This disclosure relates generally to laser processing. In particular, this disclosure relates to laser processing systems and method for processing continuously moving or unrolling sheet material.
Laser processing may be conducted on numerous different types of workpieces using various lasers to effect a variety of processes. Lasers may be used to form, for example, a hole and/or blind via in a single layer or multilayer workpiece. Semiconductor wafer processing may include various types of laser micromachining including, for example, scribing, dicing, drilling, removal of semiconductor links (fuses), thermal annealing, and/or trimming passive thick or thin film components.
Lasers may be used to process sheets of material, such as plastics or optical films. Large plastic or optical sheets may be cut into smaller pieces for use in flat panel displays, such as those used in, for example, cellular phones, automobile navigation systems, personal digital assistants (PDAs), laptop computers, televisions, and other electronic devices. Typically, a mechanical punching machine is used to cut the sheets of plastic or film material. The punching machines are fast, but many downtimes associated with the frequent replacement and maintenance of molds reduce the effective throughput. Further, the use of lasers to cut large sheets of material has been limited to straight cuts at high velocities.
The embodiments disclosed herein provide systems and methods for laser processing a moving sheet material. In one embodiment, a system for processing a moving sheet material includes one or more laser processing heads configured to illuminate the moving sheet material with one or more laser beams, and a vacuum chuck configured to removably affix a first portion of the moving sheet material thereto. The vacuum chuck is further configured to control a velocity of the moving sheet material as the first portion is processed by the one or more laser beams.
In another embodiment, a method for processing sheet material with a laser beam includes moving the sheet material from a first roller to a second roller, and removably affixing a chuck to a first portion of the sheet material as it moves from the first roller to the second roller. The method further includes moving the chuck at a predetermined velocity, and illuminating the first portion of the sheet material with the laser beam while it is affixed to the moving chuck.
In another embodiment, a laser processing system includes means for illuminating a sheet material with a laser beam, means for holding portions of the sheet material as the portions are illuminated with the laser beam, means for moving the means for holding at a constant velocity as a first portion of the sheet material and as a second portion of the sheet material are illuminated with the laser beam, and means for feeding the sheet material through a laser processing area without stopping between the illumination of the first portion and the second portion.
Additional aspects and advantages will be apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Lasers may be used to process large sheets of material, such as plastics or optical films. Sheets of plastic or optical film may be used, for example, in flat panel displays for cellular phones, automobile navigation systems, personal digital assistants (PDAs), laptop computers, televisions, and other electronic devices.
Using a laser system to cut a roll of sheet material (e.g., film) into small pieces for a particular monitor size is called conversion. In the conversion process, a roll of sheet material is generally unrolled and placed over another material for processing. The converted pieces of sheet material are then collected. When the roll of sheet material is polarizing film that includes adhesive between multiple film layers, for example, the edges of the converted pieces tend to stick to the material underneath. In such a case, it is generally difficult to pick up the converted pieces without reducing productivity.
Generally, conventional conversion systems are based on a die cutting system in which patterned blades imbedded into a flat plate are used to convert the film. In such systems, a flexible rubber-like material is used in a roll-like conveyor to collect converted pieces.
A. Beam Positioning with Three Stages
Reference is now made to the figures in which like reference numerals refer to like elements. For clarity, the first digit of a reference numeral indicates the figure number in which the corresponding element is first used. In the following description, numerous specific details are provided for a thorough understanding of the embodiments of the invention. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, or materials. Further, in some cases, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail in order to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention. Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
Some materials, such as rolls of film or discrete film sheets, are generally processed by being positioned and fixed in place under a mechanical punch or conventional laser processing system. For example,
As shown in
Thus, the overall time used for conversion includes both the time required to move the film 110 into position before processing the film 110 and the time required for processing the film 110. Throughput is reduced drastically by the time required to move and station the film 110 at a certain position before the processing takes place and the time required to align the conversion system 114 (if necessary). Thus, the disclosure herein enables the elimination or reduction of the non-process times to improve the total throughput. Furthermore, the disclosure may reduce the mechanical and optical stress of optical films that could be induced by the ordinary process of step and repeat with dancers (weights located before and after the processing area) to hold the film flat over the process area. Further, in certain embodiments, the continuous flow of the material during laser processing induces optical anisotropy in the material, which may be advantageous. For example, in the case of polarizing film, the induced anisotropy substantially improves image quality.
As discussed above, the sheet material 210 may include, for example, plastic or optical film. In one embodiment, the sheet material 210 has a thickness between approximately 1 mm and approximately 2 mm. However, the embodiments disclosed herein are not limited to this range of thicknesses. Indeed, the system 200 may be configured to process materials having thicknesses substantially less than 1 mm and substantially greater than 2 mm. In certain embodiments, the system 200 processes the sheet material 210 as it is transferred from a first roll to a second roll. In other embodiments, the system 200 processes discrete pieces or sheets of the material 210.
Regardless of whether the sheet material 210 includes discrete sheets or is transferred from a first roll to a second roll, the vacuum chucks 214 are configured to securely hold the sheet material 210 while the conveyor 216 moves the vacuum chucks 214 and the sheet material 210 (as indicated by arrow 218) at a constant velocity. While the conveyor 216 and vacuum chucks 214 move the sheet material 210, the laser 212 delivers a laser beam (as indicated by arrow 220) to the sheet material 210 from the galvo block on the X and Y stages over the conveyor 216.
The laser beam positioning is coordinated through the galvo, the X and Y stages and the conveyor 216. Therefore, the overall processing time includes the beam delivery time without the additional time required for repeated alignment or the time required to repeatedly move material in and out of the processing area under the laser 212.
An artisan will understand from the disclosure herein that the galvo and/or the X and Y stages are not required in every embodiment. For example, in one embodiment, the system 200 includes the conveyor 216 for moving the sheet material 210 to be processed and the gantry of X and Y stages that move the laser beam incident to the work surface. Also, the system disclosed herein can support additional stages, such as one for Z direction to adjust the beam focus or the collimated beam size.
A compound beam positioner, according to one embodiment, provides slow and fast movements in order to process the sheet material 210 without ceasing beam movement. In one embodiment, the entire move may be composed of three or more different moves, namely slow, intermediate, and fast moves. However, the basic algorithm may remain the same as that of a conventional compound beam positioner. The gantry velocity may be maintained constant or may be monitored for adjustment of the beam positioning.
Rough alignment of the material to be processed may be done on a vacuum chuck 214 before the material is moved under the laser 212. For example,
In some embodiments, small pieces of predetermined size are singulated out of the sheet material 210. In such embodiments, as shown in
To improve throughput, a dual head or multiple head system may also be considered. In such embodiments, the move of two heads in the Y direction, which is orthogonal to the flow of the material, may be in mirror image to reduce any vibration that may affect smooth beam movement with respect to the sheet material 210.
One example dual head system 500 is shown in
Each laser path may include optics, such as a first mirror 514 for directing the laser beam from the AOM 512 through a first lens 516, an aperture 518, and a second lens 519 to a second mirror 520 configured to direct the laser beam to a beam splitter 522 or a beam dump 524, depending on a deflection angle selected by the AOM 512. In one embodiment, the beam splitter 522 directs a portion of the laser beam to a power monitor 523 configured to provide laser power control to the AOM 512. Each beam splitter 522 also directs a portion of the laser beam to a respective processing head 526 located on an X, Y stage (gantry) 528. Each processing head 526 directs its respective laser beam to the sheet material 210 aligned on an additional stage work surface 530.
B. Index Free Film Conversion System
The system 600 provides index free film conversion by coordinating the motion of the sheet material 210 as it travels from the first roll 610 to the second roll 612 with the motions of X and Y linear stages, a vacuum chuck 618, and X and Y galvanometers. In some embodiments, the system 600 also coordinates the motion of the sheet material 210 with a Z stage.
The system 600 also seemlessly provides for recovery of the converted pieces of sheet material 210. The system 600 includes a carrier 620 configured to receive converted pieces of the sheet material 210 and to transport the converted pieces to a location where they can be picked up (e.g., by a user or robotic device) for further processing (as indicated by arrow 622 in
In one embodiment, the sheet material 210 continually moves from the first roll 610 to the second roll 612 during the conversion process. To process the sheet material 210, the system 600 positions the processing heads 614 and the vacuum chuck 618 at respective initial positions. As shown in
While the vacuum chuck 618 moves the sheet material 210, the processing heads 614 turn on (or unblock) their respective laser beams to convert pieces of the sheet material 210. After the conversion process is complete for one set of conversion pattern, the laser beam is turned off (or blocked). The vacuum chuck 618 then turns off the vacuum so that the sheet material 210 and metallic sheet of the carrier 620 separate from the vacuum chuck 618. In one embodiment, to achieve a smooth detachment of the sheet material 210, the vacuum chuck 618 may blow air through the holes in metallic sheet of the carrier 620. After separation, the first roller 610 and/or second roller 612 continue to feed the sheet material 210 and the converted pieces remain on the carrier 620. The carrier 620 then transports the converted pieces of the sheet material 210 to a pick up location (see arrow 622 in
After the conversion is complete for one portion of the sheet material 210 being fed from the first roller 610 to the second roller 612, the vacuum chuck 618, the X and Y stages, and the X and Y galvanometers move back to their respective initial positions for realignment with an additional portion of the sheet material 210.
When the sheet material 210 is converted, debris or adhesive used between sheet layers may adversely stick to the surface of the metallic sheet of the carrier 620. As the system 600 continues to affix different portions of the sheet material 210 and carrier 620 to the vacuum chuck 618, the debris and adhesive may be transferred between the different portions of the sheet material 210. To avoid such contamination transfer according to one embodiment, the metallic sheet of the carrier 620 is cleaned before being aligned with each portion of the sheet material 210.
In certain embodiments, the first roller 610 and/or the second roller 612 do not provide accurate velocity control of the sheet material 210. Rather, the vacuum chuck 620 with the underlying linear stage provides an accurate reference of the velocity and position during conversion. However, to avoid an adversely large difference in the velocity provided by the rollers 610, 612 and the velocity provided by the vacuum chuck 620, the system 600 may include a velocity controller and feedback sensors to control the relative velocities. Thus, each portion of the sheet material 210 may be quickly aligned with the vacuum chuck 618. The velocity control also allows the sheet material 210 to be fed from the first roller 610 to the second roller 612 at a substantially constant velocity throughout the conversion process of an entire continuous sheet or roll of material.
In some embodiments, the vacuum chuck 618 provides the only movement of the metallic sheet of the carrier 620. In other embodiments, the metallic sheet of the carrier 620 is driven by other rollers 626 (four shown) when not affixed to the vacuum chuck 618. In certain such embodiments, the system 600 includes appropriate velocity control and feedback to reduce the difference between the velocity of the metallic sheet of the carrier 620 and the velocity of the vacuum chuck 618.
It will be obvious to those having skill in the art that many changes may be made to the details of the above-described embodiments without departing from the underlying principles of the invention. The scope of the present invention should, therefore, be determined only by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/886,881, filed Jan. 26, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2753181 | Anander | Jul 1956 | A |
3007368 | Rosenblum | Nov 1961 | A |
3019130 | Hornbostel | Jan 1962 | A |
3057529 | Fitch | Oct 1962 | A |
3140030 | Stewart | Jul 1964 | A |
3180608 | Frederick | Apr 1965 | A |
3231668 | Nishiwaki et al. | Jan 1966 | A |
3321121 | Nyberg et al. | May 1967 | A |
3392930 | Goldfarb | Jul 1968 | A |
3395401 | Silverman | Jul 1968 | A |
3396887 | Bade | Aug 1968 | A |
3408144 | Cowan, Jr | Oct 1968 | A |
3477322 | Gerber et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3626141 | Daly | Dec 1971 | A |
3682750 | Gerber | Aug 1972 | A |
3745846 | Birckhead et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3761675 | Mason et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3765289 | Gerber et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3848327 | Gerber et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
4345496 | Pearl | Aug 1982 | A |
4452113 | Pearl | Jun 1984 | A |
4475969 | Reed | Oct 1984 | A |
4476756 | Pearl et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4542672 | Pearl | Sep 1985 | A |
4542673 | Pearl | Sep 1985 | A |
4639572 | Gruzman et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4672172 | Pearl | Jun 1987 | A |
4680442 | Bauer et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4740668 | Perez | Apr 1988 | A |
4782208 | Withrow et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4896326 | Kafka et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4941021 | Uchida et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5191466 | Gross et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5250784 | Muller et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5421933 | Nedblake et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5444212 | MacNaughton et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5487807 | Nedblake et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5561918 | Marschke | Oct 1996 | A |
5611949 | Snellman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5624520 | Nedblake et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5679199 | Nedblake et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681412 | Nedblake et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5746010 | Marschke et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751585 | Cutler et al. | May 1998 | A |
5798927 | Cutler et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5820006 | Turner | Oct 1998 | A |
5857605 | Welch et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5878464 | White | Mar 1999 | A |
5909278 | Deka et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5940789 | Yuan | Aug 1999 | A |
5960933 | Albrecht | Oct 1999 | A |
5961860 | Lu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5981903 | Baumgart et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994665 | Nishibayashi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6040552 | Jain et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6040553 | Ross | Mar 2000 | A |
6090330 | Gawa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6144007 | Levin | Nov 2000 | A |
6172330 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181463 | Galvanauskas et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6291796 | Lu et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6339604 | Smart | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6499280 | Tsutsui | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6519137 | Nitta et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6521866 | Arai et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6592693 | Nedblake | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6630057 | Broom et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6697408 | Kennedy et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6706999 | Barrett et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7027199 | Johnson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7052976 | Liu | May 2006 | B2 |
7098423 | Masuda et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7205501 | Arai et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7245412 | Bruland et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7625465 | Pesch et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7633035 | Kirmeier | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7638731 | Kosmowski | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7723642 | Gu et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7732732 | Hiramatsu | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7817685 | Osako et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7955905 | Cordingley et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7955906 | Cordingley et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8081668 | Grant et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8084706 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8110777 | Zuehlke et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8148211 | Bruland et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8173931 | Wen et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8198566 | Baird | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8208506 | Osako et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8257638 | Nakai et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8445812 | Lupinetti et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8524536 | Nakai et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8563895 | Cobben | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20010050154 | Broom et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020170889 | Faitel | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030080234 | Baggot et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030178398 | Nagatoshi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030217806 | Tait et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030222057 | Gerety | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040026384 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040217093 | Arai et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050045606 | Ito et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050263506 | Masuda et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050270631 | Johnson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050271095 | Smart | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060027540 | Bruland et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060076323 | Arai et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060132801 | Yonescu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070023413 | Wilson | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070228016 | Kita et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080083706 | Kirmeier | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1190047 | Aug 1998 | CN |
0671239 | Jun 1994 | EP |
04286515 | Oct 1992 | JP |
04303317 | Oct 1992 | JP |
05305544 | Nov 1993 | JP |
08184833 | Jul 1996 | JP |
08324786 | Oct 1996 | JP |
2000263271 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001031227 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001242410 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001315933 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002045775 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2004195469 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004216436 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004298914 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005034859 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005053615 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005034859 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006101764 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006351977 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2008521615 | Jun 2008 | JP |
1020010058629 | Jul 2001 | KR |
1020040100042 | Dec 2004 | KR |
1020060091849 | Aug 2006 | KR |
9207238 | Apr 1992 | WO |
2006062766 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Nowak, K.M. et al., “Cold processing of green state LTCC with a CO2 laser,” Applied Physics A—Material Science and Processing, vol. 84, Issue 3, pp. 267-270, May 2006. |
Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration dated May 26, 2008, for PCT/US2007/086898, filing date Dec. 10, 2007. |
Taylor, Edward W., “Space and Enhanced Radiation Induced Effects in Key Photonic Technologies,” Aerospace Conference, 1999. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE, vol. 3. pp. 307-316, Mar. 1999. |
Office Action mailed Jul. 22, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/949,534, filed Dec. 3, 2007. |
Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/907,968, filed Oct. 19, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080179304 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60886881 | Jan 2007 | US |