided to the ERP agent (block 1308) and used in the transaction. The payment is executed through the disburser (block 1306), and payment is executed (block 1305).
Early Payment Issuance
According to embodiments of the invention, the system will ensure prompt discounted payment issuance. One method is issuance against the discounted portion of the terms. If an invoice is approved within the discount terms period, the system will issue a manual payment request to the ERP system for the full discounted amount as specified by the conventional portion of the terms. This request will be issued at the end of the discount period compensating for ACH processing time. Upon success of the request, the payment will be applied to the invoice at the full discounted amount in the ERP system. Once that is complete, the system will then issue the actual payment to the supplier. This is an atomic transaction that will occur within one day. Hence, the order of operations might change.
Another method is issuance against a non-conventional portion of the terms, i.e., adjustable portion, PMN, and early payment discount offer. If an invoice is approved outside the conventional discount terms period, the XPSN will issue a manual payment request to the ERP system for the adjusted discount amount. This request will be issued on the adjusted date for the discount compensating for ACH processing time. Upon success of the request, the XPSN will issue a credit memo for the discount amount and post this credit memo to the ERP system. The payment will then be applied to the full amount of the invoice and the full amount of the credit memo, thereby bringing the net balance to 0. This is an atomic transaction that will occur within one day. Hence, the order of operations might change.
For invoices approved during the net terms, the system will NOT issue early payment for these cases by default. However, the buyer can configure the system to do so, thereby ensuring early payment without waiting for the ERP pay cycle.
Normal Early Payment Terms Payment Issuance
If the invoice with these terms is approved within the discounted period, the system will issue an early payment at the end of the period. For the period between net term and end of discount term, the buyer will configure whether the system will issue an early payment on the approved date. If the invoice is approved outside the net term, the payment will be issued through the ERP pay cycle.
For example, an invoice is submitted with 1%10Net30 terms on Jan. 1, 2003. The scheduled pay date for this invoice will be Jan. 30, 2003. If the invoice is approved any day before Jan. 10, 2003, the payment will be issued on Jan. 10, 2003. If the invoice is approved between Jan. 10, 2003 through Jan. 30, 2003, there are two scenarios. If the buyer configures the system to issue early payment for that period, payment will be issued on the approved date. Otherwise, the payment will be issued by the ERP pay cycle. The actual payment date will then be after the scheduled pay date. If the invoice is approved after the net terms, the ERP pay cycle will issue the payment, which will be after the scheduled pay date as well.
Adjustable Early Payment Terms Payment Issuance
If the invoice with these terms is approved within the conventional discounted period, the system will issue an early payment at the end of the period. For the period between the net term and the end of discount term, the system will issue an early payment on the approved date. If the invoice is approved outside the net term, the payment will be issued through the ERP pay cycle.
For example, an invoice is submitted with Adjustable 1%10Net30 on Jan. 1, 2003. The scheduled pay date for this invoice will be Jan. 30, 2003. If the invoice is approved any day before Jan. 20, 2003, the payment will be issued on Jan. 10, 2003. If the invoice is approved between Jan. 20, 2003 through Jan. 30, 2003, the XPSN will issue payment on the approved date. If the invoice is approved after the net terms, the ERP pay cycle will issue the payment, which will be after the scheduled pay date.
If no early payment terms are applicable (block 1409), then no particular action is taken for this process, and the ERP system issues payment with the normal pay cycle (block 1410). If there are early payment terms (block 1409), and the invoice has been approved within the discount terms (block 1413), then determine whether the invoice has been approved within the net terms and the buyer has configured the system to issue early payment for net terms (block 1414). If this is not the case, no additional action is taken in this process, and the ERP system issues payment with the normal payment cycle (block 1417). Otherwise, payment is issued within this process (block 1416), and a credit memo may be issued (block 1412). As appropriate, manual payment is created and applied to the invoice (block 1411), and the ERP agent 1408 interacts with the ERP system 1401 to cause the appropriate action to be taken by ERP system 1401. If the invoice is approved within the discount terms (block 1413), the system schedules payment issuance at the end of the discount terms (block 1415), and a credit memo is created if applicable (block 1412).
Enrollment and Terms
During the supplier enrollment process, the buyer can offer each supplier all the different types of discount terms described in this document as shown in
The description herein of various embodiments of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to limit the invention to the precise forms described.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/002,234, filed Dec. 1, 2004, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/581,022, filed Jun. 17, 2004, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2005003 | Patton et al. | Jun 1935 | A |
3653480 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3938090 | Borison et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4050375 | Orleans | Sep 1977 | A |
4141078 | Bridges et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4205780 | Burns | Jun 1980 | A |
4264808 | Ownes et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4321672 | Braun et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4385285 | Horst et al. | May 1983 | A |
4396985 | Ohara | Aug 1983 | A |
4443027 | McNeely et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4453074 | Weinstein | Jun 1984 | A |
4454414 | Benton | Jun 1984 | A |
RE31692 | Tyburski et al. | Oct 1984 | E |
4495018 | Vohrer | Jan 1985 | A |
4575621 | Dreifus | Mar 1986 | A |
4605844 | Haggan | Aug 1986 | A |
4614861 | Pavlov et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4617457 | Myers | Oct 1986 | A |
4650981 | Foletta | Mar 1987 | A |
4672377 | Murphy | Jun 1987 | A |
4694397 | Grant et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4697072 | Kawana | Sep 1987 | A |
4700055 | Kashkashian | Oct 1987 | A |
4701601 | Francini et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4713761 | Sharpe et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4752877 | Roberts et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4797913 | Kaplan | Jan 1989 | A |
4799156 | Shavit | Jan 1989 | A |
4807177 | Ward | Feb 1989 | A |
4812628 | Boston et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4823264 | Deming | Apr 1989 | A |
4845347 | McCrindle | Jul 1989 | A |
4859837 | Halpern | Aug 1989 | A |
4893333 | Baran et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4931793 | Fuhrmann et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4939674 | Price et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4948174 | Thomson et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4974878 | Josephson | Dec 1990 | A |
4975841 | Kehnemuyi et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4977501 | Lefevre | Dec 1990 | A |
4988849 | Sasaki | Jan 1991 | A |
4992646 | Collin | Feb 1991 | A |
4992940 | Dworkin | Feb 1991 | A |
5023904 | Kaplan | Jun 1991 | A |
5053607 | Carlson | Oct 1991 | A |
5054096 | Beizer | Oct 1991 | A |
5072380 | Randelman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5080748 | Bonomi | Jan 1992 | A |
5097115 | Ogasawara | Mar 1992 | A |
5111395 | Smith | May 1992 | A |
5121945 | Thomson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5122950 | Mee | Jun 1992 | A |
5136502 | Van Remortel et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5175682 | Higashiyama | Dec 1992 | A |
5187750 | Behera | Feb 1993 | A |
5198975 | Baker et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5224034 | Katz et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5225978 | Peterson | Jul 1993 | A |
5237159 | Stephens | Aug 1993 | A |
5237620 | Deaton | Aug 1993 | A |
5257486 | Holmwall | Nov 1993 | A |
5265007 | Barnhard, Jr. et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5276311 | Hennige | Jan 1994 | A |
5283829 | Anderson | Feb 1994 | A |
5287269 | Dorrough et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5311594 | Penzias | May 1994 | A |
5315508 | Bain et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321238 | Watanabe | Jun 1994 | A |
5326959 | Perazza | Jul 1994 | A |
5336870 | Hughes | Aug 1994 | A |
5349170 | Kern | Sep 1994 | A |
5350906 | Brody et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5351187 | Hassett | Sep 1994 | A |
5352877 | Morley | Oct 1994 | A |
5367581 | Van Horn | Nov 1994 | A |
5373550 | Campbell | Dec 1994 | A |
5382784 | Eberhardt | Jan 1995 | A |
5396417 | Burks et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402474 | Miller | Mar 1995 | A |
5430644 | Deaton et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412190 | Kopesec | May 1995 | A |
5424938 | Wagner | Jun 1995 | A |
5432506 | Chapman | Jul 1995 | A |
5444794 | Uhland | Aug 1995 | A |
5444841 | Glasser et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446740 | Yien | Aug 1995 | A |
5448471 | Deaton et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459482 | Orlen | Oct 1995 | A |
5465206 | Hilt et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477040 | LaLonde | Dec 1995 | A |
5479494 | Clitherow | Dec 1995 | A |
5483445 | Pickering | Jan 1996 | A |
5484988 | Hills | Jan 1996 | A |
5495981 | Warther | Mar 1996 | A |
5500890 | Rogge et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502576 | Ramsay et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504677 | Pollin | Apr 1996 | A |
5506691 | Bednar et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5508731 | Kohorn | Apr 1996 | A |
5513250 | McAllister | Apr 1996 | A |
5532464 | Josephson et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5532689 | Bueno | Jul 1996 | A |
5541583 | Mandelbaum | Jul 1996 | A |
5544043 | Miki et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5544046 | Niwa | Aug 1996 | A |
5550734 | Tater | Aug 1996 | A |
5551021 | Harada | Aug 1996 | A |
5557515 | Abbruzzese et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563400 | Le Roux | Oct 1996 | A |
5566330 | Sheffield | Oct 1996 | A |
5568489 | Yien | Oct 1996 | A |
5570465 | Tsakanikas | Oct 1996 | A |
5572004 | Raimann | Nov 1996 | A |
5583759 | Geer | Dec 1996 | A |
5583760 | Kleese | Dec 1996 | A |
5590196 | Moreau | Dec 1996 | A |
5592377 | Lipkin | Jan 1997 | A |
5592378 | Cameron | Jan 1997 | A |
5599528 | Igaki | Feb 1997 | A |
5602936 | Green et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603025 | Tabb | Feb 1997 | A |
5615109 | Eder | Mar 1997 | A |
5617474 | Ditzig et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5619558 | Jheeta | Apr 1997 | A |
5621201 | Langhans | Apr 1997 | A |
5621812 | Deaton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5649114 | Deaton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5642485 | Deaton et al. | May 1997 | A |
5638457 | Deaton et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640577 | Scharmer | Jun 1997 | A |
5642419 | Rosen | Jun 1997 | A |
5644723 | Deaton et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5644778 | Burks et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649117 | Landry | Jul 1997 | A |
5652786 | Rogers | Jul 1997 | A |
5659165 | Jennings | Aug 1997 | A |
5659469 | Deaton et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659741 | Eberhardt | Aug 1997 | A |
5666493 | Wojcik et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5677521 | Garrou | Oct 1997 | A |
5677955 | Doggett et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679938 | Templeton | Oct 1997 | A |
5679940 | Templeton | Oct 1997 | A |
5680459 | Hook et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687250 | Curley et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5687322 | Deaton et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692132 | Hogan | Nov 1997 | A |
5698837 | Furuta | Dec 1997 | A |
5699528 | Hogan | Dec 1997 | A |
5703344 | Bezy et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704044 | Tarter et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5708422 | Blonder et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710889 | Clark et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715298 | Rogers | Feb 1998 | A |
5715314 | Payne | Feb 1998 | A |
5715399 | Bezos | Feb 1998 | A |
5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724424 | Gifford | Mar 1998 | A |
5727249 | Powell | Mar 1998 | A |
5732400 | Mandler et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748780 | Stolfo | May 1998 | A |
5751842 | Eccles | May 1998 | A |
5757917 | Rose et al. | May 1998 | A |
5770843 | Rose et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774553 | Rosen | Jun 1998 | A |
5783808 | Josephson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784696 | Melnikof | Jul 1998 | A |
5787403 | Randle | Jul 1998 | A |
5789732 | McMahon et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794221 | Egendorf | Aug 1998 | A |
5796827 | Coppersmith et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793861 | Haigh | Sep 1998 | A |
5802498 | Comesanas | Sep 1998 | A |
5802499 | Sampson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819238 | Fernholz | Oct 1998 | A |
5826241 | Stein | Oct 1998 | A |
5826245 | Sandberg-Diment | Oct 1998 | A |
5832090 | Raspotnik | Nov 1998 | A |
5832447 | Rieker | Nov 1998 | A |
5832457 | O'Brien | Nov 1998 | A |
5832460 | Bednar | Nov 1998 | A |
5832463 | Houvener et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5832464 | Houvener et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5832488 | Eberhardt | Nov 1998 | A |
5835580 | Fraser | Nov 1998 | A |
5835603 | Coutts | Nov 1998 | A |
5835899 | Rose et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5852811 | Atkins | Dec 1998 | A |
5852812 | Reeder | Dec 1998 | A |
5859419 | Wynn | Jan 1999 | A |
5864609 | Cross et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870456 | Rogers | Feb 1999 | A |
5870721 | Norris | Feb 1999 | A |
5870723 | Pare | Feb 1999 | A |
5870725 | Belinger et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873072 | Kight | Feb 1999 | A |
5878141 | Daly et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883377 | Chapin, Jr. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884288 | Chang | Mar 1999 | A |
5884290 | Smorodinsky et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897625 | Gustin | Apr 1999 | A |
5898157 | Mangili et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903881 | Schrader | May 1999 | A |
5907142 | Kelsey | May 1999 | A |
5910896 | Hahn-Calrson | Jun 1999 | A |
5910988 | Ballard | Jun 1999 | A |
5915246 | Patterson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917965 | Cahill et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920847 | Kolling et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930778 | Geer | Jul 1999 | A |
5940811 | Norris | Aug 1999 | A |
5940844 | Cahill et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943656 | Crooks | Aug 1999 | A |
5945653 | Walker et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949044 | Walker et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5950174 | Brendzel | Sep 1999 | A |
5956700 | Landry | Sep 1999 | A |
5960411 | Hartman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963659 | Cahill et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963925 | Kolling et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966698 | Pollin | Oct 1999 | A |
5970475 | Barnes et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970478 | Walker et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978780 | Watson | Nov 1999 | A |
5987434 | Libman | Nov 1999 | A |
5987435 | Weiss et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987436 | Halbrook | Nov 1999 | A |
5987439 | Gustin | Nov 1999 | A |
5991749 | Morrill, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991750 | Craig | Nov 1999 | A |
6003762 | Hayashida | Nov 1999 | A |
6000832 | Franklin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002767 | Kramer | Dec 1999 | A |
6006205 | Loeb et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006208 | Forst et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009442 | Chen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014636 | Reeder | Jan 2000 | A |
6016482 | Molinari et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016484 | Williams et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018718 | Walker et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026388 | Liddy et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029139 | Cunningham et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029153 | Bauchner et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032133 | Hilt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032134 | Weissman | Feb 2000 | A |
6032136 | Brake, Jr. et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032137 | Hallard | Feb 2000 | A |
6035281 | Crosskey et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6035285 | Schlect et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6035287 | Stallaert et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6036099 | Leighton | Mar 2000 | A |
6038553 | Hyde, Jr. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041312 | Bickerton et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041315 | Pollin | Mar 2000 | A |
6044362 | Neely | Mar 2000 | A |
6045039 | Stinson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6047261 | Siefert | Apr 2000 | A |
6052674 | Zervides et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058380 | Anderson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058381 | Nelson | May 2000 | A |
6061665 | Bahreman | May 2000 | A |
6064764 | Bhaskaran et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064987 | Walker et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065675 | Teicher | May 2000 | A |
6067524 | Byerly et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070150 | Remington et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070798 | Nethery | Jun 2000 | A |
6073104 | Field | Jun 2000 | A |
6073113 | Guinan | Jun 2000 | A |
6076072 | Libman | Jun 2000 | A |
6078907 | Lamm | Jun 2000 | A |
6081790 | Rosen | Jun 2000 | A |
6085168 | Mori et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088683 | Jalili | Jul 2000 | A |
6088685 | Kiron et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088686 | Walker et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092056 | Tull, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092057 | Zimmerman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098053 | Slater | Aug 2000 | A |
6098070 | Maxwell | Aug 2000 | A |
6101479 | Shaw | Aug 2000 | A |
6105007 | Norris | Aug 2000 | A |
6105011 | Morrison, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108639 | Walker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110044 | Stern | Aug 2000 | A |
6111858 | Greaves et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115690 | Wong | Sep 2000 | A |
6119106 | Mersky et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119107 | Polk | Sep 2000 | A |
6125354 | MacFarlane et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128599 | Walker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128602 | Northington et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128603 | Dent et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129273 | Shah | Oct 2000 | A |
6138118 | Koppstein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138917 | Chapin, Jr. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141666 | Tobin | Oct 2000 | A |
6144946 | Iwamura | Nov 2000 | A |
6148293 | King | Nov 2000 | A |
6149055 | Gatto | Nov 2000 | A |
6149056 | Stinson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6168385 | Clamp | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173272 | Thomas et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181837 | Cahill et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185542 | Moran et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185544 | Sakamoto et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188309 | Levine | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202054 | Lawlor et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205433 | Boesch et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6213391 | Lewis | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223168 | McGurl et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227447 | Campisano | May 2001 | B1 |
6233565 | Lewis et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233566 | Leving | May 2001 | B1 |
6236972 | Shkedy | May 2001 | B1 |
6240444 | Fin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243689 | Norton | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6267292 | Walker et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278981 | Dembo et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282552 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289322 | Kitchen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292789 | Schutzer | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301379 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301567 | Leong et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304858 | Mosler et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305603 | Grunbok, Jr. et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308887 | Korman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321212 | Lange | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324524 | Lent et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327575 | Katz | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338047 | Wallman | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338049 | Walker et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341724 | Campisano | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6343279 | Bissonette et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347307 | Sandhu et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349290 | Horowitz et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363164 | Jones et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363364 | Nel | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363365 | Kou | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366967 | Wagner | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374235 | Chen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6390362 | Martin | May 2002 | B1 |
6393409 | Young et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6405173 | Honarvar et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405181 | Lent et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6415259 | Wolfinger et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418419 | Nieboer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418420 | DiGiorgio et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418430 | DeFazio et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424949 | Deaton et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434159 | Woodward et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446072 | Schulze et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460020 | Pool et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6485922 | Erickson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490568 | Omara et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493685 | Ensel et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6513019 | Lewis | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6535896 | Britton et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6536663 | Lozier et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6554185 | Montross et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560581 | Fox et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567791 | Lent et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6574350 | Rhoads et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6574377 | Cahill et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578000 | Dodrill et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578015 | Haseltine et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6607127 | Wong | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6609113 | O'Leary et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609125 | Layne et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629081 | Cornelius et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636615 | Rhoads et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6658393 | Basch et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661910 | Jones et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671673 | Baseman et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6704714 | O'Leary et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721715 | Nemzow | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728397 | McNeal | Apr 2004 | B2 |
D490840 | Arakaki et al. | Jun 2004 | S |
D491186 | Arakaki et al. | Jun 2004 | S |
D491953 | Arakaki et al. | Jun 2004 | S |
D496365 | Liu et al. | Sep 2004 | S |
D498236 | Liu et al. | Nov 2004 | S |
6820058 | Wood et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824066 | Weyant | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825940 | Wu et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6860375 | Hallowell et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6865547 | Brake, Jr. et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6954896 | Dodrill et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6965882 | Lapstun et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970259 | Lunt et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970830 | Samra et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970855 | Das et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
RE38957 | Laussermair et al. | Jan 2006 | E |
6999943 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7004382 | Sandru | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7025256 | Drummond et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7062456 | Riehl et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7068832 | Price et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7070095 | Gandel et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7104443 | Paul et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7133846 | Ginter et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7167844 | Leong et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7177836 | German et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7194437 | Britto et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7200255 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7228155 | Saunders | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7249044 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249112 | Berardi et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7312707 | Bishop et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7313543 | Crane et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7317823 | Price et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7337148 | Xie et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7349884 | Odom | Mar 2008 | B1 |
RE40220 | Nichols et al. | Apr 2008 | E |
7380707 | Fredman | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7401048 | Rosedale et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7493288 | Bishop et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7546272 | Loy | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548881 | Narayan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7587363 | Cataline et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
8244625 | Holm | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20010011222 | McLauchlin et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010018666 | Sugiyama et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010018739 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010027441 | Wankmueller | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032139 | Debonnet, Jr. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034663 | Teveler et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037300 | Miyazaki et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010037309 | Carlyle | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010038033 | Habib | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047334 | Nappe et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047489 | Ito et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051533 | Wietzke et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010051919 | Mason | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020012445 | Perry | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013728 | Wilkman | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023055 | Atognini et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026394 | Savage et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032651 | Embrey | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038363 | MacLean | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046169 | Keresman, III et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020047316 | Chitayat | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052842 | Schuba et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020055907 | Pater et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069134 | Solomon | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072976 | Virtanen et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077978 | O'Leary et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082985 | MacKay | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020084321 | Martens et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087415 | Allen et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087468 | Ganesan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087469 | Ganesan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091635 | Dilip et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095373 | Melchior et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099655 | Melchior et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020100803 | Sehr | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107770 | Meyer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107788 | Cunningham | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020110070 | Sako et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111837 | Aupperle | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128981 | Kawan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138390 | May | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138398 | Kalin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143621 | Donnelly et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156723 | Lilly et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169658 | Adler | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020170966 | Hannigan et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178071 | Walker et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178109 | Bye | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184123 | Sijacic et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184151 | Maloney | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194081 | Perkowski | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194096 | Falcone et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198817 | Dhir | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199182 | Whitehead | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018557 | Gilbert et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018563 | Kilgour et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018567 | Flitcroft et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023526 | Stewart | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028481 | Flitcroft et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037002 | Higgins et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040959 | Calvin et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046218 | Albanese et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055675 | Klein Twennaar | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069780 | Hailwood et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097335 | Muskowitz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100803 | Lu et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105641 | Lewis | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110136 | Wells et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110442 | Battle | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120686 | Kim et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130945 | Force et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130952 | Bell et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140005 | Cole | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144942 | Sobek | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030187787 | Freund | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187789 | Karas et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191710 | Green et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200107 | Allen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208421 | Vicknair et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208441 | Poplawski et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218066 | Fernandes et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225663 | Horan et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233305 | Solomon | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030237046 | Parker et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010465 | Michalski et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019605 | Keown et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029569 | Khan et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034595 | Kugeman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049449 | Martinelli | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049451 | Berardi | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049456 | Dreyer | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064409 | Kight et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073510 | Logan | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078328 | Talbert et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088245 | Narayan | May 2004 | A1 |
20040094624 | Fernandes et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107153 | Lundberg | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111302 | Falk et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117307 | Carlis et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133516 | Buchanan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040149544 | Dal Ferro | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040159700 | Khan et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172360 | Mabrey et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201735 | Baron | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210498 | Freund | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040228514 | Houle et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232223 | Beenau et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236660 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236688 | Bozeman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239481 | Beenau | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243503 | Eng et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252012 | Beenau et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254837 | Roshkoff | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260607 | Robbins et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021466 | Buchanan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033619 | Barnes et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033690 | Antognini et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035847 | Bonalle et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050040242 | Beenau et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055254 | Schmidtberg et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050077349 | Bonalle et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086178 | Xie et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091156 | Hailwood et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097046 | Singfield | May 2005 | A1 |
20050097050 | Orcutt | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108153 | Thomas et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116024 | Beenau et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144059 | Schuessler | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144130 | Staniar et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050171898 | Bishop | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177448 | Fu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177480 | Huang | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050209954 | Asher et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228751 | Keown et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261955 | Humble et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050283437 | McRae | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060036553 | Gupta et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041540 | Shannon et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060089890 | Campbell | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095374 | Lo | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106650 | Bush | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106717 | Randle et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060136335 | Ferguson, III | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149653 | Davis | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149668 | Zafrir | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161501 | Waserstein et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167989 | Bashen et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178986 | Giordano et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206427 | Love et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060259390 | Rosenberger | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282389 | Gupte | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287953 | Chauhan | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005498 | Cataline et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070138255 | Carreon et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070265924 | Shcwarz | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288334 | Creedle et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080010202 | Schwarz | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080116283 | Newbrough et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080193008 | Mount et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090043651 | Schwarz | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20110251965 | Holm | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0421808 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0665486 | Aug 1995 | EP |
1014318 | Jun 2000 | EP |
2001-266039 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002-024618 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-056063 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-083241 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-087536 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-508547 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-140505 | May 2002 | JP |
2007-088822 | Apr 2007 | JP |
9116691 | Oct 1991 | WO |
9308545 | Apr 1993 | WO |
9428497 | Dec 1994 | WO |
9608783 | Mar 1996 | WO |
9612242 | Apr 1996 | WO |
9714108 | Apr 1997 | WO |
9745796 | Dec 1997 | WO |
9745814 | Dec 1997 | WO |
9809260 | Mar 1998 | WO |
9910823 | Mar 1999 | WO |
9949404 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0018060 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0039979 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0175730 | Oct 2001 | WO |
02063432 | Aug 2002 | WO |
04079603 | Sep 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alabama Department of Revenue Selects Unisys for Imaging Solution to Speed Tax Returns, Bus. Wire, Sep. 6, 1995. |
Andersen Consulting, Image-Based Transaction Processing: The Banking Industry's Challenge for the 1990s and Beyond (1989). |
Andrew Gluck, Creating a global cash-management game plan, Bank Systems & Tech., Feb. 1997, at 28. |
Andrew Reinbach, Chase steps up treasury system, Bank Systems & Tech., Nov. 1995, at 29. |
Angela Maher & Jeffrey Troutman, PNC Bank Treasury Management, Payor's Prescription for Painless Migration to Receipt of Electronic Healthcare Payments and Remittance Advices (Dec. 2001). |
Angela Maher & Jeffrey Troutman, PNC Bank Treasury Management, Provider's Prescription for Painless Migration to Receipt of Electronic Healthcare Payments and Remittance Advices (Dec. 2001). |
Ann Keeton, Bank of America Completes Its Rollout of ‘Paperless’ Processing of Payments, Wall St. J., Nov. 1, 1999, at B13. |
BancTec Selects Alchemy CD-Based Archival Solution for Remittance Processing System, Bus. Wire, May 6, 1998. |
Bank of America Provides Nationwide Lockbox Services, Press Release, Oct. 20, 1999. |
Bridget Malone, Internet Billing: Building a Secure Global Market, Electronic Commerce World, Jan. 2001, at 46. |
Caere introduces the Model 1800 document remittance processor, Bus. Wire, Oct. 19, 1995. |
CardFlash, Daily Payment Card News, Sep. 23, 2004. |
CES/NaBanco introduces stored value card technology; Blockbuster Video is first merchant partner, Bus. Wire, Jan. 15, 1996. |
Chapter Reports: Texas Chapter, Work Process Improvement Today, Apr. 1998. |
Chase Image-Enables NY Wholesale Lockbox Facility with VICOR Technology, Press Release, Aug. 31, 1999. |
Chase Manhattan introduces new FEDI payables product, Cash Mgmt. News, May 1995. |
Chase offers image lockbox for Europe, Bank Systems & Tech., Aug. 1997, at 37. |
Chasing the Global Trend, Cash Mgmt. News, Dec. 1995, at 8. |
Christy Tauhert, Lock Box Solutions Reengineer Payment, Insurance & Tech., Aug. 1996, at 22. |
Cindy Jensen, U.S. Bank Effectively Manages Complexity, Today, May/Jun. 2006. |
Council for Electronic Billing and Payment, Business-to-Business EIPP: Presentment Models and Payment Options Part One (Jan. 2001). |
Council for Electronic Billing and Payment, Business-to-Business EIPP: Presentment Models and Payment Options Part Two (Jan. 2001). |
Crestar to Introduce New Advanced Cash Management System Based on IA Corp. Software, Bus. Wire, Oct. 28, 1996. |
Dieter Wackerow, MQSeries Enterprise Application Integration Center, MQ Series Primer, Oct. 1999. |
DMP and IMR Partner to Develop Electronic Archiving Solution for Wholesale Lockboxes and Remittance Processing, Bus. Wire, Mar. 24, 1998. |
Douglas Armstrong, Norwest eases difficulty of interstate banking Bank's customers may use the same account number at any branch, Milwaukee J. Sentinel, Oct. 12, 1995, at 2. |
Du Pont's Electronic Payments System, Corporate EFT Report, Jan. 11, 1989. |
Elena Malykhina, Cell Phone Software Formats Check for Online Banking, InformationWeek, Jan. 24, 2008. |
Erica Goode, on Profit, Loss and the Mysteries of the Mind, N.Y. Times, Nov. 5, 2002. |
Fidelity Helps Fund Sellers Trim the Taxes They'll Owe, Wall St. J., Nov. 7, 2002. |
First Data markets stored-value cards, Cards Int'l, Jan. 30, 1996, at 5. |
Frank J. Derfler, Jr. & Les Freed, How Networks Work 144-51 (2003). |
Get ready for electronic commerce, ABA Banking J., Jun. 1995, at 47. |
Gordon Platt, Online billing & payments: Technology Providers Multiply, Global Fin., Apr. 1, 2001. |
Gregory Zuckerman, The Hedge-Fund Craze, Wall St. J., Jun. 12, 2002. |
Henry Urrows & Elizabeth Urrows, Automated imaging in financial services, 11 Document Image Automation 259 (Sep.-Oct. 1991). |
IA announced installation at QuestPoint of first client/server cash management system with check image storage compatible with IBM, NCR and Unisys, Bus. Wire, May 29, 1997. |
IA Corp. Announces New CheckVision Products, Bus. Wire, Apr. 1, 1996. |
IA Corp. shows complex transaction processing software WorkVision at AIIM, Bus. Wire, Apr. 14, 1997. |
IA Corp. Wins Contract With Comercia to Install the First Digital All Items Archive, Bus. Wire, Jan. 9, 1997. |
IA Corporation Becomes a Major Player in Image-Based Cash Management Solutions, Bus. Wire, Nov. 24, 1995. |
IA Presents New Advanced Cash Management Software at TMA to Link Banks and Their Corporate Customers, Bus. Wire, Nov. 18, 1996. |
Ian McDonald, The Stars in the Sky Flicker, and Fund Stars Do the Same, Wall St. J., Jan. 15, 2003. |
IA's RemitVision adapted by Harris Bank for CD-ROM and Online Customer Viewing of Check and Remittance Documents, Bus. Wire, May 28, 1996. |
In Brief: Wachovia-InteliData Deal, Am. Banker, May 7, 2002. |
Initial Launch to 200 Credit Unions, USA Today, Jun. 27, 2002. |
Intelidata Technologies Corporation, Form 10-K for fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2001. |
J.D. Carreker, Electronic Check Presentment: Capturing new technology, Banking Mgmt., Mar./Apr. 1995, at 32. |
J.P. Buckley et al., Processing noisy structured textual data using a fuzzy matching approach: application to postal address errors, 4 Soft Computing 195 (2000). |
Jeetu Patel & Joe Fenner, E-Billing Moves Into B2B, Imaging & Document Solutions, Jan. 2001, at p. 44. |
Jeetu Patel, B-to-B E-Billing Heats Up—Business-to-business electronic billing is more complex than the business-to-consumer model, but the potential payoffs are bigger, InformationWeek, Oct. 23, 2000. |
John C. Bogle, Founder and Former Chairman, The Vanguard Group, Remarks to the '40 Act Institute of Practising Law Institute: Mutual Funds at the Millennium—Fund Directors and Fund Myths (May 15, 2000). |
John Shannon, New lockbox platform due out at NationsBank, Bank Systems & Tech., Feb. 1998, at 38. |
Jonathan Clements, Harsh Truth: Your Investments Likely Won't Make Any Money, Wall St. J., Nov. 27, 2002. |
Keith Lamond, Credit Card Transactions Real World and Online, available at, http://www.virtualschool.edu/mon/ElectronicProperty/klamond/credit_card.htm (last visited Jul. 8, 2005). |
Kristen French, Investors Worry CheckFree Being Chased from its Own Game, TheStreet.com, Jun. 20, 2001. |
Liz Moyer, Bank of Montreal to Install Imaging System by Unisys for Retail Lockbox Services, Am. Banker, Oct. 22, 1996, at 19. |
Liz Moyer, KeyCorp Joins Trend to Check Imaging Lockbox, Am. Banker, Aug. 23, 1996. |
M. Williams, FRIIS, Goodbye to paper?, ABA Banking J., Mar. 1989, at 61. |
Mark Arend, Bank applications fuel optical storage market, ABA Banking J., Oct. 1991, at 77. |
Melinda Norris, First Data Unit Develops Blockbuster Cash Card, Omaha World Herald, Jan. 19, 1996, at 16. |
NationsBank rolls out first wholesale lockbox imaging, Potomac, Aug. 3, 1995, at 1. |
NCR introduces 7780 item processing system, Bus. Wire, Mar. 11, 1992. |
Newsbyte, Visa & Carnegie Mellon Plan Online Payment Scheme, 1995 WL 2205732, Feb. 15, 1995. |
Nokia Announces the World's First NFC Enabled Mobile Product for Contactless Payment and Ticketing, PR Newswire, Feb. 9, 2005. |
Offer: Book Yourself Free Cassettes, Birmingham Post, Mar. 25, 2000, at 16. |
Operating in a multi-currency environment, Aslamoney, Oct. 1995, at 6. |
Patricia A. Murphy, E-Billing: New Age Electronic Data; Interchange or Something Better?, Bank Tech. News, Jul. 2000, at 43. |
Paul Williams, IBM UK Laboratories Ltd., IBM MQSeries Commercial Messaging, ACM SIGICE Bulletin, Apr. 1995. |
Payment Data Systems files patent on debit card payment solution, Am. City Business J., Mar. 5, 2004. |
PNC Bank Add Chicago to National Lockbox Network, PR Newswire, Nov. 5, 1997. |
Priya Malhotra, Clearing House Enumerates e-Payment Ills, Am Banker, Aug. 13, 2002. |
Richard J. Maturi, Personal Finance; When you need to send cash in a flash, N.Y. Times, Sep. 25, 1988, at A7. |
Robert M. Hunt, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Working Paper No. 03-10: An Introduction to the Economics of Payment Card Networks (Jun. 2003). |
Robert M. Hunt, An Introduction to the Economics of Payment Card Networks, Rev. Network Econ., Jun. 2003, at 80. |
Scott Leibs, Internet Billing Gets Its Due, CFO, Feb. 1, 2001, at 30. |
Shawmut Bank Provides Lockbox Customers Real-Time, On-Line Electronic Exception Processing, Bus. Wire, Jan. 9, 1996. |
Sherree DeCovney, Net scope, Banking Tech., May 1997, at 28. |
Simultaneous Image Capture, Bank News, Oct. 1996, at 10. |
State of Minnesota using AT&T imaging solution to reengineer sales tax paying process, Bus. Wire, Apr. 18, 1994. |
Stephen M. Matyas, Digital Signatures—An Overview, 3 Computer Networks 87 (1979). |
Steve Bills, Chase Pact Done, What's Next for Web Vendors?, Am. Banker, Jun. 3, 2002, at 23. |
Steve Forbes, Fact and Comment, Forbes, Sep. 30, 2002, at 33. |
Steven Marjanovic, Corporate Services: Chase Gears Up Global Payments System Series: 16, Am. Banker, Sep. 11, 1995, at 41. |
Steven Marjanovic, NationsBank offers lockbox imaging, Am. Banker, Jul. 3, 1995, at 20. |
Systems spell change for foreign exchange, Global Investor, Nov. 1996, at 18. |
Terrie Miller & Henry Yan, When custody governs, Benefits Canada, Feb. 1998, at 33. |
The payments system gets a new image, ABA Banking J., Mar. 1990, at 84. |
Thomas P. Fitch, Image Technology brings lockbox breakthroughs, Corp. Cashflow Magazine, Sep. 1995, at 16. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/133,577, filed May 11, 1999. |
Valerie Block, Blockbuster Running Test of a Stored Value Card, Am. Banker, Sep. 1, 1995. |
Wausau Financial Systems' ImageRPS and OPEX interface a perfect math, Work Process Improvement Today, Dec. 1997. |
Wells Fargo Rolls out Nationwide Lockbox Check Conversion, PR Newswire, Apr. 22, 2003. |
Wendy S. Mead, Two Banks' Imaging Deals Target Fee Revenue Increases, Am. Banker, May 9, 1997, at 11. |
Wholesale lockbox imaging, ABA Banking J., Feb. 1, 1993. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60581022 | Jun 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11002334 | Dec 2004 | US |
Child | 13969581 | US |