Some accelerometers require a high accuracy frequency estimation of an output waveform. The better the quality of the frequency estimation, the better the ability to accurately estimate acceleration. One of the problems associated with frequency estimation using digital counters is that resolution is limited by the counter frequency.
The present invention provides a way to improve the frequency estimation without increasing the counter resolution. The invention mixes and filters a known carrier signal with the signal containing the frequency of interest, in order to bring the frequency domain image closer to baseband, and then performs the frequency estimation. This allows for much better resolution without the need to increase the counter frequency.
Preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings:
The present invention provides for accurate frequency estimation of a resonating beam sensor, such as a double-ended tuning fork. As shown in
The frequency estimation device 24 receives the signal from the sensor 22, process it by mixing it down, filtering it, and digitizing it. The digitized signal is then processed by a digital circuit included in the device 24 which includes a counter in order to estimate the frequency of the mixed down signal. The frequency by which the signal from the sensor 22 was mixed down is then added to the digitally estimated frequency in order to produce an accurate estimate. The frequency estimation is significantly more accurate for the mixed down signal than it would be for the original signal from sensor 22 because the digital counter resolution would be better in estimating the mixed down signal than the original.
The output of the summation device 50 is now an accurate value of the frequency of the original signal that was received from the sensor 22. The output of the summation device 50 is then sent to one or more output devices 26 and to the adaptive reference frequency selector 54 that is controlled by a controller 56.
In one example, the controller 56 determines how often to change the reference frequency. This may be desired if the sensor signal needed to be tracked more closely. The controller 56 can select the reference frequency that is optimum for the mixer operation.
In one embodiment, the adaptive reference frequency selector 54 receives the output of summation device 50 in order to adjust the reference frequency for optimum mixer operation.
Frequency mixing of two signals (at the mixer 40) is equivalent to multiplying 2 signals in the time domain. The result of the multiplication is two components: one component has a frequency equal to the sum of the two input frequencies; and the other component has a frequency equal to the difference of the two input frequencies. In one example, the signal of interest is band limited (e.g., 1 kHz) and its center frequency is known e.g., 15 kHz). The signal of interest (signal from sensor) is used as the first input to the mixer 40. The second input to the mixer 40 is generated by the synthesizer 36) to be a single sinusoid whose frequency exceeds the center frequency of the signal of interest by about a factor of two times (or greater) the bandwidth of the signal of interest (15 kHz+[1 kHz×2]=17 kHz) to prevent aliasing. After mixing, the two components that are generated are the sum of the two input frequencies (15 kHz+17 kHz=32 kHz) and the difference of the two input frequencies (17 kHz−15 kHz=2 kHz). The mixed signal is then filtered to remove the higher frequency component (the 32 kHz component). The resulting filtered signal (2 kHz) is used for frequency estimation. This process allows for a better frequency estimation, since the digital counter resolution is better for a low frequency component (2 kHz) than for a higher frequency component (15 kHz).
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.