This disclosure relates to systems and methods for enhancing the processing of hydrocarbons in a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit by introduction of a renewable feedstock to the FCC regenerator. The disclosure relates to the addition of certain specific renewable feedstock as an additive to the FCC regenerator, such as biomass-derived pyrolysis oil.
FCC units are used in refining operations to produce gasoline and distillate fuels from higher molecular weight hydrocarbons. A catalytic FCC unit has two main components-a reactor and a regenerator. Severe hydroprocessing of FCC feedstock, such as required to meet gasoline sulfur specifications, can result in low FCC regenerator temperatures, low delta coke, and become an obstacle or constraint to unit optimization and refinery profitability. Several process variables can be changed to impact FCC regenerator temperature and formation of delta coke, but, historically the ability to incorporate biomass-derived feedstocks in response to this constraint has been limited. Traditional refinery streams/components that help with low regenerator temperature are almost always higher in sulfur or other contaminants that make processing of biomass-derived feedstocks in FCC unfavorable.
Co-processing of biomass-derived pyrolysis oil in the FCC riser of the FCC reactor cause several challenges. The bio-mass derived pyrolysis oil may cause stability/miscibility issues when the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil is mixed with the FCC feed and may include a potential to coke/plug when mixed at elevated temperatures. Certain studies have shown the development of ‘tar balls’ in the FCC stripper of the FCC reactor and more deposits in the FCC reactor were noted upon cleaning/inspection. The bio-mass derived pyrolysis oil may cause potential corrosion of stainless steel in the FCC riser of the FCC reactor. In addition to the corrosion concerns, co-processing of pyrolysis oil in a FCC riser results in significant amounts of oxygenates in the FCC hydrocarbon products. Increases in CO and CO2 can also exacerbate a FCC unit wet gas compressor constraint (commonly encountered in FCC units) and reduce unit/refinery profitability. Generation of water pulls hydrogen from going to liquid hydrocarbon products, thus leading to reduced FCC unit and refinery profitability. Oxygenates remaining in hydrocarbon products may also increase corrosion and/or operability concerns. In general, FCC yield/conversion value is proportional to the hydrogen content in FCC feed. The hydrogen content of some pyrolysis oil content is on par with FCC coke (6-8 weight percent (wt %)) and incremental FCC products/yields attributable to this feedstock are very poor.
Provided here are systems and methods to address these shortcomings of the art and provide other additional or alternative advantages. The disclosure herein provides one or more embodiments of systems and methods for enhancing the processing of hydrocarbons in a FCC unit by introduction of a renewable feedstock to the FCC regenerator. In certain embodiments, the renewable feedstock provided as an additive to the FCC regenerator contains biomass-derived pyrolysis oil. Pyrolysis/bio-oil can be utilized as a FCC feedstock additive and is a low sulfur, low hydrogen content material that despite its traditional characteristics of low miscibility with hydrocarbons and high acidity, it may be used to debottleneck refinery FCC constraints and optimize refinery profitability. Design modifications are provided for new and/or existing FCC regenerators to enhance the throughput of hydrocarbons processed in a FCC unit therefrom, which may be used independently or in various combinations. Such systems and methods, when used in combination, may advantageously provide for consumption of renewable feedstocks in a FCC unit, decrease the energy consumption of a FCC regenerator, and increase FCC unit and refinery profitability.
In certain embodiments, the throughput of hydrocarbons processed in a FCC unit is enhanced by first introducing gas oil and steam into the riser of a FCC unit. The gas oil and steam are mixed with a catalyst that is fluidized in the riser. The gas oil is cracked into one or more FCC products in the presence of the catalyst and the steam, which causes one or more surfaces of the catalyst to be at least partially covered by coke. This coked FCC catalyst is separated from the FCC products in a cyclone of the FCC unit. This cyclone can be positioned in an upper portion of the FCC unit. The coked FCC catalyst from the cyclone of the FCC unit is passed to a regenerator, where oxygen and/or air and a biomass-derived pyrolysis oil are introduced into the regenerator to combust the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil and coke from the coked FCC catalyst. Through such combustion, the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil and coke are oxidized by the oxygen (and/or, in some embodiments, oxygen in supplied air), this leading to regeneration of the catalyst. This regenerated catalyst is returned from the regenerator to the riser of the FCC unit. In certain embodiments, the introduction of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil allows for an increase of the temperature inside the regenerator by at least about 5 degrees Fahrenheit (° F.) without adversely affecting properties of the FCC products. For example, the sulfur specifications of the FCC products are maintained. The use of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil can also increase the temperature inside the regenerator while maintaining sulfur specification of gasoline in the FCC products below a pre-selected value. This temperature increase can range from at least about 5° F. to about 25° F. More than 90% of the sulfur content, but generally less than 50% of the total gasoline supply, is contributed by heavier feeds, which are cracked in the FCC. Current maximum gasoline sulfur limits vary widely from 10 ppm to 2,500 ppm depending on the jurisdiction. The sulfur content of the various FCC products can vary from about 0.01 weight percent to about 4.5 weight percent. Certain products, such as ultra-low sulfur diesel, low sulfur vacuum gas oil, and low sulfur heavy fuel oils, have a sulfur content less than about 0.5 weight percent. Certain products, such as GVL slurry and heavy sulfur vacuum gas oil, have a sulfur content from about 1 weight percent to about 2 weight percent. Certain products, such as heavy sulfur heavy fuel oil and asphalt, have a sulfur content from about 3 weight percent to about 4.5 weight percent.
In certain embodiments, the method of processing a gas oil in a FCC unit may include introducing gas oil and steam into a riser of a FCC unit, mixing the gas oil and the steam with catalyst or FCC catalyst that is fluidized in the riser, and cracking the gas oil into one or more FCC hydrocarbon products in the FCC unit. The cracking of the gas oil causes one or more surfaces of the catalyst to be at least partially covered by coke, thus producing or defining a coked FCC catalyst. The method may further include separating the coked FCC catalyst from the one or more FCC hydrocarbon products in a cyclone of the FCC unit, passing the coked FCC catalyst from the cyclone of the FCC unit to a regenerator, introducing at least oxygen and a biomass-derived pyrolysis oil into the regenerator, and combusting the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil and the coke from the coked FCC catalyst in the regenerator. The biomass-derived pyrolysis oil and coke are oxidized by the oxygen and the oxidation and/or combustion provide a regenerated catalyst, which is then returned or supplied from the regenerator to the riser of the FCC unit. The regenerated catalyst may be further mixed with additional gas oil and/or additional steam in the riser of the FCC unit (e.g., the cracking operation beginning again with the regenerated catalyst). In certain embodiments, the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil has an effective hydrogen index of less than 1.5. In certain embodiments, the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil has an effective hydrogen index of less than 1. Introducing the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil into the regenerator can allow the temperature inside the regenerator to be increased without adversely affecting one or more properties of the one or more FCC products. This temperature increase can be at least about 5° F. This temperature increase can be at least about 10° F. This temperature increase can be at least about 15° F. This temperature increase can be at least about 20° F. In certain embodiments, introducing the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil increases the temperature inside the regenerator while maintaining sulfur specifications of the one or more FCC products. This temperature increase can range from at least about 5° F. to about 25° F. In an example, the sulfur level in the FCC product, based on the specification of gasoline (e.g., one of a FCC product), is maintained below a pre-selected value. The biomass-derived pyrolysis oil can be introduced proximate to a bottom portion of the regenerator or the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil can be introduced into a bed of coked FCC catalyst positioned inside the regenerator.
In another embodiment, the method may include determining, based on a signal received by a controller from a temperature sensor positioned within the regenerator, a temperature within the regenerator; and in response to a determination that the temperature within the regenerator is less than a preselected temperature, adjusting, via a flow control device associated with the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil in signal communication with the controller, an amount of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil introduced into the regenerator to thereby adjust the temperature within the regenerator.
Another embodiment of the disclosure is directed to a method of processing a gas oil in a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit to increase yield selectivities. The method may include introducing the gas oil and steam into a riser of a FCC unit. The method may include mixing the gas oil and the steam with a catalyst fluidized in the riser. The method may include cracking the gas oil into one or more hydrocarbon products in the FCC unit, thereby to cause one or more surfaces of the catalyst to be at least partially covered by coke so as to define a coked catalyst. The method may include separating the coked catalyst and pyoil from the one or more hydrocarbon products in a cyclone positioned in an upper portion of the FCC unit. The method may include introducing a biomass-derived pyrolysis oil into the FCC unit. The biomass-derived pyrolysis oil may comprise one or more of a low miscibility with the gas oil and steam, low hydrogen content, and low sulfur content. The method may include passing the coked catalyst and the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil from the cyclone of the FCC unit to a regenerator. The method may include introducing at least oxygen into the regenerator. The method may include combusting a combination of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil and the coke from the coked catalyst in the regenerator, thereby to oxidize via the oxygen and produce a regenerated catalyst and a flue gas. The method may include returning the regenerated catalyst from the regenerator to the riser of the FCC unit.
In another embodiment, the low miscibility of pyoil may prevents the pyoil from mixing with the gas oil, steam, and catalyst. In another embodiment, introduction of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil may comprise introduction of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil into one or more of a stripping zone of the FCC unit or a stand-pipe configured to connect the FCC unit to the regenerator. The method may also include introducing additional biomass-derived pyrolysis oil into the regenerator. The amount of biomass-derived pyrolysis oil introduced into the FCC unit and the amount of additional biomass-derived pyrolysis oil introduced into the regenerator may be based on one or more of a temperature within the regenerator, a temperature within the riser, or a temperature of the regenerated catalyst. The amount of biomass-derived pyrolysis oil introduced into the riser is about 1% to about 2% wt % of the gas oil.
In another embodiment, the low sulfur content of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil may cause the hydrocarbon product to remain within a sulfur specification. In another embodiment, the low hydrogen content of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil may inhibit production of saturated products and increase production of olefinic material.
In another embodiment, the method may include determining, based on a signal received by a controller from a temperature sensor positioned within the regenerator, a temperature within the regenerator; and determining, based on a signal received by a controller from a temperature sensor positioned within the FCC unit, a temperature within the FCC unit. Further, the method may include, in response to one or more determinations that the temperature within the regenerator is less than a first preselected temperature or that the temperature within the FCC unit is less than a second preselected temperature, adjusting, via a flow control device associated with the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil in signal communication with the controller, an amount of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil introduced into the riser based on the temperature within the regenerator and the temperature within the FCC unit to thereby adjust the temperature within the regenerator and FCC unit (e.g., the riser and/or reactor).
Certain embodiments include systems for processing a gas oil in a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit. One such system may contain a riser having a first inlet to receive a gas oil stream, a second inlet to receive steam, and a third inlet to receive a FCC catalyst. The riser may be configured to be operated under cracking reaction pressure and temperature conditions to facilitate mixing and catalytic cracking of the gas oil stream in presence of the steam and the FCC catalyst to form a plurality of FCC products and coked FCC catalyst. The system further may include a reactor having (i) a FCC reaction zone connected to and in fluid communication with the upper portion of the riser and operated to continue the cracking of the gas oil stream in presence of the steam and the FCC catalyst to form more of the plurality of FCC products and more of the coked FCC catalyst, (ii) a separation zone to separate the plurality of FCC products from the coked FCC catalyst, (iii) a first outlet stream to transport the plurality of FCC products to a fractionation zone to separate the plurality of FCC products into one or more of propylene, isobutene, butylenes, gasoline, distillate, diesel fuel or heating oil, slurry oil and wet gas. The system may further include a regenerator connected to and in fluid communication with a second outlet stream of the reactor and having a fourth inlet stream to receive at least oxygen, a fifth inlet stream to receive biomass-derived pyrolysis oil, a third outlet stream being connected to and in fluid communication with the third inlet of the riser to supply a regenerated FCC catalyst to the riser, and a fourth outlet stream positioned to discharge a flue gas containing one or more of nitrogen, nitrogen oxides, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, or water vapor. In an embodiment, the oxygen may be supplied separate from and/or with ambient and/or atmospheric air. This regenerator is operated to oxidize coke on the coked FCC catalyst and the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil thereby to produce the regenerated FCC catalyst and the flue gas. The biomass-derived pyrolysis oil can be introduced proximate to a bottom portion of the regenerator or the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil can be introduced into a bed of the coked FCC catalyst positioned inside the regenerator.
In certain embodiments, the system further includes a stripping zone connected to and in fluid communication with the second outlet stream and the regenerator. The stripping zone is operated to remove adsorbed and entrained hydrocarbons from the coked FCC catalyst prior to supplying the coked FCC catalyst to the regenerator.
In certain embodiments, the oxidation of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil in the regenerator increases temperature inside the regenerator by at least about 5° F. while maintaining a sulfur level in each of the plurality of FCC products, based on one or more specifications of the plurality of FCC products produced by processing the gas oil, below a pre-selected value. In certain embodiments, the introduction of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil increases temperature inside the regenerator by at least about 5° F. while maintaining a sulfur level in each of the plurality of FCC products, based on a specification of gasoline in the plurality of FCC products, below a pre-selected value.
In certain embodiments, the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil has an effective hydrogen index of less than 1.5. In certain embodiments, the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil has an effective hydrogen index of less than 1. In certain embodiments, the quantity of biomass-derived pyrolysis oil that is introduced in the FCC regenerator is less than about 2 volume percent of the gas oil introduced into the riser of the FCC unit. In certain embodiments, the quantity of biomass-derived pyrolysis oil that is introduced in the FCC regenerator ranges from about 1 to about 2 volume percent of the gas oil introduced into the riser of the FCC unit.
Another embodiment of the disclosure is directed to a controller to control the processing a gas oil in a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit. The controller may comprise a first set of one or more inputs in signal communication with one or more sensors positioned within one or more of a regenerator, a riser of an FCC unit, and/or a reactor of the FCC unit. The controller may receive signals from the one or more sensors indicative of a characteristic, the characteristic comprising one or more of temperature, pressure, and/or flow rate. The controller may comprise a first set of one or more inputs/outputs in signal communication with one or more flow control devices positioned on one or more inlets or outlets associated with the regenerator, the riser of the FCC unit, and/or the reactor of the FCC unit. The controller may, in response to the characteristic from one of the one or more sensors being less than or greater than a preselected threshold, adjust the one or more flow control devices via a signal indicating a new flow rate for the flow control device to adjust to.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the disclosure will be apparent from a reading of the following detailed description together with the accompanying drawings, which are briefly described below. The disclosure includes any combination of one or more features or elements set forth in this disclosure or recited in any one or more of the claims, regardless of whether such features or elements are expressly combined or otherwise recited in a specific embodiment description or claim herein. This disclosure is intended to be read holistically such that any separable features or elements of the disclosure, in any of its aspects and embodiments, should be viewed as intended to be combinable, unless the context of the disclosure clearly dictates otherwise.
Having thus described the disclosure in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
The disclosure now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to specific embodiments and particularly to the various drawings provided herewith. Indeed, the disclosure may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. As used in the specification, and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” “the,” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
Biomass includes any renewable source, but does not include oil, natural gas, and/or petroleum. Biomass thus may include wood, paper, crops, animal and plant fats, triglycerides, biological waste, algae, or mixtures of these biological materials. Biomass-derived pyrolysis oil may be a complex mixture of several organic compounds, such as lignin fragments, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, carbohydrates, phenols, furfurals, alcohols, and ketones, derived from Rapid Thermal Processing (RTP) of biomass feedstocks. In some embodiments, the RTP of biomass produces the pyrolysis oil that can be utilized as a FCC feedstock additive to debottleneck refinery.
The FCC units may include “stacked” and “side-by-side” reactors, as well as other configurations. In a stacked reactor, the FCC reactor and the FCC regenerator may be contained in a single vessel with the FCC reactor above the FCC regenerator. The side-by-side reactor includes a separate FCC reactor and FCC regenerator, in other words, a side-by-side reactor may include two separate vessels, often positioned side by side.
In certain embodiments of the FCC unit, a gas oil stream, and steam may be supplied to a riser of a FCC unit. In the riser, the gas oil and steam are brought into contact with the catalyst for catalytic cracking and production of FCC products. The resulting mixture may continue upwardly through an upper portion of the riser. The FCC unit may further include a reactor in communication with the riser for continuing production of FCC products and then separating the FCC products from the coked FCC catalyst. During catalytic cracking, heavy material, known as coke, may be deposited onto the catalyst. The depositing of coke onto the catalyst may reduce catalytic activity of the catalyst. As such, regeneration is desired so the catalyst may be reused. In certain embodiments, the FCC reactor may be equipped with one or more cyclones. Most, substantially all, or a portion of the coked FCC catalyst may be transported to one or more cyclones in the reactor, where the coked FCC catalyst may be separated from the FCC hydrocarbon products. The FCC products may be transported into a fractionation or distillation zone downstream of the FCC reactor. In certain embodiments, the coked FCC catalyst with the adsorbed or entrained hydrocarbons may be passed or transported through a stripping zone. Stripping gas, such as steam, may enter a lower portion of the stripping zone and may rise counter-current to a downward flow of catalyst through the stripping zone, thereby removing adsorbed and entrained hydrocarbons from the coked FCC catalyst which flow upwardly through and are ultimately recovered with the steam by the cyclones. The FCC unit may further include a regenerator in communication with the FCC reactor, either directly or through the stripping zone, and configured to receive a portion of the coked FCC catalyst. After separation of the FCC products from the coked FCC catalyst, regeneration may be accomplished by burning off the coke from the coked FCC catalyst which restores the catalyst activity of the FCC catalyst. The regenerator may be equipped with inlets to supply oxygen and a biomass-derived pyrolysis oil to the coked FCC catalyst. The regenerator may be fed with oxygen and the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil in any ratio to the coked FCC catalyst by changing the flow rate of each into the regenerator. The biomass-derived pyrolysis oil and the coke in the coked FCC catalyst are oxidized by oxygen to produce the regenerated catalyst. In an embodiment, the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil may be injected into the reactor. Further, biomass-derived pyrolysis oil may be injected into a stand-pipe configured to connect the reactor to the regenerator and/or into a stripping zone of the reactor.
In an embodiment, the oxygen may be provided or supplied separate from and/or with ambient and/or atmospheric air. Ambient and/or atmospheric air may include varying amounts of nitrogen, oxygen, and/or other gases (e.g., argon, carbon dioxide, water vapor, and/or other small or trace amounts of other gases), as will be understood by one skilled in the art. Further, the ambient and/or atmospheric air may include about 78% nitrogen, about 21% oxygen, and about 1% of other gases (e.g., about 0.9% argon, about 0.05% carbon dioxide, and other small or trace amounts of gases including, but not limited to, water vapor, neon, helium, methane, and/or krypton, as will be understood by one skilled in the art). As noted, oxygen may be supplied to the regenerator (e.g., about 100% oxygen). In an embodiment, additional oxygen may be mixed with air (e.g., ambient and/or atmospheric air) in varying amounts and supplied to the regenerator. For example, the mixture of oxygen and air may include or comprise about 70% nitrogen, about 29% oxygen, and/or other gases; about 60% nitrogen, about 39% oxygen, and/or other gases; about 50% nitrogen, about 49% oxygen, and/or other gases; about 40% nitrogen, about 59% oxygen, and/or other gases; about 30% nitrogen, about 69% oxygen, and/or other gases; 20% nitrogen, about 79%, and/or other gases; about 20% nitrogen, about 79%, and/or other gases; about 10% nitrogen, about 89% oxygen, and/or other gases; about 99% oxygen and/or other gases (e.g., a mixture comprised of about 1% total of nitrogen, argon, carbon dioxide, water vapor, and/or other gases, as will be understood by one skilled in the art); and/or other varying percentages of nitrogen, oxygen, and/or other gases. In another embodiment, the additional oxygen may be supplied to the regenerator separate from the air (e.g., via another injection point or location). In an embodiment, the amount of air and/or oxygen injected or supplied to the regenerator may be controlled by a controller and/or flow control devices. The amount of air and/or oxygen (in addition to or rather than adjustment of biomass-derived pyrolysis oil injected into or supplied to the regenerator and/or reactor) may be varied based on the temperature within the regenerator (e.g., the temperature which may indicate the amount of coke on the coked catalyst that is combusted).
The regenerator may be operated at temperatures in the range of about 1000° F. to 1600° F., of about 1000° F. to about 1500° F., of about 1100° F. to about 1450° F., at about 1250° F. to about 1400° F., or about 1300° F. to achieve adequate combustion while keeping catalyst temperature below those temperatures at which significant catalyst degradation can occur and/or above a temperature such that cracking in the reactor may be efficient. In one or more other embodiments, the temperature in the regenerator may not exceed greater than or may be held at about 1450° F., about 1400° F., about 1350° F., about 1300° F., about 1250° F., about 1200° F., about 1150° F., about 1100° F., about 1050° F., and/or about 1000° F. The temperature at which significant catalyst degradation may occur may be based on a number of variables, such as the temperature and/or water content within the FCC unit (such characteristics may be monitored via one or more sensors and/or probes), among other factors. This processing of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil in the regenerator alleviates FCC processing constraints and optimizes refinery profitability. The biomass-derived pyrolysis oil, when utilized as a FCC feedstock additive, may be injected in low concentrations into the regenerator of the FCC unit. While crackability of this FCC feedstock additive may be poor (high levels of coke precursors/aromatics), which results in lower FCC conversion, the impact on heat balance is significant.
The tendency of a biomass-derived pyrolysis oil to cause coking of a catalyst is measured by the effective hydrogen index (EHI), also called ‘hydrogen to carbon effective ratio’ in the literature (Chen et al., 1988).
EHI=(H−2O−3N−2S)/C
where H, O, N, S and C are the atoms per unit weight of the sample of hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, and carbon, respectively.
In certain embodiments, the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil may have an effective hydrogen index of less than 1.5. In other embodiments, the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil may have an effective hydrogen index of less than 1. This FCC feedstock additive's low hydrogen content may also change or affect overall FCC yield selectivities. The FCC feedstock additive may be a net hydrogen receptor inside the FCC unit (lower hydrogen content than fresh feed). Depending on the incremental yields attributed to this FCC feedstock additive, additional economic value (e.g., renewable identification numbers, low carbon fuel standard credits, etc.) may be applicable. Utilizing this renewable FCC feedstock additive can sustainably debottleneck FCC operation/constraints and optimize refinery profitability.
Introduction of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil directly into the regenerator in a FCC unit can benefit from additional delta coke. The yields related to biomass-derived pyrolysis oil introduced into the FCC reactor are relatively poor, such that processing or cracking this biomass-derived pyrolysis oil can result in negative yields of transportation fuels. As previously discussed, there are several challenges related to processing this biomass-derived pyrolysis oil on the reactor side of the FCC unit. Therefore, this selection of introduction of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil to the regenerator or the FCC unit (e.g., the stripping zone of the reactor and/or a stand-pipe connecting the reactor to the regenerator) overcomes these challenges, and yields improvements, such as debottlenecking production constraints, further optimization of energy consumption, and reduced coke yield on fresh feed.
In certain embodiments, the coked FCC catalyst 128 with the adsorbed or entrained hydrocarbons may be passed into a stripping zone. Stripping gas, such as steam, may enter or may be injected into a lower portion of the stripping zone. The stripping gas may rise counter-current to a downward flow of catalyst through the stripping zone, thereby removing adsorbed and entrained hydrocarbons from the coked FCC catalyst which flows upwardly through and are ultimately recovered with the steam by the cyclones. In an embodiment, biomass-derived pyrolysis oil may be injected into the stripping zone at inlet or conduit 144. Such an inlet or conduit 144 may be dedicated to injection of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil. The FCC system 100 may further include a regenerator 116 in fluid communication with the FCC reactor 107 (e.g., via a conduit, pipe, inlet/outlet, stand-pipe, or pipeline, such as conduit 114), either directly or through the stripping zone, and configured to receive a portion of the coked FCC catalyst via a spent catalyst stream 140 (e.g., via conduit 114). A valve 138 (e.g., such as a slide valve or control valve) may be positioned on the conduit 114 to control the amount of the coked FCC catalyst flowing to the regenerator 116. In an embodiment, an inlet 142 may be positioned on the conduit 114 to allow for injection of biomass-derived pyrolysis oil. After separation of the FCC products from the coked FCC catalyst, regeneration may be accomplished by burning off the coke from the coked FCC catalyst, which restores the catalyst activity of the FCC catalyst. The regenerator 116 may be equipped with an inlet 117 to supply at least oxygen 130 (e.g., the oxygen being supplied as oxygen and/or with ambient and/or atmospheric air) and a pyoil inlet 118 to supply biomass-derived pyrolysis oil (e.g., pyoil 132) to the coked FCC catalyst. The regenerator 116 may be fed with oxygen 130 (and/or, in some embodiments, air) and the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil in any ratio to the coked FCC catalyst by changing the flow rate of oxygen (and/or, in some embodiments, air) supplied via the inlet 117 and the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil 132 supplied via the pyoil inlet 118 into the regenerator 116. The biomass-derived pyrolysis oil 132 and the coke in the coked FCC catalyst may be oxidized by the oxygen (and/or, in some embodiments, the oxygen in the air) to produce the regenerated catalyst. Such a reaction may be exothermic as a large amount of heat is released from the oxidation. The gaseous products of coke oxidation, which may be referred to as flue gas, may exit the regenerator 116 via the exit stream 122. The balance of the heat may cause the regenerator to produce the regenerated catalyst. The regenerated catalyst, in addition to providing a catalytic function, may act as a vehicle for the transfer of heat from the regenerator 116 to the FCC riser 106. The regenerated catalyst may be transported from the regenerator 116 via a catalyst outlet stream to the FCC riser 106 (e.g., via a conduit 120). A valve 134 may be positioned on the conduit 120 to control the amount of the regenerated catalyst flowing to the riser 106. In an embodiment, the regenerated catalyst from the catalyst outlet stream 120 may be supplied to the riser 106 of a FCC system 100 via the catalyst stream 104.
In certain embodiments, the regenerator 116 of an existing FCC unit may be adapted or retro-fitted to add an element to allow for the introduction of the renewable feedstock or biomass-derived pyrolysis oil to the regenerator. For example, this element can be an installed independent and/or dedicated conduit, pipe, or pipeline for introducing the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil (e.g., for example, conduit 118). In another embodiment, conduit 118 may be a torch oil inlet. Prior to or upon initiation of a cracking operation, the torch oil inlet may be configured to allow gas oil, feed, and/or biomass-derived pyrolysis oil to flow therethrough to the regenerator to heat the regenerator. In another embodiment, conduit 118 may include a nozzle configured for injection of biomass-derived pyrolysis oil with or without steam.
The flow through this element (e.g., conduit 118) can be initiated, modified, or stopped by an independent control system or by a control system (e.g., such as a controller) for the regenerator or the FCC unit. Various control designs and/or schemes may also be suitable for use in introduction of the renewable feedstock to the regenerator of an existing FCC unit. Various configurations and arrangements of FCC reactor and the regenerator, including the positioning of various sections and/or components therein, may vary as will be understood by a person skilled in the art.
In another embodiment, the FCC system 100 may include a controller or control system (e.g., such as controller 402 in
At block 202, an amount of gas oil and steam may be introduced to into a riser of a FCC unit. The gas oil can be one or more of the following feeds: atmospheric and vacuum gas oil, light and heavy coker gas oil, hydrocracked residue, atmospheric residue, or deasphalted oil. The hydrocarbons in the gas oil feed includes paraffins and cycloparaffins, aromatic hydrocarbons with a different number of aromatic rings, and resins and asphaltenes. At block 204, the gas oil and the steam are mixed with a FCC catalyst that is fluidized in the riser, and at block 206, the gas oil is subject to catalytic cracking of the higher molecular weight hydrocarbons into one or more FCC products. The cracking of the gas oil causes one or more surfaces of the catalyst to be at least partially covered by coke, thus producing a coked FCC catalyst. At block 208 the coked FCC catalyst is separated from the one or more FCC products in a cyclone of the FCC unit and at block 210 of passing the coked FCC catalyst from the cyclone of the FCC unit to a regenerator. Further, at block 212, oxygen (and/or, in some embodiments, air) and a biomass-derived pyrolysis oil are introduced into the regenerator and mixed with the coked FCC catalyst, and at block 214, the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil and coke from the coked FCC catalyst undergo combustion in the regenerator. The biomass-derived pyrolysis oil and coke are oxidized by the oxygen (and/or, in some embodiments, the oxygen in the air) to provide a regenerated catalyst, which is then returned at block 216 from the regenerator to the riser of the FCC unit. In certain embodiments, the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil has an effective hydrogen index of less than 1.5. In certain embodiments, the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil has an effective hydrogen index of less than 1. Introducing the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil into the regenerator can allow the temperature inside the regenerator to be increased without adversely affecting one or more properties of the one or more FCC products. This temperature increase can range from at least about 5° F. to about 25° F. In certain embodiments, introducing the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil increases the temperature inside the regenerator while maintaining sulfur specifications of the one or more FCC products. For example, the sulfur level in a specification of gasoline, a FCC product, is maintained below a pre-selected value. More than 90% of the sulfur content, but generally less than 50% of the total gasoline supply, is contributed by heavier feeds, which are cracked in the FCC. Current maximum gasoline sulfur limits vary widely from 10 ppm to 2,500 ppm depending on the jurisdiction. The sulfur content of the various FCC products can vary from about 0.01 weight percent to about 4.5 weight percent. Certain products, such as ultra-low sulfur diesel, low sulfur vacuum gas oil, and low sulfur heavy fuel oils, have a sulfur content less than about 0.5 weight percent. Certain products, such as GVL slurry and heavy sulfur vacuum gas oil, have a sulfur content from about 1 weight percent to about 2 weight percent. Certain products, such as heavy sulfur heavy fuel oil and asphalt, have a sulfur content from about 3 weight percent to about 4.5 weight percent. The biomass-derived pyrolysis oil can be introduced proximate to a bottom portion of the regenerator or the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil can be introduced into a bed of coked FCC catalyst positioned inside the regenerator.
In certain embodiments, the quantity of biomass-derived pyrolysis oil that is introduced in the FCC regenerator is less than about 2 volume percent of the gas oil introduced into the riser of the FCC unit. In certain embodiments, the quantity of biomass-derived pyrolysis oil that is introduced in the FCC regenerator ranges from about 1 to 2 volume percent of the gas oil introduced into the riser of the FCC unit.
At block 302, during a cracking operation or upon an initiation of a cracking operation, an amount of catalyst may be supplied to a riser or FCC riser of a FCC unit. The catalyst (also referred to as a FCC catalyst) may be comprised of a zeolite and/or other components (e.g., a matrix, binder, filler, etc.), as will be understood by one skilled in the art. As catalyst within the FCC unit is utilized in a cracking operation, the catalyst may attract coke or become coked (e.g., coke accumulates on the catalyst). The coked or spent catalyst may be transferred from the FCC unit and regenerated catalyst may be supplied the riser of the FCC unit. In an embodiment, the amount of regenerated catalyst supplied to the FCC unit may be adjusted based on the current amount of catalyst within the FCC unit. In such examples, a control system (e.g., controller 402) may determine the current amount of catalyst in the FCC unit based on the amount of coked catalyst transferred to a regenerator, the amount of fresh catalyst supplied to the FCC unit (e.g., which may be a small amount or a small amount in relation to the regenerated catalyst), the amount of regenerated catalyst supplied to the FCC unit, and/or the composition of hydrocarbon products produced by the FCC unit. In another example, the control system (e.g., controller 402) may determine the current amount of catalyst in the FCC unit based on a signal indicating such an amount from a sensor.
At block 304, a gas oil and steam may be supplied to the riser of the FCC unit. In an embodiment, the gas oil may be preheated prior to introduction or being supplied to the riser of the FCC unit. The temperature within the FCC unit (e.g., based on the temperature of the steam, gas oil, and/or catalyst), or the riser and/or reactor of the FCC unit, may be within the range of about 650° F. to about 1050° F., or even higher, to perform a cracking operation based on the type of gas oil supplied to the FCC unit as will be understood by one skilled in the art. Further, heat from regenerated catalyst may be utilized to increase temperature, as described herein and with further detail below, such as the temperature of the riser, reactor, and/or regenerator.
At block 306, the gas oil and steam may mix with the catalyst in the riser of the FCC unit. At block 308, the gas oil may be cracked (e.g., higher molecular weight hydrocarbons are converted or cracked to smaller vaporous molecule). Such a cracking operation may cause coke or carbonaceous material to form on the surface of the catalyst thereby forming a coked catalyst. Forming of the coke on the catalyst may reduce the catalytic capability of the catalyst, thus, to utilize the catalyst in further operations or again, the coked catalyst may be passed through a regenerator.
At block 310, the coked catalyst may be separated from the hydrocarbon or gas products formed via the cracking operation. Such separation may occur via one or more cyclones included in the reactor of the FCC unit. At block 312, the coked catalyst may flow to or be supplied or pumped to the regenerator via a pipe, pipeline, or conduit. The amount and/or rate of coked catalyst flowing to the regenerator may be controlled via a flow control device positioned on the pipe, pipeline, or conduit. At block 314 oxygen (e.g., oxygen and/or ambient and/or atmospheric air) and pyoil (e.g., biomass derived pyrolysis oil) may be supplied to the regenerator (e.g., mixed with the coked catalyst). The oxygen (e.g., oxygen and/or ambient and/or atmospheric air) may be utilized to aid in combustion of the coke deposited on the coked catalyst. Further, if the oxygen is supplied as air, additional oxygen may be supplied with the air. As the operation of regeneration is an exothermic reaction, the temperature within the reactor may increase (e.g., during combustion). Such an operation (e.g., regeneration and cracking) may be a continuous or substantially continuous process. As such, at block 316, the temperature of the regenerator may be determined. In such examples, a temperature sensor may be disposed within the regenerator and utilized to provide an indication of the temperature within the regenerator. The temperature within the regenerator may vary based on the heat from the coked catalyst and the amount of pyoil injected into the regenerator, among other factors. Further, combustion of the pyoil and coke deposited on the coked catalyst may generate flue gas. The flue gas may comprise one or more of nitrogen, nitrogen oxides, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, or water vapor. The flue gas may be discharged from the regenerator at an outlet positioned proximate a top or upper portion of the regenerator.
If the temperature within the regenerator is not within a selected temperature, then, at block 318, the amount of pyoil injected into or supplied to the regenerator may be adjusted. For example, if the regenerator is below a selected temperature, then the amount of pyoil injected into the regenerator may be increased, while if the temperature is above the selected temperature, then the amount of pyoil injected into the regenerator may be decreased. After adjustment of the amount of pyoil or if the temperature is within the selected temperature, then, at block 320, the pyoil and coke may be combusted to form a regenerated catalyst. In another embodiment, and as noted, combustion may be continuous. Thus, in such an embodiment, the adjustment of the amount of pyoil injected into the regenerator and combustion of the pyoil and coke may occur in parallel or substantially simultaneously. The amount of pyoil injected into the regenerator may be controlled via a flow control device positioned along an inlet of the regenerator, the inlet configured to allow pyoil to enter the regenerator.
At block 322 an amount of regenerated catalyst may be supplied to the riser of the FCC unit. In an embodiment, the regenerated catalyst may be stored or supplied to a well or stand-pipe, prior to transfer or reintroduction to the riser of the FCC unit. The regenerate catalyst, at this point may be at high temperature that is lower than a temperature at which the catalyst may degrade. The temperature of the regenerated catalyst may be about range of about 1000° F. to 1600° F., of about 1000° F. to about 1500° F., of about 1100° F. to about 1450° F., at about 1250° F. to about 1400° F., or about 1300° F. In one or more other embodiments, the temperature of the catalyst may not exceed greater than about 1450° F., about 1400° F., about 1350° F., about 1300° F., about 1250° F., about 1200° F., about 1150° F., about 1100° F., about 1050° F., and/or about 1000° F. The regenerated catalyst may maintain such a temperature within the well or stand-pipe for a period of time prior to reintroduction or transfer to the riser of the FCC unit. The supplied amount of regenerated catalyst may mix or be mixed with one or more of fresh catalyst, additional or new gas oil, and/or steam. In such embodiments, the cracking operation may continue with the supplied regenerated catalyst. Further, the cracking operation may be a continuous or substantially continuous operation, with such adjustments described herein occurring as the cracking operation is executed.
At block 324, the temperature of or within the riser of the FCC unit and/or of or within the reactor of the FCC unit may be determined (e.g., via a temperature sensor or probe). If the temperatures of the riser and/or reactor are not within a selected temperature, then, at block 326, the amount of regenerated catalyst supplied to the riser and/or the amount of pyoil supplied to the regenerator may be adjusted. In another embodiment, the temperature of or within other portions or locations of the FCC unit may be determined and adjustment of the amount of regenerated catalyst supplied to the riser and/or the amount of pyoil supplied to the regenerator may be performed based on that temperature.
In an embodiment, an amount of fresh catalyst may be supplied (or such a supply may be adjusted) to the riser. The amount of fresh catalyst supplied to the riser may be a small amount in relation to the amount of regenerated catalyst supplied to the riser. In other words, small amounts of fresh catalyst may be supplied to the riser from time to time.
For example, if the FCC unit is operating at slightly below optimal conditions (e.g., the temperature is too cool within the riser and/or reactor), then, rather than or in addition to increasing preheating of the gas oil or increasing the temperature of the steam (or, in other embodiments, being heated via another external heat source), an additional amount of regenerated catalyst, at a higher temperature, may be mixed with the gas oil. Further, the amount of pyoil used in the regenerator may be increased to thereby increase the temperature of the regenerated catalyst. Thus, the overall temperature within the riser and/or reactor may be increased using a renewable resource (e.g., the pyoil) and the overall efficiency of the FCC unit may be increased (e.g., operating at a higher temperature without increasing heating from any other source).
In another embodiment, rather than or in addition to, injection of the pyoil into the regenerator, the pyoil may be included in or injected into a stripping zone of the reactor and/or via a stand-pipe connecting the reactor to the regenerator (e.g., at about 1% to about 2% wt % of pyoil in relation to the gas oil). In such embodiments, the amount of pyoil may be varied based on the same factors described above (e.g., temperature within the regenerator, temperature within riser and/or reactor, and/or temperature of the regenerated catalyst), among other factors. While the pyoil may include high levels of coke precursors and/or aromatics, the use of pyoil, as noted, may increase the temperature within the reactor and increase overall yield of the FCC unit. Further, the pyoil may include low or substantially none of sulfur, thus adding the pyoil, for example, into a stripping zone of the reactor and/or via a stand-pipe connecting the reactor to the regenerator may not impact hydrocarbon or gas product specifications (e.g., particularly specifications with low sulfur). Further, the pyoil may be low in hydrogen, thereby preventing or inhibiting production of saturated products and favoring production of olefinic material.
Further still, the pyoil may include low miscibility with the gas oil and steam. As the pyoil is introduced to the, for example, stripping zone, the pyoil may remain unmixed with the other materials (gas oil, steam, and/or catalyst). In such embodiments, substantially all of the pyoil may flow to the regenerator. The pyoil may then be combusted in the regenerator along with the coke from the coked catalyst and increase the temperature in reactor. In yet another embodiment, additional pyoil may be injected directly into the regenerator to further increase the temperature within the regenerator.
In another embodiment, the method 300 may include determining, based on a signal received by a controller from a temperature sensor positioned within the regenerator, a temperature within the regenerator. Further, the temperature within the FCC unit may be determined, based on a signal received by a controller from a temperature sensor positioned within the FCC unit, a temperature within the FCC unit. Further still, in response to one or more determinations that the temperature within the regenerator is less than a first preselected temperature or that the temperature within the FCC unit is less than a second preselected temperature, a flow control device associated with the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil in signal communication with the controller may be adjusted, via the controller, such that an amount of the biomass-derived pyrolysis oil introduced into the riser may be adjusted based on (1) the temperature within the regenerator and/or (2) the temperature within the FCC unit to thereby adjust the temperature within the regenerator and riser.
Each controller 402 described above and herein may include a machine-readable storage medium (e.g., memory 406) and one or more processors (e.g., processor 404). As used herein, a “machine-readable storage medium” may be any electronic, magnetic, optical, or other physical storage apparatus to contain or store information such as executable instructions, data, and the like. For example, any machine-readable storage medium described herein may be any of random access memory (RAM), volatile memory, non-volatile memory, flash memory, a storage drive (e.g., hard drive), a solid state drive, any type of storage disc, and the like, or a combination thereof. The memory 406 may store or include instructions executable by the processor 404. As used herein, a “processor” may include, for example one processor or multiple processors included in a single device or distributed across multiple computing devices. The processor 404 may be at least one of a central processing unit (CPU), a semiconductor-based microprocessor, a graphics processing unit (GPU), a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) to retrieve and execute instructions, a real time processor (RTP), other electronic circuitry suitable for the retrieval and execution instructions stored on a machine-readable storage medium, or a combination thereof.
As used herein, “signal communication” refers to electric communication such as hard wiring two components together or wireless communication, as understood by those skilled in the art. For example, wireless communication may be Wi-Fi®, Bluetooth®, ZigBee, or forms of near field communications. In addition, signal communication may include one or more intermediate controllers or relays disposed between elements that are in signal communication with one another.
In an embodiment, the controller 402 may obtain the temperature at various points and/or locations or of materials in the system 400 or FCC unit. For example, a reactor temperature sensor 422 or probe may provide, in real-time and/or continuously or at regular intervals, a signal to the controller 402 indicative of the temperature within the reactor and/or indicative of temperature of the materials within the reactor. In another example, a regenerator temperature sensor 420 or probe may provide, in real-time and/or continuously or at regular intervals, a signal to the controller 402 indicative of the temperature within the regenerator and/or indicative of temperature of the materials within the reactor. Other temperatures sensors and/or probes may be positioned at varying locations throughout the system, e.g., including, but not limited to, at each inlet of the reactor, riser, and/or regenerator; at each outlet of the reactor, riser, and/or regenerator; and/or within a well or stand-pipe configured to store regenerated catalyst. Other sensors may be disposed throughout the system 400 to measure or indicate various other aspects or characteristic within the system, e.g., such as a coked catalyst meter 416 (e.g., to indicate a flow rate and/or amount of coked catalyst flowing from the riser or reactor), a regenerated catalyst meter 424 (e.g., to indicate a flow rate and/or amount of regenerated catalyst flowing to the riser and/or a well or stand pipe), a pyoil meter 426 (e.g., to indicate a flow rate and/or amount of pyoil flowing to the riser and/or regenerator), and/or an air (and/or separate and/or additional oxygen) meter 430 (e.g., to indicate a flow rate and/or amount of air (and/or separate and/or additional oxygen) flowing to the regenerator). Other sensors or probes may measure or indicate pressure and/or other characteristics.
In an example, the sensors or probes positioned and/or disposed throughout the system 400 may be pressure transducers, flow meters, mass flow meters, Coriolis meters, other measurement sensors to determine a density, flow, temperature, or other variable as will be understood by those skilled in the art, or some combination thereof. In such examples, the sensors may measure the density of a fluid or material, the flow of the fluid or material, the temperature of the fluid or material, and/or the pressure within various locations of the system (e.g., within the reactor, riser, and/or regenerator). As noted above, the controller 402 may be in signal communication with the sensors, probes, or meters. The controller 402 may poll or request data from the sensors at various points or substantially continuously during a cracking and/or regeneration operation.
In an embodiment, the system 400 may include one or more different flow control devices. For example, the system 400 may include a coked catalyst flow control device 418, a regenerated catalyst flow control device 427, a pyoil flow control device 428, an air (and/or separate and/or additional oxygen) flow control device 432, and/or other flow control devices to control an amount of material or fluid flowing from one location to another. Each flow control device may include one or more of a pump, a meter (as described herein), a sensor or probe (as described herein), a valve (e.g., a control valve, a slide valve, or another valve configured to control an amount of fluid or material flowing therethrough), and/or some combination thereof. In such examples, each component of the flow control device may be in signal communication with the controller 402. The flow control devices may allow for adjustment of the flow of the fluid or material based on various factors received by the controller 402.
The controller 402, according to an embodiment, may include instructions 408 to determine a wt % of pyoil in relation to coked catalyst, gas oil or feed, or another material or fluid in the system. In such embodiments, the controller 402 may determine such a value based on a number of factors. For example, if the controller 402 is determining wt % of pyoil in relation to gas oil or feed flowing into a riser, then the controller 402 may determine such a value based on the amount of gas oil or feed flowing into the riser and the amount of the pyoil injected into the regenerator, stripping zone, and/or a stand-pipe, along with the amount of gas oil or feed. In another example, if the controller 402 is determining wt % of pyoil in relation to coked catalyst flowing into the regenerator (e.g., when pyoil is injected into directly into the regenerator), then the controller 402 may determine such a value based on the amount of coked catalyst flowing into the regenerator and the amount of the pyoil injected into the regenerator.
The controller 402, in another embodiment, may include instructions 410 to adjust the pyoil injection rate. In an embodiment, to maximize efficiency and reduce cost, the controller 402 may introduce an amount of pyoil to increase the temperature within the regenerator. Initially, the amount of pyoil may be greater than 0% to about 2% wt % in relation to feed or coked catalyst (based on where the pyoil is injected). After such an initial amount is injected and during cracking operations, the amount of pyoil may be adjusted to between about 0% to about 2% wt % as noted. The controller 402 may determine whether to increase or decrease the amount of pyoil based on the temperature within the reactor, the current wt % of the pyoil, the pyoil flow rate, the flow rate of the coked catalyst flowing into the regenerator, the temperature of the coked catalyst, and/or the temperature within the regenerator, among other factors. For example, the controller 402 may, in response to the temperature within the regenerator and/or temperature of the regenerated catalyst being less than a selected temperature, increase the amount of pyoil directly injected into the regenerator. Such an increase may occur based on the controller 402 sending a signal indicating an increase in amount of pyoil to a pyoil flow control device 428. In yet another example, the controller 402 may decrease the amount of pyoil injected into the regenerator or riser if the temperature of the reactor is above a selected temperature. In an embodiment, the controller 402, in addition to adjusting or determining an adjustment to pyoil injection rate, may determine an amount of and/or injection rate of oxygen and/or air. For example, based on the temperature within the regenerator, the controller 402 may adjust an amount of oxygen to inject directly into the regenerator, an amount of additional oxygen to mix with air supplied to the regenerator, and/or adjust the flow rate of air and/or oxygen supplied to the regenerator.
The controller 402 may additionally include instructions 412 to determine a rate and/or amount of regenerated catalyst to supply to a riser of an FCC unit to mix with additional and/or new gas oil and/or steam. In an embodiment, the regenerator of a FCC unit may regenerate catalyst, as described herein. In other words, the regenerator may enable coked or spent catalyst to perform further catalytic functions based on combustion of the coke deposited on the coked or spent catalyst. Prior to the regenerated catalyst being reintroduced into or supplied to the riser, the controller 402 may determine the temperature within the riser and/or the reactor, the temperature within the regenerator, the temperature of the regenerated catalyst, the temperature of fresh catalyst, the temperature of the gas oil or feed, and/or the amount of regenerated catalyst in a well or stand-pipe, among other factors. Based on these factors the amount of regenerated catalyst being mixed in the riser may be varied. For example, if the temperature within the reactor and/or riser (or, in other embodiments, various other locations within a FCC unit) is less than a preselected temperature, then the controller may increase the amount of regenerated catalyst flowing to the riser. As the amount of regenerated catalyst is increased, the temperature within the riser may increase, thus the gas oil or feed and the steam may not utilize additional pre-heating thereby saving energy, reducing cost, and/or reducing emissions.
Such an increase or decrease of the flow of regenerated catalyst may be controlled via the regenerated catalyst flow control device 427. The controller 402 may send signals indicating adjustment of flow rate of the regenerated catalyst to the regenerated catalyst flow control device 427.
In another embodiment, the controller 402 may control flow rates of other materials or fluids, such as the amount of air (and/or separate and/or additional oxygen) introduced into the regenerator (e.g., via the air (and/or separate and/or additional oxygen) flow control device 432), the amount of coked catalyst flowing into the regenerator (e.g., via the coked catalyst flow control device 418), the amount of pyoil flowing into the regenerator or riser (e.g., via the pyoil flow control device 428), and/or the amount of gas oil or feed flowing into the riser. Other factors, as noted, may be utilized in adjusting such flow rates, such as pressure, density, and/or temperature, among other factors (e.g., for example, capacity of the reactor, riser, and/or well or stand-pipe).
In another embodiment, the controller 402 may comprise or include a first set of one or more inputs in signal communication with one or more sensors (e.g., the coked catalyst meter 416, the regenerator temperature sensor 420, the reactor temperature sensor 422, the catalyst meter 424, the regenerated catalyst meter 425, the pyoil meter 426, the air (and/or separate and/or additional oxygen) meter 430, and/or a riser temperature sensor). The one or more sensors may be positioned within or proximate to one or more of a regenerator, a riser of an FCC unit, a reactor of the FCC unit, and/or other conduits or pipe and/or inlets and/or outlets associated with the regenerator, the riser of the FCC unit, and/or the reactor of the FCC unit. The controller 402 may receive signals from the one or more sensors indicative of a characteristic. The characteristic may comprise one or more of temperature, pressure, and/or flow rate. The controller 402 may comprise a first set of one or more inputs/outputs in signal communication with one or more flow control devices (e.g., the coked catalyst flow control device 418, the regenerated catalyst flow control device 427, the pyoil flow control device 428, and/or the air (and/or separate and/or additional oxygen) flow control device 432) positioned on one or more inlets or outlets associated with the regenerator, the riser of the FCC unit, and/or the reactor of the FCC unit. The controller 402 may, in response to the characteristic from one of the one or more sensors being less than or greater than a preselected threshold (e.g., a temperature, pressure, or flow rate range), adjust the one or more flow control devices via a signal indicating a new flow rate for the flow control device to adjust to.
Certain embodiments relate to a method of decreasing energy consumption by a FCC unit in a refinery operation by introduction of a biomass-derived pyrolysis oil into the regenerator of the FCC unit. In certain embodiments, the method includes increasing temperature in a regenerator unit of an FCC unit by introduction of a biomass-derived pyrolysis oil into the regenerator of the FCC unit in an amount ranging from one and two volume percent of the gas oil introduced into the riser of the FCC unit. In certain embodiments, the method includes increasing temperature in a regenerator unit of an FCC unit by introduction of a biomass-derived pyrolysis oil into the regenerator of the FCC unit in an amount less than two volume percent of the gas oil introduced into the riser of the FCC unit. Certain embodiments relate to a method of increasing delta coke by a FCC unit in a refinery operation by introduction of a biomass-derived pyrolysis oil into the regenerator of the FCC unit. Delta coke is the difference between the coke on coked FCC catalyst leaving the stripper and the coke on regenerated catalyst (CRC) leaving the regenerator, which is expressed in weight percent of the catalyst.
Specific compositions, methods, or systems are intended to be only illustrative of the embodiments disclosed by this specification. Variation on these systems, methods, or embodiments are readily apparent to a person of skill in the art based upon the teachings of this specification and are therefore intended to be included as part of the inventions disclosed herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 18/045,314, filed Oct. 10, 2022, titled “METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ENHANCING PROCESSING OF HYDROCARBONS IN A FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING UNIT USING A RENEWABLE ADDITIVE,” which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/262,342, filed Oct. 10, 2021, titled “METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ENHANCING PROCESSING OF HYDROCARBONS IN A FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING UNIT USING A RENEWABLE ADDITIVE,” the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The above detailed description is given for explanatory or illustrative purposes. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous changes and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the inventive aspects of the technology. Accordingly, the whole of the foregoing description is to be construed in an illustrative and not a limitative sense, the scope of the invention being defined solely by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 18/045,314, filed Oct. 10, 2022, titled “METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ENHANCING PROCESSING OF HYDROCARBONS IN A FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING UNIT USING A RENEWABLE ADDITIVE,” which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/262,342, filed Oct. 10, 2021, titled “METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ENHANCING PROCESSING OF HYDROCARBONS IN A FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING UNIT USING A RENEWABLE ADDITIVE,” the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
981434 | Lander | Jan 1911 | A |
1526301 | Stevens | Feb 1925 | A |
1572922 | Govers et al. | Feb 1926 | A |
1867143 | Fohl | Jul 1932 | A |
2401570 | Koehler | Jun 1946 | A |
2498442 | Morey | Feb 1950 | A |
2516097 | Woodham et al. | Jul 1950 | A |
2686728 | Wallace | Aug 1954 | A |
2691621 | Gagle | Oct 1954 | A |
2691773 | Lichtenberger | Oct 1954 | A |
2731282 | Mcmanus et al. | Jan 1956 | A |
2740616 | Walden | Apr 1956 | A |
2792908 | Glanzer | May 1957 | A |
2804165 | Blomgren | Aug 1957 | A |
2867913 | Faucher | Jan 1959 | A |
2888239 | Slemmons | May 1959 | A |
2909482 | Williams et al. | Oct 1959 | A |
2925144 | Kroll | Feb 1960 | A |
2963423 | Birchfield | Dec 1960 | A |
3063681 | Duguid | Nov 1962 | A |
3070990 | Stanley | Jan 1963 | A |
3109481 | Yahnke | Nov 1963 | A |
3167305 | Backx et al. | Jan 1965 | A |
3188184 | Rice et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
3199876 | Magos et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
3203460 | Kuhne | Aug 1965 | A |
3279441 | Lippert et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
3307574 | Anderson | Mar 1967 | A |
3364134 | Hamblin | Jan 1968 | A |
3400049 | Wolfe | Sep 1968 | A |
3545411 | Vollradt | Dec 1970 | A |
3660057 | Ilnyckyj | May 1972 | A |
3719027 | Salka | Mar 1973 | A |
3720601 | Coonradt | Mar 1973 | A |
3771638 | Schneider et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3775294 | Peterson | Nov 1973 | A |
3795607 | Adams | Mar 1974 | A |
3838036 | Stine et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3839484 | Zimmerman, Jr. | Oct 1974 | A |
3840209 | James | Oct 1974 | A |
3841144 | Baldwin | Oct 1974 | A |
3854843 | Penny | Dec 1974 | A |
3874399 | Ishihara | Apr 1975 | A |
3906780 | Baldwin | Sep 1975 | A |
3912307 | Totman | Oct 1975 | A |
3928172 | Davis et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3937660 | Yates et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4006075 | Luckenbach | Feb 1977 | A |
4017214 | Smith | Apr 1977 | A |
4066425 | Nett | Jan 1978 | A |
4085078 | McDonald | Apr 1978 | A |
4144759 | Slowik | Mar 1979 | A |
4149756 | Tackett | Apr 1979 | A |
4151003 | Smith et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4167492 | Varady | Sep 1979 | A |
4176052 | Bruce et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4217116 | Seever | Aug 1980 | A |
4260068 | McCarthy et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4299687 | Myers et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4302324 | Chen et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4308968 | Thiltgen et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4328947 | Reimpell et al. | May 1982 | A |
4332671 | Boyer | Jun 1982 | A |
4340204 | Heard | Jul 1982 | A |
4353812 | Lomas et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4357603 | Roach et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4392870 | Chieffo et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4404095 | Haddad et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4422925 | Williams et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4434044 | Busch et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4439533 | Lomas et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4468975 | Sayles et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4482451 | Kemp | Nov 1984 | A |
4495063 | Walters et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4539012 | Ohzeki et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4554313 | Hagenbach et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4554799 | Pallanch | Nov 1985 | A |
4570942 | Diehl et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4601303 | Jensen | Jul 1986 | A |
4615792 | Greenwood | Oct 1986 | A |
4621062 | Stewart et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4622210 | Hirschberg et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4624771 | Lane et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4647313 | Clementoni | Mar 1987 | A |
4654748 | Rees | Mar 1987 | A |
4661241 | Dabkowski et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4673490 | Subramanian et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4674337 | Jonas | Jun 1987 | A |
4684759 | Lam | Aug 1987 | A |
4686027 | Bonilla et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4728348 | Nelson et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4733888 | Toelke | Mar 1988 | A |
4741819 | Robinson et al. | May 1988 | A |
4764347 | Milligan | Aug 1988 | A |
4765631 | Kohnen et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4771176 | Scheifer et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4816137 | Swint et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4820404 | Owen | Apr 1989 | A |
4824016 | Cody et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4844133 | von Meyerinck et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4844927 | Morris et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4849182 | Luetzelschwab | Jul 1989 | A |
4854855 | Rajewski | Aug 1989 | A |
4875994 | Haddad et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4877513 | Haire et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4798463 | Koshi | Nov 1989 | A |
4901751 | Story et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4914249 | Benedict | Apr 1990 | A |
4916938 | Aikin et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4917790 | Owen | Apr 1990 | A |
4923834 | Lomas | May 1990 | A |
4940900 | Lambert | Jul 1990 | A |
4957511 | Ljusberg-Wahren | Sep 1990 | A |
4960503 | Haun et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4963745 | Maggard | Oct 1990 | A |
4972867 | Ruesch | Nov 1990 | A |
5000841 | Owen | Mar 1991 | A |
5002459 | Swearingen et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5008653 | Kidd et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5009768 | Galiasso et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5013537 | Patarin et al. | May 1991 | A |
5022266 | Cody et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5032154 | Wright | Jul 1991 | A |
5034115 | Avidan | Jul 1991 | A |
5045177 | Cooper et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5050603 | Stokes et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5053371 | Williamson | Oct 1991 | A |
5056758 | Bramblet | Oct 1991 | A |
5059305 | Sapre | Oct 1991 | A |
5061467 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5066049 | Staples | Nov 1991 | A |
5076910 | Rush | Dec 1991 | A |
5082985 | Crouzet et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5096566 | Dawson et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5097677 | Holtzapple | Mar 1992 | A |
5111882 | Tang et al. | May 1992 | A |
5112357 | Bjerklund | May 1992 | A |
5114562 | Haun et al. | May 1992 | A |
5121337 | Brown | Jun 1992 | A |
5128109 | Owen | Jul 1992 | A |
5128292 | Lomas | Jul 1992 | A |
5129624 | Icenhower et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5138891 | Johnson | Aug 1992 | A |
5139649 | Owen et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5145785 | Maggard et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5149261 | Suwa et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5154558 | McCallion | Oct 1992 | A |
5160426 | Avidan | Nov 1992 | A |
5170911 | Della Riva | Dec 1992 | A |
5174250 | Lane | Dec 1992 | A |
5174345 | Kesterman et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178363 | Icenhower et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5196110 | Swart et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201850 | Lenhardt et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5203370 | Block et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5211838 | Staubs et al. | May 1993 | A |
5212129 | Lomas | May 1993 | A |
5221463 | Kamienski et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5223714 | Maggard | Jun 1993 | A |
5225679 | Clark et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5230498 | Wood et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5235999 | Lindquist et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5236765 | Cordia et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5243546 | Maggard | Sep 1993 | A |
5246860 | Hutchins et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5246868 | Busch et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5248408 | Owen | Sep 1993 | A |
5250807 | Sontvedt | Oct 1993 | A |
5257530 | Beattie et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5258115 | Heck et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5258117 | Kolstad et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5262645 | Lambert et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5263682 | Covert et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5301560 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5316448 | Ziegler et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320671 | Schilling | Jun 1994 | A |
5326074 | Spock et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5328505 | Schilling | Jul 1994 | A |
5328591 | Raterman | Jul 1994 | A |
5332492 | Maurer et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5338439 | Owen et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5348645 | Maggard et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349188 | Maggard | Sep 1994 | A |
5349189 | Maggard | Sep 1994 | A |
5354451 | Goldstein et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5354453 | Bhatia | Oct 1994 | A |
5361643 | Boyd et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5362965 | Maggard | Nov 1994 | A |
5370146 | King et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5370790 | Maggard et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5372270 | Rosenkrantz | Dec 1994 | A |
5372352 | Smith et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5381002 | Morrow et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388805 | Bathrick et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5389232 | Adewuyi et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5404015 | Chimenti et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5416323 | Hoots et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417843 | Swart et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417846 | Renard | May 1995 | A |
5423446 | Johnson | Jun 1995 | A |
5431067 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5433120 | Boyd et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5435436 | Manley et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443716 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5452232 | Espinosa et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
RE35046 | Hettinger et al. | Oct 1995 | E |
5459677 | Kowalski et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5472875 | Monticello | Dec 1995 | A |
5474607 | Holleran | Dec 1995 | A |
5475612 | Espinosa et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476117 | Pakula | Dec 1995 | A |
5490085 | Lambert et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5492617 | Trimble et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5494079 | Tiedemann | Feb 1996 | A |
5507326 | Cadman et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5510265 | Monticello | Apr 1996 | A |
5532487 | Brearley et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540893 | English | Jul 1996 | A |
5549814 | Zinke | Aug 1996 | A |
5556222 | Chen | Sep 1996 | A |
5559295 | Sheryll | Sep 1996 | A |
5560509 | Laverman et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569808 | Cansell et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5573032 | Lenz et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584985 | Lomas | Dec 1996 | A |
5596196 | Cooper et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600134 | Ashe et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5647961 | Lofland | Jul 1997 | A |
5652145 | Cody et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5675071 | Cody et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684580 | Cooper et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5699269 | Ashe et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699270 | Ashe et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712481 | Welch et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712797 | Descales et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713401 | Weeks | Feb 1998 | A |
5716055 | Wilkinson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717209 | Bigman et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5740073 | Bages et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744024 | Sullivan, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744702 | Roussis et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746906 | McHenry et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758514 | Genung et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5763883 | Descales et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5800697 | Lengemann | Sep 1998 | A |
5817517 | Perry et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822058 | Adler-Golden et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5834539 | Krivohlavek | Nov 1998 | A |
5837130 | Crossland | Nov 1998 | A |
5853455 | Gibson | Dec 1998 | A |
5856869 | Cooper et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5858207 | Lomas | Jan 1999 | A |
5858210 | Richardson | Jan 1999 | A |
5858212 | Darcy | Jan 1999 | A |
5861228 | Descales et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862060 | Murray, Jr. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865441 | Orlowski | Feb 1999 | A |
5883363 | Motoyoshi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885439 | Glover | Mar 1999 | A |
5892228 | Cooper et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895506 | Cook et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5916433 | Tejada et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919354 | Bartek | Jul 1999 | A |
5935415 | Haizmann et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940176 | Knapp | Aug 1999 | A |
5972171 | Ross et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5979491 | Gonsior | Nov 1999 | A |
5997723 | Wiehe et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6015440 | Noureddini | Jan 2000 | A |
6025305 | Aldrich et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026841 | Kozik | Feb 2000 | A |
6047602 | Lynnworth | Apr 2000 | A |
6056005 | Piotrowski et al. | May 2000 | A |
6062274 | Pettesch | May 2000 | A |
6063263 | Palmas | May 2000 | A |
6063265 | Chiyoda et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070128 | Descales et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072576 | McDonald et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076864 | Levivier et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6087662 | Wilt et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093867 | Ladwig et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099607 | Haslebacher | Aug 2000 | A |
6099616 | Jenne et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102655 | Kreitmeier | Aug 2000 | A |
6105441 | Conner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107631 | He | Aug 2000 | A |
6117812 | Gao et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130095 | Shearer | Oct 2000 | A |
6140647 | Welch et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6153091 | Sechrist et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6155294 | Cornford et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162644 | Choi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165350 | Lokhandwala et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169218 | Hearn | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171052 | Aschenbruck et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174501 | Noureddini | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190535 | Kalnes et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203585 | Majerczak | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6235104 | Chattopadhyay et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6258987 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271518 | Boehm et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6274785 | Gore | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284128 | Glover et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296812 | Gauthier et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312586 | Kalnes et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315815 | Spadaccini | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324895 | Chitnis et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328348 | Cornford et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331436 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6348074 | Wenzel | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6350371 | Lokhandwala et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6368495 | Kocal et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382633 | Hashiguchi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6390673 | Camburn | May 2002 | B1 |
6395228 | Maggard et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398518 | Ingistov | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6399800 | Haas et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6420181 | Novak | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422035 | Phillippe | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6435279 | Howe et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446446 | Cowans | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446729 | Bixenman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451197 | Kalnes | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454935 | Lesieur et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6467303 | Ross | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6482762 | Ruffin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503460 | Miller et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6528047 | Arif et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540797 | Scott et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558531 | Steffens et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6589323 | Korin | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609888 | Ingistov | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6622490 | Ingistov | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6644935 | Ingistov | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6660895 | Brunet et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6672858 | Benson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6733232 | Ingistov et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6733237 | Ingistov | May 2004 | B2 |
6736961 | Plummer et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740226 | Mehra et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6772581 | Ojiro et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6772741 | Pittel et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6814941 | Naunheimer et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6824673 | Ellis et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6827841 | Kiser et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6835223 | Walker et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6841133 | Niewiedzial et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6842702 | Haaland et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6854346 | Nimberger | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858128 | Hoehn et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6866771 | Lomas et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6869521 | Lomas | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6897071 | Sonbul | May 2005 | B2 |
6962484 | Brandl et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7013718 | Ingistov et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7035767 | Archer et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7048254 | Laurent et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7074321 | Kalnes | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7078005 | Smith et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087153 | Kalnes | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7156123 | Welker et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172686 | Ji et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7174715 | Armitage et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7213413 | Battiste et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225840 | Craig et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7228250 | Naiman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7244350 | Kar et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252755 | Kiser et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7255531 | Ingistov | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260499 | Watzke et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7291257 | Ackerson et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7332132 | Hedrick et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7404411 | Welch et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7419583 | Nieskens et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7445936 | O'Connor et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7459081 | Koenig | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7485801 | Pulter et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7487955 | Buercklin | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7501285 | Triche et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7551420 | Cerqueira et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7571765 | Themig | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7637970 | Fox et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7669653 | Craster et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682501 | Soni et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7686280 | Lowery | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7857964 | Mashiko et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7866346 | Walters | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7895011 | Youssefi et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7914601 | Farr et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7931803 | Buchanan | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7932424 | Fujimoto et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7939335 | Triche et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7981361 | Bacik | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7988753 | Fox et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
7993514 | Schlueter | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8007662 | Lomas et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8017910 | Sharpe | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8029662 | Varma et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8037938 | Jardim De Azevedo et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8038774 | Peng | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8064052 | Feitisch et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066867 | Dziabala | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8080426 | Moore et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8127845 | Assal | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8193401 | McGehee et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8236566 | Carpenter et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8286673 | Recker et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8354065 | Sexton | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8360118 | Fleischer et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8370082 | De Peinder et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8388830 | Sohn et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8389285 | Carpenter et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8397803 | Crabb et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8397820 | Fehr et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8404103 | Dziabala | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8434800 | LeBlanc | May 2013 | B1 |
8481942 | Mertens | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8506656 | Turocy | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8524180 | Canari et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8569068 | Carpenter et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579139 | Sablak | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8591814 | Hodges | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8609048 | Beadle | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8647415 | De Haan et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8670945 | van Schie | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685232 | Mandal et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8735820 | Mertens | May 2014 | B2 |
8753502 | Sexton et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8764970 | Moore et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8778823 | Oyekan et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8781757 | Farquharson et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8829258 | Gong et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8916041 | Van Den Berg et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8932458 | Gianzon et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8986402 | Kelly | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8987537 | Droubi et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8999011 | Stern et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
8999012 | Kelly et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9011674 | Milam et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9057035 | Kraus et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9097423 | Kraus et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9109176 | Stern et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9109177 | Freel et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9138738 | Glover et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9216376 | Liu et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9272241 | Königsson | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9273867 | Buzinski et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9289715 | Høy-Petersen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9315403 | Laur et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9371493 | Oyekan | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9371494 | Oyekan et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9377340 | Hägg | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9393520 | Gomez | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9410102 | Eaton et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9428695 | Narayanaswamy et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9458396 | Weiss et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9487718 | Kraus et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9499758 | Droubi et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9500300 | Daigle | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9506649 | Rennie et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9580662 | Moore | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9624448 | Joo et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9650580 | Merdrignac et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9657241 | Craig et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9663729 | Baird et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9665693 | Saeger et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9709545 | Mertens | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9757686 | Peng | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9789290 | Forsell | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9803152 | Kar et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9834731 | Weiss et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9840674 | Weiss et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9873080 | Richardson | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9878300 | Norling | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9890907 | Highfield et al. | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9891198 | Sutan | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9895649 | Brown et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9896630 | Weiss et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9914094 | Jenkins et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9920270 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9925486 | Botti | Mar 2018 | B1 |
9982788 | Maron | May 2018 | B1 |
10047299 | Rubin-Pitel et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10087397 | Phillips et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10099175 | Takashashi et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10150078 | Komatsu et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10228708 | Lambert et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10239034 | Sexton | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10253269 | Cantley et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10266779 | Weiss et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10295521 | Mertens | May 2019 | B2 |
10308884 | Klussman | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10316263 | Rubin-Pitel et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10384157 | Balcik | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10435339 | Larsen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10435636 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10443000 | Lomas | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10443006 | Fruchey et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10457881 | Droubi et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10479943 | Liu et al. | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10494579 | Wrigley et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10495570 | Owen et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10501699 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10526547 | Larsen et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10533141 | Moore et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10563130 | Narayanaswamy et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10563132 | Moore et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10563133 | Moore et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10570078 | Larsen et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10577551 | Kraus et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10584287 | Klussman et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10604709 | Moore et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10640719 | Freel et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10655074 | Moore et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10696906 | Cantley et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10808184 | Moore | Oct 2020 | B1 |
10836966 | Moore et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10876053 | Klussman et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10954456 | Moore et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10961468 | Moore et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10962259 | Shah et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10968403 | Moore | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11021662 | Moore et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11098255 | Larsen et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11124714 | Eller et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11136513 | Moore et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11168270 | Moore | Nov 2021 | B1 |
11175039 | Lochschmied et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11203719 | Cantley et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11203722 | Moore et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11214741 | Davydov et al. | Jan 2022 | B2 |
11306253 | Timken et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11319262 | Wu et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11352577 | Woodchick et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11352578 | Eller et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11384301 | Eller et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11421162 | Pradeep et al. | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11460478 | Sugiyama et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
11467172 | Mitzel et al. | Oct 2022 | B1 |
11542441 | Larsen et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
11634647 | Cantley et al. | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11667858 | Eller et al. | Jun 2023 | B2 |
11692141 | Larsen et al. | Jul 2023 | B2 |
11702600 | Sexton et al. | Jul 2023 | B2 |
20020014068 | Mittricker et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020061633 | Marsh | May 2002 | A1 |
20020170431 | Chang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030041518 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030113598 | Chow et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030188536 | Mittricker | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194322 | Brandl et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040010170 | Vickers | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040033617 | Sonbul | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040040201 | Roos et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040079431 | Kissell | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040121472 | Nemana et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040129605 | Goldstein et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139858 | Entezarian | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040154610 | Hopp et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040232050 | Martin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040251170 | Chiyoda et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050042151 | Alward et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050088653 | Coates et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050123466 | Sullivan | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139516 | Nieskens et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050150820 | Guo | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050229777 | Brown | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060037237 | Copeland et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060042701 | Jansen | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060049082 | Niccum et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060162243 | Wolf | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060169305 | Jansen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210456 | Bruggendick | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060169064 | Anschutz et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060220383 | Erickson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070003450 | Burdett et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070082407 | Little, III | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070202027 | Walker et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070212271 | Kennedy et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070212790 | Welch et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215521 | Havlik et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070243556 | Wachs | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070283812 | Liu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080078693 | Sexton et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080078694 | Sexton et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080078695 | Sexton et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080081844 | Shires et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080087592 | Buchanan | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080092436 | Seames et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109107 | Stefani et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080149486 | Greaney et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156696 | Niccum et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080207974 | McCoy et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080211505 | Trygstad et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080247942 | Kandziora et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080253936 | Abhari | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090151250 | Agrawal | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090152454 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158824 | Brown et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100127217 | Lightowlers et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131247 | Carpenter et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100166602 | Bacik | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100243235 | Caldwell et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100301044 | Sprecher | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318118 | Forsell | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110147267 | Kaul et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110155646 | Karas et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110175032 | Günther | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110186307 | Derby | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110237856 | Mak | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110247835 | Crabb | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110277377 | Novak et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299076 | Feitisch et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319698 | Sohn et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120012342 | Wilkin et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120125813 | Bridges et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120125814 | Sanchez et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131853 | Thacker et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130014431 | Jin et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130109895 | Novak et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130112313 | Donnelly et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125619 | Wang | May 2013 | A1 |
20130186739 | Trompiz | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130225897 | Candelon et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130288355 | DeWitte et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130334027 | Winter et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342203 | Trygstad et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140019052 | Zaeper et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140024873 | De Haan et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140041150 | Sjoberg | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140121428 | Wang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140229010 | Farquharson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140296057 | Ho et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140299515 | Weiss et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140311953 | Chimenti et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140316176 | Fjare et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140332444 | Weiss et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140353138 | Amale et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140374322 | Venkatesh | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150005547 | Freel et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150005548 | Freel et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150034599 | Hunger et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057477 | Ellig et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150071028 | Glanville | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150122704 | Kumar et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150166426 | Wegerer et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150240167 | Kulprathipanja et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150240174 | Bru et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150337207 | Chen et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150337225 | Droubi et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150337226 | Tardif et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150353851 | Buchanan | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160090539 | Frey et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160122662 | Weiss et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160122666 | Weiss et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160160139 | Dawe et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160168481 | Ray et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160244677 | Froehle | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160298851 | Brickwood et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160312127 | Frey et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160312130 | Majcher et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170009163 | Kraus et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170115190 | Hall et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170131728 | Lambert et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170151526 | Cole | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170183575 | Rubin-Pitel et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170198910 | Garg | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170226434 | Zimmerman | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170233670 | Feustel et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180017469 | English et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180037308 | Lee et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180080958 | Marchese et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180119039 | Tanaka et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180134974 | Weiss et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180163144 | Weiss et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180179457 | Mukherjee et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180202607 | McBride | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180230389 | Moore et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180246142 | Glover | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180355263 | Moore et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180361312 | Dutra e Mello et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180371325 | Streiff et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190002772 | Moore et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190010405 | Moore et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190010408 | Moore et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190016980 | Kar et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190093026 | Wohaibi et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190099706 | Sampath | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190100702 | Cantley et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190127651 | Kar et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190128160 | Peng | May 2019 | A1 |
20190136144 | Wohaibi et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190153340 | Weiss et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190153942 | Wohaibi et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190169509 | Cantley et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190185772 | Berkhous et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190201841 | McClelland | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190203130 | Mukherjee | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190218466 | Slade et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190233741 | Moore et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190292465 | McBride | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190338205 | Ackerson et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190382668 | Klussman et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190382672 | Sorensen | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200049675 | Ramirez | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200080881 | Langlois et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200095509 | Moore et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200123458 | Moore et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200181502 | Paasikallio et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200199462 | Klussman et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200208068 | Hossain et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200291316 | Robbins et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200312470 | Craig et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200316513 | Zhao | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200332198 | Yang et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200353456 | Zalewski et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200378600 | Craig et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200385644 | Rogel et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210002559 | Larsen et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210003502 | Kirchmann et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210033631 | Field et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210115344 | Perkins et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210181164 | Shirkhan et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210213382 | Cole | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210238487 | Moore et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210253964 | Eller et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210253965 | Woodchick et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210261874 | Eller et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210284919 | Moore et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210292661 | Klussman et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210301210 | Timken et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210396660 | Zarrabian | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210403819 | Moore et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220040629 | Edmoundson et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220048019 | Zalewski et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220268694 | Bledsoe et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220298440 | Woodchick et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20230080192 | Bledsoe et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230082189 | Bledsoe et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230084329 | Bledsoe et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230087063 | Mitzel et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230089935 | Bledsoe et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230093452 | Sexton et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230111609 | Sexton et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230113140 | Larsen et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230118319 | Sexton et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230220286 | Cantley et al. | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230241548 | Holland et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230242837 | Short et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11772 | Apr 2011 | AT |
PI0701518 | Nov 2008 | BR |
2949201 | Nov 2015 | CA |
2822742 | Dec 2016 | CA |
3009808 | Jul 2017 | CA |
2904903 | Aug 2020 | CA |
3077045 | Sep 2020 | CA |
2947431 | Mar 2021 | CA |
3004712 | Jun 2021 | CA |
2980055 | Dec 2021 | CA |
2879783 | Jan 2022 | CA |
2991614 | Jan 2022 | CA |
2980069 | Nov 2022 | CA |
3109606 | Dec 2022 | CA |
432129 | Mar 1967 | CH |
2128346 | Mar 1993 | CN |
201306736 | Sep 2009 | CN |
201940168 | Aug 2011 | CN |
102120138 | Dec 2012 | CN |
203453713 | Feb 2014 | CN |
203629938 | Jun 2014 | CN |
203816490 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104353357 | Feb 2015 | CN |
204170623 | Feb 2015 | CN |
103331093 | Apr 2015 | CN |
204253221 | Apr 2015 | CN |
204265565 | Apr 2015 | CN |
105148728 | Dec 2015 | CN |
204824775 | Dec 2015 | CN |
103933845 | Jan 2016 | CN |
105289241 | Feb 2016 | CN |
105536486 | May 2016 | CN |
105804900 | Jul 2016 | CN |
103573430 | Aug 2016 | CN |
205655095 | Oct 2016 | CN |
104326604 | Nov 2016 | CN |
104358627 | Nov 2016 | CN |
106237802 | Dec 2016 | CN |
205779365 | Dec 2016 | CN |
106407648 | Feb 2017 | CN |
105778987 | Aug 2017 | CN |
207179722 | Apr 2018 | CN |
207395575 | May 2018 | CN |
108179022 | Jun 2018 | CN |
108704478 | Oct 2018 | CN |
109126458 | Jan 2019 | CN |
109423345 | Mar 2019 | CN |
109499365 | Mar 2019 | CN |
109705939 | May 2019 | CN |
109722303 | May 2019 | CN |
110129103 | Aug 2019 | CN |
110229686 | Sep 2019 | CN |
209451617 | Oct 2019 | CN |
110987862 | Apr 2020 | CN |
215288592 | Dec 2021 | CN |
113963818 | Jan 2022 | CN |
114001278 | Feb 2022 | CN |
217431673 | Sep 2022 | CN |
218565442 | Mar 2023 | CN |
10179 | Jun 1912 | DE |
3721725 | Jan 1989 | DE |
19619722 | Nov 1997 | DE |
102010017563 | Dec 2011 | DE |
102014009231 | Jan 2016 | DE |
0142352 | May 1985 | EP |
0527000 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0783910 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0949318 | Oct 1999 | EP |
0783910 | Dec 2000 | EP |
0801299 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1413712 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1600491 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1870153 | Dec 2007 | EP |
2047905 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2955345 | Dec 2015 | EP |
3130773 | Feb 2017 | EP |
3139009 | Mar 2017 | EP |
3239483 | Nov 2017 | EP |
3085910 | Aug 2018 | EP |
3355056 | Aug 2018 | EP |
2998529 | Feb 2019 | EP |
3441442 | Feb 2019 | EP |
3569988 | Nov 2019 | EP |
3878926 | Sep 2021 | EP |
2357630 | Feb 1978 | FR |
3004722 | Mar 2016 | FR |
3027909 | May 2016 | FR |
3067036 | Dec 2018 | FR |
3067037 | Dec 2018 | FR |
3072684 | Apr 2019 | FR |
3075808 | Jun 2019 | FR |
775273 | May 1957 | GB |
933618 | Aug 1963 | GB |
1207719 | Oct 1970 | GB |
2144526 | Mar 1985 | GB |
202111016535 | Jul 2021 | IN |
59220609 | Dec 1984 | JP |
2003129067 | May 2003 | JP |
3160405 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2015059220 | Mar 2015 | JP |
2019014275 | Jan 2019 | JP |
101751923 | Jul 2017 | KR |
101823897 | Mar 2018 | KR |
20180095303 | Aug 2018 | KR |
20190004474 | Jan 2019 | KR |
20190004475 | Jan 2019 | KR |
2673558 | Nov 2018 | RU |
2700705 | Sep 2019 | RU |
2760879 | Dec 2021 | RU |
320682 | Nov 1997 | TW |
199640436 | Dec 1996 | WO |
1997033678 | Sep 1997 | WO |
199803249 | Jan 1998 | WO |
1999041591 | Aug 1999 | WO |
2001051588 | Jul 2001 | WO |
2006126978 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2008088294 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2010144191 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2012026302 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012062924 | May 2012 | WO |
2012089776 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012108584 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2014053431 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2014096703 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2014096704 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2014191004 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014177424 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2014202815 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2016167708 | Oct 2016 | WO |
2017067088 | Apr 2017 | WO |
2017207976 | Dec 2017 | WO |
2018073018 | Apr 2018 | WO |
2018122274 | Jul 2018 | WO |
2018148675 | Aug 2018 | WO |
2018148681 | Aug 2018 | WO |
2018231105 | Dec 2018 | WO |
2019053323 | Mar 2019 | WO |
2019104243 | May 2019 | WO |
2019155183 | Aug 2019 | WO |
2019178701 | Sep 2019 | WO |
2020160004 | Aug 2020 | WO |
2021058289 | Apr 2021 | WO |
2022133359 | Jun 2022 | WO |
20220144495 | Jul 2022 | WO |
2022220991 | Oct 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Lerh et al., Feature: IMO 2020 draws more participants into Singapore's bunkering pool., S&P Global Platts, www.spglobal.com, Sep. 3, 2019. |
Cremer et al., Model Based Assessment of the Novel Use of Sour Water Stripper Vapor for NOx Control in CO Boilers, Industrial Combustion Symposium, American Flame Research Committee 2021, Nov. 19, 2021. |
Frederick et al., Alternative Technology for Sour Water Stripping, University of Pennsylvania, Penn Libraries, Scholarly Commons, Apr. 20, 2018. |
Da Vinci Laboratory Solutions B. V., DVLS Liquefied Gas Injector, Sampling and analysis of liquefied gases, https://www.davinci-ls.com/en/products/dvls-products/dvls-liquefied-gas-injector. |
Zulkefi et al., Overview of H2S Removal Technologies from Biogas Production, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562, vol. 11, No. 20, pp. 10060-10066, © Research India Publications, 2016. |
Rodriguez, Elena et al., Coke deposition and product distribution in the co-cracking of waste polyolefin derived streams and vacuum gas oil under FCC unit conditions, Fuel Processing Technology 192 (2019) 130-139. |
Passamonti, Francisco J. et al., Recycling of waste plastics into fuels. LDPE conversion in FCC, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 125 (2012) 499-506. |
Andrea De Rezende Pinho et al., Fast pyrolysis oil from pinewood chips co-processing with vacuum gas oil in an FCC unit for second generation fuel production, Fuel 188 (2017) 462-473. |
Platvoet et al., Process Burners 101, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Aug. 2013. |
Luyben, W. L., Process Modeling, Simulation, and Control for Chemical Engineers, Feedforward Control, pp. 431-433. |
Cooper et al., Calibration transfer of near-IR partial least squares property models of fuels using standards, Wiley Online Library, Jul. 19, 2011. |
ABB Measurement & Analytics, Using FT-NIR as a Multi-Stream Method for CDU Optimization, Nov. 8, 2018. |
Modcon Systems LTD., On-Line NIR Analysis of Crude Distillation Unit, Jun. 2008. |
ABB Measurement & Analytics, Crude distillation unit (CDU) optimization, 2017. |
Guided Wave Inc., The Role of NIR Process Analyzers in Refineries to Process Crude Oil into Useable Petrochemical Products, 2021. |
ABB Measurement & Analytics, Optimizing Refinery Catalytic Reforming Units with the use of Simple Robust On-Line Analyzer Technology, Nov. 27, 2017, https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=14840. |
Bueno, Alexis et al., Characterization of Catalytic Reforming Streams by NIR Spectroscopy, Energy & Fuels 2009, 23, 3172-3177, Apr. 29, 2009. |
Caricato, Enrico et al, Catalytic Naphtha Reforming—a Novel Control System for the Bench-Scale Evaluation of Commerical Continuous Catalytic Regeneration Catalysts, Industrial of Engineering Chemistry Research, ACS Publications, May 18, 2017. |
Alves, J. C. L., et al., Diesel Oil Quality Parameter Determinations Using Support Vector Regression and Near Infrared Spectroscopy for Hydrotreationg Feedstock Monitoring, Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 20, 419-425 (2012), Jul. 23, 2012. |
Wasson ECE Instrumentation, LPG Pressurization Station, https://wasson-ece.com/products/small-devices/lpg-pressurization-station. |
Mechatest B. V., Gas & Liquefied Gas Sampling Systems, https://www.mechatest.com/products/gas-sampling-system/. |
La Rivista dei Combustibili, The Fuel Magazine, vol. 66, File 2, 2012. |
Niaei et al., Computational Study of Pyrolysis Reactions and Coke Deposition in Industrial Naphtha Cracking, P.M.A. Sloot et al., Eds.: ICCS 2002, LNCS 2329, pp. 723-732, 2002. |
Hanson et al., An atmospheric crude tower revamp, Digital Refining, Article, Jul. 2005. |
Lopiccolo, Philip, Coke trap reduces FCC slurry exchanger fouling for Texas refiner, Oil & Gas Journal, Sep. 8, 2003. |
Martino, Germain, Catalytic Reforming, Petroleum Refining Conversion Processes, vol. 3, Chapter 4, pp. 101-168, 2001. |
Baukal et al., Natural-Draft Burners, Industrial Burners Handbook, CRC Press 2003. |
Spekuljak et al., Fluid Distributors for Structured Packing Colums, AICHE, Nov. 1998. |
Hemler et al., UOP Fluid Catalytic Cracking Process, Handbook of Petroleum Refining Processes, 3rd ed., McGraw Hill, 2004. |
United States Department of Agriculture, NIR helps Turn Vegetable Oil into High-Quality Biofuel, Agricultural Research Service, Jun. 15, 1999. |
Npra, 2006 Cat Cracker Seminar Transcript, National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, Aug. 1-2, 2006. |
Niccum, Phillip K. et al. KBR, CatCracking.com, More Production—Less Risk!, Twenty Questions: Identify Probably Cuase of High FCC Catalyst Loss, May 3-6, 2011. |
NPRA, Cat-10-105 Troubleshooting FCC Catalyst Losses, National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, Aug. 24-25, 2010. |
Fraser, Stuart, Distillation in Refining, Distillation Operation and Applications (2014), pp. 155-190 (Year: 2014). |
Yasin et al., Quality and chemistry of crude oils, Journal of Petroleum Technology and Alternative Fuels, vol. 4(3), pp. 53-63, Mar. 2013. |
Penn State, Cut Points, https://www.e-education.psu.edu/fsc432/content/cut-points, 2018. |
The American Petroleum Institute, Petroleum HPV Testing Group, Heavy Fuel Oils Category Analysis and Hazard Characterization, Dec. 7, 2012. |
Increase Gasoline Octane and Light Olefin Yeilds with ZSM-5, vol. 5, Issue 5, http://www.refiningonline.com/engelhardkb/crep/TCR4_35.htm. |
Fluid Catalytic Cracking and Light Olefins Production, Hydrocarbon Publishing Company, 2011, http://www.hydrocarbonpublishing.com/store10/product.php?productid+b21104. |
Zhang et al., Multifunctional two-stage riser fluid catalytic cracking process, Springer Applied Petrocchemical Research, Sep. 3, 2014. |
Reid, William, Recent trends in fluid catalytic cracking patents, part V: reactor section, Dilworth IP, Sep. 3, 2014. |
Akah et al., Maximizing propylene production via FCC technology, SpringerLink, Mar. 22, 2015. |
Vogt et al., Fluid Catalytic Cracking: Recent Developments on the Grand Old Lady of Zeolite Catalysis, Royal Society of Chemistry, Sep. 18, 2015. |
Zhou et al., Study on the Integration of Flue Gas Waste He Desulfuization and Dust Removal in Civilian Coalfired Heating Furnance, 2020 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 603 012018. |
Vivek et al., Assessment of crude oil blends, refiner's assessment of the compatibility of opportunity crudes in blends aims to avoid the processing problems introduced by lower-quality feedstocks, www.digitalrefining.com/article/10000381, 2011. |
International Standard, ISO 8217, Petroleum products—Fuels (class F)—Specifications of marine fuels, Sixth Edition, 2017. |
International Standard, ISO 10307-1, Petroleum products—Total sediment in residual fuel oils—, Part 1: Determination by hot filtration, Second Edition, 2009. |
International Standard, ISO 10307-2, Petroleum products—Total sediment in residual fuel oils—, Part 2: Determination using standard procedures for aging, Second Edition, 2009. |
Ebner et al., Deactivatin and durability of the catalyst for Hotspot™ natural gas processing, OSTI, 2000, https://www.osti/gov/etdeweb/servlets/purl/20064378, (Year: 2000). |
Morozov et al., Best Practices When Operating a Unit for Removing Hydrogen Sulfide from Residual Fuel Oil, Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils, vol. 57, No. 4, Sep. 2001. |
Calbry-Muzyka et al., Deep removal of sulfur and trace organic compounds from biogas to protect a catalytic methananation reactor, Chemical Engineering Joural 360, pp. 577-590, 2019. |
Cheah et al., Review of Mid- to High-Tempearture Sulfur Sorbents for Desulfurization of Biomass- and Coal-derived Syngas, Energy Fuels 2009, 23, pp. 5291-5307, Oct. 16, 2019. |
Mandal et al., Simultaneous absorption of carbon dioxide of hydrogen sulfide into aqueous blends of 2-amino-2-methyl-1 propanol and diethanolamine, Chemical Engineering Science 60, pp. 6438-6451, 2005. |
Meng et al., In bed and downstream hot gas desulphurization during solid fuel gasification: A review, Fuel Processing Technology 91, pp. 964-981, 2010. |
Okonkwo et al., Role of Amine Structure on Hydrogen Sulfide Capture from Dilute Gas Streams Using Solid Adsorbents, Energy Fuels, 32, pp. 6926-6933, 2018. |
Okonkwo et al., Selective removal of hydrogen sulfide from simulated biogas streams using sterically hindered amine adsorbents, Chemical Engineering Journal 379, pp. 122-349, 2020. |
Seo et al., Methanol absorption characteristics for the removal of H2S (hydrogen sulfide), COS (carbonyl sulfide) and CO2 (carbon dioxide) in a pilot-scale biomass-to-liquid process, Energy 66, pp. 56-62, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230272290 A1 | Aug 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63262342 | Oct 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 18045314 | Oct 2022 | US |
Child | 18144298 | US |