Solid freeform fabrication is a process for manufacturing three-dimensional objects, for example, prototype parts, production parts, models and working tools. Solid freeform fabrication is an additive process in which an object, which is described by electronic data, is automatically built, usually layer-by-layer, from base materials.
There are a variety of different freeform fabrication systems that use different processes to form a desired object. Some systems eject the base material from which the object being formed is built up layer-by-layer. Other systems eject a binder selectively into a powdered base material.
Many solid freeform fabrication systems require the construction of support structures that must be attached below or beside the object being formed. These structures support the object being formed until it is completed and solidified. For example, stereolithography, polymer jetting, jetted wax, and fused deposition systems can all require one or more support structures to be fabricated as part of the build process.
The support structures of the systems mentioned above, however, create several issues. One of the issues associated with the support structures of current systems is the difficulty in removing that support structure from the object being fabricated after the fabrication process is complete. The support structures may be physically connected to the object being formed. Consequently, the process of removing the support structures may damage the object being formed.
Another issue with current systems is the general requirement for support structures to be relatively dense. Support structures range from polymer jetting, where every voxel of the object is supported, to stereolithography, where a matrix of relatively dense support structures is built to support the object in a liquid bath. These dense support structures can be both expensive and time consuming to fabricate.
However, another family of solid freeform fabrication systems is powder-based. Powder-based systems generally create objects by ejecting a binder onto a flat bed of powdered build material. Each powder layer may be dispensed or spread as a dry powder or a slurry within a build area. Wherever a binder is selectively ejected into the powder layer, the powder is bound into a cross section or layer of the object being formed. It is also possible to use focused energy to bind the powder together. Selective laser sintering (SLS) is an example of this approach.
In a powder-based system, unbound powder acts as the primary support for the object being formed. This is advantageous compared to the systems mentioned above, because no explicit support structures are needed. Thus, there are no support structures to remove, no material is wasted to create the support structures, and no machine throughput availability is sacrificed for building support structures. In addition, all of the unbound powder can be removed and reused.
However, one of the issues with powder-based systems is the difficulty in achieving tightly packed powder in the build regions of the fabrication machines. Many factors may cause the powder to shift or settle after layers of powder are spread. Some of the factors that cause powder shifting and/or settling may include mechanical vibration of the system equipment, spreading of subsequent layers, and settling of the powder under the weight of an object being produced in the build area.
When powder shifts and/or settles during the fabrication process, the object being formed will also sink or move. The object may move in any number of directions. This movement causes a loss of dimensional accuracy, as the fabrication systems have no way to measure or compensate for object movement during the fabrication process. If, for example, an object sinks as powder settles, a layer spread after the settling will be thicker than specified. As the fabrication process continues, the overall thickness of the object being formed becomes larger than intended, and the accuracy of the object dimensions is compromised.
In one of many possible embodiments, the present invention provides a method of producing an object through solid freeform fabrication, the method including fabricating a support structure about at least a portion of the object by applying a binder or focused energy to a build material.
The accompanying drawings illustrate various embodiments of the present invention and are a part of the specification. The illustrated embodiments are merely examples of the present invention and do not limit the scope of the invention.
Throughout the drawings, identical reference numbers designate similar, but not necessarily identical, elements.
The present specification describes techniques for creating objects by a solid freeform fabrication system, preferably using fluid ejection or sintering technology, while reducing the effects of build material shifting and/or settling as described above. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the term “binder” refers to adhesives or any other substance that is ejected to selectively bind a build material together into a desired product. “Build material” is any material from which a freeform fabrication system forms a desired product and may include a powdered build material that can be bound by the application of a liquid binder or focused energy (e.g. a laser). The term “voxel” describes a volumetric pixel, which is an addressable volume having length in x, y, and z coordinates. Also, the term “sparse” means widely spaced or scattered, or not densely packed.
Referring now to the figures, and in particular to
In the solid freeform fabrication system (100) of
A binding device such as a liquid binder ejection apparatus (e.g. a drop-on-demand or continuous liquid ejection apparatus, etc.) or a laser may be contained by the moving stage (103) of the solid freeform fabrication system (200). Alternatively, the solid freeform fabrication system (100) may include multiple liquid binder ejection apparatuses, each separately containing one or more ejection fluid. The fluid ejection apparatus or laser may also be separate from the moving stage (103) according to some embodiments.
When the moving stage (103) has distributed the powder in a binder-ejection system, the fluid ejection apparatus deposits binder onto the powder in the fabrication bin (102) in a two dimensional pattern. Similarly, if the fabrication system incorporates selective laser sintering, the laser melts the powder particles to bind them to one another in the two dimensional pattern. This two dimensional pattern is a cross section of the desired object being fabricated, or, according to aspects of the invention, a cross section of a support structure to stabilize the object and/or the powder used to build the object as discussed in more detail below.
The powder becomes bonded in the areas where the binder is deposited or focused energy has been applied, thereby forming a solid layer of the object being formed or a related support structure. The process is repeated with a new layer of powder being applied over the top of the previous layer in the fabrication bin (102). A next cross section of the desired product and/or support structure may then be built by ejecting binder or applying focused energy to the new powder layer. In addition to forming each cross-sectional layer of the object and/or support structure being fabricated, the adhesive binder or focused energy application can also bind adjacent or successive layers together.
The process continues until the desired object is entirely formed within the fabrication bin (102). The support structure and any extra powder that is not bonded may then be removed, leaving only the fabricated object. A user interface or control panel (104) is provided to allow the user to control the fabrication process.
The moving stage (103) of the solid freeform fabrication system (100) may include inkjet technology, such as continuous or drop-on-demand liquid ejection devices, for ejecting binder to form or color the layers of the desired object. Using continuous or drop-on-demand inkjet technology, the moving stage (103) may include one or more printheads to eject drops of binder that is clear or colored in a selective pattern to create the object or the support structure being fabricated.
Conventional powder-based freeform fabrication processes eject binder or apply focused energy only in the predetermined patterns necessary to fabricate the desired object. However, as discussed above, objects and powder tend to shift and sink within the fabrication bin (102), creating dimensional inaccuracies. Therefore, according to the principles described herein, a support structure for stabilizing the object and/or the powder may also be built within the fabrication bin (102) about the object. As used throughout the detailed description and claims, “about” refers to any location below, around, above, near, or surrounding the object. “About” also refers to locations between object features or stacked objects.
The support structure is built in the same manner the object is built. That is, the support structure is built by applying binder or focused energy to the powder (or other build material) in patterns intended to stabilize the object and/or the powder located about the object. By building a support structure about the object being fabricated, movement of the object and powder is reduced. Reducing the movement of the object and the powder increases the dimensional accuracy of the object.
According to the embodiments of
The first support structure (212) includes a plurality of pillars (218 and 220) sparsely arranged below the first object (210). One or more additional pillars, such as a set of two more pillars (222 and 224) shown in
As shown in
The sparse arrangement of the pillars (218/220/222/224) is designed to fully support and stabilize the first object (210), while minimizing the time and material required to build them. According to some embodiments, an aggregate footprint area of the pillars is no more than 10% of a footprint area of the first object (210). In other embodiments, the aggregate footprint area of the pillars is between 10 and 100% of the footprint area of the first object (210). It will be appreciated by those of skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure that tradeoffs between support area needed to adequately stabilize the objects being formed and time and materials used to build support structures may need to be made.
While the first support structure (212) includes multiple pillars sparsely arranged below the first object (210), the second support structure (216) includes a single pillar (228) below the second object (214). The single pillar (228) is also insulated from the second object (214) by at least one layer (230) of unbound build material to prevent attachment to the second object (214) while still providing adequate support. As with the first support structure, the second support structure (216) may also include at least one layer of unbound powder insulating it from the base (229) of fabrication bin (102,
In contrast to the first support structure (212), the single pillar (228) of the second support structure (216) has a footprint area substantially the same as a footprint area of the second object (214). In addition, the cross section of the single pillar (228) is rectangular, substantially matching the cross section of the second object (214). The footprint area of a support structure may depend somewhat on the size and shape of the object that it must support and the throughput demands of the fabrication system (100,
The support structures (212 and 216) prevent settling or sinking of the objects (210 and 214) within the fabrication bin. As noted above, it is common with powder-based solid freeform fabrication systems for objects to sink and move as they are fabricated due to the unstable nature of the powder. The support structures (212 and 216) arranged below the objects (210 and 214), according to principles discussed herein, stabilize the objects (210 and 214) and reduce or eliminate sinking of the objects without adding any new materials to the powder-based fabrication system (100,
Further, the principles discussed herein may be implemented to stabilize the powder around the sides of an object. Objects fabricated through powder-based solid freeform fabrication systems often move in horizontal planes (in addition to sinking) when they are built without supports. The movement of powder around the sides of the object can lead to both horizontal movements and sinking of the object being formed. The movement is often a result of the unbound powder shifting around the object due to vibrations and various other movements. Therefore, according to some aspects, the support structures (212 and 216) may include walls disposed at least partially around the objects (210 and 214) as shown in
According to
As shown in
While the first support structure (212) of
In contrast to the first support structure (212), the discontinuous pair of walls (448 and 450) of the second support structure (216) is disposed sparsely around the second object (214). The second support (216) may be strategically placed adjacent only certain portions of the second object (214) in a manner that provides sufficient powder stabilization while minimizing the time and materials necessary to build the support structure (216).
The support structures (212 and 216) of
Further, it will be understood that the objects (210 and 214) and the first and second support structures (212 and 216) of
Turning next to
In addition, with reference to
The preceding description has been presented only to illustrate and describe exemplary embodiments of invention. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to any precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4665492 | Masters | May 1987 | A |
| 4961154 | Pomerantz et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5121329 | Crump | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5139711 | Nakamura et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5143663 | Leyden et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5204055 | Sachs et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5340656 | Sachs et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5503785 | Crump et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5595703 | Swaelens et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5598340 | Medard et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5667820 | Heller et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5687788 | Caldarise et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5824259 | Allanic et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 6036777 | Sachs | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6193923 | Leyden et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6228437 | Schmidt | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6322728 | Brodkin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6572807 | Fong | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6658314 | Gothait | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6665574 | Farren | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6685866 | Swanson et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6799959 | Tochimoto et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6808659 | Schulman et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6821473 | Hiizumi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6838035 | Ederer et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6841116 | Schmidt | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6905645 | Iskra | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 20030083771 | Schmidt | May 2003 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 19538257 | Apr 1996 | DE |
| 0686480 | Nov 2001 | EP |
| 1358855 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 5301293 | Nov 1993 | JP |
| 2001009920 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040239009 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |