Methods and systems for discounts management

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10497016
  • Patent Number
    10,497,016
  • Date Filed
    Sunday, August 18, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 3, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A computer-implemented method and electronic system are provided in which payment information is exchanged between a buyer and seller. A user interface is provided that facilitates seller selection of an identified payment date and amount for early payment. The system operates on the seller selections to identify invoices that may be discounted based on seller selections and offers the discount to the buyer.
Description

This application is related to the following United States patent applications:

  • System and Method for Varying Electronic Settlements Between Buyers and Suppliers With Dynamic Discount Terms, U.S. application Ser. No. 10/155,806, filed May 24, 2002 (now abandoned), publication number US 2003-0220863, publication date Nov. 27, 2003, invented by Don Holm, Duc Lam, and Xuan McRae;
  • System and Method for Varying Electronic Settlements Between Buyers and Suppliers With Dynamic Discount Terms, PCT application number PCT/US03/15542, filed May 14, 2003, publication number WO 2003/100689, publication date Dec. 4, 2003, invented by Don Holm, Duc Lam, and Xuan McRae;
  • Method and System for Collaborative Vendor Reconciliation, U.S. application Ser. No. 10/155,797, filed May 24, 2002 (now abandoned), publication number US2003-0220858, publication date Nov. 27, 2003, invented by Duc Lam, Georg Muller, Chandra (CP) Agrawal, Baby Lingampalli, Pavel Lopin and Xuan (Sunny) McRae;
  • System and Method for Electronic Authorization of Batch Checks, U.S. application Ser. No. 10/155,800, filed May 24, 2002, U.S. Pat. No. 7,519,560, publication number US 2003-0220886, publication date Nov. 27, 2003, invented by Duc Lam, Matthew Roland and Xuan (Sunny) McRae;
  • System and Method for Electronic Payer (Buyer) Defined Invoice Exchange, U.S. application Ser. No. 10/155,840, filed May 24, 2002, U.S. Pat. No. 7,689,482, publication number US 2003-0220855, publication date Nov. 27, 2003, invented by Duc Lam,
  • Method and System for Invoice Routing and Approval in Electronic Payment System, U.S. application Ser. No. 10/155,853, filed May 24, 2002 (now abandoned), publication number US2003-0220875, publication date Nov. 27, 2003, invented by Bob Moore and Xuan (Sunny) McRae; and
  • Method and System for Buyer-Centric Dispute Resolution in Electronic Payment System, U.S. application Ser. No. 10/155,866, filed May 24, 2002, U.S. Pat. No. 7,437,327, publication number US2003-0220843, publication date Nov. 27, 2003, invented by Duc Lam, Celeste Wymand and Xuan (Sunny) McRae.


All of the foregoing applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the field of software and computer network systems. In particular, the invention relates to electronic systems associated with financial transactions.


DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART

In traditional paper payment systems, an organization or an individual initiates payment by sending a physical check to the party to whom a debt is owed. The check may be sent in response to an invoice from the party to whom the debt is owed. A newer approach is electronic payment. For example, in the consumer context, individuals may be able to make payment by way of electronic banking. Payment instructions are sent electronically from the individual's computer system to the individual's bank. Payment is then effected by the bank.


Numerous systems now exist relating to accounting and bill payment. For example, computer software is used to track invoices and print payment checks. Payments may be made by wire transfer, with instructions requesting funds of the payer in one financial institution to be transferred to an account of the party to whom payment is to be effected.


Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are used for managing the purchases of goods and services. Such systems may have databases of complex and extensive sets of information, such as addresses of various suppliers and similar information related to purchasing. Sellers also use electronic accounting and record keeping systems which may assist in the receipt and tracking receipt of payment for goods and services. Prior systems require considerable amounts of effort to update and maintain, and may lack compatibility with the systems used by parties with whom an organization wishes to engage in transactions. There is thus a need for improved systems to facilitate transactions between buyers and sellers.


SUMMARY

An embodiment of the invention is directed to a computer implemented business method in an electronic system in which payment information is exchanged between a buyer and a seller. Approval is received from the buyer of an electronic invoice received by the buyer. At a time when no agreed upon discount is available based on the invoice or pre-agreed terms between the buyer and the seller, a request is received from the buyer to offer the seller early payment in exchange for a discount of the amount owed. The discount is based on an annual hurdle rate provided to the system by the buyer. The early payment is to be made on days from among a set of one or more days of the week configured in the system by the buyer. The offer is presented to the seller on the seller's user interface, and a clickable button is provided for the seller to indicate selection of such offer. The clickable button may include an indication thereon that payment to the seller is to be made immediately. Such indication may include a phrase such as “pay me now.” The electronic system may include a set of computers communicating over a network. The system may include an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system and early payment may be effected by the ERP system.


According to an embodiment of the invention, initially only information regarding a first available payment date is presented to the seller, and information regarding other possible payment dates for such transaction is not initially shown to the seller. According to another embodiment of the invention, the invoice may be approved by the buyer after expiration of a discount term.


A user interface window may be provided for the buyer. The user interface window may include an entry cell for the annual hurdle rate, a calculated daily discount rate that is based on the annual hurdle rate, and a list of days of the week in which individual days can be selected by the buyer as days for payment for the offer to the seller. In another embodiment, the seller's acceptance of the offer for early payment is received through the clickable button, and in response to such acceptance, electronic payment is effected from the buyer to the seller.


Another embodiment of the invention may include presenting a list of invoices to the seller on the user interface. The list of invoices are ones for which the buyer and any other buyers have offered the seller early payment in exchange for a discount of the amount owed at a time when no agreed upon discount is available based on the invoice or pre-agreed terms between the buyer and the seller. Clickable buttons are provided to the seller on the seller user interface. Each button is associated with an indication of a respective invoice. The buttons allow the seller to select the corresponding offer.


According to an embodiment of the invention, the manual payment request is made to an ERP system for the adjusted discount amount. Upon success of the request, a credit memo is issued for the discount amount and the credit memo is posted to the ERP system.


Another embodiment of the invention is directed to a computer implemented business system. The computer implemented business system includes computer program instructions for exchanging payment information between at least a buyer and at least a seller. The business system also includes a user interface screen for the buyer for configuring an offer to the seller of early payment in exchange for a discount of the amount owed. The user interface screen includes a field to receive an annual hurdle rate from the buyer, and a field to receive selection from the buyer of a set of one or more days of the week. The system also includes computer program instructions for presenting the offer to the seller on the seller's user interface at a time when no agreed upon discount is available based on the invoice or pre-agreed terms between the buyer and the seller. The system also includes an interface screen including a clickable button for, the seller to indicate selection of such offer. Further, the system includes computer program instructions to automatically cause the discounted payment to be effected on a day in the selected set of days.


In another embodiment of the invention, in an electronic system in which payment information is exchanged between buyers and at least a seller, an identification of a date upon which a seller would like to receive early payment is received through a computer input associated with the seller. An identification of the amount of payment the seller would like to receive is also received from the seller. Invoices upon which corresponding offers may be made in order to receive the payment upon the desired date are automatically identified. The invoices do not currently have associated agreed-upon terms that would yield the desired payment at the desired date. Through a portion of the system associated with the buyer, the buyer is offered the discount in exchange for the early payment of the invoices. According to an embodiment of the invention, an identification of a particular buyer is received and the invoices identified are invoices of the particular buyer.


According to an embodiment of the invention, the total payment and total discount for the identified invoices are displayed. A list of the identified invoices may also be displayed to the seller, including, according to an embodiment of the invention, the current payment, discounted payment and discount rate for each respective invoice in the list. Such method may be implemented in the computer implemented business system including computer program instructions and a user interface screen with applicable instructions and applicable input fields to receive the respective information, such as the identification of a date upon which the seller would like to receive the early payment and identification of the amount of payment the seller would like to receive early.


Another embodiment of the invention is directed to a relationship between a buyer and a seller where there is a standard discount term, and there is also a discount term in a respective invoice. An electronic invoice which includes a discount term associated with early payment is received from the seller. The discount term from the invoice is compared with the standard discount term. Payment is then automatically effected from the buyer to the seller based on the more favorable of the discount term from the invoice and the standard discount term. The method may include effecting payment based on a discount term included in a purchase order associated with the transaction, if it is determined the purchase order is more favorable than either of the discount term from the invoice or the standard discount term.


Another embodiment of the invention is directed to a method related to enrollment of a new seller in the system. In an electronic system in which payment information is exchanged between a buyer and a seller, a set of multiple different payment terms which may apply to transactions between a new seller and buyer is presented as a process of enrollment of a new seller. Each payment term includes a discount rate, discount date upon which payment is due to receive the discount, and a net payment due date. After the enrollment, payment is automatically effected from a seller to the buyer based on the selected payment term. If payment is made on a date between the discount date and the net payment date, the discount rate is prorated according to the date upon which the payment is made between the discount date and the net payment date.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a step curve of adjustable 1%10Net30 terms according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 2a shows a set of discount offers before the final date the discount is available according to standard terms.



FIG. 2b shows a set of discount offers on the approved date according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 3 shows PMN discount offers on a given day according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 4 shows PMN discount offers in line with pay cycle according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 5 shows a user interface screen allowing the buyer to edit the PMN information according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 6 shows a user interface screen for a seller with invoices eligible for early payment according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 7 shows a user interface with additional information regarding an invoice eligible for early payment according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 8 shows a process flow related to PMN offers according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 9 shows a process flow related to updating information for a PMN program according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 10 shows a setup user interface for a seller for making early payment offers according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 11 shows a user interface for displaying information to a seller related to the early payment offer according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 12 shows a user interface screen allowing the buyer to edit the early payment terms section of a program according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 13 shows a flow diagram for a system including e-file according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 14 shows a flow diagram for general payment issuance according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 15 shows a user interface screen for enrollment of a new seller and a system in which the user may select among different payment terms according to an embodiment of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

An embodiment of the invention is directed to a system for dynamically adjusting the terms of payment in a transaction based on electronic notification of events associated with respective transactions. For example, early payments may be made after receipt of electronic notification of an event such as approval of the respective invoice or release of the payment for the invoice. An offer is made for an adjustment of the terms that apply to payment at a time after the respective event. An entity, such as a buyer, may send requests to a set of entities, such as sellers, for offers of terms different than the established terms between such entity and the respective other entities. After acceptance of an offer, payment is then effected under the newly agreed upon terms.


The buyer and seller may negotiate the new terms for payment based on different factors. For example, based on a simple time value of money based on a selected interest rate calculation, the change in the payment amount can be calculated based on the number of days earlier or later than the originally agreed-upon settlement date that payments occur. An interest rate may be used that is extrapolated from the discount provided in the seller's original terms, or the original terms in the original agreement between the buyer and the seller. For additional description, see United States patent publication System and Method for Varying Electronic Settlements Between Buyers and Suppliers With Dynamic Discount Terms, application Ser. No. 10/155,806, filed May 24, 2002, (now abandoned), publication number US 2003-0020863, publication date Nov. 27, 2003, invented by Don Holm, Duc Lam, and Xuan McRae which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


The following is a description of various embodiments of the invention. Such processes, structures, systems and architectures may be combined with the processes, structures, systems, and architectures described in the above-referenced patent disclosures or implemented separately, according to various embodiments of the invention.


Certain embodiments of the invention are directed to discounts management which help to provide the buyer the capabilities to identify, capture and track early payment discounts.


Basic discount management functionalities may include:

    • Offer additional early payment terms (better than standard terms) for PO-flip and blank invoice forms,
    • Immediate early payment “pay me now” (“PMN”) on approved invoices that either have no discounts (i.e., Net60) or have missed discounts (i.e., approved past the discounted period),
    • Normalization of electronic (e-file) terms to the buyer's advantage, and
    • Early payment offer on a set of invoices from the supplier to the buyer.


E-file terms normalization involves changing the terms on the e-file invoice to the advantage of the buyer. The normalization process takes the best of the submitted invoice terms with the supplier's standard terms. For example, an invoice submitted through e-file has the terms 1%10Net30 while that supplier's standard terms with the buyer are Net60. The normalized terms will be 1%10Net60.


Another place for discounts is in the area of the buyer offering additional early payment terms (presumably better than the supplier's standard terms) for PO-flip and blank invoice. For PO-flip, the supplier can either accept the PO terms or accept any of the newly offered early payment terms. For blank invoices, the supplier can choose from either the standard terms or any of the newly offered early payment terms.


Another place for discounts is the buyer offering early immediate payment (“pay me now,” or “PMN”) to the suppliers. If invoice terms have no discounts (i.e., Net60), the buyer can offer the supplier PMN options. These are discounts on a declining scale for different days the supplier wants early payment. PMN options can also be offered on approved invoices that have missed discounts. In this scenario, the approval date is past the terms' discount date.


Also, early payment may be offered from the suppliers on a set of invoices. The supplier will make an offer for the total discount amounts desired by a certain date for a set of invoices. In particular, the offer is made on approved invoices only.


Terms

Terms may include: standard terms, early payment terms, PMN terms, and early payment offer terms.


Standard Terms


A vendor will have existing standard terms with a buyer. The standard terms are recorded in the ERP vendor record. A second type of standard terms are those that appear on a purchase order (PO). This might be the same as the terms recorded in the vendor record or they could be provided differently, depending on the PO creation process. In either case, the terms on the PO will be considered as the standard terms for the corresponding invoice automatically created from the PO (invoice flip). The standard terms can be accessed from the database directory associated with the buyers and sellers or from the PO.


Early Payment Terms


Early payment terms are presumably better terms than the standard terms that a buyer is willing to offer to the supplier. These new early payment terms for the supplier are maintained in the database. Early payment terms will be offered in addition to the PO terms (for PO-flip) and the standard terms (for blank invoice).


Normal Early Payment Terms


Use of normal early payment terms is the conventional payment term expressed in the order “discount term/net term.” A discount term says what percentage of the bill may be deducted if the invoice is paid within a shorter time interval. A net term says how long the invoice has to be paid in full. For example, payment terms of “1%/10Net30” would be considered early payment terms for suppliers that have standard terms of “Net45.”


Adjustable Early Payment Terms


Adjustable early payment terms is a combination of the conventional payment term along with a declining discount rate for the time interval starting at the end of the discount term period and ending with the net term. For example, the terms “Adjustable 1%/10Net30” may look like FIG. 1. According to an embodiment of the invention, the adjustable slope is a step curve 101 with 1 day being the step size as shown in FIG. 1.


The discount rate of decline is the discount term percentage divided by the time interval of the slope. In the above example, the rate of decline is 0.05%/day (i.e., 1%/[30 days−10 days]). The discount percentage on a daily basis would be as follows.


Day 1-10: 1% Discount


Day 11: 0.95% Discount


Day 12: 0.90% Discount


Day . . . : . . . % Discount


Day 29: 0.05% Discount


Day 30: 0% Discount


Adjustable early payment terms can also be referred to as ASAP terms. For example, Adjustable 1%/10Net30 may be used as the same as 1%/10Net30 ASAP.



FIG. 2a shows a set of discount offers 201 before the final date 202 that the discount is available according to standard terms (i.e., discount offers for days before day 10—days 1 through 9). Thus, there is an inclining slope from the perspective from day 10 to day 1. The discount rate of incline is the discount term percentage divided by the time interval of the slope, according to an embodiment of the invention. In the above example, the rate of incline is 0.05%/day (i.e., 1%/[10 days−0 days]). The discount percentage on a daily basis would be as follows.


Day 10: 1% Discount


Day 09: 1.05% Discount


Day 08: 1.10% Discount


Day 07: . . . % Discount


Day 02: 1.40% Discount


Day 01: 1.45% Discount


Day 00: 1.50% Discount


Adjustable early payment terms with both incline and decline slopes can also be referred to as Extended ASAP (EASAP) terms. For example, Adjustable 1%/10Net30 may be used as the same as 1%/10Net30 EASAP. Thus, according to an embodiment of the invention, early payment is effected in accordance with an additional discount at a time in advance of the final date 202 at which a discount is available according to standard terms, and the additional discount is inversely proportional to the number of days remaining from the day of payment until the final date 202 at which a discount is otherwise available according to the standard terms. For example an additional discount of up to 0.5% is available at day 00 as shown above where the total discount is 1.5%. This additional discount goes down to zero of day 10, where the total discount is 1%. According to another embodiment of the invention, the discount is inversely proportional to the number of days remaining until final due date for payment 203. An example of this may be the combining of the incline and decline slopes described above.


Immediate payment PMN terms can be based on annual hurdle rate, number of calendar days per year, and pay cycle.


The above parameters are used to calculate the discount offers on a per invoice basis. To calculate the discount offers, first determine the daily discount rate:

daily discount rate=annual hurdle rate/number of calendar days per year


The discount is calculated from the scheduled pay date back to today. The discount is 0 on the scheduled pay date. The discount for each day is calculated as:

discount=invoice amount times number of days until scheduled pay date times daily discount rate



FIG. 2b shows the set of discount offers 204 on the approved date. As time passes, the current date 301 moves as shown in FIG. 3. As a result, fewer and fewer discount offers 302 will be available to the supplier as shown in FIG. 3.


The discount offers can be continuous daily pay cycle or on a weekly pay cycle. For instance, the buyer existing ERP pay cycle may run every seven days. If the buyer wishes, then the offers can be available only on those days (401a and 401b) as shown in FIG. 4.


PMN offers are made on approved invoices that have no discounts or have missed discounts. Invoices with adjustable terms already have a slope built into them and hence do not have PMN offers.


Example 1: Daily Payment

In this example, the buyer has configured for daily payment:


Buyer's Settings:


Annual hurdle rate: 8%


Number of calendar days: 360


Daily Rate: 0.08/360=0.022


Daily payment


Invoice:


Amount $100


Submitted on: Jan. 1, 2003


Terms: 1%/10Net30


Approved on: Jan. 15, 2003


Scheduled Pay Date: Jan. 31, 2003


On Jan. 15, 2003, the discount offers to the supplier will be:
















Date
Discount Amount









Jan. 15, 2003
100 * 16 * 0.08/360 = $35.60



Jan. 16, 2003
100 * 15 * 0.08/360 = $33.33



Jan. 17, 2003
100 * 14 * 0.08/360 = $31.11



. . .




Jan. 29, 2003
100 * 2 * 0.08/360 = $4.44



Jan. 30, 2003
100 * 1 * 0.08/360 = $2.22



Jan. 31, 2003
0










On Jan. 16, 2003, the discount offers to the supplier will be:
















Date
Discount Amount









Jan. 16, 2003
100 * 15 * 0.08/360 = $33.33



Jan. 17, 2003
100 * 14 * 0.08/360 = $31.11



. . .




Jan. 29, 2003
100 * 2 * 0.08/360 = $4.44



Jan. 30, 2003
100 * 1 * 0.08/360 = $2.22



Jan. 31, 2003
0










Example 2: Friday Pay Cycle

In this example, the buyer wants to make the PMN offers in line with pay cycle on Friday. Hence, discounts will only be offered on these days.


Buyer's Settings:


Annual hurdle rate: 8%


Number of calendar days: 360


Daily Rate: 0.08/360=0.022


Pay cycle is every Friday


(17th, 24th, 31st)


Invoice:


Amount $100


Submitted on: Jan. 3, 2001


Terms: 1%/10Net30


Approved on: Jan. 15, 2003


Scheduled Pay Date: Jan. 31, 2003


On Jan. 15, 2003, the discount offers to the supplier will be:
















Date
Discount Amount









Jan. 17, 2003
100 * 14 * 0.08/360



Jan. 24, 2003
100 * 7 * 0.08/360










On Jan. 24, 2003, the discount offers to the supplier will be:
















Date
Discount Amount









Jan. 24, 2003
100 * 7 * 0.08/360











Early Payment Offer Terms


Terms for an early payment offer include a discount percentage on the total amount of a collection of invoices if payment is made within a pay date. The supplier offers this discount to the buyer. This offer includes multiple invoices combined for payment on a single date. The invoices may have different due dates, and thus the number of days early the payment is to be made, and the effective discount rate, may be different for each invoice. The following is an example:


Pay By Date: Jun. 30, 2002


Invoices Total: $999,342.00


Estimated Payment: $996,210.54


Total Discount: $3,131.46


Average Rate: 0.32%


Buyer Configuration


The buyer may set up configuration information to enable the discount management functionality. The buyer can configure these areas or a subset thereof: early payment terms for PO-flip and blank invoice forms; immediate early payment (“PMN”) programs; and/or E-file normalization.


Buyer Discount Programs


The buyer will be able to create new discount programs through the use of a wizard consisting of multiple screens. The discount program may have the following characteristics:

    • One is created of the special type “default.” This program will apply to suppliers not in any other program.
    • A program applies only to a single supplier group.
    • A supplier belongs to one program (except the default program).
    • A program has configuration for all or a subset of the following functionalities: Early payment terms for PO-flip and blank invoice forms; PMN; and/or E-file normalization.
    • Creation of a new program through a wizard, i.e., multi-screens.


      Buyer User Interface


A screen may show the summary view of all the discount programs available to the buyer. From such a screen, the buyer can, according to an embodiment of the invention, click on “New Program” to get a program creation wizard; edit a particular discount program; activate/deactivate functionalities (e.g., PMN, early payment terms, e-file normalization) of a program.


A screen to initiate editing of programs is provided according to an embodiment of the invention. The screen may provide a description of each functionality and the current terms, e.g., PMN with an annual hurdle rate of 7.75% and daily discount rate of 0.021%; supplier discount terms of 1% 10/Net 30; 1.5% 10/Net 45; 2% 10/Net 60; whether e-file normalization is active.


Early Immediate Payment (“PMN”)


A screen allowing the buyer to edit the PMN section of a program is shown in FIG. 5. The screen 501 provides inputs for entry of annual hurdle rate 502 and selection of days of the week 503 upon which payment may be made (e.g., Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday). The screen may also display the daily discount rate 504.


Thus, an embodiment of the invention includes a computer implemented business system comprising computer program instructions for exchanging payment information between at least a buyer and at least a seller, and a user interface screen for the buyer for configuring an offer to the seller of early payment in exchange for a discount of the amount owed. The user interface screen includes a field to receive an annual hurdle rate from the buyer, and a field to receive selection from the buyer of a set of one or more days of the week.


The system includes computer program instructions for presenting the offer to the seller on the seller's user interface at a time when no agreed upon discount is available based on the invoice or pre-agreed terms between the buyer and the seller. The system also includes a user interface screen 601 including a clickable button 602 for the seller to indicate selection of such offer and computer program instructions to automatically cause the discounted payment to be effected on a day in the selected set of days.


The PMN portion of the discount program consists of the following attributes, according to an embodiment of the invention:

    • Active: Whether to offer PMN in the associated discount program or not.
    • Annual hurdle rate (%): The annual hurdle rate for all suppliers in this program.
    • Number of calendar days per year: Use to calculate the daily cost of capital.
    • Daily cost of capital (computed): The daily cost of capital is computed as annual hurdle rate/calendar days per year. Use the number of calendar days for the year from the general settings.
    • Discount pay cycle: PMN offers are made on a daily basis or on days specified by the pay cycle.
    • Apply to net terms: This attribute will determine whether to only offer PMN for invoices with only net terms.


The discount pay cycle will determine which days to make PMN offer on. It is based on the schedule for the pay cycle. If the schedule is for the pay cycle to be daily, offers will be made for payment on every banking business day. If the schedule is for the pay cycle to be weekly, offers will be made for payment on selected days. If the actual date is on a banking holiday, no offer will be made for payment on that day. The system provides the buyer the opportunity to select the respective day or days of the week upon which the payment is to be made.


PMN options are available on approved invoices that have:

    • Missed discounts, i.e., invoice approved after discount due date, AND
    • The supplier for that invoice belongs in a discount program where the PMN section is active.


General Process Flow


The general process flow of PMN is:


1. Invoice approved status upload from ERP to system.


2. Figure out which “program” the invoice falls into.


3. Generate and save the offers on the disburser side (buyer system).


4. Send the “program” details/offers for the invoice to the collector (seller system).


5. Collector receives invoice's program details.


6. Generate and save the offers on the collector side.


7a. Supplier does not accept PMN. Invoice will be paid through normal process. End of process.


7b. Supplier accepts PMN.


8. Offer acceptance message to disburser.


9. Disburser schedule early payment for invoice.


10. Disburser back office swipes through all scheduled early payment invoice. Activate early payment issuance instruction to the ERP system.


The following is the flow between states related to PMN status. The status “INI” (initial) is reached when the offer is made. The disburser back office will generate the offer and save this status. This will be sent to the collector side as well. When the supplier accepts an offer from the collector user interface, the status will be changed to “ACP” for acceptance. When the invoice is paid, then the status will be changed to “PD” for paid. If no offer is accepted, the status will be changed to “EXP” when the invoice paid status is processed on the collector side.



FIG. 6 shows a user interface 601 for a seller with invoices eligible for early payment. Thus, the system may include a user interface screen for the seller including a list of invoices 603 for which the buyer and any other buyers have offered the seller early payment in exchange for a discount of the amount owed at a time when no agreed upon discount is available based on the invoice or pre-agreed terms between the buyer and the seller. The user interface also includes clickable buttons 604, each in proximity to the indication of each invoice, for the seller to indicate interest in the corresponding offer.


When the supplier clicks on the “Pay Me Now” button, the next screen will show the first early payment day and the associated discount rate. The supplier can confirm to accept this early payment date or click on “More Options” to see the complete list of early payment days.


If the supplier clicks on the “More Options,” the supplier will be presented with another screen 701, the complete list 702 of all early payment days and associated discount rates as shown in FIG. 7. The supplier can “Select” 703 to accept a respective early payment day.


Early Payment Discount Offer by Seller


In addition to accepting the early immediate payment PMN terms offered by the buyer, the supplier can make an early payment discount offer on a set of approved invoices. A screen in the seller's user interface may include the “Early Payment Offer” button. The “Early Payment Offer” button may be available on early payment screens.



FIG. 8 shows a process flow related to PMN offers according to an embodiment of the invention. The process flow includes actions taking place in the disburser/buyer system 801 and in the collector/seller system 802. In an ERP agent, an invoice is approved (block 803), and then this information is uploaded to buyer system 801 (block 804). The status is updated on the collector/seller system 802 (block 812). Note that blocks 804-809 and 812, 810 and 811 are back office processes (BO). As seller system 802 is informed of the invoice approved status (block 812), seller system 802 can check for the presence of a PMN program.


Buyer system 801 checks whether the invoice matches any PMN program (block 805). If no PMN program is found, the process is completed (block 806). If the invoice matches a PMN program, the invoice is caused to reference this version of the PMN program (block 807). PMN offers are generated and saved to the database (block 808), and a PMN program is sent for an invoice (block 809). A PMN message is sent from buyer system 801 to collector system 802. The invoice is referenced in seller system 802 (block 810), and PMN offers are generated and saved to the database (block 811).



FIG. 9 shows a process flow related to updating information for a PMN program according to an embodiment of the invention. Thus, this figure shows an approach that the system may take after a PMN offer has been generated for an invoice and the buyer changes information in a discount program information. The system looks for existing invoices with offers, and regenerates these.


Thus, FIG. 9 shows communication between buyer (disburser) system 901 and seller (collector) system 902 starting with a PMN program change (block 903). The program change takes place at the application level (APP). Other processes shown are back office processes (e.g., block 904). The invoices in the program are found in buyer system 901 (block 904), and the invoice status is updated to seller system 902 (block 919). If invoices are found (block 905) on buyer system 901, the respective invoices are caused to reference this version of the PMN program (block 906). PMN offers are generated and saved to the database (block 907), and an update of the PMN program is sent from buyer system 901 to seller system 902 (block 908). Seller system 902 receives this update and processes a PMN update on seller system 902 (block 909). Seller system 902 finds prior version invoices in the PMN program (blocks 910 and 911), and determines whether the supplier has accepted an offer on a previous version of a PMN program (block 912). If the supplier has accepted such an offer, the process is ended with an exception (block 914).


If supplier has not accepted such an offer, the PMN program is updated for the invoice (block 915), and PMN offers are generated and saved to the database (block 916). Next, seller system 902 sends a PMN program update commit for the respective invoices (block 917), and buyer system 901 receives this update (block 918).


According to an embodiment of the invention, the supplier will see the screen 1001 shown in FIG. 10 upon clicking on the “Early Payment Offer.” Here, the supplier can choose the buyer 1002 to make the offer to, the date payment would like to be received 1003, the total amount to collect 1004, and the desired annual cost of capital 1005.


Thus, an embodiment of the invention includes a user interface screen for configuring offers to sellers of discounts in exchange for early payment including a field for identification of a date upon which the seller would like to receive the early payment and a field for identification of the amount of payment the seller would like to receive early. The system also includes computer program instructions for automatically identifying invoices upon which corresponding offers may be made in order to receive the payment upon the desired date. The invoices do not currently have associated agreed-upon terms that would yield the desired payment at the desired date. The system further includes computer program instructions for offering to the buyer the discount in exchange for the early payment.


For the specified total amount that the supplier would like to be collected and desired annual cost of capital, the system determines which invoices 1101 will be part of this offer. This is displayed as shown in FIG. 11. The actual total amount 1102 and total discount 1103 are displayed. The actual amount 1104 and discount 1105 are displayed at the invoice level.


A screen 1201 allowing the buyer to edit the early payment terms section of a program is shown in FIG. 12. This screen allows the user to activate or de-activate the program, for example through a clickable selection 1202. Terms can be selected through a window 1203 and displayed in another window 1204.


Buyer New Discount Program Wizard


A first page of a wizard may allow the buyer to choose the supplier group for this program. A second step of the wizard may provide configuration of a PMN function.


A third step of the wizard may allow for configuration of the early payment terms for PO-flip and blank invoice forms. Supplier discount terms allow approved suppliers to select from a list of buyer approved discount terms while creating an invoice. Available discount terms are selected from a box, and selected terms are shown in a neighboring box.


The fourth step of the wizard may allow for configuration of the e-file normalization section.


Early Payment Terms for PO-Flip and Blank Invoice Forms


The buyer will be able to turn on or off the availability of early payment terms for PO-flip and blank invoice form for a discount program. Additionally, the buyer will be able to define the list of terms as well.


The early payment terms portion of the discount program has the following attributes:

    • Active: Whether the early payment terms portion is active for program.
    • List of Terms: The terms that will be offered in this program.


In the user interface, the buyer can check/uncheck the flag (e.g. “active”) to make early payment terms active/inactive for the associated discount program. The buyer will be able to add or remove terms from the selected list in the user interface.


E-File Normalization


An embodiment of the invention is directed to “e-file normalization.” The user interface allows activation of e-file normalization. The e-file normalization screen will show the active flag. The buyer can check/uncheck the checkbox.


E-File Discount Capture


The e-file discount functionality is normalizing the submitted invoice terms and the supplier's standard terms to the buyer's advantage. Normalization is done by taking the better of both discount (if any) terms and net components of the payment terms. These normalized terms will be saved in the existing invoice terms field. A new field will be created to store the submitted e-file terms.


Thus, in an electronic system in which payment information is exchanged between a buyer and a seller, an electronic invoice is received from the seller, the system has a stored standard discount term with respect to transactions between the buyer and seller, and the invoice includes a discount term associated with early payment. The discount term from the invoice is compared with the standard discount term, and payment from the buyer to the seller is automatically effected based on the more favorable of the discount term from the invoice and the standard discount term.


The following is the set of rules to follow during normalization executed in this order:

    • Any potential discount is better than no discount.
    • A higher discount is better than a lower discount.
      • The higher discount terms will be taken as a whole. There is no normalization of the discount periods.
    • If the discount is the same, take the one with the longer discount period.
    • A longer net term is better than a shorter net term.


Which “standard terms” to normalize will be based on the following set of rules:

    • If the invoice has a PO, then normalize with the PO terms.
    • If a default system invoice posting matched found against remit address, then normalize with the standard terms of that system record.
    • Otherwise, normalize with all accepted and matched system standard terms with that remit address.



FIG. 13 shows a flow diagram for a system including e-file according to an embodiment of the invention. Information about respective vendors is loaded into the system from an ERP system database 1311 through ERP agent 1308 (line 1310). When the invoice is approved, it is posted to the ERP system database 1311 through ERP agent 1308. Before it is posted, the normalization process as shown takes place: Standard terms are uploaded from ERP system 1311 (block 1309). An invoice is submitted (block 1301) and received in the seller system (block 1302). The system, through a central storage system (block 1304), provides information regarding the invoice to the buyer system (block 1306). A work flow approval process may be involved (block 1307).


The invoice is posted (line 1314). If the e-file terms (those terms on the invoice) are better than the standard terms negotiated between the buyer and the seller (block 1313), then the better of those terms are selected and used (block 1312). These terms are then provided to the ERP agent (block 1308) and used in the transaction. The payment is executed through the disburser (block 1306), and payment is executed (block 1305).


Early Payment Issuance


According to embodiments of the invention, the system will ensure prompt discounted payment issuance. One method is issuance against the discounted portion of the terms. If an invoice is approved within the discount terms period, the system will issue a manual payment request to the ERP system for the full discounted amount as specified by the conventional portion of the terms. This request will be issued at the end of the discount period compensating for ACH processing time. Upon success of the request, the payment will be applied to the invoice at the full discounted amount in the ERP system. Once that is complete, the system will then issue the actual payment to the supplier. This is an atomic transaction that will occur within one day. Hence, the order of operations might change.


Another method is issuance against a non-conventional portion of the terms, i.e., adjustable portion, PMN, and early payment discount offer. If an invoice is approved outside the conventional discount terms period, the XPSN will issue a manual payment request to the ERP system for the adjusted discount amount. This request will be issued on the adjusted date for the discount compensating for ACH processing time. Upon success of the request, the XPSN will issue a credit memo for the discount amount and post this credit memo to the ERP system. The payment will then be applied to the full amount of the invoice and the full amount of the credit memo, thereby bringing the net balance to 0. This is an atomic transaction that will occur within one day. Hence, the order of operations might change.


For invoices approved during the net terms, the system will NOT issue early payment for these cases by default. However, the buyer can configure the system to do so, thereby ensuring early payment without waiting for the ERP pay cycle.


Normal Early Payment Terms Payment Issuance


If the invoice with these terms is approved within the discounted period, the system will issue an early payment at the end of the period. For the period between net term and end of discount term, the buyer will configure whether the system will issue an early payment on the approved date. If the invoice is approved outside the net term, the payment will be issued through the ERP pay cycle.


For example, an invoice is submitted with 1%10Net30 terms on Jan. 1, 2003. The scheduled pay date for this invoice will be Jan. 30, 2003. If the invoice is approved any day before Jan. 10, 2003, the payment will be issued on Jan. 10, 2003. If the invoice is approved between Jan. 10, 2003 through Jan. 30, 2003, there are two scenarios. If the buyer configures the system to issue early payment for that period, payment will be issued on the approved date. Otherwise, the payment will be issued by the ERP pay cycle. The actual payment date will then be after the scheduled pay date. If the invoice is approved after the net terms, the ERP pay cycle will issue the payment, which will be after the scheduled pay date as well.


Adjustable Early Payment Terms Payment Issuance


If the invoice with these terms is approved within the conventional discounted period, the system will issue an early payment at the end of the period. For the period between the net term and the end of discount term, the system will issue an early payment on the approved date. If the invoice is approved outside the net term, the payment will be issued through the ERP pay cycle.


For example, an invoice is submitted with Adjustable 1%10Net30 on Jan. 1, 2003. The scheduled pay date for this invoice will be Jan. 30, 2003. If the invoice is approved any day before Jan. 20, 2003, the payment will be issued on Jan. 10, 2003. If the invoice is approved between Jan. 20, 2003 through Jan. 30, 2003, the XPSN will issue payment on the approved date. If the invoice is approved after the net terms, the ERP pay cycle will issue the payment, which will be after the scheduled pay date.



FIG. 14 shows a flow diagram for general payment issuance according to an embodiment of the invention. This process flow includes communication between disburser/buyer system 1403 and collector/seller system 1404. The invoice is approved at disburser 1413 and an appropriate notification (notification 1405) is sent to collector 1404. After the appropriate processes are run, payment is made from disburser/buyer system 1403 to collector/seller system 1404 (notification 1406). A database system and computer system 1402 facilitate this communication.


If no early payment terms are applicable (block 1409), then no particular action is taken for this process, and the ERP system issues payment with the normal pay cycle (block 1410). If there are early payment terms (block 1409), and the invoice has been approved within the discount terms (block 1413), then determine whether the invoice has been approved within the net terms and the buyer has configured the system to issue early payment for net terms (block 1414). If this is not the case, no additional action is taken in this process, and the ERP system issues payment with the normal payment cycle (block 1417). Otherwise, payment is issued within this process (block 1416), and a credit memo may be issued (block 1412). As appropriate, manual payment is created and applied to the invoice (block 1411), and the ERP agent 1408 interacts with the ERP system 1401 to cause the appropriate action to be taken by ERP system 1401. If the invoice is approved within the discount terms (block 1413), the system schedules payment issuance at the end of the discount terms (block 1415), and a credit memo is created if applicable (block 1412).


Enrollment and Terms


During the supplier enrollment process, the buyer can offer each supplier all the different types of discount terms described in this document as shown in FIG. 15. Thus, according to an embodiment of the invention, in the process of an enrollment of a new seller in the system, a set including multiple different payment terms 1502 which may apply to transactions between the new seller and buyers is presented, for example on a user interface screen 1501. Each payment term includes a discount rate, discount date upon which payment is due to receive the discount, and a payment due date. After the enrollment, payment is automatically effected from the seller to the buyer based on the selected payment term. If such payment is made on a date between the discount date and the net payment date, discount rate is prorated according to the date upon which the payment is made between the discount date and the net payment date.


The description herein of various embodiments of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to limit the invention to the precise forms described.

Claims
  • 1. A computer-implemented method for managing discounts through interfacing with a seller system, a buyer system, and an enterprise resource management (ERP) system, the method comprising: receiving from the ERP system, at a programmed computer, electronic payment information exchanged between the buyer system and the seller system over a network;providing a seller user interface for display on the seller system, the seller user interface enabling formulation of early payment offers for multiple invoices, the seller user interface including selectable parameters including a buyer selection, an early payment date selection, and a payment amount selection, wherein the multiple invoices comprise at least a standard invoice based on standard payment terms and an e-file invoice based on e-file payment terms;receiving, at the programmed computer, through seller selection at the seller user interface, an identification of a desired early payment date, a desired payment amount, and a particular buyer;identifying, by the programmed computer, invoices for the particular buyer eligible to receive corresponding offers for a discount, wherein eligibility is based on the desired payment date and the desired payment amount identified by the seller, and wherein the identified invoices do not currently have associated agreed-upon terms that would yield the desired payment amount on the desired payment date;generating a list of the identified invoices for the particular buyer selected through the seller user interface;displaying an interactive version of the generated list on an early payment summary seller user interface, the interactive version of the generated list enabling seller confirmation of the early payment offers for the identified invoices, the interactive list comprising a current payment due, a discount payment offered, and a discount rate for each of the identified invoices, wherein the discount rate is based on a daily discount rate calculated as an annual hurdle rate divided by a number of calendar days per year;transmitting, by the programmed computer, to the buyer system of the particular buyer, offers for the discount in exchange for the early payment of a plurality of the identified invoices confirmed by the seller, the discounts offered satisfying the desired payment amount on the desired payment date identified by the seller, the offers displayed on a buyer user interface viewable by the buyer;displaying, by the buyer user interface, a summary view of all discount programs available to the buyer including corresponding selectable icons displaying an icon for a new discount program, an icon for editing the discount rate for each of the identified invoices, and an icon for activating or deactivating e-file normalization;analyzing, at the buyer system, the offers confirmed by the seller to determine net components of payment terms of the plurality of the identified invoices, identify e-file payment terms and standard payment terms of the plurality of the identified invoices, and normalize the identified e-file terms and the identified standard terms by activating the icon for the e-file normalization, wherein the e-file normalization involves changing the e-file payment terms on the e-file invoice to an advantage of the buyer; andautomatically effecting payment from the buyer system to the seller system based on the normalized terms.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving an identification of a cost of capital from the seller, wherein the identifying of invoices upon which corresponding offers may be made comprises identifying invoices based on the cost of capital identified.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising displaying a total payment amount and a total discount amount for the identified invoices.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing a selectable early payment offer button on the seller user interface.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the seller selections define a program change and the programmed computer causes invoices found on the buyer system to reference the program change.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein normalization comprises the following set of rules: any potential discount is selected over no discount;a higher discount is selected over a lower discount;if the discount is the same, select the discount with a longer discount period;a longer net term is selected over a shorter net term.
  • 7. A computer system for managing discounts through interfacing with a seller system, a buyer system, and an enterprise resource management (ERP) system, the computer system, comprising: a memory;a processing device communicatively coupled to said memory, said processing device configured to:receive payment information exchanged between buyers and sellers from the ERP system;provide a seller user interface for display on the seller system, the seller user interface enabling formulation of early payment offers for multiple invoices, the seller user interface including selectable parameters including a buyer selection, an early payment date selection, and a payment amount selection, wherein the multiple invoices comprise at least a standard invoice based on standard payment terms and an e-file invoice based on e-file payment terms;receive an identification through seller selection at the seller user interface, of a desired early payment date, a desired payment amount, and a particular buyer;identify invoices for the particular buyer eligible to receive corresponding offers for a discount, wherein eligibility is based on the desired payment date and the desired payment amount identified by the seller, and wherein the identified invoices do not currently have associated agreed-upon terms that would yield the desired payment amount on the desired payment date;generate a list of identified invoices for the particular buyer selected through the seller user interface;display an interactive version of the generated list comprising a current payment due, a discount payment offered, and a discount rate for each of the identified invoices, said list displayed on an early payment summary seller user interface, the interactive version of the generated list enabling seller confirmation of the early payment offers for the identified invoices, wherein the discount rate is based on a daily discount rate calculated as an annual hurdle rate divided by a number of calendar days per year;transmit to the buyer system of the particular buyer offers for the discount in exchange for the early payment of a plurality of the identified invoices confirmed by the seller, the discounts offered satisfying the desired payment amount on the desired payment date identified by the seller, the offer displayed on a buyer user interface viewable by the buyer;display, by the buyer user interface, a summary view of all discount programs available to the buyer including corresponding selectable icons displaying an icon for a new discount program, an icon for editing the discount rate for each of the identified invoices, and an icon for activating or deactivating e-file normalization;analyze the offers confirmed by the seller to determine net components of payment terms of the plurality of the identified invoices;identify e-file payment terms and standard payment terms of the plurality of the identified invoices;normalize the identified e-file terms and the identified standard terms by activating the icon for the e-file normalization, wherein the e-file normalization involves changing the e-file payment terms on the e-file invoice to an advantage of the buyer; andautomatically effect payment from the buyer system to the seller system based on the normalized terms.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the processing device provides a selectable early payment offer button on the seller user interface.
  • 9. The system of claim 7, wherein the seller selections define a program change and the processing device causes invoices found on the buyer system to reference the program change.
  • 10. The system of claim 7, wherein normalization comprises the following set of rules: any potential discount is selected over no discount;a higher discount is selected over a lower discount;if the discount is the same, select the discount with a longer discount period;a longer net term is selected over a shorter net term.
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/002,234, filed Dec. 1, 2004, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/581,022, filed Jun. 17, 2004, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (583)
Number Name Date Kind
2005003 Patton et al. Jun 1935 A
3653480 Yamamoto et al. Apr 1972 A
3938090 Borison et al. Feb 1976 A
4050375 Orleans Sep 1977 A
4141078 Bridges et al. Feb 1979 A
4205780 Burns Jun 1980 A
4264808 Ownes et al. Apr 1981 A
4321672 Braun et al. Mar 1982 A
4385285 Horst et al. May 1983 A
4396985 Ohara Aug 1983 A
4443027 McNeely et al. Apr 1984 A
4453074 Weinstein Jun 1984 A
4454414 Benton Jun 1984 A
RE31692 Tyburski et al. Oct 1984 E
4495018 Vohrer Jan 1985 A
4575621 Dreifus Mar 1986 A
4605844 Haggan Aug 1986 A
4614861 Pavlov et al. Sep 1986 A
4617457 Myers Oct 1986 A
4650981 Foletta Mar 1987 A
4672377 Murphy Jun 1987 A
4694397 Grant et al. Sep 1987 A
4697072 Kawana Sep 1987 A
4700055 Kashkashian Oct 1987 A
4701601 Francini et al. Oct 1987 A
4713761 Sharpe et al. Dec 1987 A
4752877 Roberts et al. Jun 1988 A
4797913 Kaplan Jan 1989 A
4799156 Shavit Jan 1989 A
4807177 Ward Feb 1989 A
4812628 Boston et al. Mar 1989 A
4823264 Deming Apr 1989 A
4845347 McCrindle Jul 1989 A
4859837 Halpern Aug 1989 A
4893333 Baran et al. Jan 1990 A
4931793 Fuhrmann et al. Jun 1990 A
4939674 Price et al. Jul 1990 A
4948174 Thomson et al. Aug 1990 A
4974878 Josephson Dec 1990 A
4975841 Kehnemuyi et al. Dec 1990 A
4977501 Lefevre Dec 1990 A
4988849 Sasaki Jan 1991 A
4992646 Collin Feb 1991 A
4992940 Dworkin Feb 1991 A
5023904 Kaplan Jun 1991 A
5053607 Carlson Oct 1991 A
5054096 Beizer Oct 1991 A
5072380 Randelman et al. Dec 1991 A
5080748 Bonomi Jan 1992 A
5097115 Ogasawara Mar 1992 A
5111395 Smith May 1992 A
5121945 Thomson et al. Jun 1992 A
5122950 Mee Jun 1992 A
5136502 Van Remortel et al. Aug 1992 A
5175682 Higashiyama Dec 1992 A
5187750 Behera Feb 1993 A
5198975 Baker et al. Mar 1993 A
5224034 Katz et al. Jun 1993 A
5225978 Peterson Jul 1993 A
5237159 Stephens Aug 1993 A
5237620 Deaton Aug 1993 A
5257486 Holmwall Nov 1993 A
5265007 Barnhard, Jr. et al. Nov 1993 A
5276311 Hennige Jan 1994 A
5283829 Anderson Feb 1994 A
5287269 Dorrough et al. Feb 1994 A
5311594 Penzias May 1994 A
5315508 Bain et al. May 1994 A
5321238 Watanabe Jun 1994 A
5326959 Perazza Jul 1994 A
5336870 Hughes Aug 1994 A
5349170 Kern Sep 1994 A
5350906 Brody et al. Sep 1994 A
5351187 Hassett Sep 1994 A
5352877 Morley Oct 1994 A
5367581 Van Horn Nov 1994 A
5373550 Campbell Dec 1994 A
5382784 Eberhardt Jan 1995 A
5396417 Burks et al. Mar 1995 A
5402474 Miller Mar 1995 A
5430644 Deaton et al. Apr 1995 A
5412190 Kopesec May 1995 A
5424938 Wagner Jun 1995 A
5432506 Chapman Jul 1995 A
5444794 Uhland Aug 1995 A
5444841 Glasser et al. Aug 1995 A
5446740 Yien Aug 1995 A
5448471 Deaton et al. Sep 1995 A
5459482 Orlen Oct 1995 A
5465206 Hilt et al. Nov 1995 A
5477040 LaLonde Dec 1995 A
5479494 Clitherow Dec 1995 A
5483445 Pickering Jan 1996 A
5484988 Hills Jan 1996 A
5495981 Warther Mar 1996 A
5500890 Rogge et al. Mar 1996 A
5502576 Ramsay et al. Mar 1996 A
5504677 Pollin Apr 1996 A
5506691 Bednar et al. Apr 1996 A
5508731 Kohorn Apr 1996 A
5513250 McAllister Apr 1996 A
5532464 Josephson et al. Jul 1996 A
5532689 Bueno Jul 1996 A
5541583 Mandelbaum Jul 1996 A
5544043 Miki et al. Aug 1996 A
5544046 Niwa Aug 1996 A
5550734 Tater Aug 1996 A
5551021 Harada Aug 1996 A
5557515 Abbruzzese et al. Sep 1996 A
5563400 Le Roux Oct 1996 A
5566330 Sheffield Oct 1996 A
5568489 Yien Oct 1996 A
5570465 Tsakanikas Oct 1996 A
5572004 Raimann Nov 1996 A
5583759 Geer Dec 1996 A
5583760 Kleese Dec 1996 A
5590196 Moreau Dec 1996 A
5592377 Lipkin Jan 1997 A
5592378 Cameron Jan 1997 A
5599528 Igaki Feb 1997 A
5602936 Green et al. Feb 1997 A
5603025 Tabb Feb 1997 A
5615109 Eder Mar 1997 A
5617474 Ditzig et al. Apr 1997 A
5619558 Jheeta Apr 1997 A
5621201 Langhans Apr 1997 A
5621812 Deaton et al. Apr 1997 A
5649114 Deaton et al. Apr 1997 A
5642485 Deaton et al. May 1997 A
5638457 Deaton et al. Jun 1997 A
5640577 Scharmer Jun 1997 A
5642419 Rosen Jun 1997 A
5644723 Deaton et al. Jul 1997 A
5644778 Burks et al. Jul 1997 A
5649117 Landry Jul 1997 A
5652786 Rogers Jul 1997 A
5659165 Jennings Aug 1997 A
5659469 Deaton et al. Aug 1997 A
5659741 Eberhardt Aug 1997 A
5666493 Wojcik et al. Sep 1997 A
5677521 Garrou Oct 1997 A
5677955 Doggett et al. Oct 1997 A
5679938 Templeton Oct 1997 A
5679940 Templeton Oct 1997 A
5680459 Hook et al. Oct 1997 A
5687250 Curley et al. Nov 1997 A
5687322 Deaton et al. Nov 1997 A
5692132 Hogan Nov 1997 A
5698837 Furuta Dec 1997 A
5699528 Hogan Dec 1997 A
5703344 Bezy et al. Dec 1997 A
5704044 Tarter et al. Dec 1997 A
5708422 Blonder et al. Jan 1998 A
5710889 Clark et al. Jan 1998 A
5715298 Rogers Feb 1998 A
5715314 Payne Feb 1998 A
5715399 Bezos Feb 1998 A
5717989 Tozzoli et al. Feb 1998 A
5724424 Gifford Mar 1998 A
5727249 Powell Mar 1998 A
5732400 Mandler et al. Mar 1998 A
5748780 Stolfo May 1998 A
5751842 Eccles May 1998 A
5757917 Rose et al. May 1998 A
5770843 Rose et al. Jun 1998 A
5774553 Rosen Jun 1998 A
5783808 Josephson et al. Jul 1998 A
5784696 Melnikof Jul 1998 A
5787403 Randle Jul 1998 A
5789732 McMahon et al. Aug 1998 A
5794221 Egendorf Aug 1998 A
5796827 Coppersmith et al. Aug 1998 A
5793861 Haigh Sep 1998 A
5802498 Comesanas Sep 1998 A
5802499 Sampson et al. Sep 1998 A
5819238 Fernholz Oct 1998 A
5826241 Stein Oct 1998 A
5826245 Sandberg-Diment Oct 1998 A
5832090 Raspotnik Nov 1998 A
5832447 Rieker Nov 1998 A
5832457 O'Brien Nov 1998 A
5832460 Bednar Nov 1998 A
5832463 Houvener et al. Nov 1998 A
5832464 Houvener et al. Nov 1998 A
5832488 Eberhardt Nov 1998 A
5835580 Fraser Nov 1998 A
5835603 Coutts Nov 1998 A
5835899 Rose et al. Nov 1998 A
5852811 Atkins Dec 1998 A
5852812 Reeder Dec 1998 A
5859419 Wynn Jan 1999 A
5864609 Cross et al. Jan 1999 A
5870456 Rogers Feb 1999 A
5870721 Norris Feb 1999 A
5870723 Pare Feb 1999 A
5870725 Belinger et al. Feb 1999 A
5873072 Kight Feb 1999 A
5878141 Daly et al. Mar 1999 A
5883377 Chapin, Jr. Mar 1999 A
5884288 Chang Mar 1999 A
5884290 Smorodinsky et al. Mar 1999 A
5897625 Gustin Apr 1999 A
5898157 Mangili et al. Apr 1999 A
5903881 Schrader May 1999 A
5907142 Kelsey May 1999 A
5910896 Hahn-Calrson Jun 1999 A
5910988 Ballard Jun 1999 A
5915246 Patterson et al. Jun 1999 A
5917965 Cahill et al. Jun 1999 A
5920847 Kolling et al. Jul 1999 A
5930778 Geer Jul 1999 A
5940811 Norris Aug 1999 A
5940844 Cahill et al. Aug 1999 A
5943656 Crooks Aug 1999 A
5945653 Walker et al. Aug 1999 A
5949044 Walker et al. Sep 1999 A
5950174 Brendzel Sep 1999 A
5956700 Landry Sep 1999 A
5960411 Hartman et al. Sep 1999 A
5963659 Cahill et al. Oct 1999 A
5963925 Kolling et al. Oct 1999 A
5966698 Pollin Oct 1999 A
5970475 Barnes et al. Oct 1999 A
5970478 Walker et al. Oct 1999 A
5978780 Watson Nov 1999 A
5987434 Libman Nov 1999 A
5987435 Weiss et al. Nov 1999 A
5987436 Halbrook Nov 1999 A
5987439 Gustin Nov 1999 A
5991749 Morrill, Jr. Nov 1999 A
5991750 Craig Nov 1999 A
6003762 Hayashida Nov 1999 A
6000832 Franklin et al. Dec 1999 A
6002767 Kramer Dec 1999 A
6006205 Loeb et al. Dec 1999 A
6006208 Forst et al. Dec 1999 A
6009442 Chen et al. Dec 1999 A
6014636 Reeder Jan 2000 A
6016482 Molinari et al. Jan 2000 A
6016484 Williams et al. Jan 2000 A
6018718 Walker et al. Jan 2000 A
6026388 Liddy et al. Feb 2000 A
6029139 Cunningham et al. Feb 2000 A
6029153 Bauchner et al. Feb 2000 A
6032133 Hilt et al. Feb 2000 A
6032134 Weissman Feb 2000 A
6032136 Brake, Jr. et al. Feb 2000 A
6032137 Hallard Feb 2000 A
6035281 Crosskey et al. Mar 2000 A
6035285 Schlect et al. Mar 2000 A
6035287 Stallaert et al. Mar 2000 A
6036099 Leighton Mar 2000 A
6038553 Hyde, Jr. Mar 2000 A
6041312 Bickerton et al. Mar 2000 A
6041315 Pollin Mar 2000 A
6044362 Neely Mar 2000 A
6045039 Stinson et al. Apr 2000 A
6047261 Siefert Apr 2000 A
6052674 Zervides et al. Apr 2000 A
6058380 Anderson et al. May 2000 A
6058381 Nelson May 2000 A
6061665 Bahreman May 2000 A
6064764 Bhaskaran et al. May 2000 A
6064987 Walker et al. May 2000 A
6065675 Teicher May 2000 A
6067524 Byerly et al. May 2000 A
6070150 Remington et al. May 2000 A
6070798 Nethery Jun 2000 A
6073104 Field Jun 2000 A
6073113 Guinan Jun 2000 A
6076072 Libman Jun 2000 A
6078907 Lamm Jun 2000 A
6081790 Rosen Jun 2000 A
6085168 Mori et al. Jul 2000 A
6088683 Jalili Jul 2000 A
6088685 Kiron et al. Jul 2000 A
6088686 Walker et al. Jul 2000 A
6092056 Tull, Jr. et al. Jul 2000 A
6092057 Zimmerman et al. Jul 2000 A
6098053 Slater Aug 2000 A
6098070 Maxwell Aug 2000 A
6101479 Shaw Aug 2000 A
6105007 Norris Aug 2000 A
6105011 Morrison, Jr. Aug 2000 A
6108639 Walker et al. Aug 2000 A
6110044 Stern Aug 2000 A
6111858 Greaves et al. Aug 2000 A
6115690 Wong Sep 2000 A
6119106 Mersky et al. Sep 2000 A
6119107 Polk Sep 2000 A
6125354 MacFarlane et al. Sep 2000 A
6128599 Walker et al. Oct 2000 A
6128602 Northington et al. Oct 2000 A
6128603 Dent et al. Oct 2000 A
6129273 Shah Oct 2000 A
6138118 Koppstein et al. Oct 2000 A
6138917 Chapin, Jr. Oct 2000 A
6141666 Tobin Oct 2000 A
6144946 Iwamura Nov 2000 A
6148293 King Nov 2000 A
6149055 Gatto Nov 2000 A
6149056 Stinson et al. Nov 2000 A
6168385 Clamp Jan 2001 B1
6173272 Thomas et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181837 Cahill et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185542 Moran et al. Feb 2001 B1
6185544 Sakamoto et al. Feb 2001 B1
6188309 Levine Feb 2001 B1
6202054 Lawlor et al. Mar 2001 B1
6205433 Boesch et al. Mar 2001 B1
6213391 Lewis Apr 2001 B1
6223168 McGurl et al. Apr 2001 B1
6227447 Campisano May 2001 B1
6233565 Lewis et al. May 2001 B1
6233566 Leving May 2001 B1
6236972 Shkedy May 2001 B1
6240444 Fin et al. May 2001 B1
6243689 Norton Jun 2001 B1
6267292 Walker et al. Jul 2001 B1
6278981 Dembo et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282552 Thompson et al. Aug 2001 B1
6289322 Kitchen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292789 Schutzer Sep 2001 B1
6301379 Thompson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6301567 Leong et al. Oct 2001 B1
6304858 Mosler et al. Oct 2001 B1
6305603 Grunbok, Jr. et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308887 Korman et al. Oct 2001 B1
6321212 Lange Nov 2001 B1
6324524 Lent et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327575 Katz Dec 2001 B1
6338047 Wallman Jan 2002 B1
6338049 Walker et al. Jan 2002 B1
6341724 Campisano Jan 2002 B2
6343279 Bissonette et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347307 Sandhu et al. Feb 2002 B1
6349290 Horowitz et al. Feb 2002 B1
6363164 Jones et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363364 Nel Mar 2002 B1
6363365 Kou Mar 2002 B1
6366967 Wagner Apr 2002 B1
6374235 Chen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6390362 Martin May 2002 B1
6393409 Young et al. May 2002 B2
6405173 Honarvar et al. Jun 2002 B1
6405181 Lent et al. Jun 2002 B2
6415259 Wolfinger et al. Jul 2002 B1
6418419 Nieboer et al. Jul 2002 B1
6418420 DiGiorgio et al. Jul 2002 B1
6418430 DeFazio et al. Jul 2002 B1
6424949 Deaton et al. Jul 2002 B1
6434159 Woodward et al. Aug 2002 B1
6446072 Schulze et al. Sep 2002 B1
6460020 Pool et al. Oct 2002 B1
6485922 Erickson et al. Nov 2002 B1
6490568 Omara et al. Dec 2002 B1
6493685 Ensel et al. Dec 2002 B1
6513019 Lewis Jan 2003 B2
6535896 Britton et al. Mar 2003 B2
6536663 Lozier et al. Mar 2003 B1
6554185 Montross et al. Apr 2003 B1
6560581 Fox et al. May 2003 B1
6567791 Lent et al. May 2003 B2
6574350 Rhoads et al. Jun 2003 B1
6574377 Cahill et al. Jun 2003 B1
6578000 Dodrill et al. Jun 2003 B1
6578015 Haseltine et al. Jun 2003 B1
6607127 Wong Aug 2003 B2
6609113 O'Leary et al. Aug 2003 B1
6609125 Layne et al. Aug 2003 B1
6629081 Cornelius et al. Sep 2003 B1
6636615 Rhoads et al. Oct 2003 B1
6658393 Basch et al. Dec 2003 B1
6661910 Jones et al. Dec 2003 B2
6671673 Baseman et al. Dec 2003 B1
6704714 O'Leary et al. Mar 2004 B1
6721715 Nemzow Apr 2004 B2
6728397 McNeal Apr 2004 B2
D490840 Arakaki et al. Jun 2004 S
D491186 Arakaki et al. Jun 2004 S
D491953 Arakaki et al. Jun 2004 S
D496365 Liu et al. Sep 2004 S
D498236 Liu et al. Nov 2004 S
6820058 Wood et al. Nov 2004 B2
6824066 Weyant Nov 2004 B2
6825940 Wu et al. Nov 2004 B1
6860375 Hallowell et al. Mar 2005 B2
6865547 Brake, Jr. et al. Mar 2005 B1
6954896 Dodrill et al. Oct 2005 B1
6965882 Lapstun et al. Nov 2005 B1
6970259 Lunt et al. Nov 2005 B1
6970830 Samra et al. Nov 2005 B1
6970855 Das et al. Nov 2005 B2
RE38957 Laussermair et al. Jan 2006 E
6999943 Johnson et al. Feb 2006 B1
7004382 Sandru Feb 2006 B2
7025256 Drummond et al. Apr 2006 B1
7062456 Riehl et al. Jun 2006 B1
7068832 Price et al. Jun 2006 B1
7070095 Gandel et al. Jul 2006 B1
7104443 Paul et al. Sep 2006 B1
7133846 Ginter et al. Nov 2006 B1
7167844 Leong et al. Jan 2007 B1
7177836 German et al. Feb 2007 B1
7194437 Britto et al. Mar 2007 B1
7200255 Jones et al. Apr 2007 B2
7228155 Saunders Jun 2007 B2
7249044 Kumar et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249112 Berardi et al. Jul 2007 B2
7312707 Bishop et al. Dec 2007 B1
7313543 Crane et al. Dec 2007 B1
7317823 Price et al. Jan 2008 B1
7337148 Xie et al. Feb 2008 B2
7349884 Odom Mar 2008 B1
RE40220 Nichols et al. Apr 2008 E
7380707 Fredman Jun 2008 B1
7401048 Rosedale et al. Jul 2008 B2
7493288 Bishop et al. Feb 2009 B2
7546272 Loy Jun 2009 B2
7548881 Narayan et al. Jun 2009 B2
7587363 Cataline et al. Sep 2009 B2
8244625 Holm Aug 2012 B2
20010011222 McLauchlin et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010018666 Sugiyama et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010018739 Anderson et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010027441 Wankmueller Oct 2001 A1
20010032139 Debonnet, Jr. Oct 2001 A1
20010034663 Teveler et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010037300 Miyazaki et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010037309 Carlyle Nov 2001 A1
20010038033 Habib Nov 2001 A1
20010047334 Nappe et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010047489 Ito et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010051533 Wietzke et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010051919 Mason Dec 2001 A1
20020012445 Perry Jan 2002 A1
20020013728 Wilkman Jan 2002 A1
20020023055 Atognini et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026394 Savage et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020032651 Embrey Mar 2002 A1
20020038363 MacLean Mar 2002 A1
20020046169 Keresman, III et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020047316 Chitayat Apr 2002 A1
20020052842 Schuba et al. May 2002 A1
20020055907 Pater et al. May 2002 A1
20020069134 Solomon Jun 2002 A1
20020072976 Virtanen et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020077978 O'Leary et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082985 MacKay Jun 2002 A1
20020084321 Martens et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020087415 Allen et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020087468 Ganesan et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020087469 Ganesan et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020091635 Dilip et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020095373 Melchior et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099655 Melchior et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020100803 Sehr Aug 2002 A1
20020107770 Meyer et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107788 Cunningham Aug 2002 A1
20020110070 Sako et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111837 Aupperle Aug 2002 A1
20020128981 Kawan et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138390 May Sep 2002 A1
20020138398 Kalin et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143621 Donnelly et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156723 Lilly et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020169658 Adler Nov 2002 A1
20020170966 Hannigan et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020178071 Walker et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020178109 Bye Nov 2002 A1
20020184123 Sijacic et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020184151 Maloney Dec 2002 A1
20020194081 Perkowski Dec 2002 A1
20020194096 Falcone et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198817 Dhir Dec 2002 A1
20020199182 Whitehead Dec 2002 A1
20030018557 Gilbert et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018563 Kilgour et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018567 Flitcroft et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023526 Stewart Jan 2003 A1
20030028481 Flitcroft et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037002 Higgins et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040959 Calvin et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046218 Albanese et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055675 Klein Twennaar Mar 2003 A1
20030069780 Hailwood et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030097335 Muskowitz et al. May 2003 A1
20030100803 Lu et al. May 2003 A1
20030105641 Lewis Jun 2003 A1
20030110136 Wells et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030110442 Battle Jun 2003 A1
20030120686 Kim et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030130945 Force et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030130952 Bell et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140005 Cole Jul 2003 A1
20030144942 Sobek Jul 2003 A1
20030187787 Freund Oct 2003 A1
20030187789 Karas et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030191710 Green et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030200107 Allen et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030208421 Vicknair et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030208441 Poplawski et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030218066 Fernandes et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030225663 Horan et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030233305 Solomon Dec 2003 A1
20030237046 Parker et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040010465 Michalski et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019605 Keown et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040029569 Khan et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040034595 Kugeman et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040049449 Martinelli Mar 2004 A1
20040049451 Berardi Mar 2004 A1
20040049456 Dreyer Mar 2004 A1
20040064409 Kight et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073510 Logan Apr 2004 A1
20040078328 Talbert et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088245 Narayan May 2004 A1
20040094624 Fernandes et al. May 2004 A1
20040107153 Lundberg Jun 2004 A1
20040111302 Falk et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117307 Carlis et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040133516 Buchanan et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040149544 Dal Ferro Aug 2004 A1
20040159700 Khan et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172360 Mabrey et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040201735 Baron Oct 2004 A1
20040210498 Freund Oct 2004 A1
20040228514 Houle et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040232223 Beenau et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040236660 Thomas et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040236688 Bozeman Nov 2004 A1
20040239481 Beenau Dec 2004 A1
20040243503 Eng et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040252012 Beenau et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254837 Roshkoff Dec 2004 A1
20040260607 Robbins et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050021466 Buchanan et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050033619 Barnes et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050033690 Antognini et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050035847 Bonalle et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050040242 Beenau et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050055254 Schmidtberg et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050077349 Bonalle et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050086178 Xie et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050091156 Hailwood et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050097046 Singfield May 2005 A1
20050097050 Orcutt May 2005 A1
20050108153 Thomas et al. May 2005 A1
20050116024 Beenau et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144059 Schuessler Jun 2005 A1
20050144130 Staniar et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050171898 Bishop Aug 2005 A1
20050177448 Fu et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050177480 Huang Aug 2005 A1
20050209954 Asher et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050228751 Keown et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050261955 Humble et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050283437 McRae Dec 2005 A1
20060036553 Gupta et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041540 Shannon et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060089890 Campbell Apr 2006 A1
20060095374 Lo May 2006 A1
20060106650 Bush May 2006 A1
20060106717 Randle et al. May 2006 A1
20060136335 Ferguson, III Jun 2006 A1
20060149653 Davis Jul 2006 A1
20060149668 Zafrir Jul 2006 A1
20060161501 Waserstein et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060167989 Bashen et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060178986 Giordano et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060206427 Love et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060259390 Rosenberger Nov 2006 A1
20060282389 Gupte Dec 2006 A1
20060287953 Chauhan Dec 2006 A1
20070005498 Cataline et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070138255 Carreon et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070265924 Shcwarz Nov 2007 A1
20070288334 Creedle et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080010202 Schwarz Jan 2008 A1
20080116283 Newbrough et al. May 2008 A1
20080193008 Mount et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090043651 Schwarz Feb 2009 A1
20110251965 Holm Oct 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (27)
Number Date Country
0421808 Apr 1991 EP
0665486 Aug 1995 EP
1014318 Jun 2000 EP
2001-266039 Sep 2001 JP
2002-024618 Jan 2002 JP
2002-056063 Feb 2002 JP
2002-083241 Mar 2002 JP
2002-087536 Mar 2002 JP
2002-508547 Mar 2002 JP
2002-140505 May 2002 JP
2007-088822 Apr 2007 JP
9116691 Oct 1991 WO
9308545 Apr 1993 WO
9428497 Dec 1994 WO
9608783 Mar 1996 WO
9612242 Apr 1996 WO
9714108 Apr 1997 WO
9745796 Dec 1997 WO
9745814 Dec 1997 WO
9809260 Mar 1998 WO
9910823 Mar 1999 WO
9949404 Sep 1999 WO
0018060 Mar 2000 WO
0039979 Jul 2000 WO
0175730 Oct 2001 WO
02063432 Aug 2002 WO
04079603 Sep 2004 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (95)
Entry
Alabama Department of Revenue Selects Unisys for Imaging Solution to Speed Tax Returns, Bus. Wire, Sep. 6, 1995.
Andersen Consulting, Image-Based Transaction Processing: The Banking Industry's Challenge for the 1990s and Beyond (1989).
Andrew Gluck, Creating a global cash-management game plan, Bank Systems & Tech., Feb. 1997, at 28.
Andrew Reinbach, Chase steps up treasury system, Bank Systems & Tech., Nov. 1995, at 29.
Angela Maher & Jeffrey Troutman, PNC Bank Treasury Management, Payor's Prescription for Painless Migration to Receipt of Electronic Healthcare Payments and Remittance Advices (Dec. 2001).
Angela Maher & Jeffrey Troutman, PNC Bank Treasury Management, Provider's Prescription for Painless Migration to Receipt of Electronic Healthcare Payments and Remittance Advices (Dec. 2001).
Ann Keeton, Bank of America Completes Its Rollout of ‘Paperless’ Processing of Payments, Wall St. J., Nov. 1, 1999, at B13.
BancTec Selects Alchemy CD-Based Archival Solution for Remittance Processing System, Bus. Wire, May 6, 1998.
Bank of America Provides Nationwide Lockbox Services, Press Release, Oct. 20, 1999.
Bridget Malone, Internet Billing: Building a Secure Global Market, Electronic Commerce World, Jan. 2001, at 46.
Caere introduces the Model 1800 document remittance processor, Bus. Wire, Oct. 19, 1995.
CardFlash, Daily Payment Card News, Sep. 23, 2004.
CES/NaBanco introduces stored value card technology; Blockbuster Video is first merchant partner, Bus. Wire, Jan. 15, 1996.
Chapter Reports: Texas Chapter, Work Process Improvement Today, Apr. 1998.
Chase Image-Enables NY Wholesale Lockbox Facility with VICOR Technology, Press Release, Aug. 31, 1999.
Chase Manhattan introduces new FEDI payables product, Cash Mgmt. News, May 1995.
Chase offers image lockbox for Europe, Bank Systems & Tech., Aug. 1997, at 37.
Chasing the Global Trend, Cash Mgmt. News, Dec. 1995, at 8.
Christy Tauhert, Lock Box Solutions Reengineer Payment, Insurance & Tech., Aug. 1996, at 22.
Cindy Jensen, U.S. Bank Effectively Manages Complexity, Today, May/Jun. 2006.
Council for Electronic Billing and Payment, Business-to-Business EIPP: Presentment Models and Payment Options Part One (Jan. 2001).
Council for Electronic Billing and Payment, Business-to-Business EIPP: Presentment Models and Payment Options Part Two (Jan. 2001).
Crestar to Introduce New Advanced Cash Management System Based on IA Corp. Software, Bus. Wire, Oct. 28, 1996.
Dieter Wackerow, MQSeries Enterprise Application Integration Center, MQ Series Primer, Oct. 1999.
DMP and IMR Partner to Develop Electronic Archiving Solution for Wholesale Lockboxes and Remittance Processing, Bus. Wire, Mar. 24, 1998.
Douglas Armstrong, Norwest eases difficulty of interstate banking Bank's customers may use the same account number at any branch, Milwaukee J. Sentinel, Oct. 12, 1995, at 2.
Du Pont's Electronic Payments System, Corporate EFT Report, Jan. 11, 1989.
Elena Malykhina, Cell Phone Software Formats Check for Online Banking, InformationWeek, Jan. 24, 2008.
Erica Goode, on Profit, Loss and the Mysteries of the Mind, N.Y. Times, Nov. 5, 2002.
Fidelity Helps Fund Sellers Trim the Taxes They'll Owe, Wall St. J., Nov. 7, 2002.
First Data markets stored-value cards, Cards Int'l, Jan. 30, 1996, at 5.
Frank J. Derfler, Jr. & Les Freed, How Networks Work 144-51 (2003).
Get ready for electronic commerce, ABA Banking J., Jun. 1995, at 47.
Gordon Platt, Online billing & payments: Technology Providers Multiply, Global Fin., Apr. 1, 2001.
Gregory Zuckerman, The Hedge-Fund Craze, Wall St. J., Jun. 12, 2002.
Henry Urrows & Elizabeth Urrows, Automated imaging in financial services, 11 Document Image Automation 259 (Sep.-Oct. 1991).
IA announced installation at QuestPoint of first client/server cash management system with check image storage compatible with IBM, NCR and Unisys, Bus. Wire, May 29, 1997.
IA Corp. Announces New CheckVision Products, Bus. Wire, Apr. 1, 1996.
IA Corp. shows complex transaction processing software WorkVision at AIIM, Bus. Wire, Apr. 14, 1997.
IA Corp. Wins Contract With Comercia to Install the First Digital All Items Archive, Bus. Wire, Jan. 9, 1997.
IA Corporation Becomes a Major Player in Image-Based Cash Management Solutions, Bus. Wire, Nov. 24, 1995.
IA Presents New Advanced Cash Management Software at TMA to Link Banks and Their Corporate Customers, Bus. Wire, Nov. 18, 1996.
Ian McDonald, The Stars in the Sky Flicker, and Fund Stars Do the Same, Wall St. J., Jan. 15, 2003.
IA's RemitVision adapted by Harris Bank for CD-ROM and Online Customer Viewing of Check and Remittance Documents, Bus. Wire, May 28, 1996.
In Brief: Wachovia-InteliData Deal, Am. Banker, May 7, 2002.
Initial Launch to 200 Credit Unions, USA Today, Jun. 27, 2002.
Intelidata Technologies Corporation, Form 10-K for fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2001.
J.D. Carreker, Electronic Check Presentment: Capturing new technology, Banking Mgmt., Mar./Apr. 1995, at 32.
J.P. Buckley et al., Processing noisy structured textual data using a fuzzy matching approach: application to postal address errors, 4 Soft Computing 195 (2000).
Jeetu Patel & Joe Fenner, E-Billing Moves Into B2B, Imaging & Document Solutions, Jan. 2001, at p. 44.
Jeetu Patel, B-to-B E-Billing Heats Up—Business-to-business electronic billing is more complex than the business-to-consumer model, but the potential payoffs are bigger, InformationWeek, Oct. 23, 2000.
John C. Bogle, Founder and Former Chairman, The Vanguard Group, Remarks to the '40 Act Institute of Practising Law Institute: Mutual Funds at the Millennium—Fund Directors and Fund Myths (May 15, 2000).
John Shannon, New lockbox platform due out at NationsBank, Bank Systems & Tech., Feb. 1998, at 38.
Jonathan Clements, Harsh Truth: Your Investments Likely Won't Make Any Money, Wall St. J., Nov. 27, 2002.
Keith Lamond, Credit Card Transactions Real World and Online, available at, http://www.virtualschool.edu/mon/ElectronicProperty/klamond/credit_card.htm (last visited Jul. 8, 2005).
Kristen French, Investors Worry CheckFree Being Chased from its Own Game, TheStreet.com, Jun. 20, 2001.
Liz Moyer, Bank of Montreal to Install Imaging System by Unisys for Retail Lockbox Services, Am. Banker, Oct. 22, 1996, at 19.
Liz Moyer, KeyCorp Joins Trend to Check Imaging Lockbox, Am. Banker, Aug. 23, 1996.
M. Williams, FRIIS, Goodbye to paper?, ABA Banking J., Mar. 1989, at 61.
Mark Arend, Bank applications fuel optical storage market, ABA Banking J., Oct. 1991, at 77.
Melinda Norris, First Data Unit Develops Blockbuster Cash Card, Omaha World Herald, Jan. 19, 1996, at 16.
NationsBank rolls out first wholesale lockbox imaging, Potomac, Aug. 3, 1995, at 1.
NCR introduces 7780 item processing system, Bus. Wire, Mar. 11, 1992.
Newsbyte, Visa & Carnegie Mellon Plan Online Payment Scheme, 1995 WL 2205732, Feb. 15, 1995.
Nokia Announces the World's First NFC Enabled Mobile Product for Contactless Payment and Ticketing, PR Newswire, Feb. 9, 2005.
Offer: Book Yourself Free Cassettes, Birmingham Post, Mar. 25, 2000, at 16.
Operating in a multi-currency environment, Aslamoney, Oct. 1995, at 6.
Patricia A. Murphy, E-Billing: New Age Electronic Data; Interchange or Something Better?, Bank Tech. News, Jul. 2000, at 43.
Paul Williams, IBM UK Laboratories Ltd., IBM MQSeries Commercial Messaging, ACM SIGICE Bulletin, Apr. 1995.
Payment Data Systems files patent on debit card payment solution, Am. City Business J., Mar. 5, 2004.
PNC Bank Add Chicago to National Lockbox Network, PR Newswire, Nov. 5, 1997.
Priya Malhotra, Clearing House Enumerates e-Payment Ills, Am Banker, Aug. 13, 2002.
Richard J. Maturi, Personal Finance; When you need to send cash in a flash, N.Y. Times, Sep. 25, 1988, at A7.
Robert M. Hunt, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Working Paper No. 03-10: An Introduction to the Economics of Payment Card Networks (Jun. 2003).
Robert M. Hunt, An Introduction to the Economics of Payment Card Networks, Rev. Network Econ., Jun. 2003, at 80.
Scott Leibs, Internet Billing Gets Its Due, CFO, Feb. 1, 2001, at 30.
Shawmut Bank Provides Lockbox Customers Real-Time, On-Line Electronic Exception Processing, Bus. Wire, Jan. 9, 1996.
Sherree DeCovney, Net scope, Banking Tech., May 1997, at 28.
Simultaneous Image Capture, Bank News, Oct. 1996, at 10.
State of Minnesota using AT&T imaging solution to reengineer sales tax paying process, Bus. Wire, Apr. 18, 1994.
Stephen M. Matyas, Digital Signatures—An Overview, 3 Computer Networks 87 (1979).
Steve Bills, Chase Pact Done, What's Next for Web Vendors?, Am. Banker, Jun. 3, 2002, at 23.
Steve Forbes, Fact and Comment, Forbes, Sep. 30, 2002, at 33.
Steven Marjanovic, Corporate Services: Chase Gears Up Global Payments System Series: 16, Am. Banker, Sep. 11, 1995, at 41.
Steven Marjanovic, NationsBank offers lockbox imaging, Am. Banker, Jul. 3, 1995, at 20.
Systems spell change for foreign exchange, Global Investor, Nov. 1996, at 18.
Terrie Miller & Henry Yan, When custody governs, Benefits Canada, Feb. 1998, at 33.
The payments system gets a new image, ABA Banking J., Mar. 1990, at 84.
Thomas P. Fitch, Image Technology brings lockbox breakthroughs, Corp. Cashflow Magazine, Sep. 1995, at 16.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/133,577, filed May 11, 1999.
Valerie Block, Blockbuster Running Test of a Stored Value Card, Am. Banker, Sep. 1, 1995.
Wausau Financial Systems' ImageRPS and OPEX interface a perfect math, Work Process Improvement Today, Dec. 1997.
Wells Fargo Rolls out Nationwide Lockbox Check Conversion, PR Newswire, Apr. 22, 2003.
Wendy S. Mead, Two Banks' Imaging Deals Target Fee Revenue Increases, Am. Banker, May 9, 1997, at 11.
Wholesale lockbox imaging, ABA Banking J., Feb. 1, 1993.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60581022 Jun 2004 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11002334 Dec 2004 US
Child 13969581 US