Patent Application
20230067004
The invention relates to removal of amines from wash liquid used in industrial processes. For example, removal of amine from wastewater from an amine production facility or removal of amine from wash water used in a CO2 capture process.
In industrial processes, it is desirable to recover and reuse materials in order to increase efficiency and reduce costs and environmental impact Amines are prevalent in industrial processes, for example, amine production and amine-solvent based processes for removing acid gases, such as CO2, from process gas streams. As a result, amines are often found in industrial water streams. It is desirable to find a way to remove amines from wash liquid streams, for example, water streams in CO2 scrubbing processes, in order to recycle and reuse the amine and the water.
Solvent-based processes for post-combustion CO2 capture involve contacting a flue gas with a CO2 scrubbing solvent typically in an absorber column. In the context of the present application, the scrubbing solvent is an amine-based scrubbing solvent. The solvent absorbs CO2 from the flue gas, and the flue-gas stream leaves the absorber column with a reduced CO2 content. The flue gas also picks up some amine from the solvent in the form of vapors and aerosols that exit the gas absorber column. To reduce the emissions from the carbon capture operations, and to reduce the amine lost to the atmosphere, it is desirable to recover entrained amine.
The treated flue gas, with the amine vapors, is generally scrubbed in a water wash column to reduce the amine emissions and amine loss. Alternatively, an organic solvent can be used to scrub amine vapors from the treated flue gas. After cleanup, the treated gas is sent to vent. It is desirable to remove the captured amine from the wash water and to return the recovered amine to the absorber for recycle of the solvent. It is also desirable to reuse the cleaned water in the wash water cycle. The cleaned wash water also has the ability to lower the amine emissions from the water wash, so that removing the amines from the wash water increases the amines removed from the treated flue gas. As one of ordinary skill in the art would understand, the lower the concentration of amines in the cleaned wash water, the more effective the cleaned wash water is in removing amines from the treated flue gas.
A schematic of a conventional post combustion CO2 capture process with water wash is shown in
The temperature of the exhaust entering the CO2 capture plant is normally from about 25° C. to about 60° C. The exhaust gas (entering through line 101) is introduced into the lower part of a CO2 absorber in which the exhaust gas flows from the bottom to the top of the absorber countercurrent to a lean liquid absorbent solvent, i.e., a solvent that absorbs CO2, and that is introduced into the upper part of the absorber through lean absorbent line 108. CO2 lean gas, i.e., absorber exhaust gas where a substantial part of the CO2 is removed, is removed through the top of the absorber (stream 102) and enters a water wash section where vapors of the solvent are removed by the circulating water in the wash section. The low-CO2 treated gas (stream 103) is then released to a vent. Rich solvent, i.e., solvent having absorbed the majority of the CO2, is removed from the absorber through a rich absorbent line 104 at the bottom of the absorber.
The rich solvent is routed and is heated against lean solvent that is returned to the absorption tower in a heat exchanger, to a temperature typically in the range between 90 and 110° C., before the rich solvent (in line 105) is introduced into a regenerator column. In the regenerator column, the rich solvent flows downwards, countercurrent to steam generated by heating some of the solvent in a regeneration reboiler. Lean solvent leaves the regenerator at the base of the regenerator column in line 106. The lean solvent is introduced into a regeneration reboiler via line 106, where the lean solvent is heated to a temperature typically in the range between 110 and 130° C., to further remove CO2 from the hot solvent and produce a vapor stream comprising CO2 and water, which is entered into the regenerator in line 112.
The lean solvent is drawn from the reboiler (in line 107) and recycled back to the absorber (via line 108). CO2 released from the solvent, water vapor and minor amounts of solvent, are withdrawn from the regenerator through a gas withdrawal line (line 109) at the top of the regenerator. The gas in the gas withdrawal line 109 is cooled in a condenser to condense water and minor amounts of solvent from the remaining gas, mainly comprising CO2. CO2 gas and some remaining water vapor is removed from the CO2 separator for further treatment, such as drying, compression, and sequestration or for utilization in another process (via line 110). The condensed water and solvent in the CO2 separator are withdrawn (via line 111) and pumped back to the top of the regenerator.
Typical solvents used for CO2 removal are aqueous solutions of amines (such as monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA), methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), 2-amino 1-propanol (AMP)) or blends of amines. These solvents are subject to emission regulation, which involves (as shown in
In a first aspect of the invention, a method for reducing the concentration of amines in a wash liquid stream exiting a wash section in an acid gas scrubbing process includes introducing the wash liquid stream exiting the wash section of the acid gas scrubbing process to an adsorbent material, wherein the wash liquid stream has a first concentration of amines, and flowing the wash liquid stream having the first concentration of amines through the adsorbent material, the adsorbent material retaining at least a portion of the amines thereby providing a wash liquid stream having a second, reduced concentration of amines. The wash liquid can be water, organic solvent or a combination thereof. The adsorbent material may be activated carbon, for example, coal-based activated carbon. The amine may comprise hydrophobic amines
In a second aspect of the invention, a method for reducing the concentration of amines in an acid gas scrubbing process gas effluent comprises introducing exhaust gas containing acid gas into an absorber vessel, the vessel containing a solvent comprising a solution having less than 50% water and one or more amines; flowing the exhaust gas through the solvent whereby at least a portion of the acid gas from the exhaust gas is absorbed by the solvent and at least a portion of the solvent is absorbed by the exhaust gas thereby forming a gas having an increased concentration of amine and a reduced concentration of acid gas; washing the gas with the increased concentration of amine with a wash liquid in a wash section thereby removing at least a portion of the amine from the gas and absorbing the removed amine into the wash liquid; introducing the wash stream exiting the wash section to an adsorbent material, wherein the wash stream has a first concentration of amines, flowing the wash stream having the first concentration of amines through the adsorbent material, the adsorbent material retaining at least a portion of the amines thereby providing a wash stream having a second, reduced concentration of amines, and recycling the wash stream having the second, reduced concentration of amines to the wash section in order to be reused therein, whereby providing a recycled wash stream with a relatively low concentration of amines to the wash section improves effectiveness of amine removal in the wash section thereby reducing the concentration of amines in the acid gas scrubbing process gas effluent. The wash liquid can be water, organic solvent or a combination thereof. The adsorbent material may be activated carbon, for example, coal-based activated carbon. The amine may comprise hydrophobic amines
In a third aspect of the invention, a method of regenerating an adsorbent material for reuse includes introducing steam to the adsorbent material, which has an initial concentration of amines adhered thereto, and treating the adsorbent material by flowing the steam there through whereby at least a portion of the adhered amine detaches from the adsorbent material such that the adsorbent material has a second, reduced concentration of amines adhered thereto after stream treatment thereby enabling reuse of the absorbent material.
In a fourth aspect of the invention, a method for recovering amine for reuse in a CO2 scrubbing process includes introducing a gas containing CO2 into an absorber vessel, the vessel containing a solvent comprising a solution having less than 50% water and one or more amines; flowing the gas through the solvent whereby at least a portion of the CO2 from the gas is absorbed by the solvent and at least a portion of the solvent is absorbed by the gas thereby forming a gas having an increased concentration of amine; washing the gas with the increased concentration of amine with wash water thereby removing at least a portion of the amine from the gas and absorbing the removed amine into the wash water; introducing the wash water having the absorbed amine to an adsorbent material; flowing the wash water with the absorbed amine through the adsorbent material, the adsorbent material retaining at least a portion of the amine thereby providing wash water having a reduced concentration of amine; treating the adsorbent material by introducing and flowing steam through the adsorbent material having the retained amine adhered thereto thereby removing at least a portion of the retained amine; forming a stream of recovered amine comprising steam and/or condensed water and amine removed from the adsorbent material; and reintroducing the stream of recovered amine to the CO2 scrubbing process.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description of the invention and the following detailed description are exemplary but are not restrictive of the invention.
A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Described herein is a method for reducing the concentration of amines in a wash liquid. The exemplary embodiments described herein relate to reducing the concentration of amines in wash water. However, one of skill in the art will understand that a wash liquid may include organic solvents. Amines are present in water streams in many industrial processes. For example, amine can be found in wastewater discharged from an amine production facility. Additionally, as described above, amine can be found in wash water used in an acid gas scrubbing process, such as a CO2 scrubbing process. The method described herein for reducing the concentration of amine in water can be used effectively in many different applications. Removing amine from water will be described in the present application in the context of wash water in a CO2 scrubbing process. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the amine removal process can be applicable in other industrial contexts.
In a CO2 scrubbing process, CO2 present in exhaust gas from combustion of carbonaceous fuel is absorbed by liquid absorbent solvent (e.g., aqueous solutions of amines) in an absorber column. CO2 lean gas (i.e., absorber column exhaust gas from which a substantial part of the CO2 has been removed) exits the top of the absorber column and enters a wash section where amines derived from the amine solvent are removed by the circulating liquid wash in the wash section. The liquid wash can be water, organic solvent, or a combination thereof. Exemplary organic solvents used as wash liquids include tri-ethyleneglycoldibutylether and Genosorb® 1843. The hydrophobicity of solvents such as tri-ethyleneglycoldibutylether and Genosorb® 1843 is like that of many hydrophobic amines and therefore have a high solubility for those amines and act well as wash liquids, while also exhibiting a low vapor pressure to not further contribute to emissions from the process. Other exemplary organic solvents include but are not limited to propanol, butanol, dichloromethane, di-ethyleneglycoldibutylether, tetraethyleneglycoldibutylether or combinations thereof. The method for reducing the concentration of amines in a wash stream exiting the wash section includes introducing the wash stream exiting the wash section of the CO2 scrubbing process to an adsorbent material, wherein the wash stream has a first, relatively high concentration of amines. The wash stream having the first concentration of amines is flowed through the adsorbent material such that the adsorbent material retains at least a portion of the amines After flowing through the adsorbent material, the wash stream has a second, reduced concentration of amines. Adsorption is the adhesion of atoms, ions or molecules from a gas, liquid or dissolved solid to a surface. Adsorption differs from absorption, wherein a liquid or gas (the absorbate) is dissolved by or permeates a liquid or solid (the absorbent), respectively.
Adsorbents can be in multiple physical forms, including, for example, powder, granular, and extruded. Each form is available in many sizes. The form and size used is generally application dependent. Adsorbents generally have high abrasion resistance, high thermal stability, and small pore diameters, which provides higher exposed surface area and hence high capacity for adsorption. In embodiments, the adsorbent material may have an average adsorption efficiency, which is at least 30% for a run time of 1 hour to 15 hours. In other embodiments, the adsorbent material may have an average adsorption efficiency of at least 50% for a run time of 1 hour to 10 hours.
In embodiments of the process described herein, the adsorbent material used for removing amines from wash stream is activated carbon. Activated carbon is a carbonaceous, highly porous adsorptive medium that has a complex structure composed primarily of carbon atoms. Activated carbon generally has a highly porous structure of nooks, crannies, cracks and crevices between carbon layers. Activated carbons can be manufactured from coconut shell, peat, hard and soft wood, lignite coal, bituminous coal, olive pits and various carbonaceous specialty materials.
The intrinsic pore network in the structure of activated carbons enables them to be effective adsorbents. In some instances, adsorption can occur in pores slightly larger than the molecules that are being adsorbed, which is why it can be important to match the molecule being adsorbed with the pore size of the activated carbon. Without being bound by theory, it is believed that the molecules are trapped within the carbon's internal pore structure by Van Der Waals Forces or other bonds of attraction and accumulate onto the solid surface.
In general, for activated carbon, the higher the internal surface area, the higher the effectiveness of the carbon. The surface area of activated carbon is high. It can be 500 to 1500 m2/g or higher. The total pore volume of the activated carbon refers to all pore spaces inside a particle of activated carbon. In general, the higher the pore volume, the higher the effectiveness. However, if the sizes of the molecules to be adsorbed are not a good match to the pore size, some of the pore volume will not be utilized.
In an embodiment of the described process, the activated carbon is coal-based activated carbon. Coal-based activated carbon can be beneficial for use in adsorbing relatively higher concentrations of amine, for example, relatively higher concentrations of hydrophobic amines Coal-based activated carbon can be used to adsorb percent-level quantities of amine, for example, percent level quantities of hydrophobic amine.
In another embodiment, the adsorbent is a coal-based activated carbon in the form of a fixed adsorbent bed through which the water having the first concentration of amine is introduced as a stream that flows through the fixed adsorbent bed. The process may include multiple fixed adsorbent beds that can be switched with one another when one bed nears or reaches adsorption capacity.
The amine being removed from the water can be any amine suitable for use in the applicable industrial process. An exemplary amine can include a primary amine, a secondary amine, a diamine, a triamine, a tetraamine, a pentamine, a cyclic amine, a cyclic diamine, an amine oligomer, a polyamine, an alkanolamine, or mixtures thereof. In an embodiment, the amine has a pKa of about 8 to about 15. In another embodiment, the amine is selected from the group consisting of primary amines, secondary amines, diamines, triamines, tetraamines, pentamines, cyclic amines, cyclic diamines, amine oligomers, polyamines, alcoholamines, guanidines, amidines, and mixtures thereof. Potential suitable amines include, but are not limited to, 1,4-diazabicyclo-undec-7-ene (“DBU”); 1,4-diazabicyclo-2,2,2-octane; piperazine (“PZ”); triethylamine (“TEA”); 1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine (“TMG”); 1,8-diazabicycloundec-7-ene; monoethanolamine (“MEA”); diethylamine (“DEA”); ethylenediamine (“EDA”); 1,3-diamino propane; 1,4-diaminobutane; hexamethylenediamine; 1,7-diaminoheptane; diethanolamine; diisopropylamine (“DIPA”); 4-aminopyridine; pentylamine; hexylamine; heptylamine; octylamine; nonylamine; decylamine; tert-octylamine; dioctylamine; dihexylamine; 2-ethyl-1-hexylamine; 2-fluorophenethylamine; 3-fluorophenethylamine; 3,5-difluorobenzylamine; 3-fluoro-N-methylbenzylamine; 4-fluoro-N-methylbenzylamine; N-methylbenzylamine; imidazole; benzimidazole; N-methyl imidazole; 1-trifluoroacetylimidazole; 1,2,3-triazole; 1,2,4-triazole; and mixtures thereof. In an embodiment, the amine may comprise N-methylbenzylamine, di-ethyleneglycoldibutylether, tri-ethyleneglycoldibutylether, tetraethyleneglycoldibutylether or a combination thereof. Additionally, the amine may consist of N-methylbenzylamine and a mixture of di-ethyleneglycoldibutylether, tri-ethyleneglycoldibutylether, and tetraethyleneglycoldibutylether.
In an embodiment, potential amines include hydrophobic amines Hydrophobic amines are often used in water lean solvents, i.e., solvents having less than 50% water. Because of the reduced water content, the concentration of amine in the water lean solvent is relatively high. Alternatively, many CO2 capture processes use hydrophilic amines in aqueous based solvents. The amount of water in the aqueous based solvent is relatively higher than that in water lean solvents. As a result, the concentration of hydrophilic amine in a water-based solvent is relatively lower than the concentration of hydrophobic amine in water lean solvents. Thus, depending on the vapor pressure of the amine in each solvent, the amount of hydrophobic amine to be removed from the wash liquid may be relatively higher than in corresponding systems that use aqueous-based solvents having hydrophilic amines. In addition, the hydrophobicity of hydrophobic amines reduces the affinity for the amine to be absorbed in the wash liquid and lowers the driving force for absorption relative to hydrophilic amines. As a result, the effectiveness of wash sections is generally lessened for hydrophobic amines compared to hydrophilic amines, and the method detailed here can be used to improve the wash effectiveness of a hydrophobic-amine-laden gas.
The method described herein also includes a method for regenerating the adsorbent material for reuse after the amine has been adsorbed thereto. As one of ordinary skill in the art will understand, it is desirable to reuse materials in industrial processes to increase efficiency and reduce costs and environmental impact. The adsorbent can be regenerated by removing or detaching the amine adsorbed thereto. In embodiments, the amine can be detached using steam or organic solvents. An exemplary organic solvent used for detaching amine from an adsorbent material includes treating activated carbon with methanol. The resulting solution of methanol and amine can be distilled to produce a purified amine for reuse. Other exemplary organic solvents include but are not limited to ethanol, isopropanol, acetone, ethyl acetate, and tetrahydrofuran.
In an exemplary embodiment, steam is introduced to the adsorbent material that has the amine adsorbed thereto, and the adsorbent material is treated by flowing the steam there through. Contacting the amine-laden adsorbent with steam causes at least a portion of the adhered amine to detach from the adsorbent material thus reducing the concentration of amine on the adsorbent material thereby enabling reuse thereof. Different flowrates of steam may be used. For example, a flowrate that produces a superficial steam velocity of 2-20 m/min may be used. Different temperatures of steam may be used. For example, steam at a temperature of between about 100-180° C. may be used. The steam may be at a pressure of 1-10 bar. The adsorbent may be treated with steam for varying amount of time depending on the kind of amine being removed, the total volume of amine being removed, the kind of adsorbent being regenerated, the volume of adsorbent being regenerated, the processing conditions being used for regeneration, etc. For example, regenerating treatment with steam may take place for a time of 5 minutes to 60 minutes. For example, steam regeneration may be performed for 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 minutes. In embodiments, multiple vessels containing adsorbent beds may be used interchangeably, such that one bed can be regenerated while another bed is being used for adsorbing amine. When one bed reaches its adsorbing saturation limit or capacity or for process optimization, it can be switched or interchanged with a bed that has been regenerated.
The method described herein also includes reusing the amine recovered from the regenerated adsorbent material in the CO2 scrubbing process. The amine that is detached from the adsorbent with steam treatment can be combined with the steam or condensed water formed from the steam and returned to the process in a suitable location in the form of a recovery stream. The recovered amine may be relatively dilute in the condensed water stream. For example, the amine may be 1-10 wt % in the stream. The stream with recovered amine may be reintroduced to the system in a first water wash or with the solvent in the absorber column. Alternatively, the amine may be separated or concentrated for further use, depending on the application.
The described process can increase the efficiency of a wash section for removal of amines, especially hydrophobic amines, derived from process gas streams, including CO2 capture units from electricity generating units. The wash liquid, for example, wash water, can be circulated through switchable fixed beds of activated carbon that adsorb amines from the wash water. Before the activated carbon bed becomes saturated with amines, the flow can be switched to another carbon bed and the first bed can be regenerated with steam. The process can interchange beds, alternating between adsorption and regeneration.
By removing amines from the wash liquid more effectively, the concentration of amine in the wash liquid is reduced thereby increasing the driving force for the amine to absorb in the cleaned wash liquid. Accordingly, wash efficiency is increased and amine emissions from wash liquid are reduced. Modeling has shown that this process can reduce amine weight fraction in cleaned wash water by two orders of magnitude, which reduces the equilibrium partial pressure of amines in the treated gas similarly.
Testing was performed to evaluate adsorption and regeneration performance.
A two-system approach with a detachable fixed sorbent bed was used to analyze the amine capture properties of a sorbent.
In the experiment, a cycle started with pumping an amine solution through approximately 6 grams of sorbent. After adsorption for a set time, the bed was detached and transferred to a steam production unit where 2 mL/min of steam stripped the amine off the sorbent. The bed went through eight cycles of testing. Table 1 outlines the operating conditions for the cycles.
During the first 3 cycles, collected samples were analyzed with an auto-titrator to determine the amine wt % of each sample. After the third cycle, a calibration curve that correlated conductivity to amine wt % was determined to be an accurate and efficient means to determine amine wt %.
The sorbent was regenerated during each cycle using steam and desorption was found to be fast and most desorption occurred in the first twenty minutes of steam exposure.
The cumulative loading of the amine on the sorbent was estimated from the samples after each adsorption and desorption cycle.
Testing was performed to evaluate adsorbent performance for two exemplary adsorbents.
In the testing, Sorbent 1 was coal-based activated carbon and Sorbent 2 was coconut-shell activated carbon. The testing showed that Sorbent 1 was more efficient than Sorbent 2.
The same adsorption setup used for Example 1 was used for Sorbent 1 in Example 2. Four sets of test conditions were conducted on the bed of 6 grams of Sorbent 1. These sets were conducted to analyze the impact that concentration and flow rate have on the amine capture performance Table 2 outlines the operating conditions for the four sets.
The cumulative loading of the amine on the sorbent was estimated from the samples collected at the outlet during each adsorption and desorption cycle.
A new bed of 5.3 grams of Sorbent 2 was set up to compare its amine capture performance with that of Sorbent 1. For 3 of the 5 total cycles, the amine concentration was maintained at 1% with a flow rate of 4 g/min to best compare Sorbent 2 to Sorbent 1.
Testing was performed to evaluate water wash performance with a hydrophobic amine without adsorbent beds. The performance could be increased with the use of adsorbent beds.
Different parameters of the water wash were investigated to determine optimal operating conditions. A warm water wash was tested at 50° C. with ˜1200 ppm of amine into the wash and ˜600 ppm of amine emissions exited the adsorber. This result highlights the temperature dependence of a water wash with a hydrophobic amine.
Experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of the amine emissions into the water wash, the temperature of the wash water, the wash flow rate, the gas flow rate, and the humidity level into the absorber. The amine emissions in the wash and the temperature of the wash water were found to have the highest impact.
The humidity level into the absorber was included to see if the steam addition through an orifice plate to humidify the absorber inlet gas may serve as nucleation sites for aerosols to form but was not found to have a statistically significant effect on the amine emissions out of the wash column. The amine emissions into the wash column were varied from 50 to 1050 ppm. The temperature of the wash column was varied between 20° C. to 30° C. to see the effectiveness of a cold wash stage.
The most significant impacts on the amine emissions out of the water wash were the amine in and the wash temperature.
Another metric that was evaluated was the percent of amine captured in the water wash versus the change in the amine into the wash and the temperature of the wash water.
The other variables of gas and liquid flow rates had smaller, but statistically significant effects on the amine out of the wash section. Testing showed that increasing gas velocity led to a higher amine concentration out, as expected. The wash flow had less of an effect and produced a less clear trend, with the amine out decreasing with higher liquid flow while the amine in was fixed at 1000 ppm but increasing with higher liquid flow and the amine in at 50 ppm.
Testing was performed to evaluate vapor emissions when using activated carbon adsorbent beds in a CO2 capture process.
A CO2 capture system like that shown in
Amine emissions were also measured at the outlets of the absorber and the first water wash. The values were consistent over the period of operation at about 30 ppm at the first water wash outlet and about 150 ppm at the absorber outlet. Error! Reference source not found. provides the hours of operation of each activated carbon bed, coordinating with the hours shown in Error! Reference source not found. Error! Reference source not found. provides the amine emission measurements at the outlet of the absorber and the first water wash.
Amine emission concentration in the outlet stream from the second water wash at the start of operation was near 10 ppm and decreased to less than 1 ppm over the first few hours of operation with the activated carbon beds. The amine emission concentration in the outlet stream of the second water wash increased gradually as the carbon adsorber bed removal efficiency decreased and the wash water amine concentration increased. After switching adsorber beds, the amine concentrations in the outlet stream decreased again, depending on the amount of carbon bed regeneration.
Both adsorber beds were partially regenerated with steam at the start of operation. Bed 2 was more fully regenerated after being removed from operation at hour 82. Bed 1 was fully regenerated at hour 85. During regeneration, the steam to one bed increased the temperature in the second water wash temporarily, which led to increased emissions. This effect can be seen at hour 87 where there was an initial bump in emissions that then increased. The impact of regeneration of Bed 1 at hour 110 is also seen in Error! Reference source not found.
The amine concentration in the sump water stream and top water stream of the second water wash over the course of testing is shown in Error! Reference source not found. The concentration of the sump water stream started at 0.0 wt % and slowly increased while the system was adsorbing with Bed 2. The activated carbon bed removal of amine from the wash water can be seen to decrease with the amine concentration increasing in the water samples after the beds before switching at hour 82. The amine concentration in the wash water after the beds dropped after switching to Bed 1 before increasing again on Bed 2 for the last 26 hours of testing. The frequency of switching or alternating beds and the extent of regeneration can be optimized to maintain a desired low amine concentration in the second water wash.
Numerous modifications and variations of the invention are possible considering the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/967,338, filed on Jan. 29, 2020, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
This invention was made with government support under DE-FE0031660 awarded by US Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US21/15050 | 1/26/2021 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62967338 | Jan 2020 | US |
