Methods and systems for disease treatment using electrical stimulation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9895539
  • Patent Number
    9,895,539
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 9, 2014
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 20, 2018
    8 years ago
Abstract
Systems for disease treatment using electrical stimulation are disclosed. A representative method for treating a patient includes changing an activity, expression, or both activity and expression of a fast sodium channel, a glial cell, or both a fast sodium channel and a glial cell of the patient by applying to a target neural population of the patient an electrical therapy signal having a frequency in a frequency range of 1.5 kHz to 100 kHz.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure is directed generally to methods and systems for disease treatment using electrical stimulation. Particular embodiments include changing an activity, expression, or both activity and expression of a fast sodium channel, a glial cell, or both a fast sodium channel and a glial cell of the patient by applying electrical stimulation to a target neural population of a patient.


BACKGROUND

Neurological stimulators have been developed to treat pain, movement disorders, functional disorders, spasticity, cancer, cardiac disorders, and various other medical conditions. Implantable neurological stimulation systems generally have an implantable signal generator and one or more leads that deliver electrical pulses to neurological tissue or muscle tissue. For example, several neurological stimulation systems for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have cylindrical leads that include a lead body with a circular cross-sectional shape and one or more conductive rings (i.e., contacts) spaced apart from each other at the distal end of the lead body. The conductive rings operate as individual electrodes and, in many cases, the SCS leads are implanted percutaneously through a needle inserted into the epidural space, with or without the assistance of a stylet.


Once implanted, the signal generator applies electrical pulses to the electrodes, which in turn modify the function of the patient's nervous system, such as by altering the patient's responsiveness to sensory stimuli and/or altering the patient's motor-circuit output. In SCS therapy for the treatment of pain, the signal generator applies electrical pulses to the spinal cord via the electrodes. In conventional SCS therapy, electrical pulses are used to generate sensations (known as paresthesia) that mask or otherwise alter the patient's sensation of pain. For example, in many cases, patients report paresthesia as a tingling sensation that is perceived as less uncomfortable than the underlying pain sensation.


Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to systems and methods that make use of, employ, rely on and/or otherwise use or incorporate aspects the interaction between electrical therapy and the patients to whom the therapy is applied.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a partially schematic illustration of an implantable spinal cord modulation system positioned at the spine to deliver therapeutic signals in accordance with several embodiments of the present technology.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Neurological stimulators have been developed to treat pain, movement disorders, functional disorders, spasticity, cancer, cardiac disorders, and various other medical conditions. Implantable neurological stimulation systems generally have an implantable pulse generator and one or more leads that deliver electrical pulses to neurological tissue or muscle tissue. For example, several neurological stimulation systems for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have cylindrical leads that include a lead body with a circular cross-sectional shape and one or more conductive rings spaced apart from each other at the distal end of the lead body. The conductive rings operate as individual electrodes and, in many cases, the SCS leads are implanted percutaneously through a large needle inserted into the epidural space, with or without the assistance of a stylet.


Once implanted, the pulse generator applies electrical pulses to the electrodes, which in turn modify the function of the patient's nervous system, such as by altering the patient's responsiveness to sensory stimuli, altering the patient's motor-circuit output, and/or otherwise modifying other neural function. Example neuromodulation systems, methods, and therapy parameters are described in co-owned published patent applications: US Patent Publication No. 2009/0204173; US Patent Publication No. 2007/0213771; US Patent Publication No. 2010/0191307; US Patent Publication No. 2010/0274312; US Patent Publication No. 2010/0274314; US Patent Publication No. 2012/0172946; and US Patent Publication No. 2013/0066411 which are all incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. To the extent the foregoing materials and/or any other materials incorporated herein by reference conflict with the present disclosure, the present disclosure controls.


Provided herein are various embodiments of neuromodulation systems, methods, and therapies for the treatment of medical conditions. The specific embodiments discussed are not to be construed as limitations on the scope of the disclosed technology. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various equivalents, changes, and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the disclosed technology, and it is understood that such equivalent embodiments are to be included herein.


The following abbreviations are used herein: AIC, anterior limb internal capsule; BST, bed nucleus of the stria terminals; CMPF, centromedian and parafascicularis; CNS, central nervous system; DREZ, dorsal root entry zone; GF, genitofemoral; GNI, glial neuronal cell interaction; GPI, globus pallidus internus; MCS, motor cortex stimulation; MD, movement disorder; MI, primary motor cortex; ONS, occipital nerve stimulation; NAcc, nucleus accumbens; NTS, nucleus tractus solitarii; PVG, periventricular grey matter; PAG, periaqueductal grey matter; PPN, pedunculopontine nucleus; SCA, superior cerebellar artery; SCS, spinal cord stimulation; SMA, supplementary motor area; SPG, sphenopalatine ganglion; STN, subthalamic nucleus; Vcpc, ventro caudalis parvocellularis; VIP, ventral intermedia nucleus; VOA, ventralis oralis anterior; VOP, ventralis oralis posterior; VPL, ventral posterolateral nucleus; VPM, ventral posteromedial nucleus; WDR, wide dynamic range; ZI, zona incerta.


Recent animal studies have shown that application of electrical stimulation to the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) at frequencies between 2 kHz and 100 kHz suppresses wide dynamic range (WDR) neuron response by 70% in response to noxious stimulation (Cuellar 2012). Inhibition of WDR firing was found to persist for seconds to minutes after stimulation ended. WDR neurons (also known as convergent neurons) are one of three types of second order projection neurons. WDR neuron firing is correlated with pain perception, with firing rate increasing steadily as stimulus intensity increases. Thus, these data suggest that electrical stimulation at the tested frequencies functions in part by direct axonal inhibition.


Glial cells were traditionally thought to play primarily a structural role in the nervous system, for example by surrounding neurons, holding neurons in place, providing electrical insulation, and destroying pathogens. However, glial cells may play a role in the transmission of chronic pain by releasing various mediators such as nitric oxide, proinflammatory cytokines, excitatory amino acids, and prostaglandins. Release of these mediators may cause the release of substance P and excitatory amino acids by peripheral nerves as well as modify local neural interactions in the CNS, which in turn results in action potential generation or neural responses to synaptic inputs. Substance P and excitatory amino acid release can also further activate glial cells, creating a positive feedback loop. Glial cells form a network with themselves and communicate via slow inward calcium currents, which are activated by a variety of factors including potassium. Electrical stimulation with appropriate signal parameters may be used to reduce extracellular potassium levels by primary afferent inhibition, thereby reducing glial cell activity.


Neurons and certain glial cells contain sodium channels that are responsible for the rising phase of action potentials. When exposed to low frequencies, all of these sodium channels exhibit changes in their conductance. At higher frequencies, however, these changes are specific to fast sodium channels such as NaV1.8 and NaV1.9, which are overly active in chronic pain. Without being bound to a particular theory, electrical stimulation with appropriate signal parameters may derive pain reduction in part from its ability to change the conductance of fast sodium channels in neurons and/or glial cells, thereby specifically downregulating those sodium channels that are most involved with chronic pain.


As disclosed herein, electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, can be used to normalize pathological neural networks associated with fast sodium channel activity and/or expression by attenuating pathology-induced sodium channel activity and modulating glial neuronal cell interaction (GNI). GNI accordingly refers generally to interactions with a glial/neuronal component, including interactions between (a) glial cells and other glial cells, (b) glial cells and neurons, (c) glial networks and neurons, and/or (d) glial networks and neural networks. Based on this, the present application provides methods and devices for attenuating pathology-induced sodium channel activity, (and/or other pathology-induced ionophores or membrane channel activity) modulating GNI, and treating various conditions associated with fast sodium channel activity and/or expression and GNI.


In certain embodiments, methods are provided for attenuating pathology-induced sodium channel activity by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. This attenuation may result in decreased activity and/or expression of one or more fast sodium channels, including for example NaV1.8 or NaV1.9. In certain embodiments, decreased activity and/or expression of one or more fast sodium channels results in decreased glial cell and/or neuronal activity. In certain embodiments, attenuation of pathology-induced sodium channel activity may also result in increased activity and/or expression of one or more slow sodium channels, including for example NaV1.3.


In certain embodiments, methods are provided for modulating GNI by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain embodiments, this modulation may result in a decrease in the release of one or more mediators by glial cells, including for example nitric oxide, proinflammatory cytokines, excitatory amino acids, and prostaglandins. In certain embodiments, this decrease may result in a decrease in action potential generation by one or more peripheral nerves or neural elements in CNS networks, and in certain of these embodiments, the decrease may result in reduction or cessation of one or more symptoms of a medical condition (e.g., chronic pain).


In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a condition associated with fast sodium channel activity and/or expression, or a condition for which attenuated fast sodium channel activity and/or expression is expected to be beneficial, by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain embodiments, the condition being treated is selected from the group consisting of a chronic pain condition, a movement disorder, dysautonomia, an anxiety disorder, a cognitive disorder, a development disorder, a metabolic disease, or a mood disorder.


In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a chronic pain condition by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments the chronic pain condition is a headache pain syndrome, fascial pain syndrome, neck and brachial plexus pain syndrome, shoulder pain syndrome, elbow pain syndrome, other upper extremity pain syndrome, wrist pain syndrome, hand pain syndrome, chest wall pain syndrome, thoracic spine pain syndrome, abdominal & groin pain syndrome, lumbar spine & sacroiliac joint pain syndrome, pelvic pain syndrome, hip & lower extremity pain syndrome, knee pain syndrome, ankle pain syndrome, foot pain syndrome, visceral pain or whole body pain syndromes. In certain of these embodiments, the chronic pain disorder may be a condition listed in Table 1. Table 1 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.









TABLE 1







Chronic pain conditions












Spinal Cord
Cortical
Sub-Cortical
Peripheral


Indication
Target
Target
Target
Target





Headache Pain
C2-C4, (e.g.,
Motor cortex
Periventricular
Sphenopalatine


Syndromes
C2-C3)
stimulation
grey matter
ganglion (SPG)




(MCS),
(PVG),





Posterior
periaqueductal





cingulum and
grey matter





cingulate
(PAG),





gyrus.
(nociceptive






pain); internal






capsule, ventral






posterolateral






nucleus (VPL),






ventral






posteromedial






nucleus (VPM)






(neuropathic






pain)



Herpes Zoster
Appropriate
Posterior
Ventro caudalis
Gasserian


(shingles) -
spinal level
cingulum and
parvocellularis
ganglion,


Trigeminal

cingulate
(Vcpc),
Sphenopalatine




gyrus.
thalamus, NAcc
ganglion (SPG)


Migraine
C1-C2
Posterior
Hypothalamus
Sphenopalatine




cingulum and

ganglion (SPG),




cingulate

Gasserian




gyrus.

ganglion,






occipital nerve






stimulation (ONS)


Cluster


Hypothalamus
SPG, Gasserian






ganglion


Analgesic Rebound


PVG, PAG



Occipital Neuralgia
C1-C2

PVG, PAG,
ONS





Vcpc



Fascial Pain
C2-C4, (e.g.,
MCS, Posterior
Vcpc, thalamus
SPG, Gasserian


Syndromes
C2-C3)
cingulum and

ganglion




cingulate






gyrus.




Trigeminal


Vcpc, thalamus
SPG, Gasserian


Neuralgia



ganglion


Temporomandibular


Vcpc, thalamus
SPG, Gasserian


Joint Dysfunction



ganglion,






superficial






temporal nerve


Trigeminal

MCS, Posterior
Vcpc, thalamus,
SPG, Gasserian


Neuropathy (aka

cingulum and
NAcc
ganglion,


Atypical Facial

cingulate gyrus

superficial


Pain)



temporal nerve


Myofascial Pain

Posterior
NAcc
SPG, Gasserian


Syndrome - Face

cingulum and

ganglion,




cingulate gyrus

superficial






temporal nerve


Cancer Pain

Insular cortex,
PVG, PAG,
SPG, Gasserian




Posterior
nucleus
ganglion,




cingulum and
accumbens
superficial




cingulate gyrus
(NAcc), Vcpc
temporal nerve





Thalamus



Hyoid Syndrome
C1-C3


SPG, Gasserian






ganglion,






superficial






temporal nerve


Reflex Sympathetic

Insular Cortex,
Vcpc, thalamus,
SPG, Gasserian


Dystrophy-Face

Posterior
hypothalamus
ganglion




cingulum and






cingulate gyrus




Neck & Brachial
C2-C6, (e.g.,





Plexus Pain
C3-C4)





Syndromes






Cervical Facet
Appropriate





Syndrome
somatotopic






spinal level





Cervical
Appropriate





Radiculopathy
somatotopic






spinal level





Fibromyalgia -
Appropriate





Cervical
somatotopic





Musculature
spinal level





Myofascial Pain
Appropriate





Syndrome -
somatotopic





Cervical
spinal level





Musculature






Brachial Plexopathy
C3-C8
MCS, Posterior
Vcpc, thalamus,




(depending on
cingulum and
PAG, PVG,




site of pain)
cingulate gyrus
centromedian






and






parafascicularis






(CMPF), NAcc



Pancoast
C3-C5
Posterior
PVG, PAG,



Syndrome

cingulum and
pulvinar





cingulate gyrus




Thoracic Outlet
C4 or C8





Syndrome






Shoulder Pain
C2-C6, (e.g.,
MCS, ,
Vcpc thalamus,
Brachial plexus


Syndromes
C3-C5)
Posterior
PAG, PVG,





cingulum and
CMPF, NAcc





cingulate gyrus




Arthritis Pain -
C3-C5
MCS, Posterior
Vcpc thalamus,
Brachial plexus


Shoulder

cingulum and
PAG, PVG,





cingulate gyrus
CMPF, NAcc



Acromioclavicular
C4


Brachial plexus


Joint Pain






Myofascial Pain
C4


Brachial plexus


Syndrome -






Shoulders






Subdeltoid Bursitis
C4


Brachial plexus


Bicipital Tendonitis
C4


Brachial plexus


Supraspinatus
C2-C4


Brachial plexus


Syndrome






Rotator Cuff Tear
C3-C5 (e.g.,


Brachial plexus



post-surgery)





Deltoid Syndrome
C-C5


Brachial plexus


Teres Major
C3-C6


Brachial plexus


Syndrome






Scapulocostal
C3-C7


Brachial plexus


Syndrome






Elbow Pain
C2-C6, (e.g.,


Brachial plexus/


Syndromes
C3-C5)


ulnar nerve


Arthritis Pain-Elbow
C4-C8





Tennis Elbow
C6-C8





Golfer's Elbow
C6-C8





Anconeus
C6-C8





Compartment






Syndrome






Supinator
C6-C8





Syndrome






Brachioradialis
C6-C8





Syndrome






Ulnar Nerve
C6-C8





Entrapment At The






Elbow






Lateral Antebrachial
C6-C8





Cutaneous Nerve






Syndrome






Olecranon Bursitis
C6-C8





Other Upper
C2-C6, (e.g.,


Brachial plexus


Extremity Pain
C3-C5)





Syndromes






Phantom Limb Pain
C2-C8, L1-S1
MCS, post-
Vcpc, cingulum,





cingulum,
NAcc





insula




Wrist Pain
C2-C6, (e.g.,





Syndromes
C3-C5)





Arthritis Pain - Wrist
C6-C8





Carpal Tunnel
C6-C8 (e.g.,





Syndrome
post-surgery)





De Quervain's
C5-C6





Tenosynovitis






Arthritis Pain -
C6-T1





Carpometacarpal






Joints






Hand Pain
C2-C6, (e.g.,





Syndromes
C3-C5)





Arthritis Pain -
C5-T1





Fingers






Trigger Thumb
C5-C7





Trigger Finger
C5-C7





Ganglion Cysts of
C5-C7





Wrist & Hand






Sesamoiditis of the
C5-C7





Hand






Chest Wall Pain
T1-T12





Syndromes






Intercostal
Level of


Costal Nerve


Neuralgia
neuralgia





Post-Thoracotomy
Level of





Pain
surgery +/−1






level





Thoracic Spine
T1-T12





Pain Syndromes






Cancer Pain
Level of pain
Insular cortex,
PVG, PAG,




+2 levels
post cingulate
cingulum, NAcc





cortex




Costovertebral
Center on





Arthritis Pain
dermatome





Postherpetic
Center on

NAcc, Vc
Center on


Neuralgia
dermatome

Thalmus
dermatome


Abdominal &
T6-T12


Left vagus nerve,


Groin Pain



subdiaphragmatic


Syndromes



right vagus nerve


Cancer Pain

Insular cortex,
PVG, PAG,





posterior
NAcc, cingulum





cingulate






cortex




Chronic Pancreatitis

Insular cortex,

Left vagus nerve,




posterior

subdiaphragmatic




cingulate

right vagus nerve




cortex




Ilioinguinal



Ilioinguinal nerve


Neuralgia



(field app)


Visceral Pain

Insular cortex,
PVG, PAG,
Left vagus


(peritoneum,

posterior
NAcc, cingulum



stomach,

cingulate




duodenum,

cortex




intestine, colon,






liver, spleen,






pancreas, kidney,






adrenal gland,






appendix, gall






bladder)






Post-vasectomy



Genitofemoral


Pain Syndrome



(GF) nerve


Genitofemoral



GF nerve


Neuralgia






Lumbar Spine &
T8-T12
Insular cortex,
PVG, PAG,



Sacroiliac Joint

post cingulate
NAcc, cingulum,



Pain Syndromes

cortex
Vcpc



Myofascial Pain
T8-T12





Syndrome






Lumbar
Segment





Radiculopathy
appropriate +/−






2 levels





Latissimus Dorsi
Upper thoracic





Muscle Syndrome






Arachnoiditis
S1-L3 (tune to
Insular cortex,
PVG, PAG




area of pain)
posterior
NAcc, cingulum





cingulate






cortex




Sacroiliac Joint
S1 and L1
Insular cortex,




Pain

post cingulate






cortex




Pelvic Pain
T12-L5





Syndromes






Cancer Pain
NO
Insular cortex,
PVG, PAG,





post cingulate
NAcc, cingulum





cortex




Gluteus Maximus






Syndrome






Visceral Pain

Insular cortex,
PVG, PAG,
Pudendal nerve


(pelvis, coccyx,

posterior
NAcc, PO



ovaries, fallopian

cingulate
thalamus,



tube, uterus, vulva,

cortex
cingulum



clitoris, perineum,






urinary bladder,






testicles, rectum)






Piriformis

Insular cortex,




Syndrome

post cingulate






cortex




Ischiogluteal



Pudendal nerve


Bursitis






Levator Ani
S3-S4


Pudendal nerve


Syndrome






Coccydynia
S3-S4


Pudendal nerve


Hip & Lower
T8-T12





Extremity Pain






Syndromes






Arthritis Pain - Hip
T11-L3





Meralgia
L1





Paresthetica






Phantom Limb Pain

MCS
Vcpc



Knee Pain
T8-T12





Syndromes






Ankle Pain
T8-T12





Syndromes






Foot Pain
T8-T12





Syndromes






Arthritis - Toe Pain
T10-S1





Bunion Pain
T10-S1





Plantar Fasciitis
T11-L3





Calcaneal Spur
T11-L3





Syndrome






Whole Body Pain
C2-C4





Syndromes






Cancer Pain

Insula cortex,
PVG, PAG,





post cingulate
cingulum,





cortex
posterior






thalamus



Chronic Regional
C4-C8, T8-T12
Insular cortex,
Hypothalamus,



Pain Syndrome -

post cingulate
posterior



Multiple Limb

cortex
thalamus



Phantom pain

Insular cortex,
Cingulum, PVG,



syndromes

posterior
PAG, Vcpc,





cingulate
thalamus





cortex, S1, S2






cortex









In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a movement disorder by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the movement disorder may be a condition listed in Table 2. Table 2 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.









TABLE 2







Movement disorders












Spinal


Periph-



Cord
Cortical
Sub-Cortical
eral


Indication
Target
Target
Target
Target














Akathisia

Primary motor
STN, Globus



(inability

cortex (MI),
pallidus internus



to sit still)

supplementary
(GPI), ventralis





motor area
oralis anterior





(SMA)
(VOA), ventralis






oralis posterior






(VOP),






subthalamic






nucleus (STN)



Akinesia


STN,



(lack of


Pedunculopontine



movement)


nucleus (PPN),






mid-thalamic






intralaminar and






reticular nuclei



Associated

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP,



Movements


STN, zona incerta



(Mirror


(ZI), area Q



Movements or






Homolateral






Synkinesis)






Athetosis

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP,



(contorted


STN



torsion






or twisting)






Ataxia (gross

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP,



lack of


STN



coordination






of muscle






movements)






Ballismus (violent

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP,



involuntary rapid


STN



and irregular






movements)






Hemiballismus


GPi, VoA, VoP,



(affecting only


STN



one side






of the body)






Bradykinesia

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP,



(slow


STN



movement)






Cerebral Palsy

MI, SMA
Deep cerebellar






nuclei



Chorea (rapid,

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP,



involuntary


STN



movement)






Sydenham's

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP,



Chorea


STN



Rheumatic

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP,



Chorea


STN



Huntington's

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP,



Disease


STN



Dystonia

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP,



(sustained


STN



torsion)






Dystonia DTY1,

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP,



DTY11 and


STN



generalized






dystonia






Blepharospasm

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP






STN



Writer's Cramp

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP






STN



Spasmodic

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP



Torticollis


STN



(twisting of






head and neck)






Dopamine-

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP



Responsive


STN



Dystonia






(hereditary






progressive






dystonia with






diurnal






fluctuation






or Segawa's






disease)






Geniospasm

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP



(episodic


STN



involuntary






up and down






movements






of the chin and






lower lip)






Myoclonus

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP



(brief,


STN



involuntary






twitching of a






muscle or






a group






of muscles)






Metabolic

MI, SMA
GPI, VOA, VOP



General


STN



Unwellness






Movement






Syndrome






(MGUMS)






Parkinson's

Motor cortex,
Subthalamic



Disease

pre-motor
nucleus, GPI, ZI,





cortex
pallidofugal fibers



Spasms


Superior



(contractions)


cerebellar artery






(SCA), Superior






Cerebellar






structures, deep






cerebellar nuc



Tardive


STN, GPI, VOA,



dyskinesia


VOP



Tic Disorders


Anterior limb



(involuntary,


internal capsule



compulsive,


(AIC), VOA,



repetitive,


CMPF thalamus



stereotyped)






Tourette's


AIC, GPI, VOA,



Syndrome


VOP, STN,






CMPF



Tremor


Ventral



(oscillations)


intermedia






nucleus (VIM),






Area Q, ZI



Rest Tremor


STN, GPI, Area



(4-8 Hz)


Q, ZI



Postural Tremor


STN, VIM, Area






Q, ZI



Kinetic Tremor


VIM, Area Q, ZI



Essential Tremor


VIM, Area Q, ZI



(6-8 Hz variable






amplitude)






Cerebellar tremor


VIM, deep



(6-8 Hz variable


cerebellar nuclei,



amplitude)


Area Q



Parkinsonian


STN +/− VIM



tremors (4-8 Hz






variable






amplitude)






Physiological


VIM, Area Q, ZI



tremor (10-12 Hz






low amplitude)






Wilson's disease


VIM and/or STN









In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a dysautonomic condition by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the dysautonomic condition may be a condition listed in Table 3. Table 3 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.









TABLE 3







Dysautonomic conditions












Spinal






Cord
Cortical
Sub-Cortical
Peripheral


Indication
Target
Target
Target
Target





Postural Orthostatic
T2-T5
insula
Hypothalamus



Tachycardia






Syndrome (POTS)






Inappropriate Sinus
T2-T5
insula
Hypothalamus



Tachycardia (IST)






Vasovagal Syncope
T2-T5
insula
NTS



Neurocardiogenic

insula
Nucleus tractus
Right vagus


Syncope (NCS)


solitarii (NTS)
nerve, left






vagus nerve


Neurally Mediated

insula
Hypothalamus



Hypotension (NMH)






Autonomic Instability
T2-T5
insula









In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating an anxiety disorder by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the anxiety disorder may be a condition listed in Table 4. Table 4 provides various spinal cord, cortical, intra-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.









TABLE 4







Anxiety disorders












Spinal






Cord
Cortical
Intra-Cortical
Peripheral


Indication
Target
Target
Target
Target





Generalized

Parietal,
Amygdala,



Anxiety

prefrontal
insula, cingulate,



Disorder


DM thalamus



Phobic

Insular cortex,
Corpus



Disorder

medial
callosum,





prefrontal
hippocampus,





cortex, anterior
ventral striatum,





cingulate
bed nucleus of





cortex,
the stria





ventromedial
terminals (BST),





prefrontal
amygdala, septal





cortex
nuclei



Specific

Insular cortex,
Amygdala,



Phobias (e.g.,

medial
NAcc, septal



arachnophobia,

prefrontal
nuclei



acrophobia

cortex, anterior






cingulate






cortex,






ventromedial






prefrontal






cortex




Social Phobias,

Insular cortex,
Amygdala,



(e.g., public

medial
NAcc, septal



speaking,

prefrontal
nuclei



crowded

cortex, anterior




areas)

cingulate






cortex,






ventromedial






prefrontal






cortex




Agoraphobia

Insular cortex,
NAcc, BST,





medial
amygdala





prefrontal






cortex, anterior






cingulate






cortex,






ventromedial






prefrontal






cortex




Panic Disorder

Insular cortex,
NAcc, BST,





medial
ventral striatum,





prefrontal
DM thalamus





cortex, anterior






cingulate






cortex,






ventromedial






prefrontal






cortex




Obsessive

Cg 25-
AIC, CMPF



Compulsive

cingulate
thalamus



Disorder

cortex,




(OCD)

orbitofrontal






cortex









In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a cognitive disorder by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the cognitive disorder may be a condition listed in Table 5. Table 5 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.









TABLE 5







Cognitive disorders












Spinal






Cord
Cortical
Sub-Cortical
Peripheral


Indication
Target
Target
Target
Target





Dementia

Entorhinal
Precommissural





cortex,
fornix





hippocampus




Amnesia

Entorhinal
Precommissural





cortex,
fornix





hippocampus









In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a development disorder by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the development disorder may be a condition listed in Table 6. Table 6 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.









TABLE 6







Development disorders












Spinal






Cord
Cortical
Intra-cortical
Peripheral


Indication
Target
Target
Target
Target





Motor disorders


GPI, VOA, VOP,






deep cerebellar






nuclei,






Cerebellar






vermis









In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a metabolic disease by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the metabolic disease may be selected from the group consisting of diabetes mellitus, an acid-base imbalance, a metabolic brain disease, a calcium metabolism disorder, a DNA repair deficiency disorder, an inborn metabolic error disorder, a mitochondrial disease, or a porphyria, and in certain of these embodiments the metabolic disease may be a condition listed in Table 7. Table 7 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.









TABLE 7







Metabolic diseases












Spinal






Cord
Cortical
Sub-Cortical
Peripheral


Indication
Target
Target
Target
Target





Diabetes Mellitus






Type I Diabetes


Hypothalamus
Splenic






and






gastric






nerve


Type II Diabetes


Hypothalamus
Splenic






and






gastric






nerve


Acid-Base


Hypothalamus,



Imbalance


subfornical






organ of pines



Acidosis+


Hypothalamus,






subfornical






organ of pines



Alkalosis+


Hypothalamus,






subfornical






organ of pines



Brain Diseases,






Metabolic






Hepatic


GPI, VOA, VOP,



Encephalopathy


thalamus



(HE)






Kernicterus


GPI, VOA, VOP,






thalamus



Mitochondrial


GPI, VOA, VOP,



Encephalo-


thalamus



myopathies






Wernicke

Entorhinal
Fornix,



Encephalopathy

cortex
mammillary






bodies



DNA Repair






Deficiency






Disorders






Ataxia


GPI, VOA, VOP,



Telangiectasia


thalamus



Bloom Syndrome


GPI, VOA, VOP,






thalamus



Cockayne


GPI, VOA, VOP,



Syndrome


thalamus



Fanconi Anemia


GPI, VOA, VOP,






thalamus



Metabolism,


GPI, VOA, VOP (to



Inborn


the extent subjects



Errors


have movement






disorders (MDs)



Amino Acid


GPI, VOA, VOP (to



Metabolism,


the extent subjects



Inborn Errors+


have MDs)



Amino Acid


GPI, VOA, VOP (to



Transport


the extent subjects



Disorders,


have MDs)



Inborn+


GPI, VOA, VOP (to



Amyloidosis,


the extent subjects



Familial+


have MDs)



Brain Diseases,


GPI, VOA, VOP (to



Metabolic,


the extent subjects



Inborn+


have MDs)



Carbohydrate


GPI, VOA, VOP (to



Metabolism,


the extent subjects



Inborn Errors+


have MDs)



Hyper-


GPI, VOA, VOP (to



bilirubinemia,


the extent subjects



Hereditary+


have MDs)



Lipid


GPI, VOA, VOP (to



Metabolism,


the extent subjects



Inborn Errors+


have MDs)



Lysosomal


GPI, VOA, VOP (to



Storage


the extent subjects



Diseases+


have MDs)



Metal


GPI, VOA, VOP (to



Metabolism,


the extent subjects



Inborn Errors+


have MDs)



Peroxisomal


GPI, VOA, VOP (to



Disorders+


the extent subjects






have MDs)



Porphyrias+


GPI, VOA, VOP (to






the extent subjects






have MDs)



Mitochondrial


GPI, VOA, VOP (to



Diseases


the extent subjects






have MDs)



Optic Atrophy,

CNS




Autosomal

visual




Dominant

prosthesis






@V1




Optic Atrophy,

CNS




Hereditary,

visual




Leber

prosthesis






@V1




Pyruvate


GPI, VOA, VOP (to



Carboxylase


the extent subjects



Deficiency


have MDs)



Disease






Pyruvate


GPI, VOA, VOP (to



Dehydrogenase


the extent subjects



Complex


have MDs)



Deficiency






Disease






Porphyrias






Porphyria,


GPI, VOA, VOP (to



Erythropoietic


the extent subjects






have MDs)









In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a mood disorder by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the mood disorder may be a condition listed in Table 8. Table 8 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.









TABLE 8







Mood disorders












Spinal






Cord
Cortical
Sub-Cortical
Peripheral


Indication
Target
Target
Target
Target





Depressive

Dorsolater
Subgenual



Disorders

prefrontal
cingulum,





cortex,
posterior





orbitofrontal
cingulum,





cortex,
NAcc, ventral





Cg25,
capsule/ventral





Posterior
striatum,





cingulate
inferior





cortex
thalamic






peduncle,






lateral






habenula, AIC,






BST



Major

Cg25,
Subgenual



depressive

Posterior
cingulum,



disorder

cingulate
posterior



(MDD)

cortex
cingulum,






NAcc, ventral






capsule/ventral






striatum,






inferior






thalamic






peduncle,






lateral






habenula, AIC,






BST



Dysthymia

Cg25,
Subgenual





posterior
cingulum,





cingulate
posterior





cortex
cingulum,






NAcc, ventral






capsule/ventral






striatum,






inferior






thalamic






peduncle,






lateral






habenula, AIC,






BST



Double

Cg25,
Subgenual



depression

posterior
cingulum,





cingulate
posterior





cortex
cingulum,






NAcc, ventral






capsule/ventral






striatum,






inferior






thalamic






peduncle,






lateral






habenula, AIC,






BST



Depressive

Cg25,
Subgenual



Disorder Not

posterior
cingulum,



Otherwise

cingulate
posterior



Specified

cortex
cingulum,



(DD-NOS)


NAcc, ventral






capsule/ventral






striatum,






inferior






thalamic






peduncle,






lateral






habenula, AIC,






BST









In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a visceral pain syndromes by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the visceral pain syndrome may be a condition listed in Table 9. Table 9 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.









TABLE 9







Visceral Pain Syndromes












Spinal
Cortical
Subcortical
Peripheral


Indication
target
target
target
target





Cystitis
S2-4
Insula,
Vc thalamus,
Pudendal




S1, S2
posterior
nerve





thalamic






nuclei



IBS
T3-9,
Insula,

R or L Vagus



L1
S1, S2

nerve,






splanchnic






nerves


Mesenteric
T3-9,
Insula




ischemia






Idiopathic
T3-9
Insula
Vc, DM
Splanchnic


abdominal


thalamus,
nerve, R or L


pain


Posterior
vagus nerve





thalamic nuc.









“Treating” or “treatment” as used herein with regard to a condition may refer to preventing the condition, reducing, or ending symptoms associated with the condition; generating a complete or partial regression of the condition; or some combination thereof. “Preventing” or “prevention” as used herein with regard to a condition may refer to total or partial prevention of the condition or symptoms associated with the condition.


In certain embodiments, electrical stimulation is performed with at least a portion of the therapy signal at a frequency in a frequency range between about 2 Hz and about 100 kHz; between about 1.5 kHz and about 50 kHz; between about 3 kHz and about 20 kHz; between about 3 kHz and about 15 kHz; or between about 5 kHz and about 15 kHz; or at frequencies of about 5 kHz, about 6 kHz, about 7 kHz, about 8 kHz, about 9 kHz, about 10 kHz, about 11 kHz, or about 12 kHz; and in one embodiment, surprisingly effective results have been found when treating certain medical conditions with frequencies between 5 kHz and 15 kHz, and in one embodiment 10 kHz. (The term “about” is intended to represent +/−10%, or a range as would be understood as reasonably equivalent by one of ordinary skill in the art.)


In various embodiments, the electrical stimulation may be applied with at least a portion of the therapy signal at amplitudes within amplitude ranges of: about 0.1 mA to about 20 mA; about 0.5 mA to about 10 mA; about 0.5 mA to about 7 mA; about 0.5 mA to about 5 mA; about 0.5 mA to about 4 mA; about 0.5 mA to about 2.5 mA; and in one embodiment, surprisingly effective results have been found when treating certain medical conditions with amplitudes below 7 mA.


In various embodiments, the electrical stimulation may be applied with at least a portion of the therapy signal having a pulse width within a pulse width range of from about 10 microseconds to about 333 microseconds; from about 10 microseconds to about 166 microseconds; from about 25 microseconds to about 166 microseconds; from about 25 microseconds to about 100 microseconds; from about 30 microseconds to about 100 microseconds; from about 33 microseconds to about 100 microseconds; from about 50 microseconds to about 166 microseconds; and in one embodiment, surprisingly effective results have been found when treating certain medical conditions with pulse widths from about 25 microseconds to about 100 microseconds; and from about 30 microseconds to about 40 microseconds. In a particular embodiment, the therapy signal at a frequency in a frequency range of 1.5 kHz to 100 kHz, a pulse width in a pulse width range of 10 microseconds to 333 microseconds and an amplitude in an amplitude range of 0.1 mA to 20 mA. The therapy signal can be applied at a duty cycle of 5% to 75%, and can be applied to thoracic spinal cord locations to treat back and/or leg pain, e.g., chronic back and/or leg pain. In another particular embodiment, a therapy signal having a pulse width is applied to the spinal cord at a pulse width in a pulse width range of 10 microseconds to 333 microseconds at any of a variety of suitable frequencies (within or outside the range of 1.5 kHz to 100 kHz) to treat a variety of pain indications, including but not limited to chronic low back pain and/or leg pain.


Application of electrical stimulation in conjunction with the methods disclosed herein can be carried out using suitable devices and programming modules specifically programmed to carry out any of the methods described herein. A variety of devices for administering an electrical signal to a target tissue or organ are taught in the references incorporated by reference above. Other examples of devices for administering an electrical signal in conjunction with SCS are disclosed in US Patent Publications Nos. 2010/0274316 and 2010/0211135, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. In certain embodiments, a device that is used for applying an electrical signal to the spinal cord may be repurposed with or without modifications to administer an electrical signal to another target tissue or organ, e.g., a cortical, sub-cortical, intra-cortical, or peripheral target. Electrical stimulation may be applied directly to a target tissue or organ, or it may be applied in close proximity to the target tissue or organ (i.e., close enough for the target tissue or organ to receive the electrical signal). As such, any of the herein described systems, sub-systems, and/or sub-components serve as means for performing any of the herein described methods.


In certain embodiments, electrical stimulation is applied to a tissue or organ using a device that comprises a lead, wherein the lead in turn comprises an electrode. In these embodiments, administration of electrical stimulation comprises a positioning step (e.g., placing the lead such that an electrode is in proximity to the target tissue or organ) and a stimulation step (e.g., transmitting an electrical signal (i.e., therapy signal) through the electrode).



FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a representative treatment system 100 for administering electrical stimulation to the spinal cord 191 in conjunction with the methods disclosed herein. The system 100 can include a pulse generator 101, which may be implanted subcutaneously within a patient 190 and coupled to a signal delivery element 110. In a representative example, the signal delivery element 110 includes one or more leads or lead bodies 111 (shown as first and second leads 111a, 111b) that carry features for delivering therapy to the patient 190 after implantation. The pulse generator 101 can be connected directly to the lead 111, or it can be coupled to the lead 111 via a communication link 102 (e.g., an extension). Accordingly, the lead 111 can include a terminal section that is releasably connected to an extension at a break 114 (shown schematically in FIG. 1). This allows a single type of terminal section to be used with patients of different body types (e.g., different heights). The terms “lead” and “lead body” as used herein include any of a number of suitable substrates and/or support members that carry devices for providing therapy signals to the patient 190. For example, the lead 111 can include one or more electrodes or electrical contacts that direct electrical signals into the patient's tissue. In other embodiments, the signal delivery element 110 can include devices other than a lead body (e.g., a paddle) that also direct electrical signals to the patient 190.


The pulse generator 101 can transmit electrical signals to the signal delivery element 110 that attenuate pathology-induced sodium channel activity and/or modulate GNI. The pulse generator 101 can include a machine-readable (e.g., computer-readable) medium containing instructions for generating and transmitting suitable therapy signals. The pulse generator 101 and/or other elements of the system 100 can include one or more processors 107, memories 108 and/or input/output devices. Accordingly, the process of providing modulation signals and executing other associated functions can be performed by computer-executable instructions contained on computer-readable media, e.g., at the processor(s) 107 and/or memory(s) 108. The pulse generator 101 can include multiple portions, elements, and/or subsystems (e.g., for directing signals in accordance with multiple signal delivery parameters), housed in a single housing, as shown in FIG. 1, or in multiple housings.


The pulse generator 101 can also receive and respond to an input signal received from one or more sources. The input signals can direct or influence the manner in which the therapy instructions are selected, executed, updated and/or otherwise performed. The input signal can be received from one or more sensors 112 (one is shown schematically in FIG. 1 for purposes of illustration) that are carried by the pulse generator 101 and/or distributed outside the pulse generator 101 (e.g., at other patient locations) while still communicating with the pulse generator 101. The sensors 112 can provide inputs that depend on or reflect patient state (e.g., patient position, patient posture and/or patient activity level, or pathophysiology measurements defined as appropriate to the clinical disorder), and/or inputs that are patient-independent (e.g., time). In other embodiments, inputs can be provided by the patient and/or the practitioner, as described in further detail later.


In some embodiments, the pulse generator 101 can obtain power to generate the electrical signals from an external power source 103. The external power source 103 can transmit power to the implanted pulse generator 101 using electromagnetic induction (e.g., radiofrequency (RF) signals). For example, the external power source 103 can include an external coil 104 that communicates with a corresponding internal coil (not shown) within the implantable pulse generator 101. The external power source 103 can be portable for ease of use. In another embodiment, the pulse generator 101 can obtain the power to generate electrical signals from an internal power source, in addition to or in lieu of the external power source 103. For example, the implanted pulse generator 101 can include a non-rechargeable battery or a rechargeable battery to provide such power. When the internal power source includes a rechargeable battery, the external power source 103 can be used to recharge the battery. The external power source 103 can in turn be recharged from a suitable power source (e.g., conventional wall power).


In some cases, an external programmer 105 (e.g., a trial modulator) can be coupled to the signal delivery element 110 during an initial implant procedure, prior to implanting the pulse generator 101. For example, a practitioner (e.g., a physician and/or a company representative) can use the external programmer 105 to vary the modulation parameters provided to the signal delivery element 110 in real time, and select optimal or particularly efficacious parameters. These parameters can include the position of the signal delivery element 110, as well as the characteristics of the electrical signals provided to the signal delivery element 110. In a typical process, the practitioner uses a cable assembly 120 to temporarily connect the external programmer 105 to the signal delivery device 110. The cable assembly 120 can accordingly include a first connector 121 that is releasably connected to the external programmer 105, and a second connector 122 that is releasably connected to the signal delivery element 110. Accordingly, the signal delivery element 110 can include a connection element that allows it to be connected to a signal generator either directly (if it is long enough) or indirectly (if it is not). The practitioner can test the efficacy of the signal delivery element 110 in an initial position. The practitioner can then disconnect the cable assembly 120, reposition the signal delivery element 110, and reapply the electrical modulation. This process can be performed iteratively until the practitioner obtains the desired position for the signal delivery device 110. Optionally, the practitioner may move the partially implanted signal delivery element 110 without disconnecting the cable assembly 120. Further details of suitable cable assembly methods and associated techniques are described in US Patent Publication No. 2011/0071593, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


After the position of the signal delivery element 110 and appropriate signal delivery parameters are established using the external programmer 105, the patient 190 can receive therapy via signals generated by the external programmer 105, generally for a limited period of time. In a representative application, the patient 190 receives such therapy for one week. During this time, the patient wears the cable assembly 120 and the external programmer 105 outside the body. Assuming the trial therapy is effective or, shows the promise of being effective, the practitioner then replaces the external programmer 105 with the implanted pulse generator 101, and programs the pulse generator 101 with parameters selected based on the experience gained during the trial period. Optionally, the practitioner can also replace the signal delivery element 110. Once the implantable pulse generator 101 has been positioned within the patient 190, the signal delivery parameters provided by the pulse generator 101 can still be updated remotely via a wireless physician's programmer (e.g., a physician's remote) 117 and/or a wireless patient programmer 106 (e.g., a patient remote). Generally, the patient 190 has control over fewer parameters than does the practitioner. For example, the capability of the patient programmer 106 may be limited to starting and/or stopping the pulse generator 101, and/or adjusting the signal amplitude.


In any of the foregoing embodiments, the parameters in accordance with which the pulse generator 101 provides signals can be modulated during portions of the therapy regimen. For example, the frequency, amplitude, pulse width and/or signal delivery location can be modulated in accordance with a preset program, patient and/or physician inputs, and/or in a random or pseudorandom manner. Such parameter variations can be used to address a number of potential clinical situations, including changes in the patient's perception of one or more symptoms associated with the condition being treated, changes in the preferred target neural population, and/or patient accommodation or habituation.


In certain embodiments, electrical stimulation is applied to the dorsal column. In other embodiments, the electrical stimulation is applied to other neural tissue such as nerve roots and peripherals nerves on the spinal level, including for example the dorsal root (DN) and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and the ventral root (VN). In other embodiments, electrical stimulation may be applied to one or more non-spinal cord tissues or organs. For example, electrical stimulation may be applied to various cortical, sub-cortical, intra-cortical, or peripheral targets. For certain conditions, electrical stimulation may be applied to a single target tissue or organ. For other conditions, electrical stimulation may be applied to multiple target tissues or organs sequentially or simultaneously. For example, where the condition is a chronic pain disorder, stimulation may be applied to the spinal cord, a cortical target, a sub-cortical target, or a combination thereof. In certain embodiments, electrical stimulation parameters are configured so as to not result in the patient experiencing paresthesia.


In certain embodiments, electrical stimulation is applied at an amplitude that is sub-threshold with regard to paresthesia and supra-threshold with regard to symptom reduction (e.g., therapy, such as pain relief). In certain of these embodiments, electrical stimulation is applied at an amplitude between about 0.5 mA to about 20 mA. In certain embodiments, electrical stimulation is applied at a duty cycle. Duty cycles can range from 1% to about 99%, or between about 5% and about 75%, or between about 10% and about 50%.


In certain embodiments of the methods provided herein, electrical stimulation may be administered on a pre-determined schedule. In other embodiments, electrical stimulation may be administered on an as-needed basis. Administration may continue for a pre-determined amount of time, or it may continue indefinitely until a specific therapeutic benchmark is reached, for example until an acceptable reduction in one or more symptoms. In certain embodiments, electrical stimulation may be administered one or more times per day, one or more times per week, once a week, once a month, or once every several months. In certain embodiments, administration frequency may change over the course of treatment. For example, a subject may receive less frequent administrations over the course of treatment as certain therapeutic benchmarks are met. The duration of each administration (e.g., the actual time during which a subject is receiving electrical stimulation) may remain constant throughout the course of treatment, or it may vary depending on factors such as patient health, internal pathophysiological measures, or symptom severity. In certain embodiments, the duration of each administration may range from 1 to 4 hours, 4 to 12 hours, 12 to 24 hours, 1 day to 4 days, or 4 days or greater.


In certain embodiments of the methods provided herein, administration of electrical stimulation may be combined with one or more additional treatment modalities. For example, electrical stimulation may be applied in combination with the administration of one or more pharmaceutical agents that block fast sodium channels. In other embodiments, electrical stimulation may be used as a replacement for other treatment modalities. For example, electrical stimulation may be administered to a subject who has previously received neuroleptics or other sodium channel blockers but who has experienced unsatisfactory results and/or negative side effects. In certain embodiments, application of electrical stimulation may result in a greater treatment effect than administration of other treatment modalities, including for example a larger reduction in symptoms or an increased duration of symptom reduction.


The following examples are provided to better illustrate the claimed invention and are not to be interpreted as limiting the scope of the invention. To the extent that specific materials are mentioned, it is merely for purposes of illustration and is not intended to limit the invention. One skilled in the art may develop equivalent means or reactants without the exercise of inventive capacity and without departing from the scope of the invention. It will be understood that many variations can be made in the procedures herein described while still remaining within the bounds of the present invention. It is the intention of the inventors that such variations are included within the scope of the invention.


EXAMPLES
Example 1

A method of attenuating pathology-induced sodium channel activity comprising applying electrical stimulation to a target neural location, wherein the electrical stimulation includes one or more system parameters as described in the embodiments above, and wherein the target neural location is chosen so as to treat the medical condition listed in Tables 1-9 above.


Example 2

A method of treating a condition associated with increased fast sodium channel comprising applying electrical stimulation to a target neural location, wherein the electrical stimulation includes one or more system parameters as described in the embodiments above, and wherein the target neural location is chosen so as to treat the medical condition listed in Tables 1-9 above.


Example 3

A method of modulating GNI comprising applying electrical stimulation to a target neural location, wherein the electrical stimulation includes one or more system parameters as described in the embodiments above, and wherein the target neural location is chosen so as to treat the medical condition listed in Tables 1-9 above.


Example 4

A neuromodulation system for treating a medical condition comprising: an implantable (or external) pulse generator configured to attenuate pathology-induced sodium channel activity by generating and applying a electrical stimulation to a target neural location, wherein the electrical stimulation includes one or more system parameters as described in the embodiments above, and wherein the target neural location is chosen so as to treat the medical condition listed in Tables 1-9 above.


Example 5

A neuromodulation system for treating a medical condition comprising: an implantable (or external) pulse generator configured to treat a condition associated with increased fast sodium channel by generating and applying a electrical stimulation to a target neural location, wherein the electrical stimulation includes one or more system parameters as described in the embodiments above, and wherein the target neural location is chosen so as to treat the medical condition listed in Tables 1-9 above.


Example 6

A neuromodulation system for treating a medical condition comprising: an implantable (or external) pulse generator configured to modulate GNI by generating and applying a electrical stimulation to a target neural location, wherein the electrical stimulation includes one or more system parameters as described in the embodiments above, and wherein the target neural location is chosen so as to treat the medical condition listed in Tables 1-9 above.


As stated above, the foregoing is merely intended to illustrate various embodiments of the present invention. The specific modifications discussed above are not to be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various equivalents, changes, and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention, and it is understood that such equivalent embodiments are to be included herein. All references cited herein are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

Claims
  • 1. A method for treating a patient by changing an activity, expression, or both activity and expression of a fast sodium channel, a glial cell, or both a fast sodium channel and a glial cell of the patient, comprising: using a signal generator to generate an electrical therapy signal having a frequency in a frequency range of 1.5 kHz to 100 kHz;transmitting the electrical therapy signal to a signal delivery element positioned proximate to a target neural population located in the patient's central nervous system;applying the electrical therapy signal to the target neural population located in the patient's central nervous system, wherein the electrical therapy signalproduces changes in the activity, expression, or both activity and expression of the fast sodium channel, the glial cell, or both the fast sodium channel and the glial cell of the patient.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the changes reduce chronic pain in the patient.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the changes include a change in a conductance of the fast sodium channel.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the changes include a downregulation of the activity, expression, or both activity and expression of the fast sodium channel, the glial cell, or both the fast sodium channel and the glial cell of the patient.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the changes includes an attenuation of pathology-induced sodium channel activity.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the changes include a normalization of pathological neural networks associated with fast sodium channel activity, expression, or both.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the changes include a modulation of glial neuronal cell interaction.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the changes include a reduction of glial cell activity by reducing an extracellular potassium level.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 wherein a frequency of the electrical therapy signal affects NaV1.8, NaV1.9, or both NaV1.8 and NaV1.9 sodium channels over another, slower sodium channel.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, further comprising applying the therapy signal to increase an activity, expression, or both activity and expression of the slower sodium channel.
  • 11. The method of claim 10 wherein the slower sodium channel includes a NaV1.3 channel.
  • 12. The method of claim 1 wherein said changes include a decrease in a release, by glial cells, of at least one of nitric oxide, a proinflammatory cytokine, an excitatory amino acids, or a prostaglandin.
  • 13. The method of claim 1 wherein the target neural population is at the patient's spinal cord.
  • 14. The method of claim 1 wherein the target neural population is at a peripheral nerve of the patient.
  • 15. The method of claim 1 wherein the changes include an increase in the activity, expression, or both activity and expression of the fast sodium channel, the glial cell, or both the fast sodium channel and the glial cell of the patient.
  • 16. The method of claim 1 wherein the changes include a decrease in the activity, expression, or both activity and expression of the fast sodium channel, the glial cell, or both the fast sodium channel and the glial cell of the patient.
  • 17. The method of claim 1 wherein the electrical therapy signal has a pulse width in a pulse width range of 10 microseconds to 333 microseconds.
  • 18. The method of claim 1 wherein the electrical therapy signal has an amplitude in an amplitude range of 0.1 mA to 20 mA.
  • 19. The method of claim 1 wherein the electrical therapy signal has a duty cycle in a duty cycle range of 5% to 75%.
  • 20. The method of claim 1 wherein the electrical signal has a pulse width in a pulse width range of 10 microseconds to 333 microseconds and an amplitude in an amplitude range of 0.1 mA to 20 mA.
  • 21. A method for treating a patient by changing an activity, expression, or both activity and expression of a fast sodium channel, a glial cell, or both a fast sodium channel and a glial cell of the patient, comprising: using a signal generator to generate an electrical therapy signal having a frequency in a frequency range of 1.5 kHz to 100 kHz, a pulse width in a pulse width range of 10 microseconds to 333 microseconds and an amplitude in an amplitude range of 0.1 mA to 20 mA;transmitting the electrical therapy signal to a signal delivery element positioned proximate to a target neural population located in the patient's central nervous system;applying the electrical therapy signal to the target neural population located in the patient's central nervous system, wherein the electrical therapy signal produces changes in the activity, expression, or both activity and expression of the fast sodium channel, the glial cell, or both the fast sodium channel and the glial cell of the patient, and wherein the electrical therapy signal treats chronic pain.
  • 22. The method of claim 21 wherein the electrical therapy treats chronic back pain and wherein the target neural population is at a thoracic vertebral level.
  • 23. A method for treating a patient by changing an activity, expression, or both activity and expression of a fast sodium channel, a glial cell, or both a fast sodium channel and a glial cell of the patient, comprising: using a signal generator to generate an electrical therapy signal having a pulse width in a pulse width range of 10 microseconds to 333 microseconds;transmitting the electrical therapy signal to a signal delivery element positioned proximate to a target neural population located in the patient's central nervous system;applying the electrical therapy signal to the target neural population located in the patient's central nervous system, wherein the electrical therapy signal produces changes in the activity, expression, or both activity and expression of the fast sodium channel, the glial cell, or both the fast sodium channel and the glial cell of the patient.
  • 24. The method of claim 23 wherein the changes produced by the electrical therapy signal reduce chronic pain in the patient.
  • 25. The method of claim 23 wherein a frequency of the electrical therapy signal is in a range of 1.5 kHz to 100 kHz.
  • 26. A method for treating a patient by changing an activity, expression, or both activity and expression of a fast sodium channel, a glial cell, or both a fast sodium channel and a glial cell of the patient, comprising: using a signal generator to generate an electrical therapy signal having a frequency in a frequency range of 1.5 kHz to 100 kHz;transmitting the electrical therapy signal to a signal delivery element positioned proximate to a target neural population located in the patient's central nervous system; andapplying the electrical therapy signal to the target neural population, wherein the electrical therapy signal produces changes in the activity, expression, or both activity and expression of the fast sodium channel, the glial cell, or both the fast sodium channel and the glial cell of the patient, andwherein the target neural population is remote from the fast sodium channel, the glial cell, or both the fast sodium channel and the glial cell.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 61/833,392, filed on Jun. 10, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (365)
Number Name Date Kind
1597061 Cultra Aug 1926 A
3195540 Waller Jul 1965 A
3727616 Lenzkes Apr 1973 A
3817254 Maurer Jun 1974 A
3822708 Zilber Jul 1974 A
3893463 Williams Jul 1975 A
4014347 Halleck et al. Mar 1977 A
4023574 Nemec May 1977 A
4055190 Tany et al. Oct 1977 A
4414986 Dickhudt et al. Nov 1983 A
4535777 Castel Aug 1985 A
4541432 Molina-Negro et al. Sep 1985 A
4608985 Crish et al. Sep 1986 A
4649935 Charmillot et al. Mar 1987 A
4764132 Stutz, Jr. Aug 1988 A
4841973 Stecker Jun 1989 A
RE33420 Sussman et al. Nov 1990 E
5002053 Garcia-Rill Mar 1991 A
5335657 Terry, Jr. et al. Aug 1994 A
5354320 Schaldach et al. Oct 1994 A
5514175 Kim et al. May 1996 A
5540734 Zabara Jul 1996 A
5562717 Tippey et al. Oct 1996 A
5643330 Holsheimer et al. Jul 1997 A
5716377 Rise et al. Feb 1998 A
5776170 MacDonald et al. Jul 1998 A
5830151 Hadzic et al. Nov 1998 A
5833709 Rise Nov 1998 A
5853373 Griffith et al. Dec 1998 A
5893883 Torgerson et al. Apr 1999 A
5938690 Law Aug 1999 A
5983141 Sluijter et al. Nov 1999 A
5995872 Bourgeois Nov 1999 A
6002964 Feler et al. Dec 1999 A
6014588 Fitz Jan 2000 A
6027456 Feler et al. Feb 2000 A
6161044 Silverstone Dec 2000 A
6161048 Sluijter et al. Dec 2000 A
6167311 Rezai Dec 2000 A
6176242 Rise Jan 2001 B1
6233488 Hess May 2001 B1
6238423 Bardy May 2001 B1
6246912 Sluijter et al. Jun 2001 B1
6319241 King et al. Nov 2001 B1
6341236 Osorio et al. Jan 2002 B1
6356786 Rezai et al. Mar 2002 B1
6393325 Mann et al. May 2002 B1
6397108 Camps et al. May 2002 B1
6405079 Ansarinia Jun 2002 B1
6421566 Holsheimer Jul 2002 B1
6440090 Schallhorn Aug 2002 B1
6473644 Terry, Jr. et al. Oct 2002 B1
6505078 King et al. Jan 2003 B1
6510347 Borkan Jan 2003 B2
6516227 Meadows et al. Feb 2003 B1
6526318 Ansarinia Feb 2003 B1
6571127 Ben-Haim et al. May 2003 B1
6584358 Carter et al. Jun 2003 B2
6609030 Rezai et al. Aug 2003 B1
6622048 Mann et al. Sep 2003 B1
6659968 McClure Dec 2003 B1
6662051 Eraker et al. Dec 2003 B1
6714822 King et al. Mar 2004 B2
6721603 Zabara et al. Apr 2004 B2
6795737 Gielen et al. Sep 2004 B2
6856315 Eberlein Feb 2005 B2
6871090 He et al. Mar 2005 B1
6871099 Whitehurst et al. Mar 2005 B1
6885888 Rezai Apr 2005 B2
6907295 Gross et al. Jun 2005 B2
6923784 Stein Aug 2005 B2
6928320 King Aug 2005 B2
6950707 Whitehurst Sep 2005 B2
6968237 Doan et al. Nov 2005 B2
6990376 Tanagho et al. Jan 2006 B2
7024246 Acosta et al. Apr 2006 B2
7047079 Erickson May 2006 B2
7054686 MacDonald May 2006 B2
7082333 Bauhahn et al. Jul 2006 B1
7117034 Kronberg Oct 2006 B2
7146224 King Dec 2006 B2
7149574 Yun et al. Dec 2006 B2
7162304 Bradley Jan 2007 B1
7167750 Knudson et al. Jan 2007 B2
7174215 Bradley Feb 2007 B2
7177702 Wallace et al. Feb 2007 B2
7180760 Varrichio et al. Feb 2007 B2
7212865 Cory May 2007 B2
7225035 Brabec et al. May 2007 B2
7236822 Dobak, III Jun 2007 B2
7239912 Dobak, III Jul 2007 B2
7252090 Goetz Aug 2007 B2
7260436 Kilgore et al. Aug 2007 B2
7266412 Stypulkowski Sep 2007 B2
7288062 Spiegel Oct 2007 B2
7313440 Miesel Dec 2007 B2
7324852 Barolat et al. Jan 2008 B2
7326181 Katims Feb 2008 B2
7333857 Campbell Feb 2008 B2
7337005 Kim et al. Feb 2008 B2
7346398 Gross et al. Mar 2008 B2
7349743 Tadlock Mar 2008 B2
RE40279 Sluijter et al. Apr 2008 E
7359751 Erickson et al. Apr 2008 B1
7363076 Yun et al. Apr 2008 B2
7389145 Kilgore et al. Jun 2008 B2
7393351 Woloszko et al. Jul 2008 B2
7463927 Chaouat Dec 2008 B1
7483747 Gliner et al. Jan 2009 B2
7493172 Whitehurst et al. Feb 2009 B2
7502652 Gaunt et al. Mar 2009 B2
7571007 Erickson et al. Aug 2009 B2
7580753 Kim et al. Aug 2009 B2
7599737 Yomtov et al. Oct 2009 B2
7634317 Ben-David et al. Dec 2009 B2
7676269 Yun et al. Mar 2010 B2
7689276 Dobak Mar 2010 B2
7689289 King Mar 2010 B2
7734340 De Ridder Jun 2010 B2
7742810 Moffitt et al. Jun 2010 B2
7761170 Kaplan et al. Jul 2010 B2
7778704 Rezai Aug 2010 B2
7813803 Heruth et al. Oct 2010 B2
7826901 Lee et al. Nov 2010 B2
7853322 Bourget et al. Dec 2010 B2
7860570 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2010 B2
7877136 Moffitt Jan 2011 B1
7890176 Jaax et al. Feb 2011 B2
7890182 Parramon et al. Feb 2011 B2
7914452 Hartley et al. Mar 2011 B2
7933654 Merfeld et al. Apr 2011 B2
7937145 Dobak May 2011 B2
8000794 Lozano Aug 2011 B2
8010198 Libbus et al. Aug 2011 B2
8027718 Spinner et al. Sep 2011 B2
8046075 Rezai Oct 2011 B2
8060208 Kilgore et al. Nov 2011 B2
8082039 Kim et al. Dec 2011 B2
8209021 Alataris et al. Jun 2012 B2
8209028 Skelton et al. Jun 2012 B2
8224453 De Ridder Jul 2012 B2
8224459 Pianca et al. Jul 2012 B1
8255057 Fang et al. Aug 2012 B2
8280515 Greenspan Oct 2012 B2
8340775 Cullen et al. Dec 2012 B1
8355792 Alataris et al. Jan 2013 B2
8359102 Alataris et al. Jan 2013 B2
8359103 Alataris et al. Jan 2013 B2
8364271 De Ridder Jan 2013 B2
8364273 De Ridder Jan 2013 B2
2622601 Alataris et al. Mar 2013 A1
8396559 Alataris et al. Mar 2013 B2
8423147 Alataris et al. Apr 2013 B2
8428735 Littlewood et al. Apr 2013 B2
8428748 Alataris et al. Apr 2013 B2
8509906 Walker et al. Aug 2013 B2
8612018 Gillbe Dec 2013 B2
8649874 Alataris et al. Feb 2014 B2
8825166 John Sep 2014 B2
8849410 Walker et al. Sep 2014 B2
8886326 Alataris et al. Nov 2014 B2
8886328 Alataris et al. Nov 2014 B2
8892209 Alataris et al. Nov 2014 B2
8918172 Moffitt et al. Dec 2014 B2
8918190 Libbus et al. Dec 2014 B2
9002459 Lee et al. Apr 2015 B2
9067076 Nolan et al. Jun 2015 B2
9180298 Alataris et al. Nov 2015 B2
9327127 Alataris et al. May 2016 B2
20020055779 Andrews May 2002 A1
20020128700 Cross Sep 2002 A1
20030100931 Mullett May 2003 A1
20030120323 Meadows et al. Jun 2003 A1
20040015202 Chandler et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040034394 Woods et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039425 Greenwood-Van Meerveld Feb 2004 A1
20040059395 North et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073273 Gluckman et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040093093 Andrews May 2004 A1
20040116977 Finch et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040162590 Whitehurst et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167584 Carroll et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040186532 Tadlock Sep 2004 A1
20040193228 Gerber Sep 2004 A1
20040210270 Erickson Oct 2004 A1
20040210271 Campen et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040267330 Lee et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050033381 Carter et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038489 Grill Feb 2005 A1
20050060001 Singhal et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050070982 Heruth et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050113877 Spinelli et al. May 2005 A1
20050113878 Gerber May 2005 A1
20050113882 Cameron et al. May 2005 A1
20050119713 Whitehurst et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143789 Whitehurst et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149148 King Jul 2005 A1
20050153885 Yun et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050154435 Stern et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050240241 Yun et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050245978 Varrichio et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050246006 Daniels Nov 2005 A1
20050267545 Cory Dec 2005 A1
20050278000 Strother et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004422 De Ridder Jan 2006 A1
20060009820 Royle Jan 2006 A1
20060015153 Gliner et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060030895 Simon et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041285 Johnson Feb 2006 A1
20060074456 Pyles et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079937 King et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095088 De Ridder May 2006 A1
20060100671 Ridder May 2006 A1
20060149337 John Jul 2006 A1
20060161219 Mock et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161235 King Jul 2006 A1
20060167525 King Jul 2006 A1
20060168805 Hegland et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190048 Gerber Aug 2006 A1
20060224187 Bradley et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060229687 Goetz et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060253182 King Nov 2006 A1
20070021803 Deem et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070032827 Katims Feb 2007 A1
20070039625 Heruth et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070043400 Donders et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070049991 Klostermann et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070060954 Cameron et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070066997 He et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073353 Rooney et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073354 Knudson et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070083240 Peterson et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070106337 Errico et al. May 2007 A1
20070106342 Schumann May 2007 A1
20070150029 Bourget et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150034 Rooney et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156183 Rhodes Jul 2007 A1
20070167992 Carley Jul 2007 A1
20070179559 Giftakis et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070179579 Feler et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203537 Goetz et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070213771 Spinner et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070213789 Nolan et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070239226 Overstreet Oct 2007 A1
20070244522 Overstreet Oct 2007 A1
20070255118 Miesel et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070265681 Gerber Nov 2007 A1
20070299482 Littlewood et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080033511 Dobak Feb 2008 A1
20080097539 Belalcazar Apr 2008 A1
20080103570 Gerber May 2008 A1
20080167697 Johnson Jul 2008 A1
20080183259 Bly et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080234791 Arle et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080269854 Hegland et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080281381 Gerber et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090018617 Skelton Jan 2009 A1
20090024187 Erickson et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090036945 Chancellor et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090054962 Lefler et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090069803 Starkebaum Mar 2009 A1
20090076565 Surwit Mar 2009 A1
20090112282 Kast et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090125079 Armstrong et al. May 2009 A1
20090132010 Kronberg May 2009 A1
20090132016 Putz May 2009 A1
20090157141 Chiao et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090157149 Wahlgren et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090198306 Goetz et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090204173 Fang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090204192 Carlton et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090281595 King et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090287274 De Ridder Nov 2009 A1
20090287279 Parramon et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090326611 Gillbe Dec 2009 A1
20100010567 Deem et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100016929 Prochazka Jan 2010 A1
20100036454 Bennett et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100042193 Slavin Feb 2010 A1
20100057178 Simon Mar 2010 A1
20100094375 Donders et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100125313 Lee et al. May 2010 A1
20100137938 Kishawi et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100152817 Gillbe Jun 2010 A1
20100191307 Fang et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100211135 Caparso et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100241190 Kilgore et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100249875 Kishawi et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100256696 Schleicher et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274312 Alataris et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274314 Alataris et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274315 Alataris et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274316 Alataris et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274317 Parker et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274318 Walker et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274320 Torgerson Oct 2010 A1
20100274326 Chitre et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100324630 Lee et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100331916 Parramon et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110009919 Carbunaru et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110009923 Lee Jan 2011 A1
20110009927 Parker et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110022114 Navarro Jan 2011 A1
20110071593 Parker et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110184301 Holmstrom et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110184486 De Ridder Jul 2011 A1
20110184488 De Ridder Jul 2011 A1
20110201977 Tass Aug 2011 A1
20110276107 Simon et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282412 Glukhovsky et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120016437 Alataris et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120016438 Alataris et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120016439 Alataris et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120089200 Ranu et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120150252 Feldman et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120172946 Alataris et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120203304 Alataris et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120209349 Alataris et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120277833 Gerber et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120283797 De Ridder Nov 2012 A1
20130006325 Woods et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130023951 Greenspan Jan 2013 A1
20130041425 Fang et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130066411 Thacker et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130096643 Fang et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130096644 Fang et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130110196 Alataris et al. May 2013 A1
20130123879 Alataris et al. May 2013 A1
20130172955 Alataris Jul 2013 A1
20130204173 Kelly et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130204320 Alataris et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130204321 Alataris et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130204322 Alataris et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130204323 Thacker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130204324 Alataris et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130204338 Alataris et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130211487 Fang et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130261695 Thacker et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130261696 Alataris et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140031896 Alataris et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140142656 Alataris et al. May 2014 A1
20140142657 Alataris et al. May 2014 A1
20140142658 Alataris et al. May 2014 A1
20140142659 Alataris et al. May 2014 A1
20140142673 Alataris et al. May 2014 A1
20140343622 Alataris et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140379044 Walker et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150012079 Goroszeniuk et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150018896 Alataris et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150032182 Alataris et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150032183 Alataris et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150039040 Cowan et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150039049 Alataris et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150039050 Alataris et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150045853 Alataris et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150045854 Alataris et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150051664 Alataris et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150343220 Alataris et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160287872 Alataris et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160287873 Alataris et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160287874 Alataris et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160287875 Thacker et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160287888 Alataris et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160303374 Alataris et al. Oct 2016 A1
20170050021 Cosman, Sr. Feb 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (39)
Number Date Country
10318071 Nov 2004 DE
1181947 Feb 2002 EP
2243511 Oct 2010 EP
2448633 May 2012 EP
2630984 Aug 2013 EP
2449546 Nov 2008 GB
2002200179 Jul 2002 JP
2007528774 Oct 2007 JP
2008500086 Jan 2008 JP
1512625 Oct 1989 SU
1690727 Nov 1991 SU
WO-02065896 Aug 2002 WO
WO-02085448 Oct 2002 WO
WO-02092165 Nov 2002 WO
WO-03015863 Feb 2003 WO
WO-03066154 Aug 2003 WO
WO-2004007018 Jan 2004 WO
WO-2005115532 Dec 2005 WO
WO-2006057734 Jun 2006 WO
WO-2006063458 Jun 2006 WO
WO-2006084635 Aug 2006 WO
WO-2006119046 Nov 2006 WO
WO-2007035925 Mar 2007 WO
WO-2007082382 Jul 2007 WO
WO-2007103324 Sep 2007 WO
WO-2007117232 Oct 2007 WO
WO-2008039982 Apr 2008 WO
WO-2008045434 Apr 2008 WO
WO-2008106174 Sep 2008 WO
WO-2008121891 Oct 2008 WO
WO-2008140940 Nov 2008 WO
WO-2008142402 Nov 2008 WO
WO-2008153726 Dec 2008 WO
WO-2009018518 Feb 2009 WO
WO-2009061813 May 2009 WO
WO-2009129329 Oct 2009 WO
WO-2010111358 Sep 2010 WO
WO-2011014570 Feb 2011 WO
WO-2016154091 Sep 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (311)
Entry
Austin, Paul J., et al. “The neuro-immune balance in neuropathic pain: Involvement of inflammatory immune cells, immunce-like glial cells and cytokines.” Aug. 13, 2010. Journal of Neuroimmunology. vol. 229. pp. 26-50.
Takeda, Mamoru, et al. “Potassium Channels as a potential therapeutic target for trigeminal neuropathic and inflammatory pain.” 2011. Molecular Pain. Edition 7, vol. 5. pp. 1-8.
Hains, Bryan C., et al “Upregulation of Sodium Channel NaV1.3 and Functional Involvement in Neuronal Hyperexcitability Associated with Central Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Cord Injury”. Oct. 1, 2003. The Journal of Neuroscience. Edition 23, vol. 26. pp. 8881-8892.
Amaya, Fumimasa, et al. “The Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel NaV1.9 is an Effector of Peripheral Inflammatory Pain Hypersensitivity.” Dec. 13, 2006. The Journal of Neuroscience. Edition 26, vol. 50. pp. 12852-12860.
Acticare.com website, http://web.archive.org/web/*/acticare.com, Internet Archive Way Back Machine, 2012, 22 pages.
Alo et al., “New Trends in Neuromodulation for the Management of Neuropathic Pain,” Neurosurgery, vol. 50, No. 4, Apr. 2002, 15 pages.
Amendment in Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,747, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Jan. 24, 2014, 21 pages.
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,450, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Feb. 1, 2012, 2 pages.
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,770, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Apr. 5, 2013, 3 pages.
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,747, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Sep. 11, 2013, 3 pages.
Application Data Sheet for U.S. Appl. No. 13/446,970 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,359,102), First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, filed Apr. 13, 2012, 6 pages.
Bahdra et al., Stimulation of High-Frequency Sinusoidal Electrical Block of Mammalian Myelinated Axons, J Comput Neurosco, 22:313-326, 2007.
Barolat et al., “Multifactorial Analysis of Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation,” Sterotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 1991; 56: 77-103.
Barolat et al., “Surgical Management of Pain—Spinal Cord Stimulation: Equipment and Implantation Techniques,” Chapter 41, Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, 2002, 11 pages.
Bhadra et al., “High Frequency electrical conduction block of the pudendal nerve,” Journal of Neural Engineering—Institute of Physics Publishing, ; 2006, 8 pages.
Bhadra MD, Niloy et al., “High-Frequency Electrical Conduction Block of Mammalian Peripheral Motor Nerve,” Muscle and Nerve, Dec. 2005, 9 pages.
Boger et al., “Bladder Voiding by Combined High Frequency Electrical Pudendal Nerve Block and Sacral Root Stimulation,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, 27, 2008, 5 pages.
Boston Scientific “Precision™ Spinal Cord Stimulator System Clinician Manual—Directions for Use,” 2015, 74 pages.
Boston Scientific, News Release: “New Data Presented at NANS 2014 Demonstrate Long-Term, Low Back Pain Relief with Boston Scientific Precision Spectra™ Spinal Cord Stimulator System,” Dec. 12, 2014, 8 pages.
Bowman and McNeal, Response of Single Alpha Motoneurons to High-Frequency Pulse Trains, Appl. Neurophysiol. 49, p. 121-138, 1986, 10 pages.
Burton, Charles, “Dorsal Column Stimulation: Optimization of Application,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 4, No. 1, Jul. 1975, 10 pages.
ClinicalTrials.gov, “Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Precision SCS System Adapted for High-Rate Spinal Cord Stimulation (Accelerate),” https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02093793?term=boston+scientific&recr=Open&cond=%22Pain%22&rank=3, Feb. 2015, 3 pages.
Crosby et al., “Stimulation Parameters Define the Effectiveness of Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Rat Model of Neuropathic Pain,” Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface, International Neurmodulation Society, 2014, 8 pages.
Cuellar et al., “Effect of High Frequency Alternating Current ; on Spinal Afferent Nociceptive Transmission,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2012, 10 pages.
Declaration of Cameron C. McIntyre, Ph.D., May 6, 2015, 88 pages.
Declaration of Cameron C. McIntyre, Ph.D., May 6, 2015, 57 pages.
Declaration of M. Jason D. Rahn, Jan. 7, 2015, 7 pages.
DeRidder et al., “Are Paresthesias necessary for pain suppression in SCS—Burst Stimulation,” BRAIN, Brain Research Center Antwerp of Innovative and Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, 2010, 27 pages.
DeRidder et al., “Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation: Toward Paresthesia-Free Pain Suppression,” www.neurosurgery-online.com, vol. 66, Nos. 5, May 2010, 5 pages.
Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, Twenty-sixth Edition, “Paresthesia,” 1981, 4 pages.
Doug Atkins of Medtronic Neurological, “Medtronic Neurostimulation Leads, 510(k) Summary,” Submission Prepared: Feb. 27, 2004, 6 pages.
European Search Report for European Application No. 14178370.4, Applicant: Nevro Corporation, Mar. 2, 2015, 6 pages.
Ex Parte Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/446,970, First Inventor Named: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Oct. 15, 2012, 9 pages.
First Preliminary Amendment for U.S. Appl. No. 13/446,970, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: May 18, 2012, 7 pages.
Grill, Warren et al., “Stimulus Waveforms for Selective Neural Stimulation,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Jul./Aug. 1995, pp. 375-385.
Guo et al., “Design and Implement of a Mini-Instrument for Rehabilitation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation,” School of Medical Instrument and Food Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai China, Mar. 31, 2007, 5 pages.
Hefferman et al., “Efficacy of Transcutaneous Spinal Electroanalgesia in Acute Postoperative Pain Management,” Anesthesiology, 2001, 2 pages.
Hilberstadt et al., “The Effect of Transcutaneous Spinal Electroanalgesia upon Chronic Pain: A single case study,” Physiotherapy, vol. 86 No. 3, Mar. 2000, 2 pages.
Holsheimer—Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Pain: Analysis of Technical Drawbacks and Solutions, Neurosurgery, vol. 40, No. 5, May 1997, pp. 990-999.
Hopp et al., “Effect of anodal blockade of myelinated fibers on vagal c-fiber afferents,” American Journal Physiological Society, Nov. 1980; 239(5), 9 pages.
Hoppenstein, Reuben, “Electrical Stimulation of the Ventral and Dorsal Columns of the Spinal Cord for Relief of Chronic Intractable Pain: Preliminary Report,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 4, No. 1, Jul. 1975, 9 pages.
Huxely et al., “Excitation and Conduction in Nerve: Quantitative Analysis,” Science, Sep. 11, 1964; 145: 1154-9.
J.P. Morgan North America Equity Research, “Nevro—Welcome to the Future of Spinal Cord Stimulation Initiating at OW with $34 Price Target,” www.jpmorganmarkets.com, Dec. 1, 2014, 39 pages.
Jain et al., Abstract—“Accelerate: A Prospective Multicenter Trial Evaluating the Use of High-Rate Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Intractable Pain,” The American Academy of Pain Medicine, 2015, 1 page.
Jang et al., “Analysis of Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation Trails in the Treatment of Intractable Chronic Pain,” J. Korean Neurosurg Soc 43, 2008, 5 pages.
JMP Securities, “Nevro Corp. (NVRO) Initiating Coverage on Nevro Corp. with a Market Outperform Rating—Investment Highlights,” Dec. 1, 2014, 42 pages.
Kapural et al., “Novel 10-Khz High Frequency Therapy (HF10 Therapy) is Superior to Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain,” Anesthesiology The Journal of American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc., 2015, 11 pages.
Kilgore et al. “Nerve Conduction Block Utilizing High-Frequency Alternating Current” Medical & Biology Engineering and Computing, 2004, vol. 24, pp. 394-406.
Kilgore et al. “Reversible Nerve Conduction Block Using Kilohertz Frequency Alternating Current,” Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface, International Neuromodulation Society, 2013, 13 pages.
Kuechmann et al., Abstract #853: “Could Automatic Position Adaptive Stimulation Be Useful in Spinal Cord Stimulation?” Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, European Journal of Pain 13, 2009, 1 page.
Kumar et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation in Treatment of Chronic Benign Pain: Challenges in Treatment Planning and Present Status, a 22-Year Experience,” Neurosurgery, vol. 58, No. 3, Mar. 2006, 16 pages.
Kumar et al., “The Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain are Sustained: A 24-month Follow-Up of the Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial of the Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation,” www.neurosurgery-online.com, vol. 63, No. 4, Oct. 2008, 9 pages.
Lempka et al., “Computational Analysis of Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain Management,” Anesthesiology, vol. 122, No. 6, Jun. 2015, 15 pages.
Linderoth et al., “Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Neuropathic and Ischemic Pain Syndromes,” Neuromodulation, Chapter 25, 2009, 19 pages.
Linderoth et al., “Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Painful Syndromes: Role of Animal Models,” Pain Medicine, vol. 7, No. S1, 2006, 13 pages.
Linderoth et al., “Physiology of Spinal Cord Stimulation: Review and Update,” Neuromodulation, vol. 2, No. 3, 1999, 15 pages.
MacDonald, Alexander J. R, and Coates, Tim W., “The Discovery of Transcutaneous Spinal Electroanalgesia and Its Relief of Chronic Pain,” Physiotherapy, vol. 81. No. 11, Nov. 1995, 9 pages.
Mediati, R.D., “Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation,” Florence, Oct. 2, 2002, 31 pages.
Medtronic—Neurological Division, QuadPlus, Model 3888, Lead Kit for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Implant Manual, 1996, 33 pages.
Medtronic—Neurological Division, Resume II, Model 3587A, Lead Kit for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS), Implant Manual, 1996, 32 pages.
Medtronic—Neurological Division, Resume TL, Model 3986, Lead Kit for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS), Implant Manual, 1996, 27 pages.
Medtronic—Neurostimulation Systems: Expanding the Array of Pain Control Solutions, 1999, 6 pages.
Medtronic commercial leaflet entitled: Surgical Lead Comparison, 1999, 4 pages.
Medtronic, “Medtronic Pain Therapy—Using Neurostimulation for Chronic Pain, Information for Prescribers” 2007, 29 pages.
Medtronic, Pain Therapy Product Guide, Dec. 2008, 31 pages.
Medtronic, Pisces Quad 3487A, Pisces Quad Compact model 3887, Pisces Quad Plus 3888 Lead Kit, Implant Manual, 2008, 16 pages.
Medtronic: Spinal Cord Stimulation Systems, 2013, 4 pages.
Melzack, Ronald et al., “Pain Mechanisms: A New Theory,” Science, vol. 150, No. 3699, Nov. 19, 1965, 9 pages.
Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition, definition of “Implantable,” 1995, 3 pages.
Morgan Stanley Research North America, “Nevro Corp—There's Something Happening Here,” Dec. 15, 2014, 12 pages.
Mosby's Medical Dictionary, 8th Edition, “Paresthesia,” 2009, 3 pages.
Muller and Hunsperger, “Helvetica Physiologica Acta—Reversible Blockierung der Erregungsleitung im Nerven durch Mittelfrequenz—Daverstrom,” Schwabe & Co. Basel, vol. 25, Fasc. 1, 1967, 4 pages.
Munglani, Rajesh, “The Longer Term Effect of Pulsed Radiofrequency for Neuropathic Pain,” Pain 80, 1999, 3 pages.
Nevro Senza Patient Manual, Jan. 16, 2015, 53 pages.
Nevro Senza Physician Implant Manual, Jan. 16, 2015, 31 pages.
Nevro, PMA Approval Letter and Referenced Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data (SSED) May 8, 2015, 60 pages.
News Release Details, “Nevro Corp. Announces Pricing of Initial Public Offering,” 2014, 1 page.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,747, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Jul. 25, 2013, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Acton for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,450, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed Nov. 18, 2011, 11 pages.
North American Neuromodulation Society—14th Annual Meeting, “Neuromodulation: Vision 2010,” Dec. 2-5, 2010, 9 pages.
North American Neuromodulation Society—16th Annual Meeting, “From Innovation to Reality Syllabus,” Dec. 6-9, 2012, 198 pages.
North American Neuromodulation Society—Celebrating 20 years, 18th Annual Meeting Program Book, Dec. 11-14, 2014, 28 pages.
North American Neuromodulation Society, “Today's Vision, Tomorrow's Reality—17th Annual Meeting,” Dec. 5-8, 2013, 12 pages.
North American Neuromodulation, “15th Annual Meeting, Our Crystal Anniversary,” Dec. 8-11, 2011, 8 pages.
North et al., “Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: 5-year Follow-Up after Spinal; Cord Stimulator Implantation,” Neurosurgery, Official Journal of thogress of Neurological Surgeons, vol. 28, No. 5, May 1991, 9 pages.
North et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation for Axial Low Back Pain,” Spine, vol. 30, No. 12, 2005, 7 pages.
North et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic, Intractable Pain: Experience over Two Decades,” Neurosurgery, vol. 32, No. 2, Mar. 1993, 12 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,450, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Mar. 14, 2012, 8 pages.
Notice of Opposition to a European Patent, Argument and Facts, and Annex for European Patent No. 2421600, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Dec. 4, 2014, 22 pages.
Notice of Opposition to a European Patent, Argument and Facts, for European Patent No. 2243510, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Medtronic, Jan. 8, 2015, 22 pages.
Notice of Opposition to a European Patent, Argument and Facts, and Annex for European Patent No. 2243510, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Jan. 8, 2015, 28 pages.
Notice of Opposition to a European Patent, Argument and Facts for European Patent No. 2630984, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Medtronic, Mar. 17, 2015, 17 pages.
Notice of Opposition to a European Patent, Argument and Facts, and Annex for European Patent No. 2630984, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Mar. 17, 2015, 21 pages.
Notice of Opposition to a European Patent, Argument and Facts, for European Patent No. 2207587, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Medtronic, Inc., Jan. 12, 2016, 22 pages.
Notice of Opposition to a European Patent, Argument and Facts, for European Patent No. 2207587, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Jan. 8, 2016, 17 pages.
Oakley et al., “A New Spinal Cord Stimulation System Effectively Relieves Chronic, Intractable Pain: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, vol. 10, No. 3, 2007, 17 pages.
Oakley et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation in Axial Low Back Pain: Solving the Dilemma,” Pain Medicine, vol. 7, No. S1, 2006, 6 pages.
Oakley, John C., “Spinal Cord Stimulation Mechanisms of Action,”; Spine vol. 27, No. 22, copyright 2002, 10 pages.
Palmer et al., “Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and transcutaneous spinal electroanalgesia: A preliminary efficacy and mechanisms-based investigation,” Physiotherapy, 95, 2009, 7 pages.
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 8,359,102, Case No. IPR2015-01203, Petitioner: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Patent Owner: Nevro Corporation, mailed Sep. 1, 2015, 70 pages.
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 8,359,102, Case No. IPR2015-01204, Petitioner: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Patent Owner: Nevro Corporation, mailed Sep. 1, 2015, 63 pages.
Perruchoud et al., “Analgesic Efficacy of High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study,” Neuromodulation: Technology at Neural Interface, International Neuromodulation Society, 2013, 7 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1, 2, 11-15, 17-23, 25 and 26 for U.S. Pat. No. 8,359,102, Petitioner: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Patent Owner: Nevro Corporation, May 14, 2015, 45 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1, 2, 11-15, 17-23, 25 and 26 for U.S. Pat. No. 8,359,102, Petitioner: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Patent Owner: Nevro Corporation, May 14, 2015, 67 pages.
Prausnitz et al., “The Effects of Electric Current Applied to Skin: A Review for Transdermal Drug Delivery,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 18, 1996, 31 pages.
Remedi Pain Relief—ENM (Electronic Nerve Modulation), https://web.archive.org/web/20050906181041/http://www.remediuk.com/trials.htm, 2005, 5 pages.
Resume of Jason D. Rahn, Jan. 7, 2015, 2 pages.
Robb et al., “Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation vs. Transcutaneous Spinal Electroanalgesia for Chronic Pain Associated with ; Breast Cancer Treatments,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 33, No. 4, Apr. 2007, 10 pages.
Science Daily, “Chronic Pain Costs U.S. up to $635 billion, study shows,” www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120911091100.htm, Sep. 11, 2012, 2 pages.
Shealy MD, C. Norman et al., “Electrical Inhibition of Pain by Stimulation of the Dorsal Columns: Preliminary Clinical Report,” Anesthesia and Analgesia Current Researches, vol. 446, No. 4, Jul.-Aug. 1967, 3 pages.
Simpson, BA, “Spinal Cord Stimulation in 60 cases of Intractable Pain.” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 1991; 54 pp. 196-199.
Simpson, BA, “Spinal Cord Stimulation.” British Journal of Neurosurgery, Feb. 11, 1997, (1), 5-11, 7 pages.
Sluijter et al., “The Effects of Pulsed Radiofrequency Fields Applied to the Dorsal Root Ganglion—A Preliminary Report,” The Pain Clinic, vol. 11, No. 2, 1998, 12 pages.
Solomonow et al., “Control of Muscle Contractile Force through Indirect High-Frequency Stimulation,” AM Journal of Physical Medicine, 1983, vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 71-82.
St. Jude Medical, “Eon Mini™ Rechargeable IPG,” Apr. 29, 2013, 3 pages.
St. Jude Medical, “Individualized Therapy through Diverse Lead Options,” 2008, 6 pages.
Stimwave, News Release: “Stimwave Receives FDA Approval for High Frequency IDE,” http://stimwave.com/newsroom/latest-news, Jun. 9, 2015, 2 pages.
Tanner, J.A., “Reversible blocking of nerve conduction by alternating-current; excitation,” Nature, Aug. 18, 1962; 195: 712-3.
Tesfaye et al., “Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy,” The Lancet, vol. 348, Dec. 21-28, 1996, 4 pages.
Tiede et al., “Novel Spinal Cord Stimulation Parameters in Patients with Predominate Back Pain,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2013, 6 pages.
Tollison et al., “Practical Pain Management; Neurostimulation Techniques,” Chapter 12, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Third Edition, 2002, 13 pages.
Urban et al., “Percutaneous epidural stimulation of the spinal cord for relief of pain—Long Term Results,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 48, ; Mar. 1978, 7 pages.
Van Butyen et al., “High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back Pain Patients: Results of a Prospective Multicenter European Clinical Study,” Neuromodulation Technology at the ; Neural Interface, International Neuromodulation Society, 2012, 8 pages.
Van Den Honert, Mortimer JT, “A Technique for Collision Block of Peripheral; Nerve: Frequency Dependence,” MP-11 IEEE Trans. Biomed, Eng. 28: 379-382, 1981.
Van Havenbergh et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back Pain Patients: 500-Hz vs. 1000-Hz Burst Stimulation,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, International Neurmodulation Society, 2014, 4 pages.
Wallace et al., Poster: “Accelerate: A Prospective Multicenter Trial Evaluating the Use of High-Rate Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Intractable Pain,” Boston Scientific Corporation, 2015, 1 page.
Wallin et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation inhibits long-term potentiation of spinal wide dynamic range neurons,” Elsevier Science B.V., Brain Research, 5 pages 2003.
Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridge, “Paresthesia,” 1993, 3 pages.
Wolter et al., “Continuous Versus Intermittent Spinal Cord Stimulation: An Analysis of Factors Influencing Clinical Efficacy,” Neuromodulation: Technology at Neural Interface, www.neuromodulationjournal.com, 2011, 8 pages.
Woo MY, Campbell B. “Asynchronous Firing and Block of Peripheral Nerve Conduction by 20KC Alternating Current,” Los Angeles Neuro Society, Jun. 1964; 87-94, 5 pages.
Zhang et al., “Simulation Analysis of Conduction Block in Myelinated Axons Induced by High-Frequency Biphasic Rectangular Pulses,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 53., No. 7, Jul. 2006, 4 pages.
“The Need for Mechanism-Based Medicine in Neuromodulation,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2012, 7 pages.
Al-Kaisy et al., “Sustained Effectiveness of 10kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Patients with Chronic, Low Back Pain: 24-month Results of Prospective Multicenter Study,” Pain Medicine, 2014, 8 pages.
Amendment in Response to Ex Parte Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/446,970, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Nov. 28, 2012, 14 pages.
Amendment in Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,450, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, filed Feb. 7, 2012, 15 pages.
J.P. Morgan North America Equity Research, “Nevro—Let the Launch Begin: Senza Approved, Raising PT to $54,” www.jpmorganmarkets.com, May 10, 2015, 8 pages.
Royle, John., “Transcutaneous Spinal Electroanalgesia and Chronic Pain,” Physiotherapy, vol. 86, No. 5, May 2000, 1 page.
Simpson et al., “A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study of the Use of Transcutaneous Spinal Electroanalgesia in Patients with Pain from Chronic Critical Limb Ischemia,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 28, No. 5, Nov. 2004, 6 pages.
Thompson et al., “A double blind randomised controlled clinical trial on the effect of transcutaneous spinal electroanalgesia (TSE) on low back pain,” European Journal of Pain, vol. 12, Issue 3, Apr. 2008, 6 pages.
Towell et al., “High Frequency non-invasive stimulation over the spine: Effects on mood and mechanical pain tolerance in normal subjects,” Behavioral Neurology, vol. 10, 1997, 6 pages.
Additional Arguments to Notice of Opposition of European Patent No. 2853285, filed by Medtronic, Inc., on May 17, 2017, 9 pages.
Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Compustim SCS Systems, ; Clinical Manual, 1997, 52 pages.
Agnew et al., “Considerations for safety with chronically implanted nerve electrodes,” Epilepsia, 31.s2, 1990, 6 pages.
Al-Kaisy et al., “10 kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Axial Low Back Pain in Patients With No History of Spinal Surgery: A Preliminary, Prospective, Open Label and Proof-of-Concept Study,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2016, 8 pages.
Al-Kaisy et al., “The Use of 10-Kilohertz Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Cohort of Patients with Chronic Neuropathic Limb Pain Refractory to Medical Management,” Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural; Interface, 2015, 6 pages.
Augustinsson et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation in Cardiovascular Disease,” Functional Neurosurgery, vol. 6, No. 1, Jan. 1995, 10 pages.
Bara et al., Poster re: High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Dominant Back Pain—1 year follow up, 2013, 1 page.
Barolat et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain Management,” Seminars in Neurosurgery, vol. 15, Nos. 2/3, 2004, 26 pages.
Bennett et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation for Complex regional pain syndrome I [RSD]: a Retrospective Multicenter Experience from 1995 to 1998 of 101 patients.” Neuromodulation, vol. 2, No. 3, 1999, 9 pages.
Benyamin et al., “A Case of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Raynaud's Phenomenon: Can Subthreshold Sensory Stimulation Have an Effect?” Pain Physician www.painphysicianjournal.com, 2007, 6 pages.
Broseta et al., “High-Frequency cervical spinal cord stimulation in spasticity and motor disorders,” Advances in Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 7. Springer Verlag 1987, 6 pages.
Butt et al., “Histological Findings Using Novel Stimulation Parameters in a Caprine Model,” European Journal of Pain Supplements, 2011, 2 pages.
Cahana et al., “Acute Differential Modulation of Synaptic Transmission and Cell Survival During Exposure to Pulsed and Continuous Radiofrequency; Energy,” Journal of Pain, vol. 4, No. 4, May 2003, 6 pages.
Cameron et al., “Effects of posture on stimulation parameters in spinal cord stimulation,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface 1.4, 1998, 8 pages.
Camilleri et al., “Intra-abdominal vagal blocking (VBLOC therapy): clinical results with a new implantable medical device,” Surgery 143.6, 2008, 9 pages.
Crapanzano et al., “High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Case Report,” Pain Physician, 2017, 6 pages.
Curriculum Vitae and Declaration of Dr. Ganesan Baranidharan, 4 pages, 2016.
Curriculum Vitae and Declaration of Dr. Jonathan Miller, 42 pages, Oct. 25, 2016.
Curriculum Vitae and Declaration of Dr. Simon James Thomson, Oct. 24, 2016, 2 pages.
Curriculum Vitae and Declaration of Prof. Bengt Linderoth, Oct. 21, 2016, 3 pages.
Curriculum Vitae of Michael A. Moffitt, 2015, 2 pages.
De Carolis et al., Poster: “Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in the Treatment of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS): a comparative study,” 2013, 1 page.
Decision and Minutes: Opposition of European Patent No. 2421600 by Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Apr. 3, 2017, 28 pages.
Declaration of Dr. Jonathan Miller on behalf of European Patent No. 2853285, 26 pages, May 16, 2017.
Declaration of M. Jason D. Rahn for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Feb. 2, 2017, 2 pages.
Declaration of Prof. Bengt Linderoth for European Patent No. 2421600, dated Dec. 16, 2016 2 pages.
Eddicks et al., “Thoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation Improves Functional Status and Relieves Symptoms in Patients with Refractory Angina Pectoris: The First Placebo-Controlled Randomised Study,” Heart Journal, 2007, 6 pages.
Feeling vs. Function Poster, Mager and Associates Consulting, 2009, 1 page.
Geddes, “A Short History of the electrical stimulation of excitable tissue—Including Electrotherapeutic Applications,” The Physiologist, vol. 27, No. 1, Feb. 1984, 51 pages.
Gulve et al., Poster: “10kHz High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Middlesbrough Experience,” 2013, 1 page.
Higuchi et al., “Exposure of the Dorsal Root Ganglion in Rats to Pulsed Radiofrequency Currents Activates Dorsal Horn Lamina I and II Neurons,”; Neurosurgery, vol. 50, No. 4, Apr. 2002, 7 pages.
House et al., “Safety and Efficacy of the House/3M Cochlear Implant in Profoundly Deaf Adults,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, vol. 19, No. 2, May 1986, 12 pages.
International Neuromodulation Society 10th World Congress, Neuromodulation: Technology that Improves Patient Care, London, England, May 21-26, 2011, 385 pages.
Jacques et al., “Development of a New Implantable Bio-Telestimulator,” Surg. Neurol., vol. 13, May 1980, 2 pages.
Jezernik et al., “Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Bladder; Dysfunction: Current Status and Future Possibilities,” Neurological Research, vol. 24, Jul. 2002, 18 pages.
Kapural et al., “Comparison of 10-kHz High Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back ; and Leg Pain: 24-Month Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial,” Neurosurgery, vol. 79, No. 5, Nov. 2016, 11 pages.
Kreitler et al., “Chapter 15: Implantable Devices and Drug Delivery Systems—The Handbook for Chronic Pain,” Nova Biomedical Books, New York, ; 2007, 17 pages.
Krista Oakes of Neuromed, Inc., “Implanted Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness,” Submission Prepared Feb. 21, 1996, 3 pages.
Lambru et al., “Safety and Efficacy of Cervical 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Refractory Primary Headaches: A Retrospective Case Series,” The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2016, 8 pages.
Manola et al., “Technical Performance of Percutaneous Leads for Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Modeling Study,” International Neuromodulation Society, 2005, 12 pages.
Mavoori et al., “An Autonomous implantable computer for neural recording and stimulation in unrestrained primates,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2005, 7 pages.
Meyerson et al., Mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain, Neurological Research, vol. 22, Apr. 2000, 5 pages.
Miller, Jonathan, “Neurosurgery Survival Guide—A Comprehensive Guide to Neurosurgical Diagnosis and Treatment,” http://d3jonline.tripod.com/neurosurgery/, Nov. 14, 2016, 4 pages.
Miller, Jonathan, “Parameters of Spinal Cord Stimulation and Their Role in Electrical Charge Delivery: A Review,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2016.
Mounaïm et al., “New Neurostimulation Strategy and Corresponding Implantable Device to Enhance Bladder Functions,” Biomedical Engineering Trends in Electronics, Communications and Software, Chapter 5, 2011, 15 pages.
Mueller et al., “The Med-El Sonatati 100 Cochlear Implant: An evaluation of its safety in adults and children,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 131, No. 5, 2011, 8 pages.
Nashold et al., “Dorsal Column Stimulation for Control Pain—Preliminary Report on 30 Patients,” J. Neurosurg., vol. 36, May 1972, 8 pages.
Nevro—Chronic Pain and Treatments, http://www.nevro.com/English/Patients/Chronic-Pain-and-Treatments/default.aspx; 2016, 3 pages.
Nevro—Clinical Evidence, www.nevro.com/English/Physicians/Clinical-Evidence/default.aspx, 2016, 2 pages.
Nevro—HF10™ Therapy Fact Sheet, http://www.nevro.com/English/Newsroom/Resources/default.aspx, 2015, 4 pages.
Nevro—Physician Overview www.nevro.com/English/Physicians/Physician-Overview/default.aspx, 2016, 5 pages.
Nevro—Senza System http://www.nevro.com/English/Physicians/Senza-System/default.aspx, 2016, 3 pages.
Nevro HF10 Therapy—New Hope for Chronic Back Pain and Leg Pain Sufferers, http://s21.q4cdn.com/478267292/files/doc_downloads/HF10-Therapy-New-Hope-for-Chronic-Pain.pdf, 2016, 2 pages.
Nevro Observations and Response to Notice of Oppositions filed by Medtronic Inc., and Boston Scientific for European Patent No. 2207587, dated Aug. 26, 2016, 16 pages.
Nevro Response to Notice of Oppositions filed by Boston Scientific for European Patent No. 2421600, dated Jul. 22, 2015, 16 pages.
Nevro Response to Notice of Oppositions filed by Medtronic and Boston Scientific for European Patent No. 2630984, dated Dec. 7, 2015, 26 pages.
Nevro Response to Opposition of Division's Comments and Summons to Oral Proceedings for European Patent No. 2630984, dated Oct. 25, 2016, 8 pages.
Nevro website: HF10 Therapy Advantages, www.nevro.com/English/Patients/HF10-Therapy-Advantages/default.aspx, 2016, 3 pages.
Nevro Written Submissions and Response to Notice of Oppositions filed by Medtronic Inc., and Boston Scientific for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Aug. 28, 2015, 17 pages.
Nevro's Response to Preliminary Opinion for Opposition by Medtronic, Inc., and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Feb. 3, 2017, 36 pages.
Nevro's presentation of HF10 therapy on Nevro's website, http://www.nervo.com/English/Home/default.aspx, 2016, 2 pages.
Nevro's Response to Further Submission by Medtronic, Inc., and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Feb. 24, 2017, 9 pages.
Nevros Response to Opponent Submission of Declaration of Jonathan Miller in European Patent No. 2630984, dated Nov. 18, 2016, 4 pages.
NIDCD-NIH 2011, Cochlear Implant Brochure, http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/hearing/pages/coch.aspx, Jun. 29, 2012, 2 pages.
North et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation With Interleaved Pulses: A Randomized, Controlled Trial,” vol. 10, No. 4, 2007, 9 pages.
Notice of Opposition to a European Patent for European Patent No. 2586488, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Medtronic, Inc., dated Mar. 15, 2017, 7 pages.
Notice of Opposition to a European Patent for European Patent No. 2853285, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Medtronic, Inc., dated Apr. 19, 2017, 40 pages.
OHSIPP Summer Newsletter, The Official Newsletter for the Ohio Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, vol. 1 Ed. 2, Summer 2010, 8 pages.
Opponent Boston Scientific: Response to Attend Oral Proceedings for European Patent No. 2630984, dated Oct. 25, 2016, 21 pages.
Opponent Response to Patent Proprietor Comments to Declaration of Dr. Jonathan Miller for European Patent No. 2630984, dated Nov. 22, 2016, 3 pages.
Opponents Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corp.: Additional Observations in view of Oral Proceedings for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Feb. 3, 2017, 8 pages.
Opponents Boston Scientific: Response to Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings for European Patent No. 2421600, dated Jan. 2, 2017, 15 pages.
Opponents Medtronic, Inc.: Additional Observations in view of Oral Proceedings for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Feb. 3, 2017, 10 pages.
Opponents Medtronic, Inc.: Response to Attend Oral Proceedings for European Patent No. 2630984, dated Oct. 25, 2016, 26 pages.
Opponents Medtronic: Response to Nevro Requests and Submission for European Patent No. 22453510, dated Mar. 29, 2017, 3 pages.
Opponents Response to Patentee's (Nevro) Written Submissions for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Feb. 22, 2016, 21 pages.
Paicius et al., “Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: Preliminary Results of Long-Term Follow-up: A Case Series,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, vol. 10, No. 3, 2007, 12 pages.
Precision—Physician System Handbook, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055253-0001, 2005, 92 pages.
Precision—Physician Trail Kit Insert, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055258-0001, 2005, 2 pages.
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Charging System Insert, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055074-0001, 2004, 2 pages.
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Charging System, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055259-0001, 2004, 2 pages.
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Patient Trial Journal, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055260-0001, 2004, 10 pages.
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Patient System Handbook, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055072-0001, 2004, 93 pages.
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Physician Implant Manual, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055100, 2004, 62 pages.
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Physician Implant Manual, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055255-0001, 2005, 70 pages.
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Physician Lead Manual, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part No. 9055183-001, May 2004, 31 pages.
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Physician Lead Manual, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055095, 2004, 62 pages.
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Physician Lead Manual, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055256-0001, 2005, 56 pages.
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Physician Trail Handbook, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055254-0001, 2005, 66 pages.
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Physician Trail Kit Model SC-7005, Part 9055066-001, Advanced Bionic Corporation, 2004, 2 pages.
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Remote Control Model SC-5200, Part 9055107-001, 2004, Advanced Bionic Corporation, 2 page.s.
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Remote Control Model SC-5210, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055257-001, 2005, 2 pages.
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation System—Patient System Handbook, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part No. 9055184-001, May 2004, 86 pages.
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation System, Patient Trial Handbook, Part 9055078, 2004, 74 pages.
Pudenz et al., “Development of an Implantable Telestimulator,” Proc. 4th Ann. Nat'l Conf. Neuroelectric Soc., Mar. 10-12, 1971, 111-12 (Wulfsohn, Norman L. And Anthony Sances, Jr. (eds.) 1971, 4 pages.
Pudenz et al., “Neural Stimulation: Clinical and Laboratory Experiences,” Surg. Neurol, 39: 1993, 8 pages.
Rapcan et al., Clinical Study, “High-Frequency—Spinal Cord Stimulation,” Indexed and Abstracted in Science Citation Index Expanded and in Journal Citation Reports, 2015, 3 pages.
Reddy et al., “Comparison of Conventional and Kilohertz Frequency Epidural Stimulation in Patients Undergoing Trailing for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Considerations,” World Neurosurgery, www.sciencedirect.com, 6 pages, 2015.
Schulman et al., “Battery Powered BION FES Network,” Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the IEEE EMBS, San Francisco, CA., Sep. 1-5, 2004, 4 pages.
Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) System—P130022, http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/Recently-ApprovedDevices/ucm449963.htm Oct. 14, 2016, 2 pages.
Shealy et al., “Dorsal Column Electrohypalgesia,” Jul. 1969, 8 pages.
Shelden et al., “Depolarization in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia,” Evaluation of Compression and Electrical Methods; Clinical Concept of Neurophysiological Mechanism, 1966, 8 pages.
Shelden et al., “Development and Clinical Capabilities of a New Implantable Biostimulator,” The American J. Of Surgery, vol. 124, Aug. 1972, 6 pages.
Shelden et al., Electrical Control of Facial Pain, Am. J. Of Surgery, vol. 114, Aug. 1967, 6 pages.
Shelden et al., “Electrical stimulation of the nervous system,” Surg. Neurol. vol. 4, No. 1, Jul. 1975, 6 pages.
Smet et al., Poster: “High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz after Failed Traditional Spinal Cord Stimulation,” NANS, 2013, 1 page.
Struijk et al., “Recruitment of Dorsal Column Fibers in Spinal Cord Stimulation: Influence of Collateral Branching,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 39, No. 9, Sep. 1992, 10 pages.
Sweet et al., “Paresthesia-Free High Density Spinal Cord Stimulation for Postlaminectomy Syndrome in a Prescreened Population: A Prospective Case Series,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2015, 7 pages.
Swigris et al., “Implantable Spinal Cord Stimulator to Treat the Ischemic Manifestations of Thromboangiitis Obliterans (Buerger's disease),” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 29, No. 5, 1998, 8 pages.
Tan et al., “Intensity Modulation: A Novel Approach to Percept Control in Spinal Cord Stimulation,” Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface, International Neuromodulation Society 2015, 6 pages.
Taylor et al., “The Coss Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 27, No. 4., Apr. 2001, 9 pages.
Verrills et al., “Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Chronic Pain: 100 Cases and Review of the Literature,” Pain Medicine, 2011, 11 pages.
Verrills et al., “Salvaging Failed Neuromodulation Implants with Nevro High Frequency Spinal Cord System,” Nans Poster, 2013, 1 page.
Von Korff et al., “Assessing Global Pain Severity by Self-Report in Clinical and Health Services Research,” Spine, vol. 25, No. 24, 2000, 12 pages.
Ward et al., “Electrical Stimulation Using Kilohertz-Frequency Alternating Current,” Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association, vol. 89, No. 2, Feb. 2009, 12 pages.
Ward et al., “Variation in Motor Threshold with Frequency Using kHz Frequency Alternating Current,” Muscle and Nerve, Oct. 2001, 9 pages.
Weinberg et al., “Increasing the oscillation frequency of strong magnetic fields above 101 kHz significantly raises peripheral nerve excitation thresholds,” Medical Physics Letter, May 2012, 6 pages.
Yearwood et al., “A Prospective Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Using Dorsal Column Stimulation (DCS), Intraspinal Nerve Root Stimulation (INRS), and Varying Pulse Width in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain,” Congress of Neurological Surgeons 56th Annual Meeting, Oct. 7-12, 2006, 2 pages.
Yearwood et al., Case Reports: “A Prospective Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Using Dorsal Column Stimulation (DCS), Intraspinal Nerve Root Stimulation (INRS), and Varying Pulse Width in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain,” Presented at the Congress of Neurological Surgeons 56th Annual Meeting, Oct. 7-12, 2006, 7 pages.
Zhang et al., Changes Across Time in Spike Rate and Spike Amplitude of Auditory Nerve Fibers Stimulated by Electric Pulse Trains, Journal of the Association for Research of Otolaryngology, 2007, 17 pages.
Defendant's Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, filed Mar. 17, 2017, 159 pages.
Exhibit A1: Invalidity Chart v. MacDonald (U.S. Pat. No. 5,776,170), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 294 pages.
Exhibit A2: Invalidity Chart v. Spinner (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0213771), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 235 pages.
Exhibit A3: Invalidity Chart v. Knudson (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0073354), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 301 pages.
Exhibit A4: Invalidity Chart v. Butukhanov (Soviet Union Publication No. 1512625), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 233 pages.
Exhibit A5: Invalidity Chart v. Sluijter (U.S. Pat. No. 6,246,912), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 226 pages.
Exhibit A6: Invalidity Chart v. Kilgore (U.S. Pat. No. 7,389,145), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 219 pages.
Exhibit A7: Invalidity Chart v. Royle (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0009820), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 188 pages.
Exhibit A8: Invalidity Chart v. King (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0149148), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 222 pages.
Exhibit A9: Invalidity Chart v. DeRidder (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0184488), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 266 pages.
Exhibit A10: Invalidity Chart v. Fang (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0204173), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 191 pages.
Exhibit B1: Invalidity Chart v. Boston Scientific's Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation System, Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 337 pages.
Exhibit C1: 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Invalidity Chart, Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 400 pages.
Declaration of Rafael Carbunaru in Support of Boston Scientific's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. (Plaintiff) vs. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, executed Mar. 17, 2017, 5 pages.
Exhibit a of Declaration of Rafael Carbunaru: “Physician Implant Manual—Precision,” in Support in Support of Defendants Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Advanced Bionics, 2004, 62 pages.
Exhibit B of Declaration of Rafael Carbunaru: “Physician Lead Manual—Precision,” in Support in Support of Defendants Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Advanced Bionics, 2004, 62 pages.
Exhibit C of Declaration of Rafael Carbunaru: “Patient System Handbook—Precision,” in Support in Support of Defendants Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Advanced Bionics, 2004, 93 pages.
Al-Kaisy et al., Poster: “High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Chronic Back Pain Patients without Prior Back Surgery,” 2013, 1 page.
BionicNAVIGATOR Software Guide, Part MP9055261-001, 2004, 58 pages.
Curriculum Vitae and Declaration of Dr. Simon James Thomson on behalf of European Patent No. 2630984, Oct. 24, 2016, 13 pages.
Duyvendak et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation With a Dual Quadripolar Surgical Lead Placed in General Anesthesia is Effective in Treating Intractable Low Back and Leg Pain,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, vol. 10, No. 2, 2007, 7 pages.
Notice of Opposition to a European Patent for European Patent No. 2853285, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, May 16, 2017, 18 pages.
Sharan et al., “Evolving Patterns of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients Implanted for Intractable Low Back and Leg Pain,” International Neuromodulation Society, vol. 5, No. 3, 2002, 13 pages.
Smet et al., “Successful Treatment of Low Back Pain with a Novel Neuromodulation Device,” AZ Nikolaas, 2010, 12 pages.
Van Buyten et al., “Pain Relief for Axial Back Pain Patients,” Ins Meeting; Poster, May 2011, 1 page.
Yearwood et al., “Pulse Width Programming in Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Clinical Study,” Pain Physician Journal, Jul./Aug. 2010, 16 pages.
De Ridder et al., U.S. Appl. No. 60/895,061, Applicant: Dirk De Ridder, filed Mar. 15, 2007, 47 pages.
Boston Scientific's Answer to First Amended Complaint and Defense, Nevro Corp. vs. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, Jul. 13, 2017, 22 pages.
Defendant's First Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, Jun. 17, 2017, 93 pages.
First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Declaratory Judgment, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, Jun. 29, 2017, 45 pages.
Amended Exhibit C1 (amendments redlined): 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Invalidity Chart, Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Jun. 13, 2017, 423 pages.
Plaintiff Nevro Corp's Motion to Strike Inequitable Conduct Allegations From Defendants' Twelfth Affirmative Defense; Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Nevro Corp. vs. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, Aug. 3, 2017, 10 pages.
Boston Scientific's Opposition to Nevro's Motion to Strike Inequitable Conduct Allegations from Defendants' Twelfth Affirmative Defense (ECF No. 172), Nevro Corp. vs. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, Aug. 17, 2017, 17 pages.
Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. vs. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, Aug. 10, 2017, 108 pages.
Exhibit A1 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. MacDonald (U.S. Pat. No. 5,776,170), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 168 pages.
Exhibit A2 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Spinner (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0213771), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 129 pages.
Exhibit A3 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Knudson (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0073354), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 173 pages.
Exhibit A5 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Sluijter (U.S. Pat. No. 6,246,912), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 135 pages.
Exhibit A6 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Kilgore (U.S. Pat. No. 7,389,145), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 110 pages.
Exhibit A7 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Royle (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0009820), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 111 pages.
Exhibit A9 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. DeRidder (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0184488), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 160 pages.
Exhibit A10 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Fang (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0204173), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 114 pages.
Exhibit A11 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Alataris (U.S. Pat. No. 8,712,533), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 13 pages.
Exhibit A12 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Gaunt (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2006/0184211), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 113 pages.
Exhibit B1 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Boston Scientific's Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation System, Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 180 pages.
Exhibit C1 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Invalidity Chart, Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 174 pages.
Corrected Exhibit C1 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Invalidity Chart, Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 171 pages.
Statement of Grounds of Appeal for the Opposition of European Patent No. 2421600 (Appeal No. T1450/17-3.4.01) by Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, dated Aug. 14, 2017, 17 pages.
Nevro's Notice of Appeal for Opposition by Medtronic, Inc., and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Aug. 3, 2017, 1 page.
Provision of a Copy of Minutes in accordance with Rule 124(4) EPC for Opposition by Medtronic, Inc., and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Jul. 27, 2017, 23 pages.
Decision Revoking the European Patent for Opposition by Medtronic, Inc., and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Jul. 27, 2017, 37 pages.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61833392 Jun 2013 US