Patent Application
20230324341
The present disclosure relates to methods and systems for manipulating a particle, in particular for studying small particles and/or biological cellular bodies.
Microscopic study and/or manipulation of small particles is an active field of research, in particular in case the small particles are biological specimens such as cells, organelles, few-cell bodies and the like. For biological specimens, biological processes are researched. Biological cells have an outer membrane. This membrane is the interface between the cell and its environment. The membrane therefore builds the platform for a variety of processes that involve membrane embedded biomolecules making physical contact with binding partners in the extracellular space.
Therefore, a number of techniques have been developed for studying cellular and subcellular processes by interaction with the cellular membrane, and techniques have been devised to quantify the components of the cell surface to obtain information on the specific cell type (for example to determine the type of breast cancer).
A particularly suitable technique for manipulating and/or studying small particles and in particular cellular bodies is employing of acoustic forces. It is noted that the use of acoustic forces to manipulate micron-sized particles and cells is known in general. E.g. WO 2014/200341 provides an example of an acoustic wave system for use in studying biomolecules attached to microbeads; WO 2018/083193 discloses a method, system and sample holder for manipulating and/or investigating cellular bodies; and WO 2019/212349 discloses a method for probing mechanical properties of cellular bodies. Further, G. Thalhammer et al. “Acoustic force mapping in a hybrid acoustic optical micromanipulation device supporting high resolution optical imaging”, Lab Chip 16:1523 (2016) is noted, and a summary of current research in acoustofluidics can be found in V. Marx, “Biophysics: using sound to move cells”, Nature Methods, 12(1):41 (2015). Reviews are also presented in H. Mulvana et al., “Ultrasound assisted particle and cell manipulation on-chip”, Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 65(11-12):1600 (2013); and M. Evander and J. Nilsson. “Acoustofluidics 20: Applications in acoustic trapping”, Lab on a Chip, 12:4667 (2012).
However, there is an ongoing desire for further increases in aspects such as sample versatility, signal-to-noise ratio, sample size, detection speed, magnitude of applied force, and in particular reliability and/or reproducibility of tests and test results.
In view of the above, herewith various methods, systems and sample holders are provided as set out hereafter.
A method is provided which comprises the steps of
The method further comprises the steps of:
The sample holder may comprise an oscillator, which may comprise a transducer for converting an electrical driving signal such as an oscillating voltage, into an acoustic signal in the sample holder providing the acoustic wave.
The acoustic wave may be an ultrasonic acoustic wave, e.g. having a frequency in a range of 1-30 MHz, preferably in a range 5-20 MHz.
The method may comprise providing a driving signal with a single frequency or with a (periodic or aperiodic) modulated frequency such as one or more of a sum of plural frequencies, a frequency sweep and a chirp. Also, in some cases driving signals of different waveforms may be applied and/or combined with other waveforms (sinusoidal, triangular, saw tooth, etc.).
For acoustic particle manipulation, standing acoustic waves may be used and one or more resonance frequencies for effective generation thereof may be determined in various ways. Calculated resonance frequencies tend not to be sufficiently accurate in practice. Practical determination of a resonance frequency may comprise performing a frequency sweep over a range of frequencies comprising at least one resonance frequency and detecting the at least one resonance frequency. System behaviour may then be further studied employing frequencies in a comparably narrow frequency range about the resonance frequency.
The resonance quality factor, also referred to as quality number or Q-factor, provides an indication of system-and frequency characteristics and an indication of efficiency of exciting the acoustic wave at and/or near the resonance frequency and/or using such acoustic wave. Therewith, the Q-factor provides additional information about behaviour of the system and efficiency of manipulating a portion of a sample in the sample holder.
A resonance frequency is in principle a system parameter, in particular a characteristic of the oscillator, the sample holder and the sample medium and the mechanical properties of these components. However, resonance conditions and therewith resonance frequencies tend, in practice, to differ between individual sample holders, due to manufacturing variations, and not to be constant but to depend on several circumstances, in particular manufacturing and/or age of the sample holder and/or circumstances such as sample fluid composition including presence of occasional gas bubbles, sample holder temperature, density of suspended particles / cellular bodies, etc., all or some of which may vary.
Moreover, it has been found that not only the resonance frequency itself is subject to variation but that also one or more frequency properties around the resonance frequency, e.g. width and/or any asymmetry of the resonance peak, tend to vary, and that as a result, determination of any effect of the acoustic wave (and-force) on (at least part of) a sample in the sample holder may, in fact, not be known and/or maintained as accurately as originally considered or desired. Thus, it has now been found that the Q-factor varies, that this may be detected, quantified and taken into account in determination of the acoustic force, and that the Q-factor is a predictor for the quality of the sample holder for generation of an acoustic wave at or near an expected and/or determined resonance frequency. E.g. a relatively low Q-factor may indicate a low coupling of an applied driving signal to a desired acoustic mode of the sample holder and/or may indicate a defect in the sample holder. It may also indicate poor experimental conditions such as a wrong temperature, wrong sample medium, presence of a gas bubble, etc.
Thus, by determining the Q-factor and basing determination of an acoustic force and/or controlling of manipulation parameters on the basis of the Q-factor, the present method provides an increased accuracy for determination and/or application of the acoustic force. The improved accuracy holds for one or more of determining and/or scaling an applied force on a particle, and therewith facilitating evaluation of any effect of the force on the particle, for predicting a force to be applied to the particle and/or for determining if the quality of a sample holder is (still) good enough for use in an experiment.
Moreover, the method enables determination of suitability of the sample holder for further use in one or more of experiments, studies, assays, etc. Also, potential aging effects of the sample holder and/or at least part of a sample contained therein may be assessed. E.g. the sample holder may be selected or rejected for further use if the quality factor is insufficient or different from the quality factors and/or (average) acoustic forces determined for a plurality of sample holders by a predetermined amount, and/or if the quality factor exhibits a particular variation over time and/or a particular dependency on experiment parameters like temperature and/or sample properties. Further, determination of the quality factor and an acoustic force of the sample holder facilitates comparison of these properties to statistical reference values determined for a plurality of sample holders such as a correlation relation.
The method may comprise the further steps of:
The impedance, admittance, susceptance, conductance and signal phase shift may be determined as one or more electrical properties of the sample holder and/or may include in the determination at least part of an oscillator, e.g. a transducer, for providing the periodic driving signal, which oscillator may be comprised in the sample holder. This facilitates detection and/or processing the respective selected property.
Determining a value of the selected property at a plurality of signal frequencies in a signal frequency range can be done by sweeping the frequency applied to the transducer in time while measuring the selected property and/or, for example, by applying a short burst containing a plurality of desired spectral frequencies simultaneously and measuring a response function of the sample holder. E.g. one may determine the impulse response of the sample holder after excitation with a suitably selected driving pulse.
In an aspect, preferably in combination with one or more other aspects disclosed herein, a method is provided comprising the steps of
These method steps may be repeated one or more times wherein the resonance frequency may be determined anew one or more times. Thus, any changes may be detected.
Such method may suitably comprise the further step of adjusting the signal frequency on the basis of the feedback signal. Thus, the signal frequency may be maintained at or near the resonance frequency, and in case of repetition also when the resonance frequency varies.
The determination of the frequency difference and the determination of the resonance frequency may be based on the selected property as indicated above; preferably then both are determined on the same selected property.
In particular, such method may comprise superposing a modulation frequency on the signal frequency thus providing a modulated signal frequency, wherein the step of determining a frequency difference between the signal frequency and the resonance frequency comprises determining the frequency difference with respect to the modulated signal frequency and the resonance frequency, and wherein the method further comprises adjusting the signal frequency and/or the modulation frequency in dependence of the frequency difference and/or adjusting the signal frequency and/or the modulation frequency on the basis of the feedback signal, where applicable.
Thus, active locking of the signal frequency may be provided. Such locking facilitates a periodic redetermination of the signal frequency with respect to the resonance frequency and/ or the other way around thus facilitating reestablishment of the resonance frequency and/or the Q-factor and according adaptation of the signal frequency. Hence, reliability of the method and any measurement results obtained with it may be increased.
The modulation frequency may be any periodic modulation, in particular a sinusoidal, triangular or a saw-tooth modulation pattern.
Adjusting the modulation frequency in dependence of the frequency difference and/or the feedback signal may allow adaptation of the modulated signal frequency to a change in position and/or other characteristics of the resonance peak, such as frequency width and/or asymmetry.
In any embodiment discussed herein, the signal amplitude and/or signal power may be determined and based on at least one of the resonance frequency, the quality factor and the feedback signal, where applicable, the signal amplitude and/or signal power may be controlled.
A locked resonance frequency as described above may improve stability of one or more operating parameters, e.g. like a position of an acoustic standing wave node and/or an acoustic force field gradient in the sample holder. Moreover, maintaining a driving frequency at or near the resonance frequency may reduce or prevent power losses into the system which may cause and/or increase heating of at least part of the sample. Since a temperature change tends to result in a change of resonance conditions, in particular the latter effect may otherwise provide a self-increasing effect and may even risk causing a runaway process wherein the system is forced away from resonance increasingly strongly.
A Q-factor may be determined in dependency of one or more system variables like a sample fluid, a temperature of at least part of a sample holder, a driver signal characteristic such as a driver signal amplitude, noise, time etc. Conversely, determining and/or monitoring a Q-factor may serve for monitoring and/or control of one or more system variables. E.g., the method may comprise determining a difference between a determined Q-factor and a predetermined Q-factor, and providing an associated signal. The signal may serve for warning an operator, and/or as a feedback signal for adjusting one or more system variables and/or process variables e.g. variables associated with the sample holder, with a sample in the sample holder and/or any one or more of experiments, studies, assays, etc. performed with the sample and/or sample holder. The Q-factor and/or a variation of the Q-factor as a function of one or more of the system variables and/or process variables may serve for determining and/or quantifying sample holder quality for enabling and/or providing reliable results in experiments performed with the sample holder.
Also or alternatively, the method may comprise determining a difference between a determined Q-factor and a desired Q-factor and providing a feedback signal for adjusting at least one system parameter such as the driving signal which may comprise a driving signal frequency and/or a driving signal amplitude, and/or a temperature in at least a part of the sample holder, and a sample parameter such as sample composition and/or sample flow, in dependence of the difference. Thus, the Q-factor may be locked and/or a system behaviour may be determined and/or be tracked, and/or a lock of the driving signal may be characterised and/or be improved, and/or a sample behaviour may be characterised and/or be improved.
Also or alternatively, the method may comprise determining an effect of the acoustic force in at least part of the sample holder and determining the acoustic force in the part and/or of a scaling on the basis of the determined Q-factor.
An aspect, which may comprise any other method embodiment disclosed herein, comprises the steps of:
It has been found that the acoustic force may not be constant throughout the sample holder but that for one acoustic resonance and/or driving signal, significant local force variations may arise. By determining an acoustic force in plural positions in the holding space distributed in two directions perpendicular to the first direction a spatial force distribution, or a force map, may be determined. Here, such force map may be measured and/or calculated from measurement data, and/or a known force map may be used to quantify and/or correct measurement data. Thus, the present method provides an increased accuracy for determination and/or application of the (actual) acoustic force on a particle in the sample holder. Note that the spatial force distribution may assist determining force gradients. Local force variations may be detectable in one, two and/or three spatial dimensions.
It has been found that relative differences in local forces tend to be sample holder specific and to be relatively constant over time for a given sample holder, the force being primarily dependent on properties of the acoustic wave in the sample holder such as the frequency and amplitude; see also elsewhere herein.
For that reason it is preferred that, in any aspect and/or embodiment disclosed herein, the respective method comprises storing in a memory at least one of
In particular the memory may be comprised in a machine readable medium. Also or alternatively, the method may comprise providing the sample holder with the memory and/or with an identifier for accessing and/or retrieving from the memory the stored frequency data and/or the stored quality-factor data and/or the stored force data, where applicable.
This facilitates characterisation of at least part of the sample holder and possibly scaling and/or normalising of measurement results from different positions in the sample holder.
The memory may be kept remote from the sample holder, possibly on a computer server and/or as part of an internet cloud memory. Storing the force data of a sample holder on a machine readable medium may facilitate automation of analysis and/or use of the force data. The medium and/or the identifier may comprise any suitable machine readable reference and/or indicia, e.g. in the form of a visual and/or electromagnetic readable code like an alphanumeric code, a bar-code, a QR-code and/or an RF-ID code.
Also or alternatively, data representing resonance frequency information and/or Q-factor data may be stored. For example, previously stored frequency data and/or Q-factor data may be compared to currently measured frequency data and/or Q-factor data to assess if the previously stored force maps (e.g. lateral force distribution data) are still valid. It can be assumed that a significant change in resonance frequency and/or Q-factor will be indicative for a change in the force map.
Any method discussed herein may comprise determining an acoustic force in plural positions in the holding space in parallel. In particular, such determination may comprise the steps of:
By determining an acoustic force in plural positions in the holding space in parallel, determination may be accelerated compared to sequential determination, facilitating repetitive determination and/or checking, possibly with respect to modification of one or more variables, and (effects of) possible unwanted and/or adverse temporal fluctuations may be reduced. Thus, accuracy and reliability may be improved. Such determined acoustic forces, both in sequential and parallel cases, may be used to predict and/or scale local forces acting on one or more particles of a sample subject to acoustic forces at the respective position(s).
One or more methods discussed herein may allow providing a probing particle independent map that can be used to predict forces acting on any sample particle.
In any method embodiment discussed herein, the determination of an acoustic force on a particle may comprise one or more optical methods, e.g. using an imaging microscope and capturing images such as video images wherein the spatiotemporal behaviour may be determined by analysing the captured video images.
The driving signal may be provided to generate a time-varying, e.g. pulsed acoustic force, and spatiotemporal behaviour of the particles may then be monitored with respect to at least one acoustic force variation e.g. at least one acoustic force pulse.
By applying e.g. a pulsed force, a temporal force variation may be determined. In particular, an effect of the acoustic force may be determined as a modification of other circumstances, in particular, preferably otherwise constant and substantially unchanging circumstances. E.g., displacement properties of the particles through the sample fluid may be determined on the basis of the Navier-Stokes equations for the specific particle shape and size, which for generally spherical particles may be simplified to the Stokes drag, and relative to a situation wherein the particles may be at rest, preferably at rest on a surface in and/or defining part of the holding space. Thus, a force profile on a particle of an acoustic wave in the sample holder with respect to a reference may be determined, in particular with respect to a surface from which the particle is urged away by the wave. In such case, forces acting at or close to the surface may in particular be determined.
Use of the Stokes drag force on a particle subject to an acoustic force has been explained in some detail in D. Kamsma “Acoustic Force Spectroscopy (AFS)—From single molecules to single cells”, PhD-thesis Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, ISBN: 978-94-028-1009-7.In order to achieve particularly accurate results the medium temperature may also be taken into account for such drag calculations since the viscosity of the medium is typically strongly temperature dependent.
As has been explained above, spatial resolution allows determining local variations of forces. In some cases, e.g. given enough measurement locations (e.g. enough spatial sampling) a spatial map may be interpolated based on plural local measurements. I.e. such map may be used to predict a force on a particle even if at a specific location of the particle no measurement has been previously performed. Such interpolation may be based on any suitable interpolation function and/or may be or comprise for example a least squares or maximum likelihood fit to any arbitrary function that represents a typical local force variation.
A force determined for one particle or one number of particles may be used for determining a force for another particle, in particular another particle provided at another time at the same location in the sample holder as the first particle. This may in particular apply if the properties of one or more (first) particles are known and differ from properties of one or more of the other (second) particles. This can be done, for example, by calculating the local (one-, two- or three dimensional) acoustic pressure gradient and/or acoustic energy density based upon the measured force on the one particle or one number of particles. Conversion from force measurement to acoustic energy density and back can for example be done using the following equation taken from Bruus, H. (2012) ‘Acoustofluidics 7: The acoustic radiation force on small particles’, Lab on a Chip, The Royal Society of Chemistry, pp. 1014-1021. doi: 10.1039/c21c21068a:
F
z
rad=−∂zrad=4πΦ(κ, ρ)kα3Eacsin (2kz)
An average over the determined forces of at least some particles in at least part of the sample holder may be determined. The thus determined average force may be used as a parameter for determining quality of a sample holder and/or may be used to scale one or more properties, e.g. amplitude and/or frequency of the driving signal in order to account for differences between sample holders e.g. to ensure that similar, well determined, forces are applied to different sample holders.
By measuring force maps for multiple sample holders and establishing a correlation with the Q-Factor, quality control of sample holders during the production process may be enabled, based on the Q-factor alone. This avoids measurements of the full force map of sample holders that are considered outside of desired specifications. Also or alternatively, changes in Q-factor over time may be detected that could signal or do signal a change in efficiency and/or force map accuracy.
Any method discussed herein may comprise the further steps of providing the sample holder with a plurality of particles in a fluid medium, and determining a size of at least some of the particles.
The method may further comprise one or more of:
Since acoustic forces on a particle in a fluid depend on the size, density and compressibility (acoustic contrast factor) of the particle relative to the fluid, the more uniform the particles are, the better (local) variations in acoustic energy density itself translate into detectable effects rather than variations in the particles which could otherwise lead to noticeably different behaviour for identical acoustic energy densities. The presented values for size and density have shown to be readily detectable using optical techniques and to enable reliable detection of forces and force differences. Alternatively, the individual particle sizes could be measured optically and corrected for in the analysis.
In particular, accuracy of determination of an acoustic force in the holding space, in particular based on the Navier Stokes equations and/or other equations relating to acoustic radiation force on small particles, may depend on determination of one or more properties of the particle like size and/or density, in particular with respect to the sample fluid. The better such properties are known in absolute and/or relative values, the more accurate (local) acoustic forces may be determined. This may apply both to detection of forces and/or to control of applied forces. E.g. size determination may be done in situ, e.g. via microscopic methods, and/or by controlling sizes and/or size distribution of particles before introducing the particles into the sample holder.
E.g. particles in a watery sample fluid may have an average density of about 1 g/cm3, e.g. they may have an average density larger than 1 g/cm3, preferably in a range 1.02-1.10 g/cm3, more preferably in a range 1.03-1.07 g/cm3.
The sample holder may comprise a wall surface portion in the holding space and the method may comprise determining an adhesion force of the particle to the wall surface portion.
Thus, one or more of the particles may be identified and/or separated based on their adhesion force to the wall surface. The wall surface may be a functionalised wall surface as discussed elsewhere herein.
Also or alternatively, accounting and/or correcting for local force variations may improve determination and/or correction of an adhesion force of a particle to a wall surface portion, and/or it may improve application of a desired force to detach particles from selected wall surface portions selectively. Also or alternatively, knowledge of a well-defined adhesion force may allow (improvements in) quantifying an applied acoustic force at or near the surface. One example is the accurate measurement of the intercellular binding strength of immune cells (e.g. T-Cells, CAR-T cells, NK cells, CAR-NK cells, etc.) to their target cells (e.g. tumor cells, virus infected cells, etc.).
Any method discussed herein may further comprise, for at least one frequency,
An average force over the determined forces of at least some particles in at least part of the sample holder may be determined. With respect to that average force, (local) differences may be determined of the determined forces of at least some particles in at least part of the sample holder, in particular a standard distribution of the differences may be determined.
The differences with respect to the average force may indicate position-sensitivity and/or homogeneity of the sample holder and, respectively, for any study and/or measurement performed with the sample holder.
The average force may be equated to an efficiency value of the sample holder. An average force may, for instance, be determined for predetermined portions of the sample holder, e.g. a predetermined portion of a detection volume of a detector such as a field of view of a microscope. Such average force, which may be suitably referred to as a local average force may be likewise equated to a local efficiency value.
A sample holder suitability for a particular use (e.g. experiment, measurement, detection, . . . ) may be related to the efficiency and may also be related to other parameters like homogeneity of the forces and/or be determined in terms of one or more of maximum forces, Root-Mean-Square value, or any other selection of and/or operation on one or more properties in the measured raw data.
Differences between local average forces with respect to the (overall) average force may indicate position-sensitivity and/or homogeneity of the sample holder and, respectively, for any study and/or measurement performed with the sample holder.
Thus, variations of local averages may also be used.
Also or alternatively, determination of plural acoustic forces facilitates use of other statistical analysis tools like determination of standard deviations and/or correlations.
Moreover, it has been found that a relationship between the efficiency and the Q-factor of a sample holder is a very effective and reliable measure for determining reliability and predictability of acoustic force generation and therewith of accuracy for determination and/or application of the acoustic force. Thus, such relationship is effective in determining suitability of the sample holder for further use and therewith for quality control of the method and devices used therein.
It has been found during tests over multiple sample holders that a generally linear relationship may be found between the Q-factor and a peak efficiency value which corresponds to the highest efficiency value determined in the sample holder. A suitable relationship, e.g. for the aforementioned quality control, is a statistical R-square (R2) fit to of the Q-factor and the peak efficiency with respect to the linear relationship.
Hence, any method described herein may be performed on a plurality of sample holders, including for each sample holder of the plurality of sample holders at least the steps of
In addition a correlation relation may be determined between the thus determined quality factors and the at least one of the acoustic forces, the average acoustic forces and the efficiency values.
Some of the sample holders may be of different types, e.g. differing with respect to one or more of size and/or shape of at least part of the holding space and/or of a sample fluid conduit, construction materials, size and/or shape of an oscillator for generating the acoustic signal (e.g. a piezo element and/or transducer), stages of manufacturing and/or use preparation, etc. etc. In such cases correlation relations may suitably be determined per type.
Then also a further sample holder may be provided and any method discussed herein me be performed using the further sample holder comprising determining a quality factor for the further sample holder with respect to its resonance frequency, and preferably determining at least one of an acoustic force, an average acoustic force in at least part of the further sample holder and an efficiency value; and additionally determining suitability of the further sample holder for further use based on a relationship between the correlation relation and the thus of the further sample holder determined quality factor and, where applicable, the at least one of the acoustic force, the average acoustic force and the efficiency value.
In some cases, a comparison between the correlation relation and the quality factor of the further sample holder may already indicate suitability or not for further use of the sample holder. Assessing also an (average) acoustic force may facilitate more detailed and/or more accurate determination. Note that further use may comprise further manufacturing and/or preparation steps of the sample holder. An early indication of a possible defective sample holder may therefore save manufacturing costs.
Using any one of the methods described herein, a sample holder may be characterised and be used for studying other particles, which may also be referred to as “second particles” or “sample particles”, wherein one or more relevant properties for determining actual acoustic forces at or on the other particle are used.
Thus, with a sample holder which has been used as the sample holder in any method described herein a method may be performed further comprising providing a second particle in a sample fluid in the holding space of the sample holder, possibly a second sample,
The first and second particles may be the same particles and/or one or more of the first and second signal frequency, first and second signal amplitude, first and second signal power and first and second acoustic wave, respectively, may be the same. In particular, the method comprises (manipulation of) plural second particles and the second particles may be biological cellular particles and/or particles interacting with and or being attached to biological cellular particles.
The sample holder may comprise a functionalised surface.
The method may comprise providing the acoustic wave such that the acoustic force on the particle(s) is relatively high at or near a surface which may be part of the sample holder in the holding space and/or which may define at least part of the holding space.
Also, herein a system is provided. The system comprises a sample holder comprising a holding space, wherein the sample holder has been used for a method according to any one of the preceding claims and wherein the system comprises a memory comprising at least one of frequency data representing resonance frequency information of the sample holder,
At least part of the memory may be comprised in a machine readable medium. The sample holder may be provided with at least part of the memory and/or with an identifier for accessing and/or retrieving stored force data from the memory. At least part of the memory may be located elsewhere, possibly on a remote server and/or on a cloud server. The memory may comprise a database.
The above-described aspects will hereafter be more explained with further details and benefits with reference to the drawings showing a number of embodiments by way of example.
It is noted that the drawings are schematic, not necessarily to scale and that details that are not required for understanding the present invention may have been omitted. The terms “upward”, “downward”, “below”, “above”, and the like relate to the embodiments as oriented in the drawings, unless otherwise specified. Further, elements that are at least substantially identical or that perform an at least substantially identical function are denoted by the same numeral, where helpful individualised with alphabetic suffixes.
The system 1 comprises a sample holder 3 comprising a holding space 5 for holding a sample 7 comprising one or more biological cellular bodies 9 in a fluid medium 11 as exemplary particles of interest. It is noted that also, or alternatively, other types of particles like microspheres could be used, possibly attached to biological cellular bodies 9. The fluid preferably is a liquid or a gel. The system 1 further comprises an acoustic wave generator 13, e.g. a piezo element, connected with the sample holder 3 to generate an acoustic wave in the holding space 5 exerting a force on the sample 7 and cellular bodies 9 in the sample 7. The acoustic wave generator 13 is connected with an optional controller 14 and power supply, here being integrated.
The sample holder 3 comprises a wall 15 providing the holding space 5 with a functionalised wall surface portion 17 to be contacted, in use, by part of the sample 7. A further wall, e.g. opposite wall 16, may also or alternatively be provided with a (further) functionalised wall surface portion.
The shown manipulation system 1 comprises a microscope 19 with an objective 21 and a camera 23 connected with a computer 25 comprising a controller and a memory 26. The computer 25 may also be programmed for tracking one or more of the cellular bodies based on signals from the camera 23 and/or for performing microscopy calculations and/or for performing analysis associated with (superresolution) microscopy and/or video tracking, which may be sub-pixel video tracking. The computer or another controller (not shown) may be connected with other parts of the system 1 (not shown) for controlling at least part of the microscope 19 and/or another detector (not shown). In particular, the computer 25 may be connected with one or more other parts of the system such as the acoustic wave generator 13, the power supply thereof, the controller 14 thereof (both as shown in
The system further comprises a light source 27. The light source 27 may illuminate the sample 7 using any suitable optics (not shown) to provide a desired illumination intensity and intensity pattern, e.g. plane wave illumination, Kohler illumination, etc., known per se. Here, in the system light 31 emitted from the light source 27 is directed through the acoustic wave generator 13 to (the sample 7 in) the sample holder 3 and sample light 33 from the sample 7 is transmitted through the objective 21 and through an optional tube lens 22 and/or further optics (not shown) to the camera 23. The objective 21 and the camera 23 may be integrated. In an embodiment, two or more optical detection tools, e.g. with different magnifications and/or components related to spectral and/or polarization properties, may be used simultaneously for detection of sample light 33, e.g. using a filter and/or a beam splitter.
In another embodiment, not shown but discussed in detail in WO 2014/200341, the system comprises a partially reflective reflector and light emitted from the light source is directed via the reflector through the objective and through the sample, and light from the sample is reflected back into the objective, passing through the partially reflective reflector and directed into a camera via optional intervening optics. Further embodiments may be apparent to the reader.
The sample light 33 may comprise light 31 affected by the sample (e.g. scattered and/or absorbed) and/or light emitted by one or more portions of the sample 7 itself e.g. by chromo-phores and/or fluorophores attached to the cellular bodies 9.
Some optical elements in the system 1 may be at least one of partly reflective, dichroic (having a wavelength specific reflectivity, e.g. having a high reflectivity for one wavelength and high transmissivity for another wavelength), polarisation selective and otherwise suitable for the shown setup. Further optical elements e.g. lenses, prisms, polarizers, diaphragms, reflectors etc. may be provided, e.g. to configure the system 1 for specific types of microscopy.
The sample holder 3 may be formed by a single piece of material with a channel inside, e.g. glass, injection moulded polymer, etc. (not shown) or by fixing different layers of suitable materials together more or less permanently, e.g. by welding, glass bond, gluing, taping, clamping, etc., such that a holding space 5 is formed in which the fluid sample 7 is contained, at least during the duration of an experiment. As shown in
As shown in
On providing a periodic driving signal to the acoustic wave generator 13 a standing wave is generated in the sample holder 3. The signal may be selected, as indicated, such that an antinode of the wave is generated at or close to the wall surface (of the sample holder 3 e.g. surface portion 17) and a node N of the wave W away from the surface 17, generating a local maximum force F on the bodies 9 at or near the surface towards the node. Thus, application of the signal may serve to probe adhesion of the bodies 9 to the surface and/or any functionalised layer on it in dependence of the force.
In an example an optimal force generation for particular studies may be achieved by selecting acoustic cavity parameters and the frequency/wavelength of the acoustic wave in order to create a maximum pressure gradient at the functionalised wall surface, e.g. by ensuring that the distance from the wall surface to the acoustic node is approximately ¼ wavelength.
When providing an oscillating driving voltage Vin by the power supply 41 to the chip 39, a phase difference φ between Vall and Vres will occur, which may be measurable. The following values may be determined (see also the complex phase diagram in
A frequency sweep, e.g. with a width of 0.5 MHz or some other suitable width, may be performed around a calculated resonance frequency. A resonance frequency f0 is identified at the frequency f where the conductance G is at a maximum, impedance |Z| is at a minimum, admittance |Y| is 0. Such case is indicated in
The quality factor Q of the chip resonance peak is determined as:
Thus, by measuring a suitable combination of properties of the sample holder and/or the system such as voltage, resistance, phase difference, impedance, admittance, conductance and/or susceptance for various frequencies and determining values thereof, the resonance frequency and/or the quality factor of the sample holder may be determined; note that presence of a sample in the sample holder and any properties of the sample may affect the resonance frequency and quality factor but these will likewise be determined.
When operating the system an acoustic force on a sample particle may be determined. The force depends on the signal power, associated with the amplitude of the driving signal. It is noted that providing the driving signal to the sample holder causes energy dissipation in the (sample and) sample holder and, thus, heating of the sample, causing a shift of the resonance frequency increasing losses of the system (
When an oscillating driving signal frequency f1 is superposed with a modulation frequency Δf1 a modulated signal frequency fm1 is provided, as shown in
The displacement of the particle 9A may be detected via the microscope using known image capturing techniques including video and/or other time-resolved methods (e.g. methods such as described in WO 2014/200341). The spatiotemporal displacement properties of the particle 9A through the sample fluid may be determined on the basis of the Navier-Stokes equations for the specific particle shape and size in combination with the properties of the fluid 11. By detecting the displacement velocity of the particle 9A the acoustic force may be determined; note that the same may hold for any lateral displacement of the particle 9A.
Using a repeating, possibly periodic, driving signal and possibly a small lateral force in one or two directions parallel to the surface and/or perpendicular to the direction of the acoustic force, an acoustic force in plural positions in the holding space distributed in one or two directions perpendicular to the acoustic force direction may be determined.
Using a single driving signal burst/acoustic force burst as indicated with respect to
Using a repeating, possibly periodic, driving signal more data may be obtained and the map may become even more accurate and/or detailed. Given sufficient homogeneity of the test particles 9A, statistical information like averages, standard deviations of and/or local patterns and/or global patterns in the force distribution may be simply determined, otherwise averages and pattern may be (or: may have to be) calculated on the basis of results calculated independently for each of plural particles 9A to be included in the determination of the average and/or the pattern.
The average acoustic force for a specific test particle or the average acoustic energy density over a certain volume or area A of the field of view for a given signal power may be determined as an efficiency η for the chip, e.g. an area A=Lx×Ly as shown in
For several chips operated at sufficiently equal conditions, in particular with respect to one or more of acoustic wave input power, resonance frequency f0, temperature, and sample compositions and-conditions therein, efficiencies ηi for different chips i may be compared.
Based on a force map of at least a portion of an active region of a sample holder, being the region in which the acoustic standing wave is produced, one can select an desired measurement region based on for example an maximum average force over the region and/or a particular homogeneity of the force over the measurement region. Coordinates and/or other properties of such measurement region may be stored on the chip or in a database from which the coordinates and/or properties may be retrieved, e.g. based on a unique chip identifier. In such case it is beneficial if the measurement system is arranged for deterministically positioning the measurement region of the chip at the correct coordinates, e.g. by a particular sample holder mount and/or an active positioning control system.
It has been found that the quality factor Q and the efficiency η are closely related. For a given set of operating conditions (e.g. temperature, sample composition, driving signal etc.) a linear relationship with a high correlation has been found between the quality factor Q and the efficiency η of the acoustic force of several chips 39 of a given type; see Table 1 and
Next to the value determined for the Q-factor other parameters such as for example the quality of the Lorentzian fit e.g. given by the R2 value may be used to reject measurements and/or sample holders/chips. For example a chip with a high Q-factor but a low R2 value may be rejected because the force applied with such a chip to the sample may be less predictable. Indeed, in Table 1 and
Different correlation relations between the quality factor and other parameters may be determined as well and be used similarly, e.g. a relation between quality number and variation of quality number over time and/or temperature (cf.
In an example, if there is any prior knowledge stored in the database about a correlation of the resonance quality and a chip efficiency, a selection can be performed based on this information to decide whether the chip is good or not. If the chip is considered not good the chip may be rejected, if the chip is considered good the chip may be selected for further use.
If a chip is thus selected, a force map may be determined for the chip according to the methods described above. Such methods may involve a longer and/or more difficult and/or more expensive measurement than the electrical measurement. So, by pre-selection based on the electrical measurement, a lot of time and cost may be saved.
Based on the force map, selection or rejection of a chip may be reconsidered. Also or alternatively a preferred region for one or more measurements may be determined. Such preferred region may for example be a region with maximum average force or with the least (or rather the most) variation in force. Also the force map and/or the coordinates of the preferred region may be stored in the on-chip memory and/or in the chip database. Such information may be used to find a correlation between the electrical properties and the chip efficiency and/or to improve one or more previously established correlation relations.
For using the chip in a measurement and/or manipulation of a sample, the chip may be included in a measurement system wherein the measurement system may position the chip such that a measurement region and/or field of view coincides with the preferred region. Also or alternatively, an efficiency may be calculated for the measurement region when positioned in the measurement system.
A sample comprising sample fluid and one or more sample particles may be chosen and loaded onto the chip (i.e. provided into the holding space of the sample holder) prior to or after such positioning and sample parameters (e.g. particle size, density, compressibility, medium density, temperature, etc.) may be known or determined. Measurement parameters may be chosen associated with one or more of sample properties and/or predetermined measurements and/or manipulations. For example, a desired force or force ramp to be applied to the sample may be chosen. Based on one or more of the sample properties, measurement parameters, the chip efficiency and resonance quality, a driving signal for achieving the desired measurement parameters may be calculated. The driving signal may be applied and the electrical parameters of the acoustic resonance may be monitored, which may be simultaneously. The electrical parameters may be used to update the driving signal during the experiment in a feedback loop to establish and/or maintain the desired measurement parameters.
During or after such measurement a relevant portion of the force map of the sample holder may optionally be used to correct force measurements that occurred during the experiment to improve an accuracy of these force measurements. Also or alternatively, one or more measurement results may be recorded and stored in a memory and/or other database for future reference and/or adjustment of sample holder characteristics like a force map and/or a correlation relation.
Measurement results (e.g. a curve showing a number of cellular bodies bound to the functionalised layer vs applied force) may be stored and/or displayed to the user, possibly after some further processing.
As is clear from the description above, this process can be used both to optimize, monitor and/or maintain quality of production of chips as well as for obtaining more accurate and reproducible experimental data.
Further, unless otherwise specified, terms like “detachable” and “removably connected” are intended to mean that respective parts may be disconnected essentially without damage or destruction of either part, e.g. excluding structures in which the parts are integral (e.g. welded or molded as one piece), but including structures in which parts are attached by or as mated connectors, fasteners, releasable self-fastening features, etc. The verb “to facilitate” is intended to mean “to make easier and/or less complicated”, rather than “to enable”.
The disclosure is not restricted to the above described embodiments which can be varied in a number of ways within the scope of the claims.
For instance, resonance features may be determined by measuring an impulse response in the time domain and Fourier transforming to the frequency domain. This could potentially speed up the locking and calibration. Measurements of the electrical properties of the resonance may also be performed using a standard vector network analyzer (VNA).
Various embodiments, in particular of method of measurement, determination and/or calculation, may be implemented as a program product for use with a computer system, where the program(s) of the program product define functions of the embodiments (including the methods described herein). In one embodiment, the program(s) can be contained on a variety of non-transitory computer-readable storage media, where, as used herein, the expression “non-transitory computer readable storage media” comprises all computer-readable media, with the sole exception being a transitory, propagating signal. In another embodiment, the program(s) can be contained on a variety of transitory computer-readable storage media. Illustrative computer-readable storage media include, but are not limited to: (i) non-writable storage media (e.g., read-only memory devices within a computer such as CD-ROM disks readable by a CD-ROM drive, ROM chips or any type of solid-state non-volatile semiconductor memory) on which information is permanently stored; and (ii) writable storage media (e.g., flash memory, floppy disks within a diskette drive or hard-disk drive or any type of solid-state random-access semiconductor memory) on which alterable information is stored.
Elements and aspects discussed for or in relation with a particular embodiment may be suitably combined with elements and aspects of other embodiments, unless explicitly stated otherwise.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026048 | Jul 2020 | NL | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/NL2021/050440 | 7/12/2021 | WO |
