The present disclosure is directed generally to methods and systems for disease treatment using electrical stimulation. Particular embodiments include changing an activity, expression, or both activity and expression of a fast sodium channel, a glial cell, or both a fast sodium channel and a glial cell of the patient by applying electrical stimulation to a target neural population of a patient.
Neurological stimulators have been developed to treat pain, movement disorders, functional disorders, spasticity, cancer, cardiac disorders, and various other medical conditions. Implantable neurological stimulation systems generally have an implantable signal generator and one or more leads that deliver electrical pulses to neurological tissue or muscle tissue. For example, several neurological stimulation systems for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have cylindrical leads that include a lead body with a circular cross-sectional shape and one or more conductive rings (i.e., contacts) spaced apart from each other at the distal end of the lead body. The conductive rings operate as individual electrodes and, in many cases, the SCS leads are implanted percutaneously through a needle inserted into the epidural space, with or without the assistance of a stylet.
Once implanted, the signal generator applies electrical pulses to the electrodes, which in turn modify the function of the patient's nervous system, such as by altering the patient's responsiveness to sensory stimuli and/or altering the patient's motor-circuit output. In SCS therapy for the treatment of pain, the signal generator applies electrical pulses to the spinal cord via the electrodes. In conventional SCS therapy, electrical pulses are used to generate sensations (known as paresthesia) that mask or otherwise alter the patient's sensation of pain. For example, in many cases, patients report paresthesia as a tingling sensation that is perceived as less uncomfortable than the underlying pain sensation.
Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to systems and methods that make use of, employ, rely on and/or otherwise use or incorporate aspects the interaction between electrical therapy and the patients to whom the therapy is applied.
Neurological stimulators have been developed to treat pain, movement disorders, functional disorders, spasticity, cancer, cardiac disorders, and various other medical conditions. Implantable neurological stimulation systems generally have an implantable pulse generator and one or more leads that deliver electrical pulses to neurological tissue or muscle tissue. For example, several neurological stimulation systems for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have cylindrical leads that include a lead body with a circular cross-sectional shape and one or more conductive rings spaced apart from each other at the distal end of the lead body. The conductive rings operate as individual electrodes and, in many cases, the SCS leads are implanted percutaneously through a large needle inserted into the epidural space, with or without the assistance of a stylet.
Once implanted, the pulse generator applies electrical pulses to the electrodes, which in turn modify the function of the patient's nervous system, such as by altering the patient's responsiveness to sensory stimuli, altering the patient's motor-circuit output, and/or otherwise modifying other neural function. Example neuromodulation systems, methods, and therapy parameters are described in co-owned published patent applications: US Patent Publication No. 2009/0204173; US Patent Publication No. 2007/0213771; US Patent Publication No. 2010/0191307; US Patent Publication No. 2010/0274312; US Patent Publication No. 2010/0274314; US Patent Publication No. 2012/0172946; and US Patent Publication No. 2013/0066411 which are all incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. To the extent the foregoing materials and/or any other materials incorporated herein by reference conflict with the present disclosure, the present disclosure controls.
Provided herein are various embodiments of neuromodulation systems, methods, and therapies for the treatment of medical conditions. The specific embodiments discussed are not to be construed as limitations on the scope of the disclosed technology. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various equivalents, changes, and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the disclosed technology, and it is understood that such equivalent embodiments are to be included herein.
The following abbreviations are used herein: AIC, anterior limb internal capsule; BST, bed nucleus of the stria terminals; CMPF, centromedian and parafascicularis; CNS, central nervous system; DREZ, dorsal root entry zone; GF, genitofemoral; GNI, glial neuronal cell interaction; GPI, globus pallidus internus; MCS, motor cortex stimulation; MD, movement disorder; MI, primary motor cortex; ONS, occipital nerve stimulation; NAcc, nucleus accumbens; NTS, nucleus tractus solitarii; PVG, periventricular grey matter; PAG, periaqueductal grey matter; PPN, pedunculopontine nucleus; SCA, superior cerebellar artery; SCS, spinal cord stimulation; SMA, supplementary motor area; SPG, sphenopalatine ganglion; STN, subthalamic nucleus; Vcpc, ventro caudalis parvocellularis; VIP, ventral intermedia nucleus; VOA, ventralis oralis anterior; VOP, ventralis oralis posterior; VPL, ventral posterolateral nucleus; VPM, ventral posteromedial nucleus; WDR, wide dynamic range; ZI, zona incerta.
Recent animal studies have shown that application of electrical stimulation to the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) at frequencies between 2 kHz and 100 kHz suppresses wide dynamic range (WDR) neuron response by 70% in response to noxious stimulation (Cuellar 2012). Inhibition of WDR firing was found to persist for seconds to minutes after stimulation ended. WDR neurons (also known as convergent neurons) are one of three types of second order projection neurons. WDR neuron firing is correlated with pain perception, with firing rate increasing steadily as stimulus intensity increases. Thus, these data suggest that electrical stimulation at the tested frequencies functions in part by direct axonal inhibition.
Glial cells were traditionally thought to play primarily a structural role in the nervous system, for example by surrounding neurons, holding neurons in place, providing electrical insulation, and destroying pathogens. However, glial cells may play a role in the transmission of chronic pain by releasing various mediators such as nitric oxide, proinflammatory cytokines, excitatory amino acids, and prostaglandins. Release of these mediators may cause the release of substance P and excitatory amino acids by peripheral nerves as well as modify local neural interactions in the CNS, which in turn results in action potential generation or neural responses to synaptic inputs. Substance P and excitatory amino acid release can also further activate glial cells, creating a positive feedback loop. Glial cells form a network with themselves and communicate via slow inward calcium currents, which are activated by a variety of factors including potassium. Electrical stimulation with appropriate signal parameters may be used to reduce extracellular potassium levels by primary afferent inhibition, thereby reducing glial cell activity.
Neurons and certain glial cells contain sodium channels that are responsible for the rising phase of action potentials. When exposed to low frequencies, all of these sodium channels exhibit changes in their conductance. At higher frequencies, however, these changes are specific to fast sodium channels such as NaV1.8 and NaV1.9, which are overly active in chronic pain. Without being bound to a particular theory, electrical stimulation with appropriate signal parameters may derive pain reduction in part from its ability to change the conductance of fast sodium channels in neurons and/or glial cells, thereby specifically downregulating those sodium channels that are most involved with chronic pain.
As disclosed herein, electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, can be used to normalize pathological neural networks associated with fast sodium channel activity and/or expression by attenuating pathology-induced sodium channel activity and modulating glial neuronal cell interaction (GNI). GNI accordingly refers generally to interactions with a glial/neuronal component, including interactions between (a) glial cells and other glial cells, (b) glial cells and neurons, (c) glial networks and neurons, and/or (d) glial networks and neural networks. Based on this, the present application provides methods and devices for attenuating pathology-induced sodium channel activity, (and/or other pathology-induced ionophores or membrane channel activity) modulating GNI, and treating various conditions associated with fast sodium channel activity and/or expression and GNI.
In certain embodiments, methods are provided for attenuating pathology-induced sodium channel activity by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. This attenuation may result in decreased activity and/or expression of one or more fast sodium channels, including for example NaV1.8 or NaV1.9. In certain embodiments, decreased activity and/or expression of one or more fast sodium channels results in decreased glial cell and/or neuronal activity. In certain embodiments, attenuation of pathology-induced sodium channel activity may also result in increased activity and/or expression of one or more slow sodium channels, including for example NaV1.3.
In certain embodiments, methods are provided for modulating GNI by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain embodiments, this modulation may result in a decrease in the release of one or more mediators by glial cells, including for example nitric oxide, proinflammatory cytokines, excitatory amino acids, and prostaglandins. In certain embodiments, this decrease may result in a decrease in action potential generation by one or more peripheral nerves or neural elements in CNS networks, and in certain of these embodiments, the decrease may result in reduction or cessation of one or more symptoms of a medical condition (e.g., chronic pain).
In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a condition associated with fast sodium channel activity and/or expression, or a condition for which attenuated fast sodium channel activity and/or expression is expected to be beneficial, by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain embodiments, the condition being treated is selected from the group consisting of a chronic pain condition, a movement disorder, dysautonomia, an anxiety disorder, a cognitive disorder, a development disorder, a metabolic disease, or a mood disorder.
In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a chronic pain condition by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments the chronic pain condition is a headache pain syndrome, fascial pain syndrome, neck and brachial plexus pain syndrome, shoulder pain syndrome, elbow pain syndrome, other upper extremity pain syndrome, wrist pain syndrome, hand pain syndrome, chest wall pain syndrome, thoracic spine pain syndrome, abdominal & groin pain syndrome, lumbar spine & sacroiliac joint pain syndrome, pelvic pain syndrome, hip & lower extremity pain syndrome, knee pain syndrome, ankle pain syndrome, foot pain syndrome, visceral pain or whole body pain syndromes. In certain of these embodiments, the chronic pain disorder may be a condition listed in Table 1. Table 1 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.
In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a movement disorder by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the movement disorder may be a condition listed in Table 2. Table 2 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.
In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a dysautonomic condition by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the dysautonomic condition may be a condition listed in Table 3. Table 3 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.
In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating an anxiety disorder by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the anxiety disorder may be a condition listed in Table 4. Table 4 provides various spinal cord, cortical, intra-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.
In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a cognitive disorder by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the cognitive disorder may be a condition listed in Table 5. Table 5 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.
In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a development disorder by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the development disorder may be a condition listed in Table 6. Table 6 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.
In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a metabolic disease by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the metabolic disease may be selected from the group consisting of diabetes mellitus, an acid-base imbalance, a metabolic brain disease, a calcium metabolism disorder, a DNA repair deficiency disorder, an inborn metabolic error disorder, a mitochondrial disease, or a porphyria, and in certain of these embodiments the metabolic disease may be a condition listed in Table 7. Table 7 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.
In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a mood disorder by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the mood disorder may be a condition listed in Table 8. Table 8 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.
In certain embodiments, methods are provided for treating a visceral pain syndromes by applying electrical stimulation, with the therapy signal parameters disclosed herein, to a target tissue or organ. In certain of these embodiments, the visceral pain syndrome may be a condition listed in Table 9. Table 9 provides various spinal cord, cortical, sub-cortical, and/or peripheral targets for applying electrical stimulation in the treatment of each condition. Treatment may be carried out by applying electrical stimulation to any of the targets listed, or to a combination thereof. The list of targets is not exhaustive, meaning that there may be one or more additional targets for each condition.
“Treating” or “treatment” as used herein with regard to a condition may refer to preventing the condition, reducing, or ending symptoms associated with the condition; generating a complete or partial regression of the condition; or some combination thereof. “Preventing” or “prevention” as used herein with regard to a condition may refer to total or partial prevention of the condition or symptoms associated with the condition.
In certain embodiments, electrical stimulation is performed with at least a portion of the therapy signal at a frequency in a frequency range between about 2 Hz and about 100 kHz; between about 1.5 kHz and about 50 kHz; between about 3 kHz and about 20 kHz; between about 3 kHz and about 15 kHz; or between about 5 kHz and about 15 kHz; or at frequencies of about 5 kHz, about 6 kHz, about 7 kHz, about 8 kHz, about 9 kHz, about 10 kHz, about 11 kHz, or about 12 kHz; and in one embodiment, surprisingly effective results have been found when treating certain medical conditions with frequencies between 5 kHz and 15 kHz, and in one embodiment 10 kHz. (The term “about” is intended to represent +/−10%, or a range as would be understood as reasonably equivalent by one of ordinary skill in the art.)
In various embodiments, the electrical stimulation may be applied with at least a portion of the therapy signal at amplitudes within amplitude ranges of: about 0.1 mA to about 20 mA; about 0.5 mA to about 10 mA; about 0.5 mA to about 7 mA; about 0.5 mA to about 5 mA; about 0.5 mA to about 4 mA; about 0.5 mA to about 2.5 mA; and in one embodiment, surprisingly effective results have been found when treating certain medical conditions with amplitudes below 7 mA.
In various embodiments, the electrical stimulation may be applied with at least a portion of the therapy signal having a pulse width within a pulse width range of from about 10 microseconds to about 333 microseconds; from about 10 microseconds to about 166 microseconds; from about 25 microseconds to about 166 microseconds; from about 25 microseconds to about 100 microseconds; from about 30 microseconds to about 100 microseconds; from about 33 microseconds to about 100 microseconds; from about 50 microseconds to about 166 microseconds; and in one embodiment, surprisingly effective results have been found when treating certain medical conditions with pulse widths from about 25 microseconds to about 100 microseconds; and from about 30 microseconds to about 40 microseconds. In a particular embodiment, the therapy signal at a frequency in a frequency range of 1.5 kHz to 100 kHz, a pulse width in a pulse width range of 10 microseconds to 333 microseconds and an amplitude in an amplitude range of 0.1 mA to 20 mA. The therapy signal can be applied at a duty cycle of 5% to 75%, and can be applied to thoracic spinal cord locations to treat back and/or leg pain, e.g., chronic back and/or leg pain. In another particular embodiment, a therapy signal having a pulse width is applied to the spinal cord at a pulse width in a pulse width range of 10 microseconds to 333 microseconds at any of a variety of suitable frequencies (within or outside the range of 1.5 kHz to 100 kHz) to treat a variety of pain indications, including but not limited to chronic low back pain and/or leg pain.
Application of electrical stimulation in conjunction with the methods disclosed herein can be carried out using suitable devices and programming modules specifically programmed to carry out any of the methods described herein. A variety of devices for administering an electrical signal to a target tissue or organ are taught in the references incorporated by reference above. Other examples of devices for administering an electrical signal in conjunction with SCS are disclosed in US Patent Publications Nos. 2010/0274316 and 2010/0211135, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. In certain embodiments, a device that is used for applying an electrical signal to the spinal cord may be repurposed with or without modifications to administer an electrical signal to another target tissue or organ, e.g., a cortical, sub-cortical, intra-cortical, or peripheral target. Electrical stimulation may be applied directly to a target tissue or organ, or it may be applied in close proximity to the target tissue or organ (i.e., close enough for the target tissue or organ to receive the electrical signal). As such, any of the herein described systems, sub-systems, and/or sub-components serve as means for performing any of the herein described methods.
In certain embodiments, electrical stimulation is applied to a tissue or organ using a device that comprises a lead, wherein the lead in turn comprises an electrode. In these embodiments, administration of electrical stimulation comprises a positioning step (e.g., placing the lead such that an electrode is in proximity to the target tissue or organ) and a stimulation step (e.g., transmitting an electrical signal (i.e., therapy signal) through the electrode).
The pulse generator 101 can transmit electrical signals to the signal delivery element 110 that attenuate pathology-induced sodium channel activity and/or modulate GNI. The pulse generator 101 can include a machine-readable (e.g., computer-readable) medium containing instructions for generating and transmitting suitable therapy signals. The pulse generator 101 and/or other elements of the system 100 can include one or more processors 107, memories 108 and/or input/output devices. Accordingly, the process of providing modulation signals and executing other associated functions can be performed by computer-executable instructions contained on computer-readable media, e.g., at the processor(s) 107 and/or memory(s) 108. The pulse generator 101 can include multiple portions, elements, and/or subsystems (e.g., for directing signals in accordance with multiple signal delivery parameters), housed in a single housing, as shown in
The pulse generator 101 can also receive and respond to an input signal received from one or more sources. The input signals can direct or influence the manner in which the therapy instructions are selected, executed, updated and/or otherwise performed. The input signal can be received from one or more sensors 112 (one is shown schematically in
In some embodiments, the pulse generator 101 can obtain power to generate the electrical signals from an external power source 103. The external power source 103 can transmit power to the implanted pulse generator 101 using electromagnetic induction (e.g., radiofrequency (RF) signals). For example, the external power source 103 can include an external coil 104 that communicates with a corresponding internal coil (not shown) within the implantable pulse generator 101. The external power source 103 can be portable for ease of use. In another embodiment, the pulse generator 101 can obtain the power to generate electrical signals from an internal power source, in addition to or in lieu of the external power source 103. For example, the implanted pulse generator 101 can include a non-rechargeable battery or a rechargeable battery to provide such power. When the internal power source includes a rechargeable battery, the external power source 103 can be used to recharge the battery. The external power source 103 can in turn be recharged from a suitable power source (e.g., conventional wall power).
In some cases, an external programmer 105 (e.g., a trial modulator) can be coupled to the signal delivery element 110 during an initial implant procedure, prior to implanting the pulse generator 101. For example, a practitioner (e.g., a physician and/or a company representative) can use the external programmer 105 to vary the modulation parameters provided to the signal delivery element 110 in real time, and select optimal or particularly efficacious parameters. These parameters can include the position of the signal delivery element 110, as well as the characteristics of the electrical signals provided to the signal delivery element 110. In a typical process, the practitioner uses a cable assembly 120 to temporarily connect the external programmer 105 to the signal delivery device 110. The cable assembly 120 can accordingly include a first connector 121 that is releasably connected to the external programmer 105, and a second connector 122 that is releasably connected to the signal delivery element 110. Accordingly, the signal delivery element 110 can include a connection element that allows it to be connected to a signal generator either directly (if it is long enough) or indirectly (if it is not). The practitioner can test the efficacy of the signal delivery element 110 in an initial position. The practitioner can then disconnect the cable assembly 120, reposition the signal delivery element 110, and reapply the electrical modulation. This process can be performed iteratively until the practitioner obtains the desired position for the signal delivery device 110. Optionally, the practitioner may move the partially implanted signal delivery element 110 without disconnecting the cable assembly 120. Further details of suitable cable assembly methods and associated techniques are described in US Patent Publication No. 2011/0071593, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
After the position of the signal delivery element 110 and appropriate signal delivery parameters are established using the external programmer 105, the patient 190 can receive therapy via signals generated by the external programmer 105, generally for a limited period of time. In a representative application, the patient 190 receives such therapy for one week. During this time, the patient wears the cable assembly 120 and the external programmer 105 outside the body. Assuming the trial therapy is effective or, shows the promise of being effective, the practitioner then replaces the external programmer 105 with the implanted pulse generator 101, and programs the pulse generator 101 with parameters selected based on the experience gained during the trial period. Optionally, the practitioner can also replace the signal delivery element 110. Once the implantable pulse generator 101 has been positioned within the patient 190, the signal delivery parameters provided by the pulse generator 101 can still be updated remotely via a wireless physician's programmer (e.g., a physician's remote) 117 and/or a wireless patient programmer 106 (e.g., a patient remote). Generally, the patient 190 has control over fewer parameters than does the practitioner. For example, the capability of the patient programmer 106 may be limited to starting and/or stopping the pulse generator 101, and/or adjusting the signal amplitude.
In any of the foregoing embodiments, the parameters in accordance with which the pulse generator 101 provides signals can be modulated during portions of the therapy regimen. For example, the frequency, amplitude, pulse width and/or signal delivery location can be modulated in accordance with a preset program, patient and/or physician inputs, and/or in a random or pseudorandom manner. Such parameter variations can be used to address a number of potential clinical situations, including changes in the patient's perception of one or more symptoms associated with the condition being treated, changes in the preferred target neural population, and/or patient accommodation or habituation.
In certain embodiments, electrical stimulation is applied to the dorsal column. In other embodiments, the electrical stimulation is applied to other neural tissue such as nerve roots and peripherals nerves on the spinal level, including for example the dorsal root (DN) and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and the ventral root (VN). In other embodiments, electrical stimulation may be applied to one or more non-spinal cord tissues or organs. For example, electrical stimulation may be applied to various cortical, sub-cortical, intra-cortical, or peripheral targets. For certain conditions, electrical stimulation may be applied to a single target tissue or organ. For other conditions, electrical stimulation may be applied to multiple target tissues or organs sequentially or simultaneously. For example, where the condition is a chronic pain disorder, stimulation may be applied to the spinal cord, a cortical target, a sub-cortical target, or a combination thereof. In certain embodiments, electrical stimulation parameters are configured so as to not result in the patient experiencing paresthesia.
In certain embodiments, electrical stimulation is applied at an amplitude that is sub-threshold with regard to paresthesia and supra-threshold with regard to symptom reduction (e.g., therapy, such as pain relief). In certain of these embodiments, electrical stimulation is applied at an amplitude between about 0.5 mA to about 20 mA. In certain embodiments, electrical stimulation is applied at a duty cycle. Duty cycles can range from 1% to about 99%, or between about 5% and about 75%, or between about 10% and about 50%.
In certain embodiments of the methods provided herein, electrical stimulation may be administered on a pre-determined schedule. In other embodiments, electrical stimulation may be administered on an as-needed basis. Administration may continue for a pre-determined amount of time, or it may continue indefinitely until a specific therapeutic benchmark is reached, for example until an acceptable reduction in one or more symptoms. In certain embodiments, electrical stimulation may be administered one or more times per day, one or more times per week, once a week, once a month, or once every several months. In certain embodiments, administration frequency may change over the course of treatment. For example, a subject may receive less frequent administrations over the course of treatment as certain therapeutic benchmarks are met. The duration of each administration (e.g., the actual time during which a subject is receiving electrical stimulation) may remain constant throughout the course of treatment, or it may vary depending on factors such as patient health, internal pathophysiological measures, or symptom severity. In certain embodiments, the duration of each administration may range from 1 to 4 hours, 4 to 12 hours, 12 to 24 hours, 1 day to 4 days, or 4 days or greater.
In certain embodiments of the methods provided herein, administration of electrical stimulation may be combined with one or more additional treatment modalities. For example, electrical stimulation may be applied in combination with the administration of one or more pharmaceutical agents that block fast sodium channels. In other embodiments, electrical stimulation may be used as a replacement for other treatment modalities. For example, electrical stimulation may be administered to a subject who has previously received neuroleptics or other sodium channel blockers but who has experienced unsatisfactory results and/or negative side effects. In certain embodiments, application of electrical stimulation may result in a greater treatment effect than administration of other treatment modalities, including for example a larger reduction in symptoms or an increased duration of symptom reduction.
The following examples are provided to better illustrate the claimed invention and are not to be interpreted as limiting the scope of the invention. To the extent that specific materials are mentioned, it is merely for purposes of illustration and is not intended to limit the invention. One skilled in the art may develop equivalent means or reactants without the exercise of inventive capacity and without departing from the scope of the invention. It will be understood that many variations can be made in the procedures herein described while still remaining within the bounds of the present invention. It is the intention of the inventors that such variations are included within the scope of the invention.
A method of attenuating pathology-induced sodium channel activity comprising applying electrical stimulation to a target neural location, wherein the electrical stimulation includes one or more system parameters as described in the embodiments above, and wherein the target neural location is chosen so as to treat the medical condition listed in Tables 1-9 above.
A method of treating a condition associated with increased fast sodium channel comprising applying electrical stimulation to a target neural location, wherein the electrical stimulation includes one or more system parameters as described in the embodiments above, and wherein the target neural location is chosen so as to treat the medical condition listed in Tables 1-9 above.
A method of modulating GNI comprising applying electrical stimulation to a target neural location, wherein the electrical stimulation includes one or more system parameters as described in the embodiments above, and wherein the target neural location is chosen so as to treat the medical condition listed in Tables 1-9 above.
A neuromodulation system for treating a medical condition comprising: an implantable (or external) pulse generator configured to attenuate pathology-induced sodium channel activity by generating and applying a electrical stimulation to a target neural location, wherein the electrical stimulation includes one or more system parameters as described in the embodiments above, and wherein the target neural location is chosen so as to treat the medical condition listed in Tables 1-9 above.
A neuromodulation system for treating a medical condition comprising: an implantable (or external) pulse generator configured to treat a condition associated with increased fast sodium channel by generating and applying a electrical stimulation to a target neural location, wherein the electrical stimulation includes one or more system parameters as described in the embodiments above, and wherein the target neural location is chosen so as to treat the medical condition listed in Tables 1-9 above.
A neuromodulation system for treating a medical condition comprising: an implantable (or external) pulse generator configured to modulate GNI by generating and applying a electrical stimulation to a target neural location, wherein the electrical stimulation includes one or more system parameters as described in the embodiments above, and wherein the target neural location is chosen so as to treat the medical condition listed in Tables 1-9 above.
As stated above, the foregoing is merely intended to illustrate various embodiments of the present invention. The specific modifications discussed above are not to be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various equivalents, changes, and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention, and it is understood that such equivalent embodiments are to be included herein. All references cited herein are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 61/833,392, filed on Jun. 10, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1597061 | Cultra | Aug 1926 | A |
| 3195540 | Waller | Jul 1965 | A |
| 3727616 | Lenzkes | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3817254 | Maurer | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3822708 | Zilber | Jul 1974 | A |
| 3893463 | Williams | Jul 1975 | A |
| 4014347 | Halleck et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4023574 | Nemec | May 1977 | A |
| 4055190 | Tany et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4414986 | Dickhudt et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4535777 | Castel | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4541432 | Molina-Negro et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4608985 | Crish et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4649935 | Charmillot et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4764132 | Stutz, Jr. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4841973 | Stecker | Jun 1989 | A |
| RE33420 | Sussman et al. | Nov 1990 | E |
| 5002053 | Garcia-Rill | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5335657 | Terry, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5354320 | Schaldach et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5514175 | Kim et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5540734 | Zabara | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5562717 | Tippey et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5643330 | Holsheimer et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5716377 | Rise et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5776170 | MacDonald et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5830151 | Hadzic et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5833709 | Rise | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5853373 | Griffith et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5893883 | Torgerson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5938690 | Law | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5983141 | Sluijter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995872 | Bourgeois | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6002964 | Feler et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6014588 | Fitz | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6027456 | Feler et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6161044 | Silverstone | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6161048 | Sluijter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167311 | Rezai | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6176242 | Rise | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6233488 | Hess | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6238423 | Bardy | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6246912 | Sluijter et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6319241 | King et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6341236 | Osorio et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6356786 | Rezai et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6393325 | Mann et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6397108 | Camps et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6405079 | Ansarinia | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6421566 | Holsheimer | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6440090 | Schallhorn | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6473644 | Terry, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6505078 | King et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6510347 | Borkan | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6516227 | Meadows et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6526318 | Ansarinia | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6571127 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6584358 | Carter et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6609030 | Rezai et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6622048 | Mann et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6659968 | McClure | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6662051 | Eraker et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6714822 | King et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6721603 | Zabara et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6795737 | Gielen et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6856315 | Eberlein | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6871090 | He et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6871099 | Whitehurst et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6885888 | Rezai | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6907295 | Gross et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6923784 | Stein | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6928320 | King | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6950707 | Whitehurst | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6968237 | Doan et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6990376 | Tanagho et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7024246 | Acosta et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7047079 | Erickson | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7054686 | MacDonald | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7082333 | Bauhahn et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7117034 | Kronberg | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7146224 | King | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7149574 | Yun et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7162304 | Bradley | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7167750 | Knudson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7174215 | Bradley | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7177702 | Wallace et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7180760 | Varrichio et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7212865 | Cory | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7225035 | Brabec et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7236822 | Dobak, III | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7239912 | Dobak, III | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7252090 | Goetz | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7260436 | Kilgore et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7266412 | Stypulkowski | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7288062 | Spiegel | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7313440 | Miesel | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7324852 | Barolat et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7326181 | Katims | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7333857 | Campbell | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7337005 | Kim et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7346398 | Gross et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7349743 | Tadlock | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| RE40279 | Sluijter et al. | Apr 2008 | E |
| 7359751 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7363076 | Yun et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7389145 | Kilgore et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7393351 | Woloszko et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7463927 | Chaouat | Dec 2008 | B1 |
| 7483747 | Gliner et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7493172 | Whitehurst et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7502652 | Gaunt et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7571007 | Erickson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7580753 | Kim et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7599737 | Yomtov et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7634317 | Ben-David et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7676269 | Yun et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7689276 | Dobak | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7689289 | King | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7734340 | De Ridder | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7742810 | Moffitt et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7761170 | Kaplan et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7778704 | Rezai | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7813803 | Heruth et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7826901 | Lee et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7853322 | Bourget et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7860570 | Whitehurst et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7877136 | Moffitt | Jan 2011 | B1 |
| 7890176 | Jaax et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7890182 | Parramon et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7914452 | Hartley et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7933654 | Merfeld et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7937145 | Dobak | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8000794 | Lozano | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8010198 | Libbus et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8027718 | Spinner et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8046075 | Rezai | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8060208 | Kilgore et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8082039 | Kim et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8209021 | Alataris et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8209028 | Skelton et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8224453 | De Ridder | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8224459 | Pianca et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8255057 | Fang et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8280515 | Greenspan | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8340775 | Cullen et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
| 8355792 | Alataris et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8359102 | Alataris et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8359103 | Alataris et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8364271 | De Ridder | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8364273 | De Ridder | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 2622601 | Alataris et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 8396559 | Alataris et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8423147 | Alataris et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8428735 | Littlewood et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8428748 | Alataris et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8509906 | Walker et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8612018 | Gillbe | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8649874 | Alataris et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8825166 | John | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8849410 | Walker et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8886326 | Alataris et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8886328 | Alataris et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8892209 | Alataris et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8918172 | Moffitt et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8918190 | Libbus et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 9002459 | Lee et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9067076 | Nolan et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9180298 | Alataris et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9327127 | Alataris et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 20020055779 | Andrews | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020128700 | Cross | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030100931 | Mullett | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120323 | Meadows et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20040015202 | Chandler et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040034394 | Woods et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039425 | Greenwood-Van Meerveld | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040059395 | North et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073273 | Gluckman et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093093 | Andrews | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040116977 | Finch et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162590 | Whitehurst et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167584 | Carroll et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186532 | Tadlock | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193228 | Gerber | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210270 | Erickson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210271 | Campen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267330 | Lee et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050033381 | Carter et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038489 | Grill | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060001 | Singhal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070982 | Heruth et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113877 | Spinelli et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113878 | Gerber | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113882 | Cameron et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050119713 | Whitehurst et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050143789 | Whitehurst et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149148 | King | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050153885 | Yun et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154435 | Stern et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240241 | Yun et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245978 | Varrichio et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246006 | Daniels | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267545 | Cory | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278000 | Strother et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060004422 | De Ridder | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060009820 | Royle | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015153 | Gliner et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060030895 | Simon et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041285 | Johnson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060074456 | Pyles et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060079937 | King et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095088 | De Ridder | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060100671 | Ridder | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149337 | John | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161219 | Mock et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161235 | King | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167525 | King | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060168805 | Hegland et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190048 | Gerber | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224187 | Bradley et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229687 | Goetz et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060253182 | King | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070021803 | Deem et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070032827 | Katims | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070039625 | Heruth et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043400 | Donders et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070049991 | Klostermann et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060954 | Cameron et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070066997 | He et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073353 | Rooney et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073354 | Knudson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083240 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070106337 | Errico et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070106342 | Schumann | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150029 | Bourget et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150034 | Rooney et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156183 | Rhodes | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167992 | Carley | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179559 | Giftakis et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179579 | Feler et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203537 | Goetz et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070213771 | Spinner et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070213789 | Nolan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070239226 | Overstreet | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070244522 | Overstreet | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255118 | Miesel et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265681 | Gerber | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299482 | Littlewood et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080033511 | Dobak | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080097539 | Belalcazar | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103570 | Gerber | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080167697 | Johnson | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183259 | Bly et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080234791 | Arle et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080269854 | Hegland et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080281381 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090018617 | Skelton | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090024187 | Erickson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090036945 | Chancellor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090054962 | Lefler et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090069803 | Starkebaum | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090076565 | Surwit | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090112282 | Kast et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125079 | Armstrong et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132010 | Kronberg | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132016 | Putz | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090157141 | Chiao et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090157149 | Wahlgren et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090198306 | Goetz et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204173 | Fang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204192 | Carlton et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090281595 | King et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287274 | De Ridder | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287279 | Parramon et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090326611 | Gillbe | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100010567 | Deem et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100016929 | Prochazka | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100036454 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100042193 | Slavin | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057178 | Simon | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100094375 | Donders et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125313 | Lee et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100137938 | Kishawi et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100152817 | Gillbe | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100191307 | Fang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100211135 | Caparso et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100241190 | Kilgore et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249875 | Kishawi et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100256696 | Schleicher et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274312 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274314 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274315 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274316 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274317 | Parker et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274318 | Walker et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274320 | Torgerson | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274326 | Chitre et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100324630 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100331916 | Parramon et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110009919 | Carbunaru et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110009923 | Lee | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110009927 | Parker et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110022114 | Navarro | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110071593 | Parker et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184301 | Holmstrom et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184486 | De Ridder | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184488 | De Ridder | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110201977 | Tass | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110276107 | Simon et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282412 | Glukhovsky et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120016437 | Alataris et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120016438 | Alataris et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120016439 | Alataris et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120089200 | Ranu et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120150252 | Feldman et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120172946 | Alataris et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203304 | Alataris et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209349 | Alataris et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277833 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120283797 | De Ridder | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130006325 | Woods et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130023951 | Greenspan | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130041425 | Fang et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130066411 | Thacker et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130096643 | Fang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130096644 | Fang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130110196 | Alataris et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130123879 | Alataris et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130172955 | Alataris | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130204173 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130204320 | Alataris et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130204321 | Alataris et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130204322 | Alataris et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130204323 | Thacker et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130204324 | Alataris et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130204338 | Alataris et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130211487 | Fang et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130261695 | Thacker et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130261696 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140031896 | Alataris et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140142656 | Alataris et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140142657 | Alataris et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140142658 | Alataris et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140142659 | Alataris et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140142673 | Alataris et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140343622 | Alataris et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140379044 | Walker et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150012079 | Goroszeniuk et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150018896 | Alataris et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150032182 | Alataris et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150032183 | Alataris et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150039040 | Cowan et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150039049 | Alataris et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150039050 | Alataris et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150045853 | Alataris et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150045854 | Alataris et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150051664 | Alataris et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150343220 | Alataris et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160287872 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160287873 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160287874 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160287875 | Thacker et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160287888 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160303374 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20170050021 | Cosman, Sr. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 10318071 | Nov 2004 | DE |
| 1181947 | Feb 2002 | EP |
| 2243511 | Oct 2010 | EP |
| 2448633 | May 2012 | EP |
| 2630984 | Aug 2013 | EP |
| 2449546 | Nov 2008 | GB |
| 2002200179 | Jul 2002 | JP |
| 2007528774 | Oct 2007 | JP |
| 2008500086 | Jan 2008 | JP |
| 1512625 | Oct 1989 | SU |
| 1690727 | Nov 1991 | SU |
| WO-02065896 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO-02085448 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO-02092165 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| WO-03015863 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO-03066154 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004007018 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO-2005115532 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO-2006057734 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006063458 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006084635 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006119046 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007035925 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007082382 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007103324 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007117232 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO-2008039982 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008045434 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008106174 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008121891 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008140940 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008142402 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008153726 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO-2009018518 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009061813 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009129329 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO-2010111358 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO-2011014570 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| WO-2016154091 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Austin, Paul J., et al. “The neuro-immune balance in neuropathic pain: Involvement of inflammatory immune cells, immunce-like glial cells and cytokines.” Aug. 13, 2010. Journal of Neuroimmunology. vol. 229. pp. 26-50. |
| Takeda, Mamoru, et al. “Potassium Channels as a potential therapeutic target for trigeminal neuropathic and inflammatory pain.” 2011. Molecular Pain. Edition 7, vol. 5. pp. 1-8. |
| Hains, Bryan C., et al “Upregulation of Sodium Channel NaV1.3 and Functional Involvement in Neuronal Hyperexcitability Associated with Central Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Cord Injury”. Oct. 1, 2003. The Journal of Neuroscience. Edition 23, vol. 26. pp. 8881-8892. |
| Amaya, Fumimasa, et al. “The Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel NaV1.9 is an Effector of Peripheral Inflammatory Pain Hypersensitivity.” Dec. 13, 2006. The Journal of Neuroscience. Edition 26, vol. 50. pp. 12852-12860. |
| Acticare.com website, http://web.archive.org/web/*/acticare.com, Internet Archive Way Back Machine, 2012, 22 pages. |
| Alo et al., “New Trends in Neuromodulation for the Management of Neuropathic Pain,” Neurosurgery, vol. 50, No. 4, Apr. 2002, 15 pages. |
| Amendment in Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,747, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Jan. 24, 2014, 21 pages. |
| Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,450, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Feb. 1, 2012, 2 pages. |
| Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,770, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Apr. 5, 2013, 3 pages. |
| Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,747, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Sep. 11, 2013, 3 pages. |
| Application Data Sheet for U.S. Appl. No. 13/446,970 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,359,102), First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, filed Apr. 13, 2012, 6 pages. |
| Bahdra et al., Stimulation of High-Frequency Sinusoidal Electrical Block of Mammalian Myelinated Axons, J Comput Neurosco, 22:313-326, 2007. |
| Barolat et al., “Multifactorial Analysis of Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation,” Sterotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 1991; 56: 77-103. |
| Barolat et al., “Surgical Management of Pain—Spinal Cord Stimulation: Equipment and Implantation Techniques,” Chapter 41, Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, 2002, 11 pages. |
| Bhadra et al., “High Frequency electrical conduction block of the pudendal nerve,” Journal of Neural Engineering—Institute of Physics Publishing, ; 2006, 8 pages. |
| Bhadra MD, Niloy et al., “High-Frequency Electrical Conduction Block of Mammalian Peripheral Motor Nerve,” Muscle and Nerve, Dec. 2005, 9 pages. |
| Boger et al., “Bladder Voiding by Combined High Frequency Electrical Pudendal Nerve Block and Sacral Root Stimulation,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, 27, 2008, 5 pages. |
| Boston Scientific “Precision™ Spinal Cord Stimulator System Clinician Manual—Directions for Use,” 2015, 74 pages. |
| Boston Scientific, News Release: “New Data Presented at NANS 2014 Demonstrate Long-Term, Low Back Pain Relief with Boston Scientific Precision Spectra™ Spinal Cord Stimulator System,” Dec. 12, 2014, 8 pages. |
| Bowman and McNeal, Response of Single Alpha Motoneurons to High-Frequency Pulse Trains, Appl. Neurophysiol. 49, p. 121-138, 1986, 10 pages. |
| Burton, Charles, “Dorsal Column Stimulation: Optimization of Application,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 4, No. 1, Jul. 1975, 10 pages. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov, “Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Precision SCS System Adapted for High-Rate Spinal Cord Stimulation (Accelerate),” https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02093793?term=boston+scientific&recr=Open&cond=%22Pain%22&rank=3, Feb. 2015, 3 pages. |
| Crosby et al., “Stimulation Parameters Define the Effectiveness of Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Rat Model of Neuropathic Pain,” Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface, International Neurmodulation Society, 2014, 8 pages. |
| Cuellar et al., “Effect of High Frequency Alternating Current ; on Spinal Afferent Nociceptive Transmission,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2012, 10 pages. |
| Declaration of Cameron C. McIntyre, Ph.D., May 6, 2015, 88 pages. |
| Declaration of Cameron C. McIntyre, Ph.D., May 6, 2015, 57 pages. |
| Declaration of M. Jason D. Rahn, Jan. 7, 2015, 7 pages. |
| DeRidder et al., “Are Paresthesias necessary for pain suppression in SCS—Burst Stimulation,” BRAIN, Brain Research Center Antwerp of Innovative and Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, 2010, 27 pages. |
| DeRidder et al., “Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation: Toward Paresthesia-Free Pain Suppression,” www.neurosurgery-online.com, vol. 66, Nos. 5, May 2010, 5 pages. |
| Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, Twenty-sixth Edition, “Paresthesia,” 1981, 4 pages. |
| Doug Atkins of Medtronic Neurological, “Medtronic Neurostimulation Leads, 510(k) Summary,” Submission Prepared: Feb. 27, 2004, 6 pages. |
| European Search Report for European Application No. 14178370.4, Applicant: Nevro Corporation, Mar. 2, 2015, 6 pages. |
| Ex Parte Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/446,970, First Inventor Named: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Oct. 15, 2012, 9 pages. |
| First Preliminary Amendment for U.S. Appl. No. 13/446,970, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: May 18, 2012, 7 pages. |
| Grill, Warren et al., “Stimulus Waveforms for Selective Neural Stimulation,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Jul./Aug. 1995, pp. 375-385. |
| Guo et al., “Design and Implement of a Mini-Instrument for Rehabilitation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation,” School of Medical Instrument and Food Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai China, Mar. 31, 2007, 5 pages. |
| Hefferman et al., “Efficacy of Transcutaneous Spinal Electroanalgesia in Acute Postoperative Pain Management,” Anesthesiology, 2001, 2 pages. |
| Hilberstadt et al., “The Effect of Transcutaneous Spinal Electroanalgesia upon Chronic Pain: A single case study,” Physiotherapy, vol. 86 No. 3, Mar. 2000, 2 pages. |
| Holsheimer—Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Pain: Analysis of Technical Drawbacks and Solutions, Neurosurgery, vol. 40, No. 5, May 1997, pp. 990-999. |
| Hopp et al., “Effect of anodal blockade of myelinated fibers on vagal c-fiber afferents,” American Journal Physiological Society, Nov. 1980; 239(5), 9 pages. |
| Hoppenstein, Reuben, “Electrical Stimulation of the Ventral and Dorsal Columns of the Spinal Cord for Relief of Chronic Intractable Pain: Preliminary Report,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 4, No. 1, Jul. 1975, 9 pages. |
| Huxely et al., “Excitation and Conduction in Nerve: Quantitative Analysis,” Science, Sep. 11, 1964; 145: 1154-9. |
| J.P. Morgan North America Equity Research, “Nevro—Welcome to the Future of Spinal Cord Stimulation Initiating at OW with $34 Price Target,” www.jpmorganmarkets.com, Dec. 1, 2014, 39 pages. |
| Jain et al., Abstract—“Accelerate: A Prospective Multicenter Trial Evaluating the Use of High-Rate Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Intractable Pain,” The American Academy of Pain Medicine, 2015, 1 page. |
| Jang et al., “Analysis of Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation Trails in the Treatment of Intractable Chronic Pain,” J. Korean Neurosurg Soc 43, 2008, 5 pages. |
| JMP Securities, “Nevro Corp. (NVRO) Initiating Coverage on Nevro Corp. with a Market Outperform Rating—Investment Highlights,” Dec. 1, 2014, 42 pages. |
| Kapural et al., “Novel 10-Khz High Frequency Therapy (HF10 Therapy) is Superior to Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain,” Anesthesiology The Journal of American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc., 2015, 11 pages. |
| Kilgore et al. “Nerve Conduction Block Utilizing High-Frequency Alternating Current” Medical & Biology Engineering and Computing, 2004, vol. 24, pp. 394-406. |
| Kilgore et al. “Reversible Nerve Conduction Block Using Kilohertz Frequency Alternating Current,” Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface, International Neuromodulation Society, 2013, 13 pages. |
| Kuechmann et al., Abstract #853: “Could Automatic Position Adaptive Stimulation Be Useful in Spinal Cord Stimulation?” Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, European Journal of Pain 13, 2009, 1 page. |
| Kumar et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation in Treatment of Chronic Benign Pain: Challenges in Treatment Planning and Present Status, a 22-Year Experience,” Neurosurgery, vol. 58, No. 3, Mar. 2006, 16 pages. |
| Kumar et al., “The Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain are Sustained: A 24-month Follow-Up of the Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial of the Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation,” www.neurosurgery-online.com, vol. 63, No. 4, Oct. 2008, 9 pages. |
| Lempka et al., “Computational Analysis of Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain Management,” Anesthesiology, vol. 122, No. 6, Jun. 2015, 15 pages. |
| Linderoth et al., “Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Neuropathic and Ischemic Pain Syndromes,” Neuromodulation, Chapter 25, 2009, 19 pages. |
| Linderoth et al., “Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Painful Syndromes: Role of Animal Models,” Pain Medicine, vol. 7, No. S1, 2006, 13 pages. |
| Linderoth et al., “Physiology of Spinal Cord Stimulation: Review and Update,” Neuromodulation, vol. 2, No. 3, 1999, 15 pages. |
| MacDonald, Alexander J. R, and Coates, Tim W., “The Discovery of Transcutaneous Spinal Electroanalgesia and Its Relief of Chronic Pain,” Physiotherapy, vol. 81. No. 11, Nov. 1995, 9 pages. |
| Mediati, R.D., “Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation,” Florence, Oct. 2, 2002, 31 pages. |
| Medtronic—Neurological Division, QuadPlus, Model 3888, Lead Kit for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Implant Manual, 1996, 33 pages. |
| Medtronic—Neurological Division, Resume II, Model 3587A, Lead Kit for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS), Implant Manual, 1996, 32 pages. |
| Medtronic—Neurological Division, Resume TL, Model 3986, Lead Kit for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS), Implant Manual, 1996, 27 pages. |
| Medtronic—Neurostimulation Systems: Expanding the Array of Pain Control Solutions, 1999, 6 pages. |
| Medtronic commercial leaflet entitled: Surgical Lead Comparison, 1999, 4 pages. |
| Medtronic, “Medtronic Pain Therapy—Using Neurostimulation for Chronic Pain, Information for Prescribers” 2007, 29 pages. |
| Medtronic, Pain Therapy Product Guide, Dec. 2008, 31 pages. |
| Medtronic, Pisces Quad 3487A, Pisces Quad Compact model 3887, Pisces Quad Plus 3888 Lead Kit, Implant Manual, 2008, 16 pages. |
| Medtronic: Spinal Cord Stimulation Systems, 2013, 4 pages. |
| Melzack, Ronald et al., “Pain Mechanisms: A New Theory,” Science, vol. 150, No. 3699, Nov. 19, 1965, 9 pages. |
| Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition, definition of “Implantable,” 1995, 3 pages. |
| Morgan Stanley Research North America, “Nevro Corp—There's Something Happening Here,” Dec. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
| Mosby's Medical Dictionary, 8th Edition, “Paresthesia,” 2009, 3 pages. |
| Muller and Hunsperger, “Helvetica Physiologica Acta—Reversible Blockierung der Erregungsleitung im Nerven durch Mittelfrequenz—Daverstrom,” Schwabe & Co. Basel, vol. 25, Fasc. 1, 1967, 4 pages. |
| Munglani, Rajesh, “The Longer Term Effect of Pulsed Radiofrequency for Neuropathic Pain,” Pain 80, 1999, 3 pages. |
| Nevro Senza Patient Manual, Jan. 16, 2015, 53 pages. |
| Nevro Senza Physician Implant Manual, Jan. 16, 2015, 31 pages. |
| Nevro, PMA Approval Letter and Referenced Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data (SSED) May 8, 2015, 60 pages. |
| News Release Details, “Nevro Corp. Announces Pricing of Initial Public Offering,” 2014, 1 page. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,747, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Jul. 25, 2013, 7 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Acton for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,450, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed Nov. 18, 2011, 11 pages. |
| North American Neuromodulation Society—14th Annual Meeting, “Neuromodulation: Vision 2010,” Dec. 2-5, 2010, 9 pages. |
| North American Neuromodulation Society—16th Annual Meeting, “From Innovation to Reality Syllabus,” Dec. 6-9, 2012, 198 pages. |
| North American Neuromodulation Society—Celebrating 20 years, 18th Annual Meeting Program Book, Dec. 11-14, 2014, 28 pages. |
| North American Neuromodulation Society, “Today's Vision, Tomorrow's Reality—17th Annual Meeting,” Dec. 5-8, 2013, 12 pages. |
| North American Neuromodulation, “15th Annual Meeting, Our Crystal Anniversary,” Dec. 8-11, 2011, 8 pages. |
| North et al., “Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: 5-year Follow-Up after Spinal; Cord Stimulator Implantation,” Neurosurgery, Official Journal of thogress of Neurological Surgeons, vol. 28, No. 5, May 1991, 9 pages. |
| North et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation for Axial Low Back Pain,” Spine, vol. 30, No. 12, 2005, 7 pages. |
| North et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic, Intractable Pain: Experience over Two Decades,” Neurosurgery, vol. 32, No. 2, Mar. 1993, 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,450, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Mar. 14, 2012, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Opposition to a European Patent, Argument and Facts, and Annex for European Patent No. 2421600, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Dec. 4, 2014, 22 pages. |
| Notice of Opposition to a European Patent, Argument and Facts, for European Patent No. 2243510, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Medtronic, Jan. 8, 2015, 22 pages. |
| Notice of Opposition to a European Patent, Argument and Facts, and Annex for European Patent No. 2243510, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Jan. 8, 2015, 28 pages. |
| Notice of Opposition to a European Patent, Argument and Facts for European Patent No. 2630984, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Medtronic, Mar. 17, 2015, 17 pages. |
| Notice of Opposition to a European Patent, Argument and Facts, and Annex for European Patent No. 2630984, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Mar. 17, 2015, 21 pages. |
| Notice of Opposition to a European Patent, Argument and Facts, for European Patent No. 2207587, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Medtronic, Inc., Jan. 12, 2016, 22 pages. |
| Notice of Opposition to a European Patent, Argument and Facts, for European Patent No. 2207587, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Jan. 8, 2016, 17 pages. |
| Oakley et al., “A New Spinal Cord Stimulation System Effectively Relieves Chronic, Intractable Pain: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, vol. 10, No. 3, 2007, 17 pages. |
| Oakley et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation in Axial Low Back Pain: Solving the Dilemma,” Pain Medicine, vol. 7, No. S1, 2006, 6 pages. |
| Oakley, John C., “Spinal Cord Stimulation Mechanisms of Action,”; Spine vol. 27, No. 22, copyright 2002, 10 pages. |
| Palmer et al., “Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and transcutaneous spinal electroanalgesia: A preliminary efficacy and mechanisms-based investigation,” Physiotherapy, 95, 2009, 7 pages. |
| Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 8,359,102, Case No. IPR2015-01203, Petitioner: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Patent Owner: Nevro Corporation, mailed Sep. 1, 2015, 70 pages. |
| Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 8,359,102, Case No. IPR2015-01204, Petitioner: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Patent Owner: Nevro Corporation, mailed Sep. 1, 2015, 63 pages. |
| Perruchoud et al., “Analgesic Efficacy of High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study,” Neuromodulation: Technology at Neural Interface, International Neuromodulation Society, 2013, 7 pages. |
| Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1, 2, 11-15, 17-23, 25 and 26 for U.S. Pat. No. 8,359,102, Petitioner: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Patent Owner: Nevro Corporation, May 14, 2015, 45 pages. |
| Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1, 2, 11-15, 17-23, 25 and 26 for U.S. Pat. No. 8,359,102, Petitioner: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Patent Owner: Nevro Corporation, May 14, 2015, 67 pages. |
| Prausnitz et al., “The Effects of Electric Current Applied to Skin: A Review for Transdermal Drug Delivery,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 18, 1996, 31 pages. |
| Remedi Pain Relief—ENM (Electronic Nerve Modulation), https://web.archive.org/web/20050906181041/http://www.remediuk.com/trials.htm, 2005, 5 pages. |
| Resume of Jason D. Rahn, Jan. 7, 2015, 2 pages. |
| Robb et al., “Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation vs. Transcutaneous Spinal Electroanalgesia for Chronic Pain Associated with ; Breast Cancer Treatments,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 33, No. 4, Apr. 2007, 10 pages. |
| Science Daily, “Chronic Pain Costs U.S. up to $635 billion, study shows,” www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120911091100.htm, Sep. 11, 2012, 2 pages. |
| Shealy MD, C. Norman et al., “Electrical Inhibition of Pain by Stimulation of the Dorsal Columns: Preliminary Clinical Report,” Anesthesia and Analgesia Current Researches, vol. 446, No. 4, Jul.-Aug. 1967, 3 pages. |
| Simpson, BA, “Spinal Cord Stimulation in 60 cases of Intractable Pain.” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 1991; 54 pp. 196-199. |
| Simpson, BA, “Spinal Cord Stimulation.” British Journal of Neurosurgery, Feb. 11, 1997, (1), 5-11, 7 pages. |
| Sluijter et al., “The Effects of Pulsed Radiofrequency Fields Applied to the Dorsal Root Ganglion—A Preliminary Report,” The Pain Clinic, vol. 11, No. 2, 1998, 12 pages. |
| Solomonow et al., “Control of Muscle Contractile Force through Indirect High-Frequency Stimulation,” AM Journal of Physical Medicine, 1983, vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 71-82. |
| St. Jude Medical, “Eon Mini™ Rechargeable IPG,” Apr. 29, 2013, 3 pages. |
| St. Jude Medical, “Individualized Therapy through Diverse Lead Options,” 2008, 6 pages. |
| Stimwave, News Release: “Stimwave Receives FDA Approval for High Frequency IDE,” http://stimwave.com/newsroom/latest-news, Jun. 9, 2015, 2 pages. |
| Tanner, J.A., “Reversible blocking of nerve conduction by alternating-current; excitation,” Nature, Aug. 18, 1962; 195: 712-3. |
| Tesfaye et al., “Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy,” The Lancet, vol. 348, Dec. 21-28, 1996, 4 pages. |
| Tiede et al., “Novel Spinal Cord Stimulation Parameters in Patients with Predominate Back Pain,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2013, 6 pages. |
| Tollison et al., “Practical Pain Management; Neurostimulation Techniques,” Chapter 12, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Third Edition, 2002, 13 pages. |
| Urban et al., “Percutaneous epidural stimulation of the spinal cord for relief of pain—Long Term Results,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 48, ; Mar. 1978, 7 pages. |
| Van Butyen et al., “High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back Pain Patients: Results of a Prospective Multicenter European Clinical Study,” Neuromodulation Technology at the ; Neural Interface, International Neuromodulation Society, 2012, 8 pages. |
| Van Den Honert, Mortimer JT, “A Technique for Collision Block of Peripheral; Nerve: Frequency Dependence,” MP-11 IEEE Trans. Biomed, Eng. 28: 379-382, 1981. |
| Van Havenbergh et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back Pain Patients: 500-Hz vs. 1000-Hz Burst Stimulation,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, International Neurmodulation Society, 2014, 4 pages. |
| Wallace et al., Poster: “Accelerate: A Prospective Multicenter Trial Evaluating the Use of High-Rate Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Intractable Pain,” Boston Scientific Corporation, 2015, 1 page. |
| Wallin et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation inhibits long-term potentiation of spinal wide dynamic range neurons,” Elsevier Science B.V., Brain Research, 5 pages 2003. |
| Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridge, “Paresthesia,” 1993, 3 pages. |
| Wolter et al., “Continuous Versus Intermittent Spinal Cord Stimulation: An Analysis of Factors Influencing Clinical Efficacy,” Neuromodulation: Technology at Neural Interface, www.neuromodulationjournal.com, 2011, 8 pages. |
| Woo MY, Campbell B. “Asynchronous Firing and Block of Peripheral Nerve Conduction by 20KC Alternating Current,” Los Angeles Neuro Society, Jun. 1964; 87-94, 5 pages. |
| Zhang et al., “Simulation Analysis of Conduction Block in Myelinated Axons Induced by High-Frequency Biphasic Rectangular Pulses,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 53., No. 7, Jul. 2006, 4 pages. |
| “The Need for Mechanism-Based Medicine in Neuromodulation,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2012, 7 pages. |
| Al-Kaisy et al., “Sustained Effectiveness of 10kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Patients with Chronic, Low Back Pain: 24-month Results of Prospective Multicenter Study,” Pain Medicine, 2014, 8 pages. |
| Amendment in Response to Ex Parte Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/446,970, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, Mailed: Nov. 28, 2012, 14 pages. |
| Amendment in Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,450, First Named Inventor: Konstantinos Alataris, filed Feb. 7, 2012, 15 pages. |
| J.P. Morgan North America Equity Research, “Nevro—Let the Launch Begin: Senza Approved, Raising PT to $54,” www.jpmorganmarkets.com, May 10, 2015, 8 pages. |
| Royle, John., “Transcutaneous Spinal Electroanalgesia and Chronic Pain,” Physiotherapy, vol. 86, No. 5, May 2000, 1 page. |
| Simpson et al., “A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study of the Use of Transcutaneous Spinal Electroanalgesia in Patients with Pain from Chronic Critical Limb Ischemia,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 28, No. 5, Nov. 2004, 6 pages. |
| Thompson et al., “A double blind randomised controlled clinical trial on the effect of transcutaneous spinal electroanalgesia (TSE) on low back pain,” European Journal of Pain, vol. 12, Issue 3, Apr. 2008, 6 pages. |
| Towell et al., “High Frequency non-invasive stimulation over the spine: Effects on mood and mechanical pain tolerance in normal subjects,” Behavioral Neurology, vol. 10, 1997, 6 pages. |
| Additional Arguments to Notice of Opposition of European Patent No. 2853285, filed by Medtronic, Inc., on May 17, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Compustim SCS Systems, ; Clinical Manual, 1997, 52 pages. |
| Agnew et al., “Considerations for safety with chronically implanted nerve electrodes,” Epilepsia, 31.s2, 1990, 6 pages. |
| Al-Kaisy et al., “10 kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Axial Low Back Pain in Patients With No History of Spinal Surgery: A Preliminary, Prospective, Open Label and Proof-of-Concept Study,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Al-Kaisy et al., “The Use of 10-Kilohertz Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Cohort of Patients with Chronic Neuropathic Limb Pain Refractory to Medical Management,” Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural; Interface, 2015, 6 pages. |
| Augustinsson et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation in Cardiovascular Disease,” Functional Neurosurgery, vol. 6, No. 1, Jan. 1995, 10 pages. |
| Bara et al., Poster re: High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Dominant Back Pain—1 year follow up, 2013, 1 page. |
| Barolat et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain Management,” Seminars in Neurosurgery, vol. 15, Nos. 2/3, 2004, 26 pages. |
| Bennett et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation for Complex regional pain syndrome I [RSD]: a Retrospective Multicenter Experience from 1995 to 1998 of 101 patients.” Neuromodulation, vol. 2, No. 3, 1999, 9 pages. |
| Benyamin et al., “A Case of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Raynaud's Phenomenon: Can Subthreshold Sensory Stimulation Have an Effect?” Pain Physician www.painphysicianjournal.com, 2007, 6 pages. |
| Broseta et al., “High-Frequency cervical spinal cord stimulation in spasticity and motor disorders,” Advances in Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 7. Springer Verlag 1987, 6 pages. |
| Butt et al., “Histological Findings Using Novel Stimulation Parameters in a Caprine Model,” European Journal of Pain Supplements, 2011, 2 pages. |
| Cahana et al., “Acute Differential Modulation of Synaptic Transmission and Cell Survival During Exposure to Pulsed and Continuous Radiofrequency; Energy,” Journal of Pain, vol. 4, No. 4, May 2003, 6 pages. |
| Cameron et al., “Effects of posture on stimulation parameters in spinal cord stimulation,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface 1.4, 1998, 8 pages. |
| Camilleri et al., “Intra-abdominal vagal blocking (VBLOC therapy): clinical results with a new implantable medical device,” Surgery 143.6, 2008, 9 pages. |
| Crapanzano et al., “High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Case Report,” Pain Physician, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Curriculum Vitae and Declaration of Dr. Ganesan Baranidharan, 4 pages, 2016. |
| Curriculum Vitae and Declaration of Dr. Jonathan Miller, 42 pages, Oct. 25, 2016. |
| Curriculum Vitae and Declaration of Dr. Simon James Thomson, Oct. 24, 2016, 2 pages. |
| Curriculum Vitae and Declaration of Prof. Bengt Linderoth, Oct. 21, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Curriculum Vitae of Michael A. Moffitt, 2015, 2 pages. |
| De Carolis et al., Poster: “Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in the Treatment of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS): a comparative study,” 2013, 1 page. |
| Decision and Minutes: Opposition of European Patent No. 2421600 by Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Apr. 3, 2017, 28 pages. |
| Declaration of Dr. Jonathan Miller on behalf of European Patent No. 2853285, 26 pages, May 16, 2017. |
| Declaration of M. Jason D. Rahn for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Feb. 2, 2017, 2 pages. |
| Declaration of Prof. Bengt Linderoth for European Patent No. 2421600, dated Dec. 16, 2016 2 pages. |
| Eddicks et al., “Thoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation Improves Functional Status and Relieves Symptoms in Patients with Refractory Angina Pectoris: The First Placebo-Controlled Randomised Study,” Heart Journal, 2007, 6 pages. |
| Feeling vs. Function Poster, Mager and Associates Consulting, 2009, 1 page. |
| Geddes, “A Short History of the electrical stimulation of excitable tissue—Including Electrotherapeutic Applications,” The Physiologist, vol. 27, No. 1, Feb. 1984, 51 pages. |
| Gulve et al., Poster: “10kHz High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Middlesbrough Experience,” 2013, 1 page. |
| Higuchi et al., “Exposure of the Dorsal Root Ganglion in Rats to Pulsed Radiofrequency Currents Activates Dorsal Horn Lamina I and II Neurons,”; Neurosurgery, vol. 50, No. 4, Apr. 2002, 7 pages. |
| House et al., “Safety and Efficacy of the House/3M Cochlear Implant in Profoundly Deaf Adults,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, vol. 19, No. 2, May 1986, 12 pages. |
| International Neuromodulation Society 10th World Congress, Neuromodulation: Technology that Improves Patient Care, London, England, May 21-26, 2011, 385 pages. |
| Jacques et al., “Development of a New Implantable Bio-Telestimulator,” Surg. Neurol., vol. 13, May 1980, 2 pages. |
| Jezernik et al., “Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Bladder; Dysfunction: Current Status and Future Possibilities,” Neurological Research, vol. 24, Jul. 2002, 18 pages. |
| Kapural et al., “Comparison of 10-kHz High Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back ; and Leg Pain: 24-Month Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial,” Neurosurgery, vol. 79, No. 5, Nov. 2016, 11 pages. |
| Kreitler et al., “Chapter 15: Implantable Devices and Drug Delivery Systems—The Handbook for Chronic Pain,” Nova Biomedical Books, New York, ; 2007, 17 pages. |
| Krista Oakes of Neuromed, Inc., “Implanted Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness,” Submission Prepared Feb. 21, 1996, 3 pages. |
| Lambru et al., “Safety and Efficacy of Cervical 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Refractory Primary Headaches: A Retrospective Case Series,” The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Manola et al., “Technical Performance of Percutaneous Leads for Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Modeling Study,” International Neuromodulation Society, 2005, 12 pages. |
| Mavoori et al., “An Autonomous implantable computer for neural recording and stimulation in unrestrained primates,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2005, 7 pages. |
| Meyerson et al., Mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain, Neurological Research, vol. 22, Apr. 2000, 5 pages. |
| Miller, Jonathan, “Neurosurgery Survival Guide—A Comprehensive Guide to Neurosurgical Diagnosis and Treatment,” http://d3jonline.tripod.com/neurosurgery/, Nov. 14, 2016, 4 pages. |
| Miller, Jonathan, “Parameters of Spinal Cord Stimulation and Their Role in Electrical Charge Delivery: A Review,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2016. |
| Mounaïm et al., “New Neurostimulation Strategy and Corresponding Implantable Device to Enhance Bladder Functions,” Biomedical Engineering Trends in Electronics, Communications and Software, Chapter 5, 2011, 15 pages. |
| Mueller et al., “The Med-El Sonatati 100 Cochlear Implant: An evaluation of its safety in adults and children,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 131, No. 5, 2011, 8 pages. |
| Nashold et al., “Dorsal Column Stimulation for Control Pain—Preliminary Report on 30 Patients,” J. Neurosurg., vol. 36, May 1972, 8 pages. |
| Nevro—Chronic Pain and Treatments, http://www.nevro.com/English/Patients/Chronic-Pain-and-Treatments/default.aspx; 2016, 3 pages. |
| Nevro—Clinical Evidence, www.nevro.com/English/Physicians/Clinical-Evidence/default.aspx, 2016, 2 pages. |
| Nevro—HF10™ Therapy Fact Sheet, http://www.nevro.com/English/Newsroom/Resources/default.aspx, 2015, 4 pages. |
| Nevro—Physician Overview www.nevro.com/English/Physicians/Physician-Overview/default.aspx, 2016, 5 pages. |
| Nevro—Senza System http://www.nevro.com/English/Physicians/Senza-System/default.aspx, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Nevro HF10 Therapy—New Hope for Chronic Back Pain and Leg Pain Sufferers, http://s21.q4cdn.com/478267292/files/doc_downloads/HF10-Therapy-New-Hope-for-Chronic-Pain.pdf, 2016, 2 pages. |
| Nevro Observations and Response to Notice of Oppositions filed by Medtronic Inc., and Boston Scientific for European Patent No. 2207587, dated Aug. 26, 2016, 16 pages. |
| Nevro Response to Notice of Oppositions filed by Boston Scientific for European Patent No. 2421600, dated Jul. 22, 2015, 16 pages. |
| Nevro Response to Notice of Oppositions filed by Medtronic and Boston Scientific for European Patent No. 2630984, dated Dec. 7, 2015, 26 pages. |
| Nevro Response to Opposition of Division's Comments and Summons to Oral Proceedings for European Patent No. 2630984, dated Oct. 25, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Nevro website: HF10 Therapy Advantages, www.nevro.com/English/Patients/HF10-Therapy-Advantages/default.aspx, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Nevro Written Submissions and Response to Notice of Oppositions filed by Medtronic Inc., and Boston Scientific for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Aug. 28, 2015, 17 pages. |
| Nevro's Response to Preliminary Opinion for Opposition by Medtronic, Inc., and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Feb. 3, 2017, 36 pages. |
| Nevro's presentation of HF10 therapy on Nevro's website, http://www.nervo.com/English/Home/default.aspx, 2016, 2 pages. |
| Nevro's Response to Further Submission by Medtronic, Inc., and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Feb. 24, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Nevros Response to Opponent Submission of Declaration of Jonathan Miller in European Patent No. 2630984, dated Nov. 18, 2016, 4 pages. |
| NIDCD-NIH 2011, Cochlear Implant Brochure, http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/hearing/pages/coch.aspx, Jun. 29, 2012, 2 pages. |
| North et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation With Interleaved Pulses: A Randomized, Controlled Trial,” vol. 10, No. 4, 2007, 9 pages. |
| Notice of Opposition to a European Patent for European Patent No. 2586488, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Medtronic, Inc., dated Mar. 15, 2017, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Opposition to a European Patent for European Patent No. 2853285, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Medtronic, Inc., dated Apr. 19, 2017, 40 pages. |
| OHSIPP Summer Newsletter, The Official Newsletter for the Ohio Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, vol. 1 Ed. 2, Summer 2010, 8 pages. |
| Opponent Boston Scientific: Response to Attend Oral Proceedings for European Patent No. 2630984, dated Oct. 25, 2016, 21 pages. |
| Opponent Response to Patent Proprietor Comments to Declaration of Dr. Jonathan Miller for European Patent No. 2630984, dated Nov. 22, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Opponents Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corp.: Additional Observations in view of Oral Proceedings for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Feb. 3, 2017, 8 pages. |
| Opponents Boston Scientific: Response to Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings for European Patent No. 2421600, dated Jan. 2, 2017, 15 pages. |
| Opponents Medtronic, Inc.: Additional Observations in view of Oral Proceedings for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Feb. 3, 2017, 10 pages. |
| Opponents Medtronic, Inc.: Response to Attend Oral Proceedings for European Patent No. 2630984, dated Oct. 25, 2016, 26 pages. |
| Opponents Medtronic: Response to Nevro Requests and Submission for European Patent No. 22453510, dated Mar. 29, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Opponents Response to Patentee's (Nevro) Written Submissions for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Feb. 22, 2016, 21 pages. |
| Paicius et al., “Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: Preliminary Results of Long-Term Follow-up: A Case Series,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, vol. 10, No. 3, 2007, 12 pages. |
| Precision—Physician System Handbook, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055253-0001, 2005, 92 pages. |
| Precision—Physician Trail Kit Insert, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055258-0001, 2005, 2 pages. |
| Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Charging System Insert, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055074-0001, 2004, 2 pages. |
| Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Charging System, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055259-0001, 2004, 2 pages. |
| Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Patient Trial Journal, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055260-0001, 2004, 10 pages. |
| Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Patient System Handbook, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055072-0001, 2004, 93 pages. |
| Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Physician Implant Manual, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055100, 2004, 62 pages. |
| Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Physician Implant Manual, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055255-0001, 2005, 70 pages. |
| Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Physician Lead Manual, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part No. 9055183-001, May 2004, 31 pages. |
| Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Physician Lead Manual, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055095, 2004, 62 pages. |
| Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Physician Lead Manual, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055256-0001, 2005, 56 pages. |
| Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Physician Trail Handbook, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055254-0001, 2005, 66 pages. |
| Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Physician Trail Kit Model SC-7005, Part 9055066-001, Advanced Bionic Corporation, 2004, 2 pages. |
| Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Remote Control Model SC-5200, Part 9055107-001, 2004, Advanced Bionic Corporation, 2 page.s. |
| Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation—Remote Control Model SC-5210, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part 9055257-001, 2005, 2 pages. |
| Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation System—Patient System Handbook, Advanced Bionic Corporation, Part No. 9055184-001, May 2004, 86 pages. |
| Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation System, Patient Trial Handbook, Part 9055078, 2004, 74 pages. |
| Pudenz et al., “Development of an Implantable Telestimulator,” Proc. 4th Ann. Nat'l Conf. Neuroelectric Soc., Mar. 10-12, 1971, 111-12 (Wulfsohn, Norman L. And Anthony Sances, Jr. (eds.) 1971, 4 pages. |
| Pudenz et al., “Neural Stimulation: Clinical and Laboratory Experiences,” Surg. Neurol, 39: 1993, 8 pages. |
| Rapcan et al., Clinical Study, “High-Frequency—Spinal Cord Stimulation,” Indexed and Abstracted in Science Citation Index Expanded and in Journal Citation Reports, 2015, 3 pages. |
| Reddy et al., “Comparison of Conventional and Kilohertz Frequency Epidural Stimulation in Patients Undergoing Trailing for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Considerations,” World Neurosurgery, www.sciencedirect.com, 6 pages, 2015. |
| Schulman et al., “Battery Powered BION FES Network,” Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the IEEE EMBS, San Francisco, CA., Sep. 1-5, 2004, 4 pages. |
| Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) System—P130022, http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/Recently-ApprovedDevices/ucm449963.htm Oct. 14, 2016, 2 pages. |
| Shealy et al., “Dorsal Column Electrohypalgesia,” Jul. 1969, 8 pages. |
| Shelden et al., “Depolarization in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia,” Evaluation of Compression and Electrical Methods; Clinical Concept of Neurophysiological Mechanism, 1966, 8 pages. |
| Shelden et al., “Development and Clinical Capabilities of a New Implantable Biostimulator,” The American J. Of Surgery, vol. 124, Aug. 1972, 6 pages. |
| Shelden et al., Electrical Control of Facial Pain, Am. J. Of Surgery, vol. 114, Aug. 1967, 6 pages. |
| Shelden et al., “Electrical stimulation of the nervous system,” Surg. Neurol. vol. 4, No. 1, Jul. 1975, 6 pages. |
| Smet et al., Poster: “High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz after Failed Traditional Spinal Cord Stimulation,” NANS, 2013, 1 page. |
| Struijk et al., “Recruitment of Dorsal Column Fibers in Spinal Cord Stimulation: Influence of Collateral Branching,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 39, No. 9, Sep. 1992, 10 pages. |
| Sweet et al., “Paresthesia-Free High Density Spinal Cord Stimulation for Postlaminectomy Syndrome in a Prescreened Population: A Prospective Case Series,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2015, 7 pages. |
| Swigris et al., “Implantable Spinal Cord Stimulator to Treat the Ischemic Manifestations of Thromboangiitis Obliterans (Buerger's disease),” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 29, No. 5, 1998, 8 pages. |
| Tan et al., “Intensity Modulation: A Novel Approach to Percept Control in Spinal Cord Stimulation,” Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface, International Neuromodulation Society 2015, 6 pages. |
| Taylor et al., “The Coss Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 27, No. 4., Apr. 2001, 9 pages. |
| Verrills et al., “Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Chronic Pain: 100 Cases and Review of the Literature,” Pain Medicine, 2011, 11 pages. |
| Verrills et al., “Salvaging Failed Neuromodulation Implants with Nevro High Frequency Spinal Cord System,” Nans Poster, 2013, 1 page. |
| Von Korff et al., “Assessing Global Pain Severity by Self-Report in Clinical and Health Services Research,” Spine, vol. 25, No. 24, 2000, 12 pages. |
| Ward et al., “Electrical Stimulation Using Kilohertz-Frequency Alternating Current,” Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association, vol. 89, No. 2, Feb. 2009, 12 pages. |
| Ward et al., “Variation in Motor Threshold with Frequency Using kHz Frequency Alternating Current,” Muscle and Nerve, Oct. 2001, 9 pages. |
| Weinberg et al., “Increasing the oscillation frequency of strong magnetic fields above 101 kHz significantly raises peripheral nerve excitation thresholds,” Medical Physics Letter, May 2012, 6 pages. |
| Yearwood et al., “A Prospective Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Using Dorsal Column Stimulation (DCS), Intraspinal Nerve Root Stimulation (INRS), and Varying Pulse Width in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain,” Congress of Neurological Surgeons 56th Annual Meeting, Oct. 7-12, 2006, 2 pages. |
| Yearwood et al., Case Reports: “A Prospective Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Using Dorsal Column Stimulation (DCS), Intraspinal Nerve Root Stimulation (INRS), and Varying Pulse Width in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain,” Presented at the Congress of Neurological Surgeons 56th Annual Meeting, Oct. 7-12, 2006, 7 pages. |
| Zhang et al., Changes Across Time in Spike Rate and Spike Amplitude of Auditory Nerve Fibers Stimulated by Electric Pulse Trains, Journal of the Association for Research of Otolaryngology, 2007, 17 pages. |
| Defendant's Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, filed Mar. 17, 2017, 159 pages. |
| Exhibit A1: Invalidity Chart v. MacDonald (U.S. Pat. No. 5,776,170), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 294 pages. |
| Exhibit A2: Invalidity Chart v. Spinner (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0213771), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 235 pages. |
| Exhibit A3: Invalidity Chart v. Knudson (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0073354), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 301 pages. |
| Exhibit A4: Invalidity Chart v. Butukhanov (Soviet Union Publication No. 1512625), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 233 pages. |
| Exhibit A5: Invalidity Chart v. Sluijter (U.S. Pat. No. 6,246,912), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 226 pages. |
| Exhibit A6: Invalidity Chart v. Kilgore (U.S. Pat. No. 7,389,145), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 219 pages. |
| Exhibit A7: Invalidity Chart v. Royle (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0009820), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 188 pages. |
| Exhibit A8: Invalidity Chart v. King (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0149148), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 222 pages. |
| Exhibit A9: Invalidity Chart v. DeRidder (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0184488), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 266 pages. |
| Exhibit A10: Invalidity Chart v. Fang (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0204173), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 191 pages. |
| Exhibit B1: Invalidity Chart v. Boston Scientific's Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation System, Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 337 pages. |
| Exhibit C1: 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Invalidity Chart, Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Mar. 17, 2017, 400 pages. |
| Declaration of Rafael Carbunaru in Support of Boston Scientific's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. (Plaintiff) vs. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, executed Mar. 17, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Exhibit a of Declaration of Rafael Carbunaru: “Physician Implant Manual—Precision,” in Support in Support of Defendants Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Advanced Bionics, 2004, 62 pages. |
| Exhibit B of Declaration of Rafael Carbunaru: “Physician Lead Manual—Precision,” in Support in Support of Defendants Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Advanced Bionics, 2004, 62 pages. |
| Exhibit C of Declaration of Rafael Carbunaru: “Patient System Handbook—Precision,” in Support in Support of Defendants Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Advanced Bionics, 2004, 93 pages. |
| Al-Kaisy et al., Poster: “High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Chronic Back Pain Patients without Prior Back Surgery,” 2013, 1 page. |
| BionicNAVIGATOR Software Guide, Part MP9055261-001, 2004, 58 pages. |
| Curriculum Vitae and Declaration of Dr. Simon James Thomson on behalf of European Patent No. 2630984, Oct. 24, 2016, 13 pages. |
| Duyvendak et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation With a Dual Quadripolar Surgical Lead Placed in General Anesthesia is Effective in Treating Intractable Low Back and Leg Pain,” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, vol. 10, No. 2, 2007, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Opposition to a European Patent for European Patent No. 2853285, Proprietor of the Patent: Nevro Corporation; Opponent: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, May 16, 2017, 18 pages. |
| Sharan et al., “Evolving Patterns of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients Implanted for Intractable Low Back and Leg Pain,” International Neuromodulation Society, vol. 5, No. 3, 2002, 13 pages. |
| Smet et al., “Successful Treatment of Low Back Pain with a Novel Neuromodulation Device,” AZ Nikolaas, 2010, 12 pages. |
| Van Buyten et al., “Pain Relief for Axial Back Pain Patients,” Ins Meeting; Poster, May 2011, 1 page. |
| Yearwood et al., “Pulse Width Programming in Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Clinical Study,” Pain Physician Journal, Jul./Aug. 2010, 16 pages. |
| De Ridder et al., U.S. Appl. No. 60/895,061, Applicant: Dirk De Ridder, filed Mar. 15, 2007, 47 pages. |
| Boston Scientific's Answer to First Amended Complaint and Defense, Nevro Corp. vs. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, Jul. 13, 2017, 22 pages. |
| Defendant's First Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, Jun. 17, 2017, 93 pages. |
| First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Declaratory Judgment, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, Jun. 29, 2017, 45 pages. |
| Amended Exhibit C1 (amendments redlined): 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Invalidity Chart, Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Jun. 13, 2017, 423 pages. |
| Plaintiff Nevro Corp's Motion to Strike Inequitable Conduct Allegations From Defendants' Twelfth Affirmative Defense; Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Nevro Corp. vs. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, Aug. 3, 2017, 10 pages. |
| Boston Scientific's Opposition to Nevro's Motion to Strike Inequitable Conduct Allegations from Defendants' Twelfth Affirmative Defense (ECF No. 172), Nevro Corp. vs. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, Aug. 17, 2017, 17 pages. |
| Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. vs. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, Aug. 10, 2017, 108 pages. |
| Exhibit A1 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. MacDonald (U.S. Pat. No. 5,776,170), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 168 pages. |
| Exhibit A2 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Spinner (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0213771), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 129 pages. |
| Exhibit A3 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Knudson (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0073354), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 173 pages. |
| Exhibit A5 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Sluijter (U.S. Pat. No. 6,246,912), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 135 pages. |
| Exhibit A6 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Kilgore (U.S. Pat. No. 7,389,145), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 110 pages. |
| Exhibit A7 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Royle (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0009820), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 111 pages. |
| Exhibit A9 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. DeRidder (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0184488), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 160 pages. |
| Exhibit A10 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Fang (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0204173), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 114 pages. |
| Exhibit A11 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Alataris (U.S. Pat. No. 8,712,533), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 13 pages. |
| Exhibit A12 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Gaunt (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2006/0184211), Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 113 pages. |
| Exhibit B1 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Chart v. Boston Scientific's Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation System, Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 180 pages. |
| Exhibit C1 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Invalidity Chart, Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 174 pages. |
| Corrected Exhibit C1 for Defendant's Second Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Invalidity Chart, Boston Scientific Corporation's and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation's Invalidity Contentions, Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC (N. D. Cal.), Aug. 10, 2017, 171 pages. |
| Statement of Grounds of Appeal for the Opposition of European Patent No. 2421600 (Appeal No. T1450/17-3.4.01) by Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, dated Aug. 14, 2017, 17 pages. |
| Nevro's Notice of Appeal for Opposition by Medtronic, Inc., and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Aug. 3, 2017, 1 page. |
| Provision of a Copy of Minutes in accordance with Rule 124(4) EPC for Opposition by Medtronic, Inc., and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Jul. 27, 2017, 23 pages. |
| Decision Revoking the European Patent for Opposition by Medtronic, Inc., and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation for European Patent No. 2243510, dated Jul. 27, 2017, 37 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61833392 | Jun 2013 | US |