The present disclosure generally relates to data processing techniques. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to methods and systems for displaying, to a user interface, item listings for the user to select from for querying the system, in order to enable the system to return to the user images of the type of item desired by the user for possible purchase.
Advancements in computer and networking technologies have enabled persons to conduct commercial and financial transactions “on-line” via computer-based applications. This has given rise to a new era of electronic commerce (often referred to as e-commerce.) A number of well-known retailers have expanded their presence and reach by operating websites that facilitate e-commerce. In addition, many new retailers, which operate exclusively online, have come into existence. The business models utilized by enterprises operating online are almost as varied as the products and services offered. For instance, some products and services are offered at fixed prices, while others are offered via various transaction methods, and still others are offered via a system of classified ad listings. Some enterprises specialize in the selling of a specific category of product (e.g., books) or a specific service (e.g., tax preparation), while others provide a myriad of categories of items and services from which to choose. Some enterprises serve only as an intermediary, connecting sellers and buyers, while others sell directly to consumers.
Despite the many technical advances that have improved the state of e-commerce, a great number of technical challenges and problems remain. One such problem involves determining how to best present products and services (e.g., items) that are being offered for sale, so as to maximize the likelihood that a transaction (e.g., the sale of a product or service) will occur. For instance, when a potential buyer performs a search for a product or service, it may often be the case that the number of item listings that satisfy the potential buyer's query far exceeds the number of item listings that can practically be presented on a search results page. Furthermore, when a buyer selects from a user interface an item of interest by textual name of that item, a selection error can occur. That is, the buyer might select the incorrect name of the product, such as selecting a clutch handbag when an evening handbag is really desired. Preventing that error and providing the buyer with an image of the precise type of item he or she is looking for enhances the buyer's experience and is more likely to lead to an executed transaction.
Some embodiments are illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which:
Methods and systems for displaying, at a user interface, item listings for the user to select from for querying the system, in order to enable the system to return to the user interface items of the type desired by the user for possible purchase. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the various aspects of different embodiments of the present invention. It will be evident, however, to one skilled in the art, that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details.
Terminology
For the purposes of the present specification, the term “transaction” shall be taken to include any communications between two or more entities and shall be construed to include, but not be limited to, commercial transactions including sale and purchase transactions, auctions and the like.
Transaction Facility
To better understand the invention, an embodiment of an electronic transaction facility is shown in
The transaction facility 10 within which an embodiment can be implemented includes one or more of a number of types of front-end servers, namely page servers 12 that deliver web pages (e.g., markup language documents), picture servers 14 that dynamically deliver images to be displayed within Web pages, listing servers 16, CGI servers 18 that provide an intelligent interface to the back-end of transaction facility 10, and search servers 20 that handle search requests to the transaction facility 10. E-mail servers 21 provide, inter glia, automated e-mail communications to users of the transaction facility 10.
The back-end servers include a database engine server 22, a search index server 24 and a credit card database server 26, each of which maintains and facilitates access to a respective database.
An on-line trading application may form a part of database engine server 22 discussed below. The on-line trading application may include an on-line trading module and item listing presentation management module, and is associated with database 23.
The Internet-based transaction facility 10 may be accessed by a client program 30, such as a browser (e.g., the Internet Explorer distributed by Microsoft Corp. of Redmond Wash.) that executes on a client machine 32 and accesses the transaction facility 10 via a network such as, for example, the Internet 34. Other examples of networks that a client may utilize to access the transaction facility 10 include a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), a wireless network (e.g., a cellular network), or the Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) (or PSTN) network.
Database Structure
Central to the database 23 is a user table 40, which contains a record for each user of the transaction facility 10. A user may operate as a seller, buyer, or both, within transaction facility 10. The database 23 also includes item tables 42 that may be linked to the user table 40. Specifically, the item tables 42 include a seller items table 44 and a buyer items table 46. A user record in the user table 40 may be linked to multiple items that are being, or have been auctioned or otherwise marketed via the transaction facility 10. A link indicates whether the user is a seller or a buyer with respect to items for which records exist within the items tables 42. While offerings by the seller are referred to as “items” in the specification, “items” includes any product or service offered by the seller. The database 23 also includes a note table 48 populated with note records that may be linked to one or more item records within the item tables 42 and/or to one or more user records within the user table 40. Each note record within the note table 48 may include, inter glia, a comment, description, history or other information pertaining to an item being auctioned or otherwise sold via the transaction facility 10 or to a user of the transaction facility 10.
A number of other tables are also shown to be linked to the user table 40, namely a user past aliases table 50, a feedback table 52, a bids table 54, an accounts table 56, and an account balances table 58,
The on-line trading system includes a user interface which may the browser 30 whereby a user can enter select a search term describing an item the user is interested in seeing for possible purchase. Usually a buyer would like to browse a category of images, for example hand bags, by style and/or brand so that the user can quickly find something interesting to the buyer. The buyer selects one of the choices for the desired item and images of one or more of the category of item selected from the choices are returned for the buyer to see for possible purchase. For instance, a number of product type can be presented via the user interface by name, such as shoes, handbags, clothes, and the like. If the category of item the user desires is a handbag, the handbag selection presented to the buyer in textual form by the user interface might be the words “clutch,” “evening bag,” “messenger style,” and “satchel,” among others. It could occur that the user might confuse, as one example, “clutch” with “evening bag” and enter “clutch” as the category of bag desired when the user is actually looking for an evening bag. This would result in one or more images of a clutch being returned to the user, when the user actually wanted one or more images of an evening hag image to be returned. Thus the item image being returned to the user that is not the actual category of item the user desires, and the user's experience is therefore less than optimum. This in itself may result in the transaction not being executed.
If, on the other hand, the selection presented to the user is in visual form, such as a silhouette of the product, then there is much less room for error. The user will see an image of the category of handbag. Using the example next above, the user would see images of “clutch,’ “evening bag,” “messenger style,” and “satchel,” This could be, for example, presented by brand. The user could then, as only one example of an embodiment, mouseover each image to display the name of each of the various types of handbag offered for each image. Mouseover is a well known function and an example, taken from Wikipedia, is seen in the appendix to this specification. The user could then click on the bag of the user's choice to view possible attributes of the bag such as styling, color and fabric, among others. Since the buyer will see images of the category of bag desired, with very little opportunity for error, the experience is more nearly optimum, and a transaction is more likely to be executed. This can be implemented, in one embodiment, by the images of types of handbags being presented to the user in silhouette so that the users could, for example, mouseover the silhouette image that is most like the category of bag desired and the title of the bag would be presented. For example, the user interface can present the prospective buyer with silhouettes of a clutch, an evening bag, a messenger style bag, and a satchel, among others. Seeing the silhouette images, the buyer can mouseover them for the name and simply select the silhouette of the category of bag desired, for example an evening bag, and the system displays the types of evening bags offered for sale. One of ordinary skill in the art will see that the displaying the title is not necessary for the invention. The user might just select the silhouette based on recognizing the silhouette. In this manner in which a buyer can find products or services which they wish to purchase. An example of general ways for a buyer to find products is seen in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/618,503 filed on Dec. 29, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
In response to the selection, information, including images and attributes of the selected silhouette can then be returned to the user interface for the user. In one embodiment this is accomplished by the system mapping the selected evening bag image information of this example to a textual value and making a query to the transaction facility 10 which will undertake a search using the query and will then obtain and return the foregoing image and attributes. In another embodiment, attributes of the images can be returned separately for presentation to the user by way of the user interface. The presentation of a silhouette of a category of product to the buyer, since it is visual, drastically reduces the opportunity for error, or error rate, makes the buyer's experience more nearly optimum, and is more likely to result in an executed transaction.
As another example, if the buyer is interested in women's shoes, various type of women's shoes will be presented in silhouette, such as high heels, pumps, flats, sandals, and the like. The user mouses over the silhouettes, again to display the name, —as only one example, and clicks to select the category of shoe of interest from the silhouettes, for example, high heels. High heel shoes of various types and attributes can be returned to the buyer for possible purchase, much the same way handbags were returned in the above example. The various types of heels could be three-inch heels stilettos, Cuban heels, and the like. Attributes could be fabric, color, size, price and availability, among others can be displayed for the user.
In some embodiments, a user operates a web browser application 30 on a client machine 32 to interact with the transaction facility 10. A user may be presented with a search interface on client browser 30, with items in silhouette, as described generally above, and in more detail below, from which the user can select an item to be used in generating a search request submitted to the transaction facility. In some embodiments users themselves may be able to select certain item attributes. For example, the buyer may be interested in women's shoes. Certain type of women's shoes are provided to the user interface in visual representation as silhouettes. The buyer selects a category of shoe in silhouette, and, as a result, shoes of that category, with certain attributes, such as the color, fabric, size, price, and the like, will be returned for the user to see and possibly purchase. This can be implemented by the transaction facility 10, after receiving and processing the search request, communicating a response to the web browser application 30. The response could be obtained from a system of the type seen in United States patent application Ser. No. 12/749,458, filed Mar. 29, 2010, entitled “Method And System for Improving The Categorization of Items for which item listings are made by a user of an ecommerce system (now abandoned) included herein by reference. The response could be, for example, an Internet document or web page that, when rendered by the browser application 30, displays a search results page showing one or more item listings, possibly with attributes, that satisfy the user's search request. The item listings are, in some embodiments, presented by a presentation module, which may be a web server or an application server.
In some embodiments, the search engine module, not shown but of a type well known in the industry could provide the actual search function. For instance, the search engine module, in some embodiments, receives and processes a search request to identify the item listings that satisfy the search request. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that a variety of search techniques might be implemented to identify item listings that satisfy a search request. In general, however, the item attributes of item listings are analyzed for the presence of the user-provided search terms. For instance, in some embodiments, selected silhouette can be converted to textual information and used to query system storage.
In an alternative embodiment, the search engine module may represent an interface to a search engine implemented as an external component or module, for example, as part of transaction facility 10, or as a separate external module. In such a scenario, the search engine module 48 may simply receive the set of item listings that satisfy a search query.
Turning now to
As seen in the
This same silhouette process can be used for other types of products, such as handbags, women's clothing, men's clothing and men's shoes, among others. The silhouette process above operates similarly for each. For example,
Men's clothing operates similarly, as in
Silhouettes can be generated for use in the system in several ways. For example, a silhouette of, say, a man's jacket can be generated using computer applications such as Adobe Illustrator and/or Adobe Photoshop. A jacket outline can be created from the photo of a man wearing a jacket. That is, the outline is traced from a photograph. A second way of obtain silhouettes is by using baseline silhouette vector images bought from i-stockphoto (www.istockphoto.com) and, using the above applications, modifying the image to represent the context of navigation. That is, a black silhouette vector file of a man wearing a jacket stockphoto is purchased and the jacket portion of it drawn out and painted in color to represent the jackets category. Several silhouettes representing several different categories can be created side by side in one large image called a sprite. This sprite is uploaded into the picture server in a desired format, for example as a transparent Portable Networks Graphic (PNG). The transparency aids in applying a background color using, for example, Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) as necessary to imply different states of the same image, for example, hover state, selected state. The developer could then point to each category using pixel co-ordinates as location and assigns a URL to each one to make each silhouette a link to a certain category. Hence one long image replaces the need to upload several images and multiple states of these images which in turn helps save page weight.
An example of mapping silhouette image information selected by the buyer to textual information to be used as, or as part of, a query for the system to obtain images of the type of item selected by the user can be seen in
Hardware Operation
The various operations of example methods described herein may be performed, at least partially, by one or more processors that are temporarily configured (e.g., by software) or permanently configured to perform the relevant operations. Whether temporarily or permanently configured, such processors may constitute processor-implemented modules that operate to perform one or more operations or functions. The modules referred to herein may, in some example embodiments, comprise processor-implemented modules.
Similarly, the methods described herein may be at least partially processor-implemented. For example, at least some of the operations of a method may be performed by one or more processors or processor-implemented modules. The performance of certain of the operations may be distributed among the one or more processors, not only residing within a single machine, but deployed across a number of machines. In some example embodiments, the processor or processors may be located in a single location (e.g., within a home environment, an office environment or as a server farm), while in other embodiments the processors may be distributed across a number of locations.
The one or more processors may also operate to support performance of the relevant operations in a “cloud computing” environment or as a “software as a service” (SaaS). For example, at least some of the operations may be performed by a group of computers (as examples of machines including processors), these operations being accessible via a network (e.g., the Internet) and via one or more appropriate interfaces (e.g., Application Program Interfaces (APIs).)
Example Computer System
The example computer system 1500 includes a processor 1502 (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU) or both), a main memory 1501 and a static memory 1506, which communicate with each other via a bus 1508. The computer system 1500 may further include a display unit 1510, an alphanumeric input device 1517 (e.g., a keyboard), and a user interface (UI) navigation device 1511 (e.g., a mouse). In one embodiment, the display, input device and cursor control device are a touch screen display. The computer system 1500 may additionally include a storage device (e.g., drive unit 1516), a signal generation device 1518 (e.g., a speaker), a network interface device 1520, and one or more sensors 1521, such as a global positioning system sensor, compass, accelerometer, or other sensor.
The drive unit 1516 includes a machine-readable medium 1522 on which is stored one or more sets of instructions and data structures software) 1523 embodying or utilized by any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein. The software 1523 may also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 1501 and/or within the processor 1502 during execution thereof by the computer system 1500, the main memory 1501 and the processor 1502 also constituting machine-readable media.
While the machine-readable medium 1522 is illustrated in an example embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” may include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” shall also be taken to include any tangible medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present invention, or that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying data structures utilized by or associated with such instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, and optical and magnetic media. Specific examples of machine-readable media include non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks.
The software 1523 may further be transmitted or received over a communications network 1526 using a transmission medium via the network interface device 1520 utilizing any one of a number of well-known transfer protocols (e.g., HTTP). Examples of communication networks include a local area network (“LAN”), a wide area network (“WAN”), the Internet, mobile telephone networks, Plain Old Telephone (POTS) networks, and wireless data networks (e.g., Wi-Fi® and WiMax® networks). The term “transmission medium” shall be taken to include any intangible medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying instructions for execution by the machine, and includes digital or analog communications signals or other intangible medium to facilitate communication of such software.
Although an embodiment has been described with reference to specific example embodiments, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be 1 regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. The accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, show by way of illustration, and not of limitation, specific embodiments in which the subject matter may be practiced. The embodiments illustrated are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the teachings disclosed herein. Other embodiments may be utilized and derived therefrom, such that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of this disclosure. This Detailed Description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of various embodiments is defined only by the appended claims, along with the full range of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
A Mouseover or hover box refers to a GUI event that is raised when the user moves or “hovers” the cursor over a particular area of the GUI The technique is particularly common in web browsers where the URL of a hyperlink can be viewed in the status bar. Site designers can easily define their own mouseover events using Javascript[1] and Cascading Style Sheets.[2] In case of multiple layers the mouseover event is triggered by the uppermost layer.
Mouseover events are not limited to web design and are commonly used in modern GUI programming. Their existence might not even be known to the user as the events can be used to call any function and might affect only the internal workings of the program.
Tooltip
A special usage of mouseover event is a tooltip showing a short description of the GUI object under the cursor. The tooltip generally appears only after the mouse is held over the object for a certain amount of time.
This application is a continuation of and claims the benefit of priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/749,467, filed Mar. 29, 2010, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5852823 | De Bonet | Dec 1998 | A |
6393427 | Vu | May 2002 | B1 |
6446061 | Doerre et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6546309 | Gazzuolo | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6704725 | Lee | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6751343 | Ferrell et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751600 | Wolin | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763148 | Sternberg et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6804683 | Matsuzaki et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6865302 | Chang | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6925196 | Kass et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941321 | Schuetze et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7035440 | Kaku | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035467 | Nicponski | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7260568 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7277572 | MacInnes et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7315833 | Schrenk | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7437321 | Hanechak | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7617016 | Wannier et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620539 | Gaussier et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7657126 | Gokturk et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7783622 | Vandermolen et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7930546 | Rhoads | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7996282 | Scott et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8073818 | Duan et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8081158 | Harris | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8121902 | Desjardins | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8180690 | Mayle et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8295854 | Osann, Jr. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306872 | Inoue et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8412594 | Kundu | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8429173 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8467613 | Baker et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8520979 | Conwell | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8543580 | Chen et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8595651 | Kenemer et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8719075 | MacDonald Korth et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8732151 | Ali et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8738630 | Lin | May 2014 | B2 |
8781231 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8861844 | Chittar et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8903816 | Dumon et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8949252 | Chittar et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9043828 | Jing et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9092458 | Perona | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9280563 | Chittar et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9405773 | Chittar et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9471604 | Chittar et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9715510 | Chittar et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9792638 | Liu et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9846903 | Kundu | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10528615 | Chittar et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
11295374 | Kundu | Apr 2022 | B2 |
20010016077 | Oki | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020035518 | Kano | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020106111 | Kass et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143636 | Carignani | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156694 | Christensen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030083850 | Schmidt et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030130910 | Pickover et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030187844 | Li et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040030578 | Cross et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040083203 | Kemp | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040182413 | De LaForcade | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040228526 | Lin et al. | Nov 2004 | A9 |
20050022106 | Kawai | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022708 | Lee | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050071256 | Singhal | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050164273 | Stoughton et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050196016 | Sato et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060080182 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060212362 | Donsbach et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070005571 | Brewer et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070074110 | Miksovsky et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070112640 | Grove et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070162328 | Reich | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168357 | Mo | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070172155 | Guckenberger | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185865 | Budzik et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070257792 | Gold | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070260597 | Cramer | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080040219 | Kim et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040671 | Reed | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071553 | Hamadi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080109327 | Mayle et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080154488 | Silva | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080160956 | Jackson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162032 | Wuersch et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168401 | Boule et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080226119 | Candelore et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243837 | Davis et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281814 | Calistri-Yeh et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301128 | Gandert et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018932 | Evans | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090061884 | Rajan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090094138 | Sweitzer et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094260 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112830 | Denoue et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090138376 | Smyers et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150791 | Garcia | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090172730 | Schiff et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182612 | Challener et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193675 | Sieber | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090271293 | Parkhurst et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276453 | Trout | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287655 | Bennett | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090313239 | Wen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100023407 | Grady et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030578 | Siddique et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036711 | Shenfield et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036883 | Valencia-Campo et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100094935 | Svendsen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105370 | Kruzeniski et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100135597 | Gokturk et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100138295 | Caron et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100159904 | Colligan et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100203901 | Dinoff et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241512 | Tirpak et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100299132 | Dolan et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100332283 | Ng et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332324 | Khosravy et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004522 | Lee | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110040602 | Kurani | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110055238 | Slaney et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110085697 | Clippard et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093361 | Morales | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106594 | Shirey | May 2011 | A1 |
20110106805 | Bao et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110161182 | Racco | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184831 | Dalgleish | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191374 | Bengio et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110196724 | Fenton | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110231278 | Fries | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110235902 | Chittar et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238534 | Yakkala | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238536 | Liu et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238659 | Chittar et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110295711 | Mazmanyan | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314031 | Chittar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120054041 | Williams | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120054059 | Rele | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120054060 | Kundu | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120126998 | Morgan et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120159294 | Gonsalves et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120265635 | Forsblom | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120276928 | Shutter | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120302258 | Pai et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130085860 | Summers et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130085900 | Williams | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130226743 | Kundu | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130262455 | Cramer et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140105489 | Chittar et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140156410 | Wuersch et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140324836 | Chittar et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150039393 | Jain | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20160012124 | Ruvini et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20170004632 | Chittar | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170322951 | Chittar et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180130121 | Kundu | May 2018 | A1 |
20200117685 | Chittar et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011299401 | Jan 2013 | AU |
2012318961 | Apr 2014 | AU |
2014206199 | Aug 2014 | AU |
11361494 | Jul 2002 | CN |
101206749 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101441651 | May 2009 | CN |
101546406 | Sep 2009 | CN |
101556584 | Oct 2009 | CN |
103430202 | Dec 2013 | CN |
104040577 | Sep 2014 | CN |
106651521 | May 2017 | CN |
1220129 | Jul 2002 | EP |
10-2002-0069767 | Sep 2002 | KR |
10-2010-0020041 | Feb 2010 | KR |
2586028 | Jun 2016 | RU |
2001011491 | Feb 2001 | WO |
2009094724 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2012030672 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012030674 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012033654 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2013052316 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2014085657 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2016007382 | Jan 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“TheFind.com Launches Next-Generation Shopping Search Engine that Helps Consumers Find Any Product Sold Online; TheFind.com Strives to Search Every Online Store to Deliver Unbiased, Relevant Shopping Search Results,” PR Newswire (New York), Oct. 31, 2006 (Year: 2006). |
“The mediating effect of brand image and information search intentions on the perceived risks associated with online purchasing on a generically-branded website,” by Christo Boshoff, Charlene Schlechter, and Shannon Ward, Management Dynamics 18.4: 18-28, 2009 (Year: 2009). |
Applicant Initiated Interview Summary received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Aug. 12, 2015, 3 pages. |
Applicant Initiated Interview Summary received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Jan. 17, 2017, 3 pages. |
Applicant Initiated Interview Summary received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated May 4, 2017, 3 pages. |
Preliminary Amendment filed for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Oct. 25, 2010, 3 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Jul. 8, 2015, 32 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Jul. 19, 2012, 23 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Mar. 8, 2017, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Mar. 1, 2012, 20 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated May 8, 2014, 27 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Nov. 7, 2014, 24 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Sep. 9, 2016, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Jun. 14, 2017, 15 pages. |
Preliminary Amendment filed for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Aug. 9, 2010, 4 pages. |
Response to Non-Final Office Action filed on Apr. 1, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Nov. 7, 2014, 18 pages. |
Response to Final Office Action filed on Dec. 30, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Jul. 8, 2015, 32 pages. |
Response to Non-Final Office Action filed on Sep. 8, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated May 8, 2014, 16 pages. |
Response to Non-Final Office Action filed on May 11, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Mar. 1, 2012, 17 pages. |
Response to Non-Final Office Action filed on Jan. 9, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Sep. 9, 2016, 17 pages. |
Response to Final Office Action filed on May 23, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Mar. 8, 2017, 17 pages. |
Response to Final Office Action filed on Sep. 18, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,467, dated Jul. 19, 2012, 17 pages. |
“Japan's Amana Web Site Will Boast Graphi-Based Image Search”, AsiaPulse News: NA, Asia Pulse Pty Ltd Dec. 15, 2006, 2 pages. |
“Shop It to Me: About Us”, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: <https://www.shopittome.com/about_us>, Accessed on Nov. 13, 2010, 2 pages. |
“Silhouette”, Dictionary.com, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:<https://www.dictionary.com/browse/silhouette?s=t?s=t>, Jan. 24, 2013, 2 pages. |
Advisory Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,458, dated Jul. 14, 2015, 4 pages. |
Advisory Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,458, dated May 10, 2013, 3 pages. |
Applicant Initiated Interview Summary received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,458, dated Jun. 20, 2013, 3 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,458, dated Apr. 8, 2015, 36 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,458, dated Feb. 13, 2013, 26 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,458, dated Feb. 3, 2012, 26 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,458, dated Jan. 13, 2016, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,458, dated Jul. 20, 2012, 24 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,458, dated Sep. 30, 2014, 40 pages. |
Response to Final Office Action filed on Apr. 15, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,458, dated Feb. 13, 2013, 15 pages. |
Response to Final Office Action filed on Dec. 30, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,458, dated Sep. 30, 2014, 17 pages. |
Response to Final Office Action filed on Jun. 8, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,458, dated Apr. 8, 2015, 25 pages. |
Response to Final Office Action filed on Jun. 13, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,458, dated Feb. 13, 2013, 13 pages. |
Response to Non-Final Office Action filed on May 1, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,458, dated Feb. 3, 2012, 22 pages. |
Response to Non-Final Office Action filed on Oct. 18, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,458, dated Jul. 20, 2012, 19 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/841,805, dated Nov. 23, 2021, 8 pages. |
Admiral Metals, “Reflecting on the History of Customer Service,” retrieved from www.admiralmetais.com on Mar. 26, 2015. |
Canadian Application Serial No. 2,804,052, Examiner's Report dated Nov. 25, 2014, 3 pgs. |
Canadian Application Serial No. 2,804,052, Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2015, 3 pgs. |
Chinese Application Serial No. 201180033079.2, Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2016, (With English Translation), 6 pgs. |
Decision of Rejection received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201611209571.1 dated Feb. 5, 2021, 2 Pages (1 page of Official Copy & 1 page of English Translation). |
Definition of silhouette https://www.dictionary.com/browse/silhouette, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report received for European Patent Application No. 11755177.0, dated Dec. 23, 2015, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/011,374, dated Apr. 1, 2016, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/011,374, dated Jul. 15, 2013, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/011,436, dated Jun. 24, 2015, 21 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/011,436, dated Mar. 7, 2014, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,926, dated Feb. 26, 2015, 25 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,936, dated Oct. 17, 2013, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,936, dated Aug. 4, 2014, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,936, dated Oct. 30, 2013, 12 pages,. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/624,599, dated Apr. 24, 2015, 19 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/624,599, dated Jun. 14, 2016, 26 pages. |
Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/841,805, dated Apr. 17, 2020, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/841,805, dated Feb. 8, 2021, 16 Pages. |
First Action Interview Office Action Summary received for U.S. Appl. No. U.S. Appl. No. 15/656,410, dated Mar. 3, 2020, 9 pages. |
First Action Interview—Office Action Summary received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/656,410, dated Jun. 4, 2019, 8 pages. |
First Action Interview—Pre-interview Communication received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/656,410, dated Feb. 26, 2019 4 pages. |
First Examination Report received for Australian Patent Application No. 2011299401, dated Sep. 27, 2013, 3 pages. |
First Examination Report received for Australian Patent Application No. 2014206199, dated Feb. 26, 2016, 5 pages. |
First Examiner Report received for Australian Patent Application No. 2012318961, dated Mar. 5, 2015, 3 pages. |
Huang et al., “Segmentation of Color Textures Using K-Means Cluster Based Wavelet Image Fusion”, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Jan. 12, 2010, pp. 209-214. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US11/49454, International Search Report dated Nov. 28, 2014, 2 pgs. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US11/49454, Written Opinion dated Nov. 28, 2014, 5 pgs. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/49449, Search Report dated Jan. 19, 2012, 2 pgs. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/49449, Written Opinion dated Jan. 19, 2012, 6 pgs. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/058101, Search Report dated Nov. 29, 2012, 2 pgs. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/058101, Written Opinion dated Nov. 29, 2012, 4 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, issued in connection with Int'l Appl. No. PCT/US2011/049444, dated Nov. 18, 2014 (11 pages). |
International Search Report received for PC i Application No. PCT/US2012/0571 10, dated Nov. 30, 2012, 2 pages. |
International Search Report received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/072339, dated Apr. 28, 2014, 4 pages. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Partial Search Report PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/072339, dated Feb. 14, 2014, 2 pages. |
Macys, “www.macys.com”, Retrieved Online from the internet URL:<https://www.macys.com/>, Accessed on Dec. 31, 2010, 9 pages. |
Meyer et al., “Multiscale Morphological Segmentations Based on Watershed, Flooding, and Eikonal PDE”, Scale-Space '99, LNCS 1682, 1999, pp. 351-362. |
Moovit-Real-Time Transit Info—Android Apps on Google Play, Accessed on Jul. 24, 2013, 2 pages. |
Non Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/841,805, dated Dec. 19, 2019, 10 pages. |
Non Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/841,805, dated Jun. 25, 2021, 5 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/011,374, dated Dec. 20, 2010, 24 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/011,374, dated Dec. 14, 2012, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/011,374, dated Mar. 3, 2017, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/011,374, dated Nov. 9, 2015, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. U.S. Appl. No. 13/011,436, dated Jan. 14, 2015, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/011,436, dated Jun. 20, 2013, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,926, dated Aug. 18, 2015, 19 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,926, dated Jul. 15, 2014, 18 pages. |
Non-Finai Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,926, dated May 21, 2013, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,936, dated Apr. 4, 2014, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,936, dated May 16, 2013, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/624,599, dated Dec. 24, 2015, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/624,599, dated Jun. 6, 2014, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,455, dated Dec. 5, 2014, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,337, dated Apr. 8, 2016, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/707,467, dated Mar. 4, 2021, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/841;805, dated Aug. 13, 2020, 15 pages. |
Notice of Acceptance received for Australian Patent Application No. 2011299401, dated Apr. 17, 2014, 2 pages. |
Notice of Acceptance received for Australian Patent Application No. 2014206199, dated Aug. 12, 2016, 2 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,804,052, dated Sep. 8, 2016, 1 page. |
Notice of Allowance received for Russian Federation Application No. 2012155513, dated Feb. 10, 2016, 12 pages (9 pages of Official Copy and 3 pages of English Claims). |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,911, dated Jan. 21, 2014, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,911, dated Jul. 19, 2013, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,911, dated Jun. 10, 2014, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,911, dated Sep. 13, 2013, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,926, dated Mar. 22, 2016, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,936, dated Sep. 24, 2014, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,455, dated Apr. 27, 2015, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,455, dated Sep. 24, 2015, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,837, dated Jun. 21, 2016, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/266,093, dated Mar. 10, 2017, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/656,410, dated Aug. 30, 2019, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance Received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/707,467, dated May 12, 2021, 8 pages. |
Office Action received for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,849,970, dated Oct. 5, 2015, 3 pages. |
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180033079.2, dated Dec. 22, 2015, 22 pages (13 pages of English Translation and 9 pages of Official Copy). |
Office Action Received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201611209571.1, dated Mar. 24, 2020, 10 pages (6 pages of Official Copy and 4 pages of English Translation). |
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201611209571.1, dated May 28, 2020, 12 pages (5 pages of Official Copy & 7 pages of English Translation). |
Office Action received for European Patent Application No. 11755177.0, dated Apr. 19, 2017, 6 pages. |
Office Action received for European Patent Application No. 11755177.0, dated Feb. 16, 2015, 5 pages. |
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2014-7012145, dated Jul. 22, 2015, 9 pages (5 pages of Official Copy & 4 pages of English Translation). |
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2016-7009512, dated Jun. 1, 2016, 11 pages (5 pages of Official Copy & 6 pages of English Translation). |
Office Action received for Russian Patent Application No. 2012155513, dated Jul, 16, 2015, 7 pages. |
Office Action received for Russian Patent Application No. 2016117291, dated Mar. 29, 2017, 12 pages. |
Wondering How TSO Mobile & GPS Tracking Benefit Passengers and the Public Transportation Industry?, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: <http://www.tsomobile.corn/tso-mobile-public-transportation/>, Aug, 2014, 2 pages. |
Wikipedia, “The Watershed Transformation”, Accessed on Jul. 3, 2016, 11 pages. |
Rui et al., “A Novel Relevance Feedback Technique in Image Retrieval”, In Proceedings of the seventh ACM International conference on Multimedia, Oct. 1999, pp. 67-70. |
Subsequent Examiner Report received for Australian Patent Application No. 2012318961, dated Jul. 21, 2015, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/250,490, Final Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2015, 17 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/250,490, Final Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2013, 13 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/250,490, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2014, 14 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/250,490, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 12, 2016, 17 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/250,490, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2013, 9 pgs. |
Wikipedia, “Recommender System”, Accessed on Jul. 10, 2014, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/171,000 by Rosenberg et al., “Query image search” filed Apr. 20, 2009, 80 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/250,326 by Clippard et al., “Automatic method to generate product attributes based sorely on product images” filed Oct. 9, 2009, 100 Pages. |
Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/057110, dated Nov. 30, 2012, 5 pages. |
Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/072339, dated Apr. 28, 2014, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180012277 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12749467 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 15655003 | US |