At least certain data processing systems currently allow a user, on the one hand, to open a file to edit or create the file, such as a word processing document, in a native application and on the other hand, to view the file in a non-native “viewer” application which cannot normally create or edit the file. The application which created the file can be considered or referred to as a native application.
In this prior art system, a user can select a file, such as the file on the desktop or a file within a window and then cause the system to display a preview of the file without launching the native application which created or can edit the file. For example, the user can select an icon on the desktop or an icon or name within a window and then press the space bar key or select a preview command from a pop-up menu to cause the presentation of the preview of the file in a preview panel 16 which includes the content 20 of the file within the preview panel 16. The preview panel can include a resize icon 18, allowing the user to resize the preview panel, which can behave somewhat like a window, and the preview panel 16 can include a close icon 17 which allows a user to close the window by selecting close icon 17. Further, preview panel 16 can include a preview top bar 17A which can allow a user to control the position or movement of preview panel 16 by selecting the preview top bar and by indicating a movement of the preview top bar (e.g. with a cursor or a touch interface, etc.). The use of the preview panel may be faster than launching the application to view the file, so a user may desire to use the preview function before deciding to launch the application to see the file within a native application which can create or edit the file. If the user wants to launch the native application, then the user can enter a command, such as a double-click action within the preview panel or some other gesture to indicate to the system that the native application is to be launched. The result of launching the native application is shown in
The process of launching the native application and loading or opening the file includes removing the preview panel 16 from the display screen 10 and then displaying any splash screen of the native application and then loading user interface elements, such as menu bar 24 and other user interface features, and then showing the content of the file within application window 25 which is a window controlled by the Text Edit program as shown by program menu 22 in the menu bar 24. The process of opening the file in the prior art can be distracting to a user because the content of the file, originally displayed within preview panel 16, is removed from the display in response to a command to open the file and then user interface elements of the launch program begin to appear and at some point in time the content of the file reappears with all of the user interface elements of the launched application surrounding the content. Thus, the user's focus is taken away from the content while the application launches itself and loads or opens the file. In some instances, it can take several seconds for the launch process to occur, and this time diverts the user's attention from the content of the file to other images.
This application relates to one or more methods and systems for opening a file, and in particular, in one embodiment, for opening a file after presenting the file in a preview or reader mode. According to one embodiment, a method can include receiving a command to display a preview of a file and displaying the preview in response to the command in a non-native application, and after the preview is displayed, receiving a command, while displaying or otherwise presenting the preview, to open the file in a native application. After receiving the command to open the file, the preview of the content of the file continues to be presented. The preview of the file, which is displayed after receiving the command to open the file, is displayed while processing the command to open the file and before loading of the application is completed. The displaying of the preview in this manner can occur without user perceptible interruption, such that the opening of the file is seamless to the user in the sense that the user is presented with the content of the file without user perceptible interruption. In one embodiment, the initial preview provided by the non-native application can be a first preview and the preview presented after receiving the command to open the file can be a second preview which is an enlarged version of the first preview or a version of the content generated by the native application, such as a snapshot of the content saved when the file was last closed. The method can also include suppressing a splash screen which would otherwise cover the representation of the content or second preview of the content, and the method can also include passing a display state of the preview from the non-native application to the native application, wherein the display state can indicate a viewing position on the content of the file. In one embodiment, the display state can also indicate a size of the preview panel or window, and the native application can use this size to determine the size of its window to display the content of the file. For example, the display state can specify that the preview was displayed in full screen mode, and the native application can automatically and directly open a window to display the content of the file in full screen mode (so that this window occupies the full screen of the display). In another example, the display state can specify the size and position of the preview window or panel and the native application can optionally use the size and position information to open its window in the same size and position (or use the size and position as a hint to open its window with a similar, but not same, size and position). The non-native application can be configured to display content of a plurality of different file types, including picture files, text files, movie files, spreadsheet files, PowerPoint slide files, but the non-native application cannot normally edit or create content of the plurality of file types.
In another embodiment, a method of the present invention can include displaying, in a user interface of a file management system such as the Finder program from Apple Inc. or Windows Explorer from Microsoft, at least one of an icon and a name of a file and receiving, from the user interface, a command to open the file in a native application and displaying, in response to the command, the content of the file by a non-native application in a first border or no border, while the native application is being launched to open the file. The content can be displayed by the non-native application before user interface elements of the native application are displayed, and the border or no border can be replaced by a user interface of a window of the native application after the native application has been launched. The border provided by the non-native application, in one embodiment, will not include scroll controls. In one embodiment, the displaying of the content of the file occurs while processing of the command to open the file and hence the display of the content by both the non-native application and the native application occurs, over time, seamlessly from a user's perspective because there is no interruption of the presentation of the content of the file after the preview of the content by the non-native application has been presented by the non-native application.
In another embodiment, a method according to the present invention can include displaying a file in a preview mode by a non-native application, wherein the file is displayed in a display state, which represents or indicates a viewable portion of the file in the preview mode. The method can further include receiving a command to open the file in a native application and passing the display state in the preview mode from the non-native application to the native application, and displaying the file in the native application based on the display state which can indicate a viewable portion of the file in the preview mode. For example, if the user was looking at page 2 of the file in the preview mode through the non-native application, the native application, after opening the file, will display the file at page 2 rather than page 1 in one embodiment. The display state can include at least one of a page number, a scroll position, or a movie frame number or movie time or other parameters or indicators of a viewable portion of the file and can also include the preview's size (size of window or panel of the preview) and position. The passing of the display state can occur in response to the command to open the file. In one embodiment, the file is displayed in the preview mode in response to a first input, and the command to open the file is invoked by a second input which is different than the first input. In one embodiment, the content of the file cannot be created or edited by the non-native application, and, in one embodiment, the non-native application can be a user interface program for a file management system, such as the Finder or Windows Explorer from Microsoft.
Systems, methods and machine readable tangible storage medium, such as DRAM, flash, hard disk drives, or other magnetic media, etc. can provide for seamless and smooth opening of a file as described further herein.
The above summary does not include an exhaustive list of all aspects of the present invention. It is contemplated that the invention includes all systems and methods that can be practiced from all suitable combinations of the various aspects summarized above, and also those disclosed in the Detailed Description below.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements.
Various embodiments and aspects of the inventions will be described with reference to details discussed below, and the accompanying drawings will illustrate the various embodiments. The following description and drawings are illustrative of the invention and are not to be construed as limiting the invention. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough understanding of various embodiments of the present invention. However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details are not described in order to provide a concise discussion of embodiments of the present inventions.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in conjunction with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification do not necessarily all refer to the same embodiment. The processes depicted in the figures that follow are performed by processing logic that comprises hardware (e.g. circuitry, dedicated logic, etc.), software, or a combination of both. Although the processes are described below in terms of some sequential operations, it should be appreciated that some of the operations described may be performed in a different order. Moreover, some operations may be performed in parallel rather than sequentially.
The present description includes material protected by copyrights, such as illustrations of graphical user interface images. The owners of the copyrights, including the assignee of the present invention, hereby reserve their rights, including copyright, in these materials. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyrights whatsoever. Copyright Apple Inc. 2010.
At least certain embodiments of the present invention can provide methods, systems, and machine readable tangible storage media that can provide for smooth and seamless opening of a file from, for example, a preview or from a user interface program for a file management system such as the Finder program from Apple Inc. of Cupertino, Calif. A preview of a file can be generated by a non-native viewer or reader application and, in response to a command to open the file in a native application, the preview can continue to be displayed while the native application launches such that the user will perceive no interruption, after the command to open the file, in display of the content in one embodiment. The non-native application can pass a display state, such as a page number or scroll position, to the native application such that the native application continues to show a user's current position or view port, in the preview mode, into the file and in some embodiments the non-native application can also pass the preview panel's size and screen position to the native application as described above.
The method shown in
The method can continue in operation 205 in which a command is received, while displaying or otherwise presenting the first preview, to open the file in a native application. For example, if the native application is a .doc file which is a Microsoft Word file, then Microsoft Word will be launched in order to open the file. A user may activate the command by double-clicking within the preview panel or window or by double-clicking on the icon of the file or the file name of the file or by other methods known in the art to generate a command to open a file. Then in operation 207, the method will continue to display a preview of the file while the file is being opened in the native application. This is unlike the prior art in which the preview is removed or closed from the display, in response to the open command, while the native application is being launched and the file is being opened. The preview which is generated in operation 207 can, in one embodiment, be an enlarged version of the initial preview and may be moved on the display screen relative to the initial preview. Several examples are provided further below in connection with
Continuing with
In one embodiment, a non-native application, such as the preview generator shown in
In the example shown in
The user can, after displaying the preview as shown in
Window 325 can have no border as is shown in
The sequence of
An example of the method of
Each of
The resulting user interface after the completion of the launching is shown in
In one embodiment, when a file is closed, it can seamlessly transition from the opened state back to the location from which it was opened. If the location is visible (e.g., the location is an icon on the desktop), the file can be closed by a zooming animation which shrinks from the window, showing the opened file, in a native application to the icon on the desktop. If the location is not visible (e.g., the location is within a folder that is closed) then the file can be closed by a zooming animation which shrinks from the window, showing the opened file, in a native application to an icon, representing the file, which is located near the center point of the window, and then the icon can disappear from view. In this embodiment, the file can appear to close to its origination point, which can give the appearance of a seamless closing to match, in reverse, the seamless opening described herein. A system in one embodiment can implement either seamless closing or seamless opening or both.
Some embodiments include one or more application programming interfaces (APIs) in an environment with calling program code interacting with other program code being called through the one or more interfaces. Various function calls, messages or other types of invocations, which further may include various kinds of parameters, can be transferred via the APIs between the calling program and the code being called. In addition, an API may provide the calling program code the ability to use data types or classes defined in the API and implemented in the called program code.
At least certain embodiments include an environment with a calling software component interacting with a called software component through an API. A method for operating through an API in this environment includes transferring one or more function calls, messages, other types of invocations or parameters via the API.
One or more Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) may be used in some embodiments. An API is an interface implemented by a program code component or hardware component (hereinafter “API-implementing component”) that allows a different program code component or hardware component (hereinafter “API-calling component”) to access and use one or more functions, methods, procedures, data structures, classes, and/or other services provided by the API-implementing component. An API can define one or more parameters that are passed between the API-calling component and the API-implementing component.
An API allows a developer of an API-calling component (which may be a third party developer) to leverage specified features provided by an API-implementing component. There may be one API-calling component or there may be more than one such component. An API can be a source code interface that a computer system or program library provides in order to support requests for services from an application. An operating system (OS) can have multiple APIs to allow applications running on the OS to call one or more of those APIs, and a service (such as a program library) can have multiple APIs to allow an application that uses the service to call one or more of those APIs. An API can be specified in terms of a programming language that can be interpreted or compiled when an application is built.
In some embodiments the API-implementing component may provide more than one API, each providing a different view of or with different aspects that access different aspects of the functionality implemented by the API-implementing component. For example, one API of an API-implementing component can provide a first set of functions and can be exposed to third party developers, and another API of the API-implementing component can be hidden (not exposed) and provide a subset of the first set of functions and also provide another set of functions, such as testing or debugging functions which are not in the first set of functions. In other embodiments the API-implementing component may itself call one or more other components via an underlying API and thus be both an API-calling component and an API-implementing component.
An API defines the language and parameters that API-calling components use when accessing and using specified features of the API-implementing component. For example, an API-calling component accesses the specified features of the API-implementing component through one or more API calls or invocations (embodied for example by function or method calls) exposed by the API and passes data and control information using parameters via the API calls or invocations. The API-implementing component may return a value through the API in response to an API call from an API-calling component. While the API defines the syntax and result of an API call (e.g., how to invoke the API call and what the API call does), the API may not reveal how the API call accomplishes the function specified by the API call. Various API calls are transferred via the one or more application programming interfaces between the calling (API-calling component) and an API-implementing component. Transferring the API calls may include issuing, initiating, invoking, calling, receiving, returning, or responding to the function calls or messages; in other words, transferring can describe actions by either of the API-calling component or the API-implementing component. The function calls or other invocations of the API may send or receive one or more parameters through a parameter list or other structure. A parameter can be a constant, key, data structure, object, object class, variable, data type, pointer, array, list or a pointer to a function or method or another way to reference a data or other item to be passed via the API.
Furthermore, data types or classes may be provided by the API and implemented by the API-implementing component. Thus, the API-calling component may declare variables, use pointers to, use or instantiate constant values of such types or classes by using definitions provided in the API.
Generally, an API can be used to access a service or data provided by the API-implementing component or to initiate performance of an operation or computation provided by the API-implementing component. By way of example, the API-implementing component and the API-calling component may each be any one of an operating system, a library, a device driver, an API, an application program, or other module (it should be understood that the API-implementing component and the API-calling component may be the same or different type of module from each other). API-implementing components may in some cases be embodied at least in part in firmware, microcode, or other hardware logic. In some embodiments, an API may allow a client program to use the services provided by a Software Development Kit (SDK) library. In other embodiments an application or other client program may use an API provided by an Application Framework. In these embodiments the application or client program may incorporate calls to functions or methods provided by the SDK and provided by the API or use data types or objects defined in the SDK and provided by the API. An Application Framework may in these embodiments provide a main event loop for a program that responds to various events defined by the Framework. The API allows the application to specify the events and the responses to the events using the Application Framework. In some implementations, an API call can report to an application the capabilities or state of a hardware device, including those related to aspects such as input capabilities and state, output capabilities and state, processing capability, power state, storage capacity and state, communications capability, etc., and the API may be implemented in part by firmware, microcode, or other low level logic that executes in part on the hardware component.
The API-calling component may be a local component (i.e., on the same data processing system as the API-implementing component) or a remote component (i.e., on a different data processing system from the API-implementing component) that communicates with the API-implementing component through the API over a network. It should be understood that an API-implementing component may also act as an API-calling component (i.e., it may make API calls to an API exposed by a different API-implementing component) and an API-calling component may also act as an API-implementing component by implementing an API that is exposed to a different API-calling component.
The API may allow multiple API-calling components written in different programming languages to communicate with the API-implementing component (thus the API may include features for translating calls and returns between the API-implementing component and the API-calling component); however the API may be implemented in terms of a specific programming language. An API-calling component can, in one embedment, call APIs from different providers such as a set of APIs from an OS provider and another set of APIs from a plug-in provider and another set of APIs from another provider (e.g. the provider of a software library) or creator of the another set of APIs.
It will be appreciated that the API-implementing component 710 may include additional functions, methods, classes, data structures, and/or other features that are not specified through the API 720 and are not available to the API-calling component 730. It should be understood that the API-calling component 730 may be on the same system as the API-implementing component 710 or may be located remotely and accesses the API-implementing component 710 using the API 720 over a network. While
The API-implementing component 710, the API 720, and the API-calling component 730 may be stored in a tangible machine-readable storage medium, which includes any mechanism for storing information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computer or other data processing system). For example, a tangible machine-readable storage medium includes magnetic disks, optical disks, random access memory (e.g. DRAM); read only memory, flash memory devices, etc.
In
Note that the Service 2 has two APIs, one of which (Service 2 API 1) receives calls from and returns values to Application 1 and the other (Service 2 API 2) receives calls from and returns values to Application 2. Service 1 (which can be, for example, a software library) makes calls to and receives returned values from OS API 1, and Service 2 (which can be, for example, a software library) makes calls to and receives returned values from both OS API 1 and OS API 2. Application 2 makes calls to and receives returned values from OS API 2.
Any one of the methods described herein can be implemented on a variety of different data processing devices, including general purpose computer systems, special purpose computer systems, etc. For example, the data processing systems which may use any one of the methods described herein may include a desktop computer or a laptop computer or a tablet computer or a smart phone, or a cellular telephone, or a personal digital assistant (PDA), an embedded electronic device or a consumer electronic device.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will be evident that various modifications may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than a restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5303388 | Kreitman et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5404316 | Klingler et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5586237 | Baecker et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5831617 | Bhukhanwala | Nov 1998 | A |
5960448 | Reichek et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974549 | Golan | Oct 1999 | A |
6006227 | Freeman et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6202061 | Khosla et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215523 | Anderson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6262732 | Coleman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6401097 | McCotter et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6519568 | Harvey et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6564383 | Combs et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6613101 | Mander et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6618733 | White et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6638313 | Freeman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6654754 | Knauft et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6725427 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6760721 | Chasen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768999 | Prager et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6944819 | Banatwala et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7051288 | Bennett et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7085761 | Shibata | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7143102 | Fiennes et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146388 | Stakutis et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159188 | Stabb et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162466 | Kaasten et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162488 | DeVorchik et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7318047 | Foth et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7333982 | Bakalash et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7392248 | Bakalash et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7437358 | Arrouye et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7587680 | Wada | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7647278 | Foth et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7657603 | He et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7689933 | Parsons | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7730047 | Hugill et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752237 | Ray | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20010028363 | Nomoto et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020054017 | Agata et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020140746 | Gargi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030076322 | Ouzts et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093572 | Laux et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030128242 | Gordon | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030156140 | Watanabe | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030189602 | Dalton et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040095396 | Stavely et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040150671 | Kamiwada et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040230599 | Moore et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050010860 | Weiss et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050102373 | Grinberg | May 2005 | A1 |
20050154716 | Watson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050246324 | Paalasmaa et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050283739 | Mohr et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289482 | Anthony et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060031357 | Misra et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060074869 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085442 | Fujiwara | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060107207 | Wada | May 2006 | A1 |
20060174214 | McKee et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195512 | Rogers et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195790 | Beaupre et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060238835 | Nishida et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060265417 | Amato et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060280437 | Logan et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070061306 | Pell et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061745 | Anthony et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070066 | Bakhash | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070136750 | Abanami et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143245 | Dettinger et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143493 | Mullig et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156669 | Marchisio et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070189708 | Lerman et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070266411 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080021921 | Horn | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033919 | Arrouye et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034306 | Ording | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034325 | Ording | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034381 | Jalon et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080062141 | Chandhri | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080115182 | van Willigenburg | May 2008 | A1 |
20080307343 | Robert et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307350 | Sabatelli et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307363 | Jalon et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090099919 | Schultheiss et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106674 | Bray et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112719 | Bhave et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125842 | Nakayama | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150769 | Konnola et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150792 | Laakso et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090249210 | Sheldon et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090300540 | Russell | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100027055 | Mori | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20130124955 | Goel et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9949396 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0063766 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 2005121920 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006032442 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2007005789 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2008019113 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2008153646 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2008153647 | Dec 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Apple Tiger vs Windows Vista,” Jun. 25, 2006, 3 pages. |
Apple, “Quick Look Programming Guide—Data Management: File Management,”XP007915043, Jul. 20, 2009, pp. 1-50. |
Apples iTunes 7 CNET Editors' Review, Sep. 15, 2006, 6 pages. |
Cody, Hinze, “CoverFlow—A beautiful way to browse your MP3s”, NOISE blog, http://noise.typepad.com/noise—blog/2006/02/cover—flow—the—html, Feb. 5, 2006, 2 pages. |
Dowdy, Thomas, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 60/843,832, filed Sep. 11, 2006, 68 pages (specification and drawings). |
Engst, Adam C., “iPhoto 6 for Mac OS X: Visual QuickStart Guide,” Peachpit Press, Jun. 20, 2006, pp. 9, 45, 50, 100, 105, 122, and 144-146. |
Enright, Andrew Coulter, “Dissatisfaction Sows Innovation”, The Treehouse + The Cave, http://thetreehouseandthecave.blogspot.com/2004/12/dissatisfaction-sows-innovation.html, Dec. 29, 2004, 6 pages, Bushwick, Brooklyn. |
Enright, Andrew Coulter, “Dissatisfaction Sows Innovation”, The Treehouse + The Cave, http://thetreehouseandthecave.blogspot.com/2004/12/dissatisfaction-sows-innovation.html, Jun. 15, 2006, Bushwick, Brooklyn. 18 pages. |
Enright, Andrew Coulter, The Fliptych Interface, The Treehouse + The Cave, Aug. 6, 2006, 2 pages. |
Imran Chandri, U.S. Appl. No. 60/937,986, filed Jun. 29, 2007, 72 pages (specification). |
Microsoft Corporation, “Creating Windows XP Icons,” Jul. 2001, 12 pages. |
Microsoft Corporation, “How to Modify your Folder View Settings or to do a Custom Folder”, Apr. 27, 2004, 5 pages. |
Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,750, entitled “Previewing User Interfaces and Other Aspects” filed Oct. 22, 2007, 8 pages. |
Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,750, entitled “Previewing User Interfaces and Other Aspects” filed Oct. 22, 2007, 11 pages. |
Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/189,673, entitled “Browsing or Searching User Interfaces and Other Aspects” filed Aug. 11, 2008, 21 pages. |
Office Action dated May 26, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/189,673, entitled “Browsing or Searching User Interfaces and Other Aspects” filed Aug. 11, 2008, 18 pages. |
Office Action dated May 28, 2009 for European Patent Application No. 07836525.1-2201, 4 pages. |
Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/760,759, entitled “Browsing or Searching User Interfaces and Other Aspects” filed Jun. 9, 2007, 16 pages. |
Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/760,760, entitled “Browsing or Searching User Interfaces and Other aspects” filed Jun. 9, 2007, 19 pages. |
Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/760,759, entitled “Browsing or Searching User Interfaces and Other Aspects” filed Jun. 9, 2007, 21 pages. |
Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/760,761, entitled “Browsing or Searching User Interfaces and Other Aspects” filed Jun. 9, 2007, 12 pages. |
Office Action dated Dec. 8, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/189,668, entitled “Browsing or Searching User Interaces and Other Aspects” filed Aug. 11, 2008, 21 pages. |
Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/760,761, entitled “Browsing or Searching User Interfaces and Other Aspects” filed Jun. 9, 2007, 14 pages. |
Ording, Bas, et al., “Methods and Apparatuses for Operating a Data Processing System,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/873,661, filed Jun. 21, 2004 (92 pages). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Appln No. PCT/US2008/005900 mailed Aug. 1, 2008. (14 pages). |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for PCT International Appln No. PCT/US2008/005900 mailed Dec. 23, 2009. (8 pages). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2008/005901 dated Sep. 11, 2008, 14 pages. |
PCT Notification of International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2008/005901 dated Dec. 23, 2009, 9 pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for PCT/US2010/042606 dated Oct. 5, 2010, 13 pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2007/017424, mailed Feb. 4, 2008, 9 pages. |
Ricadela, Aaron, “New Windows Era,” InformationWeek, Aug. 1, 2005, 3 pages. |
“Screenshots from iTunes 4.1 running on Windows XP” Internet Citation, XP002486348, Oct. 5, 2005, pp. 1-17. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/878,746, filed Jan. 5, 2007, titled “Electronic Device With Image Based Browsers”, by inventors Thomas Dowdy, David Heller and Anne Jones, 98 pages (specification and drawings). |
“Windows Media Player 11—The OTHER Album Art Aware App.,” May 11, 2006, 4 pages. |
Zaitseff, John, “Sample Page for File-type Icons,” Nov. 16, 2006, 2 pages. |
Slide Show www.digitalphotoslideshow.com/doc/configure.htm archived May 24, 2005, 1 page. |
Perry, Greg, “Sams Teach Yourself Windows® XP All in One Second Edition,” Dec. 17, 2004, Print ISBN-13: 978-0-672-32728-5, Web ISBN-13: 978-0-7686-8357-8, pp. 93-96. |
Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/760,759, entitled “Browsing or Searching User Interfaces and Other Aspects” filed Jun. 9, 2007, 20 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120081375 A1 | Apr 2012 | US |