The present invention relates generally to devices, systems and methods for material fixation. More specifically, the present invention relates to a technique that can be used to firmly hold a soft tissue or graft against bone tissue within a bone tunnel.
One of the most common needs in orthopedic surgery is the fixation of tendon to bone. The fixation of diseased tendons into a modified position is called tenodesis and is commonly required in patients with injury to the long head of the biceps tendon in the shoulder. In addition, tendons which are torn from their insertion site into bone also frequently require repair. This includes distal biceps tendon tears, rotator cuff tears, and torn flexor tendons in the hand. Tendons are also frequently used in the reconstruction of unstable joints. Common examples include anterior cruciate ligament and collateral ligament reconstructions of the knee, medial and lateral elbow collateral ligament reconstructions, ankle collateral ligament reconstruction, finger and hand collateral ligament reconstructions and the like.
Traditional techniques that are used to fix tendon to bone suffer from a number of limitations as a result of the methodology used, including the use of a “keyhole” tenodesis, pull-out sutures, bone tunnels, and interference screw fixation. The “keyhole” tenodesis requires the creation of a bone tunnel in the shape of a keyhole, which allows a knotted tendon to be inserted into the upper portion, and subsequently wedged into the lower narrower portion of the tunnel where inherent traction on the tendon holds it in place. This technique is challenging as it is often difficult to sculpt the keyhole site and insert the tendon into the tunnel. In addition, if the tendon knot unravels in the postoperative period, the tendon will slide out of the keyhole, losing fixation.
Another traditional form of tendon fixation is the use of the “pull-out stitch.” With this technique, sutures attached to the tendon end are passed through bone tunnels and tied over a post or button on the opposite side of the joint. This technique has lost favor in recent years due to a host of associated complications, which include wound problems, weak fixation strength, and potential injury to adjacent structures.
The most common method of fixation of tendon to bone is the use of bone tunnels with either suture fixation, or interference screw fixation. The creation of bone tunnels is relatively complicated, often requiring an extensive exposure to identify the margins of the tunnels. Drill holes placed at right angles are connected using small curettes. This tedious process is time-consuming and fraught with complications, which include poor tunnel placement and fracture of the overlying bone bridge. Graft isometry, which is easy to determine with single point fixation, is difficult to achieve because the tendon exits the bone from two points. After creation of tunnels, sutures must be passed through the tunnels to facilitate the passage of the tendon graft. Tunnels should be small enough to allow good tendon-bone contact, yet large enough to allow for graft passage without compromising the tendon. This portion of the procedure is often time-consuming and frustrating to a surgeon. Finally, the procedure can be compromised if the bone bridge above the tunnel breaks, resulting in loss of fixation. The technique restricts fixation to the strength of the sutures, and does not provide any direct tendon to bone compression.
More recent advances in the field of tendon fixation involve the use of an internally deployed toggle button, for example, the EndoButton®, and the use of interference screws to provide fixation. The EndoButton, by Smith & Nephew, allows the fixation of tendon into a bone tunnel by creating an internally deployed post against a bony wall. While this technique eliminates the need for secondary incisions to place the post, the fixation strength is limited to suture strength alone. This technique does not provide direct tendon to bone compression; as such this technique may slow healing and lead to graft tunnel widening due to the “bungee effect” and “windshield wiper effect”. As a result, this technique has limited clinical applications and is used primarily for salvage when bone tunnels break or backup fixation is important.
The use of the interference screw is the most notable advance in the fixation of tendon to bone. The screw is inserted adjacent to a tendon in a bone tunnel, providing axial compression between the screw threads and the bony wall. Advantages include acceptable pull-out strength and relative ease of use. Aperture fixation, the ability to fix the tendon to bone at its entrance site, is a valuable adjunct to this technique as it minimizes graft motion and subsequent tunnel widening. Some disadvantages related to soft tissue interference screws are that they can be difficult to use, and can also cut or compromise the tendon during implantation.
The newest generation interference screw allows the ability to provide tendon to bone fixation with limited exposure. For example, the Bio-Tenodesis Screw™ (Arthrex, Inc.) allows the tensioning and insertion of tendon into bone, followed by insertion of an adjacent soft tissue interference screw. While this screw system provides advantages in the insertion of tendon into bone in cases when a pull through stitch is not available, it is still limited by the potential for tendon rotation or disruption as the screw compresses the tendon. The surgical technique is also complicated, typically requiring two or more hands for insertion, making it difficult to use the system without assistance during arthroscopic or open procedures. Finally, the use of the screw requires preparation of the tendon end, which can be difficult, time consuming, and can also require conversion of an arthroscopic procedure to open.
Referring particularly to the field of repairing an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, current repair techniques utilizing soft tissue for the replacement graft are either difficult to perform or they result in less than favorable outcomes due to their relatively low tendon-to-bone fixation. Existing ACL reconstruction techniques that have acceptable outcomes (high tendon-to-bone fixation strength) require extra operating room time and surgeon effort due to the requirements of multiple drill holes, external guides and fixtures for the drill holes, and multiple assistants. Another difficulty with current techniques is that they do not well replicate the native ACL in its anatomy or physiology.
Two important factors in replicating the native ACL are aperture compression (compressing the tendon against the bone at the opening of the drill hole into the joint) and tendon length. Compression of the tendons at the aperture of the femoral tunnel will improve the healing process by increasing the intimate contact between the tendon and the bone. Studies show that the lack of intimate contact between the tendon and bone can result in less well organized fibrous tissue, resulting in lower pull-out strengths. The stiffness of the repair is also important to replicate the native ACL. Graft stiffness is decreased by the length of tendon between the fixation points.
Currently, two different sources are utilized for the tissue that replaces the injured native ACL. When the new tissue comes from the patient's own body, the new graft is referred to as an autograft, and when cadaveric tissue is used, the new graft is referred to as an allograft. The most common autograft ACL reconstruction performed currently is the bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft. The BTB graft fixed with an interference screw is used more often because it more accurately replicates the native ACL, due to its aperture compression at the femoral tunnel aperture. However, BTB reconstructions result in an increased rate of anterior knee pain post-surgically for periods of up to 3 years after the reconstruction. Additionally, the harvest procedure for the BTB autograft is invasive and can be difficult to perform. Alternatively, the hamstring tendon autograft ACL reconstruction technique does not result in any significant post-surgical pain, and the harvest procedure is minimally invasive compared to the BTB graft harvest. The reason that the hamstring tendon autograft procedure is not used more frequently in ACL reconstructions is that the fixation of the hamstring tendons to the femur and tibia are not as strong as the fixation of the BTB autografts.
Many prior art systems have addressed some of the problems associated with ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons, but there is not one system that addresses them all. For example, the EndoButton system (Smith & Nephew) is easy to use and does not need additional drill holes. However, it does require additional accessories and additional people to perform the procedure and does not replicate the native ACL due to a lack of tendon-to-bone compression at the aperture, as well as additional length of tendon between fixation points. The EndoButton system is an example of a cortical hamstring fixation device that yields a longer graft construct, resulting in a graft that is less stiff than the native ACL. Peer reviewed journal data show that existing soft tissue fixation systems with long graft lengths between fixation points have as much as a 56% reduction in graft stiffness when compared to the native ACL.
The RigidFix® product by Mitek is a cross pin device that requires multiple drill holes, additional instruments, and assistance from other people in the operating room to complete the repair. Also, there is only passive compression of tendon to bone, not direct, active compression.
The Stratis® ST product by Scandius attempts to more accurately replicate the native ACL by adding material to take up space in the femoral tunnel resulting in more intimate contact between the tendon and the bone. However, to insert the device into the femoral tunnel, the cross-sectional area must be less than the cross-sectional area of the hole. Thus, there is no real compression of tendon to bone. The Stratis ST product also requires additional drill holes, accessories, and people to properly perform the procedure.
The EZLOC™ product by Arthrotek provides high strength and attempts to more accurately replicate the native ACL in the same fashion as the Stratis ST product, by taking up the space in the femoral tunnel. This does create more intimate contact between the tendon and bone, but does not offer real compression at the aperture.
Interference screws such as the RCI™ Screw, available from Smith & Nephew, are easy to use and provide compression of tendon to bone at the femoral tunnel aperture. However, the pull-out strength and stiffness of the repair are significantly lower than the preceding systems.
Thus, although there are many conventional techniques used for the fixation of tendon to bone, each having some advantages, the disadvantages of each such technique presents a need in the art for a simple and universal technique to fixate tendon to bone such that the device is easy to use, the process is simple to follow, and the result is a firm and secure tendon to bone fixation with minimal negative effect on the tendon. Further, such device should be easy to manufacture, universally applied to different tendon to bone sites, and require minimal effort to understand and use in practice.
The present invention is a device that is easy to use, provides high fixation of tendon-bone and active tendon-bone compression, requires no additional accessories, uses only one drill hole, and can be implanted by one practitioner. The invention utilizes cancelous bone for fixation, and replicates the native ACL by compressing the tendons against the bone at the aperture of the femoral tunnel, effectively shortening the length of the graft as compared to cortical hamstring fixation devices. An important advantage of the invention is the improvement of the tendon-bone fixation of hamstring autografts as well as other soft-tissue ACL reconstruction techniques. Extra graft length is eliminated by compression of the tendon against the bone at the aperture of the femoral tunnel, which more closely replicates the native ACL and increases graft stiffness. The inventive device provides high fixation of tendon to bone and active tendon-bone compression. Graft strength has been found to be greater than 1,000 N (Newtons), which is desirable for ACL reconstruction systems.
More particularly, there is provided in one aspect of the invention a material fixation system, which comprises an implant which is placeable in a tunnel disposed in a portion of bone, wherein the tunnel is defined by walls comprised of bone. A first member is deployable outwardly to engage the tunnel walls for anchoring the implant in place in the tunnel, and a second member is deployable outwardly to engage tissue material to be fixed within the tunnel. The second member also functions to move the tissue material outwardly into contact with the tunnel walls. A third member forming a part of the implant is movable to deploy the first member outwardly. A fourth member is provided actuating the third member to move in order to deploy the first member.
Preferably, the fourth member comprises a portion which functions to deploy the second member outwardly. The implant comprises a body having a distal end and a proximal end, and the first member is disposed on the body. The first member comprises an arm which is pivotally attached to the body. The third member comprises a wedge which is movable generally axially to deploy the arm.
In one presently preferred embodiment, the fourth member comprises a deployment screw having a distal end and a proximal end, wherein the deployment screw is adapted to extend axially through the body. The distal end of the deployment screw has a threaded portion which is engageable with a complementary threaded portion on the wedge, wherein rotation of the deployment screw causes relative movement of the deployment screw and the wedge. The wedge moves proximally to deploy the arm.
The aforementioned second member comprises a compression pad. In the preferred embodiment, the fourth member portion comprises a head of the deployment screw, disposed on the proximal end thereof.
In another aspect of the invention, there is provided an anchor for securing soft tissue into a portion of bone, which comprises a body portion having a distal end and a proximal end. At least one outwardly deployable anchoring member is disposed on the body. A wedge member is movable for deploying the at least one outwardly deployable anchoring member. The anchor further comprises a generally axially movable deploying member for moving the wedge member. The deploying member engages the wedge member to move the wedge member, and is disposed proximally of the wedge member.
Preferably, the aforementioned wedge member is disposed distally of the outwardly deployable anchoring member, and moves proximally in order to deploy the outwardly deployable anchoring member outwardly. The anchor further comprises an outwardly deployable compression member for engaging a portion of soft tissue and pushing the soft tissue outwardly into contact with adjacent bone. The outwardly deployable compression member is proximal to the outwardly deployable anchoring member. A portion of the generally axially movable deploying member is adapted to deploy the compression member outwardly. Again, referencing currently preferred embodiments, the at least one outwardly deployable anchoring member comprises an arm pivotally attached to the body, and the generally axially deploying member comprises a threaded deployment screw.
In yet another aspect of the invention, there is provided an implant system for use in making an orthopedic repair of a joint, which comprises a first implant adapted for receiving a tissue graft thereon and then being disposed in a first bone tunnel location, wherein ends of the tissue graft extend through a bone tunnel and out of a proximal end of the tunnel. The first implant comprises a body portion having a distal end and a proximal end, and a first member disposed on the body portion which is deployable outwardly to engage adjacent bone for anchoring the implant in place in the tunnel. The first implant further comprises a second member disposed on the body portion which is deployable outwardly to engage tissue material to be fixed within the tunnel, and to move the tissue material outwardly into contact with the tunnel walls. The implant system further comprises a second implant adapted for disposition in a second bone tunnel location, proximal to the first bone tunnel location. The second implant is adapted to secure the ends of the tissue graft which extend from the first implant against adjacent bone. The first implant further comprises a third member which is movable to deploy the first member outwardly. A fourth member is provided for actuating the third member to move in order to deploy the first member.
In still another aspect of the invention, there is disclosed a method of making an orthopedic repair by fixing a soft tissue graft to bone, which comprises steps of placing a soft tissue graft on an implant, and disposing the implant within a bone tunnel at a desired location, such that a plurality of ends of the soft tissue graft extend from the implant in a proximal direction through the bone tunnel. Additional steps include deploying a first member on a body of the implant outwardly so that portions of the first member engage adjacent bone to secure the implant in place at the desired location, and deploying a second member on the body of the implant outwardly, so that portions of the second member engage portions of the plurality of ends of the soft tissue graft and push the soft tissue graft ends into contact with adjacent bone.
The invention, together with additional features and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying illustrative drawing.
Referring now more particularly to the drawings, procedures and anchoring devices for repairing soft tissue are illustrated. In
The left compression pad 14 slides into the right compression pad 16, and they attach to one another. Two pins 22 attach a pair of arms 24 to the body 18. There is a track 26 on each side of the wedge 20, best seen in
The compression pads 14, 16 slide into a pair of body tracks 30 (
In
Accordingly, the present invention is easy to deploy as an interference screw, and requires fewer steps than in prior art approaches. The deployment screw 12 also provides a rigid backbone to support the implant. A screw head or compression pad deployer 34 deploys the compression pads 14, 16 as the screw 12 moves axially into the implant. Another feature of the screw 12 is a load transfer disk 36 that transfers some of the axial load from a junction between the screw head 34 and the body 18 to a junction between the load transfer disk 36 and the body 18. This load transferring feature allows for thinner side walls or struts 38 on the body 18 due to a decreased load on struts 38 (
With reference now particularly to
Now referring to
The arms 24 have a few key design features, as best shown in
Referring now to
Thus, to accomplish tendon fixation using the exemplary methods and devices described herein, standard surgical preparation of the site and/or arthroscopic portals for access to the procedural region are performed. The joint is dilated with arthroscopic fluid if the procedure is to be performed arthroscopically. With open procedures, the device may easily be manipulated and deployed with a single hand. For arthroscopic procedures, the deployment device is introduced through a standard 5, 6, or 8 mm cannula placed into the joint. A range of preferred cannula sizes would be 2-11 mm.
The procedures described herein are specifically adapted to repair of the ACL in a patient's knee. However, it should be kept in mind that the implants described herein may be used in numerous other soft tissue repair applications, using surgical procedures which are adapted to those applications.
Now with respect to
As the deployment screw 12 continues to move distally through the implant 10, the distal end of the screw 12, comprising the male quad lead section 32 (
In
Alternative implant designs are shown in
Testing has been done by the inventors to verify the functionality of the disclosed invention of
In
As noted above, in this embodiment the compression pads 114, 116 are integrated into the body 118. This feature permits the use of a shorter implant than is the case for the implant of
The deployment screw 112 (
The screw head or compression pad deployer 134 deploys the compression pads 114, 116 as the screw 112 advances axially into the implant. Another feature of the screw is the provision of a load transfer disk 136 that transfers some of the axial load from the screw head 134 to body junction to the disk to body junction. This allows for thinner side walls or struts 138 on the body 118 due to the decreased load on the struts, which in turn allows a larger tendon to fit between the deployment screw 112 and the body 118.
As shown in
The body 118 functions to trap the tendons 170 on either side of the deployment screw 112. The struts 138 are split, as shown at reference numeral 76 (
The arms 124 include a few key design features, as particularly shown in
As in the prior embodiment, the wedge 120 is threaded with a female quad lead thread 156 that matches the complementary threads 132 on the deployment screw 112. The track posts 128 on the arms 124 engage with the wedge track 126 to provide torsional strength through deployment. A tapered nose 158 allows easier off-axis insertion into the femoral tunnel.
Still another embodiment of the inventive implant is illustrated in
The screw is then rotated so that it is advanced the remainder of the way, and the compression wedge 90 engages with the compression pads, thereby pressing the tendon against the bone tunnel wall. A track 92, 94 in the compression pads 214, 216 and compression wedge 90 prevents the compression wedge from engaging unevenly. A progression of deployment of the implant 210 is illustrated in
Modified cortical fixation implant designs are illustrated in
Accordingly, although exemplary embodiments of the invention has been shown and described, it is to be understood that all the terms used herein are descriptive rather than limiting, and that many changes, modifications, and substitutions may be made by one having ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/923,526, entitled Methods and Systems for Material Fixation, filed Oct. 24, 2007, now allowed, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of the filing date of Provisional U.S. Application Ser. No. 60/854,178, entitled Methods and Systems for Material Fixation, filed on Oct. 24, 2006. Each of the above referenced applications are which application is expressly incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety. This application is also related to co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 11/281,566 entitled Devices, Systems, and Methods for Material Fixation, filed on Nov. 18, 2005 and published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2006/0155287 on Jul. 13, 2006, and to co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 11/725,981, entitled Devices, Systems, and Methods for Material Fixation, filed on Mar. 20, 2007. Both of these prior pending applications are commonly owned and herein expressly incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3708883 | Flander | Jan 1973 | A |
3832931 | Talan | Sep 1974 | A |
4311421 | Okada et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4711232 | Fischer et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4716893 | Fischer et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4738255 | Goble et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4744793 | Parr et al. | May 1988 | A |
4772286 | Goble et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4778468 | Hunt et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4828562 | Kenna | May 1989 | A |
4870957 | Goble et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4955910 | Bolesky | Sep 1990 | A |
4957498 | Caspari et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5004474 | Fronk et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5037422 | Hayhurst et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5085661 | Moss | Feb 1992 | A |
5139520 | Rosenberg | Aug 1992 | A |
5161916 | White et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5176709 | Branemark | Jan 1993 | A |
5188636 | Fedotov | Feb 1993 | A |
5211647 | Schmieding | May 1993 | A |
5234430 | Huebner | Aug 1993 | A |
5236445 | Hayhurst et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5258016 | DiPoto et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5268001 | Nicholson et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5281237 | Gimpelson | Jan 1994 | A |
5320626 | Schmieding | Jun 1994 | A |
5336240 | Metzler et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5350383 | Schmieding et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5354298 | Lee et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5356435 | Thein | Oct 1994 | A |
5374269 | Rosenberg | Dec 1994 | A |
5383878 | Roger et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5411523 | Goble | May 1995 | A |
5431651 | Goble | Jul 1995 | A |
5431666 | Sauer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5439467 | Benderev et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5456685 | Huebner | Oct 1995 | A |
5464427 | Curtis et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5466237 | Byrd et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474555 | Puno et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5480403 | Lee et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5486197 | Le et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5507750 | Goble et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5571104 | Li | Nov 1996 | A |
5571184 | DeSatnick | Nov 1996 | A |
5575819 | Amis | Nov 1996 | A |
5601562 | Wolf et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603716 | Morgan et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5618314 | Harwin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5632748 | Beck, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645589 | Li | Jul 1997 | A |
5702215 | Li | Dec 1997 | A |
5702397 | Goble et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707395 | Li | Jan 1998 | A |
5713903 | Sander et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5718706 | Roger | Feb 1998 | A |
5725341 | Hofmeister | Mar 1998 | A |
5725529 | Nicholson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725541 | Anspach, III et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728136 | Thal | Mar 1998 | A |
5741300 | Li | Apr 1998 | A |
5743912 | Lahille et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5769894 | Ferragamo | Jun 1998 | A |
5782865 | Grotz | Jul 1998 | A |
5814073 | Bonutti | Sep 1998 | A |
5845645 | Bonutti | Dec 1998 | A |
5846254 | Schulze et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5871504 | Eaton et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5899938 | Sklar et al. | May 1999 | A |
5902303 | Eckhof et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911721 | Nicholson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
RE36289 | Le et al. | Aug 1999 | E |
5931869 | Boucher et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935129 | McDevitt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941901 | Egan | Aug 1999 | A |
5957953 | DiPoto et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961520 | Beck, Jr. et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5964764 | West, Jr. et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968078 | Grotz | Oct 1999 | A |
5993459 | Larsen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6017346 | Grotz | Jan 2000 | A |
6086608 | Ek et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099530 | Simonian et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113609 | Adams | Sep 2000 | A |
6117173 | Taddia et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132433 | Whelan | Oct 2000 | A |
6146406 | Shluzas et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152928 | Wenstrom, Jr. | Nov 2000 | A |
6179840 | Bowman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187008 | Hamman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190411 | Lo | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6214007 | Anderson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221107 | Steiner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6325804 | Wenstrom, Jr. et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328758 | Tornier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355066 | Kim | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379361 | Beck, Jr. et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387129 | Rieser et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6461373 | Wyman et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6482210 | Skiba et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6517579 | Paulos et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533795 | Tran et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6533816 | Sklar | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6551330 | Bain et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554862 | Hays et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562071 | Jarvinen | May 2003 | B2 |
6575973 | Shekalim | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6616694 | Hart | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6623524 | Schmieding | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632245 | Kim | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6648890 | Culbert et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656183 | Colleran et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6685706 | Padget et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689135 | Enayati | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6716234 | Grafton et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719509 | Huang et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6730124 | Steiner | May 2004 | B2 |
6736829 | Li et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6736847 | Seyr et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6752831 | Sybert et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6770073 | McDevitt et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6770084 | Bain et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6780188 | Clark et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6796977 | Yap et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802862 | Roger et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6833005 | Mantas et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6887271 | Justin et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6890354 | Steiner et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6932841 | Sklar et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939379 | Sklar | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6942666 | Overaker et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6942668 | Padget et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6986781 | Smith | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7008451 | Justin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7037324 | Martinek | May 2006 | B2 |
7083638 | Foerster | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7147651 | Morrison et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7201754 | Stewart et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7309355 | Donnelly et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7326247 | Schmieding et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7556629 | Von Hoffmann et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7556640 | Foerster | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20020120280 | Wotton, III | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020165611 | Enzerink et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030065391 | Re et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083662 | Middleton | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109900 | Martinek | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135274 | Hays et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030199877 | Steiger et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204204 | Bonutti | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040024456 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040068267 | Harvie et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040097943 | Hart | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098050 | Foerster et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098052 | West, Jr. et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040153153 | Elson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040180308 | Ebi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181240 | Tseng et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199165 | Culbert et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230194 | Urbanski et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237362 | O'Connell | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267362 | Hwang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033289 | Warren et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050251260 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060095131 | Justin et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060155287 | Montgomery et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060235413 | Denham et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070166122 | McDuff et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080119929 | Schmieding et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2235354 | Oct 1999 | CA |
0232049 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0528573 | Aug 1992 | EP |
0688185 | Feb 1993 | EP |
1033115 | Sep 2000 | EP |
0762850 | Feb 2004 | EP |
0739185 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1011535 | Dec 2005 | EP |
2696925 | Apr 1994 | FR |
10155820 | Jun 1998 | JP |
8809157 | Dec 1988 | WO |
9216167 | Oct 1992 | WO |
9515726 | Jun 1995 | WO |
9812991 | Apr 1998 | WO |
9818409 | May 1998 | WO |
0130253 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0232345 | Apr 2002 | WO |
02085256 | Oct 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Caborn et al., A Biomechanical Comparison of Initial Soft Tissue Tibial Fixation Devices: The Intrafix Versus a Tapered 35-mm Bioabsorbable Interference Screw, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004, vol. 32, No. 4. |
Charlton et al., Clinical Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Quadrupled Hamstring Tendon Graft and Bioabsorbable Interference Screw Fixation, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2003, pp. 518-521, vol. 31, No. 4, Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, Los Angeles. |
Morgan et al., Anatomic Graft Fixation Using a Retrograde Biointerference Screw for Endoscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Single-Bundle and 2-Bundle Techniques, Techniques in Orthopaedics, 2005, pp. 297-302, vol. 20, No. 3, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philadelphia. |
Robbe et al., Graft Fixation Alternatives in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Spring 2002, pp. 21-28, vol. 15, Orthopaedic Surgery Department, University of Kentucky School of Medicine, Lexington, KY, U.S.A. |
Scheffler et al., Biomechanical Comparison of Hamstring and Patellar Tendon Graft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques: The Impact of Fixation Level and Fixation Method Under Cyclic Loading, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Mar. 2002, pp. 304-315, vol. 18, No. 3, Arthroscopy Association of North America. |
Simonian et al., Interference Screw Position and Hamstring Graft Location for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Jul.-Aug. 1998, pp. 459-464, vol. 14, No. 5, The New York Hospital—Cornell University Medical College, New York, U.S.A. |
Wolf, Eugene M., Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Reconstruction using Femoral Cross-pin Fixation, Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, Oct. 1999, pp. 241-222, vol. 7, No. 4, W.B. Saunders Company, San Francisco, U.S.A. |
A Biomechanical Comparison of Femoral RetroScrew Placement in a Porcine Model, Arthrex Research and Development, 2007, Arthex, Inc. |
Scope This Out: A Technical Pearls Newsletter for Arthroscopists, Fall 1999, vol. 1, No. 3, Arthrex, Inc, U.S.A. |
Scope This Out: A Technical Pearls Newsletter for Arthroscopists, Summer 2001, vol. 3, No. 2, Arthrex, Inc, U.S.A. |
Scope This Out: A Technical Pearls Newsletter for Arthroscopists, Summer 2002, vol. 4, No. 2, Arthrex, Inc, U.S.A. |
Scope This Out: A Technical Pearls Newsletter for Arthroscopists, Summer 2002, vol. 5, No. 2, Arthrex, Inc, U.S.A. |
European Search Report dated Feb. 9, 2012 in related European Patent Application No. EP 07871231. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110184516 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60854178 | Oct 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11923526 | Oct 2007 | US |
Child | 13014441 | US |