The present invention relates to methods and systems for forecasting product demand for distribution center or warehouse operations; and in particular to an improved method and system for determining distribution center or warehouse order forecasts from store forecasts of slow selling products.
Today's competitive business environment demands that retailers be more efficient in managing their inventory levels to reduce costs and yet fulfill demand. To accomplish this, many retailers are developing strong partnerships with their vendors/suppliers to set and deliver common goals. One of the key business objectives both the retailer and vendor are striving to meet is customer satisfaction by having the right merchandise in the right locations at the right time. To that effect it is important that vendor production and deliveries become more efficient. The inability of retailers and suppliers to synchronize the effective distribution of goods through the distribution facilities to the stores has been a major impediment to both maximizing productivity throughout the demand chain and effectively responding to the needs of the consumer.
Teradata Corporation has developed a suite of analytical applications for the retail business, referred to as Teradata Demand Chain Management (DCM), which provides retailers with the tools they need for product demand forecasting, planning and replenishment. Teradata Demand Chain Management assists retailers in accurately forecasting product sales at the store/SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) level to ensure high customer service levels are met, and inventory stock at the store level is optimized and automatically replenished. The individual store product forecasts can thereafter be accumulated and used to determine the appropriate amounts of products to order from a product warehouse or distribution center to meet customer demand. The warehouse must in turn order appropriate amounts from suppliers and vendors based on its demand forecast.
Some currently used methods for forecasting product sales and determining suggested store order quantities (SOQs) include beginning on-hand (BOH) inventory levels in the determination of suggested store order quantities. Although fine for use at the store level, and for most products at the warehouse and distribution center levels, these forecasting methods may produce problematic results when used to determine warehouse or distribution center orders for low inventory, very slow selling products. Described below is an improved methodology for forecasting product sales and determining suggested store order quantities and warehouse demand forecasts for low inventory, very slow selling products.
In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that structural, logical, optical, and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limited sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.
A synchronized DC/warehouse forecasting and replenishment process is illustrated in the process flow diagram of
In step 213, DC/warehouse level policies may be established for RT (Review Time from last time the replenishment system was run), LT (Lead Time from the order being cut to the delivery of product), PSD (Planned Sales Days, the amount of time the Effective Inventory should service the forecast demand), Replenishment Strategy, and Service Level. In step 215, forecast error is calculated comparing actual store suggested order quantities (SOQs) to DC/warehouse forecast orders. Finally, in step 217, weekly forecasts are broken down to determine daily forecasts, calculate safety stock and SOQs. Safety Stock is the statistical risk stock needed to meet a certain service level for a given order quantity. The safety stock is a function of lead times, planned sales days, service level and forecast error.
There are several methods that can be utilized to produce DC/warehouse demand forecasts. Two methods for generating DC/warehouse demand forecasts, illustrated in
In the processes shown in
As stated above, some currently used methods for forecasting product sales and determining suggested store order quantities (SOQs) may produce problematic results when used to determine warehouse or distribution center orders for low inventory, very slow selling products.
Graph 501 of
As can be seen in graphs 501, 503, and 513, for the product having an ARS of 0.24, a beginning inventory of 1 at most stores, and a requirement that a minimum stock of 1 unit be maintained at each store, the DCM system will forecast a significant number of product sales near week 42 of the forecast period, followed by a drop in the effective inventory of the product, and a very large DC SOQ at week 46. In this scenario, most of the 1100 stores will order replenishment stock during the same week, week 46, a potentially problematic situation for the warehouse, distribution center, or product manufacturer. A higher or lower ARS for the product will vary the week in which the week in which the spike in SOQ occurs.
Without the requirement that a minimum stock of 1 unit be maintained at each store, graphs 501, 505, and 515 show that the DCM system will forecast a significant number of product sales near week 42 of the forecast period, followed by a drop in the effective inventory of the product, but a replenishment SOQ will not be generated until after the 65 week forecast period. The effective inventory levels are significantly lower without the requirement that a minimum stock of 1 unit be maintained at each store. Following week 46, the effective inventory for the product drops to below 600 units, well below the inventory level needed to meet the potential demand at all locations. This may cause insufficient orders and frequent stock-outs, resulting in lost product sales.
If either, or both, the beginning on-hand inventory level and average rate of sale value exceed their respective limit value, the product will not be considered a very low selling product, and in accordance with step 605 the suggested order quantity for the product is determined by subtracting the effective inventory value, i.e., the on hand and on order inventory values, of the product from the DCM demand forecast for the product. The DCM forecasting process continues in step 611 with the SOQ determined in step 605 for these products.
When both the beginning on-hand inventory level and average rate of sale value for a product falls below the BOH and ARS limit values, the product will be considered a very low selling product, and a randomized BOH level will be assigned to the product in step 607. In the example discussed herein, a BOH level of 1 unit is randomized to a value between 0.55 and 1.45 units. In step 609, the suggested order quantity for the product is determined by subtracting the randomized beginning on hand inventory value and the on order inventory value from the DCM demand forecast for the product. The DCM forecasting process continues in step 611 with the SOQ determined in step 609 for the very low selling products. Store SOQs are accumulated to determine the warehouse or distribution center SOQs.
The graphs of
Graph 701 of
Comparing graph 703 of
Graphs 705 and 715 of
The improved methodology for forecasting product sales and determining suggested store order quantities and warehouse demand forecasts described above provides an advantage in that it closely simulates the actual selling model of an item across multiple stores. Randomizing the initial inventory has the desired effect of simulating a store's sale of the item at different random weeks throughout the year. That is, a slow selling item does not sell on the same day or week across all stores of a chain. Also, the randomization algorithm guarantees approximately the same number of aggregate inventory units whether there are 100 or 1000 locations, due to the independence of the random number generator. Hence, it is a scalable solution, with no regard for determining whether there is a certain threshold of stores which meet some criteria.
The foregoing description of various embodiments of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the above teaching. Accordingly, this invention is intended to embrace all alternatives, modifications, equivalents, and variations that fall within the spirit and broad scope of the attached claims.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to the following co-pending and commonly-assigned patent application, which is incorporated herein by reference: Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/239,046, entitled “METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR RANDOMIZING STARTING RETAIL STORE INVENTORY WHEN DETERMINING DISTRIBUTION CENTER AND WAREHOUSE DEMAND FORECASTS” by Edward Kim, Arash Bateni, David Chan, and Fred Narduzzi; filed on Sep. 1, 2009. This application is related to the following co-pending and commonly-assigned patent applications, which are incorporated by reference herein: Application Ser. No. 10/875,456, entitled “METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SYNCHRONIZING DISTRIBUTION CENTER AND WAREHOUSE DEMAND FORECASTS WITH RETAIL STORE DEMAND FORECASTS” by Edward Kim, Pat McDaid, Mardie Noble, and Fred Narduzzi; filed on Jun. 24, 2004; and Application Ser. No. 10/737,056, entitled “METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR FORECASTING FUTURE ORDER REQUIREMENTS” by Fred Narduzzi, David Chan, Blair Bishop, Richard Powell-Brown, Russell Sumiya and William Cortes; filed on Dec. 16, 2003.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61239046 | Sep 2009 | US |