The present invention is directed to a method and system of telling apart a human from a computer. In particular, the present invention is directed to a graphical image verification system.
The present invention is directed to a method for generating a completely automated test to tell computers and humans apart. The method comprises generating a dynamic graphical arrangement of images. The dynamic graphical arrangement comprises at least one randomly selected image from a selected category chosen for an image recognition task and at least one image not from the selected category. Each image of the dynamic graphical arrangement comprises a unique and randomly generated access code. The dynamic graphical arrangement of images is presented to the user and the image recognition task is communicated to the user. An input is received from the user access device. The input comprises the unique randomly generated access code corresponding to the at least one image from the selected category. The input from the user access device is verified to an authenticating reference code to determine the user is a human and not a computer.
The present invention is further directed to a method for selectively accepting access requests from a client computer connected to a server computer by a network. The method comprises receiving an access request from the client computer at an authentication server. The authentication server generates a dynamic graphical arrangement of images in response to the access request. The dynamic graphical arrangement of images comprises at least one randomly selected image from a selected category chosen for an image recognition task and at least one image not from the selected category. The dynamic graphical arrangement of images is presented on an output device of the client computer. The user is instructed to select images from the selected category to generate an input. The input from the client computer is transmitted to the authentication server. The input comprises a user selection of at least one image. The access request is accepted if the user selection of the at least one image corresponds to the image chosen from the selected category and otherwise denying the access request.
Further still, the present invention is directed to a method in a computing system for providing secure transactions. The method comprises receiving a request to perform a transaction from a user and creating a transaction verification page comprising information regarding the transaction. The transaction verification page comprises a dynamic graphical arrangement of images and requests the user to select at least one image from a selected category of images chosen for an image recognition task to commit the transaction. The transaction verification page is transmitted to the client. Next, an image selection is received from the client. The image selection is input to the transaction verification page by the user. In response to the image selection matching the image displayed on the transaction verification page from the selected category, the transaction represented by the transaction verification page is committed and in response to the image selection input not matching the image displayed on the transaction verification page from the selected category, transaction represented by the transaction verification page is aborted.
The present invention is also directed to a computer system for selectively accepting access requests from an access device connected to a server computer by a network. The computer system comprises a memory and a processor to execute instructions stored in the memory. The memory stores instructions to receive an access request from the access device, generate a dynamic graphical arrangement of images in response to the access request, present the dynamic graphical arrangement of images on an output device of the access device, instruct a user to select each image from the chosen category, and receive an input from the access device. The dynamic graphical arrangement of images comprises at least one randomly selected image from at least one selected category chosen for an image recognition task. The input comprises a user selection of at least one image from the at least one selected category. The access request is accepted if the input from the access device corresponds to the images from the selected category chosen for the image recognition task and otherwise denies the access request.
The present invention provides a system and method to tell apart a human from a computer using a test generally known as a Completely Automated Public test to Tell Computers and Humans Apart (hereinafter “CAPTCHA”). Websites, and in particular web-based forms, are often the target of malicious programs designed to register for service on a large scale, consume large amounts of resources or bias results in on-line polls or voting. In response to these malicious programs CAPTCHA-based test have been developed in an attempt to discern between a human's attempt to access a website and automated access to a website.
CAPTCHA tests attempt to require a user to correctly answer a question which only a human could provide a correct answer. Most current CAPTCHA tests are text based and require the user to interpret and input a distorted piece of test presented to the user. However, user friendliness is lacking and automated attacks are not eliminated by current CAPTHCA tests. Thus, there remains a need for improved systems and methods to tell apart a human from a computer when allowing access to a website.
Computer networks, particularly those with global reach such as the Internet, have greatly influenced the way that individuals, companies and institutions conduct transactions, and store and retrieve documents, images, music, and video. Convenience, ease of use, speed, and low overhead costs are contributing factors to the widespread use of the Internet for purchasing goods as well as conducting transactions. Entire industries have emerged as a result of the evolution of the Internet.
Securing access to many computer systems or computer networks generally requires the user to register a user identity and create a profile with the provider's website. Further, many websites are established or function to collect information from Internet users via a poll, message board, or comment application. These websites allow users to add content to the website and are therefore often susceptible to attack by automated programs. Therefore, there is an ongoing need for CAPTCHA solutions to protect such websites from automated programs.
The present invention provides a method and system for an improved CAPTCHA test which requires users to select randomly generated images from a dynamic graphical arrangement of images. The images the user must select are based on selected categories selected by the verification service provider.
Referring now to the Figures and specifically to
As shown on
One skilled in the art will appreciate that the dynamic graphical arrangement may comprise a plurality of images from the selected category and several images not from the selected category yet also from several different categories. Additionally, the dynamic graphical arrangement presented to the user may comprise one or more images known to belong to the selected category, one or more images known not to belong in the selected category and one or more images suspected to belong in the selected category. In such situation, the user is still granted access to the website upon successfully selecting the images known to belong to the selected category and avoiding selection of the images known to not belong, and provides the service provider with an interpretation as to the proper category for the images suspected to belong to the selected category. Thus, the system and method of the present invention provides an automated way of learning how to categorize images based upon human feedback via the user input.
The images presented the user in the dynamic graphical arrangement may also comprise advertisements. The image selected to be displayed may be based on the websites, the advertisement campaigns, and other parameters. When the user places the cursor over the advertisement image, additional information and links about the advertisement may be provided (which could otherwise be displayed automatically without cursor movement by the user). Additionally, the advertisement image may comprise a hyperlink to the advertiser's website. If the user chooses to follow the hyperlink, the destination of the hyperlink may open a new window with the advertiser's website displayed therein. When the user finishes browsing the advertisement website, the user will return to the dynamic graphical arrangement and continue its attempt to access the desired website. The user would not need to reenter any information previously entered to allow the user to view the transaction verification page after viewing an advertisement link. Alternatively, the system may require the user to reenter its information after viewing an advertisement link after predetermined amount of time has passed for security purposes. When the user finishes viewing the advertisement link, the graphical arrangement is refreshed and displayed again.
While a series of one or more graphical images within a presented graphical arrangement can be dynamically altered in between access attempts, the selected category can remain the same from the perspective of the user.
Turning now to
The series of one or more images and corresponding access codes that make-up the dynamic access codes are preferably changed between each authentication processes. However, the selected category of images may remain the same or changed by the service provider per access session.
The selected category and non-selected categories of graphical images are not limited to particular objects only but can include any variety of themes or topics. This allows a wide variety of categories. The images (12a, 12b, 12c, 12d) of
The display device 10 illustrated in
Another embodiment of the invention may capitalize on the focus and attention of users during the testing process for advertising and marketing purposes. For example, as shown in
A dynamic image grid as shown in
It shall be understood that ads or images herein may fall within one or more categories available as a way to verify a human. Ads or graphical images can be also displayed more often within regularly scheduled display cycles even if they are within non-selected categories. The ads or images that are selected for display within an arrangement may nevertheless capture the attention of users even if they do not necessarily fall within a selected category since images or ads for non-selected categories are also displayed.
During an access session, the arrangement of dynamic graphical images can be delivered and presented to a user on a display device or display within the client system upon receipt of an access request (Step 112). The user is instructed to select images from the selected category by typing the access codes corresponding to the images from the selected categorie(s) (Step 114). The client system receives the input from the user, and transmits it to the server system (Step 116), which compares the access codes to the stored authenticating reference code (e.g., A7) (Step 118). When the user input matches the authentication reference code stored in the server system, authentication can be completed and access granted (Step 120) to the requested resource or website. When image identifier information or a password does not match the authentication reference code, then access is denied. As with other embodiments of the invention, a user may be also permitted a predetermined number of attempts before account lock-out or any other administrative action is instituted such as the implementation of network security measures indicating the possibility of an automated attack (Step 122).
The systems provided herein may also include a service provider server 50 with which a first user interacts in an attempt to gain access to information or services provided thereby.
The server 40 (system) may control access to a resource, a database or file system, or a private communication channel. The server 40 may also include a computer readable memory 52, the comparator 48 and a communications interface such as a modem or network adapter (not shown) with appropriate software drivers that support communication with the website provider 50 via the Internet. The server system may further include a secured network, file systems or resources and information stored in databases as described elsewhere herein. The databases may contain one or more libraries of images or icons that can be displayed for verifying the user is human and other purposes (e.g., advertising). The server system 40 may also include numerous devices such as file servers (Web site servers), authentication servers, password databases, repositories or databases of images or icons that may be identified as part of selected and non-selected categories.
The memory device 52 in the server system may store information regarding the relationship between the images and access codes displayed to a user during an access session. A memory look-up table can be used to store this information for mapping this information. The memory may be implemented using random access memory (“RAM”), flash memory, disk drives or any other rewritable memory technology. In some applications, the memory may also be implemented using non-rewritable memory such as read only memory (“ROM”) chips.
The user access device may include various devices such as a desktop or laptop computer, a PDA, an ATM, or any device capable of displaying images having a key entry pad keyboard, or other device for selecting images from the selected category. The user access device preferably includes an input device 54, the display device 56 and an appropriate communications interface (not shown) which allows data from the input device to be transmitted to the server system and/or service provider 50. The communications interface might include a modem, network adapter, radio transmitter/receiver, or other such communications devices, along with appropriate software. The display device 56 may be any type of display capable of displaying various images, such as computer monitors and flat panel displays.
Furthermore, the user access device 43 and server systems 40 can communicate over a variety of telecommunication systems including wireless networks. The telecommunications system may also include a variety of data communications systems generally known in the art such as a LAN, a WAN, a wireless system such as cellular, satellite and personal communications services (“PCS”) systems, or a dedicated line or connection. In this regard, it is noted that the references to server side and client side herein do not require a direct communication therebetween and intermediate computers may be present. Moreover, a computer acting as a server could transmit information to an intermediate computer which could then transmit the information to another computer where the user enters data.
As shown in
As with other embodiments of the invention, the server 40 may generate the display image by selecting images based a selected category. Alternatively, the display image may be pre-generated or displayed according to a pre-established routine or computer program, and stored in a database system. The display image 42 and dynamic graphical arrangement may be implemented as a bit mapped image, a raster image or in any other suitable image file format.
The dynamic graphical arrangement 44 may also include access codes corresponding to each of the images displayed. The user may input the access codes corresponding to images from the selected category.
The user enters on the input device 54 the access codes and communicates the input to the server system 40. The server system 40 may utilize the comparator 48 to compare the selected access codes with reference access codes as described elsewhere herein. The comparator 48 in the server system 40 can compare the one or more access codes entered by the user to reference access codes to determine whether they correspond to each other and match. If so, the user will be allowed appropriate access to the service provider's server and/or website 50. It shall be understood that the comparator, and other components to the aforementioned client/server systems implemented in any of the authentication systems and methods herein, may incorporate software using techniques known in the prior art.
Many embodiments of the invention can provide dynamic graphical arrangements that can be incorporated into existing authentication and human verification system for preventing unauthorized or automated access. Because cyber crimes often begin with unauthorized users gaining access to accounts to online accounts and applications, concepts of the invention herein can also be implemented to create a first line of defense that provides stronger user authentication. Various embodiments of the invention may be used with security protocols to provide secure login routines for user authentication that are effective against many prevalent forms of hacking, including historic threats like phishing, as well as new and growing threats like brute-force attacks, keystroke logging, and man-in-the-middle (MITM) spying. Additional embodiments of the invention can be modified for a variety of applications including network login, virtual private network (VPN) access, and web-based applications and Web sites.
It should be understood from the foregoing that, while particular implementations have been illustrated and described, various modifications can be made thereto and are contemplated herein. It is also not intended that the invention be limited by the specific examples provided within the specification. While the invention has been described with reference to the aforementioned specification, the descriptions and illustrations of the preferable embodiments herein are not meant to be construed in a limiting sense. These are described as examples in relation to the drawings attached hereto and further modifications, apart from those shown or suggested herein, may be made within the spirit and scope of the invention. Furthermore, it shall be understood that all aspects of the invention are not limited to the specific configurations set forth herein which depend upon a variety of conditions and variables. Various modifications in form and detail of the embodiments of the invention will be apparent to a person skilled in the art. It is therefore contemplated that the invention shall also cover any such modifications, variations and equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5276314 | Martino et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5428349 | Baker | Jun 1995 | A |
5465084 | Cottrell | Nov 1995 | A |
5559961 | Blonder | Sep 1996 | A |
5608387 | Davies | Mar 1997 | A |
5664099 | Ozzie et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5821933 | Keller et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5928364 | Yamamoto | Jul 1999 | A |
5948061 | Merriman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6102406 | Miles et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6209104 | Jalili | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6351634 | Shin | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6686931 | Bodnar | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6718471 | Kashima | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6720860 | Narayanaswami | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6792466 | Saulpaugh et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6823075 | Perry | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6862594 | Saulpaugh et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6895387 | Roberts et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6950949 | Gilchrist | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6980081 | Anderson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981016 | Ryan | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7021534 | Kiliccote | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7028192 | Butler | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7093282 | Hillhouse | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7130831 | Howard et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7219368 | Juels et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225157 | Howard et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7240367 | Park | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7451323 | Abe et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7536556 | Federova et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7552330 | Kokumai | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7574739 | Shirakawa | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7577994 | Sobel et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7680815 | Komine et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7844825 | Neginsky | Nov 2010 | B1 |
20010007097 | Kim | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010013039 | Choi | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010037314 | Ishikawa | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010037468 | Gaddis | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020019768 | Fredrickson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020083347 | Taguchi | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094868 | Tuck et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020188872 | Willeby | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030046551 | Brennan | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030084275 | David et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093699 | Banning et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030177248 | Brown et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191947 | Stubblefield et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210127 | Anderson | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215110 | Rhoads et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040010721 | Kirovski et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030934 | Mizoguchi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040172564 | Federova et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040230843 | Jansen | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040250138 | Schneider | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260955 | Mantyla | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010758 | Landrock et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010768 | Light et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050071637 | Shirakawa | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071686 | Bagga et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076357 | Fenne | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050169496 | Perry | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050268100 | Gasparini et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050268101 | Gasparini et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050268107 | Harris et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276442 | Alasia et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283443 | Hardt | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283614 | Hardt | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020812 | Steinberg et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020815 | Varghese et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060053293 | Zager et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075027 | Zager et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075028 | Zager et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085360 | Grim, III et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105739 | Frank et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060174339 | Tao | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183551 | Prudent | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206717 | Holt et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206918 | McLean | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206919 | Montgomery et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230435 | Kokumai | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248344 | Yang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070023506 | Lagadec et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033102 | Frank et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041621 | Lin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070074119 | Komine et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070130618 | Chen | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070198846 | Watari | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070250920 | Lindsay | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070277224 | Osborn et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080052245 | Love | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080141351 | Park | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080216163 | Pratte et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222710 | Blagsvedt et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235788 | El Saddik et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080307310 | Segal et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320310 | Florencio et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090037339 | Ancell et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090038006 | Traenkenschuh et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090077629 | Douceur et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11345206 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2001092785 | Apr 2001 | JP |
20020026636 | Apr 2002 | KR |
20040032869 | Apr 2002 | KR |
20040047155 | Jun 2004 | KR |
20040067123 | Jan 2006 | KR |
20060127850 | Dec 2006 | KR |
541711 | Jul 2005 | NZ |
02054199 | Jul 2002 | WO |
2006064241 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dhamija et al., Déjà vu: a user study using images for authentication. Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Security Symposium, Denver, CO, Aug. 14-17, 2000 (15 pages). |